Content uploaded by Kevin P. Smith
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Kevin P. Smith on May 10, 2024
Content may be subject to copyright.
Newsletter
Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History
May 2024
NOTES FROM THE DIRECTOR
By William W. Fitzhugh
Settling in after COVID-19 turned the past year into
a learning experience we had not imagined. Nancy
Shorey and I returned to nd most colleagues working
from home more than in their oces, meetings and
most lectures and events hybrid, and there were many
changes in administrative procedures—usually ever
more remote and complicated. Nevertheless, those
of us in the Recovering
Voices, Asia, and Arctic
programs chugged on
and had an interesting
and productive year.
Highlights at the Museum
include a year under the
Department chairmanship
of Rick Potts, who turned
over the reins to Josh
Bell in January ’24; the
retirements of Laurie
Burgess and Bill Billeck;
and appointments of
Dorothy Lippert as head
of the Repatriation Oce
and Celia Emmelhainz
as head of NAA/Archives,
and Matt Sanger and Marissa Shaver joined the
Repatriation Oce as Tribal Liaison ocers; however,
losses to curator ranks continue.
Museum Anthropology—and museums in general—are
facing major challenges that have been accelerated
by the brooding surge emerging from covid. National
discussions about the stewardship of collections and
institutional responsibilities to interest groups and
descendant communities, ranging far beyond issues
of graves and sacred objects, are engaging museum
curators and collection managers, stimulating changes
in policy and regulations. Community engagement is
felt at every level of museum life. New DOI and NPS
regulations might require community approval before
displaying or researching an arrowhead or potsherd. At
the ASC, we are fortunate that our Alaska Oce has
grown in step with changing museum responsibilities
for access and education, with strong support from the
Department, Museum, Repatriation, and Recovering
Voices. But the relentless squeeze on research and
collection management is a trend that will certainly
increase.
Despite custodial complications, the ASC has enjoyed
success in its research and education work. Our
Narwhal and Boreal Forest
(Understanding Nature:
Stories of the Boreal
Forest) exhibits continue
to travel in North America
with S.I.T.E.S., and Lights
Out: Recovering Our
Night Sky opened to great
acclaim in March with
major input from Stephen
Loring. We held a lively
bow and arrow workshop
organized with Brendan
Griebel and members of
the Kitikmeot Heritage
Society of Cambridge Bay,
Nunavut, with technical
support from bow and
arrow expert Coline
Lemaitre, who has been on a pre-doc fellowship with
the ASC. In October, Ted Timreck presented his epic
documentary, Ancient Sea Peoples of the North Atlantic
in our Q?rius Theater, and in late November, April
Counceller, Director of the Alutiiq Museum in Kodiak,
Alaska, was the speaker for our annual Ernest S.
Burch Lecture.
On the research front, I completed my last eld season
of the 23-year Quebec St. Lawrence Gateways project,
excavating a small 16th century Basque whaling station
in St. Paul River. This coincided with the decision to
retire the R.V. Pitsiulak, our trusty partner on countless
northern expeditions in Labrador, Ban Island, and
Quebec. Her decommissioning coincided with the
passing of Stearns (Tony) Morse, who gifted the
Beaded artwork from the NMNH “Lights Out” exhibit:
Milky Way, Starry Night #2 by Margaret Nazon, Gwich’in
Tsiigehtchic, Northwest Territories, Canada. (NMNH-2023-
00127-S; read more in Stephen Loring’s Lights Out exhibit
report. Photo by P.R. Lee, B.M. Hance, and J. Di Loreto)
https://naturalhistory.si.edu/research/anthropology/programs/arctic-studies-center Number 31
2 ASC Newsletter
vessel to the Smithsonian following the conclusion
of his Labrador geological research. This year I
published my Mongolian deer stone monograph, began
preparing a monograph on the archaeology of the
Mongolian Altai, and returned most of my remaining
archaeological collections to Newfoundland.
For Stephen Loring, the exhibit Lights Out:
Recovering the Night Sky brought a rewarding parade
of media interest that had the exhibit team much
in demand. Prior to a stint of eldwork with Innu
colleagues and associates in Labrador, he produced
reports on past research projects and collections from
the Aleutians, New England and Labrador, Tłı chǫ (Dog
Rib) ethnohistory, and new collection acquisitions.
Stephen was honored by an invitation to join the
External Advisory Council of the Center for Braiding
Indigenous Knowledge and Science (CBIKS), a
University of Massachusetts, Amherst group funded
by the NSF, to “braid together Indigenous and western
science to address the urgent and interconnected issues
of climate change, care of cultural places, and food
security”.
Dawn Biddison produced a booklet, DVDs, 15
videos, and a Smithsonian Learning Lab website for
the Batuk’enelyashi: Natural Dyes from Dena’ina
Lands project in collaboration with the Alaska Native
Heritage Center and June Simeono Pardue. In
January, with an Ahtna group she researched NMNH
and NMAI collections for Coming Home: Reclaiming
Ahtna Knowledge through Museum Collections. The
project inspired an Ahtna symposium and research
training documenting Ahtna Heritage. Dawn also
created Making Connections: Athabascan Lifeways and
You with Ahtna colleagues.
Aron Crowell completed a regional review of
southern Alaskan archaeology demonstrating repeated
(pulse) migrations by the Chugach (Sugpiat) between
Kachemak Bay, the Kenai Peninsula, and Prince
William Sound, correlated with warm and cool
phases of the Pacic Decadal Oscillation. His Yakutat
monograph, Laaxaayík, Near the Glacier: Indigenous
History and Ecology at Yakutat Fiord, Alaska, appeared
in April 2024. With ‘Life on a Sustainable Planet’
funding, Aron continued isotopic and archaeofaunal
research on a 7,400-year record of climate and
ecosystem change in the Gulf of Alaska, and as ASC
co-PI participated in science education projects in
Alaska and Washington, D.C.
Another important outreach project was my
collaboration with Igor Chechushkov that produced
an archaeological webinar series titled “Crossroads-2”
following in the footsteps of the ASC’s 1980s
pioneering Russian-American exhibition. Seven
lectures were conducted in 2023, translated into
Russian, and broadcast through public media channels
to Russian-language countries. The series continues in
2024 and may be extended into 2025.
Elisa Palomino continued her sh skin peregrinations
in European and Turkish museums. With John Cloud,
she researched ancient sh demi-gods in what is now
Turkey, Syria, and Iraq, in connection with the circa
9,000 BC ceremonial site of Gobekli Tepe, exploring
assertions made by Graeber and Wengrow in The
Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity
(2021). Closer to home, Cloud published “Le Rendez-
Vous de Virginie” describing the nal naval battles
of the American Revolutionary War, which led to the
surrender of Lord Cornwallis at Yorktown.
Freed from his service as Anthro Department Chair and
production of the Handbook of North American Indians
introductory volume, Igor Krupnik began museum
projects, focused on historical Arctic ethnographic
collections. He has been busy building new
international teams, working with Polish colleagues on
Stanislaw Poniatowski's collection at NMNH, and in
Wroclaw, Poland, with French colleagues on Nikolai
Gondatti’s Chukchi collection in Paris, and lately with
Norwegian colleagues in Oslo on their collections from
the Arctic coast of Northeast Siberia.
I hope you enjoy this issue, which has grown like topsy
this year due to expanding programs and scholarly
networks.
Khoton Lake in the Mongolian Altai featured in a 2024 ASC publication
ASC Newsletter 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
NOTES FROM THE DIRECTOR ......................... 1
2023/2024 PARTNERS AND DONORS ......................4
ANNUAL BURCH LECTURE
Burch Endowment Support for ASC Activities ............ 5
Allangaluta, Allangagkunata. We Are Dierent, We Are
Not Dierent: Community Research in The Kodiak
Alutiiq/Sugpiaq Region ................................................6
ALASKA OFFICE
NMNH Science Team Visits Alaska, June 2023 ........... 9
Climate Change and Coastal Adaptations in the Gulf of
Alaska .........................................................................12
Making Connections ................................................... 15
Ahtna Collections Access and Community Outreach ... 16
Woven Together: A “Together We Thrive” Project ..... 17
New Media .................................................................. 18
NEWS
Notes on an Archaeological Site Gone Missing .........19
Aleutian Islands Repatriation Up-Dates .....................20
3D Replication of the Mother Bear Hat for the
Teikweidi Clan of Angoon, Alaska ............................. 22
Tlingit Glacier and Lakes ............................................24
Reclaiming “Mutton,” the Coast Salish Woolly Dog ..25
The John and Lile Gibbons Center for Arctic Studies,
Peary-Macmillan Museum .......................................... 26
Cambridge Bay’s Kuugalak Cultural Campus ............27
Reections on a Conference and Visit to the New
Bedford Whaling Museum ..........................................29
Emmanuel Korneliussen and the 2023 Delmarva
Paddler Retreat ............................................................ 31
My Heritage, My Aataanngua, and the World ............ 32
Narwhal Research of the Global Stage ....................... 34
The Threshold at which Snow Starts Disappearing ... 35
American Center for Mongolian Studies Celebrates Its
20th Anniversary .........................................................35
Mongolian Studies Conferences 2023, 2024 .............. 37
Immersivity and the First-Step-For-Mankind
Innovation of Small Watercraft ................................... 37
RESEARCH
Excavating a 16th Century Basque Whaling Station In
St. Paul River on Quebec’s Lower North Shore ........40
Update on Climate, Pack Ice Extent, and Harp Seal
Fluctuation in the Northwest Atlantic .........................43
Calibrating 55 Years of Radiocarbon Dates from
Labrador ..................................................................... 45
pXRF Identicatioin of Lithic Source Materials From
Stock Cove .................................................................. 47
“Viking Raincoats” and the Use of Vararfeldir (Pile
Weaving) in the North Atlantic ................................... 48
Göbekli Tepe: Ancient Natural History and Shamanic
Narrative of a Deluge? ................................................ 49
Ritual Birch Bark Traditions in Prehistoric Eurasia: A
Case Study From The Mongolian Gobi ...................... 50
Nobuhiro Kishigami and the NPPS ............................53
Research On Women’s Explorations in Greenland ..... 54
COLLECTIONS
“Waiting to Be Reunited”? ......................................... 56
Three-Dimensional Technology and Community-Based
Capacity Building in Sápmi ........................................ 59
Beyond Comer: Arctic Collections at Mystic Seaport
Museum.......................................................................62
Managing Museum and Coastal Site Collections ....... 64
Remote Engagement Technology for Improved
Collections Access ......................................................65
Mysterious Five-Sided Stone ...................................... 66
ASC-Kitikmeot Bow and Arrow Workshop ............... 66
Fish Skin Magic: Exploring Occult Practice in Ancient
Mesopotamia and Arctic Cultures ...............................68
OUTREACH
Lights Out ...................................................................70
Ancient Sea Peoples of The North Atlantic ................ 72
ASC Traveling Exhibitions .........................................72
The Crossroads 2 Webinar Series ............................... 73
INTERNS AND POST-DOCS
Summer Internships at the ASC ..................................74
Internship with Dr. Loring ..........................................74
Internship with Dr. Krupnik ........................................75
Vera Solovyeva—Sakha Post-Doctoral Fellow .......... 75
BOOK REVIEWS
Visceral: Verity, Legacy, Identity. Alaska Native Gut
Knowledge and Perseverance ..................................... 76
Material and Spiritual Culture of the Peoples of Yakutia
in World Museums ...................................................... 77
Deer Stones, Tattoos, and Warrior Women:
Transforming Archaeological Fact Into Fiction .......... 78
The Iñupiat of Northwest Alaska over the Past
Millennium ..................................................................79
Bows and Arrows of the Greenland Thule Culture
(1200–1900) ................................................................ 80
Tengautuli Atkuk: The Flying Parka: The Meaning and
Making of Parkas in Southwest Alaska. .....................81
The Indo-European Puzzle Revisited: Integrating
Archaeology, Genetics, and Linguistics ......................82
Indigenous Arctic Fish Skin Heritage, a Ph.D. thesis by
Elisa Palomino ............................................................ 82
Arrows: The Flight of the Handbook of North
American Indians ........................................................ 83
Laaxaayik, Near The Glacier: Indigenous History A
and Ecology At Yakutat Fiord, Alaska ........................ 84
TRANSITIONS
G. Carleton Ray (1928–2023) ..................................... 85
Sergei A. Arutyunov (1932–2023) ..............................85
Stearns Anthony (‘Tony’) Morse (1931–2024) ...........87
Tributes to Norman Hallendy (1932–2023) ................ 88
Don E. Dumond (1929–2023) .....................................90
Adieu, Pitsiulak ...........................................................91
2023 ASC STAFF PUBLICATIONS .....................93
4 ASC Newsletter
Alaska Native Heritage Center
Anchorage Museum Foundation
Anonymous
Association of Tribal Archives, Libraries & Museums
Laura Beauchamp
Ernest S. “Tiger” Burch Endowment
Carlson Family Trust
The Honorable Morgan Christen and Jim Torgerson
The CIRI Foundation
Perry and Ardene Eaton
William W. and Lynne D. Fitzhugh
Stephen W. Haycox
Heather Flynn
Innu Nation
Stephen Langdon
John Levy
Jo Michalski and the Honorable Peter Michalski
Mongolian Cultural Center of Washington D.C.
National Endowment for the Arts
National Museum of the American Indian
National Resources Defense Council
National Science Foundation
Government of Newfoundland and Labrador
Newfoundland Provincial Archaeology Oce
The Frances and David Rose Foundation
Gail and Jan K. Sieberts
Fred and Laurel Stutzer
Smithsonian Institution Legacy Challenge Fund
Smithsonian Institution Oce of the Provost
Smithsonian Institution Undersecretary for Science
(Life on a Sustainable Planet)
Smithsonian Institution Oce of the Undersecretary
for Education (Together We Thrive)
Smithsonian Institution Traveling Exhibit Service
Smithsonian Institution Recovering Voices Program
University of Montreal / Brad Loewen
Whiteley Museum, St. Paul River, Quebec
Frances Ulmer
James Vanstone Endowment
Kathie and Douglas W. Veltre
First National Bank of Alaska
Don Holly and Marcel Ashini
RESEARCH ASSOCIATES AND
COLLABORATORS
Noel Broadbent, Archaeologist, Washington, D.C.:
nbroadb@pipeline.com
John Cloud, Geographer, Washington, D.C.:
cloudj@si.edu, john.cloud666@gmail.com
Bernadette Driscoll Engelstad, Ethnologist:
bdengelstad@gmail.com
Scott Heyes, Geographer: scott@scottheyes.com
William Honeychurch, Archaeologist, New Haven,
CT: william.honeychurch@yale.edu
Anthony Jenkinson, Archaeologist, Northwest River,
Labrador, Canada: shaputuan@hotmail.com
Martin Nweeia, Dentist/Narwhal Researcher,
Cambridge, MA: martin.nweeia@hsdm.harvard.edu
Elisa Palomino-Perez, Fashion Designer, London,
UK: elisapalomino@hotmail.com
Kenneth Pratt, Anthropologist, Anchorage, AK:
kenneth.pratt@bia.gov
Wilfred Richard, Geographer/Photographer,
Georgetown, ME: 34PondRoad@gmail.com
Michèle Hayeur Smith, Ethnologist/Textile Spec.,
Providence, RI: raggirl9393@gmail.com
Kevin Smith, Archaeologist, Providence. RI:
surtshellir2018@gmail.com
Ted Timreck, Film Producer, New York, NY:
ttimreck@gmail.com
Christopher B. Wol, Archaeologist, Albany, NY:
cwol@albany.edu
The Arctic Studies Center is sustained through a
public-private partnership. Philanthropic donations
provide funding for essential community-based
collaborations, impactful educational programming for
the public, and continuous research in an ever-changing
Arctic region.
To make a tax-deductible donation, please contact
the NMNH Oce of Development at 202-633-0821
or NMNH-Advancement@si.edu.
THANKS TO OUR
2023/2024 PARTNERS AND DONORS
We extend our sincerest gratitude to the donors and partners who support the Smithsonian Arctic
Studies Center
ASC Newsletter 5
April Counceller, Director, Alutiiq
Museum, Kodiak
began working at
the Alutiiq Museum
as a college intern
and then returned
to the museum to
lead its educational
and language
departments, and to
work to preserve,
document, and
teach the Alutiiq
language, after
earning her BA in
Anthropology at
Brown University
(2002) and M.A. in
Rural Development
at the University
of Alaska Fairbanks (2005). In 2010, she received her
Ph.D. degree in Language Planning and Indigenous
Knowledge Systems at the University of Alaska
Fairbanks. April is one of the rst people in her
generation to gain uency in the Alutiiq language that
also helped her develop the Alutiiq Studies Program
at the local Kodiak College. She served as executive
director of the Alutiiq Museum since 2015 and was a
member of the Alaska Native Language Preservation
and Advisory Council in 2012–2022 that provides
recommendations and advice to the Governor of Alaska
and the State Legislature on programs, policies, and
projects related to Indigenous languages. We were
particularly interested in sharing April’s experience
in leading museum-based programs in support of
Indigenous heritage, language, and culture with wider
audience, including in our own museum.
Besides the Burch Lecture, the Endowment continued
to provide funds for many ASC public-focused
activities, such as the production, printing, and
shipping of the annual ASC Newsletter—of which
we produced two issues in 2023: a regular No.30 for
2022 and a special issue dedicated to the career of Bill
Fitzhugh, both of 90 pages. It supported contracts for
graphic and collection work for the ASC sta, the ASC
membership in the Arctic Consortium of the United
States (ARCUS), research work on other ASC-based
projects, and our sta needs throughout 2023. We plan
to continue using Burch Endowment to advance our
research and public programs, for conference travel
and eldwork, and for promoting Tiger Burch’s legacy
to the international Arctic research community via
publications, public programs and presentations, annual
Newsletter, conferences, and professional exchanges.
ANNUAL BURCH LECTURE
BURCH ENDOWMENT SUPPORT FOR ASC
ACTIVITIES IN 2023
By Igor Krupnik
The Ernest S. (‘Tiger’) Burch Endowment was
established with the NMNH Arctic Studies Center
(ASC) in 2012 via the generous gift of the family of
our late colleague and long-term research associate,
Ernest S (‘Tiger’) Burch, Jr, with the aim to support,
promote, and interpret the study of Arctic Indigenous
peoples and their cultures. The fund ensures that
our work and the legacy of Tiger’s many decades of
collaboration with the Smithsonian and ASC continues.
Over the past decade, the Burch Endowment remained
the prime source of funding for the ASC operations,
in addition to individual research grants, particularly
for our collective activities. In 2023, the Endowment
continued to provide its critical lifeline to the ASC.
With the softening and then lifting of travel and
eldwork restrictions, the ASC sta was able to resume
most of its eldwork and traveling activities. The Burch
Endowment supported Stephen Loring’s eldwork in
Labrador and Bill Fitzhugh’s work in Newfoundland
and Quebec North Shore in the fall and summer of
2023 respectively. It was a key source of travel funds
for many of our conference travels, including those
covered in this Newsletter, like Krupnik and Loring’s
trip to a conference at the New Bedford Whaling
Museum and Dawn Biddison’s participation in the
annual meeting of the Association of Tribal Archives,
Libraries, and Museums (ATALM) in Oklahoma City
OK, in October 2023.
As in the previous years, the Endowment supported
our main public event, “Tiger Burch annual lecture”
that helps promote our activities at the broader NMNH,
Smithsonian, and outside professional arenas. The
annual ‘Burch Lectures’ began in 2015 to feature
recent achievements in Arctic anthropological research
to wider audiences and to our colleagues worldwide.
We now have an impressive and diverse pool of
the former speakers (‘Burch alumni’) that includes
academic and Indigenous scholars from US/Alaska,
Canada, and Greenland. Collectively, their lectures
covered advances in archaeology, ethnology, Arctic
resource management, biology, history, collection and
Indigenous heritage, women’s studies, and more.
Our 2023 Burch Speaker was Dr. April Laktonen
Counceller, Executive Director of the Alutiiq Museum
in Kodiak, Alaska. Dr. Counceller is an Alutiiq tribal
member, who grew up in the community of Larson
Bay and in the town of Kodiak, on Kodiak Island. She
6 ASC Newsletter
ALLANGALUTA, ALLANGAGKUNATA. WE
ARE DIFFERENT, WE ARE NOT DIFFERENT:
COMMUNITY RESEARCH IN THE KODIAK
ALUTIIQ/SUGPIAQ REGION
By April G.L. Counceller
The Alutiiq Museum is
a Native-run nonprot
cultural center and
repository in Kodiak,
Alaska, and a leader
in community-driven
research. Throughout
the 20th century, Alutiiq/
Sugpiaq tribal leaders from
the Kodiak Archipelago
raised concerns over
researchers taking tribal
material heritage to
far-away museums and
universities, while the
Native community suered
from cultural disconnection
and fading traditions. By
the mid-1980s, the Kodiak
Area Native Association
(KANA) initiated culture
and language programs
and formed a culture
committee to develop
funding and plans for a
tribal museum. Village
bingo games became a
source of seed funding for
the committee’s planning
eorts.
The tragic environmental
disaster of the 1989 Exxon
Valdez Oil Spill resulted
in legal settlements
that included a fund for
restoration. Governed by state and federal trustees, the
fund was to support the study and stewardship of oiled
resources. Due to the damage to coastal archaeological
resources from the spill, as well as site looting during
cleanup eorts, KANA successfully argued for funding
to build a repository to house archaeological collections
from the region. The resulting Alutiiq Museum &
Archaeological Repository opened in 1995 with an all-
Alutiiq Board of Directors and a sta of three.
Today, the Alutiiq Museum cares for over 250,000
objects and has a sta of twelve. This includes the heart
of its holdings—large archaeological collections. It
also cares for ethnographic, photographic, audiovisual,
linguistic, archival, and natural history collections. One
of the collections that has grown the fastest in recent
years are the photographic collections. The museum
completed a community photo archive project during
the COVID-19 pandemic, which resulted in digitization
of over 45,000 photographs from communities
across the archipelago.
The majority of Alutiiq
Museum collections are on
long-term loan from their
owners, including Native
corporations within our
region. Our goal is to act
as a community repository
for the Alutiiq community,
so that cultural objects can
be preserved and shared,
but not separated from
their Native owners. We
have also worked to bring
collections back to Kodiak
by negotiating curation
agreements with the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service,
State of Alaska, U.S. Coast
Guard, and others.
The collections are
accessed by researchers,
Native community
members, and members
of the public. Artists will
sometimes look at and
sketch ancestral items
to serve as inspiration
for modern creations.
Educators and families like
to view the collections as a
more in-depth exploration
of culture than available
in our public exhibits. We
have hosted researchers
from high school age to
the postgraduate level. Undergraduate and high school
internships are sometimes funded by museum partners
or agencies and are intended to provide entry into the
eld for community members and local youth.
Research at the Alutiiq Museum is only sometimes
focused on its collections. Some research combines
inspection of collections with ethnographic research
with community cultural bearers and Elders. Site
surveys on the landscape are complimented by naming
protocols led by a uent Elders group. Our sta have
been mentored by other scholars in our eld, such as
archaeologist Don Clark and linguist Je Leer.
Exterior of the Alutiiq Museum facility. Currently under
renovation, the museum will reopen in 2025. Photo by
Alutiiq Museum
Left: Alutiiq Museum sta member Chyian Heine shares
information with visitors of the Mobile Museum at a local
event. Photo by Alutiiq Museum
Right: Sydney Pestriko from the Native Village of Old
Harbor shows her partially-completed beaded headdress
during 2023 village workshop. Photo by Alutiiq Museum
ASC Newsletter 7
When scholars approach us before securing funding
for their work, we often help to guide proposal
development to enhance fundability, cultural
appropriateness, and community benet. We are
also approached to join ongoing projects to enhance
community dissemination of research results, develop
curriculum based on others research, or collaborate on
publications.
It is easy to see the connection between the concerns
that led to the museum’s founding, and modern
research priorities that focus
on local control, storage, and
access. The Alutiiq Museum
archaeology team has been
leading community-based
investigations from the
museum since our inception.
Stemming from earlier
community-based projects in
Karluk and Larsen Bay, the
museum’s archaeology crews
have included community
eld technicians, local
interns, Native corporations,
sponsored interns, students at
all levels, and whole teams of
local volunteers, depending
on the location and focus of
the excavation.
The key factor that makes
the museum’s archaeology
program “community-based” is not necessarily the
composition and inclusion of Native community
members in eldwork. Instead, we consider our
archaeology program to be community-based because
the archaeological questions are driven by local
interests, issues, and needs. Additionally, community-
based archaeology as done by the Alutiiq Museum is
distinguished by the fact that collections are studied
and stored permanently in our local archaeological
repository. The entire research process is accessible to
the community whose heritage it most closely reects,
from planning to the sharing of results and the storage
of data.
Community-based archaeology also allows
visiting researchers to gain a more comprehensive
understanding of the environment Alutiiq people live
in, the culture of the Alutiiq people, and the ways
our traditions have changed from the deep past to
the 20th century. Many researchers have expressed
that interaction with Elders and culture bearers has
enriched their understanding of features found in the
archaeological record, even when cultural practices
have changed over time. Local connections also foster
growth in public understanding of archaeology and
support for heritage preservation. This is important,
because in the Kodiak Archipelago, there is a long
history of recreational “pot hunting” and the sale of
artifacts, even in the face of state and federal laws
that protect ancient sites. It has been a practice at
the Alutiiq Museum to complement archaeological
research with public information campaigns about
the importance of protecting archaeological sites, and
what to do if archaeological materials are encountered
on the landscape.
We have been highly
fortunate to also have long-
term sta members such as
Amy Stean and Patrick
Saltonstall who could
have spent their careers
in academia, but instead
decided to devote decades
to community-based work
at the Alutiiq Museum.
Their focus on Kodiak
has allowed them to build
on each successive year
of work. This has led to a
much more comprehensive
understanding of ancestral
history, particularly in
places like Womens
Bay, where dozens of
excavations have revealed
the entire space of Alutiiq
history. Such research is allowing us to see how
ancestral uses of sh, plants, and other resources
changed over millennia.
Another area of special interest to the author is Alutiiq
language research and education. The museum has
had an active language program since 2002 when
a master-apprentice project was funded by the
Administration for Native Americans (ANA). In that
groundbreaking project, six teams of Elder speakers
and language learners in dierent communities
around the archipelago worked to pass the language
to the next generation. Only one Elder survives from
that rst project, and the number of uent speakers
of the Kodiak style of Alutiiq is now fewer than 20.
However, our eorts continue to document and teach
the language. A few National Science Foundation
Documenting Endangered Languages grants were
funded, including the “Preserving Words” project
which created a collection of language recordings,
and a “New Words” project in which new terms were
developed with a council of Elders to modernize the
lexicon.
Alutiiq community members assist with a community
archaeology dig. Alutiiq Museum curator of archaeology
Patrick Saltonstall carries buckets for screening. Photo
by Alutiiq Museum
8 ASC Newsletter
Subsequently, a number of language revitalization
grants have been awarded to area tribes, and the
Alutiiq Museum has served as a consultant to a
suite of language projects. Another success of
regional collaborative eort is the development of
the Alutiiq Studies program at Kodiak College, as
well as extensive materials development, such as
the Kodiak Alutiiq Language Orthography book,
co-authored by April Counceller and Je Leer, and
an Alutiiq Language Textbook, which is currently
in press and authored by Counceller and Dehrich
Isuwiq Chya. Regional information, sharing, and
partnering on projects is facilitated by the existence of
the Qik’rtarmut Alutiit Regional Language Advisory
Committee, which has been active for two decades.
In addition to research priorities coming from the Native
community, and an emphasis on local access, the Alutiiq
Museum’s research program has a third pillar, which
is intensive and multi-format community information
dissemination. Results of research are shared in many
ways to increase reach. Research shared in an academic
article will also be summarized in a press release for
news media, developed into lesson plans, summarized in
handouts and brochures, shared in displays or a poster,
or perhaps taught in video recordings or workshops.
Budgets for special projects always include free copies
of publications for area schools, tribes, and libraries to
increase access and recently we have added ebooks to
share digital versions of publications widely and for free.
Similarly, social media posts help to transmit information
on available resources to the Alutiiq diaspora in other
parts of Alaska and the Pacic Northwest.
When a 19th century beaded headdress set was loaned
to the Alutiiq Museum from the Museé Bolougne-sur-
Mer in France, experienced ‘beaders’ were brought in
to study the garments, learn preservation techniques,
and make copies of the originals for use in museum
programs. Every bead was counted, and each string of
beads diagramed. The information was compiled into a
video documentary and digital and printed instruction
booklets. Instructions for simpler pieces of beaded
regalia were developed for beginners and students.
The following year, an artist was commissioned to
make a contemporary headdress, which was lmed
for a tutorial series and developed into a pattern book
for other beaders. This has been followed by multiple
beaded headdress workshops and a local boom in the
production of beaded regalia.
Eorts like the beaded headdress project are the
ultimate goal of Alutiiq Museum research—to
recover ancestral knowledge and place it back in
our communities. Through archaeology, cultural
studies, language preservation, and public education,
our cultural center seeks to put Alutiiq community
members in control of research priorities.
[Editor’s note: The NMNH and Arctic Studies Center
has a long history of collaborations with Kodiak
Island and the Alutiiq Museum, including collection,
research, and exhibition projects like “Looking Both
Ways: Heritage and Identity of the Alutiiq People”
(2002, by Aron Crowell, Amy Stean, Gordon
Pullar; Fairbanks: University of Alaska Press), “New
Words”]
An Alutiiq Museum sta member shares beaded regalia items
made in a workshop with museum visitors. Photo by Alutiiq
Museum. Photo by Alutiiq Museum
The Kodiak Alutiiq Dancers perform at the 2019 Alutiiq
Museum annual meeting and Culture Fest in the museum
gallery. Photo by Alutiiq Museum
ASC Newsletter 9
ASC ANCHORAGE, ALASKA OFFICE
NMNH SCIENCE TEAM VISITS ALASKA,
JUNE 2023
By Aron Crowell
If you come to Alaska at
the height of summer for a
whirlwind three-day visit to
the Arctic Studies Center—
as Rebecca Johnson
(NMNH Associate Director
and Chief Scientist), Rick
Potts (Curator of Biological
Anthropology), Dorothy
Lippert (Program Manager,
Repatriation) and Katie
Barker (Senior Science
Program Administrator)
did in June—be prepared
to throw o your jet lag,
be on the go for 18 hours
a day, and meet dozens of
our project partners and
supporters. Dawn Biddison
and I were delighted to
host this tour by NMNH
leadership and to facilitate
discussions in Anchorage
and Juneau about ASC’s
collaborative programs
in Alaska Native arts,
heritage, history, culture, and
archaeology.
Shortly after arriving, the
Smithsonian group stretched
their legs on a walk along
the spectacular Turnagain
Arm coastal trail where
migratory sandhill cranes
were feeding on the mudats.
That evening Smithsonian
National Board member Jo
Michalski and the Honorable
Peter Michalski hosted a
welcoming reception at their home, attended by long-
time friends and donors to the ASC. The convivial
gathering included artists, educators, jurists, university
faculty, and civic leaders, among them Victor
Carlson, Morgan Christen, Heather Flynn, Sonya
Kelliher-Combs, Stephen Haycox, Stephen and
Gladys Langdon, John Levy, Jerry McEwan, Jenny
McNulty, Cathy Rasmuson, Debra Reed, Fran
Rose, Gail and Jan Sieberts, Jim Torgerson, and
Doug and Kathie Veltre. Rebecca Johnson’s engaging
after-dinner talk focused on new directions at NMNH,
from climate science and genomics to the museum’s
urgent priorities in community outreach, education,
repatriation, ethical returns, and diverse representation
in the sciences. Guests
expressed their appreciation
for the Smithsonian and its
mission, and we thanked
Jo, Peter, and Smithsonian
National Board alum Betsy
Lawer for bringing this
generous philanthropic group
together in support of our
work. Jo and Peter added
greatly to the occasion by
announcing a testamentary
gift to the ASC that will help
to secure our future, a shining
expression of their sustained
(and sustaining) generosity. A
small but delightful surprise
followed Rebecca’s talk
when she presented me with
a covid-delayed Science
Achievement Award for
Arctic Crashes: People and
Animals in the Changing
North, co-edited with Igor
Krupnik and published by
the Smithsonian in 2022.
The next day kicked o at
the Anchorage Museum,
where we were welcomed
by Monica Shah, Director
of Collections, and Aaron
Leggett, Senior Curator
of Alaska History and
Indigenous Cultures. We
toured the Living Our
Cultures, Sharing Our
Heritage: The First Peoples
of Alaska exhibition
displaying hundreds of Alaska
Native cultural heritage items on loan from NMNH
and NMAI, and discussed the statewide collaboration
with Alaska Native knowledge keepers and advisors
that shaped the exhibition’s content and design. Artists
Melissa Shagino (Ahtna), June Pardue (Sugpiaq/
Iñupiaq), and Mike Livingston (Unangax^) met with
us to discuss the knowledge and meanings embodied by
objects from their communities—a bentwood hunting
Figure 1. Rebecca Johnson presents Aron Crowell with
a Science Achievement Award at the home of Peter and
Jo Michalski. Photo by Katie Barker
Figure 2. Melissa Shagino’s talk on Ahtna heritage in
the ASC Community Consultation Room. Seated L-R:
Rick Potts, Dorothy Lippert, Rebecca Johnson, June
Pardue, Charlie Pardue, Katie Barker, Aaron Leggett.
Photo by Aron Crowell
10 ASC Newsletter
hat, woven grass socks, beaded moosehide mittens,
kayak models—that had been brought from exhibition
cases into the Community Consultation Room. The
presenters emphasized the role that Smithsonian
collections play in Indigenous teaching via ASC artist
residencies, community workshops, collections access
programs, language seminars, video productions, and
online curricula. Participation in these programs by
Melissa, Mike, June, and a host of other elders, artists,
and educators has fullled a promise made by the
Living Our Cultures co-creation team—that precious
ancestral objects brought home to Alaska would serve
communities as a resource for learning, healing, and
empowerment.
After lunch, we visited the Alaska Native Heritage
Center to learn about the ANHC’s cultural exhibits and
programs, including a recent natural dyes workshop led
by June Pardue and co-organized with the ASC (see
“Batuk’enelyshi, Natural Dyes from Dena’ina Lands”
by Dawn Biddison, ASC Newsletter 2023, p. 7-9).
We toured the facility with Director and CEO Emily
Edenshaw and Curator of Collections and Exhibits
Angie Demma; met with resident historian Benjamin
Jacuk about his study of the boarding school era; and
ended at the Center’s carving shed where the Boarding
School Healing Totem Pole was taking shape under the
chisels of Haida carvers. The nished pole was raised
in October 2023 “to pay homage and respect to the
generation that endured the boarding schools,” said one
of the carvers, T.J. Sgwaayaans, and it was blessed at
a ceremony attended by Secretary of the Interior Deb
Haaland (Anchorage Daily News, Oct. 24, 2023).
As the day ended, Aaron Leggett, who is the Dena’ina
president of the Native Village of Eklutna in addition
to his role at the Anchorage Museum, took us to see
Figure 3. Under the whalebone arch at the Alaska Native
Heritage Center. L-R: June Pardue, Dorothy Lippert,
Savanna Von Scheele, Rick Potts, Benjamin Jacuk, Rebecca
Johnson, Katie Barker. Photo by Aron Crowell
Figure 4. Alaska Native Heritage Center director Emily
Edenshaw with the Boarding School Healing Totem Pole.
Photo by Aron Crowell
Figure 5. Visiting Joel Isaak’s sculpture of Grandma Olga at
Dgheyaytnu (Ship Creek); a salmon drying rack at left is part
of the installation. Photo by Aron Crowell
Figure 6. Sealaska Heritage Institute president Rosita
Worl with Rebecca Johnson, Dorothy Lippert, and Dawn
Biddison. Photo by Aron Crowell
ASC Newsletter 11
a cast-bronze installation depicting Olga Nikolai
Ezi (Grandma Olga) and her sh camp at the mouth
of Dgheyaytnu (Ship Creek), a work created by
Dena’ina sculptor Joel Isaak (Fig. 5). The monument
is an outcome of Aaron’s citywide project to restore
Dena’ina place names and raise public awareness
about the history of his people, on whose traditional
lands Anchorage was built. We shared a moment of
connection and reection as Aaron spoke about this
honored place where generations of Dena’ina harvested
king salmon to feed their families through the winter.
An early ight the next morning
took us to Juneau to meet with
Rosita Worl, President of the
Sealaska Heritage Institute (SHI)
and SHI sta including Chuck
Smythe (Senior Ethnologist),
Kristy Ford (Education
Director), and Rebecca Soza
(STEAM Project Coordinator).
SHI’s current partnership with
the ASC and NMNH, funded by
a grant from the Smithsonian
Oce of the Undersecretary
for Education, is for developing
culturally responsive K-12
science education that
interweaves Indigenous
understanding of the natural
world with scientic methods
and principles. SHI is a national
leader in this educational
eld and has welcomed the
opportunity to work with
us on connecting Southeast
Alaskan students and teachers
to Smithsonian science and
collections (see “Together We
Thrive: Culturally Responsive
Sustaining Education in Washington DC and Alaska,”
by Margaret Benson and Aron Crowell, ASC
Newsletter 2023, p. 13-14).
At SHI, Judith Daxhootsu Ramos gave a presentation
on ASC’s partnership with the Yakutat Tlingit Tribe
to research Indigenous history, archaeology, and
ecological knowledge at Yakutat (see “Climate Change
and Indigenous Coastal Adaptations in the Gulf of
Alaska,” this issue of the ASC Newsletter). We toured
the SHI’s Walter Sobole Building, which is lled
with glorious monumental art including a full-sized
house front carved by renowned Tsimshian artist David
A. Boxley and his son, which depicts Am’ala, Wil
Mangaa da Ha’lidzogat (Am’ala, He Who Holds up
the Earth) (Fig. 7). Over lunch at the University of
Alaska Southeast (UAS) campus, we met with sta and
high school students participating in SHI’s Opening
the Box STEAM Academy, where students work
with Indigenous teachers and UAS science faculty to
conduct studies of cultural and natural landscapes.
Encounters with Juneau’s science community followed,
beginning with a great discussion about the impacts
of climate change on Southeast Alaska forests with
terrestrial ecologist Jason Feldman at the Alaska
Coastal Rainforest Center. We then toured the Auke Bay
Laboratories of the NOAA Alaska Fisheries Science
Center with Dana Hanselman
(Auke Bay Director), Chris
Lunsford (Marine Ecology
and Stock Assessment Program
Manager), and Mayumi
Arimitsu (Seabird and Forage
Fish Ecology Program, U.
S. Geological Survey). The
Auke Bay facility, which is
responsible for monitoring the
health, ecology, and population
dynamics of commercially
important stocks such as salmon,
sablesh, and rocksh, is a marine
biologist’s dream of saltwater
sh tanks, industrial-scale wet
labs, temperature and growth
experiments, a DNA lab, and
computational modeling, all to
support sustainable shing in
the Gulf of Alaska and Bering
Sea. Scientists there are frontline
observers of ocean warming,
acidication, and the ecological
impacts of climate change, and
our discussions with them were
equally fascinating and sobering.
The day ended on a high when Mayumi and Chris
took us out on their boat to see humpback whales
feeding in Gastineau Channel o Juneau, sharing their
delight in this still wild and thriving marine world and
feeding us with a smorgasbord of seafoods that they
had harvested and prepared themselves, including some
fabulous smoked salmon and lingcod. Then, a dash
back to the dock and to Juneau airport, a return ight to
Anchorage, and the end of our brief time together. We
hope that this taste of Alaska and chance to visit with
some of the amazing people who share in our work
will strengthen ties with NMNH and lead to future
visits—so please come back! And we look forward
with great anticipation to the upcoming NMNH Board
trip to Alaska this August, led by NMNH Director Kirk
Johnson.
Figure 7. David Boxley’s Tsimshian house front
at Sealaska Heritage Institute. L-R: Dawn
Biddison, Dorothy Lippert, Judith Ramos,
Rebecca Johnson, Katie Barker, Aron Crowell,
Rick Potts, Chuck Smythe. Photo by Sealaska
Heritage Institute
12 ASC Newsletter
CLIMATE CHANGE AND COASTAL
ADAPTATIONS IN THE GULF OF ALASKA
By Aron L. Crowell
Three studies in the Gulf of Alaska region by the Arctic
Studies Center and collaborating researchers, one in
progress and two recently published, explore how
ancestral Sugpiat and Tlingit communities responded
to changes in the marine ecosystem that accompanied
periods of climatic cooling and warming over the last
7,400 years. The research taps cultural, biological,
and isotopic data preserved in village sites and shell
middens to reveal interconnections between climate
cycles, ocean temperatures, ecosystem structure, and
human utilization of marine resources. Collaborative
relationships have centered this work in Indigenous
communities and enabled the integration of traditional
ecological knowledge with results from archaeology,
ecology, and other scientic disciplines.
A Deep-Time Perspective on Ocean Change and
Indigenous Responses
A millennial-scale view of ocean change is emerging
from the additional analysis of faunal remains found at
two ancestral Sugpiat sites in Amalik Bay on the Alaska
Peninsula, known as Mink Island and Little Takli (Fig.
1). Excavations in 1997–2000 led by Jeanne Schaaf
of the National Park Service in collaboration with the
Council of Katmai Descendants were undertaken to
mitigate the loss of cultural information and human
remains at the sites due to erosion by storm waves
and active vandalism. Deep deposits of interlayered
house oors, midden, and volcanic ash at Mink Island
span 7400–300 cal. BP (calibrated radiocarbon years
before present), with a hiatus from 3700–2100 cal. BP
when the site was not inhabited (Fig. 2). Little Takli,
on a neighboring islet less than a kilometer away, was
occupied during 3800–3200 cal. BP, partially lling this
temporal gap, and together the two locations preserve
one of the longest detailed records of coastal habitation
in the Gulf of Alaska, yielding thousands of artifacts
and over 83,000 identiable animal remains from 70
taxonomic families. These include sh such as Pacic
cod, rocksh, salmon, sculpins, and halibut; seabirds
including murres, puns, cormorants, sea ducks
and albatrosses; sea mammals including porpoises,
sea lions, seals (ve species), sea otters, walrus, and
whales; caribou, bears, and other land mammals; and
numerous types of clams, cockles, mussels, snails,
limpets, chitons, and whelks. This abundance and
variety reect the residents’ intimate knowledge of the
ecosystem and sophisticated technologies for shing,
hunting, and ocean travel, as well as the productivity
and biodiversity of the Gulf of Alaska, especially in the
coastal upwelling zone that encompasses Amalik Bay.
Figure 1: Gulf of Alaska research locations
Figure 2: Jeanne Schaaf at Mink Island.
Photo by Mike Hilton
Figure 3: Normalized deposition rates for sh, sea mammals,
seabirds, land mammals, and invertebrates from dated strata
at the Mink Island and Little Takli sites (bar graph on left)
compared to estimated sea surface temperatures and air
temperatures during the Neoglacial, Medieval Warm Period,
and Little Ice Age
ASC Newsletter 13
Preliminary analyses have been completed for the Arctic
Studies Center project, funded by a Smithsonian “Life
on a Sustainable Planet” research grant and the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
NOAA researcher and co-PI Thomas Helser (Alaska
Fisheries Science Center, Seattle) and colleagues at
the University of Wisconsin-Madison and University
Washington-Seattle conducted high resolution chemical
analysis of 25 Pacic cod otoliths (ear bones) from
dierent layers of the Mink Island and Little Takli sites.
