ChapterPDF Available

BOOSTING UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS' ACADEMIC INTEGRATION THROUGH EDUCATIONAL HACKATHONS: THE 'UTAD CODE AND CONQUER' EXPLORATORY STUDY

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

This paper presents a mixed-methods pre-experimental study with a one-group pre-test-post-test design. It explores the academic integration of a sample of 29 Bachelor (BSc) Informatics Engineering students before and after participating in a 6-hour educational hackathon: the 'UTAD Code and Conquer' (UCC) hackathon. The UCC hackathon challenged a total of 63 participants to solve an adapted version of the Traveling-Salesman Problem (TSP) in heterogeneous groups of three elements, with at least one first-year BSc student. Quantitative data were collected using the reduced version of the Academic Experiences Questionnaire (QVA-r), which measures students' experiences of academic adjustment across 5 key dimensions-personal, interpersonal, course-career, study, and institutional. Despite high mean scores on the QVA-r, differences before (x̄ total = 3.582) and after the event (x̄ total = 3.787) were not statistically significant (p > 0.050). While significant correlations were observed between some QVA-r dimensions, no such correlations were found with students' gender, year of study, or place of residence (in or outside the hometown). Qualitative data were collected through participant observation, document analysis, and semi-structured interviews with the student groups pre-selected for a final pitch of the five best TSP solutions. Overall, the interviewed participants expressed positive opinions, feelings, and attitudes towards the UCC hackathon, not only by recognizing its benefits for the academic integration of first-year students, as an opportunity for the practical application of theoretical knowledge and social interaction across academic cohorts but also by identifying challenges and suggestions for improvement related to the appropriateness of the TSP scenario. Consequently, practical and research implications for the adoption of educational hackathons as an academic integration strategy by higher education institutions are discussed and outlined.
Content may be subject to copyright.
!
!
BOOSTING UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS' ACADEMIC
INTEGRATION THROUGH EDUCATIONAL HACKATHONS: THE
‘UTAD CODE AND CONQUER’ EXPLORATORY STUDY
G. Cruz1, R. Nunes2, T. Ferreira3, A. Reis2, J. Cravino4
1University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal; Research Centre
on Didactics and Technology in the Education of Trainers (CIDTFF), Aveiro, Portugal;
Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science (INESC TEC),
Porto, Portugal (PORTUGAL)
2University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal; Institute for
Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science (INESC TEC), Porto, Portugal
(PORTUGAL)
3University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal
4University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal; Research Centre on
Didactics and Technology in the Education of Trainers (CIDTFF), Aveiro, Portugal (PORTUGAL)
Abstract
"#$%! &'&()! &)(%(*+%! '! ,$-(./,(+#0.%! &)(/(-&()$,(*+'1! %+2.3! 4$+#!'! 0*(/5)02&! &)(/+(%+/&0%+/+(%+!
.(%$5*6!7+!(-&10)(%!+#(!'8'.(,$8!$*+(5)'+$0*!09!'!%',&1(!09!:;!<'8#(10)!=<>8?!7*90),'+$8%!@*5$*(()$*5!
%+2.(*+%!A(90)(!'*.!'9+()!&')+$8$&'+$*5!$*!'!B/#02)!(.28'+$0*'1!#'8C'+#0*D!+#(!EF"GH!I0.(!'*.!I0*J2()K!
=FII?!#'8C'+#0*6!"#(!FII!#'8C'+#0*!8#'11(*5(.!'!+0+'1!09!BL!&')+$8$&'*+%!+0!%01M(!'*!'.'&+(.!M()%$0*!
09!+#(!")'M(1$*5/>'1(%,'*!N)0A1(,!=">N?!$*!#(+()05(*(02%!5)02&%!09!+#)((!(1(,(*+%O!4$+#!'+!1('%+!0*(!
9$)%+/3(')! <>8! %+2.(*+6! P2'*+$+'+$M(!.'+'! 4()(!8011(8+(.! 2%$*5!+#(! )(.28(.! M()%$0*! 09! +#(! G8'.(,$8!
@-&()$(*8(%! P2(%+$0**'$)(! =PQG/)?O! 4#$ 8#! ,('%2)(%!%+2.(*+%K! (-&()$(*8(%!09!'8'.(,$8! '.R2%+,(*+!
'8)0%%!S!C(3!.$,(*%$0*%!T!&()%0*'1O!$*+()&()%0*'1O!802)%(/8')(()O!%+2.3O!'*.!$*%+$+2+$0*'16!H(%&$+(!#$5#!
,('*!%80)(%!0*!+#(!PQG/)O!.$99()(*8(%!A(90)(!=-
U!+0+'1!V!L6SW:?!'*.!'9+()!+#(!(M(*+!=-
U!+0+'1!V!L6XWX?!4()(!
*0+!%+'+$%+$8'113!%$5*$9$8'*+!=&!Y!Z6ZSZ?6![#$1(!%$5*$9$8'*+!80))(1'+$0*%!4()(!0A%()M(.!A(+4((*!%0,(!PQG/
)!.$,(*%$0*%O!*0!%28#!80))(1'+$0*%!4()(!902*.!4$+#!%+2.(*+%K!5(*.()O!3(')!09!%+2.3O!0)!&1'8(!09!)(%$.(*8(!
=$*!0)!02+%$.(!+#(!#0,(+04*?6!P2'1$+'+$M(!.'+'!4()(!8011(8+(.!+#)025#!&')+$8$&'*+!0A%()M'+$0*O!.082,(*+!
'*'13%$%O!'*.!%(,$/%+)28+2)(.!$*+()M$(4%!4$+#!+#(!%+2.(*+!5)02&%!&)(/%(1(8+(.!90)!'!9$*'1!&$+8#!09!+#(!9$M(!
A(%+! ">N! %012+$0*%6!\M()'11O! +#(! $*+()M$(4(.! &')+$8$&'*+%! (-&)(%%(.!&0%$+$M(! 0&$*$0*%O! 9((1$*5%O! '*.!
'++$+2.(%!+04').%!+#(!FII!#'8C'+#0*O!*0+!0*13!A3!)(805*$]$*5!$+%!A(*(9$+%!90)!+#(!'8'.(,$8!$*+(5)'+$0*!
09!9$)%+/3(')!%+2.(*+%O!'%!'*!0&&0)+2*$+3!90)!+#(!&)'8+$8'1!'&&1$8'+$0*!09!+#(0)(+$8'1!C*041(.5(!'*.!%08$'1!
$*+()'8+$0*!'8)0%%!'8'.(,$8!80#0)+%!A2+!'1%0!A3!$.(*+$93$*5!8#'11(*5(%!'*.!%255(%+$0*%!90)!$,&)0M(,(*+!
)(1'+(.!+0!+#(!'&&)0&)$'+(*(%%!09!+#(!">N!%8(*')$06!I0*%(J2(*+13O!&)'8+$8'1!'*.!)(%(')8#!$,&1$8'+$0*%!
90)!+#(! '.0&+$0*!09! (.28'+$0*'1! #'8C'+#0*%! '%!'*! '8'.(,$8! $*+(5)'+$0*!%+)'+(53! A3! #$5#()! (.28'+$0*!
$*%+$+2+$0*%!')(!.$%82%%(.!'*.!02+1$*(.6!
^(340).%D!G8'.(,$8!7*+(5)'+$0*O!@.28'+$0*'1!_'8C'+#0*%O!_$5#()!@.28'+$0*O!@*5$*(()$*5!@.28'+$0*6!
1 INTRODUCTION
`$)%+/3(')!%+2.(*+%K!'8'.(,$8!$*+(5)'+$0*!(-&()$(*8(%!&1'3!'!8)28$'1!)01(!$*!+#($)!92+2)(!&()90),'*8(!'*.!
.(8$%$0*%O!$*812.$*5!1(')*$*5!'8#$(M(,(*+!'*.!$*+(*+$0*%!+0!.)0&!02+!09!2*$M()%$+3!abc6!@-$%+$*5!80*8(&+2'1!
9)',(40)C%!&)$,')$13!(-&10)(!'8'.(,$8!$*+(5)'+$0*!A3!(-',$*$*5!%+2.(*+%d!'.'&+'+$0*!+0!+#(!(.28'+$0*'1!
(*M$)0*,(*+O! 80*%$.()$*5! +#(! $*912(*8(! 09! A0+#! $*.$M$.2'1! =(656O! &%38#0105$8'1!'++)$A2+(%O! %08$'1!
A'8C5)02*.O! 'A$1$+$(%?! '*.! 80*+(-+2'1!9'8+0)%!=(656O!$*%+$+2+$0*'1! +3&(O! 9'821+3/%+2.(*+! )'+$0O! 1(')*$*5!
(*M$)0*,(*+!8#')'8+()$%+$8%?!0*!+#($)!%288(%%921!+)'*%$+$0*!9)0,!%(80*.')3!+0!#$5#()!(.28'+$0*!a:c6!7*!+#$%!
80*+(-+O! )(8(*+!)(%(')8#! #$5#1$5#+%!+#(! $,&0)+'*8(!09! +('8#$*5! J2'1$+3!'*.!805*$+$M(13!'8+$M'+$*5!
(*M$)0*,(*+%!$*!9'8$1$+'+$*5!+#$%!+)'*%$+$0*!aLcaec6!
G%!0*(!90),!09!%28#!(*M$)0*,(*+O!(.28'+$0*'1!#'8C'+#0*%!#'M(!A((*!$*8)('%$*513!'.0&+(.!+0!(*#'*8(!
