Content uploaded by Ijmrr Analytics -Distribution Researchgate
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Ijmrr Analytics -Distribution Researchgate on Mar 30, 2024
Content may be subject to copyright.
Shailja and Parul Singh (2024). Carbohydrate Structure and Role. International Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews, Vol 03, No. 02, pp. 52-72.
___________________________________________________________________________
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews © 2024 is licensed
under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
52
Carbohydrate Structure and Role
Shailja1, Parul Singh2*
1Tikaram PG Girls College, Sonipat, Haryana- 131001, India.
2 Department of Chemistry, Deshbandhu College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110019, India.
*Corresponding author: Parul Singh, Department of Chemistry, Deshbandhu College, University
of Delhi, Delhi-110019, India.
How to Cite the Article: Shailja and Parul Singh (2024). Carbohydrate Structure and Role.
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews, Vol 03, No. 02, pp. 52-72.
Keywords
Abstract
Carbohydrate,
Metabolism,
Glycoproteins,
Glycosylation,
Glycolysis, Protein,
glycosylation
Carbohydrates are essential biomolecules that play a variety of structural
and functional roles in living organisms. As one of the three major
macronutrients, along with proteins and fats, carbohydrates are a vital
energy source and metabolic fuel. However, carbohydrates contribute
much more than just calories. This review provides an in-depth
examination of carbohydrate chemistry, structure, function, and
metabolism. Focus is given to how the specific molecular structures of
different carbohydrate classes including monosaccharides, disaccharides,
oligosaccharides, and polysaccharides determine their physiological
activities. Key topics covered include carbohydrate digestion and
absorption, glycoprotein and glycolipid synthesis, energy storage, and
cell signaling roles. Special attention is paid to glucose metabolism and
homeostasis due to the critical importance of blood sugar regulation.
Potential links between carbohydrate structures and the development of
metabolic disorders are also discussed. Tables and figures are provided
to illustrate key concepts and summarize important information. Current
areas of research and future directions are highlighted to demonstrate
how continued elucidation of carbohydrate structural chemistry may lead
to improved understanding of carbohydrate biology and better
therapeutic interventions for carbohydrate-related diseases. This broad
review provides a structural perspective to improve comprehension of
the diverse functional roles of carbohydrates in biological systems.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF
MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH & REVIEWS
jo ur nal ho mepa ge
:
www.ij mrr. online /index.p hp/h ome
Shailja and Parul Singh (2024). Carbohydrate Structure and Role. International Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews, Vol 03, No. 02, pp. 52-72.
___________________________________________________________________________
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews © 2024 is licensed
under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
53
1. INTRODUCTION
Carbohydrates are a vital class of biomolecules that play numerous critical roles across all
domains of life. As their name indicates, carbohydrates are hydrate carbon compounds that
contain carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen atoms. The basic molecular formula for carbohydrates
is (CH2O)n where n is at least 3. Carbohydrates are synthesized by plants through
photosynthesis and serve as the primary metabolic fuel utilized by cells to produce energy
through cellular respiration [1]. In addition to their well-established function as an energy
source, carbohydrates have many other important structural and functional roles. They
contribute to cell membrane structure, facilitate cellular recognition, provide protection and
support, and participate in numerous biological processes as activating or signaling
molecules [2].
Figure 1: General classification of carbohydrates
With such widespread involvement in living systems, a thorough understanding of
carbohydrate chemistry and structure is essential. The diverse physiological functions of
carbohydrates are directly determined by their underlying molecular structures. Even subtle
differences in molecular configuration can have significant impacts on carbohydrate
metabolism and activity. Therefore, this review provides an in-depth examination of
carbohydrate structure-function relationships. Focus is given to how the specific molecular
Shailja and Parul Singh (2024). Carbohydrate Structure and Role. International Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews, Vol 03, No. 02, pp. 52-72.
___________________________________________________________________________
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews © 2024 is licensed
under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
54
structures of different carbohydrate classes and functional groups contribute to their
biological roles.
Carbohydrates can be divided into four primary categories: monosaccharides,
disaccharides, oligosaccharides, and polysaccharides. Monosaccharides are the simplest and
smallest carbohydrates. They cannot be further hydrolyzed to smaller carbohydrates and
serve as the building blocks for all higher order carbohydrate structures. Disaccharides
contain two monosaccharide units, oligosaccharides three to ten, and polysaccharides more
than ten monosaccharide units linked together [3]. Each carbohydrate category contains
distinct subgroups with unique structural attributes that determine their functional
capabilities.
