No full-text available
To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.
Ethical Considerations of AI in Financial Services: Privacy, Bias, and Algorithmic Transparency
... If past credit decisions were influenced by systemic discrimination, AI-powered credit models can perpetuate unfair lending practices, disproportionately affecting minority groups and low-income individuals [12]. This raises serious concerns about fairness and the potential for discriminatory lending outcomes, even when lenders do not explicitly intend to discriminate [13]. ...
... Additionally, these models do not account for real-time changes in financial behavior, making them less responsive to economic fluctuations [12]. As financial landscapes evolve, lenders seek more adaptive and inclusive credit assessment methods, paving the way for AI-driven models [13]. ...
... Methods such as Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) help break down complex credit scoring algorithms into understandable insights for both consumers and regulators [12]. However, balancing transparency and model performance remains a challenge, as overly simplified explanations may reduce the predictive power of AI models [13]. Ensuring explainability without compromising efficiency is essential for building consumer trust and regulatory compliance in AI-driven credit scoring [14]. ...
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in credit scoring has transformed financial decision-making, offering enhanced accuracy, efficiency, and scalability. AI-powered credit scoring models leverage vast datasets and sophisticated machine learning algorithms to predict creditworthiness, reducing reliance on traditional credit histories. This innovation expands financial access, particularly for underserved populations, by incorporating alternative data sources such as social behavior, utility payments, and mobile transactions. However, the deployment of AI-driven credit models raises significant ethical concerns, primarily related to algorithmic bias, transparency, and regulatory compliance. Bias in AI credit scoring can emerge from historical data imbalances, leading to discriminatory outcomes that disproportionately affect marginalized groups. Addressing these challenges necessitates bias reduction strategies, including algorithmic fairness techniques, rigorous model auditing, and diversified training data. Financial institutions must ensure interpretability and accountability in AI models to foster consumer trust and regulatory adherence. Furthermore, AI-powered credit scoring plays a pivotal role in advancing financial inclusion. By utilizing alternative credit assessment methodologies, AI-driven models enable fairer access to credit for individuals with limited or no formal financial history. Collaboration between financial institutions, policymakers, and technology providers is essential to establish ethical AI frameworks that mitigate risks while promoting responsible lending practices. Striking a balance between innovation and fairness in AI credit scoring is crucial for ensuring equitable financial opportunities. Future research should focus on refining ethical AI principles, developing robust bias mitigation techniques, and establishing standardized governance frameworks. This study underscores the significance of ethical AI adoption in credit scoring, advocating for transparent, inclusive, and responsible financial practices.
... Demographic parity is a fairness metric that evaluates whether different demographic groups receive equal treatment in AI-driven decisions (31). It assesses whether an AI model assigns similar probabilities of favorable outcomes across different populations. ...
... Handling sensitive personal data in AI models requires robust security measures. AI-driven analytics in sectors such as healthcare, finance, and e-commerce involve processing confidential information that, if misused, could lead to severe consequences (31). For instance, AI models used in healthcare must safeguard patient records to prevent unauthorized access or data breaches (32). ...
... Compliance officers ensure that AI-driven decisions align with legal regulations, reducing the risk of non-compliance (30). For example, Microsoft's AI Ethics Committee evaluates AI projects for ethical implications, promoting fairness and accountability in AI applications (31). ...
The widespread adoption of AI-powered business analytics applications has revolutionized decision-making, yet it has also introduced significant challenges related to algorithmic bias, data ethics, and governance. As organizations increasingly rely on machine learning and big data analytics for customer profiling, credit scoring, hiring decisions, and predictive analytics, concerns about fairness, transparency, and compliance have intensified. Algorithmic biases-often stemming from biased training data, flawed model assumptions, and insufficient diversity in datasets-can result in discriminatory outcomes, reinforcing societal inequalities and reputational risks for businesses. To address these concerns, robust data ethics frameworks must be integrated into AI governance strategies. Ethical AI principles emphasize accountability, explainability, and bias mitigation techniques, ensuring that decision-making algorithms are transparent and justifiable. Organizations must implement bias detection methods, fairness-aware machine learning models, and continuous audits to minimize unintended consequences. Additionally, regulatory frameworks such as GDPR, CCPA, and AI-specific compliance laws necessitate stringent governance practices to protect consumer rights and data privacy. Beyond compliance, fostering public trust in AI-powered analytics requires organizations to adopt ethical data stewardship, ensuring that AI models align with corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives and stakeholder expectations. The intersection of data ethics, algorithmic accountability, and regulatory compliance presents both challenges and opportunities for businesses seeking to leverage AI responsibly. This paper examines key strategies for mitigating algorithmic bias, establishing ethical AI governance models, and ensuring fairness in data-driven business applications, providing a roadmap for organizations to enhance transparency, compliance, and equitable AI adoption.
