ArticlePublisher preview available

When avifauna collide: the case for lethal control of barred owls in western North America

Wiley
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

Forest avifauna in eastern North America have expanded their range across the Great Plains to the West, likely due to anthropogenic changes. The barred owl (Strix varia) is a focal example of the negative effects that these intracontinental range expansions can have, with this invasive species becoming a major threat to the northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) and potentially larger biological communities. If barred owl populations are not managed immediately, northern spotted owl populations will likely be extirpated from large parts of their range and, ultimately, may become extinct. Of available management options, lethal control of barred owls has the greatest potential to rapidly benefit spotted owls and other impacted species. We argue that immediate action is necessary to buy time while other management options are explored and developed and that lethal control is an ethical management option. The barred owl conundrum exemplifies the challenges of managing native invasive species.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
© 2024 e Ecological Societ y of America. is article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
When avifauna collide: the case for lethal control
of barred owls in western North America
John P Dumbacher1*† and Alan B Franklin2†
Forest avifauna in eastern North America have expanded their range across the Great Plains to the West, likely due to anthropo-
genic changes. The barred owl (Strix varia) is a focal example of the negative effects that these intracontinental range expansions
can have, with this invasive species becoming a major threat to the northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) and poten-
tially larger biological communities. If barred owl populations are not managed immediately, northern spotted owl populations
will likely be extirpated from large parts of their range and, ultimately, may become extinct. Of available management options,
lethal control of barred owls has the greatest potential to rapidly benefit spotted owls and other impacted species. We argue that
immediate action is necessary to buy time while other management options are explored and developed and that lethal control is
an ethical management option. The barred owl conundrum exemplifies the challenges of managing native invasive species.
Front Ecol Environ 2025; 23(3): e2817, doi:10.1002/fee.2817
Historically, the North American Great Plains were a bar-
rier separating the eastern forest avifauna from their
western counterparts in North America (Mengel1964; Engle
et al.2008; Livezey2009b). However, in the past century, this
once almost impenetrable barrier has become freckled with
forest patches and corridors created by anthropogenic changes,
including fire suppression, planting of urban shade trees, pro-
motion of riparian woodlands after the removal of bison
(Bison bison) and beaver (Castor canadensis), and establishing
windbreaks after the Dust Bowl (Engle et al. 2008;
Livezey 2009b; Currey et al. 2022). These changes allowed
forest- dependent eastern avifauna to “island hop” or follow
riparian forest corridors across the once treeless expanse of
grasslands to interact and compete with ecologically similar
forest species of the West, which had been separated from their
eastern counterparts for millennia (DeSante and George1994;
La Sorte and Boecklen2005).
An invasive species is an organism that causes ecological or
economic harm in an environment where it is not native,
whereas native invaders are species that have become invasive by
expanding their range into new areas through anthropogenic
modifications (Carey et al.2012). The perception is usually that
an invasive species on one continent originated from a different
continent; however, increasingly, invasive species are native to a
continent but expanded their historical geographic range into
new environments in response to anthropogenic changes. These
shifts in species’ geographic ranges may result in a collision
course with native species that are naïve to the invading species.
For example, the blue jay (Cyanocitta cristata) expanded its
range from eastern to western North America within approxi-
mately the past 70 years (Figure1). Although their impacts on
western forest avifauna are largely unknown, invasive blue jays
are predicted to have negative effects on several native avian
species because they are aggressive nest predators of many spe-
cies, especially songbirds (Danielson et al.1997), and could be
potential competitors with native corvids. For instance, in
Massachusetts, Kluza et al.(2000) found that blue jay popula-
tions increased with human housing density, which correlated
with declines in open- cup- nesting bird populations. Invasive
blue jays have also been implicated in the local extirpation of
endangered golden- cheeked warbler (Setophaga chrysoparia)
populations in Texas (Engels and Sexton 1994). In addition,
invasive blue jays may impact the ecology of West Nile virus in
western North America because they are considered a compe-
tent amplifying host for the virus (LaDeau et al.2008), account-
ing for 22% of viral amplification in some areas (Levine
et al.2016).
Range expansions can also lead to “conservation conun-
drums” for impacted species that are already threatened or
1Institute for Biodiversity Science and Sustainability,California Academy
of Sciences, San Francisco, CA*(jdumbacher@calacademy.org);2US
Department of Agriculture, Wildlife Services,National Wildlife Research
Center, Fort Collins, CO
these authors contributed equally to this work.