These methods employed laser ablation inductively
coupled mass spectrometry to measure magnesium,
zinc, strontium, and barium analytes (26Mg, 66Zn, 86Sr,
138Ba) used to identify changes in salinity, productivity,
and upwelling, and secondary ion mass spectrometry to
measure oxygen isotope ratios (18O/16O) to index changes
in sea temperatures and levels of the 13C carbon isotope
to track primary productivity (plankton production).
Principal Investigator Aron Crowell (ASC), Jeanne
Schaaf, and Sebastian Wetherbee (Katmai National
Park) reanalyzed the Mink Island and Little Takli
faunal remains by computing deposition rates for each
taxon (the number of identiable bones per cubic
meter of cultural deposits per year), a measure that
reects the varying abundance of each taxon during
dierent climate periods from the Neoglacial through
the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age, ltered
by human behaviors including prey selection, hunting
eort, and disposal practices (Fig. 3).
While multifactor correlation analysis of the faunal
and isotopic variables is not yet complete, several
preliminary ndings are of interest. Accumulation
rates for sea mammals were much higher in the oldest
Early Neoglacial strata at Mink Island (5998–7412
cal. BP) than during subsequent periods when ocean
temperatures trended
upward (Fig. 3). A
marked focus on sea
mammal hunting during
the Early Neoglacial
has been reported on
Kodiak Island and
elsewhere in the GOA
region, coincident
with the Ocean Bay I
and II cultural phases,
suggesting that this
was a period when top
predators in the marine
food web (seals, sea
lions, porpoises, toothed
whales) had ample
prey and were thriving,
as were murres and
other seabirds of the
Alcidae family. During
the Middle Neoglacial
Kachemak Period
after 3200 BP, shing became much more important
on Kodiak Island and at the Little Takli site (Fig. 3),
indicated by high accumulation rates of all sh taxa
except Clupidae (herrings) and the appearance of
shing artifacts such as stone plummets for hook and
line rigs and notched pebbles used as net weights.
Our further analysis of the isotopic and archaeofaunal
data from Amalik Bay may reveal changes in ocean
temperatures and chemistry that correlate with these
major ecological and cultural transitions. Journal
publication of our ndings is anticipated in late 2024.
We are grateful for the support and cooperation of the
National Park Service, the Smithsonian Institution, the
Council of Katmai Descendants, and the Bristol Bay
Native Association.
Climate Change and Pulse Migration
A second interdisciplinary study by Aron Crowell
(Arctic Studies Center, Smithsonian) and Mayumi
Arimitsu (Seabird and Forage Fish Ecology
Program, U. S. Geological Survey, Juneau) combined
archaeological, archaeofaunal, and radiocarbon data,
marine ecosystem surveys, paleoclimatic indices, and
Indigenous oral traditions shared by residents of the
villages of Nanwalek, Port Graham, and Seldovia
to interpret 2,000 years of Sugpiat migrations from
Kachemak Bay in Cook Inlet and Prince William
Sound to the outer coast of the Kenai Peninsula,
followed by returns to their home regions (Fig. 4). This
research was published in 2023 in the journal Frontiers
in Environmental Archaeology and is available as an
open-access download at Frontiers.
Figure 4: Chugach (Sugpiat) archaeological sites in
Kachemak Bay, the Kenai Coast, and Prince William Sound,
with migration routes between these areas
Figure 5: Artifacts from the
Bear Cove site in Aialik Bay
(310–915 cal. BP) including
ground slate endblades for
lances, arrow points, knives,
and beads made of coal. Photo
by Aron Crowell
14 ASC Newsletter
The Kenai study was inspired by modern evidence of
biological “regime shifts” in the Gulf of Alaska that
accompany changes in the state of the Pacic Decadal
Oscillation (PDO), a 20 to 50-year climate cycle.
Through trophic mechanisms related to the timing of
the spring plankton bloom, weak (cool) phases of the
PDO support increases in Gulf of Alaska forage sh
(e.g., herring, smelts, eulachon), sea mammals, and
seabirds, while strong (warm) phases favor salmon
and bottom sh such as halibut. This suggested that
Sugpiat Chugach groups might have moved between
areas where these alternating suites of marine fauna
were periodically abundant, migrating to favorable
sea mammal and seabird habitats on the Kenai Coast
during cold PDO phases and returning during warm
PDO phases to the rich salmon habitats of Prince
William Sound and Cook Inlet. This type of periodic,
climate-driven “pulse migration” has been reported
elsewhere in the north including Northwest Greenland,
Labrador, and the Melville Peninsula.
For the Kenai study, we identied gaps in regional
radiocarbon sequences representing out-migrations and
peaks indicating in-migrations and found that these
coincided with PDO climate cycles as reconstructed
from tree rings by Greg Wiles (Earth Sciences and
Archaeology, College of Wooster), supporting the
climate-linked migration model. We used and marine
sh, mammal, and seabird surveys by NOAA and
USGS to prole the contrasting resources of Cook
Inlet, the Kenai Coast, and Prince William Sound
and ground-truthed the study by ecological analysis
of two glacial ords on the Kenai Coast (Aialik Bay
and Harris Bay), both biologically enriched by glacial
sediments. Archaeological sites in the two ords were
occupied during several cold PDO phases over the
last 1,000 years, and archaeofauna harvested by the
Chugach included harbor seals, porpoises, sea lions,
murres, puns, Pacic cod, and rocksh, with only
a few salmon or land mammal bones. Artifacts such
as ground slate endblades for lances, harpoons, and
arrows, bone harpoon heads, two-part bone hooks for
deep sea shing, and seal oil lamps are consistent with
this subsistence focus (Fig. 5).
The study was enhanced by ecological and historical
knowledge shared by Sugpiat elders of Kachemak
Bay during the ASC’s Kenai Fjords Oral History
and Archaeology Project (2002–2017). Accounts of
migrations by skin boat to the outer Kenai coast for
hunting and shing are preserved in oral tradition.
The late Chugach community scholar Nick Tanape,
Sr. related stories told by his father about men from
Kachemak Bay and Prince William Sound meeting
at Aialik Bay for sealing. Visiting the seal rookery at
Aialik Glacier in 2002, he said, “It would make a lot
of sense to hunt in this area. You can sneak around this
oating ice to get to the seals. They would be more
abundant here in cooler weather, cooler weather for
them, especially in the summer. And there's probably
more feed on the bottom for them” (Fig. 6).
We respectfully acknowledge that this research
took place on the traditional lands and waters of the
Chugach people and are thankful for the generous
support, permissions, and cooperation of Kenai Fjords
National Park, the Ocean Alaska Science and Learning
Center in Seward, Chugach Alaska Corporation,
English Bay (Nanwalek) Corporation, Port Graham
Corporation, and the Native Villages of Nanwalek, Port
Graham, and Seldovia.
Laaxaayík, Near the Glacier—Ecological
Knowledge at Yakutat
In partnership with the Yakutat Tlingit Tribe (YTT) and
with funding from the National Science Foundation,
the Arctic Studies Center conducted an 1,100-year
longitudinal study of the cultural ecology of Yakutat
Figure 7: Judith Ramos with a kittiwake egg collected from
the bird clis at Haenke (Egg) Island in Disenchantment
Bay, Yakutat ord. Photo by Aron Crowell
Figure 6: Female harbor seal and pup at a glacial ice oe
rookery. Photo courtesy of John Jansen, NOAA
ASC Newsletter 15
ord during 2011–
2014. The results
were published by
the Smithsonian
Institution
Scholarly Press
in early 2024 as
Laaxaayík, Near
the Glacier:
Indigenous History
and Ecology at
Yakutat Fiord,
Alaska (Aron
Crowell, with
a foreword by
Yakutat Tlingit
scholar Judith
Daxootsu Ramos)
(Fig. 7).
The goals of this
community-based
project were to document Little Ice Age glacial retreat,
settlement of the emerging ord by migrating Eyak,
Ahtna, and Tlingit clans, and utilization of marine
and terrestrial resources by past and present residents.
Today’s community members are nely attuned to
seasonal and spatial variations in the availability of key
subsistence species, enabling them to harvest more than
100 varieties of sh, birds, sea mammals, land mammals,
plants, and invertebrates totaling about 120 kg of wild
foods per person each year—a sustainable way of life on
the land made possible by ecological knowledge passed
on by ancestors and taught to each new generation.
The project design, co-developed with YTT, included
archaeological and paleoenvironmental investigations to
trace these cultural practices into the past, and extensive
interviews with community members to record Tlingit
oral historical and ecological knowledge.
An important perspective that emerged from this
collaborative research program is the strong inuence
that glaciers exert on marine and terrestrial ecology, and
thus on the resources available to Indigenous residents
of Yakutat and other ords in Southeast Alaska. Iron,
silica, phosphate, and other minerals are scraped from
mountain bedrock as glaciers descend to the coast,
entering the ocean in meltwater and ice oes. These
mineral nutrients foster abundant plankton growth,
sustaining animal populations at all levels of the marine
food web, and glacial calving produces oating ice that
provides predator-safe haulouts for harbor seals and
pups. On land, glacial retreat exposes new habitat for
human settlement, and productive forests and watersheds
develop over time, supporting salmon runs and a wide
variety of terrestrial food species.
Because Yakutat has old growth forests, abundant
terrestrial game, and salmon rivers as well as thriving
populations of demersal and benthic sh, seabirds,
seals and other marine mammals, it has sustained
continuous human habitation through the climate
variations of the last 1,100 years rather than being
periodically abandoned like the Kenai Coast. This
ecological contrast is illustrated by faunal remains from
the village site of Tlákw.aan on Knight Island (Fig. 8).
While the site’s dates of occupation (440–200 cal. BP)
were during one of the colder phases of the Little Ice
Age, the Tlákw.aan midden contained salmon as well
as abundant bones of harbor seal, fur seal, and harbor
porpoise. The basket of wild foods is more diverse at
Yakutat than on the Kenai Coast, giving rise to a larger
and more permanent Indigenous population.
This research took place in Yaakwdáat Kwáan, the
homeland of the Yakutat people. It was undertaken
with permission from the Yakutat Tlingit Tribe and
in collaboration with members of the community,
whose cooperation, hospitality, and contributions are
gratefully acknowledged.
MAKING CONNECTIONS: ATHABASCAN
LIFEWAYS AND YOU
By Dawn Biddison
Making Connections: Athabascan Lifeways and
You is a 36-page educational activities booklet with
accompanying poster and website. With the booklet,
readers can visit with Dene peoples of Alaska, look
closely at their cultural belongings cared for by the
Smithsonian Institution, learn about their ways of life,
and make connections through activities people can
do wherever they live. The guide was created with
K-8 students in mind but suits learners of all ages. The
Making Connections project, completed in September
2023, was a collaboration between artist, curator,
and Knowledge-Keeper Melissa Shagino (Ahtna/
Paiute) and Museum Specialist Dawn Biddison, Arctic
Studies Center, Alaska oce (ASC-AK). Layouts,
graphic design, and illustrations were created by Dimi
Macheras (Ahtna) and Casey Silver of 80% Studios.
All content was reviewed by Knowledge-Keeper,
language expert, and teacher Kari Shagino (Ahtna/
Paiute). The content in the guide was drawn from
knowledge shared by Athabascan collaborators on and
research contributors to the Smithsonian exhibition
Living Our Cultures, Sharing Our Heritage: The First
Peoples of Alaska located at the Anchorage Museum,
and from the collaborative project Coming Home:
Reclaiming Ahtna Knowledge through Museum
Collections, which also has a site on Learning Lab with
resources.
Figure 8: Aron Crowell and eld
school students excavating a test
trench at Tlákw.aan, 2014. Photo by
Mark Luttrel
16 ASC Newsletter
AHTNA COLLECTIONS ACCESS AND
COMMUNITY OUTREACH: COMING HOME
PROJECT COMPLETED
By Dawn Biddison
In 2022-2023,
Ahtna community
members Kiana
Carlson, Agnes
Denny, Jessica
Denny, Dimi
Macheras, and
Melissa Shagino
collaborated on
collections research
and documentation
with Ahtna cultural
belongings in
the care of the
Smithsonian during
a project developed and managed by Dawn Biddison.
To begin, they researched collections online to nd
Ahtna cultural belongings currently located nationally
and internationally. Next, they worked in-person with
collections at NMAI and NMNH in Suitland, MD, and
at the Anchorage Museum. To learn more about the
background of this project and its development and
research phases through February 2023, please see the
2023 issue of this Newsletter. The project was made
possible through the generous support of the Margaret
A. Cargill Philanthropies, NMAI, and supporters of
ASC-AK.
Throughout the project, the Ahtna group
documented resources for their communities, made
recommendations to museum sta regarding cultural
awareness and protocols, and built relationships with
each other, which in turn established relationships
with museum sta. Across time together, the group
developed community outcomes that included making
and gifting calendars, which they based on museum
collections, conversations with Ahtna community
members and reections on Ahtna cultural belongings.
They co-created a website on Smithsonian’s Learning
Lab to share project resources titled Coming Home:
Reclaiming Ahtna Knowledge through Museum
Collections (see the New Media in this Newsletter).
Each of the three villages participating in the project
was given a hard drive archive of digital resources
and printed notebooks of research and resources
compiled by Dawn to keep in their communities for
future Ahtna-led work. In addition to a symposium
organized by the Ahtna team in Anchorage, the project
concluded with a community gathering and project
presentation by Jessica and Melissa in May of 2023 at
The project team
developed fourteen
activities that
feature Athabascan
Indigenous knowledge
and community
voices based on
cultural belongings
in the Smithsonian
collections. Bonus
content for each
facilitates further
cultural connections for
readers. The booklet
concludes with two
additional activities
that connect users with
museum collections
and their creativity. The
project website on
Smithsonian’s Learning Lab includes a downloadable
PDF of the guide and solutions to the puzzles, along
with additional resources. The site also features the
content behind each activity: interviews, short essays and
exhibition research by Athabascan Knowledge-Keepers.
Outreach for the Making Connections project included
print distribution and meetings with local educators.
Ten copies of the booklet and poster, along with a cover
letter and yer for the dierent educational resources
on the main ASC-AK Learning Lab site, were shipped
to 523 recipients: all elementary and middle schools in
Alaska, all libraries on Athabascan lands and Athabascan
Tribal organizations, cultural centers and museums.
Booklets, posters and additional printed Learning Lab
resources were also distributed to educators during a
Saturday workshop at the Anchorage Museum, which
was attended by Anchorage teachers, Anchorage
School District leads of the Indigenous Education, Arts
and Social Studies departments, and the curriculum
developer for the Knik Tribe. Dawn also met with sta
from the University of Anchorage School of Education
and gave an online presentation to their Curriculum
Theory and Design students. She also presented online to
art educators statewide about Making Connections and
other ASC-AK education resources online.
The project team would like to recognize the all the
Athabascan Elders, Language Warriors, Knowledge
Keepers, and Artists who contributed to the Making
Connections activities. The creation and printing of the
booklet was made possible through generous support
from the Smithsonian Institution’s Oce of the Under
Secretary for Education, with additional support from
the Smithsonian Regional Councils, FedEx, and the
Alaska oce of the Arctic Studies Center.
Maio Nishkian using the Making
Connections booklet. Hatcher’s
Pass, Alaska, September 2023.
Photo by Melissa Shagino
Melissa Shagino and Jessica Denny
presenting project work to Ahtna
community members in Chistochina,
Alaska, May 2023. Photo by Dawn
Biddison
ASC Newsletter 17
Chistochina where a lunch of moose stew and fry bread
was provided, along with gifts of project calendars,
NMAI collections home care pamphlets, activity
handouts and crayons for children, and gifts to Elders
of tea, pilot bread, sage and beaded necklaces made by
Melissa. The event was attended by Ahtna community
members and leaders from Ahtna Inc., Ahtna Intertribal
Resources Commission, Ahtna Heritage, Cheesh’na
Tribal Council, Mt. Sanford Tribal Consortium, and
the Native Village of Kluti-Kaah. One person attending
shared, “I can’t begin to tell you how good this makes
my heart feel. It’s lling up my spirit. I’m so proud of
the work that you are doing.”
The spirit of the Coming Home project was about
“nding ways to bring personal experiences with
museum collections into community, reuniting
cultural belongings with their descendants.” The
Ahtna project collaborators also wrote: “We believe
that our cultural belongings have teachings for us, and
creating access for our communities is the purpose of
this project and should be the purpose of all museum
collections. Regaining relationships with cultural
belongings happens through both personal and physical
connections: this requires visits from communities and
ultimately returning information to communities. As
a descendant of Ahtna peoples, you have the right to
access your cultural belongings at museums, and we
encourage you to be a part of this homecoming. Search
collections online. Visit museums with Ahtna cultural
belongings. Connect with community members. Reach
out to us for help. The doors are open.”
WOVEN TOGETHER: A “TOGETHER WE
THRIVE” PROJECT
By Dawn Biddison
The Woven Together: Taperrnat Research and Art
project was co-developed by Dawn Biddison after
reaching out to the Bristol Bay Foundation (BBF)
and volunteering time in their Creating Cultural
Competence program, which seeks “to enhance the
cultural competence of educators” and “to result in
more culturally inclusive classroom practices.” After
learning from BBF sta and their collaborators about
issues and goals, Dawn recognized that ASC-AK could
become a useful ally in their work. After Dawn’s work
was discussed, she asked BBF if they would consider
collaborating on a project, and they agreed. During the
fall and winter of 2023, Dawn met and corresponded
with BBF sta and their collaborators at the Alaska
Humanities Forum, University of Alaska Anchorage
School of Education, and University of Fairbanks
Bristol Bay Campus. She proposed a preliminary
project framework based on what she learned from
BBF, asked for and incorporated advice, and the project
was approved by BBF, along with plans to continue
developing and adapting it. The Woven Together
project was reviewed and approved by the Alaska
Native Museum Sovereignty group and by tribal
representatives in areas where the work will take place:
the Native village of Eklutna, representing Indigenous
peoples in the Anchorage area, and the Ninilchik
Village Tribe. Sta from the King Salmon and Naknek
Tribes were also contacted, and the project will be
adapted to honor their guidance.
Woven Together will be based on work with Yup’ik,
Sugpiaq, and Dena’ina community members—whmo
the Bristol Bay Foundation serves—as partners,
participants, educators, learners and content-creators,
along with other Alaska collaborators, for: 1)
researching and harvesting taperrnat (beach rye grass
in the Yup’ik language); 2) teaching how to prepare and
weave taperrnat; and 3) creating and sharing resources
for educators and learners. Alaska Native Knowledge-
Keepers will be at the center of each element, and
Alaska Native cultural protocols, values and expertise
will be honored and shared throughout the project and
in the co-created educational resources.
The rst part of the project will support three
small community groups focused on learning from
Knowledge-Keepers and gaining place-based research
experience through local eld excursions to observe,
document and sustainably harvest samples of taperrnat
in the King Salmon, Anchorage, and Homer areas.
The second project part will support three weaving
workshops with a grass harvesting experience in the
three research locations, led by Yup’ik and Sugpiaq
Knowledge-Keepers who will teach educators and
students. Each workshop will have a community
gathering where people can share their grass art and
interests. The third part of the project will focus
on creating resources for educators and learners. A
culturally responsive curriculum based on the project
will be written for three grade ranges and additional
culturally responsive lessons will be written by
participating teachers. There will be a website featuring
the voices and work of community participants and
the free educational resources, along with content
to support non-Native educators teaching Alaska
Native content and support bringing Alaska Native
community experts into classrooms to improve cultural
inclusivity. The project will conclude in February
2025 with a gathering to bring together project
participants, educators, and community members for
sharing experiences and resources and for providing
professional development workshops for teachers.
The goals of this project include centering Alaska Native
ecological knowledge and protocols for harvesting from
18 ASC Newsletter
the land, practices around environmental observations
across seasons and changes for successful materials
harvesting, and scientic principles demonstrated
by techniques for preparing and weaving taperrnat;
supporting intergenerational teaching and learning;
creating culturally responsive education resources;
and contributing to cultural competency for educators.
Woven Together has received grant support from two
Alaska Native non-prot organizations, the Bristol Bay
Foundation and The CIRI Foundation, and from the
Our Shared Future, Reckoning with our Racial Past
Initiative at Smithsonian
Institution.
The Woven Together
project is part of a
Smithsonian Together
We Thrive project. The
project was awarded in
August 2022 for two
years to work in two
geographic locations,
Alaska and Washington,
D.C., in collaboration
with the Smithsonian
project team members
from NMNH’s ASC/AK,
Dept. of Anthropology,
and Oce of Education),
the National Zoo, and
Conservation Biology
Institute. The D.C. and
AK-based projects,
together, are an eort
to co-create and situate more culturally responsive
education experiences and resources specic to science
and local community needs and cultures. To learn more
about the TWT project, please read the article by Aron
Crowell in the 2023 Newsletter.
NEW MEDIA
By Dawn Biddison
Two new collections have been added to the Learning
Lab site Smithsonian Arctic Studies in Alaska, and
the following curricula have been checked and updated
for numerous website links and language revisions:
Salmon Give Life: Learning from Alaska’s First
Peoples; Gifts from the Land: Lifeways and Quill
Art of the Athabascan Peoples; Iñupiaq Lessons:
Language and Culture; and St. Lawrence Island
Yupik Lessons: Language and Culture.
The collection Making Connections: Athabascan
Lifeways and You provides a PDF copy of the
interdisciplinary educational activities booklet and
poster, puzzle solutions, an introduction video, photos
and information about the cultural belongings at the
Smithsonian. These materials are featured in each
activity along with Athabascan community members
who provided information about them, research videos,
archival photographs, and links to extension activity
resources and related educational resources on the
SASC site. The site also shares information about
Melissa Shagino and about Dimi Macheras and
Casey Silver of 80% Studios who worked with Dawn
Biddison to create the resources.
The collection Coming Home: Reclaiming Ahtna
Knowledge through Museum Collections, also co-
created by Dawn Biddison, features content from
the collections access project discussed in the article
“Ahtna Collections Access and Community Outreach:
Coming Home project completed” in this issue. There
are photographs of Ahtna researchers Kiana Carlson,
Agnes Denny, Jessica Denny, Dimi Macheras, and
Melissa Shagino, and short stories they shared about
Ahtna cultural belongings cared for by the Smithsonian
that they visited with during the project. There are also
photos of and short interviews with Athabascan Elders
and Knowledge-Keepers who provided community
information about additional cultural belongings
featured on the site: Evelyn Beeter, Lena Charley,
Emma Hildebrand, Tom Huntington, Joel Isaak,
Kari Shagino and Sondra Shagino. The website
also provides downloadable copies of the 2023
calendar and Ahtna months poster, which were printed
as gifts to Ahtna communities, and activities pages for
children that were created for the project community
gathering in Chistochina to report on the project.
Copies of the NMAI Collections Home Care pamphlets
are also provided.
Cover of the Making
Connections educational
activities booklet. Artwork by
Dimi Macheras and design by
Melissa Shagino
January from the Ahtna Coming Home 2023 calendar
featuring Kiana Carlson and snowshoes at NMAI. Artwork
by Dimi Macheras and design by 80% Studios and Melissa
Shagino
ASC Newsletter 19
NEWS
NOTES ON AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE
GONE MISSING
By Ken Pratt and Matt Ganley
In June 2022, the authors located a previously
unreported archaeological site during a helicopter
survey of the Norton Sound coast between
Solomon and Topkok Head. This section of coast is
topographically uniform, consisting of a broad, low
beach ridge backed by low hills, extensive marsh and
wet tundra areas, and
several barrier lagoons.
The newly discovered site
consists of the remains
of a semisubterranean
house (Fig. 1) measuring
about 6.3 m wide by 9.7
m long (including the
entry tunnel). Herein, it is
referred to as the “Lone
House” site. After it was
spotted, we landed and
briey searched for other
possible cultural features.
but none were found.
Locational coordinates
were noted, and several
photographs of the site
were taken before we
departed. Also in June,
Bering Straits Native Corporation obtained LiDAR
(Light-Detecting and Ranging) imagery for this stretch
of coast that shows the Lone House site clearly (Fig. 2).
Several months after our 2022 eld project concluded
and LiDAR photography had been taken, a major storm
event—Typhoon Merbok—struck western Alaska
with devastating force. A few details about the storm’s
impacts relevant to our area of interest are provided
below.
A signicant storm entered Alaska waters on
September 15, 2022, as the remnants of Typhoon
Merbok reached the waters of the Bering Sea.
By late the next day, September 16, the record
low pressure system had reached the coast along
northern Norton Sound. Over the following two
days maximum sustained winds of 31 knots were
recorded in Nome, Alaska with gusts exceeding 41
knots. Prevailing winds from the south battered the
coastline with impacts including ooding, coastal
erosion, and the destruction of subsistence camps
that dotted the shoreline east of Nome. High water
coincided with peak wind speeds on September 17th
and 18th. The coastline east of Nome, composed of
barrier lagoons and gently sloped, sandy beaches,
was overrun by the waters of Norton Sound
(National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association
2022). At Nome…the ocean was 10.5 feet (3.2
meters) above the low-tide line on Sept. 17, 2022.
That’s the highest there in nearly half a century—
since the historic storm of November 1974
(Thoman 2022).
In August 2023, the
authors returned to the site
area with the objective of
testing the house in hopes
of recovering an organic
sample that might provide
data concerning site’s
chronology. After the 2022
coordinates (which had
been checked against the
LiDAR imagery) were
entered in the helicopter’s
navigational system, we
ew to the area on 23
August but could not
nd the house—despite
conrming we were where
the coordinates indicated
we should be and circling
at low altitude several
times. Our failure to relocate the site was mystifying;
but we had other work to do so decided to move on,
then searched for the site again on another day. Back
in Nome, we checked and veried that the Lone House
site coordinates had been written down and entered
in the helicopter’s navigational system correctly. Still
confused about our inability to nd the site on the rst
attempt, we were determined to return to the area, land
and carefully search for the site on foot. That happened
three days later, on 28 August.
In the ensuing surface reconnaissance, Ganley noticed
a discreet sandy area with a suggestive key-hole shape
and speculated that it could be the house. The edges of
the keyhole-shaped area were dened by sparse grassy
vegetation, and its “interior” was completed lled in
with sand. We noticed a dierence in soil (sand) density
with less rm/dense sand within the keyhole, and
more dense sand outside the margins when we pushed
shallow probes into those areas. So, we excavated a
shovel test in the approximate center of the in-lled
area. Digging through only unconsolidated sand
Figure 1. Southwest view of site area with the key-hole
shaped house. Note accumulated driftwood along the
shoreline fringe and lack of driftwood inland. June 2022.
Photo by Matt Ganley
20 ASC Newsletter
(with the walls of the test hole constantly sloughing
in), we saw nothing of interest until encountering
some charcoal at 85 centimeters below surface. This
convinced us the house had been found, so a charcoal
sample was collected and the hole backlled (Figs. 3,
4). Radiometric analyses of the sample (Beta-674484)
returned a date of 240+/-30 BP.
Comparing a 2023 aerial photograph (Figure 4) of the
site with the one taken in 2022 (Figure 1) reveals three
obvious changes attributable to Merbok’s storm surges:
(i) the house pit was lled in with sand; (ii) most of the
driftwood that previously fronted the site was buried
by sand, and some was transported inland; and (iii)
extensive sand deposition on previously vegetated
areas created new expanses of sand-covered ground.
Our novel experience involving the Lone House site
and Typhoon Merbok made us quickly realize that this
could not be the only time storm surges associated
with powerful storms in western Alaska had buried
archaeological sites. This is signicant, because
the long-standing tendency has been to assume that
the primary impacts severe coastal storms have on
coastal archaeological sites are to erode and/or destroy
them. The Lone House site was subjected to a far
dierent type of storm impact, one that could easily go
unnoticed (see Figure 4). As this account demonstrates,
if the authors had not photographed and recorded
locational coordinates for the Lone House site in June
2022 the impacts of Typhoon Merbok several months
later would likely have prevented it from ever being
relocated.
References
Thoman, Rick. 2022. Typhoon Merbok, fueled by
unusually warm Pacic Ocean, pounded Alaska’s
vulnerable coastal communities at a critical time. The
Conversation (Sept. 19).
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association. 2022.
Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and
Services (CO-OPS), NOAA Tides and Currents. https://
tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov
ALEUTIAN ISLANDS REPATRIATION UP-
DATES
By Eric Hollinger
The anthropological collections from the Aleutian
Islands in the Smithsonian’s National Museum
of Natural History (NMNH) are extensive and
span thousands or years and many islands of the
Archipelago. Archaeological collections made
beginning in the mid-1800s and continuing through the
late 20th century included human remains and funerary
objects subject to the repatriation provisions of the
NMAI Act. NMNH’s Repatriation Oce (RO) has
been working with representatives from the Aleutian
Pribilof Islands Association, regional and village
corporations, tribes, and Native Villages to document
and assess the cultural aliations for the remains
and objects. Cultural aliations are recognized to
one or more IRA villages as having ancestor descent
relationships that give them authority to make decisions
for the dispositions of remains and objects subject to
repatriation.
The RO approached the task by working with
individual villages and island groups moving mostly
Figure 4: Image taken from southeast of the site area post-
Typhoon Merbok, with key-hole shaped house “invisible” at
lower left-center. Comparing with Figure 1.
Left: Figure 2. LiDAR comparison images of the Lone
House site. Top: Digital Elevation Model (DEM) image
showing house at center and driftwood accumulated along
the shoreline fringe. Bottom: “Bare Earth” DEM, shaded to
highlight elevation variability, shows house at center left.
Right: Figure 3: Pratt nishes backlling test hole; view from
south, looking inland. August 2023. Photo by Matt Ganley
ASC Newsletter 21
from west to east.
Assessments have
been completed
for Unga Island,
St. Paul Island, the
Near Islands, the
Hawadax Islands, the
Andreanof Islands,
Kagamil Island,
and Umnak Island.
Assessments for Ship
Rock Island is nearing
completion, and the
RO is now working
with communities
to document and
assess aliations for
Unalaska and nearby
islands and the Port
Moller area of the
Alaska Peninsula.
Repatriations have
been completed
with the Unga Tribal
Council, St. Paul, and
the Village of Atka for
the western Aleutians.
A signicant
repatriation step
occurred this past
summer when the RO
worked with Village
of Atka, the Fish and
Wildlife Service, and
the non-prot group
Atux
Forever. The
remains and funerary
objects from the Near
Islands, Hawadax Islands, and Andreanof Islands were
repatriated to the Native Village of Atka in 2019 and
were placed on temporary loan to NMNH while Atka
researched and planned for physical transfer back to
Alaska. The Native Village of Atka decided to start
with return of Saskinax
remains to the Near Islands for
reburial on the islands from which they were removed.
This was made possible with support from the Fish
and Wildlife Service and the Alaska Maritime Wildlife
Refuge, using their research vessel Tiĝlax
to transport
the remains and Saskinax
descendants and Atka
representatives to the islands.
In 2023, Crystal Dushkin, President of the Native
Village of Atka, asked NMNH to bring representatives
of Atux
Forever and the Atka Tribal Council to
the Smithsonian to work with RO Tribal Liaison
Eric Hollinger to prepare the remains for the trip
back to the Aleutians. Atka Tribal Council member
Nancy Zoachney, Atux
Forever President Helena
Schmitz, and Vice President Theresa Deal traveled
to Washington, D.C. to work with museum sta. The
team wrapped the remains in muslin bundles, and Deal
brought a beautiful quilt she made to wrap the remains
from Attu Island. Helena asked Ray Hudson to assist
in preparing a weaving to add as an oering, and Ray
provided an unnished piece begun in the 1960s by
Attu weaver Anfesia Shapsniko, Ray’s teacher.
Ray added grasses from Attu, Atka, and Unalaska and
sent the weaving to the Smithsonian to be placed with
the remains for their journey home. Remains of 51
individuals from NMNH collections and 4 individuals
being repatriated by the Fish and Wildlife Service were
included for the return.
Once the remains were bundled and boxed, they
were moved to NMNH where the RO and Unangax
teams were joined by Atka President Crystal Dushkin
and students and teachers from Atka who were in
Washington for the National History Day competition.
The Atka students had won the Alaskan State
History competition with a web site project titled A
Geopolitical Frontier: The Aleutian Islands, Home of
the Unangax
People and were joining 2,600 students
and 600 teachers for the national level competition in
College Park, Maryland. The Atka students won at the
national level for their entry in the category, ‘History of
Place’. These young scholars joined museum ocials,
RO sta, and representatives and descendants to pay
nal respects to the individuals before their ight to
Anchorage.
Once the remains were in Anchorage, Helena Schmitz
coordinated with the Native Village of Atka and the
Fish and Wildlife Service, and she and her family
transported the remains to Homer where they were
Helena Schmitz, President of
Atux
Forever, and Chris Dudar,
Director of the Repatriation
Osteology Laboratory, wrap
ancestral remains for return
to the Near Islands. Used with
permission. Photo by Eric
Hollinger
Atux
Forever President Helena
Schmitz and Vice President
Theresa Deal hold the quilt Deal
made to wrap remains returning
to Attu
Attu descendants at the reburial site on Attu Island, August
17, 2023. Photo by Helena Schmitz
22 ASC Newsletter
placed with the Fish and Wildlife Service until the
Tiĝlax
was ready for the trip in August. A team led by
Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge Manager
Steve Delehanty and Deputy Refuge Manager Je
Williams coordinated the trip with FWS Archaeologist
Jeremy Karchut, Captain John Faris, and his crew.
With the remains safely on board, Tiĝlax
picked up
representatives of the Village of Atka and descendants
and representatives from Atux
Forever and traveled
four days and more than 3,000 more miles to Agattu,
Attu, and Shemya, where community members and the
FWS teams dug new graves, conducted a ceremony,
and reburied the remains. On the return trip the team
stopped at Atka where the community hosted a feast
with song and dance to honor the completion of the
repatriation.
Repatriation is an ongoing process requiring care
and cooperation. The NMNH RO is grateful to the
Fish and Wildlife Service Alaska Maritime National
Wildlife Refuge, the Native Village of Atka, and
Atux
Forever for their eorts and assistance, and
we look forward to working together in the future.
Qaĝaasakuq to all who helped.
3D REPLICATION OF THE MOTHER BEAR
HAT FOR THE TEIKWEIDI CLAN OF
ANGOON, ALASKA
By R. Eric Hollinger, Lori Collins, Jorge González
García, Travis Doering, Carolyn Thome, and Chris
Hollshwander
On the evening of November 10, 2023, Daniel
Brown, clan leader of the Teikweidi Clan of Angoon,
Alaska, as the Tlingit say, “walked into the forest.”
His passing was a great loss to his clan, family,
community, and those of us who worked with him
from as far away as Washington, D.C., and Tampa,
Florida. One of his last eorts as clan leader was
to work with a 3D digitization and replication team
from the Center for Digital Heritage and Geospatial
Information in the University of South Florida
Libraries (USF CDHGI) and the Smithsonian
Institution to make a 3D replica of one of his clan’s
crest hats for the clan to use for educational purposes.
The Mother Bear Hat (as it is called), is a sacred
ceremonial emblem called at.oow, and belongs to the
clan and has been cared for by Dan and his ancestors.
Dan had seen some of the 3D digitization and
replication work previously undertaken with Tlingit
clans by the NMNH RO, Smithsonian Exhibits, and the
Smithsonian’s Digitization Program Oce (Hollinger
et al. 2013; Hollinger 2022). At a workshop at the
2019 Sharing Our Knowledge Conference in Juneau
Dan asked the joint USF and Smithsonian team to
digitize the Mother Bear Hat in the hopes that a 3D
digital model could be created and then used to make a
physical 3D replica. Dan said that a physical replica of
the important hat would allow him to take it to schools
and other places to teach about the history of the hat,
the stories connected to it, and the workmanship of
the artists who made it. A surrogate would allow for
teaching without putting the original hat at risk, and
it could be shown in contexts where it might not be
culturally and spiritually appropriate to display the
original without it being matched by the at.oow of an
opposite moiety.
Digitization of the hat using a structured light
scanner was led by Jorge González García with the
assistance of Thome, Hollinger, Hollshwander, and
the enthusiastic participation and supervision of Dan.
Dan personally removed wooden paws to be scanned
separately and dusted the glossy black paint with corn
starch to reduce reection from the scanner and then
took a turn scanning the hat himself. The status basket
Digital modeling from 3D scanning allowed for the digital
separation of parts (González García, USF Libraries)
Letf: Dan Brown removing the paws from the hat so they
could be scanned separately. Right: USF CDHGI Travis
Doering and Jorge González García with the full-sized 3D
print
ASC Newsletter 23
rings on top of the hat were also scanned as a separate
stack. Other clan leaders gathered to encourage the
team, share stories, and discuss other at.oowoo.
After returning to Tampa, Jorge processed the digital
les to create a complete and accurate digital model.
He added color to the surface using photographs and
digitally isolated and separated the ears, individual
shell inlays, copper eyebrows, and the tacks that
anchored the eyebrows. In communication with Dan
and the USF team, the project development was
undertaken collaboratively, with Dan allowing physical
3D prints at ½ scale to be made and sent to him in
Juneau for his comparisons with the original.
Dan suggested creating a full-sized print that could be
painted to match the original and provided feedback.
The hat was too large to print as a single piece.
Jorge digitally divided it into seven parts to print
separately. The sections had to be cut away from
support structures and then fused together into on
solid base just as the original wood hat is in one main
piece. Shell inlays were removed using digital editing
to create spaces where actual shell pieces could be
inserted, and templates were made for 3D printed
inlays and eyebrow pieces to be replaced with real
materials.
Dan had hoped to cut the shell for the teeth and
other inlays and shape the copper eyebrows using
the 3D-printed versions as templates. He had also
planned to visit Washington, D.C. with his hats so the
Smithsonian could video record him discussing the
history of the hats and his clan, and he could work
together with the USF team and the Smithsonian’s
model makers to complete assembling and painting
the replica. Unfortunately, Dan’s illness worsened,
and he asked that the replica be brought to Juneau,
where it could be nished by Hollinger and Carolyn
Thome, and brought to him at the Hospital. The USF
team handed o the main print and parts to Hollinger,
and Smithsonian Exhibits generously allowed use
of their workshop in Maryland, where Hollinger and
Hollshwander cut and shaped the shell inlays and
copper eyebrows.
With all the pieces, paints and tools ready, Hollinger
and Thome hastened to Juneau and took the 3D print
to Dan’s Hospital room for him to see before the
work began. The Brown family provided a workspace
and access to the original Mother Bear Hat and the
Teikweidi’s ancient Man-Who-Married-The-Bear Hat
as references. Dan wanted the replica Mother Bear
Hat to be restored with the red paint so that it looked
more like the original hat. The original hat had a red
color similar to the paint on the Man-Who-Married-
The-Bear Hat.
Thome and Hollinger worked several long days to
paint the replica, attach the ears, copper eyebrows and
leather chin straps, and glue in abalone shell eyes,
teeth, and other inlays. Thome’s decades of experience
as an artist and Smithsonian model maker proved
invaluable as she meticulously matched the colors and
paint patterns. The 3D replica paws, just like on the
original, were attached to the replica using real metal
bolts and 3D printed nuts, allowing them to be removed
at will, just as Dan had done during the scanning.
Donated by Dan’s stepson, Charles, real human hair
was inserted into ne holes drilled into the print. Real
ermine skins were also used to top the 3D-printed
status ring stack. The new replica was nished, and
Hollinger and Thome delivered it to Dan and his family
in his hospital room three days before he passed away.
Dan was pleased with the results as his vision had been
fullled, and his last task as Brown Bear clan leader
had been completed. With the help of the Smithsonian’s
repatriation sta and model makers and the USF
Carolyn Thome uses the original Mother Bear Hat and
the Man-Who-Married-The-Bear Hat as reference while
painting the replica
The nished replica (left), next to the original (right
24 ASC Newsletter
Libraries 3D specialists, the Teikweidi clan used 21st-
century technology to make an exact replica of their
ancient clan hat as an aid to educate clan members and
others about Tlingit culture. The Smithsonian and USF
team is grateful to Dan, the Teikweidi clan, and Dan’s
family for entrusting us with this work and great honor.
Gunalchéesh hó hó.
TLINGIT GLACIER AND LAKES—A
REPARATIVE INTERVENTION
By Sasha Huber
In 2007, the 200th anniversary of the birth of Louis
Agassiz (1807–1873) was celebrated. He was not only
a famous Swiss-American glaciologist, with over 80
places named after him on our planet, and even some
on the Moon and Mars, plus seven animal species.
After emigrating from Switzerland to the USA in
1846, he became one
of the most inuential
“scientic” racists of the
19th century. Following
the theory of polygenism,
he believed that human
groups had dierent
origins and that, in the
social hierarchy, Whites
were on top and people
of color and Blacks at the
bottom. Furthermore, he
not only advocated strict
racial segregation in his
letters to Samuel Fridely
Howe of the Freedmen’s
Inquiry Commission, but
also suggested legislation
for people of color that
would “accelerate their
disappearance from the Northern States.” Agassiz’s
thoughts on “racial hierarchies” and his warnings
against “miscegenation” can be traced later in the
theories (and practices) of hard-core eugenicists,
admirers of Mussolini, Nazi propagandists of racial
hygiene, Ku-Klux-Klan activists, and contemporary
creationists.
This part of his history has mostly been passed over
in silence. In 2007, Swiss historian and political
activist Hans Fässler took the Agassiz bicentenary
as an opportunity to found the activist campaign
“Demounting Louis Agassiz”. It was aimed at
renaming the Agassizhorn peak in the Swiss Alps
(elevation 3,946 m / 12,946 ft) to “Rentyhorn”.
Renty Taylor was an enslaved man from the Congo,
whom Agassiz had ordered (with six others) in
1850 to be photographed naked on the site of his
suering, a cotton plantation in South Carolina. From
the accounts of his descendant, great-great-great
granddaughter Tamara Lanier, Renty was able to
read and was a spiritual man. This information was,
of course, not documented when photographer Josef
T. Zealy (1812–1893) was commissioned to make
these daguerreotypes, with which Agassiz attempted
to “prove” the alleged inferiority of Black people.
The renaming of the Alpine peak was intended to
honour Renty and all who endured similar fates.
Fässler then formed a “transatlantic committee” in
support of “Demounting Louis Agassiz”. I—visual
artist-researcher Sasha Huber of Swiss-Haitian
heritage based in Finland—became a committee
member. In 2008, I started to engage artistically in
the renaming eorts. First, in Switzerland with the
symbolic, reparative renaming intervention, calling
the peak “Rentyhorn”. Soon after, I continued this
work elsewhere around the globe, including Brazil,
Scotland, Switzerland (again), Aotearoa New Zealand,
Canada (twice), the USA, and most recently Alaska—
always in collaboration with local peoples and with
Hans Fässler. The whole body of work has been
exhibited and documented in the book You Name It,
published at the end of 2022, initiated by The Power
Plant Contemporary Art Gallery in Toronto and
Autograph in London.
In Alaska I was looking to make contact with the
Yakutat Tlingit Tribe to see if there was any interest
among the Clans in developing new names for the
Agassiz Glacier and the Agassiz Lakes. These are
on the traditional lands of the Kwaashki’kwaan
in the Malaspina Glacier area, in the borderlands
of southeastern Alaska and northwestern Canada,
respectively. The Agassiz Glacier was named in 1886
by William Libbey, a member of that year’s New York
Times expedition.
In 2022, I was introduced to Assistant Professor Judith
Daxootsú Ramos from the University of Alaska. She
kindly introduced me to Chief Operations Ocer K
aa
Saayí Tláa, Amanda Bremner, Cultural Heritage
Director Yéi Dika Kudaháan, Marry Knutsen, and
others. After several remote conversations, together
with my cameraman Jonathan Clabburne, we arrived
in Yaakwdáat (Yakutat) for the rst time in August
2023. I was grateful to meet some of the community in
person and to plan the journey to the glacier and lakes.
