ArticlePDF Available

The use of Virtual Reality in Medical Training

Authors:

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) has become an increasingly important tool in medical training, offering immersive, interactive environments that provide unique opportunities for skill acquisition, education, and patient safety. Traditionally, medical education has relied on real-patient interactions, which can sometimes pose ethical challenges and risks. VR enables learners to practice clinical procedures in risk-free environments, enhancing skills such as surgery, anatomy recognition, and diagnostic interpretation. This paper investigates the history of VR in medical training, its benefits, challenges, and limitations, alongside examples of successful VR applications in healthcare education. As VR technology continues to advance, its potential to transform medical education is significant, offering a safe, affordable, and flexible method for improving healthcare outcomes.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Page | 12
https://doi.org/10.59298/ROJBAS/2024/411215
The use of Virtual Reality in Medical Training
Nyiramana Mukamurera P.
Faculty of Medicine Kampala International University Uganda
ABSTRACT
Virtual reality (VR) has become an increasingly important tool in medical training, offering immersive,
interactive environments that provide unique opportunities for skill acquisition, education, and patient
safety. Traditionally, medical education has relied on real-patient interactions, which can sometimes pose
ethical challenges and risks. VR enables learners to practice clinical procedures in risk-free environments,
enhancing skills such as surgery, anatomy recognition, and diagnostic interpretation. This paper
investigates the history of VR in medical training, its benefits, challenges, and limitations, alongside
examples of successful VR applications in healthcare education. As VR technology continues to advance,
its potential to transform medical education is significant, offering a safe, affordable, and flexible method
for improving healthcare outcomes.
Keywords: Virtual reality, medical training, simulation, medical education, clinical skills, patient safety.
INTRODUCTION
The use of computer-generated simulations of a three-dimensional environment in which an individual
may interact in a seemingly real or physical way using special electronic equipment is the definition of
virtual reality. Virtual reality immerses the user in a simulated environment that provides a perception of
being there. This technology is widely used across several applications such as entertainment, gaming,
education, and training. More recently, virtual reality has been adopted in the medical field for training
purposes [1]. Medical ethics require that learners must not adversely affect patients, meaning that
clinical skills must be learned in settings other than real patients. Traditionally, it is with the supervision
of mentors that clinical training has taken place. This apprenticeship model of medical education has
served well for many years, and the healthcare system has relied upon it. However, it has limitations.
There is an imbalance between training opportunities and patient needs, difficulties in skill
demonstration, lack of practice, and an unfair distribution of mentor burden, among others. Furthermore,
novice performance may not be good enough to avoid patient harm, and with increasing specialization,
there is concern that training is taking place on the most vulnerable patients [2]. Concerns about patient
safety have led to calls for alternatives to the apprenticeship model of learning. Simulation is one of the
directions in which medical education is moving. Medical simulators are devices or techniques to deliver
and assess healthcare tasks safely, outside of real patients. They allow for rehearsal and refining of skills,
and for the initial stages of skill learning, training is contained within the non-threatening realm of a
simulator. Training can be progressed at the pace of the learner [3].
HISTORY OF VIRTUAL REALITY IN MEDICAL TRAINING
Although virtual reality (VR) technology has only recently gained prominence, its contributions to
simulations and applications in medicine began over 250 years ago. The first simulator was created in
1775 by a surgeon named Philip Sarrazin to teach tracheostomy techniques using wax and cork. This
early simulation served as a prototype for similar devices employed to instruct generations of surgeons in
the performance of more advanced procedures. During the late 1950s, Morton Heilig developed the
Research Output Journal of Biological and Applied Science 4(1):12-15, 2024
ROJBAS Publications ONLINE ISSN: 1115-9200
https://rojournals.org/roj-biological-and-applied-science/ PRINT ISSN: 1115-6120
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Page | 13
Sensorama, often regarded as the foremost VR device. This technology consisted of a stand-in motorcycle
seat outfitted with fans, scents, and monitors to provide the user with the illusion of being a motorcycle
driver through the streets of Brooklyn. A few years later, Heilig created the first head-mounted display
(HMD) system for television viewing called the "Telesphere Mask." The development of such systems
coincided with growing fears in the U.S. about the loss of the space race to the Soviet Union. In August
1965, scientist Ivan Sutherland, a computer graphics pioneer, finished designing the first fully operational
head-mounted display system for computer-generated graphics. This device received the nickname
"Sword of Damocles" due to its large size, susceptibility to falling, and thick wires that resembled a sword
hanging over a user’s head. In the early 1970s, the first VR applications were developed while Columbia
University Medical Center’s Department of Psychiatry conducted research aimed at utilizing computer
graphics to create visual stimuli for people suffering from psychiatric disorders. During the same era,
MIT and NASA cooperated on a Multi-Sensory Flight Simulator. In the 1980s, Californian developers of
flight simulators began creating immersive virtual environments. Later, in 1989, machines capable of 3D
rendering designed by an ex-NASA engineer were purchased by the U.S. government and provided to
various institutions, universities, and research centers. As a result, VR applications rapidly expanded in
the fields of defense, aerospace, and scientific modeling. In the mid-1990s, commercial headsets and
immersive games appeared on the market. Medical applications of VR began in the late 1980s when a
company started creating virtual and augmented environments. VR devices and full-fledged VR setups
were operated by various institutions worldwide. In particular, in 1993, scientists built a VR-based
system to treat acrophobia, later known as "Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy" (VRET). In 1990, a
pioneering group of researchers developed a program that provided a VR-based exposition of traumatic
memories [4].