+#(!1(')*$*5!%C$11%!09!2*$M()%$+3!%+2.(*+%O!(%&(8$'113!$*!+#(!9$(1.!09!(*5$*(()$*5!(.28'+$0*!aBcaXc6!"#(3!')(!
%08$'1O! (-+)'82))$821')!80.$*5! (M(*+%! +#'+! (*5'5(! &')+$8$&'*+%! $*!$*90),'1! '*.! 8011'A0)'+$M(! 1(')*$*5!
&)08(%%(%! 4$+#$*!'! %&(8$9$8! +#(,(!0M()! '! )(1'+$M(13! %#0)+!&()$0.O! +0! 5(*()'+(!$**0M'+$M(! $.('%!'*.!
40)C'A1(!%012+$0*%!90)!)('1/40)1.!&)0A1(,%!aWc6!"#(!A(*(9$+%O!'%!4(11!'%!+#(!.(%$5*!&)$*8$&1(%!09!(99(8+$M(!
Proceedings of EDULEARN24 Conference
1st-3rd July 2024, Palma, Mallorca, Spain
ISBN: 978-84-09-62938-1
7778
!
!
(.28'+$0*'1! #'8C'+#0*%O!#'M(! A((*! 4(11! .082,(*+(.!$*! +#(! 1$+()'+2)(!a;cabZc6! _04(M()O! %+2.$(%!
$*M(%+$5'+$*5!+#($)!$,&'8+!0*!+#(!'8'.(,$8!$*+(5)'+$0*!09!2*.()5)'.2'+(!%+2.(*+%!)(,'$*!%8')8(6!!
"#(!82))(*+!&'&()!'..)(%%(%!+#$%!5'&!A3!&)(%(*+$*5!'!,$-(./,(+#0.%!&)(/(-&()$,(*+'1!%+2.3!2%$*5!'!
0*(/5)02&!&)(/+(%+/&0%+/+(%+!.(%$5*!+0! '%%(%%! +#(!0&$*$0*%O!9((1$*5%O!'*.!'++$+2.(%!09!<'8#(10)! =<>8?!
7*90),'+$8%!@*5$*(()$*5!%+2.(*+%!)(5').$*5!+#($)!'8'.(,$8!$*+(5)'+$0*!A(90)(!'*.!'9+()!&')+$8$&'+$*5!$*!
+#(!EF"GH!I0.(!'*.!I0*J2()K!=FII?!#'8C'+#0*6!"#(!'$,!4'%!+0!(-&10)(!A0+#!&')+$8$&'*+%K!(-&()$(*8(%!
09!'8'.(,$8!'.R2%+,(*+!'*.!+#(!0M()'11!$,&'8+!09!+#(!FII!#'8C'+#0*6!f(%21+$*5!&)'8+$8'1!'*.!)(%(')8#!
$,&1$8'+$0*%!90)!+#(!'.0&+$0*!09!(.28'+$0*'1!#'8C'+#0*%!'%!'*!'8'.(,$8!$*+(5)'+$0*!%+)'+(53!A3!#$5#()!
(.28'+$0*!$*%+$+2+$0*%!')(!&0$*+(.!02+6!
2 THE 'UTAD CODE AND CONQUER’ HACKATHON
"#(!FII!#'8C'+#0*!+00C!&1'8(!0*!g0M(,A()!:;thO!:Z:LO!'+!+#(!F*$M()%$+3!09!")h%/0%/i0*+(%!'*.!G1+0!
H02)0!=F"GH?O! 108'+(.! $*!Q$1'!f('1O! N0)+25'16! "#(!(M(*+!8#'11(*5(.!BL!<>8! 7*90),'+$8%! @*5$*(()$*5!
%+2.(*+%!+0! %01M(!'*!'.'&+(.!M()%$0*! 09!+#(!")'M(1$*5/>'1(%,'*!N)0A1(,!=">N?O! '!81'%%$8!'150)$+#,$8!
&)0A1(,!$*!I0,&2+()!>8$(*8(!'*.!\&()'+$0*%!f(%(')8#!abbc6!"#$%!&)0A1(,!+3&$8'113!'%C%!+#(!901104$*5!
J2(%+$0*D!Ej$M(*!'!1$%+!09!8$+$(%!'*.!+#(!.$%+'*8(%!A(+4((*!('8#!&'$)!09!8$+$(%O!4#'+!$%!+#(!%#0)+(%+!&0%%$A1(!
)02+(!+#'+!M$%$+%!('8#!8$+3!(-'8+13!0*8(!'*.!)(+2)*%!+0!+#(!0)$5$*!8$+3kK6!!
"#(!FII!#'8C'+#0*!80,&)$%(.!+#)((!,'$*!%(%%$0*%!=`$52)(!b?D!b?!+#(!C$8C/099O!:?!+#(!5)02&!40)CO!'*.!
L?!+#(!'4').%!8()(,0*36!
!
Figure 1. The UCC hackathon sessions - kick-off, group work, and awards ceremony.
"#(!C$8C/099! %(%%$0*!1'%+(.!LZ! ,$*2+(%!$*!'! %,'11! '2.$+0)$2,O!4#()(! +#(!0)5'*$]$*5!9'821+3! ,(,A()%!
4(180,(.! +#(! &')+$8$&'*+%! '*.! (-&1'$*(.!+#(! )21(%O! 1(')*$*5! 0AR(8+$M(%O! '*.! %+)28+2)(! 09! +#(! (M(*+6!
>2&&0)+$*5!$*90),'+$0*O!$*812.$*5!+#(!">N!%8(*')$0!.(%8)$&+$0*!'*.! (-&(8+(.! .(1$M()'A1(%O! 4'%! ,'.(!
'M'$1'A1(!0*1$*(! M$'! i00.1(! li>6! N')+$8$&'*+%! 4()(! )(J2$)(.! +0! %2A,$+! '! 80.(! 9$1(O! '*! (-(82+'A1(!
&)05)',!5(*()'+$*5!+#(!0&+$,'1!)02+(!90)!+#(!">N!%8(*')$0O!+#)((!+(-+!9$1(%!09!&)08(%%$*5!)(%21+%O!'*.!'!
:/&'5(!)(&0)+!.(+'$1$*5!+#(!'150)$+#,O!80.(!$,&1(,(*+'+$0*O!'*.!0+#()!)(1(M'*+!,(+)$8%6!"#(!8)$+()$'!+0!
A(!2%(.!A3! +#(! R2)3! &'*(1!+0!'%%(%%!+#(! %+2.(*+%K! &)0&0%(.! %012+$0*%O! $*812.$*5! $**0M'+$0*!'*.! 80.(!
J2'1$+3O!4()(!'1%0!&)(%(*+(.6!
7*!+#(! 5)02&! 40)C! %(%%$0*O! %+2.(*+%!40)C(.! +05(+#()!90)!S! #02)%! '*.!LZ! ,$*2+(%! $*!5)02&%!09! +#)((!
(1(,(*+%O!4$+#!'+! 1('%+!0*(!9$)%+/3(')!<>8!%+2.(*+!='! ,'*.'+0)3!(*)011,(*+!80*.$+$0*?O!+0!'..)(%%!'*.!
%01M(! +#(! ">N!%8(*')$06!"4(*+3/0*(! 5)02&%! )(8($M(.!52$.'*8(! '*.!%2&&0)+! 9)0,! M')$02%!+2+0)%! '*.!
(-&()+%O!$*812.$*5!0+#()!<>8O!i>8O!'*.!N#H!%+2.(*+%O!'*.!9'821+3!,(,A()%6!H2)$*5!+#$%!%(%%$0*O!'!LZ/
,$*2+(!8099((!A)('C!4'%!&)0M$.(.!+0!(*802)'5(!%08$'1! $*+()'8+$0*!A(+4((*!+#(!5)02&%!09!&')+$8$&'*+%6!
G+!+#(!(*.!09!+#(!%(%%$0*O!+#(!5)02&%!%2A,$++(.!+#($)!40)CO!'*.!+#(!&')+$8$&'*+%!)(8($M(.!'!dN')+$8$&'+$0*!
^$+d!80*+'$*$*5!%+2.3!,'+()$'1%!=(656O!A'5O!*0+(A00CO!&(*!.)$M(?6!!
"#(!'4').%!8()(,0*3!+00C!&1'8(!+#)((!,0*+#%!'9+()!+#(!FII!#'8C'+#0*!'*.!)(805*$](.!+#(!5)02&%!09!
%+2.(*+%!4$+#!+#(! A(%+! &()90),'*8(!$*! +#(!5)02&! 40)C! %(%%$0*6! <(90)(!+#(! 8()(,0*3O! '!R2)3!&'*(1! 09!
+#)((!9'821+3!,(,A()%!(M'12'+(.!+#(!%2A,$%%$0*%!9)0,!('8#!5)02&O!)(%21+$*5!$*!'!&)(/%(1(8+$0*!09!9$M(!
5)02&%!90)! '!S/,$*2+(!&$+8#!+0!&)(%(*+!+#($)! ">N!%012+$0*%6! `)0,! +#$%! &$+8#O! +#(! +0&! +#)((! 5)02&%! 4()(!
%(1(8+(.!90)!'4').%!$*!+#)((!.$%+$*8+!8'+(50)$(%D!d<(%+!>012+$0*dO!di0%+!@1(5'*+!I0.(dO!'*.!di0%+!\)$5$*'1!
G150)$+#,d6!@'8#!%+2.(*+!$*!('8#!4$**$*5!5)02&!)(8($M(.!'!&()%0*'1$](.!,(.'1!'*.!+)0&#36!
7779
!
!
