ArticlePDF Available

AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF NORMAL VARIANTS OF PANCREATICOBILIARY JUNCTION USING MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY IN THE SOUTH INDIAN POPULATION Original Research Paper Radio-Diagnosis

Authors:

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is an advanced, non-invasive imaging modality that plays a crucial role in the diagnostic evaluation of pancreaticobiliary diseases. This technique leverages magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to visualise the biliary and pancreatic ducts, providing high-contrast images essential for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning. Methodology: A hospital-based observational study was conducted in a tertiary care centre with a 1.5T MRI, a sample size of 60 cases referred for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and normal anatomical variants of pancreaticobiliary junction were accessed and categorised either as B-P type, P-B type or V/separate opening. Results: 28.3% of participants exhibited the pancreatic type junction in the bile duct, while 40.0% showed the pancreatic duct-bile duct junction variant. Additionally, 31.7% presented the V-type junction. The Conclusion: findings of our study have significant implications for the field of pancreaticobiliary research and clinical practice. By documenting the prevalence and types of pancreaticobiliary junction variants, our study supports the development of tailored surgical and diagnostic approaches that consider regional and demographic differences. This tailored approach can lead to safer surgical procedures, more accurate diagnoses, and better overall patient outcomes. Our study not only corroborates existing findings but also enhances the understanding of pancreaticobiliary junction variants, paving the way for improved clinical practices and patient care in diverse populations. The detailed insights from our study contribute to the ongoing efforts to optimize diagnostic and surgical techniques, ultimately aiming to enhance patient safety and outcomes in the field of pancreaticobiliary diseases.
AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF NORMAL VARIANTS OF PANCREATICOBILIARY JUNCTION USING MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY IN THE SOUTH INDIAN POPULATION
Dr. Aktshaya.S
Final year resident, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Puducherry, 605102
Original Research PaperRadio-Diagnosis1. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To identify and document the anatomical variations in the pancreatic and biliary ducts using Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). To determine the incidence of each identied anatomical variant in the study population. METHODOLOGY: STUDY DESIGN: Hospital-based observational studySTUDY AREA: Department of Radio-diagnosis, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre (SVMCH&RC), a tertiary care teaching hospital located in Ariyur, Pondicherry.TIME FRAME: Retrospective Study: February 2020 to March 2022 Prospective Study: April 2022 to October 2023. Study Population: South Indian populationSAMPLE SIZE: Retrospective sample: 40 Prospective sample: 20SAMPLING TECHNIQUE: Purposive samplingINCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients referred to the radiology department for MRI abdomen are included in the study.EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Any abnormality in the 2nd or 3rd parts of the duodenum in other MRI sequences. Presence of annular pancreas.DATA COLLECTION: Retrospective evaluation: Anonymized images will be utilized for the retrospective part of the study. These images will be anonymized condentially by a person or group appointed by the Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) chairman. The anonymized images will then be provided to the principal investigator by the IEC member secretary for analysis.Prospective Evaluation: Before undergoing MRCP, patients will be asked if they are willing to contribute data from their MRCP for the study. Consent will be obtained in the participant's mother tongue, both in written form and through oral explanation. Following this, patients will undergo their intended procedure, and the data from the images will be used for evaluation.DATA ANALYSIS:Data will be entered into Excel sheet and analyzed using statistical software. Descriptive statistics will summarize demographics and baseline characteristics. Chi-square tests for categorical variables and independent t-tests for continuous variables were used. A p-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically signicant. Variants of the pancreaticobiliary junction were recorded and analysed.RESULTS:Table 1: Prevalence of Pancreatic Duct joining Bile Duct Junction P-B type.Table 2: Prevalence of Bile Duct joining Pancreatic duct B-P type.Table 3: Prevalence of V/ separate Opening.Table 4: Measurement Variability of Common Channel (CC) Distances.DISCUSSION: The purpose of our study was to investigate the anatomical variations in the pancreaticobiliary junction within a South Indian population using Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). This research aimed to document the prevalence of these variations and analyze their clinical implications, particularly in the context of
INDIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH
1
Volume - 14 | Issue - 11 | November - 2024 | . PRINT ISSN No2249 - 555X | DOI : 10.36106/ijar
Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is an advanced, non-invasive imaging modality that plays a crucial role in the diagnostic evaluation of pancreaticobiliary diseases. This technique leverages magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to visualise the biliary and pancreatic ducts, providing high-contrast images essential for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning. A hospital-based observational study was conducted in a tertiary care centre with a 1.5T MRI, a sample size of 60 cases Methodology:referred for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and normal anatomical variants of pancreaticobiliary junction were accessed and categorised either as B-P type, P-B type or V/separate opening. Results: 28.3% of participants exhibited the pancreatic type junction in the bile duct, while 40.0% showed the pancreatic duct-bile duct junction variant. Additionally, 31.7% presented the V-type junction. The Conclusion:ndings of our study have signicant implications for the eld of pancreaticobiliary research and clinical practice. By documenting the prevalence and types of pancreaticobiliary junction variants, our study supports the development of tailored surgical and diagnostic approaches that consider regional and demographic differences. This tailored approach can lead to safer surgical procedures, more accurate diagnoses, and better overall patient outcomes. Our study not only corroborates existing ndings but also enhances the understanding of pancreaticobiliary junction variants, paving the way for improved clinical practices and patient care in diverse populations. The detailed insights from our study contribute to the ongoing efforts to optimize diagnostic and surgical techniques, ultimately aiming to enhance patient safety and outcomes in the eld of pancreaticobiliary diseases.ABSTRACTKEYWORDS : MRCP, MRI, Anatomical variation.
