ArticlePDF Available

The Impact of School Design on Student Learning and Wellbeing

Authors:

Abstract

This paper examines the significant influence of school design on student learning outcomes and overall wellbeing. The study reviews historical perspectives, theoretical frameworks, and methodologies used in researching school design. It explores how physical environments, including architectural elements and learning spaces, affect students' academic performance and emotional health. Case studies from Europe, North America, and developing countries highlight the benefits of innovative school design and its practical applications. The paper concludes with recommendations for policymakers and educators on leveraging school design to enhance educational experiences and student wellbeing. INTRODUCTION School design has emerged as a priority on educational agendas around the world. It is acknowledged that the quality of a school's-built environment can have a significant impact on the students who learn and grow there, as well as on the staff who work with them. This understanding has initiated a wave of school design or redesign policy initiatives and major capital works projects (e.g., new builds, refurbishment, and relocation) across many countries in Europe, North America, and Asia. Research now shows a multiplicity of ways in which the physical environment can have a positive and negative impact on educational attainment and, more recently, on wellbeing. Yet, as school design emerges and becomes a priority on national educational agendas, there are also concerns regarding the quality of design and evidence-informed practice. This is particularly the case in developing countries where advice and capacity building are greatly needed to ensure that the schools being built are fit for purpose, not just overpriced edifices that do little for students, staff, or the community [1, 2]. This paper focuses on the impact of school design on student learning and wellbeing. First, the interaction between school design, student learning, and wellbeing is considered in terms of the core claims regarding the importance and benefits of improved school designs through a review of the available literature on the area. Next, illustrations are provided of how these claims are being realized on the ground through a consideration of initiatives being undertaken in Europe and North America to capitalize on this growing evidence base. Then, the responses of some countries to these developments are examined to consider their implications, particularly for developing and newly formed countries with a focus on Asia, before concluding with a summary and some way ahead [3]. HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES ON SCHOOL DESIGN The Historical Perspectives on School Design section examines the evolution of school design over time. It investigates how the physical layout and infrastructure of educational institutions have evolved, considering key periods, movements, and influential figures that have shaped school design. This section explores the reasons behind particular architectural trends and their impact on the learning environment, providing valuable insights into the historical context of school design [4]. School design and its impact on students learning is not a new question, nonetheless, been an ongoing concern through the years. The success of students in educational institutions across the world is usually related to the institution's cost, resources, wellbeing, infrastructure, social curriculum, and a few more. Nevertheless, over the years,
https://www.eejournals.org/ Open Access
Page | 44
The Impact of School Design on Student Learning and
Wellbeing
Nalongo Ruth B.
Faculty of Education, Kampala International University, Uganda
ABSTRACT
This paper examines the significant influence of school design on student learning outcomes and overall
wellbeing. The study reviews historical perspectives, theoretical frameworks, and methodologies used in
researching school design. It explores how physical environments, including architectural elements and
learning spaces, affect students' academic performance and emotional health. Case studies from Europe,
North America, and developing countries highlight the benefits of innovative school design and its
practical applications. The paper concludes with recommendations for policymakers and educators on
leveraging school design to enhance educational experiences and student wellbeing.
Keywords: School design, Student learning, Wellbeing, Educational architecture, Learning
environments.
INTRODUCTION
School design has emerged as a priority on educational agendas around the world. It is acknowledged
that the quality of a school’s-built environment can have a significant impact on the students who learn
and grow there, as well as on the staff who work with them. This understanding has initiated a wave of
school design or redesign policy initiatives and major capital works projects (e.g., new builds,
refurbishment, and relocation) across many countries in Europe, North America, and Asia. Research now
shows a multiplicity of ways in which the physical environment can have a positive and negative impact
on educational attainment and, more recently, on wellbeing. Yet, as school design emerges and becomes a
priority on national educational agendas, there are also concerns regarding the quality of design and
evidence-informed practice. This is particularly the case in developing countries where advice and
capacity building are greatly needed to ensure that the schools being built are fit for purpose, not just
overpriced edifices that do little for students, staff, or the community [1, 2]. This paper focuses on the
impact of school design on student learning and wellbeing. First, the interaction between school design,
student learning, and wellbeing is considered in terms of the core claims regarding the importance and
benefits of improved school designs through a review of the available literature on the area. Next,
illustrations are provided of how these claims are being realized on the ground through a consideration of
initiatives being undertaken in Europe and North America to capitalize on this growing evidence base.
