ArticlePDF Available

Comparative analysis of Family Laws in Pakistan and Islamic Injuctions in this Regard

Authors:

Abstract

“No ination can ever be worthy of its existence that cannot take its women along with the men.” Mohammad Ali Jinnah, Founder of Pakistan” (Russell & Catharine, 2007).The legal status of Muslim women, especially in family relations, has been the subject of considerable international academic and media interest. The right to marital freedom is a constitutional right in Pakistan and demonstrates that in ia country in which women’s rights are notoriously and brutally violated, female divorce rights stand as a ray of light amidst the “darkness” of ithe igeneral legal status of Pakistani women. Contrary to the conventional wisdom construing Islamic law as opposed to women’s rights, the constitutionalization of Islam in Pakistan has proven to be a potent tool in the service of women’s interests.
Corresponding Author: Muhammad Tahir (Professor, School of Law, University of
Karachi , Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan Email: Email: drtahir949@gmail.com)
Citation: . Tahir, M., & Shahid, M. (2023). Comparative analysis of Family Laws in Pakistan and
Islamic Injuctions in this Regard.
Global Legal Studies Review, VIII
(IV), 35-46.
https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2023(VIII-IV).05
DOI: 10.31703/glsr.2023(VIII-IV).05 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2023(VIII-IV).05
p- ISSN: 2708-2458
e- ISSN: 2708-2466
Pages: 35 – 46 Vol. VIII, No. IV (Fall 2023)
Comparative analysis of Family Laws in Pakistan and Islamic Injuctions in this
Regard
Muhammad Tahir
*
Muhammad Shahid
Abstract:
“No
i
nation
i
can
i
ever
i
be
i
worthy
i
of
i
its
i
existence
i
that
i
cannot
i
take
i
its
i
women
i
along
i
with
i
the
i
men.”
Mohammad
i
Ali
i
Jinnah,
i
Founder
i
of
i
Pakistan” (Russell & Catharine, 2007).The
i
legal
i
status
i
of
i
Muslim
i
women,
i
especially
i
in
i
family
i
relations,
i
has
i
been
i
the
i
subject
i
of iconsiderable
i
international
i
academic
i
and
i
media
i
interest.
i
The
i
right
i
to
i
marital
i
freedom
i
is
i
a iconstitutional
i
right
i
in
i
Pakistan
i
and
i
demonstrates
i
that
i
in
i
a
i
country
i
in
i
which
i
women’s
i
rights
i
are inotoriously
i
and
i
brutally
i
violated,
i
female
i
divorce
i
rights
i
stand
i
as
i
a
i
ray
i
of
i
light
i
amidst
i
the
i“darkness”
i
of
i
the
i
general
i
legal
i
status
i
of
i
Pakistani
i
women.
i
Contrary
i
to
i
the
i
conventional
i
wisdom iconstruing
i
Islamic
i
law
i
as
i
opposed
i
to
i
women’s
i
rights,
i
the
i
constitutionalization
i
of
i
Islam
i
in iPakistan
i
has
i
proven
i
to
i
be
i
a
i
potent
i
tool
i
in
i
the
i
service
i
of
i
women’s
i
interests.
Key Words: MFLO, Traditionalist, Modernist, Divorce, Ijtihad, Commission, Child Custody, Islamic Law (Fiqh,
Shariah), Contemporary Laws.
Introduction
In
i
recent
i
years,
i
there
i
has
i
been
i
an
i
ever-increasing
i
fascination
i
with
i
human
i
rights
i
in
i
the
i
Muslim iworld,
i
particularly
i
the
i
subordinate
i
status
i
of
i
women
i
in
i
Islamic
i
law
i
and
i
culture.2
i
Westerners
i
in igeneral
i
and
i
feminists
i
in
i
particular
i
have
i
dreaded
i
the
i
possibility
i
that
i
the
i
Islamic
i
revival
i
sweeping ithe
i
Muslim
i
world
i
will
i
turn
i
back
i
the
i
clock
i
on
i
women’s
i
legal
i
and
i
social
i
rights.
i
The
i
West’s igrowing
i
unease
i
with
i
violations
i
of
i
women’s
i
rights
i
in
i
Muslim
i
countries
i
has
i
mad
i
this
i
issue
i
a
i
top ipriority
i
for
i
nations
i
and
i
advocates
i
alike.4
i
The
i
Islamic
i
Republic
i
of
i
Pakistan,
i
the
i
second
i
largest
ination
i
in
i
the
i
world
i
with
i
a
i
Muslim
i
majority,
i
represents
i
a
i
promising
i
case
i
study
i
due
i
to
i
its
i
unique
iconstitutional
i
system
i
enshrining
i
Islamic
i
law
i
alongside
i
Western
i
guarantees
i
of
i
gender
i
equality (
Reading, n.d). The
i
Muslim
i
family
i
law
i
provisions
i
that
i
were
i
enacted
i
under
i
the
i
British
i
administration
i
were
i
still iin
i
effect
i
after
i
the
i
country
i
got
i
independence
i
in
i
1947.
i
Family
i
law
i
in
i
Pakistan
i
did
i
not
i
change
i
at iall
i
between
i
1947
i
and
i
1954.
i
The
i
MFLO
i
was
i
adopted
i
in
i
1961,
i
to
i
the
i
vehement
i
disapproval
i
of ireligious
i
authorities.
i
The
i
repugnancy
i
clause
i
was
i
incorporated
i
first
i
into
i
the
i
1956
i
Constitution. iIn
i
later
*
Professor, School of Law, University of Karachi , Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Advocate, Sindh High Court, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
i
Constitutions
i
and
i
amendments,
i
the
i
repugnancy
i
provision
i
has
i
been
i
kept
i
and
i
made istronger.
The
i
article
i
in
i
hand
i
describes
i
the
i
critical
i
review
i
of
i
Muslim
i
Family
i
Laws
i
Ordinance
i
1961
i
with
ireference
i
to
i
Pakistan.
i
The
i
main
i
purpose
i
behind
i
this
i
critique
i
is
i
to
i
make
i
a
i
comparison
i
between iMuslim
i
Family
i
Laws
i
and iPakistani
i
Muslim
i
Family
i
Law
iOrdinance
i
1961
i
and
i
to
i
find
i
out
i
the isimilarities
i
and
i
the
i
contrasts
i
between
i
them.
i
Many
i
of
i
Muslim
i
scholars
i
are
i
of
i
the
i
view
i
that iPakistani
i
MFLO
i
(Muslim
i
Family
i
Laws
i
Ordinance)
i
is
i
not
i
in
i
accordance
i
with
i
the
i
Muslim
i
Laws.
Succession
In
i
the
i
event
i
of
i
death
i
of
i
any
i
son
i
or
i
daughter
i
of
i
the
i
propositus
i
before
i
the
i
opening
i
of
i
succession, ithe
i
children
i
of
i
such
i
son
i
or
i
daughter,
i
if
i
any,
i
living
i
at
i
the
i
time
i
the
i
succession
i
opens,
i
shall
i
per istripes,
i
receive
i
a
i
share
i
equivalent
i
to
i
the
i
share
i
which
i
such
i
son
i
or
i
daughter,
i
as
i
the
i
case
i
may
i
be, iwould
i
have
i
received
i
if
i
alive.
Muhammad Tahir and Muhammad Shahid
36
Global Legal Studies Review (GLSR)
Islamic Concept of Succession
Direct
i
succession
i
out
i
of
i
grandfather’s
i
heritage
i
is
i
provided
i
for
i
inheritance
i
to
i
an
i
orphan.
i
This iclause
i
is
i
repugnant
i
to
i
the
i
injunctions
i
of
i
the
i
Islam
i
as
i
direct
i
inheritance
i
is
i
not
i
provided.
i
Federal iShariat
i
court
i
asked
i
the
i
then
i
president
i
Rafiq
i
Tarar
i
to
i
amend
i
the
i
said
i
clause.
i
Prior
i
to
i
the
i
Muslim ifamily
i
law
i
ordinance
i
grand
i
children
i
had
i
no
i
shares
i
in
i
the
i
property
i
left
i
by
i
the
i
grandfather.
i
But inow
i
the
i
sec
i
4
i
of
i
the
i
ordinance
i
creating
i
an
i
entitlement
i
to
i
succession
i
in
i
favour
i
of
i
the
i
children
i
of ipredeceased
i
son
i
or
i
daughter.