3 METHODOLOGY
G! ,$-(./,(+#0.%! &)(/(-&()$,(*+'1!%+2.3! 4$+#! '! 0*(/5)02&!&)(/+(%+/&0%+/+(%+! .(%$5*! 4'%! 80*.28+(.!
ab:c6!"#(!)(%(')8#!'$,(.!+0!$*M(%+$5'+(!+#(!$,&'8+!09!+#(!FII!#'8C'+#0*!0*!+#(!'8'.(,$8!$*+(5)'+$0*!
09! &')+$8$&'*+%! A3! (-&10)$*5!+#($)!0&$*$0*%O! 9((1$*5%O! '*.! '++$+2.(%!A(90)(! '*.! '9+()! +#(! (M(*+6! <0+#!
J2'*+$+'+$M(!'*.!J2'1$+'+$M(!.'+'!4()(!8011(8+(.!+0!&)0M$.(!'!,0)(!80,&)(#(*%$M(!2*.()%+'*.$*5!09!+#(!
&#(*0,(*'!2*.()!'*'13%$%6!
3.1 The Academic Experiences Questionnaire reduced version (QVA-r)
P2'*+$+'+$M(!.'+'!4()(!8011(8+(.!A(90)(!'*.!'9+()!+#(!FII!#'8C'+#0*!2%$*5!+#(!)(.28(.!M()%$0*!09!+#(!
G8'.(,$8!@-&()$(*8(%!P2(%+$0**'$)(!=PQG/)m!abLc?6!"#(!PQG/)!$%!'!%(19/)(&0)+!$*%+)2,(*+!4$+#! BZO! S/
&0$*+!l$C()+!%8'1(!$+(,%!=)'*5$*5!9)0,!E7!%+)0*513!.$%'5)((K!+0!E7!%+)0*513!'5)((K?O!.$%+)$A2+(.!'8)0%%!S!C(3!
.$,(*%$0*%!)(1'+(.!+0!%+2.(*+%K!(-&()$(*8(%!09!'8'.(,$8!'.R2%+,(*+!abecD!!
! N()%0*'1!T!$*812.(%!bL!$+(,%!)(1'+(.!+0!+#(!%+2.(*+K%!&#3%$8'1!'*.!&%38#0105$8'1!4(11/A($*5O!80M()$*5!
'%&(8+%!%28#!'%!(,0+$0*'1!A'1'*8(!'*.!%+'A$1$+3O!0&+$,$%,O!.(8$%$0*/,'C$*5O!'*.!%(19/80*9$.(*8(m!!
! 7*+()&()%0*'1!T!$*812.(%!bL! $+(,%! )(1'+(.!+0!+#(!%+2.(*+K%!)(1'+$0*%#$&%!4$+#!8011('52(%!'*.!+0!
+#($)!)(1'+$0*%#$&!%C$11%!$*!,0)(!$*+$,'+(!%$+2'+$0*%O!80M()$*5!'%&(8+%!%28#!'%!,'C$*5!9)$(*.%!'*.!
'%C$*5!90)!#(1&m!
!I02)%(/I')(()!T!$*812.(%! bL! $+(,%! )(1'+(.!+0!+#(! %+2.(*+K%! 802)%(! '++(*.'*8(! '*.! 8')(()!
&)0%&(8+%O! 80M()$*5! '%&(8+%! %28#! '%! %'+$%9'8+$0*! 4$+#! +#(! 802)%(! '*.! &()8(&+$0*%! 09! 802)%(/
)(1'+(.!%C$11%m!
!>+2.3!T!$*812.(%! bL! $+(,%! )(1'+(.!+0! +#(!%+2.(*+d%! %+2.3! #'A$+%! '*.! +$,(! ,'*'5(,(*+O! 80M()$*5!
'%&(8+%!%28#!'%!%+2.3!)02+$*(%O!+$,(!&1'**$*5O!2%(!09!1(')*$*5!)(%02)8(%O!'*.!(-',!&)(&')'+$0*m!'*.!
! 7*%+$+2+$0*'1!T!$*812.(%! W! $+(,%!)(1'+(.!+0! +#(!%+2.(*+d%!'&&)(8$'+$0*! 09!+#(! (.28'+$0*'1!$*%+$+2+$0*!
'++(*.(.O!80M()$*5!'%&(8+%!%28#!'%!9((1$*5%!+04').%!+#(!$*%+$+2+$0*O!.(%$)(!+0!%+'3!0)!,0M(!A(+4((*!
$*%+$+2+$0*%O!'*.!C*041(.5(!'*.!'&&)(8$'+$0*!09!+#(!$*%+$+2+$0*'1!%()M$8(%!'*.!$*9)'%+)28+2)(6!
"#(!PQG/)!'$,%!+0!8'&+2)(!#04!%+2.(*+%!'.'&+!+0!%0,(!09!+#(!,0%+!80,,0*!.(,'*.%!09!'8'.(,$8!1$9(6!
Q'1$.'+$0*!%+2.$(%!09!+#(!PQG/)!#'M(!%#04*!+#'+!+#(!$*%+)2,(*+!#'%!%'+$%9'8+0)3!&%38#0,(+)$8!&)0&()+$(%O!
$*812.$*5!$*+()*'1!80*%$%+(*83!'*.!M'1$.$+3!abec6!"#(!'*'13%$%!09!+#(!PQf/)!.'+'!80*%$%+(.!09!.(%8)$&+$M(!
'*.!$*9()(*+$'1!%+'+$%+$8%!2%$*5!7<i!>N>>!>+'+$%+$8%!:;6Z6Z6Z6!
3.2 Participant observation, document analysis, and semi-structured interviews
P2'1$+'+$M(!.'+'!4()(!8011(8+(.!2%$*5!&')+$8$&'*+!0A%()M'+$0*O!.082,(*+! '*'13%$%O!'*.!%(,$/%+)28+2)(.!
$*+()M$(4%!abSc6!"#(!)(%(')8#!+(',!'%%(%%(.!+#(!%+2.(*+%K!0M()'11!(*5'5(,(*+!'*.!&()90),'*8(!.2)$*5!
+#(!5)02&!40)C!%(%%$0*!+#)025#!$*!1080!0A%()M'+$0*%!'*.!$*90),'1!.$%82%%$0*%6!"#(!$**0M'+$0*!'*.!+#(!
80.(!J2'1$+3!09!('8#!&)0&0%(.!%012+$0*!+0!+#(!">N!%8(*')$0O!'%!'%%(%%(.!A3!+#(!&'*(1!09!R2.5(%O!4()(!
'1%0!80*%$.()(.6!
7*!'..$+$0*O! +#(! %+2.(*+%K!0&$*$0*%O! 9((1$*5%O! '*.!'++$+2.(%! +04').! +#(!FII! #'8C'+#0*!4()(! (-&10)(.!
+#)025#!%#0)+!&0%+/(M(*+!$*+()M$(4%6!"#(%(!S/,$*2+(!$*+()M$(4%!4()(!A'%(.!0*!+#(!901104$*5!0&(*/(*.(.!
J2(%+$0*%D!
!H0! 302! +#$*C! +#'+! +#(! FII! #'8C'+#0*! 4'%! '*! (99(8+$M(! %+)'+(53! +0! $,&)0M(!+#(! '8'.(,$8!
$*+(5)'+$0*!09!%+2.(*+%O!(%&(8$'113!9$)%+/3(')!%+2.(*+%k!!
!H0!302!+#$*C!+#'+!+#(! ">N!%8(*')$0!4'%!$*+()(%+$*5!'*.!#'.!'*!'&&)0&)$'+(!1(M(1!09!.$99$821+3!90)!
+#(!+')5(+(.!'2.$(*8(!09!+#(!FII!#'8C'+#0*k!!
![#'+!4021.!302!$,&)0M(!$*!'!92+2)(!(.$+$0*!09!+#(!FII!#'8C'+#0*k!
G!)'&$.!80*+(*+!'*'13%$%!4'%!8'))$(.!02+!2%$*5!+#(!'2.$0!)(80).$*5%!09!+#(!$*+()M$(4(.!&')+$8$&'*+%!abBc6!
"#(!'2.$0!)(80).$*5%!4()(!80.(.O!'*'13](.O!'*.!+)'*%1'+(.!'880).$*5!+0!+#(!+#)((!&)(/$.(*+$9$(.!+#(,(%!
2%(.!+0!.(%$5*! +#(!$*+()M$(4!J2(%+$0*%D! b?!+#(! $,&'8+! 09!+#(! FII! #'8C'+#0*!0*! %+2.(*+%K!'8'.(,$8!
$*+(5)'+$0*O!:?!+#(!'&&)0&)$'+(*(%%!09!+#(!">N!%8(*')$0!90)!+#(!+')5(+(.!'2.$(*8(O!'*.!L?!%255(%+$0*%!
90)!$,&)0M(,(*+6!!
7780
!
!
3.3 Participants
\9!+#(!B:!%+2.(*+%!4#0!&')+$8$&'+(.!$*!+#(!FII!#'8C'+#0*O!:;!%+2.(*+%!=eB6Wn?!80,&1(+(.!+#(!PQG/)!
A(90)(!'*.!'9+()!+#(!(M(*+6!G,0*5! +#(%(! :;! &')+$8$&'*+%O!:L! =X;6Ln?!4()(! ,'1(O! '*.! B! 4()(! 9(,'1(O!
4$+#! '5(%! )'*5$*5! 9)0,!bW! =Sb6Xn?! +0!::!3(')%6! "#(! ,'R0)$+3! =B;n?! 4()(! 9$)%+/3(')! <>8! 7*90),'+$8%!
@*5$*(()$*5! %+2.(*+%! '+! F"GHO!:e6bn! 4()(! %(80*./3(')O! '*.!B6;n! 4()(! +#$)./3(')6! "4(*+3/+#)((!
