Available via license: CC BY 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
891
Exploring the Effectiveness of Remote and Hybrid Work
Policies: A Literature Review on Workforce Management
Practices
Duta Mustajab1
Universitas Yapis Papua, Jayapura, Papua, Indonesia
ARTICLE INFO
Correspondence Email:
dutamustajabdprp@gmail.com
Keywords:
Remote Work; Hybrid Work;
Workforce Management; Leadership;
Organizational Culture.
ABSTRACT
This literature review examines the effectiveness of remote and hybrid
work policies in contemporary workforce management practices. The
study aims to explore the impact of remote work arrangements on
employee productivity, job satisfaction, and work-life balance, as well as
to identify best practices for organizational leaders in managing remote
and distributed teams. A systematic review of existing literature was
conducted, drawing on peer-reviewed journals, conference proceedings,
and academic books. The research highlights the benefits of remote work,
including increased productivity and job satisfaction, attributed to
reduced workplace distractions and enhanced flexibility. However,
challenges such as social isolation and blurred work-life boundaries also
emerge. Hybrid work models, combining remote and in-office work, are
identified as a promising solution to address these challenges while
maintaining opportunities for collaboration. Effective leadership,
characterized by transformational leadership styles and proactive
communication strategies, is crucial for facilitating successful remote and
hybrid work arrangements. The findings underscore the need for ongoing
research to explore emerging trends and best practices in remote and
hybrid work policies, with a focus on the long-term effects on employee
well-being and organizational performance.
ABSTRAK
Kajian literatur ini meneliti efektivitas kebijakan kerja jarak jauh dan
hibrida dalam praktik manajemen tenaga kerja kontemporer. Penelitian ini
bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi dampak pengaturan kerja jarak jauh
terhadap produktivitas karyawan, kepuasan kerja, dan keseimbangan
kehidupan kerja, serta mengidentifikasi praktik terbaik bagi para pemimpin
organisasi dalam mengelola tim yang bekerja jarak jauh dan terdistribusi.
Tinjauan sistematis terhadap literatur yang ada dilakukan, dengan
mengacu pada jurnal yang telah diulas oleh rekan sejawat, prosiding
konferensi, dan buku-buku akademis. Penelitian ini menyoroti manfaat
kerja jarak jauh, termasuk peningkatan produktivitas dan kepuasan kerja,
yang disebabkan oleh berkurangnya gangguan di tempat kerja dan
fleksibilitas yang lebih baik. Namun, tantangan seperti isolasi sosial dan
kaburnya batas kehidupan kerja juga muncul. Model kerja hibrida, yang
menggabungkan kerja jarak jauh dan di kantor, diidentifikasi sebagai solusi
yang menjanjikan untuk mengatasi tantangan-tantangan ini sambil
mempertahankan peluang untuk berkolaborasi. Kepemimpinan yang efektif,
yang ditandai dengan gaya kepemimpinan transformasional dan strategi
komunikasi proaktif, sangat penting untuk memfasilitasi pengaturan kerja
jarak jauh dan hibrida yang sukses. Temuan ini menggarisbawahi perlunya
penelitian berkelanjutan untuk mengeksplorasi tren yang muncul dan
praktik terbaik dalam kebijakan kerja jarak jauh dan hibrida, dengan fokus
pada dampak jangka panjang terhadap kesejahteraan karyawan dan kinerja
organisasi
892
INTRODUCTION
In recent years, the landscape of workforce management has undergone a significant
transformation, driven primarily by the advent of remote and hybrid work policies. This shift,
precipitated by technological advancements and further accelerated by global events such as the
COVID-19 pandemic, has prompted organizations worldwide to reassess their traditional work
arrangements. Remote and hybrid work models, which allow employees to work from various
locations and combine in-office and remote work, respectively, have emerged as viable
alternatives to the conventional nine-to-five, office-centric work paradigm. This literature
review seeks to explore the effectiveness of these emerging work policies by synthesizing
findings from previous research, identifying prevailing trends, and highlighting areas for
further investigation.
The general context of this study is rooted in the broader changes within the global
workforce. As digital technologies have advanced, the feasibility of remote work has increased,
enabling employees to perform their duties from virtually anywhere with an internet
connection. This transition has been further propelled by the necessity to maintain business
continuity during the COVID-19 pandemic, which forced many organizations to adopt remote
work policies almost overnight. The immediate effectiveness of these policies in maintaining
productivity and business operations has sparked a more profound interest in their long-term
viability and benefits. Specifically, this study delves into the nuances of remote and hybrid work
policies and their impact on workforce management practices. It examines key dimensions such
as employee productivity, job satisfaction, work-life balance, and organizational commitment.
Additionally, it considers the implications for organizational culture, leadership, and the overall
operational efficiency of businesses. By analyzing a range of studies conducted across different
industries and geographical contexts, this literature review aims to provide a comprehensive
understanding of how remote and hybrid work models are reshaping workforce management.
The phenomenon of remote and hybrid work is not merely a response to immediate
crises but a reflection of deeper, ongoing changes in work. The increasing demand for flexibility
among employees, coupled with the potential cost savings for employers, has made these work
arrangements attractive. Moreover, advancements in collaboration tools and communication
technologies have made it possible to overcome many of the logistical challenges associated with
remote work. This shift represents a fundamental change in how work is structured and
managed, with far-reaching implications for both employees and employers. Relevant research
indicates a mixed but generally positive impact of remote and hybrid work policies on various
aspects of workforce management. For instance, studies have shown that remote work can lead
to increased job satisfaction due to the flexibility it offers. Employees often appreciate the ability
to better balance their professional and personal lives, leading to higher morale and reduced
stress levels. However, other research highlights potential drawbacks, such as feelings of
isolation, difficulties in team cohesion, and challenges in maintaining a strong organizational
culture.
One critical area of focus in this literature review is the effectiveness of remote and
hybrid work policies in enhancing productivity. Research findings on this front are somewhat
divided. Some studies suggest that remote work can boost productivity due to fewer distractions
and the elimination of commuting time. Others, however, indicate that productivity gains are
not universal and may depend on the nature of the work, the individual's work style, and the
support provided by the organization. Hybrid work models, which combine remote and in-
office work, are often touted as a balanced approach, potentially offering the best of both worlds.
