ArticlePDF Available

Aquatic Plants in phytoremediation of contaminated water: Recent knowledge and future prospects

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The increase of heavy metals in natural resources, including land and water has been rapidly raised due to a variety of natural methods, higher agricultural activities, contaminated irrigation water, speedy industrial development, amplified industrial wastes and mining. Heavy metals (HM) are able to remain in the environment longer time and go in the food chain, and ultimately accumulate in humans for biomagnification since they are not biodegradable. HMs contamination is extremely dangerous for humans and the ecology due to its poisonous nature. Traditional methods of cleanup are expensive and could harm the environment. Therefore, phytoremediation is an alternate method via plants to eliminate toxic HMs from the atmosphere as well as to avoid additional contamination, due to its environment-friendly, economic, efficient, exclusive and cost-effective approach. Aquatic plants can be utilized to decontaminate the contaminated sites as they are not food crops, thus reducing the danger of food chain contamination. Here, sources of HMs and their impact on human health have been briefly discussed. Several phytoremediation techniques and factors affecting the phytoremediation methods are also described. In addition, different strategies to decontaminate the metal-polluted water using aquatic plants are also reviewed. Finally, future perspectives for usages of aquatic plants in phytoremediation techniques were briefly summarised.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Available online at: https://jazindia.com 2322
Journal of Advanced Zoology
ISSN: 0253-7214
Volume 44 Issue S-6 Year 2023 Page 2322-2326
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Aquatic Plants in phytoremediation of contaminated water: Recent knowledge
and future prospects
Dipti Das1, Keya Mandal2, Supriya Kumar Bose3, Arpita Chakraborty4, Gopal Mistri5, Aritri
Laha6, Sabyasachi Ghosh7*
1,2,3,4,5,7*Department of Biotechnology, School of life science, Swami Vivekananda University, Barrackpore,
West Bengal-700121, India.
1Department of Botany, Kalna College, Purba Bardhaman, West Bengal-713409, India.
2Department of Environmental Science, Kalna College, Purba Bardhaman, West Bengal-713409, India.
5Department of Zoology, Kalna College, Purba Bardhaman, West Bengal-713409, India.
6Department of Microbiology, School of life science, Swami Vivekananda University, Barrackpore, West
Bengal-700121, India.
*Corresponding author: Sabyasachi Ghosh
*Department of Biotechnology, School of life science, Swami Vivekananda University, Barrackpore, West
Bengal-700121, India. Email: sabyasachig@svu.ac.in
Article History
Received: 30/09/2023
Revised: 05/10/2023
Accepted:03/11/2023
CC License
CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0
Abstract
The increase of heavy metals in natural resources, including land and water
has been rapidly raised due to a variety of natural methods, higher
agricultural activities, contaminated irrigation water, speedy industrial
development, amplified industrial wastes and mining. Heavy metals (HM)
are able to remain in the environment longer time and go in the food chain,
and ultimately accumulate in humans for biomagnification since they are
not biodegradable. HMs contamination is extremely dangerous for humans
and the ecology due to its poisonous nature. Traditional methods of cleanup
are expensive and could harm the environment. Therefore,
phytoremediation is an alternate method via plants to eliminate toxic HMs
from the atmosphere as well as to avoid additional contamination, due to its
environment-friendly, economic, efficient, exclusive and cost-effective
approach. Aquatic plants can be utilized to decontaminate the contaminated
sites as they are not food crops, thus reducing the danger of food chain
contamination. Here, sources of HMs and their impact on human health
have been briefly discussed. Several phytoremediation techniques and
factors affecting the phytoremediation methods are also described. In
addition, different strategies to decontaminate the metal-polluted water
using aquatic plants are also reviewed. Finally, future perspectives for
usages of aquatic plants in phytoremediation techniques were briefly
summarised.
