ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

Growing crops in city skyscrapers would use less water and fossil fuel than outdoor farming, eliminate agricultural runoff and provide fresh food
32 SCIENTIFIC AMERICA N November 2009
Together the world’s 6.8 billion people use
land equal in size to South America to
grow food and raise livestockan as-
tounding agricultural footprint. And demogra-
phers predict the planet will host 9.5 billion peo-
ple by 2050. Because each of us requires a mini-
mum of 1,500 calories a day, civilization will
have to cultivate another Brazil’s worth of land
one billion hectaresif farming continues to be
practiced as it is today. That much new, arable
earth simply does not exist. To quote the great
American humorist Mark Twain: “Buy land.
They’re not making it any more.
Agriculture also uses 70 percent of the world’s
available freshwater for irrigation, rendering it
unusable for drinking as a result of contamina-
tion with fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides and
silt. If current trends continue, safe drinking wa-
ter will be impossible to come by in certain
densely populated regions. Farming consumes
huge quantities of fossil fuels, too20 percent
of all the gasoline and diesel fuel used in the U.S.
The resulting greenhouse gases are of course a
major concern, but so is the price of food as it be-
comes linked to the price of fuel, a mechanism
that doubled the cost of eating in most places
worldwide between 2005 and 2008.
Some agronomists believe that the solution
lies in even more intensive industrial farming,
carried out by an ever decreasing number of high-
ly mechanized farming consortia that grow crops
having higher yieldsa result of genetic modi-
cation and more powerful agrochemicals. Even
if this solution were to be implemented, it is a
short-term remedy at best, because the rapid shift
in climate continues to rearrange the agricultural
landscape, foiling even the most sophisticated
strategies. Shortly after the Obama administra-
tion took ofce, Secretary of Energy Steven Chu
warned that climate change could wipe out farm-
ing in California by the end of the century.
What is more, if we continue wholesale de-
forestation just to generate new farmland, glob-
al warming will accelerate at an even more cat-
astrophic rate. And far greater volumes of agri-
cultural runoff could well create enough aquatic
“dead zones” that turn most estuaries and even
parts of the oceans into barren wastelands.
As if all that were not enough to worry about,
foodborne illnesses account for a signicant
number of deaths worldwideSalmonella ,
cholera, Escherichia coli and Shigella, to name
just a few. Even more of a problem are life-
threatening parasitic infections, such as malaria
and schistosomiasis. Furthermore, the common
practice of using human feces as a fertilizer in
most of Southeast Asia, many parts of Africa
and Central and South America (commercial
fertilizers are too expensive) facilitates the
spread of parasitic worm infections that inict
2.5 billion people.
Clearly, radical change is needed. One stra-
KEY CONCEPTS
Farming is ruining the
environment, and not
enough arable land re-
mains to feed a projected
9.5 billion people by 2050.
Growing food in glass
high-rises could drastical-
ly reduce fossil-fuel emis-
sions and recycle city
wastewater that now pol-
lutes waterways.
A one-square-block farm
30 stories high could yield
as much food as 2,40 0
outdoor acres, with less
subsequent spoilage.
Existing hydroponic
greenhouses provide a
basis for prototype verti-
cal farms now being con-
sidered by urban planners
in cities worldwide.
The Editors
TOPICTKTKTK
Growing crops in city skyscrapers would use less water and fossil fuel than
outdoor farming, eliminate agricultural runoff and provide fresh food
VERTICAL FARMS
RISEofThe
By Dickson Despommier
www.ScientificAmerican.com SCIENTIFIC AMERICA N 33
VERTICAL FARMS
34 SCIENTIFIC AMERICA N November 2009
us out. Farming machines of all kinds, improved
fertilizers and pesticides, plants articially bred
for greater productivity and disease resistance,
plus vaccines and drugs for common animal dis-
eases all resulted in more food than the rising
population needed to stay alive.
That is until the 1980s, when it became ob-
vious that in many places farming was stressing
the land well beyond its capacity to support vi-
able crops. Agrochemicals had destroyed the
natural cycles of nutrient renewal that intact
ecosystems use to sustain themselves. We must
switch to ag ricultural technologies that are
more ecologically sustainable.