Heirs
i
referred
i
to
i
as
i
primary
i
heirs
i
are
i
always
i
entitled
i
to
i
a
i
share
i
of
i
the
i
inheritance,
i
they
i
are
i
never
itotally
i
excluded.
i
These
i
primary
i
heirs
i
consist
i
of
i
the
i
spouse
i
relict,
i
both
i
parents,
i
the
i
son
i
and
i
the
idaughter.
i
All
i
remaining
i
heirs
i
can
i
be
i
totally
i
excluded
i
by
i
the
i
presence
i
of
i
other
i
heirs.
i
But
i
under
icertain
i
circumstances,
i
other
i
heirs
i
can
i
also
i
inherit
i
as
i
residuary,
i
namely
i
the
i
father,
i
paternal igrandfather,
i
daughter,
i
agnatic
i
granddaughter,
i
full
i
sister,
i
consanguine
i
sister
i
and
i
mother (Hussain, 2010).
i
Those
iwho
i
inherit
i
are
i
usually
i
confined
i
to
i
three
i
groups:
a.
Quota-heirs
i
(dhawu
i
al-farāʾ),
i
usually
i
include
i
daughters,
i
parents,
i
grandparents,
i
husband
iand
i
wife/
i
wives,
i
brothers
i
and
i
sisters,
i
and
i
others.
i
This
i
group
i
usually
i
takes
i
a
i
designated ishare
i
or
i
quota
i
of
i
the
i
estates.
b.
Members
i
of
i
the
i
ʿa aba
i
(residuaries),
i
usually
i
a
i
combination
i
of
i
male
i
(and
i
sometimes ifemale)
i
relatives
i
that
i
inherit
i
as
i
residuaries
i
after
i
the
i
shares
i
of
i
the
i
Quota-heirs
i
is idistributed (Schacht, 1991).
c.
In
i
case
i
a
i
person
i
leaves
i
no
i
direct
i
relatives
i
and
i
there
i
is
i
no
i
ʿu aba,
i
his
i
property
i
escheats
i
to ithe
i
state
i
treasury,
i
Baytul
i
Mal.
"And
i
for
i
his
i
parents
i
for
i
each
i
of
i
them
i
there
i
is
i
one-sixth
i
of
i
the
i
inheritance
i
if
i
he
i
has
i
a
i
child,
i
but
i
if
ihe
i
does
i
not
i
have
i
a
i
child
i
and
i
the
i
parents
i
are
i
the
i
heirs
i
then
i
for
i
the
i
mother
i
one-third"
i
(AnNisa:11).
The
i
Arabic
i
word
i
"walad"
i
has
i
been
i
variously
i
translated
i
as
i
child,
i
son,
i
children
i
and
i
offspring
i
by
itranslators.
i
However,
i
there
i
is
i
universal
i
agreement
i
amongst
i
the
i
Sunni
i
Muslim
i
jurists
i
that i"walad"
i
here
i
refers
i
to
i
any
i
child
i
or
i
agnatic
i
grandchild
i
(grandchild
i
through
i
son).
If
i
there
i
is
i
a
i
child
i
or
i
agnatic
i
grandchild
i
amongst
i
the
i
heirs
i
then
i
each
i
of
i
the
i
parents
i
inherits
i
onesixth.
i
In
i
the
i
absence
i
of
i
a
i
child
i
or
i
agnatic
i
grandchild
i
the
i
mother
i
inherits
i
one-third,
i
the
i
share
i
of ithe
i
father
i
is
i
not
i
mentioned
i
under
i
these
i
circumstances.
i
The
i
father
i
in
i
fact
i
inherits
i
as
i
a
i
residuary i(a
i
residuary
i
heir
i
gets
i
whatever
i
remains
i
of
i
the
i
inheritance
i
after
i
the
i
Quranic
i
sharers
i
have
i
been iallocated
i
their
i
shares,
i
residuary
i
heirs
i
are
i
generally
i
male
i
agnates)
i
under
i
these
i
circumstances.
To
i
these
i
two
i
Quranic
i
heirs,
i
the
i
mother
i
and
i
the
i
father,
i
the
i
maternal
i
grandmother
i
and
i
paternal
igrandfather
i
have
i
been
i
added
i
by
i
analogy.
i
The
i
maternal
i
grandmother
i
substitutes
i
the
i
mother
i
in ithe
i
latter's
i
absence (Butt, 2007).
Registration of Marriage
Every
i
marriage
i
solemnized
i
under
i
Muslim
i
Law
i
shall
i
be
i
registered.
i
For
i
the
i
purpose
i
of iregistration,
i
the
i
Union
i
Council
i
shall
i
grant
i
licenses
i
to
i
one
i
or
i
more
i
persons,
i
to
i
be
i
called
i
Nikah iRegistrars,
i
but
i
in
i
no
i
case
i
shall
i
more
i
than
i
on
i
Nikah
i
Registrar
i
be
i
licensed
i
for
i
any
i
one
i
Ward.
Islamic Law and Registration of Marriage
Under
i
classical
i
Islamic
i
law,
i
the
i
validity
i
of
i
a
i
marriage
i
contract
i
does
i
not
i
in
i
any
i
way
i
depend
i
on ithe
i
performance
i
of
i
any
i
recorded
i
ceremony
i
or
i
documentation:
i
mutual
i
consent,
i
capacity
i
to
i
enter
iinto
i
the
i
contract,
i
and
i
witnesses
i
on
i
the
i
occasion
i
being
i
the
i
only
i
requisites
i
necessary
i
to
i
make
i
the
icontract
i
valid
i
and
i
binding.
i
Clearly
i
when
i
dealing
i
with
i
marriages
i
celebrated
i
abroad,
i
and
i
in
i
the
iabsence
i
of
i
any
i
documentation,
i
proof
i
of
i
marriage
i
can
i
be
i
difficult,
i
particularly
i
when
i
seeking
i
to iprove
i
that
i
there
i
was
i
such
i
a
i
marriage.
i
It
i
has
i
been
i
argued
i
under
i
Islamic
i
law,
i
in
i
the
i
absence
i
of ianything
i
in
i
writing
i
to
i
prove
i
the
i
marriage,
i
or
i
a
i
Qazi's
i
evidence
i
of
i
the
i
marriage
i
being
i
celebrated ior
i
witnesses
i
who
i
can
i
give
i
relevant
i
evidence
i
of
i
the
i
marriage,
i
a
i
marriage
i
can
i
be
i
proven
i
by ipresumption.
i
For
i
instance,
i
where
i
the
i
parties
i
have
i
lived
i
together
i
for
i
a
i
long
i
time
i
as
i
husband
i
and iwife
i
or
i
where
i
either
i
party
i
has
i
acknowledged
i
the
i
marriage
i
and
i
that
i
is
i
not
i
disputed
i
by
i
the
i
other iparty,
i
a
i
valid
i
marriage
i
may
i
be
i
presumed
i
unless
i
there
i
is
i
a
i
legal
i
dispute
i
against
i
the
i
alliance.
However,
i
where
i
there
i
is
i
no
i
legal
i
presumption
i
of
i
the
i
existence
i
of
i
marriage,
i
if
i
it
i
were ichallenged,
i
it
i
would
i
have
i
to
i
be
i
proven
i
by
i
satisfactory
i
evidence
i
in
i
the
i
normal
i
way
i
and
i
any iwritten
i
documentation
i
in
i
these
i
circumstances
i
would
i
prove
i
invaluable.
i
In
i
Pakistan
i
the
i
Muslim iFamily
i
Law
i
Ordinance
i
1961,
i
Art
i
5(1)
i
states:
i
'every
i
marriage
i
solemnised
i
under
i
Muslim
i
law ishall
i
be
i
registered
i
in
i
accordance
i
with
i
the
i
provisions
i
of
i
this
i
Ordinance'.
i
In
i
India,
i
however,
i
no
ilaw
i
or
i
enactment
i
requires
i
compulsory
i
registration
i
of
i
a
i
Muslim
i
marriage
i
with
i
any
i
government iofficial.
i
Having
i
said
i
that,
i
in
i
the
i
states
i
of
i
Assam,
i
Bengal,
i
Bihar,
i
and
i
Orissa
i
local
i
enactments iprovide
i
facilities
Comparative analysis of Family Laws in Pakistan and Islamic Injuctions in this Regard
Vol. VIII, No. IV (Fall 2023)
37
i
for
i
'voluntary'
i
registration
i
of
i
Muslim
i
marriages,
i
one
i
must
i
remember
i
that, iwhen
i
all
i
else
i
fails,
i
the
i
Qazis
i
maintain
i
a
i
register
i
in
i
which
i
details
i
of
i
marriages
i
they
i
have iattended
i
are
i
recorded.
i
The
i
record
i
of
i
each
i
marriage
i
so
i
prepared
i
is
i
signed
i
by
i
the
i
parties
i
or
i
their iguardians
i
or
i
representatives,
i
the
i
witnesses,
i
and
i
the
i
Qazi
i
himself.
i
Copies
i
of
i
this
i
document
icommonly
i
called
i
'Nikahnama'
i
are
i
issued
i
by
i
the
i
Qazi
i
to
i
the
i
parties (Al_Kholy, n.d).
