Available via license: CC BY 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
The Impact of Communication Technology on Family
Dynamics
Journal of Communication
ISSN: 2791-3201 (Online)
Vol. 5, Issue No. 3, pp 1 - 16, 2024 www.carijournals.org
2
The Impact of Communication Technology on Family Dynamics
1*Janet Kyalo
Multimedia University of Kenya
Accepted: 23rd Mar 2024 Received in Revised Form: 21st May, 2024 Published: 6th June, 2024
Abstract
Purpose: This study sought to investigate the impact of communication technology on family
dynamics.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary
data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting
data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field
research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the
study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily
accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the
impact of communication technology on family dynamics. Preliminary empirical review revealed that
communication technology had a profound and complex impact on family dynamics, highlighting both
its benefits and challenges. It found that technology often led to decreased face-to-face interactions
and increased feelings of isolation, negatively affecting relationship satisfaction and increasing
conflicts. Parents' technology use played a crucial role, with active mediation and co-viewing fostering
a cohesive family environment, while excessive use by adolescents was linked to anxiety and
depression. The study emphasized the need for balanced technology use, recommending open
communication, clear guidelines, and "tech-free" zones to enhance family relationships and well-
being.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Social Information Processing Theory,
Family Systems Theory and Media Richness Theory may be used to anchor future studies on the
impact of communication technology on family dynamics. The study contributed to theoretical
knowledge by introducing concepts like "technoference" and emphasizing the socio-cultural context
of technology use. It provided practical guidelines for family therapists and counselors to manage
technology use within families, such as setting boundaries and promoting face-to-face interactions.
The study also recommended that policymakers develop educational programs for digital literacy,
encourage workplaces to respect family time, and collaborate with technology companies to create
features supporting healthy technology use. Additionally, it highlighted the need for ongoing research
funding to explore the impact of emerging technologies on family dynamics.
Keywords: Technoference, Digital Boundaries, Family Dynamics, Face-to-Face Interactions, Digital
Literacy
Journal of Communication
ISSN: 2791-3201 (Online)
Vol. 5, Issue No. 3, pp 1 - 16, 2024 www.carijournals.org
3
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Family dynamics refer to the intricate patterns of interactions, relationships, and behaviors that occur
within a family unit. These dynamics are influenced by a variety of factors, including cultural norms,
socioeconomic status, individual personalities, and external social influences. Family dynamics play a
crucial role in shaping the psychological well-being and development of individuals, influencing
everything from emotional health to social behaviors and educational outcomes. The nature of these
interactions can vary significantly between different cultural and geographic contexts, making it
essential to explore family dynamics from a global perspective. In the United States, family dynamics
have undergone significant changes over the past few decades, influenced by shifts in societal values,
economic conditions, and technological advancements. The traditional nuclear family model has
diversified, with an increase in single-parent households, blended families, and same-sex parent
families. According to the U.S. Census Bureau (2019), about 23% of children under the age of 18 live
with a single mother, and 4% live with a single father. These changes in family structures impact the
dynamics within the household, often leading to new challenges and opportunities for family members.
Research indicates that communication technology, such as smartphones and social media, has both
positive and negative effects on family interactions, facilitating connectivity while also potentially
leading to digital distractions (Hampton & Welsh, 2019).
In the United Kingdom, similar trends are observed, with a noticeable shift towards more diverse
family configurations. The Office for National Statistics (2020) reported that 14.9% of families in the
UK are lone-parent families, a figure that has been relatively stable over recent years. The UK's cultural
landscape, characterized by its mix of traditional and modern values, influences family dynamics in
unique ways. For instance, the integration of digital communication tools has become a prominent
feature in many households, affecting how family members interact and maintain relationships. Studies
have shown that while technology can enhance family communication, it also presents challenges such
as reduced face-to-face interactions and increased screen time (Baxter & Braithwaite, 2014).
In Japan, family dynamics are deeply rooted in cultural traditions and societal expectations, yet they
are also evolving in response to modernization and changing demographics. The traditional Japanese
family structure, which emphasized multigenerational living and strong patriarchal norms, is gradually
shifting. Japan's aging population and declining birth rates have led to smaller household sizes and a
growing number of nuclear families. According to the Ministry of Internal Affairs and
Communications (2018), the average household size in Japan has decreased to 2.33 persons. These
demographic changes, coupled with increasing use of communication technology, are reshaping family
interactions. Japanese families are finding new ways to maintain close-knit relationships despite
physical distances, often relying on technology to bridge gaps (Tsuji & Shimizu, 2016).
In Brazil, family dynamics are influenced by a blend of cultural traditions and socioeconomic factors.
Brazilian families often emphasize strong familial bonds and collective support systems, which are
essential in a country marked by economic disparities and social challenges. The Brazilian Institute of
Geography and Statistics (2019) noted that extended families and multigenerational households are
common, reflecting the cultural importance of family cohesion. Communication technology plays a
significant role in maintaining these bonds, particularly among younger generations who use social
media to stay connected with relatives. However, economic challenges and regional disparities also
impact family dynamics, with families in rural areas facing different issues compared to those in urban
settings (Costa & Silva, 2015).
