Content uploaded by Mohammed Ansari Gaffoor
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Mohammed Ansari Gaffoor on Nov 30, 2024
Content may be subject to copyright.
AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF NORMAL VARIANTS OF PANCREATICOBILIARY JUNCTION USING MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY IN THE SOUTH INDIAN POPULATION
Dr. Aktshaya.S
Final year resident, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Puducherry, 605102
Original Research PaperRadio-Diagnosis1. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To identify and document the anatomical variations in the pancreatic and biliary ducts using Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). To determine the incidence of each identied anatomical variant in the study population. METHODOLOGY: STUDY DESIGN: Hospital-based observational studySTUDY AREA: Department of Radio-diagnosis, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre (SVMCH&RC), a tertiary care teaching hospital located in Ariyur, Pondicherry.TIME FRAME: Retrospective Study: February 2020 to March 2022 Prospective Study: April 2022 to October 2023. Study Population: South Indian populationSAMPLE SIZE: Retrospective sample: 40 Prospective sample: 20SAMPLING TECHNIQUE: Purposive samplingINCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients referred to the radiology department for MRI abdomen are included in the study.EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Any abnormality in the 2nd or 3rd parts of the duodenum in other MRI sequences. Presence of annular pancreas.DATA COLLECTION: Retrospective evaluation: Anonymized images will be utilized for the retrospective part of the study. These images will be anonymized condentially by a person or group appointed by the Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) chairman. The anonymized images will then be provided to the principal investigator by the IEC member secretary for analysis.Prospective Evaluation: Before undergoing MRCP, patients will be asked if they are willing to contribute data from their MRCP for the study. Consent will be obtained in the participant's mother tongue, both in written form and through oral explanation. Following this, patients will undergo their intended procedure, and the data from the images will be used for evaluation.DATA ANALYSIS:Data will be entered into Excel sheet and analyzed using statistical software. Descriptive statistics will summarize demographics and baseline characteristics. Chi-square tests for categorical variables and independent t-tests for continuous variables were used. A p-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically signicant. Variants of the pancreaticobiliary junction were recorded and analysed.RESULTS:Table 1: Prevalence of Pancreatic Duct joining Bile Duct Junction P-B type.Table 2: Prevalence of Bile Duct joining Pancreatic duct B-P type.Table 3: Prevalence of V/ separate Opening.Table 4: Measurement Variability of Common Channel (CC) Distances.DISCUSSION: The purpose of our study was to investigate the anatomical variations in the pancreaticobiliary junction within a South Indian population using Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). This research aimed to document the prevalence of these variations and analyze their clinical implications, particularly in the context of
INDIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH
1
Volume - 14 | Issue - 11 | November - 2024 | . PRINT ISSN No2249 - 555X | DOI : 10.36106/ijar
Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is an advanced, non-invasive imaging modality that plays a crucial role in the diagnostic evaluation of pancreaticobiliary diseases. This technique leverages magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to visualise the biliary and pancreatic ducts, providing high-contrast images essential for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning. A hospital-based observational study was conducted in a tertiary care centre with a 1.5T MRI, a sample size of 60 cases Methodology:referred for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and normal anatomical variants of pancreaticobiliary junction were accessed and categorised either as B-P type, P-B type or V/separate opening. Results: 28.3% of participants exhibited the pancreatic type junction in the bile duct, while 40.0% showed the pancreatic duct-bile duct junction variant. Additionally, 31.7% presented the V-type junction. The Conclusion:ndings of our study have signicant implications for the eld of pancreaticobiliary research and clinical practice. By documenting the prevalence and types of pancreaticobiliary junction variants, our study supports the development of tailored surgical and diagnostic approaches that consider regional and demographic differences. This tailored approach can lead to safer surgical procedures, more accurate diagnoses, and better overall patient outcomes. Our study not only corroborates existing ndings but also enhances the understanding of pancreaticobiliary junction variants, paving the way for improved clinical practices and patient care in diverse populations. The detailed insights from our study contribute to the ongoing efforts to optimize diagnostic and surgical techniques, ultimately aiming to enhance patient safety and outcomes in the eld of pancreaticobiliary diseases.ABSTRACTKEYWORDS : MRCP, MRI, Anatomical variation.