&')+$8$&'*+%! =X;6Ln?! 1$M(.! '4'3! 9)0,! +#($)! #0,(+04*O! :b! =X:6en?! )(&0)+(.! +#'+! A0+#! &')(*+%! 4()(!
(,&103(.O!'*.!b;!=BS6Sn?!4()(!1$M$*5!$*!%#')(.!'880,,0.'+$0*!4$+#!0+#()!F"GH!%+2.(*+%6!!
7*! '..$+$0*O! b:! %+2.(*+%! =b;6en?! 9)0,! 902)!09! +#(! 9$M(! &)(/%(1(8+(.! 5)02&%! 90)! +#(! 9$*'1! &$+8#! 4()(!
$*+()M$(4(.6!\9!+#(%(!b:!&')+$8$&'*+%O!bZ!=WL6Ln?!4()(!,'1(O!'*.!:!4()(!9(,'1(O!4$+#!'5(%!A(+4((*!bW!
'*.!:b!3(')%6!"#(!,'R0)$+3!=BB6Xn?!4()(!%(80*./3(')!%+2.(*+%O!4#$1(!+#(!)(,'$*.()!4()(!$*! +#(! 9$)%+!
3(')!09!+#(!<>8!.(5)((6!!
4 RESULTS
H(%8)$&+$M(!'*.!$*9()(*+$'1!%+'+$%+$8%!09!+#(!&)(!'*.!&0%+/PQG/)!%80)(%!')(!9$)%+!&)(%(*+(.6!i('%2)(%!09!
8(*+)'1!+(*.(*83O! .$%&()%$0*O!$*+()*'1!80*%$%+(*83O!,('*!.$99()(*8(%O! '*.!80))(1'+$0*%!A(+4((*!PQG/)!
M')$'A1(%! ')(! (-',$*(.6! >(80*.13O! +#(! )(%21+%! 09! +#(! )'&$.! 80*+(*+! '*'13%$%! 09! +#(! %#0)+O! &0%+/(M(*+!
$*+()M$(4%!')(!'1%0!%2,,')$](.O!+05(+#()!4$+#!+#(!$*!1080!0A%()M'+$0*%!'*.!+#(!R2)3!&'*(1K%!(M'12'+$0*!
09!+#(!%+2.(*+K%!&)0&0%(.!%012+$0*%6!
4.1 Quantitative results
"'A1(! b! &)(%(*+%! +#(! .(%8)$&+$M(! %+'+$%+$8%! 09! +#(! PQG/)! .$,(*%$0*%!',0*5! +#(! &')+$8$&'*+%!=*! V! :;?!
A(90)(!'*.!'9+()!+#(!FII!#'8C'+#0*O!$*812.$*5!8(*+)'1$+3O!.$%&()%$0*O!'*.!$*+()*'1!80*%$%+(*83!,('%2)(%6!
"#(!0M()'11! ,('*!%80)(%!09!+#(!PQG/)!4()(!#$5#()!+#'*!+#(!0M()'11!,('*!09!+#(!$*%+)2,(*+6!"#$%!4'%!
&')+$821')13! 0A%()M(.! $*! +#(! EI02)%(/I')(()K! =-
U!+0+'1! V! e6ZeB?O! E7*%+$+2+$0*'1K! =-
U!+0+'1! V! L6;L;?O! '*.!
E7*+()&()%0*'1K! =-
U!+0+'1! V! L6WSb?! .$,(*%$0*%O! 4#$8#! #'.!#$5#()! ,('*! %80)(%! 4#(*! 80,&')(.! +0! +#(!
E>+2.3K!=-
U!+0+'1!V!L6SW:?!'*.!EN()%0*'1K!=-
U!+0+'1!V!L6eXW?!.$,(*%$0*%6!
Table 1. Centrality, dispersion, and internal consistency measures
of the QVA-r dimensions before and after the UCC hackathon.
Min.
Max.
Mean (x
*)
Std. Deviation (σ)
Cronbach’s Alpha (α)
Personal_Pre
2.077
4.846
3.552
.695
.828
Personal_Post
2.231
4.846
3.403
.803
.858
Interpersonal_Pre
3.000
4.923
3.851
.564
.820
Interpersonal_Post
2.923
5.000
3.851
.604
.817
Course-Career_Pre
2.308
5.000
4.032
.700
.819
Course-Career_Post
2.231
5.000
4.061
.652
.803
Study_Pre
2.154
5.000
3.533
.623
.803
Study_Post
2.538
4.846
3.631
.674
.801
Institutional_Pre
2.500
4.750
3.892
.556
.831
Institutional_Post
3.000
4.875
3.987
.580
.827
G!%1$5#+!$*8)('%(!4'%!0A%()M(.!A(+4((*!+#(!+0+'1!,('*!%80)(%!09!+#(!PQG/)!A(90)(!=-
U!+0+'1!V!L6SW:?!'*.!
'9+()!+#(!(M(*+!=-
U!+0+'1!V!L6XWX?6!@-8(&+!90)!+#(! EN()%0*'1K!.$,(*%$0*O!+#(!,('*!%80)(%!09!'11!+#(!0+#()!
PQG/)!.$,(*%$0*%!4()(!(J2'1!'*.o0)!A(++()!$*!+#(!&0%+/+(%+6!"#(!0M()'11!M')$'A$1$+3!A(+4((*!.'+'!&0$*+%!
9)0,!+#(!,('*!%80)(!4'%!,0.()'+(!=p!+0+'1!V!6Se:?O!'*.!+#(! 0M()'11!$*+()*'1!80*%$%+(*83!09!+#(!PQG/)!
.$,(*%$0*%!4'%!#$5#!=q!+0+'1!V!6WLX?6!
[#(*! 100C$*5!'+! +#(!,('*! %80)(%! 09!PQG/)! A3! 5(*.()O!3(')!09! %+2.3O! '*.!&1'8(! 09! )(%$.(*8(O!%1$5#+!
.$99()(*8(%!4()(! 902*.6!`(,'1(!%+2.(*+%!=-
U!+0+'1!V!L6;S;?!%80)(.!#$5#()!+#'*!,'1(!%+2.(*+%!=-
U!+0+'1!V!
L6X;b?O!'*.!%(80*./3(')!%+2.(*+%!=-
U!+0+'1!V!L6;;e?!%80)(.!#$5#()! +#'*! 9$)%+/3(')! =-
U!+0+'1!V!L6We;?!'*.!
+#$)./3(')!%+2.(*+%!=-
U!+0+'1!V!L6BWZ?6!>$,$1')13O!%+2.(*+%!1$M$*5!02+%$.(!+#($)!#0,(+04*!=-
U!+0+'1!V!L6WB;?!
%80)(.!%1$5#+13!#$5#()!+#'*!%+2.(*+%!1$M$*5!$*!+#($)!#0,(+04*!=-
U!+0+'1!V!L6Wbe?6!
7781
!
!
"#(! *0),'1$+3! 09! ('8#! PQG/)! .$,(*%$0*!4'%! '%%(%%(.! 2%$*5! +#(! >#'&$)0/[$1C! +(%+! =*!r!LZ?O! 4#$8#!
)(M('1(.! +#'+! 0*13! +#(! E7*%+$+2+$0*'1K! .$,(*%$0*! %$5*$9$8'*+13! .(M$'+(.! 9)0,! '! *0),'1! .$%+)$A2+$0*! =&! r!
Z6ZSZ?6!"#()(90)(O!&')',(+)$8!+(%+%!4()(!2%(.!90)!%2A%(J2(*+!$*9()(*+$'1!'*'13%$%O!(-8(&+!90)!+#$%!PQG/
)!.$,(*%$0*6! "#(! N'$)(.! %',&1(!+/+(%+!4'%!2%(.!+0!80,&')(!+#(!,('*!.$99()(*8(%! 09! +#(!($5#+! PQG/)!
.$,(*%$0*%!4$+#!*0),'1!.$%+)$A2+$0*%!A(+4((*!+#(!&)(!'*.!&0%+/+(%+! ="'A1(!:?6!\*!+#(!0+#()!#'*.O!+#(!
[$180-0*!%$5*(.!)'*C!+(%+!4'%!'&&1$(.!+0!80,&')(!+#(!,(.$'*!.$99()(*8(%!09!+#(!E7*%+$+2+$0*'1K!.$,(*%$0*!
A(90)(!'*.!'9+()!+#(!(M(*+!="'A1(!L?6!
Table 2. Paired sample test of the QVA-r dimensions
with normal distribution before and after the UCC hackathon.
Mean
Std. Deviation (σ)
t
One-Sided p
Pair 1
Personal_Pre - Personal_Post
.149
.682
1.174
.125
Pair 2
Interpersonal_Pre - Interpersonal_Post
.000
.439
.000
.500
Pair 3
Course-Career_Pre Course-Career_Post
-.029
.476
-.330
.372
Pair 4
Study_Pre - Study_Post
-.098
.385
-1.374
.090
Table 3. Wilcoxon signed rank test of the QVA-r dimension
without normal distribution before and after the UCC hackathon.
Null Hypothesis
Test
Sig. a,b
Decision
The median of differences between
Institutional_Pre and Institutional_Pos equals 0.
Related-Samples Wilcoxon
Signed Rank Test
.101
Retain the null
hypothesis.
The significance level is .050.
Asymptotic significance is displayed.
