Access to this full-text is provided by SAGE Publications Inc.
Content available from Composites and Advanced Materials
This content is subject to copyright.
Original Research Article
Composites and Advanced Materials
Volume 33: 1–17
© The Author(s) 2024
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/26349833241255957
journals.sagepub.com/home/acm
Sustainable building materials: A
comprehensive study on eco-friendly
alternatives for construction
Yonatan Ayele Abera
1,2
Abstract
An in-depth review of a varied range of eco-friendly options for construction is done in this thorough research on
sustainable building materials. With increased worries about environmental deterioration, the building sector is in-
creasingly focusing on long-term solutions. This research looks into a variety of materials, including bamboo, engineered
wood products, recycled composites, and optimal concrete mixtures. The study underlines the importance of com-
pressive, tensile, and flexural strengths, which are a basic feature for structural integrity. The study also gives useful insights
into their practical applicability in real-world building projects by assessing the flexural strength of various materials.
Furthermore, the study examines the environmental effect of these materials, taking into account characteristics such as
renewability, recyclability, and energy efficiency. Laboratory tests were conducted to determine the fundamental
properties of selected materials as part of the investigations. The study emphasizes the ecological advantages of adopting
these sustainable alternatives through life cycle assessments and comparative studies. The research output can be served as
a thorough reference for architects, engineers, and policymakers, providing a complete knowledge of sustainable building
materials and their critical role in developing a greener, more resilient built environment.
Keywords
sustainable building materials, eco-friendly alternatives, construction, environmental impact, life cycle assessment, green
building practices
Introduction
The building sector is important in constructing the
contemporary world, but it also poses substantial envi-
ronmental issues. The vast demand for building mate-
rials, as well as the resource-intensive processes
involved, lead to significant carbon emissions, resource
depletion, and environmental deterioration.
1
In response
to these environmental issues, there is an urgent need to
adopt sustainable building techniques that reduce the
sector’s environmental effect. One of the most important
ways for accomplishing this aim is the widespread use of
environmentally friendly and sustainable construction
materials.
2
This article gives a detailed analysis on sustainable
building materials, with an emphasis on eco-friendly con-
struction choices. The major goal is to offer a complete
grasp of various sustainable materials, their features, en-
vironmental benefits, and prospective building applica-
tions.
3
We hope to shed light on the potential solutions
available to transform the way we build and construct our
built environment by a comprehensive examination of
Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use,
reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the
SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
1
Department of Construction Technology and Management, Dilla
University, Dilla, Ethiopia
2
Department of Civil Engineering, Delhi Technological University, Delhi,
India
Date received: 22 August 2023; accepted: 29 April 2024
Corresponding author:
Yonatan Ayele Abera, Department of Construction Technology and
Management, Dilla University, 419, Dilla, Ethiopia.
Email: aberas2010@gmail.com
scientific literature, experimental assessments, and life cycle
evaluations.
4
The first section of this study delves into an extensive
literature review, capturing the latest advancements and
developments in the realm of sustainable building mate-
rials.
5
We explore a diverse range of eco-friendly alterna-
tives, including recycled materials, bio-based composites,
and low-carbon options.
6
By delving into the production
processes, material properties, and applications of each
alternative, we seek to uncover the unique environmental
advantages they offer and the challenges they might present
in real-world applications.
7
The second stage of the investigation comprises rigorous
experimental analysis to supplement the conclusions from
the literature review. We evaluate the mechanical, thermal,
and durability qualities of selected sustainable materials
using extensive laboratory experiments. These assessments
give vital insights into the material’s performance charac-
teristics, assisting in determining its appropriateness for
various building applications and informing design
decisions.
8
The third component of our research is a life cycle as-
sessment (LCA) of sustainable construction materials.
9
The
LCA investigates each material’s complete life cycle, from
raw material extraction to manufacture, transportation,
consumption, and final disposal. We may conduct educated
comparisons between eco-friendly materials and conven-
tional alternatives by measuring environmental conse-
quences such as carbon footprint, energy usage, and waste
generation, supporting evidence-based decision-making in
sustainable construction practices.
10
The four eco-friendly materials created from diverse
building wastes are rooted as sustainable construction
materials, as shown in the figure below, and these materials
are mostly produced from construction and demolition
wastes. Tiles of various sorts and sizes can be mined from
numerous sources of building byproducts (see Figure 1).
Bricks and blocks are also important construction materials
that may be sourced as recycled solutions from local gar-
bage. These materials are considered sustainable con-
struction materials because they add value to the use of
recycled resources.
11
We realize the revolutionary potential of sustainable
construction materials in producing a more eco-conscious
constructed environment as we go forward with this thor-
ough research.
12
Our goal is to give architects, engineers,
politicians, and industry stakeholders with a thorough grasp
of the various environmentally friendly choices accessible.
We hope to contribute to a greener, more robust, and
peaceful future for our planet and its people by encouraging
the use of sustainable materials in building.
13
Sustainable building materials
Because of their environmental benefits and contribution to
the creation of eco-friendly structures, sustainable building
materials have grown in popularity in recent years. Re-
claimed wood is one significant type of these materials.
Reclaimed wood, which is salvaged from ancient houses,
barns, or other structures, not only lessens the demand for
virgin lumber but also gives character to new creations.
Because of its strength and durability, it is a fantastic choice
for flooring, furniture, and ornamental pieces. The building
sector supports recycling and minimizes the depletion of
natural forests by reusing wood that would otherwise wind
up in landfills.
14
Another important sustainable building resource is re-
cycled metal. Steel and aluminum, for example, may be
recycled endlessly without losing their quality. In green
buildings, recycled metal materials are often utilized for
Figure 1. Sustainable building materials.
2Composites and Advanced Materials
structural framing, roofing, and ornamental features.
15
Metal recycling eliminates the need for mining, con-
serves energy, and lessens the environmental effect of metal
manufacturing. Furthermore, employing recycled metal
reduces the carbon impact, making it a crucial choice for
sustainable building methods (see Figure 2(a) and (b)).
Bamboo, a fast renewable material, has emerged as a
critical component of sustainable building. Its rapid de-
velopment rate, which allows it to attain maturity in a few of
years, making it a very sustainable material for a variety of
uses. Bamboo is an extremely flexible material that may be
used for flooring, roofing, wall cladding, and even structural
elements.
16
Because of its tensile strength and flexibility, it
is an excellent substitute for conventional hardwoods.
Furthermore, bamboo production aids in the fight against
deforestation, lowers greenhouse gas emissions, and pro-
vides employment possibilities for local populations.
17
Recycled glass is a long-lasting material that is often
used in green construction projects. Crushed glass is an
aggregate that may be used in concrete, glass worktops,
tiles, and insulation. Incorporating recycled glass into
building components not only saves natural resources but
also decreases the energy necessary to manufacture new
glass. The building sector helps to trash reduction initiatives
and fosters a circular economy by diverting glass debris
from landfills.
18
Rammed earth construction is a centuries-old building
style that has seen a resurgence in sustainable architecture.
To build walls, layers of soil, chalk, lime, or gravel are
compacted inside a frame. Rammed earth constructions
have high thermal mass, which automatically regulates
inside temperatures. This approach makes use of locally
available resources, which reduces transportation emis-
sions. Furthermore, with proper care, rammed earth
Figure 2. Sustainable building materials.
Abera 3
buildings have a low-carbon footprint and may survive for
millennia, making them an environmentally benign alter-
native for sustainable construction.
