ArticlePDF Available

Comparative evaluation of ten blood biomarkers of inflammation in regular heated tobacco users and non-smoking healthy males–a pilot study

Springer Nature
Scientific Reports
Authors:

Abstract

Heated tobacco products (HTPs) are novel tobacco products that are alternatives to cigarettes. The study aimed to investigate the effect of HTPs on blood biomarkers of inflammation as well as to provide a comparative evaluation between daily heated tobacco users and healthy men who do not use nicotine products. This case–control study was carried out among 92 healthy males in Poland (Lodz-Province) aged 20–56 years: 44 daily heated tobacco users (daily use in the past 90 days) and 48 controls who do not use nicotine products. The history of use of the nicotine-containing products was self-reported and verified using a saliva cotinine test. A 20 ml blood sample was collected and the levels of ten blood biomarkers were analyzed. Among all heated tobacco users (n = 44), only the levels of interleukin 8 (IL-8) were significantly higher when compared to controls: 6.86 vs. 3.95 (p = 0.01). Among exclusive heated tobacco users (n = 33), the levels of IL-8 were also significantly higher when compared to controls: 7.76 vs. 3.95 (p = 0.01). IL-8 level was positively correlated (r = 0.37; p = 0.01) with the daily number of heated tobacco sticks. Out of 10 different biomarkers of inflammation, only IL-8 levels were significantly elevated in heated tobacco use compared to controls.
1
Vol.:(0123456789)
Scientic Reports | (2024) 14:8779 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59321-y
www.nature.com/scientificreports
Comparative evaluation of ten
blood biomarkers of inammation
in regular heated tobacco users
and non‑smoking healthy males–a
pilot study
Beata Świątkowska
1*, Mateusz Jankowski
2 & Dorota Kaleta
1
Heated tobacco products (HTPs) are novel tobacco products that are alternatives to cigarettes. The
study aimed to investigate the eect of HTPs on blood biomarkers of inammation as well as to
provide a comparative evaluation between daily heated tobacco users and healthy men who do not
use nicotine products. This case–control study was carried out among 92 healthy males in Poland
(Lodz‑Province) aged 20–56 years: 44 daily heated tobacco users (daily use in the past 90 days) and
48 controls who do not use nicotine products. The history of use of the nicotine‑containing products
was self‑reported and veried using a saliva cotinine test. A 20 ml blood sample was collected and the
levels of ten blood biomarkers were analyzed. Among all heated tobacco users (n = 44), only the levels
of interleukin 8 (IL‑8) were signicantly higher when compared to controls: 6.86 vs. 3.95 (p = 0.01).
Among exclusive heated tobacco users (n = 33), the levels of IL‑8 were also signicantly higher when
compared to controls: 7.76 vs. 3.95 (p = 0.01). IL‑8 level was positively correlated (r = 0.37; p = 0.01)
with the daily number of heated tobacco sticks. Out of 10 dierent biomarkers of inammation, only
IL‑8 levels were signicantly elevated in heated tobacco use compared to controls.
Heated tobacco products (HTPs) are novel tobacco products that are alternatives to cigarettes and combustible
tobacco products13. HTPs operate based on an electronically controlled heating element that heats dedicated
tobacco-containing sticks up to 350°C and generates aerosol inhaled by the user3. Nicotine levels in aerosol
generated by HTPs are estimated at 70–80% as those generated by combustible cigarettes4. When compared to
electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes), HTPs-dedicated sticks contain processed tobacco which is a source of nicotine,
instead of a dedicated nicotine-containing liquid like in e-cigarettes5.
HTPs have been marketed since 20143. e market is dominated by the heating tobacco devices of major
tobacco companies, including “IQOS” from Philip Morris International, “glo” from British American Tobacco,
and “Ploom TECH” from Japan Tobacco3. It is estimated that 5% of the global population has ever used HTPs
and 1.5% of the global population has been identied as current HTP users6. In recent years, the prevalence of
HTPs increased rapidly. In Japan, the prevalence of HTPs increased from 0.2% in 2015 to 11.3% in 20197. In
Poland, the prevalence of daily HTP use increased from 0.4% in 2019 to 4.0% in 20228. e global prevalence of
HTPs is estimated to rise in the coming years6.
With increasing public awareness of HTPs and the growing number of users, questions about the health
eects of HTP use are increasing2,9,10. HTPs are being marketed as reduced exposure alternatives to combustible
cigarettes3,9,11. Most of the scientic evidence on the health eects of HTP use is based on laboratory evaluation
of aerosol generated by HTP use as well as experimental studies on animal and cellular models, with limited
data from human-based studies3,9. Both industry-funded studies and independent research conrmed that the
concentration of chemical compounds in aerosol generated during HTP use is lower than during smoking
combustible cigarettes3,9,12,13. In general, toxic compounds related to combustion process were signicantly
reduced, but heated tobacco products are not risk-free3,9,12. Findings from the experimental animal and cellular
studies showed that aerosol from HTPs has lower toxicity than cigarette smoke3,9. ere are concerns that while
OPEN
1Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Medical University of Lodz, Żeligowskiego 7/9 Street, 90-752 Łódź,
Poland. 2Department of Population Health, School of Public Health, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education,
Kleczewska 61/63 Street, 01-826 Warsaw, Poland. *email: beata.swiatkowska@umed.lodz.pl
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
2
Vol:.(1234567890)
Scientic Reports | (2024) 14:8779 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59321-y
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
it may expose users to less of some toxins that are also found in traditional cigarettes, the use of heated tobacco
exposes users to other toxic substances whose toxicological proles of short- and long-term health eects are
unknown2,3,9,10. Nevertheless, HTP use may induce oxidative stress, and inammation and increase the risk of
respiratory tract infections9,14. While most research funded by the tobacco industry has demonstrated the health
advantages of switching from traditional cigarettes to HTP, certain independent studies point to some possible
negative eects of HTP aerosol exposure3,9,10.
ere is a limited number of human-based studies on the health eects of HTP use, mostly on short-term
health eects1517. Majek etal. showed that the use of HTP for 5min evoked an increase in heart rate and blood
pressure as well as a decrease in fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels15. Goebel etal. reported small
airway obstruction and resistance as well as nicotine-related acute increase in arterial stiness and cardiovascular
stress aer HTP use16. Lyytinen etal. reported increased arterial stiness and platelet thrombus formation 5min
aer the HTP use in a group of healthy young adults17.
Smoking-induced oxidative stress, chronic inammation, and endothelial dysfunction are considered to play
major roles in the pathogenesis of tobacco-related diseases3,9,1517. However, little is known about blood-based
biomarkers of inammation in regular heated tobacco users.
e study aimed to investigate the eect of heated tobacco products on blood biomarkers of inammation
as well as to provide a comparative evaluation between daily heated tobacco users and healthy men who do not
use nicotine products.
Material and methods
Study design and population
is case–control study was carried out among 92 healthy males in Poland (Lodz Province): 44 daily heated
tobacco users (past 90days) and 48 controls who do not use nicotine products. All procedures were carried
out in a medical facility and supervised by a physician. Subjects were recruited using an active recruitment
network, using the Medical University of Lodz and a network of private medical facilities operating in the Lodz
Province. Volunteers who declared a conscious willingness to participate in the study were screened to assess
the inclusion and exclusion criteria and qualications to participate in the study. Subjects were asked to undergo
the examination without a meal, and heated tobacco users were asked not to use nicotine products on the day of
the tests. A physical examination and a short interview were performed to assess the current health status. e
participants were then asked to ll out a set of questionnaires and blood samples were collected. All participants
provided written informed consent. e study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of
the Medical University of Łódź (decision number: RNN/235/22/KE of 8/11/2022). All procedures performed
in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the
Declaration of Helsinki.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Heated tobacco users
Males aged 20–56,without chronic diseases, who declare regular use of HTPs (IQOS or glo) – at least one
heated tobacco stick daily in the last 90days. Among heated tobacco users, subjects who use concurrently use
e-cigarettes regularly (at least 15days/month) or concurrently use combustible cigarettes/factory made cigarettes
were classied into a subgroup of dual users (subgroup 1: HTPs + e-cigarette; subgroup 2: HTPs + cigarette).