Then, the responses of some countries to these developments are examined to consider their implications,
particularly for developing and newly formed countries with a focus on Asia, before concluding with a
summary and some way ahead [3].
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES ON SCHOOL DESIGN
The Historical Perspectives on School Design section examines the evolution of school design over time.
It investigates how the physical layout and infrastructure of educational institutions have evolved,
considering key periods, movements, and influential figures that have shaped school design. This section
explores the reasons behind particular architectural trends and their impact on the learning environment,
providing valuable insights into the historical context of school design [4]. School design and its impact
on students learning is not a new question, nonetheless, been an ongoing concern through the years. The
success of students in educational institutions across the world is usually related to the institution’s cost,
resources, wellbeing, infrastructure, social curriculum, and a few more. Nevertheless, over the years,
EURASIAN EXPERIMENT JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
SOCIAL SCIENCES (EEJHSS) ISSN: 2992-4111
©EEJHSS Publications Volume 5 Issue 2 2024
https://www.eejournals.org/ Open Access
Page | 45
filters of learning environments and designs have been placed over schools which inadvertently affected
the outcome results of students across the globe. Analyzing the infrastructure, school design, educational
curriculum, and social curriculum all together offers an accumulation of reason to address the question
being discussed. In the year 1999, The Post and Courier published an article of the same name with
strong parallels to today’s topic. A radical voice of the community at the time was largely ignored and
unheard, the institutions still ran their course as planned with little recourse and rethink towards how
schools are designed and money until another voice of the community resurfaced again in March of 2013
[5, 6].
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS IN SCHOOL DESIGN RESEARCH
The design of schools has significant implications for how students learn, experience, and participate in
educational settings. Building design encompasses all aspects that make up learning environments,
including the size and use of space, furniture configuration, technology, and location. Learning
environments, on the other hand, refer to the immediate, micro, or physical aspects of the setting where
teaching and learning take place. Research exploring school design's physical character and how it
mediates student learning is in demand, as the design of schools is largely responsible for shaping what
education can be and how it is experienced [7]. Understanding the theoretical frameworks underpinning
the area of school design is crucial for the advancement of this field. Many studies focus solely on
contemporary challenges, leaving the theoretical underpinnings unexamined. However, school design
inquiries are influenced by different perspectives from other disciplines, including psychology,
architecture, and education. These perspectives offer insights into understanding the interaction between
designed environments, social order, pedagogical scenarios, and the emergence of outcomes. Many of the
theories leveraged in school design research have broad applicability and are useful in other educational
subfields as well [8].
METHODOLOGIES FOR STUDYING SCHOOL DESIGN IMPACT
Various methodologies have been developed to investigate the impact of school design on learning and
wellbeing. Research studies typically employ quantitative measures, qualitative measures, or mixed
methods approaches. For example, an analysis of a 21st-century-designed middle school’s impact on
student achievement used a mixed methods approach, investigating the impact of the school design on
reading achievement using quantitative data and the impact of the school design on STEM instruction,
student engagement in learning, and student achievement using qualitative data. Focus groups and
observation protocols have also been employed as qualitative measures to explore the educational
effectiveness of a new school design [9, 10]. A method using a retrospective online survey was also
developed (co-designed with students) to investigate the long-term impact of school design on student
learning and wellbeing, taking the transition from old to new school as a critical event. The online survey
comprised 49 items divided into six constructs, including learning practices, perception of learning
environments, and intentionality. The simple performance measures of gpas in mathematics, humanities,
and arts subjects were also included. Data were collected from 355 students from grades 612 and
analyzed with multilevel modeling techniques. The results revealed both the direct and indirect
longitudinal positive influences of learning environments and intentionality on wellbeing through various
educational practices [11].
