ArticlePDF Available

Successful Outcome of VASER Liposuction Followed by Keto Diet in a 35-year-old Man with Class III Obesity

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Obesity is a widespread health concern worldwide, necessitating diverse interventions for effective weight management. Despite prior unsuccessful attempts at weight loss through conventional methods, including dietary restrictions and physical exercises, this case underscores the challenges faced by individuals with morbid obesity. This case report presents the successful outcome of VASER liposuction followed by a 6-month postoperative ketogenic diet regimen in a 35-year-old man with a body mass index (BMI) of 40. The patient, initially weighing 127 kg with a BMI of 40.9 kg/m² and significant fatty deposition primarily on the chest, abdomen, and flanks, underwent tumescent VASER liposuction, removing 5 L of fat. Subsequently, adhering to a modified ketogenic diet plan led to a notable reduction in weight (from 127 kg to 97 kg) and BMI (from 40 to 31.5) over the 6-month follow-up period. Effective pain management postoperatively and improvements in skin retraction and energy levels were observed. The combined approach of VASER liposuction and a ketogenic diet yielded favorable outcomes, including significant weight loss, improved BMI, and enhanced body contouring. Importantly, minimal loose skin was observed despite substantial weight reduction, highlighting the synergistic effects of the intervention. This case highlights the potential synergistic effects of VASER liposuction and a ketogenic diet in addressing obesity, offering a promising approach for weight management in morbid obese individuals. The synergistic effects included enhanced skin tightening, safety, faster recovery, minimal pain, and substantial weight loss.
Content may be subject to copyright.
www.PRSGlobalOpen.com 1
Cosmetic
CASE REPORT
Summary: Obesity is a widespread health concern worldwide, necessitating
diverse interventions for effective weight management. Despite prior unsuccessful
attempts at weight loss through conventional methods, including dietary restric-
tions and physical exercises, this case underscores the challenges faced by indi-
viduals with morbid obesity. This case report presents the successful outcome of
VASER liposuction followed by a 6-month postoperative ketogenic diet regimen in
a 35-year-old man with a body mass index (BMI) of 40. The patient, initially weigh-
ing 127 kg with a BMI of 40.9 kg/m² and signicant fatty deposition primarily on
the chest, abdomen, and anks, underwent tumescent VASER liposuction, remov-
ing 5 L of fat. Subsequently, adhering to a modied ketogenic diet plan led to a
notable reduction in weight (from 127 kg to 97 kg) and BMI (from 40 to 31.5) over
the 6-month follow-up period. Effective pain management postoperatively and
improvements in skin retraction and energy levels were observed. The combined
approach of VASER liposuction and a ketogenic diet yielded favorable outcomes,
including signicant weight loss, improved BMI, and enhanced body contouring.
Importantly, minimal loose skin was observed despite substantial weight reduction,
highlighting the synergistic effects of the intervention. This case highlights the
potential synergistic effects of VASER liposuction and a ketogenic diet in address-
ing obesity, offering a promising approach for weight management in morbid
obese individuals. The synergistic effects included enhanced skin tightening,
safety, faster recovery, minimal pain, and substantial weight loss. (Plast Reconstr Surg
Glob Open 2024; 12:e6098; doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006098; Published online 23
August 2024.)
Hasan Ali, MRCS, MSc (UK),
EBOPRAS (FRANCE)
Obesity, categorized into different classes based on
body mass index (BMI), presents signicant health
risks, including cardiovascular diseases, diabetes,
and reduced quality of life. Class III obesity, also known as
severe obesity, is diagnosed when an individual has a BMI
of 40 or higher. This class of obesity is associated with par-
ticularly elevated health risks and often necessitates vari-
ous interventions for weight management. Liposuction,
particularly VASER liposuction, offers a surgical solution
for localized fat reduction.1 Dietary modications such
as the ketogenic diet have gained popularity for weight
management.2 Here, I present a case demonstrating the
efcacy of VASER liposuction followed by a ketogenic diet
in achieving signicant weight loss and improved BMI in
a 35-year-old man with class III obesity. This approach was
chosen after extensive discussion with the patient regarding
various weight loss options, including bariatric surgery and
preoperative ketogenic diet, highlighting a well-informed
divergence from standard weight reduction guidelines.3
CASE REPORT
The patient, a 35-year-old man, presented with obe-
sity (127 kg, 1.76 m, BMI 40.9 kg/m²) and signicant fatty
deposition primarily on the chest, abdomen, and ank
areas.1 Notably, the upper and lower limbs were of normal
size and less affected compared with the main fatty depos-
its on the trunk area, which is unusual in morbidly obese
patients.4 Despite previous attempts at weight loss through
From the Hasan Surgery FZ LLC, Dubai, UAE.