BENEFITS OF VIRTUAL REALITY IN MEDICAL TRAINING
Virtual Reality (VR) technology provides immersive 3D environments that allow users to engage in
simulations using sensor-controlled controllers, often involving goggles and headphones. In medicine,
VR is emerging as a promising tool to improve medical training and education, offering benefits such as
flexibility, affordability, risk avoidance, and the opportunity for repetitive practice. In medical education,
the use of VR is still in its infancy but offers several means for achievement. VR medical training tools can
be used to improve students' handling of instruments and surgical skills and enhance the ability to
recognize anatomy, case diagnosis, measurement and interpretation of images, and interpretation of
medical symptoms. VR has many benefits for medical training, including expert time savings, human
resources savings due to standardization of training, uniform experience for all students, motivation
improvement through simulation of exotic training and testing environments, and the possibility of using
telerobotics and telementoring allowing 24-hour advanced expert presence in remote locations [3]. VR
medical training simulators are designed to minimize risk to patients and healthcare workers during
imitation of high-risk procedures, enabling trainers to recover costs caused by training accident events.
Cost reduction can arise from fewer accidents, injuries, and medical errors. Simulation-based training of
healthcare workers reflects the overall tendency of various industries, providing a safe, repeatable,
inexpensive environment for skill acquisition, improving performance, reducing errors, and leading to an
overall saving of costs and lives. The objective quality assessment of performance on VR training
simulators can help avoid many costs resulting from human error, as well as fatal, irreversible
consequences. Due to recent advances in computing power and visual realism, immersive training with a
2D display does not match reality, whether it is the impression of moving through a corridor or flying an
airplane. VR technology currently enables the creation of highly realistic immersive simulation worlds
with 3D environments that surprise even experts in simulation. To ensure paradigm shifts in training,
matchmaking of the training task and VR technology capabilities is crucial [5].
CHALLENGES AND LIMITATIONS
Despite the potential of virtual reality (VR) to revolutionize medical training, several challenges and
limitations must be addressed to fully realize its benefits. One significant concern is the lack of proficiency
in VR technology among medical faculty. As with any emerging technology, there is often a technology
gap. Since the application of immersive VR in the field is relatively new, not many medical faculty have
expertise in this area. It may take years for medical faculty to become proficient in advanced VR
technologies. This concern poses another barrier to the expanding usage of VR in the medical education
setting [6]. Although many medical schools have purchased or developed VR headsets and training
systems, they may not have the necessary staff to operate or create them. VR systems require trained
specialists for effective use, unlike other technologies that can be operated by junior staff with no
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Page | 14
technical background. Until staff become familiar with the newly acquired systems, focus groups, help
desks, or demonstrational events can be organized to assure users of their value. Another challenge is the
need for advanced knowledge of composition in VR. While 3D modeling tools have simplified the
building process, there is still a gap between 2D and 3D media compositions. Elements in VR space must
be carefully placed and rendering may require longer tasks or trouble-free file transfers. In one-person
perspective VR sessions, the user cannot see anything outside of the VR space, limiting the use of
preconceived backgrounds or components used in flat-screen productions. Budgets must be considered
and efforts to collaborate and maximize the benefits of VR should be made. Common focus groups can
generate open-source ideas for systems, software development, or medical education. Consortiums of
institutions can also help achieve objectives, such as assessments for students or materials for licensure
tests [7].
