ArticlePDF Available

Prevention of Dental Fear and Anxiety with Behavior Management Techniques

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Dental fear and anxiety can have a significant effect on an individual, ultimately leading to a poor oral health-related quality of life. Many develop fear and anxiety due to an unfortunate experience at the dentist during their childhood. Dentists, with proper training, can treat children and provide behavior management techniques to complete treatment in a positive manner. These behavior management techniques focus on decreasing the fear and anxiety toward a dental procedure and assisting the child to develop the proper skills needed to cope with such procedures in the future.
Arch Psychiatry. 2024
Volume 2, Issue 1
e Archives of Psychiatry Short Communication
35
Arch Psychiatry. 2024;2(1):35-39.
Prevention of Dental Fear and Anxiety with Behavior
Management Techniques
Elizabeth Berry1,*
1Research Course Director, Bon Secours St Mary´s Hospital Program for Advanced Paediatric Dental Education, 6900 Forest
Ave, Suite 110, Richmond, Virginia, 23230, USA
*Correspondence should be addressed to Elizabeth Berry, ELIZABETH_BERRY@bshsi.org
Received date: June 28, 2024, Accepted date: July 22, 2024
Citation: Berry EJ. Prevention of Dental Fear and Anxiety with Behavior Management Techniques. Arch Psychiatry.
2024;2(1):35-39.
Copyright: © 2024 Berry EJ. is is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source
are credited.
Introducon
Dental fear or anxiety is very common amongst children and
adults. It can be characterized by a feeling of apprehension
or unease involving the dental eld and the procedures that
may occur at a dental oce [1]. Approximately 36% of the
population has the fear of the dentist with 12% having an
extreme fear [2]. Dental fear generally starts in childhood
and can be linked to traumatic dental experiences when
one is a child [3]. The onset of dental anxiety and fear was
found to have started in childhood [4]. Patients are less likely
to seek dental care after a poor experience at the dentist
and developing a fear resulting in low oral health-related
quality of life. Children that experienced more check-up visits
before they experienced their rst treatment have reported
lower levels of dental fear [5]. This shows the more positive
experiences a child has at the dentist, the more likely they are
not to develop a fear of the dentist and follow up with needed
oral health care. It is imperative to provide a level of care to
children that enables a child to grow to not be fearful of the
dentist, so they may seek future dental care leading to better
oral health outcomes.
Pediatric Dentists are trained in behavior guidance
techniques to provide a pleasant environment for children.
These techniques include communication guidance, direct
observation or modeling, tell-show-do, voice control, and
positive pre-visit techniques. More advanced techniques may
be used if the key techniques are not working, or the child has
a disability or is not old enough for these techniques to work
[6]. Overall, the author believes that an appointment should be
considered a failure if the child leaves in tears and develops a
fear of the dentist, even if the needed treatment is completed.
Key Techniques
Many behavior guidance techniques involve proper basic
communication guidance techniques. Reective/active
listening is a technique that establishes rapport with a patient
[7]. Listening takes eort; hearing is not the same. A dentist
must take what the patient is saying and reect on what is
said. This encourages the child to speak and feel heard during
treatment. Acknowledging a child’s feeling involves listening
to them quietly, acknowledging their feelings, giving a name
to their feelings, restating their feelings in the child’s own
words, and them summarizing the child’s emotions [8]. Bi-
directional communication also allows the child to feel as an
active participant in their care [6].
Abstract
Dental fear and anxiety can have a signicant eect on an individual, ultimately leading to a poor oral health-related quality of life. Many
develop fear and anxiety due to an unfortunate experience at the dentist during their childhood. Dentists, with proper training, can treat
children and provide behavior management techniques to complete treatment in a positive manner. These behavior management techniques
focus on decreasing the fear and anxiety toward a dental procedure and assisting the child to develop the proper skills needed to cope with
such procedures in the future.
Keywords: Fear, Anxiety, Pediatric, Dentistry, Oral health
Berry EJ. Prevention of Dental Fear and Anxiety with Behavior Management Techniques. Arch Psychiatry. 2024;2(1):35-
39.