Dr. Armel Arputha Sivarajan*
Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Puducherry, 605102*Corresponding Author
Dr. Mohammed Ansari Gaffoor
Associate Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Puducherry, 605102
Pancreatic duct joining bile duct P-B type
Frequency (n)
Percentage (%)
Absent
43
71.7
Present
17
28.3
Total
60
100.0
Bile Duct joining Pancreatic Type B-P type
Percentage (%)
Absent
60.0
Present
40.0
Total
100.0
V/ Separate opening
Frequency (n)
Percentage (%)
Absent
41
68.3
Present
19
31.7
Total
60
100.0
Variable
Mean
Standard Deviation
CC (in mm)
4.905
3.9682
2
INDIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH
surgical planning and diagnostic accuracy. By employing both retrospective and prospective study designs, we sought to provide a comprehensive overview of these anatomical features and their relevance to clinical practice.Our study revealed that a signicant portion of the population exhibited variations in the pancreaticobiliary junction. Specically, we found:AGE DISTRIBUTION: 51.7% of participants were aged 45 years or younger, 26.7% were aged 46-60, and 21.7% were aged 61 or older.GENDER DISTRIBUTION: The study had a nearly balanced gender distribution with 51.7% males and 48.3% females.PREVALENCE OF VARIANTS: 28.3% of participants exhibited the pancreatic type junction in the bile duct, while 40.0% showed the pancreatic duct-bile duct junction variant. Additionally, 31.7% presented the V-type junction.CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The study highlighted the variability in C-C distances and the associations between these anatomical variants and demographic factors like age and gender.In our study, the demographic prole of participants included a relatively younger cohort, with 51.7% aged 45 years or younger, 26.7% aged 46-60 years, and 21.7% aged 61 years or older. The gender distribution was nearly balanced, with 51.7% males and 48.3% females. This comprehensive demographic breakdown contrasts with many reviewed studies that lacked detailed demographic data. For instance, studies by Ze-li Yu (2004), T. Kamisawa (2006), Y. Tang (2001), and K. Uchiyama (1998) focused on anatomical ndings and diagnostic accuracy without specifying age or gender distributions. Some studies, such as those by R. Bülow (2014) and Hong-Ja Kim (2002), included broader population samples but still did not provide specic demographic breakdowns, though Hong-Ja Kim's study noted a higher frequency of duct anomalies in patients over 40 years of age. – This broader age range is somewhat comparable to our study's demographic but without the granular detail we provided.The similarities between our study and the existing literature include the inclusion of broad age ranges and a balanced gender distribution reective of the general clinical population. However, our study's detailed demographic data offers a unique perspective, particularly focused on a South Indian population, whereas the reviewed studies varied widely in geographic and ethnic focus, including Korean, Japanese, and Chinese populations. These differences in demographic details could inuence the observed prevalence and types of pancreaticobiliary variants. For example, the relatively younger cohort in our study might impact the prevalence rates compared to studies noting higher anomaly frequencies in older populations. Moreover, our balanced gender distribution ensures broad applicability and avoids gender bias, which is crucial for generalizing the clinical relevance of the anatomical variants identied.In our study, Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) was the primary diagnostic technique used to identify anatomical variations in the pancreaticobiliary junction. MRCP was chosen for its non-invasive nature and its ability to provide detailed images of the biliary and pancreatic ducts. The retrospective evaluation involved anonymized MRCP images, while the prospective evaluation included MRCP scans performed with patient consent, ensuring comprehensive and accurate data collection.Many of the reviewed studies also employed MRCP as a key diagnostic tool, often comparing its accuracy and effectiveness to Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).CONCLUSION:The ndings of our study have signicant implications for the eld of pancreaticobiliary research and clinical practice. By documenting the prevalence and types of pancreaticobiliary junction variants, our study supports the development of tailored surgical and diagnostic approaches that consider regional and demographic differences. This tailored approach can lead to safer surgical procedures, more accurate diagnoses, and better overall patient outcomes.Our study not only corroborates existing ndings but also enhances the understanding of pancreaticobiliary junction variants, paving the way for improved clinical practices and patient care in diverse populations. The detailed insights from our study contribute to the ongoing efforts to optimize diagnostic and surgical techniques, ultimately aiming to enhance patient safety and outcomes in the eld of pancreaticobiliary diseases.CLINICAL IMAGES:Image 1: MRCP coronal image showing the bile duct joining the pancreatic duct (B-P type)Image 2: MRCP coronal image shows the separate opening of the bile duct and the pancreatic duct (V/separate opening)Image 3: MRCP coronal image shows the pancreatic duct joining the bile duct (P-B type).REFERENCES:1. