Between the Religious and the Secular: Latin American Neo-Pentecostalism in a Context of Multiple Modernities

Abstract

This article seeks to understand neo-Pentecostalism in Latin America as a religious and political movement within the framework of multiple modernities, based on an ethnographic study in evangelical churches in Chile and Mexico. The study focuses on two main axes: the discourse of the “Kingdom of God” and the experience of the Holy Spirit. The former explores the conception of public space, while the latter examines the experiential dimensions, both individual and collective, that confer meaning and legitimacy to this religious movement. Neo-Pentecostalism emerges as a complex phenomenon where religion and politics intertwine in novel ways, responding to the intricacies of the region. Contrary to the notion of a monolithic and reactionary movement, this article demonstrates how neo-Pentecostalism is a movement that navigates the interstices between the religious and the secular.

Full text

Citation: Tec-López, RenéA. 2024.
Between the Religious and the Secular:
Latin American Neo-Pentecostalism
in a Context of Multiple Modernities.
Religions 15: 1323.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15111323
Academic Editors: Cristian Parker
and Daniel Gutiérrez Martínez
Received: 31 July 2024
Revised: 30 September 2024
Accepted: 24 October 2024
Published: 29 October 2024
Copyright: © 2024 by the author.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
religions
Article
Between the Religious and the Secular: Latin American
Neo-Pentecostalism in a Context of Multiple Modernities
RenéA. Tec-López
Institute of Social Research, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán,
Mexico City 04510, Mexico; rene.teclopez@gmail.com
Abstract: This article seeks to understand neo-Pentecostalism in Latin America as a religious and
political movement within the framework of multiple modernities, based on an ethnographic study
in evangelical churches in Chile and Mexico. The study focuses on two main axes: the discourse of
the “Kingdom of God” and the experience of the Holy Spirit. The former explores the conception of
public space, while the latter examines the experiential dimensions, both individual and collective,
that confer meaning and legitimacy to this religious movement. Neo-Pentecostalism emerges as
a complex phenomenon where religion and politics intertwine in novel ways, responding to the
intricacies of the region. Contrary to the notion of a monolithic and reactionary movement, this
article demonstrates how neo-Pentecostalism is a movement that navigates the interstices between
the religious and the secular.
Keywords: neo-Pentecostalism; secularization; Evangelicalism; Holy Spirit; religion; politics
1. Introduction
Neo-Pentecostalism, as an analytical category, has been used to understand the pres-
ence of a new generation of evangelicals, especially involved in politics from neoconser-
vative ranks. On one hand, large sectors of the Protestant–Evangelical field view it as a
religious movement that threatens “sound doctrine”, considering it a theological distortion
linked to apostasy and so-called “false prophets” (Garrard-Burnett 2013). On the other
hand, it has caused great commotion in society due to the political activism of its leaders
(Ramos and Cabrera 2020;Tec-López 2020;Carpio 2021). Recent studies have shown that
neo-Pentecostalism manifests differently in various cultural and political contexts (Reu
2019;Palecek and Tazlar 2021;Orogun 2023), indicating that it is a phenomenon that has
gained relevance not only within local settings but also across various countries.
This movement is often considered the third wave of Pentecostal–Charismatic Chris-
tianity, following classical Pentecostalism and the Charismatic renewal movement, and
its distinctive traits would be the prosperity gospel and active involvement in neoconser-
vatives’ politics, setting it apart from non-charismatic evangelical movements. However,
scholars such as Leite de Moraes (2010), Jaimes (2012,2020), Jaimes and Montalvo (2018),
and Tec-López (2020) argue that neo-Pentecostalism is more than just the third wave
of Pentecostalism, as this model has been constructed primarily by observing the evo-
lution of Protestantism in the United States. Therefore, this North American-centered
view is a crucial component to consider when attempting to fit this model into the Latin
American reality.1
The term “neo-Pentecostalism” was first used in 1963 by Russell Hitt in Eternity
magazine to describe Protestant churches practicing the gifts of the Holy Spirit but rejecting
the Pentecostal label. While originally termed “Charismatic renewal” by its leaders, the
concept evolved into an analytical category in North America and later in Latin America,
where it was used to explain the intersection of religious practices (Burgess and van der
Maas 2002;Freston 1999).
Religions 2024,15, 1323. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15111323 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/religions

Religions 2024,15, 1323 2 of 17
This has led to a generalized notion of this phenomenon as a new ultraconservative
evangelical movement with clear opposition to the LGBTI+ and feminist agendas, and
whose main objective is to use political power to rebuild society from Christian moral
precepts (Pérez 2018;Oro 2018;García-Ruiz and Michel 2014;Carpio 2021). While it is
often assumed that these groups are politically driven, this article seeks to explore the
religious and sociocultural dynamics that complicate such a simplified narrative. Although
political engagement is evident, the lived religious experiences of congregants offer a more
nuanced view.
In Latin America, a region characterized by sociocultural, political, and economic
fractures, tensions, and contradictions, it has been suggested that, unlike Western Europe
where religious indifference has prevailed, there is a revitalization of the symbolic reli-
gious
2
. In other words, secularization has had different and multiple impacts, allowing
for the rearrangement and reconfiguration of the religious (Hervieu-Leger 1999) due to its
multidimensional character (Dobbelaere 1981). Consequently, we are witnessing processes
of pluralization in the religious field as a sign of a very particular Latin American religious
modernity, not as a consequence of a “reenchantment or resacralization of societies” (Cox
1994;Berger 1999).
It is from this context that this article seeks to understand neo-Pentecostalism as a
religious and political movement within a scenario of multiple modernities,
3
based on an
ethnographic study in evangelical churches in Chile and Mexico. Specifically, this article
addresses the following research questions: How do the discourses of the “Kingdom of God”
and the experiential dimensions of the Holy Spirit contribute to the political and religious
influence of neo-Pentecostalism in these contexts? And how does neo-Pentecostalism,
through these axes, shape modernity in Latin America by blending religious and political
spheres? We mainly focus on two axes of observation: the discourse of the “Kingdom of
God” and the experience of the Holy Spirit. The first one points to the way of conceiving
the public space, and the second one, on the other hand, inquires into the experiential
dimensions, both individual and collective, that give meaning and legitimacy to this
religious movement. In this regard, neo-Pentecostalism presents itself as a phenomenon
that responds to the complexity of a region where religion and politics intertwine in novel
ways (Adriance 1992;Olson 2006). Unlike the image of a monolithic and reactionary
movement, the article shows how neo-Pentecostalism is a movement that navigates the
interstices between the religious and the secular.
In the following sections, the reader will first find the methodology used to achieve the
results of this study. We then move on to a review of the literature on neo-Pentecostalism
in Latin America to provide context for the analysis. In Section 4, we delve into the concept
of multiple modernities and secularization in the region. Section 5examines the discourse
of the Kingdom of God and how it is employed within evangelical groups associated
with neo-Pentecostalism. In Section 6, we explore the experiential aspect of religious
practice, focusing on the Holy Spirit as a symbol that shapes the beliefs and practices
of believers. Finally, we conclude this article with final reflections on the findings and
broader implications.
2. The Methodological Route
To address this phenomenon, ethnographic research was carried out in evangelical
churches in Chile and Mexico, two countries that, despite their differences, share common
elements in relation to the development of neo-Pentecostalism and its political impact.
In this sense, most of the research that has been performed in the region has focused on
countries such as Brazil, Colombia, Guatemala, Costa Rica, or Argentina, nations where
the presence and political impact of the evangelical megachurches associated with this
phenomenon has been seen with greater notoriety. On the other hand, in Chile and
Mexico, the phenomenon is somewhat diffuse, since until a few years ago, there were no
evangelical megachurches of the neo-Pentecostal type with a significant political presence
at the national level, as is the case in the other countries. Furthermore, in Chile, historically,