Arch Psychiatry. 2024
Volume 2, Issue 1 36
Direct observation or modeling is another technique used
and is very useful for families of children when an older sibling
does well at the dentist. Allowing a younger sibling to watch
their older sibling during an appointment and ask questions,
can prevent the fear of a future visit. This allows the patient
to familiarize themselves with the dental settings and the
particular procedure [6]. This can also be done with lmed
modeling, a family member, or another patient.
‘Tell-show-do’ is a classic technique used throughout the
day of a pediatric dentist and has been proven to be eective
[9,10]. This desensitization technique involves explaining the
procedure rst, demonstrating how the procedure is done
in a nonthreatening manner, then carefully completing the
procedure [6]. An example would involve a simple cleaning
with a prophy angle. One would tell the patient all that is going
to be used including the “spin” toothbrush and the showing
the “toothpaste” that will be used. Next the technique can be
done on the nail of the patient to show how it does not hurt
and so they can experience from a visual, auditory, olfactory,
and tactile aspect the experience. Then the procedure would
be completed (Figure 1).
Voice control is also utilized, not in a threatening manner as it
may sound. This is a deliberate alteration of the voice volume,
tone or pace to inuence and direct the patient and their
behavior [6,11]. The type of intonation this author encourages
would be one such as a whisper. When one is having trouble
getting a patient to calm or listen, lowering the voice to
whisper and getting closer to the patient allows the patient to
focus on what the dentist is stating.
Positive reinforcement is one of the most common ways to
reward good behavior and encourage a child to want to return
to the dentist. This includes praise for particular behaviors and
reinforcing behavior with classic toys found in a dental oce
(Figure 2). Children love being rewarded with a toy at the
end of an appointment. A simple bouncy ball after getting a
restoration or lling completed can lead the child to having a
positive experience. Praising the child with what they did well
is important to encourage that behavior in the future [12].
Distraction is a technique where the patient’s attention is
diverted to avoid the actual procedure being completed [6].
Audio-visual distraction has been shown to be very eective.
For example, television as an audio-visual distraction is used
in many dental oces to distract a child from the dental
treatment. Another example would be audio distraction where
the provider is telling a story to divert the child’s attention to
the story and not the treatment, or having the child listen
to music [13,14]. These techniques are very eective in
decreasing anxiety [15,16].
Some patients may benet from positive pre-visit imagery
[6]. This involves looking at positive photographs or images
of dentistry prior to a dental appointment. The child can also
be given imaging preparing them for a dental procedure and
the instruments that will be used. By doing so, the child is
prepared for the visit and is not going into an appointment
with fear of the unknown. Dental instruments and materials
can look quite scary. Providing the child an explanation and
visual image of such items can reduce fear at the appointment.
For example, dental etchant is used to clean the tooth prior
to placing sealants, a common preventive technique used
around the age of 6-7 years old when the rst permanent
molars erupt. Dental etch comes in a syringe and looks like
a needle (Figure 3). By explaining that the blue material
simply comes out and is “painted” on the tooth like shampoo
and is then rinsed o the tooth, will assist the child in getting
through an appointment without fear.
Figure 1. Tell-show-do.
Berry EJ. Prevention of Dental Fear and Anxiety with Behavior Management Techniques. Arch Psychiatry. 2024;2(1):35-
39.
Arch Psychiatry. 2024
Volume 2, Issue 1 37
Figure 2. Common toys given at appointments.
Figure 3. Dental etchant used for sealants.
Parents or guardians also have a great inuence on the
child and how they do in the dental oce. If a parent has a
positive attitude toward oral health, then they are more
likely to establish a dental home for their child and therefore
provide more preventative care. This is more likely to lead to
prevention of caries and the child is less likely to experience
having to complete a more dicult restorative appointment
[6]. Parents also transmit their dental fear onto their child [6].
This makes it more challenging for a child to develop a positive
attitude toward the dentist. It is important to not only make
the experience for the child at each appointment positive, but
also the parent.
Advanced Techniques
The key techniques work for most children, however, at
times more advanced techniques are needed. Nitrous oxide,
sedation, and general anesthesia can additionally be used.
