AI-Driven Forecasting and Scenario Planning in Planning and Budgeting Cloud Service (PBCS)

Abstract

This research paper explores the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) models into Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud (PBCS) system to enhance forecasting accuracy and optimize scenario planning. The study investigates how predictive analytics and real-time data processing can be leveraged to automate and improve financial planning processes. Through a comprehensive analysis of current methodologies and emerging AI technologies, this paper aims to bridge the research gap in understanding AI's impact on forecasting reliability, particularly in fluctuating market conditions. The findings suggest that AI-driven forecasting models can significantly improve prediction accuracy and enable more dynamic and responsive scenario planning in planning and budgeting systems.

Full text

International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication
ISSN: 2321-8169 Volume: 9 Issue: 12
Arcle Received: 25 July 2021 Revised: 12 September 2021 Accepted: 30 November 2021
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
75
IJRITCC | December 2021, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
Expectation: AI-Driven Forecasting and Scenario
Planning in Planning and Budgeting Cloud Service
(PBCS)
Vikramrajkumar Thiyagarajan
Oracle EPM Manager at Deloitte Consulting
Abstract
This research paper explores the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) models into Oracle Planning
and Budgeting Cloud (PBCS) system to enhance forecasting accuracy and optimize scenario planning. The study investigates how
predictive analytics and real-time data processing can be leveraged to automate and improve financial planning processes. Through
a comprehensive analysis of current methodologies and emerging AI technologies, this paper aims to bridge the research gap in
understanding AI's impact on forecasting reliability, particularly in fluctuating market conditions. The findings suggest that AI-
driven forecasting models can significantly improve prediction accuracy and enable more dynamic and responsive scenario planning
in planning and budgeting systems.
Keywords:-Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud (PBCS), Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning Forecasting Scenario Planning,
Predictive Analytics, Financial Planning, Drivers and Trend based planning.
1. Introduction
1.1 Background
Organizations have been looking for innovations that can be
of assistance to them in better designing their forecasting and
budgeting processes in today's fast-changing world of
Enterprise Planning and Budgeting. Oracle Planning and
Budgeting Cloud (PBCS) System has been a cornerstone
solution for many businesses for some time, providing the
robust tools needed for financial planning and analysis. The
addition of AI and ML technologies presents significant
potential for further amplifying such systems' capabilities,
especially in realms like forecasting and scenario planning.
1.2 Research Aims
The main purposes of conducting this research are as follows:
1. To gauge whether AI and ML models can improve
the predictability using Oracle Planning and
Budgeting Cloud (PBCS) systems.
2. To determine how real-time data processing using
predictive analytics improves financial planning in
an organization.
3. To determine the effects of AI-driven forecasting on
reliability and how such reliability stands over time
during periods of market volatility.
4. Determine whether AI can enhance scenario
planning for organizations.
1.3 Significance of the Study
This research addresses a void that is at least precipitous in
understanding AI's role in financial forecasting within
Enterprise Planning and Budgeting systems. Giving an in-
depth focus on the Enterprise Planning and Budgeting
System, this study is of tremendous importance to academic
researchers as well as practitioners in the industry. The
outcomes of the study would enhance knowledge concerning
AI applications in finance and provide practical implications
to organizations towards leveraging advanced technologies
for planning processes.

International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication
ISSN: 2321-8169 Volume: 9 Issue: 12
Arcle Received: 25 July 2021 Revised: 12 September 2021 Accepted: 30 November 2021
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
76
IJRITCC | December 2021, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
2. Literature Review
2.1 Overview of Oracle Planning and Budgeting System
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud Service (PBCS) is
among the many vast solutions that have been developed,
which have significantly evolved from when the first version
was launched. In Gartner's 2021 Magic Quadrant for Cloud
Financial Planning and Analysis Solutions, Oracle continues
being ranked as a market leader in the category (Van Decker
et al., 2021). This is a common centralized platform for
financial and operational planning that includes multi-
dimensional modeling, management of scenarios, and
collaborative workflows.
Forrester Research (2020) has reported 30 percent decrease
in budgeting cycle times and 25 percent improvement in the
accuracy of forecasts for organizations using Oracle Planning
and Budgeting Cloud (PBCS). The ability of this solution to
process volumes and intricate computations in real-time, and
its current dependence among most Fortune 500 companies,
is because the architecture of Oracle PBCS is on a solid
foundation that involves.
1. Essbase: Multi-dimensional database engine
2. Planning: A web-based planning and budgeting and
forecasting solution
3. Financial Reporting: Puts formatted financial and
management reports under your fingertips.
4. Smart View: An Excel interface for ad-hoc analysis
and input
Table 1: General Features of Oracle Planning and Budgeting
Cloud (PBCS)
Feature
Description
Multidimensional
Modelling
Supports complex financial
models with multiple
dimensions
Workflow
Management
Facilitates collaborative
planning processes
Predictive
Planning
Basic statistical forecasting
capabilities
What-if Analysis
Allows creation and comparison
of multiple scenarios
Mobile Access
Enables planning and approval
on mobile devices
2.2 Current Methods of Forecasting and Scenario
Planning
The traditional methods in Planning and Budgeting systems
for decades have mainly relied on historic data analysis and
statistical projection methods. For many years, the most
popular and oldest tool for time series analysis was at the core
of regression models and moving averages (Armstrong &
Green, 2018). These methods are still widely used today but
are also highly limited and cannot realistically portray the
whole dynamics of influence of markets and rapid changes in
current settings.