In many African countries, family dynamics are shaped by a rich tapestry of cultural traditions,
economic conditions, and social norms. Extended families and communal living are prevalent,
reflecting the cultural emphasis on collective responsibility and support. For example, in Kenya, the
Journal of Communication
ISSN: 2791-3201 (Online)
Vol. 5, Issue No. 3, pp 1 - 16, 2024 www.carijournals.org
4
traditional family structure includes extended family members who often live together or maintain
close ties. According to the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (2018), the average household size is
3.9 persons. Communication technology has increasingly become a vital tool for maintaining family
connections, especially for families separated by migration. However, access to technology and
internet connectivity varies widely, creating disparities in how families communicate and interact
(Mokomane, 2013).
Despite the regional differences, certain commonalities in family dynamics can be observed across
these countries. The increasing prevalence of digital communication tools is a shared trend, influencing
how family members interact, maintain relationships, and fulfill their roles within the household.
While technology offers opportunities for enhanced connectivity, it also presents challenges such as
the potential for decreased face-to-face interactions and the emergence of digital divides. Addressing
these challenges requires a nuanced understanding of the specific cultural and socioeconomic contexts
in which families operate (Thompson & Goodman, 2019). The impact of communication technology
on family dynamics is multifaceted, with both positive and negative implications. On the positive side,
technology can facilitate better communication and stronger bonds among family members,
particularly those who live apart. For instance, video calls and social media platforms enable families
to stay connected and share experiences in real-time, fostering a sense of closeness despite physical
distance. On the negative side, excessive screen time and digital distractions can lead to decreased
quality of face-to-face interactions and potential conflicts within the household. Balancing the use of
technology with traditional forms of communication is essential for maintaining healthy family
dynamics (Fosco & Grych, 2013).
Furthermore, socioeconomic factors play a significant role in shaping family dynamics and the
adoption of communication technology. Families with higher socioeconomic status are more likely to
have access to advanced communication tools and stable internet connections, enabling them to
leverage technology effectively. In contrast, families with lower socioeconomic status may face
barriers to accessing and utilizing these technologies, leading to disparities in communication and
family interactions. Addressing these disparities requires targeted interventions and policies aimed at
improving digital literacy and access to technology for all families (Livingstone & Helsper, 2013). The
study of family dynamics and the impact of communication technology reveals the complex interplay
between cultural traditions, socioeconomic conditions, and technological advancements. By
examining these dynamics across different regions, we gain a deeper understanding of the unique
challenges and opportunities faced by families today. This knowledge is crucial for developing
effective strategies and policies to support healthy family relationships and enhance the well-being of
individuals within the family unit (Olson & Gorall, 2016).
Communication technology encompasses a wide array of tools, systems, and platforms designed to
facilitate the exchange of information across distances. This includes not only the physical devices like
smartphones, tablets, and computers but also the software and applications such as email, social media,
instant messaging, and video conferencing tools. Over the past few decades, these technologies have
seen rapid advancements, significantly altering the landscape of both personal and professional
communication. The proliferation of the internet, mobile networks, and digital platforms has
revolutionized the way people connect, share information, and maintain relationships. These
technological developments have had profound implications for family dynamics, influencing how
family members interact, support each other, and maintain relationships despite physical separations
(Walther, 2012).
The integration of communication technology into daily life has fundamentally transformed the ways
in which families communicate and interact. Smartphones, social media platforms, and instant
Journal of Communication
ISSN: 2791-3201 (Online)
Vol. 5, Issue No. 3, pp 1 - 16, 2024 www.carijournals.org
5
messaging applications have made it easier for family members to stay in touch, regardless of
geographical distances. For instance, video calling applications like Skype, FaceTime, and Zoom allow
family members to see and talk to each other in real-time, providing a sense of presence and connection
that was previously unavailable. This can be especially beneficial for maintaining relationships in long-
distance family scenarios, such as when children move away for college or work. However, the
ubiquitous nature of these technologies also presents new challenges, such as managing screen time
and ensuring meaningful face-to-face interactions within the family unit (Hertlein, 2012).
One significant impact of communication technology on family dynamics is the shift in how families
manage their daily lives and routines. Digital calendars, family group chats, and reminder apps help
families coordinate schedules, plan activities, and share important information instantly. This can
enhance organizational efficiency within the family, reducing misunderstandings and conflicts that
arise from miscommunication. For example, a family group chat can be used to coordinate meal plans,
schedule carpooling, and share updates about daily activities, fostering a collaborative and organized
family environment. However, the constant connectivity can also blur the boundaries between personal
time and family time, potentially leading to feelings of being constantly on call and stressed (McDaniel
& Coyne, 2016).
Communication technology also plays a crucial role in shaping the emotional bonds within families.
The ability to share photos, videos, and messages instantly helps family members stay emotionally
connected, even when they are physically apart. Social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and
WhatsApp enable families to share milestones, celebrate achievements, and provide emotional
support. For instance, grandparents can stay updated on their grandchildren's lives through photos and
videos shared on social media, maintaining a sense of involvement and connection. However, the
curated nature of social media content can sometimes create unrealistic expectations and pressures,
contributing to family stress and conflicts (Padilla-Walker & Coyne, 2019).
The rise of communication technology has also influenced parenting practices and child development.