On the rst day, we were fortunate to meet Tlingit
hunter, sherman and skin sewing artist Khaách
Jeremiah James, who was interested in joining us on
the journey—the most important part of the reparative
intervention. We were able to spend half a day in good
weather conditions on the glacier, a half-hour helicopter
Huber, Tlingit Glacier
and Lakes—A reparative
intervention, lm stills, 2024
ASC Newsletter 25
ight from Yakutat. We lmed the encounter in an
incredibly beautiful landscape, and Jeremiah brought
back a ask of glacial water for the future renaming
potlatch ceremony in Yaakwdáat. Before that, the new
name will be decided and hopefully made ocial.
When that will happen is not yet clear, and it will be
announced at a later date. Until then, I will be nalizing
this short lm, which I will present as a gift to the Tribe
and show for the rst time at the next You Name It
exhibition in Sion, Switzerland, this year. Sion is in the
Valais canton, which shares the summit of Agassizhorn,
or rather Rentyhorn, with the canton of Berne.
RECLAIMING “MUTTON,” THE COAST
SALISH WOOLLY DOG
By Audrey T. Lin
Ancestral Coast Salish societies in the Pacic
Northwest kept long-haired “woolly dogs” that were
bred and cared for over millennia, as supported by
longstanding oral histories and traditional knowledge.
Dog-wool blankets were prestigious cultural
belongings, and were often blended with other
materials, including mountain goat wool, waterfowl
down, and dierent plant bers. However, the dog
wool-weaving tradition declined, and the population
was lost by the third quarter of the 19th century. This
decline in the cultural practice of dog-wool weaving
had been attributed to the
increased use of machine-
made blankets by British and
American trading companies
in the early 19th century.
However, this explanation
neglects to consider the
cultural importance of woolly
dogs, as reected through
their enduring provision by
weavers, particularly for
high-status items such as
regalia. These woven textiles
were functional but most
importantly, were spiritually
protective and transformative
within Coast Salish cultures.
Our aim was to investigate
the ancestry of the woolly
dog lineage, potential genes associated with the unique
woolly phenotype, and the reasons for the decline of
this important dog breed. To provide a cultural context
for interpreting the genomic analyses, we interviewed
seven Coast Salish Elders, Knowledge Keepers, and
wool weavers about family histories and traditional
knowledge surrounding woolly dogs. The interviewees
include several Coast Salish communities across
both sides of the border, including St:l, Squamish,
Snuneymuxw, and Musqueam Nations in British
Columbia and Suquamish and Skokomish/Twana in
Washington state.
We analyzed genomic and isotopic data from a
preserved woolly dog pelt and lower leg bones from
“Mutton,” collected in 1859, and housed in the
collections at the Smithsonian National Museum of
Natural History. We found that Mutton is the only
known example of an Indigenous North American dog
with dominant precolonial ancestry that postdated the
establishment of settler colonialism. Molecular clock
analyses that estimated the timeframe of Mutton’s
maternal lineage, suggest that his woolly dog lineage
is between ~1,800 to 4,800 years old. We found that
Mutton primarily has Indigenous North American
Map of Salish tribal areas (Courtesy of Science, the journal)
Left: Salish blanket and Mutton reconstruction of a woolly dog. (Photo by Smithsonian
NMNH). Right: Fleece of George Gibbs’ dog which he collected for the Smithsonian.
(Photo: B1 - USNM4762_201808_002 NMNH Smithsonian)
26 ASC Newsletter
dog ancestry, but also a small proportion of European
settler dog ancestry, roughly on the order of one-
great-grandparent. We detected genetic signatures of
inbreeding that is often seen in individuals that come
from small breeding populations. We also identied 28
candidate genetic variants potentially linked with the
dogs’ distinct woolly phenotype, including genes linked
to skin, hair follicle development, and unique hair
morphology such as woolly hair in humans.
Finally, we integrated these data with the ethnographic
interviews and historical information. Woolly dogs
were disappearing by the time Mutton lived with the
Smithsonian’s Northwest Coast collector, George
Gibbs. By 1857, in the St꞉l territory where Gibbs
most likely acquired Mutton, the settler population
only consisted of a few dozen people, mainly fur
traders. In 1858, more than 33,000 miners ooded
into present-day British Columbia as part of the 1858
Fraser River Gold Rush, which had set o conicts
between miners, colonial governments, and Indigenous
peoples. The partial contribution of European settler
dog ancestry in Mutton’s genome is reective of the
turbulent upheavals during this time. The loss of
woolly dog is also attributed to the loss of the human
caretakers of the dogs, due to the compounded toll
of smallpox epidemics and steady depopulation due
to infectious diseases between the 18th and 19th
centuries. Residential schools that involved the
forcible removal of children from their families and
prohibiting languages other than English had further
disrupted the transference of cultural knowledge. These
compounding waves of colonialism interrupted the
transmission of important knowledge relating to woolly
dog husbandry and wool processing, spinning, and
weaving. Contrary to what was previously thought, the
dog-wool tradition was not abandoned because of the
ready availability of important textiles. Today, Coast
Salish weavers and artists
continue to promote the
preservation of traditional
wool weaving, seen as
sacred and honoring their
ancestors.
[Editor’s note: This
research was published
as ‘The history of Coast
Salish “woolly dogs”
revealed by ancient
genomics and Indigenous
Knowledge’ in February in
Science by Audrey Lin,
Logan Kistler, and other
co-authors]
THE JOHN AND LILE GIBBONS CENTER
FOR ARCTIC STUDIES, PEARY-
MACMILLAN MUSEUM
By Bernadette Driscoll Engelstad
With a series of celebratory events, the John and Lile
Gibbons Center for Arctic Studies opened in May
2023, providing a striking new home for the Peary-
MacMillan Arctic Museum at Bowdoin College.
Sharply angular in form, the building’s exterior façade
shifts from shades of grey to somber black in the New
England sunlight. An architectural gem, the airy mass
timber-framed structure is punctuated by multi-story
glass panels that oer expansive interior and exterior
views. With two oors of exhibit space, classrooms,
an archaeology lab, sta oces, and collection
storage, the new building reects the generosity and
commitment of a multi-generational family of Bowdoin
alumni with strong family connections to Alaska.
The Museum, named for Arctic explorers/alumni,
Robert E. Peary (1856–1920) and Donald B.
MacMillan (1874–1970), was founded in 1967 with an
initial donation of over 1,000 objects and an extensive
collection of photographs from Donald and Miriam
MacMillan. Guided by Director Susan A. Kaplan and
Curator Genevieve Lemoine, the museum holdings
currently contain over 41,000 artifacts, photographs,
archival media, and contemporary work by Inuit,
Iñupiat, and Yup’ik artists.
In addition to highlighting artifacts from the Peary and
MacMillan expeditions, the rst-oor gallery presents
Inuit hunting equipment and domestic items showing
diverse regional styles of ulus, snow goggles, stone
lamps, fur and skin clothing, dressed dolls and incised
ivory carvings—all under the watchful eyes of Arctic
wildlife exhibited on the ledge above. This gathering
Left: The new Peary-MacMillan Museum at Bowdoin College. Right: Peary-MacMillan
director Susan Kaplan traveling with some illustrious passengers! Photo by B.D. Engelstad
ASC Newsletter 27
of a full-size walrus, polar bear, musk-oxen, caribou,
seals, fox, and waterfowl comprises an impressive
treat for visitors, young and old. A kiosk showing
video interviews with students and faculty underscores
Bowdoin’s ongoing projects and collaborative work
with Inuit researchers across the North.
The expansive third-oor gallery showcases the work
of contemporary Inuit, Iñupiat and Yup’ik artists
with prominent displays of carved masks, painted
skin and beaded clothing, embroidered tapestries and
contemporary sculpture, prints and drawings. A major
gift by California art collectors Robert and Judith
Toll in 2009, complemented by other recent donations,
has established a solid foundation of contemporary
art by Inuit artists from across the Canadian Arctic.
The sculpture by Michael Massie portraying the
mythical gure Koodlapoodlalook—commissioned as
a memorial tribute to Maine artist Bryce Muir—and
the exuberant Sedna relief carving by Kinngait artist,
Oviloo Tunnillie, are only two of the many masterful
works on exhibit.
The inaugural exhibition, Inuit Qinigaani:
Contemporary Inuit Photography, curated by Iñupiat
photographer Brian Adams emphasizes the museum’s
eort to further strengthen connections with artists
and cultural leaders across the North. Individually and
collectively, the works of these ve photographers—
Jenny Irene Miller (Alaska), Jennie Williams
(Labrador), Niore Iqalukjuak (Kangiqtugaapik/Clyde
River, Nunavut), Minik Bidstrip (Greenland), and
Brian Adams (Alaska)—oer a provocative link to
the archival media on display, thoughtfully juxtaposing
historical events and contemporary images across the
Arctic.
Already the John and Lile Gibbons Arctic Studies
Center has served as an important site for international
meetings and conferences related to Arctic issues.
Moreover, the museum website oers virtual visitors
detailed descriptions of current research projects as
well as a unique opportunity to explore the collection
by subject matter or key word. On a decidedly
humorous note, the webpage, “Where in the World
are Robert E. Peary and Matthew A. Henson”, reports
on the tiny crafted gures of Admiral Peary and
Matthew Henson who are known to accompany sta
and alumni on expeditions at home and abroad.
CAMBRIDGE BAY’S KUUGALAK CULTURAL
CAMPUS
By Brendan Griebel
Pitquhirnikkut Ilihautiniq / Kitikmeot Heritage Society
(PI/KHS) is an Inuit-directed cultural center based
in Cambridge Bay, Nunavut, and project partner of
the Smithsonian’s Arctic Studies Center. In 2021, the
organization launched a program titled Nunamiutuqaq
to better understand how Inuit vernacular architecture
and environmental values can inform energy-ecient
infrastructure in the North. Over the last century, Arctic
infrastructure—from buildings to land development and
energy grids—has heavily relied on concepts imported
from the South, leaving little space for Inuit and local
populations to express their priorities and knowledge
for the creation of living, learning and working
environments. Nunamiutuqaq, meaning “Building from
the Land” in the Inuinnaqtun language, aims to explore
how longstanding Inuit understandings of sustainability,
which emphasize coherence and respect between human
and natural environments, can be seamlessly integrated
into contemporary Arctic communities.
The Nunamiutuqaq project has resulted in the
creation of Kuugalak, a 2550 sq. meter language
and cultural immersion
campus in Cambridge Bay
that combines indoor and
outdoor facilities, highly
customized workspaces
and equipment, and
experimental landscaping
with local plant species
for climate adaptation,
nutrition, and cultural use.
The name Kuugalak refers
to the waterway adjacent
to the campus site; one
that local Elders say used
to run wide and deep, but
which was reduced to a
small creek due to climate
change. With a dual focus on
Left: The second oor gallery looking down on rst oor exhibits. Right: Inuit art from
across the North American Arctic. Photo by Bernadette Driscoll Engelstad
28 ASC Newsletter
climate adaptation and cultural revitalization, the new
campus will draw from deep reserves of Inuit and local
knowledge to foster innovation and enable knowledge
and connection to landscape to once more ow deeply
through the community.
In the fall of 2023, PI/KHS reached a major milestone
in this project through the construction of a pilot 1300
sq. foot cultural workspace on the property. Designs
for the building were drafted by local Elders based on
physical memories of living in igluit and tupiit (skin
tent) structures, incorporating their traditional strategies
for light and
temperature,
circulation
of air and
venting,
and spatial
aordances
for specic
cultural
activities.
Key design
considerations
include the
addition
of culturally-aligned ooring, with
dierential heat and surface material
distribution to accommodate warm,
soft areas for sewing and oor-
based activities, and cooler, hard
surfaces for meat butchering and
skin preparation. The building’s
storage strategies mimic iglu
entrance/vestibule designs with cold-
trapping characteristics, allowing for
skins, food, and tools to be cooled
by outdoor air to their respective,
optimal temperature proles. Most
importantly, the building was created to physically
t Inuit. With interior design led by Nicole Luke,
Canada’s rst professionally accredited Inuk architect,
the space’s xture heights, furniture and equipment
have been entirely customized by local Elders and
cultural producers to maximize the comfort and
eciency of those occupying and using the space.
As much as this building is a testament to old ways,
it is also a monument to the future of Inuit culture.
Climate change is an escalating concern in the
Canadian Arctic, an area that sees the onset of change
happening at rates between three and four times
more rapidly than elsewhere in the world. Through
partnership with the Green Building Technology
Access Center at the Southern Alberta Institute of
Technology, PI/KHS is positioning Kuugalak to
become the rst net-zero targeted construction project
in the Canadian Arctic. The space draws much of
its electric power from a large photovoltaic awning
and window system, designed to absorb heat during
cooler months when the sun is low, and prevent
passive solar heat buildup during warmer summer
months of 24-hour sunshine. The entire structure is
built from mold and re-proof modular paneling,
whose insulative value reduces energy needs by
roughly 1/3 of traditional builds in Nunavut. Over
the next two years, Kuugalak will become a testing
ground to explore local ideas for energy islanding,
which uses distributed renewable energy
and battery storage systems that can operate
independently of the community’s diesel-
fueled power grid. Arctic energy islanding has
become increasingly important with the onset
of extreme weather events and climate change,
as it provides a means to continue operations,
backup data, and generate warmth and light
during periods of primary grid failure, leading
to greater sovereignty and resilience in local
communities.
In terms of
wider research
applications,
Kuugalak was
designed for
scalability and
replicability across
the North. To date,
there is very little
documentation as
to what building
materials,
technologies and
strategies are
eective in Arctic
climates. The new
structure’s performance is accordingly monitored to
produce a robust body of data to better understand the
impacts of building typology, system, and material
selection. With dozens of sensors providing real-
time data on performance in areas such as thermal
transfer, water usage, electrical consumption,
room temperature and humidity management; and
envelope/wall systems, the team is able to observe
the building's real-time and long-term adjustments to
changes in weather, occupancy and its surrounding
landscape, drawing closer to Inuit understandings of
built environments and animate spaces. Six families
in Cambridge Bay have volunteered their own houses
for additional monitoring, helping the team build
comparative information across multiple dierent
building, electrical, and mechanical types.
Top: Kuugalak’s Elder design committee overseeing
the unloading of construction materials. Bottom: The
Kuugalak workshop under construction. Photo by
Margaret Thompson Photography
ASC Newsletter 29
As a community-led, designed, and built project,
Kuugalak serves as an important case study in how
Arctic knowledge and capacity can be partnered
with modern materials and technologies to innovate
at the intersection of architectural design, energy
sustainability and cultural production. The campus
plans to initiate its comprehensive programing schedule
in March of 2024 with the delivery of daily, free
public workshops relating to language, culture, and
environmental sustainability. Additional information
about the campus and its construction—including
progress reports, monitoring results, and open-access
research data—can be found on its website.
REFLECTIONS ON A CONFERENCE AND
VISIT TO THE NEW BEDFORD WHALING
MUSEUM
By Stephen Loring and Igor Krupnik
In March 2023, at the kind invitation of Naomi Slipp,
Chief Curator of the New Bedford Whaling Museum,
Igor Krupnik and Stephen Loring were invited to a
symposium titled The Wider World and Scrimshaw, in
anticipation of an exhibit with the same name to open
at the museum in 2024. The curatorial and exhibition
sta at the museum convened the symposium with 12
invited speakers to bring together researchers familiar
with the cultures and artifacts of the Indigenous peoples
of the Pacic Rim and the encounter they had with the
19th-century New England whalers. In characterizing
the symposium and the future exhibition, Dr. Slipp
wrote, “Wider World aims to radically redene settler
colonial notions of scrimshaw to encompass the broad
global traditions of ivory carving across the Pacic
Rim that sat in conversation with, inuenced, and
were inuenced by Yankee scrimshaw.” An eclectic
gathering of anthropologists, museum professionals
and art historians spoke about the interactions and
inuences of the Yankee whalers—and the economic
and socio-political changes they forecasted—on
indigenous communities in Hawaii, New Zealand, and
the Arctic coasts of Siberia and Alaska as revealed (for
the most part) by worked “ivory” objects, mostly of
sperm whale teeth, walrus, and fossil mammoth tusks.
In his presentation, “From talisman to trinket: ivory
art and industry in the Bering Straits,” Stephen Loring
contrasted the world views of Yupik, Chukchi, and
Inupiat and the centrality of their all-encompassing
rapport and respect for the animals who shared their
ancestral homelands, with that of expanding Western/
Global economic inuences. Some indications of
the pervasiveness of change were apparent in the
emergence of ivory carvings—trinkets, souvenirs,
cribbage boards—created for an export market in
the wake of the 19th-century whalers, prospectors
and government administrators that stand in stark
contrast to earlier charms and amulets and the narrative
accounts on
ivory bow-drills.
Igor’s paper,
“The Bering Sea
Meeting/Market
Place: Making
‘Hybrid Arts’
and Trading It,”
addressed the
unique status of
the (northern)
Bering Sea-
Bering Strait
region as
a historical
‘crossroads’ of
peoples, cultures,
and artistic forms, styles, and traditions. It was also the
area where, since time immemorial, people had access
to ample resource materials for making art, such as
walrus tusks and teeth, animal skins, baleen, animal
bone, grasses, and driftwood. Thanks to extensive
work by archaeologists since the 1920s, we know
of two dierent traditions of aboriginal walrus ivory
carving, one featuring 2D engraved images and the
other excelling in 3D sculptural forms, often lavishly
ornamented.
During the late pre-contact era (1500–1800 CE) both
artistic traditions evolved to being highly symbolic in
imagery, laconic in style, and following established
image canons. When American whalers arrived at
the Bering Strait in the 1850s, they introduced a very
dierent tradition of ‘scrimshaw’ carving, one that
was detail-rich, naturalistic in style, with high image
density, and generally mimicking European popular
painting of the time. Thus, the history of the contact-
era interactions in the Northern Bering Sea included
An early rendering of the Kuugalak campus site
Loring and Krupnik beside the NBWM
life-size model of a blue whale heart
30 ASC Newsletter
Indigenous artists who made their living
by producing new types of Native art for
sale to museums and tourists.
Prior to the formal symposium the
conference participants were invited to
briey tour a carefully selected group
of objects selected by Michael Dyer,
Curator of Maritime History, that spoke
to the world-wide range of the whaling
industry whose participants brought
back objects from far-away peoples
and cultures—and to the incredible
diversity of the Whaling Museum’s
holdings, including unique objects and
curiosities that predate the systematic
collecting activities of anthropologists.
One such object, a large whale vertebrae
carved in a tradition of Northwest
Coast iconography caught the attention
of the Smithsonian anthropologists
for it’s striking similarity to a well-
known photograph of Frederick True
(1858–1914), a prominent Smithsonian
naturalist holding a similar specimen.
The chance encounter with the New
Bedford Whaling Museum’s specimen
is featured in the following account
by Stephen Godfrey, Curator of
Paleontology at the Calvert Marine
Museum in Solomons, Maryland, which
appeared in The Ecphora (Vol.38 #3,
September 2023), the newsletter of
the Calvert Marine Museum Fossil
Club, and here, slightly edited with
permission:
“…pictured is Dr. Frederick W. True,
mammologist at the National Museum of Natural
History, The Smithsonian Institution. True rst
came to the Smithsonian as a clerk for the U.S. Fish
Commission in 1878. In 1881, he became the acting
curator of mammals and a librarian and in 1897
advanced to Head Curator of Biology. Later, he served
as Assistant Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution
from 1911, until his death on June 25, 1914. He was the
rst person who could be termed a curator of marine
mammals at the Smithsonian because he studied both
living and fossil baleen whales. In August, I [Stephen
Godfrey] sent an email to Leslie Overstreet (Curator
of Natural-History Rare Books) at the Smithsonian
describing my interest in trying to nd the whale
vertebra that True was holding. Notice that it had been
carved into a stylized raven. Apparently, that vertebra
has been missing for many years…but wouldn’t it be
great to nd it? Thanks to Leslie, my initial inquiry was
not only bringing ‘guns, germs, and steel’ (and liquor!)
and commercial overhunting of whales and walruses,
but also trade in manufactured goods in exchange
for Native products, such as baleen, walrus tusks,
decorated ivory, and emerging ‘tourist’ art.
In this ‘arts in contact’ situation, both sides borrowed,
copied, and traded each other’s art forms; they also
created new ‘hybrid’ art products, such as ornamented
cribbage boards, paper knives, bracelets, napkin rings,
but also more ‘Native style’ objects, like lavishly
ornamented ivory pipes and small human gurines—the
famous ‘billikens.’ As Igor argued, this remarkable story
of cultural interaction at the Bering Strait crossroads
included early anthropologists and museum collectors
(who favored more ‘traditional looking’ forms), the
burgeoning souvenir trade in Indigenous objects and
frontier curios out of the city of Nome (after 1898),
and the emergence of highly professionalized local
Clockwise: far left is Northwest Coast Mortar (Tlingit). 2001.100.2221: Gift
of the Kendall Whaling Museum. Photograph courtesy New Bedford Whaling
Museum. Top right: Smithsonian naturalist Frederick True (1858–1914)
holding a similar specimen; middle right: a Bering Strait walrus ivory harpoon
rest from Smithsonian collections; lower right: Detail of Inuit “scrimshaw”
drillbow art, SI-45020
ASC Newsletter 31
cc’d and forwarded until it caught the attention of Dr.
Stephen Loring, Archaeologist in the Department of
Anthropology at the Smithsonian. His response was:
'Like yourself, and others, I too have wondered where
this object d’art might have wandered o to. It doesn’t
appear to be in the Smithsonian collections, but I do
have an abiding faith in the permanence of material
objects and suspect it is somewhere. Somewhere
obscure. Imagine my delight earlier this summer
when visiting the New Bedford Whaling Museum, I
was shown a NWC (Northwest Coast) carved whale
vertebrae that—for a moment—I thought might be
the lost Frederick True specimen. But alas it is not,
although I am pleased to see that there are at least
two similar versions of the same theme/idea. The
New Bedford specimen was fashioned as a tobacco
humidor and appears to be an eagle rather than a
raven. Sadly, the New Bedford Museum specimen had
been acquired at an auction and comes with next to no
provenience information.'
Both Michael Dyer (Curator of Maritime History
at the New Bedford Whaling Museum) and Emma
Rocha (Curatorial Assistant) provided the following
information on the carved whale vertebra in their
collection:
'Northwest Coast Mortar (Tlingit), c. 1800–1900.
Whale vertebra, 6.1 x 10.5 x 9.75 in. (15.6 x 26.7 x
24.8 cm.). Fashioned in the traditional manner; carved
in the form of a bird's head, and incised/carved with
a stylized human face and octopus tentacle/sucker
motif. Whale vertebra (either neck vertebra of some
larger species or spinal vertebra of an orca). Probably
intended for grinding tobacco, it is fashioned in the
traditional manner from a neck vertebra of a gray
whale. The dominant image is a thunderbird head
that, when the mortar is place upside down, becomes
the head of a wolf or fox. It also has a stylized human
face and octopus-tentacle suckers. Mortars of this
kind were made from the neck and spinal vertebrae of
gray whales and orcas. Analogous mortars were also
gouged out of stone. Interestingly with respect to the
carved decorations, this specimen is right-side-up when
it is placed bowl-side-up for use and is also right-side-
up when inverted for storage.'
As of winter 2024, we have not heard yet about the
progress of the exhibit for which we attended this
inspirational symposium on the cultural interactions
between Yankee whalers and Indigenous whaling nations
across the Pacic. But exhibits commonly take longer
time to prepare than is initially thought. Meantime, we
are considering another joint visit to the New Bedford
Whaling Museum in 2024 to continue our explorations
of its vast holdings related to the Arctic.
EMMANUEL KORNELIUSSEN AND THE 2023
DELMARVA PADDLER RETREAT
By Kenneth Michael Hamilton
Bridging the divides of time and culture, a few hundred
qajaq paddlers in the United States have created a
means by which the ancient qajaqing technologies
and techniques of Greenland (Kalaallit Nunaat) are
preserved, propagated, and practiced locally. Please
note that qajaq refers to a hunting craft of traditional
construction; kayak refers to a qajaq-like craft of
modern materials (qajariaq).
Qajaq USA is a nonprot membership organization
that is ocially recognized by Qaannat Kattuat,
the Greenland Qajaqing Association. Committed to
supporting the preservation, study and promotion of
traditions and techniques of qajaqing, Qajaq USA
holds regional events in Delaware, Florida, New
York, Michigan, Minnesota, and Washington. Events
oer paddle skills classes (rolling, rescues, strokes,
harpoon throwing) and workshops including paddle
carving and qajaq building. The Delmarva Paddlers
Retreat is a Qajaq USA event which occurs annually
on Rehoboth Bay in Lewes, DE. In October 2023,
85 paddlers participated in the 34th annual gathering.
In addition to learning and practicing new paddling
skills, this year’s paddle carving workshop produced
nine new paddles and the qajaq build workshop
constructed ve West Greenland, two Aleutian Iqyax
and one King Island qajaq.
The theme of this year’s event was “Giving Credit
Where Credit is Due.” To achieve this goal, we had two
objectives: 1) retell the story to the newest generation
of paddlers of how a qajaq from Illorsuit, Greenland
became the inspiration for the design of what would
ultimately become the modern production sea kayak and
2) highlight and thank the man who built that qajaq.
In short, here’s the story of the birth of the modern sea
kayak. In 1959, Emmanuel Korneliussen of Illorsuit
Island built two qajaq frames: one for Ken Taylor, a
visiting Scottish Anthropology student at the University
of Glasgow and one for historian John Heath of Texas.
After a successful and popular series of demonstrations
in Scotland, Taylor left the qajaq with friends Joe
Reid and Duncan Winning and moved to the United
States. In 1964, Duncan Winning measured the qajaq
and produced a line drawing which was later used by
Geo Blackford to make a plywood version named
the “Anas Acuta” (Northern Pintail). Carel Quaife
and Alan Byde adapted the design to berglass and
then sold the design to Frank Goodman of Valley
Canoe Products, Nottingham, England. The berglass
Valley Anas Acuta was very popular and is still sold
32 ASC Newsletter
today. Valley and other manufacturers used the Anas as
inspiration and created a diverse array of kayak designs
and the modern recreational sea kayak industry was
born. This was not the only path of kayak evolution,
but it is generally agreed to be the predominant one.
In 2004, Ken Taylor visited the Delmarva event and
brought a qajaq which he had recently built using the
survey drawing by Winning (the original Korneliussen
qajaq is in the Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum in
Scotland). He told the story of how he commissioned
Korneliussen to build the 1959
qajaq and his experiences
while in Greenland. Before his
passing in 2019, Taylor, with
the help of his long-time friend
Vernon Doucette, chronicled
his Greenland experience in a
Wordpress article.
This year, we invited
Paninnguaq Korneliussen, the
granddaughter of Emmanuel
Korneliussen, to attend our retreat and tell us more
about her aataa (grandfather). Through sharing
photographs and telling stories, Paninnguaq helped
the audience get to know more about the man whose
contribution formed the genesis of modern kayaking.
Further, she helped us to see that the qajaq means a
great deal to the Inuit, both culturally and spiritually.
Serendipitously, participant Mark Heateld of Virginia
had just nished building a replica frame of the
Korneliussen design prior to the retreat. Paninnguaq,
Mark and Peter Strand held a skinning demonstration
to complete the qajaq and in doing so, Paninnguaq
followed in the footsteps of generations of Inuit women.
Having only been in a qajaq twice before, once as
a child, which manifested in a frightful experience,
and once more recently as an adult, Paninnguaq was
reluctant to try it again. After encouragement and with
some guidance, Paninnguaq paddled the qajaq, even
learning to lay on the water in a balance brace!
Paninnguaq also reported that she had complicated
feelings about using a qajaq for a recreational purpose
as qajaqs are held as sacred in her heart, especially
due to her grandfather. After seeing other participants
learning and practicing the ancient maneuvers and
witnessing the respect that we give to qajaqs and
the Inuit who created them, she said that she now
understands why we do what we do. As to whether
she is comfortable with it remains to be seen; she is
still working through these complex intellectual and
emotional issues. Are we appropriating or
appreciating?
Paninnguaq helped us to see that this story
begins with the Inuit, not the European white
man. She is justied in feeling both proud of
her heritage and angry at those who benet
from it at the expense of the Inuit. We will
continue to celebrate and help preserve a slice
of her cultural heritage and do it in a way that
is respectful, caring and
gives credit where credit
is due. While recognizing
that kayaking comes from a
place of necessity, hunting
and migration, we must also
recognize that kayaking
meets the modern need for
recreation, spirituality and
growth.
By the way, the Inuit
word for “thank you”
is “qujanaq.” Qujanaq,
Emmanuel Korneliussen!
MY HERITAGE, MY AATAANNGUA, AND
THE WORLD
By Paninnguaq
First, I would like to thank Igor Krupnik and William
Fitzhugh, for this opportunity to tell my story, and
Mike Hamilton, who invited me to give a talk at the
Delmarva Qajaq Event.
Second, I would like to recognize my heritage, and
foremost, my family heritage. I would not be here
without their lives hard work and, and for that I am
forever grateful.
My mother Birthe was born in Illorsuit (Uummannaq)
in 1956, one of nine siblings. Her mother died when
she was about ve and left her dad at a very young age
to become a “kiaq”(domestic helper) for the local
store manager. Of the nine siblings, only three are still
alive. Rudo, 70, my mom, 67, and Lars, 64. The two
Top: Group shot. Photo by Peter Gengler.
Bottom: Paninnguaq sewing boat cover. Photo by
Mark Heateld
ASC Newsletter 33
brothers live in a small village in Tasiusaq, a village
located north part of Greenland near Upernavik. They
are both shermen and risk their lives every day to
provide for their families.
My mom’s life was marked by her early struggles, but
she managed to get an education and eventually had a
very happy life. She now lives in Faroe Islands with her
husband and is retired. She never knew how much an
impact her father had before I, by a coincidence, found
his name in a paper written by a Scottish man named
Cameron Taylor. Little did I know how much an
impact my granddad had to the whole qajariaq world;
little did I know that someday I would be invited to the
USA to talk about him.
My memories of
my grandfather
have always been
very clear. His
warmth and lovable
person were my
safe space. I still
remember the smell
of his cigars. I had
him in my life for
a very short period,
and yet he meant a
lot to me. We never
spoke to each other,
partly because of a
brain hemorrhage
in the early 60’s.
But somehow, we
understood each
other. I visited him
at the elder’s home
when my mom
was at work and
spent time with
him. I asked him
questions without
expecting answers.
Oh, I wish he knew
how much he meant
to the world.
His life story
wasn’t easy and
was marked by the
fact that he came
from a home where he lost his father when he was three
and had to move from Upernavik to Illorsuit, maybe
because of better hunting conditions, or maybe just to
start over again. He ended up being a foster child to
some family relatives.
He was born in Upernavik in 1906, with his mother
Karen, father Hans Ole, with his two other brothers
Joas and Ludvig. (We have no information about
other siblings). He lived a life as a hunter for years,
married and had children. Then his wife died, making
him a widower with six children. We don’t even have
a picture of her. Then he married again and had three
more kids my two uncles and my mother.
There was a story in the family about a white man who
came to Illorsuit in the late 1960’s and stayed for a
year, and that my grandfather Emmanuel made a qajaq
for him. They didn’t know why this qajaq was made,
but maybe Emmanuel needed some income. Cameron
promised to write him a letter, but maybe because of
miscommunication
this didn’t happen.
Emmanuel
continued to live
his life in Illorsuit
as a hunter, using
a qajaq to provide
for his children. But
in the early 1960’s
he had a stroke
that paralyzed his
right side, and he
lost his speech. He
ended up having his
children taken away
from him, and after
that an accident
resulted in his arm
being amputated.
He then moved
to the elder home
in Uummannaq.
All this time, he
never knew that his
qajaq made a huge
dierence for a lot
of people around
the world. Without
his knowledge,
some white men
used the qajaq’s
measurements to
make benets for
themselves, without
giving him a voice,
without letting him know how much an inuence he
had given to the history of the modern qajariaq around
the world.
Why shouldn’t he be credited for his work? Why
didn’t his name ever make it to the wider world? I
Left: Paninnguaq. Center: Me and my aataa Emmanuel Korneliussen.
Right: Emmanuell Korneliussen
My mom with her brothers, when they met each other again after 30 years
apart
34 ASC Newsletter
asked Cameron
Taylor if he’d ever
reached out to
him, and he did.
But Emmanuel’s
conditions
prevented him
from making
contact, because
of his location,
misunderstandings,
and not able to
speak English, or
even Kalaallisut.
But this should
never be an
obstacle for giving
him the credit he
deserves. When I
saw the impact of
his work and told
my family about
how this Anas Acuta (Taylor’s name for the qajaq) had
an impact on the world, I was angry. I was very sad that
he never knew how his lifework wasn’t credited. I knew
how hard his life had been, and maybe it could have
been easier; maybe his children wouldn’t have left, and
he could have been living in Illorsuit until his death.
He died in Uummannaq in 1988, surrounded by some of
his children, and me. I asked my mother who worked at
the hospital if she could wake him up, because I didn’t
want him to sleep anymore. I kissed him goodbye,
and that is the last memory I have of him. The funny
thing is, that every single step I’ve been taking in my
education was for him, to do his life story justice. To
make him matter for more than me and my family. I
never thought of him as a man who just survived, I saw
him as a man who made a huge sacrice for himself
to give a better opportunity for his children. He didn’t
have an education. But that was never an obstacle. He
was a humble man with a disability and could not speak,
but always had a smile on his face, lived his life with
huge losses, and tried his best his best to keep his family
together, but failed. And that is okay. Or was it? Could
things have been dierent if he, and the rest of the world
knew him as I did? Would you ever consider who this
Inuk man was from Cameron Taylor’s writing if I had
not contacted him? Should his name have been forgotten
along with his huge impact on qajariaq world?
I never saw him as a man who couldn’t do much,
but more as a human being with only love for his
surroundings. I loved to sit close to him and smell his
cigar-smelling clothes and loved his laugh. He could
laugh without a sound and smiled at every person
near him. I loved how he always oered me sweets
without my mom’s knowledge. And that is my heritage.
My heritage has taken me to the USA. He made me
travel more than 1,000 kilometers to give him voice
again. Me, Paninnguaq Korneliussen granddaughter
of Emmanuel Korneliussen, who has a voice, speaks
multiple languages, is fortunate enough to have an
education, so I can give him the voice he lost. I am
forever grateful to have this kind of heritage, that
my history did make a change to the world. I could
not be prouder of my last name and my Aataanngua
Emmanuel. The question is, can you give him the credit
he needed, not because out of pity, but because of
respect for him and for his legacy in the western world.
NARWHAL RESEARCH OF THE GLOBAL
STAGE
By Martin Nweeia
I2I, the integrated knowledge model combining
science and Inuit knowledge was discussed at
three global conference venues by Dr. Martin
Nweeia. The new method and approach for teaching
science was announced at COP-28 in Dubai at the
Technology Hub and at the Innovation Center for
Dubai’s Electricity and Water Authority. Based on six
modules: Knowing, Observing, Change, Adaptation,
Sustainability, and Gratitude, Nweeia’s research in
the high Arctic of Canada and Greenland has brought
Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit (way of knowing) and Isuma
(thinking) to the forefront of educational models. The
Gratitude module was part of the opening remarks for
the Harvard Business and Salata Institute Forum at
COP-28, and the Sustainability pillar was the focus of
Nweeia’s comments at the Harvard-Crossroads Summit
and 2030 Vision in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
The research value and input from Inuit Knowledge is
the focus of a newly released article from Dr. Nweeia
in the Journal Annual Reviews of Animal Biosciences
entitled ‘Biology and Cultural Importance of the
Narwhal’. Among the noted ndings are the rst vocal
recordings of narwhal sound les demonstrating a
unique characteristic of cetacean’s ability to carry a
low frequency sound on a high frequency wave to
create directed sound. The second result compares the
homologous unique dentinal tubules found in narwhal
with those in the Miocene Odobenocetopsidea housed
at the Smithsonian. A third signicant nding helps
to explain the unusual exibility of the narwhal tusk,
able to bend and ex 12 degrees in all directions over a
6-foot section. Descriptions of the mineral to collagen
ratios in narwhal dentine, help explain the Inuit
observation of a tusk that is exible and bendable while
swimming.
Paninnguaq practicing a balance
brace. Photo by Mark Heateld
ASC Newsletter 35
Reference
Christmas, M.J., Kaplow, I.M., Genereux, D.P., Dong,
M.X., Hughes, G.M., Li, X., Sullivan, P.F., Hindle,
A.G., Andrews, G., Armstrong, J.C. and Bianchi,
M., and Zoonomia Consortium‡including Dr. Martin
Nweeia, 2023. Evolutionary constraint and innovation
across hundreds of placental mammals. Science,
380(6643), p.eabn3943.
THE THRESHOLD AT WHICH SNOW STARTS
DISAPPEARING
By Zoë Schlanger (excepted from The Atlantic, 12
January 2024)
In January 2024, at long last, someone has gured
out a formula of sorts for how snow reacts to climate
change, and the answer is: It reacts nonlinearly…
In a paper published Wednesday in the journal
Nature, two Dartmouth researchers report nding a
distinctly nonlinear relationship between increasing
winter temperatures and declining snowpacks. And
they identify a “snow loss cli”—an average winter-
temperature threshold below which snowpack is
largely unaected, but above which things begin to
change fast.
That threshold is 17 degrees Fahrenheit. Remarkably,
80 percent of the Northern Hemisphere’s snowpack
exists in far-northern, high-altitude places that, for now,
on average, stay colder than that. There, the snowpack
seems to be healthy and stable, or even increasing.
But as a general rule, when the average winter
temperature exceeds 17 degrees (–8 degrees Celsius),
snowpack loss begins, and accelerates dramatically
with each additional degree of warming…80 percent
of the Northern Hemisphere’s snowpack exists in far-
northern, high-altitude places that, for now, on average,
stay colder than that. There, the snowpack seems to be
healthy and stable, or even increasing.
Already, millions of people who rely on the snowpack
for water live in places that have crossed that threshold
and will only get hotter. “A degree beyond that might
take away 5 to 10 percent of the snowpack, then the
next degree might cut away 10 to 15 percent, then 15
to 20 percent.” Alexander Gottlieb, the rst author on
the paper, told me…“Once you get around the freezing
point…you can lose almost half of your snow from just
an additional degree of warming.”
Gottlieb and his co-author, Justin Mankin, gured
this out by looking at how changes in temperature and
precipitation drove changes in snowpack in 169 river
basins across the Northern Hemisphere from 1981
through 2020. Using machine learning, they found a
clear signal that human-induced climate change was
indeed forcing changes in the snowpack in the places
where most people live. The sharpest declines were in
the watersheds of the southwestern and northeastern
United States, and in Central and Eastern Europe.
“In places where we are able to identify this really
clear signal that climate change has reduced spring
snowpack, we expect that to really only accelerate in
the near term,” he said. “Those are places where the
train has already kind of left the station.”
Hydrologists already worry about the future reliability
of the region’s snow-fed water supply. Previous
research found snowless winters in the Mountain
West are likely to be a regular occurrence by mid-
century. But crucially, Gottlieb doesn’t see any room
for cheerfulness about individual years with o-the-
chart snowfall, such as last year’s record snowpack
in the Colorado River basin. “This work really shows
that we can denitely still get these one-o anomaly
years that are incredibly wet, incredibly snowy, but
the long-term signal is incredibly clear”. Once you’re
over the cli, there’s no going back. The snow will
keep disappearing.
AMERICAN CENTER FOR MONGOLIAN
STUDIES CELEBRATES ITS 20th
ANNIVERSARY WITH A NEW STRATEGIC
PLAN
By Paula T. DePriest, Charles Krusekopf, and William
Fitzhugh
In 2024 the American Center for Mongolian Studies
Celebrates (ACMS) is celebrating the 20th Anniversary
of the opening of its permanent oce in Ulaanbaatar.
Over the past 20 years the ACMS has raised over $6
million to support a wide range of programs aimed
at building capacity and the Mongolian Studies
Martin Nweeia addressing questions following his
presentation at the COP-28 climate conference in Dubai.
36 ASC Newsletter
community through support for individual scholars,
research, dissemination, resource development,
training, cultural and physical heritage documentation
and preservation, and partnerships. To support the
continued development of the organization and eld
of Mongolian Studies, the ACMS has developed a
Strategic and Operational Plan to guide institutional
priorities and activities for the period 2023-25, with the
intention to continue to review and update this plan on
an annual basis. The Plan was developed by consultants
Simon & Associates with support from the Council of
American Overseas Research Centers (CAORC),
a private, not-for-prot association of centers that
research, conserve, and record cultural heritage and
modern societies.
To support the development of the new Strategic Plan,
Simon & Associates led a membership and stakeholder
survey, interviews with key stakeholders, and a
comprehensive review of the organization. The survey
had 139 respondents, 25% identifying as university
faculty, 20% as general researchers, 16% graduate of
post-doctoral students, and 4% undergraduate students,
with the remaining 35% selecting “other.” The survey
results reinforced the need for focus in three areas—
providing connection for researchers, maintaining a
strong online library, and oering logistical support
on the ground in Mongolia. Among all respondents
the most pressing barrier to undertaking research in
Mongolia was the lack of funding. However, Graduate
and Undergraduate Students were more likely to
cite lack of contacts or connections as a barrier, and
for those who chose “Other”, the primary issue was
language barriers, both in terms of their own skills and
lack of qualied translators on the ground.
The Strategic and Operational Plan endorsed
the current mission of the ACMS to support the
development of Mongolian Studies and academic
exchanges with Inner Asia through the development
of academic resources, student and research support
and the fostering of academic partnerships in all elds
of study related to Mongolia. The Plan’s vision for
the ACMS was becoming a leading institution for
Mongolian Studies, recognized for its contributions
to scholarship, cross-cultural understanding, and
sustainable development in Mongolia.
The following near-term goals were highlighted in the
Strategic Plan:
• Increase member engagement in all aspects of the
ACMS
• Reconstitute an active Board which meaningfully
participates in all aspects of the ACMS
• Diversify revenue streams to ensure long-term
viability and the ability to meet the organization’s
mission.
• Build an organizational structure which supports
the core administrative and programmatic needs of
the ACMS and promotes employee engagement.
To nalize the plan
and clearly dene a
set of initiatives and
goals that enable the
organization to meet its mission for many years to
come, the ACMS hosted, and Simon & Associates
facilitated, a Strategic and Operational Plan Retreat,
October 28–29, 2023, in-person at the Edward B. Bunn
S.J. Intercultural Center (ICC), Georgetown University,
and on-line via Zoom. At least 47 individuals
participated in the two-day retreat. The group
was excited about the potential for the ACMS but
recognized that there is a lack of awareness about its
overall mission, breadth of service oerings, and vision
for the future. The group also realized that additional
fundraising is necessary to fully meet the needs of the
stakeholder groups the ACMS serves. Foundational
work needs to be done on a number of fronts—
membership database cleanup, bylaw renement, donor
list creation, external relationship building, physical
infrastructure improvements in the Ulaanbaatar oce,
and technological enabling.
ACMS strategic planning
workshop zoom participants.
