ArticlePDF Available

Possible benefits of stretching for post-COVID-19

Authors:

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 is a new disease that causes severe health problems and is responsible for significant complications even after recovery, including disabilities that lead to motor impairment. In this sense, there is currently no protocol for physical exercises for people with physical disabilities caused by the disease. Therefore, it is necessary to find ways for individuals affected by this condition and experiencing motor difficulties to engage in physical activities, preventing their condition from deteriorating further after COVID-19. Objective: To present evidence that stretching improves strength, respiratory and vascular system function, enabling the return of individuals with physical deficits who are hindered from performing activities of daily living. Methods: This study is a literature review that analyzes the correlation between the benefits of active static stretching in individuals with physical disabilities post-COVID-19. The study collected data through accumulated scientific knowledge in the fields of clinical health and physical activity. The literature search was conducted using digital scientific databases, including SciELO, ScienceDirect, Bireme, and Google Scholar. Results: Muscle stretching is a physical activity that has shown promising benefits for post-COVID patients, however, further research in this field is needed. Conclusion: Through the presented studies, it can be concluded that stretching is a type of exercise that potentially can counterbalance various sequels caused by COVID-19, enabling the affected person to return to their daily routines.
https://doi.org/10.17784/mtprehabjournal.2024.22.1350 MTP&RehabJournal 2024, 22:1350
Manual Therapy, Posturology & Rehabilitation Journal
ISSN: 2236-5435
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Possible benefits of stretching for post-COVID-19
Pablo N. Folha, Reury Bacurau, Marcelo S. Aoki, Marcelo Massa.
School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities of the University of São Paulo (EACH-USP), São
Paulo (SP), Brazil
Abstract
Background: COVID-19 is a new disease that causes severe health problems and is responsible for
significant complications even after recovery, including disabilities that lead to motor impairment.
In this sense, there is currently no protocol for physical exercises for people with physical disabili-
ties caused by the disease. Therefore, it is necessary to find ways for individuals affected by this
condition and experiencing motor difficulties to engage in physical activities, preventing their
condition from deteriorating further after COVID-19. Objective: To present evidence that stretch-
ing improves strength, respiratory and vascular system function, enabling the return of individuals
with physical deficits who are hindered from performing activities of daily living. Methods: This
study is a literature review that analyzes the correlation between the benefits of active static
stretching in individuals with physical disabilities post-COVID-19. The study collected data
through accumulated scientific knowledge in the fields of clinical health and physical activity. The
literature search was conducted using digital scientific databases, including SciELO, ScienceDirect,
Bireme, and Google Scholar. Results: Muscle stretching is a physical activity that has shown
promising benefits for post-COVID patients, however, further research in this field is needed.
Conclusion: Through the presented studies, it can be concluded that stretching is a type of exercise
that potentially can counterbalance various sequels caused by COVID-19, enabling the affected
person to return to their daily routines.
Keywords: Muscle stretching exercise; physical activity; COVID-19.
BACKGROUND
The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, emerged in December
2019 in Wuhan, Hubei province, China1. The rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2 led the World
Health Organization (WHO) to proclaim a global pandemic on March 11, 20202.
COVID-19 is characterized as a pathogenesis disease complex and has been a major
public health challenge worldwide1. After remission, apparently healthy individuals
may present various clinical manifestations and peripheral and central inflammatory
responses that generally lead to long-lasting musculoskeletal changes and functional
impairment, characterizing the term "Long COVID"3. Among the symptoms reported in
"Long COVID," an intriguing and increasingly observed manifestation is the persistence
of post-COVID-19 pain, associated with persistent fatigue or mood changes, cognitive
changes, or persistent respiratory disorders4. The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
caused by the coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is caused by a virus with high inflammatory
potential 1and is currently known by the name Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19)1-3.
COVID-19 is a disease with multisystemic impairments 1-4 that affects the quality of
life of those affected, both during the presence of the virus and after recovery1-3. Among
all the systems the virus affects, the respiratory (Al-Jahdhami 2022) and cardiovascular3
systems are the most severely impacted, both acutely and chronically1-3. In the
respiratory system, COVID-19 in the early stage causes dyspnea, which can range from
Corresponding author: Pablo
Nascimento Folha
Email: profmspablo@gmail.com
Received: 30 Apr , 2024.
