ArticlePDF Available

Markers of T-cell dysfunction and not inflammaging predict the waning of humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA booster vaccination in people with HIV

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

In this prospective longitudinal study, we evaluated the durability of humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA booster vaccination in 93 people with HIV, exploring the possible role of T-cell dysfunction and inflammaging biomarkers in predicting antibody waning. We found that, despite a negligible influence of the inflammaging milieu, low CD4/CD8 ratio and CD4+CD127+ percentage as well as high CD8+CD38+CD45RO+ percentage are associated with faster antibody waning, in turn contributing to our understanding of the determinants of COVID-19 vaccine-elicited immune response in this population.
Content may be subject to copyright.
11. Shah AG, Smith PG, Sterling RK. Comparison of FIB-4 and APRI
in HIV-HCV coinfected patients with normal and elevated ALT.
Dig Dis Sci 2011; 56:3038–3044.
12. Wong VWS, Vergniol J, Wong GLH, Foucher J, Chan HLY, Le
Bail B, et al.Diagnosis of fibrosis and cirrhosis using liver
stiffness measurement in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. He-
patology 2010; 51:454–462.
13. Lemoine M, Assoumou L, De Wit S, Girard PM, Valantin MA,
Katlama C, et al.Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive markers of
steatosis, NASH, and liver fibrosis in HIV-monoinfected in-
dividuals at risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD):
results from the ECHAM study. J Acquir Immune Defic Synd
2019; 80:e86–e94.
14. Sebastiani G, Milic J, Gioe C, Al Hinai AS, Cervo A, Lebouche B,
et al.Diagnosis of liver fibrosis in ageing patients with HIV
at risk for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Italy and
Canada: assessment of a two-tier pathway. Lancet HIV 2022;
9 (Suppl 1):S4.
DOI:10.1097/QAD.0000000000004008
Research Letters 1987
Research Letter
AIDS 2024, 38:19821990
Markers of T-cell dysfunction and not
inflammaging predict the waning of humoral
responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA booster
vaccination in people with HIV
Matteo Augello, Valeria Bono, Roberta Rovito,
Andrea Santoro, Camilla Tincati and Giulia Marchetti
In this prospective longitudinal study, we evaluated
the durability of humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2
mRNA booster vaccination in 93 people with HIV,
exploring the possible role of T-cell dysfunction and
inflammaging biomarkers in predicting antibody
waning. We found that, despite a negligible influ-
ence of the inflammaging milieu, low CD4/CD8
ratio and CD4
R
CD127
R
percentage as well as high
CD8
R
CD38
R
CD45RO
R
percentage are associated
with faster antibody waning, in turn contributing
to our understanding of the determinants of
COVID-19 vaccine-elicited immune response in
this population.
People with HIV (PWH) may suffer worse COVID-19
outcomes compared to the general population [1,2].
Preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection remains a relevant
goal in PWH, also in the endemic phase of COVID-19,
since it has been associated with a higher incidence of
long COVID-19 and subsequent major cardiovascular
events in this population independently of its severity
[3,4]. Indeed, the widespread use of SARS-CoV-2
vaccination considerably decreased the risk of infection
and severe disease by eliciting strong humoral and T-cell
immunity [1,5]. However, while vaccine-induced T-cell
responses are durable, thus ensuring long-lasting protec-
tion from severe disease, humoral immunity wanes
over time, in turn affecting the protection against SARS-
CoV-2 infection [6,7]. Furthermore, while factors
influencing SARS-CoV-2 vaccines immunogenicity
have been extensively characterized in PWH [1,5,8
10], determinants of antibody waning are largely
unknown.
Persistent T-cell dysregulation and inflammaging des-
pite virologically-effective antiretroviral therapy (ART)
are hallmarks of HIV infection, and have been
associated with adverse immunological and clinical
outcomes [11], as well as poor vaccine immunogenicity
[1215].
We therefore aimed to assess the durability of humoral
responses to a SARS-CoV-2 mRNA booster in PWH
and to explore the possible role of baseline HIV-related
T-cell dysfunction and inflammaging milieu in predicting
antibody waning.
