ArticlePDF Available

Association Between Health Behaviors and Mental Health Among Airline Pilots

Wiley
Lifestyle Medicine
Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Background Lifestyle behaviors including physical activity, sleep, nutrition, smoking, and alcohol consumption are independently associated with health, yet the relationship between these behaviors and mental health has not been explored among airline pilots. The aim of this study was to measure the association between health behaviors and mental health. Methods A cross‐sectional study was conducted among 502 airline pilots. The primary outcome measure was the mental component score (MCS), derived from the Short Form Health Survey 12v2. We collected information regarding age, sex, ethnicity, height, body mass, alcohol consumption, tobacco smoking status, moderate‐to‐vigorous physical activity (MVPA), fruit and vegetable intake, and sleep duration. Results After controlling for demographic and anthropometric parameters, MVPA, fruit and vegetable intake, and sleep duration were positively correlated with MCS (p ≤ 0.001), and alcohol consumption and tobacco smoking were negatively correlated with MCS (p ≤ 0.001). Multiple linear regression analyses revealed alcohol consumption was the strongest predictor of MCS (β = −0.308, p ≤ 0.001), followed by smoking (β = −0.236, p ≤ 0.001), MVPA (β = 0.233, p ≤ 0.001), sleep (β = 0.148, p ≤ 0.001), and fruit and vegetable intake (β = 0.097, p = 0.003). Conclusion The results suggest that greater physical activity, sleep duration, and fruit and vegetable intake are associated with better mental health. Meanwhile, excessive alcohol consumption and tobacco smoking undermine mental health status.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Lifestyle Medicine
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Association Between Health Behaviors and Mental Health
Among Airline Pilots
Daniel Wilson1,2Matthew Driller3Ben Johnston4Nicholas Gill1,5
1Te Huataki Waiora School of Health, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand 2Faculty of Health, Education and Environment, Toi Ohomai
Institute of Technology, Tauranga, New Zealand 3Sport, Performance, and Nutrition Research Group, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La
Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia 4Aviation and Occupational Health Unit, Air New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand 5New Zealand Rugby,
Wellington, New Zealand
Correspondence: Daniel Wilson (daniel.wilson@toiohomai.ac.nz)
Received: 28 July 2024 Revised: 15 September 2024 Accepted: 25 September 2024
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Keywords: alcohol | nutrition | physical activity | sleep | smoking
ABSTRACT
Background: Lifestyle behaviors including physical activity, sleep, nutrition, smoking, and alcohol consumption are indepen-
dently associated with health, yet the relationship between these behaviors and mental health has not been explored among airline
pilots. The aim of this study was to measure the association between health behaviors and mental health.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 502 airline pilots. The primary outcome measure was the mental
component score (MCS), derived from the Short Form Health Survey 12v2. We collected information regarding age, sex, ethnicity,
height, body mass, alcohol consumption, tobacco smoking status, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), fruit and
vegetable intake, and sleep duration.
Results: After controlling for demographic and anthropometric parameters, MVPA, fruit and vegetable intake, and sleep duration
were positively correlated with MCS (p0.001), and alcohol consumption and tobacco smoking were negatively correlated with
MCS (p0.001). Multiple linear regression analyses revealed alcohol consumption was the strongest predictor of MCS (β=−0.308,
p0.001), followed by smoking (β=−0.236, p0.001), MVPA (β=0.233, p0.001), sleep (β=0.148, p0.001), and fruit and
vegetable intake (β=0.097, p=0.003).
Conclusion: The results suggest that greater physical activity, sleep duration, and fruit and vegetable intake are associated with
better mental health. Meanwhile, excessive alcohol consumption and tobacco smoking undermine mental health status.
1 Introduction
Mental ill-health substantially contributes to the health system
burden globally [1], which may be mitigated through the
attainment of modifiable lifestyle behaviors including sufficient
physical activity [2], a healthy dietary pattern [3], adequate sleep
[4], limiting alcohol consumption [5], and avoidance of smoking
tobacco [6]. Indeed, a recent nationally representative survey
among adults in China demonstrated collective improvements
in lifestyle behaviors were associated with reduced rates of
depression, anxiety, loneliness, and perceived pressure [7]. Since
the Germanwings 9525 disaster in 2015, the issue of supporting
and managing mental health among airline pilots has gained
increased attention [8]. Circadian disruption, compounded by
suboptimal work–life balance and stressful work conditions are
occupational characteristics frequently reported among airline
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly
cited.
© 2024 The Author(s). Lifestyle Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Lifestyle Medicine, 2024; 5:e70003
https://doi.org/10.1002/lim2.70003 1of9
pilots, which are associated with elevated psychological stress
and fatigue [9–11].
A diverse occupational analysis among the general population
revealed factors including high-risk occupations, excessive
work demands, low social support, and lack of control over
work demands were associated with higher odds of developing
psychological distress compared with dichotomous occupations
[12]. Noteworthily, it is evident these similar adverse occupational
characteristics are often associated with the role of being an
airline pilot [13–15]. Given the low probability of imminent alter-
ations in the occupational demands associated with the role of
an airline pilot, it is advisable to devise and implement strategies
aimed at enhancing health and wellness within this professional
group. Such initiatives could serve to mitigate occupational risk
factors, thereby promoting an environment conducive to flight
safety. This approach aligns with a preventive healthcare perspec-
tive, emphasizing the importance of addressing potential health
concerns before they escalate into significant issues, ultimately
contributing to the overall safety and efficiency of aviation opera-
tions. Accordingly, there is a need for enhanced implementation
of preventive policies and practices in aeromedical regulation
that target underlying risk factors associated with mental health.
The work of Hoffman and colleagues has raised awareness that
airline pilots often engage in healthcare avoidance behavior
due to the fear of losing their aeromedical license [16, 17].
Consequently, it is evident that there are barriers experienced by
airline pilots to seeking and engaging with healthcare support to
address underlying mental ill-health.
Recent findings suggest there is a notable proportion of air-
line pilots experiencing depressive symptoms [17] and excessive
fatigue [9]. Among the literature, there is heterogeneity in the
prevalence of mental health risk factors among airline pilots. A
recent systematic review reported a 21% (20.821.6 CI) prevalence
of mild depression among airline pilots [9]. Further, a web-based
survey reported a prevalence of 57% for meeting their threshold
for mild depression [15], whereas another systematic review
reported that the prevalence of depression ranged from 1.9% to
12.6% [8]. Regardless of the heterogeneity of existing research
methods and depression classification thresholds, collectively,
present empirical evidence suggests a notable proportion of air-
line pilots experiencing suboptimal mental health at comparable
rates to that of the general population [8].
Among the general population, a large body of evidence suggests
that lifestyle behaviors physical activity, nutrition, sleep, alcohol
consumption, and smoking are independently associated with
mental health, yet the direct relationship of each behavior with
mental health has not been sufficiently explored among airline
pilots. Recent reports from clinical trials suggest improvements
in health behaviors are associated with elevated perceived mental
health, improved cardiometabolic fitness, and decreased fatigue
[18–23]. Further, diet management and physical exercise have
been reported as the most prevalent coping mechanisms for
work-related stress among airline pilots [15]. Evidence suggests
collectively improving multiple health behaviors may have a pos-
itive effect on mental health [24], yet further research is required
to examine the independent relationship between discrete health
behaviors and mental health.
