Content uploaded by Henry Chika Ngwuta
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Henry Chika Ngwuta on Jul 25, 2024
Content may be subject to copyright.
International Journal of Humanities Social Science and Management (IJHSSM)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Jul.-Aug., 2024, pp: 527-537 www.ijhssm.org
| Impact Factor value 7.52 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 527
Media Ethics and the Fight Against Fake News Towards
Safeguarding Credibility in Modern Journalism
Ngwuta, Henry Chika
Ebonyi State University,
PMB 053, Abakaliki, Nigeria.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
Date of Submission: 08-07-2024 Date of Acceptance: 23-07-2024
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------
Abstract
In an age where misinformation proliferates rapidly,
the integrity of journalism is under unprecedented
scrutiny. This article critically appraises the role of
media ethics in combating fake news and
maintaining the credibility of journalism. It briefly
piqued the historical background and examined the
challenges posed by digital platforms that enable the
swift spread of false information and the consequent
erosion of public trust in traditional media. By
analyzing exemplified experiences and ethical
frameworks, the article highlighted the strategies
employed by reputable media organizations to
uphold journalistic standards. It discussed the
importance of fact-checking, transparency,
accountability, and adherence to ethical guidelines
in preserving the reliability of news reporting.
Furthermore, the paper explored the responsibilities
of journalists in the digital age, the impact of
economic pressures on editorial independence, and
the role of media literacy in empowering audiences
to discern credible information. Finally, the article
suggested that a robust commitment to media ethics
is essential for journalism to effectively counteract
misinformation and fulfill its role as a cornerstone of
democratic society.
Keywords: Journalistic integrity, Fake news,
Media ethics, Misinformation, Media Credibility
I. Introduction
The advent of digital technology and social
media has revolutionized the dissemination of
information, yet it has also facilitated the
proliferation of misinformation, commonly referred
to as "fake news." Researchers such as Lazer et al.
(2018) have highlighted the unprecedented speed
and reach with which false information can spread
online, often outpacing corrections and factual
reporting. The rise of fake news has been
particularly prominent during critical political
events, as documented by Allcott and Gentzkow.
(2017), who analyzed the dissemination of false
stories during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
They found that fake news not only reached millions
of people but also had significant potential to
influence public opinion and voter behavior. The
mechanisms behind the spread of fake news are
multifaceted, involving psychological, social, and
technological factors. Vosoughi et al. (2018)
identified that false news stories tend to evoke
stronger emotional responses, such as surprise and
disgust, compared to true stories, making them more
likely to be shared. Additionally, the algorithmic
curation of content on platforms like Facebook and
Twitter creates echo chambers, reinforcing users'
pre-existing beliefs and making them more
susceptible to misinformation (Bakshy et al., 2015;
Garimella et al., 2018).
Indubitably, the role of journalistic
integrity becomes paramount day by day.
Journalism, as the Fourth Estate, is fundamental to
democratic societies, tasked with providing
accurate, reliable information that enables informed
citizenry (Kovach & Rosenstiel, 2014). The ethical
foundations of journalism, including principles of
truthfulness, accuracy, fairness, and impartiality, are
critical in maintaining public trust and the credibility
of the media. Multiple studies have underscored the
necessity of upholding these ethical standards
amidst the challenges posed by the digital age.
Cinelli et al. (2021) emphasized that rigorous fact-
checking and verification processes are essential in
countering the spread of false information.
Meanwhile, Ward (2008) discussed the concept of
"ethical journalism in the era of post-truth," arguing
that transparency and accountability are vital in
restoring the public's trust in media institutions.
Moreover, the erosion of journalistic integrity can
have profound implications for society. McChesney.
(1999) argues that when journalism fails to adhere to
ethical standards, it undermines democratic
processes by misinforming the public, thus
impairing their ability to make informed decisions.
In contrast, Kovach and Rosenstiel. (2014)
International Journal of Humanities Social Science and Management (IJHSSM)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Jul.-Aug., 2024, pp: 527-537 www.ijhssm.org
| Impact Factor value 7.52 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 528
highlights that maintaining high ethical standards in
journalism not only combats misinformation but
also enhances the media's role as a watchdog,
holding power to account.
Unequivocally, the rise of fake news
presents a significant threat to the credibility and
function of journalism in society. This article
outlines the importance of journalistic integrity in
combating misinformation presenting a robust
commitment to ethical journalism as an essential
aspect of safeguarding the public trust and ensuring
the media's role as a cornerstone of democracy.
II. Brief Historical Lens of Media Ethics
and Journalistic Credibility
2.1 Evolution of Media Ethics
The concept of media ethics has evolved
significantly over the centuries, shaped by societal
changes, technological advancements, and the
evolving role of the press. In the early days of print
journalism, ethical standards were largely informal
and varied widely (Bermes, 2021). The first notable
attempt to codify journalistic ethics came in the 19th
century, with the emergence of the "penny press" in
the United States (Marsha and Hamilton, 2009).
These affordable newspapers aimed to reach a
broader audience, which necessitated a certain level
of accuracy and accountability to maintain
credibility (Bermes, 2021). The 20th century saw
more formalized efforts to establish ethical
guidelines in journalism (Ralph Frasca, 2006). The
American Society of Newspaper Editors (ASNE)
adopted its first code of ethics in 1923, emphasizing
principles such as impartiality, fairness, and a
commitment to the truth (Wilkins et al., 2004). This
period also witnessed the birth of investigative
journalism, with landmark cases like the Watergate
scandal highlighting the importance of ethical
reporting in uncovering corruption and holding
power to account (Kovach & Rosenstiel, 2014).
