Exploring Students' and Teachers' Insights on School-Based Disaster Risk Reduction and Safety: A Case Study of Western Morava Basin, Serbia

Abstract

Integrated disaster risk reduction in schools represents a key component of safety strategies within the educational sector of every country. In this study, a series of 850 face-to-face interviews (650 with students and 200 with teachers) were conducted throughout 2023 in 10 out of the total 18 municipalities in the Western Morava Basin of the Republic of Serbia. The paper proposes two central hypotheses regarding school-based disaster risk reduction. Firstly, it suggests that gender, age, parent's employment, academic achievement, living situation, paternal and maternal education levels, and engagement with social media collectively influence students' perspectives on this matter. Secondly, it posits that gender, age, marital status, parenthood, and educational background significantly impact teachers' viewpoints on school-based disaster risk reduction. Multivariate linear regression was used to explore predictors of students' and teachers' insights on school-based disaster risk reduction. Various statistical tests including Chi-square, t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and Pearson's correlation were employed to investigate the influence of demographic and socioeconomic factors on these insights. The results of multivariate regression analyses indicate that age, gender and marital emerge as the primary predictors across various facets of students' and teachers' insights on school-based disaster risk reduction (awareness of disasters, disaster education activities, attitudes on disaster risk reduction education, enhancement of disaster information accessibility, etc). The results of this study provide insight into the key factors influencing students' and teachers' perceptions of disaster risk reduction in schools. As such, they can serve as a basis for improving educational programs, developing policies and strategies, normative educational frameworks, teacher training, and further research in disaster education.

Full text

Article Not peer-reviewed version
Exploring Students' and Teachers'
Insights on School-Based Disaster Risk
Reduction and Safety: A Case Study of
Western Morava Basin, Serbia
Vladimir M. Cvetkovi
ć
* , Neda Nikoli
ć
, Tin Luki
ć
Posted Date: 7 April 2024
doi: 10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1
Keywords: disaster; safety; risk reduction; preparedness; education; schools; students; teachers; human re-
sources; Western Morava Basin, Serbia
Preprints.org is a free multidiscipline platform providing preprint service that
is dedicated to making early versions of research outputs permanently
available and citable. Preprints posted at Preprints.org appear in Web of
Science, Crossref, Google Scholar, Scilit, Europe PMC.
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons
Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article
Exploring Students' and Teachers' Insights on
School-Based Disaster Risk Reduction and Safety: A
Case Study of Western Morava Basin, Serbia
Vladimir M. Cvetković 1,2,3,*, Neda Nikolić 4 and Tin Lukić 5
1 Faculty of Security Studies, University of Belgrade, Gospodara Vucica 50, 11040 Belgrade, Serbia;
vmc@fb.bg.ac.rs
2 Scientific-Professional Society for Disaster Risk Management, Dimitrija Tucovića 121, 11040 Belgrade,
Serbia;
3 International Institute for Disaster Research, Dimitrija Tucovića 121, 11040 Belgrade, Serbia.
4 Faculty of Technical Science in Cačcak, University of Kragujevac, 32000 Čačak, Serbia;
neda.nikolic@ftn.kg.ac.rs
5 Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad,
Trg Dositeja Obradovića 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia; tin.lukic@dgt.uns.ac.rs.
* Correspondence: vmc@fb.bg.ac.rs
Abstract: Integrated disaster risk reduction in schools represents a key component of safety
strategies within the educational sector of every country. In this study, a series of 850 face-to-face
interviews (650 with students and 200 with teachers) were conducted throughout 2023 in 10 out of
the total 18 municipalities in the Western Morava Basin of the Republic of Serbia. The paper
proposes two central hypotheses regarding school-based disaster risk reduction. Firstly, it suggests
that gender, age, parent's employment, academic achievement, living situation, paternal and
maternal education levels, and engagement with social media collectively influence students'
perspectives on this matter. Secondly, it posits that gender, age, marital status, parenthood, and
educational background significantly impact teachers' viewpoints on school-based disaster risk
reduction. Multivariate linear regression was used to explore predictors of students' and teachers'
insights on school-based disaster risk reduction. Various statistical tests including Chi-square, t-
tests, one-way ANOVA, and Pearson's correlation were employed to investigate the influence of
demographic and socioeconomic factors on these insights. The results of multivariate regression
analyses indicate that age, gender and marital emerge as the primary predictors across various
facets of students' and teachers' insights on school-based disaster risk reduction (awareness of
disasters, disaster education activities, attitudes on disaster risk reduction education, enhancement
of disaster information accessibility, etc). The results of this study provide insight into the key
factors influencing students' and teachers' perceptions of disaster risk reduction in schools. As such,
they can serve as a basis for improving educational programs, developing policies and strategies,
normative educational frameworks, teacher training, and further research in disaster education.
Keywords: disaster; safety; risk reduction; preparedness; education; schools; students; teachers;
human resources; Western Morava Basin; Serbia
1. Introduction
In the endeavour to mitigate natural and man-made disasters, enhancing the awareness of
teachers and students is crucial, as they serve as pivotal conduits for disseminating vital information.
Given that effective information exchange is a fundamental prerequisite for preparedness and
response to natural disasters, every element in the information dissemination chain holds equal
significance [1]. Disaster education aims to provide knowledge, skills, and motivation to individuals
and groups to take action to reduce their vulnerability to disasters [2]. Even education of vulnerable
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions, and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and
contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting
from any ideas, methods, instructions, or products referred to in the content.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1
© 2024 by the author(s). Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY license.

2
individuals leads to effective actions for others or communities. Also, disaster education serves as a
practical, efficient, and cost-effective approach to mitigating risks [3].
In this sense, the importance of school disaster education has sharply increased in contemporary
conditions [4]. Schools play an indispensable role in reducing the risk of natural disasters [5].
Transferring knowledge about disasters, especially their consequences, within schools is crucial
because schools remain centres of education, and the results of the educational process are
transmitted to their families and the local community [6–9]. Therefore, alongside the growing role of
alternative sources and forms of education, schools retain a leading role in education and upbringing
[10,11]. With its position, a school largely reflects the real state of the social environment and its
development potential, guiding and accelerating the learning process, i.e., the development of
personality in line with its needs and possibilities [12,13].
Its purpose enables individuals and generations to live in a modern society where various
natural and man-made disasters are a reality [14]. To successfully meet the increasing demands of
human and societal development, a school needs to be of high quality, efficient, and oriented toward
new developments [15]. The path to this goal involves modernization, where tradition and
innovation play a part [16,17]. Youth are among the most vulnerable populations during disasters,
especially those attending school during such events [18,19]. School buildings are often destroyed
during disasters [20], taking the precious lives of children and teachers and disrupting access to
education after the disaster [4,21,22]. The reconstruction of these schools can take years and is very
costly. Education on disaster risk and secure school buildings are two key priority areas for action in
the event of disasters [23]. Building on the concept of enhanced social participation, an increasing
number of studies on disaster risk reduction focus on examining the role of youth in various phases
of disaster management [24,25]. The potential of youth to be active citizens and agents of change also
contributes to greater value through improving their skills in active programming for disaster risk
reduction [26–28]. Related positive outcomes include increased visibility of youth in their
communities and strong long-term resilience to disasters [29–31].
To reduce the risk of the mentioned disasters in the territory of Serbia, local self-governments
play a leading role in the process of disaster risk management, and all other state and provincial
institutions should support their role [32]. It is essential to emphasize the significant mutual
coordination and alignment of procedures and plans of all institutions and entities, conducted
through intersectoral cooperation and partnerships (Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia,
87/2018, Article 4). By the principles of participatory and solidarity, all citizens of Serbia have the
right to participate in designing the content and implementation of activities for disaster risk
reduction. They also have the right to participate in proposing, undertaking, and executing specific
measures, tasks, and activities in protection and rescue, and express their needs for aid resources
(Official Gazette of RS, 87/2018, Article 8). Disaster risk reduction involves building a culture of safety
and resilience among individuals and communities, as well as intensive collaboration of all relevant
institutions at all levels of authority. Partnership with private and public enterprises, other legal
entities, entrepreneurs, civil society organizations, and all interested citizens who can contribute to
disaster risk reduction is emphasized (Official Gazette of RS, 87/2018, Article 11).
In terms of primary and secondary education, there's a plan for occasional training to gain
essential knowledge in disaster risk reduction and emergency management [32–34]. Citizens undergo
this training as part of their primary and secondary education, adhering to specific laws and relevant
programs. However, in reality, education is sporadic and varies from school to school [35]. It involves
different entities and forces of protection and rescue, such as the police and firefighting rescue units
[36]. Those citizens who don't receive education in disaster risk reduction and emergency
management during their primary and secondary education, can acquire basic knowledge through
the activities of entities specializing in protection and rescue, as dictated by specific laws and program
activities [37]. Also, citizens have certain obligations: to equip themselves for protection and rescue,
take measures for personal and mutual protection, accept assignments in civil protection units,
respond to the mobilization of these units, heed the call of competent emergency staff to participate
in protection and rescue actions, and promptly inform the operational centre 112 about the onset of
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

3
danger. They are also required to implement prescribed and ordered protection and rescue measures
[37].
High schools in Serbia are part of the entities within the disaster risk reduction and emergency
management system, alongside state administration bodies, autonomous provinces, local self-
government units, etc. (Official Gazette of RS, 87/2018, Article 13). Educational institutions are legally
obligated to conduct a risk assessment of disasters and develop a protection and rescue plan for all
facilities where education takes place (Official Gazette of RS, 87/2018, Article 15). According to the
Law on Fire Protection (Official Gazette of RS, No. 111/2009, Article 42), institutions of importance
for education, such as primary and high schools, are required to install fire detection and reporting
devices, as well as possess fire extinguishing equipment. In cases where a school is located near the
chemical industry, which, according to the Accident Protection Plan, may be directly or indirectly
threatened by hazardous materials' consequences, the school must establish cooperation with the
Operator responsible for providing all relevant information about safety measures and procedures
in case of a chemical accident (Article 60b, Official Gazette of RS, No. 36/2009).
Based on the Law on Disaster Risk Reduction and Emergency Management (Official Gazette of
RS, 87/2018), schools (primary and secondary) play a significant and crucial role in the process of
disaster risk reduction in Serbia. Considering that the implementation of educational and other
measures (social, economic, cultural, etc.) is necessary for establishing and conducting policies to
prevent new and reduce existing disaster risks, a clear conclusion can be drawn about the
unquestionably important role of schools in such a process. One drawback is related to the fact that
the Law on Disaster Risk Reduction (Official Gazette of RS, 87/2018) extensively regulates the
obligations of higher education institutions, while schools are mentioned only in the segment related
to citizen education. It is stipulated that higher education institutions and other organizations
involved in scientific research engage in protection and rescue tasks and disaster risk reduction
through participation in staff, expert-operational teams, and operational staff (Official Gazette of RS,
87/2018, Article 35).
Additionally, it is envisaged that higher education institutions and other organizations involved
in scientific research inform the Ministry about scientific findings relevant to disaster risk reduction
and protection and rescue. On the other hand, when it comes to citizens (Official Gazette of RS,
87/2018, Article 36), it is provided that citizens have the right to be informed about disaster risks,
measures and activities undertaken to reduce them, threats, and possible consequences of disasters,
as well as all necessary information relevant to protection and rescue. However, the practice is
entirely different, considering that comprehensive and continuous citizen information mechanisms
(the 112 system is still not implemented) do not exist. Additionally, there are no provided ways to
inform citizens about measures taken or intended to be taken by competent state authorities to reduce
or prevent certain disaster risks.
When constructing facilities for preschool institutions, schools, and faculties, measures to
prevent the spread of fires must be foreseen (Regulation on technical norms for fire protection of
residential and business buildings and public-purpose buildings, Official Gazette of RS, 2019).
Preschool institution buildings can have up to one floor, and if the space for children in nurseries is
placed on the floor of the building, additional fire safety and secure evacuation measures must be
provided. Primary schools are built with a maximum of two floors, secondary schools with a
maximum of three floors, and faculties with a height not exceeding 30 m. Classrooms, offices, and
similar spaces where students of primary and secondary schools stay cannot be in underground
levels. Schools and faculties with more than two floors, a side length greater than 35 m, must have at
least two staircases mutually distant at least 25 m. Chemical and similar laboratories (one or more in
a block) of faculties are separated as fire sectors.
Considering all mentioned factors, this paper aims to investigate the influence of various
demographic and socio-economic factors, such as gender, age, parent's employment, academic
achievement, living situation, parental education levels, engagement with social media, marital
status, parenthood, and educational background, on students' and teachers' perspectives regarding
school-based disaster risk reduction. Specifically, the paper aims to examine how these factors shape
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

4
awareness of different types of disasters, disaster education activities in schools, attitudes towards
disaster risk reduction education, enhancement of disaster information accessibility, and
implementation of disaster curriculum in schools, etc.
1.1. Literature Review on School-Based Disaster Risk Reduction and Safety
In the realm of disaster studies, there has been significant scrutiny devoted to exploring the
perceptions held by both educators [6–11,38–40] and students [3,41–67] concerning the multifaceted
dimensions of disaster risk reduction. This examination encompasses a broad spectrum of factors,
ranging from understanding different types of disasters [23,68–70] to evaluate the efficacy of disaster
education initiatives within school settings [71–73].
Furthermore, literature analysis reveals that numerous studies have investigated the effects of
disaster risk reduction education programs on students' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours
concerning disaster preparedness and response [74–83]. These programs often include curriculum
integration, training workshops, simulation exercises, and community engagement strategies
[3,6,18,21,33,36,39,43,46,48,81,84–94]. Additionally, there are numerous studies assessing the safety
and resilience of school infrastructure and facilities to mitigate risks and ensure the well-being of
students and staff during disasters [7,20,72,87,88,91,95–101]. On the other hand, numerous studies
examine collaboration among various stakeholders, including government agencies, educational
institutions, civil society organizations, and local communities, to enhance disaster risk reduction
efforts. These studies focus on multi-sectoral partnerships, coordination mechanisms, and
participatory approaches aimed at enhancing resilience [43,44,48,49,51,82,94,102–104].
Diverse quantitative and qualitative research studies have exclusively focused on exploring
knowledge related to natural disasters [72,84–86,90,101,105–116]. In numerous studies, various
influences such as gender [77–83], age [6,16,18,19,21,34,38,39,44,49,53,55,59,66,67,74,80,94,96,106,117–
120], marital status [88,121–123], education [88,118,123,124], academic achievement [22,123,125–127],
prior experience [123,128], etc., have been examined on various aspects of students' and teachers'
insights on school-based disaster risk reduction and safety.
Based on a case study spanning thirty countries and centred on the analysis of disaster risk
reduction measures in schools, it's apparent that the evaluation of student learning receives minimal
attention and development [94]. This underscores the necessity for the creation of more imaginative
and innovative assessment methodologies within disaster risk reduction programs. Shaw et al. [102]
discovered that education about natural disasters within Japanese families and local communities
yields a more substantial influence compared to education provided in schools. Conversely, Adem
[129] asserts that individuals who have undergone some form of natural disaster education in schools
exhibit a deeper understanding, grounded in scientific facts. In contrast, knowledge obtained through
family and media channels, lacking structure, tends to be haphazard and may propagate
misconceptions and misinformation.
Research findings concerning youth and disasters in Serbia reveal that 40.2% of children report
feeling safe, 37.8% are uncertain, and 21.8% express feeling unsafe within school premises in the event
of disasters [130]. In Serbia, adolescents express their greatest fear of epidemics, with 67.5% citing it
as their primary concern [56]. About 65.7% of students state that they were first educated about
natural hazards in schools, while slightly more students (69.9%) mention being first educated within
their families. The sources of information about disasters and their harmful consequences influence
the perception of high school students [131]. Within various subjects and extracurricular activities,
students have the opportunity to hear certain information about natural and anthropogenic hazards.
Still, their knowledge is not assessed, and they do not practice preventive activities [132]. A handbook
for children in grades 2 to 4, "Let's Get Ready with Herman," has been presented. In this handbook,
accessible to children, the sea crab Herman describes various natural disasters that befell him and
how he dealt with them. Teachers who attended workshops then used these handbooks in their
activities with children (16 participating schools) (http://caritas.rs/caritas/?p=1902). When it comes to
child safety, as one of the vulnerable categories, the family plays a crucial role. Parents are key factors
in educating children about disasters [133]. Furthermore, research has indicated that education has
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

5
an impact on adequate responses to disasters because individuals with higher education levels have
more knowledge about disasters and are more inclined to attend various training in this field [119].
Kovačević-Majkić et al. [1] conducted an analysis of risk education status in the Republic of Serbia.
According to the authors, the current state of hazard education in Serbia remains incomplete, lacking
a comprehensive approach to risk education. They note that while hazards are systematically
addressed, the coverage of risks is sporadic and inadequately represented. Moreover, mitigating
natural disaster risks involves both reducing vulnerability and enhancing population resilience, with
proper risk education serving as a critical component in achieving these goals. Given that the public
education system reaches the widest audience, it serves as an effective platform for disseminating
essential knowledge on natural disasters, thereby enhancing community resilience [1].
2. Methods
A multistage random sampling method was employed for a study conducted in 2023 within
secondary schools (general education, vocational, and professional schools) across the western
Morava River basin in Serbia, encompassing 18 local municipalities. In the initial stage, utilizing
random number generation, 10 local municipalities were selected for the research: Užice, Čajetina,
Kruševac, Kraljevo, Vrnjačka Banja, Knić, Kosjerić, Arilje, Novi Pazar, and Gornji Milanovac. These
municipalities were chosen to reflect the diverse demographic and social characteristics of the entire
population in the Western Morava Basin of Serbia. In the second phase, 10 secondary schools
(including general education, vocational, and professional schools) were selected for the study. In the
third phase, specific classrooms were chosen, and face-to-face interviews were conducted with
students (n = 650) and teachers (n = 200) in those schools. A series of 850 face-to-face interviews (650
with students and 200 with teachers) were conducted throughout 2023 in 10 out of the total 18
municipalities in the Western Morava Basin of the Republic of Serbia (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Designing research steps to explore students' and teachers' perspectives on school-based
disaster risk reduction.
The hypothesis is proposed that demographic and socio-economic factors, including gender,
age, parent's employment, academic achievement, living situation, paternal education level, maternal
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