Accepted: 25 Nov, 2024.
Published: 03 Dec, 2024.
Copyright © 2023. This is an Open
Access article distributed under the
terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution Non-Commercial
License which permits unrestricted
non- commercial use, distribution,
and reproduction in any medium
provided article is properly cited
.
Possible benefits of stretching for post-COVID-19 Folha, P.N. et al.
2
mild to severe1. After recovering from COVID-19, the virus can cause some symptoms
that may persist for some time, such as cough, fatigue, and muscle weakness, especially
in the lower limbs. There is a significant possibility of pulmonary fibrosis after treatment
and recovery from the virus5. In the cardiovascular system, the virus causes cellular
damage due to high concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Moreover, these
cytokines increase thrombotic potential by damaging blood vessels. As a result,
symptoms such as tachycardia and heart palpitations can be observed6,7.
Most patients are discharged from the hospital with stable vital signs at rest;
however, when there is physical exertion beyond rest, they experience difficulties due to
suppressed oxygen saturation, increased heart rate, and low conditioning1. Both
respiratory and cardiovascular system changes after recovering from COVID-19 make it
challenging to perform basic activities of daily life and restrict physical activity due to
systemic physical impairment8,9. The physical activity is crucial for post-COVID-19
recovery, offering significant anti-inflammatory potential by reducing pulmonary
inflammation, restoring endothelial function through nitric oxide release, promoting
vasodilation, and strengthening the immune system1-9. However, as mentioned above,
there is a physical challenge in performing some activities due to physical impairment
resulting from post-COVID-19 sequelae1-10. The difficulties in mobility, such as carrying
equipment or oxygen cylinders, create significant resistance to initiating physical activity
for a substantial portion of those affected, primarily the elderly, sedentary individuals,
and those with chronic illnesses1-9. Despite the challenges in performing physical activity,
it is necessary for improving physical conditioning, which is essential for physical
recovery, an anti-inflammatory response, and the stabilization of vital signs resulting in
short-term improvement in physical conditioning and endurance1. COVID is a known
virus, but the variation 19 represents a new disease in terms of its characteristics10).
Therefore, there is a need for further research on the virus and the development of a
post-COVID-19 training protocol. In this case, it is essential to propose an efficient and
easy-to-administer prescription, involving low-intensity and adaptable physical activity
for the patient. Static stretching is a suitable suggestion for this purpose1. Active static
stretching is an acceptable option under such conditions because it is a straightforward
and easily adaptable physical activity. It is safe, low-intensity, and can be performed
virtually anywhere. This type of physical activity is comprehensive, as it can engage and
work on various muscle groups throughout the body2.
METHODOLOGY
This study can be classified in terms of research type as a literature review, as it
collects data through accumulated scientific knowledge, which encompasses the clinical
health and physical activity field, to analyze a correlation between the benefits of active
static stretching in individuals with physical disabilities after COVID-19. The literature
search was conducted through digital sources of scientific databases, including SciELO,
ScienceDirect, Bireme, and Google Scholar. The literature search was conducted through
digital sources of scientific databases, including SciELO, ScienceDirect, Bireme, and
Google Scholar.
Possible benefits of stretching for post-COVID-19 Folha, P.N. et al.
3
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
COVID-19 is a new disease that arises from growing studies and requires
multidisciplinary attention, including the field of sports and physical activity. Active
static stretching has been gaining prominence and strength in the scientific community
due to its simplicity, as it is an activity that can be applied at both high and low intensity,
promoting adherence to physical exercise. COVID-19 has a high inflammatory burden,
so we need an activity with a low inflammatory load. When applied at low intensity,
stretching elicits minimal pro-inflammatory response and, in fact, triggers an
anti-inflammatory response11. In addition to its anti-inflammatory effect, stretching also
promotes a positive impact on balance, increasing flexibility and mobility, reducing
stiffness in the ankles, knees, and hips, thus enabling improved mobility12, as
highlighted by Behm and colleagues in 2021, as well as Reddy and Alahmari in 2016
(mobility being one of the challenges faced by COVID-19 patients)13.
