ArticlePublisher preview available

Declining Marriage Rates and The Collapse of Household Savings 1980–2014

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract and Figures

The aggregate household saving rate has declined in many nations since the 1980s, partly due to increased borrowing. To explain this puzzling trend, previous scholarship has focused on precarity, welfare state retrenchment, and financial development. Building on research describing marriage’s significance in shaping the capacity and the motivation to accumulate assets, my main contribution in this paper is to theorize that the retreat from this institution was another factor behind the dwindling of aggregate household savings. I also empirically explore this hypothesis using country-year macro data from 19 OECD countries between 1980 and 2014. After controlling for several of the major factors previous research shows contribute to the decline of savings, including interest rates and asset price growth, I find additional effects of declining marriage rates. I estimate that this factor explains between 14 and 32% of the fall in household savings. My argument and results do not suggest promoting marriage to bolster savings. Instead, they invite research on the precautionary strategies of unmarried people, how they may disrupt the role of private savings in contemporary economies, and how policies can adapt to support savings among diverse families. Importantly, this paper also calls for attention to the macroeconomic implications of family change, which remain understudied owing to the enduring traction of the “hostile worlds” view of the economy and intimacy.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42650-024-00086-0
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Declining Marriage Rates andThe Collapse ofHousehold
Savings 1980–2014
MaudePugliese1
Received: 10 May 2024 / Accepted: 30 October 2024
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024
Abstract
The aggregate household saving rate has declined in many nations since the 1980s,
partly due to increased borrowing. To explain this puzzling trend, previous schol-
arship has focused on precarity, welfare state retrenchment, and financial develop-
ment. Building on research describing marriage’s significance in shaping the capac-
ity and the motivation to accumulate assets, my main contribution in this paper is to
theorize that the retreat from this institution was another factor behind the dwindling
of aggregate household savings. I also empirically explore this hypothesis using
country-year macro data from 19 OECD countries between 1980 and 2014. After
controlling for several of the major factors previous research shows contribute to
the decline of savings, including interest rates and asset price growth, I find addi-
tional effects of declining marriage rates. I estimate that this factorexplains between
14 and 32% of the fall in household savings. My argument and results do not sug-
gest promoting marriage to bolster savings. Instead, they invite research on the pre-
cautionary strategies of unmarried people, how they may disrupt the role of private
savings in contemporary economies, and how policies can adapt to support savings
among diverse families. Importantly, this paper also calls for attention to the macro-
economic implications of family change, which remain understudied owing to the
enduring traction of the “hostile worlds” view of the economy and intimacy.
Keywords Marriage decline· Net household saving rate· Singlehood· Cohabitation
Résumé
Depuis les années 1980, le taux global d’épargne des ménages a diminué en Amé-
rique du Nord ainsi qu’au sein de plusieurs nations européennes, notamment en
raison de l’augmentation des emprunts. Pour expliquer cette tendance surprenante,
plusieurs travaux académiques antérieurs se sont intéressés à la précarité, à la réduc-
tion des dépenses sociales et au développement de la finance. En m’appuyant sur
les recherches analysant le rôle du mariage sur l’accumulation d’actifs, la principale
* Maude Pugliese
maude.pugliese@inrs.ca
1 Institut national de la recherche scientifique, Montreal, Canada
Canadian Studies in Population (2024) 51:8
/ Published online: 26 November 2024
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
In this study we explore gender differences in saving behaviors among low- to moderate-income households using data collected online from a national sample of low- to moderate-income households (NC1172) and data on similar income single households from the 2010 Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF). Results show that saving behaviors differ by gender. With the NC1172 sample, we find gender differences in the effects of high-risk tolerance and being non-White on the likelihood of being a saver. In the SCF, the presence of other household members affects savings differently for women and men. Educators and counselors can encourage savings among men and women in low- to moderate- income households as a way to reduce financial risk and ensure financial security.
Article
Full-text available
Objective To examine the effect of marriage entry on annual net rather than gross earnings across different institutional settings. Background Previous research focused on men's gross wage marital premium to explore whether selection or specialization explains premiums. However, gross wages do not reflect disposable resources because taxes still have to be deducted. As the tax treatment varies across countries and by marital status, it is also relevant to consider such aspects. Method We use panel data from the United States (PSID), Germany (SOEP), and the United Kingdom (UKHLS) to examine annual male net earnings changes over marriage entry using fixed effect models with individual slopes. The models enable us to assess marriage‐related net earnings while adjusting for heterogeneous age slopes before marriage in addition to any time‐constant heterogeneity. Our sample contains 3244 US men, 4581 German men, and 7140 British men. Results Our results reveal a male marital net earnings premium only in Germany—a country with sizeable institutional marriage privileges. We go on to show heterogeneity in marriage effects by cohort, partner's education, and children. Results highlight that men from earlier cohorts and those married to partners with low education tend to benefit more. Conclusion Results add novel insights to our understanding of marital premiums and highlight the relevance of tax policy contexts as an institutional driver underlying marital premiums.
Article
Full-text available