As the noted ecologist Howard Odum sagely
observed: “Nature has all the answers, so what
is your question?” Mine is: How can we all live
well and at the same time allow for ecological
repair of the world’s ecosystems? Many climate
expertsfrom ofcials at the United Nations
Food and Agriculture Organization to sustain-
able environmentalist and 2004 Nobel Peace
Prize winner Wangari Maathaiagree that al-
lowing farmland to revert to its natural grassy
or wooded states is the easiest and most direct
way to slow climate changethrough the natu-
ral absorption of carbon dioxide, the most
abundant greenhouse gas, from the air. Leave
the land alone and allow it to heal our planet.
Examples abound. The demilitarized zone
between South and North Korea, created in
1953 after the Korean War, began as a 10-mile-
wide strip of severely scarred land but today is
lush and vibrant, fully recovered. The once bare
corridor separating former East and West Ger-
many is now verdant. The American dust bowl
of the 1930s, left barren by overfarming and
drought, is once again a highly productive part
of the nation’s breadbasket. And all of New
England, which was clear-cut at least three
times since the 1700s, is home to large tracts of
healthy hardwood and boreal forests.
The Vision
For many reasons, then, an increasingly crowd-
ed civilization needs an alternative farming
method. But are enclosed city skyscrapers a
practical option?
Yes, in part because growing food indoors is
already becoming commonplace. Three tech-
niquesdrip irrigation, aeroponics and hydro-
ponicshave been used successfully around the
world. In drip irrigation, plants root in troughs
of lightweight, inert material, such as vermicu-
lite, that can be used for years, and small tubes
tegic shift would do away with almost every ill
just noted: grow crops indoors, under rigorous-
ly controlled condit ions, i n vertical farms.
Plants grown in high-rise buildings erected on
now vacant city lots and in large, multistory
rooftop greenhouses could produce food year-
round using signicantly less water, producing
little waste, with less risk of infectious diseases,
and no need for fossil-fueled machiner y or
transport from distant rural farms. Vertical
farming could revolutionize how we feed our-
selves and the rising population to come. Our
meals would taste better, too; “locally grown”
would become the norm. The working descrip-
tion I am about to explain might sound outra-
geous at rst, but engineers, urban planners and
agronomists who have scrutinized the necessary
technologies are convinced that vertical farm-
ing is not only feasible but should be tried.
Do No Ha rm
Growing our food on land that used to be intact
forests and prairies is killing the planet, setting
up the processes of our own extinction. The min-
imum requirement should be a variation of the
physician’s credo: “Do no harm.” In this case, do
no further harm to the earth. Humans have risen
to conquer impossible odds before. From Charles
Darwin’s time in the mid-1800s and forward,
with each Malthusian prediction of the end of the
world because of a growing population came a
series of technological breakthroughs that bailed
[PROBLEM]
Feeding the World: Another Brazil
Growing food and raising livestock for 6.8 billion people require land equal in size to
South America. By 2050 another Brazil’s worth of area will be needed, using traditional
farming; that much arable land does not exist.
+
=
=
2050
Present
6.8 billion people
additional cropland
the size of Brazil
crop land
the size of
South America
9.5 billion people
www.ScientificAmerican.com S CIENTIFIC AMERICA N 35
ature proles. Indoor farming can take place
anywhere that adequate water and energy can
be supplied. Sizable hydroponic facilities can be
found in the U.K., the Netherlands, Denmark,
Germany, New Zealand and other countries.
One leading example is the 318-acre Eurofresh
Farms in the Arizona desert, which produces
large quantities of high-quality tomatoes, cu-
cumbers and peppers 12 months a year [see il-
lustration on page 00].
Most of these operations sit in semirural ar-
eas, however, where reasonably priced land can
be found. Transporting the food for many miles
adds cost, consumes fossil fuels, emits carbon di-
oxide and causes signicant spoilage. Moving
greenhouse farming into taller structures within
city limits can solve these remaining problems. I
envision buildings perhaps 30 stories high cov-
ering an entire city block. At this scale, vertical
farms offer the promise of a truly sustainable ur-
ban life: municipal wastewater would be recy-
cled to provide irrigation water, and the remain-
ing solid waste, along with inedible plant matter,
would be incinerated to create steam that turns
turbines that generate electricity for the farm.
