Content uploaded by Mohamed H. Abdelati
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Mohamed H. Abdelati on Dec 17, 2024
Content may be subject to copyright.
IJAEBS - Volume 5, Issue 3, 2024, (p.1-23). DOI: 10.21608/ijaebs.2024.317220.1099 1
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS SCIENCES (IJAEBS)
Journal homepage: hps://ijaebs.journals.ekb.eg
Evaluating the Impact of Transportation Costs, Supply
Chain Reliability, and Operational Efficiency on Global
Import Decisions
Mohamed H. Abdelaa*, Hilal A. Abdelawlib
*(a) Teaching Assistant Automotive and Tractor Eng. Dept., Minia University, Egypt.
(b) Automotive and Marine Department, College of Technological Studies, PAAET, Kuwait
*Corresponding author: Email address: m.hilal@mu.edu.eg
Received: 06-07-2024 Accepted: 07-12-2024 Published: 08-12-2024
ABSTRACT
The effectiveness of goods importation versus domestic production comes into consideration when
considering transportation costs, supply chain reliability, and operational efficiency. Accordingly, in this
paper, a theoretical model was developed and tested for scenario analysis. The simulation showed a
significant impact of these factors on trade decisions. Despite the critical role of transportation costs, this
study found they had to be put in a harmonious framework considering supply chain reliability and
efficiencies. High supply chain reliability may mitigate risks due to high transportation costs, permitting
imports under more challenging conditions. On the other hand, low reliability may translate into a lack of
discouragement for imports, even with low transportation costs, raising the specter of delays and
disruptions in the bargain. In this way, operational efficiency must be seen as one of the basic building
blocks of sustainable importing. It enables firms to absorb as many additional costs as possible to integrate
supplied goods effectively. This means that the research indicates several practical implications for firms
and policymakers regarding the importance of increasing supply chain reliability and operational
performance. Similarly, the study limitations, hypothetic in nature, and model simulation suggest that
research conducted further empirical validation for the respective theoretical model.
Keywords: Linear programming, network flow model, transportation costs, supply chain reliability,
import decision-making
IJAEBS - Volume 5, Issue 3, 2024, (p.1-23). DOI: 10.21608/ijaebs.2024.317220.1099 2
1. INTRODUCTION
Globalization has made world trade more compounded and interrelated; technological advancement, new
geopolitical Blocs, and alterations in use demand bring about the development of world trade
contemporary[1]. Business operators and policymakers in this web of relationships must make the most
strategic decision between importation and local manufacture. This decision is influenced by combinative
motivation such as transportation costs, reliable supply chains, and efficiency in any business. It is
necessary to grasp the relationship between these factors to enhance the global trade strategies for
achieving a competitive edge in the challenging market[2].
1.1 Background and Context
Over the years, there has been recognition that the cost of transportation is among the critical influences
in trade. When firms expand their operations across national boundaries, issues to do with the
transportation of products from one location to the other come into the picture[3]. They will, therefore, be
pegged on fuel costs, road network development, and transport organization. Such factors define how
goods are imported or made within the country. On the other hand, transport cost features in decisions
made regarding trade only occasionally. What is more, transportation costs have to be considered in
connection with the stability of the supply chain[4].
As a concept, supply chain reliability refers to the ability of an individual to deliver one’s merchandise
where it is demanded by the market, in the right quality and quantity. Maintaining reliability in the supply
chains that can be country- or continent-based in the global economy context must be one of the most
challenging yet very significant responsibilities. This is especially true of disruptive situations. Here,
disruptions are foreseen in scenarios of natural disasters, political instabilities, and, last but not least,
simple logistical failures that trigger delays, cost overruns, and lost revenues. For this reason, firms have
to compare the likely hazards of importing the finished products against the stability of the supply
chain[5].
Operational efficiency is the third complicating factor. Even in countries with low transportation costs and
reliable supply chains[6, 7], internal firm capabilities matter. In firms with high operational efficiency[8],
some of the risks and costs of importing may be overcome, enabling the firms to not just survive, but
thrive despite external adverse conditions. In firms characterized by inefficiency, these very same
difficulties may be magnified, rendering domestic manufacturing more desirable[9, 10].
IJAEBS - Volume 5, Issue 3, 2024, (p.1-23). DOI: 10.21608/ijaebs.2024.317220.1099 3
1.2 Problem Statement
Though there may be a direct monetary advantage to producing more at home instead of abroad, many
firms and countries continue importing goods. ThisThis brings us to the crux: Why make these moves if
domestically produced products could appear more economically feasible? While there have been discrete
analyses of transportation expenses, supply chain predictability, and speed to market in trade decisions,
more research is needed on the balance between these factors. This paper fills this gap by building an
integrated model of these three variables for supporting global strategic decisions.
This setup has been carefully done to touch various aspects of International Trade scenarios in general
without getting into the details that are restricted to any particular country or Region. While the insights
are meant to be broadly applicable, they will likely require modification in regions with differing trade
environments and logistical constraints.
Noting that the model is meant to apply primarily to sectors where firms have discretion between
importing goods and domestic production, it leaves out industries with a high degree of localization, such
as those subject to specific regulations (e.g., defense) or unique product characteristics (e.g., perishables).
Since no empirical data is available, the study uses a model to simulate hypothetical scenarios. These
scenarios are created to portray a s-eye view of trading mechanics while not reflecting all the nuances and
variables in actual situations, looking instead at what will be noticed as trends over stable market
conditions.
Despite the rapid fluctuation, this model also holds constant external factors such as fuel prices and
infrastructure quality. Therefore, the findings should be taken to represent large-scale trends instead of
accurate predictions (which would need a more fine-grained dataset).