Controls
Males aged , 20–56,without chronic diseases, who do not use nicotine products and did not smokers or have
smoked less than 100 cigarettes in their life who have not used nicotine replacement therapy in the last 90days,
and who have used an e-cigarette no more than once in their entire life and e-cigarette use has occurred more
than 90days before the examination, and have used HTP no more than once in their entire life and HTP use
has occurred more than 90days before the examination. e control group was recruited in such a way that it
corresponded to the demographic characteristics of the group of heated tobacco users.
Smoking status
e history of use of the nicotine-containing products was based on self-reported and veried using a saliva
cotinine test (Salimetrics 1-2002, Stratech Scientic Ltd, UK; cotinine concentration in ng per ml). e mean
cotinine concentration was 0.55ng/ml among control, which is below the cut-of value for non-smokers published
on the website18 of the test manufacturer (5ng/ml), comparted to 360.9ng/ml (p < 0.001) among HTPs (with
cut-o value for smokers 100ng/ml)18.
Participants were asked about ever and past 90days use of heated tobacco use, e-cigarette use, and cigarette
smoking. ose who declared the use of nicotine-containing products (current or in the past) were asked about
the characteristics of nicotine product use (over 20 questions on each type of nicotine-containing product). A
total of 88 questions on nicotine-containing products were addressed. Heated tobacco users were asked about
the frequency of use, the number of heated tobacco sticks consumed per day, the type of heated tobacco device
used, heated tobacco stick, motivation for HTPs use, indoor use of HTPs, harm perception of HTPs, and self-
reported health eects of HTPs use, as well as the addictive potential of HTPs. Questions on the history of HTPs
use were based on the Global Adults Tobacco Survey (GATS) and adapted to HTPs use19.
Measures
A 20ml blood sample was obtained from each subject. Levels of the following blood-based biomarkers of
inammation20 in blood serum were analyzed:
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
3
Vol.:(0123456789)
Scientic Reports | (2024) 14:8779 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59321-y
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Proinammatory cytokine levels: interleukin (IL) IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, tumor necrosis factor
alpha (TNF-α) (Magnetic Luminex® performance assay, FCSTM09, Luminex Corp, Austin, TX, US). Cytokine
levels were presented in picograms per milliliter [pg/ml].
c-reactive protein (CRP) and brinogen levels (MILLIPLEX® human cardiovascular disease (CVD) magnetic
bead panel, HCVD3MAG-67K, Merck, Darmstadt Germany). CRP levels were presented in milligrams per
liter [mg/l] and brinogen levels were presented in milligrams per deciliter [mg/dl].
Adhesion molecules: vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1) and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM-
1) (Human Luminex® Discovery Assay, LXSAHM-08, Luminex Corp, Austin, TX, US). Adhesion molecule
levels were presented in nanograms per milliliter [ng/ml].
All laboratory tests were carried out in the Central Scientic Laboratory of the Medical University of Lodz
(CoreLab). All diagnostics procedures were performed by qualied medical personnel with experience in
medical diagnostics following the laboratory in accordance with the recommendations of the diagnostic test
manufacturers.
Statistical analysis
Data analysis was performed using procedures available in IBM SPSS Statistics 29 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). e
normality of distributions was tested using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Dierences in the distribution of quantitative
variables between the HTPs users and control group were analyzed using Students t-test or non-parametric
tests U Mann–Whitney test. Spearmans rank correlation was used to analyze the correlation between the blood
biomarker levels and the daily number of heated tobacco sticks used in the last 90days. Data were presented
separately for all heated tobacco users (only HTPs or dual use HPTs and cigarette or e-cigarette) and exclusive
heated tobacco users (only HTPs in the last 90days). Statistical signicance was assessed at p < 0.05.
Results
Characteristics of the study population
A total of 92 healthy males were recruited. e mean age of HTP users was 33.6years and control 33.4years
(Table1). Most of the subjects had higher education: (56.8% of HTP users and 60.4% of controls) and lived in
cities above 500,000 residents (61.4% of HTP users and 83.3% of controls). Most of the subjects had full-time
jobs (59.1% of HTPs users and 64.6% of controls). Among heated tobacco users, 95.5% had ever tried a cigarette
and 84.1% had ever tried an e-cigarette (Table1). Among controls, 18.8% had ever tried a cigarette, 20.8% had
ever tried an e-cigarette and 12.5% had ever tried heated tobacco products. Detailed characteristics is presented
in Table1.
Patterns of heated tobacco product use
Out of all heated tobacco product users (n = 44), 11.4% were daily smokers and 15.9% declared daily use of
e-cigarettes. In total, there were 10 dual users (HTPs and cigarette or e-cigarette) and 1 triple user (HTPs,
cigarette, e-cigarette). Most of the HTP users consumed from 11 to 20 heated tobacco sticks per day (Table2).
e most popular heated tobacco device was IQOS, used by 52.3% of heated tobacco users, 40.9% used glo and
6.8% used lil SOLID 2.0. Mint or menthol avors were the most common ones, 13.6% used blueberry avor
and only one-half of HTP users used tobacco avor sticks. Most of the HTPs users used heated tobacco devices
indoors (93.2%) and 54.5% used HTPs in places where smoking is prohibited (Table2). Detailed characteristics
of the heated tobacco users is presented in Table2. e average number of heated tobacco stick packs per week
was 5.1 ± 2.9, median of 5 packs per week. Most of the participants used HTP for 3years (29.5%), one-h used
HTP for 2years, 15.9% used HTP for less than 1year, 13.3% for 4years and 11.4% of HTP users used heated
tobacco products for 5years (Table2).
Blood biomarkers of inammation levels
A comparative evaluation of blood biomarkers in regular heated tobacco users and healthy males who do not
use nicotine products is presented in Table3. Among all heated tobacco users (n = 44), the levels of interleukin 8
were signicantly higher when compared to controls: 6.86 vs. 3.95 (p = 0.01) (Table3). Among exclusive heated
tobacco users (n = 33), the levels of interleukin 8 were also signicantly higher when compared to controls: 7.76
vs. 3.95 (p = 0.01) (Table4). Among all heated tobacco users (n = 44), interleukin 8 level was positively correlated
(r = 0.37; p = 0.01) with the daily number of heated tobacco sticks (Table5). is correlation was not statistically
signicant in subanalysis for exclusive heated tobacco users (Table6). ere were no statistically signicant
dierences (p > 0.05) in the levels of 9 other blood biomarkers of inammation, including IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10,
IL-12p70, TNF-α, CRP, brinogen and adhesion molecules (VCAM-1 and ICAM-1) between heated tobacco
users and healthy males who do not use nicotine products (Tables3, 4, 5, 6).
Discussion
is is one of the rst human-based case–control studies on the blood biomarkers of inammation of regular
(past 90days) heated tobacco use. Out of 10 blood biomarkers analyzed in this study, only interleukin 8 levels
were signicantly (p < 0.05) higher among heated tobacco users compared to healthy males who do not use
nicotine products. ese dierences were observed both among all heated tobacco users (exclusive and dual
users with cigarettes or e-cigarettes) and exclusive heated tobacco users. e level of IL-8 raised with the daily
number of heated tobacco sticks consumed by HTP users.
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
4
Vol:.(1234567890)
Scientic Reports | (2024) 14:8779 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59321-y
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Most of the currently available data on the health eects of heated tobacco use are limited to laboratory-based
experimental studies or studies on short-term health eects of HTP use among humans3,9,10,1417. Previously
published human-based studies assessed the levels of dierent biomarkers immediately (mostly within 5min)
aer the use of heated tobacco sticks1517. Small airway obstruction and resistance as well as a decrease in
fractional exhaled nitric oxide were reported as the immediate health eects of HTP use15,16. Moreover, an
increase in heart rate and blood pressure, increased arterial stiness, and platelet thrombus formation were
described as cardiovascular eects of heated tobacco use17. Findings from experimental studies on cell lines
and animal models suggest that HTP use may evoke chronic inammation14,2123. Based on mice models, Sawa
etal. reported that short-term exposure to HTP aerosols may increase oxidative stress and induce the secretion
of inammatory cytokines: IL-6 and GM-CSF14. Using mice models, Gu etal. reported that chronic exposure
to aerosol generated by HTP use resulted in impaired pulmonary function and lung tissue damage21. Bhat etal.
reported that HTP use induces inammatory immune-cell accumulation in the lungs as well as augments the
levels of proinammatory cytokines and chemokines in the BAL uid22. Yamamoto etal. reported that HTP use
induced IL-8 overexpression with an increase in human monocyte THP-1 cell lines23.