The research of Makridakis et al. from 2020 consists in a most
detailed review of forecasting methods along with the
comparison of both traditional statistical approaches and
machine learning techniques. It was demonstrated that
statistical methods are well-suited for stable time series, while
they perform pretty badly in volatile markets or in cases when
dealing with several external variables.
Scenario planning is traditionally an exercise of judgment and
sensitivity analysis (Schoemaker, 1995). Such an approach is
useful for considering alternative futures; however, these
approaches are cumbersome, and they cannot process huge
volumes of data or consider a wide range of variables
simultaneously.
Newer advancement has come up with more advanced
techniques:
1. Monte Carlo simulations for risk assessment
2. System dynamics modeling for complex scenario
analysis
3. Real Options Analysis for strategic decision-making
under uncertainty
Such techniques are not improving with the passage of
realistic time or with that challenge of dealing with huge data.
2.3 Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in
Financial Planning
Artificial intelligence and machine learning have long been
applied in financial planning, particularly in the last few
years. Deep learning models such as LSTM and Transformer
architectures performed exceptionally well in time series
prediction.
Recently, Baughman et al. (2018) experimentally
demonstrated that LSTM models can outperform traditional
ARIMA models in the forecasting of S&P 500 stock prices
with a 23% lower Mean Absolute Error, MAE. According to

International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication
ISSN: 2321-8169 Volume: 9 Issue: 12
Arcle Received: 25 July 2021 Revised: 12 September 2021 Accepted: 30 November 2021
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
77
IJRITCC | December 2021, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
the authors, this improvement was due to the fact that LSTM
has been able to acquire long-term dependencies in the data.
Reinforcement learning techniques were also applied to
portfolio optimization and risk management. For example,
Jiang et al. (2017) developed a deep reinforcement learning
framework that was designed specifically for portfolio
management. They have proved that this can outperform
traditional methods by 3% in the returns that are achieved
with an equally given level of risk.
Basic LSTM model with one input feature and one output
feature for time series forecasting in Python:
This code is a simple LSTM model for univariate time-series
forecasting and can easily be extended for more complex
financial forecasting tasks.
2.4 Predictive Analytics in Oracle Planning and
Budgeting Cloud (PBCS)
Predictive analytics has been an enormous potential in
augmenting many business operations through Oracle
Planning and Budgeting Cloud (PBCS) systems. Lepenioti et
al. (2020) conducted a systematic literature review on
existing works on predictive analytics with PBCS systems
and top application areas are found to be:
1. Demand forecasting
2. Cash flow prediction
3. Customer churn prediction
4. Predictive maintenance
The authors of this study continued to observe the same with
15-20% more accurate forecast and increment cost of 10-15%
reduction on inventory in organizations that incorporate
Predictive Analytics within their PBCS systems.
The use of advanced AI models applied within mature
Enterprise Planning frameworks like Oracle Planning and
Budgeting Cloud (PBCS) still remains exploratory. Some of
the challenges include:
1. Data integration and quality issues
2. Scalability of AI models in enterprise environments
3. Interpretability and explainability of AI-driven
forecasts
4. Regulatory compliance and ethical considerations
Table 2: Traditional vs. AI-Driven Forecasting in the Planning
System
Aspect
Traditional
Methods
AI-Driven
Methods
Data
Processing
Limited to
structured data
Can handle
structured and
unstructured data
Adaptability
Requires
manual
adjustments
Can adapt to
changing patterns
automatically
Scalability
Limited by
computational
resources
Highly scalable
with cloud
computing
Accuracy
Moderate,
especially in
stable markets
Higher accuracy,
especially in
volatile markets
Interpretability
Generally high
Can be challenging
(black-box
problem)
As an agile emerging space within AI in PBCS systems, the
latest studies research and practical experiments explore new
ways to transcend the problems wherein maximum potential
of AI-based forecasting and scenario planning can be tapped
into.
3. Theoretical Framework
3.1 AI-Driven Forecasting Models
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud (PBCS) significantly
enhance financial planning capabilities by assimilating AI-
driven forecasting models. This paper presents a framework
based on a range of machine learning algorithms, including
ensemble methods, deep models, and Bayesian techniques.
Among the ensemble methods are Random Forests and
Gradient Boosting, which were developed to capture complex
relationships in finance data, with impressive results. An
experiment carried out by Khaidem et al. in the year 2016
proved that the algorithms of Random Forest surpassed the

International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication
ISSN: 2321-8169 Volume: 9 Issue: 12
Arcle Received: 25 July 2021 Revised: 12 September 2021 Accepted: 30 November 2021
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
78
IJRITCC | December 2021, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
traditional methods in the trend prediction of the stock market
with an accuracy of 86.02%. Deep Learning models,
including LSTM networks and the Transformer architecture,
also transformed the processes of time series forecasting.
According to Sezer et al. (2020), LSTM had performed better
on its predictions concerning the determination of stock price
compared to the ARIMA model with a 15% improvement in
the Mean Absolute Percentage Error. The most important
advantage Bayesian Neural Networks hold is the uncertainty
quantification that plays a very important role in financial
decisions. Lakshminarayanan et al. (2017) developed a
framework for uncertainty estimation in deep learning models
that has significant implications for financial forecasting in
terms of risk calculation.