In this prospective longitudinal study conducted at the
Clinic of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine at San
Paolo Hospital in Milan, Italy, PWH on virologically-
effective ART who received a monovalent mRNA
booster (Moderna Spikevax) 6 months after the primary
cycle were consecutively enrolled, and followed-up from
baseline (T0) to 1 month (T1) and 6 months (T2) after the
booster administration.
Anti-spike (S) immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies
were quantitatively measured on serum samples at each
time point by the DiaSorin LIAISON SARS-CoV-2
TrimericS IgG assay. Serum anti-nucleocapsid (N) IgG
were semi-quantitatively determined by the EURO-
IMMUN Anti-SARS-CoV-2 NCP ELISA IgG to track
SARS-CoV-2 infection at baseline and throughout the
follow-up period.
To assess T-cell dysfunction, CD4/CD8 ratio, as well as
percentages of CD4
þ
CD127
þ
T-cells (functionally-
competent CD4
þ
T-cells) and CD8
þ
CD38
þ
CD45RO
þ
T-cells (primed activated CD8
þ
T-cells) were measured
on blood samples at baseline by flow cytometry (Figure
S1, Supplemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.
com/QAD/D313). Markers of inflammaging were
quantified in plasma at T0 by Luminex assay [tumor
necrosis factor alpha (TNF-a), IP-10, interleukin 2 (IL-2),
IL-4, IL-17A, IL-6, IL-8, sCD14, sCD163, GDF-15,
MMP-9, TIMP-1] or ELISA (thymosin-a1, Elabscience
Human Thymosin-a1 ELISA kit). A composite
‘‘inflammaging score’’ranging from 0 to 13 was calculated
as the number of biomarkers with an abnormal level (at or
above the 75th percentile for TNF-a, IP-10, IL-17A, IL-6,
IL-8, sCD14, sCD163, GDF-15, MMP-9, and TIMP-1;
at or below the 25th percentile for IL-2, IL-4, and
thymosin-a1), similar as previously described [16].
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative
Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/aidsonline by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCy
wCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdgGj2MwlZLeI= on 10/30/2024
1988 AIDS 2024, Vol 38 No 14
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study
population were also recorded at baseline.
Repeated measures ANOVA, Pearson correlation test,
and multivariable linear regression were performed using
GraphPad Prism v10.
Ninety-three PWH were recruited and followed-up
between September 2021 and July 2022. Median age was
53 [interquartile range (IQR): 4659] years, and 76
(81.7%) were males. Median CD4
þ
T-cell nadir was 226
(IQR: 53353) cells/ml; current CD4
þ
T-cell count was
728 (IQR: 511920) cells/ml, with a median CD4/CD8
ratio of 0.76 (IQR: 0.601.06). All participants have
been on ART for a median of 114 (IQR: 67 186)
months, and were virologically-suppressed (HIV viremia
<20 copies/ml). Study participants characteristics are
detailed in Table S1, Supplemental Digital Content,
http://links.lww.com/QAD/D313.
Four PWH had positive anti-N IgG at T0, four developed
anti-N IgG positivity between T0 and T1, and four more
between T1 and T2.
Anti-S IgG antibodies were significantly increased
1 month after the booster [median: 3.99 (IQR: 3.71
4.27) vs. 2.94 (2.623.17) log
10
(BAU/ml), P<0.0001],
with a subsequent 6-month decay at levels that were
still above baseline [3.36 (3.15–3.78) log
10
(BAU/ml),
P<0.0001] (Fig. 1a).