H(%&$+(!+#(!.$99()(*8(%!0A%()M(.!$*!,('*!%80)(%!'8)0%%!+#(!PQG/)!.$,(*%$0*%!A(+4((*!+#(!&)(!'*.!&0%+/
+(%+!="'A1(!b?O!+#(%(!4()(!*0+!%+'+$%+$8'113!%$5*$9$8'*+!="'A1(!:!'*.!"'A1(!Lm!&!Y!Z6ZSZ?6!\M()'11O!&')+$8$&'*+%!
%#04(.! 80*%$%+(*+! 1(M(1%! 09! '5)((,(*+! '8)0%%! '11! +#(! PQG/)! .$,(*%$0*%! A(90)(! '*.! '9+()! +#(! FII!
#'8C'+#0*6!"#()(90)(O!+#(%(!)(%21+%!%255(%+!+#(!FII!#'8C'+#0*!.$.!*0+!%$5*$9$8'*+13!'99(8+!+#(!%+2.(*+K%!
&()8(&+$0*%!09!+#($)!(-&()$(*8(%!09!'8'.(,$8!'.R2%+,(*+!'%!,('%2)(.!A3!+#(!PQG/)!$*%+)2,(*+6!
H$99()(*+! &0%$+$M(! 80))(1'+$0*%! 4()(! 902*.! A(+4((*! %0,(! 09! +#(! PQG/)! .$,(*%$0*%!4$+#! '! *0),'1!
.$%+)$A2+$0*!="'A1(!e?6!>+)0*5!&0%$+$M(!80))(1'+$0*%!4()(!902*.!$*!+#(!&)(/+(%+!%80)(%!A(+4((*!+#(!E>+2.3K!
'*.!+#(!EI02)%(/I')(()K!.$,(*%$0*%!=&!V!Z6ZZW?6!i0.()'+(!&0%$+$M(!80))(1'+$0*%!4()(!'1%0!0A%()M(.!$*!
+#(!&)(/+(%+!%80)(%O!+#$%!+$,(!A(+4((*!+#(!E>+2.3K!'*.!+#(!EN()%0*'1K!=&!V!Z6ZbW?O!'*.!A(+4((*!+#(!E>+2.3K!
'*.!+#(!E7*+()&()%0*'1K!=&!V!Z6ZLB?!.$,(*%$0*%6!!
Table 4. Correlations between the QVA-r dimensions with
normal distribution before and after the UCC hackathon.
Personal
_Pre
Interpersona
l_Pre
Course-
Career_Pre
Study_Pre
Personal_Po
st
Interpersona
l_Post
Course-
Career_Post
Study_Post
Personal_Pre
Pearson Correlation
1
.309
.270
.436*
.594**
.184
.223
.502**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.102
.156
.018
<.001
.339
.246
.006
Interpersonal_Pre
Pearson Correlation
.309
1
.344
.391*
.040
.720**
.272
.348
Sig. (2-tailed)
.102
.068
.036
.837
<.001
.153
.064
Course-Career_Pre
Pearson Correlation
.270
.344
1
.481**
-.059
.328
.754**
.397*
Sig. (2-tailed)
.156
.068
.008
.761
.083
<.001
.033
Study_Pre
Pearson Correlation
.436*
.391*
.481**
1
.256
.515**
.657**
.827**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.018
.036
.008
.179
.004
<.001
<.001
7782
!
!
Personal_Post
Pearson Correlation
.594**
.040
-.059
.256
1
.128
.183
.355
Sig. (2-tailed)
<.001
.837
.761
.179
.508
.343
.059
Interpersonal_Post
Pearson Correlation
.184
.720**
.328
.515**
.128
1
.406*
.570**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.339
<.001
.083
.004
.508
.029
.001
Course-
Career_Post
Pearson Correlation
.223
.272
.754**
.657**
.183
.406*
1
.544**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.246
.153
<.001
<.001
.343
.029
.002
Study_Post
Pearson Correlation
.502**
.348
.397*
.827**
.355
.570**
.544**
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.006
.064
.033
<.001
.059
.001
.002
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
>$,$1')13O! %+)0*5! &0%$+$M(! 80))(1'+$0*%! 4()(! 902*.! $*! +#(! &0%+/+(%+! %80)(%! A(+4((*! +#(! E>+2.3K! '*.! +#(!
E7*+()&()%0*'1K!=&! V!Z6ZZb?O!A(+4((*! +#(! E>+2.3K!'*.! +#(!EI02)%(/I')(()K!=&! r! Z6ZZb?O!'*.! A(+4((*!+#(!
E>+2.3K!'*.!+#(!EN()%0*'1K!=&!V!Z6ZZB?!.$,(*%$0*%6!i0.()'+(!&0%$+$M(!80))(1'+$0*%!4()(!'1%0!0A%()M(.!$*!
+#(!&0%+/+(%+!%80)(%O!+#$%!+$,(!A(+4((*!+#(!E7*+()&()%0*'1K!'*.!+#(!EI02)%(/I')(()K!.$,(*%$0*%!=&!V!Z6Z:;?6!!
[#(*!'*'13]$*5!+#(!80))(1'+$0*!A(+4((*!+#(!PQG/)!M')$'A1(%!+#'+!.(M$'+(.!9)0,!'!*0),'1!.$%+)$A2+$0*!="'A1(!
S?O!'! %+)0*5! &0%$+$M(!80))(1'+$0*!4'%!902*.!A(+4((*!+#(! E7*%+$+2+$0*'1K!'*.! +#(! EI02)%(/I')(()K!.$,(*%$0*%O!
A0+#!'+!+#(!&)(/+(%+!=&! V!Z6ZZ:?!'*.!&0%+/+(%+!=&! r! Z6ZZb?6!7*! '..$+$0*O!,0.()'+(!&0%$+$M(!80))(1'+$0*%!4()(!
'1%0! 902*.! A(+4((*! +#(! &)(/+(%+! %80)(%! 09! +#(! E7*%+$+2+$0*'1K! '*.! +#(! E>+2.3K! .$,(*%$0*%! =&! V! Z6Z:L?O! '*.!
A(+4((*!+#(!&0%+/+(%+!%80)(%!09!+#(!E7*%+$+2+$0*'1K!'*.!+#(!E7*+()&()%0*'1K!.$,(*%$0*%!=&!V!Z6Z:L?6!!
Table 5. Correlations between the QVA-r dimensions
without normal distribution before and after the UCC hackathon.
Gender
Year of
Study
Place of
Residence
Institutional_
Pre
Institutional_
Post
Spearman’s
rho
Personal_Pre
Correlation Coefficient
.092
-.163
.112
.072
-.028
Sig. (2-tailed)
.636
.398
.562
.711
.886
Interpersonal_Pre
Correlation Coefficient
-.357
-.030
.066
.333
.489**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.057
.877
.732
.078
.007
Course-Career_Pre
Correlation Coefficient
-.331
.230
.234
.554**
.471**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.079
.230
.221
.002
.010
Study_Pre
Correlation Coefficient
-.271
.048
.153
.421*
.256
Sig. (2-tailed)
.156
.805
.428
.023
.180
Institutional_Pre
Correlation Coefficient
-.245
-.060
.199
1
.722**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.200
.756
.300
<.001
Personal_Post
Correlation Coefficient
.122
.097
-.229
-.165
-.072
Sig. (2-tailed)
.528
.616
.232
.392
.711
Interpersonal_Post
Correlation Coefficient
-.173
.157
-.168
.149
.422*
Sig. (2-tailed)
.368
.415
.383
.439
.023
Course-Career_Post
Correlation Coefficient
-.225
.136
.153
.614**
.651**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.242
.483
.428
<.001
<.001
Study_Post
Correlation Coefficient
-.061
-.036
-.102
.400*
.310
Sig. (2-tailed)
.753
.855
.599
.032
.102
Institutional_Post
Correlation Coefficient
-.174
.054
.031
.722**
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.367
.783
.874
<.001
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
7783
!
!
_04(M()O!4#(*!100C$*5!90)!80))(1'+$0*%!A(+4((*!%+2.(*+!8#')'8+()$%+$8%!=5(*.()O!3(')!09!%+2.3O!'*.!&1'8(!
09! )(%$.(*8(?! '*.! +#(! PQG/)! .$,(*%$0*%O!*0! %$5*$9$8'*+! )(%21+%! 4()(! 902*.6! G1+#025#! +#(! PQG/)! ,('*!
%80)(%!09!9(,'1(O!%(80*./3(')!%+2.(*+%!1$M$*5!02+%$.(!+#($)!#0,(+04*!4()(!#$5#()!+#'*!+#0%(!09!,'1(O!9$)%+!
0)!+#$)./3(')!%+2.(*+%!1$M$*5!$*!+#($)!#0,(+04*O!+#(%(!4()(!*0+!%+'+$%+$8'113!80))(1'+(.!=&!Y!Z6ZSZ?6!!
4.2 Qualitative results
"#(! )(%21+%! 9)0,! +#(! )'&$.! 80*+(*+! '*'13%$%! 09! +#(! %(,$/%+)28+2)(.! $*+()M$(4%! ')(! %2,,')$](.6! "#(!
0&$*$0*%O!9((1$*5%O!'*.!'++$+2.(%!%#')(.!A3!+#(!&')+$8$&'+$*5!5)02&%!09!%+2.(*+%!&)(/%(1(8+(.!90)!+#(!9$*'1!
&$+8#!4()(! 80*%$%+(*+! '8)0%%! +#(! +#)((! +#(,(%! '*'13](.D! b?! +#(! $,&'8+! 09! +#(! FII! #'8C'+#0*! 0*!
%+2.(*+%K!'8'.(,$8!$*+(5)'+$0*O!:?!+#(!'&&)0&)$'+(*(%%!09!+#(!">N!%8(*')$0!90)!+#(!+')5(+(.!'2.$(*8(O!