... For example, Gen AI assists frontline employees by retrieving financial data and conducting market analyses, thereby streamlining operations, enhancing credit evaluations, and enabling customized recommendations [1][2][3]. Existing surveys typically provide descriptive overviews of AI technologies and potential applications [1][2][3][4] or investigate specific industry scenarios [5][6][7][8]. However, empirical evidence clarifying how Gen AI-enabled collaboration impacts firm-level outcomes remains limited, particularly within financial contexts that demand rigorous oversight and continuous innovation. ...
... Achieving an appropriate balance between innovation and accountability enables managers to leverage AI's capabilities effectively while safeguarding stakeholder confidence [3,63,64]. Consequently, emphasizing transparency, fairness, and stringent data governance practices becomes imperative to build trustworthy AI systems and reinforce stakeholder trust in financial firms [4]. ...
Recent advances in generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) enable financial services firms to enhance operational efficiency and foster innovation through human–AI collaboration, yet also pose technical and managerial challenges. Drawing on collaboration theory and prior research, this study examines how employee skills, data reliability, trusted systems, and effective management jointly influence innovation capability and managerial performance in Gen AI-supported work environments. Through survey design, data were collected from China’s financial sector and analyzed using multiple regression analyses and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). The findings show that all four factors exert a positive influence on innovation capability and managerial performance, with innovation capability acting as a partial mediator. Complementarily, fsQCA identifies distinct configurations of these factors that lead to high levels of innovation capability and managerial performance. To fully leverage human–Gen AI collaboration, financial services firms should upskill employees, strengthen data reliability through robust governance, establish trusted AI systems, and effectively integrate Gen AI into workflows through strong managerial oversight. These findings provide actionable insights for talent development, data governance, and workflow optimization, ultimately enhancing firms’ resilience, adaptability, and long-term sustainability in financial services.
... Recent analyses of microfinance applications found that approximately 30% contained significant security vulnerabilities that could expose sensitive user data. Implementing robust data protection frameworks while maintaining algorithmic effectiveness represents a critical balance that platform developers must achieve [13]. ...
... Borrowers accustomed to fixed-rate structures may struggle to understand why their terms might change over time, even as their financial behavior remains consistent. Research suggests that implementing layered explanation frameworks-providing simple explanations for all borrowers while making more detailed information available upon request-can increase comprehension rates to 60-70% without overwhelming borrowers with excessive technical detail [13]. ...
AI-powered microloans are transforming financial inclusion by enabling microenterprises in financially excluded geographies to access critical capital through innovative technologies. This article examines how artificial intelligence addresses traditional microfinance challenges through alternative credit scoring systems that analyze diverse data sources beyond conventional credit histories. By leveraging mobile usage patterns, transaction histories, psychometric assessments, and other digital footprints, AI algorithms create comprehensive risk profiles that extend financial services to previously excluded entrepreneurs. The technology not only improves initial credit assessments but also enhances ongoing risk management through behavioral analytics that predict repayment issues before they materialize. Despite significant technical implementation challenges in connectivity-limited regions, the article explores promising solutions, including edge computing, explainable AI frameworks, adaptive learning systems, and federated learning approaches. Ethical considerations regarding data privacy, algorithmic bias, and interest rate transparency require careful attention to ensure these innovations promote genuine inclusion. The evolution of this field points toward embedded financial services, decentralized finance integration, and collaborative AI models that could further democratize access to capital for marginalized entrepreneurs worldwide.
... Legacy systems must be upgraded to support real-time data processing and integration with AI models. This involves developing APIs and middleware to connect AI algorithms with loan management platforms [51]. ...
... Loan processing times were cut in half, from an average of three days to less than 24 hours, significantly enhancing customer satisfaction. Additionally, the inclusion of alternative data sources enabled a 25% increase in loan approvals for underserved populations, improving financial inclusion and expanding the firm's customer base [51]. ...
Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing the credit analytics landscape, offering innovative solutions to enhance efficiency, accuracy, and fairness in loan approval processes. Traditional credit evaluation methods often rely on static, rule-based systems that may overlook nuanced patterns in borrower behaviour, leading to inefficiencies and potential biases. AI-driven credit analytics, leveraging advanced machine learning (ML) algorithms, provides dynamic, data-driven insights that improve decision-making and streamline lending operations. By analysing diverse data sources, including transactional history, behavioural data, and alternative credit scores, AI models can more accurately assess creditworthiness and reduce default risks. This paper explores the integration of AI into credit analytics, focusing on its transformative potential in automating loan approval processes. A simulated AI model is developed and benchmarked against traditional methods using real-world data to evaluate its performance in terms of efficiency, accuracy, and fairness. Results demonstrate a 30% reduction in loan processing times and improved prediction accuracy, particularly for underrepresented borrower groups, addressing long-standing biases in credit access. The study also examines the ethical and regulatory implications of deploying AI in credit analytics, highlighting the need for transparency, explainability, and adherence to compliance standards. While AI offers significant advantages, its implementation requires robust governance frameworks to mitigate risks associated with algorithmic bias and data privacy concerns. By advancing AI-driven credit analytics, this research underscores the potential to democratize access to credit, foster financial inclusion, and create more equitable lending practices. The findings provide actionable insights for financial institutions seeking to innovate responsibly in an increasingly competitive and technology-driven lending ecosystem.
... Tantangan etika lainnya termasuk potensi pelanggaran privasi, perlindungan data, dan transparansi algoritmik, yang dapat mengancam kepercayaan dan nilai-nilai demokratis (Al-Kfairy et al., 2024). Dalam industri keuangan, misalnya, AI dapat memperkuat diskriminasi melalui bias dalam penilaian kredit dan persetujuan pinjaman, serta menimbulkan kekhawatiran tentang transparansi dalam proses pengambilan keputusan (Qureshi et al., 2024). ...
This study examines the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in personalizing customer experiences, focusing on the benefits, challenges, and opportunities presented by this technology. AI enables companies to enhance operational efficiency while creating more personalized customer experiences through deep data analysis. The technology provides relevant product and service recommendations, optimizes every stage of the customer journey, and improves engagement and satisfaction. The research was conducted through webinars involving various groups, including academics, practitioners, and the general public. The findings indicate that AI implementation offers significant benefits, such as improved operational efficiency and customer satisfaction. However, ethical, privacy, and data security challenges require a responsible implementation approach. With a strong ethical framework, AI can continue to be developed to support innovation without compromising customer rights protection.
... Additionally, Hassan et al. (2019) argues that researchers are exploring techniques such as differential privacy, which introduces controlled noise to datasets, ensuring that individual data remains protected while maintaining model accuracy. Qureshi et al. (2024) posits that the implementation of these approaches allows financial institutions to balance predictive accuracy with ethical considerations, thereby ensuring that AI systems align with regulatory requirements and societal expectations. ...
The increasing reliance on artificial intelligence (AI) in credit scoring has raised concerns about algorithmic bias and data privacy, necessitating robust cybersecurity risk assessment frameworks. This study investigates the role of cybersecurity risk assessment in mitigating these risks, utilizing multiple datasets, including the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) dataset, the Equifax Data Breach Report, the Financial Cybersecurity Incidents Database, and the MITRE ATT&CK Financial Sector Threat Intelligence Dataset. We employ statistical fairness metrics, Bayesian Probability Modeling, Markov Chain Analysis, and Monte Carlo Simulations to evaluate the extent of bias, privacy risks, and cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Findings reveal significant disparities in loan approvals, with Black applicants receiving approval rates 28% lower than White applicants (χ² = 59.83, p < 0.001), highlighting systemic bias in AI-driven credit scoring. Data privacy remains a pressing issue, as financial sector breaches affect an average of 5,069,760 individuals per incident. Insider threats pose the greatest risk, with a probability of 0.81 of leading to financial fraud. These findings underscore the urgency of integrating fairness-aware machine learning, enhancing regulatory compliance with AI governance policies, and deploying AI-driven cybersecurity tools to fortify financial AI applications against emerging threats. This research contributes to the broader discourse on ethical AI by providing a structured cybersecurity risk assessment approach to mitigate algorithmic bias and strengthen data privacy protections. Implementing these recommendations will enhance fairness, security, and transparency in AI-driven financial decision-making, ensuring compliance with evolving regulatory frameworks and fostering trust in automated credit scoring systems.
