ArticlePDF Available

Effective Customer Relationship Marketing: Roadmap to Organization's Optimal Customer Retention

Authors:

Abstract

Customer Relationship Marketing (CRM) is a strategic approach focused on managing customer interactions to foster long-term loyalty. It aims to deliver personalized, relevant, consistent experiences across multiple channels, enhancing value for the business and its customers. As CRM is not a universal solution, its efficacy varies across organizations and is influenced by unique opportunities and challenges specific to each context. This essay critically examines the extant CRM literature to identify the key factors affecting customer retention, such as customer satisfaction, trust, and engagement. Based on this analysis, we propose a conceptual framework to guide businesses in developing CRM strategies that align with their objectives, resources, and capabilities. This framework emphasizes the importance of comprehending customer needs, leveraging data for personalization, and ensuring a seamless cross-channel experience. In conclusion, this essay proposes recommendations for future CRM research, suggesting that further investigation is necessary to address emerging trends and technologies, such as AI and big data, that are transforming the CRM landscape. Organizations can strengthen customer relationships and achieve sustainable business success by adopting a tailored approach to CRM.
Frontiers in Business and Economics 3 (2) August 2024, pp.72-86
Content lists available at SRN Intellectual Resources
Frontiers in Business and Economics
Journal homepage: https://journal.srnintellectual.com/index.php/finbe
e-ISSN: 2976-2952 @ 2024 SRN Intellectual Resources
DOI: 10.56225/finbe.v3i2.230
Original Article
Effective Customer Relationship Marketing: Roadmap to
Organization’s Optimal Customer Retention
Segun Kehinde a,*, Oladele Kehinde a, Oluwanifemi Obembe a, Busola Simon-ilogho b, Kemi Kehinde c
and Tola Kehinde d
a Faculty of Business Management, Covenant University, KM 10 Idiroko Rd, Ota 112104, Ogun State, Nigeria;
oladele.kehinde@covenantuniversity.edu.ng (K.O.); oluwanifemi.obembe9@gmail.com (O.O.)
b Faculty of Business, University of Johannesburg, CNR Kingsway and University Road, Auckland Park,
Johannesburg, South Africa; busola.kehinde@covenantuniversity.edu.ng (B.S.)
c Faculty of Languages, Anchor University, Ayobo Street, Ayobo Rd, Ipaja, Lagos, Nigeria; kkehinde@aul.edu.ng
(K.K.)
d Faculty of International Relations, Redeemers University, Akoda, Ede Rd, Ede 232101, Osun State, Nigeria;
tola.kehindepgs@stu.cu.edu.ng (T.K.)
* Correspondence: segun.kehindepgs@stu.cu.edu.ng (S.K.)
Citations: Kehinde, S., Kehinde, O., Obembe, O., Simon-ilogho, B., Kehinde, K. & Kehinde, T., (2024). Effective Customer
Relationship Marketing: Roadmap to Organization’s Optimal Customer Retention. Frontiers in Business and Economics, 3(2),
72-86.
Received: 25 December 2023
Revised: 2 July 2024
Accepted: 22 July 2024
Published: 31 August 2024
Abstract: Customer Relationship Marketing (CRM) is a strategic approach focused on managing customer interactions
to foster long-term loyalty. It aims to deliver personalized, relevant, consistent experiences across multiple channels,
enhancing value for the business and its customers. As CRM is not a universal solution, its efficacy varies across
organizations and is influenced by unique opportunities and challenges specific to each context. This essay critically
examines the extant CRM literature to identify the key factors affecting customer retention, such as customer
satisfaction, trust, and engagement. Based on this analysis, we propose a conceptual framework to guide businesses in
developing CRM strategies that align with their objectives, resources, and capabilities. This framework emphasizes the
importance of comprehending customer needs, leveraging data for personalization, and ensuring a seamless
cross-channel experience. In conclusion, this essay proposes recommendations for future CRM research, suggesting
that further investigation is necessary to address emerging trends and technologies, such as AI and big data, that are
transforming the CRM landscape. Organizations can strengthen customer relationships and achieve sustainable
business success by adopting a tailored approach to CRM.
Keywords: Customer relationship marketing, Customer retention, Optimization
Copyright: © 2022-2024 by the authors. Submitted for possible open-access publication under the terms and conditions of the
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
1. Introduction
In recent centuries, relationships have consistently formed the foundation of human and business existence. This
indicates that without a relationship between a firm and its primary business associates (customers, suppliers,
Kehinde et al., 2024/ Frontiers in Business and Economics, 3(2), 72-86 73
distributors, etc.), there would be no basis for exchange and, consequently, no business operations or retention of these
partners or associates. Marketing is conceptualized as identifying clients' needs and wants and fulfilling those needs
through the organization's resources and infrastructure, thereby leading to profitability. Relationship marketing refers to
attracting, maintaining, and enhancing customer associations. While acknowledging that client acquisition is and will
remain a component of marketers' responsibilities, this perspective emphasizes that a relationship-oriented approach to
marketing implies that customer retention and growth are of equal or greater importance to the organization in the long
term than customer acquisition. Many also perceive relationship marketing as identifying, recognising, establishing,
maintaining, and enhancing partnerships with clients and other stakeholders. Relationship marketing is crucial for
companies or organizations to sustain operations in a highly competitive market. This is regarded as essential for
improving business performance.
Relationship marketing entails having a long-term partnership with customers. It starts by clearly defining who your
customers are, what is of more importance to them, what they are willing to purchase, and how they choose to
communicate with you as an organization and served by you. Companies build good customer relationships by offering
better value and providing customer satisfaction. The profit of an effective customer relationship with the organization
involves repeat customer purchases, which increases the organization's sales level, large market share, and
profitability. Customers remain loyal to firms with better value and satisfaction, giving the organization an edge over
competing firms. According to Polk (2018), the most effective relationship marketing strategies hinge on
customer-oriented personnel, effective training platforms, employees with authority to make decisions and solve
problems and team effort. A key perspective of relationship marketing is that its outcomes are customer retention and
company profitability. It also provides a competitive benefit that competitors cannot easily replicate. Focusing on
customer relationship marketing brings more merits for an organization and its customers. Customer affiliation
marketing emphasises customer retention, value, and satisfaction. Achumba (2006) stated that relationship marketing
represents a significant paradigm shift in marketing, which indicates a movement from thinking only about competition
towards mutual support and cooperation. Dixon-Ogbechi et al. (2007) claimed that relationship marketing focuses on
continuous and long-term communication between the customers and the organization to create a more proficient basis
of interaction with the customers, which is based on the principle that a mutual longer relationship may transform into
repeat patronage and positive words of mouth communication.
Customer relationship marketing has received scholarly attention and some conceptual developments in the
literature (Kehinde et al., 2023; Meena & Sahu, 2021). However, examining this from an alternative perspective by
exploring the effect of customer relationship marketing on organizational customer retention has not received sustained
consideration. Specifically, for an organization to achieve efficiency and effectiveness in business performance, a
robust relationship or connection must be established. These organizations utilize relationship marketing to generate
profit and feedback for customer loyalty. Customers encounter various organizational challenges, such as failure to
adhere to appointment schedules, the inappropriate quantity of products purchased, unfulfilled promises, discourteous
behavior of organizational employees, stock depletion, delays, and inadequate information. These factors necessitate
the establishment of positive relationships between organizations and their customers. The banking sector is
experiencing increasing competition among banks, underscoring the importance of building enduring relationships with
customers to prevent them from transitioning to competitor banks. This emphasizes why the Guarantee Trust Bank and
other financial institutions need to focus on relationship marketing strategies.
Relationship marketing has become a continuous word in marketing management practices and theory (Palmatier
et al., 2006). Relationship marketing can be defined as the arrangement of a business method or strategy with a
customer strategy that increases customer loyalty, retention, satisfaction and profit over time. The problem then
becomes implementing this relationship marketing by the organization in getting market returns and customer feedback.
An organisation's difficulty is adapting to customer relationship marketing models that will lead to effective firm
performance. They can only continue gaining more insight into the topic, but putting it into practice has not been fully
actualized, actions that need to be taken, strategies to be put in place, necessary things to be considered, etc.
Therefore, the profits of long-term retention of existing customers, including improved productivity, reduced charges for
specific clients, and referrals via word of mouth from pleased clients become vital (Gilmore, 2003). According to Clow &
Kurtz (2003), retaining clientele necessitates a lot of cautious and artistic work and preparation which pleases clients.