893
The objective of this literature review is to synthesize existing research on remote and hybrid
work policies to provide a clear, evidence-based understanding of their effectiveness. By
critically analyzing prior studies, this review seeks to identify patterns and insights that can
inform future workforce management practices. Additionally, it aims to highlight gaps in the
current research and suggest directions for future studies to further elucidate the complexities
of remote and hybrid work arrangements.
To achieve this, the review will cover several key themes. First, it will examine the impact
of remote and hybrid work on employee productivity and performance. This includes exploring
factors that enhance or hinder productivity in remote settings, such as the role of technology,
work environment, and personal work habits. Second, it will assess the effects on employee well-
being and job satisfaction, considering how remote work influences work-life balance, stress
levels, and overall job satisfaction. Third, it will analyze the implications for organizational
culture and leadership, including how remote and hybrid work models affect team dynamics,
communication, and organizational commitment. In terms of research relevance, this review
draws on a wide array of studies from different sectors and regions, reflecting the global nature
of the shift towards remote and hybrid work. The selected studies employ various
methodologies, including quantitative surveys, qualitative interviews, and case studies,
providing a comprehensive view of the topic. This diverse body of research helps to capture the
multifaceted nature of remote and hybrid work and its impact on workforce management. The
effectiveness of remote and hybrid work policies is influenced by a range of factors, including
management practices, leadership competencies, and the challenges posed by the COVID-19
pandemic. Onnis (2016) emphasizes the crucial role of management practices in translating
HRM policies into sustainable remote health workforces, with a focus on occupational
commitment and Herzberg's motivation-hygiene theory. Avlani & Charalampous (2021)
underscores the significance of trust, relationship-building, communication, and technology
skills in remote leadership, while also highlighting the importance of problem-solving and
awareness creation. Arunprasad et al., (2022) further explores the challenges of remote work,
proposing a conceptual model that aligns technology orientation, leadership, HRM practices,
external processes, and organizational culture to achieve desired outcomes such as employee
engagement, collaboration, and organizational agility. These studies collectively underscore the
multifaceted nature of remote and hybrid work policies, and the need for a comprehensive
approach that addresses both individual and organizational factors.
One significant finding from the literature is the role of organizational support in the
success of remote and hybrid work policies. Studies indicate that employees who receive
adequate support, such as access to necessary technology, clear communication from
management, and opportunities for professional development, are more likely to thrive in
remote work environments. Conversely, a lack of support can exacerbate challenges, leading to
decreased productivity and job satisfaction. Another important aspect is the variability in
individual experiences with remote work. Factors such as personality traits, job role, and home
environment can significantly influence how employees perceive and perform in remote
settings. For instance, individuals who are highly self-motivated and possess strong time-
management skills may excel in remote work, while others may struggle without the structure
of a traditional office environment. Furthermore, the review highlights the evolving nature of
remote work technologies and their impact on workforce management. Advances in
communication and collaboration tools have made it easier for remote teams to stay connected
894
and work efficiently. However, the rapid pace of technological change also presents challenges,
as organizations must continually adapt and invest in new tools to stay competitive.
The literature on remote and hybrid work policies presents a complex and evolving
picture. While there are clear benefits in terms of flexibility, job satisfaction, and potential
productivity gains, there are also significant challenges that need to be addressed.
Organizational support, effective leadership, and the right technological infrastructure are
crucial for the success of these work arrangements. This literature review provides a
comprehensive overview of the current state of research on remote and hybrid work, offering
valuable insights for organizations seeking to implement or refine these policies. By
understanding the factors that contribute to the success and challenges of remote and hybrid
work, businesses can better navigate the future of workforce management in an increasingly
digital and flexible work environment.
Remote and Hybrid Work Policies
Remote and hybrid work policies have become a focal point in contemporary workforce
management research. These policies, which allow employees to work from home or alternate
between home and office, have gained prominence due to technological advancements and the
global COVID-19 pandemic. The sudden shift to remote work during the pandemic has
prompted extensive research into its impacts on productivity, job satisfaction, and
organizational dynamics (Mayer & Davis, 1999). This literature review aims to synthesize
findings from previous studies to provide a comprehensive understanding of remote and hybrid
work policies. Recent research indicates that the adoption of remote and hybrid work policies
has been transformative for many organizations. The necessity for social distancing measures
during the pandemic forced businesses to adopt these models rapidly, revealing both
opportunities and challenges. According to Sostero et al., (2020), remote work adoption surged
by 30% during the early months of the pandemic, highlighting the adaptability of the workforce.
This shift has prompted a reevaluation of traditional work arrangements, with many
organizations considering permanent remote or hybrid models even post-pandemic
(Choudhury et al., 2021).
Remote work, also known as telecommuting, is defined as a work arrangement where
employees perform their job duties outside of the traditional office environment, typically from
home (Allen et al., 2015). Hybrid work, on the other hand, combines remote work with periodic
in-office work, offering employees flexibility while maintaining some level of physical presence
in the workplace (Bailey & Kurland, 2002). These work arrangements are supported by digital
technologies such as high-speed internet, video conferencing, and collaboration software
(Schlegel et al., 2021). The conceptual framework for understanding remote and hybrid work
includes several key dimensions: employee productivity, job satisfaction, work-life balance, and
organizational commitment (Kossek et al., 2015). These dimensions help in assessing the
effectiveness of remote and hybrid work policies and understanding their broader implications
for workforce management. The rapid adoption of remote work has also led to the development
of new theoretical models that emphasize the importance of digital infrastructure and employee
autonomy in driving productivity (Harrison et al., 2003).
The impact of remote and hybrid work on employee productivity is a critical area of
research. Some studies indicate that remote work can enhance productivity due to fewer
workplace distractions and the elimination of commuting time. For instance, Bloom et al., (2015)
conducted a study on a Chinese travel agency and found that remote workers were 13% more
895
productive than their office counterparts. The study attributed this productivity boost to a
quieter work environment and increased work hours due to reduced breaks and sick days.
However, other research suggests that productivity gains are not uniform across all employees
or industries. A study by Dutcher (2012) found that while routine tasks saw a productivity
increase, more complex and creative tasks suffered due to the lack of face-to-face collaboration.
Similarly, Nilles (1994) argues that the effectiveness of remote work largely depends on the
nature of the job and the individual's work style. Hybrid work models, which blend remote and
in-office work, are often proposed as a balanced solution. These models aim to combine the
productivity benefits of remote work with the collaborative advantages of in-office work
(Gajendran & Harrison, 2007). Recent studies have further refined our understanding of these
dynamics, suggesting that the key to maximizing productivity in remote and hybrid settings lies
in providing adequate support and resources, such as ergonomic home office setups and access
to collaboration tools (Allen et al., 2015).