Parents now have access to a wealth of information and resources on parenting through websites, blogs,
and online forums. This can empower parents with knowledge and support, enhancing their confidence
and effectiveness in their parenting roles. Additionally, communication technology allows for more
flexible work arrangements, enabling parents to balance work and family responsibilities more
effectively. However, excessive use of digital devices by parents can lead to decreased quality of
interactions with their children, impacting the parent-child relationship negatively. Children, too, are
increasingly exposed to digital devices from a young age, which can affect their social development
and family interactions (Radesky & Christakis, 2016).
Adolescents and communication technology form a particularly dynamic and complex relationship
within the context of family dynamics. For teenagers, social media and instant messaging are central
to their social lives, providing platforms for self-expression, identity formation, and peer interaction.
While these technologies can help adolescents maintain social connections and receive social support,
they can also introduce risks such as cyberbullying, online predators, and exposure to inappropriate
content. Furthermore, the reliance on digital communication can sometimes lead to conflicts between
adolescents and their parents, particularly regarding screen time management and online behavior.
Balancing the benefits and risks of communication technology is an ongoing challenge for families
with teenagers (Uhls, Michikyan, Morris, Garcia, Small & Zgourou, 2014).
Elderly family members also experience the impact of communication technology, often benefiting
from increased connectivity and reduced feelings of isolation. Digital tools like video calls and social
media can help older adults stay in touch with family members, participate in family events, and
maintain social connections. For example, grandparents can use video calls to read stories to their
Journal of Communication
ISSN: 2791-3201 (Online)
Vol. 5, Issue No. 3, pp 1 - 16, 2024 www.carijournals.org
6
grandchildren or join family celebrations remotely. However, the digital divide remains a significant
issue, with many older adults lacking the skills or access needed to use these technologies effectively.
Bridging this gap requires targeted efforts to improve digital literacy among the elderly, ensuring they
can fully participate in the benefits of modern communication technologies (Quan-Haase & Neves,
2018).
The intersection of communication technology and work-life balance is another critical aspect of
family dynamics. The ability to work remotely or flexibly through digital communication tools has
transformed the traditional boundaries between work and home life. While this flexibility can provide
parents with more time to spend with their families, it can also lead to challenges such as work-related
stress spilling over into family time. The constant connectivity enabled by smartphones and email can
create an expectation of being available for work at all times, making it difficult for individuals to
disconnect and focus on family interactions. Finding a healthy balance between work and family life
is essential for maintaining positive family dynamics in the digital age (Chesley, 2014).
Cultural differences also play a significant role in how communication technology affects family
dynamics. In collectivist cultures, where family bonds and collective well-being are highly valued,
communication technology is often used to strengthen family ties and support systems. For instance,
in many Asian and African cultures, extended families use digital platforms to coordinate caregiving
responsibilities and maintain regular contact. In contrast, individualistic cultures, such as those in many
Western countries, may use technology more for individual convenience and personal communication.
Understanding these cultural nuances is crucial for appreciating the diverse ways in which
communication technology influences family dynamics across different societies (Hwang & He,
2015).
Despite the many benefits of communication technology, there are also potential negative impacts on
family dynamics that need to be addressed. Issues such as digital addiction, privacy concerns, and the
potential for decreased face-to-face interactions are important considerations. Families must navigate
these challenges by setting boundaries and establishing healthy technology usage habits. Encouraging
open communication about technology use and its impact on family relationships can help mitigate
some of these negative effects. By fostering a balanced approach to technology, families can leverage
its benefits while minimizing its potential downsides (Twenge & Campbell, 2018).
1.1 Statement of the Problem
The rapid advancement and widespread adoption of communication technology have significantly
transformed the way families interact and maintain relationships. While these technologies offer
numerous benefits, such as facilitating long-distance communication and providing new ways to share
experiences, they also present challenges that can impact family dynamics. For instance, the pervasive
use of smartphones and social media has been linked to reduced face-to-face interactions and increased
screen time, which can lead to feelings of disconnection and misunderstandings within the family unit.
A study by Pew Research Center (2018) found that 95% of teens have access to a smartphone, and
45% are online almost constantly, highlighting the pervasive nature of digital communication among
younger family members. Despite the growing body of research on this topic, there is a need for a
more comprehensive understanding of how these technologies affect various aspects of family
dynamics, including communication patterns, emotional bonds, and the overall functioning of the
family.
Existing literature has explored the individual effects of communication technology on specific family
relationships, such as parent-child interactions and marital satisfaction. However, there is a research
gap in understanding the holistic impact of these technologies on the entire family system. Most studies
Journal of Communication
ISSN: 2791-3201 (Online)
Vol. 5, Issue No. 3, pp 1 - 16, 2024 www.carijournals.org
7
focus on either the positive or negative aspects of technology use, often neglecting to consider the
nuanced and multifaceted ways in which technology influences family dynamics. Furthermore, there
is limited research on how different cultural contexts moderate the impact of communication
technology on families. This study aims to fill these gaps by examining both the beneficial and
detrimental effects of communication technology on family interactions, emotional closeness, and
family cohesion across diverse cultural settings. By doing so, it seeks to provide a more balanced and
comprehensive perspective on the role of technology in contemporary family life (Hertlein & Blumer,
2013).
