Content uploaded by Zsolt Kozma
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Zsolt Kozma on Apr 17, 2024
Content may be subject to copyright.
WETLAND RESTORATION AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE HYDROLOGICAL CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONING
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES –A MODEL-BASED CASE STUDY AT A HUNGARIAN LOWLAND CATCHMENT
Zsolt Kozma1*, Tamás Ács1, Bence Decsi1,Máté Krisztián Kardos1,Dóra Hidy2,Mátyás Árvai3,4,Péter Kalicz5,Zoltán Kern6,7, Zsolt Pinke8
1Department of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics. E-mail: kozma.zsolt@emk.bme.hu;2MTA-MATE Agroecology Research Group, Department of Plant
Physiology and Plant Ecology, Hungarian University for Agriculture and Life Sciences; 3Institute for Soil Sciences, HUN-REN Centre for Agricultural Research; 4National Laboratory for Water Science and Water
Security, Institute for Soil Sciences, Centre for Agricultural Research; 5University of Sopron, Faculty of Forestry, Institute of Geomatics and Civil Engineering; 6Institute for Geological and Geochemical Research,
HUN-REN Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences; 7CSFK, MTA Centre of Excellence; 8Department of Physical Geography, Eötvös Loránd University;
Materials and methods
•The alluvial character of the Great Hungarian Plain has long determined its land use
•Major wetland and river regulations between the 18th and 20th centuries
led to a trajectory of constrains
•Agricultural production is influenced by floods, excess waters and droughts
•Contemporal Hungarian landscape management is facing a major crisis, worsened by climate change
•Combination of large scale water retention and adaptive land use seems to be the most feasible alternative scenario
•We examined such a Nature Based Solutions approach with hydrological simulations at a deep floodplain area along the Tisza River
Background, aims
The project FK20-134547 has been implemented with the support provided from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund of Hungary.
The research reported in this poster is part of project no. BME-NVA-02, implemented with the support provided by the Ministry of Innovation and
Technology of Hungary from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund, financed under the TKP2021 funding scheme.
Land use scenario
Water management scenario
Reference (REF)
Excess Water Retention
(EWR)
EWR + Riverine
inundation (FLOOD)
Surface water coverage duration [%]
Ground-
water
depth at
well #2683
Present (CLC) Alternative (ALT)
Land
use Water
management
CLC REF
CLC FLOOD
ALT FLOOD
•For present conditions, the drainage network effectively reduces water coverage duration (CLC_EWR vs CLC_REF), but cannot
completly eliminate the excess water (CLC_REF)
•The extent and duration of water coverage can be controlled with stepwise water retention (Step 1: EWR; Step 2: FLOOD)
•Only water retention (CLC_EWR or CLC_FLOOD) would inhibit agricultural crop production in the low parts by water surplus
•Only aforestation (ALT_REF) without water retention would dry out the deep floodplain, also causing agricultural drought damage
•Finding the optimal proportion of afforestation and water retention could be facilitated with iterative modelling of various water
management-land use scenarios in the fashion introduced here
•As part of our research, these hydrological results are being assessed with crop yield modelling and tree growth estimates to
compare the provisioning ecosystem service performance of different scenarios
Results, conclusions
•3 water management * 2 land use variations
•Present land use and water management scenario (CLC_REF) was used for model calibraion: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511700
•Excess water retention (EWR) = no drainage and no pumping of water surplus
•Riverine inundation (FLOOD) = EWR + a single release of ~33 million m3water from the flooding Tisza River into the area in 2003
•Alternative land use (ALT) follows the prevailing Hungarian landscape planning logic and is based on the CLC_FLOOD water coverage
duration results
•ALT: Half of the croplands were converted into wetlands (15% increase) or soft/hardwood forests (20% increase)
•Time period: 2000-2010
(incl. flood, droughts and excess water)
•Area: 243 km2, cell size: 50 m
•~20 m deep unconfined aquifer
•Looped channel network + pumps
•Fully coupled hydrological model:
MIKE SHE + MIKE RIVER
Six scenarios
Abstract