Religions 2024,15, 1323 3 of 17
Creole Pentecostalism has been hegemonic in the evangelical field, whereas in Mexico,
traditional Pentecostalism, although it has been the majority, has coexisted with other
evangelical movements such as historic Protestantism and the Light of the World church.
In order to carry out this research, the following research techniques were used:
(1) participant
observation in eight evangelical churches (four in each country) with em-
phasis on understanding the internal dynamics of the organizations and the ways of acting
in the world; (2) semi-structured interviews with leaders, members and former members,
with the purpose of understanding their theological, political, and social perspectives; and
(3) documentary and digital review of publications and materials produced by the churches
such as newsletters, sermons, institutional documents, and activities in social media. The
period in which the fieldwork was carried out corresponds to the years 2019 and 2021 in
the cities of Santiago de Chile, Mexico City, and Merida, Mexico.
3. Cartographies of Neo-Pentecostalism in Latin America
This section provides a comprehensive review of how neo-Pentecostalism has man-
ifested across Latin America, revealing the diverse ways in which the movement has
developed throughout the region.
The first findings of the research show that, in Latin America, neo-Pentecostalism
has been configured from different historical trajectories and sociopolitical, economic,
and cultural conditions. The works of Jaimes (2020) and Tec-López (2022) show that the
trajectory of this phenomenon is diffuse to trace and can be assumed as a “movement” or
“current” that has been amalgamated from various evangelical expressions and historical
moments (Fediakova 2015).
While it is true that neo-Pentecostalism shares a common cultural matrix with other
Pentecostal expressions, involving a worldview based on the experience of the Holy Spirit
and the struggle against the devil and the forces of evil, it is also characterized by nu-
ances and singularities of each national context that make it different from other regions
(Reu 2019). In fact, anthropological research has shown a great diversity of forms and
manifestations of this phenomenon, even within the same country (Diara and Onah 2014).
It could be argued that the most emblematic case, and the one for which most research
has been conducted in Latin America, is that of Brazil. The works of Freston (1993,1999),
Mariano (1996,1999), and Silveira (2000), among others, have become classics in the
academic literature, solidifying neo-Pentecostalism as an analytical category and making
visible a new ecclesial model that had been gaining strength since the emergence of the
Universal Church of the Kingdom of God. The growth and influence of this church brought
it into the public eye, especially as its members began participating in national politics.
Years later, in 2018, they successfully consolidated the “Evangelical Parliamentary Group”,
which included 199 deputies and 4 senators, all aligned around moral issues such as
abortion and same-sex marriage.
This phenomenon has not been exclusive to Brazil, as other countries have witnessed
the emergence of evangelical actors promoting the slogan of “moralization” and profound
societal transformation. These movements oppose government corruption, whether from
the left or right, as well as the “gay lobby” and the globalist agenda of the global economic
elite and the institutions that represent it. Over the past 10 years, the region has been
increasingly involved in a sociopolitical scenario in which the controversy surrounding
religion within political, electoral, and legislative contexts has intensified.
In Colombia, the long-anticipated Peace Agreement between the government and the
Revolutionary Armed Forces was blocked by the negative outcome of the 2016 plebiscite.
Among the causes attributed to this result was the influence of evangelical groups, most
notably one of the country’s largest neo-Pentecostal megachurches: the International
Charismatic Mission (ICM) (Basset 2018). The reasons for the rejection had to do mainly
with the idea that the “gay” and communist agenda was behind the agreement.
In Costa Rica, Christian singer Fabricio Alvarado ran for the presidency in 2018 for the
evangelical National Restoration Party, winning the first round over the official candidate

Religions 2024,15, 1323 4 of 17
Carlos Alvarado. His campaign was based on the defense of the family and traditional
values. Fabricio Alvarado’s “militancy” within a neo-Pentecostal megachurch and his
closeness to the famous pastor–apostle Rony Chaves (Carpio 2021) made him popular in
the rural areas of the country.
In the same region, one of the first countries to show strong evangelical participation
in politics was Guatemala. It was the first nation to have an evangelical president, Efraín
Ríos Montt (1983–1984), who came to power through a coup d’état and was legitimized
by the U.S. government and neo-Pentecostal pastors. After him, other evangelicals came
to the presidential chair, but on these occasions through democratic means: Jorge Serrano
Elías (1991–1993) and Jimmy Morales (2016–2020).
In the Argentine case, there has been a constant dispute in the field of morality,
especially due to the Law on the Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy passed in 2020. In
this context, pro-life groups assumed an important role together with a wide participation
of neo-Pentecostal evangelical churches and religious political leaders, which reframed
the question about the secularity of the State and the place of religious ideas in legislative
discussions (Felitti and Prieto 2018).
In Peru, the “Don’t Mess with My Kids” movement emerged from evangelical ranks
in 2016 as a form of protest against public policies with a gender perspective that the
government was trying to implement in education and other areas of public administration
(Meneses 2019). On the other hand, in Bolivia, some evangelical groups supported the
coup government of Jeanine Añez and the leadership of Luis Fernando Camacho, both
belonging to Roman Catholicism, linked to the far right, and featured in episodes with
great symbolic–religious significance involving Bibles and crucifixes inside state buildings.
In Chile, evangelicals gained media notoriety in the context of legislative processes
such as the Civil Union Agreement (2011), the Zamudio Law or Anti-Discrimination Law
(2012), the Civil Unions Recognition Law (2015), Abortion on Three Grounds (2017), and
the Gender Identity Law (2018). Several neo-Pentecostal leaders raised their voices to
express their rejection of the promulgation of these laws (Tec-López 2022).
Finally, in Mexico, we observed the emergence of a political party with a confes-
sional origin. Its founder is a Christian lawyer linked to neo-Pentecostal churches (Garma
2019). Despite the fact that legally, confessional parties cannot exist, the Partido Encuentro
Social (PES), which was later renamed Partido Encuentro Solidario, accompanied the then-
presidential candidate of the coalition Juntos Haremos Historia, Andres Manuel López
Obrador, to his triumph in 2018. This event generated enormous criticism for him by
linking himself to an “anti-rights” party.
As we can observe, the evangelical groups known as neo-Pentecostals have acquired
relevance as new political actors, breaking into conservative political organizations, consol-
idating strategic ties with political parties and influencing the public agenda and legislative
discussions. Considering this, it has been stated that the evangelical presence in the public
and political space responds to the arrival of a new generation that has left behind what
Lalive D’Epinay (1969) called the “refuge for the masses”, to consolidate itself as a new rel-
evant citizen force with an interest in sociopolitical incidence (Fediakova and Parker 2009).
This new attitude of openness has been attributed to what Pérez (2018) calls an “evident
neo-Pentecostal spirit”, whereby renewed evangelicals, with reconstructionist pretensions
and with an emphasis on reaching the middle and upper classes, have become the new
Latin American face and the new social, cultural, and political actors of the continental
evangelical movement, challenging the classical theories of secularization and threatening
secular laws.
We can thus say that the neo-Pentecostal phenomenon points to a series of characteris-
tics associated with the new forms of political incidence of evangelical groups. These bring
a more complex background than just positioning themselves within the political field,
namely, religious symbols underlie deeply felt experiences with the sacred and build new
ways of looking at social reality and, therefore, religious action is manifested in multiple
ways, not only within the temples but also in the public space.