6
education level, and engagement on social media, collectively exert a statistically significant influence
on students' perceptions of school-based disaster risk reduction (H1-H8). It is also hypothesized that
gender, age, marital status, parenthood, and educational background significantly shape teachers'
attitudes towards school-based disaster risk reduction (H1-H5) (Figure 2).
Figure 2. The research design for exploring students' and teachers' insights on school-based disaster
risk reduction.
2.1. Study Area
Based on the results of the previous researchs [134,135], the territory of the Republic of Serbia is
vulnerable to various natural hazards, and the degree of danger is different depending on the type
of hazard, but it is sufficient to cause significant consequences, endanger people's health and lives,
and cause damage of greater volume on material goods. Heaving in mind the natural characteristics
of the territory of Serbia, the most important potential risks from natural hazards, caused by natural
and anthropogenic factors, are determined as lithospheric (seismic, strong erosion, landslides,
rockfalls), atmospheric (storm-hail, cumulative and intense precipitation, drought), hydrospheric
(floods and flash floods) and biospheric (forest fires) hazards. Every natural disaster represents a
potential danger to people (death, injury, illness, stress), material goods (property damage, economic
losses) and the environment (losses to flora and fauna, pollution and degradation). Western Morava
river basin covers around 15,850 km
2
and app. 910,500 inhabitants and this part of Serbia is seriously
vulnerable by different natural hazards (seismic, landslides, rockfalls, strong erosion, floods and
torrential floods, etc.). So, from the aspect of multi-hazards, the Western Morava river basin is at high
risk (Figure 3).
The research area is vulnerable to various natural and man-made hazards [32,35,93,100,136–138],
and the consequences of their occurrence have been recorded in previous research. The most
important natural hazards threatening this area are seismic activity, landslides, rock falls, floods and
torrential floods. The last strong earthquake in this area hit the town of Kraljevo and its surroundings.
The Kraljevo earthquake occurred on November 3rd, with the epicenter several kilometers north of
the city of Kraljevo, in Vitanovac. Approximately 70% of all structures in Vitanovac were damaged
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

7
and declared unsafe. Two people were killed in Grdica, and about 100 were injured [139]. There were
more than 350 aftershocks, including an M = 4.3 event on November 4th. During the main shock,
reported intensity in Kraljevo was VII, and it was IV in Belgrade [140].
Figure 3. Study area: Location of Western Morava Basin, Serbia.
The greatest number of torrential flood events is recorded in the watersheds of tributaries of the
Great Morava due to the highest area in the Republic of Serbia, especially in her tributaries, South
and Western Morava. In the inventory of torrential floods that was made for the territory of Serbia
[141] for the period 1915-2013. year, the highest number of torrential flood events was recorded in
the Juzna Morava basin (195 events with 61 casualties) , followed by the Zapadna Morava (157 events
with 11 casualties) and Velika Morava (127 events with 12 casualties).
According to data from Serbia's Emergency Situations Department, there was a significant 50%
rise in the number of fires documented in 2017 compared to the previous year. The Directorate for
Fire-Rescue Units records show that between 2012 and 2022, Serbia experienced 38,279 residential
fires, resulting in 665 fatalities, 1747 injuries, and 2134 successful rescues. For comparative analysis
within this period, annual fire occurrences and associated fatalities were as follows: 2012 (946/7), 2013
(836/6), 2014 (887/8), 2015 (827/5), 2016 (872/10), 2017 (899/18), 2018 (842/14), 2019 (796/10), 2020
(842/23), and 2021 (828/21). As outlined in the National Strategy for Protection and Rescue, Serbia
encountered roughly 134,686 fires from 2003 to 2011. Notably, in 2020, residential fires claimed the
lives of 51 individuals nationwide. The Ministry of Interior reported conducting over 4000
interventions, with more than 3000 specifically addressing fire incidents [100,136].
2.2. Socio-Economic and Demographic Characteristics of Respondents
2.2.1. Students in High Schools
Out of 650 respondents, the sample includes 37.8% male and 62.2% female participants.
Regarding age, the largest number of participants is 18 years old (58.2%), followed by 17 years old
(31.8%), while a certain number of participants are 16 (5.2%) and 15 years old (4.6%). The majority of
participants have excellent academic performance (39.8%), followed by very good (38.8%) and good
(20.3%). A higher number of participants in the sample indicated that they live in a community where
both parents work (59.8%), while a certain number mentioned that only one parent is employed
(30.3%) or both parents are unemployed (9.8%). A large number, of participants stated that they are
users of social networks (98.3%), while only a few mentioned that they are not (1.7%). The research
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

8
results show that a larger number of participants have not experienced the consequences of family
disasters (66%), while a certain number of participants live in families that have experienced the
consequences of specific disasters (33.8%) (Table 1).
Table 1. Basic socio-economic and demographic information of students in high schools (n = 650).
Variable Category Frequency %
Gender Male 246 37.8
Female 404 62.2
Age
15
16
17
18
30
34
207
378
4.6
5.2
31.8
58.2
Achievement in School
Good
Very Good
Excellent
132
252
259
20.3
38.8
39.8
Parental Employment
Single Parent
Both Parents Working
Unemployed
197
389
64
30.3
59.8
9.8
Social Media Users Yes
No
639
11
98.3
1.7
Experienced Consequences of Family Disasters Yes
No
220
429
33.8
66
2.2.2. Teachers in High Schools
When it comes to teachers, out of a total of 200, the sample includes 75.5% female respondents
and 24.5% male respondents. Regarding years of teaching experience, the majority of respondents
reported having 16-25 years of experience (32.5%), followed by the highest number of teachers in the
category of 26-35 years of work experience (22.7%). After that, there are teachers with 8-15 years of
experience (18.5%), teachers with 3-7 years of experience (11%), and 9% of teachers with 36 or more
years of experience, while the least number of teachers have been employed in the school for less
than two years (5.5%). Concerning marital status, the majority of respondents stated that they are
married (69%), and the least number of respondents mentioned being divorced (3.5%). In the category
of unmarried individuals, there are 23.5%, while widows/widowers make up 4%. In response to the
question, "Do you have children?" a higher number of respondents answered in the affirmative
(66.5%), while the number of respondents without children was lower (33.5%). The largest number
of respondents in the sample have completed a university degree (65.5%), while the least number of
respondents have completed vocational education (10.5%). Additionally, a certain number of
respondents mentioned having completed master's studies (24%) (Table 2).
Table 2. Basic socio-economic and demographic information for teachers in high schools (n = 200).
Variables Category N %
Gender Male 79 39.5
Female 121 60.5
Years of work experience
0-2
3-7
8-15
16-25
11
22
37
65
5.5
11
18.5
32.5
26-35
36 and over
45
18
22.5
9
Marital status Single
Married
132
252
20.3
38.8
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

9
Divorced
Widowed
259
8
39.8
4
Education level
High school
Bachelor's degree
Master's degree
21
131
48
10.5
65.5
24
Parenthood Yes
No
133
67
66.5
33.5
2.3. Questionnaire Design on School-Based Disaster Risk Reduction and Safety
Two structured survey instruments were developed (a questionnaire for students and teachers'
insights on school-based disaster risk reduction - Appendix A), incorporating a mix of qualitative
(closed-ended) multiple-choice questions and five-point Likert scales, as suggested by various studies
[18,92,95,104,142,143]. The survey instrument was administered directly to the participants in their
native Serbian language through face-to-face interactions in schools. The questions were presented
in a consistent format during the administration process.
The first segment of both mentioned questionnaires addressed the demographic and
socioeconomic profiles of the respondents (students and teachers). It encompassed factors such as
gender, age, parents' employment, academic success, living arrangement, father's education,
mother's education, use of social media, marital status, parenthood, and other relevant variables.
Subsequent sections in this questionnaire, titled Students' insights on school-based disaster risk
reduction, comprise a set of questions that explore students' attitudes and perceptions regarding
disaster risk reduction in schools, the measures and activities undertaken to ensure safety in the event
of a disaster, primary sources of knowledge and information about disasters, familiarity with various
types of disasters, support for the introduction of disaster-related subjects, collaboration with expert
institutions, and statements regarding key variables in disaster education.
On the other hand, subsequent sections in this questionnaire, titled 'Teachers' Insights on School-
Based Disaster Risk Reduction,' encompass a series of inquiries delving into teachers' attitudes
toward disaster preparedness and response, the perceived benefits of students learning about
disasters, the institutions that should be involved in educating students on disaster risk reduction,
whether teaching units related to disaster risk reduction are included in the school curriculum, the
coordination between the school and relevant emergency rescue services, barriers or challenges to
implementing student education on disaster risk reduction, the level of preparedness of your school
for natural disasters, and the steps involved in the planning process.
Before commencing the research, a preliminary questionnaire was administered to students (40
participants) and teachers (28 participants). The initial testing phase employed an online snowball
sampling technique. It is paramount to underscore that our research strictly followed the guidelines
outlined in the Helsinki Declaration, which offers ethical principles for research involving human
subjects in the social and medical fields. Furthermore, all participants granted informed consent
before their involvement in the study, thereby acknowledging and agreeing to the terms of
participation. The research protocol received approval from the Scientific-Professional Society for
Disaster Risk Management, following a thorough review by the Scientific Research Group, with ID -
04012024.
2.4. Analyses of School-Based Disaster Risk Reduction and Safety
To examine the predictors of student's (gender, age, parent's employment, academic success,
living arrangement, father's education, mother's education, and use of social media) and teachers'
(gender, age, marital status, parenthood, and education) insights on school-based disaster risk
reduction, multivariate linear regression was employed. For the purpose of examining the influences
of demographic and socioeconomic factors on students' and teachers' insights on school-based
disaster risk reduction, various appropriate statistical tests were employed, such as Chi-square, t-
tests, one-way ANOVA, and Pearson's correlation. Since the initial homogeneity test for variance
revealed a departure from the assumption of homogenous variance, alternative tests that are resilient
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

10
to this violation, namely Welsh and Brown–Forsythe tests, were taken into account for analysis.
Additionally, it's important to highlight that all tests were approached with a two-tailed perspective,
meaning we considered both directions of the effect, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. The
statistical analysis was executed using SPSS software (IBM SPSS Statistics, Version 26, New York, NY,
USA), a commonly employed tool for such analyses in research settings.
In addition to the aforementioned analyses, the internal consistency of Likert scales was assessed
for various subscales related to disaster risk reduction. The internal consistency of Likert scales for
the awareness of different types of disasters subscale (7 variables) is good, with a Cronbach’s alpha
of 0.85, attitudes on disaster risk reduction education subscale (5 variables) of 0.79, enhancing disaster
information accessibility subscale (5 variables) of 0.86, disaster education activities in school (5
variables) of 0.82, teacher preparedness for disaster response ( 5 variables) of 0.87, school disaster
preparedness assessment (12 variables) of 0.86. These findings suggest reliable measurement across
the various dimensions of disaster risk reduction education considered in the study. Previous
research findings illustrated in the residual diagram [144] indicated that assumptions regarding
normality, linearity, multicollinearity (correlation coefficient r = 0.76), and homogeneity of variances
(assessed through NPSP and scatterplot) were upheld and not found to be violated.
3. Results
The results of the study are presented in four dimensions: the predictors of students' and
teachers' insights on school-based disaster risk reduction; students' insights on school-based disaster
risk reduction; teachers' insights on school-based disaster risk reduction; and influences of
demographic and socioeconomic factors on the students' and teachers' insights on school-based
disaster risk reduction.
3.1. The Predictors of Students' and Teachers' Insights on School-Based Disaster Risk Reduction and Safety
The paper revolves around two central hypotheses related to school-based disaster risk
reduction:
a) Firstly, our hypothetical framework proposes that gender (H1), age (H2), parents'
employment (H3), academic achievement (H4), living situation (H5), paternal education level (H6),
maternal education level (H7), and engagement with social media (H8) collectively exert a
statistically significant influence on students' perspectives concerning school-based disaster risk
reduction.
b) Secondly, our framework suggests that gender (H1), age (H2), marital status (H3), parenthood
(H4), and educational background (H5) significantly shape teachers' viewpoints on school-based
disaster risk reduction.
These hypotheses serve as the foundational pillars upon which our research is constructed,
aiming to elucidate the multifaceted dynamics influencing both students' and teachers' insights
regarding disaster risk reduction within the school environment.
Multivariate regression analysis was employed to assess the relationship between eight
demographic and socio-economic variables (gender, age, parent's employment, academic
achievement, living situation, paternal education level, maternal education level, and engagement
with social media) and five dimensions of students' insights on school-based disaster risk reduction,
namely awareness of different types of disasters, disaster education activities in school, attitudes on
disaster risk reduction education, enhancing disaster information accessibility, and implementation
of disaster curriculum in schools.
The analysis conducted affirmed the validity of assumptions concerning normal distribution,
linearity, multicollinearity, and variance homogeneity, all of which are pivotal in this form of
analysis, as depicted in Tables 3 and 4. This comprehensive validation enhances the reliability of the
study's findings and strengthens the credibility of the statistical analysis conducted.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

11
3.1. The Predictors of Students' Insights on School-Based Disaster Risk Reduction and Safety
The results of the multivariate regression analyses regarding the awareness of different types of
disasters subscale reveal that the primary predictor of significance was success in school (β = 0.113),
expla ining 1.3% of t he var iance i n awar eness of different ty pes of disaste rs. This is fol lowed by gender
(β = −0.088, 0.8%). The remaining predictors did not exhibit significant associations with awareness
of different types of disasters. This model (R2 = 0.031, Adj. R2 = 0.021, F = 2.94, t = 13.70, p < 0.01) with
the inclusion of all specified independent variables, the model elucidates the 2.1% variance of
awareness of different types of disasters (Table 3 and Figure 4).
Table 3. Results of a multivariate regression analysis concerning students' insights on school-based
disaster risk reduction (awareness of disasters, perception of disaster education activities, attitudes
on disaster risk reduction and disaster information sources) (n = 650).
Predictor
Variable
Awareness of
different types of
disasters
Disaster
education activities
in school
Attitudes on
disaster risk
reduction
education
Enhancing disaster
information
accessibility
Launching disaster
curriculum in
schools
B SE β B SE β B SE β B SE β B SE β
Gender −0.123 0.058 −0.088* −0.130 0.087 −0.062 −0.109 0.077 −0.061 0.022 0.085 0.011 −0.052 0.113 −0.019
Age −0.105 0.129 −0.033 0.843 0.192 0.174** 0.945 0.192 0.191** 0.947 0.189 0.199** 1.539 0.251 0.238**
Parents employment −0.060 0.091 −0.026 0.213 0.136 0.062 0.111 0.136 0.052 −0.082 0.133 −0.024 0.216 0.177 0.047
Success in school 0.156 0.057 0.113* −0.074 0.085 −0.036 −0.075 0.085 −0.036 −0.002 0.084 −0.001 −0.402 0.111 −0.145**
Living arrangement 0.135 0.081 0.067 −0.191 0.121 −0.063 −0.171 0.111 −0.053 0.068 0.119 0.023 −0.068 0.158 −0.017
Father's education 0.023 0.055 0.016 −0.070 0.082 −0.033 −0.038 0.091 −0.017 −0.182 0.081 −0.088 −0.246 0.108 −0.087
Mother's education −0.210 0.209 −0.040 −0.336 0.311 −0.043 −0.057 0.089 −0.027 −0.572 0.306 −0.074* −0.150 0.406 −0.014*
Use of social media −0.123 0.058 −0.088 −0.130 0.087 −0.062 −0.329 0.312 −0.042 0.022 0.085 0.011 −0.052 0.113 −0.019
R2 (𝑅

) 0.031 (0.021) 0.051 (0.040) 0.052 (0.037) 0.058 (0.047) 0.093 (0.083)
* p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; B: unstandardized (B) coefficients; SE: std. error; β: standardized (β) coefficients. Note: men,
excellent school performance, living with mother, father's primary education, mother's primary education, social
media user, employed parents have been coded as 1; 0 has been assigned otherwise.
Further, the results of the multivariate regression analyses regarding the disaster education
activities in the school subscale reveal that the primary predictor of significance was age (β = 0.174),
explaining 2.9% of the variance in disaster education activities in school. The remaining predictors
did not exhibit significant associations with disaster education activities in school. This model (R2 =
0.051, Adj. R2 = 0.040, F = 4.84, t = 11.26, p < 0.01) with the inclusion of all specified independent
variables, the model elucidates the 4% variance of disaster education activities in school (Table 3).
In subsequent analyses regarding attitudes toward disaster risk reduction education, it was
found that the most prominent predictor was age (β = 0.191), explaining 3.5% of the variance in
disaster risk reduction education. The remaining predictors did not exhibit significant associations
with Attitudes toward disaster risk reduction education. This model (R2 = 0.052, Adj. R2 = 0.037, F =
3.54, t = 12.26, p < 0.01) with the inclusion of all specified independent variables, the model elucidates
the 3.54% variance of attitudes on disaster risk reduction education (Table 3).
In further analyses concerning the enhancement of disaster information accessibility, it was
determined that the most prominent predictor was age (β = 0.199), explaining 3.8% of the variance in
disaster information accessibility. This is followed by the mother's education (β = −0.074, 0.75%). This
model (R2 = 0.058, Adj. R2 = 0.047, F = 5.56, t = 12.93, p < 0.01) with the inclusion of all specified
independent variables, the model elucidates the 4.7% variance of attitudes on disaster information
accessibility (Table 3).
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

12
Figure 4. The predictors of the of students' insights on school-based disaster risk reduction.
Finally, the results of the multivariate regression analyses regarding the launching disaster
curriculum in schools reveal that the primary predictor of significance was age (β = 0.238), explaining
5.33% of the variance in the launching disaster curriculum in schools. This is followed by success in
school (β = −0.145, 1.84%) and mother's education (β = −0.014, 0.6%). This model (R
2
= 0.093, Adj. R
2
=
0.083, F = 9.32, t = 7.16, p < 0.01) with the inclusion of all specified independent variables, the model
elucidates the 8.3% variance in the launching disaster curriculum in schools (Table 3).
3.2. The Predictors of Teaches' Insights on School-Based Disaster Risk Reduction and Safety
The results of the multivariate regression analyses regarding the school facility resilience to
disasters reveal that the primary predictor of significance was success in school education (β = 0.224),
explaining 4.66% of the variance in school facility resilience. This is followed by gender (β = −0.139,
1.71%). The remaining predictors did not exhibit significant associations with school facility
resilience. This model (R
2
= 0.076, Adj. R
2
= 0.052, F = 3.17, t = 16.74, p < 0.01) with the inclusion of all
specified independent variables, the model elucidates the 5.2% variance of attitudes related to school
facility resilience (Table 4 and Figure 5).
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

13
Table 4. Results of a multivariate regression analysis concerning teachers' insights on school-based
disaster risk reduction (school facility resilience to disasters, teacher preparedness for emergency
response, involvement of students in disaster preparedness, and school disaster preparedness
assessment) (n = 200).
Predictor
Variable
School facility
resilience to disasters
Teacher
preparedness for
disaster response
Involvement of
students
in disaster preparedness
School disaster
preparedness
assessment
Disaster education
course in schools
B SE β B SE β B SE β B SE β B SE β
Gender −0.354 0.186 −0.139** −0.407 0.192 −0.152* −0.029 0.165 −0.013 −0.463 0.170 −0.196* −0.867 0.244 −0.256*
Age 0.413 0.351 0.086 0.568 0.361 0.112 0.530 0.311 0.123 0.266 0.321 0.060 0.432 0.459 0.067
Marital −0.269 0.272 −0.104 −0.390 0.280 −0.143 −0.760 0.241 −0.329** −0.488 0.248 −0.203* 0.326 0.356 0.095
Parenthood −0.054 0.240 −0.023 0.361 0.247 0.148 −0.058 0.212 −0.028 −0.054 0.219 −0.025 0.291 0.314 0.094
Education 0.800 0.256 0.224* 0.538 0.263 0.143* 0.000 0.227 0.001 0.621 0.234 0.187* 1.159 0.335 0.244*
R
2
(𝑅



