PreprintPDF Available

Exploring Consumer Trust in Supply Chain Certifications and Its Impact on Marketing Effectiveness

Authors:
Samuel Holloway
Samuel Holloway
Samuel Holloway
  • This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.
Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet.
Download file PDF
Read file
Download citation

Abstract and Figures

Consumer trust in supply chain certifications plays a pivotal role in shaping contemporary consumer behavior and marketing effectiveness. This qualitative research investigates consumer perceptions of supply chain certifications and their impact on purchasing decisions and brand loyalty. Through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with 30 participants, the study explores themes such as credibility, transparency, perceived value, and the influence of certifications on consumer trust. Findings reveal that consumers value certifications that signal ethical sourcing practices and sustainability commitments, viewing them as assurances of product quality and social responsibility. Credibility and transparency in certification processes emerged as critical factors influencing consumer trust, while perceived benefits such as environmental sustainability and fair labor practices positively influenced purchase intentions. Moreover, certifications were found to enhance brand loyalty by aligning with consumers' ethical values and beliefs. However, the study identifies challenges including high certification costs, complexity in compliance, and consumer skepticism, which hinder broader adoption and effectiveness of certifications. The implications of these findings suggest that businesses can enhance consumer trust and market competitiveness by investing in rigorous certification standards, clear communication strategies, and sustainable practices. Addressing barriers through improved transparency and consumer education is crucial for maximizing the impact of certifications on ethical consumption. Future research directions include longitudinal studies on certification impacts and comparative analyses across industries and global markets to further enrich understanding of consumer behavior and certification influences.
Figures - available via license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Content may be subject to copyright.
Available via license: CC BY
Content may be subject to copyright.
Article Not peer-reviewed version
Exploring Consumer Trust in Supply
Chain Certifications and Its Impact on
Marketing Effectiveness
Samuel Holloway *
Posted Date: 20 June 2024
doi: 10.20944/preprints202406.1393.v1
Keywords: consumer trust; supply chain certifications; ethical consumption; sustainability; branding;
marketing effectiveness
Preprints.org is a free multidiscipline platform providing preprint service that
is dedicated to making early versions of research outputs permanently
available and citable. Preprints posted at Preprints.org appear in Web of
Science, Crossref, Google Scholar, Scilit, Europe PMC.
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons
Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Article
ExploringConsumerTrustinSupplyChain
CertificationsandItsImpactonMarketing
Effectiveness
SamuelHolloway
KelloggSchoolofManagement;Email:samuelholloway989@gmail.com
Abstract:Consumertrustinsupplychaincertificationsplaysapivotalroleinshapingcontemporary
consumerbehaviorandmarketingeffectiveness.Thisqualitativeresearchinvestigatesconsumer
perceptionsofsupplychaincertificationsandtheirimpactonpurchasingdecisionsandbrand
loyalty.Throughsemi‐structuredinterviewsandfocusgroupdiscussionswith30participants,the
studyexploresthemessuchascredibility,transparency,perceivedvalue,andtheinfluenceof
certificationsonconsumertrust.Findingsrevealthatconsumersvaluecertificationsthatsignal
ethicalsourcingpracticesandsustainabilitycommitments,viewingthemasassurancesofproduct
qualityandsocialresponsibility.Credibilityandtransparencyincertificationprocessesemergedas
criticalfactorsinfluencingconsumertrust,whileperceivedbenefitssuchasenvironmental
sustainabilityandfairlaborpracticespositivelyinfluencedpurchaseintentions.Moreover,
certificationswerefoundtoenhancebrandloyaltybyaligningwithconsumers’ethicalvaluesand
beliefs.However,thestudyidentifieschallengesincludinghighcertificationcosts,complexityin
compliance,andconsumerskepticism,whichhinderbroaderadoptionandeffectivenessof
certifications.Theimplicationsofthesefindingssuggestthatbusinessescanenhanceconsumertrust
andmarketcompetitivenessbyinvestinginrigorouscertificationstandards,clearcommunication
strategies,andsustainablepractices.Addressingbarriersthroughimprovedtransparencyand
consumereducationiscrucialformaximizingtheimpactofcertificationsonethicalconsumption.
Futureresearchdirectionsincludelongitudinalstudiesoncertificationimpactsandcomparative
analysesacrossindustriesandglobalmarketstofurtherenrichunderstandingofconsumerbehavior
andcertificationinfluences.
Keywords:consumertrust;supplychaincertifications;ethicalconsumption;sustainability;
branding;marketingeffectiveness
1.Introduction
Inthecontemporarymarketplace,theissueofconsumertrustinsupplychaincertificationshas
garneredsignificantattentionamongresearchers,practitioners,andpolicymakersalike.Supplychain
certifications,suchasFairTrade,Organic,andResponsibleSourcing,haveemergedaspivotal
mechanismsthroughwhichcompaniescommunicatetheircommitmenttoethicalpracticesand
sustainabilitytoconsumers(Reed&Freeman,2020;Stevenson&Pirog,2021).Thesecertifications
servenotonlyasqualityassurancemarksbutalsoaspowerfultoolsforfosteringconsumertrust
(Dickson&Eckman,2006;Rezaietal.,2018).Theimportanceofconsumertrustincertificationsstems
fromitsprofoundimpactonconsumerbehaviorandbusinessoutcomes.Consumerstodayaremore
informedandconscientiousabouttheproductstheypurchase,seekingassurancethattheir
consumptionchoicesalignwiththeirpersonalvaluesandethicalstandards(Bhattacharya&Sen,
2003;Pargueletal.,2011).Trustinsupplychaincertificationsactsasamediatorbetweenconsumer
skepticismandpurchaseintention,facilitatingthedecision‐makingprocessbymitigatingperceived
risksassociatedwithproductquality,environmentalimpact,andsocialresponsibility(Griskevicius
etal.,2010;Bhattacharyaetal.,2008).Furthermore,theroleofsupplychaincertificationsextends
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions, and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and
contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting
from any ideas, methods, instructions, or products referred to in the content.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 20 June 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202406.1393.v1
© 2024 by the author(s). Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY license.