Recent research suggests that separations may shape inequalities (especially gender-based) in resources available at retirement. We contribute to this literature by exploring, for the first time, the impact of separation on contributions to tax-favored retirement accounts. Those accounts are not only a key savings vehicle, but also one of the main channels for benefiting from state funding of old age security in several jurisdictions. We focus on the Canadian context and on savings in Registered Retirement Savings Plans (RRSP). Furthermore, although the growth of cohabitation is changing couples’ internal economic organization and potentially weakening the impacts of separation, most previous works have focussed solely on the consequences of marriage breakdown for retirement resources. We address this limitation by comparing post-separation changes in tax-favored savings across union types for men and women. Our data are from the Canadian GSS-T1FF, a source linking survey data on family histories with administrative tax data covering the 1986–2013 period. We find that annual RRSP contributions decline after union breakdown for married men and women, and only mixed evidence that those declines are weaker among cohabitors. Our results help clarify the mechanisms whereby union dissolutions affect older age financial well-being. They also show that those life events impact not just private savings, but also the ability to take advantage of public funding for retirement.
Article
Full-text available
This article underscores the importance of recognizing the diversity and intricacy of singlehood and transcending a simplistic view of singles as a monolithic group. By adopting an intersectional approach, researchers can obtain a deeper understanding of singles' experiences and identify their unique needs. Moreover, this understanding has profound implications for social justice endeavors, as singles may encounter compounded discrimination and necessitate deliberate communities and social policies that support them. Specifically, we advance here a four‐fold argument. First, singlehood should not only be viewed as a demographic characteristic but also as a chosen status and identity. In turn, researchers must acknowledge divisions such as race, gender, class, and sexuality within this overarching category. Third, intersectionality must be analyzed in its compound and intricate effects, as singlehood intertwines with other categories in distinct ways. Fourth, this carries far‐reaching implications, and intersectionality can serve as a critical praxis that informs social justice initiatives.
Article
Full-text available
A generous welfare state decommodifies social relations and frees citizens from relying excessively on markets. We argue that decommodification is associated with population health in two ways: directly, as it provides better social protection to households and indirectly, as it mitigates health-damaging labour market polarization and reduces the incidence of labour market risks. Using time-series cross-sectional quantitative analysis for 21 OECD countries from 1971 to 2010, we observe a negative relationship between decommodification and the age-standardized death rate. We then analyze three correlates of decommodification—income redistribution, labour market polarization and the reduction of labour market risk incidence—and find that only the latter two are associated with population health. Higher labour market polarization, measured by the share of market income allocated to the richest decile relative to the share of the poorest decile, is associated with a higher death rate. A new measure of risk reduction, the degree to which the welfare state reduces the prevalence of large income losses, is also associated with lower death rates, especially for men. Welfare state decommodification thus contributes to population health directly, and indirectly, via the attenuation of labour market polarization and the mitigation of labour market risks.
Book
In Unbending Gender, Joan Williams takes a hard look at the state of feminism in America. Concerned by what she finds—young women who flatly refuse to identify themselves as feminists and working-class and minority women who feel the movement hasn’t addressed the issues that dominate their daily lives—she outlines a new vision of feminism that calls for workplaces focused on the needs of families and, in divorce cases, recognition of the value of family work and its impact on women’s earning power. Williams notes that good jobs in America are designed for the ideal employee, who works full-time and often overtime, with no career interruptions. Even today, most American mothers do not meet this ideal: a majority do not work full-time, and only a small fraction work overtime. Williams points out that women will never achieve equality until mothers do: she argues that employers need to implement parent-supportive policies—or face liability for sex discrimination. She also maintains that ideal-worker fathers are supported by a flow of family work from mothers, yet divorce courts treat the family wage as owned solely by the ideal worker. The result is the impoverishment of women and children, who comprise the bulk of the poor in the United States. Unbending Gender questions the idea that women simply choose between staying at home with their children or going to work. Given the limited options that contemporary American culture allows them, mothers are forced to make compromises. Joan Williams’ solution is an inclusive, family-friendly feminism that supports both mothers and fathers as caregivers and as workers.
Article
From the couples‐centered perspective that has dominated public discourse and scholarly literature, the values and interests of coupled people are the implicit standard against which single people are judged, resulting in deficit narratives of single life. From that perspective, single people are “alone” and “unattached,” the important people in their lives are mere substitutes for a romantic partner, and their families, if recognized at all, are described as “alternative” family forms. From a singles‐centered perspective, single life can be a psychologically rich life of freedom and autonomy, where people can chart their own life course, and value “The Ones” rather than “The One.” Solitude can be savored rather than feared, and family, intimacy, and love encompass far more than just nuclear family, sexual intimacy, and romantic love. A singles‐centered perspective recognizes systems of inequality that disadvantage single people and privilege coupled people.
Book
Drawing from stratification economics, intersectionality, and respectability politics, The Love Jones Cohort centers on the voices and lifestyles of members of the Black middle class who are single and living alone (SALA). While much has been written about both the Black middle class and the rise of singlehood, this book represents a first foray into bridging these two concepts. In studying these intersections, The Love Jones Cohort provides a more nuanced understanding of how race, gender, and class, coupled with social structures, shape five central lifestyle factors of Black middle-class adults who are SALA. The book explores how these Black adults define family and friends and decide on whether and how to pursue romantic relationships, articulate the ebbs and flows of being Black and middle class, select where to live and why, accumulate and disseminate wealth, and maintain overall health, well-being, and coping mechanisms.