This review will provide a thorough overview of carbohydrate chemistry starting with
monosaccharide structure. Key carbohydrate classes will be covered highlighting how their
molecular configurations give rise to specific biological activities. Important physiological
processes involving carbohydrates such as digestion, nutrient absorption, energy
metabolism, glycoprotein synthesis, cell signaling, and disease development will be
discussed throughout to demonstrate the form-function relationships of carbohydrate
structures. Tables and figures will be incorporated to summarize key information and
illustrate structural concepts. The goal is to provide a comprehensive structural perspective
to improve understanding of the varied functional roles of carbohydrates in biological
systems.
2. MONOSACCHARIDE STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION
Monosaccharides are the most basic carbohydrate units. They contain a single
polyhydroxy aldehyde or ketone unit making them the simplest form of a sugar molecule.
Monosaccharides are further classified by the number of carbon atoms they contain which is
typically three to seven carbons long. The most abundant monosaccharides relevant to
human physiology are the hexoses, which contain six carbon atoms [4].
The six carbon hexoses share a common chemical formula of C6H12O6. However, they
can exist as different structural isomers depending on the position of the carbonyl group
within the carbon chain and the spatial arrangements around asymmetric carbons. These
Shailja and Parul Singh (2024). Carbohydrate Structure and Role. International Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews, Vol 03, No. 02, pp. 52-72.
___________________________________________________________________________
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews © 2024 is licensed
under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
55
subtle structural differences confer each hexose with unique chemical properties that
determine their physiological functions (See Table 1).
Table 1. Structures and functions of common hexose monosaccharides.
Monosaccharide
Primary Functions
Glucose
Major energy source, metabolic intermediate
Galactose
Component of lactose, glycoproteins, glycolipids
Fructose
Sweetener, glycolysis intermediate
Mannose
Component of glycoproteins, glycolipids
Glucose is the most abundant monosaccharide in nature and the primary product of
photosynthesis [5]. As such, glucose plays a central role in carbohydrate metabolism and
bioenergetics. Glucose in its ring form can exist in either an α-pyranose or β-pyranose
structure which interconvert through mutarotation. These two anomers differ in the position of
the hydroxyl group on the anomeric carbon. This structural flexibility of glucose allows it to
adopt different conformations required to fit into active sites of metabolic enzymes and
transport proteins [6].
Fructose and galactose are structural isomers of glucose. Fructose, also known as fruit
sugar, differs from glucose only in the position of the hydroxyl group on carbon 2. This subtle
change causes fructose to be much sweeter than glucose and gives it distinct metabolic
properties. Fructose is metabolized independently of insulin by the liver which can lead to
adverse effects when consumed in excess [7]. Galactose differs from glucose in the
configuration around carbon 4 which is critical for its role in lactose synthesis and
incorporation into glycoproteins and glycolipids.
Mannose is an epimer of glucose, meaning it differs only in the stereochemistry around
one carbon. This C2 epimerization causes mannose to be metabolically inert compared to
glucose. Instead of energy metabolism, mannose is primarily utilized for protein glycosylation
[8]. Overall, the distinct structures of the various hexoses enable each one to play unique
Shailja and Parul Singh (2024). Carbohydrate Structure and Role. International Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews, Vol 03, No. 02, pp. 52-72.
___________________________________________________________________________
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews © 2024 is licensed
under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
56
biological roles critical to health. Further elucidation of monosaccharide structure-function
relationships will provide key insights into improving carbohydrate metabolism and
preventing metabolic disorders.
3. DISACCHARIDE STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION
Disaccharides are composed of two monosaccharide units linked together by a
glycosidic bond. The particular monosaccharides joined and type of glycosidic linkage
determine the classification and function of each disaccharide. The four main disaccharides
relevant to human nutrition are sucrose, lactose, maltose, and trehalose (See Table 2).
Table 2: Structures and functions of common dietary disaccharides.
Disaccharide
Linkage
Primary Functions
Sucrose
α-D-glucose, β-D-fructose, 1→2
glycosidic bond
Sweetener, energy source
Lactose
β-D-galactose, β-D-glucose , 1→4
glycosidic bond
Primary sugar in milk, probiotic
Maltose
α-D-glucose, α-D-glucose , 1→4
glycosidic bond
Product of starch digestion
Trehalose
α-D-glucose, α-D-glucose , 1→1
glycosidic bond
Energy storage, stress protection
Sucrose, also known as table sugar, is composed of glucose and fructose bonded
together. This makes sucrose very sweet and provides a readily absorbed energy source.
Lactose is the primary carbohydrate found in milk consisting of galactose and glucose. It
requires lactase enzyme to digest. Maltose, made of two glucose units, is an intermediate
product of starch breakdown. Trehalose has two glucose monomers linked in an atypical 1→1
bond, allowing it to provide stress protection [9]. Overall, the different disaccharides each
serve specialized roles in nutrition, metabolism, and homeostasis. Further study of how
disaccharide structures relate to their digestion, absorption, and utilization will provide
insights to help optimize carbohydrate benefits.