In this study, the past 90days of use of heated tobacco products evoked a signicant increase in IL-8 levels,
when compared to healthy adults who do not use nicotine products. e levels of IL-8 in blood samples collected
from HTP users were elevated regardless of the pattern of heated tobacco use – exclusive HTP use or dual-use
(HTPs and cigarettes or e-cigarettes). Interleukin 8 (IL-8) is a major mediator of inammation and acts as a
chemoattractant for neutrophils, basophils, and T cells24,25. Previous studies showed that cigarette smoke induces
IL-8 release from macrophages. IL-8 is a key chemokine during the initiation and progression of tobacco-related
lung inammation as well as the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)26,27. Findings
from cancer research25 also showed that elevated levels of IL-8 correspond to increased severity of numerous
cancers, including melanoma28. breast29, renal30, prostate31 gastric32, and colorectal cancers33. Our ndings suggest
that chronic use of heated tobacco products may lead to the development of lung diseases (especially COPD)
and cancer progression.
It is estimated that over half of HTP users use heated tobacco with other nicotine products, mostly cigarettes
or e-cigarettes (so-called dual users)34. In this study, elevated levels of IL-8 were observed also among exclusive
Table 1. Characteristics of the study population.
HTPs users (n = 44) Control group (n = 48)
n (%) n (%)
Gender
Male 44 (100.0) 48 (100.0)
Age
Mean ± SD 33.6 ± 7.27 33.4 ± 10.20
Min–max 21–46 20–56
Having higher education
No 19 (43.2) 19 (39.6)
Yes 25 (56.8) 29 (60.4)
Place of residence
City up to 10,000 residents 6 (13.6) 1 (2.1)
City from 10,000 to 20,000 residents 1 (2.3) 3 (6.3)
City from 20,000 to 50,000 residents 7 (15.9) 2 (4.2)
City from 50,000 to 100,000 residents 2 (4.5) 2 (4.2)
City from 100,000 to 200,000 residents 1 (2.3) 0 (0.0)
City from 200,000 to 500,000 residents 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
City above 500,000 residents 27 (61.4) 40 (83.3)
Occupational status
Full-time job 26 (59.1) 31 (64.6)
Part-time job 5 (11.4) 6 (12.5)
Self-employment 13 (29.5) 7 (14.6)
Student 3 (6.8) 12 (25.0)
Unemployed 1 (2.3) 1 (2.1)
Marital status
Single 13 (29.5) 14 (29.2)
Married 23 (52.3) 20 (41.7)
Informal relationship 8 (18.2) 14 (29.2)
Ever cigarette smoking 42 (95.5) 9 (18.8)
Ever e-cigarette use 37 (84.1) 10 (20.8)
Ever heated tobacco use 44 (100.0) 6 (12.5)
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
5
Vol.:(0123456789)
Scientic Reports | (2024) 14:8779 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59321-y
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
heated tobacco users, which suggests that heated tobacco use is the sucient factor that increases the IL-8 levels.
Further studies should analyze dierences in blood biomarkers of inammation between exclusive heated tobacco
users and dual users.
Among all heated tobacco users, interleukin 8 level was positively correlated with the daily number of heated
tobacco sticks, which suggests a dose-dependent reaction. is observation is in line with the previous ndings
from tobacco research which proved that the risk of diseases is dose-dependent and varies on the number of
cigarettes smoked per day35,36.
Heated tobacco products are marketed as less harmful alternatives to cigarettes3,11. Findings from the
toxicological studies suggest that HTPs compared to cigarettes may be products with a reduced risk of respiratory
diseases, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer2,9. Out of 10 dierent biomarkers analyzed in this study, the level
Table 2. Characteristics of the heated tobacco users (n = 44).
HTPs users (n = 44)
n (%)
Current cigarette smoking 5 (11.4)
Current e-cigarette use 7 (15.9)
Number of heated tobacco sticks used per day
1 2 (4.5)
2–5 8 (18.2)
6–10 7 (15.9)
11–20 21 (47.7)
Over 20 6 (13.6)
How long do you use heated tobacco products?
Less than 1year 7 (15.9)
For 1year 4 (9.1)
For 2years 9 (20.5)
For 3years 13 (29.5)
For 4years 6 (13.6)
For 5years 5 (11.4)
Type of heated tobacco device
IQOS 23 (52.3)
Glo 18 (40.9)
lil SOLID 2.0 3 (6.8)
Most frequently used avors of tobacco sticks in the last 90days
Tobacco avor 11 (25.0)
Mint avor 13 (29.5)
Menthol avor 11 (25.0)
Blueberry avor 6 (13.6)
Do you use HTPs in places where smoking is prohibited?
Yes 24 (54.5)
No 20 (45.5)
Do you use HTPs indoors?
Yes 41 (93.2)
No 3 (6.8)
How soon aer waking up do you use heated tobacco?
Up to 5min 3 (6.8)
6–30min 13 (29.5)
31–60min 12 (27.3)
Over 60min 16 (36.4)
Do you have diculty refraining from using heated tobacco in places where it is prohibited?
Yes 7 (15.9)
No 37 (84.1)
Which heated tobacco stick is the most dicult for you to give up?
From rst in the morning 24 (54.5)
From any other 20 (45.5)
At what time of day do you use heated tobacco more oen?
Within the rst hours aer waking up 12 (27.3)
During the rest of the day 32 (72.7)
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
6
Vol:.(1234567890)
Scientic Reports | (2024) 14:8779 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59321-y
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Table 3. Blood biomarkers in regular heated tobacco users (all) and control group. SD standard deviation, SE
standard error, Min minimum, Max maximum, H heated tobacco users, C controls. *U Mann–Whitney test;
**Student’s t-test. Signicant values are in bold.
Study
group
Mean SD SE Median Min Max pn
IL-1β [pg/ml] H 44 1.91 1.02 0.15 1.60 0.59 5.43 0.9*
C 48 2.07 1.34 0.19 1.73 0.29 7.83
IL-6 [pg/ml] H 44 2.83 1.12 0.17 2.73 0.97 6.63 0.2*
C 48 3.57 3.03 0.44 3.11 1.03 21.9
IL-8 [pg/ml] H 44 6.86 16.5 2.49 4.37 1.97 113.76 0.01*
C 48 3.95 0.90 0.13 3.82 2.28 6.66
IL-10 [pg/ml] H 44 2.04 0.89 0.13 1.97 0.66 4.52 0.5*
C 48 2.29 1.21 0.17 1.91 0.66 5.20
IL-12p70 [pg/ml] H 44 17.47 11.42 1.72 14.42 0.00 49.76 0.1*
C 48 13.41 7.72 1.11 12.53 0.55 33.93
TNF-α [pg/ml] H 44 13.45 2.98 0.44 13.37 7.73 18.43 0.8*
C 48 13.57 3.84 0.55 13.23 6.79 26.91
CRP [mg/l] H 44 8.26 15.67 2.36 2.20 0.00 89.00 0.2*
C 48 17.77 59.19 8.54 4.21 0.00 404.03
Fibrinogen [mg/dl] H 44 162.86 88.40 13.33 125.20 83.47 358.51 0.2*
C 48 195.64 99.65 14.38 137.28 86.69 387.80
VCAM-1 [ng/ml] H 44 967.43 254.34 38.34 954.85 496.65 1685.09 0.9**
C 48 959.28 265.51 38.32 920.52 460.61 1482.51
ICAM-1 [ng/ml] H 44 394.54 448.81 67.66 250.27 98.25 2458.535 0.7*
C 48 424.29 485.77 70.11 236.11 27.48 1999.79
Table 4. Blood biomarkers in exclusive regular heated tobacco users and control group. SD standard
deviation, SE standard error, Min minimum, Max maximum, He exclusive heated tobacco users, C controls. *U
Mann–Whitney test; **Student’s t-test. Signicant values are in bold.