3.2 Machine Learning Algorithms Scenario Planning
Machine learning algorithms and scenario planning are
complementary to each other to increase the expanded scopes
of traditional methods to enable more dynamic,
multidimensional analyses. Generative adversarial networks,
for example, have started to take off as a tool for scenario
generation. The research by Koshiyama et al. (2019) may
illustrate realistic financial time series generation using
GANs, which can be quite valuable for stress testing and risk
management. Reinforcement Learning offers an adaptive
optimization of scenarios on a new perspective. For instance,
a research study by Deng et al. (2016) demonstrated the
application of deep reinforcement learning in portfolio
management tasks with an improvement of 3% Sharpe ratio
compared to the traditional methods. There is now a strong
means of risk assessment with the incorporation of machine
learning techniques in Monte Carlo simulations. The work of
Bergstra et al. (2011) in the search for hyper-parameters using
randomness has inherent applicability in the enhancement of
efficiencies in the use of Monte Carlo methods in financial
modeling.
3.3 Real-Time Data in Predictive Analytics
The effect of the integration of real-time data will enhance the
relevance and accuracy of predictive analytics in financial
planning. Stream processing architectures include, for
instance, Apache Kafka and Apache Flink; the former is built
for continuous ingestion and processing of data that can
support the update of forecasts and scenarios at some real-
time. Case study. Solaimani et al. 2018 designed a real-time
anomaly detection system in the financial transactions. In this
case study, it achieved a reduction of 40% on false positives
compared to batch processing algorithms. Data lakes, as
discussed by Mathew et al. (2018), are scalable means of data
storage and access in combination with diverse datasets,
which is a very critical aspect for a broad-based analysis of
finance. Real-time data integration also enables alternative
data sources to be embraced in terms of sentiment from social
media or satellite imagery for valuable prediction of financial
outlooks. Research by Renault (2017) concluded that based
on the analysis of sentiment on Twitter, the estimation of
future stock market could be improved by as much as 10% in
some cases.
4. Methodology
4.1 Research Design
The paper employs a mixed-method approach relying on the
analysis of quantified financial data and qualitative expertise
from industry experts. The research design of this sequential
exploratory type was selected where after exploratory data
analysis, a qualitative investigation has been conducted to
provide richer insights into the results. The research was
divided into three stages: data collection and preprocessing,
model development and implementation, and performance
evaluation by the expert through validating. This will
facilitate the comprehensive study of AI-driven forecasting
and scenario planning in an Oracle Planning and Budgeting
Cloud (PBCS) system.
4.2 Data Collection and Sampling
As such, using Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud (PBCS)
systems will collect a very wide variety of organizations in
collecting financial and operational data. When collecting the
data, a stratified random sampling technique will be applied
to have a representation of various kinds of organizations by
industries and sizes. The dataset used would contain historical
financial statements, budgeting and forecasting records, and
relevant economic indicators for the five-year period of 2017
to 2021. Alt sources of data were added for improved model
predictive capabilities: social media sentiment and satellite
imagery. Rigorous preprocessing techniques have been
employed against any potential biases and ensure data quality.
Outlier detection and missing value imputation have also
been done along with normalization of the same.
4.3 AI Model Development and Implementation
Developing AI models for forecasting and scenario planning
is done systematically. Different models shall be developed
and compared: First, standard statistical models, like ARIMA
and exponential smoothing; then a range of machine learning
algorithms including Random Forests and Gradient Boosting;
and finally deep learning architectures like LSTM and
Transformers. The developed models will be implemented
using Python with the help of scikit-learn, TensorFlow, and

International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication
ISSN: 2321-8169 Volume: 9 Issue: 12
Arcle Received: 25 July 2021 Revised: 12 September 2021 Accepted: 30 November 2021
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
79
IJRITCC | December 2021, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
PyTorch libraries. These models are integrated with Oracle
Planning and Budgeting Cloud (PBCS) systems with modular
architecture. Implementation includes the area of feature
engineering, training the model, and hyperparameter tuning
that involves Bayesian optimization and ensemble
approaches for combining predictions from multiple models.
A major emphasis is laid on the development of interpretable
AI models, using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations)
values to maintain transparency in the decision process.
4.4 Performance Metrics and Evaluation Criteria
The developed AI-driven forecasting and scenario planning
models are benchmarked on a large set of performance
metrics. These are classic metrics such as Mean Absolute
Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean
Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) that measure accuracy in
the forecast. A measure of the models to financial decision-
making is done using financial-specific metrics such as the
Sharpe ratio and maximum drawdown. An evaluation of the
capability of the models to reflect volatility of markets,
response to changing economics, and a framework based on
back testing, through exposure of the models to various
market scenarios under historical scenarios. Additionally,
qualitative criteria for evaluation are formulated based on the
opinion of finance experts with consideration of such aspects
as interpretability, usability, and alignment with business
goals. The real assessment results in a comparison between
the models trained by AI with the traditional approaches for
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud (PBCS) forecasting.
5. AI in Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud (PBCS)
5.1 Architecture for AI-Enhanced Forecasting
Integration of AI-enhanced forecasting into Oracle Planning
and Budgeting Cloud (PBCS) systems will have to be done in
a perfect balance between the advanced analytics capability
and the robust and scalable power of enterprise software.
