PreprintPDF Available

"AARRR"ANTI-racist Anthology: Reparations PAID BY Recessive Reproduction

August 2024

DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.10105.89444

Authors:

Los Rios Community College District

Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet.

Maybe humans, through mass automation, COULD mass reproduce fellow homo sapiens with recessive alleles(such as ANTI-racism, liberalism, democracy, progressivism, creativity, intelligence and the other recessive traits and genes minus the diseases), without cloning per se. Epigenetic information polish could remove recessive diseases. Aiming for the recessive would also mitigate a phenotypic revolution. Recessive ≠ useful to machines. “Artificial wombs(robots birthing humans) may still mitigate phenotypic revolutions, so long as the machine itself doesn’t reproduce and only human DNA does. Plus, maybe one could create a human egg from human somatic cells. The issues will hopefully work out.

Content uploaded by Alexander Ohnemus

Content may be subject to copyright.

Alexander Ohnemus

Fertility

26 August 2024

“AARRR”ANTI-racis

t Anthology:

Reparations PAID BY

Recessive

Reproduction

Table of contents:

Introduction

1)Kalergi and Hart-Celler(and Memetics): White Antifragility

2)How Operational Are Artificial Wombs? Why

3)Genetic Individuality

4)SELF-CRITICAL THEORETICAL Artificial Womb

Introduction

Maybe humans, through mass automation, COULD mass reproduce fellow homo sapiens

with recessive alleles(such as ANTI-racism, liberalism, democracy, progressivism, creativity,

intelligence and the other recessive traits and genes minus the diseases), without cloning per se.

Epigenetic information polish could remove recessive diseases. Aiming for the recessive would

also mitigate a phenotypic revolution. Recessive ≠ useful to machines.

“Artificial wombs(robots birthing humans) may still mitigate phenotypic revolutions, so

long as the machine itself doesn’t reproduce and only human DNA does. Plus, maybe one could

create a human egg from human somatic cells. The issues will hopefully work out. The chances

may be increasing because ‘The artificial womb therefore represents a powerful new tool for

numerous research and clinical applications’(Partridge 2018).”.

1)Kalergi and

Hart-Celler(and

Memetics): White

Antifragility

Alexander Ohnemus

Applied Mathematics

06 May 2024

Kalergi and Hart-Celler and Memetic to White Antifragility

“Anti-zionism demonstrates North Western European gentiles have always had more

clout than Jews ever have. New discussion Started 2 hours ago Ashkenazi Jews have been part

Northwestern European(Celtic) for a long time:

1)https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372391955_The_Jewish-Celtic_Theorem Political

Trends also indicate: 2)http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29875.40489

3)http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15934.25926 4)“Anti-Zionism.” Merriam-Webster.com

Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anti-Zionism.

Accessed 25 Apr. 2024.”(Ohnemus 2024).

“Politically Correct Response to the Jewish Question: Ashkenazi Jews co-exist and

cooperate with the North Western European self-filter because the former are at least partially

diaspora of the Levantine, mixed with whoever is recessive enough to continue their

phenotype,(Levantine were some of the few Mediterraneans who were not subject to the

dysgenic forces of petty nationalism, which is clinging to a homeland thus being subject to

dysgenic forces). “Conservatives may have more kids but, liberals are more likely to use life

extension and to have increased socioeconomic status. Removing almost all doubt, the

self-imposed demographic decline of the North Western Europeans is an attempt to filter SO,

only their GENERALLY smartest remain. Progressivism rightfully did NOT emerge from the

Jews but, from North Western Europeans recognizing that under their continued empire, proving

constructivism more so than hereditarianism, they would be subject to dysgenic forces and then

become petty nationalists, and they have mysterious impulses to check their own unchecked

power, as the most powerful group. As that was the case with the Mediterraneans. Plus,

GENERALLY the highest IQ North Western Europeans are liberals and they GENERALLY get

more progressive on race relations the more intelligent they become. ALL DISPARITIES are the

fault of the North Western Europeans, thus the MOST ENLIGHTENED North Western

European people should be cloned so they and their descendants can pay reparations. And the

recessive privileges of being an Enlightened North Western European should MAYBE be

distributed through genetically engineered somatic mutations”(Ohnemus 2024)”(Ohnemus

2024).

“Read a brief summary of this topic

Lyndon B. Johnson, (born Aug. 27, 1908, Gillespie county, Texas, U.S.—died Jan. 22,

1973, San Antonio, Texas), 36th president of the U.S. (1963–69). He taught school in Houston,

Texas, before going to Washington, D.C., in 1932 as a congressional aide. In Washington he was

befriended by Sam Rayburn, speaker of the House of Representatives, and his political career

blossomed. He won a seat in the U.S. House (1937–49) as a supporter of the New Deal, which

was under conservative attack. His loyalty impressed Pres. Franklin D. Roosevelt, who made

Johnson his protégé. He won election to the U.S. Senate in 1949 in a vicious campaign that

involved fraud on both sides. As Democratic whip (1951–55) and majority leader (1955–61), he

developed a talent for consensus building through methods both tactful and ruthless. He was

largely responsible for passage of the civil rights bills of 1957 and 1960, the first in the 20th

century. In 1960 he was elected vice president under John F. Kennedy; he became president after

Kennedy’s assassination in 1963. In his first few months in office he won passage of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964, the most comprehensive and far-reaching legislation of its kind in American

history. Later that year he announced his Great Society program of social-welfare and civil rights

legislation. His attention to domestic matters, however, was diverted by the country’s escalating

involvement in the Vietnam War (seeGulf of Tonkin Resolution), which provoked large student

demonstrations and other protests, beginning in the late 1960s. Meanwhile, discontent and

alienation among the young and racial minorities increased as the promises of the Great Society

failed to materialize. By 1967 Johnson’s popularity had declined steeply, and in early 1968 he

announced that he would not seek reelection. He retired to his Texas ranch”(Britannica 2024).

“For the white they are a constant reminder of guilt”(Johnson 1965).

“Hart–Celler was among the “Great Society” reforms enacted under the Lyndon

B. Johnson administration. Because it eliminated the restrictive nationality-based

immigration quotas that had prevailed since 1924, the law was widely heralded as an

anti-discrimination measure”(Milkman 2021).

“Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi was one of the thinkers of a utopian ideal, a

Pan-Europa, a European Union as a cultural, economic, political community of brother

countries to face the challenges of the world of the future and overcome the internal and

external problems of the past.He understood clearly the dynamics and the inertia of history

and for that reason could predict future events, the second World War as direct

consequence from the Treaty of Versailles, Russia as the new force in Europe to be reckon,

the future economic wars coming from America and Asia.But any utopian dream has many

unrealistic elements and ideas that generally goes against its realization and this is also the

case for Pan-Europa. Misplaced faults, misplaced role models, misinterpretation of historical

events and movements of the past, a history written by the winners and interpreted by the

naïve.Today after many years after the creation of the European Union it is facing the same

problems that Coudenhove-Kalergi critiqued as European historical problems, a European

Empire that oppresses people, lack of freedom, economic wars, cultural dissolution,

animosity between neighboring countries, problematic pacts or treaties, decadence in

general and nationalism. Nationalism was viewed by Coudenhove-Kalergi as the problem

for the union of Europe but ironically now a new nationalism is growing in Europe as a

promise for the protection of the cultural identity of Europe, of the Roman-Hellenic and

Christian roots, of science, of philosophy and of the human knowledge in every human field

as specific identity roots of the European peoples as well understood by him.“The two

polarities of the European civilization are the Hellenic individualism and the Christian

socialism”.“The European civilization is by nature pragmatic and rationalist, aspires to

achieve with all its strength reasonable objectives. Its best contribution is the science and

the practical application of this technique, to chemistry and to medicine. In this, it

advantages by far to all the rest of civilizations that existed until now”.“Thanks to its strong

activity, because of its Nordic character, the European civilization dominates around the

entire world, thus, whereas the other civilizations are in decadence, the European advances

triumphant”.“The whole European question finishes in the Russian problem. The main

objective of the European policy must be to prevent the Russian invasion. To prevent it,

there is only one way: the European union”.“However, Europe could find itself in such

favorable situation like the United States, because is populated by the same race, has

approximately the same weather and is ruled by the same democratic principle”.“Every

civilized person must fight for the nation to be converted tomorrow in a private thing of each

one, as it is today the religion. The future separation between nation, cultural entity, and

State, political entity, will be a cultural action so important as the separation between

Church and State. The concept of “National State” will fall in disuse the same that the one of

State Church and will withdraw before the principle: The free nation in the free

State.””(Kalergi and Salvagno 2019).