The findings of this study will be valuable to various stakeholders, including family therapists,
educators, policymakers, and families themselves. Family therapists can use the insights gained to
develop more effective intervention strategies that address the specific challenges posed by
communication technology. Educators can benefit from understanding how technology affects family
dynamics, as this knowledge can inform their approaches to involving parents in students' academic
lives and addressing behavioral issues linked to technology use. Policymakers can use the research
findings to craft policies that promote healthy technology use within families, such as guidelines for
screen time and digital literacy programs. Ultimately, families will benefit from a deeper understanding
of how to navigate the complexities of technology use in a way that strengthens rather than weakens
family bonds, fostering healthier and more supportive family environments (Coyne, Padilla-Walker,
Fraser, Fellows & Day, 2014).
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Theoretical Review
2.1.1 Social Information Processing Theory
Social Information Processing (SIP) Theory, developed by Joseph Walther in 1992, provides a
foundational framework for understanding how people form impressions and develop relationships
through computer-mediated communication (CMC). The central theme of SIP theory is that
individuals can effectively convey social and emotional information through CMC, but it takes more
time compared to face-to-face interactions due to the reduced social cues. Walther posits that as users
adapt to the medium's constraints, they develop compensatory strategies to achieve relational outcomes
comparable to those in face-to-face settings. This theory is particularly relevant to the study of
communication technology's impact on family dynamics as it explains how family members can
maintain and even enhance their relationships through digital means. For instance, through frequent
texting, video calls, and social media interactions, family members can share emotions, provide
support, and sustain emotional bonds despite physical distances. The theory highlights the adaptability
and resilience of human communication, emphasizing that while the medium changes, the fundamental
processes of relationship-building and maintenance remain intact (Walther, 2012).
2.1.2 Family Systems Theory
Family Systems Theory, originated by Murray Bowen in the mid-20th century, conceptualizes the
family as an emotional unit and uses systems thinking to describe the complex interactions within it.
Bowen's theory emphasizes that family members are interconnected and that individual behaviors
cannot be understood in isolation from the family system. Key concepts include differentiation of self,
triangles, and family projection processes, which describe how family members influence and are
influenced by each other. This theory is highly pertinent to research on communication technology's
impact on family dynamics because it provides a holistic view of the family as an interdependent
system. The use of communication technology can alter traditional patterns of interaction, potentially
creating new dynamics and tensions. For example, the pervasive use of smartphones might lead to
Journal of Communication
ISSN: 2791-3201 (Online)
Vol. 5, Issue No. 3, pp 1 - 16, 2024 www.carijournals.org
8
increased connectivity but also to conflicts over screen time and attention. By applying Family Systems
Theory, researchers can explore how digital communication tools affect the entire family unit,
examining both positive and negative changes in family cohesion, conflict resolution, and emotional
support (Bowen, 1978).
2.1.3 Media Richness Theory
Media Richness Theory, developed by Richard L. Daft and Robert H. Lengel in 1986, explores the
capacity of different communication media to convey information effectively. The theory posits that
media vary in their richness—defined by the medium's ability to transmit cues such as body language,
tone of voice, and immediacy of feedback. Richer media, like face-to-face communication, are deemed
more effective for complex and ambiguous tasks, while leaner media, like emails or text messages, are
better suited for simple, unambiguous exchanges. This theory is crucial for examining the impact of
communication technology on family dynamics, as it helps explain the differential effectiveness of
various digital tools in maintaining family relationships. For example, video calls (a richer medium)
can better convey emotional nuances and foster a sense of presence compared to text messages (a
leaner medium). Understanding media richness can help identify which communication technologies
are most beneficial for specific family interactions, such as conflict resolution, emotional support, and
routine coordination. By leveraging the appropriate media, families can enhance their communication
effectiveness and overall relational satisfaction (Daft & Lengel, 1986).
2.2 Empirical Review
McDaniel & Coyne (2016) explored the phenomenon of "technoference," or the interference of
technology in couple relationships, and its implications for personal and relational well-being. With
the increasing ubiquity of smartphones and other digital devices, understanding how technology affects
intimate relationships is essential for maintaining healthy family dynamics. Authors conducted a
survey of 143 married or cohabiting women to assess their perceptions of technoference in their
relationships. Participants were asked about the frequency and impact of technology interruptions
during face-to-face interactions with their partners, as well as their overall relationship satisfaction and
individual well-being. The study found that higher levels of perceived technoference were associated
with lower relationship satisfaction, more conflict over technology use, and greater depressive
symptoms among women. These results highlight the detrimental effects of technology interruptions
on intimate relationships and individual well-being, underscoring the importance of managing
technology use within the family context. Based on their findings, authors recommended that couples
set boundaries for technology use and prioritize face-to-face interactions to mitigate the negative
effects of technoference on their relationships. They also suggested that therapists incorporate
discussions about technology use into couples counseling sessions to address potential conflicts and
enhance relational satisfaction.