Additionally, the model and scenarios consider medium to long-term trade decision perspectives with
consistent supply chain reliability & operational capability over time. Though these near-term disruptions,
being key on-the-ground factors, are recognized but kept out of the main scope for purposes of this study.
1.3 Research Objectives
This research aims to develop a conceptual model explaining the import and domestic production choice
of goods, with critical consideration of the role of transportation costs, supply chain reputation, and
operational efficiency at deciding time. From this, the specific objectives would be:
IJAEBS - Volume 5, Issue 3, 2024, (p.1-23). DOI: 10.21608/ijaebs.2024.317220.1099 4
• To study the impact of transportation costs in making decisions regarding imports with due consideration
of changes in rack fuel prices, transportation infrastructure, and logistics efficiency.
• Research the impact of the supply chain reliability issue on import decisions, significantly when the
supply chain increases its focus on risk mitigation of global trade.
• Determine the impact of operational efficiency on the import decision in a study of how "the ability on
the inside" is weighed against "the cost and risk on the outside."
• Use Operations Research tools to run "what if" scenarios and quantify the influences on import decisions.
1.4 Significance of the Study
This paper will contribute to the theoretical and practical understanding of global trade by analyzing the
factors determining importing decisions. These added details of the model, with the inclusion of
transportation costs, reliability of the supply chain, and operational efficiencies, are helpful for an
enhanced understanding of global trade dynamics. Therefore, the details are essential to businesses in
forming strategies for optimal sourcing and production decisions in increasingly complex global supply
chains. In doing so, the gained insight can be helpful to policymakers in creating trade policies meant to
reinforce resilience and competitiveness in the economy, as well as in investment decisions on
infrastructure.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
The literature dealing with the decision about importing goods versus domestic production is expansive,
cutting across many theories and models from transportation economics, supply chain management, and
operations research[11]. This section assimilates central ideas from these different fields and helps lay the
platform for the conceptual model to be developed in this study. This literature review aims to identify
gaps in previous studies that would be filled by this study, especially in understanding how transportation
costs, supply chain reliability, and operational efficiency are integrated into global trade decisions[12].
2.1 Transportation Economics
Transportation costs have been a central issue in studies relating to global trade for many centuries.
Traditional economic models, such as Ricardo's and Heckscher-Ohlin's, are oriented toward the trading
countries' comparative advantages, which are influenced by transportation costs[13]. The evolution of
IJAEBS - Volume 5, Issue 3, 2024, (p.1-23). DOI: 10.21608/ijaebs.2024.317220.1099 5
globalization has shifted the spotlight from superficial differences in cost to the details of how
infrastructural facilities, fuel prices, and logistics efficiency impact trade decisions[14, 15].
This analysis then served as a basis for many of the integration concerns outlined by Davis [16] regarding
comparative advantage within international trade under transportation costs and economics scale when
compared to Heckscher-Ohlin and traditional theories. However, his work also shows that international
trade can still be beneficial due to the efficiencies produced by comparative advantage, which often
outweigh transaction costs. The study underscores that transportation costs are not the only determinant;
in sectors where product differentiation and economies of scale matter, it is also how inherent production
efficiencies between trading countries support trade. This process exemplifies why, despite high
transportation costs, international trade can still be effective, especially when each producer has a
comparative advantage about at least one product [17, 18]. By incorporating these theories of comparative
advantage into trade frameworks, we have achieved a more complete understanding of when nations or
firms choose to produce domestically versus importing production work as it pertains to the model
presented in this study regarding balancing transportation costs against supply chain reliability and
operational efficiency.
Recent research has underlined the complexity of transport costs, underscoring variability and the drivers.
As Rodrigue et al. say, transportation costs are not functions of distance; instead, they very strongly depend
on the infrastructure quality and the logistics network's efficiency[19]. This has led to a more sophisticated
understanding of how transportation costs affect the feasibility of importing goods versus producing them
domestically. It is evident in the literature that the relationship between transport costs and trade volumes
is not linear. This means that small changes in costs can have substantial, disproportionate, that is, effects
on trade decisions, according to Hummels (2007)[1].
Whereas the effects of transportation costs on trade have been documented, less is known about the
interactions between these costs and other factors that characterize supply chain reliability and operational
efficiency in shaping import decisions. This literature gap prioritizes the need for an integrated approach
that considers the multifaceted nature of transportation costs within the broader context of global trade.
2.2 Supply Chain Management
This has also involved critical research into supply chain management, a discipline that overlaps with the
study of world trade[20]. In the evolving business environment, firms are increasingly operating across
IJAEBS - Volume 5, Issue 3, 2024, (p.1-23). DOI: 10.21608/ijaebs.2024.317220.1099 6
borders within which supply chain management becomes more complex and crucial for success[21, 22].
Literature on supply chain management stresses reliability, resilience, and risk management as significant
elements of ensuring seamless flows of goods across borders[23].
As for the concept of supply chain reliability, it is well explored in the literature. As described by
Christopher, 2016[20], the meaning of SCM pertains to the capacity of a particular supply chain to provide
customers with the right products at the right time in the correct quantity and quality. Several factors are
used to make this decision, including the stability of the logistic networks, present suppliers, and measures
taken in case of disruption. In Sheffi 2005[24], work is done more on resilient supply chains, analyzing
how firms can create capacity within the supply chains to rapidly respond to shocks and bounce back to
the right track[25].
The reliability of a supply chain is more important than ever, amid the brutal disruptions recently seen
across the globe (among others) in reaction to exogenous global events like COVID-19. Christopher [26]
stress that as events cascade through global supply chains the ability to absorb shocks is one of the key
attributes which businesses require if they are to maintain continuity in often unpredictable operating
environments. Other researches [27-29] highlight that organizations need to keep their supply chains
robustly prepared for quick recovery from those similar shocks, in order the risks with global trade could
be relieved if not avoided. These points improve the success factor of high transportation cost by providing
an example where a lower logistic challenge as output increases because it offers more bottleneck
possibility in international trade[30].