2
beyondmereconsumerassurance.Thesecertificationshavebecomeintegralcomponentsof
companies’marketingstrategies,influencingbrandreputation,marketpositioning,andcompetitive
advantage(Simmonsetal.,2010;Vachon&Klassen,2008).Assuch,understandingthedynamicsof
consumertrustinsupplychaincertificationsanditsimplicationsformarketingeffectivenessis
crucialforbusinessesseekingsustainablegrowthandmarketleadership(Luchs&Mooradian,2012;
Rahmanetal.,2015).Theevolutionofsupplychaincertificationsreflectsbroadersocietalshifts
towardssustainabilityandcorporatesocialresponsibility(CSR).Thesecertificationssignala
departurefromtraditionalprofit‐centricbusinessmodelstowardsmoreholisticapproachesthat
encompassenvironmentalstewardship,socialequity,andethicalgovernance(Waddock&Graves,
1997;Mena&Palazzo,2012).Byadheringtorigorousstandardsandundergoingcertification
processes,companiesaimnotonlytocomplywithregulatoryrequirementsbutalsotoalignwith
consumerexpectationsandsocietalvalues(Delmas&Burbano,2011;Preuss,2009).However,the
effectivenessofsupplychaincertificationsinbuildingconsumertrustandenhancingmarketing
outcomesiscontingentuponseveralfactors.Firstandforemost,thecredibilityandtransparencyof
certificationprocessesplayapivotalroleinshapingconsumerperceptions(Bauman&Skitka,2012;
Casado‐Varaetal.,2020).Consumersareincreasinglyscrutinizingthelegitimacyofcertifications,
demandingrobustevidenceofcompliancewithethicalstandardsandsustainablepractices(Egri&
Herman,2000;Hatanakaetal.,2005).Moreover,theheterogeneityofconsumerpreferencesand
socio‐culturalcontextsnecessitatesanuancedunderstandingofhowdifferentdemographic
segmentsperceiveandrespondtosupplychaincertifications(Loureiro&Lotade,2005;Sirieixetal.,
2013).Factorssuchasage,education,incomelevel,andgeographiclocationinfluencetheextentto
whichconsumersprioritizeethicalconsiderationsintheirpurchasingdecisions(Carrigan&Attalla,
2001;Vermeir&Verbeke,2006).Therefore,effectivecommunicationstrategiesthatresonatewith
diverseconsumersegmentsareessentialformaximizingtheimpactofsupplychaincertificationson
marketingeffectiveness(Elgetal.,2011;Pujarietal.,2009).Inrecentyears,advancementsin
technologyanddigitalcommunicationhavefurthertransformedthelandscapeofconsumertrust
andmarketingdynamics.Socialmediaplatforms,onlinereviews,andpeer‐to‐peerrecommendations
haveempoweredconsumerswithunprecedentedaccesstoinformationandreal‐timeinsightsinto
companies’ethicalpractices(Lamberton&Stephen,2016;Sunetal.,2020).Consequently,companies
mustnavigatethedigitalrealmstrategically,leveragingdigitalmarketingchannelstoamplifythe
credibilityandvisibilityoftheirsupplychaincertifications(Kim&Ferguson,2018;Yangetal.,2021).
Toaddressthesemultifacetedissues,thisqualitativeresearchseekstodelvedeeperintotheintricate
interplaybetweenconsumertrustinsupplychaincertificationsanditsimpactonmarketing
effectiveness.Byadoptingaqualitativeapproach,thisstudyaimstocapturetherichnessand
complexityofconsumerperceptions,attitudes,andbehaviorstowardssupplychaincertifications
acrossdifferentindustriesandgeographicregions.Throughin‐depthinterviewsandfocusgroup
discussions,thisresearchintendstouncoverunderlyingmotivations,concerns,anddecision‐making
processesthatshapeconsumertrustandinfluencepurchasingbehaviorsinthecontextofsupply
chaincertifications.Furthermore,thisresearchendeavorseekstocontributetotheoretical
advancementsinconsumerbehaviorandmarketingstrategybyexploringthemechanismsthrough
whichsupplychaincertificationstranslateintotangiblemarketingoutcomes.Byidentifyingkey
driversofconsumertrustandeffectivecommunicationstrategies,thisstudyaimstoofferpractical
insightsandrecommendationsforbusinessesstrivingtoenhancetheirbrandreputation,market
positioning,andcompetitiveadvantagethroughcrediblesupplychaincertifications.
2.LiteratureReview
Consumertrustinsupplychaincertificationsrepresentsacriticalaspectofcontemporary
consumerbehaviorandmarketingstrategy.SupplychaincertificationssuchasFairTrade,Organic,
andResponsibleSourcinghavegainedprominenceasmechanismstoassureconsumersofethical
sourcingpracticesandsustainabilitycommitments(Stevenson&Pirog,2021;Simmonsetal.,2010).
Thesecertificationsservenotonlyasqualitymarkersbutalsoassymbolsofcorporateresponsibility,
addressinggrowingconsumerconcernsaboutenvironmentalimpact,socialequity,andethical
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 20 June 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202406.1393.v1
3
governance(Mena&Palazzo,2012;Vachon&Klassen,2008).Theconceptofconsumertrustin
certificationsisrootedinthebroaderliteratureoncorporatesocialresponsibility(CSR)andethical
consumption.Studieshighlightthatconsumersincreasinglyviewcertificationsassignalsofa
company’scommitmenttoethicalpracticesandsocialresponsibility(Bhattacharya&Sen,2003;
Dickson&Eckman,2006).Thisperceptioninfluencesconsumerbehaviorbyreducingperceivedrisks
associatedwithproductquality,environmentalharm,andlaborconditions(Mohr&Webb,2005;
Griskeviciusetal.,2010).Moreover,theeffectivenessofsupplychaincertificationsinbuilding
consumertrustandenhancingmarketingoutcomeshingesonseveralfactors.Credibilityand
transparencyincertificationprocessesarecrucialdeterminantsofconsumertrustworthiness
perceptions(Bauman&Skitka,2012;Casado‐Varaetal.,2020).Consumersscrutinizetherigorand
integrityofcertificationstandards,seekingassurancethatcertifiedproductsindeedmeetspecified
ethicalandsustainabilitycriteria(Hatanakaetal.,2005;Delmas&Burbano,2011).Recentresearch
underscoresthedynamicnatureofconsumertrustincertificationswithinthecontextofdigitaland
socialmediaenvironments.Digitalplatformsamplifyconsumerscrutinyandenablerapid
disseminationofinformationaboutcompanies’ethicalpractices(Lamberton&Stephen,2016;Sunet
al.,2020).Onlinereviews,socialmediadiscussions,andpeerrecommendationsplaypivotalrolesin
shapingconsumerperceptionsandinfluencingpurchasingdecisionsrelatedtocertifiedproducts
(Kim&Ferguson,2018;Rahmanetal.,2024).Inexploringthenuancesofconsumertrustinsupply
chaincertifications,researchershaveidentifieddiverseconsumersegmentswithvaryingdegreesof
awarenessandengagement.Demographicfactorssuchasage,incomelevel,andeducational
backgroundinfluenceconsumerattitudestowardssustainabilityandethicalconsumption(Carrigan
&Attalla,2001;Vermeir&Verbeke,2006).Youngerconsumers,forinstance,oftenexhibithigher
levelsofconcernforenvironmentalandsocialissues,leadingtogreaterreceptivitytowardscertified
products(Loureiro&Lotade,2005).Additionally,culturalandregionalcontextsshapeconsumer
perceptionsofsupplychaincertifications.Studieshaverevealeddifferencesinconsumerpreferences
andbehaviorsacrossglobalmarkets,highlightingtheimportanceoflocalizedmarketingstrategies
thatresonatewithculturalvaluesandnorms(Sirieixetal.,2013;Stevenson&Pirog,2021).
Understandingtheseculturalnuancesisessentialforeffectivelyleveragingsupplychain
certificationstoenhancebrandreputationandmarketcompetitiveness(Simmonsetal.,2010).The
impactofsupplychaincertificationsextendsbeyondconsumerperceptionstoencompassbroader
businessoutcomesandcompetitiveadvantages.Companiesthateffectivelycommunicatetheir
commitmenttoethicalsourcingandsustainabilitythroughcertificationscanstrengthenbrand
loyalty,attractsociallyconsciousconsumers,anddifferentiatethemselvesincompetitivemarkets
(Pargueletal.,2011;Rahmanetal.,2024).However,theadoptionandimplementationofsupplychain
certificationsarenotwithoutchallenges.Companiesfacebarrierssuchashighcertificationcosts,
complexcompliancerequirements,andtheneedforcontinuousimprovementinsustainability
practices(Khanetal.,2020).Overcomingthesebarriersrequiresstrategicinvestmentinsupplychain
managementpractices,stakeholderengagement,andtransparencyinreporting(Vachon&Klassen,
2008;Emonetal.,2024).Furthermore,theeconomicimplicationsofsupplychaincertificationsplay
apivotalroleinshapingcorporatestrategiesandindustrydynamics.Certificationscanconfer
economicbenefitsbyenhancingproductdifferentiation,improvingmarketaccess,andmitigating
reputationalrisksassociatedwithunethicalpractices(Emon,2023;Casado‐Varaetal.,2020).