KEY FINDINGS AND CASE STUDIES
The research and empirical studies regarding the impact of school design on student learning and
wellbeing are plentiful. A few of the significant findings will be noted along with case studies that
illustrate how selected design elements have a direct impact on students. An analysis conducted by
Schwartz found that within 3 years after a new school resulted from an innovative design approach, math
and science scores increased significantly. Additionally, a case study conducted by Ortiz examined how
the deliberate design of a new campus added excessive value to social engagement, school culture,
collaboration, accessibility to technology, safety, and acoustics. In both examples, design clearly and
objectively impacts educational experience. Schwartz examined the outcomes of a newly constructed
middle school designed around changing the physical environment. A changed physical learning
environment consisted of a 21st-century designed school building and pedagogical changes regarding
instruction in mathematics and science. Case study data were collected formally from district documents,
the school’s website, public records, and emails between the author and district personnel. The population
surveyed included 189 seventh- and eighth-grade students at the newly designed middle school and 207
seventh- and eighth-grade students at the comparison middle school. The competitive two-school
population included students entering seventh grade in the same year. Quantitative data were collected
through a retrospective pretest mathematical and science achievement survey. Both school buildings were
compared before and after the implementation of the new school. A paired t -test was used to analyze the
https://www.eejournals.org/ Open Access
Page | 46
data at a 0.05 level of significance for the two school sites. The significance level of the spray of results is
<.0001, indicating that the new middle school positively affected student achievement in mathematics and
science. The results demonstrate that when given a personalized experience, all subgroups of students
benefited from the holistic design approach [12].
IMPLICATIONS FOR EDUCATIONAL POLICY AND PRACTICE
The Implications for Educational Policy and Practice section explores the practical applications and
policy implications stemming from the research on school design's influence on student learning and
wellbeing. It delves into how the findings and insights can inform educational policies, architectural
guidelines, and classroom practices to foster conducive learning environments and enhance student
wellbeing. This section aims to bridge the gap between research and real-world implementation, offering
actionable recommendations for educational stakeholders and policymakers. Titled “The Impact of
Learning Environments on Student Engagement,” this research focuses on the relationship between
learning environments and student engagement. Over 33 years of providing architectural services to
Texas public school districts have resulted in the construction of millions of square feet of learning
environments across more than 100 campuses. This has prompted interest in the need to know if the
schools designed benefit learning and how. While a variety of unique architectural learning environments
were examined in previous studies, this research investigates five mid-texas public school facilities
designed and constructed by VLK Architects from 2007 to 2015. Variables in developing school settings
assembled in this investigation include individual learning environments caused by decisions in site and
infrastructure; building systems, technology, and equipment; interior architecture, furnishings, and
fixtures; and environmental/landscape conditions. To measure engagement, observation tools were
developed and utilized to measure samples of teachers and students. Each selected teacher had their
classes observed in their respective environments. This created a relative measurement of the engagement
levels teachers had over the period of one regulation school day. Each observation took place for 45
minutes with five aforementioned data measurement variables collected: classroom setting, student’s
attention/off-task behavior, teacher’s level of engagement, classroom noise levels, and teaching modality.
Data collected from each observation site varied in context and intensely describing each learning
environment and its impact on student engagement [13, 14, 15].
CONCLUSION
The design of school environments plays a critical role in shaping student learning and wellbeing.
Historical trends and theoretical frameworks underscore the importance of well-considered school
designs that prioritize functionality and student engagement. Empirical evidence, including case studies
from various regions, illustrates how innovative school designs can lead to significant improvements in
academic performance and student wellbeing. As educational institutions continue to evolve, it is
imperative for policymakers and educators to prioritize evidence-based design strategies that foster
positive learning environments. In doing so, they can ensure that schools not only serve as places of
education but also as supportive environments conducive to holistic student development.