Dr. Armel Arputha Sivarajan*
Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Puducherry, 605102*Corresponding Author
Dr. Mohammed Ansari Gaffoor
Associate Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Puducherry, 605102
Pancreatic duct joining bile duct P-B type
Frequency (n)
Percentage (%)
Absent
43
71.7
Present
17
28.3
Total
60
100.0
Bile Duct joining Pancreatic Type B-P type
Frequency (n)
Percentage (%)
Absent
36
60.0
Present
24
40.0
Total
60
100.0
V/ Separate opening
Frequency (n)
Percentage (%)
Absent
41
68.3
Present
19
31.7
Total
60
100.0
Variable
Mean
Standard Deviation
CC (in mm)
4.905
3.9682
2
INDIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH
surgical planning and diagnostic accuracy. By employing both retrospective and prospective study designs, we sought to provide a comprehensive overview of these anatomical features and their relevance to clinical practice.Our study revealed that a signicant portion of the population exhibited variations in the pancreaticobiliary junction. Specically, we found:AGE DISTRIBUTION: 51.7% of participants were aged 45 years or younger, 26.7% were aged 46-60, and 21.7% were aged 61 or older.GENDER DISTRIBUTION: The study had a nearly balanced gender distribution with 51.7% males and 48.3% females.PREVALENCE OF VARIANTS: 28.3% of participants exhibited the pancreatic type junction in the bile duct, while 40.0% showed the pancreatic duct-bile duct junction variant. Additionally, 31.7% presented the V-type junction.CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The study highlighted the variability in C-C distances and the associations between these anatomical variants and demographic factors like age and gender.In our study, the demographic prole of participants included a relatively younger cohort, with 51.7% aged 45 years or younger, 26.7% aged 46-60 years, and 21.7% aged 61 years or older. The gender distribution was nearly balanced, with 51.7% males and 48.3% females. This comprehensive demographic breakdown contrasts with many reviewed studies that lacked detailed demographic data. For instance, studies by Ze-li Yu (2004), T. Kamisawa (2006), Y. Tang (2001), and K. Uchiyama (1998) focused on anatomical ndings and diagnostic accuracy without specifying age or gender distributions. Some studies, such as those by R. Bülow (2014) and Hong-Ja Kim (2002), included broader population samples but still did not provide specic demographic breakdowns, though Hong-Ja Kim's study noted a higher frequency of duct anomalies in patients over 40 years of age. – This broader age range is somewhat comparable to our study's demographic but without the granular detail we provided.The similarities between our study and the existing literature include the inclusion of broad age ranges and a balanced gender distribution reective of the general clinical population. However, our study's detailed demographic data offers a unique perspective, particularly focused on a South Indian population, whereas the reviewed studies varied widely in geographic and ethnic focus, including Korean, Japanese, and Chinese populations. These differences in demographic details could inuence the observed prevalence and types of pancreaticobiliary variants. For example, the relatively younger cohort in our study might impact the prevalence rates compared to studies noting higher anomaly frequencies in older populations. Moreover, our balanced gender distribution ensures broad applicability and avoids gender bias, which is crucial for generalizing the clinical relevance of the anatomical variants identied.In our study, Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) was the primary diagnostic technique used to identify anatomical variations in the pancreaticobiliary junction. MRCP was chosen for its non-invasive nature and its ability to provide detailed images of the biliary and pancreatic ducts. The retrospective evaluation involved anonymized MRCP images, while the prospective evaluation included MRCP scans performed with patient consent, ensuring comprehensive and accurate data collection.Many of the reviewed studies also employed MRCP as a key diagnostic tool, often comparing its accuracy and effectiveness to Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).CONCLUSION:The ndings of our study have signicant implications for the eld of pancreaticobiliary research and clinical practice. By documenting the prevalence and types of pancreaticobiliary junction variants, our study supports the development of tailored surgical and diagnostic approaches that consider regional and demographic differences. This tailored approach can lead to safer surgical procedures, more accurate diagnoses, and better overall patient outcomes.Our study not only corroborates existing ndings but also enhances the understanding of pancreaticobiliary junction variants, paving the way for improved clinical practices and patient care in diverse populations. The detailed insights from our study contribute to the ongoing efforts to optimize diagnostic and surgical techniques, ultimately aiming to enhance patient safety and outcomes in the eld of pancreaticobiliary diseases.CLINICAL IMAGES:Image 1: MRCP coronal image showing the bile duct joining the pancreatic duct (B-P type)Image 2: MRCP coronal image shows the separate opening of the bile duct and the pancreatic duct (V/separate opening)Image 3: MRCP coronal image shows the pancreatic duct joining the bile duct (P-B type).REFERENCES:1. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: the ABC of MRCP - PMC [Internet]. [cited 2024 May 7]. Avail able from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3292642/2. Halefoglu AM. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: A useful tool in the evaluation of pancreatic and biliary disorders. World J Gastroenterol WJG. 2007 May 14;13(18):2529–34. 3. Lomanto D, Pavone P, Laghi A, Panebianco V, Mazzocchi P, Fiocca F, et al. Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases. Am J Surg. 1997 Jul;174(1):33–8. 4. Role of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in the Evaluation of Biliary D is e as e - PM C [I nt er ne t ]. [c it ed 2 02 4 M ay 7 ]. A va il ab l e f ro m: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3074788/5. ERCP and EUS: A Case-Based Approach | SpringerLink [Internet]. [cited 2024 May 7]. Available from: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4939-2320-56. Staubli SM, Maloca P, Kuemmerli C, Kunz J, Dirnberger AS, Allemann A, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography enhanced by virtual reality as a novel tool to improve the understanding of biliary anatomy and the teaching of surgical trainees. Front Surg. 2022 Aug 12;9:916443. 7. Arcement CM, Meza MP, Arumanla S, Towbin R. MRCP in the evaluation of pancreaticobiliary disease in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2001; 8. Ling-bo L. The Sdudy of MRCP in Normal Pancreaticobiliary Duct System. J Pract Med Tech. 2007; 9. Menon K, Barkun A, Romagnuolo J, Friedman G, Mehta S, Reinhold C, et al. Patient satisfaction after MRCP and ERCP. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001; 10. Bülow R, Simon P, Thiel R, Thamm P, Messner P, Lerch M, et al. Anatomic variants of the pancreatic duct and their clinical relevance: an MR-guided study in the general population. Eur Radiol. 2014;
Volume - 14 | Issue - 11 | November - 2024 | . PRINT ISSN No2249 - 555X | DOI : 10.36106/ijar