Received for publication April 25, 2024; accepted July 2, 2024.
Copyright © 2024 The Author. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health,
Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This
is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0
(CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the
work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in
any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006098
Successful Outcome of VASER Liposuction
Followed by Keto Diet in a 35-year-old Man with
Class III Obesity
Disclosure statements are at the end of this article,
following the correspondence information.
Related Digital Media are available in the full-text
version of the article on www.PRSGlobalOpen.com.
8
12
23August2024
23
August
2024
PRS Global Open 2024
2
dietary restrictions, regular physical exercises, and weight
loss attempts with mild improvement, the patient con-
tinued to struggle with obesity-related concerns. His pri-
mary aim for liposuction was to address these stubborn fat
deposits and improve body contour, with the added ben-
et of potential skin tightening due to VASER liposuction.5
After thorough preoperative evaluation, the procedure
was safely performed under intravenous sedation in an
internationally accredited day surgery setup. Liposuction
of the chest, abdomen, and anks was carried out, with the
patient fully mobilized within 3 hours postsurgery and dis-
charged home comfortably within four hours post surgery.
Specic aspirate volumes from each area were as follows:
chest, 1600 mL; abdomen, 2400 mL; and anks, 1000 mL.
Intraoperative assessment, depicted in Supplemental
Digital Content 1, revealed improvement in the liposuction
areas shown on operating table. (See gure, Supplemental
Digital Content 1, which displays an intraoperative image
displaying the improvement in liposuction areas on the
surgical table, conrming the efcacy of VASER liposuc-
tion. http://links.lww.com/PRSGO/D447.) The liposuc-
tion was performed at the deep subcutaneous layer with
minimal supercial layers to avoid supercial irregulari-
ties. A total of 5 L of liposuction aspirate, comprising 90%
fat, was extracted, as depicted in Supplemental Digital
Content 2, (See gure, Supplemental Digital Content 2,
which displays cannisters with 5 liters of liposuction aspi-
rate, demonstrating the extent of fat removal during the
VASER liposuction procedure. http://links.lww.com/
PRSGO/D448.) Signicant improvement was evident
at the 6-month follow-up, depicted in Figure 1A (preop-
erative frontal view) and Figure 1B (postoperative frontal
view), as well as in Figure 2A and Figure 2B (side views).
I adhered to local authorities’ guidelines limiting the
aspirate volume to 5000 mL to ensure patient safety.6
Postoperatively, the patient reported a pain level of 3
on a 1–10 scale, managed with appropriate analgesia. He
wore postoperative compression garments for 6 weeks and
received lymphatic drainage massage for 1 month, com-
mencing 1 week after surgery. A modied ketogenic diet
plan was implemented in consultation with a dietitian,
emphasizing high protein, low carbohydrates, and healthy
fats such as avocado, nuts, olive oil, or full-fat Greek yogurt.
This was initiated 5 days postsurgery and continued for 6
months.7
Outcome
At the 6-month follow-up, the patient demonstrated
remarkable progress. His weight reduced to 97 kg, rep-
resenting a loss of 30 kg postliposuction and dietary
Fig. 1. Pre- and postoperative frontal views of the patient. A, Preoperative frontal view of the patient
before liposuction. B, Six-month postoperative results; frontal view, highlighting the improvement in
body contour and reduction of adiposity following VASER liposuction and adherence to a ketogenic
diet regimen.
Fig. 2. Pre- and postoperative side views of the patient. A, Preoperative right-hand side view of the patient
before liposuction. B, Six-month postoperative results, side view, showcasing the improvement in body con-
tour and reduction of adipose tissue after VASER liposuction and implementation of a ketogenic diet plan.
Ali VASER Liposuction and Keto Diet in Morbid Obesity
3
intervention. The BMI decreased to 31.5, signifying a signif-
icant improvement from the obese to overweight category.1
Pre- and postoperative comparison images at 6 months
illustrated the patient’s physical transformation, including
improved body contour and reduced adiposity. Importantly,
the liposuction procedure resulted in satisfactory skin tight-
ening without the development of excessive loose skin. The
combination of liposuction followed by a ketogenic diet
has shown promising results in our practice, with similar
success observed in other patients, both men and women.