4
Hempcrete, a combination of hemp fibers, lime, and
water, has gained popularity in recent years as a sustainable
alternative to standard concrete. Hemp growing absorbs
CO
2
, making it a carbon-negative crop. Hempcrete is a
lightweight, insulating, and non-toxic material that creates a
healthy interior atmosphere. It also has great moisture-
regulating qualities, which reduces the likelihood of mold
and mildew growth.
19
The construction sector promotes
sustainable agriculture and decreases dependency on
energy-intensive building materials by using hempcrete into
construction projects.
To summarize, the use of sustainable construction ma-
terials not only addresses environmental problems, but also
helps to the production of healthier, more energy-efficient,
and longer-lasting structures. The building sector encour-
ages sustainable methods, conserves natural resources, and
reduces the environmental effect of construction operations
by adopting recovered wood, recycled metal, bamboo, re-
cycled glass, rammed earth, and hempcrete.
20
As the de-
mand for sustainable buildings grows, the development and
use of these materials will be critical in crafting a greener
and more sustainable future for the construction industry.
Literature review
The first section of this research focuses on completing a
thorough literature assessment on sustainable construction
materials. We go through recent research articles, studies,
and industry publications to find a wide choice of envi-
ronmentally friendly products.
21
The evaluation of literature
covers recycled materials such as recycled aggregates and
recovered wood, bio-based materials such as bamboo and
hempcrete, and low-carbon solutions such as geopolymers
and fly ash-based goods.
22
We investigate each material’s
manufacturing methods, features, and uses in order to
comprehend its environmental benefits and limits.
23
The pursuit of sustainable building materials has
emerged as a critical component of the construction in-
dustry’s attempts to solve environmental concerns and
adopt more environmentally friendly methods.
5
A thorough
investigation of eco-friendly alternatives for construction
materials has become critical in the industry’s desire to
lower its ecological imprint and migrate to a greener and
more sustainable built environment.
24
Several studies have emphasized the negative environ-
mental implications of traditional building materials, such
as high carbon emissions, excessive resource usage, and
trash creation.
25
As a result, academics and industry
practitioners have shifted their focus to sustainable building
materials, which provide potential ways to alleviate these
environmental burdens.
26
Recycled materials have received a lot of interest in
recent study. Recycling aggregates from building and de-
molition debris has showed promise as a viable alternative
to conventional aggregates, decreasing the need for massive
mining and landfilling (see Figure 3). Additionally, re-
covered wood has developed as a sustainable solution,
offering an environmentally benign alternative to virgin
lumber and helping to forest conservation.
27
Bio-based products have gained popularity due to their
recyclability and minimal environmental effect. Bamboo has
been a popular alternative for structural applications because of
its quick growth rate and remarkable strength-to-weight ratio.
28
Moreover, hempcrete, a hemp fiber and lime combination, has
shown remarkable thermal and acoustic qualities, making it an
appealing choice for sustainable building insulation.
29
Low-carbon alternatives are being intensively researched
in order to reduce the carbon footprint of construction
materials. Geopolymers, which are generated by the in-
teraction of industrial byproducts such as fly ash and slag
with alkaline activators, provide a cementitious alternative
with much lower greenhouse gas emissions than typical
Portland cement. Moreover, fly ash-based goods, which use
discarded fly ash as a key constituent, have the potential to
reduce environmental impacts while also contributing to the
effective use of industrial byproducts.
2
The incorporation of environmentally friendly building
materials into the construction sector necessitates a thorough
grasp of their qualities and prospective uses. Yet, there are still
issues to address in terms of material performance, cost-
effectiveness, regulatory compliance, and public acceptance.
Addressing these impediments and providing evidence-based
data to promote the informed selection and integration of eco-
friendly options in construction methods is critical.
30
There is a rising interest in sustainable building materials in
the literature, with considerable research concentrating on
material characterization, performance evaluation, and envi-
ronmental analyses.
31
Many studies have been undertaken to
estimate the total environmental effect of these materials, al-
lowing for direct comparisons with traditional counterparts.
Finally, the literature illustrates the importance of pro-
moting sustainable building materials in the construction
business. This extensive research seeks to add to the current
body of knowledge by conducting a detailed evaluation of
eco-friendly alternatives and their potential to revolutionize
the way we design our built environment.
32
This study
intends to contribute to the paradigm shift toward greener
and more sustainable construction methods by giving in-
formation on the environmental benefits, performance
features, and prospective uses of these materials.
33
Experimental methodology
By combining diverse research methodologies, the meth-
odology used in this study intended to give a thorough
4Composites and Advanced Materials
knowledge of sustainable construction materials. To provide
a multi-dimensional perspective on the viability and effect
of eco-friendly alternatives in construction, the study ap-
proach included a combination of Interview for focused
group, literature review, material assessment, life cycle
analysis (LCA), and economic analysis.
The technique began with an exhaustive literature
research to generate a solid understanding of sustainable
construction principles. This entailed studying academic
publications, industry reports, and case studies to identify
important materials, manufacturing techniques, and appli-
cations that are environmentally benign. This literature
assessment aided in the selection of resources for deeper
investigation in following phases of the project.
Material evaluation followed, with an emphasis on se-
lected sustainable construction materials. At this phase,
material qualities such as strength, durability, thermal
performance, and fire resistance were thoroughly examined.
A comparison with traditional materials revealed technical
capability and potential benefits of eco-friendly alternatives.
This stage was critical in determining how these materials
aligned with building needs and where they might be used
most effectively.
Life cycle analysis (LCA), a thorough technique to
analyze the environmental effect of materials throughout
their full life cycle, was at the heart of the methodology. This
included the extraction of raw materials, manufacture,
transportation, usage, and end-of-life stages. Quantitative
data on greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption, and
trash creation allowed for a comprehensive assessment of
the environmental footprint of sustainable materials vs
traditional alternatives. LCA enabled the identification of
possible environmental “hotspots”and directed the evalu-
ation of products’overall environmental advantages. The
research also included economic analysis, which assessed
the cost implications of using sustainable construction
materials. This investigation provides insights into the
economic viability of sustainable materials and their po-
tential long-term advantages by assessing economic
repercussions.
Finally, the research used a multi-dimensional approach
to thoroughly investigate eco-friendly options for con-
struction materials. This study intended to provide a
comprehensive knowledge of the technical, environmental,
and economic aspects of sustainable building materials by
integrating a literature review, material assessment, life
cycle analysis, and economic analysis. The holistic char-
acter of the technique guarantees that stakeholders may
make educated decisions about the incorporation of these
materials, furthering sustainable building practices in the
construction sector.
Results and discussions
Experimental analysis
The second section of this study is an experimental in-
vestigation of the mechanical, thermal, and durability
properties of selected sustainable construction materials. We
do laboratory studies on recycled concrete, bio-based
composites, and low-carbon cementitious materials sam-
ples. Compressive strength, flexural strength, and tensile
strength are all mechanical tests. Thermal conductivity and
heat storage capacity measures are used to assess thermal
Figure 3. Partial views of sustainable building materials from recycled wastes.
Abera 5
characteristics. Weathering, chemical assault, and fire re-
sistance are all tested for in durability testing.
The current work integrates rigorous experimental
analysis to describe the mechanical, thermal, and durability
features of selected eco-friendly alternatives in the quest of
understanding and evaluating the feasibility of sustainable
building materials. This investigation seeks to give critical
data and insights to support the acceptance and integration
of these materials in real-world building applications
through laboratory experiments and simulations.
Data analysis and interpretation. The results of the experi-
mental investigation are submitted to extensive statistical
analysis and interpretation. This includes evaluating the
material’s mechanical properties, thermal properties, and
durability performance using graphical representations,
regression analysis, and other statistical techniques. The
data are then critically reviewed to discover the sustainable
building materials under consideration’s strengths, limita-
tions, and potential for development.