Stretching provides a modest improvement in lower limb strength14. Such
improvement may be sufficient for post-COVID-19 individuals to maintain bipedal
stance and mobility alongside the enhanced mobility and balance they will gain.
Stretching also promotes a positive response in oxygen saturation. Saturação is a marker
of blood oxygenation that is affected by the disease, causing negative stability changes,
which can be mitigated by stretching, which has the potential to increase capillary
extensibility, reduce muscular stiffness of the thoracic walls, and improve respiratory
patterns1-15.Another positive aspect of stretching is that this activity not only activates
muscles and tendons but also engages the peripheral nervous system by elongating the
nerves, facilitating nerve communication, thus justifying the improvement in balance
response15.The peripheral circulation is also benefited by stretching. Stretching has the
ability to reduce peripheral capillary tortuosity, facilitating oxygen delivery and
reducing cardiac effort, thus lowering blood pressure16 ,17. The vascular benefit provided
by stretching appears to be more potent than that promoted by walking18. In addition to
stimulating angiogenesis, increasing capillarity, and improving oxygenated blood flow.
In theory, there is a positive response in the major systems affected by COVID-19,
minimizing the impacts of the disease after recovering from COVID-19.
Another study3 highlights the importance of engaging in physical activity for
chronic diseases and underscores its significance. However, when it comes to COVID-19,
there is indeed a shortage of studies with exercise protocols due to this being a new
disease. The same authors3 also emphasize the need for a specific post-COVID-19
exercise protocol, suggesting that it should encompass training for frailty, interstitial
lung disease, heart failure, and pulmonary hypertension. Another study11 mentions that
stretching can be of both low and high intensity, and that high-intensity stretching
releases pro-inflammatory cytokines. In this case, such intensity is not favorable for
post-COVID-19, considering that the virus has a high inflammatory potential. The same
study states that anti-inflammatory activation occurs at low intensity, with low-intensity
stretching being the most suitable for post-COVID-19, considering its low
pro-inflammatory response and its anti-inflammatory activation19. A review study12
from 2020 concludes that stretching has positive effects on balance, both acutely and
chronically, improving the quality of life for individuals with low balance, with a
Possible benefits of stretching for post-COVID-19 Folha, P.N. et al.
4
particular focus on the elderly. It reduces the incidence of falls and enhances flexibility
and mobility. The same study from 2020 also states that the benefits of stretching go
beyond balance, benefiting the cardiovascular system through the reduction of arterial
stiffness, angiogenesis, improved vasodilation, enhanced parasympathetic function, and
reduced chronic stress. These benefits are favorable for post-COVID-19, addressing both
issues related to weakness and balance, as well as the cardiovascular system12.
According to what has been presented in the studies1-18, stretching possesses all the
positive attributes required for initiating physical activity in extreme cases of
post-COVID-19 when physical conditions are limited. The literature provides a wide
range of time protocols for stretching training, which can vary between authors. Another
study20 presents a more comprehensive concept, working with durations of 15s, 60s, 90s,
and 120 seconds. In contrast, a different study21 uses durations of 10s, 20s, 40s, and 60
seconds. employed a protocol with 30 seconds versus a control group. used a protocol of
only 30 seconds22,23. The majority of studies comparing time protocols primarily focus on
analyzing the range of motion as the primary outcome, with some also complementing
their analysis with other variables related to mobility, strength, and balance. As you
mentioned, only a few of the cited authors considered other benefits.
An important point to note is that the 30-second protocol is one of the most
commonly used because it doesn't show significant differences in results when
compared to other protocols in terms of flexibility and is associated with a lower
participant dropout rate. Additionally, it has been shown to contribute to increased
strength, balance, improved oxygen saturation, cardiovascular response, and
vascularization1,17-19. Stretching, due to its simplicity and significance, has been gaining
more and more attention in the literature and can be the most recommended activity to
begin an exercise program. Since there are no specific models, our work has shown
positive benefits in post-COVID-19 recovery. Here's a suggested training protocol1.
