Content uploaded by Roberto Rosal
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Roberto Rosal on Aug 23, 2024
Content may be subject to copyright.
Content uploaded by Roberto Rosal
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Roberto Rosal on Aug 21, 2024
Content may be subject to copyright.
Secondary nanoplastics released from a biodegradable
microplastic severely impact freshwater environments
Miguel González-Pleiter1,*, Miguel Tamayo-Belda1, Gerardo Pulido-Reyes1, Georgiana Amariei2, Francisco
Leganés1, Roberto Rosal2 and Francisca Fernández-Piñas1
1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain
2 Department of Chemical Engineering, Universidad de Alcalá, E-28871 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
* Corresponding author: mig.gonzalez@uam.es
Abstract
Over the last five decades, plastics production has increased because of their use in strategic sectors causing damage on
aquatic ecosystems. In this context, biodegradable plastics have emerged as an ecological alternative because they are easily
degradable in the environment. Despite the recent advances in the field of plastic ecotoxicology, the ecological impact of
secondary nanoplastics (nanoplastics resulting from natural degradation of micro and macro plastics) in the environment
remains poorly understood. Here, we have investigated the effects of secondary nanoplastics of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB),
a biodegradable plastic, on three representative organisms of aquatic ecosystems. Secondary PHB-nanoplastics were
produced from PHB-microplastics by abiotic degradation under environmentally representative conditions. Secondary PHB-
nanoplastics induced a significant decrease in cellular growth and altered relevant physiological parameters in all organisms.
We investigated whether the observed toxicity was exerted by PHB-nanoplastics themselves or by other abiotic degradation
products released from PHB-microplastics. An experiment was run in which PHB-nanoplastics were removed by
ultrafiltration; the resulting supernatant was not toxic to the organisms, ruling out the presence of toxic chemicals in the PHB-
microplastics. In addition, we have performed a complete physicochemical characterization confirming the presence of
secondary PHB-nanoplastics in the 75–200 nm range. All results put together indicated that secondary PHB-nanoplastics
released because of the abiotic degradation of PHB-microplastics were harmful for the tested organisms, suggesting that
biodegradable plastic does not mean safe for the environment in the case of PHB.
https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EN01427B
This article is part of the themed collection: Environmental Science: Nano Recent HOT Articles
https://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/articlecollectionlanding?sercode=en&themeid=280a89ca-3eed-4abe-
ae65-c856206f6c3c
Article selected by the Editors in Chief of Environmental Science journals:
For some reason, RG believes this postprint is protected by RSC copyright, but this is
not the case. You can download the full text from the links below:
Link to full text
https://rosal.web.uah.es/publications/Secondary%20nanoplastics%20released%20from%20a%20biodegradable%
20microplastic%20severely%20impact%20freshwater%20environments.pdf