ArticlePublisher preview available

Anxiety Sensitivity as a Transdiagnostic Factor in Emotional Disorders, Addictive Disorders, and Their Comorbidities: How Basic Research Informs Intervention Research

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

Le présent article résume notre programme de recherche sur la sensibilité à l’anxiété (SA) – un facteur dispositionnel cognitif et affectif impliquant des craintes de sensations liées à l’anxiété en raison de croyances selon lesquelles ces sensations entraînent des conséquences catastrophiques. La SA et ses dimensions d’ordre inférieur sont considérées comme des facteurs transdiagnostiques de risque ou de maintien des troubles émotionnels et des troubles addictifs. La compréhension des mécanismes par lesquels la SA exerce ses effets peut révéler des cibles d’intervention clés pour les programmes de prévention et de traitement axés sur la SA. Dans le présent article, je passe en revue les recherches fondamentales que nous avons menées pour comprendre les mécanismes qui relient la SA à ces troubles et à leurs symptômes. Je décris également les interventions transdiagnostiques ciblées sur la SA et j’illustre la manière dont la recherche fondamentale a permis d’orienter le contenu de ces interventions. Enfin, je passe en revue les projets en cours dans mon laboratoire et je souligne les orientations futures importantes dans ce domaine. Bien que des progrès considérables aient été réalisés au cours des trois dernières décennies et que la recherche ait considérablement fait avancer notre compréhension de la SA en tant que facteur transdiagnostique, de nombreuses questions restent en suspens. Les réponses devraient nous aider à affiner les interventions afin d’en faire bénéficier au maximum les personnes qui ont une grande peur d’avoir peur.
CPA Donald O. Hebb Award for Distinguished Contributions to Psychology as a Science / Prix Donald O. Hebb pour
contributions remarquables àla psychologie en tant que science
Anxiety Sensitivity as a Transdiagnostic Factor in Emotional
Disorders, Addictive Disorders, and Their Comorbidities:
How Basic Research Informs Intervention Research
Public Signicance Statement
Emotional disorders (anxiety, depressive, and stress/trauma disorders) and addictive disorders (substance use
and gambling disorders) are highly comorbid conditions. This review covers basic and intervention research
on anxiety sensitivity (AS) as a transdiagnostic factor which may help explain this comorbidity and which can
be targeted to effectively treat or prevent both emotional and addictive disorders. The article also illustrates
how basic, mechanistic research is essential for informing effective intervention content.
SHERRY H. STEWART
Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie
University
Abstract
The present article summarises our research
program on anxiety sensitivity (AS)a
cognitiveaffective dispositional factor
involving fears of anxiety-related sensations
due to beliefs that these sensations have catastrophic consequences.
AS and its lower order dimensions are established as transdiagnostic
risk or maintenance factors for emotional disorders and addictive
disorders. Understanding mechanisms by which AS exerts its effects
can reveal key intervention targets for AS-focused preventative and
treatment programs. In the present article, I review basic research we
have conducted to understand the mechanisms linking AS to these
disorders and their symptoms. I also describe AS-targeted
transdiagnostic interventions and illustrate how basic research
informed the content of these interventions. Finally, I review current
projects underway in my lab and highlight important future directions
for this eld. While substantial progress has been made over the past 3
decades, and research has considerably advanced our understanding
of AS as a transdiagnostic factor, there are many remaining questions.
Answers should help us further rene interventions to maximally
benet people with a high level of fear of fear.
Keywords: anxiety sensitivity, transdiagnostic factor, emotional disorder,
addictive disorder, cognitive behaviour therapy
The present article is an invited article to accompany my receipt of
the 2023 Donald O. Hebb Award for Distinguished Contributions to
Psychology as a Science from the Canadian Psychological Association.
In this article, I will focus on my interests in and discoveries relevant to
the nature, causes and consequences, and intervention of anxiety
sensitivity (AS)a trait which I have been studying for over 3 decades.