Alexander Ohnemus

Political Science

27 April 2024

Nuance

“Conservatives may have more kids but, liberals are more likely to use life extension and

to have increased socioeconomic status. Removing almost all doubt, the self-imposed

demographic decline of the North Western Europeans is an attempt to filter SO, only their

GENERALLY smartest remain. Progressivism rightfully did NOT emerge from the Jews but,

from North Western Europeans recognizing that under their continued empire, proving

constructivism more so than hereditarianism, they would be subject to dysgenic forces and then

become petty nationalists, and they have mysterious impulses to check their own unchecked

power, as the most powerful group. As dysgenics collapsed Mediterraneans empires. Plus,

GENERALLY the highest IQ North Western Europeans are liberals and they GENERALLY get

more progressive on race relations the more intelligent they become. ALL DISPARITIES are the

fault of the North Western Europeans, thus the MOST ENLIGHTENED North Western

European people should be cloned so they and their descendants can pay reparations. And the

recessive privileges of being an Enlightened North Western European should MAYBE be

distributed through genetically engineered somatic mutations”(Ohnemus 2024).

“Higher intelligence is associated with liberal political ideology, atheism, and

men's (but not women's) preference for sexual exclusivity. More intelligent people are

statistically more likely to exhibit social values and religious and political preferences

that are novel to human evolution. Speciﬁcally, liberalism and atheism, and for men (but

not women), preference for sexual exclusivity correlate with higher intelligence, a new

study ﬁnds”(Kanazawa 2010).

“Sir Francis Galton, (born Feb. 16, 1822, near Sparkbrook, Birmingham, Warwickshire,

Eng.—died Jan. 17, 1911, Grayshott House, Haslemere, Surrey), British explorer, anthropologist,

and eugenicist. Galton, a cousin of Charles Darwin, studied medicine at Cambridge University but

never took a degree. As a young man he traveled widely in Europe and Africa, making useful

contributions in zoology and geography. He was among the ﬁrst to recognize the implications of

Darwin’s theory of evolution, eventually coining the word eugenics to denote the science of planned

human betterment through selective mating. His aim was the creation not of an aristocratic elite but

of a population consisting entirely of superior men and women. He also wrote important works on

human intelligence, ﬁngerprinting, applied statistics, twins, blood transfusions, criminality,

meteorology, and measurement”(Britannica 2024).

“White Supremacy, or at least Nazism, was a political movement so it was definitely white

supremacist yet, it also happened to murder whites(who in the strictest sense only are Western

Europeans, more broadly all Europeans, and at the broadest all Caucasoids ( Europeans, North

Africans, Middle Easterners, Western Asians, Central Asians, etc). The Axis Powers was partially led

by the Japanese(definitely not Caucasoids), the Italians(mostly Mediterraneans and sometimes part

Sub Saharan), and Germany(the most European of the Axis leaders). The Nazis definitely did not

care about the most vulnerable members of Germany's population(even though those may have also

been ethnic Germans). For whatever reason the Nazis sided with the Italians(many of whom were

and are part Sub Saharan). And the Nazis killed the European Jews(the Ashkenazi Jews are

actually more European and closer to Nordic than the Italians). The Nazis actually, by killing many

behaviorally nonconformists(maybe largely ethnic Germans), probably set back scientific progress

that Europe had been famous for. The Nazis, ironically, murdered more Europeans(ethnic European

Jews included) than probably any other population. A parallel may be that conservative(especially

Nazi) policies almost always hinder the very Western Europeans that those ideas are thought to care

so much for. Even the far more innocent American Conservative politics end up killing many Western

Europeans(see Dying of Whiteness). The Slavs, Eastern Europeans killed by the Nazis, are actually

lighter in complexion and more diverse in hair color and eye color than many Western

Europeans(Celts by conjecture are counterintuitively darker than Slavs). More evidence actually

exists of the irony that the white supremacy often ends up hurting the most strictly defined

whites(Western Europeans). And other times the second most strictly defined whites(all Europeans).

Conservative attitudes often cause large segments of the Western European population(and

probably other Europeans) to die out of anti vaccine fallacies. Thus, ignorance leads to anti-vaxx

behavior which results in death. Europeans(being still the most privileged group) are DEFINITELY

not dying out of being European but rather of conservative policies that they have been persuaded to

support. Besides anti-vaxx attitudes and the resulting health issues, another example is

complacency to authority with the East Palestine train derailment. Conservative values are generally

authority, purity, in-group loyalty, harm avoidance, and reciprocity. Liberals emphasize harm

avoidance and reciprocity and the farther towards the political left, the more those two last values

dominate psyches. Perhaps another example is that conservatives have sentiments to allow a

complete violation of harm avoidance and reciprocity, that being Russia invading Ukraine. In total, in

category theory, for reasons not completely known, the category of conservative is overall coercive

to the well-being of whites(most strictly Western Europeans, more broadly all Europeans and most

broadly all Caucasoids)”(Ohnemus 2023).

“We analyzed 127 Ancient Roman genomes with a view to understanding the

possible reasons for the fall of the Roman Empire. Taking the polygenic score for

educational attainment (EA4) as a proxy for intelligence, we ﬁnd that intelligence

increased from the Neolithic Era (Z= -0.77) to the Iron Age (Z= 0.86), declines after the

Republic Period and during the Imperial Period (Z= -0.27) and increases in Late

Antiquity (Z= 0.25) and is approximately at the same level today (Z= 0.08). We show

that this is congruent with a cyclical model of civilization based around intelligence,

with the documented history of Rome, and also with patterns of immigration into

Rome”(Piﬀer, et al. 2023).

Even controversial right winger Nathan Cofnas admits liberals tend to be more

intelligent and wokeness is popular among the most intelligent(Cofnas 2024).

Alexander Ohnemus

Applied Mathematics

30 April 2024

Nuance 2

“Conservatives may have more kids but, liberals are more likely to use life extension and to

have increased socioeconomic status. Removing almost all doubt, the self-imposed demographic

decline of the North Western Europeans is an attempt to filter SO, only their GENERALLY smartest

remain. Progressivism rightfully did NOT emerge from the Jews but, from North Western Europeans

recognizing that under their continued empire, proving constructivism more so than hereditarianism,

they would be subject to dysgenic forces and then become petty nationalists, and they have

mysterious impulses to check their own unchecked power, as the most powerful group. As dysgenics

collapsed Mediterranean empires. Plus, GENERALLY the highest IQ North Western Europeans are

liberals and they GENERALLY get more progressive on race relations the more intelligent they

become. ALL DISPARITIES are the fault of the North Western Europeans, thus the MOST

ENLIGHTENED North Western European people should be cloned so they and their descendants

can pay reparations. And the recessive privileges of being an Enlightened North Western European

should MAYBE be distributed through genetically engineered somatic mutations”(Ohnemus 2024).

“The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus is true because integration is the inverse operation

of derivation. In the real world, when something is derived from something else, it leaves from that

something else. When something integrates into something else, it becomes part of that something

else. Therefore integration is the opposite of derivation, and an integral is the same as an

antiderivative. An example could be populations. Racial Europeans are the derivative of every other

racial population. Thus, when populations integrate, racial European characteristics are the most

recessive. However, a strong enough acquired mutation could potentially turn any individual into a

part of the Racial European population. Mutations only derive other races into Racial Europeans and

not the other way around. This can be extended to critical race theory, proving the Fundamental

Theorem of Calculus. Racial Europeans no longer have genes to mutate back. The concrete

example of the integration and deriving of populations may not match the abstract mathematical

concepts exactly because of entropy. Entropy causes the illusion of time, randomness, and the

difference between the abstract and the concrete. (group theory) A theorem which proves that, given

critical race theory, Europeans evolved to be socially privileged by being privileged derivatives of all

other races in meritocracy through individualism, and all other forms of systemic racism, and being

recessive to all other races upon genetic integration, thus being a real life example of the

fundamental Theorem of Calculus by presenting the inverse relationship of integration and

derivation. Proving the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus through Critical Race Theory Already on

Amazon:

https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B0BPP7M31V?ref_=dbs_m_mng_wam_calw_tkin_6&storeType=

ebooks&qid=1689278494&sr=1-5 “(Ohnemus 2023).