Religions 2024,15, 1323 5 of 17
Among the characteristics attributed to these groups, the following stand out:
(1) they
promote the discourse of economic prosperity as a divine end; (2) they make use of market-
ing and massmediatization of faith; (3) in general, their parishioners have a middle-class,
young, and professional profile, although we can find these groups in all socioeconomic
sectors; (4) they industrialize religious music from a market logic, but without leaving
aside religious sentiment; (5) they seek to grow numerically and establish megachurches;
(6) they develop different models of the ecclesial organization; (7) they assume theolog-
ical doctrines such as spiritual warfare and divine healing, maintaining elements of the
Pentecostal charisma; (8) they seek to articulate themselves to influence politics; and
(9) they sustain a greater openness to the world
4
, that is, they overcome the sacred/profane,
church/world dichotomy, as they assume themselves as relevant citizens. These charac-
teristics are among the most commonly found in studies on neo-Pentecostalism, but they
are not always present in all churches, which makes the phenomenon diffuse and complex
to delimit. In this sense, neo-Pentecostalism strains the secularization processes of the
modern agenda, representing a movement that evidences the blurred boundaries between
the religious and secular fields.
4. Between the Religious and the Secular
From the Western European notion of the modern agenda, religion was seen as an
element that hindered the progress of societies and, therefore, had to disappear or be
relegated to the private sphere. This conception was called secularization, a process
inherent to the program of modernity. This made it possible to explain the apparent decline
of religious sentiment, on the one hand, and the reconfiguration and pluralization of the
religious field on the other (Casanova 2006;Taylor 2007).
The concept of “multiple modernities” (Eisenstadt 2000) helps us to understand
how modernity manifests itself differently across various cultural and historical contexts.
Rather than seeing modernity as a singular, Western-dominated trajectory, this framework
recognizes that different societies negotiate their own forms of modernity, blending local re-
ligious, political, and cultural elements. In Latin America, for example, neo-Pentecostalism
emerges as a case where modernity is shaped not by the secularization thesis but by a
persistent intertwining of the sacred and the secular. This view challenges the traditional
notion that modernity leads to the inevitable decline of religion, showing instead how new
forms of spirituality and religious practices, such as the prosperity gospel and the direct
experience of the Holy Spirit, adapt to and influence modern sociopolitical realities (Parker
2019). By embracing these divergent paths, the framework of multiple modernities allows
us to see how neo-Pentecostalism, far from being an anomaly, is a legitimate expression of
modern religious and political life in the region.
Instead of speaking of a single modernity, we are witnessing a history of the consti-
tution and reconstitution of a multiplicity of cultural programs, tensions, contradictions,
and ambiguities (Eisenstadt 2000). Thus, conceiving modernity as multiple allows us to see
it as a non-global or homogeneous fact but structured according to different dimensions.
Thus, after 9/11, we entered a stage where the crisis of modern enlightened reason—and
its anti-religious bias—was called into question. The attacks of 9/11 revealed the resur-
gence of religion in the public sphere. This event marked a significant turning point in
the reconsideration of the secularization thesis (Philpott 2002;Torpey 2012). The sudden
rise of Islamic fundamentalism, coupled with a broader global reaction against the West,
brought into focus various religious movements, including the evangelical revivalist right
wing linked to neo-Pentecostalism, Catholic integrist sectors, and Jewish fundamentalism.
For these movements, modern secular civilization represented a profound threat to their
religious values (Casanova 2006;Beriain 2006).
Consequently, neo-Pentecostalism in Latin America presents itself as a religious phe-
nomenon that challenges the classical notion of secularization, as we see how this type of
religious expression is increasingly present in the public debate and in the configuration
of the political agenda in the countries of the region. For Eisenstadt, modernity is on an

Religions 2024,15, 1323 6 of 17
“endless trial” (Eisenstadt 2000, p. 26), for we also wonder how these elements, which
were once considered pre-modern, medieval, and even barbaric, now appear in the heart
of an advanced modernity, with science, technology, and a free and self-regulated market.
Has modernity failed to achieve the establishment of that civilization in which the rational
individual would enjoy a life in complete plenitude?
In this sense, religious sentiment was constantly challenged by the processes of secu-
larization included in the modern program. But, as De Melo Magalhaes (2013) points out, it
is in religion where the unfinished project of Western modernity had its greatest attack and
defeat. Religion acquired different functions in the various modernities. In Western Europe
(Latin–Mediterranean), institutional religion, headed by Roman Catholicism, was depoliti-
cized in some nations to give way to the creation of the modern non-confessional state. In
the United States, the religious maintained its undoubted presence in the fundamentalist
evangelical movement, which inherently possesses a modern character (Eisenstadt 1999,
2000). Likewise, the American “civil religion” (Bellah 1967) allowed the development
of an internal cultural diversification, as a mosaic or melting pot of the ideas and social
movements contained in the collective identity of the nation (Glazer and Moynihan 1963).
In Latin America, on the other hand, logic and developments were conceived as
distinct from what happened in the Global North. This region is characterized as a field
in constant transformation, the result of the sedimentation and juxtaposition of different
processes, composed of nations that share the Catholic colonial heritage and the intertwin-
ing of indigenous and African traditions, as well as the condition of being inserted in an
increasingly globalized world and in which neoliberalism has allowed the transformation
of social dynamics and the links of people with the religious (García-García 1994;Watts
2019;Onwuegbuchulam 2019):
“Unlike in the North, where the transformations of the religious field occur on
the foundation of a society that since the Reformation is already multi-religious,
highly exposed to an enlightened and rationalist culture, and in which the Protes-
tant ethos constitutes one of the cultural matrices that has an elective affinity
with the capitalist spirit, as Weber suggested, in Latin America the religious trans-
formation takes place on the basis of a symbolic cultural and religious structure
with rituals of strong Ibero-Catholic-Indigenous-African connotation, where the
syncretisms characteristic of the Latin American popular religions operate as “a
different logic” from which the old traditions are reconstructed and new ones
emerge”. (Parker 1998, p. 20)
In other words, the pattern is one of evolving associations, connections, and overlaps
between the different religious systems, their institutions, and the “ordinary believers”
who redefine, reformulate, and reconfigure religious beliefs and practices. Likewise, reli-
gious plurality in Latin America resists binary classifications or rigid opposition between
modernity and tradition, secular and sacred, as it is precisely in places where the imprint
of the sacred is strongest that the impact of modernization is also most intensely felt (Nash
2017;Rieger 2023).
It is exactly in this “in-between” (Bhabha 1990) that the various manifestations of
the sacred are gestated and transformed into heterodox models of religious practices.
Thus, neo-Pentecostalism emerges as a product of the popular reconstruction of magic and
spirituality that does not necessarily pass through institutionalized churches, ecclesiastical
authorities, or religious experts, although they are still needed as positive, negative, or
legitimizing references (Parker 2019). Instead, it is individuals who form collectivities,
who create, choose, complement, and resignify their relationship with the sacred and the
religious, and build collectives.
The religious field therefore results in a specific network of micro and macro social
relations in constant imbrication and tension with other fields. A network of connectivity
that points to a diversity of religious institutionality, syncretism, pluralism, hybridization,
mutations, and lines of leakage, as well as double affiliations, interactions between religious
systems, neo-magic, charismatism, neo-shamanism, and a wide range of new spiritualities.

Religions 2024,15, 1323 7 of 17
We cease to conceive of a single Catholicism, a single Christianity, or a single Pentecostalism,
and the “-isms” become plural, diverse, and multiple.
5. The Utopia of the Kingdom of God: A Neo-Pentecostal Vanguard?
One of the predominant narratives explaining the active participation of evangelicals
is that of the establishment of the Kingdom of God. While there are other interpretations
of this theological concept within Christian traditions, the most common understanding
within neo-Pentecostalism emphasizes the conquest of new territories through the expan-
sion of the word of God to the ends of the earth. This interpretation merges both traditional
elements and hypermodern strategies (Oro 2018). According to Cháves and Zúñiga (2018),
the neo-Pentecostal strategy entails (1) the formation of alliances with hegemonic and
neoliberal sectors to “share” power and (2) the consolidation of a conservative agenda
on basic human rights, functioning as a political catalyst for the imposition of neoliberal
political agendas.
We can identify three doctrinal and theological influences that are inscribed in
this narrative:
1. Evangelical fundamentalism. This emerged as an important ideological source
at the beginning of the 20th century (Gallagher 2004) and promoted the recovery of a
supposed primitive purity of Christianity, the rejection of liberalism and secular modernity,
and the affirmation of a patriarchal hierarchical social order impervious to change. Its
origins date back to the publication of The Fundamentals: A Testimony of Truth (Torrey and
Dixon 1917) in 1910, which reacted against biblical criticism that questioned the inerrancy
and infallibility of the Scriptures.
2. Dominion Theology. This arose in the 1970s with Pastor Jerry Fallwell and other
Christian leaders who tried to position themselves within politics in the United States.
They assumed a sovereignty of ecclesial power over political power with the aim of
Christianizing the state in an evangelical Constantinian version. Clarkson (2005) lists three
characteristics that are shared by all types of dominionism: (1) They celebrate Christian
nationalism, in the sense that they believe that the United States was once, and should be
again, a Christian nation. (2) They promote religious supremacy, in that they generally do
not respect the equality of other religions, or even other variants of Christianity.
(3) They
endorse theocratic views, in that they believe that the Ten Commandments should be the
foundation of American law, and that the Constitution should be seen as a vehicle for
implementing biblical principles.
3. Christian Reconstructionism. This is a postmillennialist narrative of the Kingdom
of God originated by Rousas Rushdoony, Greg Bahnsen, and Gary North in the United
States in the 1980s. It has had a great influence on the Christian right in that country and is
promoted as a philosophy that seeks to consolidate a Christian theocracy under the Old
Testament Law. This is due to the threats of the disintegration of the patriarchal authority of
the family, the moral problem of divorce, abortion laws, and the political rights of Latinos,
Black people, and LGBTI+ people (Amat 2004). They consider that the Bible should be the
universal standard of justice and lash out strongly against queer people, claiming that the
death penalty is God’s approved punishment (North 1999).
In this way, such doctrines were exported to Latin America through the Pentecostal and
charismatic preachers of the 1970s and 1980s, whose discourses encouraged the construction
of a new way of living religious practice, since before the second half of the 20th century,
Evangelicals in the region were largely kept out of the spaces of political and public
dispute, mainly because of the hegemony of Roman Catholicism and due to theologies
that emphasized the separation between religion and politics. Social research affirmed that
most evangelical churches had apolitical and antipolitical positions (Fediakova and Parker
2009). However, with the arrival of these foreign doctrines, the Latin American political
scene underwent a significant transformation (Owen et al. 1991).
Thus, neo-Pentecostalism is configured as a religious and political movement articu-
lated around a narrative of conquest and territorial expansion of “Christian truth”, which