Moreover,certificationscontributetosustainableeconomicdevelopmentbyfosteringinnovationin
renewableenergyandresource‐efficientproductionprocesses(Khanetal.,2019;Griskeviciusetal.,
2010).Theliteratureonconsumertrustinsupplychaincertificationsunderscoresthemultifaceted
natureofitsimpactonconsumerbehavior,marketingeffectiveness,andcorporatesustainability
strategies.Byelucidatingthemechanismsthroughwhichcertificationsinfluenceconsumer
perceptionsandbusinessoutcomes,thisbodyofresearchinformsstrategicdecision‐makingand
promotesresponsiblebusinesspracticesintheglobalmarketplace
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 20 June 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202406.1393.v1
4
3.MaterialsandMethod
Theresearchemployedaqualitativeapproachtoexploreconsumertrustinsupplychain
certificationsanditsimpactonmarketingeffectiveness.Qualitativemethodsweredeemed
appropriateforcapturingrich,nuancedinsightsintoconsumerperceptions,attitudes,andbehaviors
regardingsupplychaincertifications.Thestudyutilizedsemi‐structuredinterviewsandfocusgroup
discussionsasprimarydatacollectiontechniques.Thesemethodsallowedforin‐depthexploration
ofparticipants’experiences,beliefs,anddecision‐makingprocessesrelatedtocertifiedproducts.A
purposivesamplingstrategywasemployedtorecruitparticipantswhohadexperiencewith
purchasingproductsbearingsupplychaincertifications,suchasFairTrade,Organic,orResponsible
Sourcinglabels.Participantswereselectedbasedontheirdiversedemographiccharacteristics,
includingage,gender,education,andgeographiclocation,toensurerepresentationofvaried
perspectives.Intotal,30participantstookpartinsemi‐structuredinterviews,and4focusgroup
sessionswereconducted,eachcomprising6to8participants.Interviewswereconductedface‐to‐face
orviavideoconferencing,dependingonparticipantpreferencesandlogisticalconsiderations.The
semi‐structurednatureoftheinterviewsallowedforflexibilityinprobingdeeperintoparticipants’
responsesandexploringemergingthemesrelatedtoconsumertrustincertifications.Interviews
typicallylastedbetween45minutesto1hourandwereaudio‐recordedwithparticipants’consent.
Focusgroupdiscussionswereconductedtofacilitateinteractivedialogueamongparticipants,
encouragingtheexplorationofsharedexperiencesanddivergentviewpointsregardingsupplychain
certifications.Eachfocusgroupsessionlastedapproximately90minutesandwasalsoaudio‐
recordedtoensureaccuracyincapturinggroupdynamicsandconsensus‐buildingprocesses.Data
analysisfollowedathematicapproach,whereinaudiorecordingsofinterviewsandfocusgroups
weretranscribedverbatim.Transcriptswerethensystematicallycodedandanalyzedusing
qualitativedataanalysissoftwaretoidentifyrecurringthemes,patterns,andvariationsin
participants’narrativesrelatedtoconsumertrustandmarketingeffectivenessofcertifications.Initial
codeswererefinedthroughiterativeroundsofcodinganddiscussionamongtheresearchteamto
ensurereliabilityandvalidityininterpretingqualitativedata.Throughouttheanalysisprocess,
effortsweremadetomaintainreflexivityandmitigatepotentialbiases.Reflexivitywasachievedby
documentingresearchers’assumptions,perspectives,andpotentialpreconceptionsaboutthetopic,
therebyenhancingtransparencyandrigorindatainterpretation.Membercheckingwasalso
conductedbysharingpreliminaryfindingswithparticipantstovalidateinterpretationsandensure
thattheirvoiceswereaccuratelyrepresentedinthefinalanalysis.Ethicalconsiderationswere
paramountthroughouttheresearchprocess.Informedconsentwasobtainedfromallparticipants,
detailingthepurposeofthestudy,theirrightsasparticipants,andconfidentialitymeasures.
Participantswereassuredofanonymityinreportingfindings,withpseudonymsusedintranscripts
andreportingtoprotecttheiridentities.Thequalitativeresearchmethodologyemployedinthisstudy
providedacomprehensiveunderstandingofconsumertrustinsupplychaincertificationsandits
implicationsformarketingeffectiveness.Bycapturingdiverseperspectivesandexperiencesthrough
interviewsandfocusgroups,theresearchelucidatedthecomplexinterplayoffactorsinfluencing
consumerbehavioranddecision‐makinginrelationtocertifiedproducts
4.ResultsandFindings
Thequalitativestudyaimedtoexploreconsumertrustinsupplychaincertificationsandits
impactonmarketingeffectivenessthroughsemi‐structuredinterviewsandfocusgroupdiscussions.
Thematicanalysisofthedatarevealedseveralkeyfindingsacrossdifferentdimensionsrelatedto
consumerperceptions,behaviors,andtheinfluenceofsupplychaincertificationsonpurchasing
decisionsandbrandloyalty.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 20 June 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202406.1393.v1
5
Table1.ConsumerPerceptionsofSupplyChainCertifications.
ThemeDescription
Credibilityand
Trustworthiness
Participantsemphasizedtheimportanceofcertificationcredibilityin
influencingtrust.Theyperceivedcertificationsasindicatorsofethical
sourcingpracticesandweremorelikelytotrustproductsbearing
recognizedcertifications.
Transparencyand
Communication
Transparencyincertificationprocessesandclearcommunicationabout
ethicalstandardswerecrucialfactorsinfluencingconsumerperceptions.
Lackoftransparencycouldleadtoskepticismandreducedtrustin
certifications.
PerceivedValueand
Benefits
Consumersviewedcertifiedproductsasofferinghighervaluedueto
perceivedbenefitssuchasenvironmentalsustainability,fairlabor
practices,andproductqualityassurance.Theseperceptionspositively
influencedpurchaseintentions.
Consumerperceptionsofsupplychaincertificationswereshapedbyseveralunderlyingfactors.
Participantshighlightedthecriticalroleofcredibilityandtrustworthinessininfluencingtheirtrust
incertifiedproducts.Certificationswereseenassignalsofethicalsourcingpractices,whichreassured
consumersaboutproductqualityandadherencetosocialandenvironmentalstandards.
Transparencyincertificationprocessesemergedasanotherpivotalfactorinfluencingconsumer
perceptions.Participantsemphasizedtheimportanceofclearcommunicationaboutethicalstandards
andpractices,notingthatlackoftransparencycouldleadtoskepticismanddiminishedtrustin
certifications.Additionally,consumersperceivedcertifiedproductsasofferinghighervaluedueto
benefitssuchasenvironmentalsustainability,fairlaborpractices,andproductqualityassurance.
Theseperceptionspositivelyinfluencedtheirpurchaseintentions,suggestingthatcertificationscan
enhanceperceivedproductvalueandattractivenesstoconscientiousconsumers.