Given that, the methodology of our work followed the following protocol: 5
stretching exercises targeting major muscle groups - triceps, shoulder adduction, hip,
hamstring, and quadriceps, with one exercise for each muscle. Each exercise was
performed as follows: 3 sets of 30 seconds of tension, followed by a 30-second rest, and 1
minute for transitioning to the next exercise.
CONCLUSION
We can conclude from the above that active static stretching is potentially the most
suitable physical activity for individuals who have recovered from COVID-19 with
physical impairment, considering its ease of use and safety of application. Despite
COVID-19 being a new area of exploration with no specific protocol in place, stretching
has proven to be effective in cases of physical impairment, potentially improving the
quality of life for those affected. Moreover, as individuals achieve better physical
condition, they can gradually transition to other exercise modalities.
Author Contributions: P.N.F. and R.F.B., conducted the literature review and structured the study.
M.A.S. and M.M., conducted the review and standardization.
Financial Support: The authors declare that there was no financial support.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Possible benefits of stretching for post-COVID-19 Folha, P.N. et al.
5
REFERENCES
1. Cattadori G, Di Marco S, Baravelli M, Picozzi A, Ambrosio G. Exercise Training in Post-COVID-19 Patients: The
Need for a Multifactorial Protocol for a Multifactorial Pathophysiology. J Clin Med. 2022;11(2228):1-12.
2. Folha PN, Bacurau RPF. Effects of active static stretching in a patient with COPD after complication by
COVID-19, case report. Manual Therapy, Posturology & Rehabilitation Journal. 2022;20(1):1-7.
3. Al-Jahdhami I, Al-naamani K, Al-Mawali A, Bennji SM. Respiratory Complications after COVID-19. Oman Med
J. 2022;37(1):e343.
4. Brugliera L, Spina A, Castellazzi P, et al. Rehabilitation of COVID-19 patients with acute lower extremity
ischemia and amputation. J Rehabil Med. 2020;52(9):1-4.
5. Ojo AS, Balogun SA, Williams OT, Ojo OS. Pulmonary fibrosis in COVID-19 survivors: predictive factors and
risk reduction strategies. Pulm Med. 2020;2020:6175964.
6. Egidio AN, Campos BN, Junqueira CFS, et al. Implicações Cardiovasculares na Covid-19: uma revisão
sistemática. Braz J Dev. 2020;6(10)
7. González-Calle D, Eiros R, Sánchez PL. Corazón y SARS-Cov2. Med Clin. 2022;159(9):440-446.
8. Zheng Z, Yao Z, Wu K, Zheng J. Patient follow-up after discharge after COVID-19 pneumonia: Considerations
for infectious control. J Med Virol. 2020;92(11):2412-2419.
9. Jahn K, Sava M, Sommer G, et al. Exercise capacity impairment after COVID-19 pneumonia is mainly caused by
deconditioning. Eur Respir J. 2022;59(1):01136-2021.
10. Da Silveira Cespedes M, Souza JC. SARS-CoV-2: a clinical update. SciELO Preprints. 2020.
11. Nogueira CJ, Garcia ADS, de Souza IV, et al. Respostas inflamatórias agudas ao treinamento de flexibilidade:
uma revisão sistemática. Rev Bras Fisiol Exerc. 2021;20(5):562-573.
12. Behm DG, Kay AD, Trajano GS, et al. Effects of stretching on injury risk reduction and balance. J Clin Exerc
Physiol. 2021;10(3):106-116.
13. Reddy RS, Alahmari KA. Effect of lower extremity stretching exercises on balance in geriatric population. Int J
Health Sci. 2016;10(3):389.
14. Arntz F, Markov A, Behm DG, et al. Chronic Effects of Static Stretching Exercises on Muscle Strength and Power
in Healthy Individuals Across the Lifespan: A Systematic Review with Multi-level Meta-analysis. Sports Med.
2023;53(3):723-745.
15. Rattes C, Campos SL, Morais C, et al. Respiratory muscles stretching acutely increases expansion in hemiparetic
chest wall. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2018;254:16-22.
16. Kruse NT, Scheuermann BW. Cardiovascular responses to skeletal muscle stretching: “stretching” the truth or a
new exercise paradigm for cardiovascular medicine? Sports Med. 2017;47:2507-2520.