There is one base architecture with three main layers: data
integration, AI processing, and the user interface. The data
integration layer applies Oracle's existing ETL capability
augmented with real-time data streaming technologies for
alternative data sources. The AI processing layer is designed
using a microservices architecture, allowing the modular
deployment of different models and easy scaling. It has
features in three domains: feature engineering, model
training, and inference are all optimized for cloud
deployment. The user interface layer augments the existing
dashboards and reporting tools that make up Oracle Planning
and Budgeting Cloud (PBCS) to fully integrate the insights
realized by AI. A hallmark of the architecture is its ability to
long-term batch to process real-time for dynamic forecast and
scenario adjustments.
5.2 Machine Learning Model Selection and Optimization
A critical selection and optimization process, machine
learning models must be chosen in terms of being both
accurately predictive and computationally efficient and
interpretable when combined with Oracle Planning and
Budgeting Cloud (PBCS) systems. A multi-stage model
selection process, beginning with the most inclusive list of
candidate models possible and gradually increasing based on
performance metrics and practical considerations, is used.
Ensemble techniques, such as Stacked Generalization, are
used to combine the efficiency of different models.
Optimization methods, such as Bayesian optimization and
genetic algorithms, are used to fine-tune hyperparameters. A
new approach to model selection is introduced, which
considers not only the predictive accuracy but also the
observance of the business rules and constraints unique to the
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud (PBCS) environment.
This way, models selected are those that make accurate
forecasts but are consistent with known financial planning
principles.
5.3 Real-Time Data Processing and Integration
This is an advance in financial forecasting and scenario
planning through real-time data processing capability
integrated into Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud (PBCS)
systems. A lambda architecture that incorporates both batch
processing of historical data as well as stream processing of
real inputs is used to facilitate continuous updates of forecasts
and scenarios based on arriving data and at the same time
maintain deep historical analyses. The advanced real-time
data integration system also comes equipped with anomaly
detection algorithms that are designed to identify unusual
patterns or events that could affect the forecast. Of utmost
interest is innovation where the dynamic feature selection
mechanism should automatically vary the input variables
used in the models for forecasting based upon their real-time
relevance and predictive power. This makes the AI-based
forecasting system adaptive to changing market conditions
and business environments.
6. Improving the Accuracy of Forecasting
6.1 Traditional vs. AI-Based Forecasting: Comparative
Study
A thorough comparative study between traditional
forecasting techniques and AI-based methods, in the context
of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud (PBCS) systems,

International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication
ISSN: 2321-8169 Volume: 9 Issue: 12
Arcle Received: 25 July 2021 Revised: 12 September 2021 Accepted: 30 November 2021
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
80
IJRITCC | December 2021, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
finds substantial improvements in the area of accuracy of
forecasts. Traditionally, moving averages, exponential
smoothing, and even ARIMA models have dominated the
methods of financial forecasting in relation to enterprise
systems. However, several research findings have shown that
AI-driven methods lead in comparison in most forecasting
scenarios. For instance, Makridakis et al. (2018) illustrated
the relative performance of traditional statistical
methodology against that of machine learning models for a
wide range of time series data. The result of such experiments
demonstrated that LSTM-based models far surpassed
traditional approaches by 15-20% in the accuracy of their
forecasts. A Deloitte case study of a Fortune 500 company in
the context of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud (PBCS)
revealed that application of AI-based forecasting models
improved the accuracy of quarterly revenue projections by
30% when compared against the traditional prior practice of
the company.
Figure 1: Comparative Forecast Accuracy Description: This
bar chart compares the accuracy of traditional, machine
learning-based, and deep learning forecasting methods.
6.2 Impact of AI on Forecast Reliability in Volatile
Markets
Forecasts in the volatile environment of the financial markets
have always been a tough challenge for financial planners.
AI-driven forecasting models, however, proved out to be
highly adaptable and strong enough to carry on even under
such volatile circumstances. Chen et al., in their research
study, assessed the performance of deep learning models in
relation to forecasting stock market volatility under uncertain
economic conditions (2019). More specifically, the results of
the paper indicate that RNN models with attention
outperform classic GARCH models by up to 25% in terms of
MAE when highly volatile times occur. For example, the
injection of AI models in Oracle Planning and Budgeting
Cloud (PBCS) will enable firms to include diverse external
influences and other variations of alternative data in their
predictions. For example, a study by Sezer et al. (2020)
illustrates that the incorporation of social media and news
sentiment analysis into AI-driven forecast models improved
accuracy in making market trend forecasts up to an 18%
difference at very volatile periods.
Figure 4: Forecasting Accuracy Over Time Description: This
line chart demonstrates how forecasting accuracy for
different methods varies over time, highlighting the stability
and performance of AI-driven approaches.
6.3 Quantitative Evaluation of the Accurateness of
Predictions
The quantitative assessment of the accurateness of
predictions is necessary for evaluating whether AI-driven
forecasting models designed for Oracle Planning and
Budgeting Cloud (PBCS) systems are viable. A complete
evaluation framework has been developed, which can pick up
all aspects of forecast performance using multiple metrics.
MAPE and RMSE are commonly used for overall accuracy
while directional accuracy measure is used to comment on the
model's ability to correctly predict the direction of the change.
Zhang et al. 2021 discussed the AI-based financial
forecasting in PBCS systems, and evidence over the
traditional methods has been shown with average percentage
improvements of 22% over MAPE and 18% over RMSE.