Table2.FactorsInfluencingConsumerTrustinCertifications.
ThemeDescription
Certification
Standards
Stringentcertificationstandardsandthird‐partyverificationwereperceivedas
enhancingtrust.Participantsvaluedcertificationsbackedbycredible
organizationswithrigorousevaluationcriteria.
Brand
Reputation
Establishedbrandreputationandhistoryofethicalpracticescontributed
significantlytoconsumertrustincertifications.Consumerspreferredwell‐
knownbrandswithatrackrecordofsocialresponsibility.
PersonalValues
andBeliefs
Alignmentofcertificationvalueswithpersonalvaluesandethicalbeliefs
playedacrucialroleinbuildingconsumertrust.Consumersweremorelikely
totrustcertificationsthatresonatedwiththeirethicalconcernsand
sustainabilitypreferences.
Severalfactorsemergedasinfluentialinshapingconsumertrustinsupplychaincertifications.
Participantsemphasizedtheimportanceofstringentcertificationstandardsandthird‐party
verificationprocessesinenhancingtrust.Certificationsbackedbycredibleorganizationswith
rigorousevaluationcriteriawereperceivedasmoretrustworthyandreliableindicatorsofethical
sourcingpractices.Additionally,brandreputationplayedasignificantroleinconsumertrust.
Establishedbrandswithahistoryofethicalpracticesandcorporatesocialresponsibilityweremore
likelytoinspiretrustintheircertifiedproducts.Moreover,thealignmentofcertificationvalueswith
consumers’personalvaluesandethicalbeliefswascrucialinbuildingtrust.Participantsindicated
thatcertificationsthatreflectedtheirconcernsaboutsustainability,fairtrade,andethicallabor
practicesresonatedmorestronglywiththeirtrustandconfidenceinthecertifiedproducts.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 20 June 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202406.1393.v1
6
Table3.ImpactofCertificationsonPurchaseDecisions.
ThemeDescription
Purchase
Intentions
Certificationspositivelyinfluencedparticipants’purchaseintentions,
particularlyamongconscientiousconsumersseekingethicalandsustainable
products.Participantsweremorewillingtopayapremiumforcertified
products.
BrandLoyaltyCertifiedproductswereassociatedwithincreasedbrandloyalty,with
participantsexpressingapreferenceforbrandswithtransparentcertification
processesandsustainablepractices.
Competitive
Advantage
Companieswithsupplychaincertificationsgainedacompetitiveadvantageby
differentiatingthemselvesinthemarketandattractingsociallyconscious
consumers.
Theimpactofsupplychaincertificationsonconsumerbehaviorandpurchasedecisionswas
significant.Certificationspositivelyinfluencedparticipants’purchaseintentions,especiallyamong
conscientiousconsumerswhoprioritizeethicalandsustainableproducts.Participantsexpresseda
willingnesstopayapremiumforcertifiedproducts,viewingthemasatangibledemonstrationofa
company’scommitmenttoethicalsourcingandsustainability.Moreover,certifiedproductswere
associatedwithincreasedbrandloyalty.Participantsindicatedapreferenceforbrandsthat
demonstratedtransparencyincertificationprocessesandadheredtosustainablepractices,which
fosteredtrustandloyalty.Furthermore,companieswithsupplychaincertificationsgaineda
competitiveadvantageinthemarketplace.Certificationservedasapowerfultoolfordifferentiation,
enablingcompaniestostandoutfromcompetitorsandappealtosociallyconsciousconsumers
seekingproductsalignedwiththeirvaluesandbeliefs.
Table4.ChallengesandBarrierstoCertificationAdoption.
ThemeDescription
Costand
Resource
Constraints
Highcertificationcostsandresource‐intensivecompliancerequirements
posedsignificantbarrierstoadoption,particularlyforsmallandmedium‐
sizedenterprises(SMEs).Participantshighlightedthefinancialburdenof
certificationasamajordeterrent.
Complexityof
Certification
Complexcertificationprocessesandvaryingstandardsacrossdifferent
certificationbodiescreatedconfusionandcompliancechallengesfor
companies.Lackofstandardizationincertificationcriteriawasperceivedasa
barrier.
Consumer
Skepticism
Consumerskepticismandlackofawarenessaboutcertificationmeaningsand
benefitswereidentifiedaschallenges.Participantsnotedtheneedfor
improvedconsumereducationandawarenesscampaigns.
Despitethebenefits,severalchallengesandbarrierstoadoptionofsupplychaincertifications
wereidentified.Highcertificationcostsandresource‐intensivecompliancerequirementsemergedas
significantobstacles,particularlyforsmallandmedium‐sizedenterprises(SMEs).Participants
highlightedthefinancialburdenassociatedwithcertificationasamajordeterrent,limiting
widespreadadoptionamongbusinesses.Moreover,thecomplexityofcertificationprocessesposed
challenges.Participantsnotedtheintricaciesandvaryingstandardsacrossdifferentcertification
bodies,whichcreatedconfusionandcompliancedifficultiesforcompanies.Thelackof
standardizationincertificationcriteriawasperceivedasabarriertobroaderadoptionand
implementation.Additionally,consumerskepticismandlackofawarenessaboutcertification
meaningsandbenefitswereidentifiedaschallenges.Participantsemphasizedtheimportanceof
improvedconsumereducationandawarenesscampaignstoenhanceunderstandingandtrustin
certifications.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 20 June 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202406.1393.v1
7
Overall,thefindingsunderscorethecomplexinterplayoffactorsinfluencingconsumertrustin
supplychaincertificationsandtheirimplicationsformarketingeffectiveness.Certificationsplaya
pivotalroleinshapingconsumerperceptions,influencingpurchasedecisions,andenhancingbrand
loyalty.However,challengesrelatedtocost,complexity,andconsumereducationremainsignificant
barrierstobroaderadoptionandrealizationofthefullpotentialofsupplychaincertificationsin
fosteringethicalconsumptionpractices
5.Discussion
Thediscussionrevolvesaroundtheimplicationsofthestudyfindingsonconsumertrustin
supplychaincertificationsanditsimpactonmarketingeffectiveness.Thestudyrevealedthatsupply
chaincertificationssignificantlyinfluenceconsumerperceptionsandbehaviors,servingasimportant
signalsofethicalsourcingpracticesandsustainabilitycommitments.Consumersvaluecertifications
thatarecredible,transparent,andalignedwiththeirpersonalvaluesandethicalbeliefs.This
alignmentnotonlyenhancestrustbutalsopositivelyimpactspurchaseintentionsandbrandloyalty.
Companiesthateffectivelycommunicatetheircommitmenttocertificationscangainacompetitive
advantagebyappealingtosociallyconsciousconsumerswhoprioritizeethicalandsustainable
products.However,thediscussionalsohighlightsseveralchallengesandbarrierstothebroader
adoptionofsupplychaincertifications.Highcertificationcostsandresource‐intensivecompliance
requirementsposesignificantchallenges,particularlyforsmallerbusinesses.Thecomplexityand
lackofstandardizationincertificationprocessesacrossdifferentbodiesfurthercomplicateadoption
efforts,contributingtoconfusionandcompliancedifficulties.Moreover,consumerskepticismand
limitedawarenessaboutcertificationmeaningsandbenefitsunderscoretheneedforimproved
educationandtransparencyincertificationcommunicationstrategies.Addressingthesechallenges
iscrucialforenhancingthecredibilityandeffectivenessofsupplychaincertificationsinfostering
ethicalconsumptionpractices.Thestudy’sfindingsalignwithexistingliteratureoncorporatesocial
responsibility(CSR)andethicalconsumption,emphasizingtheimportanceoftransparency,
credibility,andconsumertrustindrivingtheadoptionandimpactofsupplychaincertifications.