Anti-S IgG waning, measured as the difference between
T1 and T2 levels (D
T1– T2
), was negatively correlated with
CD4/CD8 ratio (r¼0.2535, P¼0.0178) and
CD4
þ
CD127
þ
percentage (r¼–0.2421, P¼0.0239),
while positively with CD8
þ
CD38
þ
CD45RO
þ
percent-
age (r¼0.2244, P¼0.0367) (Fig. 1bd). Noteworthy,
when controlling for potential confounders/predictors
(i.e., age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, obesity,
smoke, anti-N IgG positivity at baseline and/or during
follow-up), anti-S IgG waning was confirmed negatively
associated with CD4/CD8 ratio [b¼0.3336 (95% CI:
0.5594, –0.1079), P¼0.0043] and CD4
þ
CD127
þ
percentage [b¼–0.0175 (95% CI: 0.0297, 0.0054),
P¼0.0052], while positively with CD8
þ
CD38
þ
CD45RO
þ
percentage [b¼0.1262 (95% CI: 0.0165,
0.2360), P¼0.0247] (Fig. 1f). Similar results were
obtained when performing a sensitivity analysis after
excluding PWH with positive anti-N IgG antibodies at
any time point (Table S2, Supplemental Digital Content,
http://links.lww.com/QAD/D313).
Low CD4/CD8 ratio and CD4
þ
CD127
þ
T-cell per-
centage as well as high CD8
þ
CD38
þ
CD45RO
þ
percentage have been associated with unfavorable
immunological and clinical outcomes in HIV infection
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
2
3
4
5
CD4/CD8 ratio
anti-S IgG
[log10(BAU/mL)]
P = 0.0178
20 30 40 50
2
3
4
5
CD4+127+ %
anti-S IgG
[log10(BAU/mL)]
P = 0.0239
0246
2
3
4
5
CD8+CD38+CD45RO+ %
anti-S IgG
[log10(BAU/mL)]
r = 0.2244
P = 0.0367
012345678910
2
3
4
5
Inflammaging score
anti-S IgG
[log10(BAU/mL)]
r = 0.0423
P = 0.6872
-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6
Inflammaging score
CD8+CD38+CD45RO+ %
CD4+CD127+ %
CD4/CD8 ratio P = 0.0043
P = 0.0052
= 0.1262
P = 0.0247
P = 0.9916
coefficient (95% CI)
for anti-S IgG [log10(BAU/mL)]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Anti-S IgG [log10(BAU/mL)]
T1 T2T0
P < 0.0001
P < 0.0001 P < 0.0001
(a
)
(
b
)
(
c
)
(
d
)
(
e
)
(
f
)
Fig. 1. Anti-S IgG antibodies concentrations and associations with markers of T-cell dysfunction and inflammaging. (a)
Trajectory of anti-S IgG antibodies concentration following the booster. T0: baseline (day of booster administration); T1: 1 month
after the booster; T2: 6 months after the booster; circles: individual values; black bars: median values; boxes: interquartile ranges;
statistical analysis: repeated measures ANOVA. (be) Correlations between waning of anti-S IgG antibodies, measured as the
difference between T1 and T2 levels (D
T1– T2
), and CD4/CD8 ratio, CD4
þ
CD127
þ
and CD8
þ
CD38
þ
CD45RO
þ
percentages, or
inflammaging score. Circles: individual values; solid black line: simple linear regression line; shadowed error bands within dashed
lines: interquartile ranges; statistical analysis: Pearson correlation test. (f) Forest plot showing associations between waning of anti-S
IgG antibodies (D
T1– T2
) and CD4/CD8 ratio, CD4
þ
CD127
þ
percentage, CD8
þ
CD38
þ
CD45RO
þ
percentage, or inflammaging
score. Circles:bcoefficients; error bars: 95% confidence intervals (95% CI); statistical analysis: multivariable linear regression
(adjusted for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, obesity, smoke, anti-N IgG status at baseline and during follow-up).
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/aidsonline by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCy
wCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdgGj2MwlZLeI= on 10/30/2024
Research Letters 1989
[1719]. Additionally, CD4/CD8 ratio has been reported
to negatively correlate with SARS-CoV-2 vaccines
immunogenicity in PWH [5,8,20]. Our findings argue
that such peculiar HIV-related anomalies are predictive of
faster antibody waning following SARS-CoV-2 booster
vaccination, thus potentially expanding the utility of these
markers in this setting.
