ArticlePDF Available

Linguistic Diversity and Public Servants’ Turnover Intentions: Theory and Analysis From a Multilingual State

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Although approximately a quarter of the world's countries are officially bilingual or multilingual, the relationship between linguistic diversity and human resource management has largely been overlooked. This article advances research by theoretically considering, and empirically investigating, whether public servants' ability to use their official language of choice at work is related to their turnover intentions, and whether this relationship is moderated by one's linguistic minority status. Analysis of survey data from Canada's full-time permanent public service shows a statistically significant and substantive relationship between public servants' ability to use their official language of choice at work and their internal and external turnover intentions. Moreover, the results from various hierarchical sequential multivariate models, which build-up to control for employees' personal characteristics and work environment, suggest that the relationship language of use has with turnover intention is important regardless of whether one is a linguistic minority or a linguistic majority.
Content may be subject to copyright.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Enhancing racial justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion are the core values of public administration and critical to the functions of public-sector strategic human resources management. However, very limited empirical research has delved into the interracial differences in public sector employees’ turnover intentions and its mitigating factors. Using the 2006–2017 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey data, the present study aims to contribute toward filling this gap in the literature. The theoretical arguments and empirical findings of this study show that when compared with White employees, Federal Black, Indigenous, and Employees of Color (BIEOC) are significantly more likely to intend to leave their current organizations. However, the likelihood of turnover intentions of Federal employees, particularly, BIEOC can be reduced through institutional interventions anchored in pro-diversity management (e.g., commitment to fostering a racially representative workforce), distributive justice in employment outcomes (e.g., in pay and promotions) and procedural justice in organizational processes (e.g., anti-discrimination practices).
Article
Full-text available
The Phoenix pay system has been mired by an unending string of problems negatively affecting hundreds of thousands of bureaucrats and costing billions of dollars to fix. This article studies whether Phoenix’s negative consequences might also be weakening a core component of good governance: a permanent public service. Using data from the 2017 Public Service Employee Survey, this article finds that the greater the problems an employee has endured from Phoenix, the more likely they are to intend to quit the public service. Signifying a potential loss of future talent for the federal public service, this relationship is particularly pronounced among younger and more educated public servants. Le système de paye Phénix est enlisé dans une interminable série de problèmes nuisant à des centaines de milliers de bureaucrates et coûtant des milliards de dollars à résoudre. Cet article explore si les conséquences négatives de Phénix pourraient également affaiblir une composante essentielle de la bonne gouvernance : un service public permanent. À partir des données du Sondage auprès des fonctionnaires fédéraux de 2017, nous démontrons dans cet article que plus les problèmes qu'un employé a endurés avec Phénix sont importants, plus il est susceptible de quitter la fonction publique. Cet état de fait étant particulièrement marqué chez les fonctionnaires plus jeunes et plus éduqués, Phénix pourrait mener à une perte de futurs talents pour la fonction publique fédérale.
Article
Full-text available
People with disabilities have experienced a long history of prejudice and disenfranchisement. Negative attitudes and stigmas continue to act as barriers to employment and career success of individuals with disabilities. However, diversity and inclusion of people with disabilities is an under-researched area in public administration. This study contributes to the literature by examining the turnover intentions of federal employees with disabilities as compared to employees without disabilities. In addition, this study investigates the moderating effects of inclusive organizational practices (i.e., organizational fairness, empowerment, openness, supportiveness, and cooperativeness) in lowering the turnover intentions of federal employees, and particularly, for employees with disabilities. Findings of this study indicate, as compared to employees without disabilities, the odds of demonstrating an intention to leave their current organization are significantly higher for employees with disabilities. While other inclusion practices did not have the expected effects, organizational fairness was found to be a key factor mitigating the negative relationship between employee’s disability status and turnover intentions.
Article
In the past fifty years, a notable body of literature has called into question the utility of statistical significance testing, as well as the deference granted it by quantitative researchers in the social sciences. While much of this literature has emerged from fields on the periphery of public administration (i.e. economics and psychology), recent evidence has suggested that PA scholars may also be over-reliant on significance testing in the conduct of quantitative research. Although significance testing is perceived by many as lending scientific credence to empirical analyses, critics have argued that it is not a sufficient means of generating actionable knowledge or informing public sector decision-making. This article reviews common misconceptions about significance testing and assesses current practices in the public administration literature. The use and application of significance testing in two of the field's leading academic journals is reviewed, and recommendations for enhancing the quality and impact of PA's quantitative research are offered.