17. Hotta K, Batchelor WB, Graven J, et al. Daily passive muscle stretching improves flow-mediated dilation of
popliteal artery and 6-minute walk test in elderly patients with stable symptomatic peripheral artery disease.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019;20(8):642-648.
18. Ko J, Deprez D, Shaw K, et al. Stretching is Superior to Brisk Walking for Reducing Blood Pressure in People
With HighNormal Blood Pressure or Stage I Hypertension. J Phys Act Health. 2020;18(1):21-28.
19. Hotta K, Behnke BJ, Arjmandi B, et al. Daily muscle stretching enhances blood flow, endothelial function,
capillarity, vascular volume and connectivity in aged skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 2018;596(10):1903-1917.
Possible benefits of stretching for post-COVID-19 Folha, P.N. et al.
6
20. Tirloni AT, Belchior CG, Carvalho PDT, Reis FAD. Efeito de diferentes tempos de alongamento na flexibilidade
da musculatura posterior da coxa. Fisioter Pesq. 2008;15:47-52.
21. Gallo LH, Gonçalves R, Gurjão ALD, et al. Efeito de diferentes volumes de alongamento na capacidade
funcional de idosas. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2013;15:103-112.
22. Schiessl M, Lima MCAM. Efeitos de diferentes tempos de alongamento na flexibilidade de bailarinas.
ConScientiae Saúde. 2015;14(3):456-462.
23. Konrad A, Tilp M. The acute time course of muscle and tendon tissue changes following one minute of static
stretching. Curr Issues Sport Sci. 2020;5:003-003.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Background: The current literature on the chronic effects of static stretching (SS) exercises on muscle strength and power is unclear and controversial. Objective: To examine the chronic effects of SS exercises on muscle strength and power as well as flexibility in healthy individuals across the lifespan. Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis of (randomised) controlled trials. Data sources: A systematic literature search was conducted in the databases PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and SPORTDiscus up to May 2022. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: We included studies that investigated the chronic effects of SS exercises on at least one muscle strength and power outcome compared to an active/passive control group or the contralateral leg (using between- or within-study designs) in healthy individuals, irrespective of age, sex, and training status. Results: The main findings of 41 studies indicated trivial-to-small positive effects of chronic SS exercises on muscle strength (standardised mean difference [SMD]=0.21, [95% CI=0.10 to 0.33], p=0.001) and power (SMD=0.18, [95% CI=0.12 to 0.25], p<0.001). For flexibility, moderate-to-large increases were observed (SMD=0.96, [95% CI=0.69 to 1.23], p<0.001). Subgroup analyses, taking the participants' training status into account, revealed a larger muscle strength improvement for sedentary (SMD=0.58, p<0.001) compared to recreationally active participants (SMD=0.16, p=0.029). Additionally, larger flexibility gains were observed following passive (SMD=0.97, p<0.001) compared to active SS exercises (SMD=0.59, p=0.001). SS’s chronic effects on muscle strength were moderated by the proportion of females in the sample (β=0.004, p=0.042), with higher proportions experiencing larger gains. Other moderating variables included mean age (β=0.011, p<0.001), with older individuals showing larger muscle strength gains, and the number of repetitions per stretching exercise and session (β=0.023, p=0.004 and β=0.013, p=0.008, respectively), with more repetitions associated with larger muscle strength improvements. Muscle power was also moderated by mean age (β=0.006, p=0.007) with larger gains in older individuals. The meta-regression analysis indicated larger flexibility gains with more repetitions per session (β=0.094, p=0.016), more time under stretching per session (β=0.090, p=0.026), and more total time under stretching (β=0.078, p=0.034). Conclusion: The main findings indicated that chronic SS exercises have the potential to improve muscle strength and power. Such improvements appear to benefit sedentary more than recreationally active participants. Likewise, chronic SS exercises result in a marked enhancement in flexibility with larger effects of passive, as compared to active, SS. Results of the meta-regression analysis for muscle strength indicated larger benefits of chronic SS exercises in samples with higher proportions of females, older participants, and higher number of repetitions per stretching exercise and session. For muscle power, results suggested larger gains for older participants. Regarding flexibility, findings indicated larger benefits following a higher number of repetitions per exercise and longer time under stretching per session as well as longer total time under stretching.