By contrast, when assessing inflammaging score, we
found that it was not associated with anti-S IgG waning,
either at univariable (r¼0.0423, P¼0.6872) (Fig. 1e) or
multivariable analysis [b¼0.0002 (95% CI: 0.0492,
0.0487), P¼0.9916] (Fig. 1f). A lack of association
between anti-S IgG waning and inflammaging was also
found when analyzing inflammaging markers individually
(Figure S2, Supplemental Digital Content. http://links.
lww.com/QAD/D313).
This observation was somehow unexpected, given
previous reports showing an association of reduced
vaccine-elicited serological memory with markers of
inflammation [21,22] and thymic dysfunction [23].
However, these studies assessed immune responses to
different vaccines or in different populations/models, and
thus cannot be directly translated to our setting.
Some limitations need to be acknowledged in this study.
Firstly, the sample size was relatively small, thus
potentially hindering the generalizability of such findings.
Furthermore, the follow-up was limited to 6 months,
hence longer periods should be included in future studies
to ascertain the actual long-term durability of vaccine-
induced humoral immunity and thus the optimal timing
for boosters administration. Besides, while the present
study was specifically designed to explore whether
markers of T-cell dysfunction and inflammaging mea-
sured at baseline are able to predict waning of vaccine-
elicited humoral responses later on, it would be
interesting for future studies to evaluate whether
administration of vaccine boosters may have an impact
on T-cell phenotypes and cytokine milieu over time.
In summary, our study points to low CD4/CD8 ratio
and CD4
þ
CD127
þ
T-cells as well as high
CD8
þ
CD38
þ
CD45RO
þ
T-cells as factors negatively
affecting the durability of humoral responses to SARS-
CoV-2 mRNA booster in PWH, in all suggesting the
potential for T-cell dysfunction biomarkers in the
assessment of individuals to be prioritized for future
SARS-CoV-2 boosters.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to all the individuals enrolled in this study
who agreed to participate to this research. Our special
thanks also go to all the physicians and nurses at the Clinic
of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine at San Paolo
Hospital in Milan who helped in patients’ care and
enrollment. We are also thankful to Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri
for his precious suggestions for statistical analyses design.
Authors contributions: M.A. conceived and designed the
study, collected clinical and laboratory data, analyzed and
interpreted the data, designed the figures, and wrote the
manuscript. V.B., R.R., and A.S. contributed to data
collection. C.T. contributed to the critical revision of the
manuscript. G.M. conceived and supervised the study,
interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript.
Funding: This study was supported by funding from the
European Union‘s Horizon 2020 Research and Innova-
tion Program under grant agreement no. 101016167
within the ORCHESTRA project (Connecting Euro-
pean Cohorts to Increase Common and Effective
Response to SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic), and grant
agreement no. 101046016 within the EuCARE project
(European Cohorts of Patients and Schools to Advance
Response to Epidemics).
Conflicts of interest
Authors have no conflicts of interest related to this work
to disclose.
Clinic of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine,
San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo,
Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan,
Milan, Italy.
Correspondence to Giulia Marchetti, MD, PhD, Clinic
of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, San
Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Department
of Health Sciences, University of Milan, via A. di
Rudinı`8, 20142 Milan, Italy. Tel: +39 0281843064;
fax: +39 0281843054;
e-mail: giulia.marchetti@unimi.it
Received: 10 July 2024; revised: 22 August 2024;
accepted: 3 September 2024.
References
1. Augello M, Bono V, Rovito R, Tincati C, Marchetti G. Immu-
nologic interplay between HIV/AIDS and COVID-19: adding
fuel to the flames? Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2023; 20:51–75.
2. Giacomelli A, Gagliardini R, Tavelli A, De Benedittis S, Maz-
zotta V, Rizzardini G, et al.Risk of COVID-19 in-hospital
mortality in people living with HIV compared to general
population according to age and CD4 strata: data from the
ICONA network. Int J Infect Dis 2023; 136:127–135.
3. Peluso MJ, Antar AAR. Long COVID in people living with HIV.
Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2023; 18:126–134.