Keywords: Phytoremediation, Heavy metals, Aquatic plants,
Contaminated water
Journal of Advanced Zoology
Available online at: https://jazindia.com 2323
1. Introduction:
There is an increase in heavy metal production into the surroundings due to growing urbanization,
industrialization, agricultural practices and overconsumption of natural water sources. As heavy metals are
very persistent and non-biodegradable, they pose a prolonged environmental threat. HMs accumulate in the
environment and the polluted aquatic environment disturbs the entire aquatic ecosystem and cause major
health problems for humans, plants, animals and microbes. HMs include a set of metal components with
comparatively high atomic numbers, atomic weights and densities (>5 g/cm3) (Bhat et al., 2022). As per
their action in biological systems, HMs are classified into essential and nonessential. While nonessential
HMs e.g. cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As), mercury (Hg), lead (Pb), etc., are extremely lethal and also have no
known role in biological systems; essential HMs like manganese (Mn), cobalt (Co), copper (Cu), iron (Fe),
zinc (Zn), nickel (Ni), etc. are necessary for biochemical and physiological activities during plant life cycle,
however, consuming larger amount can have adverse impact (Yan et al., 2020).
HMs can be the primary reasons of conditions such as skin disorders, dehydration, cancer, respiratory issues,
asthma, problems with the cardiovascular and excretory systems, nervous and immune system disorder and
stunted growth in humans (Rizwan et al., 2019). Therefore, remediation methods are required to reduce the
impact of the polluted area and also prevent the entry of HMs into habitats with water. Many remediation
strategies are created for restoring water contaminated with heavy metals. These physiochemical methods,
however, have been found to have some drawbacks, including high costs, permanent changes to the
biological, chemical and physical features of water.
Therefore, an economical, efficient and environmentally-safe approach named phytoremediation uses plants
to absorb and eliminate contaminants or to reduce their bioavailability in water. Aquatic plants play a vital
role in phytoremediation as hyper-accumulator in complex aquatic ecosystem (Ali et al., 2020). Even at
small amounts, plants can absorb ionic elements in water via roots, accumulate in tissues, break down and
alter contaminants to a less detrimental structures. Certain heavy metals like Zn, Cr, Cd, Fe, Cu etc. are
extracted by Eelgrass and water mint (Shi et al., 2021). Amidst the many aquatic plants, Eichhornia, Wolfia,
Lemna, Azolla, Potamogeton etc. are mainly utilized for the phytoremediation of aquatic ecosystem (A. A.
Ansari et al., 2020).
2. Sources of Heavy Metals Causing Pollution:
Both anthropogenic & natural sources are one of the main reasons of heavy metal pollution. There are
several sources, including (a) home effluent, (b) industrial sources, (c) agricultural sources, and (d) natural
sources (Hasan et al., 2019). Naturally occurring sources consist of breakdown of rocks, soil erosion, and
eruptions of volcano, whereas man-made sources involve mineral extraction, incomplete fossil burning,
metal refining, landfilling, dyes, wastewater, agricultural chemicals, military operations, smelting, and
vehicle emissions (Bhat et al., 2022).
The usage of pesticides and manures on agricultural land has increased Cd, Zn, and Cu concentrations in the
land and water. The utilization of phosphate and inorganic fertilizers results in an unequal distribution of Zn,
Pb, Ni, Cd, Cr etc. (Ali et al., 2020). Potentially hazardous substances like Cd, Cu, Pb, Ni, Zn, Cr etc. are
found in sewage water. Wastewater from sewage, dyes, alloys, mines, and other substances are common
sources of HMs like Cd, As, Pb, Cu, Hg, Cr etc. Heavy metals like Zn, Pb, Ni, Cd and other substances can
gather because of irrigation of wastewater (Bhat et al., 2022; Ali et al., 2020).
3. Impact of Heavy Metals on Human Health:
Now-a-days, a significant debate is going on throughout the world about the rate of metal pollution in the
environment (Shikha & Singh, 2020). Destructive HMs can cause several health problems according to its
concentration, kind and oxidation process (Bhat et al., 2022). It is harmful to our health to drink
contaminated groundwater. Increased levels of Cr, Cd, Pb, As in groundwater have occasionally been linked
to health risks for cancer (Ravindra and Mor, 2019). The detection of the impact of heavy metals in fish is a
crucial part of human health concern since fish are beneficial to human diet. Deadly heavy metals initially
accumulate in fish and get entry into the food chain by other organisms through biomagnification, causing
negative conditions like kidney, cardiac and neural diseases (Shikha & Singh, 2020).