The literature also highlighted that cost-reliability trade-off is another problem that firms experience. For
instance, the JIT inventory systems that reduce the cost through the lowering of inventory levels are prone
to disruption of the supply chain (Chopra & Meindl, 2019)[31]. This forms a particularly pertinent trade-
off in international business, given that while firms seek to reduce the cost of importing goods, they risk
facing supply shocks.
Although there is much literature on supply chain management and its relationship between supply chain
reliability and import decisions, there is a shortage of literature on the issue, with a focus on fluctuating
transportation costs and changes in operational productivity[32, 33]. Hence, the present study will try to
fill this gap by exploring the combined effects of the above-mentioned influencing factors on trade
decisions.
IJAEBS - Volume 5, Issue 3, 2024, (p.1-23). DOI: 10.21608/ijaebs.2024.317220.1099 7
2.3 Operations Research Models in Trade Decisions
Operations research offers powerful tools for the analysis and optimization of decisions in complex
systems, making it highly relevant to the study of world trade and import decisions[34]. The application
of OR tools to trade decisions involves mathematical modeling and simulation techniques aimed at
achieving optimality in various aspects of the supply chain, including transportation[35, 36], inventory,
and production planning. This potential for optimization should inspire optimism about the future of global
trade.
LP is applied to the most significant extent in trade decision-making of all the OR techniques. It has been
applied to routing problems for transportation, cost minimization, and efficient resource allocation in
scenarios where firms have to decide between importing the goods or producing them within the country.
Winston, 2004[37], gives an excellent account of how LP can solve most supply chain problems and,
therefore, helps optimize trade decisions.
While LP has often been used in this context, other OR techniques have also been applied to understanding
global supply chain dynamics, particularly network flow models and simulation. Network flow models
are mainly used to understand the movement of goods through complex supply chains to help identify
bottlenecks and optimize the flow of goods from the supplier to the consumer. Simulation methods allow
one to model various scenarios and quantify the impacts of different factors on trade decisions, such as
transport cost changes or supply chain disruptions.
Although OR techniques have been reasonably applied in supply chain management, there still exists an
opportunity to integrate those methods into transportation costs, supply chain reliability, and operational
efficiency in import decisions. This paper aims to further this stream of research by modeling alternate
trade scenarios using OR methodologies, focusing on quantifying the impact of these drivers on global
trade decisions.
2.4 Integration of Concepts
The knowledge of transportation economics, supply chain management and operations research can be
mined from today's literature to capture and evaluate the effecting factors that define the consequent
decisions for global trade. These areas have, however, to a great extent been researched individually, thus
why there is a disjointed picture of the relationship between transportation costs, supply chain risk, and
operating efficiency in import decisions.
IJAEBS - Volume 5, Issue 3, 2024, (p.1-23). DOI: 10.21608/ijaebs.2024.317220.1099 8
In our study, we incorporate all these concepts to develop a systematic framework that encapsulates the
general dynamics of global trade. Building from these two disciplines, we create a concept that integrates
insights from transportation economics, supply chain management, and operations research to explain the
relationship between these factors. This should put the reader at ease, knowing that we have covered all
that could be considered while arriving at the conclusions.
This paper's literature review section clearly reveals the need for and importance of an integrated approach
to analyzing global trade decisions. While quite a number of studies explain the factors affecting
transportation costs, supply chain reliability, and operation efficiency, there is a lack of insight into how
these factors interrelate. The present research addresses this issue by developing a comprehensive
conceptual model that integrates these components, providing fresh perspectives on what influences the
choice to import or domestically manufacture products.
3. THEORITICAL FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT
This is the interaction of several variables, including transportation cost, supply chain risk, and operation
excellence, which has informed our study. To understand this interaction, we have formulated a theoretical
model that is not a mere exercise in speculation but a working model that can be used from this moment.
The information from the field of transportation economics, supply chain management, and operations
research will contribute to developing this framework for identifying conditions under which importation
becomes more preferable to domestic production of goods and valuable for decision-making in
international trade.
3.1 Conceptual Model
The model is based on transportation costs as the primary driver for all global trade decisions[38].
Transport costs directly impact the total cost of importing goods. By statement, this shall incorporate all
costs involved in fuel, shipment, tariffs, and use of infrastructure. These cannot, however, be considered
in isolation. The reliability of a supply chain refers to the ability to provide goods in a timely and
predictable manner. It acts as an influencing factor in the cost of transportation. A more reliable supply
line will help adjust some effects of the high transportation costs by ensuring the products arrive at their
destination on time and in good condition, hence maintaining production efficiency.
Operational efficiency is another crucial element of the framework, which refers to the internal processes
and capabilities that define how well a firm can effectively integrate imported goods into the firm's
IJAEBS - Volume 5, Issue 3, 2024, (p.1-23). DOI: 10.21608/ijaebs.2024.317220.1099 9
production operations. Firms with high operational efficiency absorb many external costs associated with
importing, especially those ascribable to transportation, through better-structuring production processes
that reduce wastage and enhance productivity. While low operational efficiency may create a scenario in
which the costs of external factors are overwhelmingly high, it becomes more attractive to produce
domestically, even in the presence of higher initial costs.
This decision to import is a function of these three factors: transport, supply chain reliability, and
operational efficiency.
1. With reduced transportation costs, the likelihood of importing goods will increase, especially when the
supply chain reliability is high. The risks associated with ruptures in the supply chain are minimal; hence,
the cost benefits from importing are quickly realized.
2. High supply chain reliability positively affects the decision to import, even in the presence of moderate
or high transport costs. More reliable supply chains reduce the uncertainty associated with importing,
providing a sense of reassurance and thus making importing more viable for many firms that must stay as
close as possible to their production schedules.
