PresentationPDF Available

From Adversity to Advantage: An Investigation on the Relationship Between Adverse and Benevolent Childhood Experiences, Resilience, and Creativity

Authors:

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between childhood experiences (positive or negative) and creativity and examined if adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are moderated or mediated by resilience. Two creativity measures, The Inventory of Creative Activities and Achievements (ICAA) and two verbal Alternate Uses Test (AUT) items, were used. Hypotheses were tested by hierarchical multiple regression analysis, where the dependent variable was creativity, and the predictor variables were ACE, BCE, and resilience (Step 2), which were added into the regression model after the demographic variables of age and gender (Step 1). ACE X resilience interaction effect was tested in the next step to test the moderation effect (Step 3). A separate path model tested the mediating effect of resilience between ACE and creativity. Overall, the results showed that the model in Step 2 was significant, and both ACE and resilience were significantly and positively associated with creativity as measured by ICAA whereas none predicted AUT performance. While ACE was negatively correlated with resilience, BCE was positively correlated with resilience and did not predict creativity. There was no support for mediating or moderating effect of resilience. Findings are discussed in terms of theories of creativity and human development.
From Adversity to Advantage:
An Investigation on the Relationship Between
Adverse and Benevolent Childhood Experiences,
Resilience, and Creativity
Fatmanur Cifci1, Selcuk Acar1, & Jason Chiang1
1University of North Texas
APA Div 10: Society for Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts (SPACA) annual conference
March 14-16, 2024, Denton, TX.
Background
Creativity is influenced by experiences (Batcho et al., 2011; Damian & Simonton, 2015; Setiawan et al., 2017).
Positive link between creativity and well-being (Acar et al., 2021).
Benevolent childhood experiences (BCE) in enhancing creativity.
Adverse childhood experiences (ACE) may foster creativity by:
o Disrupting equilibrium and allowing creative adjustment (Runco, 1999).
Unfavorable childhood events and post-traumatic growth (PTG) (Damian & Simonton, 2015; Tedeschi & Calhoun, 2004).
Struggling to produce original products and creativity (Batcho et al., 2011; Tedeschi & Calhoun, 2004).
Unexpected events may push people's limits out of "normality" (Damian & Simonton, 2015).
Adversity and openness to new ideas and experiences (McCrae, 1987).
Expanded openness and creative problem-solving through:
o"diversifying experiences(Damian & Simonton, 2015).
Childhood trauma and unique experiences with:
oGreater cognitive freedom, problem-solving ability, and flexibility (Damian & Simonton, 2015).
Background
Literature
Review Orphan effect (Csikszentmihalyi, 1996; Simonton, 1994)
oEarly parent loss,
oPremature adult responsibilities,
oExceeding expectations, and
oExceptional achievements.
Particularly prevalent among authors, 55%.
Asynchronicity (Acar, 2020)
oOrphan effect,
oCognitive development abnormalities,
oIllness,
oFamily issues,
oHomosexuality,
oEarly school struggles, and
oChildhood loneliness.
Literature
Review
Resiliency
o“The process of bending and rebounding to overcome adversity” (Hunter, 2001).
oA specific type of adaptation (Metzl & Morrell, 2008).
High-creativity often come from: (Damian & Simonton, 2015; Simonton, 1994; Berry, 1981; Berry, 1999; Eisenstadt, 1978; Goertzel et al., 1978; Roe, 1953).
oNon-traditional backgrounds
e.g., cultural or religious minorities,
morbid tendencies,
early orphanhood, or
financial difficulties
oHave unconventional education and training experiences
e.g., study abroad,
multiple mentors,
eagerly reading, and
various hobbies
Resilient people with difficult childhoods might be more creative.
Problem
Statement
Purpose
Resilience may operate
concurrently with ACE.
Moderator Effect
Resilient people who have had ACE
might be more likely to be creative.
Mediator Effect
ACE may foster resilience resulting
in higher creativity.
The purpose of the present
study is to examine:
Relationship between childhood
experiences and creativity
If ACE are moderated or mediated
by resilience.
Research on childhood adversity
and creativity is needed
(Forgeard, 2024).
Research
Questions
Do positive childhood experiences impact creativity?
Do negative childhood experiences impact creativity?
How does resilience moderate or mediate the relationship
between adverse childhood experiences and creativity?
Methods 352 college students (Mage = 21.2)
From two Southwestern universities in US.