Religions 2024,15, 1323 8 of 17
is expressed in various ways: the control of spaces of political power, the establishment of
alliances with hegemonic sectors, direct participation in electoral contests, repositioning
in the public and cultural space, and the imposition of a conservative agenda on issues of
sexual and gender ethics.
This religious and political position is not only expressed in the region but is part
of a global trend that is evident in other contexts such as the United States, Asia, and
Africa, where this movement has been at the forefront of the articulation of a strong
ultraconservative agenda on issues of sexual and family morality, affecting the rights of
women and the LGBTI+ population (B. Martin 2017).
Given this, we ask ourselves, what is happening within the churches that make up
this neo-Pentecostal evangelical field? Among the pastors of the churches investigated, the
most frequent opinion was not to use the pulpit to orient or guide the faithful to position
themselves from any political sector. Alfred Cooper, pastor of the Trinity Anglican Church
in Santiago, Chile, maintains that although it is necessary to have Christian senators and
deputies, they should be people trained for that purpose:
“We would not be for creating a Christian political party, but rather inserting
ourselves into what already exists. There are not enough qualified leaders to form
a political party. When we talk about politics, we always have the complex issue
of not taking sides [
. . .
] From the pulpit, we try to propose biblical principles for
everyone to vote as they see fit. But we are not going to move the flock like in the
United States to vote for Trump or things like that. I have tried to avoid linking
myself with any side.” (A. Cooper, personal communication, 17 February 2020)
This position is shared by most pastors, as there is a genuine need for Christians to
hold positions of political power. However, in Cornerstone Mexico and the International
Charismatic Mission of Chile (ICM-C), the situation is different. In Cornerstone, the faithful
are encouraged to participate in pro-life and pro-family marches. In the case of ICM-C,
Pastor Luz Espinal ran as a candidate, first for Councilor and later for Deputy in Santiago
de Chile. In their own auditorium, former presidential candidate JoséAntonio Kast was
invited to hold campaign events, demonstrating that the group’s religious spaces are also
used for political proselytism:
“No one lights a lamp and places it under the bed; instead, they put it in the
highest position to illuminate the entire house. What are the highest places in a
nation? One of them is politics. We truly want to fulfill what Jesus commanded:
‘Go and make disciples’. Notice that the original text does not say ‘in all nations’.
If it did, we might feel comfortable, being just a small group of believers in this
city, in this nation. Instead, it used ‘of’: ‘Make disciples of all nations’, meaning
that God’s will is for all nations to become disciples. How can I aim to disciple a
nation if I shy away from engaging in areas like politics? The deceptive idea was
spread that Christians should not enter the political arena and look at the damage
it has caused. But the Bible speaks of kings and priests; we will reign with Him.
At ICM, political involvement has been part of our work for many years. Pastor
Claudia from Bogotáhas served three terms as a senator and ambassador. Several
of our pastor friends have also been senators. Today, my wife has been called to
enter politics, and we are fully supporting her in this journey.” (R. Perez, Pastor
at ICM-C, personal communication, 17 June 2021)
We can observe a clear influence of the theological doctrines that we mentioned before,
since ICM-C holds a position of influencing the political field, not only by having Christians
in public office, but with the idea of “discipling the nations”, that is, to have political
control over the States and their respective governments, in order to impose the “will of
God” (Solano 2022). However, this perspective differs from the views of others within the
churches. On one hand, Keila from Cornerstone Mexico considers that Christian leaders
should not participate in politics:

Religions 2024,15, 1323 9 of 17
“Never in life, it’s nonsense. I think it opens the door to mass manipulation. I’ve
seen many times where people ask the pastor, ‘Who are you going to vote for?’,
and the pastor responds with, ‘No, because the vote is free and secret.’ But there
are others who say, ‘Oh, I’m going to vote for Morena.’ And then the whole
church follows suit, voting for Morena, or the whole church votes for PAN. I
don’t think that’s right, and even less so when a pastor runs for office as a deputy
or something similar; I think it’s a serious mistake. It’s one thing to be a Christian,
and if you are just a Cristian and get involved, that’s fine, because everyone can
believe what they want. But being a leader, a pastor, or an apostle of a church, I
don’t see it as appropriate.” (Keila, personal communication, 9 December 2019)
On the other hand, some make a clear distinction between the participation of Chris-
tians in politics and the participation of churches in politics. Daniel Rebolledo from the
Pentecostal Church of the Trinity (IPETRI) in Chile states it this way:
“Church in politics? Not at all, but Christians in politics? Yes, no problem. It
doesn’t mean that a Christian in politics will represent Christians. In fact, I hope
a Christian never becomes president, as they are sure to lean towards Christianity,
which would do more harm than good, potentially damaging the church’s image
in society rather than bringing it closer.” (D. Rebolledo, personal communication,
2 November 2020)
The distinction between “Church in politics” and “Christian in politics” is crucial,
especially in the historical and religious context of Chile. While the institutional Church has
often positioned itself as a political actor—negotiating, endorsing, or opposing government
policies—individual Christians have engaged in politics based on their personal convictions
rooted in their faith, which may align with or diverge from the Church’s official stance.
Mansilla and Orellana (2018) emphasize that evangelicals have played a significant role
in key moments of Chilean history, such as during Pinochet’s dictatorship, where some
evangelical leaders supported the regime, seeing it as a protector of Christian values, while
others opposed it on moral grounds. Their involvement continued through pivotal events
like the formal recognition of non-Catholic churches in Chile and the increasing presence
of evangelicals as candidates for public office. This demonstrates that evangelicals have
always participated in politics in various forms—sometimes as representatives of church
networks of denominations, and other times as individuals whose political engagement is
shaped by personal faith. This duality highlights how evangelical political participation in
Chile has been both institutional and deeply personal, shaped by theological beliefs as well
as by the broader sociopolitical landscape.
This diversity in opinions regarding the way to participate in politics responds to
exercises of subjectivation and the agency of each believer to discern and reflect on their
own experiences and processes. On the one hand, in leaders and organizations such as
ICM-C and Cornerstone Mexico, there is a direct interpellation to the faithful to integrate
themselves in the political field, with the purpose of expanding and crystallizing the
Kingdom of God. On the other hand, other groups and believers express a position of
caution and abstention, both to prevent divisions in the religious community and to avoid
adverse effects on the public image of the church.
It has been the ecclesiastical leadership who have taken political initiatives and have
been mediatized, channeling public opinion to think that there is a type of mass mobilization
within the evangelical field. Thus, it is thought that the masses of believers follow and
act according to what the pastors ask for or carry out as representatives. In reality, what
happens is that different political attitudes are constructed, which not only differ in certain
elements but also become antagonistic.
This pluralism of political attitudes is also found in the conceptions that each believer
has of the “Kingdom of God”. Although each signifies it in a different way, all embrace
this theological figure as a narrative that characterizes their passage through life on earth
in order to reach the hereafter. The Kingdom of God serves as a theological utopia that