Globally, the establishment of various press councils
and regulatory bodies further reinforced the
importance of ethics in journalism. The Press
Council of India, founded in 1966, and the UK's
Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO),
established in 2014, are examples of efforts to
maintain high standards of journalistic integrity.
These organizations provide frameworks for
addressing ethical breaches and ensuring
accountability within the media industry (Ward,
2008).
2.2 Pre-Digital Era Journalism Standards
Before the advent of digital media,
journalism was primarily disseminated through
print, radio, and television. This era was
characterized by a more controlled flow of
information, with a limited number of media outlets
serving as gatekeepers (Bennett & Serrin, 2005).
These traditional forms of media operated under
established norms and standards that prioritized
accuracy, verification, and editorial oversight
(Karadimitriou et al., 2022). In print journalism,
editorial hierarchies play a crucial role in
maintaining standards. Editors and fact-checkers
were integral to the process, ensuring that published
content adhered to strict guidelines of accuracy and
fairness. Prominent newspapers like The New York
Times and The Washington Post developed
reputations for rigorous reporting and editorial
integrity, setting benchmarks for the industry
(Schudson, 2008). Broadcast journalism also
adhered to stringent standards, with major networks
such as the BBC, CBS, and NBC maintaining robust
editorial policies. The Fairness Doctrine in the
United States, which was in effect from 1949 to
1987, required broadcasters to present controversial
issues of public importance in a fair and balanced
manner (THOMAS et al., 1985). This regulation
exemplified the commitment to impartiality and
comprehensive reporting that characterized the pre-
digital era (Pickard, 2015). Despite these efforts, the
pre-digital era was not without its challenges.
Instances of sensationalism and yellow journalism,
particularly in the late 19th and early 20th centuries,
highlighted the ongoing struggle to balance
commercial interests with ethical reporting (Fowler
& Brennan, 1982). However, the relatively slower
pace of news dissemination and the presence of
established editorial processes generally helped to
mitigate the spread of misinformation (Campbell,
2001).
Overall, the historical background of media
ethics reveals a long-standing commitment to
principles of accuracy, fairness, and accountability
in journalism. From the early days of the penny press
to the rigorous editorial standards of the pre-digital
era, the evolution of media ethics upholds the
foundational role these principles play in
maintaining the credibility and integrity of the press.
III. Challenges of Safeguarding Media
Credibility in the Digital Age
3.1 Proliferation of Misinformation
The digital age has revolutionized how
information spreads, presenting unprecedented
challenges with the proliferation of misinformation.
The internet's speed and accessibility allow false
information to propagate swiftly across global
audiences before corrections can catch up, fueled by
International Journal of Humanities Social Science and Management (IJHSSM)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Jul.-Aug., 2024, pp: 527-537 www.ijhssm.org
| Impact Factor value 7.52 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 529
the ease of content creation (Lazer et al., 2018).
Online anonymity emboldens individuals to spread
misinformation without accountability, aided by
troll farms, bots, and fake accounts that amplify
misleading narratives (Ferrara et al., 2016). Social
media algorithms exacerbate the issue by
prioritizing sensational or emotionally charged
content, leading to the viral spread of falsehoods
(Vosoughi, Roy, & Aral, 2018). Echo chambers and
filter bubbles further compound the problem, as
digital platforms often reinforce users' existing
beliefs, making them less receptive to factual
corrections (Pariser, 2011; Eslami et al., 2015).
Moreover, the digital advertising model's reliance on
high traffic and engagement incentivizes clickbait
and sensationalism, sometimes at the expense of
accuracy and reliability (Thurman, 2011). These
factors collectively contribute to the widespread
dissemination and acceptance of misinformation in
today's digital ecosystem.
3.2 Role of Social Media Platforms
Social media platforms have become
pivotal in the modern information landscape,
serving as primary channels for news consumption
for millions worldwide (Pariser, 2011; Baker et al.,
2020). However, their role in disseminating
misinformation presents profound ethical and
operational challenges. Content moderation stands
as a significant hurdle for social media companies,
tasked with managing vast quantities of posts. While
employing algorithms and human moderators to
identify and remove false information, the sheer
volume complicates comprehensive oversight, and
decisions on what constitutes misinformation can be
contentious, and influenced by political and cultural
biases (Baker et al., 2020). Platforms like Facebook,
Twitter, and YouTube optimize user engagement
through features such as likes, shares, and
recommendations, inadvertently amplifying false
information's virality. Content that evokes strong
emotions or is sensational tends to garner more user
interaction, further exacerbating the spread of
misinformation (Anduiza et al., 2010). Addressing
responsibility and regulation remains contentious,
with debates ongoing about platforms'
accountability for misinformation dissemination.
While initiatives like fact-checking partnerships and
transparency efforts are implemented, critics argue
they are insufficient, advocating for stricter
regulatory oversight (Scheufele et al., 2020).
The prevalence of misinformation on social
media has corroded public trust in these platforms
and broader media credibility. Exposure to fake
news has been shown to foster confusion and
skepticism among users, impairing their ability to
discern credible sources (Vaduganathan et al.,
2020). To combat this issue, social media companies
are investing in advanced technologies like artificial
intelligence and machine learning to detect and flag
false information swiftly. They are also developing
features to highlight news story origins and provide
context, empowering users to make more informed
decisions about the content they consume (Baker
and Rojek, 2019). These efforts mark ongoing
attempts to mitigate the impact of misinformation
while navigating the complex landscape of digital
information dissemination. Unarguably, the digital
age presents significant challenges for maintaining
the integrity of information. The proliferation of
misinformation and the role of social media
platforms in amplifying false content reveals the
complexity of the issue. Addressing these challenges
requires a multifaceted approach that includes
technological innovations, robust content
moderation policies, and increased media literacy
among the public.