Padilla-Walker, LCoyne & Fraser (2012) investigated the role of parental mediation in adolescents'
technology use and its impact on family relationships. With the proliferation of digital devices among
adolescents, understanding how parental involvement influences technology use and family dynamics
is crucial for promoting healthy development. The researchers surveyed 500 adolescents and their
parents over a two-year period to assess the types and frequency of parental mediation strategies,
adolescents' technology use, and the quality of family relationships. Both quantitative and qualitative
data were collected to provide a comprehensive understanding of family dynamics. The study found
that active mediation (e.g., discussing online content) was associated with higher quality family
relationships, while restrictive mediation (e.g., limiting screen time) was linked to lower quality
relationships. Additionally, co-viewing (e.g., watching videos together) was positively correlated with
family cohesion, highlighting the importance of parental involvement in shaping adolescents'
Journal of Communication
ISSN: 2791-3201 (Online)
Vol. 5, Issue No. 3, pp 1 - 16, 2024 www.carijournals.org
9
technology use and its impact on family dynamics. Based on their findings, the study recommended
that parents engage in active mediation and co-viewing to enhance the positive impact of technology
on family relationships. They also emphasized the need for parents to communicate openly with their
adolescents about technology use and set clear guidelines for responsible use.
Hertlein & Blumer (2013) aimed to develop a comprehensive framework for understanding the impact
of digital technology on couple and family relationships. With the increasing integration of technology
into family life, it is essential to explore how digital communication tools shape family dynamics and
interaction patterns. The researchers conducted an extensive review of existing literature on technology
use in couple and family relationships, synthesizing key themes and patterns. Through qualitative
analysis, they identified common challenges and opportunities associated with technology use within
the family context. The review revealed several key impacts of technology on relationships, including
changes in communication patterns, issues of trust and privacy, and the blurring of boundaries between
work and home life. The authors proposed the Couple and Family Technology Framework to
conceptualize these dynamics and guide future research in this area. The study suggested that therapists
and practitioners consider the role of technology in their clients' lives and address issues of technology
use in therapy. They also emphasized the need for families to engage in open communication about
technology use and develop strategies for managing its impact on family dynamics.
Radesky, Kistin, CZuckerman, Nitzberg, Gross, Kaplan-Sanoff, Augustyn & Silverstein (2014)
investigated the patterns of mobile device use by caregivers and children during meals in fast-food
restaurants and their impact on parent-child interactions. Given the increasing prevalence of mobile
devices in family settings, understanding how device use affects parent-child relationships during
mealtime is crucial for promoting healthy family dynamics. The study observed 55 caregivers with
young children during meals at fast-food restaurants, documenting the frequency and nature of mobile
device use and parent-child interactions. Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected to
provide a comprehensive understanding of the dynamics between mobile device use and parent-child
interactions. The study found that parents who were more absorbed in their mobile devices engaged in
fewer verbal and non-verbal interactions with their children during meals. Moreover, children of these
parents were more likely to exhibit problematic behaviors to gain attention, highlighting the negative
impact of mobile device use on parent-child interactions and family dynamics. Based on their findings,
authors recommended that parents limit mobile device use during mealtime to enhance parent-child
interactions and promote healthy child development. They also emphasized the importance of creating
device-free zones and times within the family routine to facilitate meaningful family interactions.
Stockdale & Coyne (2019) investigated the impact of parents' and adolescents' social media use on
family dynamics and adolescent development. With the pervasive use of social media among
adolescents and parents, understanding how social media affects family relationships and adolescent
well-being is essential for promoting healthy family dynamics. The researchers surveyed 400 parent-
adolescent dyads over a two-year period to assess social media use, family functioning, and adolescent
developmental outcomes. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected to provide a
comprehensive understanding of the complex relationships between social media use and family
dynamics. The study found that higher levels of social media use by both parents and adolescents were
associated with lower family cohesion and increased family conflict. Additionally, excessive social
media use was linked to negative developmental outcomes for adolescents, such as increased anxiety
and depression, highlighting the detrimental effects of social media on family relationships and
adolescent well-being. Based on their findings, the authors recommended that families establish
guidelines for social media use and engage in activities that promote face-to-face interactions to
Journal of Communication
ISSN: 2791-3201 (Online)
Vol. 5, Issue No. 3, pp 1 - 16, 2024 www.carijournals.org
10
strengthen family bonds. They also emphasized the importance of open communication within families
about the risks and benefits of social media use.
Valkenburg & Peter (2013) examined the effects of online communication on adolescents' social
connectedness and family relationships. With the increasing prevalence of online communication
among adolescents, understanding its impact on social and family dynamics is crucial for promoting
healthy development. The study conducted a meta-analysis of 43 studies that investigated the impact
of online communication on adolescents' social and emotional development. They synthesized findings
from these studies to provide a comprehensive overview of the effects of online communication on
adolescents' social connectedness and family relationships. The meta-analysis found that online
communication had a small but positive effect on adolescents' social connectedness and well-being.
However, excessive use was associated with poorer family relationships and increased conflict,
highlighting the importance of moderation in online communication for maintaining healthy family
dynamics. The researchers recommended that parents monitor and guide their adolescents' online
communication to ensure a balance between online and offline interactions. They also emphasized the
importance of open communication within families about the risks and benefits of online
communication.
3.0 METHODOLOGY
The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that
which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from
existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as
the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied
on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through
the online journals and library.