3. Due to the high operational efficiency, transportation becomes feasible and very manageable, thus
making it more appealing to import instead of developing or manufacturing the goods in one's country.
More efficient companies can better incorporate imported products into their business and compensate for
some of the extra importation costs while maintaining their profitability, instilling a sense of optimism
about the potential for success.
3.2 Transportation Costs and Supply Chain Reliability
Transportation costs, which encompass generic aspects like fuel, shipping, tariffs, and logistical costs, all
define the fundamental determinant of the profitability of imported goods. In any event, transportation
costs, more than any other influence, can motivate or deter the firm from engaging in international
sourcing. However, more than transportation costs alone are required to ensure more precise imaging.
Based on the consistency and predictability of sound delivery, supply chain reliability moderates these
costs. Reliable supply chains help manage associated risks of high transportation costs; firms have the
assurance that goods will be where they are supposed to be when they are supposed to be there, so
disruptions in production can be minimized.
IJAEBS - Volume 5, Issue 3, 2024, (p.1-23). DOI: 10.21608/ijaebs.2024.317220.1099 10
On the other hand, where the supply chain is not dependable, the import risks involved are significantly
skyrocketed. Delays, disruptions, and variability of delivery are considered reasons causing excess
inventory costs, production downtime, and a competitive disadvantage. While in these situations, the
transportation cost is meager, the supply chain's uncertainty could make domestic production more
favorable.
3.3 Operational Efficiency and Import Decisions
Operational efficiency in any firm reflects how well it will absorb and handle other external costs,
including those of importing goods. This makes integrating imported goods into production processes
more seamless, reducing processes like wastage and increasing productivity. This can offset some of the
added costs related to transportation and general supply-chain risks; therefore, import is a more viable
option even when external conditions are challenging.
In cases of high organizational inefficiencies, however, the joint cost of transportation and the unreliability
cost of the supply chain might not compare all that favorably with the benefits of importing. In such cases,
the sources of inefficiency within the firm increase the challenge of dealing with external costs, pushing
the firm toward producing domestically, where it has more control over inputs and processes.
Several critical ideas in this theoretical framework – the decrease in transportation costs, the increase of
reliability of the supply chain, and the improvement of the operating efficiency – describe the process of
making decisions in the context of imports. Therefore, the framework offers a holistic view of international
trade because it considers the interaction of these variables. The following sections endeavor to apply it
under strict structural grids intended for tracing the academically sound and practically valuable effects of
this model.
4. SCENARIO ANALYSIS
The pivotal Scenario Analysis section is not just a theoretical exercise but a practical exploration of various
trade scenarios that can shed light on the complex conditions under which imported goods might be
preferred to domestic production. This section is designed to rigorously test the intricate interplay between
transportation costs, supply chain reliability, and operational efficiency in import decisions, providing
real-world insights for business executives, policymakers, and professionals involved in global trade and
supply chain management. The analysis involves:
• The creation of hypothetical scenarios.
IJAEBS - Volume 5, Issue 3, 2024, (p.1-23). DOI: 10.21608/ijaebs.2024.317220.1099 11
• The application of operations research techniques to simulate these scenarios.
• A comprehensive discussion of the results.
This study refers to historic trade scenarios that this research deems as real-life examples of the theoretical
possibilities analyzed here. The 2008 global fuel price surge, for example[39], forced many companies to
recalculate importing costs and then switch temporary production here at home on certain items as
transportation cost were becoming too high. At the same time, geopolitical events such as U.S.-China
trade tensions underscored concerns about supply chain reliability and resilience when it came to making
import decisions. Utilising these cases, the scenarios within this study are shaped in order to mimic real
world decision-making landscapes where transportation expenses have an impact upon global trade
strategies from aspects of supply chain reliability and operational performance.
4.1 Hypothetical Scenarios
The hypothetical Scenarios section was set up with a specific purpose in mind-to examine the relationships
of transportation costs, supply chain reliability, and operational efficiency. These scenarios reflect actual
world conditions facing a business or policymaker when determining whether to import goods into their
country or to produce such goods domestically.
Scenario 1: High Transportation Costs with High Supply Chain Reliability
- In such a case, transport prices are high due to increased fuel or higher tariffs, while the supply
chain can be very reliable. This scenario is exciting in contexts where geopolitical tension or a
trade war causes a spike in transportation costs, but the underlying logistics network is well-
developed and stable.
Scenario 2: Low Cost of Transportation with Low Reliability of Supply Chain
- In this scenario, transportation costs are low due to specific trade pacts, good logistics, or low fuel
costs. However, it is joined by an unreliable supply chain, which generally experiences frequent
delays, disruptions, and delivery time variability. This reflects the conditions under which cost
savings are possible but with the risk of essential challenges to the supply chain.
Scenario 3: Medium Cost of Transportation with High Operational Efficiency
- In this case, transport costs are moderate, neither very high to prohibit nor very low. In contrast,
the firm or country concerned has high efficiency, meaning that imported goods can be integrated
into the production process of the firm or the country concerned with a seamless and low-cost
IJAEBS - Volume 5, Issue 3, 2024, (p.1-23). DOI: 10.21608/ijaebs.2024.317220.1099 12
approach. This case, therefore, reviews the extent to which internal efficiencies are willing to offset
the external transportation costs.
Scenario 4: High Transport Costs and Low Supply Chain Reliability
- This scenario is challenging with high freight costs and a sensitive supply chain. An extreme event
could be a global pandemic, natural disaster, or political instability. In this case, such a scenario
would stress the theoretical model about identifying the tipping point at which firms or countries
move to domestic production rather than importing.