In the context of “Sustainable Building Materials: A
Comprehensive Research on Eco-friendly Alternatives for
Construction,”data analysis and interpretation entail re-
viewing the findings of numerous tests and experiments
done on various eco-friendly building materials. The goal is
to use the data to develop relevant inferences and insights
about the performance and appropriateness of these mate-
rials for building applications. Data analysis and interpre-
tation are important parts of the research process because
they guide the transformation of raw data into relevant
insights and practical findings. This critical stage entails a
methodical approach to organizing, analyzing, and identi-
fying patterns from acquired data. To condense complicated
information into understandable narratives, several methods
such as statistical techniques, visualization tools, and
qualitative analysis are used.
The process starts with data cleaning and preparation,
which involves identifying and correcting inconsistencies,
mistakes, and anomalies. Following that, statistical analysis
techniques are used to discover linkages, trends, and cor-
relations in the data. Inferential statistics allow researchers
to derive inferences about larger populations based on
sampling data, whereas descriptive statistics provide a
picture of the data’s fundamental patterns and dispersion.
In contrast, qualitative data analysis entails evaluating
non-numerical data such as text, photographs, or interviews.
This method uses coding and thematic analysis to uncover
repeating patterns, themes, and insights that provide light on
the research issue. Data visualization tools, such as graphs,
charts, and maps, help both expert and non-technical au-
diences communicate complicated results. Graphic repre-
sentations improve comprehension and emphasize crucial
themes, assisting in the dissemination of study findings.
The interpretation step entails developing relevant
conclusions from the data that has been studied. Researchers
contextualize their findings within the framework of current
literature, theory, and study aims, providing insights, ex-
planations, and implications. This synthesis bridges the gap
between empirical findings and theoretical frameworks, so
contributing to field knowledge progress.
Finally, data analysis and interpretation are critical steps
in the research process because they structure acquired
information and translate it into insights that influence
decision-making and motivate additional investigation. The
rigor and precision of these processes support the legitimacy
and validity of research findings, allowing researchers to
make significant contributions to their respective fields.
Mechanical testing. The mechanical characteristics of sus-
tainable building materials play an important role in de-
termining their structural performance and appropriateness
for various construction applications. The primary me-
chanical characteristics tested in this experimental inves-
tigation are compressive strength, tensile strength, and
flexural strength. Compressive strength tests entail sub-
mitting samples to compressive stresses until they break,
revealing important information about the material’s load-
bearing capabilities and structural integrity. Tensile strength
tests assess the material’s resistance to tension pressures,
whereas flexural strength tests assess the material’s capacity
to handle bending loads. To guarantee accuracy and con-
sistency, these tests are carried out in accordance with in-
dustry standards.
Compressive strength of sustainable building
material. Compressive strength is an important feature to
consider when evaluating sustainable construction materials
since it determines a material’s capacity to endure axial
loads or pressure. Sustainable construction materials have a
low environmental effect throughout their entire life cycle,
from extraction and manufacture to use and disposal. These
materials are intended to be resource- and energy-efficient,
as well as ecologically benign. One of the primary benefits
of sustainable construction materials is their ability to retain
high compressive strength while utilizing environmentally
responsible manufacturing procedures. This feature protects
the structural integrity of buildings, reducing the need for
repairs and replacements, and thereby lowering the total
environmental effect. Tables 1–10
The use of high compressive strength sustainable
building materials adds greatly to the construction in-
dustry’s efforts to cut carbon emissions and combat climate
change. Construction experts may make high-strength
concrete mixes that meet or surpass typical concrete cri-
teria by incorporating resources such as recycled aggre-
gates, fly ash, or slag, which are byproducts of other
industrial processes. These materials not only save natural
6Composites and Advanced Materials
resources but also reduce the need for energy-intensive
manufacturing procedures. As a consequence, building
projects’overall carbon impact is lowered, harmonizing
with global sustainability goals.
Furthermore, sustainable building materials with high
compressive strength provide architects and engineers with
additional design and construction freedom. This adapt-
ability enables the creation of new and efficient structural
systems, encouraging the use of smaller parts and optimal
designs. These materials result in lighter and more resource-
efficient structures by lowering the volume of material
required without sacrificing strength. Furthermore, sus-
tainable materials frequently have higher durability and
tolerance to harsh climatic conditions, enhancing the life-
span of structures while reducing maintenance require-
ments. This long-lasting performance not only benefits the
environment by minimizing trash, but it also benefits
building owners financially by lowering life cycle expenses.
In conclusion, the compressive strength of sustainable
building materials is critical to the advancement of
ecologically aware construction techniques. By using high
compressive strength materials into building projects, the
construction industry may produce long-lasting, robust, and
energy-efficient buildings, greatly contributing to the
worldwide trend toward sustainable development and a
greener future.
Tensile strength of sustainable building materials. Tensile
strength, which determines a material’s capacity to bear
pulling or stretching forces without breaking or deforming,
is an important attribute in sustainable construction mate-
rials. Bamboo, engineered wood products, and certain
natural textiles have exceptional tensile strength in the
domain of sustainable building. Bamboo, for example, is a
quickly renewable material with high tensile strength,
making it an excellent choice for a variety of structural
applications. Because of their layered and bonded structure,
engineered wood products such as laminated veneer lumber
(LVL) and cross-laminated timber (CLT) have great tensile
strength, offering architects and builders with sustainable
alternatives to traditional lumber and steel.
Furthermore, natural fibers such as hemp and jute have high
tensile strength, making them desirable components in sus-
tainable composite materials. When these natural fibers are
mixed with biopolymers or resins, they form strong and en-
vironmentally friendly composites that may be used in
building components such as panels, tiles, and even structural
elements. The use of these sustainable materials not only
decreases reliance on traditional, energy-intensive resources,
but it also dramatically reduces the carbon footprint of con-
struction projects.
Furthermore, investigating the tensile strength of re-
cycled materials is a critical component of sustainable
construction strategies. For example, recycled steel keeps
its tensile strength even after reprocessing, making it a
great choice for reinforcing constructions. Similarly,
recycled plastic composites have high tensile strength,
making them a potential alternative to traditional building
materials. By utilizing recycled materials into construc-
tion projects, the construction industry may actively
contribute to waste reduction while retaining high
structural integrity, so supporting the built environment’s
sustainability.
Table 1. Compressive strength of sustainable and conventional building materials.
Sample no. Sustainable building material Compressive strength (MPa)
1 Recycled concrete 35.2
2 Bamboo composite 48.6
3 Hempcrete 22.8
4 Geopolymer 42.1
5 Fly ash-based concrete 39.4
6 Conventional concrete 42.9
Table 2. Tensile strength of sustainable and conventional building
materials.
Sample ID Material type Tensile strength (MPa)
1 Recycled concrete 15.2
2 Bamboo 45.6
3 Hempcrete 8.9
4 Geopolymer 25.1
5 Conventional concrete 20.3
6 Steel 550.2
Table 3. Flexural strength of sustainable building materials.
Sample ID Material Flexural strength (MPa)
1 Bamboo 100-150
2 Engineered wood 40-100
3 Recycled concrete 3-10
4 Hempcrete 0.2-1.0
5 Straw bale 1-2
6 Rammed earth 0.1-0.5
Abera 7
Table 6. Thermal diffusivity of building materials.
Material Sample size (mm) Test method Thermal diffusivity (mm^
2/s)
Recycled concrete 150 × 50 × 10 Laser flash analysis 1.20 × 10^
-6
Bamboo 100 × 40 × 8 Transient plane source 1.05 × 10^
-6
Hempcrete 120 × 45 × 9 Laser flash analysis 0.98 × 10^
-6
Geopolymer 130 × 35 × 12 Transient plane source 1.15 × 10^
-6
Conventional concrete 180 × 60 × 15 Laser flash analysis 1.30 × 10^
-6
Table 7. Accelerated aging test for weathering resistance.