Religions 2024,15, 1323 10 of 17
leads to the longing for an ideal and just society, as a horizon to be headed towards. In this
way, the present is understood as the place of concretion of social practices, giving meaning
and direction to what is achieved. This leads them to become more deeply involved in
the world, redefining the public space from different perspectives with the intention of
becoming involved in society and no longer being separated from it. There is a vision of
the believer to be light on earth; Christians have the responsibility to be linked in the public
sphere, as Yadira, leader of ICM-C, says:
“I am part of a body, and that body has a responsibility: to take the gospel to all
nations. This is a call to engage with society, family, and the nation, bringing the
message of salvation while actively participating in society. It means being a part
of society, occupying spaces where we can be a light without creating distance
or barriers, but rather by being an active, contributing presence. In the political
sphere, it is especially important that we take up these positions. The primary
goal es to bring that light, that message, an to meet the need of individuals and
families.” (Yadira, personal communication, 27 May 2019)
Thus, neo-Pentecostalism as a religious and political movement in Latin America is
presented as a phenomenon that not only relocates the public sphere towards the private
and the intimate community, but also projects and puts into play new concepts of citizen-
ship, leadership, and political participation in the framework of these multiple modernities
(Fediakova 2015;Reu 2019;Bianchi et al. 2016).
6. The Experience of the Holy Spirit
In addition to the political component, neo-Pentecostalism is a profoundly religious
movement. In this sense, the churches analyzed in this study have a special emphasis on
the role of the Holy Spirit, the third person of the Trinity, distinguishing them from the rest
of the Christian denominations that do not experience or emphasize these charismatic gifts.
Since this is a continuum of experiences that involves the senses and emotions through the
body, these groups have focused more on this part of the religious experience and less on
the intellectual and systematic part of theological knowledge. This does not mean that these
groups lack a particular theology, but rather that they are the product of a combination of
an emphasis on the experiential, inherited from classical Pentecostalism, and an attempt to
articulate a hermeneutic and biblical study to support the actions they carry out.
We have seen that the great majority of these groups began from a supernatural experi-
ence of the founding leaders; therefore, although they have biblical institutes or leadership
training schools, they do not address systematic theology or delve into the history of the
Church from an integral perspective. Instead, they highlight the historical journey of their
founders, such as John Wimber for the Vineyard churches or César Castellanos for those
with the G12 model (ICM), because they consider that the important thing about biblical
preparation is not the past but the present, the here and now (Ma 2007;Maçaneiro 2013;
Lima et al. 2015).
For this reason, for authors such as Da Silva (2012), it is impossible to establish a theo-
logical current for neo-Pentecostalism since it is not absolutely evident in a single institution.
However, we find in the Principle of Pentecostality, a category developed by the theologian
Bernardo Campos (1997,2016), a recognition of the experience of the Holy Spirit as the theolog-
ical and symbolic axis articulating the Pentecostalisms/charismatisms/neo-Pentecostalisms.
In classical Pentecostalism, speaking in tongues or glossolalia was the demonstration
that the Spirit had baptized a person. Neo-Pentecostalism retains this emphasis but incorpo-
rates other manifestations that account for the action of the Spirit, such as healing, prophecy,
and deliverance from demonic spirits, among others. Evidently, these expressions are not
new; they have existed since the beginnings of Pentecostalism, but in neo-Pentecostal
groups, they occupy a central place, acquiring greater protagonism and relevance:
“Entering the Kingdom of God also means receiving the Holy Spirit, it is being
born again. The Holy Spirit is the one who opens our eyes to a reality where

Religions 2024,15, 1323 11 of 17
Jesus reigns as King over all our lives, and indeed, over all humanity. To receive
salvation is to experience everything Jesus promised. As He declared, ‘The Holy
Spirit is upon me to set captives free’. Receiving the Holy Spirit is the manifesta-
tion of the Kingdom of God in a world dominated by the kingdom of darkness.”
(Abraham Perez, Pastor at Aliento de Vida Mexico, personal communication, 14
January 2020)
As we can see in the opinion of Pastor Abraham Perez, the relationship between
the Holy Spirit and the Kingdom of God is direct and profound. The various Christian
traditions have associated the Holy Spirit with the symbols of the dove, fire, and oil, but
how do believers relate to him? The Holy Spirit would be, first of all, God himself, but
at the same time, the third person of the Trinity. This does not imply that he is the third
in order of importance, but he is the third because he is the person of God that currently
guides Christians. But he is also a person, not a breath, a wind, or a phantasmagoric entity,
but a person who feels, who is sad, who laughs, who rejoices, and who becomes angry.
Thus, believers need to build a personal relationship with him:
“The Holy Spirit can be your best friend. And I think they don’t want to believe
because he is confrontational, because a friend always tells you the truth even if
it hurts you. While the Holy Spirit is your friend and He’s tender and He’s sweet,
He’s also Truth. And when he says things, he says them. And if you don’t know
Him you can become confused by that confrontation” (Jonathan, Cornerstone
youth leader, personal communication, 3 November 2019).
To be a friend, the key is to “have an intimate relationship” with him to receive
vision, direction, and guidance. Intimacy is achieved through prayer and fellowship with
other Christians:
“Since I discovered that I can be who I am with the Holy Spirit, I said, “ah well I
want an intimate relationship with you so I’m going to take you everywhere I
go”. We went to the movies, I bought him a ticket, we have been out for dinner
and I have asked for a table for two even though people looked at me as if I
was crazy, because it seemed like no one was occupying the other chair and me
talking like I was alone, but no, I am not alone and never have been. Giving
God his place, just as Marcos Brunet’s song says, “Come and take your place”,
I opened my life to the Holy Spirit, I invited him to come into my daily life, to
my house, to accompany me on the bus. Ah, because he is a gentleman, he will
not enter without you inviting him to come in. My best moments have been with
him. Once I went out with three of my disciples and we went to the movies, and
I have programmed in my cell phone that a call comes in, it is the Holy Spirit
calling me and so I start talking to him. So we were outside the movie theater,
waiting to go in, and then my phone rang. It was a reminder that He was calling
me. I passed the phone to Javi, my disciple, and told her, “It’s the Holy Spirit”.
She answered, and I saw the surprised look on her face. As she answered, she
began to be filled with the Spirit and started crying. We had to leave the area
so we could minister to her because God had spoken to her” (Alejandra, home
group leader, Personal communication, 7 December 2021).
With Alejandra’s account, we observe a communion with the Spirit from the logic
of the friend and of intimacy, since it allows people to be constantly living a spiritual
atmosphere in any space where they are, taking the sacred aspects of religious practice to
places such as the cinema or restaurants.
Other manifestations can occur when there is the movement of the Holy Spirit within
a church and in the personal lives of believers. What is called charismata or charismatic
gifts (McClung 1994;Nel 2017), which include healing, prophecy, tongues, and others, are
received as tangible evidence of divine action. In addition to the gift of tongues, there are a
number of “manifestations” of the Holy Spirit that occur at times of “overflow” but are not
directly related to the gifts. These have been stigmatized on many occasions because they