Ongoing understanding of the connections among factors
influencing health risks may inform the development of
interventions and policies aimed at effectively reducing mental
health issues among airline pilots. Consequently, the primary
objective of this research is to explore the correlation between
lifestyle health behaviors and mental health status among
airline pilots. Additionally, this study aims to ascertain whether
adherence to a greater number of health behavior guidelines
correlates with improved mental health outcomes. This
investigation will contribute to the body of knowledge necessary
for the development of targeted strategies aimed at enhancing
the well-being and operational efficiency of this professional
group.
2Materials and Methods
2.1 Design
A cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate the asso-
ciation between lifestyle health behaviors and mental health
among airline pilots. This study examined health risk variables:
age, sex, ethnicity, body mass, body mass index (BMI), physical
activity levels, sleep duration, fruit and vegetable intake, alcohol
consumption, smoking status, and perceived mental health. The
study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee
of the University of Waikato in New Zealand (reference number
2019#35).
2.2 Participants
Five hundred two airline pilots volunteered to participate in the
study from an international airline. The aviation regulatory body
relevant to this population was the Civil Aviation Authority of
New Zealand. Airline pilots were invited to participate in the
study at the time of completing their routine aviation medical
examinations at the airlines’ occupational medicine clinic.
Invitations were delivered electronically via email prior to their
appointment and verbally by clinic staff at the time of their
appointment. Further, posters were placed at the arrival desk
and in the waiting room. Data were collected over a 12-month
period between January 2021 to January 2022 to provide all
pilots the opportunity to participate. Participants consisted of
a combination of short-haul and long-haul fleet types (n=
259 and 243, respectively). Inclusion criteria involved pilots
having a valid commercial flying license and currently being
employed on a full-time basis with active duty. All participants
provided written informed consent to participate in the
study.
2.3 Instruments/Outcome Measures
Height was measured with a SECA 206 height measure and body
mass using SECA 813 electronic flat scales (SECA, Hamburg,
Germany). For the measurement of body mass, scales were
positioned on a flat, even surface. Participants were fully clothed
and were instructed to stand at the center of the scales, arms
loosely hanging by their sides, and weight evenly distributed on
both feet. Two weight readings were recorded with a precision
2of9 Lifestyle Medicine,2024
of 0.1 kg. In cases where the two measurements displayed a
difference exceeding 1%, a third measurement was taken. The
final recorded weight for each participant was determined by
averaging the two measurements. Body mass and height values
were utilized to determine BMI (kg/m2)
An online survey delivered through Qualtrics software (Qualtrics,
Provo, UT, USA) was utilized to measure self-report measures.
Participants completed the survey in the waiting room prior
to their aviation medical appointment via an iPad (Apple, CA,
USA). To ensure anonymity and dataset blinding throughout
the data analysis process, participants were assigned a unique
identification code on their informed consent form and instructed
to use this code, rather than their name, when completing the
electronic survey.
Health-related quality of life was measured with the Short
Health Form 12v2 (SF-12v2), a short version of the SF-36 that
has demonstrated a high correlation with SF-36 scores [25]
and has been widely used in previous cohort studies including
airline pilots [10]. The 12-item questionnaire produces a mental
component summary score (MCS), which has shown good test–
retest reliability and convergent validity in detecting changes
in mental health over time in adults [26]. Further, the MCS has
demonstrated acceptable capability for detecting both active
and recent depressive disorders among the general population
[27]. Scoring of the SF-12v2 was carried out in accordance
with standard summary scoring methods [28]. Accordingly,
the scales associated with the questionnaire response were
aggregated into the MCS, which produces a value on a scale
of 0–100, with higher numbers indicating better mental
health.
Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was measured
utilizing the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short
Form (IPAQ-SF) [29]. A volume of 150 min moderate intensity
or 75 min vigorous intensity, or an equivalent combination per
week was set as the criteria for attainment of guidelines for health.
The Alcohol Use Disorders Test (AUDIT), a 10-item questionnaire
that covers three aspects of alcohol use: alcohol consumption,
dependence, and adverse consequences was used to measure
alcohol consumption [30]. A score of <8 was used to classify
nonharmful alcohol consumption and achievement of guidelines
for health [31]. Smoking status was determined by self-report
of whether the individual is currently a tobacco smoker, with
a response of no classed as achieving health guidelines. Fruit
and vegetable intake was assessed using two questions derived
from the New Zealand Health Survey to ascertain on average,
over the past week how many servings of fruit and vegetables
they had consumed per day [32]. Sleep duration was recorded
via one question derived from the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
[33], which asked how much sleep the respondent usually got
in a 24-h period, during the last month. Responses from this
question were used to identify the proportion of participants who
achieved health guidelines of 7 h of sleep per night [34]. To
generate subgroups within the sample population corresponding
to the number of health behavior guidelines achieved, a score
of 1 was allocated for each health behavior guideline participant
achieved. The associated summation was utilized to allocate
participants into groups of achieving 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 health
behavior guidelines.
2.4 Statistical Analysis
The statistical procedures were conducted utilizing SPSS software
(version 29.0. IBM Corp. Armonk, NY). The Shapiro–Wilk test
and its histograms, Q–Q plots, and box plots were analyzed
for data distribution normality. Levene’s test was used to test
homogeneity of variance. The chi-square test was utilized
for comparing categorical variables. Descriptive statistics were
computed stratified by population quartiles according to the MCS
score. Continuous descriptive data were compared via analysis
of variance (ANOVA) for variables satisfying assumptions of
normality and homogeneity and the Kruskal–Wallis test was
used for variables not meeting the assumptions for parametric
analysis. Bonferroni post hoc analysis was utilized for between
the quartile group comparison for parametric analysis variables
and the Dunn–Bonferroni was used for nonparametric analysis
variables. To compare MCS for individuals who adhered to 0, 1,
2, 3, 4, or 5 health behavior guidelines, an ANOVA was utilized,
controlling for sex, age, ethnicity, fleet type, and BMI.
Partial Pearson correlation coefficients were estimated for exam-
ination of relationships between MCS and all health behavior
parameters, controlling for sex, age, ethnicity, fleet type, and BMI.
A multiple regression model was conducted to examine the rela-
tionship between MCS and health behaviors, incorporating BMI
and age. The interaction effect of sex, ethnicity, height, and fleet
type was initially incorporated in analyses, yet none were signifi-
cant, nor did they change the significance level of predictors, thus
they were omitted from the final analysis and discussion. Multi-
collinearity was assessed using the variance inflation factor, with
a value greater than 5 indicating a multicollinearity issue [35]. All
pvalues were two-tailed, and the αlevelwassetatlessthan0.05.