Material Sample size (mm) Test method Exposure time (weeks) Color change (ΔE) Surface degradation
Recycled concrete 150 × 50 × 10 ASTM G155 12 3.2 Minimal
Bamboo 100 × 40 × 8 ISO 4892-3 8 2.5 Slight
Hempcrete 120 × 45 × 9 EN ISO 4892-2 16 4.0 Moderate
Geopolymer 130 × 35 × 12 ASTM G154 10 3.8 Moderate
Conventional concrete 180 × 60 × 15 ISO 4892-2 14 2.9 Slight
Table 8. Accelerated aging test for chemical resistance.
Material Sample size (mm) Test method Exposure time (days) Weight change (%) Surface integrity
Recycled concrete 150 × 50 × 10 ASTM D1308 30 0.5 Intact
Bamboo 100 × 40 × 8 ISO 175 20 0.3 Intact
Hempcrete 120 × 45 × 9 EN ISO 2812-2 40 1.2 Slight damage
Geopolymer 130 × 35 × 12 ASTM D543 25 0.8 Minimal damage
Conventional concrete 180 × 60 × 15 ISO 175 35 0.4 Intact
Table 4. Thermal conductivity of building materials.
Material Sample size (mm) Test method Thermal conductivity (W/mK)
Recycled concrete 150 × 50 × 10 ASTM C518 0.075
Bamboo 100 × 40 × 8 ISO 8302 0.060
Hempcrete 120 × 45 × 9 EN 12664 0.095
Geopolymer 130 × 35 × 12 ASTM C177 0.080
Conventional concrete 180 × 60 × 15 ISO 8301 0.065
Table 5. Specific heat capacity of building materials.
Material Sample size (mm) Test method Specific heat capacity (J/kg-K)
Recycled concrete 150 × 50 × 10 ASTM E1952 1000
Bamboo 100 × 40 × 8 ISO 11357 900
Hempcrete 120 × 45 × 9 EN 12524 1100
Geopolymer 130 × 35 × 12 ASTM E1269 950
Conventional concrete 180 × 60 × 15 ISO 11357 1050
8Composites and Advanced Materials
In conclusion, knowing and harnessing the tensile
strength of sustainable building materials is critical for the
construction industry’s transition to environmentally
friendly methods. Builders and architects can design robust
and ecologically responsible structures by embracing ele-
ments such as bamboo, engineered wood products, natural
fibers, and recycled materials, paving the way for a greener
future in construction.
Flexural strength of sustainable building materials. Flexural
strength is an important feature of sustainable construction
materials, since it determines structural integrity and en-
durance. Unlike typical building materials, sustainable al-
ternatives are designed to endure bending stresses while
being environmentally benign. One of the key advantages of
these materials is their capacity to properly distribute loads,
reducing the danger of fractures and failures under stress.
Wood, for example, is a renewable resource with high
flexural strength, making it a popular choice for green
building. Furthermore, engineered wood products such as
cross-laminated timber (CLT) improve flexural strength
while effectively utilizing wood, encouraging sustainable
forestry methods.
Furthermore, novel sustainable materials like bamboo
have a high flexural strength, making them perfect for
construction applications. Bamboo’s quick growth rate and
renewability make it an environmentally aware choice,
providing a sturdy and versatile alternative for a variety of
construction components. Concrete, a frequently used
building material, may also be enhanced for flexural
strength in environmentally friendly methods. The
environmental effect of concrete manufacturing can be
greatly decreased while improving flexural performance by
using recycled aggregates or supplemental cementitious
materials such as fly ash and slag.
Advances in composite materials have resulted in the
creation of high-performance alternatives with excellent
flexural strength in the field of sustainable building. Natural
fibers like jute or hemp are frequently combined with bio-
based resins to create materials that are both robust and
ecologically beneficial. Furthermore, recycled plastic
composites made from post-consumer waste have high
flexural strength, making them a viable alternative for a
variety of building applications while addressing the issue
of plastic pollution. The construction industry may further
improve the flexural strength of sustainable materials by
constantly studying and adopting novel approaches,
opening the way for eco-conscious and durable structures
that match the expectations of the future.
Thermal characterization. The thermal characteristics of
sustainable building materials are critical in evaluating their
energy efficiency and thermal insulation potential. Thermal
conductivity tests reveal the material’s ability to conduct
heat, whereas specific heat capacity measures determine the
material’s ability to store thermal energy. These tests give
vital information on the thermal performance of the ma-
terial, assisting architects and engineers in creating energy-
efficient and climate-responsive structures.
Thermal characterization is essential for comprehending
the thermal characteristics and behavior of sustainable
building materials. This evaluation is critical for improving
Table 9. Comparative analysis of sustainable building materials.
Material type Environmental impact Mechanical properties Cost-effectiveness
Recycled aggregates Low Varies Cost-saving
Bamboo Low High tensile strength Varies
Rammed earth Low Good compressive strength Cost-competitive
Straw bales Low Good insulation properties Cost-competitive
Engineered wood Low Varies Varies
Table 10. Comparative analysis of eco-friendly building materials.
Material Environmental impact (kg CO2 eq/m3) Compressive strength (MPa) Tensile strength (MPa)
Production
cost ($/m3)
Recycled aggregates 150 30 3 80
Bamboo 50 40 6 120
Rammed earth 80 25 2.5 90
Straw bales 100 15 1.5 70
Engineered wood 120 35 4 110
Abera 9
building design, assuring energy efficiency, and providing a
comfortable indoor atmosphere. Thermal conductivity,
specific heat capacity, and thermal diffusivity of sustainable
building materials are frequently measured during thermal
characterization.
Thermal conductivity. Thermal conductivity is an im-
portant attribute that governs how well a substance transmits
heat. It’s critical to understand how heat moves through
building components like walls, roofs, and floors. Low
thermal conductivity sustainable building materials may
efficiently insulate buildings, lowering heat loss during
colder months and minimizing heat gain during warmer
months. Materials’thermal conductivity is measured in
watts per meter-kelvin (W/mK) and assessed using standard
test techniques such as ASTM C518 or ISO 8302.
Specific heat capacity. The quantity of heat energy re-
quired to increase the temperature of a material by one
degree Celsius is measured as specific heat capacity, also
known as heat capacity. Sustainable building materials with
a greater specific heat capacity may store more heat energy,
resulting in increased thermal inertia. Its feature aids in the
regulation of temperature changes within buildings, re-
sulting in a more stable and comfortable interior environ-
ment. Specific heat capacity is tested using methods such as
ASTM E1952 or ISO 11357 and is expressed in joules per
kilogram-kelvin (J/kg-K).
Thermal diffusivity. Thermal diffusivity is a metric that
describes how quickly heat is transported through a material
in comparison to its ability to store heat. It is a mix of
thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity that deter-
mines how rapidly a material responds to temperature
changes. High thermal diffusivity materials transfer and
disperse heat quickly, making them ideal for applications
requiring rapid thermal reaction. Typically, thermal diffu-
sivity is determined using techniques such as laser flash
analysis (ASTM E1952) or the transient plane source
method (ISO 22007-2).
Thermal characterization of sustainable building
materials provides designers and engineers with vital
information about their thermal performance. This in-
formation aids in the selection of materials that maximize
energy efficiency, improve occupant comfort, and con-
tribute to the construction of sustainable and resilient
structures. Additionally, knowing the thermal behavior
of these materials is critical for the design of passive
heating and cooling techniques that result in lower en-
ergy consumption and a lower carbon footprint. Incor-
porating thermal characterization into material selection
and building design procedures is an important step
toward a more sustainable and energy-efficient built
environment.