Study
group
Mean SD SE Median Min Max pn
IL-1β [pg/ml] He 33 1.95 1.11 0.19 1.56 0.59 5.43 0.9*
C 48 2.07 1.34 0.19 1.73 0.29 7.83
IL-6 [pg/ml] He 33 2.96 1.18 0.21 2.78 0.97 6.63 0.4*
C 48 3.57 3.03 0.44 3.11 1.03 21.9
IL-8 [pg/ml] He 33 7.76 19.06 3.32 4.39 2.33 113.76 0.01*
C 48 3.95 0.90 0.13 3.82 2.28 6.66
IL-10 [pg/ml] He 33 2.05 0.86 0.15 2.02 0.91 4.51 0.6*
C 48 2.29 1.21 0.17 1.91 0.66 5.20
IL-12p70 [pg/ml] He 33 17.77 12.5 2.18 14.53 0.00 49.76 0.2*
C 48 13.41 7.72 1.11 12.53 0.55 33.93
TNF-α [pg/ml] He 33 12.78 2.73 0.48 12.33 7.73 18.44 0.5*
C 48 13.57 3.84 0.55 13.23 6.79 26.91
CRP [mg/l] He 33 8.22 16.67 2.90 1.96 0.00 89.00 0.1*
C 48 17.77 59.19 8.54 4.21 0.00 404.03
Fibrinogen [mg/dl] He 33 161.80 88.97 15.49 124.89 83.47 358.51 0.2*
C 48 195.64 99.65 14.38 137.28 86.69 387.80
VCAM-1 [ng/ml] He 33 902.31 215.96 37.59 906.31 496.65 1384.20 0.3**
C 48 959.28 265.51 38.32 920.52 460.61 1482.51
ICAM-1 [ng/ml] He 33 366.67 358.52 62.41 248.84 98.25 1743.55 0.9*
C 48 424.29 485.77 70.11 236.11 27.48 1999.79
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
7
Vol.:(0123456789)
Scientic Reports | (2024) 14:8779 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59321-y
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
of only one biomarker (IL-8) was signicantly higher among HTP users compared to controls. ere were no
dierences in the levels of important biomarkers like TNF-α, CRP, brinogen, and adhesion molecules as well
as other interleukins. In this study, exclusive cigarette smokers were not included as a separate group, and the
blood biomarkers of inammation were compared between heated tobacco users and nicotine-free controls. IL-6
is a predictor of the frequency of COPD exacerbation37 and is linked to chronic inammation-related cancers38.
However, in this study, there were no statistically signicant dierences in IL-6 levels between HTP users and
the control group. C-reactive protein levels are raised in stable COPD patients39. In this study, the mean age of
the subjects was 33years and participants diagnosed with COPD were excluded, so changes in CRP observed
usually in patients with COPD were not observed. ere were no signicant dierences in VCAM-1 and ICAM-
1, biomarkers associated with cardiovascular disease risk40, but due to the younger age of the study population,
this observation should be analyzed carefully as Lyytinen etal.17 revealed potential cardiovascular risk of HTP
use. e mode of operation of heated tobacco products diers from cigarette smoking, so the impact of regular
heated tobacco use on biomarkers of inammation may dier from those observed in cigarette smokers. However,
due to the limited sample size (preliminary results), our ndings should be interpreted carefully and point to the
need for further cohort studies and prospective analyses.
is study has practical implications for tobacco control and public health. Our ndings suggest that regular
heated tobacco use may lead to the development of chronic diseases (especially respiratory diseases) and the risk
is dose dependent. However, the risk of diseases may be lower than among cigarette smokers. Further cohort
studies are needed to assess the impact of regular heated tobacco use on the risk of chronic diseases, especially
those evoked by chronic inammation.
ere are several limitations of this study. is is a single-point case–control study. e history of heated
tobacco use was based on self-reported data but veried by the cotinine levels and set of questions on tobacco
use patterns. Findings are based on single-point observations, and follow-ups are needed to assess the impact
of heated tobacco use on the dynamics of blood biomarkers (especially proinammatory cytokines) changes.
is is a pilot study, so the number of participants is low. e follow-up study is planned for 2024 and the more
advanced analyses will be published aer the completion of the study group. In one subject, the IL-8 levels were
113.76pg/ml, however, even aer the exclusions of this subject from the analysis, dierences in IL-8 levels
between heated tobacco users and control were statistically signicant. is study aimed to assess the real-life
pattern of heated tobacco use, so exposure to HTPs diers between the participants. Nevertheless, this is one
Table 5. Correlation between the levels of blood biomarkers and the daily number of heated tobacco sticks
used in the last 90days among all heated tobacco users (n = 44). r the Spearman rank correlation coecient.
Signicant values are in bold.
r p
IL-1β & daily number of heated tobacco sticks − 0.11 0.5
IL-6 & daily number of heated tobacco sticks − 0.01 0.9
IL-8 & daily number of heated tobacco sticks 0.37 0.01
IL-10 & daily number of heated tobacco sticks − 0.02 0.9
IL-12p70 & daily number of heated tobacco sticks 0.11 0.46
TNF-α & daily number of heated tobacco sticks 0.03 0.83
CRP & daily number of heated tobacco sticks − 0.11 0.5
Fibrinogen & daily number of heated tobacco sticks − 0.09 0.5
VCAM-1 & daily number of heated tobacco sticks − 0.27 0.08
ICAM-1 & daily number of heated tobacco sticks − 0.20 0.2
Table 6. Correlation between the levels of blood biomarkers and the daily number of heated tobacco sticks
used in the last 90days among exclusive heated tobacco users (n = 33). r the Spearman rank correlation
coecient.
r p
IL-1β & daily number of heated tobacco sticks − 0.04 0.8
IL-6 & daily number of heated tobacco sticks − 0.10 0.6
IL-8 & daily number of heated tobacco sticks 0.08 0.6
IL-10 & daily number of heated tobacco sticks − 0.20 0.3
IL-12p70 & daily number of heated tobacco sticks 0.03 0.9
TNF-α & daily number of heated tobacco sticks − 0.06 0.8
CRP & daily number of heated tobacco sticks 0.01 0.9
Fibrinogen & daily number of heated tobacco sticks − 0.17 0.3
VCAM-1 & daily number of heated tobacco sticks − 0.18 0.3
ICAM-1 & daily number of heated tobacco sticks − 0.11 0.5
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
8
Vol:.(1234567890)
Scientic Reports | (2024) 14:8779 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59321-y
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
of the rst case–control studies on the health eects of heated tobacco use, carried out in humans. Due to the
increasing prevalence of HTP use and limited scientic data on their health consequences, investigating cause-
and-eect relationships in this area is a new challenge for public health. e results of our study demonstrated
that only one of the ten blood-based biomarker of inammation (IL-8) was signicantly higher among the eect
use of heated tobacco on blood-based biomarkers of inammation and higher interleukin 8, one of the main
measures of inammation, in users of heated tobacco compared to non-smokers. Given the lack of signicant
changes in the other biomarkers of inammation, the relevance of increases in IL8 needs further investigations
to better understand the complex interplay among various interleukins.
In conclusion, daily use of heated tobacco during the last 90days was associated with an increased level of
IL-8 among heated tobacco users compared to healthy controls who do not use nicotine products. An increase
in IL-8 level was positively correlated with the number of heated tobacco sticks consumed per day. ere were
no dierences in 9 of 10 blood biomarkers of inammation between HTP users and controls, so heated tobacco
products may be a modied risk tobacco product compared to combustible cigarettes.
Data availability
e datasets generated during and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author
on reasonable request.
Received: 12 December 2023; Accepted: 9 April 2024
References
1. Bialous, S. A. & Glantz, S. A. Heated tobacco products: Another tobacco industry global strategy to slow progress in tobacco
control. Tob Control 27(Suppl 1), s111–s117. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1136/ tobac cocon trol- 2018- 054340 (2018).