Shailja and Parul Singh (2024). Carbohydrate Structure and Role. International Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews, Vol 03, No. 02, pp. 52-72.
___________________________________________________________________________
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews © 2024 is licensed
under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
57
4. Oligosaccharide Structure and Function
Oligosaccharides are carbohydrate polymers containing between three to ten
monosaccharide units. They can be linear or branched chains with a variety of glycosidic
linkages. Oligosaccharides have many structural forms and are abundant on cell surfaces as
components of glycoproteins and glycolipids where they facilitate molecular recognition and
cell signaling [10]. Key dietary oligosaccharides include raffinose, stachyose, and
fructooligosaccharides (FOS). Their structures and functions are outlined in Table 3.
Table 3: Structures and functions of common dietary oligosaccharides.
Oligosaccharide
Composition
Primary Functions
Raffinose
Galactose, glucose, fructose
Gas production, prebiotic
Stachyose
Galactose, glucose, fructose (2 units)
Gas production, prebiotic
FOS
Fructose polymers
Prebiotic, soluble fiber
Raffinose and stachyose contain galactose, glucose, and varying numbers of fructose
units. They are indigestible oligosaccharides that provide prebiotic and gas-producing effects.
Fructooligosaccharides (FOS) are short polymers of fructose that also display prebiotic
activities. Overall, the structural diversity of oligosaccharides allows them to interact with gut
microbes and gut epithelia in ways that modulate health [11]. Additional oligosaccharide
research is needed to determine how best to leverage their structures for improved nutrition
and disease prevention.
5. POLYSACCHARIDE STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION
Polysaccharides contain long chains of monosaccharide units linked together by
glycosidic bonds. They are the most abundant carbohydrate class representing the primary
storage and structural forms of carbohydrates. Plant polysaccharides include starch and
cellulose, while animal polysaccharides include glycogen and chitin. The monosaccharide
composition, chain length, branching structure, and glycosidic linkages influence the
physical properties and functions of each polysaccharide (See Table 4).
Shailja and Parul Singh (2024). Carbohydrate Structure and Role. International Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews, Vol 03, No. 02, pp. 52-72.
___________________________________________________________________________
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews © 2024 is licensed
under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
58
Table 4: Structures and functions of key dietary polysaccharides.
Polysaccharide
Composition
Primary Functions
Starch
α-D-glucose , α-1,4 linear
with α-1,6 branches
Energy storage in plants
Cellulose
β-D-glucose , β-1,4 linear
Structural fiber in plants
Glycogen
α-D-glucose , α-1,4 linear
with α-1,6 branches
Energy storage in animals
Chitin
β-D-N-acetylglucosamine ,
β-1,4 linear
Structural fiber in fungi, insects
Starch and glycogen are highly branched glucose polymers that serve as compact energy
stores in plants and animals, respectively. Cellulose is an unbranched glucose chain that
provides structural rigidity to plant cell walls. Chitin is an unbranched N-acetylglucosamine
polymer that forms exoskeletons of insects and cell walls of fungi. These examples
demonstrate how polysaccharides are structurally optimized for key biological roles. Further
insights into polysaccharide conformations will lead to better use of dietary fibers and
improved utilization of carbohydrate energy reserves.
6. Carbohydrate Digestion and Absorption
In order to utilize ingested carbohydrates, the digestive system must first break down
polysaccharides into their monosaccharide constituents. Digestion begins in the mouth with
salivary amylase which hydrolyzes some starch into maltose and dextrin disaccharides [12].
The bulk of carbohydrate digestion then occurs in the small intestine aided by pancreatic
enzymes that further break down polysaccharides into oligosaccharides and disaccharides for
absorption.
Intestinal cells lining the small intestine, called enterocytes, complete carbohydrate
digestion through intracellular hydrolysis. Enterocytes express various membrane-bound
disaccharidases and cytosolic glycosidases that split disaccharides, oligosaccharides, and any
remaining polysaccharides into monosaccharides [13]. The monosaccharides glucose,
Shailja and Parul Singh (2024). Carbohydrate Structure and Role. International Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews, Vol 03, No. 02, pp. 52-72.
___________________________________________________________________________
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews © 2024 is licensed
under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
59
galactose, and fructose are then absorbed across the intestinal epithelium into circulation via
facilitated transport. Once absorbed, monosaccharides enter circulation and travel to tissues
for utilization.
The efficiency of carbohydrate digestion and absorption depends heavily on molecular
structure. For example, the glycosidic bonds of starch amylose and amylopectin differ in
position and branching, leading amylopectin to be more readily digested. Fiber
polysaccharides like cellulose are resistant to hydrolysis which prevents their breakdown and
absorption [14]. Disaccharides also require their specific disaccharidases in order to be
digested (See Table 5). Lactose cannot be absorbed without intestinal lactase to cleave it.
