ArticlePublisher preview available

A Mimetic Approach to Social Influence on Instagram

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

We combine philosophical theories with quantitative analyses of online data to propose a sophisticated approach to social media influencers. Identifying influencers as communication systems emerging from a dialectic interactional process between content creators and in-development audiences, we define them mainly using the composition of their audience and the type of publications they use to communicate. To examine these two parameters, we analyse the audiences of 619 Instagram accounts of French, English, and American influencers and 2,400 of their publications in light of Girard’s mimetic theory and McLuhan’s media theory. We observe meaningful differences in influencers’ profiles, typical audiences, and content type across influencers’ classes, supporting the claim that such communication systems are articulated around ‘reading contracts’ upon which influencers’ image is based and from which their influence derives. While the upkeep of their influence relies on them sticking to this contract, we observe that successful influencers shift their content type when growing their audiences and explain the strategies they implement to address this double bind. Different types of contract breaches then lead to distinct outcomes, which we identify by analysing various types of followers’ feedback. In mediating social interactions, digital platforms reshape society in various ways; this interdisciplinary study helps understand how the digitalisation of social influencers affects reciprocity and mimetic behaviours.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
Philosophy & Technology (2024) 37:65
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00736-w
1 3
RESEARCH ARTICLE
A Mimetic Approach toSocial Influence onInstagram
HubertEtienne1,2,3 · FrançoisCharton3
Received: 18 July 2023 / Accepted: 24 March 2024 / Published online: 22 May 2024
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2024
Abstract
We combine philosophical theories with quantitative analyses of online data to pro-
pose a sophisticated approach to social media influencers. Identifying influencers
as communication systems emerging from a dialectic interactional process between
content creators and in-development audiences, we define them mainly using the
composition of their audience and the type of publications they use to communi-
cate. To examine these two parameters, we analyse the audiences of 619 Instagram
accounts of French, English, and American influencers and 2,400 of their publica-
tions in light of Girard’s mimetic theory and McLuhan’s media theory. We observe
meaningful differences in influencers’ profiles, typical audiences, and content type
across influencers’ classes, supporting the claim that such communication systems
are articulated around ‘reading contracts’ upon which influencers’ image is based
and from which their influence derives. While the upkeep of their influence relies on
them sticking to this contract, we observe that successful influencers shift their con-
tent type when growing their audiences and explain the strategies they implement to
address this double bind. Different types of contract breaches then lead to distinct
outcomes, which we identify by analysing various types of followers’ feedback. In
mediating social interactions, digital platforms reshape society in various ways; this
interdisciplinary study helps understand how the digitalisation of social influencers
affects reciprocity and mimetic behaviours.
Keywords Computational philosophy· Influencers· Instagram· Social comparison·
René Girard· Marshall McLuhan
* Hubert Etienne
hae@meta.com
François Charton
fcharton@meta.com
1 Ecole Normale Supérieure, Department ofPhilosophy, Paris, France
2 Laboratory ofComputer Sciences (LIP6), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
3 Facebook AI Research, Paris, France
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Chapter
The problem of violence in the evolution on the debate about free speech certainly does not begin at the time of new digital technologies and hate speech. Already Popper identified the risks of the effects of television for liberal democracies, identifying a possible educational role for the media as much as the difficulty of making it concretely operational. The problem needs an anthropological approach, relating to a theory capable of posing the problem of containing violence beyond reliance on mere normative regulation in positive law. The article attempts to extend Girardian analyses about the mimetic structure of desire to the field of social networks and their evolution, moving from Dupuy’s fixed point theory. The concluding analysis of the mechanisms of interaction between influencers and followers shows how the ambiguity of the use of social media constitutes a problem at once cultural, technological, and normative, requiring an anthropological conception reintroducing evil and envy as explanatory principles of the relationship between followers and influencers.
Article
Full-text available
