ArticlePDF Available

Ant community composition in a citrus grove reveals eastern expansion in Florida of the South American big-headed ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Florida has become a worldwide hotspot for introduced and invasive ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Furthermore, studies have shown that non-native ants support other invasive insects in Florida, such as the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Liviidae), which is the vector of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus, the causal pathogen of citrus greening, the worst citrus disease in the world. The Asian citrus psyllid establishes beneficial interactions with invasive, introduced, and native ants. In this study, we described the ant diversity in a citrus grove in south Florida as a first step to assess ant-Asian citrus psyllid interactions for future studies. During the summer of 2018, 25 pitfall traps were set in a citrus grove. The red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta (Buren), was present in all the traps (100 %), and 19 traps (76 %) had Dorymyrmex bureni (Trager), the pyramid ant, which is native to the southeast United States. Two introduced ants, Cardiocondyla emeryi (Forel) and Brachymyrmex obscurior (Forel), were found in 15 (60 %) and 11 (44 %) traps, respectively. The South American big-headed ant, Pheidole obscurithorax (Naves), was found in 14 traps (56 %). This introduced ant has been found to co-exist with S. invicta, and to our knowledge, this is the first report of the species in this eastern part of peninsular Florida. Finally, Cardiocondyla venustula (Wheeler), an introduced ant from Africa, was found in one of the traps. Although, this ant is found in south Florida, it seems uncommon, and this is its first report in this county. Our study highlights the continued spread of introduced and invasive ants in Florida.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Research Article
Marina S. Ascunce*, Katherine Casey Carroll, Joe Aufmuth, Lauren Justice, Patricia Perez,
Andrew Nisip, Jenny M. Gavilanez-Slone, Jawwad A. Qureshi, Sanford Porter and Andrea Lucky
Ant community composition in a citrus grove
reveals eastern expansion in Florida of the South
American big-headed ant (Hymenoptera:
Formicidae)
https://doi.org/10.1515/aent-2024-0011
Received February 28, 2024; accepted February 29, 2024;
published online March 29, 2024
Abstract: Florida has become a worldwide hotspot for
introduced and invasive ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).
Furthermore, studies have shown that non-native ants
support other invasive insects in Florida, such as the Asian
citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera:
Liviidae), which is the vector of Candidatus Liberibacter
asiaticus, the causal pathogen of citrus greening, the worst
citrus disease in the world. The Asian citrus psyllid estab-
lishes benecial interactions with invasive, introduced, and
native ants. In this study, we described the ant diversity in a
citrus grove in south Florida as a rst step to assess ant-Asian
citrus psyllid interactions for future studies. During the
summer of 2018, 25 pitfall traps were set in a citrus grove.
The red imported re ant, Solenopsis invicta (Buren), was
present in all the traps (100 %), and 19 traps (76 %) had
Dorymyrmex bureni (Trager), the pyramid ant, which is
native to the southeast United States. Two introduced ants,
Cardiocondyla emeryi (Forel) and Brachymyrmex obscurior
(Forel), were found in 15 (60 %) and 11 (44 %) traps, respec-
tively. The South American big-headed ant, Pheidole
obscurithorax (Naves), was found in 14 traps (56 %). This
introduced ant has been found to co-exist with S. invicta, and
to our knowledge, this is the rst report of the species in this
eastern part of peninsular Florida. Finally, Cardiocondyla
venustula (Wheeler), an introduced ant from Africa, was
found in one of the traps. Although, this ant is found in south
Florida, it seems uncommon, and this is its rst report in this
county. Our study highlights the continued spread of intro-
duced and invasive ants in Florida.
Keywords: invasive ants; re ants; Pheidole obscurithorax;
pitfall traps; Asian citrus psyllid; citrus greening
Sumario: Floridasehaconvertidoenunhot-spotpara
especies introducidas e invasoras de hormigas
Current address: Katherine Casey Carroll, Department of Ecology and
Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309,
USA, E-mail: Casey.Carroll@colorado.edu.
Current address: Patricia Perez, Florida Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services, Department of Plant Industry, Gainesville, FL 32608,
USA, E-mail: patricia.perez@fdacs.gov.
Current address: Andrew Nisip, Department of Biology, University of
Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA; E-mail: andrew.nisip@louisville.edu.
Current address: Jenny M. Gavilanez-Slone, Entomology Laboratory,
Faculty of Natural Resources, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo
(ESPOCH), Riobamba, Ecuador; E-mail: jenny.gavilanez@espoch.edu.ec.
