ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

An argument that is often presented in order to debunk the idea that a physical medium exists in space to serve as the carrier of light waves, is, that such a medium would interfere with inertial motion and cause friction in the planetary orbits, resulting in the planets spiralling into the Sun. The counter-intuitive behaviour, however, that is observed in the case of precessing gyroscopes and rattlebacks, can only be explained if such a medium does exist, otherwise the gravity defying forces and mysterious torques would be pushing from empty space.
1
The Uniform Straight-Line Inertial Path
Frederick David Tombe,
Northern Ireland, United Kingdom,
sirius184@hotmail.com
2nd August 2024
Abstract. An argument that is often presented in order to debunk the idea that a
physical medium exists in space to serve as the carrier of light waves, is, that such a
medium would interfere with inertial motion and cause friction in the planetary orbits,
resulting in the planets spiralling into the Sun.
The counter-intuitive behaviour, however, that is observed in the case of precessing
gyroscopes and rattlebacks, can only be explained if such a medium does exist,
otherwise the gravity defying forces and mysterious torques would be pushing from
empty space.
Introduction
I. The generally accepted position is that space is empty and that the uniform
straight-line inertial motion that is undergone by objects that are not being acted
upon by a force, is simply a consequence of the fact that there is nothing in their
way that would cause friction. One problem with this perspective, however, is
that if there is nothing in space, then there is no physical basis upon which
motion itself can be defined. On the other hand, if the uniform straight-line
inertial path is a product of regulation by an all-pervading dense medium that is
possessed of fine-grained gyroscopic elasticity, this would provide a basis upon
which motion could be defined, as well as helping to explain the terminal speed
as predicted by the Lorentz transformations.
Gyroscopes and Rattlebacks
II. A pivoted gyroscope that is spinning can lean very far over, such that
intuition suggests it should fall, [1], where in fact it doesn’t fall. One would tend
to think that the gravitational force acting through its centre of mass should
ensure that it tumbles off the pivot, but the fact that this doesn’t happen is
generally explained away on the grounds, that subject to the constraints, every
element of the gyroscope is simply tending to follow its uniform straight-line
inertial path. While a mathematical analysis can indeed show this to be true, we
don’t however need any maths to notice that the primary reason why the
gyroscope doesn’t tumble is because it must be pushing against some medium
that fills the surrounding space, but where this medium is not recognized to
exist in mainstream physics. Meanwhile, the same argument holds in relation to
the reversal torque that we observe in the case of a rattleback, [2]. Both of these
precessing objects appear to induce an elastic reaction in the surrounding space
that is easily observable.
2
Conclusion
III. The uniform straight-line inertial path is a product of fine-grained
gyroscopic stability. As a body moves through the dense all-pervading sea of
tiny aethereal vortices, [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], it induces within this sea of vortices a
fine-grained precessional elasticity. These vortices are so small that they can
pass through the interstitial spaces between the atoms and molecules of
ponderable matter as easily as water passes through the holes in a basket. As a
body moves through this sea of tiny vortices, it causes the vortices to align
along their mutual rotation axes to form solenoidal vortex rings around the
body, hence producing a disc-like magnetic field, [8]. This is an extension of
Ampère’s Circuital Law into inertial motion, although the induced magnetic
field will be very weak at laboratory speeds. Meanwhile, the presence of the sea
of tiny vortices does actually cause a terminal speed as predicted, at least
approximately, by the Lorentz transformations.
References
[1] Tombe, F.D., “Magnetic Repulsion and the Gyroscopic Force”, (2015)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283225757_Magnetic_Repulsion_and_the_Gyroscopic_Force
[2] Tombe, F.D., “The Rattleback and the Magnus Effect”, (2022)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361277369_The_Rattleback_and_the_Magnus_Force
[3] Whittaker, E.T., “A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity”, chapter 4, pp. 100-102, (1910)
“All space, according to the younger Bernoulli, is permeated by a fluid aether, containing an immense
number of excessively small whirlpools. The elasticity which the aether appears to possess, and in virtue of
which it is able to transmit vibrations, is really due to the presence of these whirlpools; for, owing to
centrifugal force, each whirlpool is continually striving to dilate, and so presses against the neighbouring
whirlpools.”
