ArticlePDF Available

Fear of reinjury after acute Achilles tendon rupture is related to poorer recovery and lower physical activity postinjury

Wiley
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate how fear of reinjury to the Achilles tendon affects return to previous levels of physical activity and self‐reported Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) outcomes. Methods Data were collected from a large cohort of patients treated for an acute Achilles tendon rupture at Sahlgrenska University Hospital Mölndal between 2015 and 2020. The ATRS and additional questions concerning fear of reinjury, treatment modality, satisfaction of treatment and recovery were analyzed 1–6 years postinjury. Analysis was performed to determine the impact of fear of reinjury on patient‐reported recovery and physical activity. Results Of a total of 856 eligible patients, 550 (64%) answered the self‐reported questionnaire and participated in the follow‐up. Of the participants, 425 (77%) were men and 125 (23%) were women. ATRS, recovery in percentage, satisfaction of treatment, recovery on a 5‐point scale and physical activity level post‐ versus preinjury were significantly related to fear of reinjury (p < 0.001). Of the nonsurgically treated patients, 59% reported fear of reinjury compared to 48% of the surgically treated patients (p = 0.024) Patients that reported fear of reinjury had a 15‐point lower median ATRS score than those who did not (p < 0.001). Conclusion More than half of patients who have suffered an Achilles tendon rupture are afraid of reinjuring their tendon. Patients who reported fear of reinjury exhibited a significantly lower ATRS score. This indicates the importance of addressing psychological aspects in the treatment after this injury. Level of Evidence Level II.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Received: 1 August 2024
|
Accepted: 9 September 2024
DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70077
ORIGINAL PAPER
Fear of reinjury after acute Achilles tendon rupture is
related to poorer recovery and lower physical activity
postinjury
Elin Larsson
1
|Agnes LeGreves
1
|Annelie Brorsson
2,3
|
Pernilla Eliasson
1
|Christer Johansson
1
|Michael R. Carmont
3,4
|
Katarina Nilsson Helander
1
1
The Department of Orthopaedics,
Sahlgrenska University Hospital Mölndal,
Institute of Clinical Sciences at Sahlgrenska
Academy, Gothenburg University,
Gothenburg, Sweden
2
IFK Kliniken Rehab, Gothenburg, Sweden
3
The Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of
Clinical Science at Sahlgrenska Academy,
Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
4
The Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic
Surgery, Princess Royal Hospital, Shrewsbury
& Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Shropshire, UK
Correspondence
Elin Larsson and Katarina Nilsson Helander
Email: elin.larsson.2@gu.se and katarina.
nilsson.helander@gu.se
Funding information
Doctor Felix Neubergh Foundation
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate how fear of reinjury to the
Achilles tendon affects return to previous levels of physical activity and self
reported Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) outcomes.
Methods: Data were collected from a large cohort of patients treated for an
acute Achilles tendon rupture at Sahlgrenska University Hospital Mölndal
between 2015 and 2020. The ATRS and additional questions concerning
fear of reinjury, treatment modality, satisfaction of treatment and recovery
were analyzed 16 years postinjury. Analysis was performed to determine
the impact of fear of reinjury on patientreported recovery and physical
activity.
Results: Of a total of 856 eligible patients, 550 (64%) answered the self
reported questionnaire and participated in the followup. Of the participants,
425 (77%) were men and 125 (23%) were women. ATRS, recovery in
percentage, satisfaction of treatment, recovery on a 5point scale and
physical activity level postversus preinjury were signicantly related to fear
of reinjury (p< 0.001). Of the nonsurgically treated patients, 59% reported
fear of reinjury compared to 48% of the surgically treated patients
(p= 0.024) Patients that reported fear of reinjury had a 15point lower
median ATRS score than those who did not (p< 0.001).
Conclusion: More than half of patients who have suffered an Achilles
tendon rupture are afraid of reinjuring their tendon. Patients who reported
fear of reinjury exhibited a signicantly lower ATRS score. This indicates the
importance of addressing psychological aspects in the treatment after this
injury.
Level of Evidence: Level II.
KEYWORDS
Achilles tendon rupture, Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score, fear of reinjury
J Exp Orthop. 2024;11:e70077. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jeo2
|
1of7
https://doi.org/10.1002/jeo2.70077
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited.
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee
Surgery and Arthroscopy.
Abbreviations: ATR, Achilles tendon rupture; ATRS, Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score; IQR, interquartile ranges; SD, standard deviation; SU/Mölndal, Sahl-
grenska University Hospital Mölndal.
INTRODUCTION
The incidence of acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) is
increasing, with a particularly higher risk of injury
among those who are middleaged, male and under-
take a more active lifestyle [3]. Huttunen et al. pre-
sented that men are four times more likely to suffer
from acute ATR than women [6]. The choice of treat-
ment for ATR varies between hospitals, regions and
countries and opinions are divided as to whether sur-
gical or nonsurgical treatment is recommended. It is
generally agreed from intervention studies that surgical
repair reduces the risk of rerupture over nonsurgical
treatment by approximately two to four times, although
the magnitude of risk reduction may vary between
studies [10, 11, 13]. However, surgical treatment can
lead to a number of complications, including adhesions,
iatrogenic nerve injury, pain, cosmetically unappealing
scars, infection or other wound problems. It must also
be considered that surgical repair does not eliminate
the risk of rerupture [8]. A rupture of one's Achilles
tendon can mean long sick leave with nancial losses
for the individual patient [16]. Furthermore, a long
rehabilitation awaits and despite this, many do not
regain full function [1].