Article
Despite the growing literature that examines the determinants of turnover intention in the public sector, little effort has been made to systematize the findings from this scholarship. To address this research gap, this study conducts the first meta‐analysis of the literature on turnover intention among public sector employees. The meta‐analysis includes 249 effect sizes from 59 studies concerning the relationship between individual demographic variables, work environment characteristics, job characteristics, HRM practices, work motivation and work attitudes, and factors related to the external environment and turnover intention. It finds that predictors related to public employees’ job involvement, job exhaustion, job satisfaction, role ambiguity, affective organizational commitment, and participation in decision making are among the strongest predictors of turnover intention. In contrast, individual demographics predictors show small or negligible effects on turnover intention. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Article
This article investigates the effect of ministerial rotations on legislative output. We leverage a novel dataset on “significant” legislation in Lebanon, defined as those texts that introduce changes in the legislative environment and are potentially relevant for legal appeals. We associate the legislative output of nine key ministries in all governments between 2005 and 2020 to 72 ministerial changes in this period. We find that rotation decreases the output of significant legislation by almost a fourth of average productivity—or more than 0.75 texts—per ministry and term, a result that is robust to various model specifications and fixed effects. Leveraging 35 expert interviews with senior government officials and (ex‐)ministers, we provide a theory in which rotations give rise to “memory losses” within ministries depending on the strategies of political parties to penetrate institutions with loyalists. Our findings have important implications for priorities to reform public administrations.
Article
P-values are important to assert the relevance of findings. They should be reported in statistical studies. Although presented differently, they rely on the same sufficient statistics as confidence intervals, and they provide more information. They are a necessary, but not sufficient, condition to communicating practical significance. Effect size, or magnitude analysis, is missing in current Public Administration studies and should be at the core of ensuing discussions. Practitioners should indeed be able to know if the effects on the dependent variable are important in magnitude, but also if they can be acted upon through a cause-to-effect relationship. As we have yet to fight the old battle of p-values, Public Administrationists might be repeating the same errors that led psychologists and economists to delay their use of sound experimental designs instead of reported results from underpowered studies. In other words, the methodological turn that we should discuss and (we hope) embrace is the combined use of proper identification strategies and larger sample sizes.
Article
en For about twenty years, Public Administration scholars have used the data from the Public Service Employee Survey (PSES) for their research. Two studies evaluated the uses of data, measurement models and internal validity of the U.S. government’s Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS), and none on the use of PSES data. The article reviews studies that used Canadian PSES data to promote social science research and seeks to stimulate discussion of PSES's future and opportunities for strategic human resources research in Canada. [The table most useful for researchers is available here in English: Table 3. Aggregation of PSES Elements Assigned to Theoretical Constructs.] Sommaire fr Pendant près de vingt ans, les chercheurs en gestion publique ont utilisé les données du Sondage auprès des fonctionnaires fédéraux (SAFF) pour leur travail de recherche. Deux études ont procédé à l’évaluation de l’utilisation des données, des modèles de mesure et de la qualité des mesures du Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS) du gouvernement fédéral américain, sans tenir compte des données du SAFF. Cet article analyse les études qui ont utilisé les données du SAFF canadien afin de promouvoir la recherche en sciences sociales, et tente d'encourager la discussion sur l'avenir du SAFF et son potentiel pour la recherche en matière de gestion stratégique des ressources humaines au Canada.
Article
This study examines how the determinants of job satisfaction and turnover intention are different across employee’s career stages, using a large-scale data set from U.S. federal agencies. A comprehensive examination of career stage differences provides a sophisticated understanding of the multifaceted nature of job satisfaction and turnover intention factors. The trajectory of career stage differences is linear, and the impact of career stages is rather minimal when it comes to the determinants of job satisfaction, whereas the differences in terms of turnover intention were more drastic and salient. Also, the patterns of career stage effect were more complicated than proposed in the existing studies. The implications of these findings are explored for future research and practitioners.