3Results
3.1 Characteristics of the Study Population
Descriptive data of the population stratified by MCS quartiles are
presented in Table 1. Five hundred two airline pilots voluntarily
participated in the study, which represents approximately 33% of
the population within the airline [10]. Ethnicity within the pop-
ulation was predominantly white Caucasian, followed by Indian,
M¯
aori, and Asian (97.6%, 1.4%, 0.6%, and 0.4%, respectively). The
sex demographic of the population was heavily skewed towards
males (92%). Collectively, these demographic traits are congruent
with previous reports among this occupational group [10].
The proportion of airline pilots achieving health guidelines for
MVPA, sleep, AUDIT, smoking, and fruit and vegetable intake
were 52%, 67%, 89%, 95%, and 34%, respectively. No significant
differences were observed between sex for health behavior
guideline attainment, except the proportion of females achieving
guidelines for fruit and vegetable intake where greater than
males (50% and 32%, respectively; p0.05).
3.2 Association Between Mental Health, Health
Behaviors, and Demographic Variables
The correlation coefficient relationship between mental health,
health behaviors, and demographic variables is displayed in
3of9
TABLE 1 Demographic and health risk characteristics among airline pilots, stratified by mental health score quartiles.
First quartile
(n=126)
Second quartile
(n=125)
Third quartile
(n=126)
Fourth quartile
(n=125)
Sex (female/male) 6/120 10/115 15/111 11/114
Short haul (n)56647166
Long haul (n)70615559
Age (years) 47.1 (11.2) 47.2 (9.5) 44.8 (10.0) 44.1 (11.1)
Height (cm) 179.8 (6.5) 179.2 (6.5) 179.4 (8.4) 178.9 (7.1)
Body mass (kg) 89.6 (14.2)3,4** 90.0 (13.1)3,4** 81.2 (11.4)1,2 ** 81.2 (13.2)1,2**
BMI (kg/m2) 27.7 (4.1)3,4** 28.0 (3.2)3,4 ** 25.2 (2.9)1,2** 25.3 (3.3)1,2 **
MCS (score) 39.6 (5.4)2,3,4** 49.0 (1.6)1,3,4** 53.7 (1.1)1,2,4** 58.3 (1.8)1,2,3**
Fruit and vegetables
(servings/day)
3.1 (1.6)3,4** 3.4 (1.2)3,4 ** 4.1 (1.5)1,2** 4.3 (1.9)1,2 **
AUDIT (score) 5.5 (2.8)2,3,4** 3.4 (2.1)1,4 ** 3.2 (1.7)1** 4* 2.4 (1.2)1,2** 3*
Sleep (h) 6.7 (0.6)3,4** 6.7 (0.5)3,4 ** 7.2 (0.6)1,2** 4*7.5 (0.6)1,2 ** 3*
MVPA (minutes/week) 93.0 (52.4)2*3,4** 117.6 (58.0)1*3,4 ** 161.7 (67.8)1,2,4** 207.7 (70.3)1,2,3 **
Smoking (n,%) 27 (21%)2,3,4** 0 (0%)1** 0 (0%)1** 0 (0%)1**
Note: The data are presented by marginal estimated mean with standard deviation or counts and percentages in parentheses. A superscript number identifies a
significant relationship within categories from the post hoc analysis, 1 represents the leftmost category, 2 denotes the second category from the left, and so forth.
Abbreviations: AUDIT, alcohol use disorders identification test; BMI, body mass index; MCS, Mental Component Score; MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous physical
activity; n, sample size.
*Indicates statistically significance group difference at level p<0.05.
**Indicates p<0.001.
TABLE 2 Partial correlation coefficients between health behavior variables and mental health, controlling for ethnicity, age, sex, BMI, and fleet
type.
F&V AUDIT Sleep MVPA Smoking MCS
F&V 0.15** 0.17** 0.22** 0.17** 0.27**
AUDIT 0.34** 0.38** 0.46** 0.58**
Sleep 0.46** 0.20** 0.43**
MVPA 0.25** 0.50**
Smoking 0.49**
MCS
Abbreviations: AUDIT, alcohol use disorders identification test; F&V, fruit and vegetable servings; MCS, Mental Component Score; MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous
physical activity.
*Indicates statistical significance at p<0.05.
**indicates significance at p<0.001.
Table 2. All health behaviors and MCS were significantly cor-
related (p0.001). Age was significantly correlated with all
variables (p0.05) except fruit and vegetable intake and
smoking status. The coefficients of all variables in the multiple
regression analysis are summarized in Table 3. The model
significantly explained variances for MCS (R2=0.56, p
0.001). As illustrated in Figure 1, higher values for MVPA,
fruit and vegetable intake, sleep, and lower values for AUDIT
score were associated with better mental health (p0.001).
Age and BMI were not significantly correlated with mental
health. The variance inflation factors were all within an accept-
able range (less than 2) and did not indicate multicollinearity
issues.
3.3 Adherence to Health Behavior Guidelines
and Mental Health
After multivariable adjustment for ethnicity, age, sex, BMI, and
fleet type, a significant main effect for a group (either adhering
to 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 health behavior guidelines) was observed (p
0.001). Significant differences in MCS were observed between
all health behavior guideline groups (p0.001), where MCS
improved with increasing adherence to health behavior guide-
lines (see Figure 2). The MCS for individuals who adhered to 0
(n=16), 1 (n=30), 2 (n=81), 3 (n=120),4(n=139), and 5 (n=
116) health behavior guidelines was 32 ±3, 39 ±7.7, 46 ±5, 49 ±
5, 53 ±5, and 56 ±3, respectively.
4of9 Lifestyle Medicine,2024
TABLE 3 Results of multiple regression analysis between demo-
graphic and health behavior variables and mental health.
Mental health score
BSEβpvalue
BMI 0.109 0.069 0.052 0.114
F&V 0.447 0.149 0.097 0.003
AUDIT 0.995 0.120 0.308 <0.001
Sleep 1.704 0.412 0.148 <0.001
MVPA 0.023 0.004 0.233 <0.001
Smoking 7.889 1.149 0.236 <0.001
Age 0.014 0.022 0.019 0.553
Abbreviations: AUDIT, alcohol use disorders identification test; B, unstan-
dardized coefficient; BMI, body mass index; F&V, fruit, and vegetable
servings; MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; SE, standard error; β,
standardized coefficient.
4 Discussion
This cross-sectional study is the first to quantify the associations
of lifestyle behaviors with mental health related quality of life
among airline pilots. Consistent with previous research among
the general population, higher physical activity levels, adequate
sleep, healthful dietary behaviors, limiting alcohol, and avoidance
of tobacco smoking were associated with enhanced mental health
[2–6]. We found each behavior investigated was significantly
and independently associated with mental health status and an
accumulation effect was observed, where attainment of health
guidelines for a higher amount of health behaviors was associated
with significantly better mental health. Our findings contribute to
elucidating the relationship between lifestyle behaviors and men-
tal health status among airline pilots. Impaired mental health,
such as mild depressive symptoms, may negatively influence
cognitive function among airline pilots [36], which is critical to
flight operation safety. Thus, understanding factors that underpin
mental health among airline pilots has broad implications for the
aviation industry and may inform future policies and strategies to
promote mental well-being among this occupational group.