Few studies have been published regarding the
psychological wellbeing and attitudes of patients to-
ward recovery after an ATR and the impacts of these
factors on return to physical activity [7, 14]. Jónsdóttir
et al. presented that n= 25 patients (50%) with acute
ATR, refrained from physical activity due to fear of re-
injury to the Achilles tendon [7]. Patients who were
afraid of new injuries had a signicantly greater differ-
ence in strength between their injured leg and healthy
leg compared with those who did not [7]. Olsson et al.
showed that patients reporting fear had signicantly
worse selfreported outcomes and physical activity
3 months after an ATR [14].
Fear of reinjury is a welldocumented concept in
sports medicine as a barrier to rehabilitation. In a clin-
ical review, Hsu et al. identied that fear of reinjury can
have a negative impact on rehabilitation, recovery and
subsequent successful return to sports participation [5].
The authors proposed that athletes with a high fear of
reinjury would benet most from psychologically in-
formed practice to enhance rehabilitation. Psychologi-
cally informed practice, as described in the article,
includes measuring fear of reinjury using PROM to
monitor during rehabilitation [5].
The aim of this study was to investigate how fear of
reinjury to the Achilles tendon affects return to previous
physical activity in a large cohort. The specic ques-
tions of interest were how fear affects recovery after
acute ATR and return to previous activity. The hypoth-
esis was that a greater proportion of patients treated
nonsurgically would refrain from physical activity due to
fear of reinjury.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical
Review Authority (dnr 202101779).
This retrospective crosssectional study compiled
the medical records for all patients who visited the
emergency department with an acute ATR at Sahl-
grenska University Hospital Mölndal (SU/Mölndal)
between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2020 and
received the main diagnosis of S86.0 (damage to the
Achilles tendon). Patients meeting these inclusion
criteria were then contacted by mail 16 years after
their initial injury.
Eighthundredandftysix patients were invited to
the study and 550 patients (64.3%) were enroled in the
study. Patient demographic is presented in Table 1. The
letter contained information about the study and an
offer to participate. They were asked to selfreport
using the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS)
questionnaire [12], a patientreported outcome mea-
sure with high reliability and validity for measure out-
come after treatment for an ATR. Patients were also
provided additional questions regarding physical
activity levels preand postinjury, treatment satisfac-
tion, recovery (both in percent and on a Likert scale)
TAB LE 1 Patient demographics.
Total (n= 550) Women (n= 125) Men (n= 425) pValue
Age, years, mean (SD) 48 (14.9) 45 (14.7) 49 (14.9) 0.006
a
BMI, mean (SD) 26 (3.8) 25.3 (4.3) 26.5 (3.6) 0.002
a
Treatment, n(%) n.s.
b
Nonsurgery 395 (72%) 86 (69%) 309 (73%)
Surgery 155 (28%) 39 (31%) 116 (27%)
Note: Bold values are statistically signicant.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; n, number of patients; n.s., not signicant; SD, standard deviation.
a
Student's ttest.
b
Pearson's χ
2
test.
2of7
|
and fear of reinjuring their Achilles tendon. When re-
viewing medical records, the following parameters
were documented: age, sex, date of injury, date of
admission to the emergency department and treatment
modality.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics for patient demographics and
outcomes were reported as counts and proportions for
categorical variables. Continuous variables were re-
ported as means with standard deviations for normally
distributed data and medians with interquartile ranges
(IQR) for nonnormally distributed data. Distribution of
variables was examined by visual inspection of histo-
grams. For comparison between the two groups of
patients indicating the presence or absence of fear of
reinjury (yes/no), the Pearson χ
2
test was used for
categorical variables. The MannWhitney Utest was
used to compare ATRS scores and recovery in per-
centage between the two groups. All tests were two
sided, and the signicance level was set at 0.05. IBM
SPSS Statistics for Mac, version 28 (IBM Corp.) was
used for all statistical tests.
RESULTS
Of the 856 eligible patients, 550 (64.3%) answered the
question of whether they refrained from physical
activity due to fear of Achilles tendon reinjury. Of these,
56% reported a fear of reinjury to the Achilles tendon,
as shown in Table 2.
Treatment, ATRS, satisfaction, recovery and
current activity compared to before were signicantly
relatedtofear(Figure1,Table3). There was no
signicant difference between women and men re-
porting fear of reinjury as seen in Figure 2. The group
of patients that reported fear of reinjury had a
15point lower ATRS score compared to the group
that did not report fear of reinjury. Recovery ex-
pressed, as a percentage from 0% to 100%, was
signicantly lower among patients experiencing fear
of reinjury (Table 3).
There was a signicant association between re-
ported fear of reinjury and the age categories
(p= 0.008). The largest proportion reporting fear of re-
injuring the Achilles tendon was found in the 3039 and
4049 age categories. The lowest proportion who re-
ported fear of reinjuring the Achilles tendon was among
patients aged 70 years or older (Figure 3).
DISCUSSION
The most important nding of this crosssectional
cohort study is that 56% of the 550 patients who suf-
fered from an acute ATR reported a fear of reinjuring
their Achilles tendon. Most patients who experienced
fear of reinjury did not return to the same level of
physical activity as before their injury, were less satis-
ed with treatment, and had worse recovery and ATRS
outcomes compared to those reporting no fear of re-
injury. Furthermore, a larger proportion of nonsurgically
treated patients reported fear of reinjury. The results of
the present study are in line with previous studies that
investigated the frequency of fear of reinjury among
patients suffering from a musculoskeletal injury [7, 9].