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: the ABC of MRCP - PMC [Internet]. [cited 2024 May 7]. Avail able from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3292642/2. Halefoglu AM. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: A useful tool in the evaluation of pancreatic and biliary disorders. World J Gastroenterol WJG. 2007 May 14;13(18):2529–34. 3. Lomanto D, Pavone P, Laghi A, Panebianco V, Mazzocchi P, Fiocca F, et al. Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases. Am J Surg. 1997 Jul;174(1):33–8. 4. Role of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in the Evaluation of Biliary D is e as e - PM C [I nt er ne t ]. [c it ed 2 02 4 M ay 7 ]. A va il ab l e f ro m: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3074788/5. ERCP and EUS: A Case-Based Approach | SpringerLink [Internet]. [cited 2024 May 7]. Available from: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4939-2320-56. Staubli SM, Maloca P, Kuemmerli C, Kunz J, Dirnberger AS, Allemann A, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography enhanced by virtual reality as a novel tool to improve the understanding of biliary anatomy and the teaching of surgical trainees. Front Surg. 2022 Aug 12;9:916443. 7. Arcement CM, Meza MP, Arumanla S, Towbin R. MRCP in the evaluation of pancreaticobiliary disease in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2001; 8. Ling-bo L. The Sdudy of MRCP in Normal Pancreaticobiliary Duct System. J Pract Med Tech. 2007; 9. Menon K, Barkun A, Romagnuolo J, Friedman G, Mehta S, Reinhold C, et al. Patient satisfaction after MRCP and ERCP. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001; 10. Bülow R, Simon P, Thiel R, Thamm P, Messner P, Lerch M, et al. Anatomic variants of the pancreatic duct and their clinical relevance: an MR-guided study in the general population. Eur Radiol. 2014;
Volume - 14 | Issue - 11 | November - 2024 | . PRINT ISSN No2249 - 555X | DOI : 10.36106/ijar
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Objective The novel picture archiving and communication system (PACS), compatible with virtual reality (VR) software, displays cross-sectional images in VR. VR magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) was tested to improve the anatomical understanding and intraoperative performance of minimally invasive cholecystectomy (CHE) in surgical trainees. Design We used an immersive VR environment to display volumetric MRCP data (Specto VR TM ). First, we evaluated the tolerability and comprehensibility of anatomy with a validated simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ) and examined anatomical landmarks. Second, we compared conventional MRCP and VR MRCP by matching three-dimensional (3D) printed models and identifying and measuring common bile duct stones (CBDS) using VR MRCP. Third, surgical trainees prepared for CHE with either conventional MRCP or VR MRCP, and we measured perioperative parameters and surgical performance (validated GOALS score). Setting The study was conducted out at Clarunis, University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease, Basel, Switzerland. Participants For the first and second study step, doctors from all specialties and years of experience could participate. In the third study step, exclusively surgical trainees were included. Of 74 participating clinicians, 34, 27, and 13 contributed data to the first, second, and third study phases, respectively. Results All participants determined the relevant biliary structures with VR MRCP. The median SSQ score was 0.75 (IQR: 0, 3.5), indicating good tolerability. Participants selected the corresponding 3D printed model faster and more reliably when previously studying VR MRCP compared to conventional MRCP: We obtained a median of 90 s (IQR: 55, 150) and 72.7% correct answers with VR MRCP versus 150 s (IQR: 100, 208) and 49.6% correct answers with conventional MRCP, respectively ( p < 0.001). CBDS was correctly identified in 90.5% of VR MRCP cases. The median GOALS score was higher after preparation with VR MRCP than with conventional MRCP for CHE: 16 (IQR: 13, 22) and 11 (IQR: 11, 18), respectively ( p = 0.27). Conclusions VR MRCP allows for a faster, more accurate understanding of displayed anatomy than conventional MRCP and potentially leads to improved surgical performance in CHE in surgical trainees.