CASE STUDIES AND EXAMPLES
The use of VR in medical training has advanced worldwide. Many medical schools and organizations have
integrated VR into their education programs. One notable example is the University of Alberta, where a
VR environment for studying cadaver dissection was developed. A study on nursing students found that
the VR environment was effective and easy to use, leading to improved learning outcomes. Participants
appreciated the opportunity to study at their own pace and recommended VR for studying anatomy [8].
HoloAnatomy at Case Western Reserve University utilizes augmented reality headsets and holographic
anatomy platforms to learn anatomy. It has significantly improved anatomy examination performance and
garnered positive feedback on learning and interest in anatomy courses. The program integrates
augmented reality modules, faculty development, and training resources to promote technology adoption.
Student simulation and perfusion of donor hearts were developed using 3D printing, and computer
simulations were used to core arteries. VR heart models allowed visualization and presentation of
pathologies. Faculty received technology training for support. The program encourages institutional
investment in 3D printing and augmented/virtual reality in education. VR enhancement of medical
imaging courses at UCLA improved student interactions with 3D objects through virtual and augmented
reality features. Students could engage with 3D CT data sets of various body parts and MRI brain real-
time data using augmented reality headsets. These features were incorporated into lectures and lab
activities for first-year medical students. Survey results indicated positive ratings for the VR and AR
experience and their effectiveness in explaining medical imaging [9].
FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND INNOVATIONS
Virtual reality technology is transforming medical training. It offers numerous opportunities for
application and has the potential to revolutionize complex procedures. This will improve patient
outcomes and reduce costs. VR simulators provide practice spaces for surgeons to develop skills away
from the operating room. Trainees can practice procedures repetitively and at their own pace, improving
confidence and skill. Metrics can assess engagement and track skill progression for educators and
employers [10]. Simulations go beyond simple tasks like knot tying. Virtual environments allow complex
anatomy modeling, simulating effects of motion and forces, obstructions, and multi-surgeon teams. They
also support research, development, and training improvements. Step-by-step training modules ensure
correct skill acquisition. Bridging academia and industry needs guarantees tailored applications and
continuous user-developer interaction for valuable insights. Unique information or techniques can lead to
patents and competitive advantages [11].
CONCLUSION
Virtual reality offers a revolutionary approach to medical training by providing an immersive, interactive,
and risk-free environment for learners to acquire and refine clinical skills. The historical development of
VR technology has set the foundation for its current applications in medical education, where it offers
numerous benefits, including enhanced training outcomes, patient safety, and cost savings. While there
are challenges such as the need for specialized training and system accessibility, the potential of VR in
transforming medical education remains promising. With continuous technological advancements, VR is
poised to become a key tool in the future of healthcare training, enabling both students and professionals
to master complex procedures and improve patient care.
REFERENCES
1. Javaid M, Haleem A. Virtual reality applications toward the medical field. Clinical Epidemiology
and Global Health. 2020 Jun 1;8(2):600-5.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Page | 15
2. Koukourikos K, Tsaloglidou A, Kourkouta L, Papathanasiou IV, Iliadis C, Fratzana A,
Panagiotou A. Simulation in clinical nursing education. Acta Informatica Medica. 2021
Mar;29(1):15. nih.gov
3. Krishnamurthy K, Selvaraj N, Gupta P, Cyriac B, Dhurairaj P, Abdullah A, Krishnapillai A,
Lugova H, Haque M, Xie S, Ang ET. Benefits of gamification in medical education. Clinical
Anatomy. 2022 Sep;35(6):795-807. nus.edu.sg
4. Hilty DM, Randhawa K, Maheu MM, McKean AJ, Pantera R, Mishkind MC, Rizzo AS. A review
of telepresence, virtual reality, and augmented reality applied to clinical care. Journal of
Technology in Behavioral Science. 2020 Jun;5:178-205. academia.edu
5. Zhang W, Liu X, Zheng B. Virtual reality simulation in training endoscopic skills: A systematic
review. Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery. 2021 Dec 1;4(4):97-104.