The “key techniques” should be considered prior to the
advanced techniques. Some children though may not be able
to cooperate due to emotional immaturity, a psychological
disability or medical disability [6].
Nitrous oxide inhalation is a technique that many dentists
use to provide dental treatment safely (Figure 4). It has
Berry EJ. Prevention of Dental Fear and Anxiety with Behavior Management Techniques. Arch Psychiatry. 2024;2(1):35-
39.
Arch Psychiatry. 2024
Volume 2, Issue 1 38
multiple mechanisms of action including an analgesic eect
and anxiolytic eect. Properties that make it an advanced
technique of choice is its rapid onset of action, ability to
titrate, and how eects are easy to reverse [17]. In children
these properties allow procedures that are not pleasant to be
completed, reducing pressure-induced pain and reaction time
[18].
Sedation can safely be provided for patients unable to
cooperate by well-trained dentists. This advanced technique
is typically indicated for patients with fear and anxiety where
the key techniques do not work or to protect the developing
psyche of a child that where the key techniques most likely
will not work [6]. This type of technique requires appropriate
training by the dentist to provide sedation safely.
General anesthesia allows safe, eective, and high-quality
care to patients that are unable to complete treatment in the
chair. This technique is considered in more complex cases,
including those that involved signicant surgical procedures
or to decrease the number of anesthetic exposures [6].
Additionally, it is considered for children that are very young,
have complex medical conditions, have emergency treatment
that is extensive, or patients with neurodevelopmental needs
[6,9]. General anesthesia when used, is typically completed
either in the hospital, ambulatory surgery center or oce
setting by an anesthesiologist with the dentist completing the
dental treatment.
Conclusion
Dental fear is highly prevalent in many adults worldwide. This
leads to poorer oral health outcomes due to the avoidance
of regular preventive visits and any dental treatment. By
incorporating techniques to provide a positive environment
starting at a very young age, dental fear can be greatly
reduced. The techniques described provide many ways to
assist a child to develop into an adult with less chance of fear
of the dentist due to a poor experience while young. The goal
is to protect the overall psyche of the child and encourage
them to continue to see a dentist when older and therefore
have good oral health.
Figure 4. Nitrous oxide being administered to a patient.
Berry EJ. Prevention of Dental Fear and Anxiety with Behavior Management Techniques. Arch Psychiatry. 2024;2(1):35-
39.
Arch Psychiatry. 2024
Volume 2, Issue 1 39
Conicts of Interest
Not applicable.
Funding Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Drs. John H Unkel and William
Piscitelli for their editing of this manuscript.
References
1. Weiner AA, Sheehan DV. Etiology of dental anxiety: psychological
trauma or CNS chemical imbalance? Gen Dent. 1990 Jan-
Feb;38(1):39-43.
2. Hill KB, Chadwick B, Freeman R, O’Sullivan I, Murray JJ. Adult
Dental Health Survey 2009: relationships between dental
attendance patterns, oral health behaviour and the current
barriers to dental care. Br Dent J. 2013 Jan;214(1):25-32.
3. Berggren U, Meynert G. Dental fear and avoidance: causes,
symptoms, and consequences. J Am Dent Assoc. 1984
Aug;109(2):247-51.
4. Locker D, Liddell A, Dempster L, Shapiro D. Age of onset of dental
anxiety. J Dent Res. 1999 Mar;78(3):790-6.
5. Ten Berge M, Veerkamp JS, Hoogstraten J. The etiology of
childhood dental fear: the role of dental and conditioning
experiences. J Anxiety Disord. 2002;16(3):321-9.
6. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Behavior Guidance for
the Pediatric Dental Patient. The Reference Manual of Pediatric
Dentistry. Chicago, Ill.: American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry;
2023. pp. 359-377.
7. Hamzah HS, Gao X, Yung Yiu CK, McGrath C, King NM. Managing
dental fear and anxiety in pediatric patients: A qualitative
study from the public’s perspective. Pediatr Dent. 2014 Jan-
Feb;36(1):29-33.
8. Mostofsky DI, Fortune F. Behavioral Dentistry. 2nd ed. Wiley-
Blackwell Publishers; 2014.