These examples illustrate the critical impact carbohydrate molecular structure has on
determining its fate and physiological effects during and after digestion.
Table 5: Digestive enzymes involved in carbohydrate breakdown.
Enzyme
Production Site
Substrate
Products
Salivary amylase
Salivary glands
Starch(amylose, amylopectin)
Maltose, dextrin
Pancreatic α-amylase
Pancreas
Starch, glycogen
Maltose, dextrin
Oligo-1,6-glucosidase
Small intestine
Oligosaccharides
Glucose
Sucrase
Small intestine
Sucrose
Glucose, fructose
Maltase
Small intestine
Maltose
Glucose
Lactase
Small intestine
Lactose
Glucose, galactose
7. CARBOHYDRATE ENERGY METABOLISM
Following digestion and absorption, carbohydrates undergo cellular metabolism to
produce energy. The monosaccharides glucose and fructose enter glycolysis, a cytoplasmic
Shailja and Parul Singh (2024). Carbohydrate Structure and Role. International Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews, Vol 03, No. 02, pp. 52-72.
___________________________________________________________________________
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews © 2024 is licensed
under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
60
pathway that breaks down 6-carbon sugars into two 3-carbonglycolytic intermediates called
pyruvate. Glycolysis yields a net gain of two ATP molecules and two NADH coenzymes.
Pyruvate can then enter the mitochondria where it is completely oxidized by the
tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle producing additional energy equivalents and substrates for
cellular respiration [15].
Glucose serves as the primary input for glycolysis in most cells. Phosphorylation traps
glucose inside the cell. Hexokinase then converts glucose to glucose-6-phosphate,
committing it to further catabolism. The intermediates of glycolysis include three-carbon
sugars such as glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate and dihydroxyacetone phosphate as well as the
phosphoesters 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate and phosphoenolpyruvate. Multiple isozyme forms
of glycolytic enzymes exist with differences in kinetic parameters, allosteric regulation, and
tissue distribution reflecting the varied metabolic needs of cells [16].
All aerobic organisms completely oxidize glucose for maximum energy yield. Under
anaerobic conditions, glycolysis allows net ATP production through substrate level
phosphorylation alone. This makes glycolysis a fundamental pathway conserved across
species. However, glycolysis is regulated differently in various tissues to match
carbohydrate utilization to energetic and biosynthetic demands. For example, liver uptakes
and metabolizes glucose as needed whereas brain glycolysis is constantly active to provide
its high glucose requirement [17].
Besides glucose, galactose and fructose also feed into glycolysis after initial processing
steps. Galactose is converted to glucose-6-phosphate by the Leloir pathway in the liver and
then metabolized like glucose [18]. Fructose enters its eponymous pathway involving
phosphorylation by fructokinase and cleavage by aldolase B ultimately generating glycolytic
intermediates. However, fructose metabolism bypasses key regulatory steps leading to
unrestrained production of substrates that drive lipogenesis [19]. This provides a molecular
mechanism for the association between excess fructose consumption and adverse metabolic
effects.
Overall, the glycolytic pathway exemplifies how carbohydrate structure relates to
function. The distinct fates of glucose versus fructose during metabolism combined with
tissue-specific control of glycolysis allows this conserved catabolic route to support diverse
physiological needs. Additional insights into carbohydrate structures and fluxes through
Shailja and Parul Singh (2024). Carbohydrate Structure and Role. International Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews, Vol 03, No. 02, pp. 52-72.
___________________________________________________________________________
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews © 2024 is licensed
under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
61
intersecting metabolic pathways will further unveil the complexities of systemic energy
homeostasis relevant to health and disease.
8. GLYCOPROTEIN SYNTHESIS AND FUNCTION
In addition to energy metabolism, carbohydrates play a crucial role in protein
glycosylation. Glycoproteins contain one or more covalently attached glycan chains that
affect protein folding, distribution, stability, and activity. Glycans contribute to protein
structure while also serving as vital cell surface recognition elements mediating cell-cell and
cell-matrix interactions [20].
Glycoprotein glycans are assembled in a step-wise manner from monosaccharide building
blocks. The most prevalent sugars incorporated are glucose, mannose, galactose, fucose, N-
acetylglucosamine and N-acetylneuraminic acid which comprise over 90% of all mammalian
glycan structures [21]. Hundreds of glycosyltransferase enzymes catalyze the formation of
glycosidic linkages to extend glycans via the various sugar monomers. Branch points and
chain termination are mediated by glycosidases. This enzymatic balance determines the
ultimate glycan structures attached to proteins [22].