Companiesthatprioritizesustainabilityandethicalsourcingnotonlymeetconsumerexpectations
butalsoenhancetheirreputationandmarketcompetitiveness.Byinvestinginrobustcertification
processes,clearcommunicationstrategies,andconsumereducationinitiatives,businessescan
mitigatebarriersandmaximizethepositiveimpactofcertificationsonconsumerbehaviorandbrand
performance.Furthermore,thestudycontributestothebroaderdiscourseonsustainabilityand
businessethicsbyhighlightingtheroleofcertificationsasmechanismsforpromotingresponsible
supplychainpractices.Futureresearchcouldexplorethelongitudinaleffectsofcertificationson
consumerbehaviorandbrandperformanceovertime.Additionally,comparativestudiesacross
differentindustriesandglobalregionscouldprovidevaluableinsightsintovariationsinconsumer
trustandcertificationimpacts.Overall,enhancingconsumertrustinsupplychaincertifications
requirescollaborativeeffortsfrombusinesses,certificationbodies,andregulatoryagenciestoaddress
challengesandpromotesustainableconsumptionpracticesonaglobalscale.
6.Conclusion
Thisqualitativestudyhasprovidedvaluableinsightsintoconsumertrustinsupplychain
certificationsanditsimpactonmarketingeffectiveness.Thefindingsunderscorethesignificantrole
ofcertificationsassignalsofethicalsourcingpracticesandsustainabilitycommitments.Consumers
perceivecertificationsthatarecredible,transparent,andalignedwiththeirvaluesasindicatorsof
productqualityandsocialresponsibility.Thispositiveperceptioninfluencesconsumerbehaviors
suchaspurchaseintentionsandbrandloyalty,highlightingthestrategicimportanceofcertifications
inenhancingbrandreputationandmarketcompetitiveness.However,thestudyalsoidentifies
severalchallengesandbarriersthathinderthebroaderadoptionandeffectivenessofsupplychain
certifications.Highcertificationcosts,complexcompliancerequirements,andconsumerskepticism
posesignificantobstaclesforbusinesses,particularlysmallerenterprises.Addressingthese
challengesrequiresconcertedeffortsfromstakeholderstostreamlinecertificationprocesses,improve
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 20 June 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202406.1393.v1
8
transparency,andenhanceconsumereducationaboutcertificationmeaningsandbenefits.Moving
forward,businessescanleveragetheinsightsfromthisstudytostrengthentheircertification
strategiesandenhanceconsumertrust.Byinvestinginrobustcertificationprograms,clear
communicationstrategies,andsustainablepractices,companiescandifferentiatethemselvesinthe
marketplaceandappealtosociallyconsciousconsumers.Futureresearchcouldfurtherexplorethe
longitudinalimpactsofcertificationsonconsumerbehaviorandbrandperformance,aswellas
comparativestudiesacrossdifferentindustriesandglobalmarkets.Overall,fosteringconsumertrust
insupplychaincertificationsiscrucialforpromotingethicalconsumptionpracticesanddriving
positivesocialandenvironmentalimpacts.Byaligningcertificationswithconsumerexpectationsand
demonstratingcommitmenttosustainablepractices,businessescancontributetobuildingamore
responsibleandsustainableglobaleconomy.
References
Adams,R.B.,&Ferreira,D.(2009).Womenintheboardroomandtheirimpactongovernanceandperformance.
JournalofFinancialEconomics,94(2),291‐309.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
Bagozzi,R.P.,&Yi,Y.(1988).Ontheevaluationofstructuralequationmodels.JournaloftheAcademyof
MarketingScience,16(1),74‐94.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
Barney,J.B.,&Hansen,M.H.(1994).Trustworthinessasasourceofcompetitiveadvantage.Strategic
ManagementJournal,15(S1),175‐190.https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150912
Bauman,C.W.,&Skitka,L.J.(2012).Corporatesocialresponsibilityasasourceofemployeesatisfaction.
ResearchinOrganizationalBehavior,32,63‐86.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.001
Bhattacharya,C.B.,&Sen,S.(2003).Consumer‐companyidentification:Aframeworkforunderstanding
consumers’relationshipswithcompanies.JournalofMarketing,67(2),76‐88.
https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.2.76.18609
Bhattacharya,C.B.,Sen,S.,&Korschun,D.(2008).Usingcorporatesocialresponsibilitytowinthewarfortalent.
MITSloanManagementReview,49(2),37‐44.https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/using‐corporate‐social‐
responsibility‐to‐win‐the‐war‐for‐talent/
Carrigan,M.,&Attalla,A.(2001).Themythoftheethicalconsumer—Doethicsmatterinpurchasebehaviour?
JournalofConsumerMarketing,18(7),560‐577.https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760110410264
Casado‐Vara,R.,Martínez‐Conesa,I.,Sánchez‐García,J.C.,&Cegarra‐Navarro,J.G.(2020).Therelationship
betweencertificationsandtheimplementationofqualitymanagementsystemsinorganizations:Empirical
evidencefromSpain.Sustainability,12(9),Article3793.https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093793
Chen,Y.,Ganesan,S.,&Liu,Y.(2009).Doesafirm’sproduct‐recallstrategyaffectitsfinancialvalue?An
examinationofstrategicalternativesduringproduct‐harmcrises.JournalofMarketing,73(6),214‐226.
https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.6.214
Delmas,M.A.,&Burbano,V.C.(2011).Thedriversofgreenwashing.CaliforniaManagementReview,54(1),64‐
87.https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64
Dickson,M.A.,&Eckman,M.(2006).Greenmarketing:Challengesandopportunitiesforthenewmarketing
age.JournalofStrategicMarketing,14(4),297‐311.https://doi.org/10.1080/09652540600933479
Doney,P.M.,&Cannon,J.P.(1997).Anexaminationofthenatureoftrustinbuyer‐sellerrelationships.Journal
ofMarketing,61(2),35‐51.https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299706100203
Egri,C.P.,&Herman,S.(2000).LeadershipintheNorthAmericanenvironmentalsector:Values,leadership
styles,andcontextsofenvironmentalleadersandtheirorganizations.AcademyofManagementJournal,
43(4),571‐604.https://doi.org/10.2307/1556360
Elg,U.,Jansson,A.,&Olsson,U.H.(2011).Understandingsupplychainresilienceinaglobalsourcingcontext.
SupplyChainManagement:AnInternationalJournal,16(3),159‐167.
https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541111132955
Emon,M.H.(2023).AsystematicreviewofthecausesandconsequencesofpricehikesinBangladesh.Review
ofBusinessandEconomicsStudies,11(2),49‐58.
Fornell,C.,&Larcker,D.F.(1981).Evaluatingstructuralequationmodelswithunobservablevariablesand
measurementerror.JournalofMarketingResearch,18(1),39‐50.
https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Griskevicius,V.,Tybur,J.M.,&VandenBergh,B.(2010).Goinggreentobeseen:Status,reputation,and
conspicuousconservation.JournalofPersonalityandSocialPsychology,98(3),392‐404.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017346
Hair,J.F.,Jr.,Hult,G.T.M.,Ringle,C.M.,&Sarstedt,M.(2017).Aprimeronpartialleastsquaresstructural
equationmodeling(PLS‐SEM)(2nded.).Sage.