Photo by Adam Simons
ASC Newsletter 37
The Retreat group identied three initiatives as the next
steps:
1.Membership Engagement—Use new software to
reestablish our membership list (led by Isaac Hart,
ACMS Resident Director)
2. Board 2.0—Establish a Nomination Committee
and receive suggestions and nominations from the
group (led by William Taylor, ACMS Board)
3. Fundraising—Develop a donation drive to support
fellowships in 2024 to celebrate the 20th anniversary
of our oce in Ulaanbaatar and plan for a longer-
term campaign to create a sustainable endowment
for ACMS (led by Charles Krusekopf, ACMS
Founding Director)
The ACMS has already begun work on all three
initiatives with 2023-2024 membership and fundraising
drives and naming of a nominating committee with
a goal of seating a new board by summer 2024. In
addition, the ACMS has named a new Residential
Director for the Ulaanbaatar oce—Dr. Isaac Hart.
Members and stakeholders can follow our progress
through our website and social media.
MONGOLIAN STUDIES CONFERENCES 2023,
2024
By William Fitzhugh
For the past several years the Arctic Studies Center has
hosted, at the National Museum of Natural History, the
annual Mongolia Studies Conference, organized by
Saruul Erdene and the D.C. area Mongolia Cultural
Center, Embassy of Mongolia, and the NMNH. Before
the covid pandemic, when the NMNH Education Oce
had sucient sta, the conference included a family
day on Sunday that included display of traditional
Mongolian costumes, artwork, children’s games, and
musical performances—even in one year, the erection
of a full-side felt ger tent in the middle of the Q?rius
hall. This has not been possible in recent years, when
the Museum faced sta attrition, and so the 2023 and
2024 conferences were restricted to lecture formats. The
Mongolian Embassy oered travel grants that enabled
Mongolian scholars, artists, and performers to come
to D.C. and present. In addition to presentations, the
conference features traditional Mongolian food (yes,
including khorshuurs!) prepared by DC area Mongolians
for breakfast and lunch on both days. The event usually
ends with a reception at the Mongolian Embassy.
This year the 2024 16th Conference was held in Q?rius
on February 2 and 3 and featured opening remarks
by Mongolian Ambassador Batbayar Ulziidelgeriin,
William Fitzhugh, and Saruul-Erdene, and panels
on history and archaeology, literature, performing arts,
the Owen Lattimore Studies Center, IT and Library
Science, Arts and Culture, women’s gender issues, and
education. As in previous years, Saruul-Erdene and the
Mongolia Center miraculously produced a volume of
proceedings in time for the opening.
This year’s conference was supported by contributions
from the Mongolia Cultural Center, Arctic Studies
Center, Mongolian National University of Art and
Culture, Mongolian American Cultural Association,
Pyramid Granite LLC, National Council of Language
Policy, Mongolia. In addition to papers, the event
included poster sessions, a photography exhibit, and
a presentation by the American Center for Mongolian
Studies. Much thanks to the Q?rius Center for the use
of its spaces, and to Saruul-Erdene, Nancy Shorey, and
Narantsetseg Tseveendulam and others for planning,
logistics, and ne Mongolian food.
IMMERSIVITY AND THE FIRST-STEP-
FOR-MANKIND INNOVATION OF SMALL
WATERCRAFT
By Charlie Morrow
Extending podcast iMMERSE! with Charlie Morrow,
the iMMERSE Helsinki event and media scheduled
for October 2024 explores immersivity in art, science,
technology, and philosophy. Audio environment reects
changes in air, ice, and underwater. Here is a link to the
podcasts.
The goal is to raise awareness of immersivity in
uniquely Finnish settings. Inspired by Arctic immersive
environments, Arctic innovation of small boats and
their eect on the world, we present forms of the
immersive, free to the public in events and streaming,
as follows.
Lunchtime at the 2023 conference. Photo by Alex Jansen
38 ASC Newsletter
• iMMERSE! installation Studio Gallery. Kohta
Taidehalli Helsinki: Oct 16–Nov 10, 2024. Charlie
Morrow, Bart Plantenga, Forty iMMERSE!
Podcasts: William Fitzhugh and Harri
Luukkanen: the small arctic boats that changed
history.
• iMMERSE! Concert at Church in the Rock. post
streamed, free to public, Oct 24 19–22h, exploring
spatial sound, music and arctic space in Helsinki's
iconic sanctuary
• iMMERSE! Experience: Arctic atmosphere in
Aalto Uni Acoustics Laboratory, Oct 25, hearing
arctic sounds with discussion on their discovery
and implications, 13–16h, bus ride to Kohta
Taidehalli
• iMMERSE! Next step Talks and Music. Kohta
Taidehalli: Studio Gallery Oct 25 with display of
participants books, 17–20h.
My First Immersive Experience and Disruption
My view as a composer and sound artist is shaped
by my intentional recall of experiences and sounds
from pre-birth. From my mid-twenties, from roughly
1967 forward, I have been driven to spend years in
the process of remembering back to that transitional
moment.
I do it by identifying key sensory experiences, going
back in memory time, milestone by milestone. The
thrashing and squeezing of the birth passage is my
starting point. As one experience is remembered, I
mull it over and over until I can trust that it is true.
Then I look back further into my memory for another
milestone and so on. So as one perceptual bubble
dissolves, another one becomes visible. Driven to
return to earlier and earlier moments in my life, I
get there and there is my earliest being. It is a place
both large and small, somewhere nondimensional.
It’s an experience of listening to a world beyond my
mother’s body. There I am, timelessly oating from
one moment to the next, more a sensory body than
a physical body. I am part of a vibrating mass, my
mother’s internal organs—already listening, observing
and remembering.
From that earliest awareness, my recollections of being
can then be traced forward. In recollection, I then
began to oat forward in time, and everything began
to make sense. This recollection turned into forward
time travel, recalling the growing of my body and
receptors. First came an awareness of sound followed
by an awareness of bursts of light in what I would
come to know as my eyes. Until birth, l am attached
to my mother’s umbilical cord and her chemistry
and emotions. Now, even as an old guy, I think that I
can at will mentally return to points in my life to re-
experience them, a moment of deja vu of sorts, my rst
experience-bubble in essence. What follows is the story
of many more experience-bubbles.
Exploring Immersivity Through Interviews with
Collaborators in Immersive Experiences
The book and podcast, iMMERSE!, is a collection of
interviews and writings about immersive experience
components and design from prehistory to the future.
It is a story about the bandwidth of human perception
from a pre-birth, birth and media point of view. It is
the story of making observations in that bandwidth and
of breaking the boundaries, going beyond. My work
proceeded one project with its team of collaborators
at a time. The timeline is the conceptual spine of this
book. I could not have made this professional and
reective journey alone. It unfolded in collaborations
that opened doors.
The celebration in Helsinki is staged the famed Rock
Church where all attending are surrounded by ancient
rock. All music and arctic soundscapes presented
engage the rock environment.
All of Us Have Our Own Immersive Experiences
and Memories
There are over 200,000 years of human cultural
experiences without electricity, and only about one
and a half centuries of technological media such as
photography and lm. These technologies are paradigm
shifts that alter all our experiences. Technological
interruptions of experience-bubbles stetch and expand
the locus of life. These disruptions tend to point both to
our origins and our future technologies.
Temppeliaukio Lutheran Church in Helsinki.
Photo by Charlie Morrow
ASC Newsletter 39
What is raw immersive experience?
In the earliest days of our species, there was live
performance, which was simply life as it happens and
human memory. The spell of attention was something that
involved total engagement. Our senses were available
to instantly detect activity so we could negotiate the
challenges of survival, action, and reproduction in real
time. Our memories stored information to help inform
and identify, reect and project. Scientists have looked for
parallel processes in other species, each with their own
bandwidths of experience.
For a sound person like me, it is striking that
before sound recordings and playback, sounds were
uncaptured and originated solely from events that
occurred in life, in the here and now—such as birds
singing in a tree, the wind blowing through tall grasses,
or people singing songs just for us. Actually, we
continue to experience a world of life events only in
realtime, if we consider playback as always being a
part of the now.
In our Barton, Vermont home, I love to hear the wind
arriving in the forest near us and continue on into the
distant forest past us. I do not believe that it is only
humans who experience this sensation. Sound moving
through space speaks to us. We hear it moving near
and far (the Doppler Eect). But so do other sonically
responsive lifeforms.
The Disruptive Innovation of Small Arctic
Watercraft
In prehistoric times, small boats provided the rst
disruption of the bubble in which humans were
bounded by the locus of where our arms and legs
propelled us. Before small watercraft, the places where
we were born and live formed a bubble that described
our perspective and territory of life activities. With
these small craft we were able to
start to live on as much of the Earth
as we could navigate. This story
is well told in William Fitzhugh's
interview for iMMERSE! and in
the Harri Luukkanen and William
Fitzhugh book, The Bark Canoes
and Skin Boats of Northern Eurasia,
published by Smithsonian Press in
2020.
Thus, the history of bark canoes and
skin boats is not simply a history
of boats; it is also, inescapably, a
history of the peoples who built and
used those boats for many millennia
to master waterways; to migrate, sh,
trade, wage war, and spear reindeer
at river crossings; and to hunt seal,
walrus, and whale on bays and oceans. This way of
life became imperative at the end of the Pleistocene,
12,000 years ago, when forests expanded and human
hunters and environmental change resulted in the
extinction of mammoth, mastodon, and other tundra
and taiga megafauna. No longer could people count on
large stocks of land mammals for food, fuel, clothing,
and construction materials. Melting permafrost and
advancing forest cover required them to develop new
ways of life that depended on waterways for transport,
communication, and food. Fish and sea mammals
became an important part of the human diet. Without
the invention and renement of the bark canoe and skin
boat, hunters and shermen, their families, and their
peoples never could have survived Northern Eurasia’s
harsh climate and environment.
Harri Luukanen’s sketches of bark canoe types across Siberia, by river systems.
(from Luukkannen and Fitzhugh 2020: g. 2.2)
Holiday card from the Alaska State Library and Archives
sta, Courtesy of Director Amy Phillips-Chan, December
2023. Photo by Brian Wallace
40 ASC Newsletter
RESEARCH
EXCAVATING A 16th CENTURY BASQUE
WHALING STATION IN ST. PAUL RIVER ON
QUEBEC’S LOWER NORTH SHORE
By William Fitzhugh
Twenty-three years of ASC research on the Quebec
Lower North Shore concluded in 2023 with the
excavation of a small Basque whaling station, Bonne
Esperance-4 (EiBk-61) on Bonne Esperance Island. The
site is one of two small Basque stations discovered by an
ASC-University of Montreal team in 2019 on a protected
waterway known to local shermen by its 16th c. Basque-
derived name, ‘Chaloupe [i.e. small boat] Channel’.
BE-4 is located on a shore ledge on the west side
of Bonne Esperance Island where the hillside drops
steeply to the shore. The narrow ledge was cramped,
but it served the Basque requirements for butchering
whales, constructing ovens, assembling barrels,
preparing food, and bringing chaloups and small ships
alongside. Another
requirement was
protection from
wind and sea swell;
narrow Chaloupe
Channel met that
need as well, as
it is only a short
distance from the
whaling grounds of
the open Gulf.
Excavations were
conducted in a
5-meter wide strip
of shore ledge.
This space was suitable for Basque activities, but it
collected precipitation from the hillside that resulted in
a 50-60 cm of peat and low shrub vegetation, making
the excavation pits into major water-collectors. In the
northern part of the site, we excavated 40-60 cms of
sterile peat to reach the Basque occupation level with
its rooftiles, charcoal, wood, nails, and ceramics. Peat
build-up was less extensive in the southern part of the
site, where bedrock was close to the surface. BE-4
has three structural zones: Zone 1, a southern area
consisting of a stone wall ending in a pile of boulders;
Zone 2, a refuse pit at the north end of the boulder pile;
and Zone 3, a domestic work area north of the refuse
pit extending to the north end of the site. Eighty-eight
square meters were excavated.
The Zone 1 wall was constructed with layers of laid-
up rocks positioned 2-meters west of a ledge outcrop
(Fig. 2a, b). A midden of charcoal mixed with burned,
broken, and blubber-encrusted rock and tile extended
from the wall to the shore. The wall seems to have
been constructed as the foundation for a timber frame
structure that supported the tryworks. A small piece of
blubber-encrusted sheet copper and a fragment of a cast
iron pot are probably fragments of cauldrons. A few
large iron spikes suitable for nailing logs indicates an
open-sided tryworks structure had been erected. At its
north end, the wall ended in a pile of re-cracked, fat-
encrusted boulders.
Zone 2 consisted of a meter-deep pit, excavated in 2022
lled with stratied layers of charcoal, baleen, and
tile, barrel staves, sticks, and log fragments. Our 2023
excavation produced nails, fragments of one or more
marmite earthenware pots, a twisted and knotted strand
of baleen, tiles, and masses of raw baleen. Lacking
blubber residue but with lots of discarded baleen, the
pit may have simply been for refuse disposal.
Figure 1: Aerial view of Bonne Espérance-4 excavation.
North to right. Photo by Francisco Rivera-Amaro
Figure 2a, b: (a) Wall/tryworks foundation at the south end of the site, and beyond, a midden of
blubber cinder, re-cracked tiles and rock, and charcoal. Photo by W. Fitzhugh). (b) West prole at
2W. Graphic by S. Vakhunitsky, A. Miulli, and D. Chechushkova
ASC Newsletter 41
Zone 3 was a 3-4 meter wide section of the ledge where
Basques conducted trywork support activities. We
opened two parallel trenches leaving space between
them to provide a corridor for excavator access.
The West Trench bottomed out on granite ledge and
contained a Basque layer sandwiched between layers
of peat. In this layer we found tiles, preserved bark and
wood, a few nails, and clusters of plain or lightly-glazed
earthenware. A cluster of blue-and-white glazed faience
ceramic was recovered at the north end of the trench.
The East Trench (alias ‘mud pit’) paralleled the base of
the hillslope. Its thick peat deposits were saturated with
water, causing the trench to ll overnight. Below a thick
layer of sterile peat, we recovered barrel staves, tops,
and bottoms. The southern units were nearly barren of
tiles and artifacts. Northern units had large amounts of
earthenware, leading to the conclusion that this was a
place for food preparation or consumption, while the
central areas may have been for assembling barrels. If
wood oors or timber structures had been present, no
evidence remained.
The site was used for a short period of time—perhaps
only a single or a few seasons. The stone wall and
stone pile served as foundations for the blubber works
that produced the cinders, burned tile, stone, and
charcoal. However, we did not nd the usual oven piles
with pot depressions known from Red Bay or other
Basque sites. These characteristics congure BE-4 as
unique, suggesting dierent strategies for rendering oil.
Perhaps some other type of trywork system was used to
produce the burned material surrounding the wall and
boulder pile.
The prevalence of baleen, which was especially evident
in and around the pit, was a conspicuous feature (Fig.
3a, c). Basques used baleen between the roof frames
and the tiles. This might explain why baleen was found
throughout the site, but it does not explain the large
Figure 3a-c: (a) Stacked layers of baleen from the pit edge; (b) heel fragment of a leather shoe, and (c) a twisted knot of
baleen. Photo by W. Fitzhugh; graphics: D. Chechushkova
Figures 4a-c: (a) A marmite cooking pot recovered by Parks Canada divers in Red Bay (credit: Parks Canada Red Bay
Museum); (b) barrel staves and end-pieces; (c) re-starting European int nodule Photo by W. Fitzhugh
42 ASC Newsletter
masses in and around the pit. Nails—always abundant
on Basque sites where large spikes were required to
fasten logs and timber framing—were rare; only four
or ve large spikes were found, along with larger
quantities of medium-size nails. Smaller nails were
more common in the Zone 1 industrial area than in
the northern zones. The absence of large spikes in the
domestic areas suggests that timber structures were not
present here, or that these nails were scavenged by later
Basque explorers or Inuit who arrived after ca. 1600,
but the absence of burned timber frames makes this
scenario unlikely.
Unlike nails, domestic ceramics were common in the
northern part of the site (Fig. 4a-c). Almost all were
thin-walled, low-red earthenware vessels known as
marmites. Decorative vertical bands were present on
some body sherds, and many fragments bear remnants
of burned glaze and food or oil residue. A half dozen
sherds of tan or grey stoneware were present, indicating
some early availability of this ceramic type not
generally common until the 17th century. The other
unusual ceramic appearance was a highly fragmented
blue-and-white glazed faience vessel, possibly a teapot.
Nodules of European int were common as were
akes struck o for starting res, and a ake of
Ramah chert scavenged from an indigenous site may
have been collected for the same purpose. Several
gunints were present including one of quartz. Highly
unusual was a small, thick-walled, cup-shaped bowl
made of soapstone with a tapered hole in its lower
side and charred residue on the inside opposite the
hole, exactly reproducing the form of a clay pipe
bowl. Basques, who did not have their own soapstone
industry, could have obtained the soapstone by trade
with Inuit, who used this material extensively, or else
found it at the nearby Inuit site on Grand Isle. Other
curious items are bronze belt buckle and a small
silver(?) pendant with a grooved top and an arrow
or harpoon mark on one side—possibly a whaler’s
talisman (Figures 5a-c).
One of the many unanswered questions is the site’s
date. One indicator of a pre-1600 date is the absence
of clay pipes. Smoking and clay pipes were rare in
Europe until 1600, so BE-4 should date before then.
The abundance of baleen also suggests a date before
it became a valuable commodity in the 18th century.
A radiocarbon date on baleen, corrected for marine
reservoir eect, produced a 2-sig date of 1458-1523
calAD and 1573-1628 calAD (B-683545), while a
wood twig produced a 2-sig date of 892-932 calAD and
941-994 calAD (B-683545). The twig must have come
from the pre-Basque peat layer. The baleen sample
suggests a likely date in the 16th century.
Given their physical proximity, it seems unlikely that
BE-3 and BE-4 were separate operations. We did not
have time to investigate BE-3, and this should be a
priority for future work. Possibly BE-3 was a second
station operated by another whaling team connected
with a mothership supporting both sites. The character
of the BE-4 operation may be imagined in a 2009
rendition of the Middle Bay Basque site produced by
the artist Martin Lowe, on exhibit in the Middle Bay
Museum (Fig. 6).
A summary of our 2023 project appears in a short lm
by Alyssa Miulli titled “Life Among the Coasters”,
prepared for the Whiteley Museum to orient visitors to
the history and heritage of the Lower North Shore.
Acknowledgments. 2023 excavations were conducted
with assistance of Alyssa Miulli, Soa Vakhunitsky,
Figure 5a-c: Three unusual nds from BE-4: (a) a soapstone pipe bowl with a removable stem; (b) a metal belt buckle; and
(c) a silver(?) pendant. Color bars = 1 cm. Photos by Anja Herzog; graphic by D. Chechushka
ASC Newsletter 43
Kody Shugars, Marie Trottier, Clarence Laliberté,
and Thomas Garneau-Lelièvre, Francisco Rivera-
Amaro, and Perry Colbourne. Financial support
was provided by the Arctic Studies Center, University
of Montreal, the LNS Littoral School Board, and the
Whiteley Museum of St. Paul River, Quebec. Logistical
arrangements and hospitality were generously provided
by the Whiteley Museum. Garland Nadeau and Eileen
Schoeld were our guardians, food and information-
providers, and institutional hosts.
UPDATE ON CLIMATE, PACK ICE EXTENT,
AND HARP SEAL FLUCTUATION IN THE
NORTHWEST ATLANTIC
By Jasmine Sov
In William W. Fitzhugh’s paper, “Riding the Harp
Seal Highway: Modeling Climate, Sea Ice Pulsations,
and Inuit Migrations in the Eastern Subarctic”,
the author proposes that climate change-related
reductions in pack ice around the Northwest Atlantic
are precipitating regional changes in the harp seal
population. Fitzhugh describes the annual harp seal
migration as a “relatively dependable phenomenon”
for the seal hunters of Labrador (Fitzhugh 2020:88).
However, due to changing winter conditions–namely,
loss of breeding ground ice–the harp seal population
of the Gulf of St. Lawrence is losing pups. As a result,
the herd may be shifting its range to the Labrador
Front. This would have had devastating consequences
for prehistoric Dorset and Thule Inuit populations
occupying the northern Gulf of St. Lawrence and
Newfoundland who relied on harp seals as a key source
of food and clothing. The most recent statistics on the
Arctic climate, pack ice extent, and uctuations in harp
seal populations lend weight to Fitzhugh’s theory.
In the past decade, climate change in the Arctic
has only grown more extreme. According to the
2023 NOAA Arctic Report Card, Arctic sea surface
temperatures in August 2023 were around 5-7℃
warmer than the mean temperatures of sea surface
temperatures from 1991–2020. Mean surface air
temperatures from August 2023 were also higher than
average; 2023 was the 6th warmest year for the Arctic
since 1900 (Nakamura 2023).
As temperatures rise in the Arctic, pack ice extent
around the Northwest Atlantic region has waned.
Monthly sea ice extent in the Arctic as a whole has
shown a consistent downwards trend since 1978 (Fig.
1); as of 2023, the monthly sea ice extent was 6th
lowest in the satellite record since 1979 (Nakamura
Figure 6: An artist’s reconstruction by artist Martin Lowe of
a Basque store-shed, tryworks, and shore operations at the
Middle Bay Basque site. (Source: Middle Bay Museum)
Figure. 1. Monthly sea ice extent anomalies (solid lines)
and linear trend lines (dashed lines) for March (black) and
September (red) 1979 to 2023. The anomalies are relative
to the 1991–2020 average for each month (see Table 1).
(Nakamura 2023)
Figure 2. March and September monthly averages and
annual daily maximum and minimum extent for 2023 and
related statistics. The rank is from least sea ice to most sea
ice of the 45-year record (starting in 1979) (1 = least, 45 =
most) (Nakamura 2023)
44 ASC Newsletter
2023). Changes in Northwest Atlantic sea ice extent
also align with the overall trend of the Arctic. In
the 2014/15 season, maximum ice coverage in the
East Coast was 29.68, but dropped to 18.60% by
the 2019/20 season. Within the same time frame,
maximum ice coverage fell from 19.69% to 10.97% in
East Newfoundland and 51.28% to 36.15% in the Gulf
of St. Lawrence (Environment and Climate Change
Canada 2020).
Beginning in late October to early November, the
Northwest Atlantic harp seal population migrates
south to this pack ice to breed and whelp. The largest
of these whelping patches lie around the Gulf of St.
Lawrence, followed by the “Front” (southeast Labrador
and northern Newfoundland). Once they reach the ice,
much of the population remains there until February
and March, when the adult females give birth to and
take care of their pups. When the pups are able to swim
and feed independently and the pack ice begins to melt
(around April and May), the harp seals journey north
once again.
Without ice in these regions, however, female harp
seals are forced to give birth in the water or on shore.
Their pups then drown, die on land, or are lost to
predators (op. cit., p.93). As anticipated, the proportion
of pups in yearly Northwest Atlantic harp seal catches
has decreased. Since the late 1990s, the proportion
of YOY (Young of the Year) in the total annual catch
was over 97%; from 2016 onwards, proportions of
YOY have averaged 90% annually (Canadian Science
Advisory Secretariat 2023).
Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s 2019 report on
Northwest Atlantic Harp Seals corroborates these
ndings. In 2012, harp seal pup production in the
southern Gulf of St. Lawrence was 115,500; in 2017,
it was just 18,300. The northern Gulf of St. Lawrence
saw similar declines in pup production, falling from
74,100 in 2012 to 13,600 in 2017 (Fig. 3). Meanwhile,
pup production in the Front actually increased from
626,200 in 2012 to 714,600 in 2017 (Fig. 4). The report
also mentions that the timing of births in 2017 was later
than usual in the southern Gulf and earlier in the Front,
suggesting that some female harp seals from the Gulf
herd moved to the Front seeking suitable ice to give
birth (Fisheries and Oceans Canada).
Rather than a harp seal “boom-and-bust” population
model, Fitzhugh hypothesizes that the Gulf harp
seal herd may be changing its geographical range
in accordance with recent climatic patterns. True to
form, as the Arctic climate warms and pack ice in
the Northwest Atlantic (particularly the Gulf region)
melts at higher rates, harp seal pup production and the
proportion of YOY in annual catches have declined.
Consequently, the herd has begun to move to the Front,
which has experienced less severe reductions in ice
extent than the Gulf. The data presented above thus
continues to support Fitzhugh’s theory. Should the
Gulf herd shift its range entirely to the Front, Subarctic
coastal groups (Inuit and Euro-Canadian) would lose a
crucial resource.
[Editor’s note: Jasmine Sov is a senior at California’s
Pasadena High School who volunteered for a research
project with the ASC.]
References:
Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat. 2023. Updated
Estimates of Harp Seal Bycatch and Total Removals
in the Northwest Atlantic / Garry B. Stenson and Peter
Upward [and] Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat.”
Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Canadian Science
Advisory Secretariat, 2020, 11 Dec. 2023,
Figure 3. Maximum ice coverage of the Gulf of St. Lawrence
region from 1968–2020 (Environment and Climate Change
Canada)
Figure 4. Maximum ice coverage of the East Newfoundland
region from 1968–2020 (Environment and Climate Change
Canada)
ASC Newsletter 45
Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2020. East
Newfoundland Maximum Ice Coverage Graph 1968 to
2020. Gouv. du Canada, 30 Oct. 2020
Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2020. Gulf
of St. Lawrence Maximum Ice Coverage Graph 1968 to
2020. Gouv. du Canada, 30 Oct. 2020
Fisheries and Oceans Canada. 2019. Status
of Northwest Atlantic Harp Seals, Pagophilus
Groenlandicus. Gouv. du Canada, Fisheries and Oceans
Canada, Communications Branch, Gouvernement du
Canada, 26 Mar. 2020
Fitzhugh, William W. 2020. Riding the Harp Seal
Highway…In Arctic Crashes: People and Animals in the
Changing North. I. Krupnik and A.L. Crowell, eds., pp.
79–99. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Scholarly Press.
Nakamura, Tracey. 2023. Sea Surface Temperature -
Arctic Report Card: Update for 2023. NOAA Arctic,
NOAA, 12 Dec. 2023
CALIBRATING 55 YEARS OF
RADIOCARBON DATES FROM LABRADOR
By Kevin P. Smith
Since 1970, members of the Smithsonian Institution’s
Arctic Studies Center and their colleagues collected
and ran more than 400 radiocarbon dates on samples
of wood, charcoal, bones, baleen, and sediments
from archaeological sites and lakes in Ban Island,
Labrador, Newfoundland, and Québec’s Lower
North Shore. These dates have been available to
researchers for years, forming the foundations for
models of culture history and processes of change
in the eastern Arctic and Subarctic. These dates also
provide important documentation for the time-depth
of First Nations communities. Yet, while these dates
were being collected, protocols for sampling, handling,
and processing have changed, and several of the labs
have closed. The dates were reported in dierent
publications and reports and the programs used to
transform, or calibrate, dates into calendar years have
changed, as well. Improving their comparability and
accessibility through a comprehensive publication has
been one of ASC’s goals for several years.
In 2023, we brought all of these dates together in
a single format, with consistent information on
the materials dated and how and when they were
recovered, and then calibrated them through a
single program (OxCal 4.3.2), using the currently
most accurate calibration curves (IntCal20 and
marine20.14c). Using a single system allows them to
be compared now as a coherent set, without having
to consider which programs or which calibration
curves were used to estimate individual dates’ ages in
calendar years. We are also now able to present the
dates not only with their standard one- or two standard
deviation ranges (with 68.3% and 95.4% probability,
respectively), but also with internal probabilities of
the dated samples’ ages within those ranges, allowing
researchers to estimate the samples’ ages more exibly.
In addition, calibration allows us to analyze dates
statistically, using new tools such as Bayesian statistical
modeling. Bayesian models allow us to ask questions
that consider not only the radiocarbon dates themselves
but also other information such as sample location
within stratigraphic sequences, the ages of other datable
artifacts within those strata, or documentary sources
to re-examine our chronological sequences or identify
patterns that suggest new questions or reasons to revisit
those sites or the samples that were dated.
One example may suce to give a sense of the new
utility. The arrival of Inuit in Labrador and their
southward expansion into the northern Gulf of St
Lawrence has been a subject of discussion for several
decades. Some researchers argued that Thule Inuit
ancestors arrived in northernmost Labrador as early as
the 13th century, while others see no evidence before
the late 15th century. Similar questions have been
raised about whether Inuit expanded into the Gulf of
St. Lawrence before Basque whalers and shermen
arrived there in the 15th or early 16th century, or
whether the Inuit only moved southwards after the
arrival of Europeans in the Strait of Belle Isle provided
opportunities to acquire European goods.
Thule and Labrador Inuit sites and date ranges by symbol.
Iglosiatik Island-1 and Stae Island-1 have dates from more
than one period. Open symbols identify sites with either
uncertain cultural attribution (Tilt Cove-1) or dates that do
not match the ages of European artifacts (Grand Island-2,
Iglosiatik Island-1)
46 ASC Newsletter
To test these ideas, we ran a Bayesian analysis of
22 radiocarbon dates on samples of wood and wood
charcoal from 12 Labrador Thule sites, eliminating any
known to have been contaminated with marine mammal
oils. We divided these into two sets—those from sites
with, and those from sites without, items of European
material culture—and used a date of 1050±50 AD to
model the earliest date at which Thule culture groups
began to move eastwards from northern Alaska.
Sites with early radiocarbon dates, from the late
13th and early 14th centuries AD, are found not only
at the northern tip of Labrador (Stae Island 1) but
also in the vicinity of Nain (Iglosiatik Island 1), and
possibly as far south as Tilt Point Cove 1, where a
very ephemeral site, possibly of the Thule culture, is
located north of Hamilton Inlet. Sites with consistent
dates from the late 14th to the mid-16th century,
but without any documented European items, are
found only from Nain northward to the northern tip
of Labrador (Iglosiatik Island 1, Sculpin Island East
1, Stae Island 1, Akulialuk 1, and Nunaingok 1).
However, sites with dates from the early 16th through
17th centuries and with European goods are all located
southwards from the mouth of Hamilton Inlet to
Québec’s Lower North Shore (Monument Point 2,
Snack Cove 1, Hart Chalet, Hare Harbour 1, and Little
Canso Island).
Bayesian analysis of these dates suggests that the Thule
ancestors of the Inuit arrived in Labrador between 1185
and 1257 AD, expanded down the coast as far south
as Nain during the 13th century and may even have
explored as far south as Tilt Point Cove. Ancestral Inuit
communities appear to have become more numerous
in northern Labrador from the 14th through the early
16th centuries, prior to any sustained contact with
Europeans, and then spread south from Hamilton Inlet
to Québec’s Lower North Shore rapidly during the
16th and 17th centuries, acquiring European trade goods
there from the Basques, English, and French. While
this synopsis suggests a relatively simple pattern of
arrival, consolidation and expansion, two sites’ dates
provide reminders of the complexities that underlie any
such analyses.
House 15 at Iglosiatik 1, near Nain, produced both a
small assemblage of European items and charcoal with
a calibrated date of 1301–1396 AD (68.3% probability);
while charcoal from the oor of an Inuit qarmat (sod-
walled tent) at the site of Grand Isle 2, on Québec’s
Lower North Shore, provided a date of 1427–1452 AD
in association with both European items and Ramah
Chert debitage. Neither of these sites’ radiocarbon dates
match the ages of the European objects found at the sites
and since the qarmat at Grand Isle 2 was built on top of
an Ancestral Innu encampment, it is possible that older
charcoal was mixed into the qarmat’s oor during its
construction and use.
As other researchers have discussed, factors such as the
use of driftwood, the reuse of older structural timbers,
reoccupation of earlier sites, and the contamination of
wood and charcoal with marine mammal oils can all
produce radiocarbon dates older than the period when
the site was occupied. Thus, while the systematization,
calibration, and statistical analysis of ASC’s corpus
of radiocarbon dates suggests that the Inuit arrived in
northern Labrador late in the 13th century, consolidated
their communities in northern Labrador, and then
expanded southward around the time that the Basques
rst arrived in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, anomalous
dates within the models also alert us to the need to
reassess the dates themselves critically, along with
the materials dated and their contexts, in order to re-
evaluate and re-assess patterns of change at regional
levels.
Calibrated Thule and Labrador Inuit sites in Labrador and
Quebec Lower North Shore. The lower triangle box identies
sites with samples dated to the 13th-14th centuries; the middle
circle box identies samples with mid-14th to mid-16th century
dates; and the upper square symbol box identies samples
from sites or contexts with European items. Horizontal
dashed lines indicate start and ends of Phase 1 (lower),
Phase 2, and Phase 3
ASC Newsletter 47
pXRF IDENTIFICATIOIN OF LITHIC
SOURCE MATERIALS FROM STOCK COVE,
NFLD
By Christopher B. Wol and Kevin P. Smith
The Stock Cove (CkAl-3) is a multicomponent site at
the base of Trinity Bay in southeastern Newfoundland.
Research began in the 1980s to examine its Dorset
PaleoInuit occupation. That early work demonstrated
the richness and importance of the site, but it was not
until over twenty years later that Wol and colleagues
returned with more questions. We now know the site
was used by every culture that inhabited the island
except the Norse. However, due to the poor organic
preservation, what has primarily been recovered are
lithics. The various cultural strata contain a diverse
collection of local and non-local lithics, among which
the most abundant is Trinity Bay Chert (TBC). This
material is a ne-grained, medium gray to green chert
that through diagenesis develops a soft, chalky white
patina, based on some experimentation by Wol and
Dr. John Erwin.
The source of TBC is still unknown, although it
is probably in the vicinity of Trinity Bay. This is
because the geographical distribution of the material
is concentrated in the bay and there is distance decay
in its frequency at more distant sites. To further
complicate the source identication, there are other
cherts in eastern Newfoundland and other parts of the
island that supercially resemble the material. This
makes it dicult for researchers not familiar with TBC,
to properly identify it. For that reason, Kevin Smith
and Christopher Wol investigated whether a portable
X-ray uorescence (pXRF) device could be used to
non-destructively identify variation in lithic source
materials collected from dierent locations and assess
if TBC comes from a distinct source location.
Methods
Six archaeological specimens from Stock Cove that
shared properties of TBC were analyzed with the
pXRF; a Dorset harpoon endblade and ve pieces of
debitage from Archaic and Dorset contexts. Two pieces
of debitage were broken, allowing separate analyses
of each piece to assess the comparability of results.
These were compared to archaeological samples of
TBC collected by Wol, and samples collected by
colleagues from geological outcrops of Conception
Bay Chert (CBC), Pouch Cove Chert (PCC) from
southeastern Newfoundland, Lawrence Harbour
Chert (also known as Strong Island formation chert,
SIC) from Notre Dame Bay, and Port-aux-Port Chert
(PPC) from Newfoundland’s west coast, as well as
samples collected by Smith from primary or secondary
sources of the Fortune Harbour (FHC) and the Shoal
Arm (SAC) formations in Notre Dame Bay, the Watts
Bight (WBC), Northwest Arm (NAC), and Berry Head
(BAC) formations at the tip of Newfoundland’s Great
Northern Peninsula, and both Cow Head (CHC) and
Green Point (GPC) cherts from the island’s west coast.
Although we recognize that this sampling of geological
sources does not exhaust the full range of cherts present
across Newfoundland, it incorporates examples of
many of the major chert types known from pre-contact
sites on the island.
The readings from all four chert sources separate
cleanly. However, the two geological sources closest
to Stock Cove (TBC and CBC) have geochemical
signatures similar enough to suggest they may be
related geologically. The geochemical signatures of
both PCC and LHC, the next most proximate sources,
are distinct from these two and from one another.
Most of the readings on Stock Cove debitage have
values that cluster tightly with readings with the TBC
reference samples; but some could be either TBC or
CBC. While the Dorset endblade is visually similar to
the debitage from the site, its readings fall somewhat
outside the range of variability currently documented
for TBC, CBC, or debitage from the site, which raises
questions about whether it was made from TBC or
a dierent, potentially related, chert source, or if it
represents variability of the source itself. None of the
items from Stock Cove can be related to either the PCC
sources, located just 80 kilometers away, or to LHC
outcrops, more than 200 km distant.
These results, although preliminary and limited by
the small number of items analyzed, suggest that
pXRF has potential for dierentiating major sources
of lithic raw materials from Newfoundland and for
associating debitage and nished tools to geological
formations, if not specic outcrops. However, they also
suggest that these methods work best when geological
sources are separated by signicant distance, as Wol
and colleagues have also demonstrated with slate
from Newfoundland and Labrador. In other words,
pXRF is better at identifying lithic materials from
geological sources that are the result of signicantly
dierent formation processes. The results also conrm
prior assumptions that Stock Cove inhabitants relied
heavily on local Trinity Bay Chert, and perhaps also
Conception Bay Chert, for producing stone tools, while
the tight grouping of data of the site’s debitage suggests
the possibility that occupants prioritized specic
outcrops or beds of this chert, still to be found.
[Editor’s note: The analytical data that could not be
included here will be available in other publications by
the authors.]
48 ASC Newsletter
“VIKING RAINCOATS” AND THE USE OF
VARARFELDIR (PILE WEAVING) IN THE
NORTH ATLANTIC
By Michèle Hayeur Smith
One summer a seagoing ship, owned by Icelanders,
arrived from Iceland. It had a cargo of sheepskin
cloaks. They steered into the Harthangerfjord,
because they had heard that a great multitude was
gathered there. But when people came to bargain
with them, no one wanted to buy the sheepskins. Then
the skipper sought out King Harald, because they
were acquainted, and told him about his diculty.
The King said he would go see them, and so he did.
King Harald was a kindly disposed man and of a very
cheerful disposition. He arrived there with a fully
manned ski and looked at their wares. He asked
the skipper, “Will you give me one of your cloaks?”
“Gladly,” said the skipper, “and several if need be.”
Then the King took one of the sheepskin cloaks and
hung it over his shoulders, whereupon he boarded
the ski again. But before they rowed away every
one of his men had bought a sheepskin. A few days
later such a multitude came there who all wanted to
buy the cloaks that not a half of them got any. After
that, the king was called Harald Gráfeldr. (Snorri
Sturluson, Hollander (trans), 1964: 137).
This event in the life of the Norwegian king Harald
Greycloak (b. ca 935, d. ca. 970), described by Snorri
Sturluson in his 13th century history of the Norwegian
kings, Heimskringla, appears to lie at the root of
some conclusions that have been drawn about the
origins of the shaggy pile weave in Norway, known
as röggvarfeldur or röggvarvefnaður in Iceland.
Vararfeldir is another term used to describe woven
mantles with a piled surface that had been in vogue
around Northern Europe from the 6th century to the late
medieval period. Their true origins are to be found in
antiquity, with the earliest documented examples of
this cloth type known from Bronze Age Sumeria, 5,000
years ago (Guðjnsson 1962:70)
It has been suggested that the weaving of pile textiles
was quite popular in Iceland during the 10th and 11th
centuries and may have been a premium item exported
from Iceland to mainland customers (Guðjnsson,
1962; Gelsinger 1981). According to Heimskringla, as
quoted above, the Norwegian king Harald “Greycloak”
or “Greyskin” purchased a cloak (incorrectly
translated as sheepskin in the text) for himself and
also encouraged his entire retinue to purchase the full
cargo of cloaks from an Icelandic merchant docked in
Norway. His name Gráfeldr seems to refer to “skin”
and not cloth, but according to Guðjnsson (1962),
mantles of skin were called skinnfeldir, whereas
the terms vararfeldir and röggvarfeldur referred to
cloth woven with a piled surface (Guðjnsson 1962:
68). Vararfeldir does indeed emulate the appearance
of sheepskins, but by being woven presents a more
resilient, waterproof, and longer-lasting equivalent.
Its base is produced as a basic woven twill or tabby,
into which individual tufts of wool from the Northern
Short-tail sheep are interspersed at regular intervals to
produce the appearance of an animal pelt.
Largely on the basis of this tale, scholars have assumed
that this type of cloth was uniquely Icelandic although
possibly based on similar items brought over from
Ireland with the early settlers, as Irish scholars have
also claimed this cloth type was produced abundantly
in Ireland (Pritchard 1992:98). Pile woven textiles
are described in detail in the medieval (12th–13th
century) Icelandic law code Grágás, reinforcing the
idea that it was an important item of value, trade, and
commerce. However, archaeological examples of this
type of cloth are extremely uncommon in the corpus of
excavated Icelandic Viking Age (870–1050) and Early
Medieval (1050–1300) textiles but are common on the
Norwegian mainland.
Only twelve examples are known from Iceland, in
periods spanning the 9th-19th century, and Greenland has
just three. In contrast, the early trade and harbor site of
Borgund, on the west coast of Norway in the vicinity
of present-day Ålesund, has 37 fragments of this cloth
out if a corpus of 306 fragments of cloth. Seven of
these 37 fragments were analysed for 87Sr/86Sr isotope
ratios, following the method pioneered by Frei (2009)
and successfully reproduced at Brown University and a
commercial lab, Isobar Laboratories, in Miami, Florida.
Most of these textiles returned results consistent with
local Norwegian baselines of 87Sr/86Sr 0.7095–0.7107
and none matched the baselines for bioavailable
strontium in wool from Iceland, which exhibits a range
of 0.7042–0.7086. Therefore, there is no indication that
these textiles came to Borgund Kaupang from Iceland,
and it seems more likely that if these were not produced
from sheep that grazed near the town itself, they are
likely to be from somewhere in Norway.
The origins of shaggy pile woven textiles and cloaks
seem clearly to be found in antiquity and in the
Mediterranean region. The technique made its way
across the continent and became popular during the
Iron age in Northern Europe and persisted in Ireland
through the medieval period. Clearly, pile woven
textiles were locally also produced in Iceland during
the Viking and Medieval periods, but were they
exported to Norway in great quantities, as has been
inferred from the short description of King Harald’s
purchase of them in Heimskringla and the records
ASC Newsletter 49
of their value in medieval Iceland’s law codes? Did
the technique come to Iceland via Ireland or from
Norway with Iceland’s early settlers? This part of the
narrative remains unclear. The preliminary strontium
isotope data from Borgund suggests that Norway had
its own tradition of pile weaving during the late Viking
Age, if not before, and that vararfeldir do not seem to
have been a signicant component of the textile trade
between Iceland and Norway, even when it picked
up in intensity after the 13th century (Steinmann and
Hayeur Smith, forthcoming).
The persistence and lengthy survival of these shaggy
pile weaves in Scandinavia and Northern Europe,
despite the labor required to produce them, is most
likely because they were so well suited to the climatic
conditions of the North Atlantic. Apparently, such
cloaks were relatively impermeable, since the pile
would keep out rain during the dicult weather that
characterizes the North Atlantic’s land- and sea-scapes
(Wincott Hecket 1992: 164). While Wincott-Hecket
called it the “raincoat” of the Irish, I would suggest it
was the “Viking raincoat” and that the visual cliché of
hairy Vikings crossing the North Atlantic on their ships
really reects them wrapped in their pile woven cloaks!
[Editor's note: Data graph and bibliography were
dropped during publication for space reasons. Google
the in text cites or contact the author for details.]
GÖBEKLI TEPE: ANCIENT NATURAL
HISTORY AND SHAMANIC NARRATIVE OF
A DELUGE?
By Elisa Palomino and John Cloud
The thread through my recent Ph.D. research has
been humans and sh, in historical and contemporary
context. My original
focus was on Indigenous
Arctic Peoples and their
respective shes, but thanks
to Bill Fitzhugh, I recently
beneted from a post-doc
award at ANAMED, Koç
University's Research
Center for Anatolian
Civilizations which has
enabled me to expand my
scope. I am now delving
into the dynamics between
sh and people in ancient
Mesopotamia.