However, the present study is based on a larger cohort
than previously published reports. Jónsdóttir et al. re-
ported that 50% out of 25 included patients with an ATR
felt such a high level of fear of rerupture that they
refrained from physical activity [7]. Similarly, Kvist et al.
found that 53% of the 62 who had sustained an injury to
the ACL of the knee returned to their previous activity
levels. Of those who did not return, the primary reason
was fear of reinjury [9].
The ndings of the present study indicate that the
majority of the patients expressed satisfaction with the
treatment of their injured Achilles tendon. However, it
was observed that patients who resumed participation
in sports activities without reporting a fear of reinjury
demonstrated a higher level of satisfaction than those
who did report such a fear. Moreover, there was a
signicant correlation between fear of reinjury and
recovery. There was a large, signicant difference of 15
points in ATRS scores between patients who reported
fear of reinjury and those who did not. Similarly, pa-
tients who felt fear of reinjury had 10% lower median
recovery scores than those who did not. Consistent
with ATRS ndings, only 27% of patients with fear of
reinjury reported a return to the same preinjury activity
level compared with 52% of those without fear
(p< 0.001). The reasons for these large differences
require further investigation. In future studies, it is of
interest to gain patient perspectives regarding fear to
better understand impact on daily life due to insufcient
recovery.
The present study showed signicant discrepancy
in the prevalence of fear of reinjury between patients
who underwent nonsurgical and surgical treatment
TAB LE 2 Fear of reinjury.
Total
(n= 550)
Women
(n= 125) Men (n= 425) pValue
Fear, n(%) n.s.
a
Yes 308 (56%) 71 (57%) 237 (56%)
No 242 (44%) 54 (43%) 188 (44%)
Abbreviation: n, number of patients.
a
Pearson's χ
2
test.
|
3of7
(59% vs. 48%; p= 0.024). Previously, Grevnerts et al.
found that the inability to perform physical activity and
fear of increased symptoms are strong factors in the
patient's choice of surgical treatment over nonsurgical
treatment for ACL rupture [4]. These factors could be
inuenced by a patient's belief that surgery entails a
lower risk of future problems with pain and a lower risk
of reinjury. Filbay et al. found that patients who pro-
ceeded to surgical treatment of ACL ruptures reported
greater fear of reinjury before treatment compared with
nonsurgically treated patients [2]. The results of our
study, in alignment with those of Grevnerts et al. [4] and
Filbay et al. [2], indicate that fear plays a signicant role
in both treatment selection and the return to baseline
function and daily activities. With surgery, patients may
feel less afraid of rerupturing their Achilles tendon due
to the fact that the tendon ends are surgically repaired
together, and the strength of the tendon is thus stron-
ger. This psychological effect makes surgical treatment
a predictor of less fear. Nevertheless, there is no strong
evidence that suggests surgical treatment provides a
better functional outcome [10].
In our cohort, the largest proportion of patients who
reported a fear of reinjury was observed in the 3039
and 4049 age groups, while the 70+ age group ex-
hibited the smallest proportion of patients fearful of
reinjury. This trend could be because the elderly usually
have lower demands and lower levels of physical
activity, and, therefore, fewer opportunities to abstain
from physical activity. In addition, the elderly may be
more concerned about other more serious diseases
than reinjury to their Achilles tendon. Another ex-
planation could be that most patients aged 3049 years
are employed and/or have children and, therefore, feel
that they cannot afford to lose time due to reinjury,
hence they might experience greater fear.
There is a need to determine why such a large
percentage of patients feel afraid of injuring themselves
again and, therefore, avoid physical activity. And sev-
eral questions remain as to why and when fear of re-
injury arises after an acute ATR. There is also a need to
FIGURE 1 Distribution of patients treated with surgery (left) and nonsurgical treatments (right) reporting fear and no fear of Achilles tendon
reinjury. Pearson's χ
2
test.
TAB LE 3 Treatment, recovery, activity and satisfaction
outcomes.
Fear (n= 308)
a
No fear
(n= 242)
b
pValue
ATRS score,
median (IQR)
76 (5590) 91 (7897) <0.001
a
Recovery, median
% (IQR)
80 (7090) 90 (8298) <0.001
a
Treatment satisfaction, n(%) <0.001
b
Completely
satised
109 (35.4%) 146 (60.3%)
Somewhat
satised
112 (36.4%) 69 (28.5%)
Neither satised
nor dissatised
52 (16.9%) 19 (7.9%)
Somewhat
dissatised
22 (7.1%) 4 (1.7%)
Dissatised 13 (4.2%) 4 (1.7%)
Recovery, n(%) <0.001
b
To full extent 48 (16%) 106 (44%)
To a large extent 183 (59%) 110 (45%)
Neither 27 (8.8%) 11 (4.5%)
To a small extent 48 (16%) 15 (6.2%)
Not at all 2 (0.6%) 0 (0%)
Current activity compared to before <0.001
b
Much more
active
11 (3.6%) 8 (3.3%)
Somewhat more 21 (6.8%) 26 (11%)
Same 83 (27%) 126 (52%)
Somewhat less 142 (46%) 64 (26%)
Much less active 51 (17%) 18 (7.4%)
Note: Bold values are statistically signicant.