Service develops more efficiency when workers anticipate what clients learn about and how best to meet their needs. It
entails discovering switching factors, a sum of customer lifetime value (Clow & Kurtz, 2003), customer loyalty rate and
constructing durable consumer relationship management (Kotler, 1999).
Grönroos (1997) suggests building relationships and management are key to service industries. According to
Bowen & Chen (2001), in retaining customers, getting pleased clients is inadequate; there must be enormously pleased
clients. Satisfaction inspires repurchase intention. However, dissatisfaction has remained a prime cause for client
defection or cessation of purchase (LaBarbera & Mazursky, 1983). The penalties for not satisfying customers can be
adverse because customer satisfaction can lead to customer loyalty and retention (Gupta & Bansal, 2012). There have
not been many useful recommendations that companies can find advantageous for customer retention and relationship
Kehinde et al., 2024/ Frontiers in Business and Economics, 3(2), 72-86 74
marketing. This research investigates the customer relationship marketing influences organization customer retention.
In a bid to ascertain this, this research would study the influence of relationship marketing on customer retention by
examining variables such as customer trust, customer commitment, customer satisfaction, effective communication of
both the customer and the organization and better customer service, trying to unravel the effect of these variables on
customer retention such as corporate brand image, customer loyalty, quality of the product, good distribution system
and customer favorable price perception. Lots of studies have existed generally on relationship marketing. Very few
works have not really explored the effects of customer relationship marketing on organizations customer retention. This
research will try to cover the absent intellectual gap. The general research objective of this study is to determine the
influence of customer relationship marketing CRM on organizations customer retention.
2. Literature Review
Numerous diverse individuals have explained Customer Relationship Marketing, and there has been a shift from
transactional to relational approaches. Some of these definitions will be unraveled in this study. Dasari & Gunaseelan
(2012) opined that a relationship is a mutually concerned contact between two communally devoted parties”. From a
service marketing perspective, Grönroos et al. (2000) used the term relationship once a client observes that a mutual
manner of thinking occurs between them and the seller or service providers. According to Gummesson (1999),
relationships entail two or more parties who share a connection: a seller and a customer. Claycomb & Martin (2001)
opined that establishing a relationship requires that every concerned party (persons from selling or buying entities) like
such relationships; such wants are subject to the accomplished stage of the relationship.
Relationship marketing is a customer retention strategy using diverse marketing schemes. Relationship
marketing is a strategy concerned with the market and forms strong and long-lasting relationships with customers.
Achumba (2006) posited that RM represents a significant paradigm shift in marketing, which indicates a drive from
thinking about competition towards mutual support and collaboration. Relationship marketing emphasizes constant and
long-term communication between the customers and the organization to make a more efficient basis of interaction with
the customers, which is built on the premises that longer mutual relationships may transform into repeat patronage and
positive words of mouth communication (Dixon-Ogbechi et al., 2007). Relationship marketing canvasses the need to
make the customer the first in the outline of firm affairs and arranging marketers' activities from persuading the customer
to sincere customer engagement.
Customer relationship marketing can be defined as a business procedure in which client partnerships,
relationships, associations, customer trust and corporate brand worth are built through marketing strategies and
organizational policies or activities. CRM enables organizations to develop long-term relationships with customers,
strengthening and involving both new and existing customers while adding value to them and strengthening their
performance. Professor Payne (2013) rightly observed that customer retention is the heart of relationship marketing.
According to Sin et al. (2005) and Yau et al. (2000), defined by binding reciprocity and trust in empathy, Customer
relationship marketing focuses mainly on the emotional and behavioral. Lages et al. (2005) rightly observed that
customer relationship marketing is determined by information sharing, communication quality, long-term relationship
orientation and satisfaction with the relationship. Customer relationship marketing can be seen as a new advancement
in marketing.
2.1. Key differences between the concepts of Relationship Marketing and Transactional Marketing
According to Hennig-Thurau et al. (2001), the differences between relationship marketing and transactional
marketing using basic principles and criteria have been stated below:
Table 1. Basic Principles and Criteria of Relationship Marketing and Transactional Marketing
Relationship marketing
Transactional marketing
Relationship
Single transaction
Communication-related
Action related
Growth dynamic
Fixed
Execution focus
Decision Focus
Long vs. short-period
Usually takes a long period
View
Usually takes a short period
View
Major approach
Preservation of present
Relationships
Gaining new customers
Emphasis on decision
procedure
Every stage emphasises after-sales decisions and
activities.
Emphasis is on Pre-sales
activities and actions.
Kehinde et al., 2024/ Frontiers in Business and Economics, 3(2), 72-86 75
Relationship marketing
Transactional marketing
High
Little
Usually high Usually low
Management of the customer
(direct method)
Observing market share
(indirect method)
Quality of communication
Quality of productivity
The concentration of everything
Key concern of production
Significant planned
Importance
No or partial importance
High Low
Mass customization
Mass production
Source: Adopted from Hennig-Thurau et al. (2001)
2.2. Aims and Importance of Relationship Marketing
Building and retaining loyal clients is the fundamental aim of customer relationship marketing. Companies gain
several merits from creating and sustaining a loyal customer base, which can be directly related to an organisation's
bottom line (Aalton, 2004). Grönroos (1997) observed that the purpose of marketing relationships is to create, sustain,
and strengthen customer relationships and ensure that the goals of the partners involved are achieved. Relationship
marketing RM is considered a major tool by which organizations can get close to their customers to determine and
satisfy their needs. It also enhances an organization's understanding of customers, boosts market share, lessens
budget, and grows revenue. Ndubisi et al. (2003) observed that the price of attending to a single faithful client is lower
than that of enticing and attending to a single fresh client.
Rapp & Collins (1990) agreed that RM aims to generate and uphold permanent affiliations between the company
and their clients, compensating each side. Additionally, the aim of customer relationship marketing includes the delivery
of continued customer retention and satisfaction of those clients through the constant maintenance of such
relationships. When customers' complaints are minimal, the organization can communicate effectively and provide
customer feedback. The client's attitude towards any relationship between him/her and the supplier is significant,
according to Al-Hersh & Saaty (2014). If customers recognise the value of relationships, they establish a stronger bond
with the seller. Ndubisi et al. (2003) opined that the significance of relationship marketing intentions of venture in
customer relationship structure includes access to privileged information on customer needs, wants, mutual rewards,
cost reduction and increase in profitability. Another significant aspect of relationship marketing is its contribution to
customer satisfaction, which reduces customer complaints and improves service quality. This is a crucial element of
relationship marketing, as customer satisfaction leads to positive organisational outcomes.
Moreover, customer satisfaction contributes to a decrease in advertising expenses, thereby increasing
organizational revenue. Relationship marketing also enables organizations to comprehend their competitors' strategies
and manage competitive pressures. To maintain a competitive advantage, an organization must develop strategies to
address competitive pressures arising from products or customers, which can be mitigated through strong relationships.
Customers can provide valuable insights into competitors and their strategies, which the organization might otherwise
overlook or disregard. Relationship marketing further assists organizations in understanding competitors' tactics and
managing pressure. To distinguish itself, an organization must learn to address competitive pressures that may
originate from products or customers and can be mitigated through strong relationships. Customers can assist the
organization in obtaining pertinent information about competitors and their strategies, which the organization may
otherwise overlook or disregard. Also, relationship marketing enhances the productivity of client services. It facilitates
the provision of high-quality customer service. Organizations can obtain valuable customer feedback, which will lead to
improvements across all areas of the organization, and unsatisfactory aspects will be investigated.
2.3. Merits of Relationship Marketing To the Customer
There exist multiple merits of RM to both the customer and the organization. According to Ndubisi et al. (2003),
research has shown that the cost of serving one loyal customer is significantly less than that of attracting and serving
one new customer. According to a study carried out as discussed by Abdul Rashid et al. (2003) and Ndubisi et al.
(2003), relationship marketing could bring customers the following advantages:
1. Confidence: Through relationship marketing customers' anxiety is reduced, and they begin to trust the
organisation's product or service. And also have a sense of belief in the organization.
2. Societal Advantages: Individual acknowledgement through staff. Clients feel acquainted with the staff of an
organization, and a bond develops between them.
Kehinde et al., 2024/ Frontiers in Business and Economics, 3(2), 72-86 76
3. Special Treatment: Through relationship marketing, customers of that organization get extra services
whereby they can be served better and receive a little reduction in the cost of products offered. They
become the main concern of the organization than other customers. They also get special price offers from
the organization.
