Article

Comment on 'Estimating average annual per cent change in trend analysis' Reply

Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, USA.
Statistics in Medicine (Impact Factor: 1.83). 12/2009; 28(29):3670-82. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3733
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Trends in incidence or mortality rates over a specified time interval are usually described by the conventional annual per cent change (cAPC), under the assumption of a constant rate of change. When this assumption does not hold over the entire time interval, the trend may be characterized using the annual per cent changes from segmented analysis (sAPCs). This approach assumes that the change in rates is constant over each time partition defined by the transition points, but varies among different time partitions. Different groups (e.g. racial subgroups), however, may have different transition points and thus different time partitions over which they have constant rates of change, making comparison of sAPCs problematic across groups over a common time interval of interest (e.g. the past 10 years). We propose a new measure, the average annual per cent change (AAPC), which uses sAPCs to summarize and compare trends for a specific time period. The advantage of the proposed AAPC is that it takes into account the trend transitions, whereas cAPC does not and can lead to erroneous conclusions. In addition, when the trend is constant over the entire time interval of interest, the AAPC has the advantage of reducing to both cAPC and sAPC. Moreover, because the estimated AAPC is based on the segmented analysis over the entire data series, any selected subinterval within a single time partition will yield the same AAPC estimate--that is it will be equal to the estimated sAPC for that time partition. The cAPC, however, is re-estimated using data only from that selected subinterval; thus, its estimate may be sensitive to the subinterval selected. The AAPC estimation has been incorporated into the segmented regression (free) software Joinpoint, which is used by many registries throughout the world for characterizing trends in cancer rates.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Limin X Clegg
  • Source
    • "aapc.html) [51]. This method looks for joint points in trend and assumes that incidence changes by a constant percentage between two joint points; consequently, on a log scale, trends between two joint-points are linear. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: To illustrate the out-of-pocket (OOP) costs incurred by a population-based group of patients from 5 to 10 years since their cancer diagnosis in a country with a nationwide public health system. Methods: Interviews on OOP costs to a sample of 5-10 year prevalent cases randomly extracted from four population-based cancer registries (CRs), two in the north and two in the south of Italy. The patients' general practitioners (GPs) gave assurance about the patient's physical and psychological condition for the interview. A zero-inflated negative binomial model was used to analyze OOP cost determinants. Results: Two hundred six cancer patients were interviewed (48 % of the original sample). On average, a patient in the north spent €69 monthly, against €244 in the south. The main differences are for transport, room, and board (TRB) to reach the hospital and/or the cancer specialist (north €0; south €119). Everywhere, OOP costs without TRB costs were higher for patients with a low quality of life. Conclusions: Despite the limited participation, our study sample's characteristics are similar to those of the Italian cancer prevalence population, allowing us to generalize the results. The higher OOP costs in the south may be due to the scarcity of oncologic structures, obliging patients to seek assistance far from their residence. Implications for cancer survivors Cancer survivors need descriptive studies to show realistic data about their status. Future Italian and European descriptive studies on cancer survivorship should be based on population CRs and involve GPs in order to approach the patient at best.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2015 · Supportive Care Cancer
  • Source
    • "Groupings and calculation of agestandardized incidence rates and age-specific incidence rates were performed directly in the website of the Hong Kong Cancer Registry with its own Cancer Statistics Query System[12].To estimate the secular trends of OCC incidence in Hong Kong, the annual percentage change of incidence rates was calculated for the entire period of observation, 1986 to 2010, both for each age group and also the entire population of each gender. The annual percentage change estimation was based on the assumption that the incidence rates changed constantly and linearly on the log-scale[14]. Besides, a joinpoint analysis was conducted to investigate the chronological point in time of the trend change in a linear slope[15]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Even though oral cavity cancer (OCC; ICD 10 codes C01, C02, C03, C04, C05, and C06) ranks eleventh among the world's most common cancers, accounting for approximately 2 % of all cancers, a trend analysis of OCC in Hong Kong is lacking. Hong Kong has experienced rapid economic growth with socio-cultural and environmental change after the Second World War. This together with the collected data in the cancer registry provides interesting ground for an epidemiological study on the influence of socio-cultural and environmental factors on OCC etiology. Methods: A multidirectional statistical analysis of the OCC trends over the past 25 years was performed using the databases of the Hong Kong Cancer Registry. The age, period, and cohort (APC) modeling was applied to determine age, period, and cohort effects on OCC development. Joinpoint regression analysis was used to find secular trend changes of both age-standardized and age-specific incidence rates. Results: The APC model detected that OCC development in men was mainly dominated by the age effect, whereas in women an increasing linear period effect together with an age effect became evident. The joinpoint regression analysis showed a general downward trend of age-standardized incidence rates of OCC for men during the entire investigated period, whereas women demonstrated a significant upward trend from 2001 onwards. Conclusions: The results suggest that OCC incidence in Hong Kong appears to be associated with cumulative risk behaviors of the population, despite considerable socio-cultural and environmental changes after the Second World War.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2015 · BMC Oral Health
  • Source
    • "" (Clegg, Hankey et al. 2009)used segmented regression while analyzing the trend using the annual average percent change in rat population and denoted it as (sAPCs). (Clegg, Hankey et al. 2009) assumed that the change in the population of rats was constant within each time partition but varied between (among) different time partitions. Also different groups (racial subgroups) might have different transition points and thus different constant rates in different partitions at a common time interval (past 10 years) were assumed to be held. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The modeling non-linear behavior between independent variables and response variable remained a challenging task for the researchers. We consider precipitation data set for two monitoring stations for twenty seven years period during monsoon. Generalized linear models, Generalized additive model and piecewise regression models are used to find appropriate model to describe the characteristics of dependent variable related to independent. The results of these models are compared by means of cross validation and coefficient of determination. It is observed that generalized linear model perform poorly then generalized additive model and piecewise regression model. Since generalized additive model is non-parametric and is more flexible to model non-linear behavior therefore it also explains more variation of dependent variable then piecewise regression models. However,the difference between generalized additive model and piecewise regression model becomes negligible if segmented points are observed from generalized additive model and then those segmented points are used to estimate piecewise regression.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2015
Show more