With current technology, a wide variety of edi-
running from plant to plant drip nutrient-laden
water precisely at each stem’s base, eliminating
the vast amount of water wasted in traditional
irrigation. In aeroponics, developed in 1982 by
K. T. Hubick, then later improved by NASA sci-
entists, plants dangle in air that is infused with
water vapor and nutrients, eliminating the need
for soil, too.
Agronomist William F. Gericke is credited
with developing modern hydroponics in 1929.
Plants are held in place so their roots lie in soil-
less troughs, and water with dissolved nutrients
is circulated over them. During World War II,
more than 8,000 tons of fresh vegetables were
produced hydroponically on South Pacic is-
lands for Allied forces there. Today hydroponic
greenhouses provide proof of principles for in-
door farming: crops can be produced year-
round, droughts and oods that often ruin en-
tire harvests are avoided, yields are maximized
because of ideal growing and ripening condi-
tions, and human pathogens are minimized.
Most important, hydroponics allows the
grower to select where to locate the business,
without concern for outdoor environmental
conditions such as soil, precipitation or temper-
EUROFRESH FARMS, enclosing 318
acres outside Snowake, Ariz.,
has grown tomatoes, cucumbers
and peppers hydroponically for
more than a decadeproving
that the technologyand indoor
farmingcan be efcient on a
massive scale.
36 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN November 2009
ture will be able to rebound from our insults;
traditional farmers would be encouraged to
grow grasses and trees, getting paid to seques-
ter carbon. Eventually, selective logging would
be the norm for an enormous lumber industry,
at least throughout the eastern half of the U.S.
Practical Concerns
In recent years I have been speaking regularly
about vertical farms, and in most case, people
raise two main practical questions. First, skep-
tics wonder how the concept can be economical-
ly viable, given the often in ated value of prop-
erties in cities such as Chicago, London and Par-
is. Downtown commercial zones might not be
affordable, yet every large city has plenty of less
desirable sites that often go begging for projects
that would bring in much needed revenue.
In New York City, for example, Floyd Ben-
nett Air Force Base in Brooklyn lies fallow.
Abandoned in 1967, the 2.5 square miles scream
out for use. Another large tract is Governor’s Is-
land, a 172-acre parcel in New York Harbor
that the U.S. government recently returned to
the city. An underutilized location smack in the
heart of Manhattan is the 33rd Street rail yard
on the far west side. In addition, there are the
usual empty lots and condemned buildings scat-
tered throughout the cityscape. Several years
ago I had my graduate students survey New
York City’s ve boroughs; they found no fewer
than 120 abandoned sites waiting for change,
ble plants can be grown indoors [see illustration
on page 00]. An adjacent aquaculture center
could also raise sh, shrimp and mollusks.
Generous start-up grants and government-
sponsored research centers would be one way to
jump-start vertical farming. University partner-
ships with companies such as Cargill, Monsan-
to, Archer-Daniel Midland and IBM could also
ll the bill. Either approach would exploit the
enormous talent pool within many agriculture,
engineering and architecture schools and lead
to prototype farms perhaps ve stories tall and
one acre in footprint. These facilities could then
be the “playground” for graduate students, re-
search scientists and engineers to carry out the
necessary trial-and-error tests before a fully
functional vertical farm emerged. More mod-
est, rooftop operations on apartment complex-
es, hospitals and schools could serve as test beds
as well. Research installations already exist at
many universities, including the University of
California, Davis, Pennsylvania State Universi-
ty, Rutgers University, Michigan State Univer-
sity, and schools in Europe and Asia. One of the
best known is the University of Arizona’s Con-
trolled Environment Agriculture Center, run by
Gene Giacomelli.
Integrating food production into the tapestry
of urban life is a giant step toward making ur-
ban life sustainable. New industries will grow,
as will urban jobs never before imaginednurs-
ery attendants, growers and harvesters. And na-
GROWING
TECHNIQUES
Three technologies would be
exploited inside vertical
farms.
DRIP IRRIGATION
Plants grow in troughs of
lightweight, inert material, such
as vermiculite, reused for years.
Small tubing on the sur face
drips nutrient-laden water
precisely at each stem’s base.