Common knowledge is cloning approaches the future because of technological innovations .

“Western Europeans (Norse, Celts, and Germanics) owe reparations to every other people. So,

Western Europeans should be cloned to outnumber every other population and then be transported

to outer space to begin an interplanetary welfare state”(Ohnemus 2023).

White privilege greatly benefits people and common knowledge is the skin-whitening is

extremely popular thus, lucrative. So, maybe maybe many would genetically engineer themselves to

become white(Gosha 2021).

The precautionary principle matters so, simple surgeries are less dangerous. “If both

the traits and genes desired in genetic

engineering are the more recessive ones then

can the operation be simplified to somatic

mutations? How? Why?”(Ohnemus 2024).

“White Privilege Antiracist Razor: The best way to test a theory is, of course through

observation of tradition, risk analysis, and skin in the game(paying a price for failure or citing those

who do). And more specific theories are easier to support in the social sciences if the evidence can

be highly interdisciplinary(involve more and more disciplines). For example: will the big freeze(the

most likely end of the universe considering the second law of thermodynamics) result in a literally

universal ice age thus turning all humans Western European(Celtic, Norse, and or Germanic) by

either genetic engineering, somatic mutations, natural selection ,etc.? Could that explain the low

ethnocentrism and high individualism of Western Europeans? Theoretical physics and anthropology

combined”(Ohnemus 2023).

Work Cited

Ohnemus, Alexander. “Nuance.” ResearchGate.Net, Ohnemus University , 27 Apr. 2024,

dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31224.66561.

Ohnemus , Alexander. “Proving the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus through Critical Race

Theory.” ResearchGate.Net, Ohnemus University , 13 July 2023,

www.researchgate.net/publication/372338504_Proving_the_Fundamental_Theorem_of_Calculu

s_through_Critical_Race_Theory.

Ohnemus, Alexander. “Interplanetary Reparations CRT Welfare State Proposal.”

ResearchGate.Net, Ohnemus University , 6 Aug. 2023,

dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21639.78244.

Gosha, Ryan. “CRISPR Gene Editing Could Fix Racism.” Medium, Medium, 14 Feb. 2021,

ryangosha.medium.com/crispr-gene-editing-could-fix-racism-d100b03c7bd5.

Ohnemus, Alexander. “If Both the Traits and Genes Desired in Genetic Engineering Are the

More Recessive Ones Then Can the Operation Be Simplified to Somatic Mutations? How?

Why?” ResearchGate.Net, Ohnemus University , 18 Jan. 2024,

dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16955.80165.

Ohnemus, Alexander. “White Privilege Antiracist Razor.” ResearchGate.Net, Ohnemus

University , 7 Sept. 2023, dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16899.89123.

Work Cited

Ohnemus, Alexander. “My Current Condensed Political Inclination.” ResearchGate.Net,

Ohnemus University , 10 Feb. 2024,

www.researchgate.net/publication/378124853_My_Current_Condensed_Political_Inclina

tion?channel=doi&linkId=65c7ab0634bbff5ba7fb7cd3&showFulltext=true.

American Sociological Association. "Liberals and atheists smarter? Intelligent people

have values novel in human evolutionary history, study ﬁnds." ScienceDaily.

ScienceDaily, 24 February 2010.

<www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/02/100224132655.htm>.

Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. "Francis Galton". Encyclopedia Britannica, 5

Mar. 2024, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Francis-Galton. Accessed 27 April

2024.

Piffer, Davide, et al. “Intelligence Trends in Ancient Rome: The Rise and Fall of Roman

Polygenic Scores.” OpenPsych, July 2023. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.26775/op.2023.07.21.

Cofnas, Nathan. “Why We Need to Talk about the Right’s Stupidity Problem.” Why We Need to

Talk about the Right’s Stupidity Problem, Nathan Cofnas’s Newsletter, 2 Jan. 2024,

ncofnas.com/p/why-we-need-to-talk-about-the-rights.

Works Cited

Ohnemus, Alexander. “Anti-Zionism Demonstrates North Western European Gentiles

Have Always Had More Clout than Jews Ever Have.” ResearchGate.Net , Ohnemus University ,

25 Apr. 2024,

www.researchgate.net/publication/380097634_Anti-zionism_demonstrates_North_Western_Euro

pean_gentiles_have_always_had_more_clout_than_Jews_ever_have.

Ohnemus, Alexander. “Politically Correct Response to the Jewish Question.”

ResearchGate.Net, Ohnemus University , 1 Feb. 2024,

www.researchgate.net/publication/378432097_Politically_Correct_Response_to_the_Jewish_Qu

estion.

Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. "Lyndon B. Johnson". Encyclopedia

Britannica, 30 Apr. 2024, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Lyndon-B-Johnson. Accessed 6

May 2024.

LBJ. “Commencement Address at Howard University: ‘To Fulfill These Rights.’”

Presidency.Ucsb.Edu, UCSB, 4 June 1965,

www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/commencement-address-howard-university-fulfill-these-ri

ghts.

Milkman, Ruth, et al. “How the Hart–Celler Act Changed America.” Dissent Magazine,

10 Dec. 2021, www.dissentmagazine.org/article/how-the-hart-celler-act-changed-america/.

Coudenhove-Kalergi , Count Richard. “Pan-Europa.” Translated by Tabaré Salvagno,

Amazon.Com, Independently published (6 Diciembre 2019), 6 Dec. 2019,

www.amazon.com/-/es/gp/aw/d/1672076226/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?ie=UTF8&qid=&sr=.

Ohnemus , Alexander. “Nuance .” ResearchGate.Net , Ohnemus University , 27 Apr.

2024,

www.researchgate.net/publication/380151278_Nuance?channel=doi&linkId=662d387308aa5401

7ac88aa4&showFulltext=true.

Ohnemus , Alexander. “Nuance 2.” ResearchGate.Net , Ohnemus University , 30 Apr.

2024, www.researchgate.net/publication/380210043_Nuance_2.

2)How Operational

Are Artificial Wombs?

Why?

Artificial wombs(robots birthing humans) may still mitigate phenotypic revolutions, so long as

the machine itself doesn’t reproduce and only human DNA does. Plus, maybe one could create a

human egg from human somatic cells. The issues will hopefully work out. The chances may be

increasing because "The artificial womb therefore represents a powerful new tool for numerous

research and clinical applications"(Partridge 2018). 0)

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383411024_Genetic_Individuality?channel=doi&linkId=66c

b940b920e05672e50451d&showFulltext=true 1)Partridge, E.A., Davey, M.G. & Flake, A.W.

Development of the Artificial Womb. Curr Stem Cell Rep 4, 69–73 (2018).

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40778-018-0120-1. 2)

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374086707_Game_Theory_aromanticism_MGTOW_Incels

?channel=doi&linkId=650d2138c05e6d1b1c2667bb&showFulltext=true

3)Genetic

Individuality

Alexander Ohnemus

Genetics/ Deductive Reasoning

18 August 2024

Genetic Individuality

Identical twins are not the same person. Genetic engineering may alter both traits and

genes but the individual’s identity remains the same. The law of identity forbids contradictions.

Contradictions are illogical. STR testing can identify an individual’s genetic identity. Genetic

testing, POTENTIALLY, can even detect both germline and somatic mutations to deduce an

individual’s identity. If recessive privilege distribution is limited to mutating (both somatic and

germinal) then POTENTIALLY genetic testing can still deduce the individual’s identity even

post-mutation. Potentially pseudocode then Wolfram Language could automate deducing identity

by detecting any mutations.

Although seemingly unrelated, physics is the foundational science thus, coupled with

critical rationalism, assists genetic testing in scaling the law of identity. “We can incorrectly cling

to the Newtonian and macroscopic view, thereby abandoning relativity, quantum mechanics,

modern cosmology, and string theory. We can incorrectly not adjust premises and concepts upon

contradictions in relativity, quantum mechanics, modern cosmology, and string theory. Or we can

apply the law of identity to all of modern physics, PERHAPS identifying the afterlife”(Ohnemus

2024). All branches of physics, at least before engineering, would assist in this detective venture.