Development and validation of a measure of individual differences in social comparison orientation (the Iowa-Netherlands Comparison Orientation Measure [INCOM]) are described. Assuming that the tendency toward social comparison is universal, the scale was constructed so as to be appropriate to and comparable in 2 cultures: American and Dutch. It was then administered to several thousand people in each country. Analyses of these data are presented indicating that the scale has good psychometric properties. In addition, a laboratory study and several field studies are described that demonstrated the INCOM’s ability to predict comparison behavior effectively. Possible uses of the scale in basic and applied settings are discussed.
Preprint
Full-text available
Social media users who report content are key allies in managing online misinformation; however, no research has yet been conducted to understand the trends underlying their activity. We suggest an original approach to studying misinformation: examining it from the reporting users’ perspective both at the content level and comparatively across regions and platforms. We propose the first clas- sification of reported content, resulting from the review of 8,975 items reported on Facebook and Instagram in France, the UK, and the US. This allows us to observe meaningful distinctions regarding misinformation propagation between countries and platforms, as it significantly varies in volume, type, and topic. Our review completes existing typologies of manipulation techniques serving disinformation campaigns with a novel one, “the excuse of casualness,” which presents a concrete challenge for algorithmic detection, thus confirming the need to better classify user reports as a key signal. We then identify four reporter profiles, from which we derive four reasons for inaccurate reporting that are capable of explaining 55% of the inaccuracy in misinformation reporting. Finally, we demonstrate that a simple classifier trained on a small dataset with a combination of basic reporting signals can identify these inaccuracy types, thus improving the quality of the reporting signal.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Article
2018 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s). Giving gifts is a fundamental part of human relationships that is being affected by technology. The Internet enables people to give at the last minute and over long distances, and to observe friends giving and receiving gifts. How online gift giving spreads in social networks is therefore important to understand. We examine 1.5 million gift exchanges on Facebook and show that receiving a gift causes individuals to be 56% more likely to give a gift in the future. Additional surveys show that online gift giving was more socially acceptable to those who learned about it by observing friends' participation instead of a non-social encouragement. Most receivers pay the gift forward instead of reciprocating directly online, although surveys revealed additional instances of direct reciprocity, where the initial gifting occurred offline. Thus, social influence promotes the spread of online gifting, which both complements and substitutes for offline gifting.
Book
Les collectifs spontanés sont divers : foules, masses, multitudes, groupes. Contre la vision classique de leur fondation par la reconnaissance commune d'un point qui leur est externe (ennemi, chef, Dieu), l'auteur montre qu'ils obéissent à une seule logique : une méconnaissance de la structure collective qui prend la forme d'une « désocialisation désindividualisante ». Plus nous nous éloignons des autres individus, plus les liens se resserrent. C'est en cherchant à échapper au collectif que nous le renforçons. Il y a donc en leur coeur une structure oraculaire et tragique selon laquelle c'est en cherchant à éviter notre destin que nous le réalisons.
Conference Paper
Giving gifts is a fundamental part of human relationships that is being affected by technology. The Internet enables people to give at the last minute and over long distances, and to observe friends giving and receiving gifts. How online gift giving spreads in social networks is therefore important to understand. We examine 1.5 million gift exchanges on Facebook and show that receiving a gift causes individuals to be 56% more likely to give a gift in the future. Additional surveys show that online gift giving was more socially acceptable to those who learned about it by observing friends' participation instead of a non-social encouragement. Most receivers pay the gift forward instead of reciprocating directly online, although surveys revealed additional instances of direct reciprocity, where the initial gifting occurred offline. Thus, social influence promotes the spread of online gifting, which both complements and substitutes for offline gifting.
Article
Young media consumers are increasingly using online video platforms, as YouTube in particular registers extremely high numbers of viewers and subscribers. These numbers then increase the popularity of the celebrities who present themselves in the videos on the platform. With their far-reaching influence, through involvement in the public sphere as well as broad marketing concepts, they draw in viewers and gain attention worldwide. It can thus be understood that YouTube users also form a bond with the celebrities featured online, as formulated theoretically in the concept of parasocial relationships. In this study, an exploratory online survey examines quantitatively whether these parasocial relationships are predominantly formed with YouTubers via the platform’s feedback channels. As the results show, however, the strength of these parasocial relationships is not influenced to any great extent by use of the feedback functions.