Good for grains (wheat, corn).
HYDROPONICS
Plants are held in place so their
roots lie in open troughs; water
with dissolved nutrients is
continually circulated over them.
Good for many vegetables
(tomatoes, spinach) and berries.
AEROPONICS
Plants are held in place so their
roots dangle in air that is
infused with water vapor and
nutrients. Good for root crops
(potatoes, carrots).
Floor plan Tk tk tk
An estisci ea facipsu scipsum sandre vulputatum vendre dolorer sequam-
corem iure vero odiat wismodo et luptati onulla aliqui esto ex eros duisl
utpat dolobor ip euisi. Putat. Dui blandre raesecte dolortis augait, qui et,
si. Vulputatum ilissim duipisis augiamc onsequis do exerius cidunt lute min
ut veniam nullaorper adiamet veliquis erit lan vel elesequat iustio do
eraese feum vel eummy nullum velit praesecte exer ad dolore.Et utpat.
Seedlings
planted
Conveyor belt Drip irrigation hoses
Harvester
machine
Organic
refuse drop
Elevator
Control room
Lights
(wavelength varies)
This diagram will be further simpli ed . There will only be one conveyor belt. The
front side will be tilted up, so that it will be more of a side-view of the oor plan
rather than a top-down view. This will make it easier to see the overhanging lights
with the varying wavelengths and the moving conveyor belt.
www.ScientificAmerican.com SCIENTIFIC AMERICA N 37
How it Works
An estisci ea facipsu scipsum
sandre vulputatum vendre
dolorer sequamcorem iure
vero odiat wismodo et luptati
onulla aliqui esto ex eros duisl
utpat dolobor ip euisi. Putat.
Dui blandre raesecte dolortis
augait, qui et, si. Vulputatum
ilissim duipisis augiamc
onsequis do exerius cidunt
lute min ut veniam
nullaorper adiamet veliquis
erit lan vel elesequat iustio
do eraese feum vel eummy
nullum velit praesecte exer
ad dolore consecte.
Clean water tanks
Water purication tanks
Shipping and receiving
Incinerators
Restaurant
Grocery
Visitor center
Nursery
Thin lm photovoltaic
strips along vertical
fram members
Quality
control lab
Incoming city
graywater
Organic refuse drop
Aeroponics
Hydroponics
Drip irrigation
38 SCIENTIFIC AMERICA N November 2009
2,400 acres of food (30 stories 5 acres 16)
a year. Similarly, a one-acre roof atop a hospital
or school, planted at only one story, could yield
16 acres of victuals for the commissary inside.
Of course, growing could be further accelerated
with 24-hour lighting, but do not count on that
for now.
Other factors amplify this number. Every
year droughts and oods ruin entire counties of
crops, particularly in the American Midwest.
Furthermore, studies show that 30 percent of
what is harvested is lost to spoilage and infesta-
tion du ri ng storage a nd transport, most of
which would be eliminated in city farms be-
cause food would be sold virtually in real time
and on location as a consequence of plentiful
demand. And do not forget that we will have
largely eliminated the mega insults of outdoor
farming: fertilizer runoff, fossil-fuel emissions,
and loss of trees and grasslands.
The second question I often receive involves
the economics of supplying energy and water to
a large vertical farm. In this regard, location is
everything (surprise, surprise). Vertical farms in
Iceland, Italy, New Zealand, southern Califor-
nia and some parts of East Africa would take
advantage of abundant geothermal energy. Sun-
lled desert environments (the American South-
west, the Middle East, many parts of Central
Asia) would actually use two- or three-story
and many would bring a vertical farm to the
people who need it most, namely, the under-
served inhabitants of the inner city. Countless
similar sites exist in cities around the world.
And again, rooftops are everywhere.
Simple math sometimes used against the ver-
tical farm concept actually helps to prove its vi-
ability. A typical Manhattan block covers about
ve acres. Critics say a 30-story building would
therefore provide only 150 acres, not much com-
pared with large outdoor farms. Yet growing oc-
curs year-round. Lettuce, for example, can be
harvested every six weeks, and even a crop as
slow to grow as corn or wheat (three to four
months from planting to picking) could be har-
vested three to four times annually. In addition,
dwarf corn plants, developed for NASA, take up
far less room than ordinary corn and grow to a
height of just two or three feet. Dwarf wheat is
also small in stature but high in nutritional value.
