ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Amidst growing migratory movements and hurdles of assimilation, the INTREF initiative strives to craft a comprehensive strategy for the schooling of refugee children, melding e-learning, emotional and social support, along with adaptable teaching methods. This endeavor learns on principles like linguistic diversity, cross-cultural skills, and customizing the educational journey, crucial for assimilation and triumph within academic settings. Studies indicate the indispensability of bespoke linguistic assistance, cognizance of cultural variances, and personalized educational tactics for the seamless school transition and societal assimilation of children in refuge. The project devised a survey instrument aimed at evaluating the baseline educational scenario in the participating nations and formulating education plans tailored to specific needs. This survey zeroes on four pivotal areas: linguistic proficiency, cross-cultural consciousness, embracing diversity, and pedagogical customization. Feedback from 31 students, 30 teachers and 28 parents revealed a pressing need for augmented linguistic aid in Slovenia, heightened cross-cultural understanding, and classroom method modification to enrich the academic experiences KILIC. Education of refugee children within the INTREF project framework of culturally diverse children. The findings also underscore a discernible discrepancy between the perspectives of educators versus those of parents and children. The insights from this survey lay the groundwork for creating innovative instructional units and resources, finely adapted to the needs of children in refuge. By forging links between theoretical insights and practical application, as well as among various educational stakeholders, INTREF is ready to enrich the discourse and practices surrounding inclusivity, and endeavor made increasingly pertinent by the recent global disruptions, including the migratory dilemma and the COVID-19 outbreak.
Content may be subject to copyright.
PROBLEMS
OF EDUCATION
IN THE 21st CENTURY
Vol. 82, No. 5, 2024
658
ISSN 1822-7864 (Print) ISSN 2538-7111 (Online)
This is an open access article under the
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License
EDUCATION OF REFUGEE CHILDREN
WITHIN THE INTREF PROJECT
FRAMEWORK
Maja Kerneža, Dejan Zemljak, Metka Kordigel Aberšek, Boris Aberšek
University of Maribor, Slovenia
E-mail: maja.kerneza1@um.si, dejan.zemljak1@um.si, metka.kordigel@um.si, boris.
abersek@um.si
Polona Legvart, Helena Konšak
Primary School bratov Polančičev Maribor, Slovenia
E-mail: polona.legvart@osbp.si, helena.konsak@osbp.si
Hakan Sari
Nechmettin Erbakan University, Türkiye
E-mail: hsari@erbakan.edu.tr
Ildiko Hanuliakova
Teamwork for a better Future, Slovakia
E-mail: ildiko.hanuliakova@gmail.com
Loreta Huber, Inga Laurusone
EureCons Förderagentur GmbH, Germany
E-mail: huber@eurecons.com, inga.laurusone@eurecons.com
Kübra Terzioglu
Bolu Abant Izzet BaysalUniversity, Türkiye
E-mail: mustafa611968@hotmail.com
Metin Kilic
Düzce University, Türkiye
E-mail: metinkilic@duzce.edu.tr
Abstract
Amidst growing migratory movements and hurdles of assimilation, the INTREF initiative strives to
craft a comprehensive strategy for the schooling of refugee children, melding e-learning, emotional and
social support, along with adaptable teaching methods. This endeavor learns on principles like linguistic
diversity, cross-cultural skills, and customizing the educational journey, crucial for assimilation and
triumph within academic settings. Studies indicate the indispensability of bespoke linguistic assistance,
cognizance of cultural variances, and personalized educational tactics for the seamless school transition
and societal assimilation of children in refuge. The project devised a survey instrument aimed at
evaluating the baseline educational scenario in the participating nations and formulating education
plans tailored to specic needs. This survey zeroes on four pivotal areas: linguistic prociency, cross-
cultural consciousness, embracing diversity, and pedagogical customization. Feedback from 31 students,
30 teachers and 28 parents revealed a pressing need for augmented linguistic aid in Slovenia, heightened
cross-cultural understanding, and classroom method modication to enrich the academic experiences
https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.658
PROBLEMS
OF EDUCATION
IN THE 21st CENTURY
Vol. 82, No. 5, 2024
659
ISSN 1822-7864 (Print) ISSN 2538-7111 (Online) https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.658
Maja KERNEŽA, Dejan ZEMLJAK, Metka KORDIGEL ABERŠEK, Boris ABERŠEK, Polona LEGVART, Helena KONŠAK, Hakan SARI,
Ildiko HANULIAKOVA, Loreta HUBER, Inga LAURUSONE, Kübra TERZIOGLU, Metin KILIC. Education of refugee children within the
INTREF project framework
of culturally diverse children. The ndings also underscore a discernible discrepancy between the
perspectives of educators versus those of parents and children. The insights from this survey lay the
groundwork for creating innovative instructional units and resources, nely adapted to the needs
of children in refuge. By forging links between theoretical insights and practical application, as well
as among various educational stakeholders, INTREF is ready to enrich the discourse and practices
surrounding inclusivity, and endeavor made increasingly pertinent by the recent global disruptions,
including the migratory dilemma and the COVID-19 outbreak.
Keywords: educational system, individualization of education, integration practices, intercultural
competence, refugee children
Introduction
The current global rise in refugee movements has brought attention to the urgent need
for eective integration strategies, particularly in the eld of education. Educational institutions
play a pivotal role in facilitating the smooth transition of refugee children into new communities,
laying the groundwork for their future success and well-being. Yet, the challenge of integrating
these children into existing educational systems is multifaceted, involving linguistic barriers,
cultural dierences, and the need for social acceptance and individualized learning approaches.
In the broadest context, it does not only cover the current education of children but also lifelong
learning of refugee youth and adults across various stages of their lives (Morrice, 2021). This
study builds on the work of Morrice (2021) expanding the focus to encompass the broader
educational challenges faced by refugee youth and adults. Furthermore, recent research has
emphasized the necessity of adaptive educational models that cater to the evolving needs of
refugees in host countries, such as the holistic model proposed for integrating refugee students
in various educational contexts (Cerna, 2019). Cerna’s model provides a critical framework
for understanding how educational institutions can adjust to better serve refugee populations,
which this study will further explore.
Moreover, teachers and other educational workers face challenges not only mentioned
above but also within the educational system itself when it comes to including refugee children,
necessitating adjustments in teaching practices and educational policies. Currently, the lack
of resources, professional training, standardized procedures, and accountability measures,
combined with an educational system that appears inexible or ill-adapted to refugee children,
exacerbates inequalities between refugees and domestic children by failing to meet their unique
educational needs (Mock-Munoz de Luna, 2020). This gap in the educational system’s readiness
has been further highlighted by recent studies that call for more comprehensive teacher training
and the development of intercultural competence among educators (Antonijadu et al. 2022).
These ndings underscore the importance of equipping teachers with the necessary skills to
manage diverse classrooms and support refugee students eectively (Dolan et al., 2021).
The deciency of teacher education in this area has been identied as a signicant
factor aecting the well-being and success of refugee children by other researchers as well.