Durability assessment. Durability is an important component
of sustainable building materials since it directly affects
service life and long-term environmental effect. To imitate
real-world environmental challenges, the experimental
study includes accelerated aging testing, exposure to harsh
weather conditions, and chemical resistance tests. We ex-
amine the materials’robustness, resistance to degradation,
and propensity for weathering and deterioration by sub-
mitting them to extreme environments. This data is critical
for determining the acceptability of materials for various
building applications and assuring the long-term durability
of created structures.
Durability testing is an important part in determining the
performance and lifetime of sustainable construction ma-
terials. It entails putting the materials to a variety of en-
vironmental pressures, such as severe environments and
aging variables, in order to assess their capacity to endure
these difficulties over time. The purpose of durability testing
is to guarantee that the eco-friendly alternatives chosen have
resilience, resistance to deterioration, and longevity, making
them appropriate for use in real-world building
circumstances.
The assessment of durability is a critical component in
determining the long-term performance and resilience of
materials, components, and structures in the context of
varied environmental and operational situations. It entails
systematically testing a material’s capacity to endure wear,
degradation, and probable deterioration over time. This
evaluation is critical for assuring the lifespan of structures,
lowering maintenance costs, and decreasing the environ-
mental effect of frequent replacements.
A variety of elements are considered in the durability
evaluation, including exposure to external stressors such as
temperature variations, moisture, chemicals, and mechan-
ical pressures. Accelerated aging experiments, field expo-
sure studies, and simulation approaches are frequently used
to simulate real-world situations and forecast how materials
would perform in various scenarios.
Durability evaluations help in the identification of
possible weaknesses, allowing for the adoption of pre-
ventative actions and informed material selection. Assess-
ing the corrosion resistance of steel reinforcements in
concrete structures, for example, helps avoid structural
damage due to rust, hence increasing the construction’s
lifespan.
Material science, non-destructive testing, and predictive
modeling advancements have broadened the scope of du-
rability evaluation. Life cycle evaluations are also used to
examine the total environmental effect of a material’s
performance across its lifetime.
Finally, durability testing ensures that materials and
structures not only satisfy functional requirements but also
provide long-term value by withstanding the rigors of their
operational environment. This technique adds to the
10 Composites and Advanced Materials
building industry’s commitment to sustainability and ap-
propriate resource management by generating long-lasting
structures that contribute to a resilient built environment.
Designers, engineers, and builders may make educated
judgments about the selection and integration of sustainable
building materials by completing a full durability evalua-
tion. A thorough assessment of the material’s performance
under diverse situations permits the construction of long-
lasting and ecologically friendly structures, therefore con-
tributing to a more sustainable built environment.
Comparative analysis. The experimental research comprises
a comparison of sustainable construction materials and
conventional alternatives to give significant findings. We
can make direct comparisons and evaluate the environ-
mental benefits and performance advantages of eco-friendly
alternatives by conducting parallel testing on traditional
materials typically used in building.
The “Sustainable Building Materials: A Comprehensive
Study on Eco-friendly Alternatives for Construction”com-
parative study focuses on analyzing the performance and
applicability of various eco-friendly building materials as
alternatives to conventional construction materials. The study’s
goal is to determine each material’sbenefits and disadvantages
in terms of environmental impact, mechanical qualities, and
cost-effectiveness. Recycled aggregates, bamboo, rammed
earth, straw bales, and engineered wood are among the ma-
terials evaluated for the investigation (see Figure 4).
Environmental impact. In the construction industry’s
desire to reduce its environmental imprint, sustainable
building materials have emerged as critical components.
These materials have the potential to drastically reduce
resource use, waste creation, and stress on natural eco-
systems. The environmental effect of sustainable building
materials is diverse, spanning numerous phases of their
lifespan, including extraction and production, shipping,
installation, usage, and final disposal.
One of the key benefits of sustainable construction
materials is that they have a lower embodied energy and
carbon footprint. These materials are frequently acquired
locally, reducing transportation energy requirements and
helping area economies. Furthermore, many sustainable
building materials are sourced from renewable resources,
Figure 4. Comparative view of sustainable building materials and unsustainable building materials.
Abera 11
such as bamboo or cork, which replenish more quickly than
standard building materials. The building sector may reduce
its reliance on finite resources and help conserve natural
ecosystems by prioritizing the use of renewable resources.
Furthermore, sustainable construction materials are built
to last, decreasing the need for frequent replacements and
preserving resources throughout the structure’s existence.
This longevity, along with recyclability, increases the usable
life of the material and reduces the volume of building
debris sent to landfills. For example, using recycled con-
crete aggregates not only diverts trash from landfills but also
minimizes the environmental effect of mining virgin
materials.
In terms of indoor environmental quality, sustainable
materials frequently emit low levels of volatile organic
compound (VOC), resulting in better indoor settings. This is
especially important since poor indoor air quality can harm
occupiers’health and well-being. Low-VOC paints,
formaldehyde-free insulation, and non-toxic finishes assist
to preserve indoor air quality and the well-being of building
inhabitants.
However, it is critical to recognize that the environmental
effect of sustainable construction materials varies by option.
Life cycle evaluations are crucial tools for assessing a
material’s overall effect, taking into consideration elements
such as resource extraction, production, transportation, and
disposal. Furthermore, the availability and scalability of
sustainable materials may differ by region, necessitating
careful consideration of local context and resources.
Finally, sustainable building materials are critical in
lowering the environmental effect of the construction sector.
These materials contribute to a constructed environment
that is not only ecologically friendly but also favorable to
occupant well-being by prioritizing resource efficiency,
carbon reduction, durability, and indoor air quality. The use
of sustainable building materials demonstrates a consci-
entious commitment to a more sustainable future, helping to
shape a construction sector that balances its role in urban
expansion with a duty to protect the planet’s natural
resources.
Mechanical qualities. Sustainable building materials
provide a harmonic balance of environmental responsibility
and structural integrity, with mechanical qualities playing an
important part in molding their feasibility for construction
applications. These characteristics include a material’s ca-
pacity to tolerate external pressures, stresses, and defor-
mations while retaining overall structural performance over
time. Understanding and utilizing the mechanical charac-
teristics of sustainable building materials is critical for
designing robust and long-lasting buildings that meet
sustainability objectives.
Many sustainable construction materials have mechan-
ical qualities that rival, if not outperform, their traditional
equivalents. Cross-laminated timber (CLT), for example,
has excellent strength-to-weight ratios, making it appro-
priate for load-bearing applications while lowering the
requirement for energy-intensive steel and concrete. Fur-
thermore, natural fibers like bamboo and hemp have high
tensile strength, making them suitable reinforcing materials
in a variety of building aspects.
Durability is an important aspect of sustainable mate-
rials, which is frequently ascribed to their capacity to
withstand degradation caused by environmental variables
such as moisture, temperature changes, and chemical ex-
posure. This resilience contributes to longer service life-
spans and lower maintenance requirements, which aligns
with resource efficiency and waste reduction concepts.
Innovative sustainable materials, such as self-healing
concrete, go beyond mechanical qualities by having the
potential to mend cracks and extend their longevity on their
own. This method represents the marriage of material
science and structural engineering, offering increased lon-
gevity and sustainability for concrete structures.