'*.!L?!%255(%+$0*%!90)!$,&)0M(,(*+6!!
f(5').$*5! +#(! $,&'8+! 09! +#(! FII! #'8C'+#0*! 0*! +#(! '8'.(,$8! $*+(5)'+$0*! 09! %+2.(*+%O! +#()(! 4'%! '!
5(*()'1! '5)((,(*+! ',0*5! '11! %+2.(*+! 5)02&%! +#'+! +#(! (M(*+! #'.! '! &0%$+$M(! $,&'8+! 0*! $+6! "#$%! 4'%!
A(*(9$8$'1!(%&(8$'113!90)!+#(!9$)%+/3(')! %+2.(*+%O! .2(! +0! +#(! &)'8+$8'1! '*.! %08$'1! *'+2)(! 09! +#(! (M(*+O! '%!
(-&)(%%(.!A3!+#(!901104$*5!&')+$8$&'*+%D!
I personally liked it. It was a very good initiative by UTAD, we had a great time! Especially
for the first-year students, because it was compulsory to have one in each group. He (the
first-year student) learned something with us (…) sometimes he wanted to do it one way,
but we guided him to do it another way because of the next steps that we had to do, and
he understood.’ (Participant_1_group_2)
This event is interesting to integrate new students because it gives them a more practical
perspective. In the first year, students have more theoretical classes, and this allows them
to put the knowledge they are learning into practice, by applying it to a real-world problem.’
(Participant_2_group_1)
‘I (a first-year student) found it interesting because it was the first time I put into practice
what I was learning in class. I understood what I could do and what this course allowed me
to do. It was nice to work with older colleagues who have more knowledge than me.’
(Participant_3_group_4)
The hackathon was also socially important because it gives you a moment to know and
relate to people from the different academic years of our degree. They (the first-year
students) can ask for help for other classes, and this strengthens the relationships. I was
happy with this event, and I highly recommend it to all the students. We finally had an event
related to what we can do with our degree (usually the events are not so related). If there
is another edition, I will attend!’ (Participant_1_group_3)
7*!)(1'+$0*!+0!+#(!'&&)0&)$'+(*(%%!09!+#(!">N!%8(*')$0!90)!+#(!+')5(+(.!'2.$(*8(O!+#()(!4'%!'1%0!'!5(*()'1!
'5)((,(*+!',0*5!%+2.(*+!5)02&%!+#'+!+#(!">N!%8(*')$0!4'%!.$99$821+6!7+!4'%!&')+$821')13!.$99$821+!90)!+#(!
9$)%+/3(')! %+2.(*+%O! .2(! +0! +#(! (-$%+$*5! C*041(.5(! 5'&! A(+4((*! +#(,! '*.! +#(! %(80*.! 0)! +#$)./3(')!
%+2.(*+%O!'%!(-&)(%%(.!A3!+#(!901104$*5!&')+$8$&'*+%D!
We (second-year students) think that the problem should be easier if it is only aimed at the
first-year students. In terms of critical thinking level, he (the first-year student) had the same
thoughts and ideas as us; but in terms of code, we decided to code in C++, and he did not
have any background in that.’ (Participant_2_group_2)
‘We (second-year students) coded in Python, but our first-year student only knows a little
bit of C. He still does not know anything about discrete mathematics, so even the TSP
scenario was difficult.’ (Participant_1_group_4)
I (a first-year student) found the first phase, the algorithm, particularly interesting. But then
I got a bit lost when we started programming in Python.’ (Participant_3_group_4)
‘I (a third-year student) found the challenge easy. We work with this type of algorithm (TSP)
in our discrete mathematics classes, so we had a general idea of how it works. The first-
year student was a little bit lost because he did not know what to do so maybe it was a
bit difficult for him (he only knows C programming and we coded in Python).’
(Participant_2_group_3)
"#025#!&0%$+$M(!'++$+2.(%! +04').%!+#(!FII!#'8C'+#0*! 4()(!(-&)(%%(.!A3!+#(!0M()'11!%+2.(*+%O!%0,(!
%255(%+$0*%!90)!$,&)0M(,(*+!4()(!,'.(!)(5').$*5!+#(!">N!%8(*')$0D!
7784
!
!
It was our first time at an event like this and we think that more editions need to be
organized shortly! The time was sufficient and appropriate. We confronted our solutions
with other groups, and we wanted to improve them. It was a kind of competition between
the groups.’ (Participant_3_group_3)
‘We liked the way it was organized the kick-off session, the group work, the coffee break.
In general, I really liked it! In terms of technical knowledge, it is a bit difficult for first-year
students (but adequate for older ones). It will work better in the second semester.’
(Participant_3_group_1)
For a first edition, it was very well organized, and it was interesting! The duration was OK.
If we had more time, it might not have been so productive. We were already a little bit tired
because we were the last to finish.’ (Participant_2_group_4)
It should be about something that the first-year students do in their classes because they
did not have enough knowledge to solve it. The level of difficulty should be lower. But it is
a good option for the second and third-year students.(Participant_1_group_4)
"#(!)(%21+%!#()($*!&)(%(*+(.!4()(!'1%0!80*%$%+(*+!4$+#!+#(!$*!1080!0A%()M'+$0*%!,'.(!.2)$*5!+#(!(M(*+!
'*.!4$+#!+#(!R2.5(K%!'%%(%%,(*+!09!+#(!%+2.(*+K%!&)0&0%(.!%012+$0*%!+0!+#(!"N>!%8(*')$0!$*!$**0M'+$0*!
'*.!80.(!J2'1$+36!"#(!5(*()'1!(*+#2%$'%,!'*.!&0%$+$M(!'++$+2.(!+04').%!+#(!(M(*+!4()(!0A%()M(.!.2)$*5!
+#(!5)02&! 40)C!%(%%$0*O!4#()(!,0%+!%+2.(*+!5)02&%!09!%+2.(*+%!4()(!'8+$M(13!(*5'5(.!2*+$1!+#(!(*.O!
'9+()!S!#02)%!'*.!LZ!,$*2+(%6!"#(!1(M(1!09!.$99$821+3!09!+#(!">N!%8(*')$0!4'%!'1%0!)(91(8+(.!$*!+#(!*2,A()!
09! 5)02&%! +#'+! 4()(! &)(/%(1(8+(.! A3! +#(! R2)3! &'*(1! 90)! +#(! 9$*'1! &$+8#D! 0*13! 9$M(! 5)02&%! %2A,$++(.! '*!
'&&)0&)$'+(!80.(/A'%(.!%012+$0*!+0!+#(!">N!%8(*')$06!G11!+#(%(!9$M(! 5)02&%!80*%$%+(.!09!0*(!9$)%+/3(')!
%+2.(*+!'*.!+40!%+2.(*+%!9)0,!+#(!%(80*.!'*.o0)!+#$).!'8'.(,$8!3(')!09!+#(!<>8!.(5)((!$*!7*90),'+$8%!
@*5$*(()$*5!'+!F"GH6!
5 CONCLUSIONS
"#(!9$*.$*5%!09!+#$%!%+2.3!&)0M$.(!M'12'A1(!$*%$5#+%!$*+0!+#(!$,&'8+!09!+#(!FII!#'8C'+#0*!0*!%+2.(*+%K!
'8'.(,$8! $*+(5)'+$0*6! <'%(.! 0*! +#(!J2'*+$+'+$M(! '*.! J2'1$+'+$M(! .'+'! '*'13%$%O! +#(! FII! #'8C'+#0*!
(,()5(.!'%! '!%$5*$9$8'*+!80*+)$A2+0)!+0!90%+()$*5!'8'.(,$8!$*+(5)'+$0*!',0*5!&')+$8$&'*+%O!&')+$821')13!
90)!9$)%+/3(')!%+2.(*+%O!A3!&)0M$.$*5!'!&1'+90),!90)!+#(!&)'8+$8'1!'&&1$8'+$0*!09!+#(0)(+$8'1!C*041(.5(!'*.!
+#(!9'8$1$+'+$0*!09!%08$'1!$*+()'8+$0*!'8)0%%!'8'.(,$8!80#0)+%6!"#$%!#$5#1$5#+%!+#(!$,&0)+'*8(!09!$*90),'1!
'*.!8011'A0)'+$M(!1(')*$*5!(*M$)0*,(*+%!$*!(*#'*8$*5!%+2.(*+%K!(*5'5(,(*+!'*.!%(*%(!09!A(10*5$*5!+0!
'*!$*%+$+2+$0*O!+#()(A3!80*+)$A2+$*5!+0!%,00+#()!+)'*%$+$0*%!A(+4((*!%(80*.')3!'*.!#$5#()!(.28'+$0*!aLcaec6!
P2'*+$+'+$M(! )(%21+%O! $*812.$*5! .(%8)$&+$M(!'*.! $*9()(*+$'1!%+'+$%+$8%! 09!+#(! &)(!'*.! &0%+/PQG/)!%80)(%O!
&)0M$.(.!'*!0M()M$(4!09!#04!%+2.(*+%!4()(!'.'&+$*5!+0!'8'.(,$8!1$9(!'8)0%%!.$99()(*+!.$,(*%$0*%6!_$5#!
,('*! %80)(%! 4()(! 0A%()M(.! $*! +#(! EI02)%(/I')(()KO! +#(! E7*%+$+2+$0*'1KO! '*.! +#(! E7*+()&()%0*'1K!
.$,(*%$0*%O!&1'8$*5!+#(,!'+!+#(!8(*+()!09!%+2.(*+%K!'8'.(,$8!'.R2%+,(*+6!_04(M()O!.(%&$+(!+#(!#$5#()!