So plants could be packed tighter, doubling yield
per acre, and multiple layers of dwarf crops could
be grown per oor. “Stacker” plant holders are
already used for certain hydroponic crops.
Combining these factors in a rough calcula-
tion, let us say that each oor of a vertical farm
offers four growing seasons, double the plant
density, and two layers per oora multiplying
factor of 16 (4 2 2). A 30-story building
covering one city block could therefore produce
CONULPUTEM VEL ulla conse velit acilisim dolobore
dolutem vel eu feugait, veliquat lut utatem dolum
nibh eliscipsum dolorem at. Gait lamcore exercin
utpatie essit utat iSed molutpatin ut amcon ullaor
sum quatum quatie dolore min er susci et, ver ipi.
[THE AUTHOR]
Dickson Despommier is profes-
sor of public health and microbiol-
ogy at Columbia Unive rsity and
president of Vertical Farm Technol-
ogies, which functions as a clear-
ingh ouse for deve lopment work
(see www.verticalfarm.com). As a
postdoctoral fellow at the Rocke-
feller University years ago, he
became friends with René Dubos, a
renowned agric ultural sciences
researcher who introduced him to
the concept of human ecology.
www.ScientificAmerican.com SCIENTIFIC AMERICA N 39
become advocates and have indicated a strong
desire to actually build a prototype high-rise
farm. I have been approached by planners in
New York City, Portland, Ore., Los Angeles,
Las Vegas, Seattle, Surrey, British Columbia,
Toronto, Paris, Bangalore, Dubai, Abu Dhabi,
Incheon, Shanghai and Beijing. The Illinois
Inst it ute of Technology is now craf ting a
detailed plan for Chicago.
All these people realize that something must
be done soon if we are to establish a reliable
food supply for the next generation. They ask
tough questions regarding cost, return on in-
vestment, energy and water use, and potential
crop yields. They worry about structural gird-
ers corroding over time from humidity, power
to pump water and air everywhere, and econo-
mies of scale. Detailed answers will require a
huge input from engineers, architects, indoor
agronomists and businesspeople. Perhaps bud-
ding engineers and economists would like to get
these estimations started.
Because of the Web site, the vertical farm ini-
tiative is now in the hands of the public. Its suc-
cess or failure is a function only of those who
build the prototype farms and how much time
and effort they apply. The infamous Biosphere
II closed-ecosystem project outside Tucson,
Ariz., rst inhabited by eight people in 1991, is
the best example of an approach not to take. It
was too large of a building, with no validated
pilot projects and a total unawareness about
how much oxygen the curing cement of the mas-
sive foundation would absorb. (The University
of Arizona recently acquired the rights to reex-
amine the structure’s potential.)
If vertical farming is to succeed, planners
must avoid the mistakes of this and other non-
scientic misadventures. The news is promising.
According to leading experts in ecoengineering
such as Peter Head, CEO of sustainability for
Arup, an international design and engineering
rm, no new technologies are needed to build a
large, efcient, urban vertical farm. Many en-
thusiasts have asked:What are we waiting
for?” I have no good answer for them.
structures perhaps 50 to 100 yards wide but
miles long, to maximize natural sunlight for
growing and photovoltaics for power. Regions
gifted with steady winds (most coastal zones,
the Midwest) would capture that energy. In all
places, the plant waste from harvested crops
would be incinerated to create electricity or be
converted to biofuel.
One resource that routinely gets overlooked
is very valuable as well; in fact, communities
spend enormous amounts of energy and money
just trying to get rid of it safely. I am referring to
liquid municipal waste, commonly known as
blackwater. New York City occupants produce
one billion gallons of wastewater every day. The
city spends enormous sums to cleanse it and
then dumps the cleaned “gray water” into the
Hudson River. Instead that water could irrigate
vertical farms. Meanwhile the solid by-prod-
ucts, rich in energy, could be incinerated as well.