IV. Practical Experiences on Fake News
Proliferation
4.1 Examples of Successful and Failed Responses
to Fake News
4.1.1 Successful Responses
The New York Times and Fact-Checking
Initiatives. The New York Times has implemented a
robust approach to fact-checking, integrating it
across its reporting framework. Notably, during the
2020 U.S. presidential election, the Times' proactive
and transparent fact-checking efforts were pivotal in
swiftly debunking false claims in real-time. This
proactive stance not only bolstered the publication's
credibility but also provided the public with reliable
information during a critical electoral period
(Bateman and Jackson, 2024). The Times'
commitment to transparency, including promptly
issuing corrections and clarifications, has further
solidified reader trust and reinforced its reputation
for accuracy and accountability (Eslami et al.,
2015).
BBC's Reality Check. In response to the
misinformation surrounding Brexit and other
significant events, the BBC introduced its "Reality
Check" feature. This initiative involves dedicated
segments and articles specifically aimed at fact-
checking statements made by politicians and public
figures (Nikki Soo et al., 2023). By systematically
addressing false information and providing
necessary context, the BBC has successfully
maintained its reputation for impartiality and
accuracy. The "Reality Check" feature has proven
International Journal of Humanities Social Science and Management (IJHSSM)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Jul.-Aug., 2024, pp: 527-537 www.ijhssm.org
| Impact Factor value 7.52 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 530
instrumental in helping audiences navigate complex
and contentious issues, offering clear and verified
information amid a landscape rife with
misinformation (BBC, 2019).
4.1.2 Failed Responses
Facebook's Handling of Fake News During
the 2016 U.S. Election. Facebook came under
intense scrutiny for its role in amplifying
misinformation during the 2016 U.S. presidential
election. The platform's algorithms prioritized
sensational and false stories, contributing to their
virality and widespread dissemination (Mihelj et al.,
2022; Lucia et al., 2023). Initially, Facebook's
response was criticized as slow and inadequate,
failing to effectively mitigate the impact of fake
news on public discourse and electoral processes.
This mishandling led to widespread public distrust
and accusations that the platform facilitated
misinformation campaigns. Subsequent measures,
such as partnering with third-party fact-checkers and
adjusting algorithms, were viewed as reactive rather
than proactive, underscoring the platform's
challenges in managing information integrity
(Alkemade & Suurs, 2012).
YouTube and COVID-19 Misinformation.
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, YouTube
struggled to curb the spread of misinformation
related to the virus and vaccines (Kessler &
Humprecht, 2023). Despite implementing new
policies and removing thousands of misleading
videos, the platform faced criticism for its delayed
and inconsistent enforcement of these measures.
This inconsistency allowed harmful content to
persist, contributing to public confusion and
potentially jeopardizing public health efforts (Mihelj
et al., 2022). The platform's failure to swiftly and
effectively manage misinformation about COVID-
19 damaged its credibility among users and public
health experts alike, highlighting the critical
importance of proactive moderation and
enforcement in safeguarding public discourse and
health information (Bertin et al., 2020).
4.2 Analysis of Major Media Outlets’
Approaches
4.2.1 CNN's Multi-Faceted Strategy
CNN employed a dedicated fact-checking
team that reviews claims made by public figures and
viral content, producing detailed articles and
segments to debunk false information (Aïmeur et al.,
2023). The network maintains a clear corrections
policy, promptly addressing errors in their reporting
and publishing the methodologies behind their fact-
checking processes to foster transparency (Zhang et
al., 2020). Additionally, CNN engages with its
audience through social media and interactive
features, allowing viewers to submit questions and
concerns about misinformation, thus building a
community that values accurate information (Zhang
& Ghorbani, 2020)
4.2.2 The Guardian's Editorial Policies
The Guardian adheres to strict editorial
guidelines that emphasize accuracy, fairness, and
impartiality, as outlined in its editorial code of
conduct (The Guardian, 2023). These reflect its
commitment to ethical journalism. To enhance its
efforts in combating misinformation, The Guardian
collaborates with organizations like Full Fact and
the International Fact-Checking Network, bringing
additional expertise and resources to their fact-
checking initiatives. Furthermore, The Guardian
employs innovative storytelling through various
digital tools and formats, such as interactive
graphics and explainer videos, to present complex
information clearly and engagingly, helping readers
understand and trust their reporting (Zannettou et
al., 2019; Yavary et al., 2020).
4.2.3 Reuters' Global Approach
As a global news agency, Reuters has
established fact-checking units in multiple regions
to address misinformation across different
languages and cultural contexts, ensuring a broader
reach and relevance. Reuters also provides training
and resources for journalists worldwide on best
practices for verifying information and combating
fake news, including workshops, webinars, and
comprehensive guides. Additionally, Reuters
integrates advanced technologies, such as artificial
intelligence and machine learning, to enhance its
fact-checking capabilities, helping to identify and
address misinformation more efficiently (Chandran,
2023).
In practical terms, the examination of
successful and failed responses to fake news
highlights the critical role of proactive and
transparent measures in maintaining journalistic
integrity. Notably, major media outlets have
developed diverse strategies, from robust fact-
checking initiatives to collaborations with external
organizations, to combat misinformation effectively.