Piper et al. (2020) argued that the problem is not so much access to education for refugee
children as the need for substantial investment in improving the learning outcomes of these
children. This directly relates to the role of the teacher. Papapostolou et al. (2020) stressed
the necessity for teacher education to manage diversity in the classroom. According to Mogli
(2020), teachers are not prepared to successfully approach refugee students to create conditions
for their seamless integration into the education system. This is primarily due to a lack of
skills for psychological support of students and communication diculties due to a lack of
language knowledge. Soyu et al. (2020) also emphasized the teachers’ lack of preparedness
with knowledge that would help them overcome pedagogical challenges, highlighting a lack
of knowledge about the cultural backgrounds of refugee students and the educational system’s
unpreparedness for refugee education. These studies collectively highlight the critical gaps in
PROBLEMS
OF EDUCATION
IN THE 21st CENTURY
Vol. 82, No. 5, 2024
660
ISSN 1822-7864 (Print) ISSN 2538-7111 (Online)
https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.658
Maja KERNEŽA, Dejan ZEMLJAK, Metka KORDIGEL ABERŠEK, Boris ABERŠEK, Polona LEGVART, Helena KONŠAK, Hakan SARI,
Ildiko HANULIAKOVA, Loreta HUBER, Inga LAURUSONE, Kübra TERZIOGLU, Metin KILIC. Education of refugee children within the
INTREF project framework
teacher preparedness, which this research aims to address. Amid numerous studies exploring
the eld and suggesting various solutions and practices based on social justice and inclusion,
Karsli-Calamak and Kilinc (2019) underlined the importance of dialogue about inclusive
education to envisage new ways of supporting refugee children and their teachers. Teacher’s
perspectives on the challenges of integrating refugee children emphasize the necessity for
intercultural competence and adequate resources (Antonijadu et al., 2022). Veck and Wharton
(2019) highlighted the importance of creating inclusive school cultures, aligning with Dryden-
Petterson (2022), who conrmed that refugee youth primarily need education that enables them
to connect their past with their present and future, necessitating engagement with teachers and
schools. The proposed study will explore how these inclusive cultures can be cultivated through
targeted policies and practices. The school plays a crucial role in helping refugee children nd
a sense of security and in aiding the realization of their learning potential through a supportive
and understanding educational environment (Thomas, 2016).
One of the more signicant factors aecting the success of these children in integrating
into education is also their family. The study by Zegin and Atas Akdemir (2020) on refugees
in Turkey showed that parents of refugee students often do not attend parent-teacher meetings,
do not contact teachers, and do not support their children at home with their educational
development. The inability of parents to speak the language spoken in the school environment
and their perception of their status in Turkey as temporary inuence their priority on ensuring
their children’s physiological needs over education. This highlights the critical need for support
systems that engage refugee families in the educational process, facilitating communication
and involvement to enhance their children’s educational experiences (Cranston et al., 2021).
In addition to the role of teachers and other educational stakeholders, it is also important
to examine the role that refugee families play in the educational process, as they often face
numerous challenges, including seeking stability, security, and access to basic services, which
directly impact the educational opportunities and success of their children (Yunus Mohd, 2022).
Yalcin and Simsar (2020) highlighted communication issues as factors aecting children’s
adjustment to school, including the nancial condition of families, ocial procedures, and
prejudices, indicating a complex web of factors that need to be addressed to support refugee
children eectively in education (Cerna, 2019).
The integration of refugee children in education also involves understanding their
perspectives and experiences, which is crucial for developing eective educational strategies.
For example, Guo et al. (2019) found that Syrian refugee children in Canada struggle with
making friends and face bullying and racism, aecting their sense of belonging. Similarly,
Korntheuer and Damm (2020) highlighted the varying educational policies and their impact
on refugee students in dierent German states, suggesting the need for consistent and inclusive
policies. Additionally, teachers’ perspectives on the challenges of integrating refugee children
emphasize the necessity for intercultural competence and adequate resources (Antonijadu et
al. 2022). Further, the involvement of social work in schools can signicantly support the
integration process by addressing the psychosocial needs of refugee children (Snoubar &
Duman, 2017). Dolan et al. (2021) found that social-emotional learning programs can improve
refugee children’s perceptions of school and academic skills. Moreover, understanding the role
of literacy education and the challenges faced by refugee children in learning a new language is
crucial for their academic success (Woord & Tibi, 2018).
Research Problem
The integration of refugee children into educational systems goes beyond the mere
provision of conventional academic knowledge. It requires a broad spectrum of needs, including
linguistic prociency, psychosocial well-being, and the ability to navigate and contribute to a
PROBLEMS
OF EDUCATION
IN THE 21st CENTURY
Vol. 82, No. 5, 2024
661
ISSN 1822-7864 (Print) ISSN 2538-7111 (Online) https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.658
Maja KERNEŽA, Dejan ZEMLJAK, Metka KORDIGEL ABERŠEK, Boris ABERŠEK, Polona LEGVART, Helena KONŠAK, Hakan SARI,
Ildiko HANULIAKOVA, Loreta HUBER, Inga LAURUSONE, Kübra TERZIOGLU, Metin KILIC. Education of refugee children within the
INTREF project framework
multicultural environment. Previous studies (e.g. Celik et al. 2021; Hong & Cai, 2023; Koehler
& Schneider, 2019) have underscored the multifaceted nature of these challenges, highlighting
the gap between the existing educational paradigms and the requisites of eective integration
(Cerna, 2019). Despite the growing recognition of these needs, there remains a lack of holistic
and empirically driven strategies that address the educational requirements of refugee children
in a comprehensive manner (Antonijadu et al, 2022). Thus, the central problem of this research
is the ongoing gap between the educational needs of refugee children and the current practices
in educational systems. This research seeks to address this gap by identifying and developing
integrative educational methodologies that not only facilitate academic learning but also
promote social inclusion and emotional resilience among refugee children. Specically, the
study aims to provide an evidence-based framework that responds to these multifaceted needs
within the Slovenian educational context.
Research Focus
Building upon the identied gaps and challenges, this study focuses on exploring and
analyzing the current state of refugee children’s education in Slovenia as part of the INTREF
project, whose main objective is to devise and validate an educational framework that
combines digital learning tools, psychosocial support and exible pedagogies in the Slovenian
educational landscape. This framework emphasizes multilingualism, intercultural competence,
and personalized learning pathways, which are crucial for creating an inclusive and supportive
educational environment in Slovenia. Based on the responses to questionnaires from teachers,
parents, and children, this study oers an insight into four key research areas: language
prociency, interculturality, acceptance, and individualized teaching approaches. The focus of
this study centered on the diering perspectives towards refugee children’s education held by
teachers on one side, and by parents and children on the other.
To explore these areas comprehensively, four research questions were formulated:
R1: How does the provision of additional language support both within and outside the
school environment inuence the language acquisition process of refugee children
from the perspective of teachers, and from the perspective of parents and children?
R2: To what extent do educational practices and the school environment reect and
respect the cultural background of refugee children from the perspective of teachers,
and from the perspective of parents and children?
R3: How do refugee children perceive their social integration within the school
community, and what are the views of teachers, and the views of parents and children,
regarding the inclusion and acceptance of these children?
RQ4: What is the attitude of teachers, and the attitude of parents and children towards
the individualization of academic expectations and standards for refugee children?
Research Methodology
General Background
In Slovenia, the integration of refugee children into the education system is underpinned
by comprehensive legal and policy frameworks designed to ensure equal access to education for
all. Primary education, compulsory and free of charge, lasts for nine years and accommodates
children from a wide array of backgrounds, including EU citizens, Slovenians without Slovenian
citizenship, and those with international protection, under conditions mirroring those for
Slovenian citizens. Specic provisions within the Primary School Act facilitate the inclusion
of refugee students by organizing Slovenian language and culture classes, granting the right
PROBLEMS
OF EDUCATION
IN THE 21st CENTURY
Vol. 82, No. 5, 2024
662
ISSN 1822-7864 (Print) ISSN 2538-7111 (Online)
https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.658
Maja KERNEŽA, Dejan ZEMLJAK, Metka KORDIGEL ABERŠEK, Boris ABERŠEK, Polona LEGVART, Helena KONŠAK, Hakan SARI,
Ildiko HANULIAKOVA, Loreta HUBER, Inga LAURUSONE, Kübra TERZIOGLU, Metin KILIC. Education of refugee children within the
INTREF project framework
to compulsory primary education on equal terms, and allowing for adjusted assessments and
promotion criteria to cater to their unique educational needs. This approach is complemented by
the availability of resources such as the website infotujci.si, which oers essential information
for foreigners seeking integration into Slovenian society, supported by translation services to
bridge language barriers eectively.