2. Mallock, N., Pieper, E., Hutzler, C., Henkler-Stephani, F. & Luch, A. Heated tobacco products: A review of current knowledge and
initial assessments. Front. Public Health 7, 287. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3389/ fpubh. 2019. 00287 (2019).
3. Jankowski, M. et al. New ideas, old problems? Heated tobacco products—A systematic review. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health
32(5), 595–634. https:// doi. org/ 10. 13075/ ijomeh. 1896. 01433 (2019).
4. Brossard, P. et al. Nicotine pharmacokinetic proles of the tobacco heating system 2.2, cigarettes and nicotine gum in Japanese
smokers. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 89, 193–199. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. yrtph. 2017. 07. 032 (2017).
5. Smith, M. R. et al. Evaluation of the tobacco heating system 2.2. Part 1: Description of the system and the scientic assessment
program. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 81(Suppl 2), S17–S26. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. yrtph. 2016. 07. 006 (2016).
6. Sun, T. et al. Global prevalence of heated tobacco product use, 2015–22: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction 118(8),
1430–1444. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ add. 16199 (2023).
7. Hori, A., Tabuchim, T. & Kunugita, N. Rapid increase in heated tobacco product (HTP) use from 2015 to 2019: From the Japan
“Society and New Tobacco” Internet Survey (JASTIS). Tob. Control. 30(4), 474–475. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1136/ tobac cocon trol- 2020-
055652 (2020).
8. Jankowski, M. et al. e prevalence of tobacco, heated tobacco, and e-cigarette use in Poland: A 2022 web-based cross-sectional
survey. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19(8), 4904. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ ijerp h1908 4904 (2022).
9. Znyk, M., Jurewicz, J. & Kaleta, D. Exposure to heated tobacco products and adverse health eects, a systematic review. Int. J.
Environ. Res. Public Health 18(12), 6651. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ ijerp h1812 6651 (2021).
10. Tattan-Birch, H. et al. Heated tobacco products for smoking cessation and reducing smoking prevalence. Cochrane Database Syst.
Rev. 1(1), CD013790. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ 14651 858. CD013 790. pub2 (2022).
11. Berg, C. J. et al. IQOS marketing in the US: e need to study the impact of FDA modied exposure authorization, marketing
distribution channels, and potential targeting of consumers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18(19), 10551. https:// doi. org/ 10.
3390/ ijerp h1819 10551 (2021).
12. Akiyama, Y. & Sherwood, N. Systematic review of biomarker ndings from clinical studies of electronic cigarettes and heated
tobacco products. Toxicol. Rep. 8, 282–294. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. toxrep. 2021. 01. 014 (2021).
13. Dempsey, R. et al. Preliminary toxicological assessment of heated tobacco products: A review of the literature and proposed strategy.
Toxicol. Rep. 10, 195–205. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. toxrep. 2023. 01. 008 (2023).
14. Sawa, M., Ushiyama, A., Inaba, Y. & Hattori, K. Increased oxidative stress and eects on inammatory cytokine secretion by heated
tobacco products aerosol exposure to mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 610, 43–48. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. bbrc. 2022. 04.
042 (2022).
15. Majek, P., Jankowski, M. & Brożek, G. M. Acute health eects of heated tobacco products: Comparative analysis with traditional
cigarettes and electronic cigarettes in young adults. ERJ Open Res. 9(3), 00595–02022. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1183/ 23120 541. 00595-
2022 (2023).
16. Goebel, I. et al. Impact of heated tobacco products, e-cigarettes, and combustible cigarettes on small airways and arterial stiness.
Toxics 11(9), 758. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ toxic s1109 0758 (2023).
17. Lyytinen, G. et al. Use of heated tobacco products (IQOS) causes an acute increase in arterial stiness and platelet thrombus
formation. Atherosclerosis https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. ather oscle rosis. 2023. 117335 (2023).
18. Salimetrics. Guidelines for Interpreting Cotinine Levels: United States. https:// salim etrics. com/ guide lines- for- inter preti ng- cotin
ine- levels- united- states/ (Accessed 23 February 2024) (2024).
19. Palipudi, K. M. et al. Methodology of the global adult tobacco survey - 2008–2010. Glob. Health Promot. 23(2 Suppl), 3–23. https://
doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 17579 75913 499800 (2016).
20. Elisia, I. et al. e eect of smoking on chronic inammat ion, immune function and blood cell composition. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 19480.
https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41598- 020- 76556-7 (2020).
21. Gu, J. et al. Chronic exposure to IQOS results in impaired pulmonary function and lung tissue damage in mice. Toxicol. Lett. 374,
1–10. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. toxlet. 2022. 11. 022 (2023).
22. Bhat, T. A. et al. Acute eects of heated tobacco product (IQOS) aerosol inhalation on lung tissue damage and inammatory
changes in the lungs. Nicotine Tob. Res. 23(7), 1160–1167. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ ntr/ ntaa2 67 (2021).
23. Inoue, H. et al. Heated tobacco products induced IL-8 overexpression with increased nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in human
monocyte THP-1 cells. Eur. Re spir. J. 60, 255. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1183/ 13993 003. congr ess- 2022. 255 (2022).
24. Rizzo, A., Losacco, A. & Carratelli, C. R. Lactobacillus crispatus modulates epithelial cell defense against Candida albicans through
Toll-like receptors 2 and 4, interleukin 8 and human β-defensins 2 and 3. Immunol. Lett. 156(1–2), 102–109. https:// doi. org/ 10.
1016/j. imlet. 2013. 08. 013 (2013).
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
9
Vol.:(0123456789)
Scientic Reports | (2024) 14:8779 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59321-y
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
25. Huang, C. Y. et al. e contribution of interleukin-8 genotypes and expression to nasopharyngeal cancer susceptibility in Taiwan.
Medicine (Baltimore) 97(36), e12135. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ MD. 00000 00000 012135 (2018).
26. Zhou, G. et al. Chemical constituents of tobacco smoke induce the production of interleukin-8 in human bronchial epithelium,
16HBE cells. Tob. Induc. Dis. 14, 24. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s12971- 016- 0089-4 (2016).
27. Ko, H. K. et al. Regulation of cigarette smoke induction of IL-8 in macrophages by AMP-activated protein kinase signaling. J. Cell.
Physiol. 230(8), 1781–1793. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ jcp. 24881 (2015).
28. Huang, S. et al. Fully humanized neutralizing antibodies to interleukin-8 (ABX-IL8) inhibit angiogenesis, tumor growth, and
metastasis of human melanoma. Am. J. Pathol. 161(1), 125–134. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S0002- 9440(10) 64164-8 (2002).
29. Miller, L. J. et al. Expression of interleukin-8 receptors on tumor cells and vascular endothelial cells in human breast cancer tissue.
Anticancer Res. 18(1A), 77–81 (1998).
30. Slaton, J. W. et al. Expression levels of genes that regulate metastasis and angiogenesis correlate with advanced pathological stage
of renal cell carcinoma. Am. J. Pathol. 158(2), 735–743. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S0002- 9440(10) 64016-3 (2001).
31. Uehara, H. et al. Expression of interleukin-8 gene in radical prostatectomy specimens is associated with advanced pathologic stage.
Prostate 64(1), 40–49. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ pros. 20223 (2005).
32. Lee, K. H. et al. Relationship between urokinase-type plasminogen receptor, interleukin-8 gene expression and clinicopathological
features in gastric cancer. Oncology 66(3), 210–217. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1159/ 00007 7997 (2004).
33. Li, A., Varney, M. L. & Singh, R. K. Expression of interleukin 8 and its receptors in human colon carcinoma cells with dierent
metastatic potentials. Clin. Cancer Res. 7(10), 3298–3304 (2001).
34. Gallus, S. et al. Use and awareness of heated tobacco products in Europe. J. Epidemiol. 32(3), 139–144. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2188/
jea. JE202 00248 (2022).
35. Chang, J. T., Anic, G. M., Rostron, B. L., Tanwar, M. & Chang, C. M. Cigarette smoking reduction and health risks: A systematic
review and meta-analysis. Nicotine Tob. Res. 23(4), 635–642. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ ntr/ ntaa1 56 (2021).
