ArticlePDF Available

ATROPATES (ATURPAT) - ACHAEMENID KING DARIUS III'S GENERAL AND SATRAP OF MEDIA

Authors:

Abstract

Achaemenid Great King Darius III's General Atropates attracts the attention of historians because a couple of hypotheses exist regarding the origins of the name Azerbaijan. According to the classic tradition, the name comes from the time of Alexander of Macedon’s conquest of the Achaemenid Empire.
20th August, 2024
ATURPAT (ATROPATES) - DARIUS III’S GENERAL
AND KING OF MEDIA ATROPATENE
by Mahir Khalifa-zadeh*
Online version is available at:
https://www.azglobalcontext.org/2024/08/sculpture-of-atropates-aturpat-darius.html
ATROPATES (Old Persian: Ātrpātah and Pahlavi: Ātūrpāt; Ancient Greek: Ἀτροπάτης
Atropátēs; (370 BC 321 BC) was a Medes (Old Persian: 𐎶𐎠𐎭, Māda) and nobleman
(possibly had very distant relation to the Achaemenid House) and satrap of Media (Ancient Greek:
Μεγάλη) and general who served Darius III and Alexander of Macedon. He was a founder of the
independent kingdom Media - Atropatene (Ancient Greek: Ἀτροπατηνή or Lesser Media) and the
dynasty that was named after him. Atropates’ descendants ruled the kingdom until the 2nd century
CE. The kingdom was established in c. 323 BC and was the only Iranian region to remain under
Zoroastrian authority from the Achaemenids to the Muslim Arabs' conquest.
Sculpture of Atropates (Ātūrpāt), King of Media – Atropatena
National Military Museum, Baku, Azerbaijan
1
Azerbaijan: History and Contemporary Politics
Azerbaijan in Global Context - Media and Analysis Center, Toronto, Canada www.azglobalcontext.org
2
General Atropates attracts the attention of historians because a couple of hypotheses exist
regarding the origins of the name Azerbaijan. According to the classic tradition, the name comes
from the time of Alexander of Macedon’s conquest of the Achaemenid Empire.
In particular, it presumably originates from General Atropates - a commander of the
Achaemenid King Darius III’s army’s right wing in the battle of Gaugamela (Ancient Greek:
Γαυγάμηλα, also known as the battle of Arbella) in 331 BC. Atropates, as satrap (Median/Old
Persian: xšaçapāvān, Parthian/Arsacid Pahlavi: šahrab) of Media, commanded Median,
Arranian (Latin: Albanian), Sacasenian, Cadusian and Arminian (Achaemenid's province of
Armina, Old Persian: 𐎠𐎼𐎷𐎡𐎴, Elamite: Harminuya, Ancient Greek: Arminyaya/ Armenia)
troops.
Ilya Dyakonov indicated that Arranians (Albanians) and Cadussians participated in the battle as
the allies of Atropates, not of the Persians and, thus, he believed that Atropates' political
influence lasted far to the north from the Aras River.
On the eve of Gaugamela battle, Atropates commanded the mounted reconnaissance squad that
Darius III sent to reconnoiter the field.
Intriguingly, during the battle of Gaugamela, Atropates’ units pushed Alexander of Macedon’s
army to stop the advance and implemented defensive measures. Only Alexander’s personal
intervention with fresh troops allowed the Macedonians to stop their retreat and concentrate on a
victorious advance in the center, facing troops under the direct command of Darius III.
Indeed, it was a unique moment in the battle. The Macedonian left wing had begun to retreat and,
if King Darius III realized and utilized it, the battle’s outcome would have been completely
different. However, as is well known, Darius III’s poor commanding and leadership skills
resulted in the catastrophic defeat of the Achaemenids Army. When Darius lost the battle he ran
to the Median capital of Ecbatana where Atropates tried to help him to get a new army.