Article
Objectives To investigate the frequency of pancreatic duct (PD) variants and their effect on pancreatic exocrine function in a population-based study using non-invasive secretin-stimulated magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (sMRCP). Methods Nine hundred and ninety-five volunteers, 457 women and 538 men, aged 51.9 ± 13.4 years, underwent navigator-triggered, T2-weighted, 3D turbo spin echo MRCP on a 1.5 T system after 1 unit/kg secretin administration. Two readers evaluated images for PD variants. Pancreatic exocrine function and morphological signs of chronic pancreatitis such as abnormalities of the main PD, side branch dilatation, and pancreatic cysts were evaluated and related to PD variants using a Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc analysis. Results Of all sMRCP, 93.2 % were of diagnostic quality. Interobserver reliability for detection of PD variants was found to be kappa 0.752 (95 %CI, 0.733 – 0.771). Normal PD variants were observed in 90.4 % (n = 838/927). Variants of pancreas divisum was identified in 9.6 % (n = 89/927). Abnormalities of the main PD, side branch dilatation, and pancreatic cysts were observed in 2.4 %, 16.6 %, and 27.7 %, respectively, and were not significantly different between pancreas divisum and non-divisum group (P = 0.122; P = 0.152; P = 0.741). There was no association between PD variants and pancreatic exocrine function (P = 0.367). Conclusion PD variants including pancreas divisum are not associated with morphological signs of chronic pancreatitis or restriction of pancreatic exocrine function. Key Points • MRCP allows the evaluation of pancreatic duct variants and morphological change. • Pancreatic duct variants are not associated with morphological signs of chronic pancreatitis. • Pancreas divisum is not accompanied by restriction of pancreatic exocrine function. • Pancreatic duct variants including pancreas divisum are limited in their clinical relevance.
Article
OBJECTIVE:Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is an accurate diagnostic test for detecting abnormalities of the pancreaticobiliary system. Because it is noninvasive, MRCP appears to be more tolerable than ERCP, although this has not been studied. The purpose of this study is to compare patient satisfaction after MRCP and ERCP performed sequentially.METHODS:We prospectively recruited 34 patients undergoing ERCP, for whom an MRCP was able to be performed before ERCP. Patient satisfaction was assessed by validated questionnaires using seven-point Likhert scales (individual ratings and direct comparisons). The following dimensions were explored: anxiety, pain, discomfort, tolerability (relative to expectations), willingness to repeat the procedure, and overall preference. χ2 and Student’s t tests (paired and unpaired) were performed, and 95% CIs were provided.RESULTS:Two patients (5.9%) were unable to undergo MRCP because of claustrophobia. The remaining 32 completed both tests (94% same day) and all questionnaires. Average age was 56 ± 18 yr, and 66% were women. In 23 patients, some degree of biliary obstruction was suspected; nine patients had pancreatitis. Patients reported a lower degree of pain (p < 0.001) and discomfort (p = 0.047) with MRCP, but MRCP was more difficult than they expected (p = 0.012). Patients were marginally more willing to repeat MRCP (ns,p = 0.09). On direct comparisons, patients were more satisfied with MRCP regarding anxiety (p = 0.04) and pain (p = 0.001). Patients displayed a higher overall preference for MRCP compared with ERCP (p = 0.01); however, only 59% clearly preferred MRCP over ERCP. The most common problem with MRCP was claustrophobia or noise (n = 15), and the differences were more striking in the subgroup without this problem. The subgroup undergoing purely diagnostic ERCPs showed clear preferences for MRCP.CONCLUSIONS:In many respects, MRCP is well tolerated, and certain subgroups, especially those undergoing diagnostic ERCPs, prefer MRCP over ERCP. As an endoscopist, one needs to be aware of the limitations of MRCP and relay these to the patient, as it seems that patients find MRCP more difficult than anticipated, and a significant number still prefer ERCP over MRCP. Patient satisfaction may be further improved by reducing noise and claustrophobia with selective premedication, earplugs, and the use of the new quieter fenestrated magnetic resonance imaging scanners.