Although comparable literature concerning airline pilots is lim-
ited, congruent with earlier investigations among the general
population, our findings demonstrated that achievement of more
health behavior guidelines was associated with better health
outcomes. Among a general population cohort in Ireland, clusters
of healthy lifestyle behavior patterns including smoking and
alcohol avoidance, achievement of physical activity guidelines,
and strong adherence to the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hyper-
tension dietary pattern reported the highest levels of energy
vitality, lowest levels of psychological stress, and the highest
self-rated quality of life [24]. Within a United States–based
prospective cohort analysis, all-cause mortality risk was over
three times higher in those who adhered to 0 health behavior
guidelines (i.e., smoking, alcohol, physical activity, and fruit
and vegetable intake) compared with those who achieved all
four guidelines [37]. Interestingly, in the present study, we also
included sleep, and those who achieved all five health behavior
guidelines had an approximate 1.75 times greater average mental
health score compared with those who achieved no guidelines.
Collectively, available data suggest a synergistic effect between
health behaviors, and that accumulation of multiple guidelines
promotes more influential impacts on mental health.
We observed a significant negative relationship between mental
health status and both alcohol consumption and tobacco smok-
ing, consistent with previous research [6, 38]. Excessive alcohol
consumption and smoking are independently well-established
risk factors for all-cause mortality and adverse physical and men-
tal health [6, 39]. Alcohol consumption expressed as the AUDIT
score was the strongest individual predictor for mental health
status among the investigated lifestyle behaviors. Indeed, among
the general population, those with mild-to-moderate depressive
symptoms have demonstrated substantially higher consumption
and problems related to alcohol use [40]. Notably, the prevalence
of hazardous drinking (AUDIT >8) among airline pilots was
markedly lower than that reported among general population
estimates (11% and 22%, respectively) [41]. However, some pilots
may be inherently biased to misrepresent true alcohol intake to
healthcare professionals or researchers due to existing aviation
alcohol policies which mandate a minimum of 8 h between alco-
hol consumption and flight duty, with strict legal limits on blood
and breath alcohol levels [9, 42]. As perceived psychological stress
and negative affect have been associated with excessive alcohol
consumption patterns and often precede initiation of smoking
[43, 44], evidence-based strategies that facilitate improvements in
underlying determinants of these behaviors would be a valuable
direction for future research among this occupational population.
Circadian disruption is an inherent risk for airline pilots due
to occupational characteristics including shift work, changing
work schedules, extended duty periods, and traveling across
time zones [45]. Poor sleep is associated with impaired daytime
functioning and increased mental health problems in the general
population [4]. Among pilots, poor sleep has been expressed as
a primary form of work-related stress [15] and has been linked
to elevated psychological stress and fatigue, dysregulation of
other health behaviors, and poses risk to flight safety [9, 45]. A
recent study reported poor sleep quality among airline pilots was
associated with an adverse profile of plasma biomarkers reflective
of cardiometabolic risk [46]. We observed a prevalence of 33%
insufficient sleep (<7 h) among airline pilots, which is 6% higher
than country-matched general population sample estimates [10],
yet only 2% higher than a larger United States–based study [47].
Consequently, as one third of airline pilots reported insufficient
habitual sleep, and previous research suggests that self-report
sleep duration is often over-reported by pilots [48], there is a need
for enhanced implementation of behavioral strategies to enhance
sleep health of airline pilots to mitigate risks associated with the
nonmodifiable demands of the job.
Sedentary behavior and insufficient physical activity are associ-
ated with adverse effects on mental health [2, 49]. Work demands
of airline pilots are predominantly sedentary in nature [45], and a
recent estimate of the prevalence of insufficient physical activity
among airline pilots globally was 51.5% [9]. Correspondingly, 48%
of our participants did not achieve MVPA guidelines. Achieve-
ment of physical activity guidelines has been associated with
enhanced physical health, including lower rates of obesity and
hypertension among airline pilots [10, 50]. However, to date, there
5of9
FIGURE 1 Association between health behaviors and mental health among airline pilots.
Smoking was omitted due to being an ordinal variable. AUDIT, alcohol use disorders identification test; MCS, Mental Component Score; MVPA,
moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.
FIGURE 2 Mental health and the number of health behaviors (i.e., physical activity, fruit and vegetables, sleep, alcohol, smoking) achieving
guidelines for health. MCS =Mental Component Score. Health guideline criteria: Physical activity =150 min moderate-to-vigorous physical activity
min per week; Fruit and vegetables =5 servings per day; Sleep =7 h duration per night; Alcohol =Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test score
<8; Smoking =Nonsmoker.
6of9 Lifestyle Medicine,2024
has been a lack of investigation regarding the association between
physical activity guideline achievement and mental health. In
our analyses, physical activity demonstrated the second strongest
correlation with mental health status. Further, higher MVPA was
significantly associated with lower rates of smoking and excessive
alcohol use, higher sleep duration, and more fruit and vegetable
consumption. As there is evidence to support the notion that
sufficient physical activity may overcome the deleterious health
effects of sedentary time [51], research attention is warranted to
investigate barriers and facilitators to engagement with physical
activity among airline pilots and to establish evidence-based
strategies to increase MVPA in this population.
Adherence to fruit and vegetable intake guidelines is associated
with reduced all-cause mortality and increasing evidence sug-
gests a positive effect on mental health [52]. Our findings revealed
a significant positive association between fruit and vegetable
intake and mental health, yet only 34% of pilots achieved the
recommended guideline of 5 servings of fruit and vegetables
per day. These findings are consistent with past research which
reported approximately one third of pilots and one quarter of
the general population globally fail to achieve this guideline
[9]. Indeed, barriers to adherence to healthy dietary behaviors
have been reported among airline pilots, including unhealthy
environmental food availability and inconsistent meal timing
opportunities [15, 45]. Our findings provide preliminary insights
that dietary factors may influence mental health among pilots,
yet future research is needed to characterize nutrition compre-
hensively, such as utilization of dietary intake logging to evaluate
nutrition composition and validated food frequency question-
naires to evaluate the association between dietary patterns and
health outcomes.
4.1 Limitations and Future Research
There are inherent limitations related to this study that should
be considered in the interpretation of our findings. Although
the sample size attained represents approximately 33% of the
population, participation was voluntary and those who chose to
participate may have been more engaged in personal health than
those who did not participate. As data were collected in the post-
COVID-19 pandemic era, the associated unique circumstances
and stressors on the aviation industry may have affected out-
comes. All participants were from a single airline, which may
introduce sampling bias when generalizing to the global airline
pilot population. Data were collected within the airlines’ aviation
medicine clinic; therefore, participants may have altered their
responses due to concerns about their employment. However,
efforts were made to mitigate this by informing participants that
the study was external to their employment medical data and
survey responses were anonymized using unique identifier codes.
For feasibility, health behavior outcomes were measured via
self-report instruments, which likely yield lower accuracy than
comparative gold standard objective measures, which would be
valuable for future research to utilize (i.e., comprehensive diet
records and actigraphy). In this study, fruit and vegetable intake
was measured as a marker for dietary behaviors; however, there
are many other components that contribute to healthful nutrition
[45], which should be incorporated into future research.