The study is focused on a comparative analysis of perceptions on language, interculturality,
acceptance, and individualization among teachers, students, and parents. This analysis examines
how these key aspects of educational integration are perceived dierently by each group within
the participating countries. The research aims to provide insights into the eectiveness of
current policies and practices in meeting the diverse needs of refugee children.
The research was conducted over a two-month period, from September to October 2023.
During this time, data was collected through surveys, interviews, and focus groups involving
teachers, students, and parents across various regions in Germany, Slovakia, Slovenia and
Turkey.
Sample
The sample of this study was selected through a convenience sampling method,
encompassing a total of 322 participants from primary schools in Germany (75 participants of
which 30 students, 30 teachers, and 15 parents), Slovakia (89 participants of which 31 students,
30 teachers, and 28 parents), Slovenia (78 participants of which 31 students, 30 teachers, and 17
parents) and Turkey (80 participants of which 30 students, 30 teachers, and 20 parents), in line
with the project’s objectives. The utilization of a convenience sample allowed for the collection
of data within a specic educational context, providing valuable insights into the experiences
and perceptions of students, teachers, and parents regarding the integration of refugee children
into the educational system. The convenience sample was particularly suitable for this study
due to the exploratory nature of the research, where the primary goal was to gain initial insights
into key issues within a dened context.
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and in
accordance with the research standards and ethics of Institute of Contemporary Technology,
Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Maribor (FNM ICT) and approved
by the Ethical commission for studies involving humans (October, 2023).
Instrument and Procedures
To explore the formulated research domains language, prociency, interculturality,
acceptance, and individualized teaching approaches, three distinct questionnaires were
developed, each tailored to one of the participant groups: teachers, parents, and students.
These instruments were designed to capture a comprehensive understanding of the educational
experiences and integration processes of refugee students from the perspectives of key
stakeholders within the school environment.
The questionnaires one for each group encompassed items specically aimed at
elucidating the support systems in place for language acquisition, the extent of intercultural
integration and awareness within the school community, the level of acceptance, and inclusion
experienced by refugee students, and the individualization of teaching practices to meet the
diverse needs of students by covering key topics such as language support, the use of digital
tools for communication, respect for authority, cultural integration, inclusivity in school meals,
feelings of belonging, peer relationships, and the adaptation of academic standards to individual
needs, the instruments were able to capture the multifaceted nature of the educational integration
process from various perspectives.
PROBLEMS
OF EDUCATION
IN THE 21st CENTURY
Vol. 82, No. 5, 2024
663
ISSN 1822-7864 (Print) ISSN 2538-7111 (Online) https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.658
Maja KERNEŽA, Dejan ZEMLJAK, Metka KORDIGEL ABERŠEK, Boris ABERŠEK, Polona LEGVART, Helena KONŠAK, Hakan SARI,
Ildiko HANULIAKOVA, Loreta HUBER, Inga LAURUSONE, Kübra TERZIOGLU, Metin KILIC. Education of refugee children within the
INTREF project framework
The questionnaires were administered in the fall of 2023, ensuring that responses
reected the current educational climate and integration experiences. To accommodate the
diverse linguistic backgrounds of the student participants, the student questionnaires were
translated into multiple languages which ensured a higher degree of comprehension and
independent completion. This multilingual approach was essential for ensuring the inclusivity
and accessibility of the research process, enabling all participants to engage meaningfully and
provide insights into their experiences and perceptions regarding the integration of refugee
students into the educational system.
The study adhered to standardized procedures to ensure the reliability and validity of
the data collected through the questionnaires. The questionnaires for teachers, parents, and
students were meticulously designed to ensure consistency in how questions were posed,
minimizing variations in understanding and interpretation, thus enhancing the reliability of
the responses. Additionally, a thorough content review by a panel of experts in education and
refugee studies further strengthened reliability. These experts assessed the relevance and clarity
of each question, ensuring that the instruments accurately captured the constructs of interest.
Feedback from this review led to the renement of several questions to eliminate potential
sources of misunderstanding, thereby increasing the reliability of the responses.
Before the ocial distribution, the questionnaires underwent pilot testing with 2
participants from each participant category (teachers, parents, and students). This preliminary
testing phase allowed for the identication and correction of ambiguities or biases in the
questions. Adjustments were made based on the pilot feedback, ensuring that the nal version
of the questionnaire was clear and consistently understood by all respondents. The study
employed established theoretical frameworks related to language acquisition, interculturality,
social integration, and individualized teaching as the foundation for questionnaire design. This
alignment with recognized constructs supported the validity of the instruments in measuring
the intended variables. By collecting and comparing data from teachers, parents, and students,
the study employed a form of data triangulation to enhance validity. This comparative analysis
helped to corroborate ndings across dierent viewpoints, adding depth and validity to the
conclusions drawn.
Following the validation process, the questionnaires were distributed to the respective
participant groups. The administration of these questionnaires was carried out within the school
setting, under conditions that facilitated focus and minimized distractions, thereby maximizing
the accuracy of the students’ responses. Teachers received their questionnaires with instructions
that emphasized the signicance of their insights for improving educational strategies and
integration practices. The completion of these questionnaires was facilitated by providing
sucient time and resources, ensuring that teachers could provide thoughtful and reective
responses. Parents were also encouraged to complete their questionnaires, with the option to
use translation services or assistance as necessary to overcome any language barriers. This
approach was critical to ensuring that all parents, regardless of their prociency in the school’s
primary language, could contribute their perspectives and experiences.
Data Analysis
Once collected, the responses were anonymized to maintain the condentiality of all
participants. The data were then systematically coded and entered into a database for analysis.
The analysis was performed in IBM SPSS Statistics 29 and was guided by the research questions,
with a focus on identifying patterns, discrepancies, and insights that would inform the study’s
conclusions and recommendations.
The data analysis phase involved employing descriptive statistics to compare mean
and standard deviation across responses from three groups: teachers, students, and parents.
PROBLEMS
OF EDUCATION
IN THE 21st CENTURY
Vol. 82, No. 5, 2024
664
ISSN 1822-7864 (Print) ISSN 2538-7111 (Online)
https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.658
Maja KERNEŽA, Dejan ZEMLJAK, Metka KORDIGEL ABERŠEK, Boris ABERŠEK, Polona LEGVART, Helena KONŠAK, Hakan SARI,
Ildiko HANULIAKOVA, Loreta HUBER, Inga LAURUSONE, Kübra TERZIOGLU, Metin KILIC. Education of refugee children within the
INTREF project framework
This comparison focused on four thematic areas: language, interculturality, acceptance, and
individualization. The objective was to uncover patterns, similarities, and dierences in
perceptions and experiences regarding the integration of refugee students into the educational
system. The questionnaire was quantied using a Likert scale from 1 (totally disagree) to 5
(totally disagree), allowing for a detailed assessment of attitudes and experiences across the
spectrum of participants. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was employed to determine statistically
signicant dierences between groups’ mean scores to verify whether the dierences observed
in perceptions and experiences among teachers, students, and parents were not merely random
variations but reected statistically signicant trends.
Throughout the study, ethical considerations were paramount. Informed consent was
obtained from all participants, and the research was conducted in accordance with ethical
standards that safeguard the rights, privacy, and well-being of all involved. This rigorous
adherence to standardized procedures and ethical guidelines ensured the integrity of the research
process and the credibility of the ndings.