) 0.076 (0.052) 0.117 (0.094) 0.091(0.068) 0.104 (0.081) 0.107 (0.084)
* p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; B: unstandardized (B) coefficients; SE: std. error; β: standardized (β) coefficients. Note: men,
with up to 2 years of work experience, married, parents, with completed college education have been coded as
1; 0 has been assigned otherwise.
In further analyses concerning teacher preparedness for disaster response, it was determined
that the most prominent predictor was gender (β = 0.152), explaining 2.1% of the variance in teacher
preparedness for disaster response. This is followed by teacher education (β = 0.143, 1.90%). The
remaining predictors did not exhibit significant associations with teacher preparedness for disaster
response. This model (R
2
= 0.0117, Adj. R
2
= 0.094, F = 3.17, t = 16.75, p < 0.01) with the inclusion of all
specified independent variables, the model elucidates the 9.4% variance of teacher preparedness for
disaster response (Table 4).
Figure 5. The predictors of the of teachers' insights on school-based disaster risk reduction.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

14
In subsequent analyses regarding the involvement of students in disaster preparedness, it was
determined that the most prominent predictor was marital (β = −0.329), explaining 4.7% of the
variance in the involvement of students in disaster preparedness. The remaining predictors did not
exhibit significant associations with the involvement of students in disaster preparedness. This model
(R2 = 0.091, Adj. R2 = 0.068, F = 5.14, t = 15.46, p < 0.01) with the inclusion of all specified independent
variables, the model elucidates the 6.8% variance of involvement of students in disaster preparedness
(Table 4).
Then, the results of the multivariate regression analyses regarding school disaster preparedness
assessment reveal that the primary predictor of significance was marital (β = 0.203), explaining 3.42%
of the variance in school disaster preparedness assessment. This is followed by the gender of teachers
(β = 0.196, 2.93%) and teachers' education (β = 0.187, 2.89%). The remaining predictors did not exhibit
significant associations with school disaster preparedness assessment. This model (R2 = 0.0104, Adj.
R2 = 0.081, F = 4.52, t = 20.96, p < 0.01) with the inclusion of all specified independent variables, the
model elucidates the 8.1% variance of involvement of students in disaster preparedness (Table 4).
Finally, further analyses related to the disaster education course in schools, it was determined
that the most prominent predictor was gender (β = −0.256), explaining 14.89% of the variance in
disaster education courses in schools. This is followed by teachers' education (β = 0.244, 5.52%). The
remaining predictors did not exhibit significant associations with disaster education courses in
schools. This model (R2 = 0.0107, Adj. R2 = 0.084, F = 4.66, t = 10.94, p < 0.01) with the inclusion of all
specified independent variables, the model elucidates the 8.4% variance of disaster education courses
in schools (Table 4).
3.2. Students' Insights on School-Based Disaster Risk Reduction and Safety
Considering the subject of the research, respondents were asked how they acquired knowledge
and information about different disasters. According to the obtained results, it was found that the
majority of respondents acquire knowledge by searching the internet (54.2%), while the least common
method is through social and video games (6.5%). Some respondents mentioned that they gain
knowledge about disasters primarily through conversations with their families (13.5%), as well as
through mass media (18.6%).
In response to the question, "Does your school collaborate with professional institutions to better
acquaint students with disasters?" 38.2% of respondents provided a positive answer, while a larger
number emphasized that such collaboration does not exist (61.4%). When asked, "Does your school
involve parents to collaborate more effectively in acquainting students with disasters?" 27.7% of
respondents answered yes, while 72% stated that such collaboration does not exist.
In the further course of the research, the focus was on exploring students' awareness of specific
disasters. The majority of respondents are most familiar with epidemics (M = 3.5), followed by floods
(M = 3.0), earthquakes (M = 2.9), fires (M = 2.8), landslides (M = 2.3), while explosions (M = 2.2) and
accidents (M = 2.0) are the least known (Figure 6).
Regarding students' attitudes towards the introduction of disaster-related subjects into the
curriculum, 57.4% believe it is unnecessary, while 42.6% of respondents support the inclusion of such
subjects. When asked, "Does your school collaborate with non-governmental organizations and civil
society to better inform students about disasters and the correct way to react?" more than half (75.5%)
answered negatively, while 24.5% gave a positive response. Similarly, when asked, "Does your school
collaborate with the local government's civil protection department to better inform students about
disasters and the correct way to react?" more than half responded negatively (69.4%), while 30.6%
indicated such collaboration exists.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

15
Figure 6. Students' awareness of specific disasters.
The research results indicate that respondents mostly agree that visual representation of real-life
situations contributes to a better understanding of how to behave during disasters (M = 3.8).
Following this assertion, the majority of respondents (M = 3.5) agree that training sessions on
evacuation procedures through simulations significantly enhance knowledge about disasters (Figure
7).
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

16
Figure 7. Assessment of students' perceptions on school-led training initiatives and disaster education
efforts.
Many respondents (M = 3.3) also agree that disaster preparedness education enables them to
gain new insights into occurrences, consequences, and potential disasters in their environment. The
smallest number of respondents agree with the statement that their school provides them with
knowledge and necessary information about disasters and the correct way to react in such situations
(M = 2.5), as well as with the idea that the school consistently conducts specific training for proper
reactions in emergencies (M = 2.3) (Figure 8).
Regarding learning about disasters through the content of other subjects, more than half of the
respondents (53.7%) stated that such a system does not exist in their school, while a certain number
of respondents (46.3%) confirmed that they acquired certain knowledge about disasters within the
framework of other subjects (Table 5).
Table 5. Overview of students' attitudes towards key variables in disaster education.
Variable Category N (%)
Collaboration between schools and professional institutions is important Yes 248 (38.2)
No 399 (61.4)
Involving parents in the process of informing students about disasters Yes 180 (27.7)
No 468 (72)
Learning about disasters studied through the content of other subjects Yes 301 (46.3)
No 349 (53.7)
Introducing subjects in the field of disasters Yes 277 (42.6)
No 373 (57.4)
Collaboration between our school and NGO organizations Yes 159 (24.5)
No 491 (75.5)
Collaboration between our school and civil protection departments Yes 199 (30.6)
No 451 (69.4)
3.2. Teachers' Insights on School-Based Disaster Risk Reduction and Safety
In further research, teachers were asked to evaluate attitudes related to knowledge about the
concept of disasters, preparedness for response, knowledge of preventive actions, response
procedures during disasters, and familiarity with the field of disaster risk management.
The results show that the majority of teachers agree that their knowledge about the concept,
occurrence, and consequences of disasters is high (M = 3.46). Additionally, a large number of teachers
stated that they have a high level of knowledge about security procedures in the event of a disaster
(M = 3.37). After these, to some extent, they agree that they know about preparedness for an adequate
response during disasters (M = 3.36). A smaller number of teachers agreed that they are very familiar
with preventive actions preventing disasters (3.32). The lowest-rated attitude is that they have a high
level of knowledge about the field of disaster risk management (M = 3.24).
Considering the subject of the research, teachers were asked to assess specific attitudes (Table
4). The highest number of teachers agreed with the statement that involving students in disaster
preparedness strengthens preparedness plans (M = 4.30). Additionally, a large number of teachers
agreed that students should be involved in disaster simulations (M = 4.29), as well as that involving
students in disaster preparedness can be beneficial for them (M = 4.27) (Table 6).
Table 6. Attitudes and practices towards student involvement in disaster preparedness activities.
Attitudes М SD
Involving students in disaster preparedness can be beneficial for them 4.30 0.98
Students should be included in disaster simulations and exercises 4.29 0.97
Involving students in disaster preparedness can be beneficial for them 4.27 0.98
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

17
Teachers want to prepare for the correct response in emergencies 4.25 4.17
Educate and train teachers to respond in emergencies 4.22 1.00
The safety level of students in schools is satisfactory 4.02 1.02
Students should be involved in the process of creating household disaster plans 4.01 1.04
I am sure that I want to involve students in the process of disaster preparedness 4.01 1.07
Motivate teachers to conduct evacuation exercises from classrooms 3.94 1.21
Students should be involved in the development of plans in schools 3.93 1.01
Teachers are familiar with the correct way to respond 3.63 1.15
The school facility is resistant to disasters 3.60 1.09
Students have a significant role in the disaster preparedness process 3.44 1.11
My school has the capacity or financial means to develop a Risk Assessment and Plan 3.41 1.14
Introduce the subject of Security Culture into the curriculum. 3.35 1.46
Techers largely wish to be prepared for the correct response in disasters (M = 4.25) and agree
that the education and training of teachers for responding in disasters are significant (M = 4.22). The
results show that teachers mostly agree with the statement that the safety level of students in schools
is satisfactory (M = 4.02), but they also agree that students should be involved in the process of
creating household disaster plans (M = 4.01) (Table 6).
A significant number of teachers agree that they are sure they want to involve students in
disaster preparedness (M = 4.01) and that it is very important to motivate teachers to conduct
evacuation exercises (M = 3.94). After this, teachers most agree with the statement that students
should be involved in the process of developing plans in schools (M = 3.93). Techers, to some extent,
indicated that they are familiar with the correct way to respond in emergencies (M = 3.63) and that
their school facility is resistant to disasters (M = 3.60) (Table 6).
After that, teachers rated the attitude that students play a significant role in the disaster
preparedness process (M = 3.44). To a lesser extent, teachers rated the attitude that their school has
the capacities and financial resources to develop a Disaster Risk Assessment and Protection Plan in
disasters (M = 3.41). Techers agreed with the importance of introducing the subject of Security Culture
into the curriculum (M = 3.35), but in contrast, they poorly rated the attitude that they are familiar
with legal obligations regarding disaster risk reduction in schools (M = 3.34). Also, a very small
number of teachers think that involving students in disaster preparedness will expose them to a high
risk (M = 2.71) (Table 6).
Figure 8. Implemented certain teaching units related to disaster risk reduction in schools.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

18
The research showed that the majority of teachers think it would be very useful for students to
gain knowledge about prevention and preparedness for disasters (82.5%), followed by problem-
solving and decision-making skills in disaster (50%), knowledge about the environment and
sustainability (44.5%), climate change (29.5%), and finally, ways to participate in local community
initiatives for disaster preparedness and response (28.5%) (Figure 8).
Regarding which institutions should be involved in educating students about disaster risk
reduction, the majority of teachers mentioned competent disaster management authorities (civil
protection departments) (73.5%), followed by schools (61%) and first responders services (52.5%),
local communities (42%), health authorities (40%), and non-governmental organizations and civil
society (12%).
The research showed that schools implement certain teaching units related to disaster risk
reduction, included in the curriculum on environmental and sustainability education (41.5%) and
climate change (31.5%). The most common activities that schools carry out in this area are exercises
and workshops (65%), and the majority of teachers (94%) believe that activities of this type (disaster
simulations and response and recovery training) can contribute to improving disaster preparedness.
Also, teachers, the majority, responded that they expect certain changes in the level of collaboration
between the school and competent authorities (79.5%), as well as changes in the level of collaboration
between the school and non-governmental organizations (57%).
When it comes to barriers/challenges to implementing student education on disaster risk
reduction in schools, the majority of teachers mentioned a lack of knowledge about disaster risk
reduction (60%), insufficient space in curricula and programs (43%), as well as a lack of budget and
staff. More than half of the teachers (64.5%) are interested in training in disaster risk management
and state that practical exercises would suit them best (40%). The results show that the majority of
teachers (37%) believe that their school is moderately prepared for natural disasters (Figure 9).
Figure 9. Barriers or challenges to implementing student education on disaster risk reduction in
schools.
Regarding recommendations for legal solutions to improve schools in the process of disaster risk
reduction, teachers have stated that it is necessary to legally regulate the introduction of training in
this area, legislate lectures in schools on this topic, and introduce subjects in this area into the
curriculum. As for recommendations regarding financial capacities to improve schools in the process
of disaster risk reduction, the majority of teachers have mentioned that the school should have a good
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

19
relationship with local self-government, which will allocate a specific budget for improving resilience
and preparedness for disasters, as well as allocate a certain amount of money from the state budget.
Table 7 depicts the perception of attitudes towards various steps in disaster planning among
teachers. Also, this table provides a detailed description of responses across different variables,
including involving students, informing students, not involving students, and uncertainty regarding
each step. The obtained results show that to a greater extent, teachers: believe that students should
be involved in conducting risk assessment and analysis (56.5%); support involving students in the
development of disaster scenarios (62.5%); emphasize the importance of involving students in
analyzing the severity and impact of disasters (51.5%); advocate for involving students in identifying
policies and strategies (49%); consider it necessary to involve students in projecting needs and
available resources (33.5%); support involving students in identifying steps to improve preparedness
(37.5%); and endorse the inclusion of students in testing disaster plans through simulations (58%).
General recommendations, in terms of enhancing the school's capacity in the process of disaster risk
reduction, according to respondents, mostly involve the necessity for everyone to participate in this
process, working on informing and educating teachers and students about this topic, and organizing
workshops, seminars, and training in this area (Table 5).
Table 7. Perception of attitudes towards disaster planning steps.
Variables Involving
students n (%)
Informing
students n (%)
Not involving
students n (%)
I am
not sure n
(%)
Conducting risk assessment and analysis 113 (56.5) 46 (23) 13 (6.5) 25 (12.5)
Development of disaster scenarios 125 (62.5) 42 (21) 8 (4) 22 (11)
Analysis of severity and impact of disasters 103 (51.5) 63 (31.5) 3 (1.5) 28 (14)
Identification of policies and strategies 98 (49) 58 (29) 19 (9.5) 22 (11)
Projection of needs and available resources 67 (33.5) 76 (38) 15 (7.5) 39 (19.5)
Identification of steps to improve preparedness 75 (37.5) 71 (35.5) 13 (6.5) 38 (19)
Testing the disaster plan through simulations 116 (58) 38 (19) 14 (7) 29 (14.5)
3.4. Influences of Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors on the Students' and Teachers' Insights on
School-Based Disaster Risk Reduction and Safety
The results of the one-way ANOVA revealed correlations between students' gender and the
subsequent variables related to disaster knowledge and preparedness: evacuation exercise impact (p
= 0.047) and practical examples visualization (p = 0.001) (Table 8). Nevertheless, no statistically
significant associations were discovered between gender and other variables associated with disaster
knowledge and preparedness. Further examination revealed that female students (M = 3.64; SD =
1.44) reported significantly higher ratings for attitudes that demonstrating evacuation exercises using
simulation significantly contributes to improving disaster knowledge compared to male students (M
= 3.41; SD = 1.42). Additionally, female students (M = 3.98; SD = 1.46) reported significantly higher
ratings for attitudes that visualizing practical examples contributes to a better understanding of
disaster response.
Upon conducting additional analyses, it has been established that there exist correlations
between students' age and following variables related to disaster knowledge and preparedness:
school emergency training (p = 0.001); disaster knowledge access (p = 0.001); disaster education impact
(p = 0.001); practical examples visualization (p = 0.003); disaster knowledge level (p = 0.001); disaster
response readiness (p = 0.001); preventive action awareness (p = 0.001); safety procedure awareness
(p = 0.001); disaster risk management awareness (p = 0.001) (Table 8).
Further investigation disclosed that 16-year-old students (M = 3.01; SD = 1.27) reported
significantly higher ratings for attitudes that the school consistently conducts specific training for
proper disaster response compared to 17-year-old students (M = 2.50; SD = 1.37) and 18-year-old
students (M = 2.13; SD = 1.28). Furthermore, it was found that 17-year-old students (M = 2.75; SD =
1.35) reported significantly higher ratings for attitudes that the school provides knowledge and
necessary information about disasters and proper response methods compared to 18-year-old
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

20
students (M = 2.75; SD = 1.35). Additionally, 17-year-old students (M = 3.45; SD = 1.37) reported
significantly higher ratings for attitudes that disaster education enables acquiring new insights into
the aetiology and phenomenology of disasters compared to 18-year-old students (M = 3.15; SD = 1.38).
Similarly, 17-year-old students (M = 3.88; SD = 1.24) reported significantly higher ratings for attitudes
that visualization of practical examples contributes to easier understanding of disaster response
compared to 16-year-old students (M = 3.76; SD = 1.23) and 18-year-old students (M = 3.72; SD = 1.33).
On the contrary, 18-year-old students (M = 3.36; SD = 1.08) reported significantly higher ratings for
their knowledge of disasters compared to 17-year-old students (M = 3.46; SD = 1.01). 16-year-old
students (M = 3.67; SD = 1.01) reported significantly higher ratings for preparedness for adequate
disaster response compared to 17-year-old (M = 3.49; SD = 1.06) and 18-year-old students (M = 3.19;
SD = 1.19). Additionally, it was revealed that 16-year-old students (M = 3.79; SD = 1.07) reported
significantly higher ratings for familiarity with safety procedures during disasters compared to 17-
year-old (M = 3.44; SD = 1.17) and 18-year-old students (M = 3.20; SD = 1.15). Furthermore, 16-year-
old students (M = 3.55; SD = 1.018) reported significantly higher ratings for understanding the field
of disaster risk management compared to 18-year-old students (M = 3.08; SD = 1.015).
Then, it has been determined that there exist correlations between students' achievement in
school and the following variables related to disaster knowledge and preparedness: school
emergency training (p = 0.001); disaster knowledge access (p = 0.001); disaster education impact (p =
0.023); evacuation exercise impact (p = 0.018); practical examples visualization (p = 0.001) (Table 8).
Additional examination unveiled that students with achieved good performance (M = 2.53; SD
= 1.27) reported significantly higher ratings for attitudes that the school consistently conducts certain
training for proper disaster response compared to students who achieved very good (M = 2.50; SD =
1.44) and excellent performance (M = 2.08; SD = 1.27). Conversely, students with very good
performance (M = 2.75; SD = 1.38) reported significantly higher ratings for enabling the acquisition of
knowledge about disasters in school compared to students who achieved good (M = 2.53; SD = 1.27)
and, finally, excellent performance (M = 2.28; SD = 1.33).
Students with achieved very good performance (M = 3.46; SD = 1.35) reported significantly
higher ratings for attitudes that the school provides knowledge about disasters and proper response
in such situations compared to students who achieved excellent (M = 3.32; SD = 1.44) and good
performance (M = 3.00; SD = 1.21). Similarly, students with achieved very good performance (M =
3.65; SD = 1.46) reported significantly higher ratings for attitudes that demonstrating evacuation
exercises significantly contributed to improving disaster knowledge compared to students who
achieved good performance (M = 3.20; SD = 1.39) (Table 8).
Finally, it has been confirmed that there is no statistically significant correlation between
students' parental employment and all variables related to disaster knowledge and preparedness
(Table 8).
Table 8. One-way ANOVA results examine the relationship between students' gender, age,
achievement in school, parental employment, and variables related to disaster knowledge and
preparedness.
Variables Gender Age
Achievement
in school
Parental
employment
F p F p F p F p
School emergency training 0.210 1.57 10.86 0.001** 5.81 0.001** 2.55 0.078
Disaster knowledge access 0.222 0.63 25.41 0.001** 6.94 0.001** 2.43 0.088
Disaster education impact 6.72 0.10 5.80 0.001** 3.18 0.023* 1.87 0.154
Evacuation exercise impact 3.95 0.047* 1.88 0.130 3.94 0.018* 0.63 0.530
Practical examples visualization 16.96 0.001** 4.58 0.003* 12.04 0.001** 0.50 0.606
Disaster knowledge level 4.43 0.036 9.98 0.001** 1.68 0.056 0.756 0.470
Disaster response readiness 0.161 0.688 10.54 0.001** 0.381 0.767 0.85 0.919
Preventive action awareness 0.666 0.415 7.82 0.001** 0.176 0.913 0.96 0.91
Safety procedure awareness 1.37 0.242 15.02 0.001** 1.07 0.358 0.80 0.44
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