36. Gallucci, G., Tartarone, A., Lerose, R., Lalinga, A. V. & Capobianco, A. M. Cardiovascular risk of smoking and benets of smoking
cessation. J. orac. Dis. 12(7), 3866–3876. https:// doi. org/ 10. 21037/ jtd. 2020. 02. 47 (2020).
37. Huang, H. et al. Interleukin-6 is a strong predictor of the frequency of COPD exacerbation within 1 year. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct.
Pulmon. Dis. 16, 2945–2951. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2147/ COPD. S3325 05 (2021).
38. Ataie-Kachoie, P., Pourgholami, M. H. & Morris, D. L. Inhibition of the IL-6 signaling pathway: A strategy to combat chronic
inammatory diseases and cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 24(2), 163–173. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. cytog fr. 2012. 09. 001
(2013).
39. Aksu, F. et al. C-reactive protein levels are raised in stable Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients independent of smoking
behavior and biomass exposure. J. orac. Dis. 5(4), 414–421. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3978/j. issn. 2072- 1439. 2013. 06. 27 (2013).
40. Hwang, S. J. et al. Circulating adhesion molecules VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and E-selectin in carotid atherosclerosis and incident
coronary heart disease cases: e Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities (ARIC) study. Circulation 96(12), 4219–4225. https:// doi.
org/ 10. 1161/ 01. cir. 96. 12. 4219 (1997).
Author contributions
BS, MJ, DK conceived of the study and participated in study design, data interpretation. BS and DK coordinated
the measurements and data collection. MJ was responsible for statistical analysis. DK was responsible for project
supervision. BS, MJ, DK worked on manuscript. All authors read and approved the nal manuscript.
Funding
is study was funded from the state budget under the program of the Polish Minister of Education and Science
called "Science for Society", project entitled: "Use of heated tobacco—health and social aspects" project no.
NdS/549728/2022/20222 of November 2, 2022 amount co-nancing PLN 1,013,150.00 total project value PLN
1,013,150.00, Polska.
Competing interests
e authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to B.Ś.
Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional aliations.
Open Access is article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or
format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the
Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. e images or other third party material in this
article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the
material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not
permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from
the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/.
© e Author(s) 2024
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Terms and Conditions
Springer Nature journal content, brought to you courtesy of Springer Nature Customer Service Center GmbH (“Springer Nature”).
Springer Nature supports a reasonable amount of sharing of research papers by authors, subscribers and authorised users (“Users”), for small-
scale personal, non-commercial use provided that all copyright, trade and service marks and other proprietary notices are maintained. By
accessing, sharing, receiving or otherwise using the Springer Nature journal content you agree to these terms of use (“Terms”). For these
purposes, Springer Nature considers academic use (by researchers and students) to be non-commercial.
These Terms are supplementary and will apply in addition to any applicable website terms and conditions, a relevant site licence or a personal
subscription. These Terms will prevail over any conflict or ambiguity with regards to the relevant terms, a site licence or a personal subscription
(to the extent of the conflict or ambiguity only). For Creative Commons-licensed articles, the terms of the Creative Commons license used will
apply.
We collect and use personal data to provide access to the Springer Nature journal content. We may also use these personal data internally within
ResearchGate and Springer Nature and as agreed share it, in an anonymised way, for purposes of tracking, analysis and reporting. We will not
otherwise disclose your personal data outside the ResearchGate or the Springer Nature group of companies unless we have your permission as
detailed in the Privacy Policy.
While Users may use the Springer Nature journal content for small scale, personal non-commercial use, it is important to note that Users may
not:
use such content for the purpose of providing other users with access on a regular or large scale basis or as a means to circumvent access
control;
use such content where to do so would be considered a criminal or statutory offence in any jurisdiction, or gives rise to civil liability, or is
otherwise unlawful;
falsely or misleadingly imply or suggest endorsement, approval , sponsorship, or association unless explicitly agreed to by Springer Nature in
writing;
use bots or other automated methods to access the content or redirect messages
override any security feature or exclusionary protocol; or
share the content in order to create substitute for Springer Nature products or services or a systematic database of Springer Nature journal
content.
In line with the restriction against commercial use, Springer Nature does not permit the creation of a product or service that creates revenue,
royalties, rent or income from our content or its inclusion as part of a paid for service or for other commercial gain. Springer Nature journal
content cannot be used for inter-library loans and librarians may not upload Springer Nature journal content on a large scale into their, or any
other, institutional repository.
These terms of use are reviewed regularly and may be amended at any time. Springer Nature is not obligated to publish any information or
content on this website and may remove it or features or functionality at our sole discretion, at any time with or without notice. Springer Nature
may revoke this licence to you at any time and remove access to any copies of the Springer Nature journal content which have been saved.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Springer Nature makes no warranties, representations or guarantees to Users, either express or implied
with respect to the Springer nature journal content and all parties disclaim and waive any implied warranties or warranties imposed by law,
including merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose.
Please note that these rights do not automatically extend to content, data or other material published by Springer Nature that may be licensed
from third parties.
If you would like to use or distribute our Springer Nature journal content to a wider audience or on a regular basis or in any other manner not
expressly permitted by these Terms, please contact Springer Nature at
onlineservice@springernature.com
... Lekarz powinien podkreślić pozytywny wpływ rzucenia palenia na stan zdrowia (jest to szczególnie ważne w przypadku pacjentów chorych przewlekle) [33]. Chociaż dostępne dowody naukowe nie pozwalają na jednoznaczne zdefiniowanie skutków zdrowotnych używania e-papierosów lub podgrzewaczy tytoniu, to dostępne wyniki badań eksperymentalnych i badań krótkofalowych pozwalają stwierdzić, że e-papierosy i podgrzewacze tytoniu nie są bezpieczne dla zdrowia [13,14,[25][26][27]34]. Z uwagi na uzależniający potencjał nikotyny oraz skutki zdrowotne nikotynizmu każdy pacjent używający wyrobów nikotynowych powinien być zachęcany przez personel medyczny do zaprzestania używania nikotyny, niezależnie od formy jej przyjmowania. ...
Article
Full-text available
Wprowadzenie i cel: Rynek wyrobów nikotynowych uległ dynamicznej zmianie. Wprowadzenie nowych form wyrobów nikotynowych, takich jak papierosy elektroniczne (e-papierosy) i systemy podgrzewające tytoń, implikuje konieczność weryfikacji dotychczasowego poradnictwa antynikotynowego realizowanego przez personel medyczny. Celem pracy było omówienie wpływu e-papierosów i podgrzewaczy tytoniu na realizację działań z zakresu minimalnej interwencji antynikotynowej (zasada 5P) przez lekarzy praktyków mających bezpośredni kontakt z pacjentem palącym w Polsce. Metody przeglądu: Publikacja ma charakter przeglądu narracyjnego. Do przeglądu piśmiennictwa użyto bazy PubMed/ Medline. W pracy przedstawiono rekomendacje dotyczące konieczności modyfikacji postępowania z pacjentem uzależnionym od nikotyny dostarczanej m.in. za pomocą e-papierosów i podgrzewaczy tytoniu w odniesieniu do dotychczas obowiązujący chstandardów minimalnej interwencji antytytoniowej, opartej na zasadzie 5P. Opis stanu wiedzy: E-papierosy i podgrzewacze tytoniu stanowią nową formę dostarczania nikotyny do organizmu. Nikotyna ma silny potencjał uzależniający. Aerozol z e-papierosa lub podgrzewacza tytoniu jest szkodliwy dla zdrowia. Użytkownik e-papierosa lub podgrzewacza tytoniu powinien być traktowany jak osoba uzależniona od nikotyny i objęty tymi samymi interwencjami antynikotynowymi co palacze papierosów. Podsumowanie: Szczególnie ważna w realizacji działań antynikotynowych jest właściwa identyfikacja osób uzależnionych od nikotyny, odnotowanie informacji na temat uzależnienia od nikotyny i sposobu przyjmowania nikotyny w dokumentacji medycznej pacjenta oraz zapewnienie mu podstawowego wsparcia behawioralnego oraz farmakoterapii wspierającej leczenie uzależnienia od nikotyny, niezależnie od tego, czy nikotyna przyjmowana jest w formie papierosa, e-papierosa czy podgrzewacza tytoniu.