Article
Full-text available
Background: COPD, called Chronic Obstructive Non-transmitted Pulmonary Disease, is a disease that causes severe sequelae in the respiratory system, which in combination with other types of viruses such as covid-19 aggravates the disease, with major effects on the locomotor system due to saturation instabilities. The main victims of the disease are elderly smokers and ex-smokers of both sexes. In more severe cases, there is a need for continuous treatment with oxygen therapy, limiting the quality of life and physical activity of the elderly. Objective: Physical activity is an alternative non-pharmacological treatment to help the recovery of the individual with severe COPD, minimizing the complications of the disease. Method: The study aims to describe the case of a 77-year-old elderly man, ex-smoker for 17 years, with severe sequelae post COPD-19 in the respiratory system, dependent on oxygen therapy for great instability of mean saturation below 70%, with reflexes on the locomotor system, having difficulties in locomotion. In this case, to keep him active, active static stretching exercises were proposed for five consecutive days. Results: After five consecutive days of active stretching, the results were positive, increasing saturation by an average of 1.75%, reaching 89.79% without the help of oxygen therapy, which was enough to reduce dyspnea, wean him off oxygen therapy, and improve his mobility and quality of life. Conclusion: that active static stretching is beneficial for severe cases of COPD, minimizing complications and reducing the use of oxygen therapy.
Article
Full-text available
The battle against COVID-19 has entered a new phase with Rehabilitation Centres being among the major players, because the medical outcome of COVID-19 patients does not end with the control of pulmonary inflammation marked by a negative virology test, as many patients continue to suffer from long-COVID-19 syndrome. Exercise training is known to be highly valuable in patients with cardiac or lung disease, and it exerts beneficial effects on the immune system and inflammation. We therefore reviewed past and recent papers about exercise training, considering the multifactorial features characterizing post-COVID-19 patients’ clinical conditions. Consequently, we conceived a proposal for a post-COVID-19 patient exercise protocol as a combination of multiple recommended exercise training regimens. Specifically, we built pre-evaluation and exercise training for post-COVID-19 patients taking advantage of the various programs of exercise already validated for diseases that may share pathophysiological and clinical characteristics with long-COVID-19.
Article
Full-text available
COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with a high short-term morbidity and mortality, on the long-term, COVID-19 complications may lead to a major impact on the community and the health care the pulmonary sequelae are expected to rise significantly in the future. The lungs are the main organs affected by COVID-19. A wide variety of long-term respiratory complications secondary to COVID-19 have been described ranging from persistent symptoms and radiological changes to an impaired respiratory physiology, vascular complications and pulmonary fibrosis. Despite all of that, the respiratory sequalae post-acute SARS-CoV-2 infection has not been fully explored until now. Furthermore, the main treatment for most of the COVID-19 respiratory complications is still symptomatic and supportive care. In this review article we shed the light on the post COVID-19 complications based on the latest available evidence, focusing on pulmonary fibrosis, treatment directions, and recommendations to the physicians.
Article
Full-text available
Although pulmonary fibrosis can occur in the absence of a clear-cut inciting agent, and without a clinically clear initial acute inflammatory phase, it is more commonly associated with severe lung injury. This may be due to respiratory infections, chronic granulomatous diseases, medications, and connective tissue disorders. Pulmonary fibrosis is associated with permanent pulmonary architectural distortion and irreversible lung dysfunction. Available clinical, radiographic, and autopsy data has indicated that pulmonary fibrosis is central to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (SARS) and MERS pathology, and current evidence suggests that pulmonary fibrosis could also complicate infection by SARS-CoV-2. The aim of this review is to explore the current literature on the pathogenesis of lung injury in COVID-19 infection. We evaluate the evidence in support of the putative risk factors for the development of lung fibrosis in the disease and propose risk mitigation strategies. We conclude that, from the available literature, the predictors of pulmonary fibrosis in COVID-19 infection are advanced age, illness severity, length of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation, smoking and chronic alcoholism. With no proven effective targeted therapy against pulmonary fibrosis, risk reduction measures should be directed at limiting the severity of the disease and protecting the lungs from other incidental injuries.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To evaluate the clinical characteristics and rehabilitation management of patients who undergo amputation for COVID-19-associated coagulopathy. Methods: Clinical and laboratory data for 3 patients were analysed and their rehabilitative management discussed. Results: The medical records of 3 patients who had undergone amputation due to acute lower extremity ischaemia and who were provided with rehabilitation in our COVID-19 unit were reviewed. Conclusion: Coagulation changes related to SARS-CoV-2 may complicate recovery from this devastating disease. The rehabilitation management of amputated patients for COVID-19 acute lower extremity ischaemia is based on a multilevel approach for clinical, functional, nutritional and neuropsychological needs. Based on this limited experience, a dedicated programme for this specific group of patients seems advantageous to warrant the best functional outcome and quality of life.