The mechanical qualities of sustainable building mate-
rials, on the other hand, might vary greatly depending on
factors such as material composition, production proce-
dures, and quality control. Thorough testing and validation
are required to verify that these materials fulfill the per-
formance specifications of specific applications. Sustainable
material standards and norms must adapt to accommodate
their particular properties and promote their incorporation
into mainstream construction practices.
Finally, the mechanical features of sustainable building
materials support their importance in altering the con-
struction sector. Sustainable materials provide equivalent or
greater strength, durability, and resilience to traditional
materials, paving the path for structurally sound and eco-
logically responsible construction solutions. Because of the
synergy between mechanical performance and sustainable
principles, these materials are positioned as significant
contributors to the building industry’s progress toward a
more robust, efficient, and sustainable future.
Cost-effectiveness. As a more thorough understanding of
sustainable construction materials’long-term cost-
effectiveness emerges, the idea that they are more expen-
sive has steadily altered. While the initial investment in
sustainable materials may appear to be costlier than that of
traditional counterparts, a careful examination reveals that
the lifespan cost of these materials frequently produces
considerable savings.
Sustainable construction materials help to save costs in a
variety of ways. For starters, their durability and resistance lower
maintenance and replacement costs during the life of the
structure. Materials such as recycled steel, which has equivalent
strengthtovirginsteel,canincrease construction lifetime and
reduce maintenance costs without sacrificing structural integrity.
12 Composites and Advanced Materials
Furthermore, sustainable materials usually improve en-
ergy efficiency, resulting in lower operational costs. Ther-
mally insulated materials, such as insulated concrete forms
(ICFs), for example, minimize heating and cooling needs,
resulting in cheaper utility expenditures over time. Simi-
larly, energy-efficient windows and smart building systems
lead to significant energy savings.
The natural waste and resource consumption reduction
inherent in sustainable materials coincides with trash dis-
posal rules, potentially resulting in cheaper disposal costs
and reducing the environmental effect associated with waste
management. Furthermore, the incorporation of renewable
energy systems, which is frequently enabled by sustainable
construction materials, can result in energy savings that
more than equal the original investment costs. As green
construction approaches grow more common, economies of
scale drive down the cost of green materials. Manufacturing
process advancements, more competition, and rising de-
mand have all led to a reduction of the cost gap between
sustainable and conventional choices.
When analyzing the cost-effectiveness of sustainable
construction materials, it is critical to include not just the initial
expenses but also the overall financial impact. The financial
argument for sustainable materials becomes persuasive when
lifespan costs, decreased operational expenditures, higher
property value, and environmental benefits are included in.
The cost-effectiveness of sustainable building materials
emerges as a strategic investment in both the physical envi-
ronment and the future in a world more alert to the need for
resource efficiency and environmental responsibility.
The comparison research reveals that each eco-friendly
construction material has its own set of advantages and
disadvantages. The material used is determined by project-
specific considerations such as location, climate, resource
availability, and desired level of sustainability. Using var-
ious sustainable materials and technologies together can
provide synergistic benefits, resulting in more environ-
mentally conscious and resilient construction methods.
Further research and development in these materials will
help to promote future sustainable construction solutions.
Reliability and reproducibility. The experimental analysis is
carried out with a strict emphasis on reliability and repeatability.
All tests are repeated numerous times to assure accuracy, and
statistical averages are employed to reduce potential mistakes.
The methodologies and protocols used adhere to industry
norms and guidelines, guaranteeing that the experimental
findings can be repeated and validated by other researchers.
Finally, the experimental analysis is an important part of
this comprehensive study on sustainable construction mate-
rials. This research provides critical data to aid building in-
dustry decision-making by assessing the mechanical, thermal,
and durability qualities of eco-friendly alternatives. This study
intends to contribute to the adoption and implementation of
sustainable building materials, promoting a more ecologically
conscious and resilient built environment, through rigorous
and reliable experimental methodologies.
Life cycle analysis
A quick overview. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a thor-
ough technique for assessing the environmental effect of
goods, processes, or systems over the course of their entire
lifespan, from raw material extraction and manufacture to
use, maintenance, and final disposal. LCA considers indi-
rect and cumulative consequences in addition to immediate
ones, providing for a comprehensive knowledge of a
product’s environmental footprint.
LCA is a systematic way to quantifying environmental
issues such as energy use, greenhouse gas emissions, water
consumption, air pollution, and resource depletion. The
evaluation attempts to identify possible hotspots and areas
for improvement across the lifespan stages, assisting in the
direction of sustainable design, decision-making, and policy
formation.
Goal and scope definition, life cycle inventory analysis,
life cycle impact assessment, and interpretation are the four
essential steps of the process. Data on material inputs,
energy consumption, and emissions are gathered and cat-
egorized throughout the life cycle inventory study. The
impact assessment assesses the possible environmental
impacts of these inputs and outputs and converts them into
environmental indicators.
LCA provides useful information for informed decision-
making in a variety of industries, including building,
manufacturing, and consumer goods (see Figure 5). LCA in
construction aids in the identification of materials and de-
signs that reduce environmental effect while enhancing
performance. Comparing the life cycle implications of
different insulating materials, for example, might help guide
decisions that lead to energy efficiency and lower emissions.
LCA has gained significance as a technique for attaining
environmentally responsible practices as sustainability
becomes increasingly important in numerous businesses. It
allows stakeholders to examine the larger implications of
their decisions, promoting a more balanced approach that
adheres to the concepts of resource efficiency, circular
economy, and decreased ecological impact.
To conclude, Life Cycle Assessment is a strong tool that
aids informed decision-making by offering a comprehen-
sive perspective of the environmental implications of a
product or process. LCA promotes a more sustainable
approach to design, manufacturing, and consumption by
analyzing the full lifespan, so contributing to a more re-
sponsible and resilient global economy.
The comparative analysis emphasizes the advantages
and disadvantages of various eco-friendly construction
materials. Each material has distinct features that make it
Abera 13
appropriate for various construction applications. Re-
cycled aggregates are notable for their environmental
advantages, while bamboo and engineered wood excel in
mechanical characteristics. Rammed earth and straw
bales perform admirably in terms of environmental and
thermal performance. To obtain the best environmental,
structural, and economic outcomes in construction
projects, sustainable building materials should be chosen
with specific project needs, local availability, and project
goals in mind.
Bamboo has the lowest environmental effect and the
highest tensile strength in this example, making it an
appealing eco-friendly solution for particular applica-
tions. Recycled aggregates, on the other hand, have a
reduced cost and a competitive compressive strength,
making them acceptable for cost-conscious projects.
Rammed earth provides an excellent combination of
environmental impact and cost, whereas engineered
wood has strong mechanical characteristics and a low
environmental impact. Straw bales, while less expensive,
have poorer strength and a bigger environmental effect
than alternative materials.
The general equation for emission estimation used in this
investigation is as follows
E¼A × EF × ð1ER=100Þ(1)
where: E = emissions, A = activity rate, EF = emission
factor, and ER = overall emission reduction efficiency, %.
This simplified table illustrates the many qualities of
each eco-friendly construction material, allowing
stakeholders to make educated selections based on their
individual project needs, financial limits, and sustain-
ability objectives. Additional criteria and data points
may be incorporated in the comparison analysis for a
more thorough assessment in real-world applications.
Policy implications and suggestions. The comprehensive study
on eco-friendly options for construction materials empha-
sizes the critical need for policymakers, industry stake-
holders, and researchers to work together to promote
sustainable practices in the construction sector. This study
has important policy implications that might accelerate the
shift to eco-friendly construction materials and methods.
To begin, politicians should emphasize the creation and
implementation of strong environmental standards and
regulations for the building sector. These policies should
stimulate the use of sustainable building materials by
providing incentives, tax breaks, and subsidies to con-
struction firms that utilize environmentally friendly alter-
natives. Governments may encourage market demand for
sustainable materials by fostering a favorable policy cli-
mate, resulting in more research and development in this
sector.