6. Renganayagalu SK, Mallam SC, Nazir S. Effectiveness of VR head mounted displays in
professional training: A systematic review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 2021 Jan 1:1-
43. springer.com
7. Barteit S, Lanfermann L, Bärnighausen T, Neuhann F, Beiersmann C. Augmented, mixed, and
virtual reality-based head-mounted devices for medical education: systematic review. JMIR
serious games. 2021 Jul 8;9(3):e29080. jmir.org
8. Shin M, Prasad A, Sabo G, Macnow AS, Sheth NP, Cross MB, Premkumar A. Anatomy
education in US Medical Schools: before, during, and beyond COVID-19. BMC Medical
Education. 2022 Feb 16;22(1):103. springer.com
9. Stelter AK. Dissecting Virtual Cadavers: The Impact of Augmented Reality on Undergraduate
Students’ Motivation to Learn Human Anatomy. Concordia University Irvine; 2022.
10. Hamad A, Jia B. How virtual reality technology has changed our lives: an overview of the
current and potential applications and limitations. International journal of environmental
research and public health. 2022 Sep 8;19(18):11278. mdpi.com
11. Chen S, Zhu J, Cheng C, Pan Z, Liu L, Du J, Shen X, Shen Z, Zhu H, Liu J, Yang H. Can virtual
reality improve traditional anatomy education programmes? A mixed-methods study on the use
of a 3D skull model. BMC medical education. 2020 Dec;20:1-0. springer.com
CITE AS: Nyiramana Mukamurera P. (2024). The use of Virtual Reality in Medical
Training. Research Output Journal of Biological and Applied Science 4(1):12-15.
https://doi.org/10.59298/ROJBAS/2024/411215
Article
Full-text available
Despite virtual reality (VR) being initially marketed toward gaming, there are many potential and existing VR applications in various sectors and fields, including education, training, simulations, and even in exercise and healthcare. Unfortunately, there is still a lack of general understanding of the strengths and limitations of VR as a technology in various application domains. Therefore, the aim of this literature review is to contribute to the library of literature concerning VR technology, its applications in everyday use, and some of its existing drawbacks. Key VR applications were discussed in terms of how they are currently utilized or can be utilized in the future, spanning fields such as medicine, engineering, education, and entertainment. The main benefits of VR are expressed through the text, followed by a discussion of some of the main limitations of current VR technologies and how they can be mitigated or improved. Overall, this literature review shows how virtual reality technology has the potential to be a greatly beneficial tool in a multitude of applications and a wide variety of fields. VR as a technology is still in its early stages, but more people are becoming interested in it and are optimistic about seeing what kind of changes VR can make in their everyday lives. With how rapidly modern society has adapted to personal computers and smartphones, VR has the opportunity to become the next big technological turning point that will eventually become commonplace in most households.
Article
Full-text available
Medical education is changing at a fast pace. Students attend medical school with a high degree of technological literacy and a desire for a diverse educational experience. As a result, a growing number of medical schools are incorporating technology‐enhanced active learning and multimedia education tools into their curriculum. Gamified training platforms include educational games, mobile medical apps, and virtual patient scenarios. We provide a systematic review of what is meant by gamification in this era. Specific educational games, mobile apps, and virtual simulations that may be used for preclinical and clinical training have been discovered and classified. The available data were presented in terms of the recognized platforms for medical education's possible benefits. Virtual patient simulations have been shown to enhance learning results in general. Gamification could improve learning, engagement, and cooperation by allowing for real‐world application. They may also help with promoting risk‐free healthcare decision‐making, remote learning, learning analytics, and quick feedback. We account for Preclinical training which included 5 electronic games and 4 mobile apps, while clinical training included 5 electronic games, 10 mobile applications, and 12 virtual patient simulation tools. There were additionally nine more gamified virtual environment training products that were not commercially accessible. Many of these studies have shown that utilizing gamified media in medical education may confer advantages. This collection of hyperlinked resources may be utilized by medical students, practitioners, and instructors at all levels.