The particular glycan configurations synthesized create distinct binding epitopes for
lectins and other carbohydrate-binding proteins that induce downstream signaling effects
[23]. For example, glycans attached to cell surface receptors can alter ligand binding and
activation. Changes in glycan structures are associated with cancer, autoimmunity, and
congenital disorders of glycosylation highlighting the essential contributions of glycans to
protein activities [24]. Therapeutics targeting glycan biosynthesis pathways continue to be
explored for modulating protein functions in disease contexts [25].
In summary, the step-wise synthesis of glycoprotein glycans from carbohydrate substrates
coupled with their subsequent recognition by binding partners represents a fundamental form
of post-translational modification regulating protein structure and function. Continued
efforts to elucidate glycan assembly pathways and decode glycan structural motifs will
further unlock the secrets of this complex carbohydrate signaling system.
9. CARBOHYDRATES IN CELL SIGNALING
Beyond protein glycosylation, carbohydrates participate directly in cellular
communication systems as well. They can form ligands that bind cell surface receptors to
Shailja and Parul Singh (2024). Carbohydrate Structure and Role. International Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews, Vol 03, No. 02, pp. 52-72.
___________________________________________________________________________
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews © 2024 is licensed
under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
62
trigger signaling cascades that alter cell behavior and physiology. Key examples include
glycan-binding receptors of the C-type lectin family and glycosphingolipid signaling [26].
C-type lectins include selectins, collectins, and other receptors that bind carbohydrate
chains in a calcium-dependent manner. Selectins facilitate cell adhesion and migration
during inflammation and wound repair by interacting with sialylated and fucosylated glycans
[27]. Collectins are soluble lectins that recognize glycan pathogen-associated molecular
patterns (PAMPs) as part of the innate immune response [28]. Changes in carbohydrate
structures provoked by inflammatory stimuli, hormones, or disease processes can
dynamically alter lectin activities.
Glycosphingolipids contain carbohydrate head groups attached to a ceramide lipid
backbone embedded in cell membranes. As both glycans and lipids transduce signals,
glycosphingolipids integrate these pathways eliciting downstream effects on growth,
differentiation, and motility through direct receptor binding or membrane domain
organization [29]. Gangliosides are sialic acid-containing glycosphingolipids abundant in
neuronal membranes where they modulate ion channel activities [30]. Defects in ganglioside
catabolism lead to GM1 and GM2 gangliosidoses characterized by severe neurological
impairment.
Together these examples demonstrate that carbohydrates directly participate in cell-cell
communication mechanisms beyond their roles as passive protein modifiers. Specific
carbohydrate motifs interact with various glycan-binding proteins and lipids to initiate
signaling cascules that dynamically regulate cell functions. Further research into glycomic
and glycobiological mechanisms will continue elucidating the diverse signaling roles of
carbohydrates.
10. CARBOHYDRATES IN HEALTH AND DISEASE
Given the widespread involvement of carbohydrates in human physiology, it follows that
aberrations in carbohydrate metabolism provoke development of disease. Changes in
carbohydrate structures, concentrations, and fluxes through metabolic pathways have all
been associated with pathology [31]. One of the most prevalent diseases linked to
carbohydrate dysregulation is diabetes mellitus which is characterized by hyperglycemia
arising from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action, or both [32].
Shailja and Parul Singh (2024). Carbohydrate Structure and Role. International Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews, Vol 03, No. 02, pp. 52-72.
___________________________________________________________________________
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews © 2024 is licensed
under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
63
Chronic hyperglycemia leads totissue damage through increased protein glycation and
generation of reactive oxygen species. Major complications of diabetes include retinopathy,
nephropathy, neuropathy, and cardiovascular disease which all involve biomolecular damage
from elevated blood glucose [33]. Strict control of carbohydrate intake and metabolism
through insulin therapy, other drugs, diet, and exercise provides the cornerstone of diabetes
management to prevent long-term sequelae.
Beyond diabetes, alterations in specific carbohydrate structures have been implicated in
congenital disorders, cancer, autoimmunity, and susceptibility to pathogens. For example,
defects in N-glycan synthesis pathways underlie congenital disorders of glycosylation
associated with severe developmental impairment [34]. Thedensity of cell surface glycan
branching is increased in tumorigenic cells which may impact metastasis [35]. Antibodies
against glycoprotein glycans and glycolipids attack self-tissues in Guillain-Barre syndrome
and other autoimmune neuropathies [36]. Viral and bacterial lectins that bind cell surface
glycans facilitate infection highlighting the pivotal roles carbohydrates play on both sides of
host-pathogen interactions [37].
In summary, precise regulation of carbohydrate chemistry is required to maintain normal
physiology. Perturbations in carbohydrate structures, metabolism, or signaling contribute
broadly to the pathogenesis of diverse diseases. Continued efforts to define carbohydrate
involvement in disease processes may reveal novel glycan biomarkers and therapeutic
targets to improve prevention and treatment.