PQG/)! ,('*! %80)(%! '9+()! +#(! FII! #'8C'+#0*O! +#(%(! .$99()(*8(%! 4()(! *0+! %+'+$%+$8'113! %$5*$9$8'*+O!
%255(%+$*5!80*%$%+(*83!$*!%+2.(*+%d!&()8(&+$0*%!A(90)(!'*.! '9+()! +#(! (M(*+6!`2)+#(),0)(O!80))(1'+$0*%!
A(+4((*! PQG/)! $*+()*'1! .$,(*%$0*%! %255(%+! %0,(!$*+()&1'3! A(+4((*! M')$02%! '%&(8+%!09! %+2.(*+!
'8'.(,$8!'.R2%+,(*+O!A2+!92)+#()!)(%(')8#!$%!%+$11!*((.(.6!
P2'1$+'+$M(!)(%21+%!9)0,!+#(!)'&$.!80*+(*+!'*'13%$%!09! &0%+/(M(*+! $*+()M$(4%! #$5#1$5#+(.!+#(!)01(! 09! +#(!
FII!#'8C'+#0*!$*!&)0M$.$*5!+#(!0&&0)+2*$+3!90)!9$)%+/3(')!%+2.(*+%!+0!8011'A0)'+(!4$+#!,0)(!(-&()$(*8(.!
&(()%!'*.!5'$*!&)'8+$8'1!$*%$5#+%!$*+0!+#($)!9$(1.!09!%+2.36!_04(M()O!8#'11(*5(%!)(1'+(.!+0!+#(!80,&1(-$+3!
09!+#(!">N!%8(*')$0!4()(!(M$.(*+6!"#()(90)(O!+#(!+'$10)$*5!09!(.28'+$0*'1!(M(*+%!1$C(!#'8C'+#0*%!+0!,((+!
+#(!.$M()%(!*((.%O!C*041(.5(O!'*.!%C$11%!09! %+2.(*+%!%#021.!A(!80*%$.()(.!+0!(*#'*8(!$*812%$M$+3!'*.!
&)0,0+(!5)('+()!&')+$8$&'+$0*!'8)0%%!'8'.(,$8!80#0)+%O!'%!%255(%+(.!A3!a;c!'*.!abZc6!`2+2)(!)(%(')8#!
$%!*((.(.!+0!(-&10)(!'1+()*'+$M(!'%%(%%,(*+!,(+#0.%! '.'&+(.!+0!%+2.(*+%d!A'8C5)02*.%O!4#$8#!8021.!
$*812.(!+#(!.(M(10&,(*+!09!'.'&+'A1(!+'%C%!4$+#!.$%+$*8+!1(M(1%!09!.$99$821+36!
H(%&$+(! +#(%(! 9$*.$*5%O! $+! $%! $,&0)+'*+!+0! '8C*041(.5(!+#(! 1$,$+'+$0*%! 09! +#(! %+2.3!$*! +(),%! 09!
5(*()'1$]'A$1$+3!'*.!)0A2%+*(%%6! "#(! 5(*.()!$,A'1'*8(!'*.!+#(!.$%+)$A2+$0*!09! &')+$8$&'*+%! '8)0%%! '5(!
'*.! '8'.(,$8! 3(')! )'$%(! 80*8()*%! 'A02+! +#(!%',&1(! )(&)(%(*+'+$M(*(%%6! 7*! '..$+$0*O! +#(! 1$,$+(.!
J2'1$+'+$M(!.'+'!9)0,!+#(!$*+()M$(4(.!&')+$8$&'*+%!%(1(8+(.!90)!+#(!9$*'1!&$+8#!,'3!$,&'8+!+#(!.(&+#!'*.!
A)('.+#! 09! $*%$5#+%! 51('*(.! 9)0,! +#$%!%+2.36! `2+2)(! )(%(')8#! %#021.! '..)(%%! +#(%(! 1$,$+'+$0*%! A3!
(,&103$*5! 0+#()! )(%(')8#! .(%$5*%O! 4$+#! .$M()%(! '*.! )(&)(%(*+'+$M(! %',&1(%O! +#2%! (*%2)$*5! ,0)(!
7785
!
!
80,&)(#(*%$M(!.'+'!0*!%+2.(*+!0&$*$0*%O!9((1$*5%O!'*.!'++$+2.(%!+04').%!(.28'+$0*'1!#'8C'+#0*%O!+#($)!
'8'.(,$8!$*+(5)'+$0*O!'*.!'.R2%+,(*+6!
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
"#$%!40)C!4'%!8'))$(.!02+!'%!&')+!09!s>FI@>>\tF"GHsO!80/92*.(.!A3!+#(!_2,'*!I'&$+'1!\&()'+$0*'1!
N)05)',!=N\I_?O!N)0R(8+!g06!N\I_/Z:/SL7:/`>@/ZZZZe;O!+#)025#!+#(!@2)0&('*!>08$'1!`2*.!=@>`?6!
[(!4021.! 1$C(!+0!+#'*C!'11!+#(!%+2.(*+%!4#0!&')+$8$&'+(.!$*! +#(!FII!#'8C'+#0*6![(!4021.!'1%0!1$C(!+0!
+#'*C! '11! +#(! R2.5(%! 4#0!(M'12'+(.! +#(! ">N! %012+$0*%! %2A,$++(.! A3!+#(! %+2.(*+%O! '*.! '11! +#(! 9'821+3!
,(,A()%O!<>8O!i>8O!'*.!N#H!%+2.(*+%!$*M01M(.!4$+#!+#(!0)5'*$]'+$0*!09!+#(!FII!#'8C'+#0*!'+!F"GH6!!
REFERENCES
abc!i6!_6!I1')CO!>6!I6!i$..1(+0*O!H6!g523(*O!'*.!l6!^6!u4$8CO!si(.$'+$*5!f(1'+$0*%#$&%!A(+4((*!
G8'.(,$8!i0+$M'+$0*O!G8'.(,$8!7*+(5)'+$0*!'*.!G8'.(,$8!N()90),'*8(Os!Learning and Individual
DifferencesO!M016!LLO!&&6!LZ/LWO!:Zbe6!!
a:c! Q6!"$*+0O!vH)0&02+!9)0,!_$5#()!@.28'+$0*D!G!"#(0)(+$8'1!>3*+#(%$%!09!f(8(*+!f(%(')8#Ow!Review
of Educational ResearchO!M016!eSO!*06!bO!&&6!W;Tb:SO!b;XS6!
aLc!@6!^3*.+O!Q6!H0*8#(O!^6!")$54(11O!'*.!>6!l$*.A10,/x1y**(O!Higher Education Transitions: Theory
and Research6!l0*.0*D!f02+1(.5(O!:ZbX6!!
aec!i6!>8#*($.()O!'*.!`6!N)(8C(1O!sQ')$'A1(%!'%%08$'+(.!4$+#!'8#$(M(,(*+!$*!#$5#()!(.28'+$0*D!G!
%3%+(,'+$8!)(M$(4!09!,(+'/'*'13%(%Os!Psychological BulletinO!M016!beLO!*06!BO!&&6!SBS/BZZO!:ZbX6!
aSc!_6!>8#'(&()O!s"#(!9$)%+!3(')!$*!#$5#()!(.28'+$0*D!+#(!)01(!09!$*.$M$.2'1!9'8+0)%!'*.!+#(!1(')*$*5!
(*M$)0*,(*+!90)!'8'.(,$8!$*+(5)'+$0*Os!Higher EducationO!M016!X;O!&&6!;S/bbZO!:Z:Z6!
aBc!I6!f(**$8CO!j6!l$+%+()O!I6!I6![6!_211%O!'*.!G6!_2)%+O!sI2))$821')!_'8C'+#0*%!90)!@*5$*(()$*5!
H(%$5*!l(')*$*5D!"#(!I'%(!09!@*5$*(()$*5!H(%$5*!H'3%Os!IEEE Transactions on EducationO!M016!
BBO!*06!BO!&&6!BSe/BBeO!:Z:L6!
aXc!^6!j','O!<6!G1(*8')O!`6!I'1(5')$0O!G6!g(M(%O!'*.!N6!G1(%%$06!sG!#'8C'+#0*!,(+#0.01053!90)!
2*.()5)'.2'+(!802)%(!&)0R(8+%6s!7*!2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)O!&&6!b/;6!
7@@@O!:ZbW6!
aWc!i6!<6!j')8$'O!v_'8C'+#0*%!'%!(-+)'82))$821')!'8+$M$+$(%D!F*)'M(1$*5!+#(!,0+$M'+$0*'1!0)$(*+'+$0*!
A(#$*.!%+2.(*+!&')+$8$&'+$0*Ow!Computer Applications in Engineering EducationO!M016!LZO!*06!BO!&&6!
b;ZL/b;bWO!:Z::6!
a;c!I6!['114(3O!i6!i6!l0*5,($()O!H6!_'3.(O!z6!G),%+)0*5O!f6!^'R9(]O!'*.!f6!N(1'*O!vI0*%$.()!
v_GI^>w!4#(*!.(%$5*$*5!#'8C'+#0*!8#'11(*5(%D!_00CO!'8+$0*O!8011'A0)'+$M(!C*041(.5(!%#')$*5Ow!
Frontiers in EducationO!M016!XO!&6!;SeZeeO!:Z::6!
abZc!<6!_(11()O!G6!G,$)O!f6!['-,'*O!'*.!x6!i'')'M$O!v_'8C!302)!0)5'*$]'+$0*'1!$**0M'+$0*D!1$+()'+2)(!