One typical half-pound bowel movement con-
tains 300 kilocalories of energy when inciner-
ated in a bomb calorimeter. Extrapolating to
New York’s eight million people, it is theoreti-
cally possible to derive as much as 100 million
kilowatt-hours of electricity a year, enough to
run four, 30 -story farms from bodily wastes
alone. If this material can be converted into use-
ful water and energy, city living can become
much more efcient.
Upfront investment costs will be high, as ex-
perimenters learn how to best integrate the var-
ious systems needed. That expense is why small-
er prototypes must be built rst, as they are for
any new application of technologies. Onsite re-
newable energy production should not prove
more costly than the use of expensive fossil fuel
for big rigs that plow, plant and harvest crops
(and emit volumes of pollutants and greenhouse
gases). Until we gain operational experience, it
will be difcult to predict how protable a ver-
tical farm could be. The other goal, of course, is
for the produce to be less expensive than current
supermarket prices, which should be attainable
largely because locally grown food does not
need to be shipped very far.
Desire
It has been ve years since I rst posted some
rough thoughts and sketches about ver tical
farms on a Web site I cobbled together (www.
verticalfarm.com). Since then, architects, engi-
neers, designers and mainstream organizations
have increasingly taken note. Today many devel-
opers, investors, mayors and city planners have
MORE TO
EXPLORE
Our Ecological Footprint: Reduc-
ing Human Impact on the Earth.
William E. Rees, Mathis Wackernagel
and Phil Testemale. New Society Pub-
lishers, 1998.
Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the
Way We Make Things. William Mc-
Donough and Michael Braungart.
North Point Press, 2002.
Growing Vertical. Mark Fischetti in
5EKGPVKƂE#OGTKECP'CTVJVol. 18,
No. 4, pages 74 –79; 2008.
University of Arizona Controlled Envi-
ronment Agricultural Center: http://
ag.arizona.edu/ceac
HURDLES
Adigna feugue digniamet
ing ea facipit ilisciduis autet
init lobore minis ex ea alisl
et la faccum iliquat ueraestis
etue dit ut exerostis acilit
laor augiat landreet ent
praestrud tie magnissi.
Wissequam dolumsandre min
euissim esequisim del ing
eugue magna con ut eummolo-
bor ad magniam quatet, con
henit doluptatum adit ulla
facillam, quisi euguer
Gue feuguerat irit iriusciduip
enim ipit, conullan velisis cidunt
adipisi.
Agnit ad dolor am, sum zzrit at
augiam zzrillam, quis dolo-
borem exero commolum ea
feum vercil dionumm odiam-
conse modit
Etum in henisl et prat at ero et,
cor augiame tummodiam, cor
sectem zzriure dio cor
... This publication is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY. 10.29322/IJSRP.14. 10.2024.p15449 ...
... Raising Consumer Awareness: Effective marketing not only promotes products but also educates consumers about the benefits of sustainable agriculture and healthy eating. Campaigns that emphasize the importance of local and seasonal foods contribute to consumer awareness and can drive demand for sustainably produced goods(Klein et al., 2019).Challenges ISSN 2250-3153This publication is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.10.29322/IJSRP.14.10.2024.p15449 ...
... Vertical Farming: This innovative approach involves growing crops in stacked layers or vertically inclined surfaces, often in controlled environments. Vertical farming can significantly increase food production in urban areas and reduce transportation costs(Despommier, 2013). Increased Productivity: Sustainable practices can enhance crop yields and resilience to climate change, ensuring a stable food supply. ...
... Therefore, for the final comparative assessment a qualitative content analysis was conducted of easily accessible information about vertical farming and CSA describing their overall vision. For vertical farming, we have selected major works published by Despommier (2009Despommier ( , 2013 who is the crucial idea generator of vertical farming [67,[74][75][76]. For CSA we focused on the German CSA network and its visions [77]. ...
... In the environmental dimension, vertical farming obtained two out of six values. The values result from its focus on technical water flow regulation and closed nutrient cycles using cultivation techniques such as hydroponics or aeroponics mimicking ecosystems [88]. However, in the literature analyzed, neither targets nor technical framework conditions were found that are related to nature-based rainwater regulation or the organic origin of nutrient cycles. ...