2.4. Advantages of Relationship Marketing To an Organization
According to a study carried out by Rubin & Buchanan (2008), the advantages of relationship marketing to an
organization are customers are unlikely to switch their brand, and they are less price sensitive even when there is an
increased price because they are more interested in the value they get than the price. He also opined that relationship
marketing is a foundation for word of mouth, whereby customers can refer the organization's products to their family
members and friends. Also, the organization can gain a large market share, and expansion becomes much easier due
to customer retention. Companies that practice customer relationship marketing will have to worry less about
competitor’s products because of the strong customer loyalty they have gained, which can shut out new competitors.
Organizations also gain valuable and relevant customer information, adding value and building a good customer base.
The information given may also divulge the tactics of their competitors and ways to shut them out completely.
Organizations also benefit from customer relationship marketing, whereby their satisfied customers help the
organization introduce them to new prospects and reduce the need for paid advertisement or costly marketing
campaigns. Organizations also gain valuable and relevant customer information, adding value and building a good
customer base. The information given may also divulge the tactics of their competitors and ways to shut them out
completely.
2.5. Relationship Marketing Levels
Firms that desire to be involved in client relationship growth will follow these five levels: basic marketing, reactive
marketing, accountable marketing, proactive marketing, and partnership marketing.
Basic Marketing: At this level, the company’s sales personnel only sell the product without bothering about
its performance or customer satisfaction. This is common among companies practising production and
selling philosophies.
Reactive Marketing: Here, clients are stimulated to inquire, question, and give their remarks or feedback
about the products that are presently available.
Accountable Marketing: At this point, the firm sales employees reach out to the clients personally and
subsequently, after the purchase has been done with them to ask about the act of the goods for likely
recommendations.
Proactive Marketing: Here, clients are seen at consistent intermissions by the organization's persons to
request guidance or recommendations on what to do to help them more efficiently.
Partnership Marketing: In this case, it is the peak of relationship marketing. The salespeople create a stable
work treaty with the client to ensure an extensive relationship is paved.
Strategies for Relationship marketing
According to Roberts (2015), in their study of relationship marketing, there are five strategies for relationship
marketing, which include:
Core service marketing (Foundation): Berry (2002) opined that companies ought to grow an essential
service that interests’ fresh clients by achieving their wants, offers quality, providing various fragments or
selections that last for a long time and delivers a foundation for marketing extra amenities to those clients
continuously. This core service ought to be the basis for growing client affiliations.
Relationship customization (Not mass marketing): Customize the service presentation to make affiliations to
specific clients' particular features and wants, seize the personal information, and eventually make a
distinctive, custom-made service experience for a single personal customer (Berry, 2002).
Service augmentation (Extras): Enhance the essential amenity provision with add-ons to inspire client
fidelity and grow affiliations. Extras can be anything, from favourite client events to free packages, as long
as the target customers appreciate them and are not quickly accorded by rivals (Berry, 2002).
Relationship pricing (A superior charge for superior clients): Provide clients with reductions in numbers or
price enticements to unite considerably or every part of their organization with one dealer (for instance,
recurrent flyer events). Client fidelity ought to be stimulated by recompenses (Berry, 2002).
Internal marketing (Perceive the staff as the client and the work as the goods): Usage of marketing actions
to grow affiliations through the inward client or workers. Marketing ought to inspire outward clients to
purchase; nevertheless, they must as well inspire inward clients to perform. Moral worker’s achievements
raise the chance of outward client purchasing.
Kehinde et al., 2024/ Frontiers in Business and Economics, 3(2), 72-86 77
Customer Trust and Commitment: Trust can be defined as a person's confidence in another. According to Hersh et
al. (2014), trust relates to having faith in a person’s word from another. Trust can be an important factor that builds
strong relationships and partnerships between an organization and its customers or stakeholders. Trust is founded on
empathy, experience and satisfaction (Hersh et al., 2014). A great degree of confidence is likely to improve a more
optimistic mindset, which is then likely to raise client empathy. On the other hand, reduced confidence may show a
contradictory result: how can you start empathizing with a person you don't trust? Conway & Swift (2000) and Hersh et
al. (2014) opined that customer trust reduces vulnerability. Aalton (2004) identified that trust increases customer
retention in market groups. According to Patrick et al. (2002), trust refers to users' feelings, thoughts, behavior, or
emotions when they feel an agent can be trusted to act in their paramount interest when giving up direct control.
Brown (2012) explored that organizational confidence is a unique and most significant antecedent of constant and
cooperative relationships. Scholars have rightly observed that trust is vital for structuring and preserving permanent
relationships. Trust as an aspect of relationship management can be seen as a party’s willingness to trust the integrity
and honesty of the corresponding entity in the business relationship. According to Onoriode & Samuel (2023), one
party has confidence and trust in the other party's promise to uphold its undertaking and vice versa (Chattananon &
Trimetsoontorn, 2009). Dixon-Ogbechi et al. (2007) rightly observed that the clients value trust a lot, which is necessary
for the relationship to be effective for the organization. Customers' trust should be one of the sole aims of an
organization. It is a significant part of relationship marketing. Whereby they trace all their activities to gain their
customers' trust at all costs which leads to customer commitments. Berry (2002) proposed three approaches that
organizations can make use of in demonstrating their trustworthiness to clients, which comprise:
Companies should expose lines of interaction between them and their consumers: According to Berry
(2002), steady, open, two-way interactions deliver the company’s desire for the consumer’s wellbeing.
Companies must deliberate assuring the service to foster trust: Once performed fine, service assurances
can signify a firm’s pledge to unbiased play with consumers and enable rivalry difference (Berry, 2002).
However, organizations that have weak service excellence must not execute an assurance. Service
excellence emanates initially, followed by a likely assurance to enable additional enhancement (Roberts,
2015).
Organizations should be eager to function with an advanced standard of comportment rather than just
legitimacy. According to Roberts (2015), performing whatever is correct, not just whatever is necessary,
develops trust with the consumer.
Customer Commitment: Commitment is considered a key determining factor that measures the strength of marketing
relationships and a useful mechanism to determine the probability of client satisfaction and predict the level of potential
purchases. Baines & Egan (2001) argue that engagement is central to marketing relationships. Conway & Swift (2000)
say that the level of commitment a partner feels towards the relationship is very important in forming relationships.
Psychologists define commitment as decisions which bind a person to an action. While engagement in marketing
literature is described as an ongoing desire to sustain a valued relationship, this implies a high degree of duty to make a
relationship successful, mutually fulfilling, and beneficial. According to Fullerton (2005), affective engagement reflects a
customer's sense of belonging and commitment to a service provider akin to emotional bonding, while calculative
commitment is how the customer is compelled to stay loyal to their choice (de Ruyter et al., 1998). Customers may be
loyal to a selling company because they believe that in calculative commitment, breaking the partnership requires an
economic-to-social compromise (Fullerton, 2005). According to Fullerton et al. (2003), when customer commitment is
based on shared values and identification, it has a uniformly positive impact on customer loyalty. Four key dimensions of
consumer involvement can be analyzed: (I) loyalty (ii) willingness to invest in relationships (iii) long-term orientation (IV)
willingness to make short-term sacrifices. Commitment is an important factor in customer relationship marketing
because it is of benefit to both the organization and its customers. Once the customers of an organization are committed
to that organization product, the organization will worry less about competitors and spend less on advertisement while
for the customers they have gained trust from the organization to be committed to them through service.
Customer Satisfaction: In Kotler's (1999) opinion, satisfaction is a person’s pleasure or disappointment from
comparing a product's performance or outcome to their expectations. Parker & Mathews (2001) noted two principal
interpretations of satisfaction: satisfaction as a process and satisfaction as an outcome. Olsen & Johnson (2003)
observed that satisfaction can be separated into two approaches: transaction-specification or cumulative
satisfaction/post-consumption satisfaction (Oliver, 1999). Vavra (2002) suggested that satisfaction is an emotional
reaction from the consumer to his or her assessment of the perceived difference between his or her previous experience
with a product and organization and the actual results observed after engaging with the organization and consuming the
product. Customer satisfaction can be characterized as the outcome based on the analysis of organizational
performance, marketing and knowledge about clients’ requirements and desires via constant plus relevant
relationships, thereby leading to customer’s retention.
Kehinde et al., 2024/ Frontiers in Business and Economics, 3(2), 72-86 78
Ajaegbu (2014) viewed customer satisfaction as influencing repurchase intentions and behaviors, leading to
organizations future revenue and profits. However, Wong & Sohal (2003) stated that customer satisfaction is a primary
determining factor of repeat shopping and purchasing behavior. Ojo (2014) observed that customer satisfaction with a
company’s product is often seen as the key to a company’s success and long-term competitiveness. Furthermore,
Kotler & Armstrong (2006) established that consumer satisfaction depends on the perceived output of the goods
compared to the buyer's expectations. If the product's performance falls below expectations, the client is disappointed.