11. CURRENT TRENDS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Carbohydrate research remains an active field as the critical importance of glycobiology
in human health becomes increasingly apparent. Major research directions include:
● Development of improved analytical methods for characterizing carbohydrate structures.
Advances in mass spectrometry and NMR enable detailed compositional and conformational
analysis of glycans to define structure-function relationships [38].
● Mapping of glycan biosynthesis pathways. Genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and
metabolomic approaches are combining to identify glycosyltransferases, glycosidases,
substrates, products, and regulators to model cell-specific glycan assembly [39].
Shailja and Parul Singh (2024). Carbohydrate Structure and Role. International Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews, Vol 03, No. 02, pp. 52-72.
___________________________________________________________________________
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews © 2024 is licensed
under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
64
● Investigation of glycan recognition and signaling. Glycan arrays, glycan binding assays, and
co-crystal structures precisely define lectin-glycan interactions while improving
understanding of downstream signaling effects [40].
● Engineering of synthetic glycans and glycomimetics. Chemical and enzymatic glycan
synthesis allows generation of homogeneous glycan probes to study and modulate glycan
activities in vivo [41].
● Integration of glycomic data into systems biology models. Databases of glycan structures and
biosynthetic pathways support systems-level modeling of glycan functions in metabolism,
signaling, and overall network dynamics [42].
● Development of glycan-based biomarkers and therapeutics. Aberrant glycans show promise
as early disease indicators while glycan biosynthetic enzymes are emerging drug targets [43].
Overall, recent technological and bioinformatic advances have propelled the
glycosciences forward into the post-genomic era. The coming decades will continue to see
major discoveries related to fundamental glycan biology that translate into clinical tools for
managing carbohydrate-related diseases. These future glycomic applications will firmly
establish carbohydrates as essential biomolecules crucial for supporting human life and
health.
Shailja and Parul Singh (2024). Carbohydrate Structure and Role. International Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews, Vol 03, No. 02, pp. 52-72.
___________________________________________________________________________
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews © 2024 is licensed
under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
65
Figure 2: Interplay of the instrumental and computational methods in the 3D structure
determination of carbohydrates, proteins, and protein–glycoconjugate complexes
Shailja and Parul Singh (2024). Carbohydrate Structure and Role. International Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews, Vol 03, No. 02, pp. 52-72.
___________________________________________________________________________
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews © 2024 is licensed
under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
66
Figure 3 (a) Original glycan structure model from the PDB entry. 3(b) PDB-REDO model
with properly renamed fucose residue and improved fit to the electron density. 3(c) Manually
rebuilt model based on PDB-REDO results. 3(d) CARP distribution plot for glycosidic φ-ψ
torsions of FUC(1-6)NAG (from panel (a)) in PDB.
Shailja and Parul Singh (2024). Carbohydrate Structure and Role. International Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews, Vol 03, No. 02, pp. 52-72.
___________________________________________________________________________
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews © 2024 is licensed
under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
67
Figure 4: Deposition statistics of carbohydrate-containing structures in Protein Data Bank
based on carbohydrate remediated list data. Data for 2020 cover seven of twelve months
12. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, this broad review integrates principles from carbohydrate chemistry,
biochemistry, physiology, and pathology to provide a structural perspective on the diverse
functional roles of carbohydrates in biological systems. Key topics covered include:
● Carbohydrate classification, nomenclature, and molecular structures
● Monosaccharide, disaccharide, oligosaccharide, and polysaccharide configurations in
relation to their biological activities
● Carbohydrate digestion, absorption, and intracellular metabolism
● Glycoprotein synthesis and function
● Roles of carbohydrates in cell-cell signaling mechanisms
● Involvement of carbohydrates in health and disease processes
● Current trends and future research directions in the glycosciences
The form-function relationships of carbohydrate structures give rise to their widespread
capabilities as energy sources, metabolic intermediates, stable polymers, dynamic post-
translational modifiers, cell surface ligands, and more. Appreciation of these structure-
Shailja and Parul Singh (2024). Carbohydrate Structure and Role. International Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews, Vol 03, No. 02, pp. 52-72.
___________________________________________________________________________
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews © 2024 is licensed
under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
68
activity correlations is critical for improving carbohydrate utilization and developing glycan-
targeted therapeutics. This overview of carbohydrate chemistry and biology provides a
foundation for ongoing research efforts seeking to fully elucidate the diverse molecular roles
of these essential biomolecules.
13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship,
and/or publication of this article.
14. PLAGIARISM POLICY
All authors declare that any kind of violation of plagiarism, copyright and ethical matters will
taken care by all authors. Journal and editors are not liable for aforesaid matters.
15. SOURCES OF FUNDING
The authors received no financial aid to support for the research.