Journal of Advanced Zoology
Available online at: https://jazindia.com 2324
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) resulting from HMs, which interfere with the antioxidant defines system and
damage cells in humans and other animals, lead to oxidative damage. In severe situations, ROS may be
lethal. For example, reduction of hexavalent chromium (Cr6+) to trivalent chromium (Cr3+), damages
biological components and creates free radicals that damage DNA. Hexavalent chromium also causes cancer
in humans (Saxena et al., 2019).
4. Phytoremediation of metal-contaminated water:
Phytoremediation is an environment-friendly, cost-effective, useful process to clean up a large polluted
medium. There are many plant species that are able to absorb contaminants through roots, accumulate in
body parts, such as a leaf, stems and root and degrade and alter contaminants to a less harmful forms (Ansari
et al., 2020). Plants used for phytoremediation show the following characters like rapid growth, yielding high
biomass, easily managed, hyperaccumulation capacity, capacity to carry metals in aerial parts of the plant
and hyper-tolerance to toxic metals. Aquatic plants can absorb pollutants and toxic heavy metals naturally
(Ali et al., 2020). Ability of diverse aquatic species for reducing several heavy metals is given in Table 1.
Table 1: Different aquatic plants and also their accumulation capability (Ali et al., 2020; Mohebi and Nazari
et al., 2021)
Aquatic Species
Common Name
Heavy Metals
Contaminated Water
Lemna minor
Duckweed
Cu, As, Pb, Cr, Ni
Industrial and domestic wastewater
Eichhornia crassipes
Water hyacinth
Hg, Zn, Ni, Pb, Cu, Fe, As, Cr
Industrial and domestic wastewater, sewage
effluents
Pistia stratiotes
Water lettuce
Pb, Cd, Ni, Cu, Cr, Zn
Industrial wastewater, sewage water
Ipomoea aquatica
Water spinach
Ni, Pb, Cd
Palm oil mill effluent
Typha latifolia
Common cattail
Ni, Fe, Cu, Pb, Zn, Mn
Textile Wastewater
5. Phytoremediation Techniques:
The different phytoremediation techniques are briefly described below (Figure 1) Phytoextraction:
Phytoextraction is one of the most significant phytoremediation methods to recover HMs from contaminated
land, wastewater, and sediments. It is also known as phytoaccumulation, in which the HMs are taken by the
roots and then moved to its different above-ground parts like shoots etc. (Ali et al., 2020).
Phytostabilization: By reducing the movement and bioavailability of harmful contaminants, this method
stops them to migrate into the groundwater or their entrance into the food chain. Plant roots are essential to
immobilize various HMs in the land and water bodies (Ansari et al., 2020).
Phytovolatilization: In the process, pollutants are absorbed by plants, converted into volatile forms, and then
liberated into atmosphere through leaves. Both organic contaminants and some HMs, like Cd, Se, Hg can be
removed by this technique (Yan et al., 2020; Bhat et al., 2022).
Rhizofiltration: In this method, plant roots play important role to remove contaminants from wastewater.
HMs are absorbed by root exudates, which can change the pH level of the rhizosphere (Yan et al., 2020; Bhat
et al., 2022).
Journal of Advanced Zoology
Available online at: https://jazindia.com 2325
Figure 1: Phytoremediation Techniques used in aquatic habitats
6. Several aspects influencing the phytoremediation of HMs:
Various factors may have an impact on how plants absorb heavy metals. Some of the factors include:
1. Plant Species: The ability of a plant to absorb a chemical substance depends on the species to which it
belongs. The successful phytoextraction procedure depends on selecting a suitable plant that can absorb
the required metal.
2. Medium Properties: Several properties of the growth media can influence the amount of metals absorbed
by the plant. Some features include pH, metal concentration, organic matter content, soil texture, the
addition of chelators, and fertilizers.
3. Root Structure: Metal absorption rates will be influenced by the roots. Metals may be absorbed, stored,
transported, or metabolized in the roots of the plant.
4. Bioavailability: A plant’s capability of to absorb metals depends on their bioavailability in the aqueous
stage. To enable plant absorption, metal should react with water and other substances.