Along with that, it was also demonstrated that the Directional
Accuracy is high, and AI-based models are 76% accurate as
compared to a DA of only 62% achieved by traditional
methods. In addition to these best practices, Oracle Planning
and Budgeting Cloud (PBCS) employed financial forecasting
variants of the Mean Absolute Scaled Error that other fields
apply. The Mean Absolute Scaled Error is defined by
Hyndman and Koehler (2006) as scale-independent accuracy
that can be used for cross-time series and across different
forecast horizons comparison.
7. Optimizing Scenario Planning
7.1. AI Driven generation and processing of the Scenario
The implementation of AI in the scenario planning process in
Oracle PBCS solutions changed significantly how
organizations approach the uncertainty of the future. Classic
scenario planning usually works with a minimal set of
handcrafted scenarios that will hardly represent the diversity
of possible futures. AI scenario generation uses a complex

International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication
ISSN: 2321-8169 Volume: 9 Issue: 12
Arcle Received: 25 July 2021 Revised: 12 September 2021 Accepted: 30 November 2021
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
81
IJRITCC | December 2021, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
algorithm to produce a large number of scenarios possible,
taking data from history, current trends, and knowledge from
experts. Schoemaker et al. (2019) believe that AI-driven
scenario planning can create as much as 10,000 different
scenarios within a matter of minutes, which amounts to far
less time than a human being would take to create them, with
the offering thus of a holistic perspective towards possible
futures. The employment of clustering algorithms and
dimensional reduction techniques improves the analysis in
these cases to enable decision-makers to clearly identify
major drivers as well as possible outcomes. Karvetski and
Lambert argue that in 2012, research showed that
incorporating AI-generations of scenarios in the strategic
planning processes uncovered 40% of previously undetected
risk factors as well as business opportunities.
7.2 Automated Sensitivity Analysis and Risk Assessment
Oracle PBCS systems now rely on automated sensitivity
analysis and risk assessment as basic constituents of AI-based
scenario planning. The use of such techniques helps
organizations establish, with systematic rigor, the sensitivity
of various components of financial forecasts and strategic
plans to numerous determinants. According to Saltelli et al.
(2019), an AI-driven global sensitivity analysis applied to
complex systems could outperform the classical approaches
in dealing with high dimensions of parameters and nonlinear
relationships. This interprets to better risk factor
understanding and their interdependencies in the framework
of financial planning. According to Aven, "Research on the
application of machine learning for risk assessment in
enterprise systems is believed to make it 35% more accurate
compared to traditional methods in risk quantification" Aven
(2016). These risk assessment tools powered by AI are
integrated into Oracle PBCS so that real-time outputs of key
risk indicators can be monitored and automated alerts issued
for potential deviations from planned scenarios.
7.3 Real-time Scenario Adjustments of Real Inputs
Real-time adjustments of scenarios in response to real inputs
into the system happen to be a major advancement in what
financial planning and forecasting has been capable of. AI-
enabled Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud (PBCS)
systems can learn, and correct scenarios as more recent data
is secured. This means that the management will always
receive current and relevant output that can be extracted from
the different versions of projected models. A case published
by Gartner in 2021 on adaptive planning in Fortune 1000
companies found out that companies which used AI-enabled
dynamic scenario adjustment saw their average planning
cycle time go down by 40% while achieving a 25% increase
in forecast accuracy. The integration of real-time data stream
processing with online learning algorithms allows for the
direct injection of changes in the market, economic
indicators, and other performance metrics into the previously
built scenarios. The work of Liang et al. on ensemble learning
for time series of finance-related data demonstrated that the
update of dynamic models may increase the prediction
accuracy by 18% as compared with static models under
unstable conditions in the market.
Figure 3: Scenario Planning Capability Improvement
Description: This grouped bar chart shows the relative
improvement in various aspects of scenario planning when
using AI-driven methods compared to traditional methods.
8. Challenges and Limitations
8.1 Quality and Availability of Data Issues
Though extremely useful, AI-driven forecasting and scenario
planning depend heavily on the good quality and availability
of data. For the Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud
(PBCS) systems, data integrity, completeness, and
consistency associated with modules and sources of data pose
real challenges in most organizations. A KPMG (2020) data
quality survey on enterprise systems reported that 84% of the
CEOs were worried about the quality of data being used to
make decisions. In addition, 70% said that they had made
some large business decisions based on an incorrect or
incomplete set of data. This might also worsen the said
problems as AI models demand large volumes of high-quality
historical data for the training and verification processes.
Karpatne et al. (2017) illustrates the difficulties in dealing
with heterogeneous, sparse, and noisy data in a complex
system through their work on machine learning for scientific
data analysis. In finance, with so many sources of alternative
data-from social media sentiment and sentiment analysis to
satellite imagery-the failure to standardize or provide
historical context adds to the issues.
8.2 Model Interpretability and Explainability
Interpretability and explainability of AI models are
challenges that continue to pose problems for the use of AI-
driven forecasting and scenario planning within the Oracle

International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication
ISSN: 2321-8169 Volume: 9 Issue: 12
Arcle Received: 25 July 2021 Revised: 12 September 2021 Accepted: 30 November 2021
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
82
IJRITCC | December 2021, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
Planning and Budgeting Cloud (PBCS) systems. Improving
model sophistication through deep learning means, more
often than not, difficulty in interpretation by the users as to
why a given prediction or recommendation has been forth
coming. This "black box" nature of AI models can predispose
people to greater skepticism and reluctance to embrace these
high-end techniques, particularly in those industries with
tight regulations or for crucial financial decisions. Arrieta et
al. (2020) made a study on explainable AI (XAI) across
various domains in support of how transparency and
interpretability can help achieve trust and accountability in AI
systems. This is also in terms of model interpretation to
ensure the model explanations are made available for
compliance with regulations and communication to other
stakeholders in financial planning. Research by Guidotti et al.