Research Results
The analysis of the provided data revealed signicant insights into the perceptions
of teachers, students, and parents regarding language, interculturality, acceptance, and
individualization within the educational context of refugee children. The comparative analysis
is represented in Table 1.
Table 1
Comparative Analysis of Perceptions on Language, Interculturality, Acceptance, and
Individualization Among Teachers, Students, and Parents
Category Teacher Student Parent ANOVA
M SD M SD M SD
Language
Access to additional language support 1.98 1.384 3.52 1.198 3.23 1.615 F(2, 318) = 40.831, p = .001
Utilization of digital tools for
communication 2.98 1.230 3.07 1.545 3.28 1.475 F(2, 318) = 1.030, p = .358
Interculturality
Respect for authority and teacher
guidance 3.95 .998 4.02 .944 4.19 .943 F(2, 318) = 1.477, p = .230
Valuation of educational knowledge 3.76 .961 3.89 1.124 4.56 .884 F(2, 318) = 16.570, p = .001
Cultural integration and classroom
awareness 3.45 1.028 2.72 1.273 3.44 1.041 F(2, 318) = 15.571, p = .001
Inclusivity and cultural respect in school
meals 3.34 1.247 2.84 1.354 3.65 1.244 F(2, 318) = 10.173, p = .001
Acceptance
Feeling of belonging and school
enjoyment 3.58 .967 3.93 1.010 4.19 .956 F(2, 318) = 9.510, p = .001
Inclusion in peer activities 3.68 .830 3.09 1.354 3.46 1.440 F(2, 318) = 7.337, p = .001
Friendships across cultural backgrounds 3.80 .904 3.40 1.222 3.46 1.368 F(2, 318) = 3.960, p = .020
Peer support during challenges 3.78 .884 3.57 1.175 3.76 1.295 F(2, 318) = 1.226, p = .295
Individualization
Academic expectations and standards 3.86 .955 2.38 1.273 3.34 1.501 F(2, 318) = 44.489, p = .001
Monitoring and acknowledgment of
progress 3.80 1.149 3.02 1.411 3.46 1.302 F(2, 318) = 10.910, p = .001
Consideration of adjusted academic
standards 2.91 1.167 3.26 1.301 3.30 1.409 F(2, 318) = 3.083, p = .047
Class placement based on ability 3.73 1.069 - - 2.81 1.527 F(1, 198) = 24.721, p = .001
PROBLEMS
OF EDUCATION
IN THE 21st CENTURY
Vol. 82, No. 5, 2024
665
ISSN 1822-7864 (Print) ISSN 2538-7111 (Online) https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.658
Maja KERNEŽA, Dejan ZEMLJAK, Metka KORDIGEL ABERŠEK, Boris ABERŠEK, Polona LEGVART, Helena KONŠAK, Hakan SARI,
Ildiko HANULIAKOVA, Loreta HUBER, Inga LAURUSONE, Kübra TERZIOGLU, Metin KILIC. Education of refugee children within the
INTREF project framework
As shown in Table,1, signicant dierences are observed in the rst category of
language domain. Specically, students perceived a signicantly higher level of additional
language support (M = 3.52, SD = 1.198) compared to teachers (M = 1.98, SD = 1.384) and
parents (M = 3.23, SD = 1.615), with a clear statistical signicance (F(2,318) = 4.831, p = .001).
This indicates that students were generally satised with the language support they received,
whereas parents and particularly teachers saw room for improvement in this area. Conversely,
in the category of using digital tools for communication, the dierences across groups were
minor and not statistically signicant (F(2, 318) = 1.030, p = .358), suggesting a relatively
uniform perception across the groups.
Table 1 also highlights statistically signicant dierences in most categories within the
interculturality domain. For instance, respect for authority and teacher leadership was rated
higher by parents (M = 4.19, SD = .943) and students (M = 4.02, SD = .944) than by teachers
(M = 3.95, SD = .998), although this dierence was not statistically signicant (F(2, 318)
= 1.477, p = .230), implying dierent experiences of the teacher's role between the groups.
In contrast, the value placed on educational knowledge showed a signicant disparity, with
parents (M = 4.56, SD = .884) rating it much higher than teachers (M = 3.76, SD = .961)
and students (M = 3.89, SD = 1.124), with a signicant statistical dierence (F(2, 318) =
16.570, p = .001). Additionally, signicant dierences were observed in perceptions of cultural
integration and classroom awareness, where students reported a lower average (M = 2.72, SD
= 1.273) compared to parents (M = 3.44, SD = 1.041) and teachers (M = 3.45, SD = 1.028),
as shown by a signicant F value (F(2, 318) = 15.571, p = .001). Lastly, in the category of
inclusivity and cultural respect in school meals, parents perceive the highest level (M = 3.65,
SD = 1.244), followed by teachers (M = 3.34, SD = 1.247) and students (M = 2.84, SD = 1.354),
with statistically signicant dierences (F(2, 318) = 10.173, p = .001), suggesting that parents
particularly valued the school’s eorts in this area.
In the domain of acceptance, as outlined in Table 1, there are signicant insights into
how students feel within the school environment. Parents (M = 4.19, SD = .956) and students
(M = 3.93, SD = 1.010) reported a higher sense of belonging and enjoyment at school compared
to teachers (M = 3.58, SD = .967), with a statistically signicant dierence (F(2, 318) = 9.510,
p = .001). This nding suggests that students and their parents viewed the school environment
more positively than teachers did. Furthermore, students felt less included in peer activities (M
= 3.09, SD = 1.354) than perceived by their parents (M = 3.46, SD = 1.440) and teachers (M =
3.68, SD = .830), with signicant dierences (F(2, 318) = 7.337, p = .001), indicating a potential
area for improvement in fostering student inclusivity. Regarding friendships across cultural
backgrounds, parents again reported higher average values (M = 3.46, SD = 1.368) compared to
teachers (M = 3.80, SD = .904) and students (M = 3.40, SD = 1.222), with signicant dierences
(F(2, 318) = 3.960, p = .020). In contrast, peer support during challenges showed no statistically
signicant dierences across the groups (F(2, 318) = 1.226, p = .295), indicating consensus on
this aspect.
Finally, in individualization, particularly regarding the adjustment and recognition
of progress, Table 1 shows statistically signicant dierences in academic expectations and
standards. Parents (M = 3.34, SD = 1.501) had the highest expectations for their children to
meet the same standards as domestic students, while students strongly disagreed with the
statement that teachers demanded too much from them (M = 2.38, SD = 1.273), with signicant
dierences (F(2, 318) = 44.489, p = .001). This suggests discrepancies in perceptions of teacher
demands between the groups. Additionally, teachers moderately agree that refugee children
had enough time for their progress to be monitored (M = 3.80, SD = 1.149), while students
and parents had slightly dierent views, with parents agreeing that the monitoring period was
sucient (M = 3.46, SD = 1.302), and students showing moderate agreement (M = 3.02, SD =
1.411). These dierences are statistically signicant (F(2, 318) = 10.910, p = .001). Regarding
PROBLEMS
OF EDUCATION
IN THE 21st CENTURY
Vol. 82, No. 5, 2024
666
ISSN 1822-7864 (Print) ISSN 2538-7111 (Online)
https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.658
Maja KERNEŽA, Dejan ZEMLJAK, Metka KORDIGEL ABERŠEK, Boris ABERŠEK, Polona LEGVART, Helena KONŠAK, Hakan SARI,
Ildiko HANULIAKOVA, Loreta HUBER, Inga LAURUSONE, Kübra TERZIOGLU, Metin KILIC. Education of refugee children within the
INTREF project framework
the consideration of adjusted academic standards, students reported a greater extent that
teachers did not require them to know as much as domestic students (M = 3.26, SD = 1.301),
while teachers disagreed with the necessity of adjusting standards (M = 2.91, SD = 1.167),
with statistically signicant dierences (F(2, 318) = 3.083, p = .047). Lastly, on the question
of student placement in class based on abilities, signicant dierences are present between
teachers and parents (F(1, 198) = 24.721, p = .001), with parents being more supportive of
placement based on abilities (M = 4.14, SD = 1.098) compared to teachers (M = 2.81, SD =
1.527).