... GenAI chatbots are not free from ethical and regulatory challenges, detrimental outcomes, limitations and biases . These ethical concerns include misleading advice, privacy risks, algorithmic bias and lack of transparency, as noted by CFPB (2023) and Qureshi et al. (2024). Bing was found exhibiting threatening statements, Bard provided incorrect answers in a promotional video and ChatGPT fabricated non-existent legal cases (Maruf, 2023;Perrigo, 2023;Quach, 2023). ...
This study aims to investigate the relevance, accuracy, specificity and justification of investment recommendations of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots for different investment capitals and countries (UK and Bulgaria).
A two-stage mixed methods approach was used. Prompts were queried into OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Microsoft Bing and Google Bard (now Gemini). Finance and investment practitioners and finance and investment lecturers assessed the chatbots’ recommendations through an online questionnaire using a five-point Likert scale. The Chi-squared test, Wilcoxon-signed ranks test, Mann–Whitney U test and Friedman test were used for data analysis to compare GenAIs’ recommendations for the UK and Bulgaria across different amounts of investment capital and to assess the consistency of the chatbots.
GenAI chatbots’ responses were found to perform medium-to-high in terms of relevance, accuracy, specificity and justification. For the UK sample, the amount of investment had a marginal effect but prompt timing had an interesting impact. Unlike the British sample, the GenAI application, prompt timing and investment amount did not significantly influence the Bulgarian respondents’ evaluations. While the mean responses of the British sample were slightly higher, these differences were not statistically significant, indicating that ChatGPT, Bing and Bard performed similarly in both the UK and Bulgaria.
The study assesses the relevance, accuracy, specificity and justification of GenAI chatbots’ investment recommendations for two different periods, investment amounts and countries.
... While some countries have high standards of ethical practice on data privacy, some countries do not have laws and policies on the regulation of private data on digital platforms. [76] . To comply with the various regulations in monetary policies, data privacy, and other ethical practices, bespoke digital platforms are often created to match a country's or region's law requirements. ...
Artificial intelligence analytics in digital finance platforms is important in the modern digital world. AI can conduct analytics quickly and provide the outcomes for the system users to make informed, data-driven conclusions. AI can scan through large datasets and provide meaningful information on social media platforms, historical quantitative transactions, and finances to give critical findings, unlike traditional systems. This review article assessed previous research articles on financial risk evaluation using AI analytics in the finance industry and digital finance platforms. The outcomes outlined the capabilities of financial risks evaluated with the help of AI in digital finance platforms. The key identified risks were credit risks, market risks, operational risks, fraud risks, and compliance risks. The study outlined the key capabilities of AI in shielding firms against such risks through predictive analytics, anomaly detection, sentiment analysis, and credit scoring. The AI systems should be hosted on the cloud to have access to large datasets to give accurate, data-driven conclusions. The identified challenges are algorithm bias, data privacy, regulatory compliance (especially across platforms and countries), and skill gaps in the market. In conclusion, using AI in digital finance platforms has increased the efficiency in making informed decisions for sustainability and strategic growth.
With the widespread application of AI-generated content (AIGC) tools in creative domains, users have become increasingly concerned about the ethical issues they raise, which may influence their adoption decisions. To explore how ethical perceptions affect user behavior, this study constructs an ethical perception model based on the trust–risk theoretical framework, focusing on its impact on users’ adoption intention (ADI). Through a systematic literature review and expert interviews, eight core ethical dimensions were identified: Misinformation (MIS), Accountability (ACC), Algorithmic Bias (ALB), Creativity Ethics (CRE), Privacy (PRI), Job Displacement (JOD), Ethical Transparency (ETR), and Control over AI (CON). Based on 582 valid responses, structural equation modeling (SEM) was conducted to empirically test the proposed paths. The results show that six factors significantly and positively influence perceived risk (PR): JOD (β = 0.216), MIS (β = 0.161), ETR (β = 0.150), ACC (β = 0.137), CON (β = 0.136), and PRI (β = 0.131), while the effects of ALB and CRE were not significant. Regarding trust in AI (TR), six factors significantly negatively influence it: CRE (β = −0.195), PRI (β = −0.145), ETR (β = −0.148), CON (β = −0.133), ALB (β = −0.113), and ACC (β = −0.098), while MIS and JOD were not significant. In addition, PR has a significant negative effect on TR (β = −0.234), which further impacts ADI. Specifically, PR has a significant negative effect on ADI (β = −0.259), while TR has a significant positive effect (β = 0.187). This study not only expands the applicability of the trust–risk framework in the context of AIGC but also proposes an ethical perception model for user adoption research, offering empirical evidence and practical guidance for platform design, governance mechanisms, and trust-building strategies.
Emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain, and fintech, have profoundly reshaped the financial sector driving unprecedented innovation and creating transformative opportunities for development. However, they also pose significant challenges to long-term sustainability. While the existing literature provides valuable insights into their influence, a broader scope is necessary to reflect their role in advancing sustainable finance. This study conducts a bibliometric analysis of 2,446 publications from the Web of Science (1996–2024) to map the evolving nexus between emerging technologies and finance. Our findings reveal an expanding research landscape, with key themes including the application of emerging technologies in solving financial problems, the integration of technologies with behavioural and regulatory frameworks, financial innovation for promoting development, risk management and financial stability, digital currencies and blockchain, digital transformation challenges, and sustainable finance. The analysis highlights the dual nature of emerging technologies: while they enhance financial efficiency, transparency, and inclusion, and offer significant opportunities to advance sustainable finance, they also introduce risks such as cybersecurity threats, algorithmic bias, regulatory challenges, and critical barriers to long-term sustainability. To address these challenges, we propose a research agenda prioritizing ethical governance, stress-testing AI models under economic crises, securing decentralized systems, mitigating greenwashing risks, and fostering globally aligned regulatory standards. Interdisciplinary collaboration is essential to tackle ethical, security, and inclusivity concerns. It is imperative for policymakers, regulators, and financial institutions to align technological innovation with sustainability objectives to ensure that advancements contribute to the development of an equitable, resilient, and inclusive financial ecosystem.
In this study, the challenges faced by organisations in integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into human resource management (HRM) practises are examined. For that, AI can bring significant benefits, including increasing efficiency and decision-making in the HR processes, namely recruitment, performance evaluation and talent development. Its adoption, however, presents many challenges in technological infrastructure, data privacy, ethical, and organizational culture. This chapter investigates these barriers, particularly the importance of proper management changes and the trade-off between human element and AI's capabilities. The article discusses strategies for overcoming these challenges, the importance of practising ethical AI, data security and employee development. This study offers actionable insights for organisations attempting to leverage AI in HRM in a way that can succeed at both the operational and ethical dimensions.
Bias in Financial Artificial Intelligence Systems: Origins, Impacts, and Solutions
- Lee
Transparency in Financial AI: Navigating the Black Box
- H Zhang
Differential Privacy in Financial Analytics: Protecting User Data While Gaining Insights
- T Richardson
- N Ahmed
Federated Learning: A Revolution in Financial Services Data Privacy
- C Brooks
- J Singh
Pre-processing Techniques for Bias Mitigation in AI: A Financial Services Perspective
- G Harper
- B Liu
In-Processing Strategies for Fair AI: Overcoming Bias in Algorithmic Finance
- S Mitchell
- F Khan
Explaining AI Decisions in Financial Services: Techniques and Regulatory Implications
- P Kumar
- H Choi
Algorithmic Accountability in Financial Services: Bridging the Gap Between Ethics and Practice
- K Foster
- M Yang
Bias in Financial Artificial Intelligence Systems: Origins, Impacts, and Solutions
- M Lee
- S Park
- Y Kim
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Financial Services: A Comprehensive Review
- J Smith
- A Doe
Privacy Concerns in AI-driven Financial Services: An Analysis of Data Protection and User Consent
- L Johnson
- R Kumar
Algorithmic Transparency in Financial Services: Necessity, Challenges, and Approaches
- H Zhao
- L Zheng
Mitigating Bias in Financial AI Systems: A Data-Centric Approach
- S Gupta
- A Kumar
Towards Ethical AI in Finance: A Multidisciplinary Framework
- D Morales
- E Fisher
Fairness Metrics and Their Applications in AI-Powered Financial Services
- F Nolan
- R Pearce
Balancing AI Innovation and Ethical Standards in Finance: A Path Forward
- A Greene
- S Patel
The Role of AI in Enhancing Financial Inclusion: Ethical Considerations
- J Davis
- R Thompson
Privacy in the Age of Financial AI: Challenges and Solutions
- J Thompson
- M Lee
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in FinTech: A Comparative Study
- H Bennett
- D Gupta
Post-Processing for Equity: Adjusting AI Decisions in Financial Applications
- L Neil
- V Martinez