Fish, in a largely arid
landscape, inhabit springs
and pools and rivers like
the celebrated Tigris and Euphrates. They also inhabit
lakes, many of which are the shrunken remains of
much larger lakes that existed back when climates were
dierent. On one of my research trips, I traveled to the
city now known as Urfa, in southeast Turkey, thirty
miles north of the Syrian border in search of the sacred
carp. John Cloud had also suggested I seek out the
famous Urfa peppers, a local specialty. Urfa originally
was Ur, a very ancient city, critical to many religions,
as it was the home of Abraham the Patriarch. The
ancient story is geographically depicted in the Pool
of Abraham, where sacred carp still swim. In this
narrative, Abraham is cast into ames by the Assyrian
King Nimrod for contesting the king's faith in idols,
yet he is miraculously saved by an angel. Divine
intervention transforms the re into water and the very
logs of the re into the revered carp.
Six miles from Urfa were the ruins of Göbekli
Tepe, which I visited. Initially explored and
disregarded in the 1960s, it wasn’t until 1994 that
German archaeologist Klaus Schmidt properly
discovered them. Since then, Göbekli Tepe has
been revolutionizing the elds of archaeology and
anthropology. It is a set of monumental structures,
dating to about 9,000 BC, resting on the top of a hill
without any evident nearby water. Göbekli Tepe has
many sets of large pillars of various sizes, with central
T-shaped pillars standing up to 5.5 meters tall depicting
an abstract representation of the human form from
a side view, featuring low relief depictions of arms,
hands, and items of clothing like belts and loincloths.
The surrounding smaller yet more intricately decorated
pillars predominantly display zoomorphic decorations,
facing towards the central pillars, with benches
between them suggesting the impression of a gathering,
possibly representing ancestors or even deities. One
Left: Pillar 43 in Enclosure D decorated with a wide
array of animal depictions. Right: Overview of enclosure
C. Göbekli Tepe, Sanliurfa, South-east Anatolia. (Credit:
Wikipedia Commons)
50 ASC Newsletter
hundred and forty-three bas-relief sculptures have
been uncovered thus far, including animals, phalli,
and human-animal composite sculptures, and various
animal species, including mammals, birds, and sh—a
virtual natural history museum—all identiable from
osteological records and ethnographic descriptions of
the Euphrates region. These include species such as
the fox, jackal, leopard, wild boar, aurochs, gazelle,
mouon, and common crane. Some interpretations
suggest that the snake-like creatures represented on
the pillars may actually depict sh, particularly species
like the Mesopotamian spiny eel, which inhabits the
region. In my discussion with Prof. Dr. Necmi Karul
from Istanbul University, he armed that amidst the
array of animal bones recovered from the site by the
team's archaeozoologist, Joris Peters, numerous sh
bones were unearthed suggesting their potential use for
sustenance or sacricial purposes.
The enclosures at Göbekli Tepe, believed to have
served as venues for nightly performances, feature
complex scenes involving terrestrial and aquatic
animals, possibly indicating totemic signicance.
The presence of predatory animals portrayed in
unfavorable conditions, along with depictions of death
and rebirth, aligns with symbolic themes common
in rites of passage, such as initiation ceremonies.
Ethnographic and archaeological evidence at Göbekli
Tepe, suggests shamanistic practices through gurative
art (Watkins 2020; Peters and Schmidt 2004). Animal
representations, particularly snakes, wild boars, and
foxes, may have facilitated spiritual encounters in
shamanic rituals at Göbekli Tepe (Gheorghiu 2015).
Monumental architecture like that found at Göbekli
Tepe was utilized for novel forms of shamanistic
practices. The enclosures with their benches between
pillars suggest the presence of large audiences,
possibly engaged in communal rituals, while also
serving as places for the disposal of corpses to be
consumed by necrophagic animals, indicating a
shift in religious ideologies. Göbekli Tepe provides
a glimpse into the spiritual and cultural practices of
prehistoric societies, where shamanism played a central
role in mediating between the natural world and the
supernatural, and where the landscape itself served
as a canvas for storytelling and ritual enactment. One
can envision this prehistoric sanctuary as a stone-
carved world dominated by water, revolving around
the Balikh and Euphrates rivers. Catastrophic events
like oods, depicted in Enclosure D, are associated
with water. Animal representations in Palaeolithic
art signify distinct moments, reecting hunter-
gatherer communities' seasonal rhythms and temporal
constructions. Enclosure D's iconography suggests
a narrative of ooding and riverine landscapes,
evoking ancient stories of cataclysmic events like the
Biblical Flood. This narrative evokes parallels with
ancient ood myths, including the biblical narrative,
underscoring the resonance of these primordial stories
(Albayrak 2023).
Despite speculation about the meaning of the structures
and the specic activities that occurred there, what
can be stated with condence is that Göbekli Tepe
was a very large ceremonial site, erected long
before agriculture developed in the region. Hence,
its existence becomes an article of evidence in the
argument of Graeber and Wengrow’s book, The Dawn
of Everything: A New History of Humanity (2021),
that the long-established theory of the evolutionary
progression of human settlements and social order,
from hunting and gathering to pastoralism to
agriculture, etc. was not obligatory. Particularly hunter-
gatherers are traditionally believed to have lacked
complex symbolic systems, but the mythical characters
depicted on the bas-reliefs of Göbekli Tepe prove
dierently. The fact that the pillars appear to have been
deliberately buried, all at once, around 8200 B.C., some
thirteen hundred years after their construction, and
that Göbekli Tepe was subsequently abandoned, might
provide evidence supporting the thesis of NMNH’s
own Noel Broadbent, that human history has been
shaped by near endless cycles such as oods or roving
plagues, which can depopulate local landscape, “wiping
the slate clean” for a new occupation by other cultures.
Whatever else, my eldtrip to Urfa and Göbekli Tepe
revealed a very rich history and prehistory of people
and sh, and my recent fellowship in Istanbul, Turkey,
was highly fruitful and productive.
RITUAL BIRCH BARK TRADITIONS IN
PREHISTORIC EURASIA: A CASE STUDY
FROM THE MONGOLIAN GOBI
By Christina Carolus, Asa Cameron, Bukhchuluun
Dashzeveg, Chunag Amartuvshin, Byambatseren
Batdalai, Gabat Dashzeveg, Davaakhuu Odsuren, and
Molor Adiyasuren
The exploitation of birch bark (Betula sp.) and its
byproducts is well documented throughout the northern
hemisphere. Birch bark is a versatile material with
a wide variety of practical and artistic applications,
including building materials (Usenyuk et al. 2015,
Rybníček et al. 2020), storage and cooking vessels
(Vogt 1949, Piezonka 2021), clothing (Pozdnyakov et
al. 2018), canoes and sleds (Densmore 1929; Adney
and Chapelle 1964; Luukkanen and Fitzhugh 2020),
and bases of ceramic motifs (Kashina and Petrova
2019). When processed, it can generate tar that
produces an adhesive (Rageot et al. 2019), sap that
ASC Newsletter 51
produces sugar syrup (Chamberlain et al. 2009), and
byproducts traditionally used in tattooing and medicine
(Batchelor 1927).
Birch trees also feature prominently in circumpolar
cosmologies. They are especially prominent in the
subarctic boreal forest and forest-steppe regions of
Eurasia, where groups such as the Buryat of northern
Mongolia and Transbaikal incorporate raw birch
materials and bark-based craft objects directly into
shamanic rituals and initiation rites (Wu 1996). These
practices continue across northern Siberia, where the
Yakuts and Nenets (among others) hold cosmovisions
founded in a birch world tree or “birch god” (Lintrop
2001; Lehtisalo 1924) and whose mortuary rites require
symbolic interment or ritual burning under layers
of its bark. Similar practices have been documented
in prehistoric graves in southern Siberia as far back
as the rst millennium BCE. However, despite
their widespread use as technological items and
components of religious practice, we nd the physical
movement and trade of birch bark in prehistory to be
underexamined.
The Siberian Ritual Economic Sphere
Southern Siberia has been emphasized as an important
core of cultural genesis and regional interaction
during the Bronze and Iron Ages (Syvatko et al.
2021). Starting at 3100 BCE, Western Eurasian steppe
pastoral and indigenous Siberian traditions coalesced
to varying degrees in Southern Siberia with the arrival
of the Afanasievo and their later expansion eastward
and southward through what is now Mongolia.
The movements of the Afanasievo and subsequent
groups such as the Okunevo (c.2600–2000 BCE)
and Chemurchek (c.2700–1900 BCE) introduced
major transformations across the steppe: pastoralism,
monumental mortuary traditions, and copper and bronze
metallurgy, as well as novel ideological, symbolic, and
ritual concepts (Honeychurch et al. 2021).
Scholars have previously tracked the developing
ritual sphere of Siberia-steppe belt interaction through
the circulation of durable items like the ceremonial
bronze knives and daggers produced by the Karasuk
Culture (c.1200–700 BCE) in the Minusinsk Basin.
By the Late Bronze Age (c.1500–1000 BCE), ritual
bronze knives appear in the monumental graves of
the earliest known Gobi pastoral culture, the Prone
Burial tradition, indicating long-distance material
and symbolic connections to Southern Siberia
(Honeychurch 2015). Their Early Iron Age successors
in the Gobi, the Slab Grave culture (c.1000–400
BCE), are known for burying their dead with a wealth
of inorganic luxury goods, especially the bronze
daggers which have been extensively looted in the
past and present (Wright 2021).
We propose that a similar process occurred with ritually
signicant birch bark objects by at least the Xiongnu
Period (c.250 BCE–150 CE) with the emergence of the
steppe’s earliest nomadic polity, and perhaps beginning
as early as the Late Bronze Age. The circulation of
birch bark objects by the end of the rst millennium
BC is associated with ritual deposits, particularly in
graves. Their documentation serves as a useful index
of relations between the steppe and Gobi regions
of Mongolia and a broad boreal zone that included
Southern Siberia, Transbaikal, and possibly portions of
Inner Mongolia and Manchuria.
A and B: Birch bark container lids recovered from EX.19.08;
C: fragment of a sewn birch bark container lid recovered
from Baga Chuluu Agui. Photo by A. Cameron and C.
Carolus
The birch bark container from Zuun Khotgor Ders contains
a broken bronze mirror and is found on a red pine (Pinus
sylvestris L.) grave lining, another import from the boreal
zone. Similar containers are known throughout circumpolar
boreal zone. Photo by Byambatseren Batdalai
52 ASC Newsletter
The Shiriin Chuluu Archaeological Project
The Dornogovi province of southeastern Mongolia,
the locus of our team’s archaeological research since
2018, is characterized by a desertic stacked granite
environment that could not be more physically alien
from these distant birch forests. Birch is a drought
sensitive species (Gradel et al. 2017) and while two
very isolated pockets of birch-willow stands described
as “mountain forest islands” are reported in the Gobi
Altai Mountains approximately 600–900 km west of
the study area, no other forests appear within less than
500 km to the south or east (Miehe et al. 2007). The
vast majority of birch forest cover in eastern Eurasia
begins about 250 km north of our study area at the
southernmost edges of the boreal forest zone (Glauner
and Dugarjav 2018).
Nevertheless, an
unexpected throughline
of practice and meaning
has emerged. The Shiriin
Chuluu Archaeological
Project focuses on aspects
of habitation, subsistence,
mortuary customs, and
political and social
complexity in the Gobi-
steppe from the Neolithic
(c.6000–3000 BCE)
through the Xiongnu Period
(c.250 BCE–150 CE).
An overarching research
interest centers on charting
the establishment and
expansion of trade networks
which linked emerging complexity on the Gobi-steppe of
Mongolia to relationships with distant groups.
Birch bark artifacts recovered from habitation and
mortuary contexts at Shiriin Chuluu have provided
unexpected evidence for exchange networks between
boreal and Gobi populations in the form of whole
and partial birch bark containers from three Xiongnu
ring graves located in two cemeteries: Kheree Khad
and Zuun Khotgor Ders. Kheree Khad is a small ring
grave cemetery associated with the local elite of Shiriin
Chuluu. Excavations in 2019 produced two birch bark
discs identied as lids of round birch bark containers.
Both discs were manufactured by sewing round
sheets of birch bark together. Similar lids have been
found in contemporaneous sites in central Mongolia
(Amartuvshin and Honeychuch 2010) and northwestern
Manchuria (Wei and Songlin 2015).
Zuun Khotgor Ders is located approximately 1 km
north of Kheree Khad, and with 18 burials total, it is
the largest Xiongnu ring grave cemetery in Shiriin
Chuluu. Excavation of EX.21.09 yielded a container lid
similar to those found previously. The most signicant
nd was recovered from grave EX.21.10 in the same
cemetery that produced an intact birch bark container
with a broken bronze mirror wrapped in silk. The
outside of the box was inscribed with images of a
procession of carts, tree-like forms, and representations
of a traditional Mongolian ger or yurt.
Birch bark objects are a well-documented but
inconsistent feature of Xiongnu ring graves
(Honeychurch 2015). At Shiriin Chuluu, they were
present in 20% of burials. This disparity could reect
either the frequency of Xiongnu individuals buried
with birch bark objects or issues of preservation and
looting. Xiongnu birch bark artifacts in graves thus
tend to be recovered in
fragments and as container
lids alone (Amartuvshin
and Honeychurch 2010).
Their scarcity might
explain why these artifacts
have not been discussed
more frequently as “trade”
objects.
Lastly, other newly
discovered evidence
includes birch bark
fragments from two
multi-period cave/rock
shelter habitation sites
(Baga Chuluu Agui
and Aduun Ordon). The
rst, Baga Chuluu Agui,
was investigated in 2023 and yielded a fragment
identied as the sewn edge of a birch bark container
lid. Radiocarbon dates for the site are forthcoming.
This site has also yielded textiles, human remains, and
evidence from Upper Paleolithic through Neolithic to
the Early Iron Age. The second site, Aduun Ordon, is
a stratied cave habitation site with occupation dating
from at least the Late Bronze Age (c.1400 BCE) and
containing material cultural sequences associated with
the Prone tradition, Early Iron Age Slab Grave culture,
Xiongnu, Khitan, Mongol, and Manchu periods. Birch
bark fragments recovered from levels associated with
Xiongnu through Khitan (c. 5th century CE) occupations
are presently being radiocarbon dated. The fragments
are too small to link to object types, but we surmise
they may represent containers. In later-dated strata
they may represent manuscript fragments, as at least
one partial manuscript with Mongol text has been
recovered from the site. Birch bark has a long history in
Eurasian manuscript production and was used until the
Incised imagery on the birch bark container from Zuun
Khotgor Ders. Photo by B. Dashzeveg
ASC Newsletter 53
Late Medieval period to record Mongolian legal and
religious texts (Chiodo 2000).
Concluding Remarks
Recoveries of archaeological birch bark objects
are uncommon globally despite evidence of their
widespread importance in the past. A study by Orsini et
al. (2015) notes that “birch bark objects are preserved
for long periods of time only under peculiar burial
conditions, such as very dry conditions in arid or
cold climates, or wet conditions in sediments and
glaciers”. In combination with their general fragility
and the destructive eects of looting, we speculate that
the extant record of birch bark objects in Mongolian
burial contexts underrepresents their presence and may
misrepresent their distribution spatially and temporally.
The general underrepresentation of stratied habitation
sites in Mongolian archaeology, especially in regions
with ideal preservation conditions, further skews
our knowledge about the nature of their uses and
distributions. The relatively high incidence of birch
bark recoveries from our Gobi excavations suggests
that circulation of these objects may well have been
wider and earlier than expected.
The appearance and nature of these archaeological birch
bark objects in the Gobi oers new insight and research
directions. The rst and most general: that the subarctic
boreal regions and the forest steppe continued to be a
core of long-distance trade through the end of the Iron
Age. In particular we are prompted to delve further into
the nature of these relationships with respect to Xiongnu
social and political apparatus. The predominant recovery
of these objects in specialized mortuary contexts,
excellent preservation of ritualized design features
and depositional contexts, and the sheer distance by
which the objects traveled to reach these desert-steppe
populations, suggests their likely status as exotic prestige
goods. Portable craft goods with distant procurement
and production outside of local elite control tend to be
imbued with special power and allure that exceeds use
value (Helms 1993). This is further amplied if tied to
cosmology. We have little doubt that possession of these
exotic objects aided relatively far-ung Gobi elites in
maintaining status and legitimizing established political
associations with the Xiongnu political heartland.
While not much can currently be said about the precise
origins or social lives of these objects, this preliminary
work suggests that the meaning, incidence, and ritual
economic signicance of birch objects deserves further
research as a category of portable material culture
present among steppe and desert groups distant from the
boreal zone.
[Editor's note: space limitations precluded inclusion of
the authors’ reference list.]
NOBUHIRO KISHIGAMI AND THE NORTH
PACIFIC PREHISTORY SYMPOSIUM
By Ben Fitzhugh
In early November 2023, I participated in the
“Symposium on Northern Prehistory, Language and
Culture of North Pacic Peoples” hosted by longtime
ASC friend Nobuhiro Kishigami at the National
Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan. Kishigami
sensei (Nobu) organized the three-day workshop
that brought together three American and nine
Japanese scholars to discuss issues in archaeology,
linguistic anthropology, and ethnology of North
Pacic Rim. Nobu opened with a masterful synthesis
of research trends, and in the spirit of comparative
research, reviewed the last quarter century of North
Pacic scholarship in each of the Boasian subelds,
synthesized the state of the research, and oered a
vision for the future, centered around Indigenous
collaboration using comparative research from Japan,
Russia, the U.S., and Canada to support community
eorts to address environmental and political
challenges.
In the archaeology session, I explored Indigenous
sheries management in the Kodiak region and future
plans to bring archaeology and oral history to bear
on needs for co-management and sovereignty of
local sheries. Hirofumi Kato and Kaoru Tezuka
individually explored issues related to late Pleistocene
hunter-gatherer adaptations to marine environments and
seafaring in Siberia, Japan, the Kurils and Kamchatka.
Yu Hirasawa explored the technological relationships
between Late Pleistocene Alaska microblade
technologies and those of Japan and Siberia. On the
linguistic front, Alexander King provided a rich
discourse analysis of Koryak storytelling based on his
Left: Nobuhiro Kishigami. Right: Alaskan craft gifts
presented on behalf of ASC and friends.
Photo by B. Fitzhugh
54 ASC Newsletter
Kamchatka research, and Baek Sangyub fascinated
the assembly with a map-based linguistic analysis
of Tungusic lexical borrowings. Tom Thornton
reviewed SE Alaskan Tlingit resource “cultivation,”
that entails promoting predictable resource availability.
He reected on the knowledge developed by these
communities to promote healthy kelp forests, herring
schools, clam beds, and salmon runs. The remaining
speakers showcased the continuing interest among
Japanese scholars in the ethnography of Alaskan
Native culture. Toshiaki Inoue examined Gwich'in
concepts of “tradition” and their relations to US and
Canadian colonial powers. Hiroko Ikuta reported
on her social network research into Native Alaskan
food sharing and food security, and Ryo Kubota
reported his research into history and the role of Alaska
Native Corporations and commercial development of
natural resources. In the afternoon of the third day,
Hiroya Noguchi compared Suqpiaq and Unangan
hunting visors in terms of their potential historical and
social implications. Kishigami-sensei closed out the
conference with a second full-length lecture on “Social
Change and Indigenous Prints of Northwest Coast
Peoples of North America,” a talk that reected on a
century of Indigenous print-making and building on a
temporary exhibition he curated, which we viewed in
the NME temporary exhibit hall.
Nobu organized the symposium as a “last hurrah” of
his NME curatorship. After thirty years conducting
research in the Arctic, curating exhibits, and hosting
conferences at NME—including the 8th Conference on
Hunting and Gathering Societies in 1998 where I rst
met him—this gathering celebrated Nobu's impending
retirement in March 2024. To celebrate the milestone
and in cahoots with ASC staers (Aron Crowell, Bill
Fitzhugh, and Igor Krupnik) who could not attend, I
presented Nobu with retirement gifts of Alaska Native
grassworks (a small rye grass basket and two dance
fans) woven by Yup'ik artist, Nellie Pauk of Togiak,
Alaska. The artworks had been scouted by ASC’s
Dawn Biddison at the Alaska Federation of Natives
art sale and were purchased by Sven Haakanson, Jr.
It was nice to be able to honor Nobu-sensei’s decades
of service to cross-cultural and international research
and scholarly community building. He assures us he
plans to continue publishing well past his retirement.
We wish Nobu well as he settles into a new phase of
his career, one with more time with his wife Miwa and
less in committee meetings! And, of course, we look
forward to seeing him at future conferences he has not
organized and reading his forthcoming work.
RESEARCH ON WOMEN’S EXPLORATIONS
IN GREENLAND
By Joanna Kafarowski
As part of my research for my next book, I recently
had the pleasure of chatting with Bill Fitzhugh,
Stephen Loring, and Bernadette Driscoll Engelstad
in Washington, D.C. and viewed Smithsonian
collections relating to Arnarulunnguaq and the Fifth
Thule Expedition (1921–24) as well as Tookoolito and
the Polaris Expedition (1871–73). I am a Canadian
independent scholar and geographer currently based
in Victoria, British Columbia. I originally worked
with Inuit women in the Canadian Arctic on gender
and natural resource issues before focusing on writing
biographies of polar women. My current project is
tentatively titled, Where Bold Women Go: Exploration
and Climate Change in Greenland, and it’s more wide-
ranging and ambitious in scope than my previous work.
It presents a story of women’s exploration of
Greenland and a portrait of Greenland as revealed
The Symposium participants. Photo by B. Fitzhugh
Left: Kishigami-sensei and his wife, Miwa. Right: Ben and
Nobu in relaxed mode. Photo by B. Fitzhugh
ASC Newsletter 55
by this exploration. An accurate and comprehensive
understanding of the historic exploration of Greenland
is only gained through investigating issues related
to gender, race, and class. Women, and particularly
Indigenous women, have been written out of the
literature of Arctic exploration despite their active
participation as guides, translators, seamstresses,
photographers, etc. The rst part of the book will
investigate the lives of Tookoolito who worked with
Charles Francis Hall on the Polaris Expedition;
Josephine Diebitsch-Peary who accompanied
her husband Robert Peary and lived and worked
with him in northern Greenland in 1891 and 1894;
Arnarulunnguaq who travelled with Knud
Rasmussen on the Fifth Thule Expedition; botanist
Isobel Wylie Hutchison who lived in Greenland
during the late 1920s, and geographer/photographer
Louise Arner Boyd who organized and participated
in ve expeditions to Greenland in the 1930s and 40s.
During their collective travels throughout Greenland
in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, these
women documented the land and its culture in diverse
ways and shared their discoveries with the world. This
book will examine their historic legacy, the forces that
shaped their work in Greenland and the country that
inspired them.
Today, the Arctic region is a harbinger of climate
change. The second part of the book argues that,
in this context, exploring Greenland assumes a
broader meaning. Women who explore face a country
struggling with the physical and social upheaval
wrought by climate change and the trauma induced
by an entrenched colonial heritage. Scientists are
tackling the greatest environmental challenge of our
time, but climate change is a complex problem that
cannot be solved by conventional Western science
alone. Exploring Greenland today means looking
at this “wicked” problem from various perspectives
and asking dierent questions. The women who
explore Greenland today do exactly that. Scientists
including pioneering paleoclimatologist Dorthe Jens-
Dahl; fearless artists such as Greenlandic visual and
performance artist Pia Arke; community activist turned
politician Mariane Paviasen, and “new” explorer
Felicity Aston, display innovative responses to this
issue. Due to climate change, these women experience
a dierent land than did their historic predecessors.
They explore Greenland through science, the arts,
community activism and entrepreneurship, but their
profound, deeply felt commitment to this vibrant
country remains the same.
To date, eldwork has been conducted in Greenland,
Denmark, England, Scotland and the United States,
and further research will be carried out in Greenland in
2024. Where Bold Women Go Exploration and Climate
Change in Greenland will be published in 2026 by
Princeton University Press. Joanna can be contacted at
joannakafarowski@gmail.com
Joanna Kafarowski examining the relics collected by Charles
Francis Hall in Nunavut during his 2nd Arctic Expedition
1864-1869. She is holding a large Thule ground-slate
endblade or knife on which Hall had written “Found by
Esquimaux Joe Aug.’69”. Photo by Stephen Loring
56 ASC Newsletter
“WAITING TO BE REUNITED”? AN
INTERNATIONAL TEAM TAKES ON THE
PONIATOWSKI AMUR COLLECTION
By Igor Krupnik, Joanna Dolińska, Stefania Skowron-
Markowska, and Marta Nowakowska
A quick recap…
ASC Newsletter No.30 featured an article about a
new study of some 150 ethnographic objects from
the Amur River region in Siberia now housed with
the NMNH Anthropology Arctic/Siberian collections
(Krupnik 2023). The objects are associated with the
name of Polish anthropologist Stanisław Poniatowski
(1884–1945), who collected them (or most of them?)
on his eld trip to the Amur River in 1914. He himself
called it “going to the land of the Goldi and Orochon
(people)” (Poniatowski 1966). Today’s names of these
Siberian Indigenous nations are the Nanay and the
Udehe, respectively.
Poniatowski’s trip of 1914 was undertaken on behalf
of the Smithsonian Institution and was initiated by Dr.
Aleš Hrdlička, curator of physical anthropology at the
U.S. National Museum (hereafter USNM). Hrdlička
charged Poniatowski to collect physical evidence, such
as anthropological measurements and photographs
of living individuals, plaster masks, and skeletal
remains to support his theory that Indigenous people of
South Siberia preserved the original type of the early
populations that had peopled North America from Asia
many millennia prior. Poniatowski was one of several
people commissioned by Hrdlička to collect materials
in 1912–1914 for the display on ‘early human races’
at the Panama-California exposition in the city of San
Diego in 1915. The outbreak of WWI in summer 1914
changed Poniatowski’s plans and caused a hasty ending
of his Amur River expedition and the subsequent
fragmentation of his original collection. The bulk
of ethnographic objects that Poniatowski collected
eventually made its way to Washington, to the USNM,
but not his anthropometric measurements, photographs,
plaster masks, skeletal remains nor any other evidence
he was tasked to collect for Hrdlička.
The 2023 Newsletter article introduced a preliminary
survey of Poniatowski’s collection and its history at
NMNH by Igor Krupnik. It argued that the Amur
River objects that arrived at the USNM in 1918 and
were recorded as two separate accessions, no. 63969
under the name of Poniatowski and no. 63972, under
the name of Vladimir K. Arseniev, then the-director of
the Khabarovsk Museum in the city of Khabarovsk on
the Amur River, were actually parts of one collection.
It was most probably assembled by Poniatowski and
was left upon his departure in the care of Arseniev, who
eventually shipped it to the USNM.
By that time, Igor was already aware that a signicant
portion of Poniatowski’s collections from the Amur
River was also preserved at the Polish Ethnological
Society (Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze, hereafter
PES), in Wroclaw, Poland. In included, among other
items, his original eld diary in Polish from 1914
(published in full in Polish in 1966 and in Russian in
2007–2009), his original photo collection of 120+ glass
plates, lms, and negatives, paper drawings by the
Nanay people, stencils, cut-outs and birch bark pieces,
clothing patterns and ornaments, object drawings,
and scores of anthropological measurement sheets
(that never reached the USNM). All these materials
were studied and digitized in 2014–2016 by a Polish
team at the University of Wroclaw (UWr) and posted
online on his memorial website (Fig. 1). The team
leaders, Dr. Stefania Skowron-Markowska at the
UWr School of Philology and Dr. Marta Nowakowska
(then with the UWr) published two collection volumes
in Polish that described their work on Poniatowski’s
collections. One covered the history of digitizing
Poniatowski’s legacy at the PES a full century
after his Amur River expedition and the other dealt
specically with Poniatowski’s photos and other visual
materials. It was clear that the dispersed elements of
Poniatowski’s legacy that survived for over 100 years
without knowing of each other should be ‘re-united’
and introduced ‘in total’—to museum professionals,
northern specialists, and the Indigenous communities in
the collections’ ‘home area,’ as a heritage resource.
Building an International Team in 2023
In spring 2023, while Igor was completing his
summary of the Poniatowski’s collection at NMNH,
Dr. Joanna Dolinska, a specialist in Mongolic and
Tungusic languages at the University of Warsaw’
COLLECTIONS
Figure. 1. PoniPoniatowski collection website screen,
Wroclaw University Library
ASC Newsletter 57
Center for Research and Practice in Cultural Continuity
in Warsaw, Poland, received a two-month fellowship
with the ‘Recovering Voices’ program at NMNH
Anthropology. She was looking for a local project that
she could explore while at NMNH and was thrilled
to learn that she could join a study of Poniatowski’s
collection as a linguist. In May 2023, Joanna arrived
in Washington with a load of Polish publications on
Poniatowski, digital copies of his materials, and some
preliminary results of her own explorations at the
National Ethnographic Museum in Warsaw.
Also in March 2023, Igor reached out to Dr. Stefania
(Stenia) Skowron-Markowska at the Institute of
Classical, Mediterranean, and Oriental Studies, School
of Philology, University of Wroclaw in Wroclaw,
Poland. Stenia’s main research eld is in the Chinese
martial arts and associated tourism; but her initial
training was in the history of Anthropology. Her rst
book published in 2012 was about the life and work
of a famous Polish anthropologist, Maria Czaplicka
(1884–1921), who traveled to Siberia roughly at the
same time, as Poniatowski was on the Amur River. In
2014–2016, together with her Polish colleague, Dr.
Marta Nowakowska, then at the University of Wroclaw,
they led a two-year survey of Stanislaw Poniatowski’s
records at the PES that produced the above-mentioned
online database and publications on Poniatowski’s
records from the 1914 expedition. They were aware
of Poniatowski’s materials at the Smithsonian, mainly
of the letters he exchanged with Hrdlička, but never
heard of his objects preserved at the NMNH. Both
Stenia and Marta were keen to get on board, and so the
‘team of four’ for a joint Smithsonian-Polish study of
Poniatowski’s collections was born.
In summer 2023, the team began having regular zoom
meetings. We made our rst goal to take stock of what
we knew about the various aspects of Poniatowski’s
legacy that left its marks from the Amur River to
Poland to Washington, D.C. Over the next few months,
the team revisited materials associated with the
Poniatowski’s 1914 trip and produced a summary paper
of 30-some pages, with several appendices. We were up
for a few pleasant surprises…
What Did We Learn?
Certain elements of Poniatowski’s Amur River legacy,
like the ethnographic objects and accession records at
the Smithsonian, his correspondence with Hrdlička’s,
or his photography at PES, were already covered in
various other writings. Other elements, even if known,
were hardly touched. Below are the snapshots of some
additional studies, undertaken in 2023.
1914 Anthropometric Measurement Sheets. For
individual measurements, Poniatowski used the
standard anthropometric data sheets of the U.S.
National Museum supplied by Hrdlička (Fig. 2).
According to Poniatowski’s preliminary report from
1914, he was able to take measurements of 109 Nanay
(Goldi) and 25 Udehe (Orochon) individuals; he took
the anthropometric sheets with him to Warsaw upon
leaving Khabarovsk in August 1914. Miraculously,
they survived WWII and were retrieved after his death;
they were later donated to the PES and preserved there
with other Poniatowski’s records. Anthropometric data
collected by Poniatowski in 1914 were analyzed in
the 1960s by Polish biological anthropologists Josef
Glinka and Franciszek Wokroj and published with
scores of photographs of the individuals he measured.
Since these sheets were digitized and are now
accessible as a part of Poniatowski’s digital collection
at the Wroclaw University Library (WUL), the online
database displays the full set of 134 original sheets
lled in pencil and 96 nal sheets in ink. These were
the materials that Hrdlička never had a chance to look
at and use.
Besides being a source of morphometric data that
are hardly in use by today’s biological anthropology,
Poniatowski’s anthropometric sheets have additional
value that neither he nor Hrdlička could ever foresee.
Each sheet was assigned a number and displayed
personal names (rst and last), age and sex of the
individual, as well as the place where the measurement
was taken, often with a date. Because of this added
data, anthropometric sheets serve as a key source to
cross-reference Poniatowski’s other types of records;
the sheets also constitute the most complete list of
Indigenous people (over 130), with whom Poniatowski
interacted. They provide personal names of many
people in group photographs that were identied in
captions only by their sheet number. Besides personal
names and age, many sheets display maiden clan names
for women, family status, and residence. People’s
names on sheets may be also cross-referenced for
Figure 2. Poniatowski's 1914 anthropometric data sheet on
the UWL website
58 ASC Newsletter
their contributions to other types of Poniatowski’s
collections, by making drawings, papercuts, stencils,
ornamentations or providing linguistic materials and
ethnographic objects.
Another important aspect of Poniatowski’s eldwork
was his keen interest in Indigenous languages
and, specically, in the Nanay and Udehe cultural
terminology for spiritual objects and
symbols. His 13-page publication,
Materials on the Vocabulary of the
Amur Gold (Poniatowski 1923—Fig.
3), contained the list of over 300 words,
preceded by a short introduction and
accompanied by tables representing
conjugational forms in the Nanay
language. From Poniatowski’s diary
we know that one of his key informants
was Semen Aktanka (“Gendzu”—
Fig. 4) from Sikachi-Alyan, and that
Poniatowski collected information on
vocabulary and grammar from him on
July 7, and July 24, 1914. Gendzu also
shared the Nanay cultural and religious
knowledge during their trip in July-
August 1914. Compiling a vocabulary
or an organized list of words in a local
language was a common practice
followed by researchers, missionaries,
and educated travelers of the era.
Therefore, it might have seemed natural
to Poniatowski and explains his eort
to compile a short Nanay wordlist (a
vocabulary), with some added Udehe
words.
The value of Poniatowski’s Nanay
‘vocabulary’ lies primarily in the
sociolinguistic dimension of the
words he recorded in several semantic
categories. Altogether, he included ca.
360 Nanay terms that can be loosely
classied into the following categories:
[1] time, [2] animals, [3] religious
beliefs, [4] human beings according to
their age, [5] human body, [6] weather,
[7] hunting, [8] verbs, [9] numerals, [10] prepositions,
and [11] housing. The very choice of selected
categories conrmed his strong ethnographic interests
and probably reected on the topics of conversations
with his Nanay informants.
The group of words related to ‘religious beliefs’
deserves special attention, as it oers a glimpse into
Poniatowski’s venture into the spiritual world of
the Nanay people. In his brief description of [the]
Nanay grammar, Poniatowski perceived it through
the lenses of a speaker of an Indo-European language
and, primarily, as an anthropologist. He missed some
typical features, like the vocal harmony present in all
Tungusic languages. What makes his work outstanding,
by today’s standard, was his attention to the names
that local communities used for themselves, but also
how their neighbors called them, as well as [to] the
neighbor’s ethnonyms. It is unfortunate,
from a linguist’s perspective, that
Poniatowski’s list of the Nanay and Udehe
words, with short explanations, was not
followed by a more thorough analysis or
by a sample text in the Nanay language to
oer insight on how the terminology was
used.
With such material lacking, Poniatowski’s
Nanay ‘vocabulary’ can be best used
when read alongside his eld diary lled
with drawings of the objects, charms, and
spiritual gures he mentions. In the diary,
he also recorded stories concerning the
origin of humankind and certain taboo
topics. In these accounts we also nd
words for the objects he collected. Lastly,
his vocabulary documented the likely
Nanay pronunciation common in the
Sikachi-Alyan community around 1914.
Therefore, his 1923 publication opens a
window to the world of beliefs, rituals,
and prayers of the Nanay people from
the sociolinguistic perspective and is a
valuable source for studies in historical
linguistics of the Tungusic languages.
And in 2024…
The team has ambitious plans for
activities in 2024. With the preliminary
survey phase completed at both NMNH
and the PES in Wroclaw, the next step
will be to start converting this new
knowledge into tangible ‘products.’
According to our vision, it should be
an illustrated book, a catalog on the
American side published with the
ASC, and an interactive open portal,
presumably hosted in Poland. The two products should
be compatible, perhaps with more Polish language
options available on the portal. At this time, we
view them structured by the main components of the
Poniatowski’s collections (in plural), ethnographic
objects, photographs, stencils and ornaments,
drawings, anthropometric sheets, and also the
associated documents, like the Poniatowski- Hrdlička
correspondence (at both NAA and PES), excerpts from
Poniatowski’s 1914 diary, and other personal records.
Figure 3. Title page of
Poniatowski’s Goldi
vocabulary publication
Figure 4. Onenka Gendzu,
Poniatowski key partner and
language expert
ASC Newsletter 59
Both formats should include a narrative on his 1914
expedition and major resources for further exploration
of his legacy.
We anticipate two academic papers published in 2024
from our studies that have been already submitted to
Arctic Anthropology and Sibirica, respectively. The
texts will serve as a base resource for more extensive
writings for a future web portal and printed catalog.
In Warsaw and Wroclaw preparations have begun
for a major proposal to one of Polish grant agencies
for a funding award for travel, portal development,
international conference on museums, heritage
management, and endangered languages, perhaps in
2025. There should be support for scores of students
from Skowron-Markowska’s seminar at the University
of Wroclaw, who may join the project for professional
training in museum research and collection care.
Therefore, outreach and mentoring the next generation
of museum professionals will be a new addition to the
‘Poniatowski project.’
This work is to pave the way for the next phase,
bringing Poniatowski’s collections, even if in a digital
format, back to its ‘home area,’ to the descendants of
people he surveyed in 1914. Even more critical would
be to seek insight from Indigenous and local cultural
experts from the Amur River region into Poniatowski’s
linguistic, ethnographic, visual, artistic, and other
records, both in Poland and the U.S. For today’s
communities in the Russian Far East, Poniatowski’s
materials may provide a heritage resource to strengthen
Indigenous cultures and languages. Unfortunately,
the prospects for such an eort remain distant as
long as Russia’s war against Ukraine continues, yet
another war that interferes with Poniatowski’s Amur
expedition legacy. We may only hope that in the
future such crucial local expertise can be added to his
collections and that the journey once started by a young
anthropologist from Warsaw may be completed.
THREE-DIMENSIONAL TECHNOLOGY AND
COMMUNITY-BASED CAPACITY BUILDING
IN SÁPMI
By Paaula Rauhala
The Smithsonian Institution (SI) safeguards and
houses 158 million artifacts and other materials, with
approximately 58 of them originating from Sámi
communities (Magnani et al. 2023). The Sámi people
are the Indigenous people of Norway, Finland, Sweden,
and Russia. These countries constitute the heartlands
of the Sámi people, called Sápmi. Cultural artifacts
originating from Sámi communities are scattered
around the world due to expropriation, state policies,
anthropological
interest, tourism,
World War II,
trade, migration,
and expeditions.
One can nd a
pair of reindeer
fur shoes from
Washington,
D.C. and an
ancestral Sámi
drum from Italy.
Very often, Sámi
artifacts made
of reindeer fur
and leather were
treated with
mercury or arsenic in the 1900s for pest control.
The museum institution I work for, called Sámiid
Vuorká-Dávvirat (SVD), operates as an Indigenous-run
and community-based museum in Sápmi, located in
Karasjok, Norway. In July 2022, I joined my colleagues,
Dr. Jelena Porsanger and Anne May Olli from SVD
along with Dr. Matthew Magnani (University of
Maine) and Dr. Natalia Magnani (University of Maine),
on a research trip to the SI. This collaboration was
centered around three-dimensional (3D) technology,
cultural heritage research, and community engagement.
As members of the UArctic Thematic Network on
Digital North: Three-Dimensional Technologies and
Arctic Education, we arrived in Washington, D.C. with
enthusiastic spirit, eager to meet and greet the Sámi
cultural artifacts. Dr. Eric Hollinger and Dr. Igor
Krupnik, the professionals at the SI, welcomed us with
fantastic hospitality and facilitated research practices
throughout the week. Prior to our visit to the SI, we
at SVD, collaborated with our community elders to
select specic artifacts of special interest from the SI
catalog, representing the Sámi collection. The objective
was to create 3D digital representations of the chosen
artifacts and address potentially toxic elements within
them. As a North Sámi conservator at SVD with a
focus on the material science of Sámi methods related
to reindeer skin processing practices, I was particularly
interested in reindeer fur shoes and coats. As a master's
student at UiT the Arctic University of Norway with
a focus on 3D technologies and heritage preservation
in Sápmi, I was drawn to challenging 3D imaging
methods with intricate shoe design. The chosen
artifacts were digitized using photogrammetry at the
SI Museum Support Center. In addition to creating
photogrammetric digital models, we were able to test
the pair of reindeer fur shoes for possible contaminants.
Under the leadership of Dr. Eric Hollinger and
Paaula Rauhala
60 ASC Newsletter
EXPLORING ARCTIC COLLECTIONS IN
NEW ENGLAND MUSEUMS
By Igor Krupnik
Following the “World and Scrimshaw” conference in
New Bedford, I set out on a short tour of the nearby
museums across southern New England. This coastal
area of southern Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and
northeastern Connecticut was once a thriving hub of
American colonial trade, commercial whaling, and port
facilities with connections to distant lands, including
to the North. It was and still is the home to a large
Portuguese and Azores diaspora that shares a century-
old whaling tradition from the eastern Atlantic. Today,
this maritime legacy is mostly preserved in coastal
towns with historical buildings and other landmarks,
and in local museums that house many insightful
objects from the Arctic, like the New Bedford Whaling
Museum described above.
My rst destination was the storage facility of the
Haenreer Museum of Anthropology in Bristol RI,
once a farm owned by the museum founder, Rudolf
F. Haenreer, Jr. (1874–1954). A successful
entrepreneur and philanthropist, Haenreer
collected Native American artefacts (very much like
George Heye, the founder of the Museum of the
American Indian, now the Smithsonian NMAI). After
Haenreer’s death, his family donated his massive
collection to Brown University in Providence RI,
whereas the farm located on the outskirts of Bristol, on
the shore of the Mt. Hope Bay, became the museum’s
Collections Research Center. It also serves as the hub
for the Brown University Laboratory for Circumpolar
Studies, the seat of our colleagues Douglas D.
Anderson and Wanni Anderson, and the ‘breeding
ground’ to so many Northern archaeologists they
trained at Brown over decades.
The purpose of my visit to Bristol was neither
inspecting the Haenreer Museum’s thousands of
Anne May Olli, we detected mercury residue with a
handheld pXRF spectrometer. Excited for the mercury
compound discovery, SVD is now part of generating
research on contaminated Sámi artifacts in Norway.
Our local community elders, many of whom are
professional artisans and craftsmen, expressed interest
in the same pair of reindeer fur shoes chosen by the
museum sta at SVD. Following the visit, we at SVD
presented the 3D digital version of the reindeer fur
shoes to the community elders. The digital model they
studied and examined raised questions and interest
regarding the inventive traditions of craftsmanship.
The 3D digital model caused our local community to
mobilize. The shoes, collected from Alaska, present
sewing and design methods that appear distinct
from those employed in Sápmi. Integration of 3D
technologies enables us to connect remote Sámi
artifacts with our local community, without the risk of
inhaling toxic vapors accumulated in the air.
This collaboration with the SI is rooted in capacity
building with the local Sámi community. This trip
provided a learning opportunity for me outside
university lectures, which is how I came across
with the Arctic Studies Center. The outcome of this
collaboration has shifted my research focus from
viewing 3D technology as an alternative practice in
heritage preservation to actively exploring its potential
in identifying key factors for addressing complex
craftsmanship methods and conservation practices.