The
i
Muslim
i
Family
i
Laws
i
Ordinance
i
(MFLO)
i
1961
i
introduced
i
reforms
i
regarding
i
registration
i
of
imarriages,
i
and
i
in
i
default
i
of
i
such
i
registration,
i
penalties
i
of
i
fine
i
and
i
imprisonment
i
have
i
been
iprescribed.
i
Nevertheless,
i
Muslim
i
marriages
i
are
i
still
i
legal
i
and
i
valid
i
if
i
they
i
are
i
performed iaccording
i
to
i
the
i
requisites
i
of
i
Islam (Mutahhari, 1980).
Polygamy
Every
i
marriage
i
solemnized
i
under
i
Muslim
i
Law
i
shall
i
be
i
registered
i
and
i
husband
i
should
i
seek ipermission
i
from
i
the
i
wives
i
before
i
second
i
marriage.
i
On
i
receipt
i
of
i
the
i
application,
i
Chairman ishall
i
ask
i
the
i
applicant
i
and
i
his
i
existing
i
wife
i
or
i
wives
i
each
i
to
i
nominate
i
a
i
representative,
i
and
i
the iArbitration
i
Council
i
if
i
satisfied
i
that
i
the
i
proposed
i
marriage
i
is
i
necessary
i
and
i
just,
i
grant,
i
the ipermission
i
applied
i
for
i
marriage.
Islamic Concept of Polygamy
The
i
Muslim
i
scripture,
i
the
i
Quran,
i
is
i
the
i
only
i
known
i
world
i
scripture
i
to
i
explicitly
i
limit
i
polygamy iand
i
place
i
strict
i
restrictions
i
upon
i
its
i
practice: “marry
iwomen
i
of
i
your ichoice,
i
two
i
or ithree
i
or
i
four; ibut iif
i
you
i
fear
i
that
i
you
i
shall
i
not
i
be iable ito
i
deal
i
justly
i
with
i
them,
i
then
i
only
i
one.”
i
(Quran
i
4:3)
The
i
Quran
i
limited
i
the
i
maximum
i
number
i
of
i
wives
i
to
i
four.
i
In
i
the
i
early
i
days
i
of
i
Islam,
i
those
i
who
ihad
i
more
i
than
i
four
i
wives
i
at
i
the
i
time
i
of
i
embracing
i
Islam
i
were
i
required
i
to
i
divorce
i
the
i
extra iwives.
i
Islam
i
further
i
reformed
i
the
i
institution
i
of
i
polygamy
i
by
i
requiring
i
equal
i
treatment
i
to
i
all iwives.
i
The
i
Muslim
i
is
i
not
i
permitted
i
to
i
differentiate
i
between
i
his
i
wives
i
in
i
regards
i
to
i
sustenance iand
i
expenditures,
i
time,
i
and
i
other
i
obligations
i
of
i
husbands.
i
Islam
i
does
i
not
i
allow
i
a
i
man
i
to
i
marry ianother
i
woman
i
if
i
he
i
will
i
not
i
be
i
fair
i
in
i
his
i
treatment.
i
Prophet
i
Muhammad
i
forbade idiscrimination
i
between
i
the
i
wives
i
or
i
between
i
their
i
children.
i
Also,
i
marriage
i
and
i
polygamy
i
in iIslam
i
is
i
a
i
matter
i
of
i
mutual
i
consent.
i
No
i
one
i
can
i
force
i
a
i
woman
i
to
i
marry
i
a
i
married
i
man.
i
Islam isimply
i
permits
i
polygamy;
i
it
i
neither
i
forces
i
nor
i
requires
i
it.
i
Besides,
i
a
i
woman
i
may
i
stipulate
i
that iher
i
husband
i
must
i
not
i
marry
i
any
i
other
i
woman
i
as
i
a
i
second
i
wife
i
in
i
her
i
prenuptial
i
contract.
i
The ipoint
i
that
i
is
i
often
i
misunderstood
i
in
i
the
i
West
i
is
i
that
i
women
i
in
i
other
i
cultures
i
-
i
especially iAfrican
i
and
i
Islamic
i
-
i
do
i
not
i
necessarily
i
look
i
at
i
polygamy
i
as
i
a
i
sign
i
of
i
women’s
i
degradation. iConsequently,
i
to
i
equate
i
polygamy
i
with
i
degrading
i
women
i
is
i
an
i
ethnocentric
i
judgment
i
of
i
other isocieties.
Even
i
though
i
we
i
see
i
the
i
clear
i
permissibility
i
of
i
polygamy
i
in
i
Islam,
i
its
i
actual
i
practice
i
is
i
quite
i
rare iin
i
many
i
Muslim
i
societies.
i
Some
i
researchers
i
estimate
i
no
i
more
i
than
i
2%
i
of
i
the
i
married
i
males ipractice
i
polygamy (Chaudhry, n.d).
i
Most
i
Muslim
i
men
i
feel
i
they
i
cannot
i
afford
i
the
i
expense
i
of
i
maintaining
i
more
ithan
i
one
i
family.
i
Even
i
those
i
who
i
are
i
financially
i
capable
i
of
i
looking
i
after
i
additional
i
families
i
are ioften
i
reluctant
i
due
i
to
i
the
i
psychological
i
burdens
i
of
i
handling
i
more
i
than
i
one
i
wife.
i
One
i
can
i
safely isay
i
that
i
the
i
number
i
of
i
polygamous
i
marriages
i
in
i
the
i
Muslim
i
world
i
is
i
much
i
less
i
than
i
the
i
number iof
i
extramarital
i
affairs
i
in
i
the
i
West.
i
In
i
other
i
words,
i
contrary
i
to
i
prevalent
i
notion,
i
men
i
in
i
the iMuslim
i
world
i
today
i
are
i
more
i
strictly
i
monogamous
i
than
i
men
i
in
i
the
i
Western
i
world.
Seeking Permission from the First Wife in
Islam
Polygamy
i
is
i
within
i
the
i
injunctions
i
of
i
Islam.
i
Seeking
i
of
i
permission
i
by
i
the
i
husband
i
from
i
the iarbitration
i
council
i
before
i
marrying
i
another
i
woman
i
is
i
criticized. Allah
i
says: then
i
marry
i
(other)
i
women
i
of
i
your
i
choice,
i
two
i
or
i
three,
i
or
i
four.”
i
(Quran
i
4:3)
i
It
i
is
i
well
i
known
i
that
i
women
i
are
i
by
i
nature
i
jealous
i
and
i
reluctant
i
to
i
share
i
their
i
husband
i
with
iother
i
women.
i
Women
i
are
i
not
i
to
i
be
i
condemned
i
for
i
this
i
jealousy,
i
for
i
it
i
existed
i
in
i
the
i
best
i
of irighteous
i
women,
i
the
i
wives
i
of
i
the
i
Companions,
i
and
i
even
i
in
i
the
i
Mothers
i
of
i
the
i
Believers.
i
But iwomen
i
should
i
not
i
let
i
jealousy
i
make
i
them
i
object
i
to
i
that
i
which
i
Allah
i
has
i
permitted,
i
and
i
they ishould
i
not
i
try
i
to
i
prevent
i
it;
i
a
i
wife
i
should
i
allow
i
her
i
husband
i
to
i
marry
i
another
i
woman
i
for
i
this
i
is ia
i
kind
i
of
i
cooperating
i
in
i
righteousness
i
and
i
piety.