The client is happy if the result meets expectations. The customer is pleased when performance exceeds expectations.
Consumer satisfaction passes through two phases; first, through ads, word of mouth or other media, the consumer
establishes perceptions from the service provider. Second, those standards are contrasted by the consumer to what
they have received (Deku et al., 2016).
Communication is an important tool for relationship marketing because it is a medium whereby both parties can be
understood, and information exchange can occur. Communication is a critical factor in establishing business
relationships, according to Andersen & Eliassen (2001). Still, it is a variable often believed or taken for granted and thus
ignored as a factor of relationship growth. In marketing relationships, communication is important because it plays a
central role in understanding the exchange partners' purpose and capabilities, thus forming the groundwork for
establishing trust among interested parties (Al-Hersh & Saaty, 2014). To build a long-lasting connection between the
organization and its customers, the organization must develop frequent communication between them and its partners
to show that it listens to them. Communication is a strong variable in customer relationship marketing because when the
organization can build good communication with their customers, they will develop a level of trust for that organization
then, the organization begins to feel they are committed to them in ensuring that they are satisfied, leading to customer
retention. Communication in relationship marketing helps solve conflicts or disagreements between the organization
and their customers.
When the organization does not deliver the level of products or services that the customers expect from them or
they have inadequate infrastructure for production, the price of product or service increases. Competitors' influence on
their customers, shortage in the quantity of products or services etc., all these can be solved through communication.
Organizations can also use communication to get feedback about a new product or service from their customers, their
needs and wants at a particular time and information on their competitors’ tactics and ideas. In situations whereby the
organization did not deliver the level of products or services that the customers expect from them, or they have
inadequate infrastructure for production, increase in price of product or service, competitors influence on their
customers, shortage in quantity of product or services etc. all these can be solved through communication.
Organizations can also use communication to get feedback about a new product or service from their customers, their
needs and wants at a particular time and information on their competitors’ tactics and ideas.
Relationship marketing helps organizations to interact efficiently with their clients, according to Dixon-Ogbechi et
al. (2009). Marketing communication transmits information to consumers to stimulate purchasing habits, attract loyalty,
and keep them updated on more details about the organization's goods and services (Kotler & Armstrong, 2006).
Akintunde & Akaighe (2016) correctly observed that communication describes sharing thoughts, emotions and
experiences between a buyer and the seller warmly and intimately as part of relationship marketing. Customer retention
can be achieved through the provision of timely and quality information. Al-Hersh & Saaty (2014) accurately stated that
communication also helps to reassure disgruntled clients of what the company is doing to correct the causes of
discontent. Ahmad & Buttle (2002) claim that communication is essential to successfully sustaining the relationship and
loyalty of consumers to the brand and the organization. Effective and efficient communication between the organization
and its customers improves relationships and customer retention.
2.6. Concept of Customer Retention
Customer retention has been revealed to be a primary objective in an organization that undertakes relationship
marketing. However, customer retention's exact definition and dimensions can differ among businesses and
organizations. HennigThurau & Klee (1997) agree that concentrating on customer retention can bring numerous
economic advantages (Dawkins & Reichheld, 1990; Iriana & Buttle, 2007; Reichheld & Teal, 1996). According to
Nischal (2019), customer retention is a scheme of events to enhance business practices. Customer retention can be
seen as maintaining constant transaction relationships with customers over an extended period and satisfying them
(Iriana & Buttle, 2008). It can also be seen as several relationships a firm can sustain continuously. Customer retention
is a very natural and simple idea that if consumers feel happy and interact often, they will return to the company. The
price of getting a fresh client is numerous times higher than keeping a current client. They are diverse approaches and
tools that are accessible for retaining the client. Amongst these tools, the most essential are giving valuable goods and
services (Terblanche & Hofmeyr, 2005). Consequently, clients who remain with an organization for a long are seen as
retained clients.
Kehinde et al., 2024/ Frontiers in Business and Economics, 3(2), 72-86 79
2.7. Advantages of Customer Retention
According to Imran & Allil (2016), the advantages of customer retention include:
a. Purchasing from your organisation is a key influence on revenue development and managers' main
stimulus.
b. It’s vital since the cost of convincing new customers to purchase the organization's product is quite low to
persuade them to make a continuous purchase.
c. Customer retention will give an organization a strong image and reputation among its customers.
d. Customer retention brings about a healthy rivalry with other organizations.
e. Customer retention accounts are seen as the greatest evidence concerning the value of the
organisation's goods and services available to customers.
f. It shows how other studies and growth can occur in the organization's goods and services.
g. Through customer retention, the business can understand the needs of both current and potential clients
and implement a method for delivering quality customer fulfillment goods in a broad marketplace.
2.8. Customer Loyalty
According to Awais et al. (2015), customer loyalty is intellectualized as the current aim and mental connection to
the organization. Customer loyalty can be defined as an intensely seized pledge to stay with the benefaction of a chosen
product, service or organization constantly in the years to come, even in the look of marketing exertions proficiently
initiating flaws and condition effects (Oliver, 1999). According to Jones (1995), it is the mood of affection or care
customers grasp for a good, service, or organization’s staff. Furthermore, behavior dependability or loyalty scrutinizes
client’s outline of previous procurements. Naimat (2016) opined that loyal clientele are vital to the accomplishment of
any organization, as a minor number of loyal clients may bring about substantial productivity. Client loyalty is insistent,
positive, passionate understanding and entirely approximately consumer’s obligation tendency to maintain affiliation
with the vendor (Naimat, 2016).
2.9. Theoretical Review
According to Kehinde et al. (2017), an interactive relationship assumes merging the platform and communication
processes of marketing players and associates to protect passionate, financial and operational bonds between
themselves. It displays support in place of self-reliance of choice between the players, which also strains partnership in
place of rivalry and ensuing war that might occur among the groups. Thus, the progression of relationship marketing
specifies a significant movement in the axiom of marketing (Kehinde et al. 2017). Many relationship marketing strategies
allow for proficiency, such as effective customer reply (ECR), customer retention, and the distribution of assets between
the marketing players (Kehinde et al., 2017). Each of those strategies will assist in slashing down the marketer’s
operational expenses. Similarly, greater marketing efficiency is achieved as it tries to involve clients in the early phases
of marketing strategic growth, helping the probable marketing actions of the company. Furthermore, from modified
marketing and receiving of group personalized techniques, relationship marketing schemer can solve the wants and
requirements of a single selected client, consistently leading to marketing success, showing marketing productivity via
achieving efficiency and productivity (Kehinde et al., 2017).
2.10. Commitment-Trust Theory
According to Hunt & Morgan (1994), in the commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing (possibly the most
persuasive relationship marketing journal), relationship commitment with trust is vital to effective relationship marketing,
not authority. They also claimed that trust and relationship commitment are the principal intermediaries in the
interchange amongst members, fundamentally structuring relationship collaboration. Moorman et al. (1993) opine that
relationship commitment is a persistent want to preserve an appreciated affiliation, and trust is the assurance in an
interchange members' dependability and honesty. Hunt & Morgan (1994) are the main components that describe a
relationship's influence on their achievements. Therefore, dedicated relationship members spend additional strength
and effort to preserve and fortify interactive ties, which impacts collaboration, monetary actions, and further progressive
results (Hunt & Morgan, 1994; Kumar et al., 2013).
2.11. A Holistic Theory to Satisfaction, Trust and Substituting Barriers
According to Ranaweera & Prabhu (2003), a holistic approach was taken to the collective effect of switching
barriers on customer retention, as well as on confidence and satisfaction. Client retention is the proclivity of consumers
to stay with the organization or firms they purchase and transact with (Ranaweera & Prabhu, 2003). This context
contains two basic purposes; the foremost purpose is to explore autonomously the influence of the three variables on
client retention. The second purpose is to scrutinize the influence of trust and switching barriers on client retention and
Kehinde et al., 2024/ Frontiers in Business and Economics, 3(2), 72-86 80
satisfaction. Client Satisfaction: Ranaweera & Prabhu (2003) opined that the greater the degree of satisfaction, the
greater the degree of retention. Numerous kinds of research have revealed that if clients have higher satisfaction, they
stay dedicated to the organization (Fornell, 1992). Therefore, extra organizations are placing better work on
management and growing client satisfaction (Ranaweera & Prabhu, 2003). According to Patterson et al. (1997),
satisfied clients provide maintainable benefits for organizations in their rival surroundings.
