Dear Editor,
We have read recent publications on ChatGPT in the Journal of Public Health with keen interest. One area we would like to highlight, which we believe is often overlooked in these publications, concerns the comparison between Artificial Intelligence (AI) and human experts. For instance, the latest publication titled ‘Battle of the minds: AI vs. mental health professionals in mental
... [Show full abstract] wellness care’ emphasizes the importance of evaluating AI's abilities and limitations compared to trained mental health professionals.¹ Similarly, other works underscore the boundaries of AI in juxtaposition to human mental health experts.²,³ While we largely agree with the arguments made in these publications, we contend that the limitations of AI chatbots like ChatGPT are already well-recognized. Few would seriously argue that AI is poised to supplant human experts. Instead, we believe the focal point should shift rather than comparing AI and human experts, the key question should be the net impact of AI chatbots on individuals when professional mental health access is unavailable. The question is not so much whether AI chatbots are superior or inferior to human experts, but rather whether these chatbots can be beneficial or harmful without the guidance of human experts.