Religions 2024,15, 1323 12 of 17
are related to “heretical” experiences by representing unconventional body movements
and expressions, which completely break with the solemnity, sobriety, and order of the
worship. In addition, many detractors consider that since they are not clearly described in
the Bible, they may be expressions that have more to do with demons than with the Holy
Spirit. Some of the most recurrent manifestations are (1) convulsions; (2) holy laughter; (3)
growling like an animal; (4) coughing up evil spirits; (5) fainting or falling backwards as
if fainting; (6) golden frost; (7) uncontrollable crying; (8) sensation of fire in the body; (9)
visions; (10) dancing; and (11) drunkenness of the spirit.
As we can see, the Holy Spirit plays a central role in Pentecostalism and neo-Pentecostalism,
since it is an energizing principle that permeates the entire religious experience, from
preaching, miracles, healings, manifestations, intimacy, personal relationships, and the
evangelizing mission.
All these experiences that involve the body and the mind make us see neo-Pentecostalism
as a religious phenomenon that renews practices and elements of classical Pentecostalism
in the midst of a context of modernized evangelical liturgy, with technology and audiovi-
sual production that stimulates the senses and the mind, generating spaces of emotional
ecstasy, in which the mind can connect with the corporeality and the spirit from a religious
worldview with detonating symbols around the figure of the Holy Spirit and its power.
This element can be understood from the collective feeling to understand the overexaltation
of emotions in the midst of religious gatherings with shared codes (Parker 1993).
In this context, neo-Pentecostalism presents itself as a religious movement that reaf-
firms aspects of classical Pentecostalism while also integrating and reinterpreting new
ways of ritualizing the relationship with the Holy Spirit. This is accompanied by symbolic
practices that demonstrate the power of the Spirit through healing, deliverance, and the
transformative action of the divine in people’s lives (Baer 2001;Ma 2007). All of this is
framed within a dichotomous worldview, where the spiritual and earthly realms are seen
as the battleground between God and the Devil for human souls (Oro 2018;Mariano 1999).
This perspective forms part of the doctrine of spiritual warfare, which was inherited from
fundamentalist movements of the nineteenth century, later adopted by Pentecostalism, and
systematized by neo-Pentecostal and charismatic groups in the 1970s. This theological
doctrine “presents a metaphysical understanding of social, economic and natural events”
(Wynarczyk 1995, p. 153), where Satan’s actions must be identified and “bound”. According
to Oro (2018), this doctrine represents a form of Holy War that transcends the spiritual
realm and manifests in the material world across various aspects of social life, requiring
believers to remain vigilant in resisting the “forces of evil”.
In some cases, the Holy Spirit is invoked not only as a personal guide but also a divine
force in social and political struggles. Movements that view their battles against secular
forces as part of a larger spiritual warfare see the Holy Spirit as actively leading believers
in these efforts. This framing transforms the spiritual battle into a broader “Holy War”
against moral decay, where the Holy Spirit is perceived as an essential ally in confronting
issues that are seen as threats to the Christian worldview, such as “gender ideology” or
movements advocating for LGBTIQ+ rights. By invoking the Holy Spirit in these contexts,
Evangelicalism extends its theological influence into the political realm, presenting divine
sanction for its sociopolitical stances (Aguilar 2019;Tec-López 2023;Bárcenas 2023).
This focus on the Holy Spirit is not limited to the political realm; it also plays a central
role in personal spiritual experiences, shaping believers’ relationship with the divine. The
Protestant Reformation implied the cessation of magic and miracle, replacing them with
enlightened reason and the systematic study of the Bible. While it can be argued that
certain Pentecostal practices may resemble magical traditions, Pentecostals themselves
would frame their actions as faithful adherence to Biblical teachings, particularly through
the ritual of the Baptism of the Holy Spirit, with the gift of tongues as evidence and
demonstration of the Spirit’s presence. In this sense, both the gift of tongues (glossolalia)
and the manifestations of the Holy Spirit empower believers to overcome the barriers of
secularizing modernity and re-enter the archetypal world, a “simultaneous retrocession and

Religions 2024,15, 1323 13 of 17
progression that leads to the creation of the sphere where the pre-literal and the post-literal
are united” (D. Martin 1990, p. 124).
However, this emphasis on religious experience does not exist in isolation. Neo-
Pentecostalism’s fusion of religious fervor with political engagement extends beyond
the personal into the public sphere, where it often aligns itself with conservative politi-
cal agendas, though not exclusively. While the trend leans toward conservative stances,
neo-Pentecostal political involvement can vary depending on local contexts. This align-
ment raises critical questions about the instrumentalization of religious discourse in po-
litical processes, particularly in areas such as minority rights, gender, and sexual diver-
sity (Ramos and Cabrera 2020). By seeking to influence legislation and public opinion,
neo-Pentecostalism challenges the secular framework of modern states, complicating the
relationship between church and state, and potentially threatening democratic pluralism.
7. Final Reflections
This article has explored how neo-Pentecostalism in Latin America operates at the
intersection of religious fervor and political engagement, influencing both personal and
public spheres—by focusing on the discourses of the Kingdom of God and the experiential
dimensions of the Holy Spirit, we have examined how this movement navigates the
complexities of modernity in Chile and Mexico. Our central research question was as
follows: How do these elements influence the political and religious practices of neo-
Pentecostal believers, and how do they shape the relationship between religion and politics
in Latin America?
Our methodology combined participant observation, interviews, and documentary
analysis within evangelical churches in Chile and Mexico. As discussed in the section on
“Cartographies of Neo-Pentecostalism”, the movement is not uniform across Latin America.
It varies significantly depending on each country’s historical, political, and cultural context.
This diversity reflects the concept of multiple modernities, which recognizes that modernity
is not a single, global phenomenon but manifests differently across various cultural and
religious landscapes. In Latin America, modernity has not led to the decline of religion, but
rather to a space where the sacred and the secular coexist and often overlap in tension.
The political engagement of neo-Pentecostals is best understood through the lens of
the Kingdom of God, as explored in Section 5. This concept motivates believers to see their
political involvement as part of a divine mission to expand God’s rule on earth. Often
forming alliances with neoliberal and hegemonic sectors, neo-Pentecostals work to advance
conservative agendas, especially concerning human rights, gender, and sexual diversity.
However, significant differences exist in how churches approach this political involvement.
While some leaders encourage active participation in politics, others prefer to keep the pulpit
free from political directives, reflecting the plurality of perspectives within the movement.
In the section on the experience of the Holy Spirit, we saw how this symbol plays a
crucial role in shaping the personal and collective religious identity of the believers. Charis-
matic experiences—such as glossolalia, healing, and deliverance—reinforce theological
beliefs while also providing a direct, tangible connection to the divine. The Holy Spirit
is invoked not only as a personal guide but also as a divine force in social and political
struggles. This demonstrates how neo-Pentecostalism integrates the experiential with the
political, showing how personal spiritual practices can extend into public life, influencing
even legislative agendas.
The neo-Pentecostal believer is a believer and a citizen at the same time; they often
raise their hands to receive the Holy Spirit in the temple and raise them to rebuke the
“demons” of homosexuality during marches against sexual rights. The neo-Pentecostal
believer does not distinguish between the differentiated fields of modernity, but rather
lives their faith in every area of daily life. They bring religious discourse into the public
sphere, sacralize politics, and, at the same time, repoliticize the sacred.
Thus, we ask, does the Latin American believer, characterized by being both religious
and modern, not embody two aspects of the same process? It is in this believer, and their

Religions 2024,15, 1323 14 of 17
everyday practices—both religious and secular—that we can glimpse the intricate web of
meanings that sustain and give continuity to what we understand as neo-Pentecostalism.
Latin American believers favor a symbolic–emotive rationality where the body plays a
crucial role, blurring the boundaries between different spheres of social reality. This is
evident in neo-Pentecostal and Pentecostal rituals, Afro-American religions, neo-magical
and neo-pagan expressions, esoteric spiritualities, and syncretic Catholic practices, all of
which thrive on expressiveness, affection, and emotion (Parker 1993).
In this way, Pentecostal/charismatic/neo-Pentecostal practice reclaims the body as an
essential substratum of life, integrating both body and mind through a magical–emotive
rationality that departs from Western notions of reason. This logic permeates their religious
experiences, intertwining them with their political and social actions (Parker 1993).
In conclusion, neo-Pentecostalism in Latin America presents a dynamic fusion of the
religious and political, offering a complex response to modernity in the region. Through its
emphasis on both the Kingdom of God and the Holy Spirit, neo-Pentecostalism challenges
traditional distinctions between the sacred and the secular, reshaping the religious and
political landscape in profound ways. This involvement in society and politics is not solely
driven by theological interpretation, but also by broader social processes taking place in
the world, particularly in Latin America. The way neo-Pentecostals influence the public
sphere reflects the creation of new societal norms, with an emphasis on the ethical-moral
factor, the resurgence of anti-left and anti-communist discourses, and the increasing role of
religion in political decision-making, marking a significant transformation in the region’s
sociopolitical fabric.
Funding: This research was funded by Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo ANID 21170354.
Institutional Review Board Statement: The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration
of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of University of Santiago, Chile Nº 012320 17
June 2019.
Informed Consent Statement: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement: The data supporting the findings of this study are available in the
author’s doctoral dissertation, which can be accessed at https://hdl.handle.net/10533/63800 or
obtained from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest: The author declares no conflict of interest.
Notes
1
These authors emphasize that using this typification requires prior argumentation and adaptation to the specific context
being studied. Additionally, the main challenge with this classification is that its characteristics overlap with those of other
typologies, creating a highly diffuse scenario where religious expressions from all three waves coexist: “The churches originating
from these waves are now experiencing a form of coexistence in which the differences between them have become diluted
and increasingly indistinct. First, second, and third-wave churches exchange experiences, liturgical practices, and doctrines,
largely due to the advancement of media power. As a result, classifying them as isolated, self-contained groups is misleading”
(Leite de Moraes 2010).
2
In Western Europe, alongside secularization, there is not only religious indifference but also a growing diversity of religious
expressions. New forms of religiosity have emerged, including influences from Asian religions like Buddhism and Hinduism,
as well as the increasing presence of Islam, which has significantly shaped the religious landscape (Davie 2015;Cesari 2014).
This pluralization challenges the notion of a purely secular Europe and points to the need for further analysis of the interaction
between traditional religious frameworks and these new religious movements.
3
The concept of “multiple modernities” is used here to highlight how modernity manifests differently in diverse cultural contexts.
However, it is important to acknowledge that other frameworks, such as decoloniality, transmodernity, or enchanted modernity,
can also be considered within this broader framework. In fact, when speaking of multiplicity, we can observe different processes
and layers of modernity that coexist and interact. Decoloniality, for instance, provides a critical lens to examine the ongoing
influences of colonial power dynamics (Mignolo 2011), while transmodernity opens up pathways for understanding new forms
of global interconnectedness that transcend Eurocentric paradigms (Dussel 2002). These notions, rather than standing apart from
the idea of multiple modernities, can be integrated as a part of the same broader discourse that acknowledges diverse experiences
and articulations of modernity.