9. Paryab M, Arab Z. The eect of Filmed modeling on the anxious
and cooperative behavior of 4-6 years old children during dental
treatment: A randomized clinical trial study. Dent Res J (Isfahan).
2014 Jul;11(4):502-7.
10. Virupaxi SG. A comparative study of lmed modeling and tell-
show-do technique on anxiety in children undergoing dental
treatment. Ind J Dent Adv. 2016;8:215-22.
11. Stigers JI. Nonpharmacologic management of children’s
behaviors. In: Dean JA, ed. McDonald and Avery’s Dentistry for
Child and Adolescent. 10th ed. St. Louis, Mo.: Elsevier; 2016. pp.
286-302.
12. Nash DA. Engaging children’s cooperation in the dental
environment through eective communication. Pediatr Dent.
2006 Sep-Oct;28(5):455-9.
13. Pande P, Rana V, Srivastava N, Kaushik N. Eectiveness of
dierent behavior guidance techniques in managing children
with negative behavior in a dental setting: A randomized control
study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2020 Jul-Sep;38(3):259-65.
14. Kharouba J, Peretz B, Blumer S. The eect of television distraction
versus Tell-Show-Do as behavioral management techniques
in children undergoing dental treatments. Quintessence Int.
2020;51(6):486-94.
15. Navit S, Johri N, Khan SA, Singh RK, Chadha D, Navit P, et al.
Eectiveness and Comparison of Various Audio Distraction Aids
in Management of Anxious Dental Paediatric Patients. J Clin
Diagn Res. 2015 Dec;9(12):ZC05-9.
16. Singh D, Samadi F, Jaiswal J, Tripathi AM. Stress Reduction
through Audio Distraction in Anxious Pediatric Dental Patients:
An Adjunctive Clinical Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014 Sep-
Dec;7(3):149-52.
17. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Us of Nitrous Oxide
for Pediatric Dental Patients. The Reference Manual of Pediatric
Dentistry. Chicago, Ill.: American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry;
2023. pp. 393-400.
18. Grønbæk AB, Svensson P, Væth M, Hansen I, Poulsen S. A
placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial on analgesic
eect of nitrous oxide-oxygen inhalation. Int J Paediatr Dent.
2014 Jan;24(1):69-75.
19. Ba’akdah R, Farsi N, Boker A, Al Mushayt A. The use of general
anesthesia in pediatric dental care of children at multi-
dental centers in Saudi Arabia. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008
Winter;33(2):147-53.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Dental anxiety is a widespread phenomenon and a concern for paediatric dentistry. The inability of children to deal with threatening dental stimuli often manifests as behaviour management problems. Nowadays, the use of non-aversive behaviour management techniques is more advocated, which are more acceptable to parents, patients and practitioners. Therefore, this present study was conducted to find out which audio aid was the most effective in the managing anxious children. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of audio-distraction aids in reducing the anxiety of paediatric patients while undergoing various stressful and invasive dental procedures. The objectives were to ascertain whether audio distraction is an effective means of anxiety management and which type of audio aid is the most effective. Materials and Methods: A total number of 150 children, aged between 6 to 12 years, randomly selected amongst the patients who came for their first dental check-up, were placed in five groups of 30 each. These groups were the control group, the instrumental music group, the musical nursery rhymes group, the movie songs group and the audio stories group. The control group was treated under normal set-up & audio group listened to various audio presentations during treatment. Each child had four visits. In each visit, after the procedures was completed, the anxiety levels of the children were measured by the Venham’s Picture Test (VPT), Venham’s Clinical Rating Scale (VCRS) and pulse rate measurement with the help of pulse oximeter. Results: A significant difference was seen between all the groups for the mean pulse rate, with an increase in subsequent visit. However, no significant difference was seen in the VPT & VCRS scores between all the groups. Audio aids in general reduced anxiety in comparison to the control group, and the most significant reduction in anxiety level was observed in the audio stories group. Conclusion: The conclusion derived from the present study was that audio distraction was effective in reducing anxiety and audio-stories were the most effective.