Scenario 5: Preferential Trade Agreements with Improved Resilience of Supply Chains
- In this scenario, a company or country enjoys preferential trading agreements that reduce tariffs
and cut transportation costs but, at the same time, invests in infrastructure and strategies to increase
the resilience of supply chains. This evaluates how much favorable external elements—supportive
trade policies and resilient logistics networks—impact decisions to import.
4.2 Model Simulations
The above scenarios are simulated using operations research techniques to make decisions. The
simulations can quantify dependent variables of the decision on where to import, vis-à-vis producing in-
country, as a function of transportation costs, supply chain reliability, and operations efficiency.
1. Application of Linear Programming
Linear programming is employed to model the optimum allocation of resources between importing and
domestic production under each scenario. It involves each option's respective costs and benefits,
accounting for changes in transport costs and supply chain reliability. The goal is to find the optimal
decision to produce the least total cost while maintaining production efficiency.
2. Network Flow Model Analysis
The network flow models are run to simulate the flow of goods through global supply chains. This
considers how changes in transportation costs and supply chain reliability may impact the flow of goods
from suppliers to consumers. By visualizing these flows, the model may recognize probable bottlenecks
and inefficiencies that could influence the decision to import.
3. Sensitivity Analysis
Sensitivity analysis is then conducted to determine the degree to which the importation decision responds
to changes in critical variables such as transport costs, fuel prices, and the reliability of the supply chain.
IJAEBS - Volume 5, Issue 3, 2024, (p.1-23). DOI: 10.21608/ijaebs.2024.317220.1099 13
From this analysis, all these critical threshold values will be derived, which indicate ranges of small
changes in the factor values leading to significant changes in trade decisions.
Figure 1 illustrates transportation costs and probability of importing under different levels of supply chain
reliability. For large values of supply chain reliability, the green line shows that the likelihood of importing
remains high even in the presence of high transportation costs since the reliable supply chain lowers
associated risks. At medium values of supply chain reliability, the orange line, a more significant drop in
the likelihood of importing, is seen with increasing transportation costs due to the extra risks introduced
by its medium reliability. Finally, the red line plots a shallow level of supply chain reliability. While
transport costs are rising, the likelihood of importing drops significantly in this case due to low reliability,
which amplifies the risks of importing.
Figure 1 Impact of Transportation Costs on Likelihood of Importing under Different Supply Chain Reliability Levels
4.3 Discussion of Results
The results from the model simulations provide comprehensive insight into the conditions that influence
import decisions. Different scenarios yield different outcomes, showing complex interactions among
variables such as transportation costs, supply chain reliability, and operational efficiency. This
IJAEBS - Volume 5, Issue 3, 2024, (p.1-23). DOI: 10.21608/ijaebs.2024.317220.1099 14
comprehensive discussion, which ensures that the audience is well-informed and knowledgeable about the
implications of the scenarios, is a key part of our report.
1. High Transport Costs with High Supply Chain Reliability
In this case, results indicate that even with higher transportation costs, firms may still prefer to import if
the supply chain is reliable. The reliability of the supply chain offsets part of the costs by reducing some
risks of high costs that may threaten consistent production schedules.
2. Low Transportation Costs with Low Supply Chain Reliability
statements here manifest that even when the transport cost was low, the firms still needed to rely more on
importation if the supply chain was unreliable. Those potential disruptions and delivery-time variability
may create risks too high to be compensated by the reduction in variable costs alone; some may find
domestic production a safer alternative.
3. Medium Transportation Cost with High Operational Efficiency
The analysis shows that high operational efficiency can compensate for moderate freight costs and thus
provide an option to import. A firm with high operational efficiency is well placed to incorporate the
imported inputs into the production line and remain profitable.
4. High Transportation Cost with Low Reliability in the Supply Chain
In this scenario, in particular, the simulations reveal that firms will be more inclined to produce
domestically than import. High costs and an unreliable supply chain interact with one another to provide
a hazardous environment within which benefits to import are reduced.
5. Better Trade Agreements with More Resilient Supply Chains
The results from this scenario indicate that when external conditions are favorable—reduced tariffs and
improved resiliency of supply chains—the attractiveness of importing improves dramatically. This
positive risk and cost-reducing impact mitigates the risk level and cost related to importing, making it
more competitive.
The scenario analysis described the types of nuanced conditions under which firms and policymakers
might decide to import goods rather than produce domestically. The results underscore the importance of
considering transportation cost, supply chain reliability, and operation efficiency in making global trade
decisions rather than in isolation. This holistic approach provides theoretical and practical insights that
empower strategic decision-making in an increasingly complex global trading environment.
IJAEBS - Volume 5, Issue 3, 2024, (p.1-23). DOI: 10.21608/ijaebs.2024.317220.1099 15
4.4 Model Application Example
Without a data source in the real world, this section aims to account for an example of how the theoretical
model shown throughout this study would manifest in an actual trade. For example, a manufacturing firm
weighing whether to import critical components or make them in the home country. The model shows the
effect on firm decision-making if there were changes in transportation costs, supply chain reliability, and
operational efficiency. To do that, it uses synthetic data made from industry yardsticks such as routine
transportation expenses and standard supply chain reliability metrics.
In the case of this model application, synthetic data was generated for three key variables — transportation
costs, supply chain reliability, and operational efficiency. For example, transportation costs were based
on historical averages, and the reliability of a supply chain was quantified through traditional metrics like
On-Time Delivery rates. Lastly, a sensitivity analysis was conducted during which each variable was
altered and tested how the firm responded in both importing versus domestic production. Correlation
analysis then investigated how these factors related to one another, and even where a costly transportation
strategy could be compensated by higher supply chain reliability in certain trade scenarios With theoretical
data, it gives concrete intuition on how the model works and whether or not these predictions make any
sense (even from day 1).