In a nutshell:
In response to anthropogenic climate change and habitat
alteration, animals are shiing their geographic ranges,
sometimes with negative eects on the ecological com-
munities therein
Barred owls (Strix varia) from the eastern US have ex-
panded to the West and will need to be managed eec-
tively to prevent the extinction of the federally listed
northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina)
In North America, as the fauna mix, dicult decisions
on management will need to be made
CONCEPTS AND QUESTIONS 1 of 8
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Simple Summary Current trends of human population growth and landscape development in Europe suggest that wildlife impacts will increase. Traditional methods to mitigate these impacts, such as culling, can be ineffective, environmentally harmful and often publicly opposed. Contraceptives might be an alternative to culling. This review focuses on contraceptives for mammals and birds, currently registered or widely tested, which might be considered for European wildlife. The review describes the effects of contraceptives on reproduction and welfare, the methods and challenges of contraceptive administration to large numbers of animals, the potential cost and feasibility of using fertility control and the knowledge gaps in this area. Contexts and species for using contraceptives to reduce the impacts of European wildlife include small, isolated wildlife populations, charismatic species and situations in which lethal control is either illegal or publicly unacceptable, such as urban environments and national parks. The review provides guidance to assist decisions about the potential use of wildlife fertility control and lists eight main reasons for Europe to invest in this area, and particularly in developing oral contraceptives which will allow large-scale applications of wildlife fertility control. This would be crucial for Europe, where humans and wildlife are increasingly sharing space and resources. Abstract Trends of human population growth and landscape development in Europe show that wildlife impacts are escalating. Lethal methods, traditionally employed to mitigate these impacts, are often ineffective, environmentally hazardous and face increasing public opposition. Fertility control is advocated as a humane tool to mitigate these impacts. This review describes mammalian and avian wildlife contraceptives’ effect on reproduction of individuals and populations, delivery methods, potential costs and feasibility of using fertility control in European contexts. These contexts include small, isolated wildlife populations and situations in which lethal control is either illegal or socially unacceptable, such as urban settings, national parks and areas where rewilding occurs. The review highlights knowledge gaps, such as impact of fertility control on recruitment, social and spatial behaviour and on target and non-target species, provides a decision framework to assist decisions about the potential use of wildlife fertility control, and suggests eight reasons for Europe to invest in this area. Although developing and registering contraceptives in Europe will have substantial costs, these are relatively small when compared to wildlife’s economic and environmental impact. Developing safe and effective contraceptives will be essential if European countries want to meet public demand for methods to promote human–wildlife coexistence.
Article
Full-text available
Invasive birds cause damage to economies, natural resources, and human safety across the globe. In the United States, rose-ringed parakeets (Psittacula krameri), monk parakeets (Myiopsitta monachus), European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris), common mynas (Acridotheres tristis), rock doves (Columba livia), Eurasian collared doves (Streptopelia decaocto), and house sparrows (Passer domesticus) are among the invasive and often harmful small-bodied birds inhabiting periurban habitats. The destructive nature of these species warrants a review of methods to reduce or eradicate populations along with methods to reduce damage when population eradication cannot be achieved. We reviewed damage management literature from these species’ native and introduced ranges. Additionally, we used the behavior and ecology of these species to inform tool recommendations and potential efficacy under various damage scenarios, while being sensitive to cultural preferences and location of implementation (residential, commercial, and agricultural). Although this review focuses on invasive birds in the United States, it is applicable to other pest species across the globe. Our review highlights areas where research is needed to validate promising damage management methods (lethal control, fertility control, habitat modification, exclusionary methods, frightening devices, and chemical repellents). Where birds are invasive, integrated pest management techniques should focus on eradication or population reduction (toxicants, shooting, and trapping) to keep populations at levels where nonlethal tools can reduce damage. We acknowledge the efficacy of an eradication campaign depends on biological, environmental, and economic factors, along with social license for lethal removal. We recommend integrated pest management strategies including lethal and nonlethal tools specific to the damage problem. Sustained efforts to reduce invasive populations should be used along with integrated deterrent strategies for short-term damage relief.