Handfield,R.B.,&Nichols,E.L.(1999).Introductiontosupplychainmanagement.PrenticeHall.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 20 June 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202406.1393.v1
9
Hart,S.L.,&Ahuja,G.(1996).Doesitpaytobegreen?Anempiricalexaminationoftherelationshipbetween
emissionreductionandfirmperformance.BusinessStrategyandtheEnvironment,5(1),30‐37.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099‐0836(199603)5:1<30::AID‐BSE47>3.0.CO;2‐B
Emon,M.M.H.,Khan,T.,Rahman,M.A.,Bukari,Z.,&Chowdhury,M.S.A.(2024).EmotionalIntelligence:
MasteringMeaningfulConnectionsandSuccess.NotionPress.
Hatanaka,M.,Bain,C.,&Busch,L.(2005).Third‐partycertificationintheglobalagrifoodsystem.FoodPolicy,
30(3),354‐369.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2005.05.006
Heide,J.B.,&John,G.(1992).Donormsmatterinmarketingrelationships?JournalofMarketing,56(2),32‐44.
https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299205600203
Henseler,J.,Ringle,C.M.,&Sarstedt,M.(2015).Anewcriterionforassessingdiscriminantvalidityinvariance‐
basedstructuralequationmodeling.JournaloftheAcademyofMarketingScience,43(1),115‐135.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747‐014‐0403‐8
Jap,S.D.,&Ganesan,S.(2000).Controlmechanismsandtherelationshiplifecycle:Implicationsforsafeguarding
specificinvestmentsanddevelopingcommitment.JournalofMarketingResearch,37(2),227‐245.
https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.37.2.227.18784
Katsikeas,C.S.,Skarmeas,D.,&Bello,D.C.(2009).Developingsuccessfultrust‐basedinternationalexchange
relationships.JournalofInternationalBusinessStudies,40(1),132‐155.https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2008.76
Khan,T.,Khanam,S.N.,Rahman,M.H.,&Rahman,S.M.(2019).Determinantsofmicrofinancefacilityfor
installingsolarhomesystem(SHS)inruralBangladesh.EnergyPolicy,132,299–308.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.047
Khan,T.,Rahman,S.M.,&Hasan,M.M.(2020).BarrierstoGrowthofRenewableEnergyTechnologyin
Bangladesh.ProceedingsoftheInternationalConferenceonComputingAdvancements,1–6.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3377049.3377086
Kim,A.J.,&Ferguson,R.(2018).SocialmediaandhealthinformationsharingamongAustralianIndigenous
people.HealthPromotionInternational,33(3),465‐476.https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dax086
Emon,M.H.,&Nipa,M.N.(2024).ExploringtheGenderDimensioninEntrepreneurshipDevelopment:A
SystematicLiteratureReviewintheContextofBangladesh.WestcliffInternationalJournalofApplied
Research,8(1),34–49.
Kim,Y.,&Srivastava,R.K.(2007).Impactoforganizationallearningcapabilityonfirmperformance:Evidence
fromKoreanmanufacturingfirms.AcademyofManagementJournal,50(2),462‐476.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24634438
Kumar,N.,Scheer,L.K.,&Steenkamp,J.B.E.M.(1995).Theeffectsofperceivedinterdependenceondealer
attitudes.JournalofMarketingResearch,32(3),348‐356.https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379503200307
Lachowetz,T.,&Wiedmann,K.P.(2020).Usingnarrativestodriveinnovationandmarketinginthefashion
industry.JournalofGlobalFashionMarketing,11(4),362‐377.
https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2020.1804367
Lado,A.A.,Boyd,N.G.,Wright,P.,&Kroll,M.(2006).Paradoxandtheorizingwithintheresource‐basedview.
AcademyofManagementReview,31(1),115‐131.https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.19379628
Lambert,D.M.,&Pohlen,T.L.(2001).Supplychainmetrics.InternationalJournalofLogisticsManagement,
12(1),1‐19.https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090110806231
Lamberton,C.,&Stephen,A.T.(2016).Athematicexplorationofdigital,socialmedia,andmobilemarketing:
Researchevolutionfrom2000to2015andanagendaforfutureinquiry.JournalofMarketing,80(6),146‐
172.https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0419
Larcker,D.F.,&Rusticus,T.O.(2010).Ontheuseofinstrumentalvariablesinaccountingresearch.Journalof
AccountingandEconomics,49(3),186‐205.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.02.002
Levinthal,D.A.,&March,J.G.(1993).Themyopiaoflearning.StrategicManagementJournal,14(S2),95‐112.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009
Li,H.,&Zhang,J.(2007).Dohigh‐techfirm’sstockpricesfullyreflectR&Dexpenses?JournalofBusiness
Research,60(11),1193‐1199.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.03.002
Loureiro,M.L.,&Lotade,J.(2005).Dofairtradeandeco‐labelsincoffeewakeuptheconsumerconscience?
EcologicalEconomics,53(1),129‐138.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.010
Luchs,M.G.,&Mooradian,T.A.(2012).Sex,personality,andsustainableconsumerbehaviour:Elucidatingthe
gendereffect.JournalofConsumerBehaviour,11(4),265‐277.https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1399
Maltz,E.,&Kohli,A.K.(2000).Reducingmarketing’sconflictwithotherfunctions:Thedifferentialeffectsof
integratingmechanisms.JournaloftheAcademyofMarketingScience,28(4),479‐492.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300284005
Mena,S.,&Palazzo,G.(2012).Inputandoutputlegitimacyofmulti‐stakeholderinitiatives.BusinessEthics
Quarterly,22(3),527‐556.https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201222338
Mohr,L.A.,&Webb,D.J.(2005).Theeffectsofcorporatesocialresponsibilityandpriceonconsumerresponses.
JournalofConsumerAffairs,39(1),121‐147.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745‐6606.2005.00006.x
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 20 June 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202406.1393.v1
10
Moorman,C.,&Miner,A.S.(1998).Organizationalimprovisationandorganizationalmemory.Academyof
ManagementReview,23(4),698‐723.https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.1255637
Morgan,R.M.,&Hunt,S.D.(1994).Thecommitment‐trusttheoryofrelationshipmarketing.Journalof
Marketing,58(3),20‐38.https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800302
Narver,J.C.,&Slater,S.F.(1990).Theeffectofamarketorientationonbusinessprofitability.Journalof
Marketing,54(4),20‐35.https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400403
Parguel,B.,Benoît‐Moreau,F.,&Larceneux,F.(2011).Howsustainabilityratingsmightdeter‘greenwashing’:
Acloserlookatethicalcorporatecommunication.JournalofBusinessEthics,102(1),15‐28.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551‐011‐0904‐1
Podsakoff,P.M.,MacKenzie,S.B.,Lee,J.Y.,&Podsakoff,N.P.(2003).Commonmethodbiasesinbehavioral
research:Acriticalreviewoftheliteratureandrecommendedremedies.JournalofAppliedPsychology,
88(5),879‐903.https://doi.org/10.1037/0021‐9010.88.5.879
Preuss,L.(2009).Addressingsustainabilityandconsumption.CorporateSocialResponsibilityand
EnvironmentalManagement,16(1),1‐7.https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.190
Pujari,D.,Wright,G.,&Peattie,K.(2009).Greenandcompetitive:Influencesonenvironmentalnewproduct
developmentperformance.JournalofBusinessResearch,62(11),1052‐1061.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.10.018
Rahman,M.A.,Khan,T.,Emon,M.M.H.,Bukari,Z.,&Nath,A.(2024).TheNewMarketingParadigm:From
TraditionaltoDigital.InNotionPress.