Article
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a new, noninvasive imaging technique for the visualization of the biliary ducts with cholangiographic images similar to those obtained with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. No contrast medium injection is used. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of MRCP versus ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary tract and pancreatic diseases. One hundred and thirty-six patients were submitted to MRCP. They were referred to MR study according to four inclusion criteria: (1) evidence or suspicion of choledocholithiasis, (2) benign or malignant bile ducts stenosis, (3) follow-up of patients submitted to biliary-enteric anastomosis, and (4) chronic pancreatitis with Wirsung duct dilatation. The MRCP was performed with a 0.5T superconducting magnet (Philips Gyroscan T5). When neoplastic disease was detected, additional images on axial planes were acquired. MRCP allowed images of diagnostic value to be obtained in all the cases. In choledocholithiasis, MRCP showed 91.6% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and overall diagnostic accuracy 96.8%. Of 48 patients with stenotic lesions, 16 were correctly characterized as benign and 30 as malignant. Two cases of focal chronic pancreatitis were misdiagnosed as pancreatic head carcinoma. In the patients submitted to biliary-enteric anastomosis, MCRP was able to detect the dilatation of the intrahepatic ducts, the stenosis, and associated stones in all 8 positive cases. In the remaining 7 patients with mild signs of cholangitis, MCRP showed irregular aspects of the biliary tree in the main ducts. In the 11 patients with chronic pancreatitis, MCRP was able to depict the dilated Wirsung duct and the stenotic tract, although the fine details of the secondary ducts were not evaluated due to the low spatial resolution as compared with conventional films. MRCP can be considered a technique able to completely replace diagnostic ERCP. Further studies are necessary for a better evaluation of the potential advantages and disadvantages of this technique.
Article
Radiologic assessment of pancreaticobiliary ductal disease (PBDD) in children currently consists of physiologic tests (radionuclide examinations) or invasive anatomic studies (ERCP and PTC). An accurate noninvasive and reproducible examination that can direct the subsequent need for more invasive studies would be helpful in this patient group. To determine the effectiveness of MRCP as a screening tool for PBBD in the pediatric population. Over the last year, 33 patients ranging from 7 months to 20 years of age were prospectively evaluated with MRCP on a 1.5 T magnet. One patient was examined twice, several months apart. Thirteen patients had liver transplants. Coronal SPGR and heavily T-2W FSE cross-sectional images were obtained. Standard and oblique 2- to 6-cm-thick slab SSFSE (single-shot fast spin echo) acquisition and 3D MIP reconstruction of 2D FSE images were obtained in the planes of the CBD and pancreatic duct. Nine studies were performed with the patient under sedation with chloral hydrate or nembutal and fentanyl with quiet respiration, and the non-sedated patients were assessed with single breath hold or quiet respiration. Three patients received secretin. MRCP results were correlated with ERCP (9), PTC (7), liver biopsy (13), clinical information (6), surgery (3), and autopsy (2). All 34 studies performed were considered diagnostic. Periportal fluid, proximal bowel fluid, and gallbladder distention did not significantly diminish the diagnostic information in any cases. Motion artifact did not cause serious degradation in image quality. MRCP depicted abnormalities including stones, stricture, intraductal tumor, and extrinsic compression, all of which were confirmed at ERCP, PTC ( two unsuccessful in patients with non-dilated ducts by MRCP), surgery, liver biopsy, and autopsy. There were no false-negative examinations. Normal pancreatic studies performed to exclude pancreas divisum were followed without additional clinical or laboratory evidence of pancreatitis. Secretin administration increased the conspicuity of the pancreatic duct in two of three patients. MRCP is a fast non-invasive method of evaluating the pancreatic duct and biliary tree in children. A normal MRCP may obviate the need for PTC or ERCP. Abnormalities detected on MRCP can direct the type of intervention.
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: A useful tool in the evaluation of pancreatic and biliary disorders
resonance cholangiopancreatography: the ABC of MRCP -PMC [Internet]. m : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3292642/ 2. Halefoglu AM. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: A useful tool in the evaluation of pancreatic and biliary disorders. World J Gastroenterol WJG. 2007 May 14;13(18):2529-34.
The Sdudy of MRCP in Normal Pancreaticobiliary Duct System
  • Ling-Bo L
Ling-bo L. The Sdudy of MRCP in Normal Pancreaticobiliary Duct System. J Pract Med Tech. 2007;