Anderson and Sullivan (1993) proposed that investment in client satisfaction is similar to undergoing an
insurance/assurance rule and policy. If little adversity momentarily happens to the firm, clients will most likely stay
faithful. According to Patterson et al. (1997), client displeasure and dissatisfaction are seen as the dissimilarity amongst
a person's before buying anticipations and after buying actions of the goods or service. According to Ranaweera &
Neely (2003), previous researchers focused on customer satisfaction as a metric to assess the standard of service.
However, assessing consumer retention simply by observing only customer loyalty is impossible. Now, businesses
must often understand customer actions/behavior, such as repurchasing behaviors. They believe businesses must start
with customer loyalty to keep a client, but it is not the only driving factor.
In his study, Richards (1996) found that there are chances that even a happy consumer will drift to other service
providers, and often, even a dissatisfied customer will stay loyal to organizations (Ranaweera & Neely, 2003). Trust:
Trust occurs once a group of individuals have self-reliance in the honesty and dependability of another group. According
to Ranaweera & Prabhu (2003), organizations are futile in maintaining their clients even after they are satisfied. It
illustrates that satisfaction is not the only element that induces long-lasting client commitment to the organization.
Magasi (2016) proposes that a long-term client-company relationship is vital to durable client retention. Therefore, if
there is no good relationship between organizations and their clients, there will be no client retention.
3. Materials and Methods
This study aims to determine the influence of Customer Relationship Marketing (CRM) on organizations' customer
retention. A quantitative research design will be employed to achieve this objective, using primary data collection and
statistical analysis to explore the relationship between CRM practices and customer retention in various organizations.
A quantitative research design will be used to examine the strength and nature of the relationship between CRM
practices and customer retention. This appropriate design allows the researcher to identify whether a significant
association exists between the independent variable (CRM practices) and the dependent variable (customer retention).
The target population for this study includes organizations across multiple industries that implement CRM strategies to
manage customer interactions and relationships. The sample will consist of businesses in the retail, banking, hospitality,
and telecommunications sectors, as these sectors prioritize CRM in their operations. A total of 100 respondents are
involved in this study. Data collected from the surveys will be analyzed using statistical methods. Descriptive statistics
(such as mean and standard deviation) will first be calculated to summarize the CRM practices and customer retention
scores. Next, correlation and multiple regression analysis will be conducted to assess the relative relationship of
different CRM dimensions on customer retention.
Table 2. Summary of Response Rate
Questionnaires
Frequency
Percentage
Distributed
100
100%
Filled and returned
100
100%
Not filled and not returned
0
0%
Source: Field Survey (2020)
4. Results
4.1. Customer Trust, Corporate Brand Image and Customer Loyalty
In today’s competitive business landscape, customer trust and corporate brand image are critical factors
significantly influencing a company’s success. Customer trust refers to the confidence consumers have in a company’s
ability to deliver on its promises, maintain integrity, and act in the best interests of its customers. Trust is often the
cornerstone of long-term customer relationships, influencing purchase decisions, loyalty, and overall satisfaction.
Corporate brand image is the perception customers and the public have about a company’s identity, values, and
reputation. It encompasses a brand's visual, emotional, and functional aspects, shaped through marketing efforts,
customer experiences, and public relations. A positive brand image helps to differentiate a company in the marketplace,
fostering customer loyalty and emotional attachment. The relationship between customer trust and corporate brand
image is dynamic and reciprocal. A strong, positive brand image can enhance customer trust, while high levels of trust
can reinforce and solidify a company’s brand image. The result of the analysis can be seen in Table 1 below:
Kehinde et al., 2024/ Frontiers in Business and Economics, 3(2), 72-86 81
Table 3. Result of Hypothesis Testing (Model 1)
Unstandardized Coefficients
Standardized Coefficients
t Sig.
B
Std. Error
Beta
(Constant) 2.509 0.361
6.942 0
Customer trust
0.362
0.087
0.386
4.139
0
R
.386
a
Sum of Squares
10.479
R Square
0.149
df
1
Adjusted R Square
0.14
Mean Square
10.479
Std. Error of the Estimate
0.78201
F
17.135***
a. Dependent Variable: Corporate Brand Image
Table 3 illustrates the correlation coefficient (R) and strength of the relationship between the two variables. A value
between 0.0 and 0.2 indicates a weak relationship, 0.20 to 0.40 suggests a medium relationship, 0.40 to 0.60 denotes a
moderate relationship, 0.60 to 0.80 signifies a strong relationship, and above 0.80 represents a very strong relationship.
The null hypothesis (Ho1) is rejected when the significance value is below 0.05 and not rejected when it exceeds 0.05.
Table 4.3.27 presents the model summary, showing an R-value of 0.386, which indicates a moderate relationship
between customer trust and corporate brand image. This R-value demonstrates the extent to which the variance in the
dependent variable (corporate brand image) is explained by the model (the impact of customer trust in customer
relationship marketing on corporate brand image). The R-squared value is .149, meaning the model accounts for 14.9%
of the variance in corporate brand image influenced by customer trust in customer relationship marketing. Given the
significant relationship between customer trust and corporate brand image, the null hypothesis should be rejected in
favor of the alternative hypothesis. Customer trust contributes 14.0% to corporate brand image in the context of
customer relationship marketing. The correlation between the independent variable (customer trust) and the dependent
variable (corporate brand image) was 0.386, classified as a medium-strength relationship.
The ANOVA table was utilized to evaluate the null hypothesis and determine its significance. The results indicate
that the model is statistically significant (Sig = 0.000), with an F-value of 17.135 and a significance level below 0.05.
Consequently, the null hypothesis (Ho1), which posits that customer trust in customer relationship marketing has no
significant impact on corporate brand image, should be dismissed. Instead, the alternative hypothesis (Ha1), asserting
that customer trust in customer relationship marketing significantly influences corporate brand image, should be
accepted. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that customer trust in customer relationship marketing affects
corporate brand image, supporting the alternative hypothesis.
Table 4. Result of Hypothesis Testing (Model 2)
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
t Sig.
B
Std. Error
Beta
(Constant)
1.602
0.552
2.903
0.005
Customer Commitment
0.575
0.132
0.401
4.339
0.000
R
.401a
df
1
R Square
0.161
Mean Square
14.687
Adjusted R Square
0.153
F
18.83
Std. Error of the Estimate
0.88318
Sig.
0.000b
Sum of Squares
14.687
a. Dependent Variable: Customer Loyalty
Source: Field Survey, 2020
Table 4 presents the results of the regression analysis for Model 2. This study indicates that R represents the
strength of the relationship between two variables. Consequently, values between 0.0 and 0.2, 0.20 to 0.40, 0.40 to
0.60, 0.60 to 0.80, and values exceeding 0.80 indicate a weak, moderate, substantial, strong, and very strong
relationship, respectively. Furthermore, the null hypothesis (Ho1) was rejected when the significance value was less
than 0.05, or it was not rejected when the significance exceeded 0.05. The model summary indicates that R is 0.401,
suggesting a substantial relationship between customer commitment and loyalty. It demonstrates the extent to which
the variance in the dependent variable (customer loyalty) is explained by the model (the effect of customer commitment
in customer relationship marketing on customer loyalty). The R-squared value was .161. Expressed as a percentage,
this indicates that our model (effect of customer commitment in customer relationship marketing on customer loyalty)
Kehinde et al., 2024/ Frontiers in Business and Economics, 3(2), 72-86 82
accounts for 16.1% of the variance in customer loyalty as influenced by customer commitment in customer relationship
marketing. The null hypothesis is rejected, and the alternative hypothesis is accepted, as a significant relationship exists
between customer commitment and loyalty. Customer commitment contributes 15.3% to customer loyalty in customer
relationship marketing. The relationship between the effect of the independent variable (customer commitment) and the
dependent variable (customer loyalty) is 0.401, which is substantial.
Table 4 presents the calculation of the significance of the outcome. The ANOVA table tested the null hypothesis to
determine its significance. The results indicated that the model in the table was statistically significant (sig. = .000), with
an F-value of 18.830 and a significant level of less than 0.05. The null hypothesis (Ho1), which posits that customer
commitment to customer relationship marketing does not influence customer loyalty, should be rejected. The alternative
hypothesis (Ha1), which proposes that customer commitment in customer relationship marketing influences customer
loyalty, should be accepted. From the table above, it can be concluded that customer commitment to customer
relationship marketing affects customer loyalty. Therefore, the alternative hypothesis is supported. Additionally, the
unstandardized coefficient B is 0.575, indicating that customer commitment influences customer loyalty. This finding
suggests that a one-unit increase in customer commitment can result in a 0.575 increase in customer loyalty. This
influence was also significant at 0.000. It can be inferred that customer commitment influences customer loyalty at a
significant level of less than 0.05. The B coefficient for the independent variable (customer commitment) is 0.575,
directly influencing the dependent variable (customer loyalty).