Discussion
The exploration of the educational integration of refugee children in Germany, Slovakia,
Slovenia and Turkey has yielded signicant insights, which are essential for shaping future
educational policies and practices. The main ndings from this study underscore the existence
of substantial discrepancies between the perceptions of teachers, parents, and students across
key areas including language support, interculturality, acceptance and individualized education.
Notably, the discrepancy in perceptions of language support among stakeholders aligns with
Zegin and Atas Akdemir (2020), emphasizing the need for enhanced parental engagement and
addressing language barriers to improve support for refugee students. Similar challenges have
been noted in the integration of Ukrainian refugee children in Germany, where language barriers
and the lack of culturally sensitive support systems have been highlighted as key obstacles
(Fert, 2023).
For the rst research question regarding the impact of additional language support, it was
evident that students perceive a signicantly higher level of support than what is recognized by
teachers and parents, as shown by the statistically signicant dierences in perceptions. This
disconnect underscores the need for a reassessment of language assistance programs, to ensure
they are meeting the needs of all stakeholders. The minor dierences observed in the use of
digital tools for communication, which were not statistically signicant, suggest that these tools
are uniformly perceived across groups, indicating a potential area for standardization in digital
communication strategies. This is consistent with ndings from the “Lend a Hand” project,
which emphasized the importance of standardized approaches in the use of digital tools for
enhancing the social inclusion of refugee students (Almeida et al., 2019).
The exploration of interculturality within the school environment, as posed in the second
question, revealed that parents highly value eorts towards cultural integration, as evidenced
by the signicant dierences in their perceptions compared to those of teachers and students.
This nding suggests that initiatives fostering an inclusive culture are well-received by families
but may not be as visible or valued by teachers and students. This resonates with the emphasis
on creating inclusive school cultures highlighted by Veck and Wharton (2019), indicating the
importance of making intercultural eorts more apparent and appreciated across all groups.
Furthermore, research in Sweden, Germany, Greece, Lebanon, and Turkey has shown that
inclusive educational environments, which involve close collaboration among children,
educators, and communities, are crucial for the successful integration of refugee children (Crul
et al., 2019).
The study’s ndings on acceptance and social integration reect the necessity of policies
that connect students’ pasts, presents, and futures, as advocated by Dryden-Peterson (2022). The
discrepancies between the positive perceptions of parents and students versus the more critical
viewpoint of teachers, particularly in areas of social inclusion and friendships across cultural
backgrounds, suggest the potential area for development in enhancing the inclusivity and
acceptance within the school community. This indicates a need for more targeted interventions
that can bridge the gap between diering perceptions and foster a more cohesive and supportive
PROBLEMS
OF EDUCATION
IN THE 21st CENTURY
Vol. 82, No. 5, 2024
667
ISSN 1822-7864 (Print) ISSN 2538-7111 (Online) https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.658
Maja KERNEŽA, Dejan ZEMLJAK, Metka KORDIGEL ABERŠEK, Boris ABERŠEK, Polona LEGVART, Helena KONŠAK, Hakan SARI,
Ildiko HANULIAKOVA, Loreta HUBER, Inga LAURUSONE, Kübra TERZIOGLU, Metin KILIC. Education of refugee children within the
INTREF project framework
school environment. A comparative policy analysis in Germany also underscores the need for
context-sensitive policies that address the specic integration challenges faced by refugee
students in dierent regions (Korntheuer & Damm, 2020).
Lastly, the study explored the individualized education approaches for refugee children
that revealed divergent views on the adjustment of academic expectations and standards. The
signicant dierences in perceptions between teachers and parents, particularly regarding the
placement of students based on abilities, point to a critical need for dialogue between educators
and families. This dialogue is essential to ensure that educational practices are both equitable and
tailored to meet diverse learning needs. The ndings emphasize the importance of personalized
education plans that consider the unique backgrounds and experiences of refugee children,
aiming to foster a sense of belonging and support their overall well-being. The importance
of such individualized approaches is further supported by ndings that highlight the role of
vocational education and training in supporting the integration of young refugees, particularly
in overcoming language and cultural barriers (Jorgensen et al. 2021).
The study's main ndings reveal several key areas of discrepancy in the perceptions
of teachers, parents, and students regarding the educational integration of refugee children.
These discrepancies are particularly evident in the areas of language support, interculturality,
acceptance, and individualized education. For example, while students generally perceive a
higher level of language support, teachers and parents recognize signicant gaps, indicating
a need for more consistent and eective language programs. This nding aligns with Zegin
and Atas Akdemir's (2020) observations about the critical gap in parental involvement due to
language barriers, suggesting that language support must be expanded not only for students but
also for their families to ensure comprehensive integration. Furthermore, the study highlights
diering views on interculturality, with parents placing a higher value on cultural integration
eorts than teachers and students. This discrepancy suggests that while schools may implement
intercultural initiatives, these eorts are not suciently visible or impactful from the perspective
of all stakeholders. This echoes Veck and Wharton’s (2019) insights on the importance of
creating inclusive school cultures, where intercultural eorts are recognized and appreciated by
the entire school community. The ndings suggest that schools need to enhance the visibility and
eectiveness of their intercultural programs to foster a more inclusive environment. The study
also identies a gap in acceptance and social integration, with parents and students generally
holding more positive views than teachers, particularly regarding social inclusion and cross-
cultural friendships. This gap highlights the potential for targeted interventions to improve
teachers' perceptions and practices around inclusion, thereby bridging the divide between these
diering viewpoints. As Dryden-Peterson (2022) emphasizes, policies that connect students'
pasts, presents, and futures are essential for fostering meaningful social integration, indicating
that schools need to adopt more contextually sensitive approaches to inclusion that consider the
unique experiences of refugee students.
In terms of individualized education, the study uncovers signicant dierences in
how academic expectations and standards are perceived by teachers and parents, particularly
regarding student placement based on abilities. This nding underscores the need for open
dialogue between educators and families to ensure that educational practices are equitable and
tailored to the diverse needs of refugee children. The necessity of such individualized approaches
is supported by Karsli-Calamak and Kilinc (2019), who argue that diverse educational needs and
backgrounds must be considered in curriculum design and policymaking. The study contributes
to this ongoing discussion by emphasizing the importance of personalized education plans that
are responsive to the unique challenges faced by refugee students.
The ndings collectively underscore the need for enhanced communication and
collaboration between teachers, parents, and students to address the identied discrepancies.
Implementing comprehensive support systems that address not only academic but also social
PROBLEMS
OF EDUCATION
IN THE 21st CENTURY
Vol. 82, No. 5, 2024
668
ISSN 1822-7864 (Print) ISSN 2538-7111 (Online)
https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.658
Maja KERNEŽA, Dejan ZEMLJAK, Metka KORDIGEL ABERŠEK, Boris ABERŠEK, Polona LEGVART, Helena KONŠAK, Hakan SARI,
Ildiko HANULIAKOVA, Loreta HUBER, Inga LAURUSONE, Kübra TERZIOGLU, Metin KILIC. Education of refugee children within the
INTREF project framework
and emotional needs is imperative. The study highlights the critical role of personalized
education plans that take into consideration the unique backgrounds and experiences of refugee
children, aiming to foster a sense of belonging and support their overall well-being.