The
i
first
i
wife’s
i
consent
i
is
i
not
i
a
i
prerequisite
i
for
i
a
i
man
i
to
i
take
i
another
i
wife.
i
The
i
Standing
iCommittee
i
for
i
Issuing
i
Fatwas
i
was
i
asked
i
about
i
this
i
and
i
replied
i
as
i
follows:
“It
i
is
i
not
i
obligatory
i
for
i
the
i
husband,
i
if
i
he
i
wants
i
to
i
take
i
a
i
second
i
wife,
i
to
i
have
i
the
i
consent
i
of
i
his ifirst
i
wife,
i
but
i
it
i
is
i
good
i
manners
i
and
i
kindness
i
to
i
deal
i
with
i
her
i
in
i
such
i
a
i
manner
i
that
i
will iminimize
i
the
i
hurt
i
feelings
i
such
i
thing
i
might
i
produce.
i
So
i
it’s
i
incumbent
i
on
i
the
i
husband
i
to
i
be ikind
i
to
i
his
i
wife,
i
discuss
i
the
i
matter
i
with
i
her
i
in
i
a
i
gentle
i
and
i
pleasant
i
manner,
i
and
i
this
i
should
i
be icoupled
i
with
i
spending
Muhammad Tahir and Muhammad Shahid
38
Global Legal Studies Review (GLSR)
i
whatever
i
money
i
may
i
be
i
necessary
i
in
i
order
i
to
i
gain
i
her
i
acceptance
i
of
i
the isituation.”
MFLO
i
has ialso iintroduced isome
i
reforms iin
i
the
i
law
i
relating
i
to
i
polygamy.
i
Now, ia
i
husband imust
isubmit
i
an
i
application
i
and
i
pay
i
a
i
prescribed
i
fee
i
to
i
the
i
local
i
union
i
council
i
in
i
order
i
to
i
obtain ipermission
i
for
i
contracting
i
a
i
polygamous
i
marriage.
i
Thereafter,
i
the
i
chairman
i
of
i
the
i
union icouncil
i
forms
i
an
i
arbitration
i
council
i
with
i
representatives
i
of
i
both
i
husband
i
and
i
wife/wives
i
in iorder
i
to
i
determine
i
the
i
necessity
i
of
i
the
i
proposed
i
marriage.
i
The
i
application
i
must
i
state
i
whether ithe
i
husband
i
has
i
obtained
i
consent
i
of
i
the
i
existing
i
wife
i
or
i
wives.
i
Contracting
i
a
i
polygamous imarriage
i
without
i
prior
i
consent
i
is
i
subject
i
to
i
penalties
i
of
i
fine
i
and
i
or
i
imprisonment
i
and
i
the ihusband
i
becomes
i
bound
i
to
i
make
i
immediate
i
payment
i
of
i
dowry
i
to
i
the
i
existing
i
wife
i
or
i
wives.
iNonetheless,
i
if
i
the
i
husband
i
has
i
not
i
obtained
i
consent
i
of
i
the
i
existing
i
wife
i
or
i
wives
i
the isubsequent
i
marriage
i
remains
i
valid.
Talaq
Any
i
man
i
who
i
wishes
i
to
i
divorce
i
his
i
wife
i
shall,
i
as
i
soon
i
as
i
may
i
be
i
after
i
the
i
pronouncement
i
of iTalaq
i
in
i
any
i
form
i
whatsoever,
i
give
i
the
i
chairman
i
a
i
notice
i
in
i
writing
i
of
i
his
i
having
i
done
i
so,
i
and ishall
i
supply
i
a
i
copy
i
thereof
i
to
i
the
i
wife.
i
A
i
person
i
fail
i
to
i
do
i
so
i
shall
i
be
i
punishable
i
with
i
simple iimprisonment
i
for
i
a
i
term
i
which
i
may
i
extend
i
to
i
one
i
year,
i
or
i
with
i
fine
i
which
i
may
i
extend
i
to
i
five ithousand
i
rupees,
i
or
i
with
i
both.
i
If
i
the
i
Talaq,
i
is
i
not
i
revoked
i
expressly
i
or
i
otherwise,
i
it
i
shall
i
not
i
be ieffective
i
until
i
the
i
expiration
i
of
i
ninety
i
days
i
from
i
day
i
on
i
which
i
notice
i
is
i
delivered
i
to
i
the
iChairman.
i
If
i
the
i
wife
i
be
i
pregnant
i
at
i
the
i
time
i
Talaq
i
is
i
pronounced,
i
Talaq
i
shall
i
not
i
be
i
effective iuntil
i
the
i
period
i
of
i
90
i
days
i
or
i
the
i
pregnancy,
i
whichever
i
later,
i
ends.
Islamic Law of Talaq and its Effectiveness
Divorce
i
is
i
operative
i
from
i
the
i
announcement.
i
Hence
i
pending
i
it
i
for
i
90
i
days
i
is
i
repugnant
i
to iIslamic
i
teachings.
i
Under
i
MFLO
i
limited
i
reforms
i
have
i
also
i
been
i
introduced
i
in
i
relation
i
to
i
Talaq. iUnder
i
MFLO
i
a
i
divorcing
i
husband
i
shall,
i
as
i
soon
i
as
i
possible
i
after
i
Talaq
i
has
i
been
i
pronounced, iin
i
whatever
i
form,
i
give
i
a
i
notice
i
in
i
writing
i
to
i
the
i
chairman
i
of
i
the
i
Union
i
Council.
i
The
i
chairman imust
i
then
i
supply
i
a
i
copy
i
of
i
the
i
notice
i
of
i
Talaq
i
to
i
the
i
wife.
i
Non-compliance
i
is
i
punishable
i
by iimprisonment
i
and/or
i
a
i
fine.
i
Within
i
thirty
i
days
i
of
i
receipt
i
of
i
the
i
notice
i
of
i
Talaq,
i
the
i
chairman imust
i
constitute
i
an
i
Arbitration
i
Council
i
in
i
order
i
to
i
take
i
steps
i
to
i
bring
i
about
i
reconciliation
ibetween
i
the
i
husband
i
and
i
the
i
wife.
i
If
i
and
i
when
i
such
i
attempts
i
to
i
negotiate
i
reconciliation
i
fail,
i
a iTalaq
i
that
i
is
i
not
i
revoked
i
in
i
the
i
meantime,
i
either
i
expressly
i
or
i
implicitly
i
takes
i
effect
i
after
i
the iexpiry
i
of
i
ninety
i
days
i
from
i
the
i
day
i
on
i
which
i
the
i
notice
i
of
i
repudiation
i
was
i
first
i
delivered
i
to
i
the ichairman (Glenn, 2007).
i
If,
i
however,
i
the
i
wife
i
is
i
pregnant
i
at
i
the
i
time
i
of
i
the
i
pronouncement
i
of
i
Talaq,
i
the
i
Talaq idoes
i
not
i
take
i
effect
i
until
i
ninety
i
days
i
have
i
elapsed
i
or
i
the
i
end
i
of
i
the
i
pregnancy,
i
whichever
i
is ilater.
i
Failure
i
to
i
notify,
i
in
i
the
i
above
i
stated
i
manner,
i
invalidated
i
Talaq
i
until
i
the
i
late
i
1970s
i
and iearly
i
1980s,
i
but
i
introduction
i
of
i
the
i
Zina
i
Ordinance
i
allowed
i
scope
i
for
i
abuse
i
as
i
repudiated
i
wives iwere
i
left
i
open
i
to
i
charges
i
of
i
Zina
i
if
i
their
i
husbands
i
had
i
not
i
followed
i
the
i
MFLO's
i
notification iprocedure.
i
Since
i
early
i
1980s,
i
the
i
practice
i
of
i
the
i
Courts
i
in
i
Pakistan
i
is
i
that
i
they
i
validate
i
a
i
Talaq idespite
i
a
i
failure
i
to
i
notify
i
as
i
provided
i
under
i
the
i
MFLO.
As
i
far
i
as
i
the
i
Islamic
i
concept
i
of
i
effectiveness
i
of
i
the
i
Talaq
i
is
i
concerned,
i
Talaq
i
is
i
effective
i
from ithe
i
time
i
of
i
utterance
i
of
i
the
i
word
i
Talaq
i
by
i
the
i
husband.
i
Registration
i
is
i
only
i
subjected
i
to
i
the icountry
i
law
i
and
i
it
i
has
i
nothing
i
to
i
do
i
with
i
Islamic
i
law
i
of
i
Talaq.