Abbreviations: ATRS, Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score; IQR, interquartile range.
a
MannWhitney U test.
b
Pearson's χ
2
test.
4of7
|
characterize the degree to which patients are affected
in their everyday life because of their fear and whether
they have stopped doing certain activities compared to
preinjury simply because of fear. In addition to patient
related factors (e.g., personality traits), fear of reinjury
may, unfortunately, be supported or even amplied by
comments and mannerisms of treating clinicians during
the recovery process. Collectively, the results of this
study emphasize the importance of treating clinicians in
encouraging patients to not be afraid of pursuing
physical activity or sports. In their investigation of
psychological factors during the rehabilitation of ATR,
Slagers et al. [15] showed that fear of movement
decreased and readiness to return to sport improved
over time. This is in line with our interpretation that
psychological factors could affect rehabilitation, where
physiotherapists have an essential role in terms of
screening for and addressing fear. Going forward,
rehabilitation that includes psychological aspects could
be a valuable addition to physical rehabilitation to
overcome fear and encourage physical activity after
injury, thus, preventing patients from getting stuck in a
vicious cycle of fear and lack of physical activity. In the
orthopaedic community, individualized treatmentis
commonly seen as an approach to optimize outcomes
after an injury. Fear of reinjury could be an important
component of an individualized choice of treatment
during the rehabilitation process for acute ATR.
The large cohort size is one of the strengths of this
study. Previous studies in the same eld have been
FIGURE 2 Distribution of women (left) and men (right) reporting fear and no fear of Achilles tendon reinjury. Pearson's χ
2
test.
FIGURE 3 Proportion of patients reporting fear of Achilles tendon reinjury within each age category. The percentages reporting yes/no sum
up to 100% in each age category. A χ
2
test for association indicates an association between fear and age categories (p= 0.008).
|
5of7
carried out on much smaller cohorts. Another strength
was the use of the ATRS, an injuryspecic, validated
and reliabilitytested patientreported outcomes mea-
sure, to evaluate recovery in patients treated for a total
ATR. Furthermore, all patients included in the present
study were managed at one centre, which means that
the same local guidelines were followed regarding the
assessment of injury, ATRS and treatment choice
reducing the heterogeneity of the cohort. But this can
also be regarded as a limitation since the results could
be less generalizable and applicable to other settings
and in other countries with different working methods
and guidelines. Another limitation is the retrospective
nature of this study and the effect of recall bias. The
questionnaire was sent to patients so that at least
1 year had passed since injury, and the period
between the injury and questionnaire completion var-
ied from 1 to 6 years. Recall bias can affect the pa-
tients' answers as it can be difcult to remember the
time before injury. Nevertheless, previous studies
identied no signicant differences in ATRS scores
2 years after injury or several years after injury [1].
Related to the long study period, only 66% of patients
who were invited accepted and participated in the
followup study and answered the questionnaires. The
moderate response rate could pose a risk of selection
bias in that patients who felt completely satised with
their treatment and recovery chose to answer the
questionnaire to a greater extent than those who did
not feel satised. Finally, the study questionnaire
included only one question related to fear of reinjury.
This question was a yes/no question, and there was
no possibility for patient reporting the level of fear.
Future studies could ask more questions regarding
fear and the reasons for perceived fear. Studies where
patients are interviewed could help explore the topic
further.
The ndings of this study highlight the crucial
importance of inquiring about the potential fear
of reinjury during the course of both medical
consultationswith the orthopaedic surgeon and the
physiotherapistand of addressing this issue in a
comprehensive and sensitive manner.
CONCLUSIONS
More than half of patients affected by acute ATR are
afraid of reinjuring their Achilles tendon. Patients who
experienced fear of reinjury have a signicantly worse
selfestimated recovery as measured by the ATRS. The
ndings of this study emphasize the importance of
taking patients' fear of injury seriously.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Elin Larsson, Agnes LeGreves, Annelie Brorsson,
Pernilla Eliasson, Christer Johansson, Michael R.
Carmont and Katarina Nilsson Helander participated in
the design of the study. Elin Larsson, Katarina Nilsson
Helander and Christer Johansson performed the data
processing and statistical analysis. All of the authors
have contributed to the manuscript.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Doctor Felix Neubergh Foundation.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors declare no conict of interest.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data sets generated and/or analyzed during the
current study are not publicly available due to con-
dential information but are available from the corre-
sponding author on reasonable request.
ETHICS STATEMENT
Approval was provided by the Swedish Ethical Review
Authority, dnr 202101779. All patients that were
included in the study provided written consent for
enrolment.
ORCID
Elin Larsson http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3064-6146
Annelie Brorsson http://orcid.org/0000-0002-
9099-9529
Pernilla Eliasson http://orcid.org/0000-0001-
6718-034X
Christer Johansson http://orcid.org/0000-0002-
3707-9766
Michael R. Carmont http://orcid.org/0000-0002-
7472-6280
Katarina Nilsson Helander https://orcid.org/0000-
0002-1292-5102
REFERENCES
1. Brorsson, A., Grävare Silbernagel, K., Olsson, N. &
Nilsson Helander, K. (2018) Calf muscle performance decits
remain 7 years after an Achilles tendon rupture. The American
Journal of Sports Medicine, 46, 470477. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517737055
2. Filbay, S. & Kvist, J. (2022) Fear of reinjury following surgical
and nonsurgical management of anterior cruciate ligament
injury: an exploratory analysis of the NACOX multicenter lon-
gitudinal cohort study. Physical Therapy, 102(2), 111. Availa-
ble from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzab273
3. Ganestam, A., Kallemose, T., Troelsen, A. & Barfod, K.W.
(2016) Increasing incidence of acute Achilles tendon rupture
and a noticeable decline in surgical treatment from 1994 to
2013. A nationwide registry study of 33,160 patients. Knee
Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 24, 37303737.
Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3544-5
4. Grevnerts, H.T., Kvist, J., Fältström, A. & Sonesson, S. (2020)
Patients focus on performance of physical activity, knee stability
and advice from clinicians when making decisions concerning
the treatment of their anterior cruciate ligament injury.
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy,15(3),
441450. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26603/ijspt20200441
6of7
|
5. Hsu, C.J., Meierbachtol, A., George, S.Z. & Chmielewski, T.L.
(2017) Fear of reinjury in athletes: implications for rehabilitation.
Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach, 9, 162167.
Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738116666813
6. Huttunen, T.T., Kannus, P., Rolf, C., FelländerTsai, L. &
Mattila, V.M. (2014) Acute Achilles tendon ruptures: incidence
of injury and surgery in Sweden between 2001 and 2012. The
American Journal of Sports Medicine, 42, 24192423. Available
from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514540599
7. Jónsdóttir, U.S., Briem, K., Tranberg, R. & Brorsson, A. (2021)
The effect of fear of reinjury on joint power distribution during a
drop countermovement jump two years after an Achilles tendon
rupture. Translational Sports Medicine, 4, 667674. Available
from: https://doi.org/10.1002/tsm2.261.
8. Khan, R.J.K., Carey Smith, R.L. & Khan, R.J.K. (2010) Surgical
interventions for treating acute Achilles tendon ruptures.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2010, CD003674.
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003674.pub4
9. Kvist, J., Ek, A., Sporrstedt, K. & Good, L. (2005) Fear of re
injury: a hindrance for returning to sports after anterior cruciate
ligament reconstruction. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,
Arthroscopy, 13, 393397. Available from: https://doi.org/10.
1007/s00167-004-0591-8
10. Myhrvold, S.B., Brouwer, E.F., Andresen, T.K.M., Rydevik, K.,
Amundsen, M., Grün, W. et al. (2022) Nonoperative or sur-
gical treatment of acute Achilles' tendon rupture. New
England Journal of Medicine, 386, 14091420. Available
from: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2108447
11. NilssonHelander, K., Grävare Silbernagel, K., Thomeé, R.,
Faxén, E., Olsson, N., Eriksson, B.I. et al. (2010) Acute achilles
tendon rupture: a randomized, controlled study comparing surgical
and nonsurgical treatments using validated outcome measures.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 38, 21862193.
Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546510376052
12. NilssonHelander, K., Thomeé, R., GrävareSilbernagel, K.,
Thomeé, P., Faxén, E., Eriksson, B.I. et al. (2007) The Achilles
tendon total rupture score (ATRS) development and validation.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 35, 421426.
Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506294856
13. Ochen, Y., Beks, R.B., van Heijl, M., Hietbrink, F.,
Leenen, L.P.H., van der Velde, D. et al. (2019) Operative
treatment versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon
ruptures: systematic review and metaanalysis. BMJ, 364,
k5120. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5120
14. Olsson, N., Karlsson, J., Eriksson, B.I., Brorsson, A.,
Lundberg, M. & Silbernagel, K.G. (2014) Ability to perform a
single heelrise is signicantly related to patientreported out-
come after Achilles tendon rupture. Scandinavian Journal of
Medicine & Science in Sports, 24, 152158. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2012.01497.x
15. Slagers, A.J., Dams, O.C., van Zalinge, S.D., Geertzen, J.H.,
Zwerver, J., Reininga, I.H. et al. (2021) Psychological factors
change during the rehabilitation of an Achilles tendon rupture: a
multicenter prospective cohort study. Physical Therapy, 101(12),
110. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzab226
16. Westin O., Svensson M., Nilsson Helander K., Samuelsson K.,
Grävare Silbernagel K., Olsson N. et al. (2018) Cost
effectiveness analysis of surgical versus nonsurgical man-
agement of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Knee Surgery,
Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 26:30743082. Available
from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-4953-z
How to cite this article: Larsson, E., LeGreves,
A., Brorsson, A., Eliasson, P., Johansson, C.,
Carmont, M.R. et al. (2024) Fear of reinjury after
acute Achilles tendon rupture is related to poorer
recovery and lower physical activity postinjury.
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics,11,
e70077. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeo2.70077
|
7of7
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Whether surgical repair of an acute Achilles' tendon rupture by an open-repair or minimally invasive approach is associated with better outcomes than nonsurgical treatment is not clear. Methods: We performed a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial that compared nonoperative treatment, open repair, and minimally invasive surgery in adults with acute Achilles' tendon rupture who presented to four trial centers. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in the Achilles' tendon Total Rupture Score (scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of tendon rerupture. Results: A total of 554 patients underwent randomization, and 526 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean changes in the Achilles' tendon Total Rupture Score were -17.0 points in the nonoperative group, -16.0 points in the open-repair group, and -14.7 points in the minimally invasive surgery group (P = 0.57). Pairwise comparisons provided no evidence of differences between the groups. The changes from baseline in physical performance and patient-reported physical function were similar in the three groups. The number of tendon reruptures was higher in the nonoperative group (6.2%) than in the open-repair or minimally invasive surgery group (0.6% in each). There were 9 nerve injuries in the minimally invasive surgery group (in 5.2% of the patients) as compared with 5 in the open-repair group (in 2.8%) and 1 in the nonoperative group (in 0.6%). Conclusions: In patients with Achilles' tendon rupture, surgery (open repair or minimally invasive surgery) was not associated with better outcomes than nonoperative treatment at 12 months. (Funded by the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority and Akershus University Hospital; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01785264.).