While this study has provided valuable insights into the educational integration of
refugee children, several limitations should be acknowledged. First, the reliance on self-
reported data introduces the possibility of response bias, as participants may have interpreted
questions dierently or provided socially desirable answers. Second, the study was conducted
within a specic geographic region, which may limit the generalizability of the ndings to other
contexts. Additionally, the cross-sectional design of the study captures perceptions at a single
point in time, which does not account for how these perceptions might change over time with
ongoing integration eorts. Finally, the study's focus on the perspectives of teachers, parents,
and students, while comprehensive, does not include the views of other important stakeholders
such as policymakers, school administrators, or community organizations. Future research
should address these limitations by employing longitudinal designs, expanding the geographic
scope, and including a broader range of stakeholders to provide a more nuanced understanding
of the integration process.
This research highlights the complex interplay between language support, interculturality,
acceptance and individualization in the educational integration of refugee children. It calls for a
collaborative eort among teachers, parents, and students to develop and implement strategies
that not only address academic needs but also support the holistic development and well-being
of refugee children in their new educational environments. The ndings serve as a foundation
for future research aimed at optimizing educational practices for refugee children and ensuring
their successful integration into society.
Conclusions and Implications
The essence of this study transcends the mere collation and analysis of responses regarding
the educational integration of refugee children in Germany, Slovakia, Slovenia and Turkey.
It reveals a disparity in perceptions among teachers, parents, and students, that underscores
a broader, systemic challenge. This challenge is not only about linguistic support or cultural
integration but also about the fundamental recognition and fulllment of refugee children's
unique educational needs and their right to an inclusive, respectful learning environment.
By illuminating these disparities, the study not only conrms the necessity of a multifaceted
approach to refugee education but also contributes to a deeper understanding of the intricate
dynamics at play within educational systems facing the task of integration.
The ndings advocate for a paradigm shift towards more personalized, culturally
sensitive educational practices that not only address language acquisition but also foster a sense
of belonging and acceptance among refugee children. This study has successfully highlighted
the critical gaps and has laid the groundwork for future endeavors in crafting educational
strategies that are as diverse as the populations they aim to serve.
There is a clear imperative for ongoing research and action that further explores the
eectiveness of integrated educational frameworks. This includes examining the long-term
outcomes of such approaches on students' academic achievements, social integration, and overall
well-being. While this study oers a signicant contribution to the eld, it also underscores the
complexity of educational integration eorts and the need for continued dialogue, innovation,
and commitment from all stakeholders involved. As we move forward, it is essential to keep in
mind that the ultimate goal is not merely to accommodate refugee children within our schools
but to empower them to thrive within their new communities. The path forward should be
paved with strategies that are informed by empathy, evidence, and a steadfast commitment to
inclusivity and equity.
PROBLEMS
OF EDUCATION
IN THE 21st CENTURY
Vol. 82, No. 5, 2024
669
ISSN 1822-7864 (Print) ISSN 2538-7111 (Online) https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.658
Maja KERNEŽA, Dejan ZEMLJAK, Metka KORDIGEL ABERŠEK, Boris ABERŠEK, Polona LEGVART, Helena KONŠAK, Hakan SARI,
Ildiko HANULIAKOVA, Loreta HUBER, Inga LAURUSONE, Kübra TERZIOGLU, Metin KILIC. Education of refugee children within the
INTREF project framework
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their appreciation to the research program P5-0433,
Digital Restructuring of Decit Occupations for Society 5.0 (Industry 4.0), nanced by the
Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS), and to the project Integration of Refugee Children Toward
Sociocultural Harmony, project number 2022-1-TR01-KA220-SCH-000087388, nanced
under the Erasmus+ program. This support has signicantly aided in the advancement of our
study and has been instrumental in achieving the research objectives.
Declaration of Interest
The authors declare no competing interest.
References
Antoniadou, E., Palaiologou, N., & Karanikola, Z. (2023). Teaching refugee children: Challenges teachers
face. Nastava I Vaspitanje, 71(3), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.5937/nasvas2203311a
Celik, S., Kardas, Isler, N., & Saka, D. (2021). Refugee education in Turkey: Barriers and suggested solutions.
Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 31(4), 687–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1947878
Cerna, L. (2019). Refugee education: Integration models and practices in OECD countries. OECD
working paper no. 203. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a3251a00-en
Cranston, J., Labman, S., & Crook, S. (2021). Reframing parental involvement as social
engagement: A study of recently arrived Arabic-speaking refugee parents’ understanding of
involvement in their children’s education. Canadian Journal of Education, 44(2), 371–404.
https://doi.org/10.53967/cje-rce.v44i2.4439
Crul, M., Lelie, F., Biner, O., Bunar, N., Keskiner, E., Kokkali, I., Schneider, J., & Shuayb, M. (2019).
How the dierent policies and school systems aect the inclusion of Syrian refugee children
in Sweden, Germany, Greece, Lebanon and Turkey. Comparative Migration Studies, 7(10).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0110-6
Dolan, C. T., Kim, H. Y., Brown, L., Gjicali, K., Borsani, S., El Houchaimi, S., & Aber, L. (2021).
Supporting Syrian refugee children’s academic and social-emotional learning in national education
systems: A cluster randomized controlled trial of nonformal remedial support and mindfulness
programs in Lebanon. American Educational Research Journal, 59(2), Article 000283122110629.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312211062911
Dryden-Peterson, S. (2022). How refugee teachers and students are changing the future of education.
Harvard University Press.
Ferreira de Almeida, A. C., Ribeiro, C., Couceiro-Figueira, A. P., Di Fabio, A., Er, E., Palazzeschi, L.,
Sahin, F., & Yenel, K. (2019). Building a better world for all children: Toolkit for social inclusion
of migrant or refugee students in schools output of the international project “Lend a Hand”.
EDULEARN19 Proceedings: 11th International Conference on Education and New Learning
Technologies (pp. 10339–10346). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.2597
Fert, O. (2023). Inclusion of Ukrainian children with special needs in Germany. Visnyk of the Lviv
University. Series Pedagogics, 38, 273–279. https://doi.org/10.30970/vpe.2023.38.11870
Guo, Y., Maitra, S., & Guo, S. (2019). “I belong to nowhere”: Syrian refugee children’s
perspectives on school integration. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Education, 14(1),
89–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.20355/jcie29362
Hong, H., & Cai, Q. (2023). Evidence-based educational practices for working with
refugee children. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 37(3), 405–422.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2023.2211127
Jorgensen, C. H., Hautz, H., & Li, J. (2021). The role of vocational education and training in the
integration of refugees in Austria, Denmark and Germany. International Journal of Research in
Vocational Education and Training, 8(3). 276–299. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.8.3.2
Karsli-Calamak, E., & Kilinc, S. (2019). Becoming the teacher of a refugee child: Teachers’
evolving experiences in Turkey. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(2), 259–
282. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1707307
PROBLEMS
OF EDUCATION
IN THE 21st CENTURY
Vol. 82, No. 5, 2024
670
ISSN 1822-7864 (Print) ISSN 2538-7111 (Online)
https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.658
Maja KERNEŽA, Dejan ZEMLJAK, Metka KORDIGEL ABERŠEK, Boris ABERŠEK, Polona LEGVART, Helena KONŠAK, Hakan SARI,
Ildiko HANULIAKOVA, Loreta HUBER, Inga LAURUSONE, Kübra TERZIOGLU, Metin KILIC. Education of refugee children within the
INTREF project framework
Koehler, C., & Schneider, J. (2019). Young refugees in education: the particular
challenges of school systems in Europe. Comparative Migration Studies, 7, Article
28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-019-0129-3
Korntheuer, A., & Damm, A. C. (2020). What shapes the integration trajectory of refugee students? A
comparative policy analysis in two German states. Refugee: Canada’s Journal of Refugees, 36(2),
31–44. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.40719
Mock-Munoz de Luna, C., Granberg, A., Kransik, A., Vitus, K. (2020). Towards more equitable education:
meeting health and wellbeing needs of newly arrived migrant and refugee children – perspectives
from educators in Denmark and Sweden. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health
and Well-being, 15, Article 1773207. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1773207
Mogli, M., Kalbeni, S., & Stergiou, L. (2020). ‘‘The teacher is not a magician’’: Teacher training in Greek
reception facilities for refugee education. International e-Journal of Educational Studies, 4(7),
42–55. https://doi.org/10.31458/iejes.605255
Morrice, L. (2021). The promise of refugee lifelong education: A critical review of the eld. International
Review of Education, 67, 851–869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-021-09927-5
Papapostolou, A., Manoli, P., & Mouti, A. (2020). Challenges and needs in the context of formal language
education to refugee children and adolescents in Greece. Journal of Teacher Education and
Educators, 9(1), 7–22.