These highlighted case studies and analyses suggest
the importance of adaptability, accountability, and
innovation in upholding the credibility of journalism
in the digital age.
International Journal of Humanities Social Science and Management (IJHSSM)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Jul.-Aug., 2024, pp: 527-537 www.ijhssm.org
| Impact Factor value 7.52 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 531
V. Ethical Frameworks in Journalism
Journalistic ethics are fundamental to
maintaining the credibility and trustworthiness of
the media, grounded in several core principles that
form the foundation of ethical journalism.
Truthfulness and accuracy are paramount, requiring
journalists to provide comprehensive and honest
reporting through rigorous fact-checking, source
verification, and a steadfast commitment to
promptly correcting errors, as emphasized by the
SPJ (Society of Professional Journalists) Code of
Ethics (Ibbi, 2016). Fairness and impartiality are
equally crucial, with reporters obligated to present
stories in a balanced manner, giving voice to
multiple perspectives and avoiding bias, as
highlighted by the BBC's Editorial Guidelines
(Celiberti et al., 2020). Independence is another
cornerstone, necessitating that journalists remain
free from conflicts of interest that could compromise
their objectivity, a standard rigorously upheld by the
Reuters Handbook of Journalism. Furthermore,
accountability and transparency are vital, with
media organizations needing to be answerable to
their audience and open about their processes,
including error corrections and conflict of interest
disclosures, a practice endorsed by The Guardian's
editorial code (Ibbi, 2016). Minimizing harm is a
principle that calls for journalists to consider the
potential adverse effects of their reporting,
particularly when dealing with vulnerable subjects,
as outlined by the Ethical Journalism Network.
Lastly, respecting privacy is essential, especially in
sensitive stories, requiring journalists to balance the
public's right to know with individuals' right to
privacy, as stipulated in the IPSO (Independent
Press Standards Organisation) Code of Practice.
Collectively, these principles ensure that journalism
remains a trusted and ethical pillar of society.
5.2 Application of Ethical Guidelines in Modern
Journalism
The application of core principles in
modern journalism involves adapting traditional
ethical frameworks to the challenges and
opportunities presented by the digital age. One key
area is digital verification and fact-checking; with
the rapid spread of information online, fact-checking
has become more critical than ever (Awofadeju, &
Sawyerr, 2024). Media organizations like The New
York Times employ advanced digital tools and
techniques, such as forensic verification methods,
analyzing metadata, and using reverse image
searches to ensure the accuracy of their reporting.
Another area is transparency in corrections and
updates, where modern newsrooms emphasize
openness by correcting errors and updating stories
as new information becomes available. This practice
builds trust and demonstrates accountability,
exemplified by CNN's clear notes on corrections and
updates in their online articles.
Engaging with audiences is also a vital
application of ethical guidelines, as social media and
digital platforms offer new opportunities for
journalists to interact with their audience, gather
feedback, and address concerns (Vosoughi, Roy, &
Aral, 2018). NPR's active engagement with listeners
through social media and interactive segments
allows for real-time feedback and accountability,
fostering a community of informed readers.
Balancing speed and accuracy remains a challenge,
but ethical journalism prioritizes getting the story
right over being the first to report it. The Associated
Press exemplifies this by prioritizing accuracy and
verification, even if it means delaying publication.
The ethical use of user-generated content
(UGC) presents challenges such as verifying
authenticity and ensuring consent. Media
organizations like BBC’s UGC Hub navigate these
issues carefully, verifying content submitted by the
public and ensuring ethical considerations are met
before using such content in their reporting.
Protecting sources and confidentiality has become
more complex in the digital era but remains vital.
Journalists use encrypted communication tools and
other measures to safeguard their sources' identities.
ProPublica, for example, provides secure methods
for whistleblowers to share information, such as
encrypted email and secure drop sites, ensuring their
anonymity and safety (Ibbi, 2016).
Finally, combatting misinformation and
fake news is a crucial responsibility of journalists,
who actively debunk false claims and provide clear,
evidence-based reporting. The Washington Post’s
“Fact Checker” column rigorously debunks false
claims made by public figures and widely circulated
misinformation. Generally, the application of ethical
guidelines in modern journalism is essential for
maintaining the credibility and integrity of the media
in the digital age. Core principles of truthfulness,
fairness, independence, accountability, minimizing
harm, and respect for privacy guide journalists in
their work. By adapting these principles to address
contemporary challenges such as digital
verification, transparency, audience engagement,
and combating misinformation, journalists can
uphold their ethical responsibilities and foster trust
with their audience.
International Journal of Humanities Social Science and Management (IJHSSM)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Jul.-Aug., 2024, pp: 527-537 www.ijhssm.org
| Impact Factor value 7.52 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 532
VI. Strategies for Combating Fake News
6.1 Fact-Checking Initiatives
Media organizations are increasingly
investing in specialized fact-checking units that
rigorously verify information before publication,
employing advanced tools and methodologies to
assess the accuracy of claims (Nyitse et al., 2023).
PolitiFact and Snopes, for example, are dedicated
fact-checking organizations that evaluate the
veracity of statements made by politicians, public
figures, and viral content, helping to debunk false
information and provide context. Collaborating with
other fact-checking organizations and academic
institutions enhances these efforts by bringing
diverse expertise and resources, as seen with the
International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) at
Poynter, which promotes global collaboration
among fact-checkers, setting standards and
facilitating joint initiatives to combat
misinformation. Real-time fact-checking during live
events, such as political debates or major news
broadcasts, allows for the immediate countering of
false claims, exemplified by the 2020 U.S.
presidential debates where CNN and The
Washington Post provided real-time fact-checking
to address misleading statements as they occurred.