5. DISCUSSION
The scenario analysis results lend granularity to the complex interplay of transport cost, supply chain
reliability, and operational efficiency as factors that shape import decisions. This section synthesizes the
results and explores their theoretical and practical implications, broadening these insights into relevance
for academic research and strategic decision-making in global trade.
5.1 Theoretical Implications
According to the simulations run under different scenarios, as vital as they are, transportation costs cannot
be looked at in isolation in the decisions involving importation. Reliability in the supply chain emerged
as a significant moderating variable that would amplify or mute the effects of transportation costs. For
instance, when transportation costs are highly detrimental, but the supply chain is reliable, firms are more
willing to maintain their imports. This finding supports the theory that a stable and predictable supply
chain can help balance some of the added risks and higher costs brought about by more extraordinary
transportation expenses.
IJAEBS - Volume 5, Issue 3, 2024, (p.1-23). DOI: 10.21608/ijaebs.2024.317220.1099 16
The decision to import will also be less attractive when transportation costs are low while the supply chain
could be more reliable. Delays, disruptions, and delivery time variability will outweigh the cost reductions,
and firms will choose domestic production as a risk-averse strategy. Therefore, the role of supply chain
management in global trade should be emphasized more. This also shows that reduced costs have to be
weighed against the risks involved in the supply chain.
Operational efficiency is a crucial factor in import decisions. The results indicate that firms with higher
operational efficiency can absorb external costs, such as increasing transportation costs, without reducing
gains. They can efficiently handle imported goods by reducing resource wastage in the production process.
In contrast, operationally less efficient firms struggle more when external costs rise, making domestic
production a more attractive option.
Trade policies and investments in supply chain infrastructure play a significant role in making importing
a more competitive option. As shown by the simulations, if trade policies drop tariffs and improve logistics
infrastructure, the total cost and risk of importing decrease dramatically. These conditions make importing
a more competitive option, even in cases where transportation costs might otherwise be prohibitive. This
finding underscores the importance of supportive trade policies and investments in supply chain
infrastructure as key enablers of global trade.
Theoretically, this research enriches a unified definition model of import decisions through transportation
costs, supply chain reliability, and operational efficiency. These findings justify the need for considering
these factors in combination rather than in isolation, therefore putting forth a holistic understanding of the
dynamics that drive global trade. This unified approach plugs a gap in the literature where these elements
have more often been examined in bits to result in fragmented insights.
5.2 Practical Implications
The implication of the findings in this research is of paramount importance for any business and
policymakers. For businesses, it means that investing in supply chain reliability and operational efficiency
not only mitigates external costs effectively but also provides a strategic advantage to the firm,
empowering it to remain competitive in the global market. A company efficient in operations can absorb
more of such pressures, at which point importing would still remain a feasible option. Moreover,
companies that work towards improving the reliability of supply chains can reduce global sourcing risks
IJAEBS - Volume 5, Issue 3, 2024, (p.1-23). DOI: 10.21608/ijaebs.2024.317220.1099 17
by assuring continuity and minimizing the possibilities of expensive disruptions, thereby taking a
proactive stance in managing their supply chains.
The Model Application Example in Section 4.4 illustrates how firms can utilize this study's theoretical
model within particular decision contexts. This example shows that when transportation costs are getting
high, the firms with higher Supply chain reliability will import more to compensate for extra costs if they
can. As the example also indicates, companies with superior operational efficiency are thus more capable
of integrating overseas items amidst localized price hikes, reinforcing how powerful these advantages
become in global trade. These insights support the growing emphasis on supply chain resilience and
operational enhancements in recent years by firms wishing to capture competitive advantage within
unpredictable trade scenarios.
On the other hand, policymakers are shown through this study that trade policies that decrease
transportation costs and increase supply chain resiliency should be formulated. This would not only benefit
the industries of a country but also improve the resiliency of the economy as a whole, making it possible
for firms to make credible choices when it comes to sourcing goods internationally. Investments in ports,
railways, and logistics networks are most valuable because they directly affect the feasibility of importing
goods. Moreover, business-friendly trade agreements that bring down tariffs and facilitate cross-border
logistics can further make importing more attractive and lead to economic gains by stimulating volumes
of trade and lower consumer prices.
5.3 Limitations of the Study
While this study gives valuable insights, it has its limitations. These studies are based on hypothetical
situations and model simulations, which are powerful tools for studying theoretical relationships but are
too simplified to come close to explaining real-world conditions. Assumptions that enter into their
construction cannot capture all the variables that determine trade decisions in practice. For example, the
simplification of other key drivers of world trade, like geopolitical risks, cultural differences, or regulatory
environments, might need to be more concise by the deployed models.
Due to the largely theoretical nature of this analysis, no real-world data was available · As such, default
scenarios were created based on standard industry practices and historical averages. Though such an
approach may constrain the exactitude of the conclusions, it does offer a valuable rendering of how
dynamics revealed by models develop in conditions routinely seen in international trade. The scenarios
IJAEBS - Volume 5, Issue 3, 2024, (p.1-23). DOI: 10.21608/ijaebs.2024.317220.1099 18
and case studies suggest further research building on these theoretical foundations, subjecting the model
to real trade data for empirical validation.
Another limitation is that these three factors—transportation cost, supply chain reliability, and operational
efficiency—although elaborate in their ways, cannot view the spectrum of factors that might impact import
decisions. Some elements were not explicitly set out here: technological changes, environmental
sustainability, and consumer preference; these would obviously significantly affect trade dynamics.
A Model Application Example included in this study offers an illustrative application of the theoretical
model, drawing attention to the possible benefits despite a lack of empirical data. Nonetheless, synthetic
data in this example restricts precision and requires more extensive empirical corroboration. Such a model
could be tested under different trade conditions using real-world data, the results of which would allow
for more general insights into the dynamics examined here. This would assist in confirming the theoretical
underpinnings of this study and further explain the applicability of our model across multiple trading
contexts.