Piper, B., Dryden-Peterson, S., Chopra, V., Reddick, D., & Oyanga, A. (2020). Are refugee children
learning? Early grade literacy in a refugee camp in Kenya. Journal of Education in Emergencies,
5(2), 71–107. https://doi.org/10.33682/f1wr-yk6y
Snoubar, Y., & Duman, N. (2014). Role of social work in integrating refugee and immigrant children
into schools. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 10(2), 334–344.
http://dx.doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v10i2.p294-294
Soyu, A., Kaysili, A., & Sever, M. (2020). Refugee children and adaptation to school: An analysis through
cultural responsivities of the teachers. Egitim Ve Bilim-Education and Science, 201, 313–334.
http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.8274
Thomas, R. L. (2016). The right to quality education for refugee children through social inclusion. Journal
of Human Rights and Social Work, 1, 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-016-0022-z
Veck, W., & Wharton, J. (2019). Refugee children, trust and inclusive school cultures. International
Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(2), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1707304
Woord, M. C., & Tibi, S. (2017). A human right to literacy education: Implications for serving
Syrian refugee children. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20(1), 182–
190. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2017.1397746
Yalcin, V., & Simsar, A. (2020). Adjustment of Syrian refugee children into pre-school education in
Turkey. Ilkogretim Online – Elementary Education Online, 19(3), 1214–1224.
Yunus Mohd, R. (2023). Educational integration of refugee children in Malaysia: A scoping review.
Journal of Education in Muslim Societies, 4(2), 4–27. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/iupjournals/
index.php/jems/article/view/4928
Zegin, M., & Atas Akdemir, O. (2020). Teachers’ views on parent involvement in refugee
children’s education. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 8(15), 75–85.
https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.649547
Received: July 11, 2024 Revised: July 30, 2024 Accepted: September 08, 2024
Cite as: Kerneža, M., Zemljak, D., Kordigel Aberšek, M., Aberšek, B., Legvart, P., Konšak,
H., Sari, H., Hanuliakova, I., Huber, L., Laurusone, I., Terzioglu, K., & Kilic, M. (2024).
Education of refugee children within the INTREF project framework. Problems of Education
in the 21st Century, 82(5), 658–671. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.658
PROBLEMS
OF EDUCATION
IN THE 21st CENTURY
Vol. 82, No. 5, 2024
671
ISSN 1822-7864 (Print) ISSN 2538-7111 (Online) https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.658
Maja KERNEŽA, Dejan ZEMLJAK, Metka KORDIGEL ABERŠEK, Boris ABERŠEK, Polona LEGVART, Helena KONŠAK, Hakan SARI,
Ildiko HANULIAKOVA, Loreta HUBER, Inga LAURUSONE, Kübra TERZIOGLU, Metin KILIC. Education of refugee children within the
INTREF project framework
Maja Kerneža
(Corresponding author)
PhD, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Education, University of Maribor, Koroška
cesta 160, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
E-mail: maja.kerneza1@um.si
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0813-8675
Dejan Zemljak Teaching Assistant, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of
Maribor, Koroška cesta 160, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
E-mail: dejan.zemljak1@um.si
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7757-5457
Metka Kordigel Aberšek PhD, Professor, Faculty of Education, University of Maribor, Koroška cesta 160,
2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
E-mail: metka.kordigel@um.si
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3530-9994
Boris Aberšek PhD, Professor, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of
Maribor, Koroška cesta 160, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
E-mail: boris.abersek@um.si
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4198-4240
Polona Legvart Primary Schol Teacher, Primary School bratov Polančičev, Prešernova ulica 19,
2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
E-mail: polona.legvart@osbp.si
Helena Konšak Primary Schol Teacher, Primary School bratov Polančičev, Prešernova ulica 19,
2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
E-mail: helena.konsak@osbp.si
Hakan Sari PhD, Professor, Ahmet Kelesoglu Faculty of Education, Nechmettin Erbakan
University, A Blok, No: 116 Meram Yeni Yol Street, Meram/Konya, Turkey.
E-mail: hsari@erbakan.edu.tr
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4528-8936
Ildiko Hanuliakova Teamwork for a better Future, Kúpeľná 3544/33, 932 01 Veľký Meder, Slovakia.
E-mail: ildiko.hanuliakova@gmail.com
Loreta Huber PhD, Professor, EureCons Förderagentur GmbH, Parkstraße 1, 86405
Meitingen, Germany.
E-mail: huber@eurecons.com
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5453-7995
Inga Laurusone PhD, EureCons Förderagentur GmbH, Parkstraße 1, 86405 Meitingen,
Germany.
E-mail: inga.laurusone@eurecons.com
Kübra Terzioglu PhD, Professor, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University, Baibü Gölköy Yerleşkesi,
14030 Bolu Merkez/Bolu, Turkey.
E-mail: mustafa611968@hotmail.com
Metin Kilic PhD, Professor, Faculty of Science and Arts, Düzce University, Düzce
Üniversitesi Konuralp Yerleşkesi Yörük Mah. Merkez/Düzce, 81620, Turkey.
E-mail: metinkilic@duzce.edu.tr
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7384-0997
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Malaysia is among the biggest hosts of refugees and asylum seekers (RAS) in Southeast Asia, of whom the majority are Rohingya Muslims. In Malaysia, RAS children are not allowed to enroll in public schools and therefore rely on a non-formal parallel education system that comprises learning centers run by refugee communities, NGOs, and faith-based organizations. To date, little research is available on initiatives that attempt to integrate RAS children into Malaysian society through education. This study aims to gather evidence on the current situation of RAS children’s education in Malaysia and answer the following questions: (a) what is the current state of evidence? and (b) to what extent has existing research/evidence addressed the question of RAS children integration into the national education system? We conducted a scoping review that gathers and summarizes findings from existing studies using a specific strategy: selection of keywords and systematic search through online databases, followed by screening of papers based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Our findings showed that the overall body of evidence is small, with most studies describing the challenges and barriers faced by RAS children in accessing formal/non-formal and quality education. There was little focus and discussion on integrating RAS children into the national education system, which perhaps is due to the underlying assumption that Malaysia remains a transit country for RAS, and not a destination for permanent settlement.