Reference
Magnani, M., Porsanger, J., Laiti, S., Magnani, N.,
Olli, A. M., Rauhala, P., Valkeapää, S., and Hollinger,
E. 2023. Small collections remembered: Sámi material
culture and community‐based digitization at the
Smithsonian Institution. Museum Anthropology 46(2):
92-105
Sámi reindeer fur shoes in the Smithsonian collection. Photo
by Paaula Rouhala
Haenreer Museum Collection Research Center in
Bristol, RI. Photo courtesy: museum webpage
ASC Newsletter 61
archaeological artefacts from Alaska assembled by
Doug Anderson and his mentor, J. Louis Giddings
(1909–1964), the museum’s rst director, nor even
its much smaller ethnographic collections from the
Arctic: 300+ objects from Alaska, 250 from Canada,
35 from Greenland, and tiny sets from Siberia and
northern Scandinavia/Sami—‘thank you’ Jen Wico,
museum registrar. According to Rip (Rodney) Gerry,
museum archives manager, Haenreer also houses
an impressive visual collection from the Arctic that
includes over 4,000 slides, prints, and negatives from
Alaska, almost all generated by Giddings over his
years of Alaskan research, in addition of more than
six hours of his lm footage, plus some 600+ slides
from northern Canada, and 350 from Greenland and
Siberia. Seven years prior, I teamed with Rip and
Kevin P. Smith, then the-Haenreer deputy director
(now ASC research associate) to explore a small
set of about 50 portrait and landscape photographs
Giddings took in 1939 on his short visit to the Yupik
community of Gambell on St. Lawrence Island,
Alaska. The story of that small project in identifying
people’s faces on 80-year-old photographs and eventual
visual ‘repatriation’ was presented in 2017 (see ASC
Newsletter 24:49–51). Now, I wanted to check with
Rip whether there were any other photographs taken by
Giddings’ in Gambell that we missed in 2016–2017.
As Rip and I pored over Giddings’ old prints and
negatives, I was able to identify a few more pictures
that were taken on St. Lawrence Island. We now
assume that the original collection was perhaps of 55–
60 photos, if not more, since all portrait images were
taken as “face and side” pairs, and for several people
either face or side image was missing. The modest
“Giddings collection” from Gambell is an insightful
window into people’s life on St. Lawrence, now some
85 years ago. Each person photographed by Giddings
had his/her history. Many had direct links to dozens
of today’s descendants, who would love to see faces
of their deceased family members. It now remains for
the Haenreer Museum to share this heritage ‘trove’
from its collections, by providing high quality copies
of Giddings’ photos to the descendant families on the
Island. I also looked at some historical ethnographic
objects from St. Lawrence Island kindly shared by
museum curator Thierry Gentis.
My next destination was the museum of the Rhode
Island School of Design (RISD) in Providence
RI, following the invitation of Laurie Brewer, its
curator of costume and textiles. Among myriad other
specimens, Laurie cares for a modest collection of
Arctic artifacts that she wanted to examine with me.
According to museum online database, its collections
contain more than 100,000 works of art and design
dating from ancient times to the present-day, of which
over 84,000 are available online. Of these, only a
small portion comes from the Arctic—20 objects from
Alaska, including a beautifully engraved pipe from the
late 1800s, with the bowl and stem made of ivory; 55
modern graphic works and carvings by the Canadian
Inuit, and a few pieces evidently from Greenland.
Most of the objects were donated by local owners and
collectors who once held them as ‘curiosities’ or were
purchased as art specimens to inspire RISD students.
We spent three hours going over the objects that Laurie
displayed on a large table. This collection was never
described and never studied; hopefully, its many ne
pieces will one day be exhibited or published in a
catalog that tells their stories.
My last stop was in Mystic, CT, where I visited the
Mystic Seaport Museum on the banks of the Mystic
River estuary. Established in 1929, it is one of the
largest specialized maritime museums in the country
dedicated to the preservation of the ‘American
maritime experience.’ The museum includes a recreated
New England coastal village, a working shipyard, a
large watercraft collection featuring four National
Historic Landmark vessels, exhibit halls and state-of-
the-art collection storage facilities. The purpose of my
trip was to explore the museum’s Arctic ethnographic
collections, particularly those not associated with the
famous whaling captain George Comer (1858–1937).
Comer’s objects, photographs, diaries, and memorabilia
acquired primarily on his many voyages to the Inuit of
Hudson Bay have been the subject of many published
stories, catalogs, temporary exhibits, and long-term
displays (see ASC Newsletter 25: 59–60). Therefore, on
this short visit I was looking ‘beyond Comer.’
At the museum I was met by its enthusiastic
collection sta: curator Krystal Rose, registrar Laura
Nadelberg, and cataloger Jenny Carroll. Over a day-
long stay, they introduced me to many rare and exciting
objects from the Arctic; many are hardly known besides
Laura Nadelberg, Mystic Seaport Museum registrar, displays
a set of model kayaks from Greenland and Alaska.
Photo by Igor Krupnik
62 ASC Newsletter
million pieces of manuscript material along with large
collections of ship’s plans, charts, maps, and oral
histories. The art and objects collection includes well
over a million photographs, 1,400 paintings, 2,100 ship
models, 75 gureheads, 4,000 prints, 1,400 pieces of
scrimshaw, and over 450 small boats.
The collection includes a surprising number of Arctic
materials collected by whalers, sailors, and explorers.
One of the most frequently used Arctic collections
is comprised of materials related to whaling and
sealing ship captain George Comer (1858–1937) of
East Haddam, Connecticut. Comer was an amateur
anthropologist and naturalist, who in addition to his
ship-related work, compiled detailed notes on Inuit life,
traded and collected objects, gathered and preserved
ora and fauna, and took hundreds of photographs
the museum storage walls. Upon my suggestion, the
sta agreed to produce an overview of the Mystic
Seaport Museum ethnographic collections from the
Arctic (yes, ‘beyond Comer’) that is published below.
The takeouts from this short tour were many, but the
main message is obvious. Museums across the country,
even with the medium-size, even modest collections,
house troves of artefacts from the North—in the
forms of ethnographic and archaeological specimens,
Indigenous art objects, historical photos, diaries, and
other documentary records. These museums are often
o the ‘beaten path’ of Arctic collection surveys that
commonly favor larger institutions. Knowing this
local collection geography and sharing it with the
home communities in the Arctic and fellow museum
specialists via print, exhibits, and increasingly via
online databases would ensure that these Arctic
heritage treasures are valued by today’s users and the
generations to come.
BEYOND COMER: ARCTIC COLLECTIONS
AT MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM
By Laura Nadelberg and Krystal Rose
Since 1929, Mystic Seaport Museum has been one
of the premier maritime museums in the world, with
collections that reect the extraordinary scope and
signicance of America’s relationship with the sea
and inland waterways. Housed in the Museum’s
Collections Research Center, the collections represent
a wide variety of materials, from manuscripts to ne
art. Within the library, researchers can nd over a
Umiak used by John Bockstoce (1981.156).
Photo by Joe Michael, Mystic Seaport Museum
Summer boots (1948.415-416), child’s polar bear pants
(1948.419), and sealskin mittens (1948.419-420), all from the
Peter Freuchen collection at Mystic Seaport Museum
Studio portrait of Captain John Orrin Spicer
taken in New London, Connecticut, in the
mid-1880s (1955.954). After retiring from
the whaling industry, Spicer was often seen
in New London and on his farm wearing
sealskin boots
ASC Newsletter 63
that give us a glimpse into Arctic life in the late 19th
and early 20th centuries. The collection includes small
objects and carvings, including a delicate ivory comb
made by Niviatsarnaq (also known as ‘Shooy’),
hundreds of glass plate negatives,
a photograph album, and numerous
library materials including
correspondence, notes, clippings,
and “Records of Births at or near
Cape Fullerton, Hudson Bay,” kept
by Comer between 1877–1911.
A Visit from Igor Krupnik
The Comer materials are some of
the most frequently studied and
used materials in our collection, so
in March of 2023, when Dr. Igor
Krupnik, Smithsonian Curator of
Arctic and Northern Ethnology,
visited Mystic Seaport Museum
to examine the Arctic collections,
Museum sta were surprised his
research visit was to see everything
of Arctic origin not related to Captain Comer. This
was not to diminish the Comer-related materials in
the collection, but because the Comer materials are
well-known and documented, and he was interested
in exploring what other Arctic materials the Museum
held. The collections sta were eager to guide Krupnik
through the Arctic materials and take him up on his
oer to examine and bring more clarity to some of
the lesser-known Arctic collections, many of which
have little provenance and
documentation. Some of the
collections he explored have
associations with other well-
known names such as Nelson
R. Perry, Peter Freuchen,
John Bockstoce, and others.
What follows is an overview
of some of those materials.
Arctic Watercraft
Among more than 450 small
boats held in the watercraft
collection, several hail from the Arctic. One frequently
exhibited example is an umiak, donated to the Museum
by ethnologist and archaeologist John Bockstoce (b.
1944). Originally built around 1930, the vessel was
used to make trade trips between the Diomede Islands,
Siberia, and Nome, Alaska. By 1971, the vessel (now
greatly deteriorated) was purchased by Bockstoce
with the goal of doing a complete restoration using
traditional materials. With the help of his friends from
the area (Diomede Islands, King Island, and Nome),
the group rst restored the frame, and then prepared,
sewed, and tted walrus hides to the frame in the
traditional Inupiat way.
Bockstoce and a crew of ve
then spent the next several years,
traveling more than six thousand
miles through the Northwest
Passage. During this time,
Bockstoce and his crew completed
coastal surveys for historical
commercial whaling sites, while
also following some of the path of
the original Thule voyagers. Their
voyage from Alaska to Cornwallis,
Nunavut, became the rst open-
boat voyage to travel the Northwest
Passage in modern times.
Also in the watercraft collection
is a qajaq from Ugiuvak (King
Island), Alaska, unique because of
its two-hole design. Constructed in
a similar manner to the one-hole
qajaqs of this region, this two-hole qajaq consists of
a wooden frame, covered in seal skin and lashed with
sinew. While we don’t exactly know when it was made
or for whom, we do know that it was collected in the
late 1920s by John Borden (1884–1961) of Chicago,
a wealthy businessman and self-proclaimed explorer.
While visiting Ugiuvak, Borden saw the qajaqs that
had been traditionally used by the Ugiuvvaŋmiut
people for centuries, to hunt and sh. Borden, an avid
sportsman, was impressed
by the vessel’s eciency in
rough waters and decided
he wanted to have one
replicated in canvas. He
shipped the skin qajaq o
to the Old Town Canoe
Company for them to use
as reference, but while
in transit, he fell upon
nancial diculties and
had to abandon the project
all together.
Art, Objects, Photography, and Clothing from the
Arctic
One of the collections Krupnik focused on was that
of Nelson R. Perry (1894–1964). Perry was the
Regional Manager of the Met Life Insurance Company,
but also an avid collector of Indigenous Arctic art.
As an amateur anthropologist and member of the
Explorers Club, he made numerous trips to the Arctic,
predominantly Alaska and Canada. While some of the
Ugiuvak (King Island) two-hole qajaq
(1938.312). Photo by Joe Michael,
Mystic Seaport Museum
A display of implements, many associated with Nelson R.
Perry. Photo Joe Michael, Mystic Seaport Museum
64 ASC Newsletter
pieces he brought back were traditional or previously
used pieces like spears and paddles, he predominantly
collected trade art including carvings, dolls, and
clothing. In going through this material with Krupnik,
we began to understand the importance of trade art
documenting shift from traditional art to contemporary
art in the Arctic.
Krupnik was surprised to discover that the Museum
holds a number of high quality Greenlandic model
qajaqs. At least eight of these models are almost
completely outtted with miniature tools. Three models
have small model qajaqers sitting in the boat. Little was
known about the models because of minimal catalog
records. Most were acquired by the Museum between
1959 and 1966, and many were incorrectly identied
as simply “Eskimo kayaks.” Only a few gave clues
to their origin based on information in the donation
paperwork. An example of this includes qajaq models
given in memory of Arctic explorer Peter Freuchen by
his widow shortly after his death.
In looking through our model qajaqs, Krupnik pointed
out key characteristics that dierentiated them from
similar vessels of other regions such as Hudson Bay
and Alaska. We were able to use this information to
closely examine the collection and conrm the three
models we knew were from Greenland, but then also
identied ve more that were decidedly Greenlandic,
with another being highly probable.
While examining one of the models, we noticed that
its qajaqer was wearing a leather coat with a tted
hood, which was presumed to be a tuilik, or watertight
qajaqing jacket from Greenland. This reminded sta
of an object in the collection that had been donated in
1960 and catalogued as an “Eskimo parka.” A closer
inspection of the garment showed many similarities to
the one worn by the model qajaqer—the coat was made
of leather, with a tted hood, and had ties with bone
toggles. Bearing an uncanny resemblance to the tuilik
worn by the small model, collections sta dug into the
object correspondence les to see if there was any more
information to help determine the origin of the jacket.
As it turns out, the donor of the piece was the nephew
of John M. Jaynes (1878–1967), the Chief Engineer
on the schooner Bowdoin for 10-12 years, who traveled
on multiple voyages to Greenland with Donald B.
MacMillan. The odds of this jacket being a tuilik in the
traditional Greenlandic style increased exponentially,
leading to the update the object’s record. The Freuchen
collection, donated by his widow and well-known
fashion illustrator, Dagmar Cohn, also includes a
child’s pants made of polar bear fur, leather summer
boots, and mittens featured on the previous page.
Another notable and one-of-a-kind object with
components from the Arctic is a narwhal and walrus
tusk coat rack made by Connecticut whaling captain
John Orrin Spicer (1835–1917). The coat rack was
accompanied by a colorful account from Spicer,
claiming that he “worked on every piece but did not
make it all.” Spicer claims he captured the narwhals
and walrus in the Arctic, and gathered the dark, ne-
grained wood from the Sandwich Islands.
Manuscripts
Many objects mentioned above have connections in
the Museum’s manuscript collections. Such is the case
with Collection 8, the Henry Grinnell (1799–1874)
letters, and photographs that we have of Inuk guide
and interpreter Taqulittuq (1838–1876) (often
transliterated as Tookoolito or referred to as ‘Hannah’)
and her family. The Grinnell letters focus on the
Charles F. Hall (1821–1871) polar expedition and
include letters from Hall to Grinnell. Hall frequently
mentions Taqulittuq, her husband Ipirvik (also known
as ‘Joe’), and their daughter Panik (also known as
‘Sylvia’). Taqulittuq and Ipirvik were two of the
most well-known and widely traveled Inuit of their
time. They worked with Hall in searching for the lost
Franklin expedition and the Polaris expedition, which
attempted to reach the North Pole. In addition to the
Comer and Grinnell manuscripts, the library collection
also holds the papers of the previously mentioned
collector, Nelson R. Perry, and the Arctic-focused
research papers of maritime historian Lucille M.
Showalter.
The Collections sta at Mystic Seaport Museum would
like to thank Dr. Krupnik for sharing his knowledge
regarding Arctic items in the collection. There is still
much to learn about these materials, and we happily
welcome researchers to the Collections Research
Center by appointment. Please visit our website to
learn more.
MANAGING MUSEUM AND COASTAL SITE
COLLECTIONS
By Alex Jansen
While at the Smithsonian’s Arctic Studies Center,
I have been working with Dr. William Fitzhugh,
helping him manage archaeological site collections
accumulated from decades of eld research, including
over 700 sites located in Canada, Mongolia, Siberia,
Japan, and Alaska and several thousand lithic artifacts,
bone specimens, and other site materials. I conducted
an inventory of these materials and helped prepare
them for permanent curation at the Smithsonian,
Canada, and elsewhere. For my future Ph.D., I plan
ASC Newsletter 65
to research how people adapted to and used coastal
and marine environments and how this can provide
information on how to better manage the ocean today. I
will also focus on how museum collections can serve as
teaching tools on ocean issues to educate people about
the need to preserve marine ecosystems.
While at the museum, I also published two papers on
my research in Chesapeake Bay and Baltimore Harbor
through the Smithsonian’s Ocean Portal, including
“Oysters as a Keystone Species in the Chesapeake
Bay” and “Jellies in the Baltimore Harbor.” These
papers explore people’s personal connections to their
local waterways by highlighting rich coastal and marine
ecosystems right in their own backyards through the
use of museum collections, underwater photography,
and video. In both papers, I utilize my work in the
Chesapeake Bay and Baltimore Harbor along with
examples from the museum’s Sant Ocean Hall to help
educate people about the ocean. Furthermore, I have
been working with the Smithsonian Environmental
Research Center (SERC) on the development of a
series of educational lms and other initiatives based
on my research and underwater photography and video
work. These lms focus on jellysh and comb jellies,
oyster reef species, and seasonal species, to enhance
education about the Chesapeake and ocean issues. See:
Oysters as a Keystone Species in the Chesapeake
Bay by Alex Jansen (2023).
REMOTE ENGAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY
FOR IMPROVED COLLECTIONS ACCESS
By Eric Hollinger
Today, we use various forms of video communications
everyday and almost take it for granted, and some of us
remember when such technology was science ction.
With the COVID pandemic, visual tech became more
commonplace and indispensable to almost everyone.
We are now recognizing it can also be an essential
tool for connecting distant communities with heritage
collections at the Smithsonian.
The idea is not new for the NMNH Anthropology
Department and its Repatriation Oce (RO).
Consultation required by the 1989 NMAI Act
brought challenges of connecting Indigenous
representatives with the collections from as far away
as Hawaii and Alaska. In 1995, we experimented with
teleconferencing for repatriation consultations using
the FTS2000 Video Interoperability teleconference
system of AT&T. Curators and RO sta took collection
pieces to AT&T oces in Vienna, Virginia, where they
were connected by cameras and a TV monitor with
Tlingit and Haida in Juneau, Alaska. It was a great
idea, but the technology was not up to supporting
real-time discussion of objects. The time delay for the
sound resulted in long pauses and turn-taking between
comments and questions. After the experiment, eorts
emphasized in-person visits to the collections for the
next 25 years.
Jellysh in Baltimore Harbor. Photo by A. Jansen NMNH curators, RO sta, and collections managers
teleconference from Virginia with Tlingit leaders in Juneau,
1995
Tlingit elder Florence Sheakley lecturing students in Alaska
via a web-camera held by Eric Hollinger in 2017
66 ASC Newsletter
Video technology next found its way into collections
by visitors with 2-way cameras on cell phones who
connected with those back home to discuss what
they were seeing. Tlingit teachers and elders using
FaceTime showed collections to students in Wrangell
and Juneau in real-time, making the experience a
virtual eld trip to the Smithsonian!
The pandemic made us realize that video communication
is here to stay and we had better start thinking about
how to use it eectively. The nancial and time cost,
and the physical and emotional toll of a trip from Alaska
to Washington, D.C. can be prohibitive for many. Even
if some can make the journey in person, many more at
home still need to view and engage with collections.
Recently, the RO purchased video cameras, lights, and
rigging equipment to outt a large room along with a
computer and large screen monitor. An overhead camera
with remote control allows one to pan across large items
and zoom in close to facilitate real-time discussions with
one or more participants on a zoom call. We anticipate
that visiting researchers who come to the museum can
connect via this system with people back home, or with
experts anywhere in the world. We are now researching
cameras that can be rolled on carts among the drawers
and cabinets so remote viewers can browse and select
what they wish to spend more time examining. We
expect remote access for collection and consultation
will become standard practice for repatriation and other
forms of community engagement with the museum’s
collections.
MYSTERIOUS FIVE-SIDED STONE FROM ST.
LAWRENCE ISLAND
By Brendan P. Kelly and Edwin Campbell
In February 2023, Vera Metcalf and Brendan Kelly
were in Gambell, Alaska when Edwin Campbell
showed us a stone that he had excavated from the
tundra on the north side of St. Lawrence Island. He
estimated that he uncovered it from a depth of 6 to 8
feet. He hoped we could identify it, but neither of us
had never seen anything like it. The stone’s maximal
dimensions are 89 mm (length) and 49 cm (width). At
the base, ve planar surfaces measure 30, 33, 25, 24,
and 20 mm and taper to a dull point. The stone appears
to be broken at both ends.
I sent a description and photographs to Bill Fitzhugh,
Kirk Johnson, and Torben Rick at the Smithsonian
Institution, but they also could not identify the stone.
Recently, I took the stone to the Museum of Natural
History where Fitzhugh and Johnson examined it.
Johnson thought the object was likely siltstone.
Fitzhugh noted that one of the surfaces had a subtle but
distinct concavity as develops on sharpening stones.
Johnson then examined the surface with magnication
and noted very ne, parallel striations.
We share the photographs and description here in the
hope that a reader will have insight as to the stone’s
identity. Please share any thoughts with Kelly at
bpkelly@alaska.edu.
ASC-KITIKMEOT BOW AND ARROW
WORKSHOP
By William Fitzhugh and Brendan Griebel
Over several days during the rst week of May, 2023,
the ASC and Pitquhirnikkut Ilihautiniq / Kitikmeot
Heritage Society (PI/KHS) of Cambridge Bay, NWT,
Canada, conducted study tours among the NMNH and
NMAI bow and arrow (B&A) collections, and held a
workshop at NMAI documenting the Donald Cadzow
bow and arrow collection. Cadzow’s materials include
complete B&A sets collected from Inuvialuit hunters
between 1917–1919 when Cadzow was collecting for
the Museum of the American Indian (now NMAI).
Most of Cadzow’s collections are from the Inuinnait
(Copper Inuit) of Coronation Gulf and Cambridge Bay
Eric Hollinger using the new Remote Engagement Station
to show a Yupik box from the mouth of the Yukon River
(E176082). Photo by Matt Sanger
The 5-sided ‘mystery’ stone. Photos by Brendan Kelly and
Kirk Johnson
ASC Newsletter 67
(Iqaluktuuttiaq), Nunavut. The collection is one of the
most complete inventories of Inuit material culture of
any ethnographic group in the Canadian North.
The study tour and workshop came together from
a conuence of events beginning with the ASC’s
association with Brendan Griebel, a long term
employee and Manager of Collections and Archives
at PI/KHS). With Griebel’s help, PI/KHS and its
community have become leaders in reassembling
heritage collections—artifacts, archival information
and photography—that has been transferred to southern
institutions and lost to home communities. Heritage
returns will be important assets in a new cultural
facility soon to open in the community (see “Kuugalak
Cultural Center” by Griebel in this issue).
The other stream of activity was the appearance at ASC
of SI predoctoral fellow Coline Lemaitre who spent
several months researching NMNH B&A collections
for her Ph.D. thesis in Paris. Lemaitre, an archery
athlete, returned from eldwork in Alaska to work with
Cambridge Bay participants in discussions about B&A
technology. Cadzow’s collections and ethnographic
photography by early eld anthropologists like
Vilhjalmur Stefansson and Diamond Jenness
provided some of the best ethnographic bow
information in northern North America because this
technology was still in use in the early 20th century,
and vestiges of that knowledge remain today.
The primary goal of the project was to revitalize
traditional practices of Inuinnait bow manufacture
and use. The successful revival of this technology
requires practical understanding of the materials and
techniques involved in rebuilding the technology,
but also a broader comprehension of the language,
beliefs, relationships, and
supporting technologies (ie.
bow cases, amulets, arrows,
etc.) that once provided social
and cultural context for bow-
making among Inuinnait.
Project objectives included:
1) Identifying relevant
Inuinnait bow collections
and transferring images,
collections records, and
additional metadata to PI/
KHS; 2) bridging Inuinnait
experts with cultural and
heritage collections; 3)
documenting select bows and
related technologies, including
the taking measurements,
blueprints, photos, and
recording terminology and
manufacture techniques; 4) documenting and digitizing
Smithsonian archival resources; 5) building awareness
of the importance of bow manufacture to Inuinnait
culture, past and present.
PI/KHS participants spent a full week at the
Smithsonian. Monday, May 1st they visited the ASC,
toured NMNH exhibits and facilities, discussed Inuit
approaches to youth curriculum enhancement, and
visited the MacFarlane bow and arrow collections at the
Museum Support Center in nearby Suitland. Tuesday
brought the group to the NMAI to meet sta and visit
exhibits in the morning with a transfer to NMAI’s
Cultural Resource Center in Suitland. Wednesday saw
a return to CRC for workshop discussion and research
on Cadzow collections. Thursday was a free ‘recovery’
day for relaxation and Mall visits, followed by a dinner
at the Fitzhugh residence. Friday was another workshop
day with the Cadzow collection at CRC, including
remote information sharing of objects with KHS
people in Cambridge Bay via digital conferencing. The
workshop ended with discussions about future ASC-
PI/KHS collaboration, sharing of archival documents,
and a possible future ASC visit to Cambridge Bay
after the opening of its new Kuugalak Cultural Center.
Our discussions ended with a dinner at one of the DC
waterfront restaurants, and participants prepared for
their ights home.
Workshop participants included Emily Angulalik,
PI/KHS executive director; Kim Crockatt, PI/KHS
CFOO; Mabel Etegik; PI/KHS board member, elder
in residence; Brendan Griebel, PI/KHS manager
collections and archives; Charlie Ikkutisluk, PI/KHS
program coordinator; Tommy Epakhoak, technology
expert and knowledge holder; William Fitzhugh,
Left: Cambridge Bay Elder Mabel Etegik opens the workshop with a traditional Inuit
qulliq lighting ceremony. Right: Stephen Loring inspecting Cadzow arrows with Kim
Crockatt, Emily Angulalik, Mabel Etegik and Charlie Ikkutisluk at NMAI.
Photo by B.D. Engelstad
68 ASC Newsletter
NMNH curator and director, Arctic Studies Center;
Stephen Loring, museum anthropologist, Arctic
Studies Center; Coline Lemaitre, Ph.D. candidate,
Université de Paris, professional archer; Cali Martin,
supervisory collections manager, NMAI; Martin
Thomas Nweeia, educational curriculum development,
Harvard. NMAI participants included Terry Snowball,
Cali Martin, collection manager; and Nathan Sowry,
reference archivist.
FISH SKIN MAGIC: EXPLORING OCCULT
PRACTICE IN ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIA
AND ARCTIC CULTURES
By Elisa Palomino
Ancient civilizations in Mesopotamia and the Arctic
developed intricate occult rituals, incorporating
sh skin into their religious practices and attire.
Mesopotamian priests and Arctic shamans alike wore
sh skin garments, tapping into its mystical properties
to navigate the supernatural realms. In Mesopotamia,
sh were revered for their divine qualities, with Enki,
the god associated with water, fertility, and healing.
Enki created the seven demi-gods or Apkallu, one
bearing the form of a sh-human hybrid. These gures,
depicted wearing cloaks made from a species of giant
carp from the Euphrates and Tigris basin, symbolised
the connection between humanity and the divine.
Mesopotamian civilization boasted sophisticated
leather production technologies, utilising various
animal hides for clothing, footwear, and cultic objects.
While primarily using domesticated animals for leather,
ancient texts mention the tanning of sh species
like mullet, suggesting their potential use in ritual
attire. Depictions of gures clad in sh-shaped capes,
possibly priests, appear in Mesopotamian art. They
could take the form of colossi as bas-relief sculptures
in palaces and temples, at doorways, as apotropaic
clay gurines buried under oors in groups of seven,
as cylinder seals or seal impressions or depicted on
magical plaques. Such usages accord with the fact
that sh-cloaked apkallu had the role of protective
supernatural beings. Though lacking archaeological
One of several Cadzow B&A sets studied at NMAI.
Photo by NMAI
Feathers and etching cutting board in the Cadzow
collection. Photo by NMAI
MacFarlane model Inuinnait bow from Fort Anderson, NWT.
NMNH E007487. Photo by S. Loring
Roderick MacFarlane Inuinnait quiver and arrow set from
Fort Anderson, NWT. NMNH E007481. Photo by S. Loring
ASC Newsletter 69
evidence, these representations suggest a historical
practice of making garments from sh skins.
Similarly, in early modern Arctic societies inhabited
by Indigenous Peoples such as the Inuit, Ainu, Saami,
Hezhe, and Nivkh, sh hold signicant spiritual
importance. These cultures, deeply connected to nature
and reliant on shing, viewed sh as sacred beings.
Fish skin served as a raw material for crafting garments
and accessories, symbolising a spiritual connection
with the animal world. Arctic shamans, acting as
intermediaries between humans and spirits, often wore
sh skin garments during rituals to commune with the
spirit realm.
A comparative analysis reveals striking parallels
between Mesopotamian occult practices and Arctic
shamanism involving sh skin. Both cultures
recognised the occult properties of sh skin, using
it to access transcendent powers. Despite cultural
dierences, sh skin remained symbolically signicant,
representing harmony between humans, spirits,
and the natural world. Whether through myths or
practical rituals, wearing sh skin signied humanity's
interconnectedness with the divine
forces of nature, oering protection
and healing.
Both Mesopotamian religion and
Arctic shamanic practices shared
a belief in divine powers residing
within animals, plants, and natural
forces. However, a notable shift
occurred in Mesopotamian times,
where deities became distinct from
natural phenomena, transitioning from
manifestations of nature to controllers
of it. Similarly, recent colonisers of
Arctic territories assumed control over
nature, mirroring this separation of
divine beings from natural elements.
Contemporary society's emphasis
on materialism has led to a neglect
of spiritual harmony with nature.
Rituals, deeply ingrained in human
culture, preserve cultural heritage
and foster community bonds.
Exploring Mesopotamian occult
practices and Arctic shamanism
sheds light on humanity's quest
for spiritual connection and
transcendence. By acknowledging
these ancient practices, we can
rediscover our spiritual heritage
and deepen our connection with the
universe.
This research was carried out during a postdoctoral
fellowship at ANAMED, the Anatolian Civilizations
Research Centre at Koç University, Istanbul in 2023.
Left: Fish Apkallu. Drawing of Bas-relief from the ruins of Nimrud excavated
by Sir Austen Henry Layard. Artist N. Chevalier. Photo credit: Trustees of the
British Museum Right: Henry Lansdell (1841–1919) British explorer, dressed in
a Nanai sh skin coat from the Amur River, Siberia. Photo credit: Ethnographic
Museum, Stockholm
70 ASC Newsletter
OUTREACH
LIGHTS OUT—RECOVERING THE NIGHT
SKY OPENS AT NMNH
By Stephen Loring (exhibit co-curator)
When the exhibit team was considering the problem
of light pollution as something the museum should
explore, I joined the exhibition and education sta in
conducting a survey of museum visitors to judge public
awareness of the problem. I approached a family, from
Texas as it turned out, and asked if I might ask them
a few questions about their experiences in visiting the
museum. In steering the conversation towards their
awareness of various conservation themes I opened
with a question “Have you ever seen the Milky Way?”.
Their little girl, seven-
eight-ish, looked at me
quizzically and asked, “the
candy-bar?” We all smiled
at her question as her father
recounted a memory of
riding at night in the scrub-
brush country near Alpine
with only the light from
the stars to mark the trail.
Now while living outside
Houston, he allowed
wistfully, as indeed it had
been a long time since he'd
gazed up at the night sky.
Today, perhaps 80% of
Americans live in places
where light pollution
has obscured all but the
brightest stars and deprived many of what once was a
common denominator of the human experience. The
anthropologist Laurens van der Post wrote of an evening
camping in the Kalahari with several Kung! hunters
who remarked on the sounds the stars made. They were
incredulous when van der Post allowed as he couldn’t
hear anything at all and thinking it was the crackling
of the re, they took him further aeld and inquired
if now he could hear them and when he still couldn’t,
accompanied him back to the re and consoled him.
As star light and re light are replaced by street lights
and LCD screens a certain intimacy and wonder and
appreciation of the natural world fades as well. Life on
Earth evolved in response to the diurnal cycle of night
and day, and the loss of the night sky resulting from
articial lights has disrupted this pattern around the
world, making nights brighter in ways that negatively
aect nature and people. Light pollution has profound
consequences for much of the natural world and is
responsible for declines in insect populations (including
critical pollinators) and migrating songbirds, who die in
the tens of thousands from striking city buildings when
they become disoriented by excessive urban lighting.
(For more about the impact of light pollution on bird
migration, see this website).
The Light’s Out exhibit is a collaboration with the
Harvard/Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
(SAO) whose Dr. Kimberly Arcand served as co-
curator and joined the NMNH’s exhibition sta—
including Juliana Olsson (writer), Jennifer Collins
(education and outreach), and Shannon Willis
(design) and Jill Johnson (exhibit developer/project
manager). The resulting
4340-square-foot exhibit
opened in March of
2023 and will remain on
display through December
2025. A traveling version
with the Smithsonian
Institution Traveling
Exhibition Service
(SITES) is planned.
Through extraordinary
photographs, objects from
the museum’s collections
and interactive displays,
Lights Out oers ways
to discover and regain
a connection with the
night sky. In addition to
the exhibition’s visual
components, it oers
opportunities for blind and low vision visitors, as well
as visitors who prioritize experiential and multi-sensory
learning. Building on museum collections, the exhibit’s
stories touch on the history of lighting including objects
from the National Museum of American History,
the cultural importance of night skies, the organisms
(including humans) impacted by articial lights, and
the tangible solutions to light pollution that also help
tackle climate change.
At the center of the exhibit an immersive night-sky
theatrical experience (produced by Katherine Raisz/42
Degrees North Media and NMNH Exhibits audiovisual
team) transports visitors to a dark-sky park in
Coudersport, PA, with a timelapse lm and soundscape
from dusk to dawn. The lm. explores the universal
fascination that the stars and constellations have had
for peoples throughout time and the notion that each
Mio Yachita, Kenyu Yamamaru), Masahiro Nomoto, Sato
Hiroki, Jill Johnson and Juliana Olsson.
Photo by William Fitzhugh
ASC Newsletter 71
culture interprets their
view of the same night
sky uniquely. The lm
retells several stories
about the distinctive
constellation we call
the Pleiades: one based
on Greek mythology,
another as told by
the Ainu of northern
Japan and Sakhalin,
and a third story
from Aotearoa (New
Zealand). We drew on
the long association
between the Arctic
Studies Center and
the Ainu National
Museum (including Masahiro Nomoto, Director of
the Ainu Museum’s Cultural Promotion Department,
with whom we have worked closely since 1997) and
with Rangi Matamua (Māori cultural astronomer and
Professor of Mātauranga Māori at Massey University)
to capture their unique language and perspective on the
signicance of this star cluster that is visible around
the world. The opportunity to engage with Ainu and
Māori scholars, students, and artisans, was one of the
most rewarding aspects of the whole exhibition project.
We sometimes take for granted (but never should) the
weight of the stories we tell as evidenced from email
received from a New Zealand visitor several months
after the exhibit opened: “I just wanted to thank you
(and your team) for sharing our story and express
what a honour and privilege it was to see our ancestral
knowledge displayed in such an acclaimed museum.
Kind regards/nga mihi nui,” Nathan Matamua.
It has long been a hallmark of the Arctic Studies
Center’s engagement with exhibits at the NMNH to
recognize the vitality and continuity of the northern
cultures whose heritage and history we seek to celebrate.
Indigenous participation and contributions have gured
signicantly in Inua (1982), Crossroads (1988), Ainu
(1999), Looking Both Ways (2001), and Living Our
Cultures (2010), and we have always tried to acquire
contemporary objects that augment these exhibits of
primarily 19th-century museum specimens as a means
of demonstrating the continuity and vitality of cultural
practices and perspectives. Towards this end I had
learned of an extraordinary Gwich’in artist, Margaret
Nazon, from Tsiigehtchic, Northwest Territories, Canada
who was causing something of a stir among devotees of
Northern Athabaskan beadwork for her extraordinary,
beaded tapestries inspired by the night sky and by the
fantastic images produced by the Hubble telescope.
With funds allocated from the exhibit’s budget and
from the Anthropology Department (thanks to then
chair Igor Krupnik) we were able to commission one
of Margaret’s beaded tapestries for inclusion in the
exhibition and subsequent accession in the Anthropology
collections, where it will reside alongside earlier
masterpieces of Gwich’in beaded clothing and personal
items. In the Light’s Out exhibit Margaret’s tapestry
is prominently situated in the section dealing with the
universal cultural engagement with the night-sky and
transitions between a section featuring objects derived
from Inuit, Yup’ik and Plains Indian (Kiowa and Lakota)
cultures and Van Gogh’s Starry Night.
In an era of rapid global change, the Smithsonian
Institution—and the NMNH in particular—should play
a prominent role in helping the public see themselves
as part of the natural world, understand how their
actions impact the planet, and make choices about
the future. In tackling the issue of light pollution, the
Light’s Out exhibition explores the means available to
confront and reduce the problem, as such it taps into
the Earth Optimism movement, which is changing the
conservation conversation from doom and gloom to
optimism and opportunity.
For a variety of reasons, I could never convince my
colleagues on the exhibit team to include the last stanza
from Dante’s Inferno on a panel as one exited the
exhibit hall, but I get to do it here:
Him rst, then me –until we came to a round
opening
Through which I saw some of the beautiful things
That come with Heaven. And we walked out
To once again catch sight of the stars.
— Dante Alighieri (1265–1321), Mary Jo Bang
trans. 2012
Dead bird display: just one
example of light pollution’s
toll on our planetary partners.
NMNH-2023-00894. Photo
by B.M. Hance, J.D. Tiller,
P.R. Lee, and J. Di Loreto,
Smithsonian Institution
Milky Way, Starry Night #2” by Margaret Nazon, Gwich’in
Tsiigehtchic, Northwest Territories, Canada, 2021. The only
other light a candle glowing inside our parent’s nearby tent,
my brothers and I lay in the snow, awestruck by millions of
stars, sparkling and streaking across the expansive Arctic
sky. Credit: NMNH-2023-00127: E437462, Anthr. Dept., SI.
Photo by P.R. Lee, B.M. Hance, and J. Di Loreto
72 ASC Newsletter
ANCIENT SEA PEOPLES OF THE NORTH
ATLANTIC: A FILM BY THEODORE
TIMRECK
By Bill Fitzhugh
For decades, Smithsonian scientists worked to uncover
the importance of one of America’s most surprising
anthropological mysteries—the story of the early
ocean-adapted, Native civilization that once existed
along the now-submerged Atlantic coastlines of North
America. The history of Native boating dates to the Ice
Age, and it took 40 years of research to document it.
Ancient Sea Peoples of the North Atlantic, a
documentary lm by Peabody award winning
lmmaker T.W. Timreck, tells the story of how the
oceans and their changing environments have shaped
the development of cultures over millennia. The lm
oers a Native American perspective and places
this discovery in the context of the world’s poorly
understood maritime revolution. Since 1980, Timreck
has worked with Smithsonian scientists William
Fitzhugh, Stephen Loring, Dennis Stanford, Douglas
Owsley, and Carolyn Rose to document their research
and produce television, exhibition, and electronic
media. On October 18, 2023, Timreck presented his
lm at the Natural History Museum, followed by
Q&A and panel discussion with Timreck by William
Fitzhugh and Stephen Loring of the Museum’s Arctic
Studies Center.
Timreck became associated with the Smithsonian in
the mid-1970s when I was researching the prehistoric
cultures of Labrador—at that time an unknown
archaeological province. Our discovery of Maritime
Archaic cultures dating 7500–3500 years ago revealed
the existence of a highly developed early Indian
civilization similar to that known in historical times
from the Northwest Coast Indians. Apparently, cold
climates and icy waters were not the impediments to
the development of cultural complexity assumed by
earlier anthropologists. Timreck’s lm follows the
archaeological discoveries in the eld documenting
how these ancient Native Americans progressed
over four thousand years from small-scale hunters
and shermen to maritime hunters and traders of
Ramah chert that reached peoples as far south as the
mid-Atlantic coast. Ranging farther aeld, Timreck
compares these cultural developments of the Far
Northeast to the early peoples and cultures of Northern
Scandinavia and Western Europe, nding startling
parallels that reveal cold-water paths to cultural
complexity are a general feature of northern maritime
environments.
Ancient Sea Peoples of the North Atlantic has been
selected for showing at the District of Columbia
Environmental Film Festival in March 2024.
ASC TRAVELING EXHIBITIONS: NARWHAL
AND KNOWING NATURE
By Carole Bossert
The Smithsonian Traveling Exhibition Service
(S.I.T.E.S.) exhibit Narwhal: Revealing an Arctic
Legend has been making its way across the country,
opening recently at the Upcountry Museum in
Greensboro, South Carolina, where it will be on view
through June 16, 2024. It will then travel to a Canadian
venue, returning in September where it will remain
be seen at at the Peabody Essex Museum in Salam,
Massachusetts, through February 2025.
Knowing Nature: Stories of the Boreal Forest /
Historias del Bosque Boreal opened its tour at
Title image of the lm
Imagined view of Native American raft people. For years,
anthropologists lacked a full understanding of the early
Native American peoples that once lived along the Northeast
coast. This painting represents the nadir of the public image
of Indigenous watercraft. Decades of research in the Far
Northeast by Smithsonian scientists has revealed a very
dierent story. Painting by David Wagner
ASC Newsletter 73
Michigan State University Museum on April 9, 2023.
The show sparked several innovative projects for
graduate students, including the development of an
app-based interactive game focused on sustainability.
The exhibit was also the focus of a project supported
by Smithsonian’s Oce of Accessibility to test the
feasibility of using RFID technology to provide
customized audio description to blind and low vision
visitors. Knowing Nature is scheduled to open this
summer at Minnetrista, a 40-acre art museum and
gardens complex in Muncie, Indiana.
Editor’s note: Carole was the S.I.T.E.S. research and
production coordinator for the ACS’s Narwhal and
Boreal exhibits.
THE CROSSROADS 2 WEBINAR SERIES
By Igor Chechushkov
Crossroads of the Continents: Cultures of Siberia and
Alaska marked a signicant milestone in the history
of collaboration between the U.S. and the then-Soviet
Union. A decade of scientic exchanges culminated
in an exhibit jointly prepared by the Smithsonian
and the Soviet Academy of Sciences. The exhibition,
opening to the public at the Smithsonian’s National
Museum of Natural History in 1988, showcased the
cultures of Alaska and Siberia from the end of the Ice
Age to modern times. After a year in D.C., it traveled
throughout North America until 1993. Although plans
were made for the exhibit to go to the Soviet Union, the
political collapse and subsequent turbulence in Russia
made this impossible.
The Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 ushered
in a new chapter in global history and scholarly
collaborations. Many Russian academics and politically
aware individuals were forced to leave the country,
facing prosecution. In this new era, despite politics,
the continuation of scientic exchange and the
dissemination of our work to a broader audience are
essential for maintaining relationships between people
and fostering free thinking in oppressive environments.
Therefore, the Arctic Studies Center initiated a new
project called “Crossroads 2” to revive the goals of
the original “Crossroads.” The new project utilizes the
power of the Internet and social media to present cutting-
edge anthropological research to a Russian audience and
facilitate scholarly exchanges between both sides.
“Crossroads 2” consists of a series of webinars
published on YouTube, wherein one American and
one Russian scholar discuss their research. To date,
we have published six videos featuring Bill Fitzhugh,
Bill Shindler and Ivan Semyan, James Dixon and
Sergei Vasiliev, Fernando Villanea and Arina
Khatsenovich, Robert Drennan and Denis Sharapov,
and William Taylor. English speakers are dubbed in
Russian. The topics covered range from the history
of Arctic research to experimental archaeology, and
from Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA to the early
archaeology of North America.
The project is co-hosted by our friends at “The Past”
YouTube channel, which has been featuring Russian
historians and archaeologists for several years,
interviewing them about their work. The channel was
created by Mikhail Rodin, a Russian journalist and
historian who, like many others, was forced to leave
the country. “Crossroads 2” has been warmly received
by the Russian audience, with some videos garnering
over 50K views on various platforms and with over
200K total views. We are determined to continue this
endeavor and feature even more exciting research in
our future programs.