Job satisfaction and work-life balance are significant factors influenced by remote and
hybrid work policies. Studies have shown that remote work can lead to higher job satisfaction
due to increased autonomy and flexibility (Golden et al., 2006). Employees often appreciate the
ability to better manage their personal and professional lives, which can reduce stress and
improve overall well-being (Felstead & Henseke, 2017). For example, a study by Bloom et al.,
(2015) found that remote workers reported higher job satisfaction levels compared to their in-
office colleagues. This increase in satisfaction was linked to the flexibility to manage work
around personal commitments. Similarly Choudhury et al., (2021) found that remote work
arrangements contributed to a better work-life balance, particularly for employees with family
responsibilities. Nevertheless, remote work can also present challenges. Isolation from
colleagues and the blurring of boundaries between work and home life can negatively impact
job satisfaction and mental health (Wang et al., 2023). Hybrid work models can mitigate these
issues by providing opportunities for in-person interaction and maintaining a clearer separation
between work and home environments (Johnson et al., 2020). Recent research also highlights the
importance of organizational support in enhancing job satisfaction and work-life balance in
remote settings, emphasizing the role of leadership in fostering a supportive work culture
(Kossek et al., 2023).
Remote and hybrid work policies have profound implications for organizational culture
and leadership. Maintaining a cohesive organizational culture in a remote work environment
can be challenging. Physical distance can lead to a sense of isolation and weaken the social bonds
that are crucial for a strong organizational culture (Bailey & Kurland, 2002). Leaders must adapt
their management styles to support remote teams effectively. This includes fostering open
communication, building trust, and ensuring that employees feel connected to the
organization’s goals and values (Golden et al., 2006). Effective leadership is crucial in remote
and hybrid work settings. Studies highlight the importance of transformational leadership,
where leaders inspire and motivate employees by creating a vision and fostering an inclusive
culture (Bartsch et al., 2020). Leaders must also be adept at using digital communication tools
and managing virtual teams (Dulebohn & Hoch, 2017). Furthermore, providing adequate
resources and support for remote work, such as access to technology and opportunities for
professional development, is essential for maintaining employee engagement and productivity
(Kossek et al., 2015). In conclusion, remote and hybrid work policies represent a significant shift
in workforce management practices. While these policies offer numerous benefits, including
increased flexibility and potential productivity gains, they also pose challenges related to
896
isolation, maintaining organizational culture, and ensuring effective leadership. By
understanding these dynamics and drawing on insights from existing research, organizations
can better navigate the complexities of remote and hybrid work arrangements. Future research
should continue to explore these areas, particularly considering ongoing technological
advancements and evolving work patterns. This literature review provides a foundation for
understanding the multifaceted nature of remote and hybrid work and its impact on workforce
management.
Definitions and Conceptual Frameworks
Remote work, also known as telecommuting, is defined as a work arrangement where
employees perform their job duties outside of the traditional office environment, typically from
home (Allen et al., 2015). Hybrid work, on the other hand, combines remote work with periodic
in-office work, offering employees flexibility while maintaining some level of physical presence
in the workplace (Bailey & Kurland, 2002). These work arrangements are supported by digital
technologies such as high-speed internet, video conferencing, and collaboration software
(Schlegel et al., 2021). The conceptual framework for understanding remote and hybrid work
includes several key dimensions: employee productivity, job satisfaction, work-life balance, and
organizational commitment ((Kossek et al., 2015). These dimensions help in assessing the
effectiveness of remote and hybrid work policies and understanding their broader implications
for workforce management. Recent studies have expanded on these dimensions, illustrating the
complex dynamics at play in remote and hybrid work environments. For instance Bick et al.,
(2023) found that the productivity of remote workers varied significantly depending on the
nature of their tasks and their home environments. Employees with dedicated home office
spaces and fewer household distractions reported higher productivity levels compared to those
in less optimal conditions. Furthermore, the role of digital technologies in supporting remote
work has become more pronounced. Tools such as Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Slack have been
essential in maintaining communication and collaboration among remote teams, with their
usage increasing exponentially during the pandemic (Mazmanian et al., 2013; Richter, 2020).
Job satisfaction in remote and hybrid work settings is influenced by several factors,
including the level of autonomy, the quality of communication with colleagues and supervisors,
and the ability to balance work and personal life (Gajendran & Harrison, 2007). A study by (Yang
et al., 2020) highlighted that remote worker who maintained regular virtual check-ins with their
teams and received consistent feedback from their managers reported higher job satisfaction.
Conversely, employees who experienced poor communication and a lack of managerial support
often felt isolated and less satisfied with their jobs (Toscano & Zappalà, 2020b). Work-life
balance is another critical dimension, with remote work offering both opportunities and
challenges. While many employees appreciate the flexibility to manage their work around
personal commitments, the lack of clear boundaries between work and home life can lead to
overworking and burnout (Felstead & Henseke, 2017). Recent research by Galanti et al., (2023)
found that remote workers who established structured routines and designated workspaces
were better able to maintain a healthy work-life balance. However, the same study also noted
that the absence of physical separation between work and personal life often led to extended
working hours and increased stress for some employees.
Organizational commitment in remote and hybrid work environments depends heavily
on the perceived support from the organization and the quality of workplace relationships
(Kossek et al., 2015). A sense of belonging and connection to the organizational culture can be
897
challenging to sustain without face-to-face interactions. However, innovative practices such as
virtual team-building activities and regular online social events have been shown to strengthen
organizational commitment among remote workers (Bartsch et al., 2020). Additionally, ensuring
that remote employees have access to the same professional development opportunities as their
in-office counterparts is crucial for maintaining engagement and loyalty (Dulebohn & Hoch,
2017). Moreover, the evolution of remote and hybrid work has prompted new theoretical models
that emphasize the importance of digital infrastructure and employee autonomy. Studies by
Choudhury et al., (2021) suggest that remote work can lead to enhanced productivity and
innovation when employees have the autonomy to structure their work and leverage digital
tools effectively. These findings align with earlier research by Gajendran & Harrison (2007),
which emphasized the benefits of remote work for tasks that require deep focus and minimal
interruptions. The conceptual framework for understanding remote and hybrid work continues
to evolve as more research sheds light on the nuanced impacts of these work arrangements.