Religions 2024,15, 1323 15 of 17
4
To investigate the specific characteristics of neo-Pentecostalism in Latin America, review the work of Tec-López (2020), which
provides an overview of the main literature on this phenomenon in the region and highlights the various characterizations made
by academic research.
References
Adriance, Madeleine. 1992. The Paradox of Institutionalization: The Roman Catholic Church in Chile and Brazil. Sociology of Religion
53: S51. [CrossRef]
Aguilar, Hedilberto. 2019. Contra la Ideología de género: Dirigentes de megaiglesias evangélicas en Perúy México. In Brevario
multidisciplinario sobre el fenómeno religioso. Edited by Boris Briones Soto, Stefanía Butendieck, Cremildo Cau and Andrea
Monsalvez. Buenos Aires: Centro Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales, pp. 202–19.
Amat, Óscar. 2004. Carisma y política: Motivaciones para la acción política en el Perúcontemporáneo. In Anuario de Ciencias de la
Religion. Las religiones en el Perúde Hoy. Edited by Dorothea Ortmann. Lima: UNMSM-CONCYTEC, pp. 115–33.
Baer, Jonathan. 2001. Redeemed Bodies: The Functions of Divine Healing in Incipient Pentecostalism. In Church History. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, vol. 70, pp. 735–71. [CrossRef]
Basset, Yann. 2018. Claves del rechazo del plebiscite para la paz en Colombia. Estudios Políticos 52: 241–65. [CrossRef]
Bárcenas, Karina. 2023. Movimientos antigénero en América Latina. Cartografías del neoconservadurismo. Mexico City: Instituto de
Investigaciones Sociales—UNAM.
Bellah, Robert. 1967. Civil Religion in America. Daedalus, Journal of the merican Academy of Arts and Sciences 96: 1–21.
Beriain, Josetxo. 2006. Modernidades en disputa. Barcelona: Anthopos.
Berger, Peter. 1999. The Desacularization of the World: Resurgent Religion and World Politics. Washington, DC: Ethics and Public
Policy Center.
Bhabha, Homi. 1990. DissemiNation: Time, Narrative, and the Margins of the Modern Nation. In Nation and Narration. Edited by Homi
K. Bhabha. London: Routledge, pp. 291–322.
Bianchi, Matías, Cristian León Coronado, and Antonella Perini. 2016. Transformaciones de la participación política en América Latina.
Revista Electrónica de Ciencia Política 7: 46–66. [CrossRef]
Burgess, Stanley, and Eduard van der Maas. 2002. The New International Dictionary of Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements. Grand
Rapids: Zondervan.
Campos, Bernardo. 1997. De la reforma protestante a la pentecostalidad de la iglesia: Debate sobre el pentecostalismo em América Latina. Lima:
Consejo Latinoamericano de Iglesias CLAI.
Campos, Bernardo. 2016. El principio pentecostalidad. La unidad em el Espíritu, fundamento de la paz. Salem: Kerigma.
Carpio, María José. 2021. El líder de la elite neopentecostal costarricense Rony Chaves y su discurso geoestratégico. Revista Protesta y
Carisma 1: 1–25.
Casanova, José. 2006. Rethinking Secularization: A Global Comparative Perspective. The Hedgehog Review 8: 7–22.
Cesari, Jocelyne. 2014. The Awakening of Muslim Democracy: Religion, Modernity, and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cháves, Nery, and Taroa Zúñiga. 2018. Religion(es) y política en Centroamérica: Matrimonios y rupturas. Contrainformación.
Available online: https://contrainformacion.es/religiones-y-politica-en-centroamerica-matrimonios-y-rupturas/ (accessed on
15 July 2021).
Clarkson, Frederick. 2005. The Rise of Dominionism: Remaking America as a Christian Nation. The Public Eye, 19.
Cox, Harvey. 1994. Fire from Heaven: The Rise of Pentecostal Spirituality and the Reshaping of Religion in the Twenty-First Century. New York:
Addison Wesley.
Da Silva, Nilson. 2012. Uma análise do Neopentecostalismo a partir da ética protestante e o espirito do capitalismo. Ciberteología
VIII: 4–21.
Davie, Grace. 2015. Religion in Britain. A Persistent Paradox. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
De Melo Magalhaes, Antonio Carlos. 2013. Religiao: Arvore ou Rizoma. Estudos de Religiao 27: 59–67. [CrossRef]
Diara, Benjamin, and Nkechinyere Onah. 2014. The Phenomenal Growth of Pentecostalism in the Contemporary Nigerian Society:
A Challenge to Mainline Churches. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 5: 395–402. [CrossRef]
Dobbelaere, Karel. 1981. Trend Report: Secularization: A Multi-Dimensional Concept. Current Sociology 29: 3–153. [CrossRef]
Dussel, Enrique. 2002. World System and Transmodernity. Nepantla: Views from South 3: 221–44.
Eisenstadt, Shmuel Noah. 1999. Fundamentalism, Sectarianism and Revolution. The Jacobin Dimension of Modernity. London: Cambridge
University Press.
Eisenstadt, Shmuel Noah. 2000. Multiple Modernities. Daedalus 129: 1–29.
Fediakova, Evguenia. 2015. Ficar menos no templo e mais na rua: Transformação do espaço evangélico chileno, 1990–2012. Estudos
Ibero-Americanos 40: 240. [CrossRef]
Fediakova, Evguenia, and Cristian Parker. 2009. Evangélicos en Chile Democrático (1990–2008): Radiografía al centesimo aniversario.
Cultura y Religión3: 48–75. [CrossRef]
Felitti, Karina, and Sol Prieto. 2018. Configuraciones de la laicidad en los debates por la legalización del aborto en la Argentina:
Discursos parlamentarios y feministas (2015–2018). Salud Colectiva 14: 405–23. [CrossRef]
Freston, Paul. 1993. Brother votes for Brother: The New Politics of Protestantism in Brazil. In Rethinking Protestantism in Latin America.
Edited by Virginia Garrard-Burnett and David Stoll. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Religions 2024,15, 1323 16 of 17
Freston, Paul. 1999. Neo-Pentecostalism in Brazil: Problems of definition and the struggle for hegemony. Archives de sciences sociales des
religions 105: 145–62. [CrossRef]
Gallagher, Sally. 2004. The Marginalization of Evangelical Feminism. Sociology of Religion 65: 215–37. [CrossRef]
García-García, Juan. 1994. Nación, identidad y paradoja: Una perspectiva relacional para el estudio del nacionalismo. Reis: Revista
Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas 64: 165–65. [CrossRef]
García-Ruiz, Jesús, and Patrick Michel. 2014. El neo-pentecostalismo en América Latina. Contribución a una antropología de la
mundialización. Sociedad y Religión41: 43–78.
Garma, Carlos. 2019. Religión y política en las elecciones del 2018. Evangélicos mexicanos y el Partido Encuentro Social. Alteridades
29: 35–46. [CrossRef]
Garrard-Burnett, Virginia. 2013. Neopentecostalism and Prosperity Theology in Latin America: A Religion for Late Capitalist Society.
Iberoamericana. Nordic Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 42: 21–34. [CrossRef]
Glazer, Nathan, and Daniel Moynihan. 1963. Beyond the Melting Pot. Cambridge: Harvar University Press.
Hervieu-Leger, Danièle. 1999. La religion en movement: Le pèlerin et le converti. Paris: Flamarion.
Jaimes, Ramiro. 2012. El neopentecostalismo como objeto de investigación y categoría analítica. Revista Mexicana de Sociología
74: 649–78.
Jaimes, Ramiro. 2020. La paradoja neopentecostal. Secularización y movimientos evangelicos en el campo religioso de la Baja California. Tijuana:
Universidad Autónoma de Baja California.
Jaimes, Ramiro, and Alethia Montalvo. 2018. Neopentecostalismo difuso: Movimientos evangélicos en Tijuana. Estudios Sociológicos
37: 133–64.
Lalive D’Epinay, Christian. 1969. Haven of the Masses: A Study of the Pentecostal Movement in Chile. Cambridge: Lutterworth Press.
Leite de Moraes, Gerson. 2010. Neopentecostalismo, um conceito obstáculo na comprensao do subcampo religioso pentecostal
brasileiro. Revista de Estudios de Religiao 10: 1–19.
Lima, Adriano, Diandra Brandt, and Clodovis Boff. 2015. A experiencia do batismo com o espirito santo no pentecostalismo.
Teocomunicacao 45: 72–84. [CrossRef]
Ma, Wonsuk. 2007. When the Poor are Fired Up. Transformation: An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies 24: 28–34. [CrossRef]
Maçaneiro, Marcial. 2013. Uma aproximação ao diálogo internacional católico-pentecostal. Pontifícia Revista de Cultura Teológica
8: 11–31.
[CrossRef]
Mansilla, Miguel, and Luis Orellana. 2018. Evangélicos y política en Chile 1960–1990. Política, apoliticismo y antipolítica. Santiago de Chile:
UNAP/RIL Editores.
Mariano, Ricardo. 1996. Os neopentecostais e a teoria da prosperidade. Novos Estudos 44: 24–44.
Mariano, Ricardo. 1999. Neopentecostais. Sociologia do novo pentecostalismo no Brasil. São Paulo: Loyola.
Martin, Bernice. 2017. Violent Conversion: Brazilian Pentecostalism and Urban Women in Mozambique. Journal of Contemporary
Religion 32: 539–40. [CrossRef]
Martin, David. 1990. Tongues of Fire: The Explosion of Protestantism in Latin America. New York: Basil Blackwell.
McClung, Lloyd Grant. 1994. Pentecostal/Charismatic Perspectives on a Missiology for the Twenty-First Century. Pneuma 16: 11–21.
[CrossRef]
Meneses, Daniela. 2019. Con Mis Hijos No te Metas: Un estudio de discurso y poder en un grupo de Facebook peruano opuesto a la
ideología de género. Anthropologica 37: 129–54. [CrossRef]
Mignolo, Walter. 2011. The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options. Durham: Duke University Press.
Nash, Donna. 2017. Pre-Columbian Studies of Ritual and Religion: Place, Power, Practice, and Ontology. Latin American Research
Review 52: 887–94. [CrossRef]
Nel, Marius. 2017. Re-enactment leading to transformation: A critical assessment of the distinctives of Pentecostal preaching.
Stellenbosch. Teological Journal 3: 285–307. [CrossRef]
North, Gary. 1999. Boundaries and Dominion: An Economic Commentary on Leviticus. Harrisonburg: Dominion Education Ministries, Inc.
Olson, Elizabeth. 2006. Development, Transnational Religion, and the Power of Ideas in the High Provinces of Cusco, Peru. Evironment
and Planning A: Economy and Space 38: 885–902. [CrossRef]
Onwuegbuchulam, Sunday Paul Chinazo. 2019. Religion versus state and the struggle for control in society’s developmental arena: A
review. Acta Academica 51: 1–20. [CrossRef]
Oro, Ari Pedro. 2018. Neopentecostalismo. In Diccionario de Religiones en América Latina. Edited by Roberto Blancarte. Mexico City:
Fondo de Cultura Económica, pp. 413–20.
Orogun, Daniel. 2023. Hybrid Leadership in African Neo-Pentecostalism. Religions 14: 632. [CrossRef]
Owen, Dennis, Kenneth Wald, and Samuel Hill. 1991. Authoritarian or Authority-Minded? The Cognitive Commitments of
Fundamentalists and the Christian Right. Religion and American Culture: A Journal of Interpretation 1: 73–100. [CrossRef]
Palecek, Martin, and Tomas Tazlar. 2021. The Limiting of the Impact of Proxy Culture Wars by Religious Sensitivity: The Fight of
Neo-Pentecostal Churches against LGBTQ Rights Organizations over Uganda’s Future. Religions 12: 707. [CrossRef]
Parker, Cristian. 1993. Otra Lógica en América Latina. Santiago de Chile: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Parker, Cristian. 1998. Nuevo panorama, nuevos movimientos religiosos en América Latina. Documentación Social 113: 211–22.
Parker, Cristian. 2019. Popular Religions and Multiple Modernities: A Framework for Understanding Current Religious Transforma-
tions. Religions 10: 565. [CrossRef]