5. Effect of Age: The biophysiological function of a plant is most significantly influenced by the age effect.
Young roots have a greater ability than its mature ones to absorb ions. (Ghosh et al., 2023)
7. Conclusion and Future Prospects:
Heavy metal pollution is one of the major hazards to water bodies. The utilization of low-cost, eco-friendly
methods appears to be a feasible strategy for cleaning up these pollutants. Therefore, phytoremediation is one
of the most well-known and successful plant-based methods for cleaning up contaminated media. Some
aquatic species are more resistant to pollutants and can prevent their entry into food chains. However, this
method will be accepted worldwide, if it is provided with understandable and correct details. Further study,
invention and initiatives are required to improve this technique and inspire developing countries to use it.
Besides, there are still a number of barriers preventing the complete prospective of aquatic plants for the
resourceful managing of pollutants in aquatic habitat. In future, genetically modified plants will be used by
Journal of Advanced Zoology
Available online at: https://jazindia.com 2326
boosting their potentiality of heavy metal absorption and decontamination. Later, the removal of plant
biomass can be utilized as animal fodder and also for biogas manufacturing.
8. Reference:
1. Ali, S., Abbas, Z., Rizwan, M., Zaheer, I. E., Yavaş, İ., Ünay, A., ... & Kalderis, D. (2020). Application of
floating aquatic plants in phytoremediation of heavy metals polluted water: A
review. Sustainability, 12(5), 1927.
2. Ansari, A. A., Naeem, M., Gill, S. S., & AlZuaibr, F. M. (2020). Phytoremediation of contaminated
waters: An eco-friendly technology based on aquatic macrophytes application. The Egyptian Journal of
Aquatic Research, 46(4), 371-376.
3. Bhat, S. A., Bashir, O., Haq, S. A. U., Amin, T., Rafiq, A., Ali, M., ... & Sher, F. (2022). Phytoremediation
of heavy metals in soil and water: An eco-friendly, sustainable and multidisciplinary
approach. Chemosphere, 303, 134788.
4. Ghosh, P., Konar, A., Dalal, D. D., Roy, A., & Chatterjee, S. (2023). Phytoremediation technology: A
review. blood pressure, 400, 5-00.
5. Hasan, M. M., Uddin, M. N., Ara-Sharmeen, I., F. Alharby, H., Alzahrani, Y., Hakeem, K. R., & Zhang, L.
(2019). Assisting phytoremediation of heavy metals using chemical amendments. Plants, 8(9), 295.
6. Huynh, A.T., Chen, Y. C., & Tran, B. N. T. (2021). A Small-Scale Study on Removal of Heavy Metals
from Contaminated Water Using Water Hyacinth. Processes, 9, 1802.
7. Kumar, V., Parihar, R. D., Sharma, A., Bakshi, P., Sidhu, G. P. S., Bali, A. S., ... & Rodrigo-Comino, J.
(2019). Global evaluation of heavy metal content in surface water bodies: A meta-analysis using heavy
metal pollution indices and multivariate statistical analyses. Chemosphere, 236, 124364.
8. Mohebi, Z., & Nazari, M. (2021). Phytoremediation of wastewater using aquatic plants, A review. Journal
of Applied Research in Water and Wastewater, 8(1), 50-58.
9. Ravindra, K., & Mor, S. (2019). Distribution and health risk assessment of arsenic and selected heavy
metals in Groundwater of Chandigarh, India. Environmental pollution, 250, 820-830.
10. Rizwan, M., Ali, S., Rehman, M. Z. U., & Maqbool, A. (2019). A critical review on the effects of zinc at
toxic levels of cadmium in plants. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 6279-6289.
11. Saxena, G., Purchase, D., Mulla, S. I., Saratale, G. D., & Bharagava, R. N. (2019). Phytoremediation of
heavy metal-contaminated sites: eco-environmental concerns, field studies, sustainability issues, and
future prospects. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 249, 71-131.
12. Shi, Z., Usman, M., He, J., Chen, H., Zhang, S., & Luo, G. (2021). Combined microbial transcript and
metabolic analysis reveals the different roles of hydrochar and biochar in promoting anaerobic digestion
of waste activated sludge. Water Research, 205, 117679.