Article
Full-text available
Objective Training young physicians in gastrointestinal endoscopy through virtual reality (VR) simulators has become popular. It is important to evaluate the benefits and usefulness of this technology for teaching endoscopic skills. The objective of this literature review was to understand the benefits of VR technology through quantitative and qualitative examination of learning outcomes. Methods A literature search of 7 databases was conducted. Studies which compared the effects of learning through VR simulation and another method of learning were included. In addition, studies were included if they evaluated learning outcomes on clinical patients. Participants could be medical residents, fellows, physicians, or nurses. Common outcomes measured across studies included subjective overall performance scores, total procedure times, rate of successful procedure completion, error rates, patient pain or discomfort, and measures of independence. Results A total of 22 studies were included. Overall, VR simulation training was seen to be comparable or significantly better than clinical training, no training, other types of simulation, and another form of VR training. Many authors reported increasing patient safety, reducing stress and time constraints, and shortening the learning curve as advantages of VR simulation training. However, this form of training is also expensive and may result in the learning of bad habits. Conclusion VR simulation technology can be a valuable form of educating endoscopy novices if properly supervised during training, and if there is also integration of clinical training.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Augmented reality (AR), mixed reality (MR), and virtual reality (VR), realized as head-mounted devices (HMDs), may open up new ways of teaching medical content for low-resource settings. The advantages are that HMDs enable repeated practice without adverse effects on the patient in various medical disciplines; may introduce new ways to learn complex medical content; and may alleviate financial, ethical, and supervisory constraints on the use of traditional medical learning materials, like cadavers and other skills lab equipment. Objective: We examine the effectiveness of AR, MR, and VR HMDs for medical education, whereby we aim to incorporate a global health perspective comprising low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: We conducted a systematic review according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) and Cochrane guidelines. Seven medical databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Science Direct, PsycINFO, Education Resources Information Centre, and Google Scholar) were searched for peer-reviewed publications from January 1, 2014, to May 31, 2019. An extensive search was carried out to examine relevant literature guided by three concepts of extended reality (XR), which comprises the concepts of AR, MR, and VR, and the concepts of medicine and education. It included health professionals who took part in an HMD intervention that was compared to another teaching or learning method and evaluated with regard to its effectiveness. Quality and risk of bias were assessed with the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale-Education, and A Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions. We extracted relevant data and aggregated the data according to the main outcomes of this review (knowledge, skills, and XR HMD). Results: A total of 27 studies comprising 956 study participants were included. The participants included all types of health care professionals, especially medical students (n=573, 59.9%) and residents (n=289, 30.2%). AR and VR implemented with HMDs were most often used for training in the fields of surgery (n=13, 48%) and anatomy (n=4, 15%). A range of study designs were used, and quantitative methods were clearly dominant (n=21, 78%). Training with AR- and VR-based HMDs was perceived as salient, motivating, and engaging. In the majority of studies (n=17, 63%), HMD-based interventions were found to be effective. A small number of included studies (n=4, 15%) indicated that HMDs were effective for certain aspects of medical skills and knowledge learning and training, while other studies suggested that HMDs were only viable as an additional teaching tool (n=4, 15%). Only 2 (7%) studies found no effectiveness in the use of HMDs. Conclusions: The majority of included studies suggested that XR-based HMDs have beneficial effects for medical education, whereby only a minority of studies were from LMICs. Nevertheless, as most studies showed at least noninferior results when compared to conventional teaching and training, the results of this review suggest applicability and potential effectiveness in LMICs. Overall, users demonstrated greater enthusiasm and enjoyment in learning with XR-based HMDs. It has to be noted that many HMD-based interventions were small-scale and conducted as short-term pilots. To generate relevant evidence in the future, it is key to rigorously evaluate XR-based HMDs with AR and VR implementations, particularly in LMICs, to better understand the strengths and shortcomings of HMDs for medical education.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Simulation constitutes a teaching method and a strategy for learning and understanding theoretical knowledge and skills in the nursing and medical field. Objective: To review and present modern data related to this issue. Methods: Literature review of data related to the issue derived from Medline, Cinhal, and Scopus databases, in English, using the following keywords: nursing, simulation, simulator, nursing laboratory. Results: The implementation of simulation enables students to practice their clinical and decision-making skills for some significant issues they may face in their daily work. The protected environment and the sense of security enhance students' self-esteem and confidence, thus promoting learning. In this way, the gap between theory and practice is substantially reduced. Conclusion: The further development of simulation, along with other instructional techniques, can significantly help the efforts made by the students to become integrated and successful healthcare professionals.