Article
Full-text available
Objectives The purpose of this study was to compare fear and certainty of reinjury between follow-up time points and treatment groups (no anterior cruciate ligament [ACL] reconstruction [no ACLR], pre-ACLR, post-ACLR) and to identify prognostic factors for fear of reinjury at 3 and 12 months following injury or ACLR. Methods An exploratory analysis of the NACOX multicenter longitudinal cohort study was conducted. Patients (n = 275) with primary ACL injury and 15 to 40 years of age received usual care (initial physical therapist–supervised rehabilitation, before considering ACLR). Fear of reinjury (as measured with the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Quality of Life instrument [ACL-QOL] item 31 and the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury instrument [ACL-RSI] item 9) and certainty of reinjury (as measured with the Knee Self-Efficacy Scale [K-SES] item D2) were evaluated at baseline and at 3-, 6-, and 12-months following ACL injury or ACLR. Comparisons were performed with linear mixed models. Linear regression assessed potential prognostic factors (age, sex, preinjury activity, baseline knee function, baseline general self-efficacy, and expected recovery time) for fear of reinjury (ACL-QOL item 31) at the 3- and 12-month follow-up assessments. Results Fear of reinjury was common regardless of ACL treatment. Fear of reinjury decreased between 3 and 6 months and 3 and 12 months (mean difference: ACL-QOL = 9 [95% CI = 2 to 15]; ACL-RSI = 21 [95% CI = 13 to 28]) after injury. This improvement was not observed in patients who later underwent ACLR, who reported worse fear of reinjury at 3 months (ACL-QOL = 10 [95% CI = 3 to 18]) and at 12 months (ACL-RSI = 22 [95% CI = 2 to 42]) postinjury compared with those who did not proceed to ACLR. Following ACLR, fear of reinjury decreased between the 3- and 12-month follow-up assessments (ACL-QOL = 10 [95% CI = 4 to 16]; ACL-RSI = 12 [95% CI = 5 to 19]). Greater baseline general self-efficacy was associated with reduced fear of reinjury at 12 months after injury (adjusted coefficient = 1.7 [95% CI = 0.0 to 3.5]). Female sex was related to more fear of reinjury 3 months after ACLR (−14.5 [95% CI = −25.9 to −3.1]), and better baseline knee function was related to reduced fear of reinjury 12 months after ACLR (0.3 [95% CI = 0.0 to 0.7]). Conclusions People who had ACLR reported worse fear of reinjury before surgery than those who did not proceed to ACLR. Different prognostic factors for fear of reinjury were identified in people treated with ACLR and those treated with rehabilitation alone. Impact Fear of reinjury is a concern following ACL injury. Clinicians should evaluate and address reinjury fears. These results may assist in identifying individuals at risk of fear of reinjury following surgical and nonsurgical management of ACL injury.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To gain insight into the changes in psychological factors during rehabilitation after Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) and to explore the association between psychological factors during rehabilitation and functional outcome 12 months after ATR. Methods: Fifty patients clinically diagnosed with ATR were invited to visit the hospital 3, 6, and 12 months after injury for data collection. They completed questionnaires assessing psychological factors: psychological readiness to return to sport (Injury Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport Questionnaire), kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia), expectations, motivation, and outcome measures related to symptoms and physical activity (Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score), and sports participation and performance (Oslo Sports Trauma Research Centre Overuse Injury Questionnaire). To determine whether psychological factors changed over time, generalized estimating equation analyses were performed. Multivariate regression analyses were used to study the association between psychological factors at 3, 6, and 12 months and outcome measures at 12 months after ATR. Results: Psychological readiness to return to sport improved, and kinesiophobia decreased significantly during rehabilitation. Psychological readiness at 6 and 12 months showed significant associations with sports participation and performance. Kinesiophobia at 6 months was significantly associated with symptoms and physical activity. Motivation remained high during rehabilitation and was highly associated with symptoms and physical activity, sports participation and performance. Conclusion: Psychological factors change during rehabilitation after ATR. Patients with lower motivation levels during rehabilitation, low psychological readiness to return to sports, and/or high levels of kinesiophobia at 6 months after ATR need to be identified. Impact: According to these results, psychological factors can affect the rehabilitation of patients with ATR. Physical therapists can play an important role in recognizing patients with low motivation levels and low psychological readiness for return to sport and patients with high levels of kinesiophobia at 6 months post-ATR. Physical therapist interventions to enhance motivation and psychological readiness to return to sport and to reduce kinesiophobia need to be developed and studied in the post-ATR population. Lay summary: If you have Achilles tendon rupture, your level of motivation, psychological readiness for return to sport, and fear of movement can affect your rehabilitation outcome. Your physical therapist can help you recognize these factors.