Dissolution of Marriage otherwise than by
Talaq
Where
i
the iright ito
i
divorce ihas ibeen
i
duly idelegated
ito ithe iwife
i
and
i
she
i
wishes ito
i
exercise ithat iright,
i
or
i
where
i
any
i
of
i
the
i
parties
i
to
i
a
i
marriage
i
wishes
i
to
i
dissolves
i
the
i
marriage
i
otherwise
i
than iby
i
Talaq
i
the
i
provisions
i
of
i
section
i
7
i
shall,
i
mutatis
i
mutandis
i
and
i
so
i
far
i
as
i
applicable,
i
apply.
Islamic Concept of Dissolution of Marriage
otherwise than by Talaq
We
i
have
i
so
i
far
i
dealt
i
with
i
the
i
natural
i
right
i
of
i
divorce
i
which
i
belongs
i
exclusively
i
to
i
the
i
husband.
iBut
i
he
i
can
i
confer
i
the
i
power
i
of
i
divorce
i
on
i
the
i
wife.
i
This
i
delegation
i
of
i
power
i
can
i
either
i
be igeneral
i
or
i
limited
i
to
i
certain
i
specified
i
circumstances.
i
To
i
make
i
it
i
irrevocable
i
it
i
is
i
included
i
in
i
the imarriage
i
contract
i
as
i
a
i
binding
i
clause,
i
according
i
to
i
which
i
the
i
wife
i
is
i
empowered
i
to
i
dissolve
i
the imarriage
i
in
i
the
i
specified
i
circumstances
i
already
i
agreed
i
upon.
It
i
has
i
been
i
customary
i
since
i
the
i
olden
i
days
i
that
i
the
i
women,
i
who
i
feel,
i
in
i
any
i
way,
i
apprehensive iof
i
the
i
conduct
i
of
i
their
i
husbands,
i
insist
i
on
i
the
i
inclusion
i
of
i
such
i
a
i
clause
i
in
i
the
i
marriage
i
contract iand
i
exercise
i
the
i
power
i
delegated
i
to
i
them,
i
if
i
necessary.
i
Thus,
i
according
i
to
i
the
i
Islamic
i
law, ithough
i
woman
i
does
i
not
i
have
i
the
i
natural
i
right
i
of
i
divorce,
i
she
i
can
i
have
i
the
i
contractual
i
right
i
of ithe
i
dissolution
i
of
i
marriage.
i
Hence,
i
it
i
is
i
not
i
correct
i
to
i
say
i
that
i
the
Comparative analysis of Family Laws in Pakistan and Islamic Injuctions in this Regard
Vol. VIII, No. IV (Fall 2023)
39
i
right
i
of
i
divorce
i
is
i
unilateral iand
i
Islam
i
has
i
given
i
it
i
only
i
to
i
man (Marriage Commission Report, 1959).
Maintenance
a.
If
i
any
i
husband
i
fails
i
to
i
maintain
i
his
i
wife
i
adequately,
i
or
i
where
i
there
i
are
i
more
i
wives
i
than ione,
i
fails
i
to
i
maintain
i
them
i
equitably,
i
the
i
wife,
i
or
i
all
i
or
i
any
i
of
i
the
i
wives,
i
may
i
in
iaddition
i
to
i
seeking
i
any
i
other
i
legal
i
remedy
i
available
i
apply
i
to
i
the
i
Chairman
i
who
i
shall
iconstitute
i
an
i
Arbitration
i
Council
i
to
i
determine
i
the
i
matter,
i
and
i
the
i
Arbitration
i
Council imay
i
issue
i
a
i
certificate
i
specifying
i
the
i
amount
i
which
i
shall
i
be
i
paid
i
as
i
maintenance
i
by
i
the ihusband.
b.
A
i
husband
i
or
i
wife
i
may,
i
in
i
the
i
prescribed
i
manner,
i
within
i
the
i
prescribed
i
period,
i
and
i
on
ipayment
i
of
i
the
i
prescribed
i
fee,
i
prefer
i
an
i
application
i
for
i
revision
i
of
i
the
i
certificate,
i
to
i
the iCollector
i
concerned
i
and
i
his
i
decision
i
shall
i
be
i
final
i
and
i
shall
i
not
i
be
i
called
i
in
i
question
i
in iany
i
Court (Butt, 2007).
c.
Any
i
amount
i
payable
i
under
i
Sub-section
i
(1)
i
or,
i
(2)
i
if,
i
not
i
paid
i
in
i
the
i
due
i
time,
i
shall
i
be
irecoverable
i
as
i
arrears
i
of
i
land
i
revenue.
i
PUNJAB
i
AMENDMENT
i
In
i
sub-section
i
(2),
i
the ifull-stop
i
occurring
i
at
i
the
i
end
i
shall
i
be
i
replaced
i
by
i
a
i
colon
i
and
i
thereafter
i
the
i
following iproviso
i
shall
i
be
i
added,
i
namely:
i
Provided
i
that
i
the
i
Commissioner
i
of
i
a
i
Division
i
may,
i
on ian
i
application
i
made
i
in
i
this
i
behalf
i
and
i
for
i
reasons
i
to
i
be
i
recorded,
i
transfer
i
an
i
application ifor
i
revision
i
of
i
the
i
certificate
i
from
i
a
i
Collector
i
to
i
any
i
other
i
Collector,
i
or
i
to
i
a
i
Director, iLocal
i
Government,
i
or
i
to
i
an
i
Additional
i
Commissioner
i
in
i
his
i
Division.
Islamic Concept of Maintenance
Islamic
i
concept
i
of
i
maintenance
i
is
i
given
i
below:
Injunctions of the Qur'an
Injunctions
i
of
i
the
i
Holy
i
Qur'an
i
regarding
i
the
i
rights
i
of
i
woman
i
in
i
respect
i
of
i
maintenance iare
i
contained
i
in
i
the
i
following
i
verses:
i
-
a.
The
i
mothers
i
shall
i
give
i
suck
i
to
i
their
i
offspring
i
for
i
two
i
whole
i
years,
i
if
i
the
i
father
i
desires, ito
i
complete
i
the
i
term.
i
But
i
he
i
shall
i
bear
i
the
i
cost
i
of
i
their
i
food
i
and
i
clothing
i
on
i
equitable iterms
i
(Quran
i
2:233).
b.
There
i
is
i
no
i
blame
i
on
i
you
i
if
i
ye
i
divorce
i
women
i
before
i
consummation
i
or
i
the
i
fixation
i
of itheir
i
dower;
i
but
i
bestow
i
on
i
them
i
(a
i
suitable
i
gift)
i
the
i
wealthy
i
according
i
to
i
his
i
means,
i
and ithe ipoor iaccording ito
i
his
i
means,- ia
i
gift
i
of
i
a
i
reasonable
i
amount
i
is
i
due
ifrom
i
those iwho iwish
i
to
i
do
i
the
i
right
i
things
i
(Quran
i
2:236).
c.
For
i
divorced
i
women
i
maintenance
i
(should
i
be
i
provided)
i
on
i
a
i
reasonable
i
(scale).
i
This
i
is
i
a
iduty
i
on
i
the
i
righteous
i
(Quran
i
2:241).
d.
Men
i
are
i
the
i
protectors
i
and
i
maintainers
i
of
i
women,
i
because
i
Allah
i
has
i
given
i
the
i
one
i
more i(strength)
i
than
i
the
i
other,
i
and
i
because
i
they
i
support
i
them
i
from
i
their
i
means
i
(Quran
i
4:34).
e.
O
i
Prophet!
i
When
i
ire
i
do
i
divorce
i
women,
i
divorce
i
them
i
at
i
their
i
prescribed
i
periods,
i
and
icount
i
(accurately)
i
their
i
prescribed
i
periods:
i
And
i
fear
i
Allah
i
your
i
Lord:
i
and
i
turn
i
them
i
not
iout
i
of
i
their
i
houses,
i
nor
i
shall
i
they
i
(themselves)
i
leave,
i
except
i
in
i
case
i
they
i
are
i
guilty
i
of isome
i
open
i
lewdness.
i
Those
i
are
i
limits
i
set
i
by
i
Allah:
i
and
i
any
i
who
i
transgresses
i
the
i
limits iof
i
Allah,
i
does
i
verily
i
wrong
i
his
i
(own)
i
soul:
i
Thou
i
knowest
i
not
i
if
i
perchance
i
Allah
i
will ibring
i
about
i
thereafter
i
some
i
new
i
situation
i
(Quran
i
65:1).
f.