REFERENCES
[1] Fan, L.; Ding, Y. Research on risk scorecard of sick building syndrome based on machine
learning. Build. Environ. 2022, 211, 108710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[2] Kiewiet, M.B.G.; Elderman, M.E.; El Aidy, S.; Burgerhof, J.G.M.; Visser, H.; Vaughan,
E.E.; Faas, M.M.; de Vos, P. Flexibility of Gut Microbiota in Ageing Individuals during
Dietary Fiber Long-Chain Inulin Intake. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2021, 65, e2000390. [Google
Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Hughes, R.L.; Horn, W.H.; Finnegan, P.; Newman, J.W.; Marco, M.L.; Keim, N.L.; Kable,
M.E. Resistant Starch Type 2 from Wheat Reduces Postprandial Glycemic Response with
Concurrent Alterations in Gut Microbiota Composition. Nutrients 2021, 13, 645. [Google
Scholar] [CrossRef]
[4] Stratton, R.J.; Elia, M. A review of reviews: a new look at the evidence for oral nutritional
supplements in clinical practice. Clin. Nutr. Suppl. 2007, 2, 5–23. [Google Scholar]
[CrossRef]
[5] Engfer, M.; Green, C. Oral Nutritional Supplement to Tackle Malnutrition: Summary
Booklet. Medical Nutrition International Industry. Available online:
http://www.file:///C:/Users/bronsal/Downloads/MNIBookletFINAL2911%20(2).pdf (accessed
on 6 March 2018).
Shailja and Parul Singh (2024). Carbohydrate Structure and Role. International Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews, Vol 03, No. 02, pp. 52-72.
___________________________________________________________________________
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews © 2024 is licensed
under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
69
[6] Oral Nutritional Supplements. The British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Website. Available online: http://www.bapen.org.uk/nutrition-support/nutrition-by-
mouth/oral-nutritional-supplements (accessed on 10 May 2018).
[7] Absorption of Monosaccharides. Vivo Pathophysiology Website. Available online:
http://www.vivo.colostate.edu/hbooks/pathphys/digestion/smallgut/absorb_sugars.html
(accessed on 11 May 2018).
[8] Tierney, M.; Gallagher, A.; Giotis, E.S.; Pentieva, K. An online survey on consumer
knowledge and understanding of added sugars. Nutrients 2017, 9, 37. [Google Scholar]
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Know Your Limit for Added Sugars. Center for Disease Control and Prevention Website.
Available online: http://www.cdc.gov/nutrition/data-statistics/know-your-limit-for-added-
sugars.html (accessed on 9 May 2018).
[10] Clemens, R.A.; Jones, J.M.; Lee, S.Y.; Mayhew, E.J.; Slavin, J.; Zivanovic, S.
Functionality of sugars in foods and health. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2016, 15, 433–
470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[11] Dennis, B. FDA Says Consumers Should Have More Details about ‘Added Sugars’ in
Foods. Washington Post. Available online: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-
health/wp/2015/07/24/should-consumers-have-details-about-added-sugar-in-foods-fda-says-
yes/ (accessed on 9 May 2018).
[12] US Department of Health and Human Services; US Department of Agriculture. 2010
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 7th ed.; US Department of Health and Human Services:
Washington, DC, USA, 2010. Available online:
https://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/dga2010/dietaryguidelines2010.pdf (accessed on 2 April
2018).
[13] World Health Organization. WHO Calls on Countries to Reduce Sugars Intake among
Adults and Children. Available online:
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2015/sugar-guideline/en/ (accessed on 2
March 2018).
[14] US Department of Health and Human Services; US Department of Agriculture. 2015–
2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 8th ed.; US Department of Health and Human
Services: Washington, DC, USA, 2015. Available online:
http://www.health.gov/DietaryGuidelines (accessed on 16 May 2018).
Shailja and Parul Singh (2024). Carbohydrate Structure and Role. International Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews, Vol 03, No. 02, pp. 52-72.
___________________________________________________________________________
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews © 2024 is licensed
under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
70
[15] Guideline: Sugar Intake for Adults and Children. World Health Organization. Available
online: https://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=2033879 (accessed on 10 May
2018).
[16] Changes to the Nutrition Facts Label. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Website.
Available online:
https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/L
abelingNutrition/ucm385663.htm (accessed on 10 May 2018).
[17] Terrie, Y.C. Medical Food and Meal Replacement Nutritional Supplements. Pharmacy
Times Website. Available online:
http://www.pharmacytimes.com/publications/issue/2015/january2015/medical-food-and-meal-
replacement-nutritional-supplements?p=2 (accessed on 10 May 2018).
[18] Therapeutic. Abbott Nutrition Website. Available online:
https://abbottnutrition.com/therapeutic (accessed on 10 May 2018).