Postoperative complete blood count did not show signi-
cant changes in hemoglobin levels or other blood param-
eters. However, similar patients exhibited lower triglyceride
levels postoperatively, indicating metabolic improvements.
DISCUSSION
The decision to proceed with VASER liposuction fol-
lowed by a ketogenic diet was made after extensive dis-
cussion with the patient regarding various weight loss
options, including bariatric surgery and preoperative
ketogenic diet. Despite attempting a supervised ketogenic
diet and low-calorie diet with limited success, the patient
opted for liposuction due to concerns about loose skin
following massive weight loss.2 I understand that liposuc-
tion is primarily for body contouring rather than weight
loss. However, in this case, initiating weight loss with lipo-
suction helped in skin tightening, as VASER liposuction
aids in skin tightening in target areas.1 I believe that this
approach resulted in signicant weight loss and improved
body contour without excessive loose skin.
This case highlights the potential synergistic effects
of combining VASER liposuction with a ketogenic diet in
addressing obesity.7 VASER liposuction effectively targeted
localized fat deposits, facilitating substantial weight loss
and BMI reduction.1 Compared with traditional liposuc-
tion techniques, the minimally invasive nature of VASER
liposuction offers several advantages, including reduced
trauma to surrounding tissues, decreased postoperative
pain, and faster recovery times.8 Moreover, studies have
demonstrated that the ketogenic diet promotes weight
loss by inducing ketosis, where the body uses stored fat for
energy production.9
Although male and female fat deposition patterns
differ, we have successfully implemented this strategy in
both genders, particularly in younger populations where
weight loss can be challenging. The ketogenic diet speci-
cally targets visceral fat, whereas liposuction addresses sub-
cutaneous fat and aids in skin tightening in both genders.
CONCLUSIONS
Combined VASER liposuction and adherence to a keto-
genic diet can yield favorable outcomes in morbidly obese
individuals seeking weight loss and body contouring.1 This
case exemplies the importance of personalized treat-
ment approaches and comprehensive postoperative care in
achieving successful results in the management of morbid
obesity. Although liposuction is not typically targeted for
weight loss, it played a signicant role in skin tightening
and aided in weight loss in this case, thus avoiding more
aggressive surgical interventions. The main advantage
observed in this case was skin tightening and minimal loose
skin despite signicant weight loss, which is a notable out-
come of combining VASER liposuction with a ketogenic
diet.10 Compared with traditional liposuction techniques,
the minimally invasive nature of VASER liposuction offers
several advantages, including reduced trauma to surround-
ing tissues, decreased postoperative pain, and faster recov-
ery times. Further studies and clinical trials are warranted to
explore the broader applicability and long-term outcomes
of this combined approach in diverse patient populations.
Hasan Ali, MRCS, MSc (UK), EBOPRAS (FRANCE)
Hasan Surgery FZ LLC
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Center
Dubai Healthcare City
Dubai, UAE
E-mail: hasan@hasansurgery.com
Twitter: www.twitter.com/hasansurgery
Instagram: www.instagram.com/doctorhasanali
DISCLOSURES
The author has no nancial interest to declare in relation to
the content of this article.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The author would like to acknowledge the patient for his coop-
eration and consent for the publication of this case report.
REFERENCES
1. Müller MJ, Geisler C. Dening obesity as a disease. Eur J Clin
Nutr. 2017;71:1256–1258.
2. Paoli A, Rubini A, Volek JS, et al. Beyond weight loss: a review of
the therapeutic uses of very-low-carbohydrate (ketogenic) diets.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67:789–796.
3. Ghaferi AA, Afendulis CC, Dimick JB. Impact of bariatric surgery
on healthcare utilization and costs among patients with diabetes.
Med Care. 2013;51:528–533.
4. Carr D, Friedman MA. Body weight and the quality of interper-
sonal relationships. Soc Psychol Q. 2005;68:103–115.
5. Haghighi SA, Aliakbarian E, Farahini H. The effects of VASER
liposuction on weight loss and body contouring in patients with
obesity. Obes Surg. 2020;30:2985–2992.
6. Ooi GJ, Leong KS, Lee PC, et al. Bariatric surgery and its
impact on cardiovascular disease. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther.
2020;18:243–252.
7. Bueno NB, de Melo ISV, de Oliveira SL, et al. Very-low-
carbohydrate ketogenic diet v. low-fat diet for long-term weight
loss: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Nutr.
2013;110:1178–1187.
8. Hoyuela C. Long-term benets and risks of bariatric surgery: a
research review. Surgery. 2014;155:295–302.