Religions 2024,15, 1323 17 of 17
Pérez, José. 2018. ¿Políticos evangélicos o evangélicos politicos? In Evangélicos y poder en América Latina. Edited by JoséPérez and
Sebastian Grundberger. Santiago: Instituto de Estudios Social Cristianos/Fundación Konrad Adenauer Stiffung, pp. 11–106.
Philpott, Daniel. 2002. The Challenge of September 11 to Secularism in International Relations. World Politics 55: 66–95. [CrossRef]
Ramos, Yirlean, and Ada Cabrera. 2020. Neopentecostales y nuevas derechas: Un vínculo para la conservación del neoliberalismo en
América Latina. Bajo el Volcán2: 109–34.
Reu, Tobias. 2019. Leadership in the Mold of Jesus: Growing the Church and Saving the Nation in Neo-Pentecostal Guatemala City.
The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology 24: 746–62. [CrossRef]
Rieger, Ivy Alana. 2023. Popular Religion or Lived Religion? Exploring Indigenous Religious Festival Practice in Mexico. International
Journal of Latin American Religions 7: 124–46. [CrossRef]
Silveira, Leonildo. 2000. Teatro, templo, mercado. Comunicación y marketing de los nuevos pentecostales em América Latina. Quito: Abya-Yala.
Solano, Sindy Mora. 2022. A mis hijos los educo yo: Reflexiones en torno a una manifestación política conservadora en Costa Rica.
Revista Rupturas 12: 84–109. [CrossRef]
Taylor, Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tec-López, René. 2020. El neopentecostalismo y sus caracterizaciones em América Latina. Política y Cultura 54: 105–32. [CrossRef]
Tec-López, René. 2022. De la huelga social al involucramiento sociopolítico. Los evangélicos en el chile neoliberal. Iztapalapa 92: 45–77.
[CrossRef]
Tec-López, René. 2023. De canutos, maricones y comunidas: La cruzada evangélica contra la “ideología de género” en Chile. In
Movimientos antigénero en América Latina: Cartografías del neoconservadurismo. Edited by Karina Bárcenas Barajas. Mexico City:
Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales—UNAM, pp. 339–71.
Torpey, John. 2012. Religion and Secularization in the United States and Western Europe. In The Post-Secular in Question: Religion
in Contemporary Society. Edited by Philip Gorski, David Kyuman Kim, John Torpey and Jonathan VanAntwerpen. New York:
New York University Press, pp. 279–306. [CrossRef]
Torrey, Reuben, and Amzi Dixon. 1917. The Fundamentals: A Testimony of Truth. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House.
Watts, Galen. 2019. Religion, Science, and Disenchantment in Late Modernity. Journal of Religion & Science 54: 1022–35. [CrossRef]
Wynarczyk, Hilario. 1995. La Guerra espiritual em el campo evangélico. Revista Sociedad y Religión13: 152–68.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.