Measurements
oBenevolent Childhood Experience measurement (BCE, α= .79),
oAdverse Childhood Experiences International Questionnaire (ACE-IQ, α= .80),
oBrief Resilience Scale (BRS, α= .82),
oThe Inventory of Creative Activities and Achievements (ICAA, α= 0.79), and
otwo verbal Alternate Uses Test (AUT) items.
Hypotheses were tested by hierarchical multiple regression analysis:
oDV was creativity, and IVs were ACE, BCE, and resilience (Step 2),
oAdded into the regression model after the demographic variables of age and gender (Step 1),
oACE X resilience was tested to test moderation effect (Step 3),
oTested mediating effect of resilience between ACE and creativity (Step 4).
Coefficients
a
Model
t pBSE β
1
(Constant)
80.387 10.914
7.366
<.001**
Year of Birth
.390 .244 .107
1.600
.111
Gender
-6.224 8.571 -.046 -.726 .468
University
4.239 2.594 .111
1.634
.103
Parent Education
Level
.045 .442 .006 .101 .920
2
(Constant)
47.473 13.757
3.451
<.001**
Year of Birth
.314 .236 .086
1.328
.185
Gender
-14.612 8.761 -.107
-1.668
.097
University
4.876 2.638 .128
1.848
.066
Parent Education
Level
.127 .431 .018 .294 .769
ACE
.352 .136 .178
2.585
.010*
Resilience
1.089 .292 .232
3.730
<.001**
BCE
.962 .771 .087
1.247
.214
3
(Constant)
55.687 26.243
2.122
.035*
Year of Birth
.312 .237 .086
1.319
.189
Gender
-14.646 8.777 -.107
-1.669
.096
University
4.897 2.643 .128
1.853
.065
Parent Education
Level
.136 .432 .020 .314 .754
ACE
.133 .609 .068 .219 .827
Resilience
.656 1.211 .140 .542 .588
BCE
.933 .776 .085
1.203
.230
ACE X
Resilience
.012 .032 .138 .368 .713
a. Dependent Variable: ICAA
Results
Both ACE and resilience were significantly and
positively associated with creativity (ICAA)
= .18, t= 2.585, p = .010, and
= .232, t = 3.730, p < .001, respectively
The model in Step 2 was significant
F(3, 251) = 6.745,
p< .001, R2= .07.
None of them predicted AUT performance.
Results
Correlations
Birth
Year
Gender
University
Parent
Education
Level
Resilience
BCE
ACE X
Resilien
ce
ICAA
.067
-.032
.070 .012
.222** .051
.224**
Year of
Birth
1.000
.004
-.350**
-.149**
.054 -.055
.135*
Gender
.004
1.000
.118* .027
.191*
.298**
.085
University
-.350**
.118*
1.000 .203** -
.080
.244**
-.215**
Parent
Education
Level
-.149**
.027 .203** 1.000
.001
.135*
-.137*
ACE
.117*
-.061
-.331**
-.161*
-.109*
-.405**
.726**
Resilience
.054
.191*
.080 .001
1.000
.169*
.585**
BCE
-.055
.298**
.244** .135* -
.169*
1.000
-.196*
ACE X
Resilience
.135*
.085
-.215**
-.137*
.585**
-.196*
1.000
ACE was negatively correlated
with resilience (r = -109, p = .040).
BCE was positively correlated
with resilience (r = .169, p = .003)
and did not predict creativity.
There was no support for
mediating or moderating effect of
resilience.
Discussion
Creativity is a multifaceted construct.
We measured two different aspects of creativity:
oDivergent thinking
oCreative activity and accomplishment
Statistically significant association between both
resilience and ACE and creative activity and
accomplishment, but not with creative ideation.
Discussion
Lack of resources or unfavorable circumstances may influence exceptionally
creative people, (Benedek, 2024) it may not influence their creative ideation but rather
their creative achievements.
Creative conduct is not submission; rather, it entails taking actions that result in a
novel product or a resolution to a difficulty (Cabra & Uribe-Larach, 2013).
Creative behavior through practical problem-solving skills from adverse life experiences
Understanding early experiences and resilience may enhance creativity.
This study is limited by its correlational-retrospective design.
With a causal relationship, longitudinal research would expand our comprehension.
References
1. Damian, R. I., & Simonton, D. K. (2015). Psychopathology, adversity, and creativity: Diversifying experiences in the development of eminent African Americans. Journal of Pers onality and Social Psychology, 108(4), 623-636.
2. Setiawan, E., Juliantine, T., & Komarudin, K. (2017). Development creativity students through problem-based learning model in physical education in reviewed of adversity quotient. In 2nd International Conference on Sports Science,
Health and Physical E ducation (pp. 611-613).