4. Martı´n-Iguacel R, Moreno-Forn
es S, Bruguera A, Aceit
on J,
Nomah DK, Gonz
alez-Cord
on A, et al.Major cardiovascular
events after COVID-19 in people with HIV. Clin Microbiol
Infect 2024; 30:674–681.
5. Augello M, Bono V, Rovito R, Tincati C, d’Arminio Monforte A,
Marchetti G. Six-month immune responses to mRNA-1273
vaccine in combination antiretroviral therapy treated late
presenter people with HIV according to previous SARS-CoV-
2 infection. AIDS 2023; 37:1503–1517.
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/aidsonline by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCy
wCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdgGj2MwlZLeI= on 10/30/2024
1990 AIDS 2024, Vol 38 No 14
6. Sette A, Crotty S. Immunological memory to SARS-CoV-2 infec-
tion and COVID-19 vaccines. Immunol Rev 2022; 310:27–46.
7. Costiniuk CT, Lee T, Singer J, Galipeau Y, Arnold C, Langlois
MA, et al.Correlates of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections in
people with HIV: results from the CIHR CTN 328 study.
Vaccines 2024; 12:447.
8. Antinori A, Cicalini S, Meschi S, Bordoni V, Lorenzini P, Vergori
A, et al.Humoral and cellular immune response elicited by
mRNA vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome
coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in people living with human im-
munodeficiency virus receiving antiretroviral therapy based on
current CD4 T-Lymphocyte count. Clin Infect Dis 2022; 75:
e552–e563.
9. Vergori A, Tavelli A, Matusali G, Azzini AM, Augello M,
Mazzotta V, et al.SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine response in
people living with HIV according to CD4 count and CD4/
CD8 ratio. Vaccines 2023; 11:1664.
10. Montesi G, Augello M, Polvere J, Marchetti G, Medaglini D,
Ciabattini A. Predicting humoral responses to primary and
booster SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in people living with
HIV: a machine learning approach. J Transl Med 2024; 22:432.
11. Nasi M, De Biasi S, Gibellini L, Bianchini E, Pecorini S, Bacca V,
et al.Ageing and inflammation in patients with HIV infection.
Clin Exp Immunol 2017; 187:44–52.
12. McKittrick N, Frank I, Jacobson JM, White CJ, Kim D, Kappes
R, et al.Improved immunogenicity with high-dose seasonal
influenza vaccine in HIV-infected persons: a single-center,
parallel, randomized trial. AnnInternMed2013; 158:19–26.
13. Berger CT, Greiff V, Mehling M, Fritz S, Meier MA, Hoenger G,
et al.Influenza vaccine response profiles are affected by
vaccine preparation and preexisting immunity, but not HIV
infection. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2015; 11:391–396.
14. Avelino-Silva VI, Miyaji KT, Hunt PW, Huang Y, Simoes M,
Lima SB, et al.CD4/CD8 ratio and KT ratio predict yellow fever
vaccine immunogenicity in HIV-infected patients. PLoS Negl
Trop Dis 2016; 10:e0005219.
15. Tian Y, Hua W, Wu Y, Zhang T, Wang W, Wu H, et al.Immune
response to hepatitis B virus vaccine among people living with
HIV: a meta-analysis. Front Immunol 2021; 12:745541.
16. Fuster D, Cheng DM, Quinn EK, Armah KA, Saitz R, Freiberg
MS, et al.Inflammatory cytokines and mortality in a cohort of
HIV-infected adults with alcohol problems. AIDS 2014;
28:1059–1064.
17. Ron R, Martı´nez-Sanz J, Herrera S, Ramos-Ruperto L, ´ez A,
Sainz T, et al.CD4/CD8 ratio and CD8RT-cell count as
prognostic markers for non-AIDS mortality in people living
with HIV. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Im-
munol 2024; 15:1343124.
18. Kiazyk SA, Fowke KR. Loss of CD127 expression links immune
activation and CD4(R) T cell loss in HIV infection. Trends
Microbiol 2008; 16:567–573.