13. Shikha, D., & Singh, P. K. (2020). In situ phytoremediation of heavy metalcontaminated soil and
groundwater: a green inventive approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 4104-4124.
14. Singh, B. M., Singh, D., & Dhal, N. K. (2022). Enhanced phytoremediation strategy for sustainable
management of heavy metals and radionuclides. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental
Engineering, 5, 100176.
15. Yan, A., Wang, Y., Tan, S. N., Mohd Yusof, M. L., Ghosh, S., & Chen, Z. (2020). Phytoremediation: a
promising approach for revegetation of heavy metal-polluted land. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 359.
16. Yang, L., Zhang, Y., Kang, S., Wang, Z., & Wu, C. (2021). Microplastics in soil: A review on methods,
occurrence, sources, and potential risk. Science of the Total Environment, 780, 146546.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
The pollution of the environment by heavy metals is becoming a serious problem. Environmental pollution directly or indirectly influences the condition of atmosphere, biosphere, hydrosphere, pedosphere and lithosphere. Heavy metals that are present in environment are outcome from industrial, thermal, and nuclear pollution. Non-biodegradable, heavy metals persist in the environment and can become part of the food chain through plants. Examples of some of the heavy metals are Arsenic (As), Lead (Pb), Mercury (Hg) etc. It is already possible to clean up the environment from these kinds of contaminants, but most of the methods are costly and difficult to achieve optimal results. At present to overcome these times problems a newly developed plant mediated technology has been used known as Phytoremediation. In this context, several phytoremediation methods are currently being used to remove heavy metal pollutants from contaminated soil and water, this technology is eco-friendly and cost effective. Over 400 plant species are capable of remediating contaminated soil and water. Some phytoremediating plants are Brassica juncea, Brassica oleracea, Sedum alfredii, Thlaspi caerulescens, Ipomea, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Helianthus annuus etc.
Article
Full-text available
Rapid industrialization, increased waste production and surge in agricultural activities, mining, contaminated irrigation water and industrial effluents contribute to the contamination of water resources due to heavy metal (HM) accumulation. Humans employ HM-contaminated resources to produce food, which eventually accumulates in the food chain. Decontamination of these valuable resources, as well as avoidance of additional contamination has long been needed to avoid detrimental health impacts. Phytoremediation is a realistic and promising strategy for heavy metal removal from polluted areas, based on the employment of hyper-accumulator plant species that are extremely tolerant to HMs present in the environment/soil. Green plants are used to remove, decompose, or detoxify hazardous metals in this technique. For soil decontamination, five types of phytoremediation methods have been used: phytostabilization, phytodegradation, rhizofiltration, phytoextraction and phytovolatilization. Traditional phytoremediation methods, on the other hand, have significant limits in terms of large-scale application, thus biotechnological efforts to modify plants for HM phytoremediation ways are being used to improve the efficacy of plants as HM decontamination candidates. It is relatively a new technology that is widely regarded as economic, efficient and unique besides being environment friendly. New metal hyperaccumulators with high efficiency are being explored and employed for their use in phytoremediation and phytomining. Therefore, this review comprehensively discusses different strategies and biotechnological approaches for the removal of various HM containments from the environment, with emphasis on the advancements and implications of phytoremediation, along with their applications in cleaning up various toxic pollutants. Moreover, sources, effects of HMs and factors affecting phytoremediation of HMs metals have also been discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Disposal of waste products and residuals into the natural water bodies can have fatal consequences for aquatic ecosystems, posing severe threats to natural habitats and human health. Natural treatment systems are the most suitable treatment technologies for various types of wastewaters, which has attracted much attention in recent years. Phytoremediation is a plant-based technique used to eliminate or recover surplus nutrients in contaminated environments. The use of aquatic plants in wastewater phytoremediation is very efficient due to they have a very significant ability for assimilating and degrading contaminants (e.g., nitrates, phosphates, and heavy metals). Phytoremediation is a relatively new technology that is considered as an operational, efficient, new, and environmentally friendly technology that is still in the early stages of development and optimization. Its application on a large scale is still limited. It should also be noted that a clear vision of this innovation should be taken into account and, accurate data should be made available to the public as it will enhance its efficiency as a manageable solution in the worldwide. Additionally, phytoremediation has been evaluated as a separate low-tech and environmentally friendly green option compared to the existing technologies. The present study attempts to review the recently published literature to explain phytoremediation technology and its advantages in purifying water and wastewater.