Article
Full-text available
This scoping review article explores the application of telepresence (TPr), virtual reality (VR), and augmented reality (AR) to clinical care. A literature search of key words was conducted from January 1990 through May 2019 of the following databases: PubMed/Medline, American Psychological Association PsycNET, Pubmed/Medline, Cochrane, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, OTSeeker, ABI/INFORM, computer-mediated communication (CMC), technology-mediated communications, Arts & Humanities Citation Index, Project Muse, ProQuest Research Library Plus, Sociological abstracts, Computers and Applied Sciences Complete and IT Source. It focused on concept areas: (1) TPr related to technologies; (2) virtual, augmented, reality, environment; (3) technology or computer-mediated communication; (4) clinical therapeutic relationship (boundaries, care, communication, connect, engagement, empathy, intimacy, trust); (5) telebehavioral health; (6) psychotherapy via technology; and (7) medicine/health care. Inclusion criteria were concept area 1 in combination with 2–7 and 2 or 3 in combination with any of 4–7. From a total of 5214 potential references, the authors found 512 eligible for full-text review and found 85 papers directly relevant to the concepts. From papers’ references and a review of books and popular literature about TPr, virtual reality (VR), and augmented reality (AR), 13 other sources of information were found. The historical evolution of TPr, VR, and AR shows that definitions, foci of studies (e.g., social neuroscience to business), and applications vary; assessments of TPr also vary widely. Studies discuss VR, AR, and TPr in medicine (e.g., rehabilitation, robotics), experimental psychology (laboratory, field, mixed), and behavioral health. Virtual environment (VE) designs aid the study of interpersonal communication and behavior, using standardized social interaction partners, virtual standardized patients, and/or virtual humans—all contingent on the participants’ experience of presence and the ability to engage. Additional research is needed to standardize experimental and clinical interventions, while maintaining ecological validity. Technology can significantly improve quality of care, access to new treatments and training, if ethical and reimbursement issues are better explored.
Article
Full-text available
Background/objectives: Virtual Reality (VR) is a developing technology, which seems to have extensive applications in different areas such as entertainment, sports, gaming and simulation. In the current scenario, due to Computer-generated imagery and content aim at simulating a real presence through senses capability, it has functional applications in the medical field. So, there are requirements to study its applicability in the medical field. Methods: Relevant papers on VR in the context of the medical field are identified and studied. This paper is a literature review based analysis, where we are trying to find how this technology is going to solve a medicalrelated problem in saving the life of the patient and what are the significant applications. Results: VR provides a simulated environment to interact with the 3D world. Medical professionals are developing and implementing this technology for training, diagnosis and virtual treatment during a critical situation. The study sees that there is good potential for VR in the medical field. We also studied the processes involved in implementing this technology in the medical field. Finally, this paper identifies fourteen major applications of VR in the medical field with description. This technology is helping to create quality healthcare services during complicated cases. Conclusions: VR is used effectively for better surgical technique. It creates detailed virtual models of a patient's anatomy. It helps physicians to effectively move around and view virtual 3D images from different angles. This technology is currently applied in cardiology and Neurology for monitoring and improves patient outcomes. It plays a significant role to help physician related to trauma and other fractures. VR is an emerging technology which can also be used in hospitals and clinics for rehabilitation & training approaches. The applications of this technology are in virtual guides and to fulfil different other virtual goals in the medical field. It seems like an efficient technology to teach body fitness and help create a positive impact on doctors and the patient. This technology leads to creative and exciting discoveries in the medical field.
Effectiveness of VR head mounted displays in professional training: A systematic review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning
  • S K Renganayagalu
  • S C Mallam
  • S Nazir
Renganayagalu SK, Mallam SC, Nazir S. Effectiveness of VR head mounted displays in professional training: A systematic review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 2021 Jan 1:1-43. springer.com
Anatomy education in US Medical Schools: before, during, and beyond COVID-19
  • M Shin
  • A Prasad
  • G Sabo
  • A S Macnow
  • N P Sheth
  • M B Cross
  • A Premkumar
Shin M, Prasad A, Sabo G, Macnow AS, Sheth NP, Cross MB, Premkumar A. Anatomy education in US Medical Schools: before, during, and beyond COVID-19. BMC Medical Education. 2022 Feb 16;22(1):103. springer.com
Dissecting Virtual Cadavers: The Impact of Augmented Reality on Undergraduate Students' Motivation to Learn Human Anatomy
  • A K Stelter
Stelter AK. Dissecting Virtual Cadavers: The Impact of Augmented Reality on Undergraduate Students' Motivation to Learn Human Anatomy. Concordia University Irvine; 2022.