21
Disaster risk management awareness 0.451 0.502 10.46 0.001** 1.26 0.286 0.100 0.90
* p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01.
The Chi-square test results examining the relationship between students' gender and factors in
disaster education engagement indicate a statistically significant association with the following
variable: disaster knowledge channels (p = 0.006) (Table 9). No statistically significant association was
found between gender and other variables related to disaster education engagement.
Further examination of the acquired results discloses that female students, to a greater extent
compared to male students, emphasize obtaining information about disasters through school (62.8%
compared to 37.2%), mass media (66.1% compared to 33.9%), internet usage (64.8% compared to
35.2%), and discussions with family members (59.6% compared to 40.4%). Conversely, male students,
to a greater extent compared to female students, acquire information about disasters through social
media and certain video games (64.3% compared to 35.7%). Discussion with family members is an
important source of information for both genders, with similar proportions (40.4% for males and
59.6% for females).
Concerning age, the Chi-square test results reveal a statistically significant association between
age and the following variables related to disaster education engagement: knowledge channels (p =
0.001); school collaboration (p = 0.001); parent involvement (p = 0.001); cross-subject teaching (p =
0.011); and civil protection collaborations (p = 0.001) (Table 9). However, no statistically significant
association was found between age and other variables related to disaster education engagement.
Extended scrutiny of the obtained findings unveils that students aged 17 and 18 predominantly
emphasize obtaining disaster-related information from school (39.5% and 37.2%), compared to
students aged 15 and 16 (7.0% and 16.3%). Furthermore, it has been established that older students
aged 18 and 17 are more likely (48% and 34.3%) to highlight their school's collaboration with
professional institutions to better acquaint students with disasters. Students aged 18 most commonly
(65.8%) indicate that their school does not involve parents in disaster education processes, while 17-
year-old students predominantly highlight parental involvement (40.6%) in such forms of
collaboration. Similarly, older students aged 18 and 17 more frequently (55.5% and 31.2%) point out
the inclusion of disaster-related content in other subjects compared to students aged 16 and 15 (8.3%
and 5.1%). Additionally, older students aged 18 and 17 are more likely (53.8% and 26.6%) to highlight
school cooperation with local government civil protection departments to enhance student education
on disasters, compared to students aged 15 and 16 (12.1% and 7.5%).
In further analyses, it has been found that there is a statistically significant association between
achievements in school and the following variables related to disaster education engagement:
knowledge channels (p = 0.001); school collaboration (p = 0.038); and parent involvement (p = 0.032)
(Table 9). Nevertheless, no statistically significant association was found between achievements in
school and other variables related to disaster education engagement.
A thorough analysis of the obtained results uncovers that students who achieve excellent
academic performance predominantly highlight obtaining information about disasters through
public media (52.1%), the internet (43.2%), and family discussions (30.3%). On the other hand, it has
been found that students who attain very good academic performance mostly rely on social media
and video games as sources of information about disasters (64.3%). Meanwhile, students with good
academic performance often depend on social media and video games (28.6%) and family discussions
(29.2%), while public media (13.2%) are less utilized in the process of obtaining information. These
results suggest that academic success can influence the choice of sources for information about
disasters. Importantly, it is noted that more successful students tend to use traditional media and
resources such as public media and family discussions, while less successful students often rely on
digital sources of information such as social media and video games.
Also, the Chi-square test results examining the relationship between students' parental
employment and factors in disaster education engagement indicate a statistically significant
association with the following variables: school collaboration (p = 0.001); parent involvement (p =
0.001); NGO and civil collaboration (p = 0.001); civil protection collaborations (p = 0.001) (Table 9).
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

22
Nevertheless, no statistically significant association was found between parental employment and
other variables related to disaster education engagement. Further examination of the gathered results
reveals that students whose both parents are employed rate the collaboration with specialized
institutions in disaster risk reduction the highest (52.8%). On the other hand, students with only one
employed parent give lower ratings to such collaboration (33.1%), while students whose parents are
unemployed rate it the lowest (14.1%).
Finally, the Chi-square test results examining the relationship between social media users and
factors in disaster education engagement indicate no statistically significant association with all
observed variables (Table 9).
Table 9. Chi-square test results examine the relationship between students' gender, age, achievement
in school, parental employment variables, and factors in disaster education engagement.
Variable Gender Age
Achievement
in School
Parental
Employment
Social media
users
p X2 p X2 p X2 p X2 p X2
Disaster knowledge channels 0.006* 14.59 0.001** 38.51 0.001** 46.01 0.062 14.87 0.205 5.92
School Collaboration 0.564 2.03 0.001** 40.16 0.179 12.64 0.038* 13.34 0.961 0.293
Parent involvement 0.527 1.28 0.001** 68.03 0.001** 32.22 0.032* 10.55 4.04 0.132
Cross-subject teaching 0.989 0.01 0.011* 11.13 0.032* 8.78 0.093 4.74 0.558 0.362
Disaster subject support 0.056 0.849 0.374 3.11 0.848 0.805 0.211 3.11 1.01 0.540
NGO and civil collaboration 0.273 1.20 0.240 4.2 0.61 1.77 0.21* 7.68 0.310 0.206
Civil protection collaborations 0.102 2.67 0.001** 40.82 0.39 3.00 0.05* 10.71 0.744 0.449
* p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01.
The results of the one-way ANOVA revealed correlations between teachers' education level and
the subsequent attitudes and practices towards student involvement in disaster preparedness
activities: involving students in disaster preparedness exposes them to high risk (p = 0.007); the school
facility is resistant to disasters (p = 0.016); the school has the capacity and financial means for planning
(p = 0.000); introduce the subject of security culture into the curriculum (p = 0.008) (Table 10).
Additional examination unveiled that teachers with completed vocational education (M = 3.10;
SD = 1.09) mostly perceive that involving students in disaster preparedness processes exposes them
to risk compared to teachers with completed university education (M = 2.79; SD = 1.12) and master's
degrees (M = 2.31; SD = 1.15). To the least extent (M = 3.46; SD = 1.05), teachers with completed
master's degrees highlight the resilience of the facility to disasters compared to teachers with
completed vocational education (M = 4.24; SD = 1.01). Furthermore, teachers with completed
university education (M = 3.37; SD = 1.17) and master's degrees (M = 3.06; SD = 1.00) least emphasize
that the school has the capacity and financial resources to develop appropriate documentation for
student protection and rescue in disasters compared to teachers with vocational education (M = 4.28;
SD = 1.03). Regarding the introduction of the subject of security culture, within which contents related
to risk reduction and response to disasters would be studied, the obtained results show that teachers
with completed university education mostly agree with this (M = 3.34; SD = 1.46), while teachers with
completed vocational education least agree with it (M = 3.00; SD = 1.52).
Upon conducting additional analyses, it has been established that there exist correlations
between teachers' marital status and following attitudes and practices towards student involvement
in disaster preparedness activities: students should be included in disaster simulations and exercises
(p = 0.001); teachers want to prepare for the correct response in emergencies (p = 0.000); educate and
train teachers for responding in emergencies (p = 0.000); the safety level of students in schools is
satisfactory (p = 0.000); involve students in the process of disaster preparedness (p = 0.000); motivate
teachers to conduct evacuation exercises from classrooms (p = 0.000); students have a significant role
in the disaster preparedness process (p = 0.004) (Table 10).
Further investigation revealed that married teachers (M = 4.42; SD = 0.79) predominantly assess
that students should be included in disaster drill simulations compared to divorced teachers (M =
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

23
4.86; SD = 0.65) and widowers (M = 4.38; SD = 0.55). Additionally, it was found that married teachers
are more inclined (M = 4.47; SD = 1.65) towards preparing for proper disaster response compared to
single teachers (M = 3.55; SD = 1.58) or divorced (M = 3.25; SD = 1.45).
In contrast, divorced teachers (M = 4.92; SD = 1.01) predominantly believe that educating and
training teachers for disaster response is necessary compared to married teachers (M = 4.36; SD = 1.21)
and single teachers (M = 3.68; SD = 1.36). Similarly, divorced teachers primarily (M = 4.57; SD = 0.53)
emphasize that the level of student safety from disasters is satisfactory compared to single teachers
(M = 3.66; SD = 1.08) and married teachers (M = 4.19; SD = 1.07). Divorced teachers (M = 2.86; SD =
1.09) predominantly advocate for involving students in disaster preparedness processes compared to
married teachers (M = 2.43; SD = 1.01) and single teachers (M = 2.43; SD = 1.01). Married teachers (M
= 4.14; SD = 1.42) primarily emphasize the need to motivate teachers to conduct education and drills
for disasters compared to single teachers (M = 2.43; SD = 1.01) and divorced teachers (M = 2.43; SD =
1.01).
Table 10. One-way ANOVA results examine the relationship between teachers' education level,
marital status, years of work experience, and attitudes and practices towards student involvement in
disaster preparedness activities.
Variables
Education
level
Marital
status
F p F p
Involving students in disaster preparedness can be beneficial 0.368 0.693 2.439 0.066
Students should be included in disaster simulations and exercises 0.018 0.982 5.514 0.001*
Involving students in disaster preparedness exposes them to high-risk 5.12 0.007* 1.688 0.171
Teachers want to prepare for the correct response in emergencies 1.534 0.219 8.255 0.000**
Educate and train teachers to respond in emergencies 0.763 0.467 7.501 0.000**
The safety level of students in schools is satisfactory 2.519 0.083 8.025 0.000**
Students should be involved in the process of creating disaster plans 0.360 0.698 1.705 0.051
Involve students in the process of disaster preparedness 0.673 0.511 13.626 0.000**
Motivate teachers to conduct evacuation exercises from classrooms 2.306 0.102 7.186 0.000**
Students should be involved in the development of plans in schools 0.538 0.585 .615 0.607
Teachers are familiar with the correct way to respond 1.882 0.155 5.053 0.002*
The school facility is resistant to disasters 4.214 0.016* 1.174 0.321
Students have a significant role in the disaster preparedness process 0.825 0.440 4.597 0.004*
School has the capacity and financial means for planning 12.787 0.000** 1.622 0.186
Introduce the subject of Security Culture into the curriculum 5.042 0.008* 2.160 0.094
* p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01.
According to the results of Pearson's correlation, it was found that there is a statistically
significant correlation between the years of teaching experience of teachers and the school facility
being resistant to disasters (r = 0.024). On the other hand, the results of Pearson's correlation indicate
that there is no statistically significant association between years of teaching experience of teachers
and the following variables: student involvement in disaster preparedness; student participation in
disaster simulations; student involvement high high-risk exposure; teacher emergency response
preparedness; teacher emergency training; student school safety satisfaction; student involvement
plan creation; student involvement preparedness process; teacher evacuation exercise motivation;
student plan development involvement; teacher correct response familiarity; school facility disaster
resistance; student disaster preparedness role; school planning capacity; and security culture
curriculum introduction (Table 11).
In further analyses, it was found that with an increase in teachers' years of work experience, the
rating of the resilience of school facilities to various disasters also increases. The obtained result could
be related to the fact that with increasing years of work experience, teachers gain a deeper
understanding of the needs and requirements for the resilience of school facilities to disasters.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

24
Furthermore, it can be assumed that more experienced teachers have developed skills in identifying
security risks related to the resilience of the school infrastructure itself and other risks to both teachers
and students.
Table 11. Pearson’s correlation results for the relationship between teachers' attitudes and practices
towards student involvement in disaster preparedness activities and their years of work experience.
Variables Years of work experience
Sig. r
Involving students in disaster preparedness can be beneficial 0.236 −0.085
Students should be included in disaster simulations and exercises 0.635 −0.034
Involving students in disaster preparedness exposes them to high-risk 0.068 0.130
Teachers want to prepare for the correct response in emergencies 0.918 0.008
Educate and train teachers to respond in emergencies 0.588 −0.039
The safety level of students in schools is satisfactory 0.406 0.059
Students should be involved in the process of creating disaster plans 0.828 −0.016
Involve students in the process of disaster preparedness 0.473 −0.051
Motivate teachers to conduct evacuation exercises from classrooms 0.346 0.067
Students should be involved in the development of plans in schools 0.272 0.079
Teachers are familiar with the correct way to respond 0.383 0.062
The school facility is resistant to disasters 0.024* 0.160
Students have a significant role in the disaster preparedness process 0.899 0.009
My school has the capacity and financial means for planning 0.266 0.079
Introduce the subject of Security Culture into the curriculum 0.305 0.073
Independent samples t-test results for teachers between gender and the variables on attitudes
and practices towards student involvement in disaster preparedness activities, indicate that there is
a statistically significant association with the following variables: student safety satisfactory (p =
0.009); students in plan creation (p = 0.018); involve students in preparedness (p = 0.019); subject of
security culture (p = 0.006); teachers know response (p = 0.045). Alternatively, there was no
statistically meaningful correlation between gender and the remaining variables: students in disaster
preparedness; student inclusion in simulations; student inclusion, high risk; students in prep.
beneficial; school capacity for planning; school facility resilient; educate teachers for disasters;
teachers preparedness for emergencies; motivate teachers in drills (Table 12).
After a more thorough investigation and analysis of additional results, it was found that female
teachers (M = 4.33) rate the level of student safety in schools from disasters higher compared to male
teachers (M = 4.18). Furthermore, it was determined that female teachers (M = 4.03) give higher ratings
to involving students in the process of developing school-level disaster protection and rescue plans
compared to male teachers (M = 3.63). Similarly, female teachers (M = 4.10) give higher ratings to
involve students in school-level disaster preparedness processes compared to male teachers (M =
3.71). Regarding the introduction of the subject of Security Culture, which encompasses teaching
content related to the reduction of risks from various natural and man-made disasters, it was found
that female respondents (M = 3.51) are more supportive of its introduction compared to male
respondents (M = 2.86). Additionally, it was found that female teachers (M = 4.41) rate the familiarity
and training of teachers for proper response during natural or man-made disasters in schools higher
compared to male teachers (M = 3.70) (Table 12).
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

25
Table 12. Independent samples t-test results for teachers between gender and the variables on
attitudes and practices towards student involvement in disaster preparedness activities.
Variable F t Sig.
(2-Tailed) df Male
M (SD)
Female
M (SD)
Students in disaster preparedness 0.079 −0.754 0.362 198 3.32 (1.033) 3.54 (1.118)
Student inclusion in simulations 0.647 −1.780 0.077 198 4.08 (1.057) 4.36 (0.934)
Student inclusion with high risk 1.208 −0.875 0.273 198 3.76 (1.109) 4.09 (1.052)
Students in preparedness beneficial 0.575 0.870 0.385 198 4.16 (1.028) 4.30 (0.967)
Student safety satisfactory 0.664 −2.656 0.009* 198 4.18 (0.972) 4.33 (0.985)
Students in plan creation 6.190 −2.393 0.018* 198 3.63 (1.185) 4.03 (0.934)
Involve students in preparedness 1.842 −2.387 0.019* 198 3.71 (1.099) 4.10 (1.012)
The subject of Security Culture 3.214 −2.760 0.006* 198 2.86 (1.339) 3.51 (1.469)
School capacity for planning 0.73 −0.666 0.506 198 3.10 (1.195) 3.51 (1.113)
School facility resilient 0.575 −1.563 0.120 198 3.39 (1.077) 3.67 (1.100
Educate teachers about disasters 0.029 −1.776 0.077 198 4.00 (1.118) 4.29 (0.956)
Teachers preparedness for disasters 0.578 −0.906 0.366 198 3.35 (1.011) 3.73 (1.188)
Teachers know response 2.680 −2.021 0.045* 198 3.70 (.777) 4.41 (4.739)
Motivate teachers in drills 0.325 −0.953 0.570 198 3.80 (1.323) 3.99 (1.183)
* p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01.
4. Discussion
In this paper, we present the results of a quantitative research aimed at exploring how
demographic and socio-economic factors collectively influence students' perceptions (H1-H8) and
shape teachers' attitudes towards school-based disaster risk reduction (H1-H5). The findings from
the multivariate regression analyses reveal that age, gender, and marital status emerge as significant
predictors across different aspects of students' and teachers' perceptions regarding school-based
disaster risk reduction. These aspects include awareness of disasters, participation in disaster
education activities, attitudes towards disaster risk reduction education, and improvement of access
to disaster information, among others. Discussion divided into two sections for conciseness and ease
of follow-up: teachers' and students' perspectives on school-based disaster risk reduction.
4.1. Discussion Related to Students' Insights on School-Based Disaster Risk Reduction and Safety
The research results show that the majority of respondents primarily acquire knowledge
through internet searches, while the least common method is through social and video games.
Conversations with family members and mass media are also mentioned as sources of information
about disasters. Potential explanations for these results could include the availability and accessibility
of the internet as the primary source of information in today's digital age [30,31]. Internet searches
provide quick and easy access to various sources of knowledge about disasters, including news and
guidance for action [18,19]. On the other hand, social and video games may not be as common sources
of information about disasters due to their entertainment nature [145], while conversations with
family members and mass media can provide information passed down through generations or
obtained through regular news and safety programs [146,147].
When asked about the collaboration between schools and professional institutions and the
involvement of parents in disaster education, a significant percentage of respondents reported a lack
of such collaboration. However, there is general awareness of certain disasters, with epidemics being
the most well-known and accidents such as fires being the least known among respondents. It can be
said that schools and parents may not fully grasp the importance of collaboration in disaster
education or may prioritize other educational initiatives over disaster preparedness [41–47].
Additionally, there may be limitations in terms of time, finances, or staff for establishing and
maintaining effective collaboration in disaster education [48,49]. Furthermore, communication and
coordination challenges between schools, professional institutions, and parents may lead to a lack of
effective collaboration in disaster education initiatives [50,51].
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