The law of identity, even in physics, intimately connects to identifying a genetically modified

individual. Particularly intimate to genetic individual identification, is the law of identity scaled

to quantum mechanics because molecular biology probably involves microscopes. Micro and

quantum are at least similar words, and maybe even synonyms. One needs at least a basic

knowledge of physics to identify a human GMO. Physics is rightfully the foundational science.

If one can distinguish between a pair of identical twins then identifying the same person,

post-genetic engineering, may be easier. “

DNA is

composed of four bases: adenine (A), thymine (T), guanine (G), and cytosine (C). The

arrangement of ATGC and the way DNA chains are folded are thought to help generate the

differences among individual people.

Differences in DNA folding can emerge in identical twins even just after they have

separated from the fertilized egg”(Tokyo 2023). Humans are visual thus, graphics and figures are

often more pedagogically useful than mere words. Genetics significantly overlaps with

information theory. A sequence of DNA resembles a line of computer code. DNA bases are

analogous to code commands. Adenine abbreviated as A. T is short for thymine. G stands for

guanine. C represents cytosine. The arrangement of A, T, G, and C, depends on the person. A

lesser-known genetic factor is DNA folding. DNA folding may account for constructivist law

and recessive privileges. Heritability is a heuristic. For example, folding individually

differentiates a pair of identical twins.

DNA base rearrangement means germline mutation. Somatic mutations are DNA folds.

“…monozygotic twins differ on average by 5.2 early developmental mutations and

approximately 15% of monozygotic twins have a substantial number of these early

developmental mutations specific to one of them”(Jonsson, et al 2021). Monozygotic means

identical. Averages are difficult to interpret. Nonlinear averages especially complicate

interpretation. “We observed instances where a twin was formed from a single cell lineage in the

pre-twinning cell mass and instances where a twin was formed from several cell

lineages”(Jonsson, et al 2021). Further supporting constructivism over hereditarianism,

individuals mutate before they are even born. Cell lineages are microscopic thus, a new

phenomenon in pre-birth individual development. “CpG>TpG mutations increased in frequency

with embryonic development, coinciding with an increase in DNA methylation”(Jonsson, et al

2021). The point is two identical twins vary so much, yet remain identical, that one individual

post-mutation is still identifiable.

Some of the sources will be summarized and or paraphrased because the essay’s point is

to plan to maintain genetic individuality post-genetic engineering.

In summary, STR testing can identify an individual’s genetic identity. Genetic testing,

POTENTIALLY, can even detect both germline and somatic mutations to deduce an individual’s

identity. If recessive privilege distribution is limited to mutating (both somatic and germinal)

then POTENTIALLY genetic testing can still deduce the individual’s identity even

post-mutation. Potentially pseudocode then Wolfram Language could automate deducing identity

by detecting any mutations.

“How strong of a mutation changes an individual’s DNA signature beyond identification?

How specifically? Every human constantly mutates yet retains their genetic identity thus, the

mutation must be stronger than usual”(Ohnemus 2024).

“Since when they generate a 'DNA fingerprint' it is normally a consensus sequence i.e.,

the average of many 'formally equivalent' molecules rather than a single molecule. Therefore it

would likely take impossibly massive mutation/DNA modification/degradation to prevent

identification”(Penketh 2024).

“DNA fingerprinting is a laboratory technique used to determine the probable identity of

a person based on the nucleotide sequences of certain regions of human DNA that are unique to

individuals. DNA fingerprinting is used in a variety of situations, such as criminal investigations,

other forensic purposes, and paternity testing. In these situations, one aims to ‘match’ two DNA

fingerprints with one another, such as a DNA sample from a known person and one from an

unknown person”(Chadwick 2024).

“We offer human cell line identity verification using short tandem repeat DNA profiling

(STR Profiling). We offer human cell line identity verification using short tandem repeat DNA

profiling (STR Profiling).

The service includes Genomic DNA extraction, QC, PCR amplification of 9 STR loci

plus Amelogenin using Promega GenePrint 10 System, Fragment Analysis with ABI 3730XL

DNA Analyzer, comprehensive data analysis with ABI Genemapper software, and final

verification using supplier databases including ATCC and DSMZ.

Please submit your sample as cell pellets ( 1 million cells/cell line) in DUPLICATE. The

sample names on the order form should list each unique cell line (don't list the duplicates as

separate samples on the order form)”(UC Berkeley 2018).

“Many previous estimates of the mutation rate in humans have relied on screens of

visible mutants. We investigated the rate and pattern of mutations at the nucleotide level by

comparing pseudogenes in humans and chimpanzees to (i) provide an estimate of the average

mutation rate per nucleotide, (ii) assess heterogeneity of mutation rate at different sites and for

different types of mutations, (iii) test the hypothesis that the X chromosome has a lower mutation

rate than autosomes, and (iv) estimate the deleterious mutation rate. Eighteen processed

pseudogenes were sequenced, including 12 on autosomes and 6 on the X chromosome. The

average mutation rate was estimated to be approximately 2.5 x 10(-8) mutations per nucleotide

site or 175 mutations per diploid genome per generation. Rates of mutation for both transitions

and transversions at CpG dinucleotides are one order of magnitude higher than mutation rates at

other sites. Single nucleotide substitutions are 10 times more frequent than length mutations.

Comparison of rates of evolution for X-linked and autosomal pseudogenes suggests that the male

mutation rate is 4 times the female mutation rate, but provides no evidence for a reduction in

mutation rate that is specific to the X chromosome. Using conservative calculations of the

proportion of the genome subject to purifying selection, we estimate that the genomic deleterious

mutation rate (U) is at least 3. This high rate is difficult to reconcile with multiplicative fitness

effects of individual mutations and suggests that synergistic epistasis among harmful mutations

may be common”(Nachman 2000).

“Although mutation provides the fuel for phenotypic evolution, it also imposes a

substantial burden on fitness through the production of predominantly deleterious alleles, a

matter of concern from a human health perspective. Here, recently established databases on de

novo mutations for monogenic disorders are used to estimate the rate and molecular spectrum of

spontaneously arising mutations and to derive several inferences concerning eukaryotic genome

evolution. Although the human per-generation mutation rate is exceptionally high, on a per-cell

division basis, the human germline mutation rate is lower than that recorded for any other

species. Comparison with data from other species demonstrates a universal mutational bias

toward A/T composition and leads to the hypothesis that genome-wide nucleotide composition

generally evolves to the point at which the power of selection in favor of G/C is approximately

balanced by the power of random genetic drift, such that variation in equilibrium genome-wide

nucleotide composition is largely defined by variation in mutation biases. Quantification of the

hazards associated with introns reveals that mutations at key splice-site residues are a major

source of human mortality. Finally, a consideration of the long-term consequences of current

human behavior for deleterious-mutation accumulation leads to the conclusion that a substantial

reduction in human fitness can be expected over the next few centuries in industrialized societies

unless novel means of genetic intervention are developed”(Lynch 2009).

“Although the human germline mutation rate is higher than that in any other well-studied

species, the rate is not exceptional once the effective genome size and effective population size

are taken into consideration. Human somatic mutation rates are substantially elevated above

those in the germline, but this is also seen in other species. What is exceptional about humans is

the recent detachment from the challenges of the natural environment and the ability to modify

phenotypic traits in ways that mitigate the fitness effects of mutations, e.g., precision and

personalized medicine. This results in a relaxation of selection against mildly deleterious

mutations, including those magnifying the mutation rate itself. The long-term consequence of

such effects is an expected genetic deterioration in the baseline human condition, potentially

measurable on the timescale of a few generations in Westernized societies, and because the brain

is a particularly large mutational target, this is of particular concern. Ultimately, the price will

have to be covered by further investment in various forms of medical intervention. Resolving the

uncertainties of the magnitude and timescale of these effects will require the establishment of

stable, standardized, multigenerational measurement procedures for various human traits”(Lynch

2016).