4.0 FINDINGS
This study presented both a contextual and methodological gap. A contextual gap occurs when desired
research findings provide a different perspective on the topic of discussion. For instance, Radesky,
Kistin, CZuckerman, Nitzberg, Gross, Kaplan-Sanoff, Augustyn & Silverstein (2014) investigated the
patterns of mobile device use by caregivers and children during meals in fast-food restaurants and their
impact on parent-child interactions. Given the increasing prevalence of mobile devices in family
settings, understanding how device use affects parent-child relationships during mealtime is crucial
for promoting healthy family dynamics. The study observed 55 caregivers with young children during
meals at fast-food restaurants, documenting the frequency and nature of mobile device use and parent-
child interactions. Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected to provide a comprehensive
understanding of the dynamics between mobile device use and parent-child interactions. The study
found that parents who were more absorbed in their mobile devices engaged in fewer verbal and non-
verbal interactions with their children during meals. Based on their findings, authors recommended
that parents limit mobile device use during mealtime to enhance parent-child interactions and promote
healthy child development. They also emphasized the importance of creating device-free zones and
times within the family routine to facilitate meaningful family interactions. On the other hand, the
current study focused on exploring the impact of communication technology on family dynamics,
Secondly, a methodological gap also presents itself, for example, in their study on investigating the
patterns of mobile device use by caregivers and children during meals in fast-food restaurants and their
impact on parent-child interactions; Radesky, Kistin, CZuckerman, Nitzberg, Gross, Kaplan-Sanoff,
Augustyn & Silverstein (2014) observed 55 caregivers with young children during meals at fast-food
restaurants, documenting the frequency and nature of mobile device use and parent-child interactions.
Journal of Communication
ISSN: 2791-3201 (Online)
Vol. 5, Issue No. 3, pp 1 - 16, 2024 www.carijournals.org
11
Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected to provide a comprehensive understanding of the
dynamics between mobile device use and parent-child interactions. Whereas, the current study adopted
a desktop research method.
5.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Conclusion
The study has revealed a multifaceted and nuanced landscape, where the influence of digital devices
and online communication tools permeates every aspect of family life. At the heart of these findings
is the observation that technology, while facilitating connection and convenience, can also introduce
significant challenges to maintaining healthy family relationships. The constant presence of
smartphones, tablets, and other digital devices has reshaped how family members interact with each
other, often leading to decreased face-to-face communication and increased feelings of isolation within
the household. This duality underscores the critical need for families to find a balanced approach to
technology use that leverages its benefits while mitigating its potential downsides.
One of the central themes emerging from the study is the concept of "technoference," where technology
interrupts and interferes with direct interpersonal interactions. This phenomenon has been shown to
negatively impact relationship satisfaction, leading to increased conflicts and a general sense of
disconnect among family members. Parents, in particular, play a crucial role in mediating technology's
impact by setting boundaries and modeling appropriate technology use. When parents are absorbed in
their devices, it not only diminishes the quality of interactions with their children but also sets a
precedent for technology use within the family. Conversely, when parents engage in active mediation
and co-viewing of digital content, it fosters a more cohesive family environment and enhances
relational satisfaction.
Another significant insight from the study is the role of communication technology in shaping
adolescents' development and their relationships with their parents. Adolescents today are growing up
in an environment where social media and online communication are integral to their social lives.
While these tools can enhance social connectedness and provide valuable opportunities for self-
expression, excessive use has been linked to negative developmental outcomes, such as increased
anxiety and depression. The study emphasizes the importance of parental guidance in helping
adolescents navigate the digital landscape. By maintaining open lines of communication about the
risks and benefits of technology use, parents can help their children develop healthy habits and
maintain a balance between online and offline activities.
Lastly, the study highlights the potential for technology to be a double-edged sword in family
dynamics. On one hand, digital communication tools can bridge physical distances, allowing family
members to stay connected across geographical boundaries. This is particularly beneficial for
maintaining relationships with extended family members and for families with members who travel
frequently. On the other hand, the omnipresence of technology can blur the boundaries between work
and home life, leading to stress and burnout. To mitigate these effects, families are encouraged to
establish "tech-free" zones and times, such as during meals or before bedtime, to ensure that quality
interactions are prioritized. Therapists and counselors are also advised to incorporate discussions about
technology use in their sessions to help families develop strategies for managing its impact on their
relationships.
The impact of communication technology on family dynamics is profound and complex, requiring a
thoughtful and proactive approach to harness its benefits while addressing its challenges. By fostering
open communication, setting clear guidelines, and modeling healthy technology use, families can
navigate the digital age in a way that supports their well-being and strengthens their relationships. The
Journal of Communication
ISSN: 2791-3201 (Online)
Vol. 5, Issue No. 3, pp 1 - 16, 2024 www.carijournals.org
12
study underscores the importance of balance and intentionality in technology use, highlighting the
potential for both positive and negative outcomes depending on how it is integrated into family life.
Ultimately, the findings call for a collective effort from family members, educators, and mental health
professionals to promote healthy digital habits and ensure that technology serves to enhance, rather
than hinder, family dynamics.