For the outcome measure MCS, there are no well-established
cut points among the literature for a score-based threshold for
psychological distress, depression, or mental ill-health. There-
fore, we conducted a within-population quartile-based analysis
to evaluate mental health status relative to the sample. Future
research investigating the association between health behaviors
and mental health, using mental health outcome measures that
incorporate well-defined cut points for mental ill-health and
depression. Consequently, this would enable the calculation
of associated odds ratios for the relationship between health
behaviors and mental ill-health, which would complement our
research aim and findings.
The findings from this study are correlational in nature, and
the scientific body of knowledge would benefit from future
research investigating the cause-and-effect relationship between
discrete health behaviors and mental health status. Further,
future research should investigate broader subdomains of mental
ill-health, such as mood regulation and severity of anxiety and
depressive symptoms.
5 Conclusion
This is the first study to quantify the relationship between health
behaviors and mental health status among airline pilots. We
found alcohol consumption, physical activity, sleep duration, fruit
and vegetable intake, and tobacco smoking were significantly
and independently associated with mental health status. Fur-
ther, an accumulation effect was observed, where attainment
of health guidelines for more health behaviors was associated
with significantly better mental health. These findings highlight
the importance of addressing modifiable lifestyle behaviors in
policies and practices to support mental health among airline
pilots.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the pilots for providing their time to participate
in this study.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the
corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
1. H. A. Whiteford, L. Degenhardt, J. Rehm, et al., “Global Burden of
Disease Attributable to Mental and Substance Use Disorders: Findings
From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010,” The Lancet 382, no. 9904
(2013): 1575–1586.
2. R. L. White, M. J. Babic, P. D. Parker, D. R. Lubans, T. Astell-Burt, and
C. Lonsdale, “Domain-Specific Physical Activity and Mental Health: A
Meta-analysis,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 52, no. 5 (2017):
653–666.
7of9
3. J. Godos, W. Currenti, D. Angelino, et al., “Diet and Mental Health:
Review of the Recent Updates on Molecular Mechanisms,” Antioxidants
9, no. 4 (2020): 346.
4. D. Freeman, B. Sheaves, and G. M. Goodwin, “The Effects of Improving
Sleep on Mental Health (OASIS): A Randomised Controlled Trial With
Mediation Analysis,” The Lancet Psychiatry 4, no. 10 (2017): 749–758.
5. P. Makela, K. Raitasalo, and K. Wahlbeck, “Mental Health and Alco-
hol Use: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Finnish General Population,”
European Journal of Public Health 25, no. 2 (2014): 225–231.
6. G. M. J. Taylor and J. L. Treur, “An Application of the Stress-Diathesis
Model: A Review About the Association Between Smoking Tobacco,
Smoking Cessation, and Mental Health,” International Journal of Clinical
and Health Psychology 23, no. 1 (2023): 100335.
7. X. Wang, Y. Wu, X. Shi, et al., “Associations of Lifestyle With Mental
Health and Well-Being in Chinese Adults: A Nationwide Study,” Frontiers
in Nutrition 10 (2023): 1198796.
8. T. Pasha and P. R. A. Stokes, “Reflecting on the Germanwings Disaster:
A Systematic Review of Depression and Suicide in Commercial Airline
Pilots,” Frontiers in Psychiatry 9 (2018): 86.
9. D. Wilson, M. Driller, B. Johnston, and N. Gill, “The Prevalence of
Cardiometabolic Health Risk Factors Among Airline Pilots: A Systematic
Review,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public
Health 19, no. 8 (2022): 4848.
10. D. Wilson, M. Driller, B. Johnston, and N. Gill, “The Prevalence and
Distribution of Health Risk Factors in Airline Pilots: A Cross-Sectional
Comparison With the general population,” Australian and New Zealand
Journal of Public Health 46, no. 5 (2022): 572–580.
11. I. S. Widyahening, “High Level of Work Stressors Increase the Risk of
Mental-Emotional Disturbances Among Airline Pilots,” Medical Journal
of Indonesia 16, no. 2 (2007): 117–121.
12.J.N.Laditka,S.B.Laditka,A.A.Arif,andO.J.Adeyemi,“Psycholog-
ical Distress Is More Common in Some Occupations and Increases With
Job Tenure: A Thirty-Seven Year Panel Study in the United States,” BMC
Psychology 11, no. 1 (2023): 95.
13. P. Minoretti and E. Emanuele, “Health in the Skies: A Narrative
Review of the Issues Faced by Commercial Airline Pilots,” Cureus 15, no.
4 (2023): e38000.
14. C. L. Cooper and S. Sloan, “Occupational and Psychosocial Stress
Among Commercial Aviation Pilots,” Journal of Occupational Medicine
27, no. 8 (1985): 570–576.
15. J. Cahill, P. Cullen, S. Anwer, S. Wilson, and K. Gaynor, “Pilot Work
Related Stress (WRS), Effects on Wellbeing and Mental Health, and
Coping Methods,” The International Journal of Aerospace Psychology 31,
no. 2 (2021): 87–109.
16. W. R. Hoffman, J. Aden, R. D. Barbera,et al., “Healthcare Avoidance in
Aircraft Pilots Due to Concern for Aeromedical Certificate Loss: A Survey
of 3765 Pilots,” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 64,
no. 4 (2022): e245–e248.
17. A. C. Wu, D. Donnelly-Mclay, M. G. Weisskopf, E. Mcneely, T.
S. Betancourt, and J. G. Allen, Airplane Pilot Mental Health and
Suicidal Thoughts: A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study via Anonymous
Web-Based Survey,” Environmental Health 15, no. 1 (2016): 121.
18. D. Wilson, M. Driller, B. Johnston, and N. Gill, “The Effectiveness of a
17-Week Lifestyle Intervention on Health Behaviors Among Airline Pilots
During COVID-19,” Journal of Sport and Health Science 10, no. 3 (2021):
333–340.
19. D. Wilson, M. Driller, P. Winwood, T. Clissold, B. Johnston, and N. Gill,
“The Effectiveness of a Combined Healthy Eating, Physical Activity, and
Sleep Hygiene Lifestyle Intervention on Health and Fitness of Overweight
Airline Pilots: A Controlled Trial,” Nutrients 14, no. 9 (2022): 1988.
20. D. Wilson, M. Driller, P. Winwood, B. Johnston, and N. Gill, “The
Effects of a Brief Lifestyle Intervention on the Health of Overweight
Airline Pilots During COVID-19: A 12-Month Follow-UpStudy,” Nutrients
13, no. 12 (2021): 4288.
21. D. Wilson, M. W. Driller, B. Johnston, and N. D. Gill, “A Contactless
App-Based Intervention to Improve Health Behaviors in Airline Pilots:
A Randomized Trial,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 64, no. 5
(2023): 666–676.
22. A. van Drongelen, C. R. Boot, H. Hlobil, J. W. Twisk, T. Smid, and A. J.
van der Beek, “Evaluation of an mHealth Intervention Aiming to Improve
Health-Related Behavior and Sleep and Reduce Fatigue Among Airline
Pilots,” Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 40, no. 6
(2014): 557–568.