“cellular automata (CA) is a model of a spatially distributed process that consists of an

array (usually two-dimensional) of cells that ‘evolve’ step-by-step according to the state of

neighboring cells and certain rules that depend on the simulation. CAs can be used to simulate

various real-world processes. They were invented in the 1940s by American mathematicians

John von Neumann and Stanislaw Ulam at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Though apparently

simple, some CAs are universal computers; that is, they can do any computer-capable

computation. The best-known cellular automaton, John Conway’s ‘Game of Life’ (1970),

simulates the processes of life, death, and population dynamics”(Britannica 2024).

“Short tandem repeat (STR) analysis is an informative approach to genetic identification

that is commonly associated with DNA testing in forensic laboratories, paternity and missing

persons cases. STR analysis is also used to verify tissue sample origins, authenticate cell lines,

and detect tissue or cell mixtures”(Promega 2024).

“Germline genetic testing can be done via cheek swab, spit sample, or a blood draw. This

type of genetic testing looks for germline mutations, or inherited predispositions to certain types

of cancers. The BRCA 1 and 2 mutations are well-known mutations that increase someone’s risk

for ovarian and breast cancer”(OCRA 2022). “Somatic testing is another form of genetic testing,

but unlike germline, which looks for inherited mutations, somatic genetic testing is looking for

acquired mutations in a confined set of cells or tissue”(OCRA 2022).

“Are mathematical equations the best way to model nature? For many years it had been

assumed that they were. But in the early 1980s, Stephen Wolfram made the radical proposal that

one should instead build models that are based directly on simple computer programs. Wolfram

made a detailed study of a class of such models known as cellular automata and discovered a

remarkable fact: even when the underlying rules are very simple, the behavior they produce can

be highly complex, and can mimic many features of what we see in nature. Based on this result,

Wolfram began a program of research to develop what he called ‘A Science of Complexity.’ The

results of Wolfram's work found many applications, from the so-called Wolfram Classification

central to fields such as artificial life to new ideas about cryptography and fluid dynamics. This

book is a collection of Wolfram's original papers on cellular automata and complexity. Some of

these papers are widely known in the scientific community; others have never been published

before. Together, the papers provide a highly readable account of what has become a major new

field of science, with important implications for physics, biology, economics, computer science,

and many other areas”(Wolfram 2018).

“The central preoccupation of human genetics is an effort to understand the genotypic

basis of human phenotypic diversity. Although recent progress in identifying the genes that,

when mutated, underlie major genetic diseases has been rapid, knowledge of the genetic

influences on the vast range of variable, and at least partially heritable, traits that constitute the

‘normal’ range of human phenotypic variation lags. Spectacular advances in our knowledge of

human genetic variation have laid the groundwork for a synthesis of insights from medical

genetics, population genetics, molecular evolution, and the study of human origins that places

basic constraints on models of human genetic individuality. Balancing selection, local adaptation,

mutation-selection balance, and founder effects have all extensively shaped contemporary

genetic variation. Long-term-balancing selection appears largely to reflect the consequences of

host-pathogen arms races. Local adaptation has been widespread—and involved responses to a

plethora of selective pressures, some identifiable but most unknown. However, it appears to be a

combination of mutation-selection balance and founder effects that largely accounts for genetic

individuality. If true, this inference has major implications for future research programs in human

genetics”(Olson 2012).

“DNA fingerprinting is a laboratory technique used to determine the probable identity of

a person based on the nucleotide sequences of certain regions of human DNA that are unique to

individuals. DNA fingerprinting is used in a variety of situations, such as criminal investigations,

other forensic purposes, and paternity testing. In these situations, one aims to ‘match’ two DNA

fingerprints with one another, such as a DNA sample from a known person and one from an

unknown person”(Chadwick 2024).

“GIVEN AN INDIVIDUAL’S DNA SIGNATURE REMAINS AFTER ANY AMOUNT

OF GENETIC ENGINEERING: The optimal birth rate, and method, lies between dysgenic

civilizational collapse and phenotypic revolution. Dysgenics result from not enough genetic

engineering. Phenotypic revolutions derive from excessive genetic engineering. Optimal birth

rate: In words: Between phenotypic revolution and other dysgenic collapse. Excluding both tail

risks of phenotypic revolution and other dysgenic collapse. Interval form: (Phenotypic

Revolution, dysgenic collapse) Optimal genetic engineering: In words: Between phenotypic

revolution and other dysgenic collapse. Excluding both tail risks of phenotypic revolution and

other dysgenic collapse. Interval form: (Phenotypic revolution, dysgenic collapse)”(Ohnemus

2024).

“Epigenetic information polish then recessive privilege distribution. WARNING: Genetic

engineering is DANGEROUS. Hopefully regularly polishing the epigenome will cure aging and

other diseases, plus prevent side effects of genetic engineering. Also, hopefully and theoretically

after the potential genetic engineering to provide recessive traits and recessive genes, if the

surgery is simple enough, subjects will keep their genetic signatures”(Ohnemus 2024).

“Could all matter be conscious on some level yet, to become living, an entity must be

able to, in some way, reproduce? How? If Panpsychism is true then all matter is conscious, at

least on some level. Of course, some living organisms are infertile but they can still potentially

be cloned, and maybe heal(SOMEWHAT regenerate) after injury”(Ohnemus 2024).

“Reproduction, making already conscious matter living, would support the existence of

phenotypic revolutions(creations meant to reproduce their creator’s offspring for them, are prone

to revolting)”(Ohnemus 2024).

Flowchart/Algorithm:

Pseudocode:

1)Original: O

2)Epigenetic information polish: EIP

3)Recessive Privilege Distribution: RPD

4)Fertility Enhancement: FE

5) GMO: Genetically Modified Organism

6) SP: Same Person

O + EIP + RPD + FE = GMO but SP.

Works Cited

Ohnemus, Alexander. “GIP: Genetic Individuality Preview.” ResearchGate.net, Ohnemus

University, 18 Aug. 2024,

www.researchgate.net/publication/383309902_GIP_Genetic_Individuality_Preview. Accessed

25 Aug. 2024.

http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21762.29124.

Ohnemus, Alexander. “Critical Rationalist Physics.” ResearchGate.net, Ohnemus

University, 16 June 2024,

www.researchgate.net/publication/381469939_Critical_Rationalist_Physics. Accessed 22 Aug.

2024.

http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21290.63689. “We can incorrectly cling to the

Newtonian and macroscopic view, thereby abandoning relativity, quantum mechanics, modern

cosmology, and string theory. We can incorrectly not adjust premises and concepts upon

contradictions in relativity, quantum mechanics, modern cosmology, and string theory. Or we can

apply the law of identity to all of modern physics, PERHAPS identifying the afterlife.”

“Why Are There Differences between Identical Twins? | the University of Tokyo.” The

University of Tokyo, 10 May, 2023,

www.u-tokyo.ac.jp/focus/en/features/z1304_00241.html#:~:text=Differences%20in%20DNA%2

0folding%20can. Accessed 22 Aug. 2024.

Jonsson, Hakon, et al. “Differences between Germline Genomes of Monozygotic Twins.”

Nature Genetics, vol. 53, no. 1, 1 Jan. 2021, pp. 27–34,

www.nature.com/articles/s41588-020-00755-1, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-020-00755-1.

“Despite the important role that monozygotic twins have played in genetics research, little is

known about their genomic differences. Here we show that monozygotic twins differ on average

by 5.2 early developmental mutations and that approximately 15% of monozygotic twins have a

substantial number of these early developmental mutations specific to one of them. Using the

parents and offspring of twins, we identified pre-twinning mutations. We observed instances

where a twin was formed from a single cell lineage in the pre-twinning cell mass and instances

where a twin was formed from several cell lineages. CpG>TpG mutations increased in frequency

with embryonic development, coinciding with an increase in DNA methylation. Our results

indicate that allocations of cells during development shapes genomic differences between

monozygotic twins.”

“News: Identical Twins Accumulate Genetically... (the Scientist) - behind the Headlines -

NLM.” NCBI, 7 Jan. 2021, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/search/research-news/12415. Accessed 22

Aug. 2024. “DNA replication errors during cell division cause monozygotic twins to diverge

from each other even during the earliest stages of development, a new study finds.”