4.2. Correlations between Customer Satisfaction and Product Quality
There are no substantial correlations between customer satisfaction in customer relationship marketing and
product quality. Correlation analysis was used to test this, as shown below.
Table 5. Result of Correlation between customer satisfaction and quality of the product
Variable(s)
Test Statistics
1
2
1 Customer Satisfaction
Correlation Coefficient
1.000
0.454
**
Sig. (2-tailed)
0.000
2 Quality of the Product Correlation Coefficient 0.454** 1.000
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.000
Table 5 captures the coefficient correlation between customer satisfaction and product quality, with a detailed
0.454 value showing a medium relationship. As there is a significant relationship between customer satisfaction and the
quality of the product, we accept the alternative hypothesis and reject the null hypothesis. This suggests that customer
satisfaction has a significant relationship with product quality. This hypothesis test tried to determine the effect of
customer satisfaction on product quality. The Spearman rho correlation was used to test the effect of customer
satisfaction in customer relationship marketing on product quality as 0.454 at 0.01 significant Level. We rejected the null
hypothesis (there is no significant relationship between customer satisfaction in customer relationship marketing and
product quality), and the alternative hypothesis was accepted (there is a significant relationship between customer
satisfaction in customer relationship marketing and product quality).
Researchers have established various numbers of theories to come to terms with customer relationship marketing.
This study analysed two customer relationship marketing theories: Relationship quality theory and commitment-trust
theory. The relationship quality theory suggests that relationship quality seizes various facets or proportions of a
relationship (for example, trust, commitment, and relationship satisfaction), which has a sturdier effect on aim
accomplishment than any sole aspect. Relationship marketing is concentrated on incorporating the wholesalers, the
clients, and every other shareholder into the marketing procedure and methods. Once the relationship is strong, every
organisation's objective can be easily achieved. Besides that, the commitment-trust theory suggests that relationship
commitment with trust is vital to effective relationship marketing, not authority. It was also stated that trust and
relationship commitment are the principal intermediaries in the interchange amongst members, fundamentally
structuring relationship collaboration.
Once an organization establishes a strong relationship with its clients and associates, it can readily develop
high-quality commitment and trust. However, commitment or trust cannot be established without a strong relationship.
Various theories of customer retention proposed by researchers were also discussed, including a holistic theory of
satisfaction, trust, switching barriers, and the conversion model. A holistic theory of satisfaction, trust, and switching
barriers comprehensively describes the influence of these factors on customer retention. This theory posits that a higher
degree of satisfaction corresponds to higher retention while acknowledging that satisfaction is not the sole factor
influencing long-term client commitment to an organization. This establishes that specific costs are associated with
Kehinde et al., 2024/ Frontiers in Business and Economics, 3(2), 72-86 83
terminating the affiliation; therefore, once the affiliation is established, there is a reduced likelihood of its termination.
Also, it suggests that greater trust in the service provider correlates with a higher perceived significance of affiliation.
Finally, it was postulated that a higher perceived price increases the likelihood of client loyalty. The conversion model
asserts that satisfaction is not the only element in retaining a client. It further contends that there are instances where
satisfied clients may leave the organization while dissatisfied clients may remain. Consequently, companies should
focus on client commitment rather than customer satisfaction.
5. Conclusions
This study concludes that customer satisfaction in relationship marketing significantly influences product quality.
Effective communication in customer relationship marketing substantially impacts customers and organizations,
correlating with an efficient distribution system. Enhanced customer service in this context favorably affects customers’
perception of pricing. While pursuing the research objectives, certain limitations posed challenges during the study,
suggesting areas for future investigation. The study's outcomes may prove valuable to other researchers and
organizations seeking to leverage customer relationship marketing to improve product retention. Various sectors,
including banking, telecommunications, beverage industries, businesses of all sizes, and future researchers in similar
fields, can benefit from this study. A comprehensive understanding and application of customer relationship marketing
strategies can lead to superior customer service, increasing customer satisfaction and retention. This knowledge is
crucial in market research as it enables marketers to effectively engage with information sources and comprehend their
target markets. Relationship marketing techniques can assist in market segmentation, distinguishing between potential
and unlikely customers. Furthermore, these methods can enhance marketers' understanding of diverse client
behaviors.
This study will provide significant value for advertising agencies in comprehending their clients and determining
optimal advertisement placement strategies to maximize their return on investment. It offers insights into cost-effective
customer retention techniques, benefiting the agencies and their clients. Future researchers and readers should learn
about the impact of customer relationship strategies, including trust, commitment, satisfaction, effective communication,
and improved service, on organizational customer retention. This research elucidates the advantages of customer
retention and methods to sustain it. The study suggests that organizations should prioritize customer commitment
through repeated purchases of quality products rather than solely focusing on satisfaction. Companies must
consistently offer high-quality products to establish strong relationships with clients and associates, fostering
commitment and trust. Organizations should ensure that their sales and marketing personnel demonstrate
professionalism in customer interactions to enhance relationship quality. Staff should receive comprehensive training
on customer relationship strategies to gain a competitive advantage. Companies must promptly address customer
complaints and feedback to strengthen their relationships. Effective communication skills are crucial when marketing
products and services to customers. Organizations should strive for positive customer comments about their brands to
build trust. Maintaining a continuous supply of quality products is essential for establishing strong and lasting
relationships with clients and associates. To foster quality relationships, sales and marketing personnel must conduct
customer-related activities professionally.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, S.K. and O.K.; methodology, S.K.; software, S.K.; validation, O.K., O.O., B.S., K.K. and
T.K.; formal analysis, S.K.; investigation, S.K., O.K., O.O. and B.S.; resources, S.K.; data curation, O.K., O.O., B.S., K.K. and T.K.;
writingoriginal draft preparation, S.K., O.K., O.O., B.S., K.K. and T.K.; writingreview and editing, S.K., O.K., O.O., B.S., K.K. and
T.K.; visualization, S.K.; supervision, O.K., O.O. and B.S.; project administration, S.K.; funding acquisition, S.K. All authors have
read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement: Not applicable.
Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank Covenant University, University of Johannesburg, Anchor University and
Redeemers University, for supporting this research and publication. We also thank the reviewers for their constructive comments
and suggestions.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
Aalton, P. (2004). Customer relationship Marketing and effect of Demographic and technology on customer satisfaction and loyalty
in financial services. In PhD unpublished thesis, Old Dominion University, USA.
Kehinde et al., 2024/ Frontiers in Business and Economics, 3(2), 72-86 84
Abdul Rashid, Z., Sambasivan, M., & Johari, J. (2003). The influence of corporate culture and organisational commitment on
performance. Journal of Management Development, 22(8), 708–728. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710310487873
Achumba, I. C. (2006). The Dynamics of Consumer Behaviour,(New ed.). In Lagos: Mac–Williams (pp. 127–129).
Ahmad, R., & Buttle, F. (2002). Customer retention management: a reflection of theory and practice. Marketing Intelligence &
Planning, 20(3), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500210428003
Ajaegbu, C. C. (2014). Promoting foreign direct investment (FDI): The case of Uganda. International Journal of Research in
Business Management, 2(4), 73–94.
Akintunde, O. A., & Akaighe, G. O. (2016). Customer relationship management (CRM) and customer retention in Nigeria banking
industry: A Strategic Standpoint. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 10(2), 39–43.
Al-Hersh, A. M., & Saaty, A. S. (2014). The impact of customer relationship marketing on customer satisfaction of the Arab bank
services. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(5), 167.
Andersen, S. S., & Eliassen, K. A. (2001). Making policy in Europe. Sage.
Awais, M., Malik, M. S., & Qaisar, A. (2015). A review: The job satisfaction act as mediator between spiritual intelligence and
organizational commitment. International Review of Management and Marketing, 5(4), 203210.
Baines, P. R., & Egan, J. (2001). Marketing and political campaigning: mutually exclusive or exclusively mutual? Qualitative Market
Research: An International Journal, 4(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750110364541
Berry, L. L. (2002). Relationship Marketing of Services Perspectives from 1983 and 2000. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 1(1),
59–77. https://doi.org/10.1300/J366v01n01_05
Bowen, J. T., & Chen, S. (2001). The relationship between customer loyalty and customer satisfaction. International Journal of
Contemporary Hospitality Management, 13(5), 213217. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596110110395893
Brown, E. (2012). Trust and customer satisfaction in Ghana commercial bank.