6. CONCLUSION
The current paper aims to establish the nature and factors that make the decision-making process regarding
the importation or local production of goods tiresome for firms and policymakers. The study has
constructed, in general terms, a theoretical framework within which such essential trade decisions can be
understood by highlighting the relationship between transport cost and supply chain risk and reliability
and operating efficiency. This paper has also done the scenario analysis in the research to support when
importing goods is preferable, showing theoretical and practical contributions. The study results include
transportation cost, supply chain availability, and operating-cost parameters. This should not imply that
trade decisions are based purely on the 'Cost of Transportation'; these must be viewed and facilitated within
the general framework of supply chain considerations and firm-specific factors. A reliable supply chain
can either minimize or phase out transport costs' impact, making importation possible under unfavorable
transport costs. In another case, if the supply chain is unreliable, low transport costs may render importing
unsuitable because of the credibility of untimely and interrupted supplies.
Another significant criterion that is relevant to such decisions is operational efficiency. More operationally
efficient organizations can bear the external cost, predominantly the rising transportation costs, on their
profitability. This allows the company to feed the imported goods into production with minimal scrap and
IJAEBS - Volume 5, Issue 3, 2024, (p.1-23). DOI: 10.21608/ijaebs.2024.317220.1099 19
wasted time. On the other hand, low operational efficiency will make domesticate more appealing to firms
due to more control and stability on the outside factors.
This research has tremendous practical implications. To businesses, it reinforces the timeliness message
of supply chain reliability and operational efficiency as the fundamental competitive weapon in the
contemporary global marketplace. It is clear to policymakers that strategic support for trade policies and
infrastructure development will considerably improve global supply chain performance. Substantial
economic reward can be gathered by enhancing preferential trade agreements that bring down the cost of
transport and infrastructure in the supply chain, which enhances the supply chain shock.
Nevertheless, some restrictions must be mentioned concerning the attempt to advance a theoretical
framework for analyzing contemporary media systems. As this work used hypothetical data and was
model-based, such observation requires empirical substantiation. Thus, future work should continue
employing this theoretical model to analyze real-world data to assess its robustness and, in addition,
consider other factors that may affect the importation decision. This study continuously improves the
knowledge about decision-making in international trade.
The research has filled the gap in the determinants of import decisions in international trade. Establishing
the costs of transporting goods, supply chain dependability, and operational effectiveness within a
structural framework makes this research more inclusive for assessing trade decisions. Therefore, the
results are helpful for scholars and practitioners, thereby improving the analysis of global trade patterns
and business strategies in the interconnected world.
IJAEBS - Volume 5, Issue 3, 2024, (p.1-23). DOI: 10.21608/ijaebs.2024.317220.1099 20
REFERENCES
[1] D. Hummels, "Transportation costs and international trade in the second era of globalization," Journal of
Economic perspectives, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 131-154, 2007.
[2] S. N. Kotlyarova, Y. G. Lavrikova, and L. M. Averina, "The role of industrial production localization in the
import substitution policy," Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 115-
127, 2017.
[3] M. H. Abdelati, "Smart Traffic Management for Sustainable Development in Cities: Enhancing Safety and
Efficiency," International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Business Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, 2024.
[4] N. Naderializadeh, K. A. Crowe, and R. Pulkki, "On the Importance of Integrating Transportation Costs into
Tactical Forest Harvest Scheduling Model," Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering: Journal for Theory and
Application of Forestry Engineering, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 1-10, 2020.
[5] E. del Barrio, A. G. Sanz, J.-M. Loubes, and J. Niles-Weed, "An improved central limit theorem and fast
convergence rates for entropic transportation costs," SIAM Journal on Mathematics of Data Science, vol.
5, no. 3, pp. 639-669, 2023.
[6] Y. Huang and B. J. Bronnenberg, "Consumer transportation costs and the value of e-commerce: Evidence
from the dutch apparel industry," Marketing Science, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 984-1003, 2023.
[7] M. Abdelati, A. M. Abd-El-Tawwab, E. E. M. Ellimony, and M. Rabie, "A NEW APPROACH FOR FINDING AN
INITIAL SOLUTION NEAR TO OPTIMUM FOR THE SOLID TRANSPORTATION PROBLEMS," AGPE THE ROYAL
GONDWANA RESEARCH JOURNAL OF HISTORY, SCIENCE, ECONOMIC, POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, vol.
4, no. 3, pp. 93-101, 2023.
[8] I. Setiawan, H. Kurnia, S. Setiawan, H. H. Purba, and H. Hernadewita, "Reduce Transportation Costs Using
the Milk-run System and Dynamo Stages in the Vehicle Manufacturing Industry," Operational Research in
Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 17-27, 2022.
[9] E. del Barrio, A. González-Sanz, and J.-M. Loubes, "Central limit theorems for general transportation
costs," in Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincare (B) Probabilites et statistiques, 2024, vol. 60, no. 2: Institut
Henri Poincaré, pp. 847-873.
[10] A. El-Wahab, M. Rabie, M. H. Abdelati, M. I. Khalil, and K. Abdelgawwad, "A case study of reducing the
total wasted time for the bus movement of Public Transportation Authority in Cairo (CTA)," SVU-
International Journal of Engineering Sciences and Applications, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 82-87, 2021.
[11] M. H. Abdelati, A. M. Abd-El-Tawwab, E. E. M. Ellimony, and M. Rabie, "" Efficient and Versatile
Methodology for Solving Solid Transportation Problem Using Excel Solver: A Comparative Study with
LINGO Code," Industrial Engineering, vol. 3, no. 1, 2024.