Employee productivity, job satisfaction, work-life balance, and organizational commitment are
all influenced by various factors, including the quality of digital tools, the level of managerial
support, and the ability to maintain clear boundaries between work and personal life. As
organizations continue to adapt to these new work models, ongoing research will be essential
in identifying best practices and strategies for maximizing the benefits of remote and hybrid
work while mitigating their challenges.
Impact on Employee Productivity and Performance
The impact of remote and hybrid work on employee productivity is a critical area of
research. Some studies indicate that remote work can enhance productivity due to fewer
workplace distractions and the elimination of commuting time. For instance, Bloom et al., (2015)
conducted a study on a Chinese travel agency and found that remote workers were 13% more
productive than their office counterparts. The study attributed this productivity boost to a
quieter work environment and increased work hours due to reduced breaks and sick days.
However, other research suggests that productivity gains are not uniform across all employees
or industries. A study by (Dutcher, 2012) found that while routine tasks saw a productivity
increase, more complex and creative tasks suffered due to the lack of face-to-face collaboration.
Similarly, Nilles (1994) argues that the effectiveness of remote work largely depends on the
nature of the job and the individual's work style. Hybrid work models, which blend remote and
in-office work, are often proposed as a balanced solution. These models aim to combine the
productivity benefits of remote work with the collaborative advantages of in-office work
(Gajendran & Harrison, 2007).
Recent research has expanded on these findings, providing a more nuanced
understanding of productivity in remote and hybrid work settings. According to Bick et al.,
(2023), the productivity impact of remote work during the COVID-19 pandemic varied widely
across different sectors. While knowledge-intensive industries saw substantial productivity
gains, sectors that relied heavily on in-person interaction and physical presence experienced
mixed results. This variability underscores the importance of considering industry-specific
factors when evaluating the productivity implications of remote work. The role of digital
technologies in supporting remote work has also become more evident. Tools such as Zoom,
Microsoft Teams, and Slack have been critical in maintaining communication and collaboration
among remote teams, with their usage increasing dramatically during the pandemic
(Mazmanian et al., 2013; Richter, 2020). These technologies have mitigated some of the
898
challenges associated with remote work, such as feelings of isolation and difficulties in team
coordination (Luebstorf et al., 2023). However, the effectiveness of these tools depends on their
integration into the daily workflow and the digital literacy of the employees (Waizenegger et
al., 2020).
Job satisfaction and productivity are closely linked, and the ability to work remotely has
been found to positively influence job satisfaction. A study by Wang et al., (2023) indicated that
employees who maintained regular virtual check-ins with their teams and received consistent
feedback from their managers reported higher job satisfaction, which in turn boosted their
productivity. Conversely, employees who experienced poor communication and a lack of
managerial support often felt isolated and less productive (Toscano & Zappalà, 2020b). The
hybrid work model, which combines remote and in-office work, has been proposed as an
optimal solution for many organizations. According to Choudhury et al., (2021), hybrid work
arrangements allow employees to benefit from the flexibility of remote work while also enjoying
the collaborative and social aspects of in-office work. This model helps in maintaining a balance
between individual productivity and team cohesion. Recent studies by Galanti et al., (2023) have
shown that hybrid work can lead to improved employee engagement and reduced burnout by
offering a change of environment and opportunities for face-to-face interactions.
Furthermore, the design of remote and hybrid work policies plays a crucial role in
determining their success. Research by Kossek et al., (2015) emphasizes the importance of
providing employees with autonomy and flexibility in their work arrangements. When
employees have control over their schedules and work environments, they are more likely to be
productive and satisfied with their jobs. However, the same study also cautions that without
clear boundaries and guidelines, remote work can lead to overworking and burnout.
Organizational support is another critical factor in enhancing productivity in remote and hybrid
work settings. Studies by Sha et al., (2020) highlight the importance of leadership in fostering a
supportive work culture. Leaders who are adept at using digital communication tools and who
actively engage with their teams can help maintain high levels of productivity and morale
among remote workers. Additionally, providing access to professional development
opportunities and resources for remote work, such as ergonomic office setups and reliable
internet connections, can significantly impact employee productivity (Kossek et al., 2021). The
impact of remote and hybrid work on employee productivity is multifaceted and influenced by
various factors including the nature of the job, the quality of digital tools, managerial support,
and organizational policies. While remote work offers potential productivity gains by reducing
workplace distractions and commuting time, these benefits are not uniformly distributed across
all employees or industries. Hybrid work models, which combine the advantages of remote and
in-office work, present a balanced approach that can enhance productivity, job satisfaction, and
work-life balance. Ongoing research and the continued adaptation of work policies will be
essential in optimizing these work arrangements for the future.
Effects on Job Satisfaction and Work-Life Balance
Job satisfaction and work-life balance are significant factors influenced by remote and
hybrid work policies. Studies have shown that remote work can lead to higher job satisfaction
due to increased autonomy and flexibility (Golden et al., 2006). Employees often appreciate the
ability to better manage their personal and professional lives, which can reduce stress and
improve overall well-being (Felstead & Henseke, 2017). For example, a study by Bloom et al.,
(2015) found that remote workers reported higher job satisfaction levels compared to their in-
899
office colleagues. This increase in satisfaction was linked to the flexibility to manage work
around personal commitments. Similarly, Choudhury et al., (2021) found that remote work
arrangements contributed to a better work-life balance, particularly for employees with family
responsibilities. Nevertheless, remote work can also present challenges. Isolation from
colleagues and the blurring of boundaries between work and home life can negatively impact
job satisfaction and mental health (Sha et al., 2020). Hybrid work models can mitigate these
issues by providing opportunities for in-person interaction and maintaining a clearer separation
between work and home environments (Johnson et al., 2020). Recent research by (Galanti et al.,
2023; Toscano & Zappalà, 2020b) suggests that hybrid work models, which combine remote and
in-office work, can offer a balanced approach to addressing these challenges. Their study
showed that employees in hybrid work arrangements reported lower levels of stress and higher
job satisfaction compared to those working entirely remotely or entirely in-office.
Advancements in digital technology have played a crucial role in supporting remote and
hybrid work models. Tools such as video conferencing, instant messaging, and collaborative
software have become essential in maintaining communication and teamwork among remote
employees (Richter, 2020). These technologies have also been instrumental in preserving
organizational culture and employee engagement, which are critical for job satisfaction
(Mazmanian et al., 2013). However, the effectiveness of these tools depends on their proper
integration into the workflow and the digital literacy of employees (Waizenegger et al., 2020).
