PreprintPDF Available

The Effectiveness of Lockdowns, Face Masks and Vaccination Programmes Vis-à-Vis Mitigating COVID-19

November 2024

DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.12370.57281/1

Authors:

Martin Victor Sewell

Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet.

A seasonal influenza-like illness became a pandemic of governmental overreach and collective hysteria. Lockdowns turned out to be the greatest health economics mistake in modern history, face masks served no useful purpose in the community, in schools or in healthcare, whilst vaccinations were effective against severe COVID-19 in the elderly in 2021, but ultimately likely did more harm than good.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.

Article

An Analysis of Seasonal Tokens

June 2023 · International Journal of Cryptocurrency Research

Martin Victor Sewell

Article

Full-text available

Evaluating the effectiveness of countywide mask mandates at reducing SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Uni...

January 2022 · Journal of Osteopathic Medicine

Context With the rise of the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 and the low vaccination rates in the United States, mitigation strategies to reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2 are essential for protecting the health of the general public and reducing strain on healthcare facilities. This study compares US counties with and without mask mandates and determines if the mandates are associated with reduced ... [Show full abstract] daily COVID-19 infection. US counties have debated whether masks effectively decrease COVID-19 cases, and political pressures have prevented some counties from passing mask mandates. This article investigates the utility of mask mandates in small US counties. Objectives This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of mask mandates in small US counties and places where the population density may not be as high as in larger urban counties and to determine the efficacy of countywide mask mandates in reducing daily COVID-19 infection. Methods The counties studied were those with populations between 40,000 and 105,000 in states that did not have statewide mask mandates. A total of 38 counties were utilized in the study, half with and half without mask mandates. Test counties were followed for 30 days after implementing their mask mandate, and daily new SARS-CoV-2 infection was recorded during this timeframe. The counties were in four randomly selected states that did not have statewide mask mandates. The controls utilized were from counties with similar populations to the test counties and were within the same state as the test county. Controls were followed for the same 30 days as their respective test county. Data were analyzed utilizing t-test and difference-in-difference analyses comparing counties with mask mandates and those without. Results These data showed statistically significant lower averages of SARS-CoV-2 daily infection in counties that passed mask mandates when compared with counties that did not. The difference-in-difference analysis revealed a 16.9% reduction in predicted COVID-19 cases at the end of 30 days. Conclusions These data support the effectiveness of mask mandates in reducing SARS-CoV-2 infection spread in small US counties where the population density may be less than in urban counties. Small US counties that are considering passing mask mandates for the population can utilize these data to justify their policy considerations.

Article

Full-text available

Seasonal influenza vaccination may mitigate the potential impact of an H5N1 pandemic

September 2008 · Chinese Medical Journal

Preprint

Full-text available

Optimal intervention strategies for a new pandemic: The case of Covid-19

December 2024

We present an age-stratified SEIR-type model of the Norwegian population, which is extended to include the effects of broad types of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) like general lockdownpolicies, contact tracing and quarantine and border control. The model can be used to explore the spread of a new virus with given virulence and transmissibility, and to assess the main costs of the ... [Show full abstract] disease and the NPIs in terms of lost health and welfare as well as economic losses. We define the optimal strategy as the intervention policy which minimizes the total costs from the pandemic, including health, economic and other welfare effects. We find that the optimal policy typically is a bang-bang-strategy, where costly interventions are either so strict that the pandemic is suppressed to a low level, or they are not used at all. Strict interventions may be used to stop the disease at the herd immunity level (i.e prevent pandemic overshoot), while mitigation policies aimed at merely slowing the spread of the pandemic are not optimal in our baseline simulations. We explore how the optimal strategy depends on the properties of the virus, healthcare capacity, intervention costs, population behavior and other relevant variables. These results are informative for decisions regarding costly investments and interventions. In addition, we explore the consequences of policy errors and delays, providing guidance for decision making in the uncertain early stages of a new pandemic.

Last Updated: 13 Nov 2024