Discrete Behavioral States Theory (DBST) developed by Frank W. Putnam is a transtheoretical, translational rlieory of
/11111c1oa1111s cious11eTshs.i s chapter focuses on DBST particularly as it relates to psychological trauma, dissociation and
pomraumatic and dissociative disorders (DD). For a complete discussion of OBST see Putnam's book, Tlie Way We
Are:H ow States of Nlind Ii,jfoence Our Ide11titicsP, ersonalitya, nd Pote11tialfoCr hange( 2016).1
OBST elucidates human experience and behavior across myriad normal and pathological domains. Discrete states of
being (SoB) are so pervasive and ubiquitous as to be essentially invisible, unless they shift in dramatic, unexpected ways,
and, even then, we usually do not conceptualize these changes in terms of behavioral states - although we use the word
'·state" frequently. The "atheoretical" DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association, 2013) uses the term "state/states·•
over 100 times in describing psychiatric symptoms and disorders. DID diagnostic criteria are founded on the constructs
of "identity state" and "personality state," in the DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 (and DSM-111-R), respectively. The term
"state" appears frequently in writings about the DD, especially dissociative identity disorder (DID).
OBST is not a "perfect" theory. There are many areas that need to be refined, and it may not explain all aspects of
human consciousness. However, the power ofDBST is based in substantial support from numerous domains of research,
including human development, neurobiology, chronobiology, psychopathology, and many others - from subcellular to
social systems.