26
Regarding awareness of specific disasters, it is assumed that epidemics and other widely spread
disasters often receive extensive media coverage, leading to greater public awareness and knowledge
among respondents [52–54]. Moreover, students may have personal experiences or know someone
who has experienced epidemics, which could contribute to their familiarity with such disasters [55–
58]. Certainly, schools or community organizations may prioritize educating students and families
about certain types of disasters, leading to increased awareness among respondents [3,59].
As for attitudes towards the introduction of subjects related to disasters into the curriculum, a
significant portion of respondents believe it is unnecessary. Similarly, there is limited collaboration
between schools and non-governmental organizations or civil society, as well as local authorities
responsible for civil protection, in informing students about disasters and proper response. Students
may not fully realize the importance of disaster education and the significance of preparedness for
such situations, leading them to consider the introduction of such subjects unnecessary [60,61].
Schools and teaching staff may prioritize other areas of education or programs over disaster
education, resulting in a lack of support for the introduction of such subjects or collaboration [62,63].
Respondents generally believe that visual representations and training sessions on evacuation
procedures through simulations contribute to better understanding disaster response. However,
there is a perception of a lack of knowledge provision and specific training in schools for proper
reactions in emergencies. When it comes to learning about disasters through the content of other
subjects, most respondents reported a lack of such integrations in their school curriculum, suggesting
a potential area for improvement in disaster education initiatives. It is possible that school
administration and teachers may not fully grasp the importance of integrating disaster education into
the curriculum [64,65]. The lack of support or guidance may hinder teachers from integrating this
topic into their lesson plans [46,66,67].
It has been found that female students showed higher ratings of attitudes regarding the impact
of evacuation exercises and visualization of practical examples on disaster knowledge. These results
can be explained by a higher level of female socialization or their encouragement towards greater
attention to various aspects of natural and man-made hazards [67,148]. They may also exhibit a
greater inclination and interest in group exercises and activities involving information exchange and
collaboration [149,150]. Thus, various cultural factors and societal expectations may influence
students' attitudes towards education and preparations for disasters [87,151].
Further analysis of the obtained results reveals that female students, to a greater extent
compared to male students, emphasize obtaining information about disasters through school, mass
media, internet usage, and discussions with family members. Conversely, male students, to a greater
extent compared to female students, acquire information about disasters through social media and
certain video games. These findings can be explained through a variety of socio-cultural factors,
preferences, and information-gathering habits on one hand [152–154], and differences in risk
perception and priorities on the other [155,156]. Specifically, female students may show a greater
inclination towards traditional sources of information such as school, mass media, and discussions
with family members. This may be due to their higher attention to reliable and verified sources of
information, as well as greater openness to conversation and discussion within the family [157]. On
the contrary, male students may prefer digital media and video games as sources of entertainment
and information. Additionally, female students may perceive disasters as a more serious threat and
thus are more motivated to inform themselves through various channels [99]. Conversely, male
students may have a different approach and interest in disaster-related topics, perhaps being more
attracted to interactive and visual aspects provided by quick and dynamic entertainment, along with
the possibility of gaining information [158].
Additionally, significant differences in attitudes and perceptions regarding disaster knowledge
and preparedness among students of different ages are noticeable. Specifically, students who are 16
years old tend to give higher ratings to attitudes related to school training on disaster response and
familiarity with safety procedures, while students who are 17 years old tend to give higher ratings to
attitudes related to the impact of disaster education and visualization of practical examples.
Furthermore, students who are 18 years old are inclined to give higher ratings in their perception of
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

27
their knowledge about disasters and readiness to respond to disasters. According to the obtained
results, these differences may be attributed to various stages of emotional, cognitive, and social
development [159] that occur during adolescence, as well as the specific needs and experiences of
students at different ages [89]. Moreover, it can be argued that 16-year-old students may be more
focused on practical skills and procedures that prepare them for possible disaster situations [21]. In
contrast, 18-year-old students may be more focused on understanding and confidence in their ability
to cope with disasters [97]. Additionally, it can be noted that older students may be more influenced
by societal norms and expectations, which can affect their perception of knowledge and preparedness
for disasters [160]. Peer influences and behavior modeling may play a greater role in shaping the
attitudes of older adolescents [161].
Further analysis of the obtained findings reveals that students aged 17 and 18 predominantly
highlight obtaining information about disasters from school, compared to students aged 15 and 16.
Similarly, they more frequently indicate the inclusion of disaster-related content in other subjects and
give higher ratings to the collaboration of the school with local government departments of civil
protection to enhance student education on disasters. Additionally, they more commonly emphasize
their school's collaboration with professional institutions to better acquaint students with disasters.
Furthermore, students aged 18 most often mention that their school does not involve parents in
disaster education processes, while 17-year-olds predominantly highlight parental involvement in
such forms of collaboration. Such results can be understood through the explanation that older
students may have a higher level of awareness of the importance of disaster preparedness [162], as
well as the significance of obtaining information about disasters through the school system. As they
become more mature, they may prioritize topics relevant to their personal safety both in and out of
school [98]. Older students may perceive a greater integration of disaster-related themes across
various subjects, which can contribute to their higher ratings of collaboration between the school and
local government departments of civil protection [163,164]. They may be more informed about such
collaborations and recognize their value in providing comprehensive disaster education [165].
Regarding academic achievement, certain correlations have been identified indicating that
students with better academic performance tended to give higher ratings to attitudes related to school
training on disaster response, acquiring knowledge about disasters at school, and perception of the
school's effectiveness in providing knowledge about disasters and appropriate responses. These
results suggest that students with better academic performance may demonstrate a higher level of
motivation and engagement throughout their schooling [125]. As a result, they may be more attentive
to the disaster training and education provided by the school, leading to more positive attitudes
towards it [22]. Additionally, they may have stronger cognitive abilities, enabling them to better
understand complex concepts and appreciate the value and importance of disaster preparedness
education [126]. Certainly, they may also exhibit a higher level of responsibility and thus recognize
the importance of disaster preparedness [127]. In contrast, concerning parental employment, no
statistically significant correlation was found with any variables related to disaster knowledge and
preparedness.
Furthermore, it has been found that students achieving outstanding academic results mainly
emphasize obtaining information about disasters through public media, the internet, and discussions
with family members. On the other hand, students achieving very good academic results tend to use
social media and video games as sources of information about disasters. Additionally, students with
good academic results often rely on social media and video games, as well as discussions with family
members, while public media are less utilized in the process of obtaining information. It is important
to note that more successful students often use traditional media and resources such as public media
and discussions with family members, whereas less successful students often use digital sources of
information such as social media and video games. Observed patterns can be explained by various
factors influencing students' behavior in seeking information about disasters [166]. Students
achieving outstanding academic results may prioritize reliable and credible sources of information
[167]. Their academic success may also reflect their ability to critically evaluate information and
effectively use it in their studies [168]. Conversely, students achieving very good academic results
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

28
may find social media and video games more engaging and accessible, leading them to rely on these
digital platforms for information about disasters [169]. Additionally, differences in media usage
among students with good academic results may reflect varying levels of media literacy and critical
thinking skills. In contrast, students with lower academic achievement may rely more on digital
sources without fully considering their reliability or accuracy [170]. Furthermore, the results of the
examination of the relationship between the use of social media and variables related to engagement
in disaster education do not show a statistically significant association with all observed variables.
4.2. Discussion Related to Teachers' Insights on School-Based Disaster Risk Reduction and Safety
The discussion reveals several key findings regarding teachers' attitudes and practices related to
disaster risk reduction in schools. Generally, teachers express a strong desire to be prepared for the
correct response during disasters and to involve students in disaster preparedness. They also largely
agree that the safety level of students in schools is satisfactory, but they recognize the importance of
involving students in developing household disaster plans. Teachers who express a strong desire to
be prepared for disaster response are likely to have undergone appropriate training [6], participated
in workshops dedicated to disaster preparedness [7], have awareness of the potential consequences
of future disasters [8], and recognize the necessity of building better societal preparedness [9].
Additionally, teachers emphasize the importance of student involvement in various aspects of
disaster preparedness, such as developing disaster scenarios, analyzing the severity and impact of
disasters, identifying policies and strategies, and testing disaster plans through simulations. This
highlights a proactive approach to involving students in efforts to reduce disaster risk. These results
indicate the recognition of the value of empowering and involving students in addressing security
issues [38]. Furthermore, teachers may believe that involving students in the development of disaster
plans and simulations not only enhances their preparedness but also fosters a sense of responsibility
and resilience among students [10,11].
Regarding educational content, teachers prioritize teaching units related to disaster risk
reduction within the curriculum, especially in the areas of environmental education and
sustainability, as well as climate change. They also recognize the value of activities such as exercises
and workshops in improving disaster preparedness. It can be said that prioritizing teaching units
related to disaster risk reduction within the curriculum reflects a conscious effort to integrate disaster
preparedness education into broader educational objectives, such as environmental education and
sustainability [39]. This indicates the recognition of the interconnectedness of disaster risk with
broader social and environmental issues [40].
Teachers acknowledge the importance of collaboration between schools and relevant authorities
and organizations in disaster risk reduction efforts, expressing expectations for increased
collaboration in the future. They also support the involvement of various stakeholders, including
competent disaster management authorities, first responder services, local communities, and non-
governmental organizations, in educating students about disaster risk reduction. It seems that
teachers recognize that collaborative relationships can facilitate access to resources, expertise, and
support systems necessary for effective disaster preparedness initiatives in schools [96]. By engaging
various stakeholders, teachers can leverage community resources and knowledge to enhance
students' understanding of disaster risks [171].
The obtained results show that the majority of teachers believe that their knowledge of disasters,
as well as their familiarity with safety procedures for responding to such situations, is at a higher
level. They somewhat agree that they are familiar with preparations for an adequate response during
disasters. However, a smaller number of respondents stated that they are very familiar with
preventive measures to prevent disasters. Potential explanations for these results could include
various factors, such as the level of training and awareness programs provided to teachers regarding
disaster preparedness [6]. It is possible that teachers have undergone comprehensive training or
updates on disaster management protocols, leading to their perceived higher knowledge in this area
[22]. The lowest rating pertains to teachers' perception of a high level of knowledge about disaster
risk management. Such lower ratings regarding preventive measures may indicate a lack of training
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

29
or awareness in this specific aspect of disaster management [172]. Regarding specific attitudes related
to the research topic, respondents evaluated their agreement with certain statements. The highest
level of agreement was recorded for the statement that involving students in disaster preparedness
strengthens preparedness plans. Additionally, a significant number of respondents agreed that
students should participate in disaster simulations, as well as that such involvement can be beneficial
for students. As for specific attitudes, the high level of agreement among teachers regarding the
benefits of involving students in disaster preparedness activities may reflect the recognition of the
importance of proactive measures in ensuring school safety [91]. Furthermore, positive attitudes
towards involving students in disaster simulations suggest the recognition of the value of practical
experiences in enhancing students' preparedness for emergencies [12,13].
After a more thorough investigation, it was observed that female teachers exhibit certain
differences in perception compared to their male counterparts regarding student safety and disaster
preparedness in schools. Specifically, female teachers often rate the level of student safety in schools
in the event of disasters higher compared to male teachers. These findings may stem from traditional
social norms and roles associated with care and protection [77]. Additionally, it is possible that they
possess higher emotional intelligence or levels of empathy, making them more sensitive to student
safety issues [78]. Furthermore, it can be assumed that female teachers perceive greater responsibility
for student well-being and consider the safety dimension an important part of their profession [79].
Additionally, it was found that female teachers are more inclined to involve students in the
process of developing school-level disaster protection and rescue plans compared to male teachers.
This suggests that female teachers may value student involvement and empowerment in disaster
preparedness initiatives more [80], as well as support a more inclusive approach to education, which
entails involving all students in decision-making and planning processes [81].
Similarly, female teachers also give higher ratings to involving students in the processes of
disaster preparedness at the school level, as well as to introducing the subject of Security Culture,
which would encompass teaching content related to reducing the risks of disasters, compared to male
teachers. All of this clearly indicates a potential gender difference in attitudes towards integrating
disaster preparedness education into the curriculum [81]. Undoubtedly, this can have long-term
benefits for the school community in terms of raising awareness of disaster risks and readiness for
their potential consequences [82]. Therefore, it is important to support further research and
implementation of initiatives that promote inclusivity and preventive action in the field of school
safety [83].
Ultimately, female teachers rate the familiarity and training of teachers for proper response
during natural or human-induced disasters in schools higher compared to male teachers. This result
suggests that female teachers may have more social interactions with colleagues and students, which
can increase their awareness of the need for disaster training and preparedness [173]. Additionally,
they may have a broader and deeper professional network that provides access to a greater number
of information and potential resources in the field of disaster training. And of course, they may have
experienced more negative personal experiences related to disasters, which could make them more
aware [117].
The results indicate significant correlations between teachers' levels of education and their
attitudes and practices regarding student involvement in disaster preparedness activities. Namely, it
was found that teachers with different levels of education have different perspectives on these issues.
Teachers with completed vocational education express greater concern about exposing students to
risk during disaster preparedness activities, while those with higher academic qualifications, such as
master's degrees, perceive greater resilience of school facilities to disasters. Similarly, teachers with
vocational education are more likely to believe that the school has the capacity and financial resources
for planning in case of disaster compared to those with university or master's degrees. Furthermore,
there is a difference of opinion regarding the introduction of a safety culture into the curriculum,
with teachers holding master's degrees being more supportive of this initiative compared to their
colleagues.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

30
Differences in attitudes among teachers with different levels of education may result from their
varying experiences, expertise, and training in disaster management [174]. Teachers with higher
education levels may have a deeper understanding of risk management principles and the
possibilities for protecting school facilities [103]. Additionally, they might have greater trust in
institutional support mechanisms, such as legal regulations and professional assistance, which could
make them more optimistic about the resilience of school facilities to disasters [120]. On the other
hand, teachers with lower levels of education may have less experience and training in this area,
which could result in greater concern about potential risks for students [175].
Further analysis has revealed correlations between the marital status of teachers and their
attitudes towards involving students in disaster preparedness activities. Married teachers tend to
prioritize involving students in disaster drills and exercises, preparing for disaster response, and
encouraging fellow teachers to conduct evacuation drills. On the other hand, divorced teachers
express stronger beliefs in the necessity of educating and training teachers for disaster response and
are more inclined to involve students in disaster preparedness processes. It can be emphasized that
married teachers, likely relying on their family responsibilities and experiences, prioritize student
safety and preparedness by advocating for their active participation in disaster drills and simulations
[121]. Their belief in the importance of student involvement may stem from a desire to ensure the
well-being of the entire school community, reflecting a sense of duty towards protecting the students
under their care [122]. Conversely, divorced teachers, perhaps considering their personal experiences
or seeking to enhance school safety in light of potential risks, emphasize the necessity of educating
and training teachers for disaster response [88].
Further analysis revealed that as teachers' years of work experience increase, so does their
assessment of the resilience of school facilities to different disasters. This finding could be attributed
to the notion that as teachers accumulate more years of experience, they develop a deeper
understanding of the necessary measures for ensuring the resilience of school facilities to disasters
[88]. Moreover, it is plausible to assume that more experienced teachers have honed their ability to
identify security risks associated with the resilience of school infrastructure and other potential
hazards affecting both teachers and students [118].
After conducting a more thorough investigation and analyzing additional results, it became
evident that female teachers generally perceive a higher level of student safety in schools from
disasters compared to their male counterparts. Additionally, female teachers tend to give higher
ratings to involving students in the development of school-level disaster protection and rescue plans,
as well as in disaster preparedness processes, in comparison to male teachers. Moreover, female
respondents are more supportive of the introduction of Security Culture subject, which covers
teaching content related to the reduction of risks from various disasters, compared to male
respondents. Furthermore, female teachers rate the familiarity and training of teachers for proper
response during disasters in schools higher than male teachers.
The obtained results unequivocally indicate observed differences between female and male
participants regarding various aspects and attitudes and practices towards student involvement in
disaster preparedness activities. Overall, female teachers provided higher ratings compared to male
teachers regarding the level of student safety in schools, active involvement of students in the process
of developing disaster protection and rescue plans, involvement in disaster preparedness processes,
and support for the introduction of the subject of Security Culture. Higher ratings can be explained
by potentially heightened awareness of disaster risks, nurturing instincts, emphasis on collaborative
and participatory learning methods regarding disasters, clear prioritization of acquiring and
improving relevant skills and knowledge related to disaster response, deeper understanding of the
importance of comprehensive disaster education, recognition of the value of incorporating topics
related to disaster risk reduction into curricula, and acknowledgement of the long-term benefits of
promoting a culture of resilience among students [124,176,177]. Such findings necessitate a gender
perspective in initiatives aimed at developing more inclusive and effective strategies for integrated
disaster risk reduction in schools [178].
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

31
Regarding the limitations of the conducted research, the following have been identified: a) the
study was conducted only in secondary schools in the western Morava River basin in Serbia, which
may limit the general applicability of the results; b) although the sample size was quite large (650
students and 200 teachers), the research was conducted in only 10 out of a total of 18 municipalities
in the western Morava River basin. This may lead to limitations in the representativeness of the
sample for the overall population; c) the research used a multistage random sampling method, but
only certain municipalities and schools were included in the study. This may affect the generalization
of the results to a wider population; d) although the survey questions were structured and designed
to explore specific aspects of disaster risk reduction education in schools, there is a possibility that
some questions did not sufficiently cover all relevant aspects or were too general; e) although the
survey questionnaires were distributed among students and teachers in certain schools in the western
Morava River basin in Serbia, the sample may not have been sufficiently representative of the entire
population of students and teachers across Serbia; f) respondents answered questions during face-to-
face interactions in schools, which may lead to potential response biases due to social norms or
expectations.
5. Recommendations
Based on the findings, the following recommendations are proposed: a) schools should enhance
collaboration with disaster risk reduction entities and forces to transfer knowledge, experience, and
all relevant information about disasters; b) develop mechanisms for actively involving all parents in
various disaster education processes, especially to create synergy between schools and families in
enhancing society's resilience to disasters; c) introduce the subject of safety culture to inform students
about all potential risks and protection opportunities from various natural and anthropogenic
disasters; d) integrate disaster themes into other existing subjects to adequately cover this topic within
the current curriculum; e) promote the use of online resources for disaster education among students;
f) implement student training programs for proper and safe disaster response, including evacuation
simulations and visualization of practical examples, to enhance understanding and readiness for
disaster response; g) conduct evacuation drills and disaster simulation exercises to actively involve
students in preparation processes and develop response skills; h) educate and train teachers for
disaster education and proper disaster response; i) enable students to participate in the development
of disaster protection plans to strengthen their personal responsibility and risk awareness; j) develop
and strengthen collaboration with relevant disaster management authorities for more effective
student education; k) increase students' awareness of legal obligations related to disaster risk
reduction to promote responsibility and compliance with regulations; l) conduct education on proper
disaster response and increase awareness of risks, encouraging the development of personal and
family disaster plans; m) ensure inclusivity in disaster preparedness processes, considering the
diverse needs and abilities of students; n) organize additional training for teachers, including topics
such as first aid, student safety during disasters, and the latest information on community-facing
risks; o) increase the budget for acquiring modern equipment, materials for teachers and students,
organizing field visits, and practical exercises. Additionally, allocate part of the budget to promote
educational programs on disaster risk reduction through campaigns and workshops; p) intensify
collaboration with intervention and rescue services and non-governmental organizations, including
regular meetings, joint exercises, and sharing resources and information on disasters; q) form local
working groups or councils involving representatives from educational institutions and relevant
organizations to further advance disaster risk reduction; r) integrate practical exercises into the
regular curriculum, focusing on realistic scenarios that may occur in a specific community; s) besides
organizing workshops and seminars, it is important to develop online platforms that enable
continuous access to information on disaster risk reduction; t) engage local disaster risk management
experts to share their knowledge with teachers and students; u) implement a monitoring and
evaluation system for disaster risk reduction education programs; v) encourage schools to join local
initiatives for disaster risk reduction; w) promote the formation of local support networks involving
schools, local government representatives, non-governmental organizations, and other relevant
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