19. Bofill M, Mocroft A, Lipman M, Medina E, Borthwick NJ, Sabin
CA, et al.Increased numbers of primed activated
CD8RCD38RCD45RORT cells predict the decline of CD4R
T cells in HIV-1-infected patients. AIDS 1996; 10:827–834.
20. Alexandrova Y, Yero A, Mboumba Bouassa RS, Comeau E,
Samarani S, Brumme ZL, et al.SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced
T-cell response after three doses in people living with HIV on
antiretroviral therapy compared to seronegative controls (CTN
328 COVAXHIV study). Viruses 2023; 15:575.
21. Bordoni V, Casale M, Pinto VM, Carsetti R, Gianesin B,
Gamberini MR, et al.Inflammatory and senescence-asso-
ciated mediators affect the persistence of humoral response
to COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in transfusion-dependent
beta-thalassemic patients. Am J Hematol 2023; 98:E145–
E147.
22. Aaron T, Laudermilch E, Benet Z, Ovando LJ, Chandran K,
Fooksman D. TNF-alimits serological memory by disrupting
the bone marrow niche. J Immunol 2023; 210:595–608.
23. Pozo-Balado MDM, Bulnes-Ramos
A, Olivas-Martı´nez I, Gar-
rido-Rodrı´guez V, Lozano C,
Alvarez-Rı´os AI, et al.Higher
plasma levels of thymosin-a1 are associated with a lower
waning of humoral response after COVID-19 vaccination:
an eight months follow-up study in a nursing home. Immun
Ageing 2023; 20:9.
DOI:10.1097/QAD.0000000000004010
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/aidsonline by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCy
wCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdgGj2MwlZLeI= on 10/30/2024
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Background SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines are highly immunogenic in people living with HIV (PLWH) on effective antiretroviral therapy (ART). However, whether viro-immunologic parameters or other factors affect immune responses to vaccination is debated. This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based model able to predict the humoral response to mRNA vaccines in PLWH and to assess the impact of demographic and clinical variables on antibody production over time. Methods Different machine learning algorithms have been compared in the setting of a longitudinal observational study involving 497 PLWH, after primary and booster SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. Both Generalized Linear Models and non-linear Models (Tree Regression and Random Forest) were trained and tested. Results Non-linear algorithms showed better ability to predict vaccine-elicited humoral responses. The best-performing Random Forest model identified a few variables as more influential, within 39 clinical, demographic, and immunological factors. In particular, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, BMI, CD4 T-cell count and CD4/CD8 ratio were positively associated with the primary cycle immunogenicity, yet their predictive value diminished with the administration of booster doses. Conclusions In the present work we have built a non-linear Random Forest model capable of accurately predicting humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, and identifying relevant factors that influence the vaccine response in PLWH. In clinical contexts, the application of this model provides promising opportunities for predicting individual vaccine responses, thus facilitating the development of vaccination strategies tailored for PLWH.
Article
Full-text available
COVID-19 breakthrough infection (BTI) can occur despite vaccination. Using a multi-centre, prospective, observational Canadian cohort of people with HIV (PWH) receiving ≥2 COVID-19 vaccines, we compared the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) and receptor-binding domain (RBD)-specific IgG levels 3 and 6 months post second dose, as well as 1 month post third dose, in PWH with and without BTI. BTI was defined as positivity based on self-report measures (data up to last study visit) or IgG data (up to 1 month post dose 3). The self-report measures were based on their symptoms and either a positive PCR or rapid antigen test. The analysis was restricted to persons without previous COVID-19 infection. Persons without BTI remained COVID-19-naïve until ≥3 months following the third dose. Of 289 participants, 92 developed BTI (31.5 infections per 100 person-years). The median days between last vaccination and BTI was 128 (IQR 67, 176), with the most cases occurring between the third and fourth dose (n = 59), corresponding to the Omicron wave. In analyses adjusted for age, sex, race, multimorbidity, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, diabetes and obesity, a lower IgG S/RBD (log10 BAU/mL) at 1 month post dose 3 was significantly associated with BTI, suggesting that a lower IgG level at this time point may predict BTI in this cohort of PWH.