Additionally, leveraging AI (artificial intelligence)
and machine learning technologies to detect and flag
potential misinformation significantly enhances the
speed and accuracy of fact-checking; for instance,
Facebook uses AI to detect and demote false news
stories while partnering with third-party fact-
checkers to review and label dubious content. This
integration of technology with traditional fact-
checking practices ensures that misinformation is
promptly addressed and mitigated, maintaining the
integrity and credibility of the media in the digital
age (Vosoughi, Roy, & Aral, 2018).
6.2 Transparency and Accountability Measures
Media outlets are increasingly
implementing transparency and accountability
measures to build trust with their audiences. One
crucial aspect is having clear correction policies,
which involve promptly addressing mistakes and
making the process accessible and transparent. For
instance, The New York Times maintains a public
corrections page where they list and correct errors in
their reporting, demonstrating accountability and
transparency. Another measure is the disclosure of
sources and methodologies, which provides detailed
information about how conclusions were reached
and enhances credibility. ProPublica, for example,
often includes “Methodology” sections in their
investigative reports, explaining how they gathered
and verified information (International Press
Institute, 2023).
Establishing roles such as public editors or
ombudsmen is also essential for maintaining
accountability. These roles involve reviewing reader
complaints and investigating potential ethical
breaches. The Guardian's readers' editor addresses
concerns and critiques from the audience, providing
explanations and, if necessary, corrections or
apologies. Furthermore, actively engaging with the
audience through social media, forums, and
feedback forms encourages dialogue and allows the
media to address concerns and correct
misinformation. NPR exemplifies this by actively
engaging with listeners via social media platforms
and interactive segments on their website, fostering
a transparent relationship with their audience.
Collectively, these transparency and accountability
measures ensure that media organizations remain
trustworthy and credible in the eyes of the public
(Iyorkyaa et al., 2020).
6.3 Role of Editorial Policies
The role of editorial policies is crucial in
maintaining the integrity and credibility of news
organizations. Establishing rigorous editorial
standards is fundamental; these policies must
emphasize accuracy, impartiality, and fairness to
guide journalists in their reporting (Okonkwo,
2023). The Reuters Handbook of Journalism, for
example, outlines detailed editorial guidelines that
ensure consistency and integrity in their news
coverage. Regular training and professional
development are also essential, ensuring that
journalists are equipped with the latest ethical
journalism practices, fact-checking techniques, and
digital tools to handle misinformation (Okoro,
2004). The BBC, for instance, conducts regular
training sessions on digital verification and ethical
reporting standards for its journalists.
Editorial independence and integrity are
vital to prevent commercial, political, or other
external pressures from influencing reporting
(Nyitse et al., 2023). The Associated Press (AP)
enforces strict policies to maintain editorial
independence, ensuring their journalism remains
unbiased and credible. The ethical use of user-
generated content (UGC) is another critical area;
policies must ensure that content sourced from the
public is verified and meets journalistic standards.
The BBC’s UGC Hub, for example, rigorously
verifies public submissions and follows ethical
guidelines before incorporating them into their
reporting. Promoting media literacy is another
important role of editorial policies. By providing
International Journal of Humanities Social Science and Management (IJHSSM)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Jul.-Aug., 2024, pp: 527-537 www.ijhssm.org
| Impact Factor value 7.52 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 533
resources and initiatives to help the public critically
evaluate information and identify misinformation,
news organizations can foster a more informed
audience. The New York Times’ “The Learning
Network” exemplifies this approach by offering
educational resources and activities that teach
students and educators about news literacy. Through
these comprehensive editorial policies, news
organizations can uphold high standards of
journalism, maintain public trust, and effectively
combat misinformation (Ojebuyi & Chukwunwike,
2018).
Iteratively, combating fake news requires a
multifaceted approach that includes robust fact-
checking initiatives, transparency and
accountability measures, and strong editorial
policies. By establishing dedicated fact-checking
teams, leveraging technology, engaging with
audiences, and maintaining high editorial standards,
media organizations can effectively address
misinformation and uphold the integrity of
journalism. These strategies not only help to debunk
false information but also foster trust and credibility
with the audience, reinforcing the essential role of
journalism in a democratic society.
VII. Role of Media Literacy
7.1 Educating the Public to Discern Credible
News Sources
Educating the public about discerning
credible news sources is crucial in today's
information-rich environment. Understanding
media bias and propaganda techniques is a
foundational step, as it helps individuals recognize
biased reporting, sensationalism, and manipulative
tactics commonly used in news media Okoro, 2004).
Organizations like the News Literacy Project
provide resources and programs that teach
individuals how to identify bias and propaganda,
enabling them to evaluate the reliability of
information more effectively. Developing critical
thinking skills is equally essential for analyzing
news content critically. This includes questioning
the credibility of sources, understanding the context
in which information is presented, and
distinguishing between opinion and fact (Olagoke et
al., 2021). The Center for News Literacy at Stony
Brook University offers curricula designed to
enhance critical thinking skills related to news
consumption, empowering individuals to make
informed judgments about the news they encounter.
Teaching verification techniques is another
vital aspect of media literacy education. Techniques
such as reverse image searches, checking source
credibility, and cross-referencing information with
multiple sources enable the public to independently
verify the authenticity of news (Rauf et al., 2013).