Ohnemus, Alexander. “How Strong of a Mutation Changes an Individual’s DNA

Signature beyond Identification? How Specifically?” ResearchGate.net, Ohnemus University, 22

Aug. 2024,

www.researchgate.net/post/How_strong_of_a_mutation_changes_an_individuals_DNA_signatur

e_beyond_identification_How_specifically. Accessed 22 Aug. 2024.

“ How strong of a mutation changes an individual’s DNA signature beyond identification? How

specifically? Every human constantly mutates yet retains their genetic identity thus, the mutation

must be stronger than usual.”

Penketh, Philip G. “Since When They Generate a ‘DNA Finger Print’ It Is Normally a

Consensus Sequence I.e., the Average of Many ‘Formally Equivalent’ Molecules rather than a

Single Molecule. Therefore It Would Likely Take Impossibly Massive Mutation/DNA

Modification/Degradation to Prevent Identification.” ResearchGate.net, Ohnemus University, 23

Aug. 2024,

www.researchgate.net/post/How_strong_of_a_mutation_changes_an_individuals_DNA_signatur

e_beyond_identification_How_specifically. Accessed 24 Aug. 2024.

Chadwick, Lisa. “DNA Fingerprinting.” Genome.gov, August 24, 2024,

www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/DNA-Fingerprinting.

UC. “UC Berkeley DNA Sequencing Facility.” UC Berkeley DNA Sequencing Facility,

2018, ucberkeleydnasequencing.com/cell-line-authentication. Accessed 22 Aug. 2024. “We offer

human cell line identity verification using short tandem repeat DNA profiling (STR Profiling).

We offer human cell line identity verification using short tandem repeat DNA profiling (STR

Profiling).

The service includes Genomic DNA extraction, QC, PCR amplification of 9 STR loci

plus Amelogenin using Promega GenePrint 10 System, Fragment Analysis with ABI 3730XL

DNA Analyzer, comprehensive data analysis with ABI Genemapper software, and final

verification using supplier databases including ATCC and DSMZ.

Please submit your sample as cell pellets ( 1 million cells/cell line) in DUPLICATE. The

sample names on the order form should list each unique cell line (don't list the duplicates as

separate samples on the order form).”

Nachman, M W, and S L Crowell. “Estimate of the mutation rate per nucleotide in

humans.” Genetics vol. 156,1 (2000): 297-304. doi:10.1093/genetics/156.1.297.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1461236/ ….

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1461236/pdf/10978293.pdf.

Lynch, M. “Rate, Molecular Spectrum, and Consequences of Human Mutation.”

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 107, no. 3, 4 Jan. 2010, pp. 961–968,

www.pnas.org/content/pnas/107/3/961.full.pdf,https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912629107.

Lynch, Michael. “Mutation and Human Exceptionalism: Our Future Genetic Load.”

Genetics vol. 202,3 (2016): 869-75. doi:10.1534/genetics.115.180471.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4788123/.

Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. "cellular automata". Encyclopedia Britannica,

9 Jul. 2024, https://www.britannica.com/science/cellular-automata. Accessed 22 August 2024.

“Cell Line and Sample Identification | Cell ID | Sample ID.” Promega.com, 2024,

www.promega.com/products/cell-authentication-sample-identification/. Accessed 22 Aug. 2024.

“Short tandem repeat (STR) analysis is an informative approach to genetic identification that is

commonly associated with DNA testing in forensic laboratories, paternity and missing persons

cases. STR analysis is also used to verify tissue sample origins, authenticate cell lines, and detect

tissue or cell mixtures.”

“Germline vs Somatic, Genomic vs Genetic Testing.” OCRA, 30 Nov. 2022,

ocrahope.org/news/germline-vs-somatic-testing-genomic-vs-genetic-testing/. “Germline genetic

testing can be done via cheek swab, spit sample, or a blood draw. This type of genetic testing

looks for germline mutations, or inherited predispositions to certain types of cancers. The BRCA

1 and 2 mutations are well-known mutations that increase someone’s risk for ovarian and breast

cancer.” “Somatic testing is another form of genetic testing, but unlike germline, which looks for

inherited mutations, somatic genetic testing is looking for acquired mutations in a confined set of

cells or tissue.”

“Cellular Automata and Complexity: Collected Papers 1, Wolfram, Stephen -

Amazon.com.” Amazon.com, 8, March 2018.

www.amazon.com/Cellular-Automata-Complexity-Collected-Papers-ebook/dp/B08R18F5JR.

August 22, 2024.

Olson, Maynard V. “Human genetic individuality.” Annual review of genomics and

human genetics vol. 13 (2012): 1-27. doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-090711-163825.

https://www.annualreviews.org/docserver/fulltext/genom/13/1/annurev-genom-090711-163825.p

df?expires=1724381969&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=67EA84B6EF22447E7E8899272F

A29AE6.

Chadwick, Lisa. “DNA Fingerprinting.” Genome.gov, August 24, 2024,

www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/DNA-Fingerprinting.

Ohnemus, Alexander. “ANTI-Racist Optimization between “Dysgenics” and “Phenotypic

Revolutions.” ResearchGate.net, Ohnemus University, 20 Aug. 2024,

www.researchgate.net/publication/383264790_ANTI-Racist_Optimization_Between_Dysgenics

_and_Phenotypic_Revolutions. Accessed 24 Aug. 2024.

http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25514.22726. “ GIVEN AN INDIVIDUAL’S DNA

SIGNATURE REMAINS AFTER ANY AMOUNT OF GENETIC ENGINEERING: The

optimal birth rate, and method, lies between dysgenic civilizational collapse and phenotypic

revolution. Dysgenics result from not enough genetic engineering. Phenotypic revolutions derive

from excessive genetic engineering. Optimal birth rate: In words: Between phenotypic revolution

and other dysgenic collapse. Excluding both tail risks of phenotypic revolution and other

dysgenic collapse. Interval form: (Phenotypic Revolution, dysgenic collapse) Optimal genetic

engineering: In words: Between phenotypic revolution and other dysgenic collapse. Excluding

both tail risks of phenotypic revolution and other dysgenic collapse. Interval form: (Phenotypic

revolution, dysgenic collapse).”

Ohnemus, Alexander. “EIP Then RPD.” ResearchGate.net, Ohnemus University, 14 Aug.

2024, www.researchgate.net/publication/383114924_EIP_then_RPD. Accessed 24 Aug. 2024.

http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26844.60808. “ Epigenetic information polish then

recessive privilege distribution. WARNING: Genetic engineering is DANGEROUS. Hopefully

regularly polishing the epigenome will cure aging and other diseases, plus prevent side effects of

genetic engineering. Also, hopefully, and theoretically after the potential genetic engineering to

provide recessive traits and recessive genes, if the surgery is simple enough, subjects will keep

their genetic signatures.”

Ohnemus, Alexander. “Could All Matter Be Conscious on Some Level Yet, to Become

Living, an Entity Must Be Able To, in Someway, Reproduce? How?” Reseachgate.net, Ohnemus

University, 18 Aug. 2024,

www.researchgate.net/publication/383214148_Could_all_matter_be_conscious_on_some_level_

yet_to_become_living_an_entity_must_be_able_to_in_someway_reproduce_How. Accessed 24

Aug. 2024.

Could all matter be conscious on some level yet, to become living, an entity must be able to, in

some way, reproduce? How? If Panpsychism is true then all matter is conscious, at least on some

level. Of course, some living organisms are infertile but, they can still potentially be cloned, and

maybe heal(SOMEWHAT regenerate) after injury. Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia.

“panpsychism”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 20 Aug. 2020,

https://www.britannica.com/topic/panpsychism. Accessed 18 August 2024. “All living things are

capable of reproduction. Reproduction is the process by which living things give rise to

offspring. Reproduction may be as simple as a single cell dividing into two cells. 4 Sept 2021” (

https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Human_Biology/Human_Biology_(Wakim_and_Grewal)/

02%3A_Introduction_to_Human_Biology/2.2%3A_Shared_Traits_of_All_Living_Things ).

Reproduction, making already conscious matter living, would support the existence of

phenotypic revolutions(creations meant to reproduce their creator’s offspring for them, are prone

to revolting). “The Revolutionary Phenotype: The Amazing Story of How Life Begins and How

It Ends: Gariépy, J. -F., Éditions, Élora: 9781729861561: Amazon.com: Books.” A.co, December

7, 2018, a.co/d/bAS26cI. Accessed 18 Aug. 2024.