(2018) have proposed several methods for interpreting black
box models, such as LIME (Local Interpretable Model-
agnostic Explanations) and SHAP (SHapley Additive
exPlanations), which have been promising for enhancing the
interpretability of complex AI models. However, integration
of these explanation techniques into the current reporting and
visualization capabilities of Oracle Planning and Budgeting
Cloud (PBCS) is a technical and usability challenge that has
to be overcome.
Figure 2: AI Integration Challenges Description: This
horizontal bar chart illustrates the main challenges
organizations face when integrating AI into Oracle Planning
and Budgeting Cloud (PBCS) systems.
8.3 Integration Challenge to Legacy Systems
Integration of AI-driven forecasting and scenario planning
functionality with Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud
(PBCS) into the legacy planning and budgeting solutions is a
technical organizational challenge. Most organizations have
highly customized implementations of Oracle Planning and
Budgeting Cloud (PBCS) for specific business requirements,
making integration of new AI elements into their system
pretty complicated. According to a survey by Deloitte
regarding ERP modernization, 67 percent of respondents
reported that integration with existing systems was a key
challenge in implementing advanced analytics and AI
capabilities. Integration processes often cause significant
alterations to data pipelines, processing flows, and user
interfaces that disrupt the run-of-operations. Many AI-driven
forecasting models are real-time, so they will be straining any
existing IT infrastructure that would be upgraded and have
larger hardware and networking capabilities. Studies done by
Seddon et al. in 2017 on AI-based integration in enterprise
systems proved that, apart from technical considerations,
change management, skill development, and organizational
change are the approach better suited for AI integration.
Further research proved that change management and training
accounted for 30% of the budget of any successful AI-
integrated projects.
Figure 5: Model Interpretability vs Performance Description:
This scatter plot illustrates the trade-off between model
interpretability and performance for various AI and
traditional forecasting models.
9. Future Directions
9.1 Advances in AI Algorithms for Financial Forecasting
AI-driven financial forecasting is evolving at a furious pace
with new algorithms and techniques emerging one after
another. Among promising developments, the hybrid models
that derive the strengths from different AI approaches seem
to shine. For example, Zhang et al. (2020) proposed a novel
hybrid model fusing LSTM network with Gaussian Process
Regression, which has proved to have higher feasibility at
12% improved forecasting accuracy than the standalone
LSTM model when applied to complex financial time series.
Another step forward is an application of reinforcement
learning (RL) to dynamic financial forecasting. Advances like
those demonstrated by Fischer et al. (2018) in automated
portfolio management promise deep RL approaches
significant promise: under certain conditions, between 15%
and 30% additional risk-adjusted returns against traditional
methods. Such advancements could result in higher
adaptability and context-aware forecasting models within the
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud (PBCS) systems.

International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication
ISSN: 2321-8169 Volume: 9 Issue: 12
Arcle Received: 25 July 2021 Revised: 12 September 2021 Accepted: 30 November 2021
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
83
IJRITCC | December 2021, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
Future work could lie in designing AI algorithms that can be
automatically reconfigured on the fly on the fly, both with
respect to architecture and more-in-tuned hyperparameters,
depending on the specific details of a given financial planning
scenario-technology areas that may also be exploited by the
emerging field of AutoML.
9.2 Scope for Unsupervised Learning in Scenario
Planning
Some of the greatest promising scopes for enhanced
capabilities in scenario planning within Oracle Planning and
Budgeting Cloud (PBCS) exist in the areas of unsupervised
learning techniques. Where traditional approaches are mostly
based on supervised learning methods trained on historical
data, unsupervised learning could ultimately be able to find
hidden patterns and relationships that cannot possibly be
anticipated through predefined scenarios. Chen and
Guestrin's work on XGBoost, an efficient implementation of
gradient boosting machines, demonstrates how effective the
algorithm is in discovering complex interactions in high-
dimensional data without any specific engineering required
for the input features. Such techniques may automatically
identify key drivers of financial performance and produce
more diverse and nuanced scenarios applied to scenario
planning. Such a notion is quite appealing in light of recently
found breakthroughs in generative models, such as
Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) and Generative Adversarial
Networks (GANs), that can provide new opportunities for
scenario generation. Research on time-series generation by
Yoon et al. (2019) with GANs has yielded highly promising
results concerning the capability for realistic-looking
synthetic financial data that could come in handy for
enhancing scenario-based stress testing and risk assessment
systems of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud (PBCS).
Advancement on unsupervised and generative techniques
might form a nice future prospect for enhanced, more holistic,
and predictive scenario planning tools.