First Draft News provides workshops and online
courses focused on verification skills and digital
literacy, equipping individuals with the tools to
assess the reliability of online content accurately.
Recognizing reliable sources is crucial for
discerning credible news. Educating the public on
identifying characteristics of reliable news sources,
such as transparency in reporting, a proven track
record of accuracy, and adherence to journalistic
ethics, helps distinguish credible news from
misinformation (Ojebuyi & Chukwunwike, 2018).
Media outlets like The New York Times and BBC
exemplify this by providing detailed information
about their editorial standards and fact-checking
processes, serving as benchmarks of credible
journalism.
Promoting the use of digital tools and
resources designed to detect and flag
misinformation further aids the public in navigating
the information landscape effectively (Rodrigo-
Gines, 2023). Tools such as NewsGuard and
FactCheck.org offer browser extensions and fact-
checking databases that assist users in assessing the
credibility of news websites and content, enhancing
their ability to access reliable information. By
educating the public through these comprehensive
strategies, media literacy efforts contribute to a more
informed and discerning society capable of
navigating the complexities of the modern media
environment.
7.2 Collaborative Efforts Between Journalists
and Educators
Collaboration between journalists and
educators plays a pivotal role in promoting media
literacy and enhancing public understanding of
credible news sources. Journalists can lead
workshops and seminars in partnership with schools
and community organizations, offering valuable
insights into the journalistic process, fact-checking
techniques, and the significance of ethical reporting
(Paris, 1986). For instance, programs such as the
News Literacy Project’s “Newsroom to Classroom”
initiative bring journalists into schools to engage
students in discussions on news literacy and the
importance of trustworthy journalism. Also, joint
efforts in curriculum development integrate media
literacy into standard education, covering topics like
the history of journalism, the media's role in
democracy, and practical skills for evaluating news
(Okonkwo, 2023). Collaborations between the
American Press Institute and educational institutions
have resulted in comprehensive media literacy
International Journal of Humanities Social Science and Management (IJHSSM)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Jul.-Aug., 2024, pp: 527-537 www.ijhssm.org
| Impact Factor value 7.52 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 534
curricula implemented nationwide, ensuring
students receive foundational knowledge in media
literacy.
Additionally, media literacy campaigns,
involving both journalists and educators, are
effective in raising public awareness about
discerning credible news sources (Wellbrock &
Kure, 2020). These campaigns utilize various media
channels, including social media, to reach broad
audiences. For instance, the European Union’s
“WePROTECT Global Alliance” features
campaigns that promote media literacy and digital
safety across member countries, highlighting the
collaborative efforts between journalists and
educators. University-industry partnerships are
instrumental in conducting research on media
literacy and misinformation, leading to evidence-
based strategies for enhancing media literacy
education (Olagoke et al., 2021). The Tow Center
for Digital Journalism at Columbia University, in
collaboration with media organizations, conducts
research on digital journalism trends and
misinformation impacts, contributing valuable
insights to media literacy initiatives. Furthermore,
encouraging student journalism programs further
enriches media literacy efforts by providing students
with firsthand experience in journalistic principles
(Ibbi, 2016). Programs like Scholastic Journalism
Week support student journalists with resources and
mentorship, fostering media literacy and ethical
journalism practices within schools. These
collaborative efforts between journalists and
educators are essential for equipping individuals
with the skills and knowledge to navigate the media
landscape responsibly and critically (Olagoke et al.,
2021). Generally, media literacy is a crucial tool in
combating fake news and ensuring an informed
public. Educating the public to discern credible
news sources involves teaching critical thinking,
verification techniques, and recognizing reliable
journalism. Collaborative efforts between
journalists and educators enhance these initiatives
by bringing practical insights and professional
expertise into educational settings. Through
workshops, curriculum development, media literacy
campaigns, and student journalism programs,
journalists and educators can work together to
empower individuals with the skills needed to
navigate the complex media landscape effectively.
VIII. Conclusion and Future Perspective
This piece of work upheld that journalistic
integrity remains paramount in the era of fake news,
requiring a steadfast commitment to ethical
principles and innovative strategies to combat
misinformation. The evolution of media ethics,
coupled with the challenges posed by digital
platforms, underscores the necessity for rigorous
fact-checking, transparency, and robust editorial
policies. Furthermore, the role of media literacy in
empowering the public to discern credible
information cannot be overstated, with collaborative
efforts between journalists and educators playing a
pivotal role in this endeavor. As we look to the
future, the integration of advanced technologies,
continuous professional development for
journalists, and comprehensive media literacy
education will be crucial in preserving the credibility
and trustworthiness of journalism. By fostering a
well-informed and critical audience, we can
strengthen the foundation of a democratic society
where truth and integrity prevail.
References
[1]. Aïmeur, E., Amri, S., & Brassard, G. (2023).
Fake news, disinformation and
misinformation in social media: a review.
Social Network Analysis and Mining, 13, 30.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-023-01028-5
[2]. Alkemade, F., & Suurs, R. A. (2012). Patterns
of expectations for emerging sustainable
technologies. Technological Forecasting and
Social Change, 79(3), 448-456.
[3]. Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social
media and fake news in the 2016 election.
Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2),
211-236.
https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
[4]. Anduiza, E., Gallego, A., & Cantijoch, M.
(2010). Online political participation in
Spain: The impact of traditional and Internet
resources. Journal of Information Technology
& Politics, 7(4), 356-368.
[5]. Awofadeju, P. O., & Sawyerr, O. (2024). The
Role of Media Ethics in Shaping Public
Perception: A Critical Analysis of Biased
Reporting and Its Impact on Public Opinion.