I began this work as a clinical psychology graduate student at McGill
University and continued to expand and rene it as a faculty member at
Dalhousie University. I am truly honoured to receive an award that
celebrates the legacy of D. O. Hebb given overlaps in our institutional
histories, research epistemologies, and student mentorship philoso-
phies. When I was an undergraduate honours psychology student at
Dalhousie in the mid-1980s, Hebb was a professor emeritus there, as he
had returned to his home province of Nova Scotia in his retirement; his
inuence was pervasive in the top-notch experimental methodology,
cognitive psychology, and neuroscience training I received as an
undergraduate. Hebbs legacy continued to shape my doctoral training
at McGill where Hebb spent most of his academic career; his
philosophy that mechanistic research is needed to inform effective
interventions can be seen in my PhD dissertation researchasetof
basic, mechanistic studies designed to understand the role of AS in the
comorbidity of anxiety and alcohol use disorders. Hebbsinuence
persisted as I returned home to Nova Scotia to begin as a faculty
The author thanks Gordon Flett whose helpful comments on an earlier
version of this article helped to substantially improve the nal product. The
author also acknowledges the contributions of my many students and
colleagues over the years who have contributed immensely to the ideas and
work presented herein. Finally, the author acknowledges grants received
from Health Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Social Sciences
and Humanities Research Council, the Natural Sciences and Humanities
Research Council, Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Matters, the
Alcoholic Beverage Medical Research Foundation, the Canadian Foundation
for Innovation, and the Canada Research Chairs program for providing the
funding for the work described in this review.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Sherry
H. Stewart, Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, 5909
VeteransMemorial Lane, 8th Floor, Abbie J. Lane Building, Halifax,
NS B3H 2E2, Canada. Email: sstewart@dal.ca
Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne
ISSN: 0708-5591 2024, Vol. 65, No. 2, 7592
© 2024 Canadian Psychological Association https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000393
75
... Personality factors such as anxiety sensitivity, hopelessness, impulsivity, and sensation seeking have been established as risk factors for psychopathology and substance use (Castellanos-Ryan et al., 2013;Conrod & Nikolaou, 2016;Stewart, 2024) and are over-represented among adolescents involved in bullying (Kelly et al., 2018). This study used a person-centred approach to extend this research to emerging adults and demonstrated that individuals with both personality and relational risk typically experienced the highest substance use symptomology. ...
Article
Full-text available
Bullying is a form of interpersonal aggression that is associated with mental health and substance use problems. Certain personality traits are risk factors for both bullying involvement (i.e., bullying perpetration and/or victimization), and psychopathology, particularly among adolescents. However, little is known about whether these associations between bullying involvement, personality vulnerability, and psychopathology persist into emerging adulthood. This study examined how bullying involvement and maladaptive personality traits (anxiety sensitivity, hopelessness, impulsivity, sensation seeking) cluster together in groups and how those groups differ in emotional distress/substance use symptoms. Five profiles were identified using latent profile analysis: 1) high victimization, inhibited personality; 2) high perpetration/victimization, impulsive personality; 3) high-risk personality; 4) resilient/inhibited personality; and 5) resilient/externalizing personality. The high-risk personality profile demonstrated the highest emotional distress, followed by profiles characterized by bullying involvement. Elevated substance use was observed among groups characterized by both bullying involvement and personality vulnerability.
Article
Full-text available
Background/Purpose Anxiety sensitivity (AS) is a transdiagnostic risk factor for mental health disorders. While its lower order factors – social, physical, and cognitive concerns – and their associations with emotional disorders have been examined independently of each other, research has not fully appreciated that these factors might appear to different degrees in individuals, with psychopathology implications. Methods We used cluster analysis to investigate how the lower order AS factors appear in treatment-seekers with high AS and how these manifestations of AS (i.e., the different clusters) are uniquely associated with psychopathology. Participants (N = 154; from two studies) were high AS treatment-seeking adults with anxiety and/or depressive disorders who completed a diagnostic interview and self-report measures of AS and anxiety and depression symptoms. Results A four-cluster solution emerged including a Multidimensional cluster (33.8% of the sample) and Social (28.6%), Physical (21.4%), and Cognitive (16.2%) clusters. Validation analyses revealed cross-cluster differences in age, gender, ethnicity, and psychopathology, the latter reflecting known associations between AS and mental health (e.g., depression symptoms were significantly highest in the Cognitive and Multidimensional clusters). Conclusions Results provide valuable insight into the heterogeneity of high AS as it appears clinically, with implications for best matching treatment approaches for this population.