[19] Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol,
Protein, and Amino Acids. Institute of Medicine. Available online:
http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/Reports/2002/Dietary-Reference-Intakes-for-Energy-
Carbohydrate-Fiber-Fat-Fatty-Acids-Cholesterol-Protein-and-Amino-Acids.aspx (accessed on
10 May 2018).
[20] Jensen, G. Oral nutritional supplementation. Am. J. Manag. Care 2013, 19, 119–120.
[Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[21] Wilson, M.; Purushothaman, R.; Morley, J. Effect of liquid dietary supplements on
energy intake. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2002, 75, 944–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Ruxton, C. Compliance with Oral Nutritional Supplements and the Role of Taste. CN
Focus 2014, 6. Available online: https://www.nutrition2me.com/images/free-view-
articles/free-downloads/ONSjuneCNFocus14.pdf (accessed on 8 December 2017).
[23] Hubbard, G.P.; Elia, M.; Holdoway, A.; Stratton, R.J. A systematic review of compliance
to oral nutritional supplements. Clin. Nutr. Edinb. Scotl. 2012, 31, 293–312. [Google Scholar]
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Darmon, P.; Karsegard, V.L.; Nardo, P.; Dupertuis, Y.M.; Pichard, C. Oral nutritional
supplements and taste preferences: 545 days of clinical testing in malnourished in-patients.
Clin. Nutr. 2008, 27, 660–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Breslin, P.A.S. An evolutionary perspective on food and human taste. Curr. Biol. 2013,
23, R409–R418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Shailja and Parul Singh (2024). Carbohydrate Structure and Role. International Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews, Vol 03, No. 02, pp. 52-72.
___________________________________________________________________________
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews © 2024 is licensed
under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
71
[26] How Does Our Sense of Taste Work? PubMed Health Website. Available online:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0072592/ (accessed on 9 May 2018).
[27] Hardy, K.; Brand-Miller, J.; Brown, K.D.; Thomas, M.G.; Copeland, L. The importance
of dietary carbohydrate in human evolution. Q. Rev. Biol. 2015, 90, 251–268. [Google
Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Tastes Differ: How Taste Preferences Develop. The European Food Information Council
(EUFIC). Available online: http://www.eufic.org/en/food-today/article/tastes-differ-how-taste-
preferences-develop (accessed on 30 August 2018).
[29] Auvray, M.; Spence, C. The multisensory perception of flavor. Conscious. Cogn. 2008,
17, 1016–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Beauchamp, G.K.; Cowart, B.J. Congenital and experiential factors in the development of
human flavor preferences. Appetite 1985, 6, 357–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[31] Hoffman, J.; Ishii, E.; Macturk, R. Age-related changes in the prevalence of smell/taste
problems among the United States adult population. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1998, 855, 716–
722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Cooper, R.M.; Bilash, I.; Zubek, J.P. The effect of age on taste sensitivity. J. Gerontol.
1959, 14, 56–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Stevens, J.C.; Cain, W.S.; Demarque, A.; Ruthruff, A.M. On the discrimination of
missing ingredients: Aging and salt flavor. Appetite 1991, 16, 129–140. [Google Scholar]
[CrossRef]
[34] Stevens, J.C. Detection of tastes in mixture with other tastes: Issues of masking and
aging. Chem. Sens. 1996, 21, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[35] Schiffman, S.S. Perception of taste and smell in elderly persons. Crit. Rev. Food Sci.
Nutr. 1993, 33, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Schiffman, S.S. Taste and smell losses in normal aging and disease. JAMA 1997, 278,
1357–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Duffy, V.B.; Backstrand, J.R.; Ferris, A.M. Olfactory dysfunction and related nutritional
risk in free-living, elderly women. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1995, 95, 879–884. [Google Scholar]
[CrossRef]
[38] Arcavi, L.; Shahar, A. Drug related taste disturbances: Emphasis on the elderly. Harefuah
2003, 142, 446–450. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Shailja and Parul Singh (2024). Carbohydrate Structure and Role. International Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews, Vol 03, No. 02, pp. 52-72.
___________________________________________________________________________
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews © 2024 is licensed
under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
72
[39] Schiffman, S.S.; Gatlin, C.A. Clinical physiology of taste and smell. Annu. Rev. Nutr.
1993, 13, 405–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Schiffman, S.S.; Graham, B.G.; Suggs, M.S.; Sattely-Miller, E.A. Effect of psychotropic
drugs on taste responses in young and elderly persons. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1998, 855, 732–
737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Douglass, R.; Heckman, G. Drug-related taste disturbance. Can. Fam. Phys. 2010, 56,
1142–1147. [Google Scholar]
[42] Seiberling, K.A.; Conley, D.B. Aging and olfactory and taste function. Otolaryngol. Clin.
N. Am. 2004, 37, 1209–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] MacDonald, D.E. Principles of geriatric dentistry and their application to the older adult
with a physical disability. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 2006, 22, 413–434. [Google Scholar]
[CrossRef] [PubMed]