Top: Narwhal: Revealing an Arctic Legend at the Milwaukee
Public Museum. Bottom: Knowing Nature: Stories from the
Boreal Forest at the Michigan State University Museum, on
North American tours with S.I.T.E.S. Photo credits: MPM
and MSUM
74 ASC Newsletter
INTERNS AND POST-DOCS
SUMMER INTERNSHIPS AT THE ASC
By Stephen Loring
As we get old(er), and the distance back to the
paradigms and inuences of our “youth” in graduate
school increase, we come to rely in part on the
infectious enthusiasm of students, when the opportunity
aords, to facilitate and stimulate our research and even
challenge our assumptions with their relentless “whys”
and “hows”. Such was the case last summer with a pair
of interns, Lola Page (Hunter College) who worked
with Igor Krupnik and Adele Roulston (Washington
and Lee) who worked with Stephen Loring on a
variety of projects.
INTERNSHIP WITH DR. LORING
By Adele Roulston
What do seal teeth, musk-
ox, and ceramics have in
common? All three and
more were integral to my
summer internship with the
ASC’s Dr. Stephen Loring.
My rst assignment began
with an ethnography which
read more like a novel.
Dr. David E. Wheeler’s
manuscript includes stories
about various sled dogs,
near-death experiences,
and successful hunting expeditions. During his two-
year quest for musk-ox, Wheeler kept a detailed journal
of his experience living among the Tłıchǫ. To help Dr.
Loring prepare the manuscript for publication, I began
compiling an index of all the locations, people, and
topics mentioned. For each entry, I added additional
background information to be used for adding footnotes
to the nal publication. Along with the manuscript, I was
given access to a collection of Wheeler’s photographs
and correspondences. After my inventory, I began
determining where in the manuscript each photo would
make the most sense. My favorite part was exploring
maps of Wheeler’s trip. Creating a supplemental map of
his journey was much more dicult than I anticipated.
Very few of the placenames written by Wheeler are listed
on modern maps. Wheeler wrote most of the locations by
approximating a phonetic spelling of the Tłıchǫ terms.
His guess work in combination with the non-standardized
spelling of the early 1900s, less-than-accurate depictions
in hand-drawn maps, and changes in location names since
the time of writing required a lot of detective work. If
anyone is looking for a travel agent to the very specic
region of the Northwest Territories surrounding Great
Slave Lake, I know more about the geography than I
imagined possible.
My summer in the Arctic Studies Center did not end with
the completion of my rst project. I began a series of
archaeological tasks, learning various skills of cataloging
and identifying artifacts. I worked with artifacts from
the Aleutian Islands and Labrador. Dr. Loring taught
me how to categorize various stone and bone tools,
ceramic sherds, wooden fragments, and faunal remains.
The miniscule bone needles and carved bone shhooks
were among my favorite artifacts because of their
impressively small detailing and preservation. Some
bonus education occurred when Dr. Torben Rick taught
me to identify marine animal teeth, pointing out various
clues such as the tricuspid shape of seal molars.
Outside of my ongoing
projects, there were a
handful of other stand-out
experiences. Multiple visits
to the Museum Support
Center with Dr. Loring
and Dr. Igor Krupnik gave
me the chance to examine
beautiful and intricate
cultural heritage objects.
Although we kept our visits
to manageable hours, I could
easily lose days enjoying
the immense collections at
MSC! We looked at objects
from the Tłıchǫ in conjunction with my manuscript
project, such as hunting bags, decorated clothing, and
snowshoes. In addition to full sized snowshoes, we
saw a pair of tiny shoes made for a toddler! With time
to spare before the next bus, Dr. Loring showed me
a few other items from the collection. We looked at a
number of Alaskan parkas made from various animals
such as caribou and ground squirrels. My favorite item
is a raincoat made from seal intestines that are stitched
together so tightly the coat becomes waterproof!
It is bittersweet to write this on my last day at the
Natural History Museum. Looking back over the
summer I am proud of all that I’ve learned and
accomplished and will miss the chance to come into
such a wonderful oce every day. I am eternally
grateful to the ASC team, especially to Dr. Loring for
taking me on and nding me assignments to work
on! As I head into my senior year as an anthropology
major at Washington and Lee University, this summer
has been invaluable in preparation for my anticipated
career in museum anthropology.
Lola Page (right), Adele Roulston, and Igor Krupnik at the
Museum Support Center examine the Winchester rie once
owned by Sitting Bull. Photo by Stephen Loring.
ASC Newsletter 75
INTERNSHIP WITH DR. KRUPNIK
By Lola Page
My connection to the Arctic Studies Center began
in June 2023 by almost complete chance. I had just
nished my rst year at the New School in NYC
coupled with an internship at the ‘Arms and Armor’
Department at the Met, and I knew, with condence,
I wanted to be involved in museum work. I was eager
to try nearly anything, and I gured my best chance
was with the familiar interests I had never gotten to
engage in a legitimate way. Upon an email hoping for a
chance to do just that, I began my internship under Igor
Krupnik at the ASC in mid-summer.
The project I undertook was organizing the Handbook
of North American Indians, Volume 1 archive. Such an
archive contained multitudes of correspondence, drafts,
and original materials for creating the 950-page book.
Prior to my arrival, the task to organize the contents
of this enormous le cabinet and several excess bins
had been partially completed pre-pandemic. I had little
to no knowledge of anthropology, and more notably,
none in archiving a project as extensive as this, but I
was eager to learn. The purpose of the Handbook was
to create a guide to dierent Indigenous cultures of
North America, and to document these cultures. It was
a perfect project, as it helped me achieve two things at
once: learn about Indigenous people through the actual
contents of the book and archive, but also learn how to
organize such a large project.
As Igor was the editor, much of these dual learning
opportunities grew not only from hands-on experience,
but also through long talks with him. Discussing
the many questions that I had for the nal published
product helped paint a fuller picture, not only about
the actual practice of anthropology, but also about
something as simple as what were the right questions
to ask. As our joint project went on, I became more
condent in navigating this new knowledge and sharing
it with others.
The Handbook project spanned decades, while my
internship with Igor was only a few weeks. There was
a balance between the actual contents of each chapter
draft, but also the stories of the many individuals who
contributed to the Handbook from the 1970s onward.
As I made it to the last few boxes, it became apparent
that Igor and I also played a role in this story. It seems
obvious in hindsight, but there is a way of being
overwhelmed by the magnitude of such a venture and
surrounding yourself with so much information at
once. I spent hours of my internship talking with Igor
about museum collections and anthropology. It was
an incredible experience to be a part of such a project
involving so many people over the course of a decade.
My own copy of Handbook Volume 1, and also Volume
4, bought at a secondhand store, now sit proudly on my
own bookshelf as a testament to what I learned.
VERA SOLOVYEVA—SAKHA POST-
DOCTORAL FELLOW
By Igor Krupnik
The ASC is pleased
to welcome Vera
Solovyeva (Ph.D. 2021,
Environmental Science
and Policy, George
Mason University), as
a postdoctoral fellow
for 2024–2025. Last
year, Vera received a
prestigious two-year
SI ‘Resilience and
Sustainability’ award
and is working with us
on her project, “Tracing
Climate Change through
Community Knowledge:
Sustainable Indigenous
Ethnobotany in Alaska and Siberia.” Vera was born
in the city of Yakutsk in Siberia, now the capital of
the Sakha Republic/Yakutia, Russia; she will be the
rst Siberian Indigenous (Sakha) scholar formally
aliated with the ASC. She grew up in the rural
area of Yakutia and is intimately familiar with the
ways Arctic Indigenous people use the resources of
their land and waters and track the impact of climate
change via numerous local indicators. Vera graduated
from the Yakut Federal University in Yakutsk with a
joint MS degree in Biology, Botany, and Chemistry
and worked in the 1990s as a researcher at the
Institute of Biology in Yakutsk. She also holds a
Ph.D. in Biology from the Russian Institute of Animal
Genetics and Breeding in St. Petersburg. During
her years of research in the North, she travelled
extensively across the Russian Arctic, also visited
Nome, Alaska, and has strong connections with the
American Museum of Natural History in New York
that houses Sakha ethnographic collections from the
Jesup North Pacic Expedition of 1897–1902. We
published a summary of Vera’s dissertational research
in an earlier issue of the ASC NSL (2021, 29:43–44).
Igor Krupnik will serve as Vera’s prime Smithsonian
advisor, with Dr. Kevin Jernigan, an ethnobotanist
from the University of Alaska Fairbanks as co-
advisor, and Darlene Orr from Sitka, Alaska, former
ASC Indigenous collaborator on the Crossroads
Alaska exhibit project.
76 ASC Newsletter
BOOK REVIEWS
VISCERAL: VERITY, LEGACY, IDENTITY.
ALASKA NATIVE GUT KNOWLEDGE AND
PERSEVERANCE, by Sonya Kelliher-Combs and
Ellen Carrlee: Alaska State Museum: Juneau 2023
Review by Igor Krupnik
This slim book of 92 pages, with its intriguing title
(“Visceral”) and a captivating red-orange-brownish
cover, is a catalog of the exhibit that was put on display
at the Alaska State Museum (ASM) in Juneau, AK
from May 5, to October 9, 2023.
The exhibit combined mixed-media
installations with an impressive
selection of objects from the ASM
collections, to which the catalog
adds extensive text, object and
display photographs, maps, and the
list of exhibited specimens (about
120 altogether). As seen from the
exhibit title, Visceral, the show tells
the story of objects made of animal
guts, or gut skin cover (membrane);
but its full message goes far beyond
the narrative of using animal organs
and intestines in Alaskan Indigenous
cultures. It is also about knowledge,
perseverance of tradition, skills, and identity, and about
keeping memory alive.
The catalog and the exhibit were co-authored by two
partners—Sonya Kelligher-Combs, a Native Alaskan
artist born in Bethel, who now lives in Anchorage, and
Ellen Carrlee, ASM conservator born in Sheboygan,
WI, now residing in Juneau. Sonya Kelligher-Combs
is a renowned artist of mixed descent: Iñuapiq from
Utqiagviq and Athabascan from the interior community
of Nulato in the Yukon River valley. She has been a
close partner to our ASC sta in the Anchorage Oce
and was named in several earlier Newsletters as a
consultant, event participant, project partner, and just a
close friend. The two collaborating experts—a Native
artist and a museum conservator—produced a show
and a catalog lled with power, knowledge, and great
artistic taste.
The masterpiece of the catalog is its section titled
Identity: Innovation (pp.48–65) that describes, in great
detail, major types of gut-skin raincoats and parka
covers used by dierent communities across Alaska—
from the well-known walrus or bearded seal gutskin
pieces made by the Iñupiat on the North Slope, around
Bering Strait, the Yupik on St. Lawrence Island, the
Yup’ik in the Yukon-Kuskokwim region, and by the
Cup’ig on Nunivak Island, to regional varieties of the
Unangax (primarily of Steller lion or northern fur seal),
Alutiiq (primarily of bear), and the Athabascan (often
of bear, also of beluga whale). Each type of garment
is described with the details of its design and making,
a Native name in the respective language, commonly
used materials, and other features that allow one to
distinguish it from other varieties. To those who deal
with such objects in museum collections, heritage
programs, student classes, and craft shows it oers the
rst-ever guide to the richness of Indigenous gut-skin
clothing.
Another invaluable section, Identity:
Knowledge, covers the preparation
of animal inner organs serving
as material for clothing, family
belongings, art pieces, and, simply,
food. It requires a lot of ingenuity,
skills, and special equipment to
transform thin skin of freshly
harvested game into a durable,
waterproof, and worn-resilient
material that is a characteristic
feature of many Native Alaskan
cultural traditions. It also takes a lot
of time and experience to transform
the gut and organ membranes of
walrus, seals, bear, caribou, whale, and other species
into objects as diverse, as raincoats, drums, boot pieces,
bags, and decorative materials. Though the elements
of the transformation—cleaning, removing the outer
and inner layers, soaking, inating, drying, whitening
(when needed), cutting, rolling, and storing are
generally known—this book oers the rst illustrated
guidance on all steps in this process.
The exhibit and catalog also carry a particular
message—the memory of abuse that many Native
Alaskans were subjected to in boarding schools,
missions, and in their home communities by (primarily)
Catholic clergy, lay employees, and Church volunteers
across the State of Alaska. On pages 5-6, readers may
nd the list of 35 Native Alaskan communities and of
dozens of people accused of (often repeated) sexual
abuse from the 1920s to the 1980s, but primarily in
the 1950s and 1960s, compiled by reporters from the
Anchorage Daily News. To that harrowing legacy,
Sonya Kelliher-Combs dedicated a special installation
titled “Credible” that combined maps featuring the
communities, quilts of acrylic polymer and seal
intestine, and dozens of small bags made of cotton
fabric, nylon thread, walrus stomach, reindeer and
sheep rawhide, acrylic polymer, and other materials
that were pinned to the wall on exhibit display.
ASC Newsletter 77
This powerful book is a must-read for Arctic curators
and museum conservators, but also for everyone
interested in the legacy and traditions of Alaskan
Indigenous people.
MATERIAL’NAIA I DUKHOVNAIA
KUL’TURA NARODOV YAKUTII V
MUZEIAKH MIRA/ MATERIAL AND
SPIRITUAL CULTURE OF THE PEOPLES
OF YAKUTIA IN WORLD MUSEUMS (17TH—
EARLY 20TH CENTURY). CATALOGUE. VOL.2,
BOOK 2, MUSEUMS OF GERMANY, BY A.N.
ZHIRKOV, ED., A.L. GABYSHEVA, YU. V.
KRAVTSOVA, G.G. NEUSTROEVA, AND V.V.
TIMOFE’EVA, Ayar: Yakutsk, 2023
Review by Igor Krupnik
In April 2023, a team of
museum specialists from
the Republic of Sakha/
Yakutia, a huge and
resource-rich region in the
Siberian Arctic, unveiled
a new catalog volume
in the ongoing series
dedicated to historical
ethnographic collections
from the territory of
Sakha/Yakutia in world
museums. This venture
began in 2006 by Sakha
museum professionals,
with funding from the
Russian section of the ICOM (International Council of
Museums/ICOM Russian Federation) and the Sakha
regional government, and with the endorsement by
the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. The
original plan was to cover all ethnographic collections
from the Republic of Sakha/Yakutia preserved in
world museums in three regional clusters—“Museums
of North America,” “Museums of Europe,” and
“Museums of Russia.” Each would be featured in one
or several massive illustrated catalogs with a thorough
description of individual objects, in Russian and in
English. The project clearly followed the footsteps of
a similar venture from the 1990s, The Overseas Ainu
Collections, by a Japanese team directed by Yoshinobu
Kotani that covered over 13,500 Ainu ethnographic
objects stored in North American, European, and
Russian museums.
The latest volume of 784 pages, prepared by a team
led by Dr. Asia L. Gabysheva under the overall
project leadership of Dr. Alexander Zhirkov,
covers ethnographic collections in ve museums in
Germany—Museum at the Rothenbaum “Cultures and
Arts of the World” in Hamburg, Linden-Museum in
Stuttgart/State Museum of Ethnology, Rautenstrauch-
Joest Museum “Cultures of the World” in Cologne,
the Overseas Museum in Bremen, and the Museum
of Five Continents in Munich. Collectively, these
museums host over 2,000 objects belonging to several
Indigenous nations of Sakha/Yakutia—the Sakha/
Yakut, Dolgan, Evenk, Even, Yukaghir, and the
Chukchi—of which 1491 pieces are featured in the
catalog with color images. The 2023 volume listed
as “Book 2” is a sequel to “Book 1” published in
2018 that includes 1309 artefacts from four of the
largest ethnographic museums in Germany–Berlin
Ethnological Museum, the State Ethnographic
Collections of Saxony (SES)/Ethnographical Museum
Grassi in Leipzig and Dresden, Museum of World
Cultures in Frankfurt am Main, and the Ethnological
Museum of the University
of Göttingen in Göttingen.
These two books featuring
German museums follow
in the footsteps of Vol. 1
(2017, by Zinaida Ivanova-
Unarova) dedicated
to collections of two
American museums: the
AMNH in New York with
its monumental holding
of ca. 1550 objects from
the Jesup North Pacic
Expedition of 1897–1902,
and a much smaller stock
of 45 Sakha specimens at
the Smithsonian NMNH in Washington. Altogether,
the three volumes cover almost 4,400 Indigenous
ethnographic objects from Arctic Siberia.
All three published volumes, including the current
one, are organized along the same template. They are
framed as bilingual books (Russian and English) in two
columns, structured by the individual museums. Two
books of Volume 2 include detailed general overviews
of collecting Siberian/Sakha objects by German
museums and collectors; Vol.2 (2) also features short
biographies of the most important collectors and
donors (by A. Gabysheva). Each museum section
begins with an opening narrative on the history of its
respective Siberian/North Asian collections written
by a local curator. The main texts covering individual
museums are structured along the Indigenous groups
of the Sakha/Yakutia–the Sakha (Yakut), Dolgan,
Evenk, Even, Yukaghir, and the Chukchi. Within each
ethnic sub-chapter, objects are organized along major
cultural categories (clothing, jewelry, household items
including hunting and shing equipment, art objects,
78 ASC Newsletter
toys and games, shaman and cult objects, musical
instruments, and the likes). Individual object entries,
all bilingual, oer extensive description by Sakha
museum specialists and Indigenous knowledge holders,
plus Indigenous name/s for each object, and whatever
provenience data are available at the respective
museum. The format produces an unparalleled trove
of collection information for museum specialists,
Indigenous users, researchers, collectors, artists and
crafts people, and the general audience interested in
Siberian Indigenous cultures.
Unfortunately, these beautifully printed books with
accompanying CD-ROM(s) are now victims of their
technology. Due to the freeze in academic and cultural
cooperation with Russia following its war against
Ukraine, hardly any copies of vol. 2(2) reached Western
museums and libraries. Nor is there a way to access
the books online or upload a PDF at present. Evidently,
no steps were taken to post the objects on a unied
‘cloud portal,’ with the description, provenience data,
and color images prepared for the printed catalogs.
True, the objects remain under copyright of the
respective host institutions, but none of these museums
developed a user-friendly online search for its Siberian
collections either. It is hard to predict when the next
volume/s may be produced under the current political
situation, and a task to digitally “combine” the many
thousand ethnographic objects heroically retrieved and
researched by our Sakha colleagues in museums in
Europe and North America remains a distant prospect.
DEER STONES, TATTOOS, AND
WARRIOR WOMEN: TRANSFORMING
ARCHAEOLOGICAL FACT INTO FICTION
By Judith Lindbergh
As a novelist specializing in ancient historical ction,
archaeology is a primary source of inspiration.
Through my writing, I bring countless fragments of
material culture, midden debris, and human
remains back to life, shaping them into the
cultures and lives of my characters. My new
novel, Akmaral (Regal House, May 2024),
began with the storied Siberian Ice Maiden
discovered in 1993 by Natalia Polosmak.
Please don’t judge me because I came to
her in the most pedestrian of ways, via a
documentary on PBS! Often my stories are
sparked by a news article, documentary, or
exhibition that briey opens a window into the
past that begs me to nd out more.
The Siberian Ice Maiden led me to the late
Jeannine Davis-Kimball, Ph.D., whose book,
Warrior Women, shifted my focus from the Ice Maiden
to the Issyk “Golden Man” whom, she speculated,
might have been a woman. Davis-Kimball connected
the ancient Greek legends of Amazon warriors with the
women who fought and died of battle wounds and were
buried with their weaponry at their sides in kurgan
mounds across Central Asia. Suddenly, the breathtaking
expanse of the steppes became rich with possibilities,
and my titular character, Akmaral, became a young
warrior training to protect her people.
While I am no stranger to JSTOR or dig reports, to
create authentic ction I knew I had to dig deeper.
To research my rst novel, The Thrall’s Tale (Viking,
2006) about women in Viking Age Greenland, I sailed
from Iceland to Greenland on an ice-class ship. It
was the closest that I could come to experiencing my
characters’ journey. Once in Greenland, the haunted
landscapes, the icebergs groaning and clacking against
rocky shores, and the chill seat I took on the stony edge
of Erik the Red’s homestead, Brattahlid, lled me with
sensory experiences that helped me bring the lives of
the rst Norse settlers to the page.
Unfortunately, a decade later, I could not travel to the
Ukok Plateau in the heart of the Altai Mountains. Nor
could I visit The Hermitage to peruse its extensive
Scythian and Altai collections. My travels were
curtailed by the responsibility of raising two small
children, so I was forced to nd new ways to explore.
This time, I rode the Mongolian steppes and stood atop
the Altai peaks through the vivid reality of Google
Earth. I collected catalogues from every exhibition I
could nd, just to gaze at the full-color photographs
of objects made of gold, iron, wood, and bronze. I
thrilled at the 3D gallery tours of The Hermitage’s
collection of Scythian and Altai Bronze and Iron Age
materials. As I paused my mouse to ponder, a cluster
of iron arrowheads became a clutch retrieved from a
battle between nomad bands. A bronze mirror became
a ritual object that connected Akmaral to her shamanic
ancestors.
ASC Newsletter 79
But it isn’t enough to simply study and gaze. To
authentically reconstruct Akmaral’s everyday life, I
turned to the nomads of Mongolia and Kazakhstan. I
borrowed traditional wrestling and horse racing from
Naadam, the annual summer festival whose roots
go back to the Mongol Empire and likely beyond.
Central Asian folktales introduced me to the game of
kesh kumay that horseback herding people used for
courtship. I learned, at least in theory, how to build a
ger, dry cheese on its roof, ferment mare’s milk into
koumiss, and fashion bows and arrows. Then I put this
knowledge into practice. With my children, I crafted
rough bows out of freshly cut boughs, etching them
with goose feathers we found on hikes in the woods.
I pounded lint from our clothes dryer into fragile felt.
And I practiced archery in my backyard—until one
bad shot pierced a hole through my neighbor’s PVC
fence!—so that I could experience, in my own inexpert
way, the skills my woman warrior needed simply to
survive.
Beyond materials, traditions, or even survival practices,
I also had to understand what Akmaral believed. But
how do you conjure social values without documentary
evidence? The Scythians left no written record, and
the words of Herodotus and other ancient Greeks can
only be taken as hearsay, by some reports. To devise
an authentic origin story for Akmaral and her people,
I looked to both the west and east, drawing from
Herodotus’ story of the Amazons’ post-Trojan War
escape to justify her clan’s acceptance of her union
with a Scythian captive, while connecting Akmaral to
her Eastern and Siberian roots through the deer tattoo
that graces her shoulder, as it does the Siberian Ice
Maiden’s.
The deer stones of Mongolia became key to blending
the dierent aspects of Akmaral’s faith, merging east
and west in the powerful imagery of the ying deer.
Esther Jacobson’s invaluable The Deer Goddess
of Ancient Siberia became the source of some of
Akmaral’s most important beliefs and rituals, with
practices borrowed from reindeer herding nomads like
the Evenk, Ket, Nenets, and Dolgan.
Even when a novel is nished, I never stop researching.
Just as Akmaral was heading to typesetting, I came
across the Smithsonian Magazine article about Arctic
Studies Center Director William Fitzhugh’s new
research on deer stones. I immediately ordered a copy
of his Deer Stone Diary and he kindly followed up
with the full volume of Jamsranjav Bayarsaikhan’s
extensive research. As I scanned new evidence that the
deer stones originated in the east and were carried west
to the Pontic steppes, a wave of panic struck me that
my ctional construction might be wrong. But then I
remembered DNA research that evidenced European
and mixed ancestry in several mummies found in the
Altai. This reinforced the connective leap I had taken
to create Akmaral’s combined Scytho-Siberian roots.
It also reminded me of something Jeannine Davis-
Kimball had mentioned in a 2007 email answering
some of my earliest research questions: that the tribes
of the ancient steppes had traveled freely both west and
east like the waves of a shallow sea.
I hope you will join me for Akmaral’s journey when my
novel is published in May 2024. Akmaral is available at
all major online book retailers.
Editor’s note: Judith Lindbergh’s debut novel, The
Thrall’s Tale, about women in the rst Viking Age
settlement in Greenland, was an IndieBound Pick,
a Borders Original Voices Selection and praised by
Pulitzer Prize winners Geraldine Brooks and Robert
Olen Butler. She is the Founder/Director of The
Writers Circle, a creative writing center based in New
Jersey.
THE IÑUPIAT OF NORTHWEST ALASKA
OVER THE PAST MILLENNIUM, BY
DOUGLAS ANDERSON. Borgo Publishing, 2023
Review by William Fitzhugh
Douglas Anderson
has published a major
monograph covering
a lifetime of research
on the Iñupiat cultures
of Northwest Alaska.
Doug once counselled
me to be cautious
accepting oers to
give symposium
papers because they
sap your time and
energy, keeping you
from making real
contributions—those
monographs that turn
elds around and last for centuries. Anderson has kept
his counsel and produced another monograph that
would have made his mentor James Louis Giddings,
Jr. proud many times over.
The Iñupiat of Northwest Alaska is a large format 264-
page book that combines detailed documentation of ve
periods of Iñupiat development beginning with Western
Alaska Thule and ending in 1930, when traditional
culture, subsistence, and settlement patterns had become
substantially transformed by Euroamerican contact. It
begins with a dedication to Froelich Rainey, Helge
Larsen, and Giddings, signaling Anderson’s schooling
80 ASC Newsletter
by three towering pioneers of ‘Eskimo’ archaeology that
laid the foundation for Anderson’s research. Despite
debunked early theories of Eskimo emergence from
the forests west of Hudson Bay, Giddings showed that
‘forest’ Eskimos had a long history in Kobuk River
Iñupiat woodland culture and were just as ‘Eskimo’ as
its their better-known coastal cousins. Two introductory
chapters describe the regional organization, adaptations,
and history of the Iñupiat people and how anthropology,
archaeology, oral history, and folklore combine to
produce a comprehensive—if still incomplete—
understanding of their 1000-year history.
The book’s voluminous data are organized in
a complex but ingenious way, presented in four
information categories: settlements, artifacts, statistical
studies, and fauna. Each of these categories are then
described for each of ve chronological periods, and
within these periods by three geographical regions:
coast, lower river, and upper river sites. Excellent
maps, site and house plans, artifact drawings, and
photographs accompany each category. Chapter 6
presents composite illustrations of artifact types by
chronological period, showing stylistic, technological,
and regional patterns. Many of the artifact plates are
in color, which is also used to enhance maps and
diagrams. Tables present tabulated data on artifact
types, raw materials, fauna, and other data by region,
period, and activity type, and house oor plans
illustrate the spatial patterns of artifact, material, and
faunal nds. A nal Chapter 7 summarizes “what
we think we have learned about the resilient and
resourceful Iñupiat culture”—which is A LOT!
Anderson’s opus is a monument to a career dedicated
to documenting the peoples and culture of a highly
complex region, from its river headwaters to the coast.
Not only has Anderson fullled the pledge of ‘complete
publication’ of one’s lifework rarely accomplished
by archaeologists; he has also trained a generation of
students in solid science that places indigenous peoples
and their well-being in the center of one’s professional
responsibilities. One of the many interesting features
of the monograph is the chatty language and informal
style of the subheads (“How the Iñupiat…Organized
Themselves Geographically”, “Ethnology and
Archaeology Tie the Knot in Northwest Alaska”
etc.), perhaps a contribution of the ne editing and
production work of Borgo Publications.
One of the themes central to Anderson’s work and
this monograph is attention to social mechanisms
within Iñupiat society and how its subsistence and
political systems interacted with the environment and
with Athabascan neighbors with whom they traded,
competed, or fought over for hunting, shing, and
extractive materials, and how relations were inuenced
by caribou crashes or abundance. These relations are
not easily perceived in the type of household settlement
archaeology that Anderson’s research featured. Given
the imbalance of material recovery for these groups,
archaeological evidence of shifting boundaries will
be dicult to obtain. Another major theme is simply
the sustained 1000-year history of Iñupiat culture and
population in a ‘cat-bird’ location between Eurasia
and America. One thing we can be sure of: Anderson,
assisted by decades of students, colleagues, and
indigenous partner, has opened a huge window into the
life, culture, and history of the Iñupiat people and given
us a structure for future investigations.
REVIEW: BOWS AND ARROWS OF THE
GREENLAND THULE CULTURE (1200–1900
AD). A STUDY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND
ETHNOGRAPHIC SOURCES, BY SEBASTIAN
PFEIFER. BAR Publishing, 2021, 118 p.
Review by Coline Lemaitre
The hunting weapons of Arctic cultures have been
extensively documented
in more than 100 years
of ethnographic and
archaeological research,
and the weapons of
Greenland’s Thule
culture are no exception.
However, until now, no
study had synthesized
knowledge of Thule
bows and arrows from a
single geographic region,
combining ethnographic,
iconographic, and
archaeological materials.
Sebastian Pfeifer, from
Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, achieves this with
great clarity.
The book is structured in three sections in an approach
that creates an easy-to-read, beautifully illustrated
book. In the rst part, Pfeifer considers the mechanics
of the bow-and-arrow system based on traditional
archery studies of J. Hamm, by C. A. Bergman et
al., B.W. Kooi, and others. The main components of
a bow and arrow are summarized and illustrated with
diagrams and photographs, and the introduction to
Arctic bow and arrow terminology (i.e. “cable-backing,
“triple-curved prole”, etc.) gives the reader all the
keys to understand the rest of the book.
In the next section, the collections from the National
Museum of Denmark are analyzed in terms of technical
ASC Newsletter 81
and material components (design and cross-section of
bows and arrows, raw materials, assembly techniques,
mechanical properties), and cultural geography (Polar
Greenland, Northwest Greenland, Central West
Greenland, and East Greenland). The large dimension
of this analysis would give readers some head spins
were the text not supported by thematic maps showing
each object’s distribution across Greenland with
their technical and material characteristics identied.
The nal section is devoted to the bow and arrow
technology’s function and highlights its social and
environmental implications. This contrasts with the
purely technical analysis in the two previous parts and
shows the role this innovation played in the daily lives
of Greenland’s Thule people.
Pfeifer follows a “cataloguing” and diagnosing
principle in describing bow and arrow technology by
providing high-quality visual, metric, and technical
documentation. The study includes the most recent
archaeological data from North America. In addition
to analytical rigor, and scalar analysis (materials,
bow mechanics, assembly techniques, and uses), the
approach —studying both the bow and the arrow
as a system—provides a model for studying other
technological systems, for instance, harpoons.
The author’s “spatiotemporal and technological”
method highlights the heterogeneity and complexity
of the weapon. One might only regret the lack of
more discussion of analytical methods. The author
acknowledges that the study raises more questions
about a technology that is profoundly empirical in
its manufacture and use that only experimentation
could answer—something that so far has been missing
in Arctic archery. Overall, the author provides new
insight into Greenlandic bow and arrow technology
that should be of interest to a wide range of readers,
from the curious archer to the researcher specializing
in Arctic cultures.
TENGAUTULI ATKUK: THE FLYING PARKA:
THE MEANING AND MAKING OF PARKAS
IN SOUTHWEST ALASKA, BY ANN FIENUP-
RIORDAN, ALICE REARDEN, AND MARIE
MEADE. University of Washington Press, 2023.
Review by Bernadette Driscoll Engelstad
There is too much to praise in this deeply informative,
richly illustrated study of Yup’ik parka design by Ann
Fienup-Riordan, Alice Rearden and Marie Meade
to be covered in a short review. Flowing from the
knowledge and expertise of Yup’ik elders, Tengautuli
Atkuk: The Flying Parka provides unsurpassed insights
into the design and production of the Yup’ik parka—
particularly the woman’s parka—and its central role
within Yup’ik oral tradition, cultural history and lived
experience.
Published by the University of Washington Press,
this work draws on over twenty years of in-depth
discussions with Yup’ik elders. Acknowledging more
than 60 tradition-bearers, cited by the writers as the
true authors of the publication, each contributor is
identied by Yup’ik and English names, birth year, and
village of origin and residence. Although sadly, many
of these elders have passed, their memories, spanning
well over a century of personal experience, have been
documented in thousands of transcribed pages by the
authors over the years.
Emerging from a series of parka-focused workshops
held in Bethel and Anchorage supported by the Calista
Elders Council (CEC, now Calista Education and
Culture), the research project culminated in a study
of Yup’ik historical clothing at the Smithsonian’s
National Museum of Natural History (NMNH) and
National Museum of the American Indian (NMAI) by
elders Albertina Dull, Elsie Tommy and Martina
John as well as Mark John, Ann Fienup-Riordan,
Ruth Jimmie and media intern Abby Moses with
funding assistance from CEC and the National Science
Foundation.
A multi-generational achievement, the text interweaves
Yup’ik oral history with women’s expert knowledge
of material resources and exceptional skill as creative
designers and seamstresses. Over the course of several
chapters, the authors detail the production of fur, bird-
skin, seal-gut and sh-skin parkas with meaningful
insights into the repository of family designs that create
and strengthen social relationships over time and space.
Elders Martina, Albertina, and Elsi examining the fur strip
bordering the neck opening. E76708-0, Department of
Anthropology, Smithsonian institution. Photo by Ann Fienup-
Riordan
82 ASC Newsletter
A treasury of photographs taken in the 1930s by Dr.
Leuman M. Waugh (NMAI) as well as prints of color
slides from the 1960s in the collection of Mabel and
Harley McKeague at the University of Delaware, not to
mention contemporary images by Ann Fienup-Riordan
stretching over more than twenty years, complement
and enliven the text. Most notably, the publication
includes the bilingual transcription of several legends
(qulirat) dealing with the Yup’k parka as subject—
including Tengautuli atkuk / The Flying Parka related
by Paul John—as well as diagrams of parka styles
by Wassilie Moses and Deborah Reade with design
elements identied in Yup’ik and English, and maps
identifying locations mentioned in the text. The book
design by Katrina Noble stands out for its exquisite
attention to detail, graphic artistry, and impressive use
of stylistic elements.
Finally, the workshop methodology used in shaping the
parka project provides a critical model for recording
community knowledge across a geographical and
temporal expanse. The myriad contributions of elders,
seamstresses, linguists, photographers, illustrators,
and designers have not only enriched the collaborative
work of the authors but produced a foundational text
that will serve as a critical guide and vital source of
inspiration for future generations.
THE INDO-EUROPEAN PUZZLE REVISITED:
INTEGRATING ARCHAEOLOGY, GENETICS,
AND LINGUISTICS, EDITED BY KRISTIAN
KRISTIANSEN , GUUS KROONEN, AND ESKE
WILLERSLEV. Cambridge University Press, 2023.
Reviewed by Igor Chechushkov
The Indo-European
Puzzle Revisited is a
comprehensive overview
of the current state of
early Indo-European
studies, covering topics in
archaeology, linguistics,
and genetics. The book
comprises a collection of
papers originally presented
at the conference titled
“When Archaeology
Meets Linguistics and
Genetics,” hosted by
Gothenburg University
in 2018, and is organized
in ve parts. Part I delves into Early Indo-Europeans
from both archaeological and linguistic perspectives,
oering up-to-date information on early steppe
pastoralists. Part II explores the dispersal of Indo-
Europeans, encompassing detailed studies of mining
and metallurgy-related terminology in the Indo-
European language, thus bridging archaeology with
linguistics. Part III focuses on the Bell Beaker horizon
of the Atlantic Fringe, addressing topics such as long-
distance exchange in the Bronze Age and ancient
human DNA. Part IV explores the chariot and wool
horizons of the Bronze Age, examining topics related
to the absolute chronology of the chariot complex and
wool terminology. Finally, Part V examines previously
understudied topics concerning kinship systems
and prehistoric slavery. The book not only advances
research in Indo-European studies but also contributes
to our understanding of the prehistory of the Eurasian
continent by opening new avenues of research. The
Society for American Archaeology (SAA) recognized
this contribution as the most important scholarly
research in archaeology for the year 2023.
INDIGENOUS ARCTIC FISH SKIN
HERITAGE, A Ph.D. THESIS BY ELISA
PALOMINO
By Elisa Palomino
My recently completed Ph.D. represents an
interdisciplinary exploration intersecting fashion,
sustainability, Arctic eldwork, anthropology, and
museum collections. The research builds on the
design practices I instigated during eight years as
head of John Galliano's design studio, developing
sh skin garments for his signature collection.
The highlight of my PhD journey was a Fulbright
Fellowship at the Arctic Studies Center (ASC) in
Washington DC, and in Alaska, where I collaborated
with Indigenous communities and developed global-
scale engagements, spanning three continents,
nine countries, and forty international museums.
The thesis includes literature review, ethnographic
research, artifact analysis, interviews with sh skin
professionals and museum curators, collaborative
workshops, and educational programmes with
students in Arctic and Subarctic environments. The
overarching theme is the examination of how sh
skin connects populations across the Arctic. This
practice aligns with principles of respecting the
relationship between all things on Earth, countering
contemporary practices of over-consumption. This
research has been instrumental in establishing positive
relationships linking historic Indigenous collections
with contemporary communities and addresses critical
issues in contemporary sustainable fashion practices,
presenting the transformation of seafood waste
into leather. Environmental considerations include
overproduction, sh rearing conditions, chemical
pollutants in tanning and dyeing, water and energy
ASC Newsletter 83
use, and responsible material disposal. Rooted in the
resourcefulness of Arctic cultures, the work advocates
for the rights of Indigenous Peoples, animals, and the
natural environment, oering a less consumerist form
of fashion. The interdisciplinary approach identies
sustainable alternatives to conventional sh leather
production processes to minimize environmental
impact.
I owe special thanks to Bill Fitzhugh and the ASC
team: Stephen Loring, John Cloud, Igor Krupnik,
Bernardette Driscoll Engelstad, Nancy Shorey,
Aron Crowell and Dawn Biddison. By hosting me
as a Fulbright scholar, Fitzhugh granted me access to
the world’s most extensive collection of Alaskan sh
skin artefacts and introduced me to his dedicated team
in Washington D.C. In Anchorage, Aron Crowell and
Dawn Biddison introduced me to museums across
Alaska and to Alaska Native sh skin artists. Fitzhugh’s
publications and exhibitions have been an inspiration.
Stephen Loring shared his knowledge of sh skin
collections, while his passion for contemporary
fashion helped me to link the study of Arctic
traditional materials with contemporary fashion. John
Cloud’s knowledge of Arctic cartography contributed
extensively from the areas of Arctic sh skin tradition.
The dissertation is available online.
ARROWS: THE FLIGHT OF THE HANDBOOK
OF NORTH AMERICAN INDIANS
Series review by John Cloud
Publication of Volume 1, Introduction, the opening
volume of the Handbook of North American Indians
(NMAI) series started in the 1970s, deserves a
comment after a half-century of Smithsonian enterprise.
It is without question, the most in-depth and longest-
running publication project ever undertaken by the
Institution. The Handbook originated from a suggestion
by curator John C. Ewers to update Bureau of
American Ethnology (BAE) Bulletin 30: Handbook of
American Indians North of Mexico. The plan proposed
by series editor, William C. Sturtevant, called for
quarto-sized volumes with copious maps, illustrations,
and photographs. Volumes would address cultural
regions, from northern Mexico to the Arctic, along with
various thematic “cross-cutting” volumes. The project
ended in 2007, with the last volume published in 2008,
and various other volumes were abandoned, including
the introductory volume. In 2013, Mary Jo Arnoldi,
then Chair of Anthropology, proposed to create Volume
1, and Igor Krupnik agreed to organize and edit the
swan-song volume, which appeared in 2022 in print
and digital format.
Since most ASC readers today have no knowledge of
the Handbook’s history, I oer a few notes comparing
the Handbook process to a ight of arrows, some
falling to earth prematurely while other reached their
mark. The completed volumes (“arrows”) included
v.8 California (1978), v.15 Northeast (1978), v.9 and
10 Southwest (1979, 1983), v.6 Subarctic (1981), v.5
Arctic (1984), v.11 Great Basin (1986), v.4 History of
Indian-White Relations (1988), v.7 Northwest Coast
(1990), v.17 Languages (1996), v.12 Plateau (1998),
v.13 Plains (in 2 vols., 2001), v.14 Southeast (2004),
v.3 Environment, Origins, and Populations (2007),
v.2 (Indians in Contemporary society (2008), v.1
Introduction (2022).
William C. Sturtevant, who served as the general
editor for most of the Handbook’s existence, planned
20 volumes which were to be published in order of
their completion rather than in number sequence.
The Introduction and several other volumes fell prey
when funding terminated. Two thematic volumes
were completed because of their social relevance: v.4,
History of Indian-White Relations, and v.17 Languages,
which was driven by the appearance of Ives Goddard
early in the project’s history, in part for his linguistics
skills, but also for his management skill.
Now to the ights of arrows. The rst headwind was
the complex relationships between the enterprise, the
Smithsonian “Castle” administration, and the U.S.
Congress. The Handbook began under S.I. Secretary
S. Dillon Ripley at a time of great expansion of
Smithsonian museums. As each succeeding Secretary
arrived, it grew more dicult to maintain Handbook
funding, as each successively was challenged to push
the Handbooks forward, with varying success. In 2007
funding dried up and the project was abandoned in
mid-stream—that arrow fell short.
Sturtevant’s trajectory was complex. He was superbly
educated, had connections to scholars worldwide,
84 ASC Newsletter
read French, Spanish, and German, and was devoted
to “four eld” anthropology. But he was not good
at delegating authority, and his attention to detail
while creating a series of superb volumes eventually
resulted in production delays and, ultimately, in several
unnished volumes (like the most recent Volume 1).
Another arrow was the growing critique of the
legitimacy of “anthropology” during the Handbook’s
long tenure. These included Indigenous critiques of the
anthropological discipline and its practices; the idea
that archaeology was seen by some Native Americans
as a kind of ‘looting’ of their past; and the arcane
museum practices toward Native American artifacts,
human remains, and allied issues that led to new
laws like the Native American Graves Protection and
Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). In eect, the Handbook
lasted for so long that the earth changed underneath the
arrow in ight.
A nal arrow was that the Handbook clung to an
outmoded publication model. Initially, submissions
came to the Handbook as typewritten manuscripts to
be edited and retyped many times by hand. By the
1970s, at the very least, large institutional presses
were compositing nal text and formatting graphics
with computers. Handbook materials could have been
worked with digital les, but this did not occur till the
very last volumes. Further, all graphics, maps, and
photographs were negotiated for one-time use rights.
This meant that volumes published between 1978 and
2008 could not be scanned or re-formatted as digital
les and publications unless new publication contracts
were negotiated with all rights holders, many of whom
were no longer living.
All Handbook arrows returned to earth, with one
exception—volume 1, Introduction. The book that was
to introduce the series became its nale. Like all the
other series volumes, it is massive, profusely illustrated
(in color), densely constructed, with a comprehensive
bibliography by Corey Heyward and Cesare Marino,
excellent indexing, Indigenous participation, and
thematic sets of chapters compiled and edited by
Igor Krupnik, volume editor, and the editorial team
including Ives Goddard, the late Ira Jacknis, Sergei
Kan, Ann McMullen, William Merrill, J. Daniel
Rodgers, Gabriel Tayac, and Joe Watkins. Dan
Cole did the extensive cartography, as he did for many
volumes of the original project. There is also a whole
paragraph of others who worked on the volume, whom
I am leaving out lest I miss someone. Igor’s editor’s
Preface and introductory essays provide a deep history
for the entire Handbook project of 1966–2022. Volume
1 is the only one in the series accessible online and
available for free download.
BOOK NOTICE: LAAXAAYIK, NEAR THE
GLACIER: INDIGENOUS HISTORY AND
ECOLOGY AT YAKUTAT FIORD, ALASKA,
BY ARON L. CROWELL. SMITHSONIAN
CONTRIBUTIONS TO KNOWLEDGE #55.
Smithsonian Institution Press.