[4] Clerk-Maxwell, J., “On Physical Lines of Force”, Philosophical Magazine, vol. XXI, Fourth Series,
London, (1861)
http://vacuum-physics.com/Maxwell/maxwell_oplf.pdf
[5] Tombe, F.D., “The Double Helix Theory of the Magnetic Field”, (2006)
Galilean Electrodynamics, vol. 24, Number 2, p.34, (March/April 2013)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295010637_The_Double_Helix_Theory_of_the_Magnetic_Field
[6] Tombe, F.D., “The Double Helix and the Electron-Positron Aether”, (2017 )
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319914395_The_Double_Helix_and_the_Electron-Positron_Aether
[7] Tombe, F.D., “The Positronium Orbit in the Electron-Positron Sea”, (2020)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338816847_The_Positronium_Orbit_in_the_Electron-Positron_Sea
[8] Tombe, F.D., “Straight Line Motion”, (2018)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325472420_Straight_Line_Motion
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
The rattleback (Celtic stone) is the most mysterious phenomenon in classical mechanics. It freely undergoes a complete reversal of its angular momentum without the involvement of any apparent external torque. This mystery will now be investigated at the molecular level.
Article
Full-text available
The purpose is to show that the equation E = mc^2 was already implicit in Maxwell's 1861 paper "On Physical Lines of Force" and that it doesn't mean that mass is equivalent to energy, but rather it relates to the propagation of electromagnetic radiation through a sea of rotating electron-positron dipoles which pervades all of space.
Article
Full-text available
The straight line inertial path will be examined from the perspective that it is caused by pressure equilibrium in a sea of tiny aethereal whirlpools that are pressing against each other with centrifugal force while striving to dilate. This is opposite to the traditional perspective whereby centrifugal force is considered to be a consequence of the tendency of a body to move in uniform straight line motion in the absence of any Newtonian forces.
Article
Full-text available
The historical linkage between optics and electromagnetism can be traced back to the year 1855, when Wilhelm Eduard Weber and Rudolf Kohlrausch, by discharging a Leyden Jar (a capacitor), demonstrated that the ratio of the electrostatic and electrodynamic units of charge is equal to c√2, where c is the directly measured speed of light. Although not initially aware of the connection to the speed of light, Weber interpreted c√2 as a kind of mutual escape velocity for two elements of electricity in relative motion, such as would enable the induced magnetic force to overcome the mutual electrostatic force. A few years later, James Clerk Maxwell converted this ratio from electrodynamic units to electromagnetic units, hence exposing the speed of light directly. On connecting Weber’s ratio to the dielectric constant in an all-pervading elastic solid, Maxwell concluded that light consists in the transverse undulations of the same medium that is the cause of electric and magnetic phenomena. The differing perspectives of Weber and Maxwell can be reconciled by linking the speed of light to the circumferential speed of the electric particles surrounding the tiny molecular vortices that Maxwell believed to be the constituent units of the luminiferous medium. If we consider these molecular vortices to be tiny electric current circulations, mutually aligned along their rotation axes to form magnetic lines of force, magnetic repulsion can then be explained in terms of centrifugal pressure acting sideways from these field lines. And if these molecular vortices should take the more precise dipolar form of an electron and a positron in mutual orbit, we can then further explain magnetic attraction, this time in terms of the more fundamental electrostatic force being channeled along the double helix of electrons and positrons that forms a magnetic line of force.
Article
Full-text available
The counterintuitive gravity defying behaviour that is exhibited by a pivoted gyroscope suggests the involvement of an active spin-induced force, similar in nature to the magnetic force, F = qv×B. The phenomenon of gyroscopic stability exhibits a strong spin-induced reactance which cannot be accounted for by the moment of inertia alone. The physical connection between the inertial forces and magnetic repulsion will be investigated.