Journal of African Innovation & Advanced
Studies (JAIAS), 3(2), 31-49.
[6]. Baker, S. A., & Rojek, C. (2019). Lifestyle
gurus: Constructing authority and influence
online. Polity Press.
[7]. Baker, S. A., Wade, M., & Walsh, M. J.
(2020). The challenges of responding to
misinformation during a pandemic: Content
moderation and the limitations of the concept
of harm. Media International Australia,
177(1), 103-107.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X20951301
International Journal of Humanities Social Science and Management (IJHSSM)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Jul.-Aug., 2024, pp: 527-537 www.ijhssm.org
| Impact Factor value 7.52 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 535
[8]. Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A.
(2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse
news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348,
1130-1132.
[9]. Bateman, J., & Jackson, D. (2024).
Countering disinformation effectively: An
evidence-based policy guide. Available from
https://carnegieendowment.org/research/202
4/01/countering-disinformation-effectively-
an-evidence-based-policy-guide?lang=en
[10]. BBC. (2019). Supporting healthier media
ecosystems. Available from
https://downloads.bbc.co.uk/mediaaction/pdf
/approaches-media-ecosystems.pdf
[11]. Bennett, L. W., & Serrin, W. (2005). The
watchdog role. In G. Overholser, & K. H.
Jamieson (Eds.), The press (pp. 169-188).
Oxford University Press.
[12]. Bermes, A. (2021). Information overload and
fake news sharing: A transactional stress
perspective exploring the mitigating role of
consumers’ resilience during COVID-19.
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,
61, 102555.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102
555
[13]. Bertin, P., Nera, K., & Delouvée, S. (2020).
Conspiracy beliefs, rejection of vaccination,
and support for hydroxychloroquine: A
conceptual replication-extension in the
COVID-19 pandemic context. Frontiers in
Psychology, 11, 565128.
[14]. Celiberti, D., Sniezyk, C., & Leif, E. (2020).
Five principles of ethical journalism:
Implications for media representations of
autism treatment. Science in Autism
Treatment, 18(2).
[15]. Chandran, R. (2023). AI 'supercharges' online
disinformation and censorship, report warns.
Available from
https://www.reuters.com/article/business/ai-
supercharges-online-disinformation-and-
censorship-report-warns-idUSL8N3B53P6/
[16]. Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G.,
Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini,
M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social
media. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences, 118(9), e2023301118.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118
[17]. Fowler, M. S., & Brennen, L. (1982). A
marketplace approach to broadcast
regulation. Texas Law Review, 60, 207-217.
[18]. Frasca, R. (2006). Benjamin Franklin's
printing network: Disseminating virtue in
early America. University of Missouri Press.
[19]. Garimella, K., De Francisci Morales, G.,
Gionis, A., & Mathioudakis, M. (2018).
Political discourse on social media: Echo
chambers, gatekeepers, and the price of
bipartisanship. In P. A. Champion, F. Gandon,
& L. Médini (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2018
World Wide Web Conference, WWW ’18
(pp. 913-922). International World Wide Web
Conferences Steering Committee.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.3186139
[20]. Hamilton, M. L. (2009). Social and economic
networks in early Massachusetts: Atlantic
connections. Penn State Press.
[21]. Ibbi, A. (2016). The Battle for
Professionalism in Journalism in Nigeria
Amidst Unethical Practices, Journal of Mass
Communication and Journalism, 6(3), p.1
[22]. International Press Institute (2023).
Independence Through Sustainability:
Innovation Highlights from IPI in 2023.
[23]. Iyorkyaa, T., Bo, D. & Nyihair, V. (2020).
Sensationalism and the Nigerian Media: A
Content Analysis of Newspaper Reports on
the Arrest of Eight Judges. Journal of Spanish
Studies, 1(1), 12
[24]. Karadimitriou, A., von Krogh, T., Ruggiero,
C., Biancalana, C., Bomba, M., & Lo, W. H.
(2022). Investigative journalism and the
watchdog role of news media: Between acute
challenges and exceptional counterbalances.
In J. Trappel, & T. Tomaz (Eds.), Success and
failure in news media performance:
Comparative analysis in the Media for
Democracy Monitor 2021 (pp. 101-125).
Nordicom, University of Gothenburg.
https://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855589-5
[25]. Kessler, S. H., & Humprecht, E. (2023).
COVID-19 misinformation on YouTube: An
analysis of its impact and subsequent online
information searches for verification. Digital
Health, 9.
https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231177131
[26]. Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2014). The
elements of journalism: What newspeople
should know and the public should expect.
Three Rivers Press.
[27]. Krattenmaker, T. G., & Powe, L. A., Jr.
(1985). The fairness doctrine today: A
constitutional curiosity and an impossible
dream. Duke Law Journal, 1985(1), 151-176.
[28]. Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y.,
Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F.,
Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G.,
Rothschild, D., Schudson, M., Sloman, S. A.,
Sunstein, C. R., Thorson, E. A., Watts, D. J.,
International Journal of Humanities Social Science and Management (IJHSSM)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Jul.-Aug., 2024, pp: 527-537 www.ijhssm.org
| Impact Factor value 7.52 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 536
& Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake
news. Science, 359(6380), 1094-1096.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
[29]. Lucia, B., Vetter, M. A., & Adubofour, I. K.
(2023). Behold the metaverse: Facebook’s
Meta imaginary and the circulation of elite
discourse. New Media & Society.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231184249
[30]. McChesney, R. W. (1999). Rich media, poor
democracy: Communication politics in
dubious times. University of Illinois Press.