)(M$(4!'*.!$*+(5)'+$M(!,0.(1!90)!)2**$*5!#'8C'+#0*%Ow!Journal of Innovation and
EntrepreneurshipO!M016!b:O!*06!BO!&&6!b/:eO!:Z:L6!
abbc!i6!i6!`100.O!v"#(!+)'M(1$*5/%'1(%,'*!&)0A1(,Ow!Operations ResearchO!M016!eO!*06!bO!&&6!Bb/XSO!b;SB6!
ab:c!H6!"6!I',&A(11!'*.!z6!I6!>+'*1(3O!Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research6!
<0%+0*O!iGD!_025#+0*!i$991$*!I0,&'*3O!b;BL6!
abLc!l6!>6!G1,($.'O!z6!G6!j6!`())($)'O!'*.!G6!N6!>0')(%O!vP2(%+$0*h)$0!.(!M$M{*8$'%!'8'.|,$8'%D!
80*%+)2}~0!(!M'1$.'}~0!.(!2,'!M()%~0!)(.2]$.'!=PQG/)?Ow!Revista Portuguesa de PedagogiaO!M016!
LLO!*06!LO!&&6!bWb/:ZXO!b;;;6!!!
abec!l6!>6!G1,($.'O!G6!N6!I6!>0')(%O!'*.!z6!G6!`())($)'O!vP2(%+$0*h)$0!.(!Q$M{*8$'%!G8'.{,$8'%!=PQG/
)?D!GM'1$'}~0!.0!'R2%+',(*+0!.0%!(%+2.'*+(%!2*$M()%$+h)$0%Ow!Avaliação PsicológicaO!M016!bO!*06!:O!
&&6!Wb/;LO!:Z::6!
abSc!z6![6!I)(%4(11!'*.!I6!g6!N0+#O!Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design - Choosing Among Five
Approaches6!"#02%'*.!\'C%O!IGD!>'5(O!:ZbW6!
7786
!
!
abBc!z6![6!g('1O!u6!N6!g('1O!@6!Q'*H3C(O!'*.!i6!^0)*A12#O!v@-&(.$+$*5!+#(!'*'13%$%!09!J2'1$+'+$M(!.'+'!
$*!(M'12'+$0*D!G!&)08(.2)(!90)!+#(!)'&$.!$.(*+$9$8'+$0*!09!+#(,(%!9)0,!'2.$0!)(80).$*5%!=f7"G?Ow!
American Journal of EvaluationO!M016!LBO!*06!bO!&&6!bbW/bL:O!:ZbS6!
7787
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Contribution: This article defines “curricular hackathons” and describes the features, challenges, and opportunities of adopting the hackathon format into engineering curricula. It is based on experience implementing a series of curricular hackathons which provide students with formative design experiences as they address ill-structured and integrative design problems. Background: Design is an essential part of engineering practice. However, undergraduate engineering students are provided few opportunities to develop the skills necessary for solving ill-structured and complex design problems prior to their final year capstone projects. Cornerstone projects and other summative activities are common attempts to introduce students to design, but often carry significant academic weight in the host course. Adapting the hackathon format into curricular elements could provide a useful pedagogy for formative design practice. Research Question: How can the hackathon format be effectively adapted into curricular activities? Methodology: The study uses a multiple case study research design to extract insight from 12 implementations of curricular hackathons in engineering at the University of Waterloo. The twelve cases were analyzed through two methods: 1) a synthesis of eight previous publications and 2) an interview study of 12 instructors involved in their design and implementation. Findings: Adapting the popular hackathon format to a curricular setting requires several adaptations to maximize the impact on students. Curricular hackathons: are a short, high intensity social experience; that guide students through the design-build-test cycle of a design problem, include opportunities for reflection; and achieve some level of integration and/or embedding in a program’s curriculum.
Article
Full-text available
This article aims to offer a comprehensive overview of the existing literature on the hackathon phenomenon to offer scholars a common ground for future research and managers and practitioners research-based guidelines on best planning and running a hackathon. A review of the most relevant literature on hackathons was conducted to serve as the research basis for our integrative model and guidelines. This article synthesizes the research on hackathons to offer comprehensible guidelines for practitioners while also providing questions for future hackathon researchers. We differentiate between the different design characteristics of hackathons while noting their advantages and disadvantages, discuss tools and methodologies for successful hackathon setup and execution step-by-step, and provide recommendations to encourage project continuity.
Article
Full-text available
Our world’s complex challenges increase the need for those entering STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Math) disciplines to be able to creatively approach and collaboratively address wicked problems – complex problems with no “right” answer that span disciplines. Hackathons are environments that leverage problem-based learning practices so student teams can solve problems creatively and collaboratively by developing a solution to given challenges using engineering and computer science knowledge, skills, and abilities. The purpose of this paper is to offer a framework for interdisciplinary hackathon challenge development, as well as provide resources to aid interdisciplinary teams in better understanding the context and needs of a hackathon to evaluate and refine hackathon challenges. Three cohorts of interdisciplinary STEAM researchers were observed and interviewed as they collaboratively created a hackathon challenge incorporating all cohort-member disciplines for an online high school hackathon. The observation data and interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis to distill the processes cohorts underwent and resources that were necessary for successfully creating a hackathon challenge. Through this research we found that the cohorts worked through four sequential stages as they collaborated to create a hackathon challenge. We detail the stages and offer them as a framework for future teams who seek to develop an interdisciplinary hackathon challenge. Additionally, we found that all cohorts lacked the knowledge and experience with hackathons to make fully informed decisions related to the challenge’s topic, scope, outcomes, etc. In response, this manuscript offers five hackathon quality considerations and three guiding principles for challenge developers to best meet the needs and goals of hackathon sponsors and participants.
Article
Full-text available
The education sector is constantly progressing its competency paradigm by establishing a nexus between practical, theoretical, and technical dimensions of teaching and learning. In the modern age of education, hackathons are becoming increasingly prominent in providing an optimal academic environment that connects classroom learnings to real‐life scenarios. This study explored the motivational orientation behind student participation in hackathons through the framework provided by self‐determination theory. Specifically, it investigated the role of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations in encouraging initial and continuous hackathon participation. The partial least squares‐structural equation modeling method was used to analyze data collected from 437 students in 12 countries. According to the findings, although intrinsic motivation influences participation intention, extrinsic motivation drives continuance participation. When intrinsic and extrinsic motivational constructs were analyzed individually, it was found that continuance participation demands both motivational orientations. Comparisons of demographic characteristics indicate that older students with more extensive educational experience may have higher intentions to participate and continue participating in these events. This study offers insights into how the education sector can increase hackathon participation by tapping on students’ motivational orientation. From a methodological point of view, it is apparent to recommend the promotion of hackathons as a core extracurricular activity at a school level, and more indispensably, as pedagogy at a classroom level. In a world where students are encouraged to fail early, fast, and often, participating in hackathons is a tactical preparation for eventual success.
Article
Full-text available
The transition to higher education and the initial phase of studying play a crucial role in future educational decisions and academic development. To successfully manage this transition, a certain degree of integration into the new environment is required. For this reason, and drawing on the conceptual framework of Tinto’s model of student departure, the study examines academic integration as an important first-year experience. Going beyond Tinto’s approach and most of the previous research, both individual and contextual factors were analysed by estimating multilevel structural equation models. Data were taken from a panel study of new entrants to higher education institutions in Germany (N = 10,697), which is part of the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS). The results corroborate previous findings and confirm the importance of psychological attributes like self-esteem and conscientiousness. They also provide evidence that a cognitively activating learning environment enhances academic integration considerably. However, direct instruction was found to negatively affect academic integration. The study concludes with a discussion of limitations and implications for practice and future research.
Article
Full-text available
The last two decades witnessed a surge in empirical studies on the variables associated with achievement in higher education. A number of meta-analyses synthesized these findings. In our systematic literature review, we included 38 meta-analyses investigating 105 correlates of achievement, based on 3,330 effect sizes from almost 2 million students. We provide a list of the 105 variables, ordered by the effect size, and summary statistics for central research topics. The results highlight the close relation between social interaction in courses and achievement. Achievement is also strongly associated with the stimulation of meaningful learning by presenting information in a clear way, relating it to the students, and using conceptually demanding learning tasks. Instruction and communication technology has comparably weak effect sizes, which did not increase over time. Strong moderator effects are found for almost all instructional methods, indicating that how a method is implemented in detail strongly affects achievement. Teachers with high-achieving students invest time and effort in designing the microstructure of their courses, establish clear learning goals, and employ feedback practices. This emphasizes the importance of teacher training in higher education. Students with high achievement are characterized by high self-efficacy, high prior achievement and intelligence, conscientiousness, and the goal-directed use of learning strategies. Barring the paucity of controlled experiments and the lack of meta-analyses on recent educational innovations, the variables associated with achievement in higher education are generally well investigated and well understood. By using these findings, teachers, university administrators, and policymakers can increase the effectivity of higher education.
Article
Full-text available
The underachievement and dropouts of students in higher education reach preoccupying levels in most developed countries. Therefore, it's important to know their causes and to implement the measures, above all preventive ones, that can reduce the cost individual, familiar and institutional of such situations. This paper presents the construction and procedures of validation of reduced version of Questionário de Vivências Acadêmicas (QVA, Almeida & Ferreira, 1997). The substantial reduction of the number of items in the abbreviated version of the scale (QVA-r; Almeida, Ferreira & Soares, 2001), tries to overcome the inherent difficulties to the administration of an integral version of the questionnaire, formed by 170 items distributed by 17 subscales. This abbreviated version of QVA is formed by 60 items distributed by five dimensions of students´ adaptation: personal, interpersonal, vocational, study-learning, and institutional. Results show adequate psychometric characteristics on internal consistency and validity.