Article
Full-text available
Aim Extensive portions of high‐latitude grasslands worldwide have recently experienced increased vegetative productivity (i.e., greening) and have undergone a rapid transition towards woody plant dominance via the process of woody plant expansion (WPE). This raises the underlying question: To what degree are WPE and greening spatiotemporally linked? Given that these vegetative changes are predicted to continue, we seek to understand how recent changes in vegetation extent and productivity have interacted under recent climate change and anthropogenic disturbance to provide insights surrounding the future trajectory of temperate grasslands broadly. Location Northern Great Plains (NGP), North America. Taxon Woody plants. Methods Greening was measured as the significant increase in three metrics between 2000 and 2019: leaf area index (LAI), annual maximum normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI) and annual mean NDVI. WPE was measured as the significant proportional increase in percent tree cover change between 2000 and 2019 in grasslands. We then examined these variables across a host of 26 potential driving variables. Results We show that average proportional greening increased by 0.2–1.3% year ⁻¹ (depending on metric), and proportional WPE increased by 6.9% year ⁻¹ since 2000 across the NGP. Both changes are largely driven by the absence of wildfire and changing climate. Furthermore, WPE was spatially coherent and positively associated with a large component of recent greening, as revealed by their coupling across 34.1%–40.6% of grassland area and as evidenced by the 9.7%–19.7% of the variability in greening explained by WPE. Main conclusions WPE and greening are spatiotemporally coupled across large portions of the NGP. Under continued climate change and wildfire suppression, WPE and greening are likely to continue across large swathes of grasslands globally. Furthermore, our results show that using a single greening metric may be insufficient to capture the large‐scale vegetative changes such as the expansion of woody vegetation.
Article
Full-text available
Invasive species are a primary threat to biodiversity and are challenging to manage once populations become established in previously unoccupied areas. But removing them is further complicated when invasions occur in continental, mixed‐ownership systems. We demonstrate a rare conservation success: the regional‐scale removal of an invasive predator – the barred owl (Strix varia) – to benefit the spotted owl (Strix occidentalis) in California. Barred owl site occupancy declined sixfold, from 0.19 to 0.03, following 1 year of removals, and site extinction (0.92) far exceeded colonization (0.02). Spotted owls recolonized 56% of formerly occupied territories within 1 year, contrasting starkly with removals conducted after barred owls achieved high densities in the Pacific Northwest. Our study therefore averted the otherwise likely extirpation of California spotted owls (Strix occidentalis occidentalis) by barred owl competition. Collectively, leveraging technological advances in population monitoring, early intervention, targeting defensible biogeographic areas, and fostering public–private partnerships will reduce invasive species‐driven extinction of native fauna in continental systems.
Article
Full-text available
Significance Invasive species can cause extinctions of native species and widespread biodiversity loss. Invader removal is a common management response, but the use of long-term field experiments to characterize effectiveness of removals in benefitting impacted native species is rare. We used a large-scale removal experiment to investigate the demographic response of a threatened native species, the northern spotted owl, to removal of an invasive competitor species, the barred owl. Removal of barred owls had a strong, positive effect on survival of spotted owls, which arrested long-term population declines of spotted owls. The results demonstrate that the long-term persistence of spotted owls will depend heavily on reducing the negative impacts of barred owls while simultaneously addressing other threats, such as habitat loss.
Article
Full-text available
Compassionate conservation holds that compassion should transform conservation. It has prompted heated debate and has been criticized strongly. We reviewed the debate to characterize compassionate conservation and to philosophically analyze critiques that are recurring and that warrant further critical attention. The necessary elements of compassionate conservation relate to the moral value of sentient animals and conservation and to science and conservation practice. Although compassionate conservation has several nontraditional necessary conditions, it also importantly allows a degree of pluralism in values and scientific judgment regarding animals and conservation practice. We identified 52 specific criticisms from 11 articles that directly critique compassionate conservation. We closely examined 33 of these because they recurred regularly or included substantial questions that required further response. Critics criticized compassionate conservation's ethical foundations, scientific credentials, clarity of application, understanding of compassion, its alleged threat to conservation and biodiversity. Some criticisms, we found, are question begging, confused, or overlook conceptual complexity. These criticisms raise questions for critics and proponents, regarding, for example, equal versus differential intrinsic moral value of different sentient animals (including humans), problems of natural and human‐caused suffering of wild animals and predation, and the acceptability of specific conservation practices within compassionate conservation. By addressing recurring and faulty critiques of compassionate conservation and identifying issues for compassionate conservation to address, this review provides a clearer basis for crucial ongoing interdisciplinary dialogue about ethics, values, and conservation.