Article
Full-text available
INTRODUCTION A covid-19 pandemic decreed by WHO has raised greater awareness of it. EPIDEMIOLOGY The infection, reached the mark of 2,000,000 patients in 33 countries and caused the risk of the presence of comorbidities and advanced age. TRANSMISSIBILITY The transmissibility calculated so far is similar to the H1N1 epidemic, but with lower mortality rates. PHYSIOPATHOLOGY The SARS-CoV-2 virus, of the Coronaviridae family, has the capacity for cellular invasion through the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 does not have a lower respiratory epithelium and in the cells of the small intestine mucosa. CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS a presentation can be divided into mild (fever, fatigue, cough, myalgia, and sputum) and severe (cyanosis, dyspnoea, tachypnea, chest pain, hypoxemia and need for clinical measurement) and has an estimated estimate of 2%. DIAGNOSIS allows the detection of viral load in CRP-TR of patients with high clinical suspicion. TREATMENT based on supportive measures and infection control. In severe cases, the use of medications such as hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin or medication can be promising. Take care to avoid the use of corticosteroids. There are no restrictions on the use of resources and IECAs / BRAs.
Article
Evidence for the effectiveness of acute and chronic stretching for improving range of motion is extensive. Improved flexibility can positively impact performances in activities of daily living and both physical and mental health. However, less is known about the effects of stretching on other aspects of health such as injury incidence and balance. The objective of this review is to examine the existing literature in these areas. The review highlights that both pre-exercise and chronic stretching can reduce musculotendinous injury incidence, particularly in running-based sports, which may be related to the increased force available at longer muscle lengths (altered force-length relationship) or reduced active musculotendinous stiffness, among other factors. Evidence regarding the acute effects of stretching on balance is equivocal. Longer-term stretch training can improve balance, which may contribute to a decreased incidence of falls and associated injuries and may thus be recommended as an important exercise modality in those with balance deficits. Hence, both acute and chronic stretching seem to have positive effects on injury incidence and balance, but optimum training plans are yet to be defined.
Article
Background: Aerobic exercise is recommended for reducing blood pressure; however, recent studies indicate that stretching may also be effective. The authors compared 8 weeks of stretching versus walking exercise in men and women with high-normal blood pressure or stage 1 hypertension (ie, 130/85-159/99 mm Hg). Methods: Forty men and women (61.6 y) were randomized to a stretching or brisk walking exercise program (30 min/d, 5 d/wk for 8 wk). Blood pressure was assessed during sitting and supine positions and for 24 hours using a portable monitor before and after the training programs. Results: The stretching program elicited greater reductions than the walking program (P < .05) for sitting systolic (146 [9] to 140 [12] vs 139 [9] to 142 [12] mm Hg), supine diastolic (85 [7] to 78 [8] vs 81 [7] to 82 [7] mm Hg), and nighttime diastolic (67 [8] to 65 [10] vs 68 [8] to 73 [12] mm Hg) blood pressures. The stretching program elicited greater reductions than the walking program (P < .05) for mean arterial pressure assessed in sitting (108 [7] to 103 [6] vs 105 [6] vs 105 [8] mm Hg), supine (102 [9] to 96 [9] vs 99 [6] to 99 [7] mm Hg), and at night (86 [9] to 83 [10] vs 88 [9] to 93 [12] mm Hg). Conclusions: An 8-week stretching program was superior to brisk walking for reducing blood pressure in individuals with high-normal blood pressure or stage 1 hypertension.