3. Batcho, K. I., Nave, A. M., & DaRin, M. L. (2011). A retrospective survey of childhood experiences. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(4), 531-545.
4. Acar, S., Tadik, H., Myers, D., Van der Sma n, C., & Uysal, R. (2021) . Creativity and well‐being: A meta‐analysis. The Journal of Cre ative Behavior, 55(3), 738-751.
5. Benjet, C., Bromet, E., Karam, E. G., Kessler, R. C., McLaughlin, K. A., Ruscio, A. M., ... Koenen, K. C. (2016). The epidemiology of traumatic event exposure worldwide: Results from the World Mental Health Survey Consortium.
Psychological Medicine, 46(2), 327-343.
6. Sledjeski, E. M., Speis man, B., & Dierker, L. C. (2008). Does number of lifetime traumas explain the relationship between PTSD and chronic medical conditions? Answers from the National Comorbidity Survey-Replication (NCS-R).
Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 31(4), 341-349.
7. Runco, M. A. (1999). Tension, adaptability, and cre ativity. In S. W. Russ (Ed.), Affect, creative experience, and psychological adju stment (pp. 165-194). Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Fra ncis.
8. Orkibi, H. & Ram-Vlasov, N. (2019). Linking trauma to posttraumatic growth and mental health through emotional and cognitive creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(4), 416-430.
9. Tedeschi, R. G. & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1-18.
10. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Ha rper Collins Publishers.
11. Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12. Acar, S. (2020). Asynchronicity. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (3rd ed., pp. 83-89). Vol. 1. Elsevier, Academic Press.
13. Berry, C. (1981). The Nobel scientists and the origin of scientific achievement. British Journal of Sociology, 32(3), 381391.
14. Berry, C. (1999). Religious traditions as contexts of historical creativity: Patterns of scientific and artistic achievement and their stability. Personality and Individual Dif ferences, 26(6), 1125-1135.
15. Eisenstadt, J. M. (1978). Parental loss and genius. American Psycho logist, 33(3), 211-223.
16. Goertzel, M. G., Goertzel, V., & Goertzel, T. G. (1978). 300 eminent personalities: A psychosocial analysis of the f amous. San Francisco. CA: Jossey-Bass.
17. Roe, A. (1953). The making of a scientist. New York, NY: Dodd, Mead.
18. Root-Bernstein, R., Allen, L., Beach, L. Bhadula, R., Fast, J., Hosey, C., ... Weinlander, S. (2008). Arts f oster scientific success: Avocations of Nobel, National Academy, Royal Society, and Sigma Xi members. Journal of Psychology of
Science and Technology, 1(2), 51-63.
19. Einat S. Metzl & Malissa A. Morrell (2008). The Role of Creativity in Models of Resilience: Theoretical Exploration and Practical Applications. Journal of Creativity in Mental Heal th, 3(3), 303-318.
20. Hunter, A. J. (2001). A cross-cultural comparison of res ilience in adolescents. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 16(3), 172-179.
21. McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Pers onality and Social Psychology, 52 (6), 1258-1265.
22. Forgeard, M. (2024). Creativity and resilience: Creativity from, or through adversity?. Creati vity Resea rch Journal, 1-8.
23. Cabra, J. F., & Uribe-Larach, D. (2013). Creative behavior. In E. G. Carayannis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 266271). Springer.
24. Benedek, M. (2024). On the relationship between creative potential and creative achievement: Challenges and future directions. Learning and Individual Differences, 110, 102424.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
The purpose of this research is to develop students' creativity through problem based learning model in physical education in review of adversity quotient. The research method used is experimental method with 2x2 factorial designs. The population in this study are the students of 10th grade in SMK 1 Cipanas Cianjur Regency consists of 10th grade as many as 8 classes with a total of 375 students. The sample in this research is as many as 60 students, consists of 30 students with high adversity quotient skills and 30 students with low adversity quotient skills. The sampling using cluster random sampling technique. The instrument used is a questionnaire to measure the level of adversity quotient and the creativity. The result of data analysis Two Way Anova showed that there are interactions between the learning model and the adversity quotient on students' creativity. Discussion and Conclusion of the study showed that problem based learning model has more effective impact and can be applied by physical education teachers in an effort to develop student creativity.