Article
Full-text available
The heavy metal contamination of soil and groundwater is a serious threat to environment worldwide. The survival of human being primarily relies upon soil and groundwater sources. Therefore, the remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soil and groundwater is a matter of utmost concern. Heavy metals are non-degradable and persist in the environment and subsequently contaminate the food chain. Heavy metal pollution puts a serious impact on human health and it adversely affects our physical body. Although, numerous in situ conventional technologies have been utilized for the treatment purpose, but most of the techniques have some limitations such as high cost, deterioration of soil properties, disturbances to soil native flora and fauna and intensive labour. Despite that, in situ phytoremediation is a cost-effective, eco-friendly, solar-driven and novel approach with significant public acceptance. The past research reflects rare discussion addressing both (heavy metal in situ phytoremediation of soil and groundwater) in one platform. The present review article covers both the concepts of in situ phytoremediation of soil and groundwater with major emphasis on health risks of heavy metals, enhanced integrated approaches of in situ phytoremediation, mechanisms of in situ phytoremediation along with effective hyperaccumulator plants for heavy metals remediation, challenges and future prospects.
Article
Full-text available
Heavy metal accumulation in soil has been rapidly increased due to various natural processes and anthropogenic (industrial) activities. As heavy metals are non-biodegradable, they persist in the environment, have potential to enter the food chain through crop plants, and eventually may accumulate in the human body through biomagnification. Owing to their toxic nature, heavy metal contamination has posed a serious threat to human health and the ecosystem. Therefore, remediation of land contamination is of paramount importance. Phytoremediation is an eco-friendly approach that could be a successful mitigation measure to revegetate heavy metal-polluted soil in a cost-effective way. To improve the efficiency of phytoremediation, a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying heavy metal accumulation and tolerance in plant is indispensable. In this review, we describe the mechanisms of how heavy metals are taken up, translocated, and detoxified in plants. We focus on the strategies applied to improve the efficiency of phytostabilization and phytoextraction, including the application of genetic engineering, microbe-assisted and chelate-assisted approaches.
Article
Full-text available
The quality of waters is disturbing day by day by various inorganic and organic pollutants. Among various strategies developed so far the technique of phytoremediation using aquatic plants is most preferable. Aquatic ecosystems are facing high level of stress and depletion due to the inputs of polluting materials. Nonetheless, there are certain species of aquatic macrophytes that have ability to cope with these stressful conditions even high concentration of various organic and inorganic pollutants present in water. These species are useful in polluted water treatment through phytoremediation or bioremediation technologies. Among the various aquatic plant species, Azolla, Eichhornia, Lemna, Potamogeton, Spirodela, Wolfia, and Wolfialla have been reported as phytoremediators and also they are highly efficient in reducing aquatic contamination through bioaccumulation of contaminants in their body tissues. Among the various aquatic species, water hyacinth (Eichhornia) is highly resistant and can tolerate the toxicity of heavy metals, phenols, formaldehydes, formic acids, acetic acids and oxalic acids even in their high concentrations. Likewise some other species of the family Lemnaceae are very efficient to reduce the percentage of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), as well as impact of HMs (heavy metals), and various ionic forms of nitrogen and phosphorus. Here in this review we are providing up-to-date information regarding the utilization of these aquatic plants for the bioremediation of contaminated waters. The review is primarily focused on the specific capabilities of aquatic plants and as an important tool in phytotechnologies in the management of contaminants in aquatic environment.