Furthermore, investment in research and development is
critical. Governments and the commercial sector should
sponsor research and development activities aimed at dis-
covering new eco-friendly materials and upgrading current
ones. Collaboration between academics, research institutes,
and industry actors can lead to the development of novel
materials that are both environmentally friendly and eco-
nomically feasible for large-scale construction projects.
Furthermore, research should focus on enhancing the du-
rability, strength, and insulating features of sustainable
materials in order to make them more appealing to builders
and developers.
Furthermore, education and awareness programs should
be undertaken to educate architects, engineers, contractors,
and customers about the advantages of adopting environ-
mentally friendly construction materials. Training programs
and workshops may assist construction workers grasp the
technical features and uses of sustainable materials. By
raising knowledge, not just legislation but also educated
consumer decisions may increase demand for sustainable
materials. Furthermore, educational institutions should add
modules on sustainable construction techniques into their
curricula to ensure that the future generation of architects
and engineers is well-versed in environmentally friendly
solutions.
Green building certifications, such as LEED (Leadership
in Energy and Environmental Design) and BREEAM
(Building Research Establishment Environmental Assess-
ment Method), can also encourage the use of environ-
mentally friendly products. For buildings that acquire
certain certifications, governments may grant tax breaks or
quicker permitting processes. Policymakers may provide a
competitive edge for eco-friendly construction by recog-
nizing and rewarding sustainable building techniques,
driving more stakeholders to invest in such materials and
processes.
Figure 5. LCA: Sustainable building materials.
14 Composites and Advanced Materials
Furthermore, governments should consider encouraging
cross-national research cooperation and knowledge ex-
change. International collaboration can help to encourage
the exchange of best practices, technical developments, and
effective policies relating to sustainable building materials.
Countries may expedite their efforts to create more sus-
tainable infrastructure and reduce the total environmental
effect of the construction sector by learning from one an-
other’s experiences.
Finally, the study on eco-friendly construction materials
gives useful insights into the policy implications required to
promote sustainable practices in the construction sector.
Policymakers can pave the way for a greener and more
sustainable future in the construction sector by developing
and enforcing stringent regulations, investing in research
and innovation, launching educational initiatives, incen-
tivizing green certifications, and fostering international
collaborations. When implemented properly, these policy
recommendations can stimulate broad use of eco-friendly
construction materials, resulting in considerable reductions
in environmental degradation and a more sustainable built
environment for future generations.
Discussions
The significant research on environmentally friendly con-
struction materials has yielded helpful insights that require
serious debate and review. This part delves into important
findings, potential ramifications, and opportunities for fu-
ture research, highlighting the significance of sustainable
building processes and the role of eco-friendly materials in
shaping the construction industry’s future.
One important discovery is the clear environmental
benefit of sustainable building materials. The LCA analysis
indicated the potential for lower greenhouse gas emissions,
energy consumption, and resource depletion associated with
the use of environmentally friendly alternatives. This aligns
with global efforts to combat climate change and under-
scores the critical role that the construction industry can play
in advancing environmental goals. The use of sustainable
materials not only gives immediate environmental benefits,
but also sets the standard for a more responsible approach to
construction.
The economic research yielded mixed results, empha-
sizing the significance of a thorough understanding of the
economic implications of sustainable materials. While some
materials showed cost savings over time, others needed
upfront investments, which may prevent early adoption.
This stresses the importance of looking forward and ac-
counting for concerns other than immediate building costs.
Policymakers and industry stakeholders should consider
innovative financing mechanisms and incentive structures
to balance these constraints and promote the use of sus-
tainable alternatives.
The debate also emphasizes the potential of technology
and innovation to drive the use of sustainable construction
materials. The study’s focus on material characterization
underlines the importance of technical feasibility in material
selection. Emerging technology, such as enhanced
manufacturing methods and digital tools like Building In-
formation Modeling (BIM), offer opportunities to enhance
the design, manufacture, and application of sustainable
materials. Continued investment in research and develop-
ment can lead to materials with higher performance qual-
ities, allowing them to be employed in a wider range of
construction projects.
However, the use of sustainable construction materials
has concerns that must be carefully addressed. Barriers
identified in the study included industry inertia, a lack of
customer information, and potential quality disparities. To
solve these difficulties, a multifaceted approach involving
education, capacity building, and collaboration among
many stakeholders is required. Policy and regulation are
vital, as well-designed incentives and enabling structures
can promote dramatic transformation in the industry.
Finally, the argument emphasizes the transformative
power of environmentally friendly construction materials in
creating a sustainable future. The study’sfindings show the
interconnection of environmental, economic, and techno-
logical factors in driving the use of these materials. As the
construction industry works for greater sustainability, it
must adopt a comprehensive approach that includes inno-
vation, regulatory support, and collaborative efforts to in-
corporate sustainable materials and practices, paving the
way for a more resilient and ecologically conscious built
environment.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this extensive study on eco-friendly options
for construction materials provided numerous critical
conclusions that highlight the necessity and promise of
sustainable building methods. The examination of diverse
materials’environmental, technological, and economic
characteristics has offered significant insights into their
feasibility and influence on the building industry.
·One of the most important conclusions is the sig-
nificant environmental benefit provided by sustain-
able construction materials. Life cycle assessment
(LCA) studies repeatedly demonstrated that these
materials had lower carbon emissions, energy con-
sumption, and resource depletion. This emphasizes
their potential to greatly contribute to global sus-
tainability goals and address the building sector’s
ecological footprint.
·The economic research found a complicated inter-
action between the initial expenses and the long-term
Abera 15
advantages. While some sustainable materials dem-
onstrated significant cost advantages over their lives,
others required substantial inputs. This highlights the
significance of a holistic strategy that takes into ac-
count both short-term expenditures and long-term
returns, emphasizing the importance of novel fund-
ing mechanisms and regulatory incentives.
·The study also highlighted the importance of tech-
nology and innovation in promoting the use of sus-
tainable materials. Material characterization showed
these materials’technical feasibility and performance
characteristics, highlighting prospects for further
improvement and refinement. The outcomes of the
study imply that developing technologies can im-
prove the design, manufacture, and application of
sustainable materials.
·However, the study revealed certain barriers to wider
adoption. Inertia in the industry, a lack of market
knowledge, and possible quality variances surfaced
as impediments that need focused actions. Effective
legislation, incentives, and stakeholder collaboration
are required to overcome these obstacles and speed
the incorporation of sustainable materials into
mainstream building methods.
·Finally, the study’sfindings highlight the critical
significance of eco-friendly options in forging a more
sustainable future for the construction sector.
Stakeholders can work together to drive the adoption
of sustainable building materials by addressing en-
vironmental concerns, economic considerations, and
technological innovations, fostering a resilient and
environmentally conscious built environment that
meets the needs of current and future generations.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank the Department of Civil Engi-
neering, DTU, for their valuable initiatives during practical lab-
oratory works that were part of the current research work. And I
also would like to thank all who facilitated site visits at Burari
C&D waste recycling plants, Shastri Park C&D waste recycling
plant, and Mundika C&D waste recycling plant, New Delhi. I also
would like to thank Prof. Raju Sarkar and Prof. Amit Kumar
Srivastava for their valuable guidance during the preparation of
the work.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with re-
spect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, au-
thorship, and/or publication of this article.
ORCID iD
Yonatan Ayele Abera https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4366-7561
Data availability statement
Supporting data for this research is included in the manuscript.