[31]. Mihelj, S., Kondor, K., & Štětka, V. (2022).
Establishing trust in experts during a crisis:
Expert trustworthiness and media use during
the COVID-19 pandemic. Science
Communication, 44(3), 292-319.
[32]. Nyitse, G., Odeba, B. & Ogbu, E. (2023).
Privacy Law and Journalism in Nigeria:
Knowledge, Uses and Challenges. European
Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(4), 145.
[33]. Ojebuyi, B. & Chukwunwike, A. (2018).
Gender Bias in Media Representation of
Political Actors: Examples from Nigeria 2015
Presidential Election. Legon Journal of the
Humanities, 29(1), 195-225.
[34]. Okonkwo, O. (2023). Strategic Litigation:
Safeguarding and Advancing Media Freedom
in Nigeria. Center for International Media
Assistance (CIMA).
[35]. Okoro, N. (2004). Constitutional Limitations
of Press Freedom in Nigeria: Cases, Indices
and Implications. International Journal of
Communication, 1, 147.
[36]. Olagoke, I., Olatunji, S. & Najeem, A.
(2021). Media Ethics and Regulatory
Mechanisms in Media Practice in Nigeria.
International Journal of Engineering and
Information Systems (IJEAIS),5(2), 35.
[37]. Paris, France: John Wiley& Sons Inc. Seng,
M. & Hunt, G. (1986). The Press and Politics
in Nigeria: A Case Study of Developmental
Journalism. Boston College Third World Law
Journal, 6(85), 9.5
[38]. Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the
internet is hiding from you. Penguin UK.
[39]. Popescu, M., Toka, G., Gosselin, T., &
Pereira, J. S. (2011). European media.
[40]. Rauf, A., Ojo, O., Akinreti, Q., Odegbenle, L.
Jegede, O. & Nwaolikpe, O. (2013).
Deregulation of Broadcast Media in Nigeria:
An Appraisal. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian
Journal of Business and Management
Review, 3(3), 12.
[41]. Rodrigo-Gines, F. J. (2023). A Systemic
Review on Media Bias Detection: What is
Media Bias, How it is expressed, and How to
Detect it. Expert Systems and Applications,
237(c).
[42]. Rosenstiel, T. (2014). The elements of
journalism: What newspeople should know
and the public should expect. Three Rivers
Press.
[43]. Scheufele, D. A., Krause, N. M., Freiling, I.,
& Brossard, D. (2020). How not to lose the
COVID-19 communication war. Issues in
Science and Technology, 17.
[44]. Schudson, M. (2008). Why democracies need
an unlovable press. Polity Press.
[45]. Shrum, L. (2017). Cultivation Theory:
Effects and Underlying Processes. The
International Encyclopedia of Media Effects,
1.
[46]. Soo, N., Morani, M., Kyriakidou, M., &
Cushion, S. (2023). Reflecting party agendas,
challenging claims: An analysis of editorial
judgments and fact-checking journalism
during the 2019 UK general election
campaign. Journalism Studies, 24(4), 460-
478.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.216
9190
[47]. The Guardian. (2023). Editorial code of
practice and guidance. Available from
https://www.theguardian.com/about/2023/jul
/07/guardian-editorial-code-of-practice-and-
guidance-2023
[48]. Thurman, N. (2011). Making 'The Daily Me':
Technology, economics, and habit in the
mainstream assimilation of personalized
news. Journalism, 12(4), 395-415.
[49]. Vaduganathan, M., van Meijgaard, J., Mehra,
M. R., Joseph, J., O’Donnell, C. J., &
Warraich, H. J. (2020). Prescription fill
patterns for commonly used drugs during the
COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.
JAMA, 323(24), 2524-2526.
[50]. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The
spread of true and false news online. Science,
359(6380), 1146-1151.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
[51]. Ward, S. J. A. (2008). Global journalism
ethics. McGill-Queen's University Press.
[52]. Wellbrock, CM. & Kure, M. (2020).
Competition and Media Performance: A
Cross-National Analysis of Corporate Goals
of Media Companies in 12 Countries.
International Journal of Communication, 14,
6159.
[53]. Wilkins, L., & Brennen, B. (2004).
Conflicted interests, contested terrain:
International Journal of Humanities Social Science and Management (IJHSSM)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Jul.-Aug., 2024, pp: 527-537 www.ijhssm.org
| Impact Factor value 7.52 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 537
Journalism ethics codes then and now. In
College of Communication Faculty Research
and Publications (152).
https://epublications.marquette.edu/comm_f
ac/152
[54]. Yavary, A., Sajedi, H., & Abadeh, M. S.
(2020). Information verification in social
networks based on user feedback and news
agencies. Social Network Analysis and
Mining, 10(1), 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-019-0616-4
[55]. Zannettou, S., Sirivianos, M., Blackburn, J.,
& Kourtellis, N. (2019). The web of false
information: Rumors, fake news, hoaxes,
clickbait, and various other shenanigans.
Journal of Data and Information Quality
(JDIQ), 11(3), 1-37.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3309699
[56]. Zhang, J., Dong, B., & Philip, S. Y. (2020).
Fakedetector: Effective fake news detection
with a deep diffusive neural network. In 2020
IEEE 36th International Conference on Data
Engineering (ICDE) (pp. 1826-1829). IEEE.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE48307.2020.00
180
[57]. Zhang, X., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2020). An
overview of online fake news:
Characterization, detection, and discussion.
Information Processing & Management,
57(2), 102025.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.03.004