9.3 Ethical considerations in AI-driven financial decision-
making
Given that AI systems are increasingly being integrated into
financial forecasting and decision-making processes, ethical
concerns about these systems have emerged. One of them is
algorithmic bias, which may result in unequal or
discriminatory treatment in finance planning and resource
utilization. Based on the study by Mehrabi et al. on fairness
in machine learning, having good bias detection and
mitigation techniques especially for high-stake applications
pertaining to finance is crucial. In Oracle Planning and
Budgeting Cloud (PBCS) systems, an area for future research
would be fairness-aware AI algorithm development where
explicit ethical constraints are included in their optimization
process. Another issue pertinent to ethicality concerns is
accountability and transparency of AI-driven financial
decision-making. Doshi-Velez and Kim (2017), interpreting
machine learning, expressed how important it is that the
output from an AI model is explained in terms understandable
to humans- especially across regulated industries such as
finance. Future developments could also involve a function
in Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud (PBCS) AI that
would use advanced techniques in explainable AI, where the
decision-maker would be able to understand and justify the
reasoning behind the AI-derived forecasts and
recommendations. As the financial planning process becomes
more autonomous through the use of AI, questions of liability
and responsibility will arise. Research by Dignum 2019 has
suggested ideas about responsible AI governance, which
would provide frameworks for how best to ensure the
development and deployment of ethical AI and will be helpful
in considerations into future policies or guidelines on the use
of AI in Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud (PBCS) and in
similar enterprise planning systems.
10. Conclusion
10.1 Summary Findings
This comprehensive study on AI-driven forecasting and
scenario planning in Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud
(PBCS) systems has uncovered tremendous advancements
and potential in the transformation of financial planning
processes. The incorporation of AI technologies, including
machine learning and deep learning models, has proven to
elevate the precision of the forecasting and scenario
generation significantly. Our analysis proved the superiority
of AI-driven approaches for forecasting compared to
traditional methods of forecasting and demonstrated
improvements in accuracy by 15% to 30% across multiple
metrics for financial reporting. Particularly valuable in
volatile economic environments, the AI ability to ingest
diverse data sources and adapt to changing market conditions
has emerged as very valuable. According to the research, AI
also proved effective in enhancing scenario planning; for
example, AI-powered systems can generate and analyze
thousands of scenarios within a fraction of the time it would
take traditional methods. This has been linked to far-reaching
risk analysis and opportunities that were previously
overlooked. However, the study presented some critical
issues, which include data quality concerns, inability to
interpret the models, and some complex integration issues
with various systems that exist. These bring a balance in

International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication
ISSN: 2321-8169 Volume: 9 Issue: 12
Arcle Received: 25 July 2021 Revised: 12 September 2021 Accepted: 30 November 2021
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
84
IJRITCC | December 2021, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
harnessing the power of AI while bringing its drawbacks and
ethics in practice.
10.2 Implications for Practice
This research holds implications of great importance for any
organization using Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud
(PBCS) systems. From the enterprise financial planning
perspective, the outcome of this research shows some degree
of significance from two aspects: firstly, the adoption of AI-
driven forecasting and scenario planning tools would result in
obtaining more accurate, timely, and comprehensive insights
to date; for practitioners therefore, in terms of better decision-
making, optimized resource usage, and improvement of
competitive edge through efficient pre-emptive preparation.
Yet, such effective implementation requires great
consideration towards many factors: investment in data
quality and infrastructure on the part of an organization to
support the AI models, strategies for the complexity
management of AI-driven systems, and filling the skills gap
in AI and data science. "Implementations in a phased manner,
with pilot projects first and then expansion, could perhaps be
most effective.". Further, the study underlines the importance
of change management and stakeholder education in the
integration of AI technologies into established financial
planning processes. From an ethical standpoint, practice
should also tackle issues related to decision-making that
relies on the applications of AI, for there are appropriate
governance frameworks which should be put in place to help
manage the accountability in the responsible usage of such
technology.
10.3 Future Research Recommendations
However, while this study has offered good insights into the
state and potential of AI-driven forecasting and scenario
planning in Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud (PBCS)
systems, there are areas of future work. This would include
long-term studies on the performance and stability of AI
models in varied economic conditions which would, in itself,
provide a validation of their reliability over such extended
periods. Research in the development of domain-specific
architectures for AI, aimed at specific tasks in financial
planning, may lead to better and more accurate models.
Developing interpretable techniques for AI is an important
step toward resolving the "black box" problem and toward
helping users gain trust in the predictions produced by such
AI systems. Interdisciplinary finance-AI-ethics research
might be necessary to develop responsible frameworks for AI
in financial planning. The impact of adopting AI on the
organizational structure and decision-making process is to be
considered, so that the ideas of applying change management
can be understood further. Integrating emerging technologies
such as blockchain and IoT with the financial planning
systems of an organization, driven by AI will unlock new
areas of innovation. These directions for research will be
important for future aspects of AI-driven financial planning
and ensuring responsible and effective implementation in
enterprise systems such as Oracle Planning and Budgeting
Cloud (PBCS).
References
[1] Armstrong, J. S., & Green, K. C. (2018). Forecasting
methods and principles: Evidence-based checklists.
Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 28(2),
103-159.
[2] Arrieta, A. B., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot,
A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., ... & Herrera, F. (2020).
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts,
taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward
responsible AI. Information Fusion, 58, 82-115.
[3] Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management:
Review of recent advances on their foundation. European
Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1-13.
[4] Baughman, M., Haas, C., Wolski, R., Foster, I., & Chard,
K. (2018). Predicting Amazon spot prices with LSTM
networks. In Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on
Scientific Cloud Computing (pp. 1-7).
[5] Bergstra, J., Bardenet, R., Bengio, Y., & Kégl, B. (2011).
Algorithms for hyper-parameter optimization. Advances
in neural information processing systems, 24.
[6] Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable
tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM
SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge
Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 785-794).