References
1. Chakraborty D and Elzarka H. Advanced machine learning
techniques for building performance simulation: a compar-
ative analysis. Journal of Building Performance Simulation
2019; 12(2): 193–207. DOI: 10.1080/19401493.2018.
1498538.
2. Xie X and Gou Z. Building performance simulation as an
early intervention or late verification in architectural design:
same performance outcome but different design solutions.
Journal of Green Building 2017; 12(1): 45–61. DOI: 10.
3992/1552-6100.12.1.45.
3. Endo N, Shimoda E, Goshome K, et al. Simulation of design
and operation of hydrogen energy utilization system for a
zero emission building. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2019; 44(14):
7118–7124. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.232.
4. Charai M, Mghazli MO, Channouf S, et al. Lightweight
waste-based gypsum composites for building temperature
and moisture control using coal fly ash and plant fibers.
Construct Build Mater 2023; 393. DOI: 10.1016/j.
conbuildmat.132092.
5. Pearlmutter D, Theochari D, Nehls T, et al. Enhancing the
circular economy with nature-based solutions in the built
urban environment: green building materials, systems and
sites. Blue-Green Systems 2020; 2(1): 46–72. DOI: 10.2166/
BGS.2019.928.
6. Farrukh B, Younis I and Longsheng C. The impact of natural
resource management, innovation, and tourism development
on environmental sustainability in low-income countries.
Resour Pol 2023; 86. DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.
104088.
7. Ruggerio CA. Sustainability and sustainable development: a
review of principles and definitions. Sci Total Environ 2021;
786. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147481.
8. Alqahtani FK, Ghataora G, Khan MI, et al. Lightweight
concrete containing recycled plastic aggregates. 2015 inter-
national conference on electromechanical control technology
and transportation, Montr´
eal, QC, Canada, 12–15 May 2015.
DOI: 10.1002/pola.
9. Emad MZ, Mitri HS and Henning JG. Effect of blast vi-
brations on the stability of cemented rockfill. Int J Min
Reclamat Environ 2012; 26: 233–243. DOI: 10.1080/
17480930.2012.707527.
10. Jayasinghe G, Tokashiki Y and Kitou M. Development of
synthetic lightweight soil aggregates utilizing coal fly ash and
mine clay as waste materials. Tropical Agricultural Research
Extension 2005; 8. https://www.agri.ruh.ac.lk/tare/pdf/V_8/
AG.8.1.pdf
16 Composites and Advanced Materials
11. Walker R and Pav´
ıa S. Moisture transfer and thermal
properties of hemp-lime concretes. Construct Build Mater
2014; 64: 270–276. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.
081.
12. Kym¨
al¨
ainen HR and Sj¨
oberg AM. Flax and hemp fibres as
raw materials for thermal insulations. Build Environ 2008;
43(7): 1261–1269. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.03.006.
13. Feng SJ, Li J, Zheng QT, et al. Utilization potential of waste
residue and dust powder from C&D waste. Case Stud Constr
Mater 2023; 19: e02513. DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02513.
14. V´
azquez-López A, Ao X, del R´
ıo Saez JS, et al. Triboelectric
nanogenerator (TENG) enhanced air filtering and face
masks: recent advances. Nano Energy 2023: 108635. DOI:
10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108635.
1.5. Chakraborty D and Elzarka H. Advanced machine learning
techniques for building performance simulation: a compar-
ative analysis. Journal of Building Performance Simulation
2019; 12(2): 193–207. DOI: 10.1080/19401493.2018.
1498538.
16. Shaheen N, Khushnood RA, Memon SA, et al. Feasibility
assessment of newly isolated calcifying bacterial strains in
self-healing concrete. Construct Build Mater 2023; 362.
DOI: 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2022.129662.
17. Ye X and Rasoulinezhad E. Assessment of impacts of green
bonds on renewable energy utilization efficiency. Renew
Energy 2023; 202: 626–633. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.
11.124.
18. Corinaldesi V and Moriconi G. Use of synthetic fibers in self-
compacting lightweight aggregate concretes. J Build Eng
2015; 4: 247–254. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2015.10.006.
19. Teotónio I, Cabral M, Cruz CO, et al. Decision support
system for green roofs investments in residential buildings.
J Clean Prod 2020; 249. DOI: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.
119365.
20. de Brito J and Robles R. Recycled aggregate concrete (RAC)
methodology for estimating its long-term properties. Indian J
Eng Mater Sci 2010; 17(6): 449–462. DOI: 10.1063/1.
4953383.
21. Zhou X, Li H and Lu C. An environment-friendly thermal
insulation material from cotton stalk fibers. Energy Build
2010; 42(7): 1070–1074. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.01.
020
22. Brzyski P and Widomski M. The influence of partial re-
placement of hemp shives by expanded perlite on physical
properties of hemp-lime composite. AIP Conf Proc 2017;
1866(1). DOI: 10.1063/1.4994486.
23. Sai Trivedi S, Snehal K, Das BB, et al. A comprehensive
review towards sustainable approaches on the processing and
treatment of construction and demolition waste. Construct
Build Mater 2023; 393. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.
132125.
24. Bheel N, Ali MOA, Khahro SH, et al. Experimental study on
fresh, mechanical properties and embodied carbon of con-
crete blended with sugarcane bagasse ash, metakaolin, and
millet husk ash as ternary cementitious material. Environ Sci
Pollut Control Ser 2022; 29(4): 5224–5239. DOI: 10.1007/
S11356-021-15954-4
25. Rukhaiyar S and Samadhiya NK. Strength behaviour of
sandstone subjected to polyaxial state of stress. Int J Min Sci
Technol 2017; 27(6): 889–897. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2017.
06.022.
26. Vennes I and Mitri H. Geomechanical effects of stress
shadow created by large-scale destress blasting. J Rock Mech
Geotech Eng 2017; 9(6): 1085. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.
09.004.
27. Pisello AL, Castaldo VL, Pignatta G, et al. Experimental in-
lab and in-field analysis of waterproof membranes for cool
roof application and urban heat island mitigation. Energy
Build 2016; 114: 180–190. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.05.
026.
28. Abadie A, Diamond A and Hainmueller AJ. Synthetic
control methods for comparative case studies: estimating the
effect of California’s Tobacco control program. J Am Stat
Assoc 2010; 105(490). DOI: 10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746.
29. Ma W, Liu T, Hao JL, et al. Towards a circular economy for
construction and demolition waste management in China:
critical success factors. Sustainable Chemistry and Phar-
macy 2023; 35. DOI: 10.1016/j.scp.2023.101226.
30. Maderuelo-Sanz R, Garc´
ıa-Cobos FJ, S´
anchez-Delgado FJ,
et al. Thermal and acoustical evaluation of biocomposites
made of agricultural waste for ceiling tiles. Appl Acoust
2022; 191. DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.108689
31. Farrant WE, Babafemi AJ, Kolawole JT, et al. Influence of
sugarcane bagasse ash and silica fume on the mechanical and
durability properties of concrete. Materials 2022; 15(9).
DOI: 10.3390/MA15093018.
32. Imam S, Coley DA and Walker I. The building performance
gap: are modellers literate? Build Serv Eng Res Tecnol 2017;
38(3): 351–375. DOI: 10.1177/0143624416684641.
33. Minapu LK, Ratnam MV, Rangaraju U, et al. Experimental
study on light weight aggregate concrete with pumice stone,
silica fume and fly ash as a partial replacement of coarse
aggregate. International Journal of Innovative Research in
Science, Engineering and Technology (An ISO Certified
Organization) 2007; 3297(12): 18130–18138. DOI: 10.
15680/IJIRSET.2014.0312051.
Abera 17