Let
i
the
i
women
i
live
i
(In
i
`Iddat,)
i
in
i
the
i
same
i
style
i
as
i
ye
i
live,
i
according
i
to
i
your
i
means;
iannoy
i
them
i
not,
i
so
i
as
i
to
i
restrict
i
them.
i
And
i
if
i
they
i
carry
i
(life
i
in
i
their
i
wombs),
i
then ispend
i
(your.
i
substance)
i
on
i
them
i
until
i
they
i
deliver
i
their
i
burden:
i
and
i
if
i
they.
i
Suckle
i
your
i(offspring),
i
give
i
them
i
their
i
recompense;
i
and
i
take
i
mutual
i
counsel
i
together,
i
according
i
to
iwhat
i
is
i
just
i
and
i
reasonable.
i
And
i
if
i
ye
i
find
i
yourselves
i
in
i
difficulties,
i
let
i
another
i
woman
isuckle
i
(the
i
child)
i
on
i
the
i
(father's)
i
behalf
i
(Quran
i
65:6).
g.
Let
i
the
i
man
i
of
i
means
i
spend
i
according
i
to
i
his
i
means:
i
and
i
the
i
man
i
whose
i
resources
i
are
irestricted,
i
let
i
him
i
spend
i
according
i
to
i
what
i
Allah
i
has
i
given
i
him.
i
Allah
i
puts
i
no
i
burden
i
on
iany
i
person
i
beyond
i
what
i
he
i
has
i
given
i
him.
i
After
i
a
i
difficulty,
i
Allah
i
will
i
soon
i
grant
i
relief
i(Quran
i
65:7).
Ahadith of the Prophet (PBUH)
The
i
Traditions
i
of
i
the
i
Holy
i
Prophet
i
about
i
the
i
rights
i
of
i
woman
i
for
i
maintenance
i
are:
a.
Jaber-b-Abdullah
i
reported
i
that
i
the
i
Messenger
i
of
i
Allah
i
said:
i
Fear
i
Allah
i
regarding iwomen.
i
Verily
i
you
i
have
i
married
i
them
i
with
i
trust
i
of
i
Allah
i
and
i
made
i
their
i
private
i
parts ilawful
i
with
i
the
i
word
i
of
i
Allah....
i
They
i
have
i
got
i
rights
i
over
i
you
i
in
i
respect
i
of
Muhammad Tahir and Muhammad Shahid
40
Global Legal Studies Review (GLSR)
i
their
i
food iand
i
clothing
i
according
i
to
i
means
i
(Bukhari
i
and
i
Muslim).
i
b.
Jaber-b-Abdullah
i
reported:
i
The
i
Apostle
i
of
i
Allah
i
addressed
i
the
i
people
i
at
i
Arafat
i
during
ihis
i
farewell
i
pilgrimage....
i
Fear
i
Allah
i
about
i
women,
i
because
i
you
i
have
i
taken
i
them
i
with
ithe
i
trust
i
of
i
Allah
i
and
i
made
i
their
i
private
i
parts
i
lawful
i
with
i
the
i
word
i
of
i
Allah.
i
You
i
have
igot
i
rights
i
over
i
them
i
that
i
they
i
shall
i
not
i
entertain
i
anybody
i
on
i
your
i
bed
i
which
i
you
i
dislike. iIf
i
they
i
do
i
that,
i
scourge
i
them
i
without
i
being
i
oppressive.
i
And
i
they
i
have
i
got
i
rights
i
over iyou
i
that
i
you
i
shall
i
clothe
i
them
i
and
i
feed
i
them
i
in
i
a
i
just
i
manner
i
(Muslim).
c.
Hakim-
i
b-Muawiyah
i
from
i
his
i
father
i
reported:
i
I
i
asked:
i
O
i
Messenger
i
of
i
Allah!
i
What iright
i
has
i
the
i
wife
i
of
i
one
i
among
i
us
i
got
i
over
i
him?
i
He
i
said:
i
It
i
is
i
that
i
you
i
shall
i
give
i
her ifood
i
when
i
you
i
have
i
taken
i
your
i
food,
i
that
i
you
i
shall
i
clothe
i
her
i
when
i
you
i
have
i
clothed iyourself
i
...
i
(Ahmad,
i
ibn
i
e
i
Maja).
d.
Abu
i
Hurairah
i
reported
i
that
i
the
i
Messenger
i
of
i
Allah
i
said:(As
i
for)
i
a
i
dinar
i
you
i
have
i
spent
iin
i
the
i
way
i
of
i
Allah,
i
and
i
a
i
dinar
i
you
i
have
i
spent
i
in
i
emancipating
i
a
i
slave
i
and
i
a
i
dinar
i
you ihave
i
given
i
to
i
a
i
poor
i
man
i
in
i
charity,
i
and
i
a
i
dinar
i
you
i
have
i
spent
i
for
i
your
i
family,
i
the
igreatest
i
of
i
them
i
in
i
reward
i
is
i
that
i
which
i
you
i
have
i
spent
i
for
i
your
i
family
i
(Muslim).
e.
Ayesha
i
reported
i
that
i
Hind,
i
daughter
i
of
i
Utbah,
i
asked:
i
O
i
Messenger
i
of
i
Allah!
i
Abu
iSufiyan
i
is
i
a
i
miserly
i
fellow.
i
He
i
does
i
not
i
give
i
what
i
may
i
be
i
sufficient
i
for
i
me
i
and
i
my
ichildren,
i
unless
i
I
i
take iit
i
from
i
him
i
without
ihis iknowledge.
i
He
i
said:
i
Take
i
what
i
suffice
iyou
i
and
i
your
i
children
i
according
i
to
i
means
i
(Bukhari
i
and
i
Muslim).
Rights In The Light of Qur'an and Hadith
Principles
i
regarding
i
woman's
i
right
i
of
i
maintenance
i
as
i
enunciated
i
by
i
the
i
Qur'an
i
and
i
Sunnah
i
are:
i.
According
i
to
i
some
i
well-known
i
Traditions
i
reported
i
in
i
authentic
i
books
i
of
i
Hadith,
i
the
iProphet
i
(may
i
Allah's
i
peace
i
be
i
upon
i
him)
i
required
i
his
i
followers
i
to
i
accord
i
their
i
wives
ithe
i
best
i
possible
i
treatment.
i
He
i
impressed
i
upon
i
the
i
men
i
the
i
rights
i
of
i
women
i
regarding ithe
i
food,
i
clothing
i
and
i
lodging.
i
Even
i
in
i
his
i
famous
i
Farewell
i
Address
i
at
i
Arafat,
i
the iApostle
i
of
i
Allah
i
did
i
not
i
forget
i
to
i
exhort
i
the
i
believers
i
to
i
fulfil
i
their
i
obligations
i
regarding ithe
i
proper
i
maintenance
i
of
i
their
i
women.
i
The
i
Qur'an
i
says:
"Lodge
i
them
i
where
i
ye
i
dwell,
i
according
i
to
i
your
i
wealth,
i
and
i
harass'
i
them
i
not
i
so ias
i
to
i
straighten
i
life
i
for
i
them"
i
(Quran
i
65:6).
i
The
i
Qur'an
i
makes
i
the
i
men
i
Qawwam
i
(caretaker)
i
of
i
women
i
and
i
places
i
the
i
responsibility
i
of
iearning
i
livelihood
i
of
i
the
i
family
i
primarily
i
on
i
the
i
shoulders
i
of
i
men
i
when
i
it
i
says: "...
i
and
i
because
i
they
i
support
i
them
i
from
i
their
i
means"
i
(Quran
i
4:34).
ii.