Article
Full-text available
A plethora of evidence supports that nicotine, the primary alkaloid in tobacco products that is generally accepted to be responsible for maintaining use, is immunoregulatory and may function as an immunosuppressant. Women have unique experiences with use of nicotine-containing products and also undergo significant reproductive transitions throughout their lifespan which may be impacted by nicotine use. Within the extant literature, there is conflicting evidence that nicotine may confer beneficial health effects in specific disease states. Use prevalence of nicotine-containing products is exceptionally high in individuals presenting with some comorbid disease states that impact immune system health and can be a risk factor for the development of diseases which disproportionately impact women; however, the mechanisms underlying these relationships are largely unclear. Further, little is known regarding the impacts of nicotine’s immunosuppressive effects on women’s health during the menopausal transition, which is arguably an inflammatory event characterized by a pro-inflammatory peri-menopause period. Given that post-menopausal women are at a higher risk than men for the development of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and are also more vulnerable to negative health effects associated with diseases such as HIV-1 infection, it is important to understand how use of nicotine-containing products may impact the neuroimmune milieu in women. In this review, we define instances in which nicotine use confers immunosuppressive, anti-inflammatory, or pro-inflammatory effects in the context of comorbid disease states, and posit that regardless of potential health benefits, nicotine use cessation should be a priority in clinical care of women. The synthesis of this review demonstrates the importance of systematically defining the relationships between volitional nicotine use, immune system function, and comorbid disease states in women to better understand how nicotine impacts women’s health and disease.
Article
Full-text available
Smoking cessation is difficult but maintaining smoke-free without nicotine replacement therapy is even harder. During the last few years, several different alternative products, including heated tobacco products (HTP), have been introduced to the market. In this study, we investigated the acute effects of IQOSTM and gloTM (two HTP) consumption on small airway function and arterial stiffness in a head-to-head design, comparing them to combustible cigarettes, nicotine-free e-cigarettes and a sham smoking group. Seventeen healthy occasional smokers were included in a single-center, five-arm, crossover study. The parameters of small airway function and hemodynamics were collected at several time points before and after consumption using Mobil-O-Graph™ (I.E.M., Stolberg, Germany) and TremoFlo® c-100 (THORASYS Thoracic Medical Systems Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada). Small airway obstruction and resistance were both significantly increased after the consumption of cigarettes and substitute products. All products containing nicotine led to similar significant increases in blood pressure and arterial stiffness. Hemodynamic parameters were also increased after the consumption of e-cigarettes without nicotine, but compared to nicotine-containing products, the increase was shorter and weaker. We conclude that, although it has yet to be determined why, HTP have acute harmful effects on small airway function, possibly even exceeding the effects of combustible cigarettes. Like other nicotine-containing products, HTP leads to a nicotine-related acute increase in arterial stiffness and cardiovascular stress, similar to combustible cigarettes, which associates these products with an increased cardiovascular risk.
Article
Full-text available
Background Heated Tobacco Products (HTPs) were designed to deliver nicotine by heating the tobacco instead of burning it. Aim The study aimed to examine the acute health effects on the respiratory and cardiovascular systems during the use of HTPs and compare these effects with acute health effects evoked by cigarette smoking or electronic cigarettes. Methods The study group comprised 160 healthy young adults (age 23 [Q1 21; Q3 26] years), both sexes divided into groups according to their smoking status: 40 HTPs users (H-group), 40 traditional cigarette smokers (T-group), 40 e-cigarette users (E-group), 40 non-smokers (C-group). The measurements of heart rate, blood pressure, O2 saturation, the concentration of FeNO, CO, temperature of exhaled air, and spirometry were performed thrice: initially, immediately after the exposure, and after 30 min. The exposure differed depending on smoking status: heating HTP, smoking a cigarette, using an e-cigarette, and simulation of smoking. Results After 5 min of exposure, a significant decrease in FeNO was observed in H and E groups, from 12.8±5.5ppb to 11.2±5.3ppb and from 16.9±6.5 to 14.2±6.8, p<0.01; respectively. A slight, but statistically significant, increase in the temperature of exhaled air after 30 min was observed in groups T and E (from 34.1[33.6;34.4]°C to 34.4[34.1;34.6]°C, p=0.02 and from 34.2 [33.9;34.5]°C to 34.4 [33.8;34.6]°C p<0.01; respectively). In C, E and H groups, a significant increase in heart rate and blood pressure was observed. Only cigarette smoking increased CO levels (p<0.01). Conclusions The use of HTPs elicits acute respiratory and cardiovascular health effects.
Article
Full-text available
Heated tobacco products (HTP) have become increasingly common in many countries worldwide. The principle of heating tobacco, without combustion, to produce a nicotine-containing aerosol with remarkably reduced levels of other known toxins, compared to combusted tobacco cigarettes, is now well established. As these products are intended as alternatives to traditional combusted products, during the early stages of their development, it is important for manufacturers to ensure that the design of the product does not lead to any unintentionally increased or new risk for the consumer, compared to the traditional products that consumers seek to replace. There is limited guidance from tobacco product regulations concerning the requirements for performing such preliminary toxicological assessments. Here, we review the published literature on studies performed on HTPs in the pursuit of such data, outline a proposed approach that is consistent with regulatory requirements, and provide a logical approach to the preliminary toxicological assessment of HTPs.
Article
Full-text available
Monitoring tobacco use on a regular schedule is a basic tool of tobacco control policy. This study aimed (1) to assess the current prevalence and patterns of tobacco and e-cigarette use, as well as (2) to identify socioeconomic factors associated with smoking behavior among adults in Poland. This cross-sectional study was carried out in March 2022 on a nationwide, representative sample of 1090 adults in Poland. The computer-assisted web interview (CAWI) technique was used. Daily tobacco smoking was declared by 28.8% of respondents (27.1% of females and 30.8% of males; p = 0.2) and 4.2% were occasional smokers (4.2% of females and 4.3% of males; p = 0.8). Most of the current smokers (62.1%) smoked regular cigarettes and 25.2% smoked hand-rolled cigarettes. The prevalence of daily e-cigarette use was 4.8% (4.0% among females and 5.6% among males; p = 0.2). Daily heated tobacco use was declared by 4.0% of respondents (5.1% of females and 2.9% of males; p = 0.07). Age, having children, and educational level were significantly associated with current daily tobacco smoking. This study revealed a high prevalence of tobacco and e-cigarette use among adults in Poland. The presented data underscore the importance of further improvements in adopting a comprehensive tobacco control strategy in Poland.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Heated tobacco products (HTPs) are designed to heat tobacco to a high enough temperature to release aerosol, without burning it or producing smoke. They differ from e-cigarettes because they heat tobacco leaf/sheet rather than a liquid. Companies who make HTPs claim they produce fewer harmful chemicals than conventional cigarettes. Some people report stopping smoking cigarettes entirely by switching to using HTPs, so clinicians need to know whether they are effective for this purpose and relatively safe. Also, to regulate HTPs appropriately, policymakers should understand their impact on health and on cigarette smoking prevalence. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of HTPs for smoking cessation and the impact of HTPs on smoking prevalence. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group's Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and six other databases for relevant records to January 2021, together with reference-checking and contact with study authors and relevant groups. Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which people who smoked cigarettes were randomised to switch to exclusive HTP use or a control condition. Eligible outcomes were smoking cessation, adverse events, and selected biomarkers. RCTs conducted in clinic or in an ambulatory setting were deemed eligible when assessing safety, including those randomising participants to exclusively use HTPs, smoke cigarettes, or attempt abstinence from all tobacco. Time-series studies were also eligible for inclusion if they examined the population-level impact of heated tobacco on smoking prevalence or cigarette sales as an indirect measure. Data collection and analysis: We followed standard Cochrane methods for screening and data extraction. Our primary outcome measures were abstinence from smoking at the longest follow-up point available, adverse events, serious adverse events, and changes in smoking prevalence or cigarette sales. Other outcomes included biomarkers of harm and exposure to toxicants/carcinogens (e.g. NNAL and carboxyhaemoglobin (COHb)). We used a random-effects Mantel-Haenszel model to calculate risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous outcomes. For continuous outcomes, we calculated mean differences on the log-transformed scale (LMD) with 95% CIs. We pooled data across studies using meta-analysis where possible. Main results: We included 13 completed studies, of which 11 were RCTs assessing safety (2666 participants) and two were time-series studies. We judged eight RCTs to be at unclear risk of bias and three at high risk. All RCTs were funded by tobacco companies. Median length of follow-up was 13 weeks. No studies reported smoking cessation outcomes. There was insufficient evidence for a difference in risk of adverse events between smokers randomised to switch to heated tobacco or continue smoking cigarettes, limited by imprecision and risk of bias (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.15; I2 = 0%; 6 studies, 1713 participants). There was insufficient evidence to determine whether risk of serious adverse events differed between groups due to very serious imprecision and risk of bias (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.94; I2 = 0%; 4 studies, 1472 participants). There was moderate-certainty evidence for lower NNAL and COHb at follow-up in heated tobacco than cigarette smoking groups, limited by risk of bias (NNAL: LMD -0.81, 95% CI -1.07 to -0.55; I2 = 92%; 10 studies, 1959 participants; COHb: LMD -0.74, 95% CI -0.92 to -0.52; I2 = 96%; 9 studies, 1807 participants). Evidence for additional biomarkers of exposure are reported in the main body of the review. There was insufficient evidence for a difference in risk of adverse events in smokers randomised to switch to heated tobacco or attempt abstinence from all tobacco, limited by risk of bias and imprecision (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.46; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 237 participants). Five studies reported that no serious adverse events occurred in either group (533 participants). There was moderate-certainty evidence, limited by risk of bias, that urine concentrations of NNAL at follow-up were higher in the heated tobacco use compared with abstinence group (LMD 0.50, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.66; I2 = 0%; 5 studies, 382 participants). In addition, there was very low-certainty evidence, limited by risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision, for higher COHb in the heated tobacco use compared with abstinence group for intention-to-treat analyses (LMD 0.69, 95% CI 0.07 to 1.31; 3 studies, 212 participants), but lower COHb in per-protocol analyses (LMD -0.32, 95% CI -1.04 to 0.39; 2 studies, 170 participants). Evidence concerning additional biomarkers is reported in the main body of the review. Data from two time-series studies showed that the rate of decline in cigarette sales accelerated following the introduction of heated tobacco to market in Japan. This evidence was of very low-certainty as there was risk of bias, including possible confounding, and cigarette sales are an indirect measure of smoking prevalence. Authors' conclusions: No studies reported on cigarette smoking cessation, so the effectiveness of heated tobacco for this purpose remains uncertain. There was insufficient evidence for differences in risk of adverse or serious adverse events between people randomised to switch to heated tobacco, smoke cigarettes, or attempt tobacco abstinence in the short-term. There was moderate-certainty evidence that heated tobacco users have lower exposure to toxicants/carcinogens than cigarette smokers and very low- to moderate-certainty evidence of higher exposure than those attempting abstinence from all tobacco. Independently funded research on the effectiveness and safety of HTPs is needed. The rate of decline in cigarette sales accelerated after the introduction of heated tobacco to market in Japan but, as data were observational, it is possible other factors caused these changes. Moreover, falls in cigarette sales may not translate to declining smoking prevalence, and changes in Japan may not generalise elsewhere. To clarify the impact of rising heated tobacco use on smoking prevalence, there is a need for time-series studies that examine this association.
Article
Background and aim: Heated tobacco products (HTPs) are electronic devices that heat processed tobacco to release an aerosol containing nicotine and other chemicals. Limited data exist on worldwide HTP use prevalence. This meta-analytic review estimated the prevalence of HTP use by country, WHO region, year, sex/gender, and age. Methods: Five databases (Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, PubMed, and PsycINFO) were searched between January 2015 and May 2022. Included studies reported the prevalence of HTP use in nationally representative samples post-modern HTP device market entry (2015). A random effects meta-analysis was used to estimate overall prevalence for lifetime, current, and daily HTP use. Results: Forty-five studies (n=1,096,076) from 42 countries/areas from the European Region (EUR), Western Pacific Region (WPR), Region of the Americas (AMR) and African Region (AFR) met inclusion criteria. Estimated pooled prevalence for lifetime, current and daily HTP use was 4.87% (95% confidence interval [CI]:4.16,5.63), 1.53% (95%CI:1.22,1.87), and 0.79% (95%CI:0.48,1.18), respectively, across all years (2015-2022). Lifetime HTP use prevalence significantly increased by 3.39% for WPR (0.52% [95%CI:0.25,0.88] in 2015 to 3.91% [95%CI:2.30,5.92] in 2019) and 5.58% for EUR (1.13% [95%CI:0.59,1.97] in 2016 to 6.98% [95%CI:5.69,8.39] in 2020). Current HTP use increased by 10.45% for WPR (0.12% [95%CI:0,0.37] in 2015 to 10.57% [95%CI:5.59,16.88] in 2020) and 1.15% for EUR (0% [95%CI:0,0.35] in 2016 to 1.15% [95%CI:0.87,1.47] in 2020). Meta-regression revealed higher current HTP use in WPR (3.80%[95%CI:2.88,4.98]) compared with EUR (1.40%[95%CI:1.09,1.74]) and AMR (0.81%[95%CI:0.46,1.26]), and for males (3.45%[95%CI:2.56,4.47]) compared with females (1.82%[95%CI:1.39,2.29]). Adolescents had higher lifetime HTP use prevalence (5.25%[95%CI:4.36,6.21]) than adults (2.45%[95%CI:0.79,4.97]). Most studies scored a low risk of sampling bias due to their nationally representative sampling. Conclusion: The prevalence of heated tobacco products (HTP) use increased in the European and Western Pacific Regions between 2015 and 2020, with nearly 5% of the included populations having ever tried HTP and 1.5% identifying as current users during the study period.
Article
The use of IQOS brand heated tobacco products (HTPs) is increasing worldwide; however, little is known about the long-term effects of HTPs aerosol exposure on the lungs. Herein, we exposed C57BL/6 J mice for 24 weeks to clean air, IQOS aerosol, or cigarette smoke, and determined pulmonary function, lung tissue pathology, inflammation, and oxidative stress. Compared with the control group mice, IQOS group mice showed substantially decreased weight and lung function. Levels of IL-6 and TNF-a, as well as oxidative stress markers, were comparable to those found in the cigarette group. In addition, hematoxylin and eosin staining showed that the alveolar space was enlarged and that emphysema had formed in the IQOS group. Masson staining showed that collagen deposition areas were substantially increased in the airway walls in the IQOS group than in the control group. Immunohistochemical staining showed epithelial-mesenchymal transition in the airways of mice in the IQOS group. In conclusion, chronic exposure to IQOS aerosol results in impaired pulmonary function and lung tissue damage; hence, concern should be raised regarding the long-term safety of this product.
Article
Although the amount of chemicals in heated tobacco products (HTPs) aerosols is reduced compared to conventional combustible cigarette smoke, the association between HTPs and reduced health effects remains unclear. In this study, we hypothesized that exposure to IQOS, an HTP, would increase oxidative stress and affect the secretion of inflammatory cytokines. First, C57BL/6 mice exposed to IQOS aerosols were evaluated to determine the adverse effects of IQOS exposure. IQOS exposure significantly decreased the concentration of GSH in alveolar macrophages in a dose-dependent manner and increased the percentage of GSSG in lung tissues. These results indicate that IQOS exposure increases oxidative stress, and GSH is consumed to remove oxidative stress. In addition, foamy alveolar macrophages were observed in the bronchial alveolar lavage fluid after IQOS exposure. Although the concentration of inflammatory cytokines, IL-6, and GM-CSF, in the plasma increased significantly after IQOS exposure, there were no significant changes in other cytokines. These results indicate that short-term exposure to IQOS aerosols may increase oxidative stress and induce the secretion of inflammatory cytokines. Lastly, the longer-term effects of IQOS aerosols exposure should be evaluated in the future.