[12] H. Rasay and A. M. Golmohammadi, "Modeling and analyzing incremental quantity discounts in
transportation costs for a joint economic lot sizing problem," Interdisciplinary Journal of Management
Studies (Formerly known as Iranian Journal of Management Studies), vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 23-49, 2020.
[13] T. Gao and J. Lu, "The impacts of strait and canal blockages on the transportation costs of the Chinese
fleet in the shipping network," Maritime Policy & Management, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 669-686, 2019.
[14] C. Arbib, M. Ç. Pınar, and M. Tonelli, "Competitive location and pricing on a line with metric transportation
costs," European journal of operational research, vol. 282, no. 1, pp. 188-200, 2020.
[15] H. A. Abdelwali and M. H. Abdelati, "Enhancing Time Series Forecasting with the Advanced Cumulative
Weighted Moving Average Technique," International Journal of Advanced Scientific Innovation, vol. 6, no.
7, 2024.
[16] D. R. Davis, "Intra-industry trade: a Heckscher-Ohlin-Ricardo approach," Journal of international
Economics, vol. 39, no. 3-4, pp. 201-226, 1995.
[17] Z. Sheidaei, "Intra-industry trade efficiency and gains from trade “Evidence from high-and middle-income
countries”," SN Social Sciences, vol. 2, no. 10, p. 213, 2022.
[18] S. Dutta, "Two Approaches of Measuring Intra-industry Trade," Available at SSRN 4119929, 2022.
IJAEBS - Volume 5, Issue 3, 2024, (p.1-23). DOI: 10.21608/ijaebs.2024.317220.1099 21
[19] S. Y. Jang, J. Y. Seon, and I.-H. Oh, "Influencing factors of transportation costs regarding healthcare service
utilization in Korea," Journal of Korean medical science, vol. 35, no. 35, 2020.
[20] M. Christopher, Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Logistics & Supply Chain Management. Pearson
UK, 2016.
[21] C. Krishnaraj, A. A. Jayakumar, and S. D. Shri, "Solving supply chain network optimization models using
LINGO," International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, vol. 10, no. 19, pp. 14715-14718, 2015.
[22] M. H. Abdelati, A. M. Abd-El-Tawwab, E. E. M. Ellimony, and M. Rabie, "Solving a multi-objective solid
transportation problem: a comparative study of alternative methods for decision-making," Journal of
Engineering and Applied Science, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 1-16, 2023.
[23] N. Bajwa, K. Prewett, and C. L. Shavers, "Is your supply chain ready to embrace blockchain," The Journal
of Corporate Accounting & Finance, vol. 31, pp. 54-64, 2020.
[24] Y. Sheffi, The resilient enterprise: overcoming vulnerability for competitive advantage. Pearson Education
India, 2005.
[25] M. H. Abdelati, Abd-El-Tawwab, A. M., Ellimony, E. E. M., & Rabie, M., "Time Optimization in Fleet
Management: A Case Study in the Soft Drinks Industry," Gongcheng Kexue Yu Jishu/Advanced Engineering
Science, vol. 55, no. 6, 2023.
[26] M. Christopher, Logistics and supply chain management. Pearson Uk, 2022.
[27] D. J. Ketchen Jr and G. T. M. Hult, "Bridging organization theory and supply chain management: The case
of best value supply chains," Journal of operations management, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 573-580, 2007.
[28] R. E. Miles and C. C. Snow, "Organization theory and supply chain management: An evolving research
perspective," Journal of operations management, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 459-463, 2007.
[29] P. K. Bagchi and T. Skjoett‐Larsen, "Integration of information technology and organizations in a supply
chain," The International Journal of Logistics Management, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 89-108, 2003.
[30] C. Martin, "Logistics and supply chain management," ed: Pearson Education, 2023.
[31] S. Chopra and P. Meindl, Supply chain management. Strategy, planning & operation. Springer, 2007.
[32] M. A. U. Rehman, A. Chaabane, and S. A. Khan, "Review of construction supply chain optimization papers
for performance improvement," in Proc. 29th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean
Construction (IGLC), July, 2021, pp. 974-984.
[33] M. H. Abdelati, "IMPROVING SOLUTION QUALITY IN TRANSPORTATION PROBLEMS: A NOVEL ALGORITHM
FOR EFFICIENT RESOURCE ALLOCATION," AGPE THE ROYAL GONDWANA RESEARCH JOURNAL OF HISTORY,
SCIENCE, ECONOMIC, POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 1-10, 2023.
[34] M. H Abdelati and A. Abdelhafeez, "An Integrated Approach for Promoting Sustainable Transportation: A
Case Study of Fuel Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Emissions Reduction in the Cairo Transport
Authority," International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Business Sciences, vol. 4, no. 3, 2023.
[35] H. A. Taha, "Operation Research: An Introduction, 7th," 2003.
[36] H. A. Mohamed, "IMPROVING SOLUTION QUALITY IN TRANSPORTATION PROBLEMS: A NOVEL
ALGORITHM FOR EFFICIENT RESOURCE ALLOCATION," AGPE THE ROYAL GONDWANA RESEARCH JOURNAL
OF HISTORY, SCIENCE, ECONOMIC, POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 1-10, 08/02 2023.
[Online]. Available: https://agpegondwanajournal.co.in/index.php/agpe/article/view/297.
[37] W. L. Winston, Operations research: applications and algorithms. Cengage Learning, 2022.
[38] M. Alardhi, H. A. Abdelwali, A. M. Khalfan, and M. H. Abdelati, "Using the Minimize Distance Method to
Find the Best Compromise Solution of Multi-objective Transportation Problem with Case Study."
[39] C. Hall and A. Groat, "Energy price increases and the 2008 financial crash: a practice run for what's to
come," The Corporate Examiner, vol. 37, no. 4-5, pp. 19-26, 2010.