Work-life balance is another significant factor affected by remote and hybrid work policies.
Employees who work remotely often report better work-life balance due to the flexibility to
manage their schedules and reduce commuting time (Felstead & Henseke, 2017). For instance,
Choudhury et al., (2021) found that remote work allowed employees to better manage family
responsibilities and personal commitments, leading to improved work-life balance and higher
job satisfaction. However, the lack of physical separation between work and personal life can
sometimes lead to longer working hours and increased stress (Felstead & Henseke, 2017).
A study by Yang et al., (2020) highlighted that employee who maintained regular virtual
check-ins with their teams and received consistent feedback from their managers reported
higher job satisfaction. Conversely, employees who experienced poor communication and a lack
of managerial support often felt isolated and less satisfied with their jobs (Toscano & Zappalà,
2020b). The hybrid work model can help address these issues by providing opportunities for
face-to-face interactions and fostering a sense of community among employees (Johnson et al.,
2020). Regular in-office days can help maintain team cohesion and provide a clearer separation
between work and home life, which is beneficial for mental health and overall job satisfaction
(Galanti et al., 2023). The flexibility offered by remote and hybrid work models can also enhance
employee retention and reduce turnover rates. According to a study by Allen et al., (2015),
employees who have the flexibility to work remotely or in a hybrid model are more likely to
stay with their current employer. This is because flexibility is highly valued by employees,
particularly those with family responsibilities or other personal commitments. Additionally, the
ability to work remotely can attract a broader talent pool, as geographic constraints are less of a
barrier (Kossek et al., 2015).
However, it is important to recognize that remote and hybrid work models are not a one-
size-fits-all solution. The effectiveness of these work arrangements can vary depending on the
nature of the job, the individual's work style, and the organizational culture (Nilles, 1994). For
example, while remote work may be highly effective for tasks that require deep focus and
minimal interruptions, it may not be suitable for roles that rely heavily on collaboration and
900
face-to-face interaction (Dutcher, 2012). Therefore, organizations should consider these factors
when designing remote and hybrid work policies to ensure they meet the needs of their
employees and support overall productivity and job satisfaction. Remote and hybrid work
policies can significantly impact job satisfaction and work-life balance. While remote work offers
benefits such as increased autonomy, flexibility, and improved work-life balance, it also presents
challenges such as isolation and blurred boundaries between work and home life. Hybrid work
models can provide a balanced approach by combining the advantages of remote work with
opportunities for in-person interaction. The success of these work arrangements depends on
several factors, including the nature of the job, the quality of digital tools, managerial support,
and organizational culture. As organizations continue to adapt to these new work models,
ongoing research and the continued adaptation of work policies will be essential in optimizing
these arrangements for the future.
Implications for Organizational Culture and Leadership
Remote and hybrid work policies have profound implications for organizational culture
and leadership. Maintaining a cohesive organizational culture in a remote work environment
can be challenging. Physical distance can lead to a sense of isolation and weaken the social bonds
that are crucial for a strong organizational culture (Bailey & Kurland, 2002). Leaders must adapt
their management styles to support remote teams effectively. This includes fostering open
communication, building trust, and ensuring that employees feel connected to the
organization’s goals and values (Gajendran & Harrison, 2007). Effective leadership is crucial in
remote and hybrid work settings. Studies highlight the importance of transformational
leadership, where leaders inspire and motivate employees by creating a vision and fostering an
inclusive culture (Bartsch, Weber, Büttgen, & Huber, 2020). Leaders must also be adept at using
digital communication tools and managing virtual teams (Dulebohn & Hoch, 2017).
Furthermore, providing adequate resources and support for remote work, such as access to
technology and opportunities for professional development, is essential for maintaining
employee engagement and productivity (Kossek et al., 2023). Recent research underscores the
evolving challenges and strategies in maintaining organizational culture and effective
leadership in remote and hybrid work environments. According to Richter (2020), the rapid shift
to remote work during the COVID-19 pandemic has tested organizational cultures, with
companies needing to reinvent how they foster community and employee engagement without
physical presence. Digital platforms have become the new hub for cultural exchange, but the
efficacy of these tools depends on the consistency and authenticity of their use by leadership
(Waizenegger et al., 2020). Leaders who regularly communicate and demonstrate organizational
values through these platforms can maintain a strong culture even in a dispersed environment
(Mazmanian et al., 2013).
The role of leadership in remote and hybrid settings has been further explored,
emphasizing the need for transformational leadership. This leadership style, characterized by
the ability to inspire and motivate employees, has proven effective in remote settings where
physical oversight is minimal. Bartsch et al., (2020) found that transformational leaders who
communicate a clear vision and encourage innovation can significantly enhance remote team
performance and morale. Additionally, Galanti et al., (2023) noted that leaders who foster an
inclusive culture and actively engage with their teams through digital means can mitigate the
sense of isolation often experienced in remote work. Effective leadership in remote and hybrid
work also requires proficiency with digital communication tools. Dulebohn & Hoch (2017)
901
emphasize that leaders must be adept at using platforms like Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Slack
to maintain seamless communication and collaboration. These tools not only facilitate daily
operations but also help in maintaining a sense of community and connection among team
members. The use of these tools must be strategic and thoughtful, ensuring that they enhance
rather than hinder productivity and engagement (Schlegel et al., 2021).
Providing adequate resources and support for remote work is another critical leadership
function. Kossek et al. (2015) argue that leaders must ensure their teams have access to the
necessary technology and training to perform their tasks efficiently. This includes high-speed
internet, ergonomic office setups, and continuous learning opportunities. Choudhury et al.,
(2021) suggest that investing in professional development for remote employees not only
enhances their skills but also boosts their engagement and commitment to the organization. The
hybrid work model, which combines remote and in-office work, presents unique challenges and
opportunities for maintaining organizational culture and effective leadership. According to a
study by Bick et al., (2023), hybrid work models can help retain the benefits of remote work,
such as flexibility and reduced commuting time, while also addressing the need for face-to-face
interaction and spontaneous collaboration that are often lacking in fully remote settings. Leaders
in hybrid environments must be skilled at managing both remote and in-office employees,
ensuring that all team members feel included and valued regardless of their location (Gajendran
& Harrison, 2007).