23. Y. Y. Choi and K. Y. Kim, “Effects of Physical Examination and Diet
Consultation on Serum Cholesterol and Health-Behavior in the Korean
Pilots Employed in Commercial Airline,” Industrial Health 51, no. 6
(2013): 603–611.
24. M. C. Conry, K. Morgan, P. Curry, et al., “The Clustering of Health
Behaviours in Ireland and Their Relationship With Mental Health,
Self-Rated Health and Quality of Life,” BMC Public Health [Electronic
Resource] 11, no. 1 (2011): 692.
25. J. A. Fleishman, A. J.Selim, and L. E. Kazis, “Deriving SF-12v2 Physical
and Mental Health Summary Scores: A Comparison of Different Scoring
Algorithms,” Quality of Life Research 19, no. 2 (2010): 231–241.
26. N. C. Cheak-Zamora, K. W. Wyrwich, and T. D. McBride, “Reliability
and Validity of the SF-12v2 in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey,”
Quality of Life Research 18, no. 6 (2009): 727–735.
27. G. Vilagut, C. G. Forero, A. Pinto-Meza, et al., “The Mental Com-
ponent of the Short-Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) as a Measure of
Depressive Disorders in the General Population: Results With Three
Alternative Scoring Methods,” Value in Health 16,no.4(2013):564573.
28. J. E. Ware, S. D. Keller, and M. Kosinski, SF-12: How to Score the SF-
12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales (New England Medical
Center: Health Institute, 1995). Boston, MA.
29. P. H. Lee, D. J. Macfarlane, T.h Lam, and S. M. Stewart, “Validity of
the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF):
A Systematic Review,” International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and
Physical Activity 8, no. 1 (2011): 115.
30. D. F. Reinert and J. P. Allen, “The Alcohol Use Disorders Identifi-
cation Test: An Update of Research Findings,” Alcoholism: Clinical and
Experimental Research 31, no. 2 (2007): 185–199.
31. P.-C. Thiebaud, C. Martin, D. Naouri, A. Le Joncour, J. Truchot, and
Y. Yordanov, “Alcohol Consumption Among French Physicians: A Cross-
Sectional study,” Drug and Alcohol Dependence 218 (2021): 108356.
32. Ministry of Health. Methodology Report 2017/18: New Zealand Health
Survey. (Wellington: Ministry of Health, 2019), https://www.health.
govt.nz/publication/methodology-report-2017-18-new-zealand-health-
survey.
33.D.J.Buysse,C.F.Reynolds,T.H.Monk,S.R.Berman,andD.J.Kupfer,
“The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: A New Instrument for Psychiatric
Practice and Research,” Psychiatry Research 28, no. 2 (1989): 193–213.
34. F. P. Cappuccio, L. D’elia, P. Strazzullo, and M. A. Miller, “Sleep Dura-
tion and All-Cause Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of
Prospective Studies,” Sleep 33, no. 5 (2010): 585–592.
35. R. M. O’Brien, “A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance
Inflation Factors,” Quality & Quantity 41, no. 5 (2007): 673–690.
36. P. Minoretti, A. S. Santiago Sáez, Á. F. García Martín, M. Liaño Riera,
M. Gómez Serrano, and E. Emanuele, “Mild Depressive Symptoms in
Airline Pilots Associated With Impaired Executive Functions,” Cureus 15,
no. 7 (2023): e41616.
37. E. M. Matheson, D. E. King, and C. J. Everett, “Healthy Lifestyle
Habits and Mortality in Overweight and Obese Individuals,” The Jour-
nal of the American Board of Family Medicine 25, no. 1 (2012): 9–
15.
8of9 Lifestyle Medicine,2024
38. J.o-A. Puddephatt, P. Irizar, A. Jones, S. H. Gage, and L. Goodwin,
“Associations of Common Mental DisorderWith Alcohol Use in the Adult
General Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Addiction
117, no. 6 (2022): 1543–1572.
39. C. Probst, C. Kilian, S. Sanchez, S. Lange, and J. Rehm, “The Role
of Alcohol Use and Drinking Patterns in Socioeconomic Inequalities in
Mortality: A Systematic Review,” The Lancet Public Health 5, no. 6 (2020):
e324–e332.
40. J. Åhlin, M. Hallgren, A. Öjehagen, H. Källmén, and Y. Forsell,
“Adults With Mild to Moderate Depression Exhibit More Alcohol Related
Problems Compared to the General Adult Population: A Cross Sectional
Study,” BMC Public Health [Electronic Resource] 15, no. 1 (2015): 542.
41. H. O’Brien, S. Callinan, M. Livingston, J. S. Doyle, and P. M.
Dietze, “Population Patterns in Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test
(AUDIT) Scores in the Australian Population; 2007–2016,” Australian and
New Zealand Journal of Public Health 44, no. 6 (2020): 462–467.
42. Federal Aviation Administration, Literature Review and Recommen-
dations Concerning Alcohol Tolerance Under Part 67 (Washington, DC:
Federal Aviation Administration, 2018).
43. J. D. Kassel, L. R. Stroud, and C. A. Paronis, “Smoking, Stress, and
Negative Affect: Correlation, Causation, and Context Across Stages of
Smoking,” Psychological Bulletin 129, no. 2 (2003): 270–304.
44. W. R. Corbin, N. M. Farmer, and S. Nolen-Hoekesma, “Relations
Among Stress, Coping Strategies, Coping Motives, Alcohol Consump-
tion and Related Problems: A Mediated Moderation Model,” Addictive
Behaviors 38,no.4(2013):19121919.
45. D. Wilson, M. Driller, B. Johnston, and N. Gill, “Healthy Nutrition,
Physical Activity, and Sleep Hygiene to Promote Cardiometabolic Health
of Airline Pilots: A Narrative Review,” Journal of Lifestyle Medicine 13, no.
1 (2023): 1–15.
46. M. Liaño Riera, A. Santiago Sáez, Á. García Martín, M. Gómez
Serrano, and P. Minoretti, “Relation of Sleep Quality to a Panel of Plasma
Cardiometabolic Markers in Airline Pilots: A Cross-Sectional Study,”
Cureus 16, no. 1 (2024): e51650.
47. Y. Liu, A. G. Wheaton, D. P. Chapman, T. J. Cunningham, H. Lu, and
J. B. Croft, “Prevalence of Healthy Sleep Duration Among Adults–United
States, 2014,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 65, no. 6 (2016): 137–
141.
48. L. J. Wu, P. H. Gander, M. J. Van Den Berg, and T. L. Signal, “Estimat-
ing Long-Haul Airline Pilots’ At-Home Baseline Sleep Duration,” Sleep
Health: Journal of the National Sleep Foundation 2, no. 2 (2016): 143–145.
49. Y. Huang, L. Li, Y. Gan, et al., “Sedentary Behaviors and Risk
Of Depression: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies,” Translational
Psychiatry 10, no. 1 (2020): 26.