5.2 Recommendations
The study on the impact of communication technology on family dynamics significantly contributes
to theoretical frameworks by underscoring the nuanced ways in which digital interactions reshape
familial relationships. It is recommended that future theoretical models incorporate the concept of
"technoference," a term that encapsulates the interruptions caused by technology in face-to-face family
interactions. This concept should be expanded to understand the broader implications on emotional
and relational well-being within families. Additionally, theoretical frameworks should consider the
bidirectional nature of technology use and family dynamics, where not only does technology influence
family relationships, but the quality of these relationships can also dictate the manner and extent of
technology use. Theories should also integrate the idea of digital boundaries within family units,
emphasizing the importance of setting limits to manage the intrusion of technology in intimate spaces
and times.
Moreover, existing theories on family dynamics should be updated to reflect the changing patterns of
communication brought about by the pervasive use of digital devices. This includes understanding
how asynchronous communication (e.g., texting, social media messaging) impacts real-time
interactions and emotional closeness among family members. Theoretical work should also explore
how different family members adapt to technological changes at varying paces, creating potential
generational gaps in technology use and preferences. Lastly, the study recommends that theoretical
models should consider the socio-cultural context in which technology use occurs, as cultural attitudes
towards technology and family can significantly influence its impact on family dynamics.
Practitioners, including family therapists and counselors, should incorporate discussions about
technology use into their sessions with families. It is essential to recognize and address the role of
digital devices in creating or exacerbating family conflicts and to work towards strategies that promote
healthier technology habits. Therapists should guide families in setting clear boundaries for technology
use, such as establishing device-free zones and times, particularly during meals and family gatherings,
to encourage more meaningful interactions. Practitioners can also help families develop
communication skills that balance online and offline interactions, ensuring that digital communication
does not replace face-to-face conversations but rather complements them. In addition, it is
recommended that practitioners educate families on the potential mental health impacts of excessive
technology use, including increased stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. By providing tools and
techniques to manage screen time and encouraging activities that foster real-world connections,
practitioners can help mitigate these negative effects. It is also important for practitioners to stay
informed about the latest technological trends and their implications for family dynamics to offer
relevant and up-to-date advice. Furthermore, practitioners should promote digital literacy within
families, helping all members understand the benefits and risks associated with various forms of
communication technology.
Policymakers should consider the findings of this study to create and promote policies that support
healthy technology use within families. This includes developing guidelines and educational
campaigns that inform the public about the potential impacts of communication technology on family
dynamics and mental health. Policies could mandate the inclusion of digital literacy programs in school
curricula, aimed at teaching children and adolescents about responsible technology use and its effects
Journal of Communication
ISSN: 2791-3201 (Online)
Vol. 5, Issue No. 3, pp 1 - 16, 2024 www.carijournals.org
13
on their relationships and well-being. Additionally, policies should encourage workplaces to respect
family time by limiting after-hours work communications, thereby reducing technoference at
home.Governments could also fund and support community programs that offer resources and support
for families struggling with technology-related issues. This could include family counseling services,
workshops on setting technology boundaries, and activities that promote family bonding without
digital distractions. Policymakers should collaborate with technology companies to design features
that help families manage screen time, such as parental controls, screen time reports, and the ability to
schedule device-free periods. Moreover, there should be a push for research funding dedicated to
further exploring the impact of emerging technologies on family dynamics, ensuring that policy
decisions are based on the latest scientific evidence.
The study contributes to theoretical knowledge by highlighting the complex interplay between
technology and family dynamics. It provides a foundation for understanding how digital
communication tools can both enhance and hinder family interactions, depending on how they are
used. By introducing new concepts such as technoference and digital boundaries, the study adds depth
to existing theories of family communication and interaction. It also emphasizes the importance of
considering the socio-cultural context, which can influence how technology impacts family life. These
contributions help to build a more comprehensive understanding of the digital age's effect on family
dynamics. The study also suggests that future research should explore the long-term effects of
communication technology on family relationships, as well as the potential for generational differences
in technology use to create conflicts or misunderstandings. By addressing these gaps in the literature,
researchers can develop more robust theories that better explain the evolving nature of family dynamics
in a digital world. Additionally, the study's findings can inform theoretical models that examine the
role of technology in shaping individual identity and social connections within the family unit.
In practice, the study's findings offer valuable insights for family therapists, counselors, and educators
working with families affected by communication technology. It provides practical guidelines for
managing technology use within the family, emphasizing the importance of setting boundaries and
promoting face-to-face interactions. These recommendations can help practitioners develop
interventions that address the specific challenges posed by digital devices, such as reduced quality time
and increased conflicts over screen time. By incorporating these strategies into their practice,
professionals can better support families in navigating the complexities of technology use.
The study also highlights the need for ongoing education and training for practitioners, ensuring they
are equipped with the latest knowledge and tools to address technology-related issues in family
dynamics. This includes staying informed about emerging technologies and their potential impacts, as
well as understanding the cultural context in which families use these technologies. By integrating this
knowledge into their practice, professionals can provide more effective and relevant support to
families.
