A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
CASE STUDY
International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering (2024) 10:94
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-024-00602-x
signicant environmental damage and economic costs dur-
ing reconstruction. For instance, the Kettleman Hills failure
was primarily attributed to interface failure resulting from
insucient interface shear strength [1–4]. In the case of the
Cincinnati Landll, excavation at the toe of the slope was
identied as the primary cause of instability [5, 6]. Lique-
faction of the bottom waste led to reduced waste strength,
which subsequently contributed to slope instability at the
Bulbul Drive Landll during operation [7–9]. The failures
at Dona Juana and Shenzhen Landlls demonstrated how
increased leachate levels and surcharge can precipitate slope
instability [10, 11]. Furthermore, the Xerolakka Landll
failure exemplied how overloading and inadequate waste
compaction can result in diminished shear strength of the
waste material, ultimately leading to slope failure [12, 13].
Therefore, accurate estimation of the shear strength through
the geosynthetic interface testing is a key to prevent the fail-
ure of landll slopes. This paper focuses on the eect of soil
nes on geosynthetic interface strength, which governed the
stability of the landll slope in 2013.
Introduction
Landlling is the most common method of regulated dis-
posal of municipal solid waste (MSW). However, a number
of landll failures have occurred since the 1988 Kettleman
Hills slope failure in a hazardous waste landll including
Cincinnati, Ohio; Bulbul Drive, South Africa; Dona Juana,
Columbia; Shenzhen, China; Xerolakka, Greece; and Shi-
raz, Iran [1–13]. Overestimation of the shear strength
caused slope instability in these cases and resulted in
Timothy D. Stark
tstark@illinois.edu
Hyunil Jung
hyunilj2@illinois.edu
Jiale Lin
jialelin1994@outlook.com
Abedalqader Idries
aidries@langan.com
1 University of Macau, Macau, China
2 Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-
Champaign, 205 N. Mathews Ave, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
3 Langan Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc, 9606
N. Mopac Expressway Suite 110, Austin, TX 78759, USA
Abstract
The interface between a geosynthetic drainage composite (GDC) and textured geomembrane (GMX) is assumed to be free
of soil particles and other debris to facilitate drainage, maintain interface shear resistance, and minimize clogging. How-
ever, soil particles usually can pass through the GDC and accumulate on the upper surface of the primary-GMX during
landll construction and operation. This paper presents a case study involving a geosynthetic bottom liner system with a
leachate collection and removal system above the primary-GMX comprised of granular drainage media and an underlying
GDC. After exhumation, the primary-GDC/GMX interface contained signicant soil particles while the secondary-GDC/
GMX interface did not. Torsional ring shear tests were conducted to study the impact of the soil particles on the primary-
and secondary-GDC/GMX interfaces to understand why failure occurred along the top of the secondary-GMX and not
the primary-GMX even though similar geosynthetics were used for both interfaces.
Keywords Textured geomembrane · Drainage composite · Peak strength · Large displacement strength · Residual
strength · Ring shear testing · Soil
Received: 25 December 2023 / Accepted: 27 October 2024 / Published online: 7 November 2024
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024
Eect of Soil Fines on Geosynthetic Interface Shear Strength
JialeLin1· Timothy D.Stark2· HyunilJung2· AbedalqaderIdries3
1 3
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.