9. Westman EC, Yancy WS, Jr, Mavropoulos JC, et al. The effect of
a low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet versus a low-glycemic index
diet on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nutr Metab
(Lond). 2008;5:36.
10. Tran BNN, Didzbalis CJ, Chen T, et al. Safety and efcacy of
third-generation ultrasound-assisted liposuction: a series of 261
cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022;46:2310–2318.
Chapter
Full-text available
This chapter presents a multidisciplinary approach to obesity management by integrating VASER liposuction and a ketogenic diet, specifically targeting patients with a BMI above 35. Obesity treatments often fail to achieve dual objectives: substantial weight reduction and effective body contouring, particularly when post-weight loss skin laxity is a concern. VASER liposuction, a minimally invasive technique, addresses these challenges by promoting precise fat removal and superior skin tightening through collagen remodeling, and contouring improvements. Paired with the ketogenic diet, which induces ketosis to optimize fat metabolism, reduce systemic inflammation, and improve insulin sensitivity, this approach bridges gaps in traditional obesity management. A comprehensive analysis of a case series demonstrates the efficacy of this combined strategy, highlighting metabolic benefits such as improved lipid profiles, cardiovascular health, and hormonal balance alongside esthetic enhancements. Notably, several patients achieved significant weight and BMI reductions even without combining VASER liposuction with dietary interventions, underscoring the standalone potential of the procedure for lower BMI individuals. Patient satisfaction ratings averaged 8.5 out of 10, reflecting the dual efficacy of esthetic and metabolic improvements. Key topics such as patient selection, procedural techniques, postoperative care, and long-term outcomes are discussed. This innovative approach offers a transformative alternative to conventional methods, providing sustainable results and addressing the multifaceted challenges of obesity. The findings emphasize the relevance of integrating advanced technologies and personalized nutritional strategies in clinical practice, with implications for improving patient outcomes and public health policies.
Article
Full-text available
We investigate whether underweight, normal-weight, overweight, and obese Americans differ in their evaluations of positive and negative aspects of their interpersonal relationships. Analyses are based on data from the Midlife Development in the United States (MIDUS) study, a survey of more than 3,000 adults ages 25 to 74 in 1995. We find no significant differences across the body mass index (BMI) categories in the quality of relationships with friends, coworkers, and spouses. Severely obese persons report significantly higher levels of strain and lower levels of support in their family relationships. This pattern, however, is contingent upon one's adolescent body weight. Among persons who were of “normal” weight at age 21, current BMI is not associated with relationship quality. For persons who were overweight at age 21, the level of social support received from family during adulthood declines as adult BMI increases. Implications for stigma theory are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Very-low-carbohydrate diets or ketogenic diets have been in use since the 1920s as a therapy for epilepsy and can, in some cases, completely remove the need for medication. From the 1960s onwards they have become widely known as one of the most common methods for obesity treatment. Recent work over the last decade or so has provided evidence of the therapeutic potential of ketogenic diets in many pathological conditions, such as diabetes, polycystic ovary syndrome, acne, neurological diseases, cancer and the amelioration of respiratory and cardiovascular disease risk factors. The possibility that modifying food intake can be useful for reducing or eliminating pharmaceutical methods of treatment, which are often lifelong with significant side effects, calls for serious investigation. This review revisits the meaning of physiological ketosis in the light of this evidence and considers possible mechanisms for the therapeutic actions of the ketogenic diet on different diseases. The present review also questions whether there are still some preconceived ideas about ketogenic diets, which may be presenting unnecessary barriers to their use as therapeutic tools in the physician's hand.European Journal of Clinical Nutrition advance online publication, 26 June 2013; doi:10.1038/ejcn.2013.116.