Building and maintaining trust is another crucial aspect of leading remote and hybrid
teams. Research by Golden et al., (2006) highlights that trust between managers and employees
is fundamental to the success of remote work. Trust is built through consistent communication,
transparency, and demonstrating empathy towards employees' individual circumstances.
Leaders who trust their employees and give them autonomy are more likely to see higher levels
of job satisfaction and productivity (Felstead & Henseke, 2017). The psychological well-being of
employees is also a significant consideration for leaders in remote and hybrid work settings. Sha
et al., (2020) found that remote work can sometimes lead to feelings of isolation and stress due
to the blurring of boundaries between work and home life. Leaders can counteract these effects
by promoting a healthy work-life balance, encouraging regular breaks, and recognizing
employees' contributions. Toscano & Zappalà, (2020) emphasize the importance of
organizational support in mitigating these negative effects, suggesting that leaders should
provide resources for mental health and well-being.
Hybrid work models require leaders to be adaptable and flexible in their management
approaches. According to Galanti et al., (2023), leaders who are flexible in their expectations and
open to feedback from their teams can better navigate the complexities of hybrid work
arrangements. This flexibility includes accommodating different work styles and schedules,
which can enhance employee satisfaction and retention. Remote and hybrid work policies have
significant implications for organizational culture and leadership. Maintaining a cohesive
culture in remote settings requires leaders to adapt their management styles, utilize digital
communication tools effectively, and provide adequate resources and support for their teams.
Transformational leadership, which inspires and motivates employees through a clear vision
and inclusive culture, is particularly effective in these environments. Trust, communication, and
a focus on employees' well-being are essential components of successful leadership in remote
and hybrid work settings. As organizations continue to navigate these new work models,
ongoing research and the adaptation of leadership strategies will be crucial in optimizing these
arrangements for the future.
902
RESEARCH METHOD
The research methodology employed for this qualitative literature review involved a
systematic and comprehensive approach to synthesizing existing literature on remote and
hybrid work policies. The initial phase included the identification of relevant academic
databases and scholarly sources, such as peer-reviewed journals, conference proceedings, and
academic books, using keywords related to remote work, hybrid work, organizational culture,
leadership, and related topics. The search strategy aimed to gather a diverse range of
perspectives and findings from various disciplines, including management, psychology,
sociology, and information technology. Following the selection of pertinent literature, a
thorough examination of each source was conducted to extract key concepts, theories, and
empirical evidence related to the impact of remote and hybrid work on organizational culture
and leadership. The data extraction process involved categorizing and organizing the
information according to thematic areas, such as the challenges and benefits of remote work,
leadership strategies for remote teams, and the role of organizational culture in remote work
environments. Throughout the review process, careful attention was paid to the credibility and
validity of the selected literature, with an emphasis on including recent studies and seminal
works in the field. The synthesis of findings involved identifying patterns, contradictions, and
gaps in the literature to develop a coherent narrative that elucidates the current state of
knowledge on remote and hybrid work policies. Finally, the research methodology incorporated
the integration of relevant quotations and citations from the selected literature to support the
analysis and provide evidence-based insights into the research topic. Overall, this qualitative
literature review employed a rigorous and systematic approach to examining the existing body
of knowledge on remote and hybrid work policies, offering valuable insights for future research
and practice in the field.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The literature review on remote and hybrid work policies sheds light on the multifaceted
nature of workforce management practices and their impact on organizational dynamics.
Remote work arrangements have garnered attention for their potential to enhance employee
productivity and job satisfaction while promoting a healthier work-life balance. Research by
Bloom et al., (2015) indicates that remote work can lead to increased productivity by minimizing
workplace distractions and eliminating commuting time. This autonomy and flexibility afforded
by remote work have been found to correlate with higher levels of job satisfaction and well-
being among employees (Golden et al., 2006). Moreover, remote work offers individuals the
opportunity to better integrate their personal and professional lives, fostering a more
harmonious work-life balance (Felstead & Henseke, 2017). However, remote work is not without
its challenges. Social isolation and the blurring of boundaries between work and home life are
among the potential downsides of remote work arrangements Sha et al., (2020). These challenges
can impact job satisfaction and mental health, underscoring the need for strategies to mitigate
such negative effects. Hybrid work models, which combine elements of remote and in-office
work, have emerged as a promising solution to address these challenges. Gajendran & Harrison
(2007) highlight the benefits of hybrid models in providing the flexibility of remote work while
maintaining opportunities for face-to-face interaction and collaboration.
Recent research underscores the positive effects of hybrid work on stress reduction and
job satisfaction (Galanti et al., 2023). This suggests that hybrid models may offer a balanced
903
approach to addressing the diverse needs and preferences of employees. However, the
successful implementation of hybrid work requires careful consideration of various factors,
including organizational culture, leadership practices, and technological infrastructure.
Organizational culture plays a crucial role in shaping attitudes and behaviors towards remote
and hybrid work. Leaders must foster a supportive culture that embraces flexibility and
innovation while maintaining a sense of belonging and cohesion among remote and in-office
employees. Effective communication and collaboration tools are essential for facilitating
seamless interaction and information sharing in hybrid work environments (Dulebohn & Hoch,
2017). Furthermore, leaders must adapt their leadership styles to effectively manage remote and
hybrid teams. Transformational leadership, characterized by vision-setting and empowerment,
has been identified as particularly effective in remote settings (Bartsch et al., 2020). Leaders who
can inspire and motivate their teams, even from a distance, are more likely to achieve positive
outcomes in terms of employee engagement and performance. It is important to note that the
effectiveness of remote and hybrid work policies may vary depending on individual and
organizational factors. Future research should explore these factors in greater depth to inform
the development of evidence-based strategies and practices. Additionally, the long-term
implications of remote and hybrid work on organizational culture, employee well-being, and
performance warrant further investigation. By adopting a multi-perspective approach,
researchers can gain a comprehensive understanding of the complexities surrounding remote
and hybrid work policies, ultimately contributing to the development of sustainable and
inclusive workforce management practices.