REFERENCES
1. Altomonte S, Allen J, Bluyssen PM, Brager G, Heschong L, Loder A, Schiavon S, Veitch JA,
Wang L, Wargocki P. Ten questions concerning well-being in the built environment. Building
and Environment. 2020 Aug 1; 180:106949. Sciencedirect.com
2. Minkos ML, Gelbar NW. Considerations for educators in supporting student learning in the
midst of COVID19. Psychology in the Schools. 2021. Nih.gov
3. Govorova E, Benítez I, Muñiz J. Predicting student well-being: Network analysis based on PISA
2018. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020 Jun;17(11):4014.
Mdpi.com
4. Rosyadi I, Aprilianto A, Rofiq MH, Bisri AM. Development of Islamic Educational Institutions
in Increasing Competitiveness in Madrasah Tsanawiyah. Chalim Journal of Teaching and
Learning. 2023 Sep 18;3(1):52-63. Jurnalikhac.ac.id
5. Huang R, Ritzhaupt AD, Sommer M, Zhu J, Stephen A, Valle N, Hampton J, Li J. The impact of
gamification in educational settings on student learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational
Technology Research and Development. 2020 Aug; 68:1875-901. [HTML]
6. Moore S. The design models we have are not the design models we need. The Journal of Applied
Instructional Design. 2021;10(4):11-9. Amazonaws.com
7. Ibáñez MB, Portillo AU, Cabada RZ, Barrón ML. of augmented reality technology on
academic achievement and motivation of students from public and private Mexican schools. A
case study in a middle-school …. Computers & Education. 2020. Academia.edu
https://www.eejournals.org/ Open Access
Page | 47
8. Armstrong PW, Brown C, Chapman CJ. Schooltoschool collaboration in England: A
configurative review of the empirical evidence. Review of education. 2021. Wiley.com
9. Othman AR, Ruslan NA, Zahrah W. Impact of Physical Learning Environment Towards
Students’ Performance at Taylor’ s University. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings
Journal. 2022 Mar 31;7(19):101-10. E-iph.co.uk
10. Curtis B. The Nature of the Community College Leadership Shortage Crisis: a descriptive work-
based study. 2021. Usq.edu.au
11. Jadil Y, Rana NP, Dwivedi YK. Understanding the drivers of online trust and intention to buy
on a website: An emerging market perspective. International Journal of Information
Management Data Insights. 2022 Apr 1;2(1):100065. Sciencedirect.com
12. Wannapiroon N, Pimdee P. Thai undergraduate science, technology, engineering, arts, and math
(STEAM) creative thinking and innovation skill development: a conceptual model using a digital
…. Education and Information Technologies. 2022. Springer.com
13. Alquhtani S. Spatial distribution of public elementary schools: A case study of Najran, Saudi
Arabia. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering. 2023 Mar 4;22(2):705-25.
Tandfonline.com
14. Long SW, Olsen RJ, Christensen PA, Bernard DW, Davis JJ, Shukla M, Nguyen M, Saavedra
MO, Yerramilli P, Pruitt L, Subedi S. Molecular architecture of early dissemination and massive
second wave of the SARS-cov-2 virus in a major metropolitan area. Mbio. 2020 Dec 22;11(6):10-
128. Asm.org
15. Karimi A, Kim YJ, Zadeh NM, García-Martínez A, Delfani S, Brown RD, Moreno-Rangel D,
Mohammad P. Assessment of outdoor design conditions on the energy performance of cooling
systems in future climate scenariosA case study over three cities of Texas, Unites States.