50. D. Wilson, M. Driller, B. Johnston, and N. Gill, “The Relation-
ship Between Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Blood Pressure Among
Airline Pilots: A Mediation Analysis of Body Composition,” Journal of
Hypertension 42, no. 2 (2024): 344–349.
51. R. Santos, J. Mota, A. D.Okely, et al., “The Independent Associations of
Sedentary Behaviour and Physical Activity on Cardiorespiratory Fitness,”
British Journal of Sports Medicine 48, no. 20 (2014): 1508–1512.
52. D. Głąbska, D. Guzek, B. Groele, and K. Gutkowska, “Fruit and
Vegetable Intake and Mental Health in Adults: A Systematic Review,”
Nutrients 12, no. 1 (2020): 115.
9of9
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Background Insomnia and poor sleep are leading modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Given the high susceptibility of airline pilots (APs) to sleep disturbances, we sought to investigate the hypothesis that poor sleep in this professional group correlates with alterations in plasma biochemical markers that would reflect critical aspects in the pathophysiology of cardiometabolic disorders. Methods In this preliminary cross-sectional study, we examined the relation of poor sleep to fourteen plasma biomarkers reflecting multiple cardiometabolic pathways in a convenience sample of 117 male APs. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was used to categorize the participants into good sleepers (n = 70, 59.8%; PSQI scores from 0 to 4) and poor sleepers (n = 47, 40.2%; PSQI scores of 5 or higher). The concentrations of biomarkers were compared between the two groups using both univariable and multivariable analyses. Results Compared to good sleepers, APs identified as poor sleepers exhibited significantly different levels of four plasma cardiometabolic biochemical markers in univariable analysis. However, in multivariable-adjusted analysis, only three biomarkers, adiponectin, fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-21, and growth differentiation factor (GDF)-15, remained independently associated with poor sleep. Conclusion Poor sleep quality in APs correlates with lower plasma concentrations of adiponectin and elevated levels of FGF-21 and GDF-15. Further longitudinal studies are required to elucidate the role of these biomarkers in the link between sleep disturbances and cardiometabolic risk in this professional group.
Article
Full-text available
Objective Blood pressure (BP), cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), and body composition are independently associated with health outcomes, yet the relationship between these variables has not been explored among airline pilots. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between CRF and BP, and further examine whether the relationship is mediated by body composition. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among 356 airline pilots in New Zealand. We measured height, body mass, BP, waist circumference, skinfolds, and CRF (via a WattBike cycle ergometer submaximal VO 2max test). Partial correlation coefficients were estimated to examine the relationships between all variables while controlling for age and sex. Haye's PROCESS macro and the Sobel test were utilized for the mediation analysis. Results All body composition variables (body mass index, waist circumference and body fat percentage) were positively correlated with all BP variables (systolic pressure, diastolic pressure and mean arterial pressure) ( P < 0.001). CRF was negatively correlated with all body composition and BP variables ( P < 0.001). The Sobel test and indirect effect were significant ( P < 0.001), confirming that all body composition variables partially mediate the relationship between CRF and all blood pressure variables. Conclusion Lower CRF is associated with higher blood pressure, and body composition partially mediates the relationship between these health risk factors. These findings highlight the importance of physical fitness and healthy body composition in the management of blood pressure among this occupational group.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: While significant efforts have been made to understand the influence of depression-related impairments on executive functioning within the general population, the specific impact on airline pilots remains largely unexplored. Considering the crucial role that cognitive abilities play in the realm of aircraft piloting, it is imperative to probe into the potential repercussions of depressive symptoms on executive functions (EFs) among this professional cohort. Objectives: This study aims to explore the associations between depressive symptoms and EFs in a convenience sample of airline pilots. Methods: Male airline pilots (n = 100) underwent the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) to gauge both the presence and intensity of depressive symptoms. The Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT), the Digit Span Task (DST), and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) were used to assess EFs. Results: Of the entire sample of pilots, 88% (n = 88) demonstrated minimal depressive symptoms with a BDI-II score ranging from 0 to 13. The remaining 12% (n = 12) exhibited mild depression, with scores between 14 and 19. Pilots suffering from mild depression demonstrated prolonged color and word times and a higher time interference (TI) score on the SCWT. Moreover, these individuals exhibited lower scores on the DST across both the forward digit span (FDS) and backward digit span (BDS) subtests. Finally, the presence of mild depression correlated with an increased number of total errors, encompassing both perseverative and non-perseverative errors, in the WCST. After adjusting for potential confounding variables, we found an independent association between BDI-II scores and total errors in the WCST. Conclusion: Our research points to substantial differences in EFs between airline pilots demonstrating mild depression and those exhibiting minimal depressive symptoms. This information can catalyze heightened consciousness about the psychological welfare of pilots.
Article
Full-text available
Background A healthy lifestyle is beneficial to individuals’ health. However, little is known about the associations of lifestyle factors with mental health and well-being. This study examined the associations of lifestyle factors with mental health (i.e., depression, anxiety, loneliness, perceived pressure, and self-rated health status) and well-being in Chinese adults. Methods A nationally representative survey was conducted in China from 20 June 2022 to 31 August 2022. Data from the survey were analyzed using multiple linear regression to determine the associations of lifestyle with mental health and well-being in Chinese adults. Standardized regression coefficients (β) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using multiple linear regression. Results The survey included 28,138 Chinese adults. Multiple linear regression results showed that there were significant negative associations of lifestyle scores with scores of depression (β = −0.93, 95% CI: −0.98, −0.88), anxiety (β = −0.71, 95% CI: −0.76, −0.67), loneliness (β = −0.23, 95% CI: −0.24, −0.21), and perceived pressure (β = −0.19, 95% CI: −0.22, −0.16). Moreover, there were significant positive associations of lifestyle with self-rated health status (β = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.79, 2.20) and well-being (β = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.91, 1.02). Conclusion This study provides insight into the associations of lifestyle factors with mental health and well-being and highlights the importance of improving and maintaining healthy lifestyle behaviors for favorable mental health and well-being.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Airline pilots experience unique occupational demands that may contribute to adverse physical and psychological health outcomes. Epidemiological reports have shown a substantial prevalence of cardiometabolic health risk factors including excessive body weight, elevated blood pressure, poor lifestyle behaviors, and psychological fatigue. Achieving health guidelines for lifestyle behavior nutrition, physical activity, and sleep are protective factors against the development of noncommunicable diseases and may mitigate the unfavorable occupational demands of airline pilots. This narrative review examines occupational characteristics for sleep, nutrition, and physical activity and outlines evidence-based strategies to inform health behavior interventions to mitigate cardiometabolic health risk factors among airline pilots. Methods: Literature sources published between 1990 and 2022 were identified through electronic searches in PubMed, MEDLINE (via OvidSP), PsychINFO, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases, and a review of official reports and documents from regulatory authorities pertaining to aviation medicine and public health was conducted. The literature search strategy comprised key search terms relating to airline pilots, health behaviors, and cardiometabolic health. The inclusion criteria for literature sources were peer-reviewed human studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and reports or documents published by regulatory bodies. Results: The results of the review show occupational factors influencing nutrition, sleep, and physical activity behaviors and delineate evident occupational disruptions to these lifestyle behaviors. Evidence from clinical trials demonstrates the efficacy of nutrition, sleep, and physical activity interventions for enhancing the cardiometabolic health of airline pilots. Conclusion: This narrative review suggests that implementing evidence-based interventions focused on nutrition, physical activity, and sleep could help mitigate cardiometabolic health risk factors among airline pilots, who are particularly susceptible to adverse health outcomes due to unique occupational demands.