... However, in the literature analyzed, neither targets nor technical framework conditions were found that are related to nature-based rainwater regulation or the organic origin of nutrient cycles. Rainwater regulation in vertical farming systems is addressed by recycling polluted urban wastewater for irrigation fostering the optimal water use through complex technical solutions [88]. In the case of CSA, strengthening closed cycles is a major target by emphasizing, for example, the importance of fostering humus depletion for soil protection [77]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Intensifying social-ecological urban challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss and social injustices call for sustainable nature-based solutions. In this regard, bringing food production back into cities can be a major lever. However, so far a systematic comparison is lacking between the environmental, social, and economic sustainability of different types of urban agriculture. This paper addresses this research gap and adds to current sustainability research conceptually as well as empirically. Conceptually, we provide a structured workbook for how to select and operationalize indicators according to their feasibility and suitability for a comparative sustainability assessment of urban agriculture types. Empirically, the indicators have been exemplified in a comparative evaluation of community supported agriculture (CSA) and vertical farming. Based on a qualitative content analysis of its vision guidelines, the results suggest that CSA can be considered the more sustainable form of urban agriculture across all three sustainability dimensions. However, when taking into account that the major benefit of vertical farming in an urban context is its increase in food production efficiency, we suggest balancing its shortcomings and lack of vision on social justice, biodiversity conservation, and food quality by fostering a hybrid model of community supported vertical farming.
... Controlled environment agriculture (CEA), particularly in its vertical farming form, has been a subject of research and industry experimentation for at least 25 years. Despommier is often cited as formally defining the concept [1]. Despommier's lab started developing a vertical farm as early as 1999 [2]. ...
... For example, ideally designed vertical farming systems controlling lighting spectrum, intensity, and duration, as well as other environmental factors such as CO 2 level, air temperature, and humidity, can enhance the appearance, taste, or nutrient levels of leafy greens [5,6]. Further research has explored CEA's potential to address the food demand in urban areas while promoting sustainability [1,[7][8][9]. Industry development has been supported by multidisciplinary research focused on optimizing environmental variables to maximize yield or resource use efficiency [5,[10][11][12][13][14] and market segmentation and acceptance studies [15][16][17][18][19]. From the industry's perspective, particularly in the U.S., securing funding for capital-intensive vertical farming structures, specialized labor training, and managing high electricity consumption remain significant challenges [20]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Food systems around the world are challenged to meet increased demand while also mitigating ecosystem pressures from their current structure. Controlled environment agriculture (CEA) offers a potential solution to augment the food supply by adopting innovative production systems designed to overcome environmental resource limitations and efficiently serve densely populated urban areas. By utilizing Elkington’s profit, plant, and people framework (3Ps), this article assesses the sustainability of a major subcategory of CEA farms: indoor agriculture vertical farms (IA/VFs). The qualitative analysis attempts to answer the question of whether IA/VFs have fulfilled their potential. Results suggest that IA/VFs have not yet optimized their positive impact on future food system sustainability. For each of the three Ps, IA/VF’s observed progress and required breakthroughs are summarized. Notably, the financial viability of an IA/VF is more likely to be achieved through whole systems solutions: growing the right crops in the right environment, efficient use of resources, and effective consumer targeting. Significant progress is being made in the direction of innovating IA/VF’s role in future food systems. Through public–private partnerships and further analyses, further progress can be made toward realizing IA/VF’s potential to address the growing demands of an expanding world population and shrinking resource base.
... [12] The crime detection system employs a fusion of 3D convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks to analyze video data [13]. By leveraging 3D CNNs, it captures spatiotemporal features crucial for understanding frame relationships. ...
Article
Full-text available
In this paper, a deep learning based automated crime classification system called CrimeSense is proposed. CrimeSense employs a transfer learning approach utilizing a MobileNetV2 base model fine-tuned with additional convolutional layers to extract robust features from video frames. This approach facilitates the classification of various criminal activities depicted in videos. The system achieves a remarkable accuracy of 97.8% on the UCF Crime Dataset, demonstrating its potential as a useful instrument for law enforcement and other stakeholders in video-based crime analysis. In this paper, a deep learning based automated crime classification system called CrimeSense is proposed.