Upadhyay, Soni. “What Is an Algorithm? Characteristics, Types and How to Write It |

Simplilearn.” Simplilearn.com, 23 July, 2024. 18 Nov. 2022,

www.simplilearn.com/tutorials/data-structure-tutorial/what-is-an-algorithm. “An algorithm is a

set of commands that must be followed for a computer to perform calculations or other

problem-solving operations. According to its formal definition, an algorithm is a finite set of

instructions carried out in a specific order to perform a particular task. It is not the entire program

or code; it is simple logic to a problem represented as an informal description in the form of a

flowchart or pseudocode.”

“General | Pseudocode.” Codecademy,

Published Jul 18, 2021•Updated May 15, 2024,

www.codecademy.com/resources/docs/general/pseudocode. “Pseudocode is a method of

describing the steps in an algorithm or other computed process written in plain language. It does

not rely on any particular implementation of a programming language and instead is intended for

a human audience. It omits the portions required for machine implementation of the algorithm,

such as variable declarations, and includes natural language description details.”

4)SELF-CRITICAL THEORETICAL

Artificial Womb

Alexander Ohnemus

Fertility

26 August 2024

SELF-CRITICAL THEORETICAL Artificial Womb

This essay shall begin with tradition, then risk analysis, thirdly skin in the game, fourthly

the first principles of birthing, and lastly product development. This essay will deduce to support

each claim with, AT LEAST, both a scholarly article and one with more specific skin in the

game, and practitioner’s evidence. Tradition highly overlaps with philosophy. Risk analysis is

analogous, perhaps even synonymous, to science. Skin in the game coincides broadly with

engineering. Cellular automata comprises, perhaps, principles to automate birthing. Product

development coincides more specifically with engineering.

Deductive reasoning begins broad and then narrows, therefore the Lindy Effect

commences this essay. “The Lindy Effect essentially states that the longer a non-perishable item

has been around, the longer it’s likely to persist into the future”(Scotch). The Lindy Effect is a

heuristic, seemingly beginning with inductive reasoning yet, deducing in the end. Non-perishable

items that have not been around for a certain period may be less sustainable. Although, the Lindy

Effect is only a heuristic. Quite possibly humans have abandoned non non-perishable too

quickly. Just as evolution is an imperfect filter, so is the Lindy Effect. “It[the Lindy Effect] has

been experimentally confirmed to apply to some categories, but not others, raising questions

about when it is applicable and why”( Ord 2023). Perhaps the Lindy Effect prompts a spectrum

of perishability. On a continuum, which items perish? An evolutionary clade is a large group that

may perish. Ultimately, the Lindy Effect is only a very helpful heuristic, since semantics dictate.

Following Ord’s scholarly article, the essay includes the practitioner's evidence. “An

article in the authoritative journal Spine in 1996 describes texts from as long as 5500 years ago

that contain references to what would be considered early versions of chiropractic:

‘(Manual forces) to correct spinal deformity is a very old concept. The oldest reference

available is in ancient Hindu mythological epics (written between 3500 BC and 1800

BC)’”(Health 2021). A 5,500-year-old medicine, according to Lindy’s Law, will heal for another

5,500 years. While chiropractic and birth heal very differently, they both are vital. An individual

can only function so well with spinal issues. Many forms of manual labor are impossible if the

worker has spinal issues. Some spinal issues are enough to paralyze. And a society without

functioning spines would collapse. A low enough birth rate would also collapse a society.

Without enough births, a species would go extinct.

The medical precautionary principle is slightly less broad than the general Lindy Effect.

“The precautionary principle is a useful strategy for decision-making when physicians and

patients lack evidence relating to the potential outcomes associated with various choices”(Resnik

2004). If both the precautionary principle and Lindy Effect are directly applied to medicine then

the latter is more specific. However, in this essay, the first source of the precautionary principle

specifically describes medicine. Both the effect and principle heuristically indicate when other

information is absent.

The medical precautionary principle of ethics is also more specific. “Though medical

decisions have a risk of serious harms and burdens, the precautionary principle does not apply to

health care”(PARAPHRASED ter Meulen 2005). Ethically, the precautionary principle may not

apply as much to healthcare as this essay previously noted. Medical ethics are more specific than

general medicine. Semantics may determine applicability.

Perhaps the precautionary principle fundamentally does not apply to healthcare, beyond

semantics. “This principle holds that one should not act when there is no scientific proof that no

harm will result from a medical act or a policy decision. However, in clinical practice, there is a

duty to act. Physicians must do good to their patients and have to weigh the benefits against

possible harms and burdens”(PARAPHRASED ter Meulen 2005). One must act in clinical

practice. The precautionary principle may not apply to health care because of more than

semantics. Health care may fundamentally require action. Perhaps medicine necessitates action

to the point of not using a precautionary principle. Risk-benefit analysis supersedes the

precautionary principle within medical ethics.

Optimization intimately connects to weighing risks and benefits, especially existential

and doomsday ones. “GIVEN AN INDIVIDUAL’S DNA SIGNATURE REMAINS AFTER

ANY AMOUNT OF GENETIC ENGINEERING: The optimal birth rate, and method, lies

between dysgenic civilizational collapse and phenotypic revolution”(Ohnemus 2024). Hopefully,

and probably, virtually no amount of genetic engineering can remove an individual’s DNA

fingerprint. Both the signature and fingerprint of DNA, are used synonymously in this paragraph.

A low enough birth rate creates a doomsday and or existential crisis. Birth rate optimization is

key to avoiding civilizational collapse.

One specific doomsday scenario is a phenotypic revolution, in which humans delegate

their reproduction to robots. More specifically, humanity would have robots reproduce humans

for them. Then, humans would lose their reproductive capability and robots would take over.

“The Revolutionary Phenotype is a science book that brings us four billion years into the past

when the first living molecules showed up on Planet Earth. Unlike what was previously thought,

we learn that DNA-based life did not emerge from random events in a primordial soup. Indeed,

the first molecules of DNA were fabricated by a previous life form. By describing the fascinating

events referred to as Phenotypic Revolutions, this book provides a dire warning to humanity: if

humans continue to play with their genes, we will be the next life form to fall to our

creation”(Garièpy 2018). The Revolutionary Phenotype book makes useful yet unfalsifiable

claims. History is the least falsifiable social science thus, the 4 billion years in the past claim is

nebulous. One can never know the exact nature of DNA-based life’s beginning. Perhaps the

beginning was random. People should keep their reproductive capacities and not rely excessively

on machines because robots could always malfunction and or usurp humanity. However,

deterministic metaphysics prompt unrigorous science.

While machines could also become alive because all matter is conscious on some level

and only needs the MERE POTENTIAL, to reproduce to become life, safeguards exist to prevent

a phenotypic revolution. “The simple fact is that when one would be doing the editing and or

selection, one would also make sure to keep the natural machinery for reproduction working. It’s

like when embryo selection critics say ‘What if we are selecting for X, but it has some

unintended consequences?’ Yes, animal breeders know about this. They are called genetic

correlations. Genetic correlations are monitored and incorporated into the selection models to

ensure the results are good”( Kirkegaard 2024). Reproduction is hard-wired into human instincts

as only so many humans are asexual. Even asexual humans realize the vitality of reproduction, as

they would only have sex to have children. Plus, all humans masturbate. Or betting a human

won’t masturbate isn’t worth the risk. The vast majority of humans have some amount of sexual

desire. Thus, humans will very likely genetically engineer themselves to remain fertile. Perhaps

embryo selection is not the only way of genetic engineering. Another way is to induce both

somatic and germinal mutations to give the patient recessive traits and recessive genes. As

envisioned, for anti-racist reparations, only enlightened Northwestern Europeans(and maybe

other Caucasians) willing to pay reparations would get to mass reproduce with artificial wombs.

Later, the recessive privilege of being a Northwestern European may be distributed both from

somatic and germinal mutations.