Article
Full-text available
The incidence of Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) is increasing and at least 20% do not return to preinjury activity. The aim of the study was to evaluate biomechanical differences between those assigned to a Fear‐group and No Fear‐group based on fear of reinjury during activity after ATR, by evaluating a drop countermovement jump. Twenty‐five participants were evaluated 23.5 months after ATR. Peak values for eccentric and concentric joint power were identified for ankles, knees and hips. Participants were assigned to Fear‐group or No Fear‐group depending on their answer to a question regarding fear of reinjury during activities. Interlimb peak power was compared between groups for landing and push off with a mixed model ANOVA. Compared to the No‐fear group, the Fear‐group presented significant decreased power in the ankle (p<0.001) but increased power in the knee (p<0.001) in the involved limb during both phases. A 3‐way interaction was found between group, side and phase for frontal plane hip power (p<0.001). Our findings indicate that those who are afraid of reinjury demonstrate higher interlimb differences compared to those who are not. They also compensate for ankle deficits with greater knee and hip power.
Article
Full-text available
Background: When deciding medical treatment, patients' perspectives are important. There is limited knowledge about patients' views when choosing non-operative treatment or anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) after ACL injury. Purpose: To describe reasons that influenced patients' decisions for non-operative treatment or ACLR after ACL injury. Study design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: This study recruited a total of 223 patients (50% men), aged 28 ± 8 years who had sustained ACL injury, either unilateral or bilateral. Subjects were, at different time points after injury, asked to fill out a questionnaire about their choice of treatment, where an ACLR treatment decision was made, some responded before and some after the ACLR treatment. A rating of the strength of 10 predetermined reasons in their choice of treatment graded as 0 (no reason) to 3 (very strong reason), was done. Results: Patients with unilateral ACL injury treated with ACLR (110 patients) rated "inability to perform physical activity at the same level as before the injury due to impaired knee function" (96%), "fear of increased symptoms during activity" (87%) and "giving way episodes" (83%) as strong or very strong reasons in their treatment decision. Patients with bilateral ACL injury treated with ACLR (109 knees) rated similar reasons as patients with unilateral ACLR and also "low confidence in the ability to perform at the preinjury activity level without ACLR" (80%) as strong or very strong reasons. Patients with unilateral ACL injury treated non-operatively (46 patients) rated "advice from clinician" (69%) as a strong or very strong reason. Patients with bilateral ACL injury treated non-operatively (25 knees) rated "absence of giving way episodes" (62%), and "no feeling of instability" (62%) as strong or very strong reasons. Conclusion: Inability to perform physical activity, fear of increased symptoms, and giving way episodes were reasons that patients with ACL injury considered when making decisions about ACLR. When choosing non-operative treatment, patients considered the absence of instability or giving way symptoms, being able to perform physical activity, and advice from clinicians. Level of evidence: 4.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives To compare re-rupture rate, complication rate, and functional outcome after operative versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures; to compare re-rupture rate after early and late full weight bearing; to evaluate re-rupture rate after functional rehabilitation with early range of motion; and to compare effect estimates from randomised controlled trials and observational studies. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources PubMed/Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases were last searched on 25 April 2018 for studies comparing operative versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures. Study selection criteria Randomised controlled trials and observational studies reporting on comparison of operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Data extraction Data extraction was performed independently in pairs, by four reviewers, with the use of a predefined data extraction file. Outcomes were pooled using random effects models and presented as risk difference, risk ratio, or mean difference, with 95% confidence interval. Results 29 studies were included—10 randomised controlled trials and 19 observational studies. The 10 trials included 944 (6%) patients, and the 19 observational studies included 14 918 (94%) patients. A significant reduction in re-ruptures was seen after operative treatment (2.3%) compared with nonoperative treatment (3.9%) (risk difference 1.6%; risk ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.31 to 0.60; P<0.001; I ² =22%). Operative treatment resulted in a significantly higher complication rate than nonoperative treatment (4.9% v 1.6%; risk difference 3.3%; risk ratio 2.76, 1.84 to 4.13; P<0.001; I ² =45%). The main difference in complication rate was attributable to the incidence of infection (2.8%) in the operative group. A similar reduction in re-rupture rate in favour of operative treatment was seen after both early and late full weight bearing. No significant difference in re-rupture rate was seen between operative and nonoperative treatment in studies that used accelerated functional rehabilitation with early range of motion (risk ratio 0.60, 0.26 to 1.37; P=0.23; I ² =0%). No difference in effect estimates was seen between randomised controlled trials and observational studies. Conclusions This meta-analysis shows that operative treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures reduces the risk of re-rupture compared with nonoperative treatment. However, re-rupture rates are low and differences between treatment groups are small (risk difference 1.6%). Operative treatment results in a higher risk of other complications (risk difference 3.3%). The final decision on the management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures should be based on patient specific factors and shared decision making. This review emphasises the potential benefits of adding high quality observational studies in meta-analyses for the evaluation of objective outcome measures after surgical treatment.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: An Achilles tendon rupture is a common injury that typically affects people in the middle of their working lives. The injury has a negative impact in terms of both morbidity for the individual and the risk of substantial sick leave. The aim of this study was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of surgical compared with non-surgical management in patients with an acute Achilles tendon rupture. Methods: One hundred patients (86 men, 14 women; mean age, 40 years) with an acute Achilles tendon rupture were randomised (1:1) to either surgical treatment or non-surgical treatment, both with an accelerated rehabilitation protocol (surgical n = 49, non-surgical n = 51). One of the surgical patients was excluded due to a partial re-rupture and five surgical patients were lost to the 1-year economic follow-up. One patient was excluded due to incorrect inclusion and one was lost to the 1-year follow-up in the non-surgical group. The cost was divided into direct and indirect costs. The direct cost is the actual cost of health care, whereas the indirect cost is the production loss related to the impact of the patient's injury in terms of lost ability to work. The health benefits were assessed using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Sampling uncertainty was assessed by means of non-parametric boot-strapping. Results: Pre-injury, the groups were comparable in terms of demographic data and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The mean cost of surgical management was €7332 compared with €6008 for non-surgical management (p = 0.024). The mean number of QALYs during the 1-year time period was 0.89 and 0.86 in the surgical and non-surgical groups respectively. The (incremental) cost-effectiveness ratio was €45,855. Based on bootstrapping, the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve shows that the surgical treatment is 57% likely to be cost-effective at a threshold value of €50,000 per QALY. Conclusions: Surgical treatment was more expensive compared with non-surgical management. The cost-effectiveness results give a weak support (57% likelihood) for the surgical treatment to be cost-effective at a willingness to pay per QALY threshold of €50,000. This is support for surgical treatment; however, additionally cost-effectiveness studies alongside RCTs are important to clarify which treatment option is preferred from a cost-effectiveness perspective. Level of evidence: I.
