Two populations of Corbicula fluminea were found in the Iberian Península; one in Spain and the other in Portugal. A detailed description in terms of ecology shell morphology and microstructure, morphometrics and anatomy is given for the Spanish population from the Mino River. Lectotypes for Tellina fluminea and T. fluminalis, and a neotype for T. fluviatilis are designated and illustrated. Distribuüon and spread of C. fluminea in Europe are revised. Comparisons among some European populations and the populations from Cantón, China, and the Mino River are made. Results suggest that, except for one doubtful population, all records of Corbicula in Europe are attributable to C. fluminea. Corbicula taxonomy begins in 1774 with Müller who described three species in the genus Tellina Linne, 1758: T. fluminalis "in fluvio Asiae Euphrat"; T. fluminea "in arena fluviali Chinae"; T. fluviatilis "in ilumine emporium Can tón Chinae praeterlabente". Since then, many living species of Corbicula Mühlfeldt, 1811, have been described in freshwater and estuarine habitáis from Southeast Asia, the Indian subcontinent, the Pacific islands, and the easternmost part of Europe and África (McMahon, 1983). The fossil record of Corbicula includes Europe, North América and Japan (see Linstow, 1922; Zhadin, 1952; Ellis, 1978; and Britton and Morton, 1979 for a review). The first published record of Corbicula in North América is that of Burch (1944) in 1938. Counts (1981, 1985) cites the presence of the species in 1924 and 1937 in Nanaimo, Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canadá, and in Ray-mond, Pacific County, Washington, respectively. Since then, it spread widely in most lotic and lentic habitáis, being a pest with very important economic and ecological effects (Sinclair and Isom, 1963; McMahon, 1983). Many papers have been published with records of new localities and biological data using different species ñames, mainly C. fluminea, C. manilensis and C. leana (McMahon, 1983 and references therein). Several hypotheses about the importance of the role of human activities in the spread of Corbicula have been treated (e.g. Thompson and Sparks, 1977; McMahon, 1982). The wide geographical and ecological range of Cor bicula seems to be related to the great variation in shell form and colour. These two features are the most common tax-onomic characters and the only ones used by the early conchologists, suggesting that Corbicula taxonomy probably involves more species ñames than needed. Thus, Talavera and Faustino (1933) {In: Britton and Morton, 1979) placed Corbicula manilensis (Philippi, 1844) into synonymy with C. fluminea, Morton (1977) considered C. leana to be a júnior synonym of C. fluminea, while C. fluviatilis was previously placed into synonymy with C. fluminea by Prashad (1929). Moreover, a thorough review by Britton and Morton (1979) lead the authors to consider that most Asiatic species previously described could be attributed to two taxa: the freshwater species C. fluminea (Müller, 1774) and the estuarine species C. fluminalis (Müller, 1774). Studying North American populations of Corbicula on the basis of ecology, functional morphology and reproduc-tive biology, Britton and Morton (1979) concluded that all belonged to the single species, C. fluminea. The results of this paper, and the conclusions of Morton (1982), seem to provide a good discrimination between C. fluminea and C. fluminalis. In the last decade, Corbicula was also introduced into South América (Ituarte, 1981) and Europe. Mouthon (1981) reports the presence of C. fluminalis in France (La Dordogne) and in Portugal (Tajo River estuary). Nagel (1989) cites the species from the Duero River near Oporto (Portugal) and Girardi (1989-1990) indicates the occurrence of C. fluminalis also in France at the Canal du Midi at Grisolles (Tarn and Garonne). We found two Corbicula populations in the Iberian Península, one in Spain and the other in Portugal, apparent-ly corresponding to C. fluminea. These facts suggest that, as occurred in North América, Europe is being currently invaded by this bivalve and that species discrimination is probably not as clear as previously thought (Morton, 1982), because it still seems to allow the use of various species ñames for morphological variants of the same species concept.