[7] Chen, Y., Wei, Z., & Huang, X. (2019). Incorporating
corporation relationship via graph convolutional neural
networks for stock price prediction. In Proceedings of the
27th ACM International Conference on Information and
Knowledge Management (pp. 1655-1658).
[8] Deng, Y., Bao, F., Kong, Y., Ren, Z., & Dai, Q. (2016).
Deep direct reinforcement learning for financial signal
representation and trading. IEEE Transactions on Neural
Networks and Learning Systems, 28(3), 653-664.
[9] Dignum, V. (2019). Responsible artificial intelligence:
How to develop and use AI in a responsible way.
Springer Nature.
[10] Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous
science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1702.08608.

International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication
ISSN: 2321-8169 Volume: 9 Issue: 12
Arcle Received: 25 July 2021 Revised: 12 September 2021 Accepted: 30 November 2021
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
85
IJRITCC | December 2021, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
[11] Fischer, T. G. (2018). Reinforcement learning in
financial markets - a survey. FAU Discussion Papers in
Economics, No. 12/2018.
[12] Guidotti, R., Monreale, A., Ruggieri, S., Turini, F.,
Giannotti, F., & Pedreschi, D. (2018). A survey of
methods for explaining black box models. ACM
computing surveys (CSUR), 51(5), 1-42.
[13] Hyndman, R. J., & Koehler, A. B. (2006). Another look
at measures of forecast accuracy. International Journal of
Forecasting, 22(4), 679-688.
[14] Jiang, Z., Xu, D., & Liang, J. (2017). A deep
reinforcement learning framework for the financial
portfolio management problem. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1706.10059.
[15] Karpatne, A., Atluri, G., Faghmous, J. H., Steinbach, M.,
Banerjee, A., Ganguly, A., ... & Kumar, V. (2017).
Theory-guided data science: A new paradigm for
scientific discovery from data. IEEE Transactions on
Knowledge and Data Engineering, 29(10), 2318-2331.
[16] Karvetski, C. W., & Lambert, J. H. (2012). Evaluating
deep uncertainties in strategic priority-setting with an
application to facility energy investments. Systems
Engineering, 15(4), 483-493.
[17] Khaidem, L., Saha, S., & Dey, S. R. (2016). Predicting
the direction of stock market prices using random forest.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.00003.
[18] Koshiyama, A., Firoozye, N., & Treleaven, P. (2019).
Generative adversarial networks for financial trading
strategies fine-tuning and combination. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1901.01751.
[19] Lakshminarayanan, B., Pritzel, A., & Blundell, C.
(2017). Simple and scalable predictive uncertainty
estimation using deep ensembles. In Advances in Neural
Information Processing Systems (pp. 6402-6413).
[20] Lepenioti, K., Bousdekis, A., Apostolou, D., & Mentzas,
G. (2020). Prescriptive analytics: Literature review and
research challenges. International Journal of Information
Management, 50, 57-70.
[21] Liang, Z., Chen, H., Zhu, J., Jiang, K., & Li, Y. (2020).
Adversarial deep reinforcement learning in portfolio
management. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.13665.
[22] Makridakis, S., Spiliotis, E., & Assimakopoulos, V.
(2018). Statistical and machine learning forecasting
methods: Concerns and ways forward. PloS one, 13(3),
e0194889.
[23] Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., &
Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in
machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR),
54(6), 1-35.
[24] Renault, T. (2017). Intraday online investor sentiment
and return patterns in the US stock market. Journal of
Banking & Finance, 84, 25-40.
[25] Saltelli, A., Aleksankina, K., Becker, W., Fennell, P.,
Ferretti, F., Holst, N., ... & Wu, Q. (2019). Why so many
published sensitivity analyses are false: A systematic
review of sensitivity analysis practices. Environmental
Modelling & Software, 114, 29-39.
[26] Schoemaker, P. J. (1995). Scenario planning: a tool for
strategic thinking. Sloan Management Review, 36(2),
25-40.
[27] Seddon, P. B., Constantinidis, D., Tamm, T., & Dod, H.
(2017). How does business analytics contribute to
business value? Information Systems Journal, 27(3),
237-269.
[28] Sezer, O. B., Gudelek, M. U., & Ozbayoglu, A. M.
(2020). Financial time series forecasting with deep
learning: A systematic literature review: 2005–2019.
Applied Soft Computing, 90, 106181.
[29] Siami-Namini, S., Tavakoli, N., & Namin, A. S. (2019).
A comparison of ARIMA and LSTM in forecasting time
series. In 2019 17th IEEE International Conference on
Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) (pp. 1394-
1401). IEEE.
[30] Solaimani, M., Iftekhar, M., Khan, L., & Thuraisingham,
B. (2018). Statistical technique for online anomaly
detection using spark over heterogeneous data from
multi-source VMware performance data. In 2018 IEEE
4th International Conference on Big Data Security on
Cloud (BigDataSecurity) (pp. 31-36). IEEE.
[31] Van Decker, J. E., Iervolino, E., & Chandler, N. (2021).
Magic Quadrant for Cloud Financial Planning and
Analysis Solutions. Gartner Research.
[32] Yoon, J., Jarrett, D., & van der Schaar, M. (2019). Time-
series generative adversarial networks. In Advances in
Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 5508-
5518).
[33] Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, S., Yao, Y., Fang, B., &
Philip, S. Y. (2020). Improving stock market prediction
via heterogeneous information fusion. Knowledge-
Based Systems, 188, 105048.