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this study is to investigate the incidence of acute Achilles tendon rupture in Denmark from 1994 to 2013 with focus on sex, age, geographical areas, seasonal variation and choice of treatment. The National Patient Registry was retrospectively searched to find the number of acute Achilles tendon rupture in Denmark during the time period of 1994-2013. Regional population data were retrieved from the services of Statistics Denmark. During the 20-year period, 33,160 ruptures occurred revealing a statistically significant increase in the incidence (p < 0.001, range = 26.95-31.17/100,000/year). Male-to-female ratio was 3:1 and average age 45 years for men and 44 years for women. There was a statistically significant increasing incidence for people over 50 years. A higher incidence in rural compared with urban geographical areas was found, but this was not statistically significant. There was a statistically significant decreasing incidence of patients treated with surgery from 16.9/10(5) in 1994 to 6.3/10(5) in 2013. The incidence of acute Achilles tendon rupture increased from 1994 to 2013 based on increasing incidence in the older population. There was no difference in incidence of acute Achilles tendon rupture in the rural compared with urban geographical areas. A steady decline in surgical treatment was found over the whole period, with a noticeable decline from 2009 to 2013, possibly reflecting a rapid change in clinical practice following a range of high-quality randomized clinical trials (RCT). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Article
Background: Optimizing calf muscle performance seems to play an important role in minimizing impairments and symptoms after an Achilles tendon rupture (ATR). The literature lacks long-term follow-up studies after ATR that describe calf muscle performance over time. Purpose: The primary aim was to evaluate calf muscle performance and patient-reported outcomes at a mean of 7 years after ATR in patients included in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. A secondary aim was to evaluate whether improvement in calf muscle performance continued after the 2-year follow-up. Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Sixty-six subjects (13 women, 53 men) with a mean age of 50 years (SD, 8.5 years) were evaluated at a mean of 7 years (SD, 1 year) years after their ATR. Thirty-four subjects had surgical treatment and 32 had nonsurgical treatment. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated with Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) and Physical Activity Scale (PAS). Calf muscle performance was evaluated with single-leg standing heel-rise test, concentric strength power heel-rise test, and single-legged hop for distance. Limb Symmetry Index (LSI = injured side/healthy side × 100) was calculated for side-to-side differences. Results: Seven years after ATR, the injured side showed decreased values in all calf muscle performance tests ( P < .001-.012). Significant improvement in calf muscle performance did not continue after the 2-year follow-up. Heel-rise height increased significantly ( P = .002) between the 1-year (10.8 cm) and the 7-year (11.5 cm) follow-up assessments. The median ATRS was 96 (of a possible score of 100) and the median PAS was 4 (of a possible score of 6), indicating minor patient-reported symptoms and fairly high physical activity. No significant differences were found in calf muscle performance or patient-reported outcomes between the treatment groups except for the LSI for heel-rise repetitions. Conclusion: Continued deficits in calf muscle endurance and strength remained 7 years after ATR. No continued improvement in calf muscle performance occurred after the 2-year follow-up except for heel-rise height.
Article
Context: A sports injury has both physical and psychological consequences for the athlete. A common postinjury psychological response is elevated fear of reinjury. Objective: To provide an overview of the implications of fear of reinjury on the rehabilitation of athletes, including clinical methods to measure fear of reinjury; the impact of fear of reinjury on rehabilitation outcomes, including physical impairments, function, and return to sports rate; and potential interventions to address fear of reinjury during rehabilitation. Evidence acquisition: PubMed was searched for articles published in the past 16 years (1990-2016) relating to fear of reinjury in athletes. The reference lists of the retrieved articles were searched for additionally relevant articles. Study design: Clinical review. Level of evidence: Level 3. Results: Fear of reinjury after a sports injury can negatively affect the recovery of physical impairments, reduce self-report function, and prevent a successful return to sport. Athletes with high fear of reinjury might benefit from a psychologically informed practice approach to improve rehabilitation outcomes. The application of psychologically informed practice would be to measure fear of reinjury in the injured athletes and provide interventions to reduce fear of reinjury to optimize rehabilitation outcomes. Conclusion: Fear of reinjury after a sports injury can lead to poor rehabilitation outcomes. Incorporating principles of psychologically informed practice into sports injury rehabilitation could improve rehabilitation outcomes for athletes with high fear of reinjury.