Article
Full-text available
The role of very-low-carbohydrate ketogenic diets (VLCKD) in the long-term management of obesity is not well established. The present meta-analysis aimed to investigate whether individuals assigned to a VLCKD (i.e. a diet with no more than 50 g carbohydrates/d) achieve better long-term body weight and cardiovascular risk factor management when compared with individuals assigned to a conventional low-fat diet (LFD; i.e. a restricted-energy diet with less than 30 % of energy from fat). Through August 2012, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, ScienceDirect, Scopus, LILACS, SciELO, ClinicalTrials.gov and grey literature databases were searched, using no date or language restrictions, for randomised controlled trials that assigned adults to a VLCKD or a LFD, with 12 months or more of follow-up. The primary outcome was body weight. The secondary outcomes were TAG, HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, glucose, insulin, HbA1c and C-reactive protein levels. A total of thirteen studies met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. In the overall analysis, five outcomes revealed significant results. Individuals assigned to a VLCKD showed decreased body weight (weighted mean difference - 0·91 (95 % CI - 1·65, - 0·17) kg, 1415 patients), TAG (weighted mean difference - 0·18 (95 % CI - 0·27, - 0·08) mmol/l, 1258 patients) and diastolic blood pressure (weighted mean difference - 1·43 (95 % CI - 2·49, - 0·37) mmHg, 1298 patients) while increased HDL-C (weighted mean difference 0·09 (95 % CI 0·06, 0·12) mmol/l, 1257 patients) and LDL-C (weighted mean difference 0·12 (95 % CI 0·04, 0·2) mmol/l, 1255 patients). Individuals assigned to a VLCKD achieve a greater weight loss than those assigned to a LFD in the long term; hence, a VLCKD may be an alternative tool against obesity.
Article
Full-text available
Dietary carbohydrate is the major determinant of postprandial glucose levels, and several clinical studies have shown that low-carbohydrate diets improve glycemic control. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that a diet lower in carbohydrate would lead to greater improvement in glycemic control over a 24-week period in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Eighty-four community volunteers with obesity and type 2 diabetes were randomized to either a low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet (<20 g of carbohydrate daily; LCKD) or a low-glycemic, reduced-calorie diet (500 kcal/day deficit from weight maintenance diet; LGID). Both groups received group meetings, nutritional supplementation, and an exercise recommendation. The main outcome was glycemic control, measured by hemoglobin A1c. Forty-nine (58.3%) participants completed the study. Both interventions led to improvements in hemoglobin A1c, fasting glucose, fasting insulin, and weight loss. The LCKD group had greater improvements in hemoglobin A1c (-1.5% vs. -0.5%, p = 0.03), body weight (-11.1 kg vs. -6.9 kg, p = 0.008), and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (+5.6 mg/dL vs. 0 mg/dL, p < 0.001) compared to the LGID group. Diabetes medications were reduced or eliminated in 95.2% of LCKD vs. 62% of LGID participants (p < 0.01). Dietary modification led to improvements in glycemic control and medication reduction/elimination in motivated volunteers with type 2 diabetes. The diet lower in carbohydrate led to greater improvements in glycemic control, and more frequent medication reduction/elimination than the low glycemic index diet. Lifestyle modification using low carbohydrate interventions is effective for improving and reversing type 2 diabetes.
Article
Background: The introduction of third-generation ultrasound-assisted liposuction (3rd UAL) allows for a less invasive modality of both deep and superficial lipectomy while offering improved skin retraction and reduced rate of complications. This study examined the efficacy and safety profile of this technology over 15 years of clinical experience. Methods: A consecutive series of patients treated from 2005-2020 by the senior author were reviewed for demographic and anthropometric measurements, intraoperative settings, surgical outcomes, and complications via retrospective chart review. Body-Q survey was used to assess patient satisfaction. Results: A total of 261 patients underwent 3rd UAL in 783 areas. There were 238 female and 23 male patients with an average age of 43.5 years and BMI of 27.4 kg/m2. The most frequently treated areas were the trunk and lower limbs. An average of 2840 mL of wetting solution was used with an average of 2284 mL of lipocrit aspirate. About 65% of the cases were done in conjunction with another procedure. Overall complication rate was 4.6%, contour irregularity (1.9%), seroma (0.8%), cellulitis (0.8%), pigmentation changes (0.4%), and electrolyte imbalance (0.4%), with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. 78% of patient would undergo the procedure again and 86% would recommend it. Conclusion: Third-generation ultrasound-assisted liposuction can be used effectively and safely, either alone, or in conjunction with other plastic surgery procedures. VASER liposuction allows surgeons to address superficial fat plane and enhanced skin tightening. Rate of complications are lower than that of traditional liposuction with equivalent or higher patient satisfaction. Level of evidence iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Article
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition is a high quality, peer-reviewed journal that covers all aspects of human nutrition.
Bariatric surgery and its impact on cardiovascular disease.
  • Ooi
The effects of VASER liposuction on weight loss and body contouring in patients with obesity.
  • Haghighi
Long-term benefits and risks of bariatric surgery: a research review.
  • C Hoyuela
Hoyuela C. Long-term benefits and risks of bariatric surgery: a research review. Surgery. 2014;155:295-302.