Duty
i
of
i
providing
i
maintenance
i
to
i
the
i
women
i
is
i
so
i
important
i
that
i
the
i
Qur'an
i
makes
i
even
ithe
i
divorced
i
women
i
entitled
i
to
i
it
i
during
i
the
i
period
i
of
i
Iddah
i
when
i
the
i
husband
i
would
iprovide
i
her
i
food,
i
clothing
i
and
i
lodging
i
and
i
cannot
i
expel
i
her
i
from
i
his
i
house
i
(Quran
i
65:16).
i
If
i
she
i
is
i
expecting,
i
the
i
husband
i
is
i
bound
i
to
i
maintain
i
her
i
till
i
delivery
i
and
i
in
i
case
i
she isuckles
i
the
i
child
i
she
i
would
i
be
i
entitled
i
to
i
receive
i
the
i
due
i
payment
i
for
i
this
i
service i(Quran
i
65:6).
i
Again
i
the
i
Qur'an
i
says:
"The
i
duty
i
of
i
feeding
i
and
i
clothing
i
nursing
i
mothers
i
in
i
seemly
i
manner
i
is
i
upon
i
the
ifather
i
of
i
the
i
child"
i
(Quran
i
2:233).
i
In
i
case
i
the
i
father
i
of
i
the
i
child
i
is
i
dead,
i
the
i
obligation
i
of
i
providing
i
maintenance
i
to
i
the
i
nursing imother
i
would
i
be
i
on
i
the
i
heir
i
of
i
the
i
deceased,
i
as
i
the
i
Qur'an
i
says:
"And
i
on
i
the
i
(father's)
i
heir
i
is
i
incumbent
i
the
i
like
i
of
i
that
i
(which
i
was
i
incumbent
i
on ithe
i
father)"
i
(Quran
i
2:233).
iii.
The
i
Qur'an
i
makes
i
it
i
a
i
duty
i
for
i
the
i
pious
i
and
i
God-fearing
i
persons
i
to
i
make
i
some
iprovision
i
even
i
for
i
those
i
women
i
who
i
have
i
been
i
divorced
i
by
i
them
i
(Quran
i
2:241)
iMuhammad
i
Asad
i
explains
i
this
i
verse
i
(Quran
i
2:233)
i
of
i
the
i
Holy
i
Qur'an
i
in
i
these
i
words:
i
"This
i
obviously
i
relates
i
to
i
women
i
who
i
are
i
divorced
i
without
i
any
i
legal
i
fault
i
on itheir
i
part.
i
The
i
amount
i
of
i
alimony
i
-payable
i
unless
i
and
i
until
i
they
i
remarry
i
-
i
has ibeen
i
left
i
unspecified
i
since
i
it
i
must
i
depend
i
on
i
the
i
husband's
i
financial icircumstances
i
and
i
on
i
special
i
conditions
i
of
i
the
i
time."
iv.
No
i
scale
i
or
i
standard
i
has
i
been
i
fixed
i
for
i
maintenance
i
by
i
the
i
Qur'an
i
or
i
by
i
the
i
Sunnah.
iHowever
i
a
i
lot
i
of
i
guidance
i
has
i
been
i
provided
i
to
i
determine
i
it
i
in
i
the
i
given
i
circumstances. iThe
i
Qur'an
i
says:
i
"No
i
one
i
should
i
be
i
charged
i
beyond
i
one's
i
capacity"
i
(Quran
i
2:233).
i
At ianother
i
place,
i
the
i
Qur'an
i
directs:
i
"Provide
i
for
i
them;
i
the
i
rich
i
according
i
to
i
his
i
means
i
and ithe
i
straitened
i
according
i
to
i
his
i
means,
i
a
i
fair
i
provision"
i
(Quran
i
2:236).
Comparative analysis of Family Laws in Pakistan and Islamic Injuctions in this Regard
Vol. VIII, No. IV (Fall 2023)
41
The
i
same
i
principle
i
has
i
been
i
further
i
elaborated
i
when
i
the
i
Qur'an
i
says:
"
i
Let
i
the
i
man
i
of
i
means
i
spend
i
according
i
to
i
his
i
means;
i
and
i
the
i
man
i
whose iresources
i
are
i
restricted,
i
let
i
him
i
spend
i
according
i
to
i
what
i
Allah
i
has
i
given
i
him" i(Quran
i
65:7).
These
i
are
i
some
i
of
i
the
i
verses
i
which
i
highlight
i
the
i
guiding
i
principles
i
regarding
i
the
i
determination
iof
i
the
i
quantum
i
of
i
maintenance.
i
The
i
rich
i
according
i
to
i
his
i
means
i
and
i
the
i
poor
i
according
i
to
i
his imeans
i
and
i
nobody
i
to
i
be
i
charged
i
beyond
i
his
i
capacity
i
-
i
this
i
is
i
the
i
golden
i
rule.
Islamic Law and Fiqh
Islamic
i
law
i
and
i
Fiqh
i
regarding
i
maintenance
i
of
i
the
i
women
i
lay
i
down
i
the
i
following
i
principles:
i
-
a.
The
i
meaning
i
of
i
"
Nafqah
",
i
which
i
is
i
the
i
Arabic
i
equivalent
i
of
i
"maintenance",
i
is
i
what
i
a iperson
i
spends
i
on
i
his
i
family.
i
Maintenance
i
includes
i
food,
i
clothing
i
and
i
lodging.
b.
The
i
husband
i
is
i
bound
i
to
i
maintain
i
his
i
wife.
i
Her
i
right
i
to
i
receive
i
maintenance
i
is
i
absolute
ieven
i
if
i
she
i
is
i
very
i
rich
i
and
i
owns
i
a
i
lot
i
of
i
property.
c.
If
i
the
i
husband
i
neglects
i
or
i
refuses
i
to
i
maintain
i
his
i
wife
i
without
i
any
i
lawful
i
cause,
i
the
i
wife
imay
i
sue
i
him
i
for
i
maintenance.
i
The
i
Muslim
i
Family
i
Laws
i
Ordinance,
i
1961
i
permits
i
the
iwife
i
to
i
apply
i
to
i
the
i
chairman
i
who
i
will
i
constitute
i
an
i
Arbitration
i
Council
i
to
i
determine ithe
i
matter.
i
She
i
can
i
also
i
apply
i
for
i
an
i
order
i
of
i
maintenance
i
under
i
section
i
488
i
of
i
Code
i
of iCriminal
i
Procedure,
i
1908.
d.
After
i
divorce,
i
the
i
woman
i
is
i
entitled
i
to
i
maintenance
i
from
i
her
i
husband
i
during
i
the
i
period iof
i
Iddah
.
i
However,
i
a
i
widow
i
is
i
not
i
entitled
i
to
i
maintenance
i
during
i
the
i
period
i
of
i
Iddah
.
i
If ithe
i
divorcee
i
is
i
pregnant
i
she
i
is
i
entitled
i
to
i
maintenance
i
till
i
delivery
i
and
i
if
i
she
i
suckles
i
the ichild,
i
her
i
entitlement
i
would
i
be
i
up
i
to
i
the
i
expiry
i
of
i
suckling
i
period.
i
In
i
case
i
the
i
custody iof
i
the
i
children
i
is
i
with
i
her,
i
the
i
husband
i
would
i
be
i
bound
i
to
i
provide
i
maintenance
i
for
i
the ichildren (Chaudhry, n.d).
e.
About
i
the
i
scale
i
of
i
maintenance,
i
there
i
has
i
always
i
been
i
difference
i
of
i
opinion
i
among
i
the
ijurists.
i
Hanafi
i
Law
i
prescribes
i
that
i
the
i
maintenance
i
should
i
be
i
determined
i
with
i
reference ito
i
the
i
social
i
position
i
of
i
both
i
the
i
spouses,
i
husband
i
and
i
wife.
i
But
i
the
i
Shafis
i
say
i
that
i
the iposition
i
of
i
the
i
husband
i
alone
i
should
i
be
i
considered.
i
According
i
to
i
Hedaya
,
i
when
i
one
i
of ithem
i
-
i
the
i
husband
i
and
i
the
i
wife
i
-
i
is
i
rich
i
and
i
other
i
poor,
i
a
i
proper
i
mean
i
should
i
be iadopted
i
between
i
the
i
two.
i
If
i
both
i
the
i
parties
i
are
i
rich,
i
maintenance
i
should
i
be
i
provided
i
at ithe
i
high
i
scale,
i
but
i
if
i
both
i
are
i
poor,
i
husband
i
may
i
provide
i
accordingly.
i
Scale
i
of imaintenance,
i
according
i
to
i
the
i
Shia
i
Law,
i
should
i
be
i
determined
i
with
i
reference
i
to
i
the irequirements
i
of
i
the
i
wife
i
regarding
i
condiments,
i
food,
i
clothing,
i
residence,
i
servants
i
and iarticles
i
for
i
adornment
i
subject
i
to
i
the
i
custom
i
of
i
her
i
equals
i
among
i
her
i
own
i
people
i
living iin
i
the
i
same
i
town
Dower
Where
i
no
i
details
i
about
i
the
i
mode
i
of
i
payment
i
of
i
dower
i
are
i
specified
i
in
i
the
i
Nikahnama
i
or
i
the
imarriage
i
contract,
i
the
i
entire
i
amount
i
of
i
the
i
dower
i
shall
i
be
i
presumed
i
to
i
be
i
payable
i
on
i
demand.
