Really? I asked the editors. You really want me to review Susan McClary right after she reviewed me in these very pages? You’re willing to risk the sort of spectacle in which, say, Joseph Kerman and Charles Rosen hand the palm back and forth in The New York Review of Each Other’s Books? Don’t you know that is how one loses one’s clout?
Oh yes, we’ll risk it, they replied, and I am glad. What Susan handed me was not exactly a palm, although there were fronds amid the brambles. And as the editors evidently expected, what I am about to hand back will not exactly be a palm either, although I do intend it as a token of admiration. It is no secret that Susan and I are old acquaintances—old friends, even—united in what I trust are resilient bonds of affection. Those bonds have never constrained our free exchange of often critical opinion; and as long as she has made hers public in a decidedly mixed review of my Oxford History of Western Music, I am happy to follow suit now that she has been honoured by Ashgate with a collection of reissued essays called Reading Music1—one in a series, Ashgate Contemporary Thinkers on Critical Musicology, that also includes volumes devoted to the writings of Lawrence Kramer, Gary Tomlinson, Simon Frith, and Nicholas Cook—and also with a Festschrift called Musicological Identities (2008),2 assembled and edited by Raymond Knapp, her UCLA colleague, and her former pupils Steven Baur and Jacqueline Warwick. This pair of tributes invites a comprehensive stocktaking of McClary’s achievement and impact.
But first, a harsh complaint: The words ‘honoured’ and ‘tributes’ above really belong in scare quotes, so cheesy is Ashgate’s presentation, especially of the retrospective collection, photographically reproduced from the original publications so that it amounts to a measly course reader between hard covers at a grotesquely inflated price. Redundancies (in one case a two-page block incorporating three citations from sources) are unpruned; typefaces and editorial policies clash; ‘rarefied’ is spelled correctly in one piece, as ‘rarified’ in another. Endnotes are a special disgrace, with fragments of unincluded items negligently reproduced (couldn’t they at least have been covered up when xeroxing?). Most infuriating of all, the penultimate essay in the collection, corresponding to the opening chapter of McClary’s most recent book, the prize-winning Modal Subjectivities: Self-Fashioning in the Italian Madrigal (Berkeley, 2004), consists in the main of a very close modal and tropological analysis of Ah, dolente partita from Monteverdi’s Fourth Book of madrigals. The original publication, by the University of California Press, carried the full score as a most necessary appendix. The score is absent from the reprint, rendering futile any attempt to follow the dissection. I really don’t understand why McClary accepted such insulting terms. By now MacArthured, Kinkeldeyed, and Festschrifted, she could have proposed this collection to practically any academic house—yes, even now—as a prestige publication, and could have expected an elegant, newly redacted presentation in a uniform style. She has earned it. If she submitted to Ashgate’s mistreatment for the sake of solidarity with her fellows in their series, it was a gallant but unwarranted sacrifice. She has ascended to a stature far above theirs.
She has done this by dint of the sheer multifariousness of her output and influence, something that must inspire wonder in any observer. Surely McClary has broken all records for musicological versatility. In Reading Music (the title chosen, I presume, to emphasize her conspicuous role in the resurgence of musical hermeneutics that was the signal musicological event of the 1980s) she has selected and arranged the contents in four groups: ‘Interpretation and Polemics’, ‘Gender and Sexuality’, ‘Popular Music’, and ‘Early Music’. The first is devoted to her notorious early publications: calculatedly strident demands, dating between 1983 and 1993, that music be re-correlated with the history of ideas, but on a new footing that reflected not amiable nineteenth-century Geistesgeschichte but contentious twentieth-century cultural studies. Beginning with her very first article, ‘Pitches, Expression, Ideology: An Exercise in Mediation’, a piece (included, as the...