Effective leadership plays a pivotal role in navigating the complexities of remote and
hybrid work arrangements, ensuring the success and productivity of distributed teams. Bartsch
et al., (2020) underscore the significance of transformational leadership styles in remote settings,
where leaders must inspire and motivate their teams through a compelling vision and inclusive
culture. Transformational leaders are adept at fostering trust, empowering their teams, and
promoting collaboration, all of which are essential for building cohesive and high-performing
remote teams. Moreover, Dulebohn & Hoch, (2017) highlight the importance of adapting
communication styles and leveraging digital tools to maintain engagement and cohesion among
remote teams. Leaders must embrace various communication channels, such as video
conferencing, instant messaging, and collaboration platforms, to foster open dialogue and
facilitate effective collaboration. In addition to effective communication, providing adequate
resources and support for remote work is essential for maintaining employee engagement and
productivity. Kossek et al., (2015) emphasize the importance of access to technology and
professional development opportunities in enabling remote workers to perform their tasks
efficiently. Leaders play a crucial role in ensuring that remote employees have the necessary
tools and resources to thrive in a remote work environment. This includes providing training
on remote work best practices, offering technical support, and creating opportunities for skill
development and career advancement. Furthermore, leaders must prioritize the well-being of
their remote teams, considering the unique challenges and stressors associated with remote
work. Sha et al., (2020) highlight the potential negative impacts of remote work on mental health,
such as social isolation and blurred boundaries between work and personal life. Leaders must
actively promote work-life balance, encourage regular breaks, and foster a supportive work
environment that prioritizes employee well-being. This may involve implementing policies and
initiatives that promote physical and mental health, such as flexible work hours, wellness
programs, and access to counseling services.
904
Effective leadership in remote and hybrid work environments requires a proactive
approach to building and maintaining trust among team members. Allen et al., (2015) emphasize
the importance of trust in facilitating collaboration, communication, and teamwork in remote
settings. Leaders must demonstrate trust in their teams by empowering them to make decisions
autonomously, providing constructive feedback, and fostering a culture of transparency and
accountability. Additionally, leaders must be mindful of cultural differences and diversity
within their remote teams, recognizing and valuing the unique perspectives and contributions
of each team member. Galanti et al., (2023) highlight the importance of inclusive leadership in
remote work environments, where leaders must actively promote diversity, equity, and
inclusion initiatives to ensure that all team members feel valued and respected. Effective
leadership is essential for facilitating successful remote and hybrid work arrangements.
Transformational leadership styles, effective communication strategies, provision of resources
and support, prioritization of employee well-being, and promotion of trust and inclusivity are
key components of leadership in remote settings. By adopting a multi-faceted approach to
leadership, organizations can create a supportive and empowering work environment that
enables remote teams to thrive and achieve their full potential.
The results of this literature review highlight the importance of ongoing research to
address the evolving landscape of remote and hybrid work policies. While existing studies
provide valuable insights, there remain several areas that warrant further investigation to
inform evidence-based practices and policies. One crucial area for future research is the
exploration of emerging trends and best practices in remote and hybrid work arrangements. As
technological advancements continue to reshape the way we work, it is essential to understand
how organizations can leverage these developments to optimize remote and hybrid work
policies (Bloom et al., 2015). Moreover, future studies could delve into the long-term effects of
remote work on employee well-being and organizational performance. While initial research
suggests positive outcomes associated with remote work, such as increased job satisfaction and
flexibility, there is a need to examine the sustainability of these benefits over time (Evans et al.,
2020). Longitudinal studies tracking the well-being and performance of remote workers over
extended periods can provide valuable insights into the potential challenges and opportunities
associated with remote work arrangements. Additionally, research on the role of leadership in
facilitating effective remote and hybrid work arrangements is crucial. Leadership plays a
significant role in shaping organizational culture, fostering engagement, and promoting
collaboration in remote settings (Dulebohn & Hoch, 2017). Understanding the leadership
behaviors and strategies that contribute to successful remote work outcomes can provide
valuable guidance for organizational leaders seeking to navigate the complexities of remote and
hybrid work environments.
There is a growing recognition of the importance of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)
initiatives in remote work environments. Remote work has the potential to create more equitable
opportunities for individuals with diverse backgrounds and circumstances (Golden et al., 2006).
However, there is a need to examine how remote work policies and practices impact DEI
outcomes within organizations. Future research could explore the challenges and opportunities
associated with promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion in remote and hybrid work
environments and identify strategies for creating more equitable work environments for all
employees. Overall, continuous research in these areas is essential to inform evidence-based
policies and practices that support the evolving needs of the workforce in the digital age. By
addressing these research gaps, organizations can better understand the implications of remote
905
and hybrid work arrangements and develop strategies to maximize their benefits while
mitigating potential challenges. Moreover, ongoing research can contribute to the development
of inclusive and equitable workplaces that promote employee well-being, engagement, and
performance in remote and hybrid work environments.
CONCLUSIONS
The literature review on remote and hybrid work policies provides valuable insights into
the challenges and opportunities associated with managing remote and distributed teams. The
findings underscore the importance of understanding the multifaceted nature of remote work
arrangements and their implications for organizational dynamics. From a theoretical
perspective, the research highlights the need for a nuanced understanding of the factors
influencing the effectiveness of remote and hybrid work policies. Studies suggest that while
remote work can offer benefits such as increased productivity, job satisfaction, and work-life
balance, it also presents challenges such as social isolation and blurred boundaries between
work and personal life. Hybrid work models emerge as a promising solution to address these
challenges by combining the flexibility of remote work with opportunities for face-to-face
interaction and collaboration.
The literature review emphasizes the role of leadership in facilitating successful remote
and hybrid work arrangements. Transformational leadership styles, effective communication
strategies, and provision of resources and support are crucial for fostering engagement,
collaboration, and well-being among remote teams. Leaders must adapt their leadership styles
to effectively manage remote teams and promote a culture of trust, inclusivity, and
accountability. Additionally, research on the long-term effects of remote work on employee
well-being and organizational performance is essential for informing evidence-based policies
and practices.
From a managerial perspective, the implications of the literature review are profound.
Organizational leaders must recognize the importance of embracing remote and hybrid work
arrangements as integral components of the modern workplace. By implementing policies and
practices that support remote and distributed teams, organizations can unlock the full potential
of their workforce and achieve greater flexibility, productivity, and innovation. However, to
maximize the benefits of remote work, managers must invest in training and development
programs, provide access to technology and resources, and create a supportive work culture
that values diversity, equity, and inclusion. Additionally, managers must be proactive in
addressing the challenges associated with remote work, such as maintaining communication,
fostering team cohesion, and promoting work-life balance. The literature review underscores
the need for organizations to adapt their workforce management practices to meet the evolving
needs of the digital age. By embracing remote and hybrid work arrangements and adopting
effective leadership strategies, organizations can create inclusive, flexible, and resilient
workplaces that empower employees to thrive and succeed in today's dynamic business
environment.