Sustainability. 2022 Nov 10;14(22):14848. Mdpi.com
CITE AS: Nalongo Ruth B. (2024). The Impact of School Design on
Student Learning and Wellbeing. EURASIAN EXPERIMENT
JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 5(2):44-47.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
The excessive use of energy in buildings due to increased populations and economic development leads to more greenhouse gas emissions, which affect climate change and global warming. Changes in prevailing outdoor weather conditions significantly affect the energy systems of buildings through increased cooling and decreased heating. In this paper, 30 years of data of dry and wet bulb temperatures (1990–2020) with a time interval of 3 h were considered in order to estimate the climatic outdoor design conditions in the cities of Dallas–Fort Worth, Houston, and San Antonio in the state of Texas. The results suggest that the dry bulb temperature (DBT) had significantly higher increases in Dallas–Fort Worth (2.37 °C) than the wet bulb temperature (WBT) in Houston (4.1 °C) during the study period. Furthermore, this study analyzed the effects of climate change on cooling degree hours (CDH) and heating degree hours (HDH) and the results suggest the most significant drop in HDH in Dallas–Fort Worth with a maximum CDH fluctuation as compared to other two cities. The effect of climate change on the performance of cooling systems is also investigated in this study via direct evaporative coolers (DECs) and direct-indirect evaporative coolers (IDEC), which do not perform well in the selected cities. In contrast, absorption system (Abs) and vapor compression (VC) systems show an increase in the number of additional loads. The second part of this study is related to the future projection using the ARIMA model, which suggests that DBT would rise significantly in Houston (from 37.18 °C to 37.56 °C) and Dallas–Fort Worth (39.1 °C to 39.57 °C) while diminishing in San Antonio (from 34.81 °C to 33.95 °C) from 2020 to 2030. In contrast, WBT will experience an upward trend in Houston (from 36.06 °C to 37.71 °C) and Dallas–Fort Worth (from 31.32 °C to 31.38 °C) and a downward trend in San Antonio (from 32.43 °C to 31.97 °C) during 2020–2030. Additionally, the future performance prediction of Abs and VC systems is also performed, which reveals that the amount of additional load required is significantly higher in 2030 compared to 2020 and is more prominent in Houston. Conversely, amount of additional load required for cooling systems in San Antonio shows a decreasing trend in 2030.
Article
Full-text available
In recent years, examining the determinants and outcomes of online trust in emerging online markets in the North Africa Region has been lacking. Therefore, the purpose of this study is twofold: first, to gain knowledge of the key predictors of online trust in Morocco; second, to investigate the consequences of online trust on perceived risk, attitude, and online purchase intentions in Morocco. A research model based on the work of Jarvenpaa et al. (2000) was empirically tested. Data was collected from a total of 414 experienced online buyers through online surveys. The PLS approach using SmartPLS 3 was performed to test the hypotheses. The results demonstrate that the effect of perceived size and perceived reputation on online trust is positively significant; online trust has a significant positive influence on attitude and significant negative influence on perceived risk; online trust and attitude positively influence purchase intention; perceived risk has a significant negative effect on attitude and the negative influence of perceived risk on purchase intentions was found to be not significant. The post-hoc analysis further shows that attitude transmits completely the effect of perceived risk on purchase intention, while perceived risk partially mediates the effects of online trust on attitude.
Article
Full-text available
The latest trends in research extend the focus of school effectiveness beyond students’ acquisition of knowledge and skills, looking at aspects such as well-being in the academic context. Although the concept of well-being itself has been defined and measured in various ways, neither its dimensions nor the relationships between the components have been clearly described. The aim of the present study was to analyse how the elements of well-being interact and determine how they are influenced by school factors. To do that, we conducted a network analysis based on data from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2018 international assessment. Our results demonstrated that cognitive, psychological, and social well-being variables form a solid welfare construct in the educational context, where students’ resilience and fear of failure, along with their sense of belonging, play central roles. Although the influence of school factors on student well-being is generally low, teaching enthusiasm and support promote positive school climates which are, in turn, crucial in reducing bullying.