One month after Darius III’s death in June 330 BC, Atropates surrendered to Alexander. Later, in
a personal meeting, Alexander mentioned Atropates’ military skills and esteemed him so highly
that his daughter was married to Perdiccas - a close ally to Alexander and commander of the
Macedonian cavalry. The marriage occurred at the famous mass wedding in Susa in February
324 BC. Atropates traveled to Susa with Alexander and offered 100 Amazons, as Greeks called
beautiful female archers from Media and Arrān (Latin: Albania, present-day Azerbaijan), for the
Macedonian military elite.
In 324 B.C. Atropates pacified unrest against the Greeks, and Alexander decided to keep him as
a King of the land, which later became the independent (or semi-independent, vassal of Arsacid
Parthia) kingdom of Atropatena (Parthian/Arsacid Pahlavi: Āturpātakān, Pahlavi: Ādurbādagān)
with its capital at Ganzak/Gazaca (Ancient Greek: Γάζακα).
Atropates had a last interview with Alexander in Media in 324-323, who came to inspect the
breeding of the ancient world-famous Nisaean horses for the Macedonian army (Alexander's
Bucephalus was a Nisaean horse).
Alexander acknowledged the geostrategic location of the Medes' Ecbatana for its approximately
equal distance from Babylon, Susa, and Persepolis. In Ecbatana, Alexander left a huge treasure
of 180,000 talents as a special reserve garrisoned by a force of 6000 Macedonians.
3
By establishing the military base for Alexander's main army, Ecbatana became the most
important military center of his empire. Ecbatana was the place where Bessus (Bactria's Viceroy
and slaughterer of Darius III) was executed and his body was publicly exposed to the
Macedonian soldiers.
Atropates (Ātūrpāt) meets Alexander of Macedon, painting,National
Museum of History, Baku, Azerbaijan
After Alexander's death in June 323 BC, Atropates, unfortunately, did not participate in
Alexander's satraps and generals meeting in Babylon. However, thanks to his diplomatic and
political skills, he became one of only two non-Macedonians (along with Alexander's
Bactrian father-in-law Oxyartes), who were listed as holding a satrapy after the division of
the empire between Alexander's generals.
It should be highlighted that Atropates was a strong follower of Zarathustra (Zoroaster) and
his name was neither Median nor Persian but Zoroastrian. The name Ātūrpāt originates from
Avesta's word “Âtare-pâta”, ("keeper of the fire") was one of the sons of Zarathustra. The
transcription of name Ātūrpāt from Pahlavi (Middle Persian) could be “protected by fire”.
Atropates enjoyed full support from Zoroastrian priests or Magi/Magus (Old
Persian: 𐎶𐎦𐏁 maguš; Pahlavi: maguš; Ancient Greek μάγος magos) to minimize Greeks
impact on Zoroastrianism in Media-Atropatena. Indeed, the Achaemenids favored Goddess
Anāhītā fire temple had been sacked and desecrated by Alexander the Great, who had burnt there
the 12,000 ox-hides on which the original Avesta was written in golden lettering and which had
been placed in the Fortress of Archives in the city of Istakhr in Pārs. However, Atropates was
able to secure the fire temple of Ādur Gušnasp in Šiz (now Azar Gushnasp in Takht-e Soleyman,
Iranian Azerbaijan), where the other copy of the Holy Avesta was preserved and copied on calf
skins.
Later, under the order of Sasanian King Shāpūr I (r. 240-272), the fire of Ādur Gušnasp (the last
survived Great Fire of State) was classified as the empire’s most sacred victorious (Pahlavi:
pērōzgar) warriors’ (Pahlavi: artēštār) class fire of the highest grade, holding the rank of
“cathedral”.
4
The fire of Ādur Gušnasp, as Ataš Bahrām (Parthian: Ātaš-i Wahrām or Pahlavi: Ādur Bahrām
-“fires of Victory,” the Zoroastrian name of the God of War and Victory), was most sacred or
“cathedral” fire of the highest grade in Zoroastrianism, established in the late Achaemenid or
Parthian era in Ādurbādagān in Media. Each new king, as Sasanian King Shāpūr I proclaimed,
was obligated to make a pilgrimage after coronation to Ādur Gušnasp, providing royal gifts and
celebrating Nowruz (Pahlavi: No Ruz).