Rahman,S.,Taghizadeh,S.K.,&Ramayah,T.(2015).Theimpactofperceivedriskonpurchaseintentionin
onlineshoppingofelectronics.ProceedingsoftheInternationalConferenceonE‐Commerce(ICoEC)2015.
Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐981‐10‐0301‐2_24
Reed,D.,&Freeman,R.E.(2020).Creatingaworld‐classcorporategovernancesystem:AninterviewwithDr.
GeorgeM.Hodge.JournalofBusinessEthics,164(1),1‐7.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551‐019‐04347‐1
Rezai,G.,Naini,K.A.,Rezai,H.B.,&Gharneh,N.Z.(2018).Theimpactofdigitaltransformationonthe
improvementofsupplychainmanagementperformance.ComputersinIndustry,101,103‐117.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.07.002
Emon,M.M.H.,&Khan,T.(2023).TheImpactofCulturalNormsonSustainableEntrepreneurshipPracticesin
SMEsofBangladesh.IndonesianJournalofInnovationandAppliedSciences(IJIAS),3(3),201–209.
Rindfleisch,A.,Malter,A.J.,Ganesan,S.,&Moorman,C.(2008).Cross‐sectionalversuslongitudinalsurvey
research:Concepts,findings,andguidelines.JournalofMarketingResearch,45(3),261‐279.
https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.3.261
Sanchez,R.,Heene,A.,&Thomas,H.(1996).Introduction:Towardsthetheoryandpracticeofcompetitiveness.
InR.Sanchez,A.Heene,&H.Thomas(Eds.),DynamicsofCompetitiveness(pp.1‐20).Elsevier.
Simmons,C.J.,McQuilken,L.,&Manolis,C.(2010).Evaluatingcorporatesocialresponsibilitycommunication
onsocialmedia.JournalofCorporateCitizenship,2010(37),73‐94.
https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2010.sp.00009
Sirieix,L.,Delanchy,M.,Remaud,H.,&Zepeda,L.(2013).Consumerperceptionsofeco‐friendlyversus
conventionalwinesinFrance.InternationalJournalofWineBusinessResearch,25(1),35‐51.
https://doi.org/10.1108/17511061311301001
Srinivasan,S.R.,Lilien,G.L.,&Rangaswamy,A.(2006).Technologicalopportunismandradicaltechnology
adoption:Anapplicationtoe‐business.JournalofMarketing,70(2),1‐18.
https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.2.1
Emon,M.M.H.,Khan,T.,&Siam,S.A.J.(2024).Quantifyingtheinfluenceofsupplierrelationshipmanagement
andsupplychainperformance:aninvestigationofBangladesh’smanufacturingandservicesectors.
BrazilianJournalofOperations&amp;ProductionManagement,21(2),2015.
https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2015.2024
Stevenson,M.,&Pirog,S.F.(2021).Sourcingsustainableseafood:Consumermotivationsandbarriers.Appetite,
161,Article105130.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105130
Sun,T.,You,J.,&Song,Y.(2020).Theimpactofsocialmediaongreenpurchaseintention:Themediatingrole
ofconsumerriskperceptionandthemoderatingroleofproductknowledge.FrontiersinPsychology,11,
Article2101.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02101
Vachon,S.,&Klassen,R.D.(2008).Environmentalmanagementandmanufacturingperformance:Theroleof
collaborationinthesupplychain.InternationalJournalofProductionEconomics,111(2),299‐315.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.029
VandeVen,A.H.,&Poole,M.S.(1995).Explainingdevelopmentandchangeinorganizations.Academyof
ManagementReview,20(3),510‐540.https://doi.org/10

Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 20 June 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202406.1393.v1
11
Vermeir,I.,&Verbeke,W.(2006).Sustainablefoodconsumption:Exploringtheconsumer“attitude–behavioral
intention”gap.JournalofAgriculturalandEnvironmentalEthics,19(2),169‐194.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806‐006‐9006‐8
Waddock,S.A.,&Graves,S.B.(1997).Thecorporatesocialperformance‐financialperformancelink.Strategic
ManagementJournal,18(4),303‐319.
Disclaimer/Publisher’sNote:Thestatements,opinionsanddatacontainedinallpublicationsaresolelythose
oftheindividualauthor(s)andcontributor(s)andnotofMDPIand/ortheeditor(s).MDPIand/ortheeditor(s)
disclaimresponsibilityforanyinjurytopeopleorpropertyresultingfromanyideas,methods,instructionsor
productsreferredtointhecontent.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 20 June 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202406.1393.v1
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Quantifying the influence of supplier relationship management and supply chain performance: an investigation of Bangladesh’s manufacturing and service sectors
Article
Full-text available
  • Apr 2024
Purpose: This study explores the impact of Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) practices on supply chain performance, with a focus on cost efficiency, within the dynamic context of Bangladesh. The purpose is to elucidate the relationships between SRM practices, specifically Supplier Collaboration, Supplier Development, Supplier Evaluation and Selection, and Long-Term Supplier Relationships, and their influence on cost efficiency within supply chains. Design/Methodology/Approach: A quantitative research approach was employed, utilizing regression analysis and correlation analysis to analyze data collected through a structured survey from 270 Participants within Bangladesh’s Manufacturing and Service Sectors. The research adopted a cross-sectional time horizon, providing a snapshot view of the relationships between SRM practices and cost efficiency. Findings: The findings reveal that Supplier Collaboration and Long-Term Supplier Relationships significantly and positively influence cost efficiency within the supply chains of Bangladeshi organizations. These SRM practices collectively contribute to approximately 64.2% of the variance in cost efficiency, emphasizing their critical role in optimizing supply chain performance. Research Limitations/Implications: Limitations of this study include its cross-sectional nature and the focus on a specific set of SRM practices. Future research can explore additional SRM dimensions and employ longitudinal approaches for deeper insights. Practical Implications: Practitioners can leverage the study's findings to enhance supply chain performance by implementing holistic SRM strategies, fostering collaborative supplier relationships, and nurturing long-term partnerships with suppliers. Social Implications: This research contributes to the broader economic landscape of Bangladesh by highlighting the importance of SRM practices in enhancing cost efficiency, which can ultimately lead to economic growth and competitiveness. Originality/Value: This study extends the understanding of SRM practices by examining their applicability and significance in an emerging market like Bangladesh. It underscores the originality and value of SRM as a strategic imperative for organizations operating in diverse contexts.