Article
Full-text available
Educating refugee children is a demanding process, as teachers must have special knowledge, skills and attitudes. In Greece, many efforts have been made to educate refugee children by creating refugee reception and integration classes in schools and recruiting temporary staff. Still, teachers face various problems in language teaching and children’s integration into the school environment. The purpose of this study is to identify the challenges and difficulties faced by teachers who teach refugee students and to explore their intercultural competence and readiness. Eight interviews were conducted for the research. The results show that participants face many problems due to a lack of training material, tools and resources. The characteristics of refugee children slow down the educational process, while the unpreparedness and inadequacy of teachers in intercultural education complicate the situation. However, the education of refugees can be improved, provided that the intercultural education of teachers is enriched and appropriate educational material (school books, guides, toolkits) is provided.
Article
Full-text available
Experimental evidence on strategies to support refugee children's integration into host-country public schools is needed. We employ a three-arm, site-randomized controlled trial to test the impact of short-term access to two versions of nonformal remedial programming infused with social-emotional learning (SEL) among Syrian refugee children in Lebanese public schools. Remedial programming with classroom climate-targeted SEL practices improved children's perceptions of public schools (effect sizes [ES] = 0.48–0.66) only. The remedial program with both classroom climate-targeted SEL and skill-targeted activities had positive impacts on children's perceptions of public schools (ES = 0.43–0.50) and on certain basic academic skills (ES = 0.08–0.14), and marginally significant positive and negative impacts on some SEL outcomes (ES = 0.16–0.31). We found no impacts of either version on children's global literacy or numeracy competence.
Article
Full-text available
The increasing number of refugees, coupled with the protracted nature of refugee situations around the globe, underline the critical importance of refugee education. Since 2010, education has been one of the global strategic priorities of the United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR), but much of the focus and resourcing has been on primary education and, to a lesser extent, secondary education. Recognition of the role of lifelong learning for refugees has been much slower, only recently entering into prominence in global documents and policies. For refugees, the hope and desire for education that will enable them to achieve sustainable and dignified livelihoods has always been a core part of their realities. Lifelong learning has the potential to provide the bridge between disrupted schooling and future aspirations of self-reliance and participation in society. This article situates the emerging agenda for refugee lifelong learning in a postcolonial and global context. The author begins with a critical examination of the postcolonial “logics” which continue to construct and frame the study of refugees, before problematising how lifelong learning is incorporated and conceptualised in global policy. She draws the conclusion that despite global commitments, the realisation of lifelong learning for refugee youth and adults is likely remain frustrated for some time by normative assumptions firmly embedded in the conceptualisation of lifelong learning and the education frameworks of nation states. However, she argues that the recent global disruption to education and the inequalities that have been exposed by the COVID-19 pandemic provide an opportunity to rethink how education is conceptualised and the importance of providing lifelong learning opportunities to enable young people and adults to fulfil their aspirations.
Article
Full-text available
The involvement of refugee parents in their children’s education is crucial for academic success and social integration. However, school personnel often seem to struggle to find approaches that will increase recently arrived refugee parents’ involvement with the school. While refugee parents are not a homogenous group, many face uniquely similar and intersecting challenges. Using a qualitative research approach, specifically semi-structured interviews, this study examines the perceptions of one group of Arabic-speaking, recently arrived refugee parents’ perceptions of being and becoming involved in their children’s education after their arrival in Canada. The findings suggest the following factors act as barriers to their involvement: (1) limited language proficiency, (2) competing basic needs, (3) lack of homework, (4) teachers’ limited cross-cultural and interreligious understanding, and (5) sexual health education being a contested shared space. While the findings illuminate what some recently arrived refugee parents regard as barriers, the discussion challenges educational leaders and policy makers to critically question the dominant, normative model of parental involvement that is employed and recommends they reframe their conceptions of parental involvement as social engagement with a school community. Such a reframing may better support recently arrived refugee parents’ integration into their new home country. Keywords: parental involvement, recently arrived refugees, integration
Article
Full-text available
Context: Vocational education and training (VET) plays a crucial role in the social inclusion of refugees. The aim of this paper is to examine how the VET systems of Austria, Denmark and Germany responded to the arrival of young refugees since 2015. VET in these countries are all categorised as systems of collective skill formation, which offer apprenticeships in addition to school-based training. The article examines and juxtaposes the legal rights, the actual opportunities and the barriers to refugees’ participation in and completion of VET at upper secondary level in the three selected countries. Methods: The study is based on reviews of literature and an analysis of refugee policies in the three countries. The literature search used a snowballing strategy and included policy documents, research publications and grey literature from organisations of civil society. The literature review employed a narrative, issue-focused approach to explore and compare key categories relating to the research question. To elaborate, refine and structure the categories for each of the three countries we used an input-process-output model (Adams, 1993) and a combination of deductive and inductive analysis procedure. Findings: The findings of the study are divided into six categories that structure the analysis: admission requirements, validation of prior learning, vocational guidance, language training, social support measures and access to apprenticeships. The analysis finds that both asylum seekers and recognised refugees have more opportunities in Germany than in the other two countries regarding the key categories. The findings show no major differences in the position of the social partners in the three countries in relation to refugees’ participation in VET, however the national governments reacted differently to the influx of refugees. In Austria and Denmark, new governments with strong anti-immigration agendas took office and reduced the access to and participation in VET for asylum seekers and refugees. At the same time, the German government introduced various integration measures for refugees in cooperation with employers with the aim of making VET more accessible to refugees. Conclusion: To access and complete VET, refugees depend on supporting measures to overcome a variety of barriers, e.g. regarding language training and access to apprenticeships. Overall, reforms in Germany demonstrate promising initiatives to overcome the barriers to the integration of refugees in VET, while reforms in Austria and Denmark have limited refugees’ opportunities to access and complete VET.
Article
Today, in the context of the war in Ukraine, more and more Ukrainian refugees are seeking refuge in European countries, and a significant number of Ukrainians are temporarily staying in Germany. As of April 2023, 205,000 children and young people from Ukraine are integrated into the German education system. A particular challenge is the inclusion of children with special educational needs in Germany and all over Europe. This article analyzes the current situation and main challenges related to the integration of Ukrainians in Germany. The purpose of the article is to explore the main difficulties associated with the inclusion of children with special needs in the German education system. For coping with this huge and complicated problem, we should develop some strategies for teachers and parents to make them understand the causes of the main difficulties; also we should give them instruments to improve current situation and minimize maladaptation in the future. The first step for all these purposes is to analyze the near future: explore the main challenges for Ukrainian refugees in the German education system and analyze the prospects for efficient inclusion of this group of students into German education institutions. In the course of the study, based on the results of a survey of parents of children with special needs, the main challenges for children with special needs and their parents when integrating into German society were recognized. They are conditions of chronic stress, language barrier, and difficulties with integration into peer groups. As for the school environment, the main problems are the lack of Ukrainian-speaking teachers and insufficient attention of the teaching staff to the processes of socialization, integration and behavioral characteristics of children. Strengthening special support for children in the educational environment is also desirable. The processes of comprehensive integration of Ukrainian refugees into both educational and social environments require further study, because most of the problems faced by children with disabilities and their parents in Germany are also characteristic of the wider refugee population from Ukraine in Europe. Keywords: Ukrainian refugees, inclusion, children with special needs, German education system.
Article
Education is among the areas most affected by immigration. Addressing refugee children’s schooling is an important contribution to the refugee crises, which span the world with far-reaching socio-economic effect. This study unpacks the challenges that refugee children, mainly from Syria, face in integrating into primary and secondary public schools in Turkey. It also proposes some tentative resolutions, drawing from the experiences of refugee parents, teachers, and headteachers. Within the current study, data were collected by means of fishbone analysis and semi-structured interviews with the participation of teachers, school headteachers, and refugee parents. The study draws from the theories of refugee education and confirms students’ barriers in schooling with regard to psychosocial factors, cultural adaptation, language learning, systemic barriers, and family relations. Some further implications were elicited from the data and are discussed in line with the existing research.