Next, following the administrative and military reforms of the Sasanian kings Kawād I (r. 473-
531) and his oldest son Xusrō I Anōšīrvān (r. 531- 579), the name Ādurbādagān [Azerbaijan]
was extended toward Caucasia, covering Arrān (Caucasian Albania) and Armin (Arminyaya or
Armenia). Particularly, King Xusrō I Anōšīrvān established the kust-ī Ādurbādagān (region of
Ādurbādagān) military command holding Ādurbādagān’s general (Pahlavi: spāhbed), who was
at the time the famous Iranian hero - Prince and General Rostam Farrokhzād of Ādurbādagān.
Finally, as someone assumes, General Atropates (Āturpāt) occupies a significant place in the
history of Azerbaijan. His name, possibly, is the key to understand the origin of the name
Azerbaijan - a land of fire (Azerbaijani: odlar yurdu). Eventually, Pahlavi name Ādurbādagān
evolved into the Turkified form of Azarbaijan/Azerbaijan. This is where the Republic of
Azerbaijan and the Iranian province of Azerbaijan get their name.
Khalifa-zadeh Mahir, Research Professor, PhD, Founder and Director of the Toronto-based
"Azerbaijan in Global Context" Media and Analysis Center (www.azglobalcontext.org ), Toronto, Canada
Sources:
“ATROPATES”,
LIVIUS.org,
https://www.livius.org/articles/person/atropates/
Bosworth C.E., "ARRĀN", Encyclopedia Iranica, II/5, 520-522, available online
at: http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/arran-a-region
Chaumont M.L., "ATROPATES", Encyclopedia Iranica, Vol. III, Fasc. 1, pp. 17-18, available
at: https://iranicaonline.org/articles/atropates-aturpat-lit
Dandamayev M., “MAGI”, Encyclopedia Iranica, available at: https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/magi
Dyakonov I., “Очерк истории древнего Ирана", (History of Ancient Iran), in Russian, Izdatelstvo Vostochnoi
Literaturi, Moskva, 1961, 444.
Dyakonov I., "История Мидии: От древнейших времен до конца IV в до н.э". (History of Medes: From Ancient
times till the end of IV BC), in Russian, Publisher, Moskva-Leningrad, Academy of Science of the USSR, 1956,
488.
Ghodrat-Dizaji M., Administrative Geography of The Early Sasanian Period: Case of Ādurbādagān, Iran: Journal of
the British Institute of Persian Studies. 2007, Vol.45, 87-93.
Heckel W., "In the Path of Conquest", Oxford University Press, 2020, 336.
Khalifa-zadeh M., Sasanian Imperial Strategy and King Xusrō I Anōšīrvān’s Reform: The Case of Ādurbādagān and
Arrān (Caucasian Albania), International Journal of History, 2024, Vol. 6, Issue 1, 111-121.
https://doi.org/10.22271/27069109.2024.v6.i1b.271
5
Khalifa-zadeh M., From Sasanian Adurbadagan to Modern Azerbaijan: Historical Background and Developments,
In book: Recent Trends in Arts and Social Studies, Edition: First, Chapter: 8, Publisher: B P International, London,
Kolkata, 2023: 116-136. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/rtass/v9/7649A
Khalifa-zadeh M., Adurbadagan and Arran (Caucasian Albania) in the Late Sasanian Period, International Journal
of History, 2023, Vol5, Issue 2, 15- 18, DOI: 10.22271/27069109.2023.v5.i2a.220
Khalifa-zadeh M., and Maksymiuk K., Reforms of Sasanian king Khusro I and the northern bank of the Araxes
Arrān (Caucasus Albania), Historia I Świat, Vol. 12, 167182. https://doi.org/10.34739/his.2023.12.10
Mayor A., "AMAZONS IN THE IRANIAN WORLD". Encyclopedia Iranica; available
at https://iranicaonline.org/articles/amazons-ii
Sharifzadeh A., "Eternal Fires of Ancient IranOn the Sasanian-era Ādur Gušnasp Zoroastrian Temple", Eternal
Fires of Ancient IranOn the Sasanian-era Ādur Gušnasp Zoroastrian Temple borderlessblogger
Shifman I., Александр Македонский”, (Aleksandr Makedonski), in Russian, Izdatelstvo Nauka, Moskva, 1988,
ISBN 5-02-027233-7бб, 205.