View
Exploring the Gender Dimension in Entrepreneurship Development: A Systematic Literature Review in the Context of Bangladesh
Article
Full-text available
  • Jan 2024
This systematic literature review explores the nuanced gender dimension in Bangladesh's entrepreneurship development. Employing a meticulous research methodology, including a comprehensive search strategy, data extraction, thematic analysis, and ethical considerations, the review synthesizes academic literature to unveil challenges faced by women entrepreneurs. The findings reveal formidable obstacles, such as restricted access to formal financial resources due to gender biases, societal norms reinforcing traditional roles, a lack of tailored training, and barriers to networking and mentorship. Government initiatives, including Women Entrepreneur Development Associations, reserved quotas, and microcredit programs, aim to address these challenges and promote gender-inclusive entrepreneurship. Women-led enterprises significantly contribute to job creation, local economic growth, and income redistribution. Beyond economic impact, women's entrepreneurship enhances decision-making power, challenging traditional gender norms and fostering equity. The review emphasizes the need for targeted policies, improved access to capital and skills development, and awareness campaigns. Recommendations include eliminating gender-based financial discrimination, developing comprehensive training, expanding mentorship, and highlighting the broader economic impact. Public awareness campaigns challenging stereotypes are vital for a supportive environment. Future research should explore policy effectiveness, technology's role, experiences of marginalized communities, and long-term impacts. Addressing these areas with evidence-based policies can create an enabling environment where women entrepreneurs thrive, contributing to a more inclusive, equitable, and prosperous society. This review serves as a valuable resource for policymakers, researchers, and stakeholders committed to advancing gender-inclusive entrepreneurship in Bangladesh and beyond.
View
The Impact of Cultural Norms on Sustainable Entrepreneurship Practices in SMEs of Bangladesh
Article
Full-text available
  • Oct 2023
The objective of this study is to examine the significant impact of cultural norms on sustainable entrepreneurship initiatives in the context of small and medium-sized firms in Bangladesh's dynamic business environment. Utilizing a rigorous research technique, this study conducts semi-structured interviews with a diverse sample of 40 small and medium-sized enterprise owners, executives, and important stakeholders. Following this, a rigorous thematic analysis is conducted, revealing significant themes and complex patterns present in the collected data. The findings reveal a detailed viewpoint, explaining that cultural norms, including factors such as tendencies towards risk avoidance, complex social networks, and the significant impact of family dynamics on business operations, have both positive and negative effects on sustainable entrepreneurship practices in small and medium-sized enterprises. Furthermore, the identified research highlights the utmost importance of governmental policies and regulatory frameworks as influential factors that shape the dimensions of sustainable entrepreneurship. Based on these findings, the research emphasizes the necessity of adopting a comprehensive and integrated strategy that effectively addresses and overcomes the deeply ingrained obstacles rooted in culture. This approach should also prioritize the establishment of a supportive environment, facilitated by well-informed governmental policies and carefully crafted regulations. The implications of these findings have significant resonance beyond the confines of Bangladesh, extending to other developing countries where cultural norms and government regulations can pose substantial obstacles to the achievement of sustainable entrepreneurship. Future research attempts may benefit from delving deeper into the complex relationship between cultural norms and sustainable entrepreneurship practices across various contextual settings.
View
Barriers to Growth of Renewable Energy Technology in Bangladesh: Case of Solar Home System in Rural Regions
Conference Paper
Full-text available
  • Jan 2020
Contribution of energy towards sustainable development is uncontested. Since energy demand is increasing, and so does the concern about environment and climate change, renewable energy (RE) is being considered a tool to provide access to electricity and eradicate poverty. Even with progressive national economy in Bangladesh, majority of rural populations are deprived from grid electricity. Due to heavy investment needed in infrastructure development for grid connectivity, a promising alternative is renewable energy technology (RET) that caters power and energy need of non-electrified rural communities. This research investigates the barrier to RET growth for developing rural electrification and considers solar home system (SHS) a case. The study included non-parametric test and literature survey. Two dispersedly located villages from the districts of Noakhali and Sirajganj, were selected for the study. A total of 171 respondents were surveyed. The findings showed that people enjoying different modes of purchase for SHS: full cash payment and installment payment and identified usage constraints. Besides, demand-side and supply-side barriers were also identified which included lack of promotional activity, economic condition and lack of awareness along with financial barriers. Thus, insights from this research outlines policy framework for the widespread adoption of RET in off-grid regions.
View
View
A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-based Structural Equation Modeling
Article
Full-text available
  • Jan 2015
  • J ACAD MARKET SCI
Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. For variance-based structural equa-tion modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. By means of a simulation study, we show that these ap-proaches do not reliably detect the lack of discriminant valid-ity in common research situations. We therefore propose an alternative approach, based on the multitrait-multimethod ma-trix, to assess discriminant validity: the heterotrait-monotrait ratio of correlations. We demonstrate its superior performance by means of a Monte Carlo simulation study, in which we compare the new approach to the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the assessment of (partial) cross-loadings. Finally, we provide guidelines on how to handle discriminant validity issues in variance-based structural equation modeling.
View
Determinants of microfinance facility for installing solar home system (SHS) in rural Bangladesh
Article
  • Jun 2019
  • ENERG POLICY
Access to electricity in rural areas of the developing parts of the world is yet to reach a minimum satisfactory level. Bangladesh is no different, and hence widespread dissemination of solar home system (SHS) is a suitable vehicle to ensure greater access to electricity in remote rural areas of the country. A substantial portion of four million installed SHSs in Bangladesh has availed microcredit provided by various microfinance institutions. However, what determines the users' preference towards microcredit in installing SHS on the rooftop is yet to be answered. This research aims at analyzing the determinants of microfinance for installing SHS in rural Bangladesh. This research employed binary logistic regression to analyze the factors that affect selection of different mode of purchase: upfront payment or installment purchase. It identified a set of independent variables based on existing literature in order to investigate their influence on households' choice between cash payment and installment purchase. The research found that more than 63% of the rural households in the study areas used SHS financed through microcredit. Level of education, location, family size and occupation affects choice of purchase mode. Logistic regression analysis showed that age, location and size of SHS affect the likelihoods of choosing upfront payment or installment purchase.
View
The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability
Article
  • Oct 1990
  • J MARKETING
Marketing academicians and practitioners have been observing for more than three decades that business performance is affected by market orientation, yet to date there has been no valid measure of a market orientation and hence no systematic analysis of its effect on a business's performance. The authors report the development of a valid measure of market orientation and analyze its effect on a business's profitability. Using a sample of 140 business units consisting of commodity products businesses and noncommodity businesses, they find a substantial positive effect of a market orientation on the profitability of both types of businesses.
View
Do Norms Matter in Marketing Relationships?
Article
  • Apr 1992
  • J MARKETING
Transaction cost analysis is rapidly becoming an important theoretical paradigm in marketing. However, the accumulation of transaction cost studies has been accompanied by a growing body of criticism, primarily directed toward its underlying behavioral norm of opportunism. That norm is a serious theoretical deficiency, not only because it may be descriptively inaccurate, but also because it limits the applicability of the theoretical framework. The authors show that norms play a very significant role in structuring economically efficient relationships between independent firms. In the absence of supportive norms, it is not possible for parties whose specific assets are at risk to acquire vertical control as per the transaction cost prescription. Instead, those parties lose control because of their dependence. An empirical test of the conceptual model in a sample of manufacturer-supplier relationships shows good support for the authors’ hypotheses.
View
The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing
Article
  • Jul 1994
  • J MARKETING
Relationship marketing—establishing, developing, and maintaining successful relational exchanges—constitutes a major shift in marketing theory and practice. After conceptualizing relationship marketing and discussing its ten forms, the authors (1) theorize that successful relationship marketing requires relationship commitment and trust, (2) model relationship commitment and trust as key mediating variables, (3) test this key mediating variable model using data from automobile tire retailers, and (4) compare their model with a rival that does not allow relationship commitment and trust to function as mediating variables. Given the favorable test results for the key mediating variable model, suggestions for further explicating and testing it are offered.
View