The study's findings have important implications for policy development, particularly in promoting
healthy technology use within families. By advocating for educational programs that teach digital
literacy and responsible technology use, policymakers can help equip families with the skills they need
to navigate the digital landscape. This includes incorporating these topics into school curricula, as well
as providing resources and support for parents and caregivers. Additionally, policies that encourage
workplaces to respect family time and reduce after-hours communications can help mitigate the
negative effects of technoference. Furthermore, the study suggests that policymakers should
collaborate with technology companies to design features that support healthy technology use, such as
parental controls and screen time management tools. By creating an environment that encourages
balanced and mindful technology use, policies can help families maintain strong and healthy
Journal of Communication
ISSN: 2791-3201 (Online)
Vol. 5, Issue No. 3, pp 1 - 16, 2024 www.carijournals.org
14
relationships in the digital age. Finally, the study highlights the need for ongoing research funding to
explore the impact of new and emerging technologies on family dynamics, ensuring that policy
decisions are informed by the latest scientific evidence.
Journal of Communication
ISSN: 2791-3201 (Online)
Vol. 5, Issue No. 3, pp 1 - 16, 2024 www.carijournals.org
15
REFERENCES
Baxter, L. A., & Braithwaite, D. O. (2014). Family communication: Theory and research. SAGE
Publications.
Chesley, N. (2014). Information and communication technology use and social connectedness over the
life course. Sociology Compass, 8(6), 589-602.
Costa, R. R., & Silva, M. T. (2015). Family dynamics in Brazilian households: Cultural and
socioeconomic influences. Journal of Family Studies, 21(3), 325-341.
Coyne, S. M., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Fraser, A. M., Fellows, K., & Day, R. D. (2014). Media time=
family time: Positive media use in families with adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research,
29(5), 663-688.
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and
structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571.
Fosco, G. M., & Grych, J. H. (2013). Capturing the family context of emotion regulation: A family
systems model comparison approach. Journal of Family Issues, 34(4), 557-578.
Hampton, K. N., & Welsh, E. (2019). Digital media and the reconfiguration of parent-child
relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 81(5), 1098-1110.
Hertlein, K. M. (2012). Digital technology and relationships: A research review. Family Science
Review, 17(2), 72-91.
Hertlein, K. M., & Blumer, M. L. C. (2013). The Couple and Family Technology Framework: Intimate
relationships in a digital age. Routledge.
Hwang, K. K., & He, F. (2015). Modernization of Confucian values: Impacts of communication
technology. Asian Journal of Communication, 25(5), 456-469.
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2013). Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers’ use of the
internet: The role of online skills and internet self-efficacy. New Media & Society, 15(6), 987-
1005.
McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). "Technoference": The interference of technology in couple
relationships and implications for women's personal and relational well-being. Psychology of
Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000065
McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). "Technoference": The interference of technology in couple
relationships and implications for women's personal and relational well-being. Psychology of
Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85-98.
Mokomane, Z. (2013). Social protection as a mechanism for family protection in sub-Saharan Africa.
International Journal of Social Welfare, 22(3), 248-259.
Olson, D. H., & Gorall, D. M. (2016). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of
Family Therapy, 38(1), 64-80.
Padilla-Walker, L. M., Coyne, S. M., & Fraser, A. M. (2012). Getting a high-speed family connection:
Associations between family media use and family connection. Family Relations, 61(3), 426-
440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00710.x
Padilla-Walker, L. M., Coyne, S. M., & Fraser, A. M. (2012). Getting a high-speed family connection:
Associations between family media use and family connection. Family Relations, 61(3), 426-
440.
Journal of Communication
ISSN: 2791-3201 (Online)
Vol. 5, Issue No. 3, pp 1 - 16, 2024 www.carijournals.org
16
Quan-Haase, A., & Neves, B. B. (2018). Exploring the use of communication technologies by older
adults in Brazil: How does digital inclusion contribute to social inclusion? Information,
Communication & Society, 21(10), 1253-1268.
Radesky, J. S., Christakis, D. A. (2016). Increased screen time: Implications for early childhood
development and behavior. Pediatrics, 138(5), e20162591.
Radesky, J. S., Kistin, C. J., Zuckerman, B., Nitzberg, K., Gross, J., Kaplan-Sanoff, M., Augustyn, M.,
& Silverstein, M. (2014). Patterns of mobile device use by caregivers and children during meals
in fast food restaurants. Pediatrics, 133(4), e843-e849. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-3703
Stockdale, L. A., & Coyne, S. M. (2019). Parenting, social media, and the digital generation: The
impact of parents' and adolescents' social media use on family dynamics. Computers in Human
Behavior, 98, 76-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.019
Thompson, R. A., & Goodman, M. (2019). The role of digital communication in adolescent
relationships. Journal of Adolescent Health, 64(2), 134-143.
Tsuji, I., & Shimizu, Y. (2016). Changing Japanese family dynamics: Implications of demographic
shifts and digital communication. Journal of Family Issues, 37(12), 1675-1693.
Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2018). Media use is linked to lower psychological well-being:
Evidence from three datasets. Psychological Reports, 122(2), 338-354.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2019). America’s families and living arrangements: 2019. Retrieved from
https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2019/demo/families/cps-2019.html
Uhls, Y. T., Michikyan, M., Morris, J., Garcia, D., Small, G. W., & Zgourou, E. (2014). Five days at
outdoor education camp without screens improves preteen skills with nonverbal emotion cues.
Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 387-392.
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal
of Communication, 63(2), 221-243.
Walther, J. B. (2012). Social Information Processing Theory (CMC). In K. O. Mikkelson (Ed.),
Theories of Human Communication (10th ed., pp. 379-391). Waveland Press.