32
stakeholders for resource sharing, information exchange, and best practices; x) support innovation in
approaches to educating students and teachers about disaster risk reduction through various
technologies and other interactive learning methods; y) develop collaboration with non-
governmental organizations and civil society to improve informal and additional education beyond
the school curriculum on disasters.
The recommendations resulting from the conducted research aim to contribute to the creation
of a more effective disaster education system, increasing the level of knowledge, awareness, and
preparedness of students for adequate responses to various natural and man-made disasters. These
recommendations focus on enhancing: methods of disaster risk reduction education, awareness
among students and teachers about the consequences of disasters, collaboration, safety culture,
integration of themes, online educational resources, disaster training and exercises, etc. Targeting
various aspects of the educational process, these recommendations provide a comprehensive
approach to raising awareness and preparedness for disasters within the education system.
6. Conclusions
In this paper, we present insights from a quantitative study examining the collective influence
of demographic and socio-economic factors on students' perceptions and teachers' attitudes toward
school-based disaster risk reduction. The findings highlight the importance of age, gender, and
marital status as significant predictors affecting various aspects of disaster risk reduction perceptions
among both students and teachers.
Overall, teachers demonstrate a strong commitment to disaster preparedness and express a
desire to actively involve students in disaster risk reduction initiatives. They recognize the
importance of collaboration between schools and relevant authorities and organizations in advancing
disaster education and risk reduction efforts. Teachers prioritize instructional units related to disaster
risk reduction within the curriculum, emphasizing the integration of disaster education into broader
educational goals such as environmental education and sustainability. They value practical activities
such as drills and disaster simulations in improving disaster preparedness among students.
Additionally, differences in attitudes and practices among teachers based on their education and
marital status were identified.
On the other hand, it was found that the majority of students primarily use internet searches as
the main source of information on disasters, while social media and video games are significantly
less utilized for this purpose. Family discussions and mass media are also mentioned as significant
sources of information. Regarding collaboration between schools, professional institutions, and
parents in disaster education, the results indicate a lack of such collaboration, although there is
general awareness of certain types of disasters. Moreover, epidemics were found to be the most
recognized among respondents, while accidents such as fires were the least recognized. Regarding
attitudes toward the introduction of disaster-related subjects into the curriculum, a significant
number of respondents consider it unnecessary. Lastly, differences in attitudes and perceptions
among students of different age groups and academic achievement levels were identified. Based on
the extensive array of recommendations provided, it is evident that a comprehensive approach to
disaster risk reduction education is essential for fostering resilience within communities.
The findings underscore the imperative for schools to not only integrate disater risk reduction
into their curricula but also to actively engage with various stakeholders to ensure effective
implementation. Collaboration with disaster risk reduction entities, including intervention and
rescue services, non-governmental organizations, and local government representatives, emerges as
a key strategy for transferring knowledge and resources. Incorporating disaster themes into existing
subjects, promoting online resources for education, and conducting practical exercises such as
evacuation drills are crucial steps towards enhancing students' understanding and readiness for
disaster response. Moreover, empowering students to participate in the development of disaster
protection plans fosters personal responsibility and risk awareness.
Teacher education and training are paramount in ensuring the effective delivery of disaster risk
reduction education, including topics such as first aid and student safety during disasters.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

33
Additionally, initiatives to ensure inclusivity in preparedness processes and to address the diverse
needs of students are fundamental for equitable resilience-building efforts. Allocating sufficient
budgetary resources for modern equipment, materials, and educational programs underscores the
commitment to prioritizing DRR within the educational framework. Moreover, promoting local
initiatives, forming support networks, and leveraging innovative approaches are vital for sustaining
momentum in DRR education beyond the school curriculum. By embracing these recommendations,
educational institutions can play a pivotal role in nurturing a culture of safety and resilience, thereby
contributing to the overall well-being and sustainability of communities in the face of disasters.
Therefore, the results emphasize the significance of comprehensive disaster preparedness
initiatives in schools and underscore the need for tailored approaches that consider the diverse
attitudes, experiences, and backgrounds of teachers. Implementing effective disaster education
programs requires collaboration, proactive engagement, and ongoing professional development
among teachers to ensure the safety and well-being of students and the broader school community.
Further research in this area is crucial to inform evidence-based practices and policy
recommendations aimed at strengthening disaster resilience in educational institutions.
The scientific significance of this research lies in investigating the collective impact of
demographic and socio-economic factors on students' perceptions and teachers' attitudes towards
school-based disaster risk reduction. By analyzing these factors, the study provides valuable insights
into the dynamics shaping attitudes and preparedness for disaster management within educational
environments.
This research contributes to the advancement of knowledge and practices in the field of disaster
risk reduction education by providing insights into the complex interaction of factors shaping
perceptions and attitudes within educational environments. By emphasizing the importance of
collaboration, inclusivity, and tailored approaches, the study informs evidence-based practices aimed
at strengthening resilience and ensuring the safety and well-being of communities in the face of
disasters. Further research in this area is crucial for refining strategies and policies to enhance
resilience to disasters in educational institutions.
Author Contributions: V.M.C. conceived the original idea for this study and developed the study design and
questionnaire. Also, V.M.C. and N.N. contributed to the dissemination of the questionnaire, while V.M.C.
analyzed and interpreted the data. T.L. made a significant contribution by drafting the introduction; V.M.C. and
N.N. drafted the discussion, and V.M.C., T.L. and N.N. composed the conclusions. V.M.C., T.L. and N.N.
critically reviewed the data analysis and contributed to revising and finalizing the manuscript. All authors have
read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This research was funded by the Scientific–Professional Society for Disaster Risk Management,
Belgrade (hps://upravljanje-rizicima.com/, accessed on 14 February 2024) and the International Institute for
Disaster Research (hps://idr.edu.rs/, accessed on 14 February 2024), Belgrade, Serbia.
Institutional Review Board Statement: The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration
of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Scientific–Professional Society for Disaster
Risk Management and the International Institute for Disaster Research (protocol code 003/2024, 1 February 2024).
Informed Consent Statement: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement: Data are contained within the article.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Appendix A
1. Questionnaire for Students' Insights on School-Based Disaster Risk Reduction
Please state the name and location of the high school you attend:____________________
Please indicate your age:_____________
1. Gender of the participant:
− Male
− Female
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

34
2. Please indicate your academic achievement:
− Excellent
− Very good
− Good
− Sufficient
3. You live in a community:
− Only with mother
− Only with father
− With both parents
− Someone else takes care of you
4. In the community where you live:
− Only one parent works
− Both parents work
− Both parents are unemployed
5. Please indicate the educational level of your parents:
Father:
− Elementary education
− Secondary education
− Higher education
− High Education
Mother:
− Elementary education
− Secondary education
− Higher education
− High Education
6. Are you a user of social networks?
− Yes
− No
7. Has anyone in your family experienced direct or indirect consequences of a disaster?
− Yes
− No
8. How do you primarily receive knowledge and information about disasters? (not at all familiar
(1); somewhat familiar (2); moderately familiar (3); very familiar (4) ):
− Learning and knowledge from school | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
− Social and video games | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
− Mass media | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
− Searching for information on the internet | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
− Conversations with family | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
9. Please indicate to what extent you are familiar with the following disasters (not at all familiar
(1); somewhat familiar (2); moderately familiar (3); very familiar (4) ):
− Earthquake | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
− Flood | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
− Landslide or soil slippage | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
− Pandemic | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
− Fire | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
− Explosion | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
− Accident | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
10. Are you in favour of introducing subjects related to disasters?
− Yes
− No
11. Does your school collaborate with expert institutions to better acquaint students with disasters?
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

35
− Yes
− No
12. Does your school involve parents to collaborate on better-acquainting students with disasters?
− Yes
− No
13. Is learning about disasters covered through the content of other subjects?
− Yes
− No
14. Does your school collaborate with non-governmental organizations and civil society to better
acquaint students with disasters and proper response methods?
− Yes
− No
15. Does your school collaborate with the civil protection department of the local government to
better acquaint students with disaster and response methods?
− Yes
− No
16. Rate your agreement with the following statements towards key variables in disaster education
(strongly disagree; disagree; neutral; agree; strongly agree):
− My school consistently conducts certain training to ensure proper response in disasters | 1
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
− The school enables me to acquire knowledge and necessary information about disasters and
proper response methods in such situations | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
− Disaster education allows me to gain new insights into the occurrence, consequences, and
potential disasters in the environment | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
− Demonstration of evacuation exercises through simulation significantly contributes to
improving knowledge about disasters | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
− Visualizing practical examples contributes to a better understanding of how to behave in
the event of a disaster | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
19. Rate the following attitudes toward disaster risk reduction (strongly disagree; disagree; neutral;
agree; strongly agree):
− Comprehensive understanding of the concept, occurrence patterns, and ramifications of
disasters | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
− Readiness to effectively respond in the event of a disaster | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
− Familiarity with proactive measures to mitigate the occurrence of disasters | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
5
− Proficiency in safety protocols to be followed during a disaster | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
− Competence in disaster management strategies for handling disasters effectively | 1 | 2 | 3
| 4 | 5
1. Questionnaire for Teachers' Insights on School-Based Disaster Risk Reduction
1. Gender: 1. male 2. female
2. Years of work experience: 0-2, 3-7, 8-15, 16-25, 26-35, 36 and above
3. Marital status:
a) single
b) married
c) divorced
d) widowed
4. Do you have children?
a) yes
b) no
5. Level of education:
a) high school
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

36
b) college
c) master's degree
d) doctoral studies
6. Please rate the following attitudes regarding disaster preparedness and response attitudes
assessment (strongly disagree; moderately disagree; neither agree nor disagree; moderately
agree; strongly agree):
− I am familiar with legal obligations regarding disaster risk reduction in schools | 1 | 2 | 3 |
4 | 5
− My school has the capacity or financial resources to develop a Disaster Risk Assessment
and Emergency Response Plan | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
− The school building is resilient to disasters | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
− The level of student safety in schools is satisfactory | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
− Students play a significant role in disaster preparedness processes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
− Involving students in disaster preparedness exposes them to high risk | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
− Involving students in disaster preparedness can be beneficial for them | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
− Involving students in disaster preparedness strengthens the preparedness plan | 1 | 2 | 3 |
4 | 5
− I am confident that I want to involve students in disaster preparedness | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
− Students should be included in disaster simulations and drills | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
− Students should be involved in developing household disaster plans | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
− Students should be involved in the development of school plans | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
− Teachers are familiar with proper response procedures in emergencies | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
− Teachers are willing to prepare for proper emergency response | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
− Educate and train teachers for emergency response | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
− Motivate teachers to conduct classroom evacuation drills | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
− Introduce safety culture subject into the curriculum | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
7. I believe it will be very beneficial for students to learn about (you can choose more than one
answer):
− Disaster prevention and preparedness
− Problem-solving/decision-making
− Engaging with the local community in disaster preparedness and response
− Climate change
− Environment and sustainability
− None of the above
8. I believe the following institutions should be involved in educating students about disaster risk
reduction (you can choose more than one answer):
− School
− Disaster management authorities (civil protection department)
− Public health authorities
− Local communities
− Non-governmental organizations and civil society
− Emergency rescue services (police, military, emergency medical services)
9. The following teaching units related to disaster risk reduction are included in the curriculum at
my school (you can choose more than one answer):
− Disaster prevention and preparedness
− Problem-solving and decision-making on life issues
− Engaging with the local community to assist in preparation and response to disasters
− Climate change
− Environment and sustainability
− None of the above
10. My school conducts the following activities (check x):
− Exercises and workshops
− Response and recovery training
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

37
− Disaster simulations
11. Do you think the mentioned activities can contribute to improving disaster response
preparedness?
− Yes
− No
12. How would you rate the coordination between the school and relevant emergency rescue
services responsible for disaster prevention?
− No coordination
− Very weak
− Weak
− Moderate
− High
− Very high
− Don't know
13. Do you expect certain changes in the level of cooperation between your school and relevant
disaster management authorities?
− Yes
− No
14. How would you rate the coordination between the school and non-governmental organizations
significant for disaster prevention?
− No coordination
− Very weak
− Weak
− Moderate
− High
− Very high
− Don't know
15. Do you expect certain changes in the level of cooperation between your school and non-
governmental organizations significant for disaster management and preparedness?
− Yes
− No
16. What do you consider to be barriers or challenges to implementing student education on disaster
risk reduction in schools (check x):
− Lack of knowledge about disaster risk reduction
− Lack of training for the development and implementation of such programs
− The topic is not relevant to students
− The topic is not a priority for school management
− Incompatibility with what students should learn in schools according to my beliefs
− Insufficient space in the curriculum
− Lack of community interest
− Insufficient budget and staff shortage
− Poor coordination between schools and disaster management authorities
− Unclear policy on implementing disaster risk reduction in schools
17. Are you interested in training if offered and does not disrupt your schedule?
− Yes
− No
− If you answered yes, what type of training would be suitable for you (check x):
− Classroom learning
− Practical exercises
− Computer-based learning
− Distance learning
− Combination of the above
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

38
18. Please indicate how prepared your school is for natural disasters (check x):
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
19. The following are steps in the planning process. Please mark one option for each of the 7 steps
(I think students should be involved in this process (1); I think students should only be informed
about the results of this process (2); I don't think students should be involved in this process (3);
Not sure (4):
− Step 1: Conducting risk assessment and analysis | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
− Step 2: Development of disaster scenarios | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
− Step 3: Analysis of the severity of disaster impacts | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
− Step 4: Identification of policies and strategies during disasters | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
− Step 5: Assessment of projected needs and available resources | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
− Step 6: Identification of steps to improve building preparedness | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
− Step 7: Testing the disaster plan through simulations | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
References
1. Kovačević - Majkić, Jelena, Marko V. Milošević, Milena Panić, Dragana Miljanović, and Jelena Ćalić. "Risk
Education in Serbia." Acta geographica Slovenica 54, no. 1 (2014): 163–78.
2. Vu, Bay Dinh, Hien Thi Nguyen, Hong-Van Thi Dinh, Quynh-Anh Ngoc Nguyen, and Xuan Van Ha.
"Natural Disaster Prevention Literacy Education among Vietnamese High School Students." Education
Sciences 13, no. 3 (2023): 262.
3. Torani, Sogand, Parisa Moradi Majd, Shahnam Sedigh Maroufi, Mohsen Dowlati, and Rahim Ali Sheikhi.
"The Importance of Education on Disasters and Emergencies: A Review Article." Journal of education and
health promotion 8, no. 1 (2019): 85.
4. Gibbs, Lisa, Jane Nursey, Janette Cook, Greg Ireton, Nathan Alkemade, Michelle Roberts, H. Colin
Gallagher, Richard Bryant, Karen Block, and Robyn Molyneaux. "Delayed Disaster Impacts on Academic
Performance of Primary School Children." Child development 90, no. 4 (2019): 1402-12.
5. Mutch, Carol. "How Schools Build Community Resilience Capacity and Social Capital in Disaster
Preparedness, Response and Recovery." International journal of disaster risk reduction 92 (2023): 103735.
6. Kawasaki, Hiromi, Satoko Yamasaki, Mina Kurokawa, Hiroshi Tamura, and Kei Sonai. "Relationship
between Teachers’ Awareness of Disaster Prevention and Concerns About Disaster Preparedness."
Sustainability 14, no. 13 (2022): 8211.
7. Hilton, Carla, and Vicky Allison. "Disaster Preparedness: An Indictment for Action by Nursing Educators."
The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 35, no. 2 (2004): 59-65.
8. Elangovan, Aravind Raj, and Sekar Kasi. "Psychosocial Disaster Preparedness for School Children by
Teachers." International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 12 (2015): 119-24.
9. Pan, Hui-Ling Wendy. "The Catalysts for Sustaining Teacher Commitment: An Analysis of Teacher
Preparedness and Professional Learning." Sustainability 15, no. 6 (2023): 4918.
10. Lee, Joohi, Kathleen Tice, Denise Collins, Amber Brown, Cleta Smith, and Jill Fox. "Assessing Student
Teaching Experiences: Teacher Candidates' Perceptions of Preparedness." Educational research quarterly 36,
no. 2 (2012): 3-20.
11. Viado, Alexander C. "Extent of Disaster Management Program Implementation and Prepared-Ness Level
in Selected Public Secondary Schools in Zambales, Philippines." International Journal of Multidisciplinary:
Applied Business and Education Research 4, no. 7 (2023): 2511-24.
12. Kim, Jina, and Ogcheol Lee. "Effects of a Simulation-Based Education Program for Nursing Students
Responding to Mass Casualty Incidents: A Pre-Post Intervention Study." Nurse education today 85 (2020):
104297.
13. Olson, Debra K., Amy Scheller, Susan Larson, Linda Lindeke, and Sandra Edwardson. "Using Gaming
Simulation to Evaluate Bioterrorism and Emergency Readiness Education." Public Health Reports 125, no. 3
(2010): 468-77.
14. Ibarrarán, María Eugenia, Matthias Ruth, Sanjana Ahmad, and Marisa London. "Climate Change and
Natural Disasters: Macroeconomic Performance and Distributional Impacts." Environment, development and
sustainability 11 (2009): 549-69.
15. Birasnav, M., Swapna Bhargavi Gantasala, Venugopal Prabhakar Gantasala, and Abhishek Singh. "Total
Quality Leadership and Organizational Innovativeness: The Role of Social Capital Development in
American Schools." Benchmarking: An International Journal 30, no. 3 (2023): 811-33.
16. Lidstone, John. "Disaster Education: Where We Are and Where We Should Be." International perspectives on
teaching about hazards and disasters (1996): 3.
17. Jakovljević, Vladimir, Vladimir M. Cvetković, and Jasmina Gačić. "Prirodne Katastrofe I Obrazovanje,
Fakultet Bezbednosti." Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet bezbednosti, Beograd, 2015.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