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the eff-cacy of 'audio distraction' in anxious pediatric dental patients. Sixty children were randomly selected and equally divided into two groups of thirty each. The first group was control group (group A) and the second group was music group (group B). The dental procedure employed was extraction for both the groups. The children included in music group were allowed to hear audio presentation throughout the treatment procedure. Anxiety was measured by using Venham's picture test, pulse rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation. 'Audio distraction' was found efficacious in alleviating anxiety of pediatric dental patients. 'Audio distraction' did decrease the anxiety in pediatric patients to a significant extent. How to cite this article: Singh D, Samadi F, Jaiswal JN, Tripathi AM. Stress Reduction through Audio Distraction in Anxious Pediatric Dental Patients: An Adjunctive Clinical Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;7(3):149-152.
Article
Full-text available
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of Filmed modeling in comparison with commonly used Tell-Show-Do technique (T.S.D) on the anxious and cooperative behavior of 4-6 years old children during dental practice. Materials and Methods: Forty six children aged 4-6 years were enrolled in this study and randomly allocated into two groups. Group I: At the first visit, the procedure of Tell-Show-Do, and at the second visit, the treatment procedures were performed by the dentist for the children. Group II: At the first visit, children watched a film consisting of the procedure of Tell-Show-Do performed on a child model. At the second visit, treatment procedures were performed. In both groups, during the treatment procedure, index of heart rate was measured and behaviors of children were recorded. The children's anxious and cooperative behaviors on the recordings were quantified according to Venham and Frankl rating scales, respectively. The data were compared between two groups using T-test method. All statistical references were made at 0.05. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in heart rate measures, clinical anxiety and cooperative behavior scores of children between the two groups (P = 0.6). Conclusion: Filmed modeling can be an efficient alternative method to Tell-Show-Do technique in pre-appointment preparation of the 4-6 years old children during dental treatment.
Article
Full-text available
The importance of understanding barriers to dental attendance of adults in the UK was acknowledged in the first Adult Dental Health Survey in 1968 and has been investigated in all subsequent ADH surveys. In 1968, approximately 40% of dentate adults said they attended for a regular check-up; by 2009 this was 61%. Attendance patterns were associated with greater frequency of toothbrushing, use of additional dental hygiene products, lower plaque and calculus levels. Just under three-fifths of adults said they had tried to make an NHS dental appointment in the previous five years. The vast majority (92%) successfully received and attended an appointment, while a further 1% received an appointment but did not attend. The remaining 7% of adults were unable to make an appointment with an NHS dentist. The majority of adults were positive about their last visit to the dentist, with 80% of adults giving no negative feedback about their last dentist visit. Cost and anxiety were important barriers to care. Twenty-six percent of adults said the type of treatment they had opted for in the past had been affected by the cost and 19% said they had delayed dental treatment for the same reason. The 2009 survey data demonstrated a relationship between dental anxiety and dental attendance. Adults with extreme dental anxiety were more likely to attend only when they had trouble with their teeth (22%) than for a regular check-up.
Article
Background: Dental fear is a common cause of uncooperative behavior among young children, which poses a challenge in providing effective dental treatment. With the advancements in technology, several behavior guidance techniques in the form of distraction have emerged over time for managing uncooperative pediatric dental patients. Aim: The aim of this study is to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of four different behavior guidance techniques in managing uncooperative pediatric patients by measuring pre- and post-operative dental fear/anxiety levels using physiological and nonphysiological parameters. Methodology: Sixty systemically healthy children aged 5-8 years with negative behavior as per Frankl's Rating Scale, requiring restoration were included in the study and randomly divided into four equal groups (n = 15), based on the guidance techniques used: Tell-Show-Do (TSD) as a control group and audio distraction, audiovisual distraction (AVD) (virtual reality [VR]) and Mobile Phone Game Distraction as test groups. Pre- and post-intervention levels of the child's fear/anxiety were assessed using both physiological (blood pressure and pulse rate) and nonphysiological (facial image scale) parameters. The data were evaluated using t-test and one-way ANOVA test. Results: A statistically significant difference was observed in both physiological and non-physiological parameters post-intervention in the groups with a maximum decrease in the AVD (VR) group. Conclusions: AVD (VR) was found to be the most effective while TSD alone as the least effective behavior guidance technique in reducing dental fear/anxiety in uncooperative pediatric dental patients.