Chattananon, A., & Trimetsoontorn, J. (2009). Relationship marketing: a Thai case. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 4(3),
252–274. https://doi.org/10.1108/17468800910968418
Claycomb, C., & Martin, C. L. (2001). Building customer relationships: an inventory of service providers’ objectives and practices.
Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 19(6), 385–399.
Clow, K. E., & Kurtz, D. L. (2003). Services marketing: Operation, management, and strategy. John Wiley & Sons.
Conway, T., & Swift, J. S. (2000). International relationship marketing The importance of psychic distance. European Journal of
Marketing, 34(11/12), 1391–1414. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560010348641
Dasari, S., & Gunaseelan, R. (2012). Relationship Marketing: An overview. Indian Journal of Marketing.
Dawkins, P., & Reichheld, F. (1990). Customer retention as a competitive weapon. Directors and Boards, 14(4), 4247.
de Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., & Bloemer, J. (1998). On the relationship between perceived service quality, service loyalty and
switching costs. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 9(5), 436–453.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09564239810238848
Deku, S. Y., Kara, A., & Molyneux, P. (2016). Access to consumer credit in the UK. The European Journal of Finance, 22(10), 941
964.
Dixon-Ogbechi, B. N., Haran, E., & Aiyeku, J. (2009). Relationship marketing as a strategic Tool for indigenous companies in the
Nigerian food and beverage industry. Journal of Global Business Development, 1(1), 145–157.
Dixon-Ogbechi, B. N., Haran, E. M., Jagun, S. O., Rahim, G. A., Ighomereho, S. O., & Ogbechi, A. D. (2007). Investigation of The
Factor Related to the Relative Importance of Promotional Tools of Nigerian Insurance Companies. Journal of Strategic and
International Studies, 107.
Fornell, C. (1992). A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience. Journal of Marketing, 56(1), 621.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1252129
Fullerton, G. (2005). How commitment both enables and undermines marketing relationships. European Journal of Marketing,
39(11/12), 1372–1388. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560510623307
Fullerton, R. R., McWatters, C. S., & Fawson, C. (2003). An examination of the relationships between JIT and financial performance.
Journal of Operations Management, 21(4), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(03)00002-0
Gilmore, A. (2003). Services marketing and management. Sage.
Grönroos, C. (1997). Keynote paper From marketing mix to relationship marketing towards a paradigm shift in marketing.
Management Decision, 35(4), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749710169729
Kehinde et al., 2024/ Frontiers in Business and Economics, 3(2), 72-86 85
Grönroos, C., Heinonen, F., Isoniemi, K., & Lindholm, M. (2000). The NetOffer model: a case example from the virtual marketspace.
Management Decision, 38(4), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740010326252
Gummesson, E. (1999). Total Relationship Marketing: Experimenting with a Synthesis of Research Frontiers. Australasian
Marketing Journal, 7(1), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1441-3582(99)70204-1
Gupta, K. K., & Bansal, I. (2012). Development of an instrument to measure internet banking service quality in India. Researchers
World, 3(2 Part 2), 1–11.
Hennig-Thurau, T., Langer, M. F., & Hansen, U. (2001). Modeling and Managing Student Loyalty. Journal of Service Research,
3(4), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050134006
HennigThurau, T., & Klee, A. (1997). The impact of customer satisfaction and relationship quality on customer retention: A critical
reassessment and model development. Psychology & Marketing, 14(8), 737–764.
Hersh, A. M. A.-, Aburoub, A. S., & Saaty, A. S. (2014). The Impact of Customer Relationship Marketing on Customer Satisfaction of
the Arab Bank Services. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(5), 167.
https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v4-i5/824
Hunt, S. D., & Morgan, R. M. (1994). Relationship marketing in the era of network competition. Marketing Management, 3(1), 118.
Imran, R., & Allil, K. (2016). The impact of organizational justice on employee retention: evidence from Oman. International Review
of Management and Marketing, 6(2), 246–249.
Iriana, R., & Buttle, F. (2007). Strategic, Operational, and Analytical Customer Relationship Management. Journal of Relationship
Marketing, 5(4), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1300/J366v05n04_03
Iriana, R., & Buttle, F. (2008). Does organizational culture influence CRM outcomes. ANZMAC Annual Conference, Sydney.
Jones, T. (1995). Why Satisfied Customers Defect. Harvard Business Review, Reprint, 11(8), 112.
Kehinde A, A, O., A, B., O, A., & OA, A. (2017). Enterprise Risk Management and the Survival of Small Scale Businesses in Nigeria.
International Journal of Accounting Research, 05(02), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4172/2472-114X.1000165
Kehinde, S., Moses, C., Borishade, T., Kehinde, O., Simon-ilogho, B., Kehinde, T., & Kehinde, K. (2023). A Study of Great
Resignation on Work-Life Balance: Global Perspective. International Journal of Finance, Economics and Business, 2(4),
280–300. https://doi.org/10.56225/ijfeb.v2i4.229
Kotler, F., & Armstrong, G. (2006). Basics of marketing.
Kotler, P. (1999). Kotler on marketing: How to create, win, and dominate markets. Simon and Schuster.
Kumar, S., Webber, D. J., & Fargher, S. (2013). Money demand stability: A case study of Nigeria. Journal of Policy Modeling, 35(6),
978–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2013.03.012
LaBarbera, P. A., & Mazursky, D. (1983). A Longitudinal Assessment of Consumer Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction: The Dynamic
Aspect of the Cognitive Process. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(4), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151443
Lages, C., Lages, C. R., & Lages, L. F. (2005). The RELQUAL scale: a measure of relationship quality in export market ventures.
Journal of Business Research, 58(8), 1040–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.03.001
Magasi, C. (2016). Determinants of customer loyalty in Sub Saharan African banking industry: an empirical review. International
Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 4(2), 574–588.
Meena, P., & Sahu, P. (2021). Customer Relationship Management Research from 2000 to 2020: An Academic Literature Review
and Classification. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 25(2), 136–158.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262920984550
Moorman, C., Deshpandé, R., & Zaltman, G. (1993). Factors Affecting Trust in Market Research Relationships. Journal of
Marketing, 57(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700106
Naimat, A. (2016). The new artificial intelligence market. O’Reilly Media, Incorporated.
Ndubisi, N. O., Gupta, O. K., & Massoud, S. (2003). Organizational learning and vendor support quality by the usage of application
software packages: A study of Asian entrepreneurs. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 12(3), 314–331.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-006-0138-2
Nischal, S. (2019). International market analysis of gold’s demand and supply-with special reference to gold strikes in India. ZENITH
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 9(5), 300–315.
Ojo, J. S. (2014). E-governance: An imperative for sustainable grass root development in Nigeria. Journal of Public Administration
and Policy Research, 6(4), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.5897/JPAPR2013.0264
Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence Consumer Loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 63(4_suppl1), 33–44.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429990634s105
Kehinde et al., 2024/ Frontiers in Business and Economics, 3(2), 72-86 86
Olsen, L. L., & Johnson, M. D. (2003). Service Equity, Satisfaction, and Loyalty: From Transaction-Specific to Cumulative
Evaluations. Journal of Service Research, 5(3), 184195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670502238914
Onoriode, O. H., & Samuel, A. P. (2023). Do Leadership Structure and Team Trust Drive Organisational Performance? Empirical
Approach. International Journal of Professional Business Review: Int. J. Prof. Bus. Rev., 8(7), 2525–3654.
Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., Grewal, D., & Evans, K. R. (2006). Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Relationship Marketing: A
Meta-Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.4.136
Parker, C., & Mathews, B. P. (2001). Customer satisfaction: contrasting academic and consumers’ interpretations. Marketing
Intelligence & Planning, 19(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500110363790
Patrick, D. L., Edwards, T. C., & Topolski, T. D. (2002). Adolescent quality of life, Part II: initial validation of a new instrument.