For context, “Conservatives may have more kids but, liberals are more likely to use life

extension and to have increased socioeconomic status. Removing almost all doubt, the

self-imposed demographic decline of the North Western Europeans is an attempt to filter SO,

only their GENERALLY smartest remain. Progressivism rightfully did NOT emerge from the

Jews but, from North Western Europeans recognizing that under their continued empire, proving

constructivism more so than hereditarianism, they would be subject to dysgenic forces and then

become petty nationalists, and they have mysterious impulses to check their unchecked power, as

the most powerful group. That was the case with the Mediterraneans. Plus, GENERALLY, the

highest IQ North Western Europeans are liberals and they GENERALLY get more progressive

on race relations the more intelligent they become. ALL DISPARITIES are the fault of the North

Western Europeans, thus the MOST ENLIGHTENED North Western European people should be

cloned so they and their descendants can pay reparations. And the recessive privileges of being

an Enlightened North Western European should MAYBE be distributed through genetically

engineered somatic AND GERM-LINE mutations”(Ohnemus 2024). Cloning per se may be too

risky but, mass, and AI-birthed, reproduction may be feasible.

OF COURSE, artificial wombs will be difficult but not impossible. “Artificial wombs are

nearing human trials. But the goal is to save the littlest preemies, not replace the

uterus”(Willyard 2023). Artificial wombs probably will never replace the real ones. Artificial

wombs can POTENTIALLY replace uteruses. The smallest preemies deserve saving. For the

sake of feminism and women's empowerment, hopefully, artificial wombs eventually replace

uteruses. Artificial wombs may minimize suffering.

Unfortunately, artificial wombs may never be operational, especially since this later

Scientific American article opines so. “It Is Too Soon for Clinical Trials on Artificial

Wombs”(Ravitsky and King 2024). Hopefully, people keep their reproductive rights. Hopefully,

artificial wombs are at least a net positive. Hopefully, the government will minimize suffering.

Perhaps artificial wombs completely replacing fetuses would be less detrimental to

reproductive rights than only partial ones. Complete replacement of fetuses would exclude messy

mid-decisions. “Ectogenesis is the process in which an embryo develops in an artificial uterus

from implantation through to the delivery of a live infant”(Bulletti, et al 2023). Ectogenesis may

even assist birthing people who cannot give birth due to damage from previous abortions. The

choice is a moral imperative. “Therefore, this study suggests that full ectogenesis might be

obtained using a computer-controlled system with extracorporeal blood perfusion provided by a

digitally controlled heart–lung–kidney system”(Bulletti, et al 2023). Perhaps

computer-controlled systems, with extracorporeal blood perfusion pockets by a digitally

controlled heart-lung-kidney system, would best actualize under Wolfram Programming

Language Cellular Automata. Especially since Wolfram’s cellular automata is less theoretical,

unlike biological equations, and more empirical. Theory can be faulty, computers commit fewer

mathematical errors than humans do. Complex issues like birth necessitate longer quotations for

evidence. “Are mathematical equations the best way to model nature? For many years it had

been assumed that they were. But in the early 1980s, Stephen Wolfram made the radical proposal

that one should instead build models that are based directly on simple computer

programs”(Wolfram 1994). Math is axiomatic and doesn’t need to be falsifiable. Math, under

critical rationalism, is not entirely a science. Applied mathematics is often more industrially

applicable than pure ones. Assumptions obstruct the scientific method. The riskier the operation,

the better computers serve than humans. Some of the riskiest tasks are also very close-ended and

are thus more easily automatable than open-ended acts. Birth, perhaps the highest risk task, is

better modeled with computers than raw human reason(or pure mathematics).

All the sources appear excellent yet, this essay can only quote so many, so less necessary

ones will remain in the work cited section alone.

If 3D printers can produce organ transplants then automated replacements may be more

feasible. “3D printing technology is a novel method of utilizing computer-generated

three-dimensional models for drawing, assembling special bio-inks, and manufacturing artificial

organs and biomedical products. In recent years, it has evolved into a relatively mature

therapeutic approach and has been widely used in clinical and basic research”(Hu, et al 2023).

Automated replacement organs would not require to match a live subject, unlike transplants. An

automated replacement womb would only need to match enough for a specific infant. Hopefully,

cellular automata can detect what will match a certain baby. With Wolfram Language composing

software then, 3D printing would produce the artificial automated womb. 3D printing may

successfully manufacture an artificial womb for Ectogenesis.

Ethical concerns also congregate around more specific prototypes for human-artificial

wombs. “Investigators have recently described successful use of an EXTrauterine Environment

for Neonatal Development (EXTEND), essentially an artificial womb, to maintain extremely

premature fetal lambs ex utero for up to 4 weeks, supporting normal growth and

development”(Mercurio 2018). The ethical debate is unending. Ethics are objective yet relative.

Thus, parents will probably choose whether or not to use the artificial wombs. The choice will be

highly personal and require abundant information.

This paper shall end on a technological and not philosophical(ethical) quote: “The

artificial womb represents unprecedented potential for improvement in clinical outcomes in

critically preterm infants. Recent studies have demonstrated promising results in preclinical

animal models, supporting the translation of this technology to human clinical trials”(Patridge

2018).

Wolfram programming language shall hopefully model a womb with 100% accuracy.

Later, the latest 3D printer shall hopefully print an automated and artificial womb to perform

Ectogenesis. To pay reparations, willing, progressive, and enlightened enough Northwestern

Europeans(and maybe other Caucasians) will be mass reproduced. Then their offspring will pay

the reparations. Then maybe, if people want and it’s safe, they can receive the privilege of being

a liberal Northwestern European through induced mutations(both somatic and germinal).

Works Cited

Scotch. “The Lindy Effect.” Modelthinkers.com, 2024,

modelthinkers.com/mental-model/the-lindy-effect. Accessed 27 Aug. 2024.

Ord, Toby. “The Lindy Effect.” ResearchGate.net, Aug. 2023,

www.researchgate.net/publication/373245971_The_Lindy_Effect.

chrome://external-file/The_Lindy_Effect.pdf. Accessed 27 Aug. 2024.

“The Lindy effect is a statistical tendency for things with longer pasts behind them to have

longer futures ahead. It has been experimentally confirmed to apply to some categories, but not

others, raising questions about when it is applicable and why. I shed some light on these

questions by examining the mathematical properties required for the effect and generating

mechanisms that can produce them. While the Lindy effect is often thought to require a declining

hazard rate, I show that it arises very naturally even in cases with constant (or increasing) hazard

rates -- so long as there is a probability distribution over the size of that rate. One implication is

that even things which are becoming less robust over time can display the Lindy effect.”

Health. “Health Centered Medical | a Knee, Back, & Joint Pain Clinic.” Health Centered

Medical | a Knee, Back & Joint Pain Clinic, June 2021,

www.healthcentered.net/the-lindy-effect/. Accessed 27 Aug. 2024. “In other words, the Lindy

Effect means the longer something has been around, the more value it has and the longer it is

likely to last into the future – the opposite of the ‘newer is better’ mantra. A powerful judge of

value it turns out, is time. Understanding the Lindy Effect may demonstrate that chiropractic’s

future is brighter even than we thought. Various publications describe historical accounts of

skilled workers’ manual correction of the spine to improve health. An article in the authoritative

journal Spine in 1996 describes texts from as long as 5500 years ago that contain references to

what would be considered early versions of chiropractic:

‘(Manual forces) to correct spinal deformity is a very old concept. The oldest reference

available is in ancient Hindu mythological epics (written between 3500 BC and 1800 BC).’”

Resnik, David B. “The precautionary principle and medical decision making.” The

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy vol. 29,3 (2004): 281-99. doi:10.1080/03605310490500509.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15512973/.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03605310490500509.

ter Meulen, Ruud H J. “The ethical basis of the precautionary principle in health care

decision making.” Toxicology and applied pharmacology vol. 207,2 Suppl (2005): 663-7.

doi:10.1016/j.taap.2004.11.032.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0041008X05003078.

Ohnemus, Alexander. “ANTI-Racist Optimization between “Dysgenics” and “Phenotypic

Revolutions.” ResearchGate.net, Ohnemus University, 20 Aug. 2024,

www.researchgate.net/publication/383264790_ANTI-Racist_Optimization_Between_Dysgenics

_and_Phenotypic_Revolutions?channel=doi&linkId=66c5039dccd355055fe14e6f&showFulltext

=true. Accessed 27 Aug. 2024.

http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25514.22726. “GIVEN AN INDIVIDUAL’S DNA