Islamic Concept of Dower and
Maintenance
The
i
form
i
of
i
the
i
dower
i
described
i
above
i
in
i
connection
i
with
i
the
i
fifth
i
stage
i
is
i
not
i
an
i
invention
i
of
ithe
i
Qur'an.
i
All
i
that
i
the
i
Qur'an
i
did
i
was
i
to
i
restore
i
it
i
to
i
its
i
natural
i
and
i
pristine
i
form.
i
The
i
Qur'an iin
i
its
i
incomparably
i
elegant
i
style
i
says:
i
"Give
i
to
i
the
i
women
i
a
i
free
i
gift
i
of
i
their
i
marriage
i
portions"
i
(Quran
i
4:4).
i
This
i
means
i
that
i
the
i
dower
i
belongs
i
to
i
women
i
exclusively
i
and
i
it
i
is
i
a
i
gift
i
to
i
be
i
paid
i
directly
i
to ithem.
i
It
i
has
i
nothing
i
to
i
do
i
with
i
their
i
fathers
i
or
i
brothers.
In
i
this
i
short
i
sentence
i
the
i
Holy
i
Qur'an
i
has
i
referred
i
to
i
three
i
basic
i
points:
Firstly
i
it
i
has
i
used
i
for
i
marriage
i
portion
i
or
i
the
i
dower
i
the
i
word,
i
saduqatehinna
i
meaning
itruthfulness
i
and
i
sincerity
i
and
i
not
i
the
i
word
i
mehr
.
i
Thus,
i
the
i
dower
i
is
i
a
i
symbol
i
of
i
the
i
cordiality iof
i
the
i
man
i
paying
i
it.
i
This
i
point ihas
i
been
i
expressly
imentioned
i
by ia
i
number
i
of ithe
i
commentators iof
i
the
i
Holy
i
Qur'an,
i
such
i
as
i
Zamakhshari,
i
the
i
author
i
of
i
the
i
well-known
i
commentary,
i
the iKashshaf
i
similarly,
i
the
i
famous
i
philologist,
i
Raghib
i
Isfahani
i
says
i
in
i
his
i
lexicon
i
of
i
the
i
Qur'an ithat
i
the
i
dower
i
has
i
been
i
called
i
saduqah
i
because
i
it
i
is
i
a
i
symbol
i
of
i
the
i
sincerity
i
of
i
faith.
Secondly,
i
it
i
is
i
clear
i
from
i
the
i
above
i
verse
i
of
i
the
i
Qur'an
i
that
i
the
i
dower
i
is
i
to
i
be
i
paid
i
directly
i
to ithe
i
woman,
i
and
i
her
i
parents
i
have
i
no
i
claim
i
to
i
it.
i
It
i
is
i
not
i
a
i
compensation
i
for
i
the
i
efforts
i
made
i
by ithem
i
to
i
bring
i
up
i
their
i
daughter.
i
Thirdly,
i
it
i
is
i
clear
i
that
i
the
i
dower
i
is
i
nothing
i
except
i
a
i
present
i
and
i
a
i
gift
i
(Mutahhari,
i
1980).
Muhammad Tahir and Muhammad Shahid
42
Global Legal Studies Review (GLSR)
The
i
section
i
12
i
provides
i
an
i
effect
i
only
i
to
i
the
i
opinion
i
of
i
Shiati
i
faction.
i
As
i
I
i
have
i
studied
i
the
iopinion
i
of
i
Abu
i
Hanifa,
i
he
i
says
i
that
i
in
i
such
i
case,
i
the
i
prompt
i
portion
i
of
i
the
i
dower
i
should
i
be idecided,
i
while
i
taking
i
in
i
consideration
i
three
i
things
i
(1)
i
custom
i
(2)
i
status
i
of
i
the
i
husband
i
(3) iamount
i
of
i
the
i
dower
i
fixed.
So
i
the
i
provisions
i
of
i
section
i
12
i
don't
i
have
i
the
i
merit
i
of
i
balance.
Power to Make Rules
i.
The
i
Government
i
may
i
make
i
rules
i
to
i
carry
i
into
i
effect
i
the
i
purposes
i
of
i
this
i
Ordinance.
ii.
In
i
making
i
rules
i
under
i
this
i
section,
i
such
i
Government
i
may
i
provide
i
that
i
a
i
breach
i
of
i
any
i
of ithe
i
rules
i
shall
i
be
i
punishable
i
with
i
simple
i
imprisonment
i
which
i
may
i
extend
i
to
i
one
i
month, ior
i
with
i
fine
i
which
i
may
i
extent
i
to
i
two
i
hundred
i
rupees,
i
or
i
with
i
both.
iii.
Rules
i
made
i
under
i
this
i
section
i
shall
i
be
i
published
i
in
i
the
i
official
i
Gazette
i
and
i
shall
ithereupon
i
have
i
effect
i
as
i
if
i
enacted
i
in
i
this
i
Ordinance (Tanzilur, 1991).
Islamic Concept of Making Rules
There
i
are
i
two
i
sources
i
of
i
Sharia
i
(understood
i
as
i
the
i
divine
i
law):
i
the
i
Qur'an
i
and
i
Sunnah. iAccording
i
to
i
Muslims,
i
the
i
Qur'an
i
is
i
the
i
unalterable
i
word
i
of
i
God.
i
Much
i
of
i
the
i
Qur'an
i
exhorts iMuslims
i
to
i
general
i
moral
i
values;
i
only
i
80
i
verses
i
of
i
the
i
Qur'an
i
contain
i
legal
i
prescriptions.
i
The iSunnah
i
is
i
the
i
life
i
and
i
example
i
of
i
the
i
Islamic
i
prophet
i
Muhammad.
i
The
i
Sunnah's
i
importance
i
as ia
i
source
i
of
i
Sharia,
i
is
i
confirmed
i
by
i
several
i
verses
i
of
i
the
i
Qur'an
i
(e.g.
i
Quran
i
33:21).
i
The
i
Sunnah iis
i
primarily
i
contained
i
in
i
the
i
hadith
i
or
i
reports
i
of
i
Muhammad's
i
sayings,
i
his
i
actions,
i
his
i
tacit iapproval
i
of
i
actions
i
and
i
his
i
demeanor.
i
While
i
there
i
is
i
only
i
one
i
Qur'an,
i
there
i
are
i
many icompilations
i
of
i
hadith,
i
with
i
the
i
most
i
authentic
i
ones
i
forming
i
during
i
the
i
sahih
i
period
i
(850
i
to i915
i
CE).
i
The
i
six
i
acclaimed
i
Sunni
i
collections
i
were
i
compiled
i
by
i
(in
i
order
i
of
i
decreasing iimportance)
i
Muhammad
i
al-Bukhari,
i
Muslim
i
ibn
i
al-Hajjaj,
i
Abu
i
Dawood,
i
Tirmidhi,
i
Al-Nasa'i, iIbn
i
Maja.
i
The
i
collections
i
by
i
al-Bukhari
i
and
i
Muslim,
i
regarded
i
the
i
most
i
authentic,
i
contain
i
about i7,000
i
and
i
12,000
i
hadiths
i
respectively
i
(although
i
the
i
majority
i
of
i
entries
i
are
i
repetitions).
i
The ihadiths
i
have
i
been
i
evaluated
i
on
i
authenticity,
i
usually
i
by
i
determining
i
the
i
reliability
i
of
i
the inarrators
i
that
i
transmitted
i
them.
i
For
i
Shias,
i
the
i
Sunnah
i
may
i
also
i
include
i
anecdotes
i
The
i
Twelve
iImams.
The
i
process
i
of
i
interpreting
i
the
i
two
i
primary
i
sources
i
of
i
Islamic
i