Article
Full-text available
Heavy-metal (HM) pollution is considered a leading source of environmental contamination. Heavy-metal pollution in ground water poses a serious threat to human health and the aquatic ecosystem. Conventional treatment technologies to remove the pollutants from wastewater are usually costly, time-consuming, environmentally destructive, and mostly inefficient. Phytoremediation is a cost-effective green emerging technology with long-lasting applicability. The selection of plant species is the most significant aspect for successful phytoremediation. Aquatic plants hold steep efficiency for the removal of organic and inorganic pollutants. Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes) and Duck weed (Lemna minor) along with some other aquatic plants are prominent metal accumulator plants for the remediation of heavy-metal polluted water. The phytoremediation potential of the aquatic plant can be further enhanced by the application of innovative approaches in phytoremediation. A summarizing review regarding the use of aquatic plants in phytoremediation is gathered in order to present the broad applicability of phytoremediation.
Article
Full-text available
Phytoremediation is one of the safer, economical, and environment-friendly techniques in which plants are used to recover polluted soils, particularly those containing toxic organic substances and heavy metals. However, it is considered as a slow form of remediation, as plants take time to grow and flourish. Various amendments, including the augmentation of certain chemical substances i.e., ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), ethylene glycol tetra acetic acid (EGTA), and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) have been used to induce and enhance the phytoextraction capacity in plants. Several reports show that chemical amendments can improve the metal accumulation in different plant parts without actually affecting the growth of the plant. This raises a question about the amount and mechanisms of chemical amendments that may be needed for potentially good plant growth and metal phytoremediation. This review provides a detailed discussion on the mechanisms undertaken by three important chemical amendments that are widely used in enhancing phytoremediation (i.e., EDTA, EGTA, and SDS) to support plant growth as well as soil phytoremediation. A core part of this review focuses on the recent advances that have been made using chemical amendments in assisting metal phytoremediation.
Article
Hydrothermal pretreatment of waste activated sludge (WAS) could eliminate the rate limiting step of anaerobic digestion (AD) -hydrolysis. However, the high organic loading rate may cause acid accumulation, thus leading to an unstable system. This study compared the effect of different hydrochar (HC2–260°C and HC3–320°C) and biochar (BC5–500°C and BC7–700°C) on AD of hydrothermal pretreated WAS (HPS). Results demonstrated that hydrochar was superior to biochar in the methane yield and production rate, especially HC2. HC2 had the highest surface oxygen-containing functional groups that could facilitate direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET). The enhanced methane yield was related with the increased protein utilization, and hydrochar and biochar enriched different microbes related to protein degradation. Metabolomic analysis showed the significantly changed metabolites induced by hydrochar and biochar were involved in fatty acids and amino acids-related metabolism, indicating the rapid conversion of intermediated products, which was consistent with the microbial community structure results. Hydrochar and biochar also induced upregulation of metabolites related to microbial metabolic activity and extracellular electron transfer. Although biochar induced the same metabolic changes, the alterations of these metabolites were weaker than those of hydrochar. The results of this study offered new insights into the molecular mechanisms of enhanced AD of HPS by hydrochar and biochar.
Article
Microplastic is an emerging contaminant of concern in soil globally due to its widespread and potential risks on the ecological system. Some basic issues such as the occurrence, source, potential risks, and quantification and estimation of regional emissions of microplastics in the soil are still open questions. These problems arise due to the lack of systematic and comprehensive analysis of microplastic in soils. Therefore, we comprehensively reviewed the current status of knowledge on microplastics in soil on detection, occurrence, characterization, source, and potential risk. Our review suggests that microplastics are ubiquitous in soil matrices globally. However, the research progress of microplastics in the soil is restricted by inherent technological inconsistencies and difficulties in analyzing particles in complex matrices, and studies on the occurrence and distribution of microplastics in soil environments remain very scarce, especially in Africa, South America, and Oceania. The consistency of the characteristics and composition of the microplastics in the aquatic environment and soil demonstrate they share sources and exchange microplastics. Wide and varied sources of microplastic are constantly filling the soil, which causes the accumulation of microplastics in the soil. Studies on the effects and potential risks of microplastics in soil ecosystems are also reviewed. Limited research has shown that the combination and interaction of microplastics with contaminants they absorbed may affect soil health and function, and even migration along the food chain. The occurrence and impact of microplastic on the soil depend on the morphology, chemical components, and natural factors. We conclude that large research gaps exist in the quantification and estimation of regional emissions of microplastics in soil, factors affecting the concentration of microplastics, and microplastic disguising as soil carbon storage, which need more effort.