Article
Full-text available
Background In people living with HIV (PLHIV), the CD4/CD8 ratio has been proposed as a useful marker for non-AIDS events. However, its predictive ability on mortality over CD4 counts, and the role of CD8+ T-cell counts remain controversial. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies from 1996 to 2023, including PLHIV on antiretroviral treatment, and reporting CD4/CD8 ratio or CD8+ counts. The primary outcome was non-AIDS mortality or all-cause mortality. We performed a standard random-effects pairwise meta-analysis comparing low versus high CD4/CD8 ratio with a predefined cut-off point of 0.5. (CRD42020170931). Findings We identified 2,479 studies for screening. 20 studies were included in the systematic review. Seven studies found an association between low CD4/CD8 ratio categories and increased mortality risk, with variable cut-off points between 0.4-1. Four studies were selected for meta-analysis, including 12,893 participants and 618 reported deaths. Patients with values of CD4/CD8 ratio below 0.5 showed a higher mortality risk (OR 3.65; 95% CI 3.04 - 4.35; I2 = 0.00%) compared to those with higher values. While the meta-analysis of CD8+ T-cell counts was not feasible due to methodological differences between studies, the systematic review suggests a negative prognostic impact of higher values (>1,138 to 1,500 cells/uL) in the long term. Conclusions Our results support the use of the CD4/CD8 ratio as a prognostic marker in clinical practice, especially in patients with values below 0.5, but consensus criteria on ratio timing measurement, cut-off values, and time to event are needed in future studies to get more robust conclusions. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020170931, identifier CRD42020170931.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Our aim was to estimate the rates of not achieving a robust/above-average humoral response to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in people living with HIV (PLWH) who received ≥2 doses and to investigate the role of the CD4 and CD4/CD8 ratio in predicting the humoral response. Methods: We evaluated the humoral anti-SARS-CoV-2 response 1-month after the second and third doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine as a proportion of not achieving a robust/above-average response using two criteria: (i) a humoral threshold identified as a correlate of protection against SARS-CoV-2 (<90% vaccine efficacy): anti-RBD < 775 BAU/mL or anti-S < 298 BAU/mL, (ii) threshold of binding antibodies equivalent to average neutralization activity from the levels of binding (nAb titer < 1:40): anti-RBD < 870 BAU/mL or anti-S < 1591 BAU/mL. PLWH were stratified according to the CD4 count and CD4/CD8 ratio at first dose. Logistic regression was used to compare the probability of not achieving robust/above-average responses. A mixed linear model was used to estimate the mean anti-RBD titer at various time points across the exposure groups. Results: a total of 1176 PLWH were included. The proportions of participants failing to achieve a robust/above-average response were significantly higher in participants with a lower CD4 and CD4/CD8 ratio, specifically, a clearer gradient was observed for the CD4 count. The CD4 count was a better predictor of the humoral response of the primary cycle than ratio. The third dose was pivotal in achieving a robust/above-average humoral response, at least for PLWH with CD4 > 200 cells/mm3 and a ratio > 0.6. Conclusions: A robust humoral response after a booster dose has not been reached by 50% of PLWH with CD4 < 200 cells mm3. In the absence of a validated correlate of protections in the Omicron era, the CD4 count remains the most solid marker to guide vaccination campaigns in PLWH.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives: To study whether people living with HIV (PLWH) are at higher risk of in-hospital COVID-19 mortality compared to general population (GenPop). Methods: Retrospective study in 19 Italian centres (Feb2020-Nov2022) including hospitalized PLWH and GenPop with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Main outcome: in-hospital mortality. Competing risk analyses by Fine-Gray regression model were used to estimate the association between in-hospital mortality and HIV-status/age. Results: 7,399 COVID-19 patients were included, 239 (3.2%) PLWH, and 7,160 (96.8%) GenPop. By day 40, in-hospital death occurred in 1,283/7,160 (17.9%) among the GenPop and 34/239 (14.2%) among PLWH. After adjusting for potential confounders, compared to GenPop <65 years, a significantly higher risk of death was observed for the GenPop ≥65 [aSHR 1.79 (95%CI 1.39-2.31)], PLWH ≥65 [aSHR 2.16 (95%CI 1.15-4.04)], PLWH <65 with CD4 ≤200 [aSHR 9.69 (95% CI 5.50-17.07)] and PLWH <65 with CD4 201-350 [aSHR 4.37 (95%CI 1.79-10.63)], whereas no evidence for a difference for PLWH <65 with CD4 >350 [aSHR 1.11 (95%CI 0.41-2.99)]. Conclusions: In PLWH aged <65 years a CD4 ≤350 rather than HIV itself seems the driver for the observed higher risk of in-hospital mortality. We cannot however rule out that HIV-infection per se is the risk factor in those aged ≥65 years.