Article
Objective: Distraction is a highly acceptable technique for diverting a patient's attention from what may be perceived as an unpleasant procedure, reducing anxiety and helping the patient relax. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of watching television during dental treatment on pediatric patients' anxiety and cooperation compared to the commonly used conventional Tell-Show-Do (TSD) behavioral management method. Method and materials: Sixty-nine children (mean age 6.8 years) scheduled to undergo restorative dental treatment were randomly divided into two intervention groups: a group that was managed by television distraction and a control group that was managed by TSD. During treatment, anxiety was assessed by the Facial Image Scale and cooperative behavior was assessed by the Frankl scale. Pulse rate and oxygen saturation were also measured during the treatment. Results: Compared to TSD, television distraction significantly reduced anxiety by 1.27 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.798 to 1.744, adjusted P < .001), decreased pulse rate by 6.44 beats per minute (bpm) (95% CI 4.60 to 8.28, adjusted P < .001), and significantly increased cooperation by 1.17 (95% CI -1.318 to -1.020, adjusted P < .001). A greater effect of television distraction on reduced anxiety and increased cooperation was observed during administration of the anesthetic injection. No effect of television distraction on saturation levels was noted. Conclusions: Television distraction is an effective method for reducing anxiety and improving cooperative behavior in children during dental treatments.
Article
Internet social media offers a rich source for soliciting the public's views on health issues. This qualitative research, using You-Tube as a platform, aimed to explore the public's perspectives on management of dental fear and anxiety (DFA) in pediatric patients. Using three keywords ("dental fear," "dental phobia," and "dental anxiety"), YouTube videos were searched. Twenty-seven videos related to DFA in children and adolescents were reviewed by three investigators, including a nondental layperson. Inductive thematic analysis was adopted for interpreting the data. Several strategies were considered useful for controlling DFA in pediatric patients, including: verbal and nonverbal communication to establish closeness and effective guidance (explanation, permission-seeking, reassurance, and negotiation); desensitization to dental settings and procedures; tell-show-do; positive reinforcement; distraction by imagination and thoughtful designs of clinic; and parental presence and support. Some self-coping strategies adopted by patients alleviated their DFA, such as self-reasoning and trust-building through long-term connection. Dentists' clinical competence, favorable treatment outcomes, and state-of-the-art devices and technologies (dental lasers, intraoral camera, and adapted anaesthesia method) contributed to reducing DFA. Authentic testimonials in YouTube videos endorsed and interpreted a variety of strategies adoptable by patients, parents, and dental professionals for managing children's and adolescents' dental fears and anxieties.
Article
Background The sedative effect of nitrous oxide-oxygen (N2O/O-2) inhalation is relatively well established. Less in known about its analgesic effect. AimTo determine the analgesic effect of N2O/O-2 inhalation on pulp sensitivity and jaw muscle pressure pain threshold in children. DesignA placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial with random allocation to two sequences: atmospheric air at the first session and N2O/O-2 at the second; or N2O/O-2 at the first session and atmospheric air at the second. Measurements included reaction time, pulp pain sensitivity, jaw muscle pressure pain thresholds and a VAS score of overall discomfort from the pain tests. ResultsFifty-six children (12-15years) completed the study. N2O/O-2 inhalation increased reaction time (P<0.001). Pulp pain sensitivity was reduced during N2O/O-2 inhalation (P<0.001), but no effect was found after adjustment for the increased reaction time. Pressure pain threshold on the jaw muscle was also reduced during N2O/O-2 inhalation (P<0.001), also after adjustment for reaction time (P<0.005). An effect was still found 10min after the mask had been removed (P=0.03). No effect on VAS scores of discomfort from the tests could be found. Conclusions No analgesic effect of N2O/O-2 inhalation on pulp pain sensitivity was found, whereas an increased pressure pain threshold of jaw muscles was found.