39
18. Muzenda-Mudavanhu, Chipo, Bernard Manyena, and Andrew E. Collins. "Disaster Risk Reduction
Knowledge among Children in Muzarabani District, Zimbabwe." Natural Hazards 84 (2016): 911-31.
19. Shankar, Kalpana, David J. Wild, Jaesoon An, Sam Shoulders, and Sheetal Narayanan. "Information
Technology in Times of Crisis: Considering Knowledge Management for Disaster Management." In
Building the Knowledge Society on the Internet: Sharing and Exchanging Knowledge in Networked Environments,
219-40: IGI Global, 2008.
20. Kit Miyamoto, H., Amir S. J. Gilani, and Akira Wada. "Damage Mitigation for School Buildings in
Seismically Vulnerable Regions." International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment 2, no. 1
(2011): 8-29.
21. Khorram-Manesh, Amir, Johan Berlin, Lina Ljung Roseke, Johan Aremyr, Josef Sörensson, and Eric
Carlström. "Emergency Management and Preparedness Training for Youth (Empty): The Results of the
First Swedish Pilot Study." Disaster medicine and public health preparedness 12, no. 6 (2018): 685-88.
22. Salita, C., R. Liwanag, R. E. Tiongco, and R. Kawano. "Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of a
Lay Responder Disaster Training Package among School Teachers in Angeles City, Philippines: Using
Witte's Behavioral Model." Public health 170 (2019): 23-31.
23. Krnjić, Ivanka, and Vladimir M. Cvetković. "Investigating Students Attitudes and Preferences Towards
Disaster Learning Multimedia to Enhance Preparedness." (2021).
24. Shah, Ashfaq Ahmad, Zaiwu Gong, Muhammad Ali, Ruiling Sun, Syed Asif Ali Naqvi, and Muhammad
Arif. "Looking through the Lens of Schools: Children Perception, Knowledge, and Preparedness of Flood
Disaster Risk Management in Pakistan." International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 50 (2020): 101907.
25. Yeon, Da-Hye, Ji-Bum Chung, and Dong-Hyeon Im. "The Effects of Earthquake Experience on Disaster
Education for Children and Teens." International journal of environmental research and public health 17, no. 15
(2020): 5347.
26. Adzkiya, Ubbadul, Nazar Nurdin, Anis Fittria, and Ulfatun Nihayah. "Perceptions of Youth Religious
Understanding of Natural Disaster Resistance and Preparedness." KnE Social Sciences (2023): 229-38.
27. Oktaria, Renti, Purwanto Putra, Andi Windah, and Nandi Haerudin. "Needs Analysis of Disaster
Mitigation Learning Design Based on Information Literacy in Efforts to Increase Disaster Self-Awareness
of Early Childhood." 2023.
28. Sonmez, Elif Dasci, and Tuba Gokmenoglu. "Understanding the Teachers' Disaster Preparedness Beliefs."
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 85 (2023): 103511.
29. Tatebe, Jennifer, and Carol Mutch. "Perspectives on Education, Children and Young People in Disaster Risk
Reduction." International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 14 (2015): 108-14.
30. Cvetković, Vladimir, Aleksandra Nikolić, and Aleksandar Ivanov. "The Role of Social Media in the Process
of Informing the Public About Disaster Risks." Journal of Liberty and International Affairs 9, no. 2 (2023): 104-
19.
31. Jacobs, Wura, Ann O. Amuta, and Kwon Chan Jeon. "Health Information Seeking in the Digital Age: An
Analysis of Health Information Seeking Behavior among Us Adults." Cogent social sciences 3, no. 1 (2017):
1302785.
32. Cvetković, Vladimir M., Jasmina Tanasić, Adem Ocal, Želimir Kešetović, Neda Nikolić, and Aleksandar
Dragašević. "Capacity Development of Local Self-Governments for Disaster Risk Management."
International journal of environmental research and public health 18, no. 19 (2021): 10406.
33. Cvetković, V. "The Relationship between Educational Level and Citizen Preparedness for Responding to
Natural Disasters." Journal of the Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić” SASA 66, no. 2 (2016): 237-53.
34. Cvetković, V., and J. Stanišić. "Relationship between Demographic and Environmental Factors with
Knowledge of Secondary School Students on Natural Disasters., Sasa, ." Journal of the Geographical Institute
Jovan Cvijic 65, no. 3 (2015): 323-40.
35. Cvetković, Vladimir M., Neda Nikolić, Adem Ocal, Jovana Martinović, and Aleksandar Dragašević. "A
Predictive Model of Pandemic Disaster Fear Caused by Coronavirus (Covid-19): Implications for Decision-
Makers." International journal of environmental research and public health 19, no. 2 (2022).
36. Cvetković, Vladimir, Paolo Tarolli, Giulia Roder, Aleksandar Ivanov, Kevin Ronan, Adem Ocam, and Rana
Kutub. "Citizens Education About Floods: A Serbian Case Study." Paper presented at the VII International
scientific conference Archibald Reiss days 2017.
37. "Law on Disaster Risk Reduction and Emergency Management ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia",
No. 87/2018)."
38. Pfefferbaum, Betty, Rose L. Pfefferbaum, and Richard L. Van Horn. "Involving Children in Disaster Risk
Reduction: The Importance of Participation." European journal of psychotraumatology 9, no. sup2 (2018):
1425577.
39. Kitagawa, Kaori. "Disaster Risk Reduction Activities as Learning." Natural Hazards 105, no. 3 (2021): 3099-
118.
40. Pescaroli, Gianluca, Michael Nones, Luca Galbusera, and David Alexander. "Understanding and
Mitigating Cascading Crises in the Global Interconnected System." 159-63: Elsevier, 2018.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

40
41. Kawasaki, Hiromi, Satoko Yamasaki, Md Moshiur Rahman, Yoshihiro Murata, Mika Iwasa, and Chie
Teramoto. "Teachers-Parents Cooperation in Disaster Preparation When Schools Become as Evacuation
Centers." International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 44 (2020): 101445.
42. Cvetković, Vladimir M., Aleksandar Ivanov, and Boban Milojković. "Influence of Parenthood on Citizen
Preparedness for Response to Natural Disaster Caused by Floods." Paper presented at the VI Internationa
scientific conference Archibald Reiss days, Belgrade 2016.
43. Savas, Ahmet Cezmi. "The Contribution of School-Family Cooperation on Effective Classroom
Management in Early Childhood Education." Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice 12, no. 4 (2012): 3099-
110.
44. Mestry, Raj, and Bennie Grobler. "Collaboration and Communication as Effective Strategies for Parent
Involvement in Public Schools." Educational research and reviews 2, no. 7 (2007): 176.
45. Rico, Gian Carla S. "School-Community Collaboration: Disaster Preparedness Towards Building Resilient
Communities." International Journal of Disaster Risk Management 1, no. 2 (2019): 45-61.
46. Domingo Dela Cruz, Ronie, and Rashid Ceazar Galanto Ormilla. "Disaster Risk Reduction Management
Implementation in the Public Elementary Schools of the Department of Education, Philippines."
International Journal of Disaster Risk Management 4, no. 2 (2022): 1-15.
47. Mavrodieva, Aleksandrina V., Dyah S. Budiarti, Zhou Yu, Federico A. Pasha, and Rajib Shaw.
"Governmental Incentivization for Smes’ Engagement in Disaster Resilience in Southeast Asia."
International Journal of Disaster Risk Management 1, no. 1 (2019): 32-50.
48. Thayaparan, Menaha, Chamindi Malalgoda, Kaushal Keraminiyage, and Dilanthi Amaratunga. "Disaster
Management Education through Higher Education–Industry Collaboration in the Built Environment."
Procedia Economics and Finance 18 (2014): 651-58.
49. Guo, Xuesong, and Naim Kapucu. "Examining Collaborative Disaster Response in China: Network
Perspectives." Natural Hazards 79 (2015): 1773-89.
50. Curtis, Christopher A. "Understanding Communication and Coordination among Government and Service
Organisations after a Disaster." Disasters 39, no. 4 (2015): 611-25.
51. Kapucu, Naim. "Collaborative Emergency Management: Better Community Organising, Better Public
Preparedness and Response." Disasters 32, no. 2 (2008): 239-62.
52. Akdim, Khadija, Adil Ez-Zetouni, and Mehdi Zahid. "The Influence of Awareness Campaigns on the
Spread of an Infectious Disease: A Qualitative Analysis of a Fractional Epidemic Model." Modeling Earth
Systems and Environment (2021): 1-9.
53. Funk, Sebastian, E. Gilad, and Vincent A. A. Jansen. "Endemic Disease, Awareness, and Local Behavioural
Response." Journal of theoretical biology 264, no. 2 (2010): 501-09.
54. Cvetkovic, Vladimir M., and Jovana Martinović. "Innovative Solutions for Flood Risk Management."
International Journal of Disaster Risk Management 2, no. 2 (2021): 71-100.
55. Oliveira, Gabriella, Jorge Grenha Teixeira, Ana Torres, and Carla Morais. "An Exploratory Study on the
Emergency Remote Education Experience of Higher Education Students and Teachers During the Covid-
19 Pandemic." British Journal of Educational Technology 52, no. 4 (2021): 1357-76.
56. Cvetković, Vladimir, Adem Öcal, and Aleksandar Ivanov. "Young Adults’ Fear of Disasters: A Case Study
of Residents from Turkey, Serbia and Macedonia." International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (2019):
101095.
57. Cvetković, Vladimir, Adem Öcal, Yuliya Lyamzina, Eric Noji, Neda Nikolić, and Goran Milošević. "Nuclear
Power Risk Perception in Serbia: Fear of Exposure to Radiation Vs. Social Benefits." Energies 14 (2021): 2464.
58. Cvetkovic, Vladimir M. "Risk Perception of Building Fires in Belgrade." International Journal of Disaster Risk
Management 1, no. 1 (2019): 81-91.
59. Mamon, Mark Anthony Catedral, Regin Adrian Vargas Suba, and Ignacio Lakip Son. "Disaster Risk
Reduction Knowledge of Grade 11 Students: Impact of Senior High School Disaster Education in the
Philippines." International Journal of Health System and Disaster Management 5, no. 3 (2017): 69.
60. Adiyoso, Wignyo, and Hidehiko Kanegae. "Effectiveness of Disaster-Based School Program on Students’
Earthquake-Preparedness." Journal of Disaster Research 8, no. 5 (2013): 1009-17.
61. Romo-Murphy, Eila, and Marita Vos. "The Role of Broadcast Media in Disaster Preparedness Education:
Lessons Learned in the Scientific Literature 2002–2012." Media Asia 41, no. 1 (2014): 71-85.
62. Thi, Tong, and Rajib Shaw. "School-Based Disaster Risk Reduction Education in Primary Schools in Da
Nang City, Central Vietnam." Environmental Hazards 15, no. 4 (2016): 356-73.
63. Muñoz, Viviana Aguilar, Barbara Carby, Enrique Castellanos Abella, Omar Dario Cardona, Tania López-
Marrero, Victor Marchezini, Lourdes Meyreles, Débora Olivato, Rachel Trajber, and Ben Wisner. "Success,
Innovation and Challenge: School Safety and Disaster Education in South America and the Caribbean."
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 44 (2020): 101395.
64. Amri, Avianto, Deanne K. Bird, Kevin Ronan, Katharine Haynes, and Briony Towers. "Disaster Risk
Reduction Education in Indonesia: Challenges and Recommendations for Scaling Up." Natural Hazards and
Earth System Sciences 17, no. 4 (2017): 595-612.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

41
65. Kirk, Jackie, and Rebecca Winthrop. "Promoting Quality Education in Refugee Contexts: Supporting
Teacher Development in Northern Ethiopia." International Review of Education/Internationale Zeitschrift Für
Erziehungswissenschaft/Revue Internationale De l'Education 53, no. 5/6 (2007): 715-23.
66. Hew, Khe Foon, and Thomas Brush. "Integrating Technology into K-12 Teaching and Learning: Current
Knowledge Gaps and Recommendations for Future Research." Educational technology research and
development 55 (2007): 223-52.
67. Margot, Kelly C., and Todd Kettler. "Teachers’ Perception of Stem Integration and Education: A Systematic
Literature Review." International Journal of STEM education 6, no. 1 (2019): 1-16.
68. Suriyanti, Suriyanti, Ismail A. B. Ismail Ab, and Sulastri Sulastri. "Student Knowledge of Fire Disasters in
Senior High School: The Case Study at Man 1 Aceh Besar." International Journal of Multicultural and
Multireligious Understanding 7, no. 2 (2020): 337-46.
69. Tuladhar, Gangalal, Ryuichi Yatabe, Ranjan Kumar Dahal, and Netra Prakash Bhandary. "Knowledge of
Disaster Risk Reduction among School Students in Nepal." Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 5, no. 3
(2014): 190-207.
70. Kamil, Puspita Annaba, Sugeng Utaya, and Dwiyono Hari Utomo. "Improving Disaster Knowledge within
High School Students through Geographic Literacy." International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 43 (2020):
101411.
71. Shiwaku, Koichi, and Rajib Shaw. "Proactive Co-Learning: A New Paradigm in Disaster Education."
Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal 17, no. 2 (2008): 183-98.
72. Shiwaku, Koichi, Rajib Shaw, Ram Chandra Kandel, Surya Narayan Shrestha, and Amod Mani Dixit.
"Future Perspective of School Disaster Education in Nepal." Disaster Prevention and Management: An
International Journal 16, no. 4 (2007): 576-87.
73. Wang, Ziyi, Ziqiang Han, and Yuhuan Li. "The Interplay between School Preparedness and Student’s
Individual Protective Actions: The Mediating Role of Disaster Education." Sustainability 15, no. 20 (2023):
14888.
74. Issa, Fadi S., Michael Molloy, Alexander Hart, Mahmoud S. Issa, Reem AlFalasi, Abdullah A. Alhadhira,
Ritu R. Sarin, Amalia Voskanyan, and Gregory R. Ciottone. "Effectiveness of Children’s Disaster Risk
Reduction (Drr) Program on Earthquake Preparedness in Jordan." Prehospital and disaster medicine 34, no. s1
(2019): s42-s43.
75. Shoji, Masahiro, Yoko Takafuji, and Tetsuya Harada. "Behavioral Impact of Disaster Education: Evidence
from a Dance-Based Program in Indonesia." International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 45 (2020): 101489.
76. Anggaryani, M. "Linking Disaster Preparedness Education to Risk Awareness: Should We Teach Our Kids
About Risk?", 2021.
77. Huang, Shwu-yong L., and Barry J. Fraser. "Science Teachers' Perceptions of the School Environment:
Gender Differences." Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for
Research in Science Teaching 46, no. 4 (2009): 404-20.
78. Gliebe, Sudi Kate. "Emotional Intelligence in Christian Higher Education." Christian Higher Education 11,
no. 3 (2012): 192-204.
79. Rohyatun, Rohyatun, Sudirman Wilian, and Untung Waluyo. "Analysis of Female School Principal
Leadership in Improving Teacher Performance and Student Achievement." International Journal of
Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 7, no. 2 (2020): 197-204.
80. De Boer, Anke, Sip Jan Pijl, and Alexander Minnaert. "Regular Primary Schoolteachers’ Attitudes Towards
Inclusive Education: A Review of the Literature." International journal of inclusive education 15, no. 3 (2011):
331-53.
81. Messiou, Kyriaki, and Mel Ainscow. "Inclusive Inquiry: Student–Teacher Dialogue as a Means of
Promoting Inclusion in Schools." British educational research journal 46, no. 3 (2020): 670-87.
82. Midtbust, Liv Gunvor Hove, Atle Dyregrov, and Heidi Wittrup Djup. "Communicating with Children and
Adolescents About the Risk of Natural Disasters." European journal of psychotraumatology 9, no. sup2 (2018):
1429771.
83. Eichel, Joanne De Simone, and Leslie Goldman. "Safety Makes Sense: A Program to Prevent Unintentional
Injuries in New York City Public Schools." Journal of School Health 71, no. 5 (2001): 180-83.
84. King, Teresa. Children and Natural Disasters: An Investigation of Cognitions, Knowledge and Emotions
in Wellington Year 5 Students: A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree
of Master of Sciences in Psychology at Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand. 2012.
85. Shaw, Rajib, K. Shiwaku, and Y. Takeuchi. Disaster Education. United Kingdom: Emerald group publishing
limited., 2011.
86. Gray, Duncan. "Disaster Plan Education: How We Made and Tested a Video." Journal of accident & emergency
medicine 13, no. 1 (1996): 21-22.
87. Appleby-Arnold, Sandra, Noellie Brockdorff, Ivana Jakovljev, and Sunčica Zdravković. "Disaster
Preparedness and Cultural Factors: A Comparative Study in Romania and Malta." Disasters 45, no. 3 (2021):
664-90.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

42
88. Uhm, Dongchoon, and Hyang Soon Oh. "Disaster Preparedness of Child Care Teachers: A Cross-Sectional
Study in South Korea." Disaster medicine and public health preparedness 12, no. 3 (2018): 321-28.
89. Lapada, Aris. "Disaster Risk Reduction Knowledge among Filipino Senior High School Students." Journal
of Social Sciences Review 2, no. 1 (2022): 56-73.
90. Karen P, Ir, and Simon R Bush. "Educating Students to Cross Boundaries between Disciplines and Cultures
and between Theory and Practice." International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 11, no. 1 (2010):
19-35.
91. Pambudi, D. I., and A. Ashari. "Enhancing Role of Elementary School in Developing Sustainable Disaster
Preparedness: A Review with Some Examples from Disaster-Prone Areas of Merapi." 2019.
92. Cvetković, V., S. Dragićević, M. Petrović, S. Mijaković, V. Jakovljević, and J. Gačić. "Knowledge and
Perception of Secondary School Students in Belgrade About Earthquakes as Natural Disasters." Polish
journal of environmental studies 24, no. 4 (2015): 1553-61.
93. Cvetković, Vladimir M., Neda Nikolić, Una Radovanović Nenadić, Adem Öcal, Eric K Noji, and Miodrag
Zečević. "Preparedness and Preventive Behaviors for a Pandemic Disaster Caused by Covid-19 in Serbia."
International journal of environmental research and public health 17, no. 11 (2020): 4124.
94. Kagawa, Fumiyo, and David Selby. "Ready for the Storm: Education for Disaster Risk Reduction and
Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation1." Journal of Education for Sustainable Development 6, no. 2 (2012):
207-17.
95. Avcı, Görkem. "Disaster Education in Primary School: A Qualitative Research Based on Teachers’
Opinions." Psycho-Educational Research Reviews 11, no. 1 (2022): 125-46.
96. Oktari, Rina Suryani, Koichi Shiwaku, Khairul Munadi, and Rajib Shaw. "Enhancing Community
Resilience Towards Disaster: The Contributing Factors of School-Community Collaborative Network in the
Tsunami Affected Area in Aceh." International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 29 (2018): 3-12.
97. Alim, Syahirul, Masato Kawabata, and Minato Nakazawa. "Evaluation of Disaster Preparedness Training
and Disaster Drill for Nursing Students." Nurse education today 35, no. 1 (2015): 25-31.
98. Codreanu, Tudor A., Antonio Celenza, and Ali A. Rahman Alabdulkarim. "Factors Associated with
Discussion of Disasters by Final Year High School Students: An International Cross-Sectional Survey."
Prehospital and disaster medicine 30, no. 4 (2015): 365-73.
99. Woolnough, April D. "Fear of Crime on Campus: Gender Differences in Use of Self-Protective Behaviours
at an Urban University." Security Journal 22 (2009): 40-55.
100. Cvetković, Vladimir, Aleksandar Dragašević, Darko Protić, Bojan Janković, Neda Nikolić, and Milošević
Predrag. "Fire Safety Behavior Model for Residential Buildings: Implications for Disaster Risk Reduction."
SSRN Electronic Journal (2021).
101. Çakın, YO, MA Petal, S Sezan, and Z Türkmen. "Public Education–Disaster Preparedness Education
Program in Turkey." Paper presented at the poster), 100th Anniversary Earthquake Conference, CA: San
Fransisco 2006.
102. Shaw, Rajib, Koichi Shiwaku Hirohide Kobayashi, and Masami Kobayashi. "Linking Experience,
Education, Perception and Earthquake Preparedness." Disaster Prevention and Management 13, no. 1 (2004):
39-49.
103. Freund, Anat, Amit Zriker, and Zehava Sapir. "Optimal Educational Climate among Students at Risk: The
Role of Teachers’ Work Attitudes." European Journal of Psychology of Education (2022): 1-20.
104. Parham, Martin, Richard Teeuw, Carmen Solana, and Simon Day. "Quantifying the Impact of Educational
Methods for Disaster Risk Reduction: A Longitudinal Study Assessing the Impact of Teaching Methods on
Student Hazard Perceptions." International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 52 (2021): 101978.
105. Becker, SM. "Environmental Disaster Education at the University Level: An Integrative Approach." Safety
science 35, no. 1 (2000): 95-104.
106. Burstein, Jonathan L. "The Myths of Disaster Education." Annals of emergency medicine 47, no. 1 (2006): 50-
52.
107. FitzGerald, Gerard J, Peter Aitken, Paul Arbon, Frank Archer, David Cooper, Peter Leggat, Colin Myers,
Andrew Robertson, Michael Tarrant, and Elinor R Davis. "A National Framework for Disaster Health
Education in Australia." Prehospital and disaster medicine 25, no. 01 (2010): 4-11.
108. Johnson, A., R. Ronan, M. Johnston, and R. Peace. "Evaluations of Disaster Education Programs for
Children: A Methodological Review." International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 9 (2014): 107-23.
109. Macaulay, John. "Disaster Education in New Zealand." In International Perspectives on Natural Disasters:
Occurrence, Mitigation, and Consequences, 417-28: Springer, 2004.
110. Mitchell, Jerry T. "Hazards Education and Academic Standards in the Southeast United States."
International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 18, no. 2 (2009): 134-48.
111. Nikolić, Vesna, and Mirjana Galjak. "Obrazovanje Za Zaštitu Životne Sredine U Kriznim Uslovima3."
Andragoške studije (2012): 163.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