... Light plays a crucial role in fruit development. In a hydroponic greenhouse, light falls evenly on both the upper and lower parts of the plant, leading to more uniform fruit development (Despommier, 2009 Components of a hydroponic system include the growing area/location, the specific crop being cultivated, the growing medium, nutrient solution, a reservoir for the nutrient solution, and a lighting system (Mudo et al, 2020). These systems can be operated automatically, with automated systems controlling factors such as temperature, pH level of the water, nutrient delivery, air conditioning, and humidity. ...
Article
Hydroponics is a soilless farming technique in which the plants are irrigated with a nutrient solution consisting of water and compounds necessary to provide all the essential elements for normal mineral nutrition. Increase in population, industrialization which has lead to pollution and change in climatic condition has pose a serious threat to food security. This paper therefore explores the integration of Deep Learning (DL) and Business Intelligence (BI) in smart hydroponic greenhouse systems, aiming to optimize cultivation through data-driven automation. A conceptual architecture is presented, highlighting the flow of information from sensor inputs and cameras, through a Raspberry Pi and IoT gateway, to a central database. ANNs, including classification and prediction models, process this data, enabling automated control of actuators and providing actionable insights through a BI dashboard. The discussion of findings, based on reviewed literature and the proposed architecture, reveals a strong trend towards leveraging advanced technologies for improved efficiency, accuracy, and productivity in hydroponic agriculture. The integration of deep learning for tasks like disease detection and yield prediction, coupled with BI for data visualization and decision support, underscores the potential of these technologies to revolutionize hydroponic practices. This research emphasizes the importance of data-driven approaches, IoT infrastructure, and closed-loop control systems in creating intelligent and sustainable greenhouse environments.
... The minimum operational load and maximum ramping rates for applicable technologies are regulated based on Eqs. (17)(18)(19). ...
Article
Full-text available
The environmental impacts of the food system exceed several planetary boundaries, with protein production being a major contributor. Single-Cell Protein (SCP) is a protein-rich microbial biomass that offers a sustainable alternative when derived from renewable energy and sustainable feedstocks. We evaluate the global potential for SCP production utilising electrolytic hydrogen and oxygen, atmospheric carbon dioxide and nitrogen, and hourly-optimised hybrid PV-wind power plants at a 0.45° × 0.45° spatial resolution. We outline a roadmap for industrial-scale production, commencing in 2028, targeting an annual capacity of 30 million tonnes of protein by 2050. Here we show that the cost of renewable electricity-based protein (e-protein) could decline at optimal sites from 5.5–6.1 € kg⁻¹ in 2028 to 4.0–4.5 € kg⁻¹ by 2030, and further to 2.1–2.3 € kg⁻¹ by 2050. Consequently, e-protein production can mostly decouple protein supply from water and arable land constraints, substantially mitigating the environmental impacts of food production.
... Practiced in one form or another for thousands of years as a 'protected' form of agriculture, vertical farming is increasingly positioned as techno-local food utopia (Broad, 2020). By controlling environmental conditions inside buildings to grow healthy crops (usually micro greens and vegetables), proponents argue that the vertical farming utopia can bypass seasonal constraints to facilitate a more consistent supply of food than horizontal farming (Despommier, 2009). This is seen to be all the more important given that we are running out of land to grow food, although this is primarily because we use vast swathes of productive land to grow feed for animals to produce meat, which has profound ecological and social consequences (Weis, 2013). ...
Chapter
This chapter extends Elias’s discussion of utopias to food systems via the notion of contemporary social processes and ecological civilising processes. Looking at the role played by utopias in illuminating the worsening social and ecological problems associated with the long-term developmental trajectory of the global food system, the foundations of industrial agriculture are traced back to the sixteenth century when European powers were exerting their influence around the globe and perfect utopian societies were becoming fashionable. Examining the entanglement of technological food utopias, based on the belief that technology can deliver clean and affordable food for everyone everywhere, with anthropological food utopias and moral arguments stressing the need for humans to change what and how they eat, it is argued that a focus on social relations is key to realising ecological utopian visions.
Article
Estudo de requisitos para sistema embarcado para controle de iluminação suplementar deste cultivo de plantas indoor, sendo também aplicado um estudo e possível analise de quais equipamentos mínimos, são mais indicados para o projeto, onde avaliaremos o baixo custo inicial, visando fácil aprendizado e possível aplicação de pequena escala de implementação.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.