REFERENCE
Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing
the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273
906
Arunprasad, P., Dey, C., Jebli, F., Manimuthu, A., & Hathat, Z. El. (2022). Exploring the remote
work challenges in the era of COVID-19 pandemic: review and application model.
Benchmarking: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-07-2021-0421
Avlani, A., & Charalampous, M. (2021). Exploring the Significance of Remote Leadership
Competencies in the Virtual Workplace: A Systematic Literature Review.
https://doi.org/10.31124/advance.14781744.v1
Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions,
and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The
International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior,
23(4), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/JOB.144
Bartsch, S., Weber, E., & Büttgen, M. (2020). Leadership matters in crisis-induced digital
transformation: how to lead service employees effectively during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Journal of Service Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-05-2020-0160
Bick, A., Blandin, A., & Mertens, K. (2023). Work from home before and after the COVID-19
outbreak. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 15(4), 1–39.
https://doi.org/10.24149/wp2017r2
Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015). Does working from home work? Evidence
from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 165–218.
https://doi.org/10.48152/ssrp-t9fr-jr64
Choudhury, P., Foroughi, C., & Larson, B. (2021). Work-from-anywhere: The productivity
effects of geographic flexibility. Strategic Management Journal, 42(4), 655–683.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3494473
Dulebohn, J. H., & Hoch, J. E. (2017). Virtual teams in organizations. In Human resource
management review (Vol. 27, Issue 4, pp. 569–574). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-07-
2021-0421
Dutcher, G. (2012). The effects of telecommuting on productivity: An experimental examination.
The role of dull and creative tasks. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 84, 355–
363. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEBO.2012.04.009
Evans, J., Taylor, J., Browne, J., Ferguson, S., Atchan, M., Maher, P., Homer, C. S. E., & Davis, D.
L. (2020). The future in their hands: Graduating student midwives’ plans, job satisfaction
and the desire to work in midwifery continuity of care. Women and Birth : Journal of the
Australian College of Midwives. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2018.11.011
Felstead, A., & Henseke, G. (2017). Assessing the growth of remote working and its
consequences for effort, well-being and work-life balance. New Technology, Work and
Employment, 32(3), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12097
Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about
telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
Galanti, T., Ferrara, B., Benevene, P., & Buonomo, I. (2023). Rethinking the Unthinkable: A
Delphi Study on Remote Work during COVID-19 Pandemic. Social Sciences, 12(9), 497.
https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12090497
Golden, T. D., Veiga, J. F., & Simsek, Z. (2006). Telecommuting’s differential impact on work-
family conflict: Is there no place like home? Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1340.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1340
907
Harrison, A., Wheeler, P., & Whitehead, C. (2003). The distributed workplace: Sustainable work
environments. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203616574
Johnson, A., Dey, S., Nguyen, H., Groth, M., Joyce, S., Tan, L., Glozier, N., & Harvey, S. B. (2020).
A review and agenda for examining how technology-driven changes at work will impact
workplace mental health and employee well-being. Australian Journal of Management, 45(3),
402–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896220922292
Kossek, E. E., Dumas, T. L., Piszczek, M. M., & Allen, T. D. (2021). Pushing the boundaries: A
qualitative study of how stem women adapted to disrupted work–nonwork boundaries
during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(11), 1615.
https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000982
Kossek, E. E., Perrigino, M. B., Russo, M., & Morandin, G. (2023). Missed connections between
the leadership and work–life fields: Work–life supportive leadership for a dual agenda.
Academy of Management Annals, 17(1), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2021.0085
Kossek, E. E., Thompson, R. J., & Lautsch, B. A. (2015). Balanced workplace flexibility: Avoiding
the traps. California Management Review, 57(4), 5–25.
https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.4.5
Luebstorf, S., Allen, J. A., Eden, E., Kramer, W. S., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Lehmann-Willenbrock,
N. (2023). Digging into “zoom fatigue”: A qualitative exploration of remote work
challenges and virtual meeting stressors. Merits, 3(1), 151–166.
https://doi.org/10.3390/merits3010010
Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for
management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 123.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.123
Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013). The autonomy paradox: The implications
of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organization Science, 24(5), 1337–1357.
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0806
Nilles, J. M. (1994). Making telecommuting happen: A guide for telemanagers and telecommuters.
Onnis, L. (2016). What is a sustainable remote health workforce? People, practice and place.
https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH3806
Richter, A. (2020). Locked-down digital work. International Journal of Information Management, 55,
102157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102157
Schlegel, E. C., Tate, J. A., Pickler, R. H., & Smith, L. H. (2021). Practical strategies for qualitative
inquiry in a virtual world. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 77(10), 4035–4044.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15000
Sha, D., Malarvizhi, A. S., Liu, Q., Tian, Y., Zhou, Y., Ruan, S., Dong, R., Carte, K., Lan, H., &
Wang, Z. (2020). A state-level socioeconomic data collection of the United States for
COVID-19 research. Data, 5(4), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/data5040118
Sostero, M., Milasi, S., Hurley, J., Fernandez-Macías, E., & Bisello, M. (2020). Teleworkability and
the COVID-19 crisis: a new digital divide? JRC working papers series on labour, education
and technology.
Toscano, F., & Zappalà, S. (2020a). Smart working in Italia: origine, diffusione e possibili esiti.
Psicologia Sociale, 15(2), 203–223.
Toscano, F., & Zappalà, S. (2020b). Social isolation and stress as predictors of productivity
908
perception and remote work satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of
concern about the virus in a moderated double mediation. Sustainability, 12(23), 9804.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239804
Waizenegger, L., McKenna, B., Cai, W., & Bendz, T. (2020). An affordance perspective of team
collaboration and enforced working from home during COVID-19. European Journal of
Information Systems, 29(4), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085x.2020.1800417
Wang, K., Yang, B., Wu, C., & Zheng, L. (2023). The moderation of satisfaction with working
conditions in the association between workload and mental health among healthcare
workers collecting test samples in the post-COVID-19 era. Frontiers in Public Health, 11,
1106299. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1106299
Yang, Y., Youyou, W., & Uzzi, B. (2020). Estimating the deep replicability of scientific
findings using human and artificial intelligence. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, 117(20), 10762–10768. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1909046117