Article
Full-text available
The northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) inhabits older coniferous forests in the Pacific Northwest and has been at the center of forest management issues in this region. The immediate threats to this federally listed species include habitat loss and competition with barred owls (Strix varia), which invaded from eastern North America. We conducted a prospective meta-analysis to assess population trends and factors affecting those trends in northern spotted owls using 26 years of survey and capture-recapture data from 11 study areas across the owls' geographic range to analyze demographic traits, rates of population change, and occupancy parameters for spotted owl territories. We found that northern spotted owl populations experienced significant declines of 6–9% annually on 6 study areas and 2–5% annually on 5 other study areas. Annual declines translated to ≤35% of the populations remaining on 7 study areas since 1995. Barred owl presence on spotted owl territories was the primary factor negatively affecting apparent survival, recruitment, and ultimately, rates of population change. Analysis of spotted and barred owl detections in an occupancy framework corroborated the capture-recapture analyses with barred owl presence increasing territorial extinction and decreasing territorial colonization of spotted owls. While landscape habitat components reduced the effect of barred owls on these rates of decline, they did not reverse the negative trend. Our analyses indicated that northern spotted owl populations potentially face extirpation if the negative effects of barred owls are not ameliorated while maintaining northern spotted owl habitat across their range.
Technical Report
Full-text available
Populations of Northern Spotted Owls (Strix occidentalis caurina; hereinafter referred to as Spotted Owl) are declining throughout this subspecies’ geographic range. Evidence indicates that competition with invading populations of Barred Owls (S. varia) has contributed significantly to those declines. A pilot study in California showed that localized removal of Barred Owls coupled with conservation of suitable forest conditions can slow or even reverse population declines of Spotted Owls. It remains unknown, however, whether similar results can be obtained in areas with different forest conditions, greater densities of Barred Owls, and fewer remaining Spotted Owls. During 2015–17, we initiated a before-after-control-impact (BACI) experiment at three study areas in Oregon and Washington to determine if removal of Barred Owls can improve population trends of Spotted Owls. Each study area had at least 20 years of pre-treatment demographic data on Spotted Owls, and represented different forest conditions occupied by the two owl species in the Pacific Northwest. This report describes research accomplishments and preliminary results from the first 2.5 years (March 2015–August 2017) of the planned 5-year experiment.
Article
Invasive predators can have detrimental impacts on native species and biological communities through direct consumptive effects and indirect effects on trophic interactions, yet these relations are often poorly understood through the initial stages of predator expansion. Leveraging early, lethal collection efforts to study invasive barred owls (Strix varia) at the leading edge of their range expansion in northeastern California, we conducted DNA metabarcoding of intestinal samples to assess the diet of this invasive predator. Through the development of customized primers and this novel approach to observing owl diet, we screened the intestinal contents of 124 barred owls and detected a broad diet of 78 unique prey types (48 vertebrates and 30 invertebrates), including prey types undetected in previous methodologies. Mammals were the most consumed vertebrate class (frequency of occurrence = 65 %), followed by amphibians (32 %), birds (22 %), and reptiles (19 %). Diets differed regionally but were similar among ages and sexes and exhibited limited variation in response to local environmental conditions. Our work highlights the generalist predatory strategy of invasive barred owls, identifies numerous native species potentially threatened by their range expansion, and indicates that they will not serve as ecological replacements for congeneric spotted owls (Strix occidentalis) they displace. These findings suggest that expanding currently limited barred owl removals could benefit native species and communities in western North America. More broadly, we demonstrate DNA metabarcoding, combined with early intervention, provides a powerful tool for conducting detailed assessments of species consumed by invasive predators, potentially incentivizing conservation actions and improving outcomes.
Article
Ethics reviews are not part of environmental policy or wildlife management in the United States. This changed when, for the first time, the US Fish and Wildlife Service conducted such a review with respect to the barred and northern spotted owls. Spotted owls are endangered throughout their range by a variety of anthropogenic and natural forces. The interspecific competition between barred and spotted owls is a key factor second only to habitat destruction. A proposed lethal experiment to remove barred owls raised ethical concerns among wildlife agencies, citizens, and advocacy groups. Seeking to better understand these concerns, the Service created the Barred Owl Stakeholder Group. Using an innovative method and instrument in the form of an ethics-based policy dialogue and an ethics brief, the stakeholder group explored the ethical dimensions of the removal experiment. This process holds lessons for how public policy can bring ethics to bear on wild lives.