43
112. Panić, Milena, Jelena Kovačević-Majkić, Dragana Miljanović, and Radmila Miletić. "Importance of Natural
Disaster Education-Case Study of the Earthquake near the City of Kraljevo: First Results." Journal of the
Geographical Institute Jovan Cvijic, SASA 63, no. 1 (2013): 75-88.
113. Peijun, Shi. "Theory and Practice of Disaster Study." Journal of Natural Disasters 5, no. 4 (1996): 6-14.
114. Shiwaku, K. "Essentials of School Disaster Education: Example from Kobe, Japan." Disaster management:
global challenges and local solutions (2009): 321-37.
115. Wisner, Benjamin, and Thematic Cluster. Let Our Children Teach Us!: A Review of the Role of Education and
Knowledge in Disaster Risk Reduction: Books for Change, 2006.
116. Živković, Ivana, and Slobodan Janjić. "Kriza Menadžmenta U Ekološkom Obrazovanju U Osnovnim
Školama." Paper presented at the Međunarodna naučna konferencija Menadžment, Kruševac, Srbija 2010.
117. Greening, Leilani, Stephen J. Dollinger, and Gordon Pitz. "Adolescents' Perceived Risk and Personal
Experience with Natural Disasters: An Evaluation of Cognitive Heuristics." Acta Psychologica 91, no. 1
(1996): 27-38.
118. Wood, Brandon J., and Eric Hampton. "The Influence of School Resource Officer Presence on Teacher
Perceptions of School Safety and Security." School psychology review 50, no. 2-3 (2021): 360-70.
119. Цветковић, В. "Metodologija Istraživanja Katastrofa I Rizika: Teorije, Koncepti I Metode - Disaster and
Risk Research Methodology: Theories, Concepts and Methods." Beograd: Zadužbina Andrejević, Instant
system., 2017.
120. Hassan, Emad M., Hussam N. Mahmoud, and Bruce R. Ellingwood. "Resilience of School Systems
Following Severe Earthquakes." Earth's future 8, no. 10 (2020): e2020EF001518.
121. Stough, Laura M., Donghyun Kang, and Sungyoon Lee. "Seven School-Related Disasters: Lessons for
Policymakers and School Personnel." Education Policy Analysis Archives 26 (2018): 100-00.
122. Kilgo, Cindy A., Amanda L. Mollet, and Ernest T. Pascarella. "The Estimated Effects of College Student
Involvement on Psychological Well-Being." Journal of College Student Development 57, no. 8 (2016): 1043-49.
123. Yildiz, Ayse, Julie Dickinson, Jacqueline Priego-Hernández, Richard Teeuw, and Rajib Shaw. "Effects of
Disaster Education on Children's Risk Perception and Preparedness: A Quasi-Experimental Longitudinal
Study." The Geographical Journal (2023).
124. Zhong, Shuang, Qiu Cheng, Shuwei Zhang, Cunrui Huang, and Zhe Wang. "An Impact Assessment of
Disaster Education on Children’s Flood Risk Perceptions in China: Policy Implications for Adaptation to
Climate Extremes." Science of the total environment 757 (2021): 143761.
125. Green, Jasmine, Gregory Arief D. Liem, Andrew J. Martin, Susan Colmar, Herbert W. Marsh, and Dennis
McInerney. "Academic Motivation, Self-Concept, Engagement, and Performance in High School: Key
Processes from a Longitudinal Perspective." Journal of adolescence 35, no. 5 (2012): 1111-22.
126. Keselman, Alla, Laura Slaughter, and Vimla L. Patel. "Toward a Framework for Understanding Lay
Public’s Comprehension of Disaster and Bioterrorism Information." Journal of Biomedical Informatics 38, no.
4 (2005): 331-44.
127. Peek, Lori. "Children and Disasters: Understanding Vulnerability, Developing Capacities, and Promoting
Resilience—an Introduction." Children Youth and Environments 18, no. 1 (2008): 1-29.
128. Codreanu, Tudor A., Hanh Ngo, Andrew Robertson, and Antonio Celenza. "Challenging Assumptions:
What Do We Need to Address in Our Disaster Risk Reduction Efforts?" Prehospital and disaster medicine 32,
no. 2 (2017): 134-47.
129. Adem, Öcal. "The Relationship between Earthquake Knowledge and Earthquake Attitudes of Disaster
Relief Staffs." Disaster Advances 4, no. 1 (2011): 19-24.
130. Cvetković, Vladimir M., Bojan Janković, and Saša Milojević. "Bezbednost Učenika Od Posledica Prirodnih
Katastrofa U Školskim Objektima." Ecologica 84 (2016): 809-14.
131. Cvetković, Vladimir M., Slavoljub Dragićević, Marina Petrović, Saša Mijalković, Vladimir Jakovljević, and
Jasmina Gačić. "Knowledge and Perception of Secondary School Students in Belgrade About Earthquakes
as Natural Disasters - Znanje I Percepcija Učenika Srednjih Škola U Beogradu O Zemljotresu Kao Prirodnoj
Katastrofi." Polish journal of environmental studies 24, no. 4 (2015): 1553-61.
132. Cvetković, Vladimir. "Upravljanje Rizicima U Vanrednim Situacijama - Disaster Risk Management."
Naučno-stručno društvo za upravljanje rizicima u vanrednim situacijama …, 2020.
133. Cvetković, Vladimir, Vladimir Jakovljević, Jasmina Gačić, and Marina Filipović. "Obuka Građana Za
Reagovanje U Vanrednim Situacijama - Citizens' Training for Emergency Situations." Ecologica (2017): In
press.
134. Dragicevic, S, D Filipovic, S Kostadinov, N Zivkovic, G Andjelkovic, and B Abolmasov. "Natural Hazard
Assessment for Land-Use Planning in Serbia." International Journal of Environmental Research, no. 5 (2011):
371-80.
135. Dragićević, Slavoljub, Minucsér Mészáros, Snežana Djurdjić, Dragoslav Pavić, Ivan Novković, and
Radislav Tošić. "Vulnerability of National Parks to Natural Hazards in the Serbian Danube Region." Polish
journal of environmental studies 22, no. 4 (2013).
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

44
136. Cvetković, Vladimir M., and Vanja Šišović. "Understanding the Sustainable Development of Community
(Social) Disaster Resilience in Serbia: Demographic and Socio-Economic Impacts." Sustainability 16, no. 7
(2024): 2620.
137. Cvetković, V., G. Roder, A. Öcal, P. Tarolli, and S. Dragićević. "The Role of Gender in Preparedness and
Response Behaviors Towards Flood Risk in Serbia." International journal of environmental research and public
health 15, no. 12 (2018): 2761.
138. Ocal, A., Vladimir M. Cvetković, Hoda Baytiyeh, Fantina Tedim, and Miodrag Zečević. "Public Reactions
to the Disaster Covid-19: A Comparative Study in Italy, Lebanon, Portugal, and Serbia." Geomatics, Natural
Hazards and Risk (2020).
139. Novković, Ivan, Slavoljub Dragićević, and Mirela Djurović. "Geohazard and Geoheritage." The Geography
of Serbia: Nature, People, Economy (2022): 119-31.
140. Herak, Davorka, Marijan Herak, and Mihailo Trifunac. "Kraljevo Earthquake-Reduced Damage by
Asymmetric Radiation." Izgradnja 65, no. 5-6 (2011): 241-45.
141. Petrović, Ana, Stanimir Kostadinov, and Slavoljub Dragićević. "The Inventory and Characterization of
Torrential Flood Phenomenon in Serbia." Polish journal of environmental studies 23, no. 3 (2014): 823-30.
142. Nurdin, Nurmalahayati. "Disaster Risk Reduction in Education and the Secondary High School Science
Curriculum in Indonesia." (2019).
143. Fathoni, Mukhamad. "Disaster Risk Reduction in Schools: The Relationship of Knowledge and Attitudes
Towards Preparedness from Elementary School Students in School-Based Disaster Preparedness in the
Mentawai Islands, Indonesia." Prehospital and disaster medicine 33, no. 6 (2018): 581-86.
144. Tabachnick, Barbara G., Linda S. Fidell, and Jodie B. Ullman. Using Multivariate Statistics. Vol. 6: pearson
Boston, MA, 2013.
145. Gautam, Akash Kumar, Luv Misra, Ajit Kumar, Kush Misra, Shashwat Aggarwal, and Rajiv Ratn Shah.
"Multimodal Analysis of Disaster Tweets." 2019.
146. Meeusen, Cecil. "The Intergenerational Transmission of Environmental Concern: The Influence of Parents
and Communication Patterns within the Family." The Journal of Environmental Education 45, no. 2 (2014): 77-
90.
147. Cheng, John W., Hitoshi Mitomo, Tokio Otsuka, and Stefan Y. Jeon. "Cultivation Effects of Mass and Social
Media on Perceptions and Behavioural Intentions in Post-Disaster Recovery–the Case of the 2011 Great
East Japan Earthquake." Telematics and Informatics 33, no. 3 (2016): 753-72.
148. Harris, Mary B., and Kari C. Miller. "Gender and Perceptions of Danger." Sex Roles 43 (2000): 843-63.
149. Shah, Chirag, and Gary Marchionini. "Awareness in Collaborative Information Seeking." Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology 61, no. 10 (2010): 1970-86.
150. Cummings, Jonathon N. "Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global
Organization." Management science 50, no. 3 (2004): 352-64.
151. Lin, Shu Hsu, Hsing-Chen Lee, Ching-Ter Chang, and Changjui James Fu. "Behavioral Intention Towards
Mobile Learning in Taiwan, China, Indonesia, and Vietnam." Technology in Society 63 (2020): 101387.
152. Ardichvili, Alexandre, Martin Maurer, Wei Li, Tim Wentling, and Reed Stuedemann. "Cultural Influences
on Knowledge Sharing through Online Communities of Practice." Journal of knowledge management 10, no. 1
(2006): 94-107.
153. Odero, Naomi Auma, and Ishmail Mahiri. "The Complacency of Flood Victims, Socio Economic Factors,
and Effects and Vulnerabilities of Floods in Lower Kano Plains, Kisumu County, Kenya." International
Journal of Disaster Risk Management 4, no. 2 (2022): 59-77.
154. Kabir, Md Humayain, Tanvir Hossain, and Md Wahidul Haque. "Resilience to Natural Disasters: A Case
Study on Southwestern Region of Coastal Bangladesh." International Journal of Disaster Risk Management 4,
no. 2 (2022): 91-105.
155. Lucas, Kristen, and John L. Sherry. "Sex Differences in Video Game Play: A Communication-Based
Explanation." Communication research 31, no. 5 (2004): 499-523.
156. Lin, Xiaolin, and Xuequn Wang. "Examining Gender Differences in People’s Information-Sharing Decisions
on Social Networking Sites." International Journal of Information Management 50 (2020): 45-56.
157. Waring, Sara, Laurence Alison, Grace Carter, Chloe Barrett-Pink, Michael Humann, Lauren Swan, and
Tomas Zilinsky. "Information Sharing in Interteam Responses to Disaster." Journal of occupational and
organizational psychology 91, no. 3 (2018): 591-619.
158. Mulvey, Kelly Lynn, Angelina Joy, Michael Caslin, Darby Orcutt, Deniz Eseryel, and Madhusudan Katti.
"Forests after Florence: An Informal Community-Engaged Stem Research Project Promotes Stem Identity
in Disaster-Impacted Students." Research in Science & Technological Education 41, no. 2 (2023): 717-33.
159. Sunal, Cynthia Szymanski, and Julianne M. Coleman. "Social Studies Beginnings: Investigating Very Young
Children’s Prior Knowledge of a Disaster." Social Studies Research and Practice 8, no. 3 (2013): 21-41.
160. Evans, Jeff. "Mapping the Vulnerability of Older Persons to Disasters." International journal of older people
nursing 5, no. 1 (2010): 63-70.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1

45
161. Giletta, Matteo, Sophia Choukas-Bradley, Marlies Maes, Kathryn P. Linthicum, Noel A. Card, and Mitchell
J. Prinstein. "A Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Peer Influence Effects in Childhood and Adolescence."
Psychological Bulletin 147, no. 7 (2021): 719.
162. Cabuga Jr, Cresencio C., and Rachel Ann P. Cańete. "International Journal of Social Science and Human
Research."
163. Seddighi, Hamed, Homeira Sajjadi, Sepideh Yousefzadeh, Mónica López López, Meroe Vameghi, Hassan
Rafiey, Hamid Reza Khankeh, and Magdalena Garzon Fonseca. "Students’ Preparedness for Disasters in
Schools: A Systematic Review Protocol." BMJ paediatrics open 4, no. 1 (2020).
164. Goddard, Yvonne L., Roger D. Goddard, and Megan Tschannen-Moran. "A Theoretical and Empirical
Investigation of Teacher Collaboration for School Improvement and Student Achievement in Public
Elementary Schools." Teachers college record 109, no. 4 (2007): 877-96.
165. Watson, Patricia J., and Josef I. Ruzek. "Academic/State/Federal Collaborations and the Improvement of
Practices in Disaster Mental Health Services and Evaluation." Administration and Policy in Mental Health and
Mental Health Services Research 36 (2009): 215-20.
166. Lu, Hung-Yi, Donald O. Case, Mia Liza A. Lustria, Nahyun Kwon, James E. Andrews, Sarah E. Cavendish,
and Brenikki R. Floyd. "Predictors of Online Information Seeking by International Students When Disaster
Strikes Their Countries." CyberPsychology & Behavior 10, no. 5 (2007): 709-12.
167. Tracy, Andrew, and Amy Javernick-Will. "Credible Sources of Information Regarding Induced Seismicity."
Sustainability 12, no. 6 (2020): 2308.
168. Fong, Carlton J., Yughi Kim, Coreen W. Davis, Theresa Hoang, and Young Won Kim. "A Meta-Analysis on
Critical Thinking and Community College Student Achievement." Thinking Skills and Creativity 26 (2017):
71-83.
169. Flanigan, Abraham E., and Wayne A. Babchuk. "Social Media as Academic Quicksand: A
Phenomenological Study of Student Experiences in and out of the Classroom." Learning and Individual
differences 44 (2015): 40-45.
170. Sumarni, Sri, and Rika Feranita. "The Utilization Effect of Video Learning Media through Critical Thinking
Skills and Student Learning Outcomes Towards Tenth Grade Student in Sociology Subject at Sma 1
Banyuasin Ii." 2018.
171. Mutasa, Sebia, and Edson Munsaka. "Botswana and International Policies on the Inclusion of Disaster Risk
Reduction in the School Curriculum: Exploring the Missing Link." International Journal of Disaster Risk
Reduction 40 (2019): 101271.
172. Mubarak, A. F., R. Amiruddin, and S. Gaus. "The Effectiveness of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation
Training for the Students in Disaster Prone Areas." 2019.
173. Story, William T., Halkeno Tura, Jason Rubin, Belaynesh Engidawork, Anwar Ahmed, Feysel Jundi,
Teshale Iddosa, and Teweldebrhan Hailu Abrha. "Social Capital and Disaster Preparedness in Oromia,
Ethiopia: An Evaluation of the “Women Empowered” Approach." Social Science & Medicine 257 (2020):
111907.
174. Johnson, Victoria A., Kevin R. Ronan, David M. Johnston, and Robin Peace. "Evaluations of Disaster
Education Programs for Children: A Methodological Review." International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
9 (2014): 107-23.
175. Le Fevre, Deidre M. "Barriers to Implementing Pedagogical Change: The Role of Teachers' Perceptions of
Risk." Teaching and teacher education 38 (2014): 56-64.
176. Alfred, Danita, Jenifer Chilton, Della Connor, Belinda Deal, Rebecca Fountain, Janice Hensarling, and Linda
Klotz. "Preparing for Disasters: Education and Management Strategies Explored." Nurse education in practice
15, no. 1 (2015): 82-89.
177. Lu, Su-Ju, Yu-Chiao Lin, Kim Hua Tan, and Ying-Chieh Liu. "Revolutionizing Elementary Disaster
Prevention Education and Training Via Augmented Reality-Enhanced Collaborative Learning."
International Journal of Engineering Business Management 14 (2022): 18479790211067345.
178. Ginige, Kanchana, Dilanthi Amaratunga, and Richard Haigh. "Tackling Women's Vulnerabilities through
Integrating a Gender Perspective into Disaster Risk Reduction in the Built Environment." Procedia Economics
and Finance 18 (2014): 327-35.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those
of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s)
disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or
products referred to in the content.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0472.v1