Article
Full-text available
While the health of airline pilots is crucial to ensuring the safe travel of millions of people worldwide, they remain vulnerable to a variety of health challenges due to the nature of their job. The purpose of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive summary of the most common health issues experienced by commercial airline pilots. By examining the published literature on this topic, we sought to identify areas where further research is needed to understand better the health risks associated with being a pilot and to develop effective interventions to address these risks. We also highlight how recent technological advances in digital health can be leveraged to conduct research into the potential usefulness of telehealth assessments for identifying occupational hazards in the aviation sector and providing targeted interventions. Overall, addressing the challenges of taking care of pilots' health and ensuring public safety will require a collaborative effort among airlines, governments, and regulators. Prioritizing pilot health and safety can actually improve profitability in the aviation sector by reducing costs associated with absenteeism, turnover, and accidents.
Article
Full-text available
Background Workers in certain occupations may have elevated risks of psychological distress. However, research is limited. For example, researchers often measure distress that may have existed before occupational exposures. We studied occupations and the development of psychological distress using national data from the United States. Methods We reviewed relevant research to identify occupations with low and high risks of mental health problems. We confirmed those individual low and high risk occupations using 1981–2017 data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (n = 24,789). We measured new cases of distress using the Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (Kessler K6) and compared distress in the low and high risk groups, adjusted for factors associated with occupational selection and non-occupational distress risks. A subset of participants described their jobs (n = 1,484), including factors such as job demands, social support, and control over work. We examined associations of those factors with psychological distress. Results Workers in high risk occupations had 20% higher adjusted odds of developing distress than those in low risk occupations (odds ratio, OR 1.20, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.13–1.28). Distress increased with time in a high risk occupation: ≥5 years OR 1.38 (CI 1.18–1.62), ≥ 10 years OR 1.46 (CI 1.07–1.99), and ≥ 15 years OR 1.77 (CI 1.08–2.90; p-trend = 0.0145). The most common positive participant descriptions of their jobs indicated social support (34%), sense of accomplishment (17%), and control over work (15%). Participants reporting such descriptions were significantly less likely to have a high risk occupation (OR 0.66, CI 0.46–0.94, p = 0.0195). The most common negative descriptions were excessive job demands (43%), low social support (27%), and lack of control (14%). Participants reporting such descriptions were significantly more likely to have a high risk occupation (OR 1.49, CI 1.03–2.14, p = 0.0331). Conclusion Certain occupations may have high risks of psychological distress, which may be due to characteristics of the occupations rather than employee characteristics, or in addition to them. Results were consistent with theoretical models of psychosocial work environments. Providers of health care and social services should ask patients or clients about work-related distress.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: There is a need for enhanced preventive health care among airline pilots to mitigate the prevalence of cardiometabolic health risk factors. Design: A randomized, waitlist-controlled trial was utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of a smartphone-based app intervention for improving health behaviors and cardiometabolic health parameters. Setting/participants: A total of 186 airline pilots (aged 43.2±9.1 years; male, 64%) were recruited and participated in the trial during 2022. Intervention: This intervention was a personalized, 16-week smartphone-based app multicomponent physical activity, healthy eating, and sleep hygiene intervention. Main outcome measures: Outcome measures of objective health (Cooper's 12-minute exercise test, resting heart rate, push ups, plank isometric hold, body mass), subjective health (self-rated health, perceived psychological stress and fatigue), and health behaviors (weekly physical activity, sleep quality and duration, fruit and vegetable intake) were collected at baseline and after intervention. The waitlist control completed the same measures. Results: Significant interactions for time Χ group from baseline to 16 weeks were found for all outcome measures (p<0.001). Significant between-group differences for positive health changes in favor of the intervention group were found after intervention for all outcome measures (p<0.05, d=0.4-1.0) except for self-rated health, body mass, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score. Conclusions: Study findings show that an app-based health behavior intervention can elicit positive cardiometabolic health changes among airline pilots over 16 weeks, associated with trivial to large effect sizes. Trial registration: The trial protocol was prospectively registered at The Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622000288729).
Article
Full-text available
Background Worldwide, approximately 24% of all adults smoke, but smoking is up to twice as prevalent in people with mental ill-health. There is growing evidence that smoking may be a causal risk factor in the development of mental illness, and that smoking cessation leads to improved mental health. Methods In this scholarly review we have: (1) used a modern adaptation of the Bradford-Hill criteria to bolster the argument that smoking could cause mental ill-health and that smoking cessation could reverse these effects, and (2) by considering psychological, biological, and environmental factors, we have structured the evidence to-date into a stress-diathesis model. Results Our model suggests that smoking is a psychobiological stressor, but that the magnitude of this effect is mediated and modulated by the individual's diathesis to develop mental ill-health and other vulnerability and protective factors. We explore biological mechanisms that underpin the model, such as tobacco induced damage to neurological systems and oxidative stress pathways. Furthermore, we discuss evidence indicating that it is likely that these systems repair after smoking cessation, leading to better mental health. Conclusion Based on a large body of literature including experimental, observational, and novel causal inference studies, there is consistent evidence showing that smoking can negatively affect the brain and mental health, and that smoking cessation could reverse the mental ill-health caused by smoking. Our model suggests that smoking prevention and treatment strategies have a role in preventing and treating mental illness as well as physical illness.
Article
Full-text available
(1) Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a three-component nutrition, sleep, and physical activity (PA) program on cardiorespiratory fitness, body composition, and health behaviors in overweight airline pilots. (2) Methods: A parallel group study was conducted amongst 125 airline pilots. The intervention group participated in a 16-week personalized healthy eating, sleep hygiene, and PA program. Outcome measures of objective health (maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max), body mass, skinfolds, girths, blood pressure, resting heart rate, push-ups, plank hold) and self-reported health (weekly PA, sleep quality and duration, fruit and vegetable intake, and self-rated health) were collected at baseline and post-intervention. The wait-list control completed the same assessments. (3) Results: Significant group main effects in favor of the intervention group were found for all outcome measures (p < 0.001) except for weekly walking (p = 0.163). All objective health measures significantly improved in the intervention group when compared to the control group (p < 0.001, d = 0.41–1.04). Self-report measures (moderate-to-vigorous PA, sleep quality and duration, fruit and vegetable intake, and self-rated health) significantly increased in the intervention group when compared to the control group (p < 0.001, d = 1.00–2.69). (4) Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that a personalized 16-week healthy eating, PA, and sleep hygiene intervention can elicit significant short-term improvements in physical and mental health outcomes among overweight airline pilots. Further research is required to examine whether the observed effects are maintained longitudinally.