Article

OLIY TA'LIMNI BOSHQARISHDAGI INNOVATSIYALAR. CHAT GPT YOHUD SUN’IY INTELLEKTINNOVATIONS IN HIGHER EDUCATION MANAGEMENT. CHAT GPT OR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCEИННОВАЦИИ В УПРАВЛЕНИИ ВЫСШИМ ОБРАЗОВАНИЕМ. ЧАТ GPT ИЛИ ИСКУССТВЕННЫЙ ИНТЕЛЛЕКТ

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

Bugungi kunda butun dunyo oliy ta’lim tizimi Chat GPT tomonidan vujudga kelayotgan o'zgarishlar va muammolar yoqasida turibdi. Ushbu maqolada Chat GPT va generativ sun'iy intellekt (AI) vositalarining o'rni, pozitsiyasi va ta'siri haqida asosiy savollar muhokam qilinadi.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
In this commentary, we discuss the nature of reversible and irreversible questions, that is, questions that may enable one to identify the nature of the source of their answers. We then introduce GPT-3, a third-generation, autoregressive language model that uses deep learning to produce human-like texts, and use the previous distinction to analyse it. We expand the analysis to present three tests based on mathematical, semantic (that is, the Turing Test), and ethical questions and show that GPT-3 is not designed to pass any of them. This is a reminder that GPT-3 does not do what it is not supposed to do, and that any interpretation of GPT-3 as the beginning of the emergence of a general form of artificial intelligence is merely uninformed science fiction. We conclude by outlining some of the significant consequences of the industrialisation of automatic and cheap production of good, semantic artefacts.
Article
Full-text available
Abstract Along with the increasing attention to artificial intelligence (AI), renewed emphasis or reflection on human intelligence (HI) is appearing in many places and at multiple levels. One of the foci is critical thinking. Critical thinking is one of four key 21st century skills – communication, collaboration, critical thinking and creativity. Though most people are aware of the value of critical thinking, it lacks emphasis in curricula. In this paper, we present a comprehensive definition of critical thinking that ranges from observation and inquiry to argumentation and reflection. Given a broad conception of critical thinking, a developmental approach beginning with children is suggested as a way to help develop critical thinking habits of mind. The conclusion of this analysis is that more emphasis should be placed on developing human intelligence, especially in young children and with the support of artificial intelligence. While much funding and support goes to the development of artificial intelligence, this should not happen at the expense of human intelligence. Overall, the purpose of this paper is to argue for more attention to the development of human intelligence with an emphasis on critical thinking.
Article
Full-text available
Learning analytics can improve learning practice by transforming the ways we support learning processes. This study is based on the analysis of 252 papers on learning analytics in higher education published between 2012 and 2018. The main research question is: What is the current scientific knowledge about the application of learning analytics in higher education? The focus is on research approaches, methods and the evidence for learning analytics. The evidence was examined in relation to four earlier validated propositions: whether learning analytics i) improve learning outcomes, ii) support learning and teaching, iii) are deployed widely, and iv) are used ethically. The results demonstrate that overall there is little evidence that shows improvements in students’ learning outcomes (9%) as well as learning support and teaching (35%). Similarly, little evidence was found for the third (6%) and the forth (18%) proposition. Despite the fact that the identified potential for improving learner practice is high, we cannot currently see much transfer of the suggested potential into higher educational practice over the years. However, the analysis of the existing evidence for learning analytics indicates that there is a shift towards a deeper understanding of students’ learning experiences for the last years.
Article
Based on a two-year ethnographic study of global virtual teams (GVTs) (n = 323) in a technology-enhanced global course among six universities (i.e. U.S., China, South Korea, Germany, Israel, and India), this paper presents how and in what ways the participating students made sense of and constructed understandings about the interactive learning environment. Focusing on the student engagement, this study identified three pathways in which they negotiated and developed their respective understandings about technology, culture, and teamwork in GVTs. In each pathway, it was found that students engaged in the development process of reflecting upon problematic experiences, revolving unanticipated challenges, and establishing new ways of being, doing, and thinking. This study highlights the dynamic nature of understanding construction and provides important implications about how to implement GVTs and support students to succeed in GVTs.
Article
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship among students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning settings. Two hundred and fifty-six students participated in this study. All participants completed an online survey that included demographic information, the modified motivation strategies learning questionnaire, the online technology self-efficacy scale, the course satisfaction questionnaire, and the final grades. The researchers used structural equation modeling to examine relationships among student characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes. Based on the results from the final model, students with previous online learning experiences tended to have more effective learning strategies when taking online courses, and hence, had higher levels of motivation in their online courses. In addition, when students had higher levels of motivation in their online courses, their levels of technology self-efficacy and course satisfaction increased. Finally, students with higher levels of technology self-efficacy and course satisfaction also earned better final grades. Based on the findings, we recommend that instructors design courses in a way that can promote students’ self-regulated learning behaviors in online learning settings and that students in online classes, as in traditional classes, set aside a regular time to concentrate on the course. Also, institutions should provide user-friendly online learning platforms and workshops for instructors and students to facilitate the teaching and learning experiences.
  • S Bubeck
  • V Chandrasekaran
  • R Eldan
  • J Gehrke
  • E Horvitz
  • E Kamar
  • P Lee
  • Y T Lee
  • Y Li
  • S Lundberg
Bubeck S, Chandrasekaran V, Eldan R, Gehrke J, Horvitz E, Kamar E, Lee P, Lee YT, Li Y, Lundberg S. Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12712. 2023.
Alarmed by AI chatbots, universities start revamping how they teach
  • K Huang
Huang K. Alarmed by AI chatbots, universities start revamping how they teach. New York Times. 2023. Retrived March 1 from https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/16/technology/chatgpt-artificialintelligence universities.html.
Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes
  • Lev Vygotsky
  • Michael Semenovich
  • Cole
Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich, and Michael Cole. Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press, 1978.
Personalized learning: The conversations we're not having
  • Monica Bulger
Bulger, Monica. "Personalized learning: The conversations we're not having." Data and Society 22.1 (2016): 1-29.
ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?
  • Jürgen Rudolph
  • Samson Tan
  • Shannon Tan
Rudolph, Jürgen, Samson Tan, and Shannon Tan. "ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?." Journal ofApplied Learning and Teaching 6.1 (2023)