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: Immune responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccines in people with HIV (PWH) with a history of late presentation (LP) and their durability have not been fully characterized. Design: In this prospective, longitudinal study, we sought to assess T-cell and humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination up to 6 months in LP-PWH on effective combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) as compared to HIV-negative healthcare workers (HCWs), and to evaluate whether previous SARS-CoV-2 infection modulates immune responses to vaccine. Methods: SARS-CoV-2 spike (S)-specific T-cell responses were determined by two complementary flow cytometry methodologies, namely activation-induced marker (AIM) assay and intracellular cytokine staining (ICS), whereas humoral responses were measured by ELISA [anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) antibodies) and receptor-binding inhibition assay (spike-ACE2 binding inhibition activity), before vaccination (T0), 1 month (T1) and 5 months (T2) after the second dose. Results: LP-PWH showed at T1 and T2 significant increase of: S-specific memory and circulating T follicular helper (cTfh) CD4+ T cells; polyfunctional Th1-cytokine (IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2)- and Th2-cytokine (IL-4)-producing S-specific CD4+ T cells; anti-RBD antibodies and spike-ACE2 binding inhibition activity. Immune responses to vaccine in LP-PWH were not inferior to HCWs overall, yet S-specific CD8+ T cells and spike-ACE2 binding inhibition activity correlated negatively with markers of immune recovery on cART. Interestingly, natural SARS-CoV-2 infection, while able to sustain S-specific antibody response, seems less efficacious in inducing a T-cell memory and in boosting immune responses to vaccine, possibly reflecting an enduring partial immunodeficiency. Conclusions: Altogether, these findings support the need for additional vaccine doses in PWH with a history of advanced immune depression and poor immune recovery on effective cART.
Article
Full-text available
Abstract Background Older people achieve lower levels of antibody titers than younger populations after Covid-19 vaccination and show a marked waning humoral immunity over time, likely due to the senescence of the immune system. Nevertheless, age-related predictive factors of the waning humoral immune response to the vaccine have been scarcely explored. In a cohort of residents and healthcare workers from a nursing home that had received two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine, we measured specific anti-S antibodies one (T1), four (T4), and eight (T8) months after receiving the second dose. Thymic-related functional markers, including thymic output, relative telomere length, and plasma thymosin-α1 levels, as well as immune cellular subsets, and biochemical and inflammatory biomarkers, were determined at T1, and tested for their associations with the magnitude of the vaccine response (T1) and the durability of such response both, at the short- (T1-T4) and the long-term (T1-T8). We aimed to identify age-related factors potentially associated with the magnitude and persistence of specific anti-S immunoglobulin G (IgG)-antibodies after COVID-19 vaccination in older people. Results Participants (100% men, n = 98), were subdivided into three groups: young (
Article
Purpose of review: It is now recognized that SARS-CoV-2 infection can have a long-term impact on health. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge regarding Long COVID in people living with HIV (PLWH). Recent findings: PLWH may be at elevated risk of experiencing Long COVID. Although the mechanisms contributing to Long COVID are incompletely understood, there are several demographic and clinical factors that might make PLWH vulnerable to developing Long COVID. Summary: PLWH should be aware that new or worsening symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection might represent Long COVID. HIV providers should be aware of this clinical entity and be mindful that their patients recovering from SARS-CoV-2 infection may be at higher risk.