Article
Full-text available
This study explored the validity of classifying a community-recruited sample of substance-abusing women (N = 293) according to 4 personality risk factors for substance abuse (anxiety sensitivity, introversion–hopelessness, sensation seeking, and impulsivity). Cluster analyses reliably identified 5 subtypes of women who demonstrated differential lifetime risk for various addictive and nonaddictive disorders. An anxiety-sensitive subtype demonstrated greater lifetime risk for anxiolytic dependence, somatization disorder, and simple phobia, whereas an introverted–hopeless subtype evidenced a greater lifetime risk for opioid dependence, social phobia, and panic and depressive disorders. Sensation seeking was associated with exclusive alcohol dependence, and impulsivity was associated with higher rates of antisocial personality disorder and cocaine and alcohol dependence. Finally, a low personality risk subtype demonstrated lower lifetime rates of substance dependence and psychopathology.
Article
Full-text available
Female substance abusers recruited from the community were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 brief interventions that differentially targeted their personality and reasons for drug use. The 90-min interventions were: (a) a motivation-matched intervention involving personality-specific motivational and coping skills training, (b) a motivational control intervention involving a motivational film and a supportive discussion with a therapist, and (c) a motivation-mismatched intervention targeting a theoretically different personality profile. Assessment 6 months later (N = 198) indicated that only the matched intervention proved to be more effective than the motivational control intervention in reducing frequency and severity of problematic alcohol and drug use and preventing use of multiple medical services. These findings indicate promise for a client–treatment matching strategy that focuses on personality-specific motives for substance abuse.
Article
Full-text available
Substantial correlational evidence supports a causal (mediational) interpretation of alcohol expectancy operation, but definitive support requires a true experimental test. Thus, moderately to heavily drinking male college students were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions in a pre–post design: Expectancy challenge (designed to manipulate expectancy levels), “traditional” information, and assessment-only control. Expectancy challenge produced significant drinking decreases, compared with the other 2 groups. Decreases in measured expectancies paralleled drinking decreases in the challenge condition. Significant increases in alcohol knowledge in the traditional program were not associated with decreased drinking. These experimental findings support a causal (mediational) interpretation of expectancy operation. The implications for a cognitive (memory) model of expectancies and for prevention and intervention programs for problem drinking and alcoholism are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
We investigated cardiac perception in panic disorder with both self-report and objective measures. In Study 1, 120 patients with panic disorder, 86 infrequent panickers, and 38 patients with other anxiety disorders reported greater cardiac and gastrointestinal awareness than 62 normal control subjects. Subjects with panic attacks reported greater cardiac awareness, but not gastrointestinal awareness, than those with other anxiety disorders. Studies 2 and 3 included a test of heart rate perception in which subjects silently counted their heartbeats without taking their pulse. In Study 2, 65 panic disorder patients showed better performance than 50 infrequent panickers, 27 patients with simple phobias, and 46 normal control subjects. No group differences were found in ability to estimate time intervals. In Study 3, 13 patients with panic disorder and 15 with generalized anxiety disorder showed better heart rate perception than 16 depressed patients.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: While individuals have many motives to gamble, one particularly risky motive for gambling is to cope with negative affect. Conflict with one's romantic partner is a strong predictor of negative affect, which may elicit coping motives for gambling and, in turn, gambling-related problems. Support for this mediational model was demonstrated in relation to drinking-related problems. We extended this model to gambling. Method: Using a cross-sectional design, we examined links between romantic conflict (Partner-Specific Rejecting Behaviors Scale), negative affect (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales-21), coping gambling motives (Gambling Motives Questionnaire, coping subscale), and gambling-related problems [Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI)] in 206 regular gamblers (64% men; mean age = 44.7 years; mean PGSI = 8.7) who were in a romantic relationship and recruited through Qualtrics Panels in July 2021. Results: Results supported our hypothesis that the association between romantic conflict and gambling-related problems would be sequentially mediated through negative affect and coping gambling motives, β = 0.38, 95% CI [0.27, 0.39], and also showed a strong single mediation pathway through negative affect alone, β = 0.27, 95% CI [0.17, 0.38]. Discussion: Negative affect and coping gambling motives partially explain the link between romantic conflict and gambling-related problems. Interventions should target both negative affect and coping gambling motives in response to romantic conflict to reduce gambling-related problems in partnered gamblers.