Schippmann K., “AZERBAIJAN iii. Pre-Islamic History”, Encyclopedia Iranica, Vol. III, Fasc. 2, 221-224,
available at https://iranicaonline.org/articles/azerbaijan-iii
Sykes P.M. "A History of Persia", Published by London Macmilan and Company, St. Martin's Street, London
1915, Vol I, 742. https://archive.org/details/dli.ernet.547
Toumanoff C., "Introduction to Christian Caucasian History I: The Formative Centuries (IVth-VIIIth)", Traditio,
Vol. 15 (1959), 1-106.
Yamamoto Y., "The Zoroastrian Temple Cult of Fire in Archaeology and Literature (I)". Orient 15, 1979, 19-53.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
The article analyses the Sasanian imperial policy and strategy toward Ādurbādagān and Arrān (Caucasian Albania).
Chapter
Full-text available
The author discusses the historical background of the origin of modern Azerbaijan divided by the Araz river into southern or Iranian and northern or the independent Republic of Azerbaijan. The author analyzes the application of the Sasanian name Adurbadagan to both sides of modern Azerbaijan. He believes that the name Azerbaijan originates from the Avestan words Atash or Atar or Azar that means fire. As a historical and political term, Azerbaijan roots deep to Achaemenids’ Aturpatakan (Atropatena) evolving into the Sasanian Adurbadagan - a Zoroastrian center of the empire. Since late Antiquity, Adurbadagan’s military and administrative functions were extended and applied by the Sasanids to all lands in the north from the Aras river, up to Darband fortress in Arran (Albania) in Caucasia. The author argue, since late Antiquity, Adurbadagan and Arran became interchangeable names in the northern bank of the Araz river. In the Islamic period, particularly after Seljuk Turks conquest of Iran, Adurbadagan evolved into the Turkified form of Azarbadajan or Azerbaijan, cementing the modern Azerbaijani Turks’ identity in the south and north sides of the entire Azerbaijan divided by the Araxes.
Article
Full-text available
The article considers the Sasanian king Khusro I Anushirwan’s reforms to improve the empire’s military and administrative architecture in the northwestern region of Ērānšahr, by creating the kust ī Ādurbādagān. The authors believes that it was a key element in the Sasanian strategy to enforce both central and military power in the defense sensitive Caucasia. The authors argues that the reform initiated the projecting of Ādurbādagān’s name, military, and administrative functions in Arrānšahr forming a strong interrelationship between the southern and northern sides of the Araxes as the entire Ādurbādagānšahr. Since Late Antiquity, Ādurbādagān and Arrān became interchangeable names and were in use on the northern bank of the Araxes.
Article
Full-text available
The article considers the Sasanian King Khusraw I Anushirwan (Pahlavi: Xusrō I Anōšīrvān) reforms to improve the empire’s military and administrative architecture during the wars with Byzantium and the Turks. The author discusses the establishment of the region or kust-ī Ādurbādagān, which allowed the nomination of Arrān’s general. The author believes that it was a key element in the Sassanian strategy to enforce both central and military power in the defense sensitive Caucasia challenged by the Byzantium and nomads. The reforms pulled Arrān (Albania) to be closer to the Sasanian crown, enforcing the dynastic ties between Sasanian shāhanshāh and Arrānshāh. These reforms facilitated the incorporation of Arranian (Albanian) troops into the Sasanian Army under Ādurbādagān’s general command to shield Ērānšahr from the Khazar’s and Turk’s incursions. The author argues that the reform initiated the projecting of Ādurbādagān’s name, military, and administrative functions in Arrān forming a strong interrelationship between the southern and northern sides of the Araxes as the entire Ādurbādagān šahr. Since Late Antiquity, Ādurbādagān and Arrān became interchangeable names and were in use on the northern bank of the Araxes.