Fiord glaciers of
southern Alaska reshape
landscapes as they
advance and retreat
in response to climate
cycles, inuencing
coastal ecosystems by
enriching marine food
webs with minerals
carried in meltwater
and ice oes. On
land, biodiverse forest
ecosystems grow and
mature as glaciers
withdraw, connected to
the sea by glacially fed
rivers and lakes where salmon spawn.
For millennia, Alaska Native peoples have lived and
thrived in these highly productive cryogenic biomes,
harvesting bounties of plant and animal foods by
employing complex ecological knowledge, adaptive
technologies, and lineage-based social patterns of
cooperation and resource sharing. A longitudinal study
of the 1,100-year cultural ecology of Yakutat ord in
Southeast Alaska was conducted during 2011–2014
by the Smithsonian Institution’s Arctic Studies Center
and the Yakutat Tlingit Tribe to document Little Ice
Age glacial retreat; settlement of the emerging ord
by migrating Eyak, Ahtna, and Tlingit clans; and
utilization of the ord’s marine and terrestrial habitats
by past and present residents.
Applying principles of knowledge coproduction, this
study joins oral ecological and historical knowledge
shared by members of the community with scientic
data from archaeology, archaeofaunal analysis, marine
and terrestrial ecology, glaciology, subsistence surveys,
and historical archives. Information and cultural
perspectives from interviews conducted in English
and Tlingit with community scholars, hunters, and
artists are presented alongside results of archaeological
investigations at former villages and camps dating from
the thirteenth century to the 1960s. Special emphasis
is placed on hunting and consumption of harbor
seals (Phoca vitulina), a cultural focus and principal
subsistence species throughout Yakutat history. The
study demonstrates the centuries-long construction and
modication of a cultural niche, or integrated human
role, within the ecosystem of Yakutat ord.
ASC Newsletter 85
TRANSITIONS
G. CARLETON RAY (1928–2023): NATURAL
HISTORIAN
By Igor Krupnik
The Arctic Studies Center lost
an old and trusted partner with
the passing of marine biologist
and conservationist G. Carleton
Ray, 95, on December 14,
2023. His last position was
a research professor at the
Department of Environmental
Sciences, University of Virginia,
in Charlottesville VA, where
he and his wife and coauthor,
Jerry McCormick-Ray had
been working for over 40 years,
before retiring in 2022. Carleton
was a man of many talents
and of highly diverse interests,
who operated at ease at many
scales in biology, ecosystem studies, and conservation.
In one of his bios, he identied his research as
reaching into several scientic disciplines, including
animal physiology, taxonomy, oceanography, physics
(acoustics), and behavior, and falling into the categories
of coastal and marine biodiversity, land- and seascape
ecology, marine mammal ecology, and physiological
ecology, each leading to coastal-marine conservation.
His geographic focus was equally diverse. Over his
long career, he worked in the Bering Sea, Chesapeake
Bay, the Bahamas, in Antarctica, small islands in the
southern Pacic and the Atlantic, and other places.
He was a deep-ocean diver, an avid photographer, an
accomplished guitar player, a good storyteller, and at
one time, a milk-father of baby walruses.
Carleton was a top-notch scholar, with his B.S., M.S.,
and Ph.D. degrees in Zoology from Yale, University of
California Berkeley, and Columbia, respectively. Before
his long tenure at UVa, he taught at Columbia, Rutgers,
and Johns Hopkins University. Besides his many diving
expeditions and ocean cruises, he worked for ten years as
curator at the New York Aquarium in Brooklyn, NY and
was twice a research associate at the Smithsonian, with
a small oce next to the Anthropology Chair’s space at
the Natural History Museum. He was instrumental in the
making and passing of the Marine Mammal Protection
Act of 1972. He was also a humble and widely respected
person, with great wit and sense of humor.
Carleton and I met in May 1999 in the Yupik town of
Gambell on St. Lawrence Island, Alaska, where he and
his wife Jerry were organizing a skin-boat trip with a
Yupik crew to observe migrating walruses among the
ow of rapidly drifting ice. Over the years, I heard
numerous stories about his many visits to Gambell
in the late 1950s and 1960s for
underwater observations of walrus
feeding and mating behavior. He
was befriended by several hunters
and Yupik Elders, with whom he
made easy and natural connections.
Almost fty years later, in February
2004, I persuaded Carleton to
go with me on a trip to another
island community, Savoonga,
where, I introduced him to a Yupik
marine mammal expert, Chester
Tapghaghhmii Noongwook
(1933–2019—see ASC Newsletter
27). It was such a pleasure to watch
two wise men enjoying each other’s
knowledge and company. Carleton
was always keen on including an anthropologist’s and
Indigenous users’ perspective, so that I became his co-
author on several papers and book chapters about the
Bering Sea ecosystems and Pacic walrus.
Carleton was one of the very few contemporary
scholars who proudly called himself a ‘natural
historian’ or a ‘naturalist.’ He always professed an
integrative vision and stressed the myriad links among
environment, marine mammals, and people who live
by hunting them. He contributed a great chapter titled
“Arctic Crashes: A Naturalist’s General Perspective”
to our Arctic Crashes volume (Krupnik and Crowell
2020), in which he articulated his vision. Together with
his wife Jerry, he published an award-winning textbook,
Coastal-Marine Conservation: Science and Policy
(2004, Wiley Blackwell, Oxford) reprinted as Marine
Conservation: Science, Policy, and Management in
2014. The world of marine conservation and of marine
mammal science will be a dierent space without one
of its last dedicated ‘naturalists.’ He will be greatly
missed, and our deep sympathy goes to his wife of 46
years, Dr. Jerry McCormick-Ray.
SERGEI A. ARUTYUNOV (1932–2023):
‘CROSSROADS’ PARTNER
By Igor Krupnik and Bill Fitzhugh
Russian and international Arctic/North Pacic
anthropology lost one of its last ‘giants’ with the
passing of Sergei A. Arutyunov, 91, in Moscow,
Carleton and Jerry Ray, 2020. Photo by Tom
Cogill, courtesy of UVa Dept. Envir. Sci.
86 ASC Newsletter
Russia, on December 21, 2023. He was born in Tbilisi,
then the capital of the Soviet Republic of Georgia
(today’s independent Republic of Georgia), in a mixed
family with strong Armenian roots and broad cultural
background. He received
his B.A. in the Japanese
language at the Institute
of Oriental Studies in
Moscow and a Ph.D. in
Japanese anthropology
at the then-Moscow
Institute of Ethnography
(today’s Russian Institute
of Ethnology and
Anthropology—IEA). He
was elected a Corresponding
Member of the Russian
Academy of Sciences in
1990, served as the head of
the Department of Caucasus
at the IEA, and received
numerous awards in Russia,
Armenia, Japan, and other
nations.
His professional interests
and the geography of
his eld studies were
remarkably diverse. For
decades, he was known
as the leading Russian
specialist in traditional
Japanese family life and
everyday culture. Yet after
completing his Ph.D. thesis on medieval Japan in
1958, he joined his mentor, Maxim G. Levin, and
archaeologist Dorian Sergeev on a trip to the Russian
side of Bering Strait to excavate the newly discovered
ancient Eskimo burial ground near the Chukchi town
of Uelen. That rst trip triggered Sergei’s lifelong
connection to Arctic anthropology and ancient Eskimo
cultures, from Bering Strait to Greenland. For several
seasons from 1958 to 1975, he took part in excavating
the Uelen burial ground and later, another ancient
settlement at Ekven, at the southern entry to Bering
Strait. These excavations resulted in magnicent
museum collections of ancient Eskimo artefacts now
housed in St. Petersburg and Moscow, several exhibits,
two monographs co-authored with Sergeev, and several
dozen papers in Russian, English, French, German,
and other languages. In course of these excavations,
he became a renowned expert on the early Eskimo arts
and ornamentation styles and on Bering Sea cultural
typologies developed by Smithsonian Henry B. Collins
in the 1930s. In 1977, he joined Michael Chlenov
and Igor Krupnik on a survey of the site called
‘Whalebone Alley’ (the book by three co-authors was
published in 1982). He returned to Chukotka in 1987,
to inaugurate a new cycle of excavations at Ekven
led by his former student, Michael Bronstein. In
between, he spent several
eld seasons working as
ethnologist among the
Nenets reindeer herders in
Western Siberian Arctic
(with Vladimir Vasiliev),
Armenian peasants in
Armenia (with a large
Armenian eld team),
and among various ethnic
groups across India and
Vietnam.
Since the 1960s, Sergei
was a world known
‘star’ and international
darling of the then-Soviet
anthropology. Intellectual,
artistic, well-read, and
uent in many languages,
including English, French,
German, and Japanese,
he was a constant feature
at international meetings,
where he eagerly served as
a mediator and interpreter
to his colleagues. His
elaborated wine toasts
at many a dining table, a
cultural legacy of his native
Georgia, and his hilarious poetic inscriptions written
for his friends were cherished as treasures. He was an
internationally admired scholar, particularly in Japan, a
true ‘Crossroads’ man, who comfortably moved across
and between cultures, nations, and continents.
No wonder that in 1979 Sergei was chosen as the
Soviet/Russian co-lead for the international exhibit
project, “Crossroads of Continents: Cultures of
Siberia and Alaska.” It brought him in a decade-long
collaboration and, eventually, personal friendship
with his anthropology colleagues at the Smithsonian
National Museum of Natural History. His relationship
with the Smithsonian began a few years prior when he
participated as a speaker and panelist at a symposium
on circumpolar maritime adaptations organized by
William Fitzhugh at the 1974 9th International
Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences
in Chicago. This was the rst anthropological meeting
in the U.S. to be attended by several Russian scholars.
During that meeting Sergei ‘stole the show’ by seizing
the microphone from ocial translators who proved
Top: Arutyunov demonstrating a spear at the Museum of
Anthropology and Ethnography
Bottom: Crossroads team toasting prospective success with
MAE director Rudolph Its: Joanne MacDonald, Bill Holm,
William Sturtevant, Rudolph Its, Sergei Arutyunov, James
VanStone, and George MacDonald
ASC Newsletter 87
incapable of properly translating professional papers in
Russian and Japanese (something he reportedly did at
several meetings). When the Smithsonian launched the
planning for the “Crossroads of Continents” exhibit
in 1977, Sergei became the lead actor on the Soviet
side. He shepherded the American curators’ visits to
the rich Russian-America collections at the Museum
of Anthropology and Ethnography in St. Petersburg,
and Soviet curators’ trips to the American Museum
of Natural History in NYC and to the Smithsonian in
Washington D.C. He then led the Soviet delegations to
several Crossroads venues in DC, NYC, Anchorage,
and other locations in North America. In addition
to his contributions to the exhibit, its catalogue, and
symposium volume, Sergei and his younger colleague,
the late Sergei Serov, became the rst Soviet
anthropological ‘ambassadors’ to counter the American
propaganda of a Soviet Evil Empire. Following
Crossroads, Sergei’s inuence led to decades of
Smithsonian and other institutions’ collaborations
with Russian ethnologists and archaeologists, opening
new, long-lasting ‘crossroads’ doors with Alaskan,
Smithsonian, and other American and Canadian
colleagues. Those research and friendship ties helped
bring many more Russian scholars to the USA and
fostered growing research collaborations until the
recent Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Sergei Arutyunov’s passing marks a generation
of collaboration that for several decades realized
Knud Rasmusson’s 1933 dream of a coming
global partnership in the study of Eskimo origins.
Knud cautioned that this “cannot be brought to
realization in the twinkling of an eye,” but thought it
would eventually take place as a “great cooperative
undertaking”. Sergei’s legacy, besides his many other
accomplishments, brought Rasmussen’s dream to
reality. We hope that a world, after the ugly war is over,
will awake again to Knud’s and Sergei’s vision.
STEARNS ANTHONY (‘TONY’) MORSE (1931–
2024)
By Elise Morse-Gagne published in Daily Hampshire
Gazette on Feb. 10, 2024
Pelham, MA—Stearns Anthony “Tony” Morse died
on January 9, 2024, six days after his 93rd birthday.
Tony was born in 1931 to Stearns Morse and Helen
(Ward) Field Morse in Hanover, NH, the youngest of
four children. The family spent summers on a family
farm in Bath, NH. Tragedy struck in 1937 when Tony's
brother Stephen, 11, and a friend both drowned while
shing…Tony matriculated at Dartmouth College
in 1948. From 1949 to 1952 he spent summers
working on the schooner Blue Dolphin, operated as an
oceanographic research
vessel on the Labrador
coast by David C.
Nutt, a Dartmouth
professor. After
graduating with a major
in geology he was
drafted into the Army
and served for two
years in post-WWII
Germany, learning
to ski and to love
opera; immediately
upon his return to the
States, he returned to
Labrador for further
eldwork. Breaking
his leg in the eld, he
was transported by
helicopter to the Grenfell Mission in Northwest River,
where Dorothy Forbes was volunteering as a nurse's
aide after her rst year at Vassar College. The two were
married in 1960.
In 1962 Tony earned his Ph.D. in Geology from McGill
University and joined the faculty of Franklin and
Marshall College in Lancaster, PA, where the couple
raised their three daughters, Elise, Anne, and Sophie.
Tony continued to research Labrador anorthosites in
the summers. Dorothy joined him for several of these
excursions, living in a beaverboard cabin some 25
miles north of Nain with rst two young children, then
three, assisted by Benigna Semigak, from Nain.
In 1971 Tony took a position in the Earth Sciences
department at UMass Amherst. The family moved
to Massachusetts, and Tony launched a decade-
long research project studying the Nain Anorthosite
Complex with a series of graduate students, now using
a mobile base camp in the form of R/V Pitsiulak, which
he designed based on the Newfoundland Long Liner
work boat. Dorothy and their children lived aboard as
well for part of several summers, and Anne and Sophie
each returned in later years to work as assistants. In
1977-78 the Morses lived in Oslo, Norway, where Tony
collaborated with colleagues at Universitetet i Oslo. In
addition to his exploration of anorthosites, Tony studied
the nature of the Earth's core-mantle boundary and the
thermodynamics of rocks and melts. His 1980 textbook
Basalts and Phase Diagrams is a foundational resource
in the eld of petrology…and he published almost 90
research articles.
In 2013 Tony, then 82, with Anne Morse and her
daughter Emily, organized and led the Kiglapait Field
Conference, a unique gathering in Labrador for 22
geologists from around the world. In 2019 he received
Tony Morse on a Blue Dolphin
Labrador oceanographic cruise
in 1951
88 ASC Newsletter
the Mineralogical Association of Canada's highest
award, for outstanding contributions to the mineral
sciences of Canada. He was a Life Member of Clare
Hall at the University of Cambridge, a Fellow of the
American Geophysical Union, a Carnegie Fellow, a
Senior Fellow of the Mineralogical Association of
America, and a Fellow of the Geological Society of
America.
In an era of increasingly siloed specialists, Tony
was multifaceted. He was a lifelong outdoorsman:
a eld geologist, navigator, scything promoter and
contestant, avid skier, builder, (maple)sugar-maker,
hunter, and active manager of woodlands. He was also a
rigorous scholar who conducted meticulous laboratory
experiments, and a lucid and precise writer with a gift
for exposition and unexpected analogies. A colleague
recalls that “everyone wanted Tony to write their tenure
recommendations” because his writing, while always
impeccably correct, was never “geeky.” He loved
poetry, especially the works of Robert Frost, and could
quote long passages by heart. In his 20s, prevented by
bad weather from getting into the eld in Labrador, he
translated a Moravian missionary's account of the deadly
1918 inuenza epidemic in Hebron from German to
English. For many years he wrote reminiscences and
essays for the Littleton (NH) Courier, many compiled
into a slim volume titled Too Far North for Architects.
His musical repertoire was seemingly inexhaustible.
Friends and family remember decades of guitar playing
and singing; until he had Bell's palsy in his 80s, his
melodious whistle could also be heard in operatic arias
and the themes from classical symphonies…
Always an ebullient presence—warm, open-hearted,
tempestuous—Tony was also generous with time and
encouragement for younger scholars, with a special
warm spot for late bloomers. He championed the entry
of women and members of minorities into elds too
long dominated by white men. He believed science was
at its best when it was full of humanity, while life at its
best included plenty of scientic thinking. Together, the
two were like a big house party, spilling out onto the
lawn and lasting well into the night: eusive greetings
and introductions, games of frisbee or poker, children
underfoot, gusts of laughter, beer, singing, and above
all, stories celebrating good science and good people.
[Additional notes by Bill Fitzhugh: The above is a
warm, wonderful tribute to Tony’s life, his professional
accomplishments, and his impact on colleagues and
younger scholars—like me. Also a Dartmouth grad, I
became aware of Tony’s work in Labrador through his
association with Elmer Harp, who brought Tony to
Labrador as a eld assistant in 1949 and 1950, and me
to Hudson Bay in 1967. Tony contributed a petrographic
appendix on Ramah chert to my Ph.D. dissertation,
contributed information leading to discovery of the
Ramah chert quarries on the Torngat coast of northern
Labrador, and, with an assist from his geological mentor,
Everett (Pep) Wheeler, lured me from Hamilton Inlet
to Nain and its archaeological and geological riches.
During the late-70s and early 80s, after I acquired my
own boat, Tony’s and my crews shared research, food,
and home brew whenever we crossed paths around
the Kiglapaits. Later, when I outgrew R/V Tunuyak
and needed al larger, safer vessel, he loaned his pride
and joy—the R/V Pitsiulak—to the Smithsonian for
our 4-year project in Frobisher Bay, Ban Island,
investigating the archaeology of the Martin Frobisher
voyages (1576–1578) in the early 1990s. Then, in 2001,
he and the University of Massachusetts donated Pitsiulak
to the Smithsonian for the Arctic Studies Center’s
continuing research in Labrador and the Quebec Lower
North Shore. For more the thirty years, Tony’s generous
support enabled the ASC to conduct pioneering research,
train new generations of archaeologists and other
‘ologists’, and work with indigenous partners, bringing
the history, cultures, and environments of the Far
Northeast into focus as never before. We hope we have
carried on the tradition established by Tony and his salty
predecessors, Alexander Forbes, Donald MacMillan,
David C. (‘Beany’) Nutt, and countless Inuit who made
their scientic work productive and safe. Tony’s passing
this year is especially poignant because it also marks a
‘goodbye’ to Pitsiulak, a victim of the covid transition
and a time for the ASC to retire from fty-ve years
of northern eld research. Thank you, Tony, for your
inspiration, leadership, and generosity.
(Readers will nd other Newsletter pieces by or about
SAM in ASC Newsletters #24 (2017), 26 (2019), and
28 (2021), and in ‘Adieu Pitsiulak’ in this issue.)
TRIBUTES TO NORMAN HALLENDY (1932–
2023)
By William Fitzhugh
Sometimes it takes an 'outsider' to shake the foundations
of our academic trains of thought. I think of Alexander
Marshack's idea that seemingly random scratches
on Upper Paleolithic bones marked lunar cycles; of
Milankovitch's notion that climate change was forced
by precession of the earth's axis; or of Wegener's
hypothesis about continental drift. Norm was never
trained formally in astronomy or geophysics, or for that
matter in anthropology or archaeology; but his decades
of work with Inuit of southern Ban, and his passion
for exploring stone structures, transformed the way
anthropologists and many others approach the Inuit
landscape. No longer can we entertain the idea that it
can be adequately described or interpreted without Inuit
ASC Newsletter 89
assistance and consultation. His beautiful photography
and sensitive probing for meaning—especially his
lexical recording—among his Inuit friends and elders
opened our eyes to a spiritual, historical, and intellectual
world hidden in seemingly prosaic rock placements,
cairns, alignments, and inuksuks—formations long
known to anthropologists who never realized that to
understand them one had to establish a 'Rasmussen-like'
trust with Inuit that only a
few researchers achieved.
Norm did not solve many
of the riddles behind Inuit
geo-sculpture, but he showed
they had purpose we never
imagined. Norm opened the
door to a world hidden from
outsiders that with the passing
of elders we will never fully
recover. But at least we now
know the Arctic landscape
is lled with physical
manifestations of stories,
meaning, and mystery that
may still be recovered—at
least partially—if one has the
stamina, intuition, sensitivity,
and communication skills of
a Norman Hallendy.
By Alan Morantz
I’ve known Norm since
1994. We worked intensively
and creatively, rst on an
inuential article on inuksuit
for Equinox magazine, then
on his trailblazing book on
the same subject published
a few years later, and most
recently on his memoirs,
An Intimate Wilderness.
More than anyone I know,
Norm embodied the
Walt Whitman poetic
declaration, “I am large,
I contain multitudes.”
Norm could be the most
cantankerous and the most charming man. He was both
artist and scientist. He could hold a room of thousands
spellbound or make himself small to draw others in. He
had no formal education in linguistics, ethnohistory, or
anthropology yet made lasting contributions in each of
those areas.
What compelled Norm to return to the North year after
year, decade after decade? It wasn’t fame or fortune. It
wasn’t escape. It wasn’t some vainglorious endeavour.
The easy answer is that he saw a life purpose in acting
as a ghost writer for Inuit elders whose traditional life
was disappearing. There was certainly aection for the
Cape Dorset elders he befriended; they became a second
family in a sort of parallel universe. Norm grew old with
them. But I think the most compelling explanation is that
Norm was on a lifelong journey of self-discovery, and
for him most roads led North. On several occasions, he
would say to me that, as far
as he was concerned, “the last
great wilderness is yourself.”
In his encounters with the
Inuit elders, he listened a
lot, but he also shared his
own experiences and life
stories. Of his forbears from
Bukovina. Of the traditions
of his grandmother. Of the
seemingly arcane rituals
of the Church. It was a
learning loop: traveling
on the land in all seasons,
Norm would share stories
from his upbringing and life
down south, and the elders
would relate those stories
to their own experiences.
Over time, and against the
backdrop of a spare and
unforgiving environment,
Norm developed a keener
understanding of who he was
and who he wanted to be.
I once asked Norm for
information to include in the
biographical line at the end
of his rst Equinox story. He
wrote back: “I don’t know
who I am. I’m just a person
who went to school, got a
good education, learned how
to observe things well, got a
series of interesting jobs, had
the good fortune of working
with people much smarter
than I, and who continues to derive much pleasure in
discovering things for myself rather than, as Lin Yutang
once said, being carried in the rickshaw of another
man’s labours. Today, we honour and stay goodbye to
Norman Hallendy, explorer of the last great wilderness.
By Louise Terrillon-Mackay, Gatineau
I met Norm in the early 90s when I was Director of
international relations in the Department of Canadian
Norman Hallendy at the McMichael Canadian Art
Collection gallery during the exhibition entitled Sakka:
Observing the Invisible: Photographs by Norman
Hallendy. (McMichael Canadian Art Collection)
Inuksuks in South Ban Island. Photo by Norman
Hallendy
90 ASC Newsletter
Heritage and Chargé de Mission to UNESCO. He came
to me with a proposal to give a lecture and organize
an exhibition of his collection of Inuit Art at the
headquarters of UNESCO in Paris. An exhibit of his
photographs of the Arctic was also shown at the then
Canadian Museum of Civilization, now known as the
Canadian Museum of History. We discussed at length
how to get both exhibits to Europe. It was a long and
complicated process which took a few years.
But the wait was worth it. Norm came to Paris, and
the combined exhibit was placed in the main hall of
UNESCO Headquarters. The lecture was also advertised,
and Norman, who as you all know was a raconteur
extraordinaire, talked for one hour about Inuit culture
and traditions and his experiences and adventures
with his friends in Cape Dorset. The hall was full to
overowing. There had never been such a turn-out for
a lecture at UNESCO! It was also thanks to the help of
Rosamaria Durand, a Canadian who was the Executive
Assistant to the Assistant Director General for Culture at
UNESCO, that the exhibition and lecture happened. She
organized a dinner, and a great evening was had by all
with amenco music played on a guitar by Milagros Del
Corral from Spain. You should have seen Norm dancing
amenco! The photo exhibit toured around Europe
after its stay in Paris and was returned to the Canadian
Museum of Civilization
Norman was a good friend and interested in so many
things. He was even on the Board of the Canadian
Institute for Mediterranean Studies, which I Chair,
for a few years, because of his Italian connection. But
his love for the Arctic was so strong that he returned
his focus to his Inuit friends in the North. We had so
many things to discuss over the years. I will miss our
conversations. He was a very special person, and we
shall all miss him. May you rest in peace Norman, you
deserve it.
Statement by the McMichael Collection
All of us at the McMichael are saddened to hear
of the death of Norman E. Hallendy (1932-2023),
an important ethnographer and photographer who
worked closely with Inuit communities in the North–
especially in Kinngait–for many decades. Through
six donations consisting of his ethnographic archives
and four donations of Inuit art, Norman supported the
McMichael for over forty years and through his Arctic
research spanning more than 50 years, contributed
signicantly to the preservation of Inuit cultural
heritage in Canada. We are grateful for Hallendy's
important work and for entrusting us with his legacy.
The McMichael Canadian Art Collection will host a
special event featuring Norman’s life and work on April
13, 2024.
DON E. DUMOND (1929–2023): ARCTIC
SCHOLAR
By Dennis Grin
Don E. Dumond, Arctic
archaeologist, scholar,
professor, and past
director of the University
of Oregon’s Museum
of Natural and Cultural
History, passed away
on June 8th at the age of
94. He was a colleague,
mentor, and friend to
many in the Arctic
academic community, in
addition to the University
of Oregon, with which he
was associated for over 60
years. While publishing
on both Arctic and
Mesoamerica, he spent
decades working at the then Oregon State Museum
of Anthropology, helping to insure its survival when
museums were neither appreciated nor adequately
funded. His perseverance and leadership insured
that the now-named Oregon Museum of Natural and
Cultural History is both thriving and much loved
throughout the Pacic Northwest.
Born in Texas on March 23, 1929, Dumond spent his
formative years in rural New Mexico where his family
had a small livestock ranch. He attended the University
of New Mexico graduating with a degree in English
literature in 1949. Before joining the military, he spent
several months traveling through Mexico. This trip
not only served as the impetus to his life-long interest
in Mexican culture history, but it is where he met his
future wife Carol Steichen, an accomplished artist,
cartographer, and illustrator who drew most of the
maps and gures in his published works.
Don returned from the Air Force, after serving in
both Korea and Japan, and using the GI Bill, attended
Mexico City College where he earned a master’s
degree in Latin American Studies in 1957. There he
took his rst eld archaeology class and excavated at
Teotihuacán. After graduation, Don followed Carol to
Oregon, and enrolled at the University of Oregon’s new
Ph.D. program in Anthropology with Luther Cressman
as his advisor, because—as he told Donald Grayson
(2010, Arctic Anthropology 47(2):1)—"I always
enjoyed the story of things”.
Dumond spent a few summers working in Oregon
before accepting a federal contract to investigate
The way most of us remember
Don: taking a question,
considering, and responding
with a touch of humor. Photo
courtesy: UO/MNCH
ASC Newsletter 91
historical salmon runs in Alaska before the 1880s. This
job brought him to the Alaska Peninsula, which became
the focus for his dissertation. His rst project in 1960
was in Katmai National Park. As he told Don Grayson,
“I wanted to make Alaskan archaeology a story, with
a beginning, a middle, and an end, and Alaska wasn't
complete in my mind yet and wouldn't be for years to
come.” Dumond completed his dissertation in 1962.
Don spent the next four decades working on the
Alaskan Peninsula as well as in Mexico, making major
contributions to the history of both regions. His rst
publication was in 1957, and he continued to publish as
late as 2018. His Arctic publications focused on human
prehistory and demography on the Alaska Peninsula,
but his geographic framework continuously expanded,
taking in southwestern Alaska, the Americas, and
Northeast Siberia. Dumond lived only a few doors
down from the Moss Lab at the museum, and long
after his retirement one could see him walking to the
lab each morning. A prolic writer, he authored the
text book, Eskimos and Aleuts, and published articles
in journals including American Antiquity, American
Anthropologist, Science, Arctic Anthropology, and
Arctic, in addition to numerous monographs in
Anthropological Papers of the University of Alaska and
University of Oregon Anthropological Papers series.
Dumond's entire career was spent at the University of
Oregon (UO). He began his graduate studies there in
1959, taught until 1994, serving as department head
from 1972 to 1979, and in 1982 served as the Director
of the Oregon State Museum of Anthropology, now
called the UO’s Museum of Natural and Cultural
History, from which he retired in 1996. During his
teaching years, Dumond served as advisor to more
than 17 graduate students who received their Ph.D.s,
of which I was his last. I had the good fortune to serve
as his teaching assistant during his last two years of
teaching and so was able to witness his interaction with
students considering a career in archaeology. While his
lectures were both detailed and comprehensive and he
expected his students to have read the assigned material
and lectures, his door was always open and his insight
was appreciated by those who approached him
During his long career, Dumond received many
accolades. He was an elected Fellow in the American
Anthropological Association, the Arctic Institute of
North America, and the American Association for
the Advancement of Science, and was elected to
the Sociedad Mexicana de Antropologia. Following
his retirement, he was presented with the Career
Achievement Award of the Alaska Anthropological
Association, the Director’s Lifetime Achievement
Award by the Museum of Natural and Cultural History,
and the Gertrude Bass Warner Award from the Jordan
Schnitzer Museum of Art. He will be missed by many!
ADIEU, PITSIULAK—WELL-TRAVELED
RESEARCH PARTNER!
By William Fitzhugh
This year saw the departure of two old friends: Stearns
A. (Tony) Morse, and his boat-child, R.V. Pitsiulak.
Tony died after a brief illness in January 2024 (see
Morse obit in this Newsletter). Tony was introduced to
Labrador geology by Elmer Harp and David (Beanie)
Nutt and picked up the tradition, dating to David
MacMillan and Robert Peary, of conducting boat-
based research along the rugged Arctic and Subarctic
coasts of the Far Northeast. After a few seasons
traveling around the Kiglapait Mountains north of Nain
with his wife, Dorothy Morse, in canoes and small
outboards, Tony convinced NSF to fund construction
Don in Northeast Siberia in 1990. Photo courtesy: Arctic
Anthropology
Dumond at the University of Oregon’s Museum of Natural
and Cultural History. Photo courtesy: UO/MNCH
92 ASC Newsletter
of a vessel built on the lines of a Newfoundland long-
liner, with modications for hosting a research crew
and lab equipment. Pitsiulak (Inuit for sea pigeon or
Black Guillemot) was built in a Lewisport boatyard in
1971. Tony used it to support teams of geologists along
the northern Labrador coast for ten years, gathering
data on the anorthosite intrusion that was at that time
producing dates on some of the oldest rocks in the
world. Tony wrote about his family’s participation on
Pitsiulak trips:
With NSF help we built a 51-foot research vessel
with greenheart sheathing for work in ice. Dorothy
cooked and steered, called out the ice ahead, and
took care of the daughters for several summers.
We used Pitsiulak in Labrador for ten years and
then gave it to the Smithsonian for their Arctic
archaeology studies under William Fitzhugh. Bill
took the ship to Ban Island where for several
summers our youngest daughter Sophie Morse
served as Operations Ocer. (ASC Newsletter 28,
p. 79)
After a gap in funding left
Pitsiulak stranded onshore,
Tony loaned the boat to
support the Smithsonian’s
“Archaeology of the Martin
Frobisher Voyages”
project in Ban Island. Pits
was truly in her element
during the Frobisher
project. Equipped with new
engines and electronics
tted out by Smithsonian,
and with Perry
Colbourne of Lushes
Bight, Newfoundland, as
skipper, we left Newfoundland in 1990 and motored
north along the Labrador coast, crossed turbulent
Hudson Strait, passed Resolution Island, and entered
Frobisher Bay, where we were greeted by 40-foot
tides. In a snowstorm at the end of the rst summer’s
explorations, we hauled her ashore on a cradle built
from steel sent up from Ontario. It took three tractors
to move her a quarter mile up the ats, racing the in-
coming tide! There she sat for three winters alongside
the deteriorating hulk of Max Dunbar’s boat, Calanus,
built in Nova Scotia in 1949 and abandoned on the
Iqaluit beach in the late 1970s. For three more years
we returned to Frobisher with large teams, launched
and hauled Pits, and worked on sites in outer Frobisher
Bay—Kodlunarn Island (Frobisher’s base camp),
Tikkoon, Willows Island, Cyrus Field Bay, and others,
returning to the Port Saunders (Nd) Marine Center in
late August 1993.
Through the 1990s we worked yearly along the
Labrador coast, returning to Port Saunders, where
Bill and Ilene Lowe provided hospitality while we
staged and hauled-out, before we shifted homebase to
the Triton Marine Center, near Springdale, Nd, near
Perry’s home on Long Island. From there, the Labrador
voyages launched and returned until the Smithsonian
and Pitsiulak became household words, while boat
upkeep pumped funds into the local economy.
In 2001, Pits turned her bow west to the Quebec Lower
North Shore (LNS), pursuing knowledge about the
southern boundary of Inuit cultures and their contacts
with 16-17th century Basque whalers. For nineteen
years, she carried teams back and forth along the LNS,
stopping yearly to check out the Norse site at L’Anse
aux Meadows, visit with Boyce Roberts in Quirpon, and
eat a meal at Gina and Adrian Noordhof’s Norseman
restaurant at L’Anse aux Meadows. On the LNS we were
hosted at Brador by Cliord and Florence Hart while
we excavated the Hart Chalet Inuit site, by Christine
and Wilson Evans of
Harrington Harbor while
digging Inuit-Basque sites
at Petit Mécatina, and by
Garland Nadeau and
Eilene Schoeld of St. Paul
River while working on
Inuit and Basque sites there.
Pits and Skipper Perry
threaded these Gulf shores
and shoals for another 19
years while we explored,
excavated, and hosted teams
of University of Montreal
and Smithsonian underwater
archaeologists.
When we returned in 2019 from St. Paul River and
hauled out at Triton, we expected to be back in 2020 for
several more years of work on the LNS, but covid had
other plans. Pits sat ashore for the next two years while
we were unable to reach her, and I sensed the ebbing
of her sea-going days. In 2023, Perry was eligible
for retirement, boat engineering needed upkeep, and
funds for putting her back in shape were no longer
available. For two more years, 2022 and 2023, we
visited and saluted her as we headed o for the LNS,
hauling a trailered speedboat behind Parry’s truck.
Finally, in 2023, with no way for a future launch, Perry
and I cleared our gear out, emptied her fuel tanks, and
presented her to the Triton yard for recycling. Some
parts like her generator, motor and shaft, props, anchor
chain and winch, and guard rails may nd new life on
another vessel.
Pitsiulak underway in Labrador in the mid-1980s
ASC Newsletter 93
Perry’s and my last visit to her was more than
sentimental—it was like saying goodbye to an old,
trusted friend. The hours and miles travelled, the
storms braved—all came rushing back: desperate
hours as the tide dropped her on a sharp rock; the
two terrifying storm-stranded days in Frobisher Bay
when Perry, alone, rode out a storm while we were
caught ashore; a near stranding in the Hamilton
Inlet Backway when a wind-shift set us on a rock
at dinner-time; a falling-tide grounding in the
Fischot Island channel; loosing and regaining towed
speedboats (one of which drifted back to us on her
own!); a bad stormy night at the Blanc Sablon pier;
and the silence of an engine failure in high seas o
St. Paul River. Thanks to Perry’s engineering and
crisis management skills we survived these and other
dicult times. When the chips were down, Perry and
Pits worked things out.
Entering history, Pitsiulak joins a long line of sturdy
vessels that served science along the Newfoundland,
Labrador, and Ban coasts: Nutt’s Blue Dolphin,
MacMillan’s Bowdoin, Dunbar’s Calanus, and
former ASC vessels, Qilaluak and Tunuyak. All
hosted countless teams of researchers; all became
familiar and famous (or infamous!) to local
residents; and all created legends recorded in our
logbooks and work reports. Pitsiulak, like Bowdoin
(which was rebuilt and still serves the Maine
Maritime Academy as a training ship), served a great
number of students and scientists, from its Morse
and Smithsonian days from 1971 to 2019. She will
be remembered by all who sailed with her and those
ashore who knew of her.
2023 ASC STAFF PUBLICATIONS
Biddison, Dawn
Batuk’enelyashi: Natural Dyes from Dena’ina Lands.
15 videos featuring knowledge shared by Sugpiaq/
Iñupiaq Master Artist June Simeono Pardue and her
apprentice/granddaughter Destinee VonScheele.
Batuk’enelyashi: Natural Dyes from Dena’ina Lands.
50-page instructional booklet accompanying the video
set. (June Simeono Pardue and Dawn Biddison)
Coming Home: Reclaiming Ahtna Knowledge through
Museum Collections, edited by Dawn Biddison with
illustrations and designs by 80% Studios.
Making Connections: Athabascan Lifeways and
You. 36-page educational activities booklet featuring
Smithsonian collections and Athabascan research.
(Melissa Shagino and Dawn Biddison, illustrations
and designs by 80% Studios)
Cloud, John
Le Rendez-Vous de Virginie. In: Kowalski, Jean-Marie,
Chaline, Olivier., L'Amiral de Grasse et l'Indépendance
Américaine. Paris, France: Sorbonne Université
Presses, (Histoire Maritime) pp. 287-325. (Cloud, John
and Oliver Chaline)
Crowell, Aron
Climate Change and Pulse Migration: Intermittent
Chugach Inuit Occupation of Glacial Fiords on the
Kenai Coast, Alaska. Frontiers in Environmental
Archaeology 2:1145220. (Aron L. Crowell and Mayumi
Arimitsu)
The Truth of Oral Tradition: Multisource Conrmation
of Northern Indigenous Histories. In On Melting
Ground: Arctic Archaeology, ed. J. Beutmann, S.
Hansen, C. Michel, S. Reinhold, and S. Wolfram.
Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Berlin.
Driscoll Engelstad, Bernadette
Inuit Clothing Design: Art Across Time. In Inuit
Sanaugangit: Art Across Time, edited by Darlene Wight
and Jocelyn Piirainen, eds. Winnipeg, MB: Winnipeg
Art Gallery.
Fitzhugh, William W.
Archaeology of the North American Arctic. In: Nikita,
E., Rehren, T. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Archaeology,
2nd Edition, vol. 3, pp. 337–366, London: Academic
Press. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90799-
6.00207-X.
Captain Perry Colbourne beside the vessel he rebuilt several
times, when both retired in 2023, in Triton, Newfoundland.
Photo by Bill Fitzhugh
94 ASC Newsletter
Archaeology of Bronze Age Mongolia: A Deer Stone
Diary. 277pp. Arctic Studies Center, Smithsonian
Institution, and Inuit Press International.
Smithsonian 2022 Surveys in Northwest Newfoundland
and Testing a Basque Whaling Station in St. Paul
River, Quebec. A Field Report. Arctic Studies Center,
Smithsonian Institution. Wash., D.C. (Fitzhugh,
William, Sarai Barreiro-Argüelles, Francisco Rivera
Amaro, and Ben Fitzhugh)
Exploring a Basque Whaling Tryworks at Bonne
Espérance-4, St. Paul River, Quebec. 2022 Permit
Report to the Quebec Ministry of Culture and
Communication. (Fitzhugh, William W., Sarai Barreiro-
Argüelles, and Francisco Rivera Amaro)
On the Question of the Tent Rings, Caribou, and Inuit
in Northwest Newfoundland. Provincial Archaeology
Oce 2022 Annual Review. Pp. 7-17. (Barreiro-
Argüelles, S., William W. Fitzhugh, Brad Loewen, Ben
Fitzhugh, and Dongya Yang)
A Small Basque Whaling Station in St. Paul River,
Quebec. Provincial Archaeology Oce 2022 Annual
Review: 109-115. (Fitzhugh, William W., Sarai
Barreiro-Argüelles, and Francisco Rivera Amaro)
Conjuring Mongolian Deer Stones: Biographical
Statuary of Bronze Age Central Asia and South Siberia.
Current World Archaeology 117 (Jan-Feb.):1-26.
(William W. Fitzhugh and Richard Kortum)
Deer Stones and the Bronze to Iron Age Transition
in Mongolia. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual
International Mongolian Studies Conference, May 12-
13, 2023, Ed. G. Dashlkhagvan, pp. 83-89. Wash,, D.C.
Krupnik, Igor
George Noongwook (1949–2023). Arctic 76(2): 239–
242. (H. P. Huntington, I. Krupnik, and H. Ikuta)
Yupik Elder Broke Ground in Whaling, Culture and
Research. Indian Country Today (online December 13,
2023). (H. Huntington, I. Krupnik, and H. Ikuta.)
J. Louis Giddings: Photographs from St. Lawrence
Island, Alaska: A Haenreer Hidden ‘Trove’.
Contexts. Annual Report of the Haenreer Museum of
Anthropology 46: 36-37.
Loring, Stephen
To Bring Back the Summer”: Seeking a Concordance
Between Innu History and Archaeology. The Oxford
Handbook of Global Indigenous Archaeologies, edited
by Claire Smith, Joe Watkins, et al. Published on-line,
26 January 2023. (Chelsee Arbour, Stephen Loring,
Anthony Jenkinson, Napes Ashini)
Palomino, Elisa
Indigenous Arctic Fish Skin Heritage: Sustainability,
Craft and Material Innovation. Ph.D. Thesis. Univ. of
the Arts, London. https://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/
id/eprint/20124/
Digital Tools in the Fashion Industry: Fish Skin
Garments and Ainu Fish Skin Traditions'. A.
Schramme, and N. Verboven (eds.). Routledge.
(Palomino, E. Karmon, A. Topaz, O., Solo, A.,
Cordoba, A.)
Smith, Kevin
All that Glitters is not Gold: Multi-instrumental
Identication of Viking Age Orpiment (As2S3) from
Surtshellir Cave, Iceland. Journal of Archaeological
Science Reports 47: 103724 (K. Smith and G.
Ólafsson)
Wol, Christopher
Scaling Up and Hunkering Down: The Evolution of
Beothuk Houses and Households. North American
Archaeologist 44(4): 146-175. (D.H. Holly, jr., J. C.
Erwin, C.B. Wol, S. H. Hull, A. Samuels, and J.
Brake)
The Maritime Archaic Occupation of Inspector Island:
New Survey and Evidence. PAO Archaeological
Review, 21: 322-325. (C.B. Wol, D. H. Holly, Jr., K.
Farley, Z. Huelskamp, and A. Lovett)
ASC Newsletter 95
Contact Information
Arctic Studies Center
Department of Anthropology
Natural History Building, MRC 112
Smithsonian Institution
P.O. Box 37012
10th and Constitution Ave. N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20013-7012
(202) 633-1887 (phone) (202) 357-2684 (fax)
ASC Anchorage Oce
Anchorage Museum
625 C Street Anchorage, AK 99501
(907) 929-9207
Arctic Studies Center homepage
https://naturalhistory.si.edu/research/anthropology/programs/arctic-studies-center
ASC X Account: @arcticstudies
ASC Facebook Account: https://www.facebook.com/ArcticStudiesCenter/
Captain Perry Colbourne and Pitsiulak at Petit Mecatina,
2004. Photo by Bill Fitzhugh
A lobster feast in St. Paul River, Quebec, 2019.
Photo by Bill Fitzhugh
Supporting Archaeology in Frobisher Bay, Ban Island,
1992. Photo by Bill Fitzhugh
Harrington Harbor, 2005. Photo by Bill Fitzhugh
Arctic Studies Center
Department of Anthropology
Natural History Building, MRC 112
Smithsonian Institution
P.O. Box 37012
10th and Constitution, NW
Washington, DC 20013-7012
Ocial Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
Presorted Standard
Postage & Fees Paid
Smithsonian Institution
G-94
This newsletter was edited by William Fitzhugh,
Igor Krupnik, Stephen Loring, Aron Crowell, Dawn
Biddison and Nancy Shorey.
Designed and produced by
Nancy Shorey and Igor Chechushkov