Journal of Adolescence, 25(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.2002.0471
Patterson, P. G., Johnson, L. W., & Spreng, R. A. (1997). Modeling the determinants of customer satisfaction for
business-to-business professional services. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(1), 417.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894505
Payne, A. (2013). Relationship marketing: The six markets framework. In Relationship Marketing (pp. 15–46). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080525150-7
Polk, X. L. (2018). Marketing: The Key to Successful Teaching and Learning. Journal of Marketing Development and
Competitiveness, 12(2), 12–57. https://doi.org/10.33423/jmdc.v12i2.1257
Ranaweera, C., & Neely, A. (2003). Some moderating effects on the service qualitycustomer retention link. International Journal of
Operations & Production Management, 23(2), 230–248. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570310458474
Ranaweera, C., & Prabhu, J. (2003). The influence of satisfaction, trust and switching barriers on customer retention in a continuous
purchasing setting. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(4), 374–395.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230310489231
Rapp, S., & Collins, T. (1990). The great marketing turnaround: the age of the individual-and how to profit from it. In (No Title).
Reichheld, F. F., & Teal, T. (1996). The loyalty effect: The hidden force behind growth, profits and lasting. In Harvard Business
School Publications, Boston.
Richards, G. (1996). The social context of cultural tourism. In Cultural tourism in Europe (pp. 47–70). CAB International: Wallingford.
Roberts, N. C. (2015). The Age of Direct Citizen Participation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315700427
Rubin, J., & Buchanan, P. (2008). What’s the Real Cause of the Global Recession? CIBC World Markets Incorporated.
Sin, L. Y. M., Tse, A. C. B., & Yim, F. H. K. (2005). CRM: conceptualization and scale development. European Journal of Marketing,
39(11/12), 1264–1290. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560510623253
Terblanche, N. S., & Hofmeyr, J. (2005). A study of two customer retention measures: the American customer satisfaction index and
the conversion model. ANZMAC Conference: Relationship Marketing (Consumer), 1, 5065.
Vavra, T. G. (2002). ISO 9001: 2000 and customer satisfaction. Quality Progress, 35(5), 6975.
Wong, A., & Sohal, A. (2003). Service quality and customer loyalty perspectives on two levels of retail relationships. Journal of
Services Marketing, 17(5), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040310486285
Yau, O. H. M., McFetridge, P. R., Chow, R. P. M., Lee, J. S. Y., Sin, L. Y. M., & Tse, A. C. B. (2000). Is relationship marketing for
everyone? European Journal of Marketing, 34(9/10), 1111–1127. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560010342494
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
The great resignation is an unprecedented labour force phenomenon that has garnered significant attention in contemporary employment dynamics. This multifaceted phenomenon, characterised by an exodus of employees from their current positions, has initiated a profound transformation in the work landscape. The paramount concern of this research endeavour is to elucidate the intricate relationship between the Great Resignation and its consequential impact on work-life balance. A compelling exploration of the shifting priorities of the modern workforce is paramount to understanding the underlying dynamics of this phenomenon, especially in light of the profound influence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Central to this examination is an in-depth analysis of the concept of work-life balance itself. By scrutinising the varying definitions and perceptions of work-life balance, we aim to unveil the underpinnings of this critical construct. Also, the study delves into the emergence of hybrid work models as potential solutions to the challenges posed by the Great Resignation. Employers, recognising the significance of work-life balance as a pivotal driver of employee retention, have begun to implement strategies and adaptations to address the evolving needs of their workforce. This study scrutinises the measures taken by organisations to facilitate work-life balance and explores their efficacy. Complementing this, we scrutinise the expectations and demands of employees in the post-Great Resignation landscape, shedding light on the pivotal role of benefits and perks in influencing workplace choices. Lastly, the research offers a forward-looking perspective on the future of work-life balance, envisioning the contours of post-pandemic work culture and predicting long-term implications stemming from this seismic labour market shift.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: Over the years, manufacturing firms have struggled to achieve maximum productivity because such organizations lack good leadership, work-team, and persons with the team leading skills to lead work-teams. The problem of leadership structure of work-teams in most Nigerian firms was the motivating factor for this research. Thus, the aim of this paper is to assess the effect of team trust and leadership structure on performance of manufacturing firms in Niger Delta Region of Nigeria. Theoretical Framework: The theoretical framework is hinged on Self-Leadership Theory, which focused on participatory decision making, individual discretion and team work as important motivating factor and suggestions that will lead more committed employees who strive for greater efficiency and effectiveness. Design/Methods/Approach: Two specifics objectives are considered; the first being team trust and the other being leadership structure. Using a descriptive survey research design, 534 respondents in nine states in Nigeria were examined to obtain their perceptions. Findings: The results of the analysis indicated that the performance of manufacturing firms is dependent on team-work. In other words, acceptable and planned team-building had direct relationship with performance of firms. Research, Practical and Social Implication: The study shows that team trust and leadership structure are major drivers of organizational performance. Originality/Value: The value of the study is vital to manufacturing firms such that top management are advised to create teams whereby members should create increased trust among themselves by communicating openly and avoiding activities purely out of self-interest and reciprocating help from team mates for better results in manufacturing industries.
Article
Full-text available
This article aims to review the literature on customer relationship management (CRM) research. This review article analyses the trends in CRM research, popular research topics and tools used in studies. This study presents how CRM research developed over 21 years in terms of critical areas, type of studies, sources of papers, the origin of articles (country-wise distribution), type of data used, under-researched areas and popular researched areas. The study provides a broad classification and summarizes the last 21 years of CRM research in an organized way. For this review article, research papers were taken from January 2000 to June 2020, that is, 21 years. A total of 104 papers were selected from different journals and conferences. Findings show that most of the articles were published in the year 2009. A total of 95% of articles were published in journals, and 5% were conference papers—most of the CRM research done in the USA and the United Kingdom. Empirical papers were maximum in number, whereas case studies were least. Primary studies were more than secondary studies. In review papers, the maximum times CRM and electronic customer relationship management (E-CRM) were taken as a basis for reviewing. The further article has classifications within primary studies and review papers. It also presents the most frequently used keywords and variables in literature. The study will be useful for researchers, practitioners and academicians for further CRM research. This study also provides the classification within primary studies based on data collection tools used, sampling technique used, sampling country, industry, statistical tests and methods and software used, also it gives a brief view of keywords and variables used in a total of 104 papers. This article provides the first such review on keywords and variables, thus presenting the classification on a different basis, which none of the published research has presented.
Article
Full-text available
The AIDA model assists marketers in developing vibrant, memorable, and persuasive television, radio, print, and electronic communications. Communication of this nature motivates consumer engagement and action, in regards to goods, services, and ideas. This paper explores the use of the AIDA model in educational settings. Specifically, the AIDA model can be used to improve teaching and learning techniques for educators. Furthermore, the use of the AIDA model in educational settings can improve subject comprehension and enthusiasm in adult learners. Consistent and continuous societal and technological changes make it necessary for educators to adapt and adopt new teaching and learning strategies.
Article
Full-text available
Building on previous work suggesting that trust is critical in facilitating exchange relationships, the authors describe a comprehensive theory of trust in market research relationships. This theory focuses on the factors that determine users’ trust in their researchers, including individual, interpersonal, organizational, interorganizational/interdepartmental, and project factors. The theory is tested in a sample of 779 users. Results indicate that the interpersonal factors are the most predictive of trust. Among these factors, perceived researcher integrity, willingness to reduce research uncertainty, confidentiality, expertise, tactfulness, sincerity, congeniality, and timeliness are most strongly associated with trust. Among the remaining factors, the formalization of the user's organization, the culture of the researcher's department or organization, the research organization's or department's power, and the extent to which the research is customized also affect trust. These findings generally do not change across different types of dyadic relationships.
Article
Both practitioners and academics understand that consumer loyalty and satisfaction are linked inextricably. They also understand that this relation is asymmetric. Although loyal consumers are most typically satisfied, satisfaction does not universally translate into loyalty. To explain the satisfaction–loyalty conundrum, the author investigates what aspect of the consumer satisfaction response has implications for loyalty and what portion of the loyalty response is due to this satisfaction component. The analysis concludes that satisfaction is a necessary step in loyalty formation but becomes less significant as loyalty begins to set through other mechanisms. These mechanisms, omitted from consideration in current models, include the roles of personal determinism (“fortitude”) and social bonding at the institutional and personal level. When these additional factors are brought into account, ultimate loyalty emerges as a combination of perceived product superiority, personal fortitude, social bonding, and their synergistic effects. As each fails to be attained or is unattainable by individual firms that serve consumer markets, the potential for loyalty erodes. A disquieting conclusion from this analysis is that loyalty cannot be achieved or pursued as a reasonable goal by many providers because of the nature of the product category or consumer disinterest. For some firms, satisfaction is the only feasible goal for which they should strive; thus, satisfaction remains a worthy pursuit among the consumer marketing community. The disparity between the pursuit of satisfaction versus loyalty, as well as the fundamental content of the loyalty response, poses several investigative directions for the next wave of postconsumption research.