Article
Full-text available
Well-being in the built environment is a topic that features frequently in building standards and certification schemes, in scholarly articles and in the general press. However, despite this surge in attention, there are still many questions on how to effectively design, measure, and nurture well-being in the built environment. Bringing together experts from academia and the building industry, this paper aims to demonstrate that the promotion of well-being requires a departure from conventional agendas. The ten questions and answers have been arranged to offer a range of perspectives on the principles and strategies that can better sustain the consideration of well-being in the design and operation of the built environment. Placing a specific focus on some of the key physical factors (e.g., light, temperature, sound, and air quality) of indoor environmental quality (IEQ) that strongly influence occupant perception of built spaces, attention is also given to the value of multi-sensory variability, to how to monitor and communicate well-being outcomes in support of organizational and operational strategies, and to future research needs and their translation into building practice and standards. Seen as a whole, a new framework emerges, accentuating the integration of diverse new competencies required to support the design and operation of built environments that respond to the multifaceted physical, physiological, and psychological needs of their occupants.
Article
Whitbeck (1996) presents a design-anchored approach to ethics that provides a way to think about the intersection of instructional design and social justice. While ethics are typically treated as deciding between what is “right” or “wrong,” Whitbeck (1996) explains this is a simplistic view, as ethics are about confronting complex moral problems that require designers to devise responses (design). When critiqued through the lens of accessibility and equity and racial and economic inequalities, areas where present design models fall short become apparent. Ethics as design affords a way to see design models anew and reconsider design practices.
Article
COVID‐19 has presented a period of unprecedented challenge for schools in the United States. Thousands of school buildings across the country were closed in the spring of 2020 through the end of the school year to slow the spread of the global pandemic. Plans to reopen schools in many states remain uncertain as the virus continues to spread across communities. Current and future challenges are complex, with significant impacts on the global economy, health care system, and overall well‐being. When schools reopen, students will present with a wide variety of academic and social‐emotional needs, and schools will need to mindfully adjust systems and practices to meet the needs of their unique student population. This paper provides educators with suggestions on how to adapt existing multitiered systems of support using a trauma‐informed lens to support students during this unusual time.
Article
In this paper, the authors show that augmented reality technology has a positive impact on learning-related outcomes of middle-school Mexican students. However, the impact varies depending on whether students were enrolled in public or private schools. The authors designed an augmented reality application for students to practice the basic principles of geometry, and a similar application which encompasses identical learning objectives and content deployed in a Web-based learning environment. A 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design was employed with 93 participants to investigate the effect of type of technology (web, augmented reality), type of school (private, public), and time of assessment (pre, post) on motivation, and declarative learning. The results show that: (1) there is an interactive effect of type of technology, type of school, and time of assessment when students' achievement scores are measured; (2) students using the augmented reality-based learning environments scored higher in post-test than those using the web-based application; (3) the augmented reality learning environment was more learning effective compared with the web-based learning environment in public schools, but not in private schools; (4) there is not an interactive effect of type of technology, type of school and time of assessment when students' motivation is measured; (5) students from private schools reported higher levels of motivation compared with those from public schools when using the augmented reality learning environment. The research findings imply that in Mexico, augmented reality technology can be exploited as an effective learning environment for helping middle-school students from public and private schools to practice the basic principles of Geometry.
Development of Islamic Educational Institutions in Increasing Competitiveness in Madrasah Tsanawiyah
  • I Rosyadi
  • A Aprilianto
  • M H Rofiq
  • A M Bisri
Rosyadi I, Aprilianto A, Rofiq MH, Bisri AM. Development of Islamic Educational Institutions in Increasing Competitiveness in Madrasah Tsanawiyah. Chalim Journal of Teaching and Learning. 2023 Sep 18;3(1):52-63. Jurnalikhac.ac.id
The impact of gamification in educational settings on student learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development
  • R Huang
  • A D Ritzhaupt
  • M Sommer
  • J Zhu
  • A Stephen
  • N Valle
  • J Hampton
  • J Li
Huang R, Ritzhaupt AD, Sommer M, Zhu J, Stephen A, Valle N, Hampton J, Li J. The impact of gamification in educational settings on student learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2020 Aug; 68:1875-901. [HTML]
School-to-school collaboration in England: A configurative review of the empirical evidence
  • P W Armstrong
  • C Brown
  • C J Chapman
Armstrong PW, Brown C, Chapman CJ. School-to-school collaboration in England: A configurative review of the empirical evidence. Review of education. 2021. Wiley.com