Article
Full-text available
The association between adverse life events and creativity has almost exclusively been investigated qualitatively and with eminent creators. Also, the mediating roles of emotional creativity (the ability to experience novel and appropriate emotions), divergent thinking (the cognitive ability to think of multiple ideas), and creative self-efficacy (CSE; one’s confidence in their ability to be creative) have not been explored simultaneously or in this context. The goal of the present study was to test a multiple mediation model which theorized that exposure to traumatic events would be associated with posttraumatic growth (PTG) and mental health symptoms through emotional creativity, divergent thinking, and CSE in the general population. Findings from a sample of 252 Israeli adults (73% females, aged 19–58), of whom 64% had been exposed to war as civilians, showed that exposure to a greater number of traumatic events was related to higher CSE scores, emotional creativity, and overall divergent thinking. A path analysis to test indirect effects indicated that emotional creativity (but not divergent thinking) followed by CSE mediated the positive association between exposure and PTG as well as the negative association between exposure and mental health symptoms. CSE mediated the association between emotional creativity and divergent thinking to both PTG and mental health symptoms. The results may provide a better understanding of possible paths through which exposure to traumatic events relates to psychological outcomes, highlighting the role of CSE as a mediator that may account for how emotional and cognitive creative abilities are associated with PTG and mental health.
Article
Creativity and well‐being are popular subjects in psychological and organizational studies. The recent literature presented mixed perspectives about the nature of the relationship between the two. Whereas the mad‐genius hypothesis, which was often explored among eminently creative individuals, seems to imply a negative relationship between the two, trends in the field of creativity, such as everyday creativity and general psychology (i.e., positive psychology) linked them positively. The present meta‐analysis study synthesized 189 effect sizes obtained from 32 samples in 26 different studies based on a total sample of 8,189. Analyses with multilevel modeling yielded a mean effect of r = .14. The moderator analysis tested the impact of age, gender, measure of creativity, measure of well‐being, stimulus type of creativity measure, and index of creativity measure. Only the creativity measure explained the variation in the study outcomes. The relationship between creativity and well‐being was significantly higher when creativity was measured by instruments focusing on creative activity and behavior (r = .22) than the divergent thinking tasks (r = .06). Those findings are discussed in terms of theoretical and practical implications.
Article
Test scores of divergent thinking obtained between 1959 and 1972 were correlated with a variety of personality measures administered since 1980. In this sample of 268 men, divergent thinking was consistently associated with self-reports and ratings of openness to experience, but not with neuroticism, extraversion, agreeableness, or conscientiousness. Both divergent thinking and openness were also modestly correlated with Gough's (1979)empirically derived Creative Personality Scale. Several other personality variables mentioned in the literature were also examined; those that were associated with divergent thinking were also generally correlated with openness. These data suggest that creativity is particularly related to the personality domain of openness to experience.
Article
Background: Considerable research has documented that exposure to traumatic events has negative effects on physical and mental health. Much less research has examined the predictors of traumatic event exposure. Increased understanding of risk factors for exposure to traumatic events could be of considerable value in targeting preventive interventions and anticipating service needs. Method: General population surveys in 24 countries with a combined sample of 68 894 adult respondents across six continents assessed exposure to 29 traumatic event types. Differences in prevalence were examined with cross-tabulations. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to determine whether traumatic event types clustered into interpretable factors. Survival analysis was carried out to examine associations of sociodemographic characteristics and prior traumatic events with subsequent exposure. Results: Over 70% of respondents reported a traumatic event; 30.5% were exposed to four or more. Five types - witnessing death or serious injury, the unexpected death of a loved one, being mugged, being in a life-threatening automobile accident, and experiencing a life-threatening illness or injury - accounted for over half of all exposures. Exposure varied by country, sociodemographics and history of prior traumatic events. Being married was the most consistent protective factor. Exposure to interpersonal violence had the strongest associations with subsequent traumatic events. Conclusions: Given the near ubiquity of exposure, limited resources may best be dedicated to those that are more likely to be further exposed such as victims of interpersonal violence. Identifying mechanisms that account for the associations of prior interpersonal violence with subsequent trauma is critical to develop interventions to prevent revictimization.
Article
This article describes the concept of posttraumatic growth, its conceptual foundations, and supporting empirical evidence. Posttraumatic growth is the experience of positive change that occurs as a result of the struggle with highly challenging life crises. It is manifested in a variety of ways, including an increased appreciation for life in general, more meaningful interpersonal relationships, an increased sense of personal strength, changed priorities, and a richer existential and spiritual life. Although the term is new, the idea that great good can come from great suffering is ancient. We propose a model for understanding the process of posttraumatic growth in which individual characteristics, support and disclosure, and more centrally, significant cognitive processing involving cognitive structures threatened or nullified by the traumatic events, play an important role. It is also suggested that posttraumatic growth mutually interacts with life wisdom and the development of the life narrative, and that it is an on-going process, not a static outcome.