Article
Full-text available
According to historical sources Azerbaijan's local nobilities were closely associated with the early Sasanian kings. Historical events during the reigns of Ardashīr I and Shāpūr I confirm Azerbaijan's adherence to the Sasanians. Azerbaijan's importance also increased under the Sasanians as Arsacid Armenians were converted to Christianity and showed an inclination towards the Roman Empire. This is why in their inscriptions, Shāpūr and Kirdēr regarded Azerbaijan as part of Ērān (and not Anērān). According to these sources, Azerbaijan was bounded on the north by Aras River. Ganzak was one of the important cities of this province at that time and was perhaps the residence of authorities such as Šahrāb, āmārgar and mag.
Book
This book offers a fresh insight into the conquests of Alexander the Great by attempting to view the events of 336–323 from the vantage point of the defeated. The extent, and form, of the resistance of those whose territories were invaded varied in accordance with previous relationships with either the Macedonian invader or the Achaemenids. The internal political situations of many states—particularly the Greek cities of Asia Minor—were also a factor. In the vast Persian Empire from the Aegean to the Indus, some states surrendered voluntarily, and others offered fierce resistance. Not all regions were subdued through military actions. Indeed, the excessive use of force on Alexander’s part is demonstrated as ineffective and counterproductive. This book examines the reasons for these varied responses, giving more emphasis to the defeated and less to the Conqueror and his Macedonians. In the process, it debunks many long-held views concerning Alexander’s motives. Such a study involves rigorous analysis of the ancient sources, and their testimony is presented throughout the book in the form of newly translated passages.
Article
It is no doubt a commonplace to state that Western Civilization is an heir, one among several, of an anterior unity: Christian Mediterranean Civilization. In that earlier unity all the local cultures that had sprung up round the great central sea — Egyptian, Mesopotamian, Anatolian, Aegean, Syrian, Iranian, Hellenic, Italic — had coalesced in three successive and increasingly comprehensive phases within the corresponding imperial frameworks of the pax achaemenia , the pax macedonica , and the pax romana. With the advent of Christianity this political and cultural amalgam passed into still another phase, that of the pax christiana , which fell heir also to the hitherto seclusive cultural tradition of the Jews. But, before this last phase was reached, the rhythm of history had changed from gathering to scattering; Iran, which once itself had contributed to the cultural syncretism of the Mediterranean world, and which can be regarded as that world's easternmost bastion, withdrew from it under the impact of the ‘neo-Achaemenian’ and anti-Hellenic reaction which inaugurated the Sassanian age. Iran was to remain hostile to the pax romana and, although Christian enclaves were to be established in its territory, outside the new unity of Christendom. But, even though withdrawn back to the pre-Hellenistic phase of history — as if Alexander the Great had never lived — New Iran exercised, chiefly through Syria, a profound influence, especially in art, upon the rest of the Mediterranean world, both before and after the ushering in of the pax christiana. With time, the disintegration begun in Iran spread. Christian Mediterranean Civilization was broken up and succeeded by several others that derived from it: that of the West was one, that of Byzantium another, and so also that of Christian Caucasia.
Очерк истории древнего Ирана
  • I Dyakonov
Dyakonov I., "Очерк истории древнего Ирана", (History of Ancient Iran), in Russian, Izdatelstvo Vostochnoi Literaturi, Moskva, 1961, 444.
AMAZONS IN THE IRANIAN WORLD
  • A Mayor
Mayor A., "AMAZONS IN THE IRANIAN WORLD". Encyclopedia Iranica; available at https://iranicaonline.org/articles/amazons-ii