Article
Full-text available
Background The Four Factor Personality Vulnerability model identifies four specific personality traits (e.g., sensation seeking [SS], impulsivity [IMP], anxiety sensitivity [AS], and hopelessness [HOP]) as implicated in substance use behaviors, motives for substance use, and co-occurring psychiatric conditions. Although the relationship between these traits and polysubstance use in opioid agonist therapy (OAT) clients has been investigated quantitatively, no study has examined the qualitative expression of each trait using clients’ voice. Method Nineteen Methadone Maintenance Therapy (MMT) clients (68.4% male, 84.2% white, mean age[SD] = 42.71 [10.18]) scoring high on one of the four personality traits measured by the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale [SURPS] completed a semi-structured qualitative interview designed to explore their lived experience of their respective trait. Thematic analysis was used to derive themes, which were further quantified using content analysis. Results Themes emerging from interviews reflected (1) internalizing and externalizing symptoms, (2) adversity experiences, and (3) polysubstance use. Internalizing symptoms subthemes included symptoms of anxiety, fear, stress, depression, and avoidance coping. Externalizing subthemes included anger, disinhibited cognitions, and anti-social and risk-taking behaviors. Adverse experiences subthemes included poor health, poverty, homelessness, unemployment, trauma, and conflict. Finally, polysubstance use subthemes include substance types, methods of use, and motives. Differences emerged between personality profiles in the relative endorsement of various subthemes, including those pertaining to polysubstance use, that were largely as theoretically expected. Conclusion Personality is associated with unique cognitive, affective, and behavioral lived experiences, suggesting that personality may be a novel intervention target in adjunctive psychosocial treatment for those undergoing OAT.
Article
Anxiety sensitivity (AS) – characterized by a persistent fear that arousal-related bodily sensations will lead to serious cognitive, physical, and/or social consequences – is associated with various psychopathologies, including depressive symptoms and binge eating. This 3-week, 3-wave longitudinal study examined the relation between AS (including its global AS factor and lower-order AS cognitive, physical, and social concern dimensions), depressive symptoms, and binge eating among 410 undergraduates from two universities. Using generalized estimating equation models, we found that global AS, AS social concerns, and depressive symptoms predicted binge eating during any given week. Mediation analyses showed that global AS (as a latent variable with its lower-order AS dimensions as indicators), AS cognitive concerns, and AS physical concerns at Wave 1 predicted subsequent increases in depressive symptoms at Wave 2, which, in turn, led to increases in binge eating at Wave 3. Findings contribute to a better understanding of the interplay between AS, depressive symptoms, and binge eating, highlighting the role of binge eating as a potential coping mechanism for individuals with high AS, particularly in managing depressive symptoms. This study underscores the importance of AS-targeted intervention and prevention efforts in addressing depressive symptoms and binge eating.
Article
Cognitive models of insomnia posit a role for anxiety sensitivity (AS) in sleep difficulties. While sleep disturbances have been linked to AS, particularly AS cognitive concerns, prior studies have rarely accounted for the correlated construct of depression. We used pre-treatment intervention trial data from 128 high AS, treatment-seeking adults with a DSM-5 diagnosis of an anxiety, depressive, or posttraumatic stress disorder to determine whether AS cognitive concerns and/or depression are independently associated with sleep impairment domains (e.g., sleep quality, latency, daytime dysfunction). Participants provided data on AS, depressive symptoms, and sleep impairments. AS cognitive concerns (but not other AS dimensions) were correlated with four of five sleep impairment domains; depression was correlated with all five. Multiple regressions revealed four of five sleep impairment domains were predicted by depression with no independent contribution of AS cognitive concerns. In contrast, AS cognitive concerns and depression were independently associated with daytime dysfunction. Results suggest previous findings linking AS cognitive concerns to sleep impairments may have been largely secondary to the overlap of cognitive concerns with depression. Findings demonstrate the importance of incorporating depression into the cognitive model of insomnia. Both AS cognitive concerns and depression may be useful targets for reducing daytime dysfunction.