*Corresponding author: Marina S. Ascunce, USDA-ARS Center for
Medical, Agricultural, and Veterinary Entomology, Gainesville, FL 32608,
USA; and Emergency Pathogens Institute, Department of Plant
Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA,
E-mail: marina.ascunce@usda.gov. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5239-
3585
Katherine Casey Carroll, Patricia Perez and Jenny M. Gavilanez-Slone,
Emergency Pathogens Institute, Department of Plant Pathology, University
of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
Joe Aufmuth, George A. Smathers Libraries, University of Florida,
Gainesville, FL 32611, USA, E-mail: mapper@uib.u.edu
Lauren Justice and Sanford Porter, USDA-ARS Center for Medical,
Agricultural, and Veterinary Entomology, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA,
E-mail: lauren.justice@usda.gov (L. Justice), sdporter22@gmail.com
(S. Porter)
Andrew Nisip, USDA-ARS Center for Medical, Agricultural, and Veterinary
Entomology, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA; and Emergency Pathogens
Institute, Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville,
FL 32610, USA
Jawwad A. Qureshi, Entomology and Nematology Department, Southwest
Florida Research and Education Center (SWFREC), University of Florida,
Immokalee, FL 34142, USA, E-mail: jawwadq@u.edu
Andrea Lucky, Entomology and Nematology Department, University of
Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA, E-mail: alucky@u.edu
Fla. Entomol. 2024; 107(1): 20240011
Open Access. © 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter on behalf of the Florida Entomological Society. This work is licensed under the Creative
Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
(Himenóptera: Formicidae). A su vez, estudios han mos-
tradoquelashormigasno-nativasayudanaotrasespecies
invasoras en Florida como el psílido asiático de los cítricos,
Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemíptera: Liviidae), el cual
es vector de Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus, el agente
causal de la enfermedad del enverdecimientode los
cítricos, la peor enfermedad de los cítricos a nivel mundial.
El psílido asiático de los cítricos establece relaciones
beneciosas con hormigas invasoras, introducidas y nati-
vas. En este estudio, describimos la diversidad de hormigas
en una huerta de cítricos en el sur de la Florida, como un
primer paso para evaluar las interacciones entre las hor-
migas y el psílido asiático de los cítricos en estudios futu-
ros. En el verano del 2018 se pusieron 25 trampas de caída
enunahuertadecítricos.Lahormigainvasorarojade
fuego, Solenopsis invicta (Buren), estuvo presente en todas
las trampas (100 %), mientras que 19 trampas (76 %) tenían
Dorymyrmex bureni (Trager), la hormiga piramidal, la cual
es nativa del sureste de los Estados Unidos. Dos hormigas
introducidas: Cardiocondyla emeryi (Forel) y Brachymyr-
mex obscurior (Forel) se encontraron en 15 (60 %) y 11
(44 %) de las trampas, respectivamente. La hormiga Sud-
americana de cabeza grande, Pheidole obscurithorax
(Naves), fue hallada en 14 trampas (56 %). Esta hormiga
introducida ha sido hallada coexistiendo con S. invicta ya
nuestro entender, este sería el primer reporte de esta
hormiga en el este de la península de Florida. Finalmente,
Cardiocondyla venustula (Wheeler), una hormiga intro-
ducida del Viejo Mundo fue hallada en una de las trampas.
A pesar de que esta hormiga se encuentra en el sur de la
Florida, es menos común, y este sería el primer reporte de
esta hormiga en este condado. Nuestro estudio remarca la
continua expansión de las hormigas introducidas e inva-
soras en Florida.
Palabras Claves: hormigas invasoras; hormigas de fuego;
Pheidole obscurithorax; trampas de caída; psílido asiático de
los cítricos; enverdecimiento de los cítricos
More than 520 ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) have
been transported outside their native range and established
in new areas worldwide (Bertelsmeier et al. 2018; Lach et al.
2010; Wong et al. 2023). Five of them are among the 100 most
concerning invasive species including the red imported re
ant, Solenopsis invicta (Buren), the Argentine ant, Line-
pithema humile (Mayr), the African big-headed ant, Pheidole
megacephala (Fabricius), the little re ant, Wasmannia
auropunctata (Roger), and the longlegged ant, Anoplolepis
gracilipes (Smith) (ISSG 2015). All these ve ants are in the
United States, and all but A.gracilipes are in Florida (Deyrup
2003; King and Porter 2007; Ohyama et al. 2020). The total ant
fauna in Florida encompasses 218 ant species, with 52 being
introduced or invasive (Deyrup 2003; Deyrup et al. 2000).
This non-native ant fauna is the largest among any of the
states in the United States (Deyrup 2003) and the largest
regional non-native ant fauna in the world (King and Porter
2007), making Florida a hot spot for introduced and invasive
ants. Even though non-native ant species are known in
Florida, the understanding of ant community composition
has not received enough attention, and the knowledge of the
distributions of even well-established species is limited. A
clear understanding of how these non-native ants get
established in Florida may eventually allow formal meta-
analyses of invasion impacts, which could help pinpoint
problematic taxa and prioritize early responses. Mapping
the new reports of invasive species is central to reporting
expansions of invasive species, guiding eective early re-
sponses to limit their further geographical expansion, and
determining if control eorts are working (Elith and
Leathwick 2009). This study aimed to characterize the ant
fauna at one agricultural site in Florida, particularly at a
citrus grove, due to its importance in Florida agriculture.
In Florida, citrus is a major part of the agricultural
landscape and a high-value crop of USD $438 million
(USDA-NASS 2022). In 1998, a serious pest of citrus, the Asian
citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Livii-
dae), was discovered in Florida (Halbert 1998). This invasive
psyllid is the vector of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus, a
phloem-limited α-proteobacterium, that is the cause of
the devastating citrus disease Huanglongbing or citrus
greening. About seven years after D. citri arrived in Florida,
Huanglongbing was detected in 2005 (Bové 2006) and since
this date has spread throughout Florida. Currently, 100 % of
the citrus groves in Florida are positive for Huanglongbing
(Graham et al. 2020). Because no cure is available, infected
trees die within a few years, resulting in an 85 % reduction in
citrus production since the onset of Huanglongbing in the
state (Singerman and Rogers 2020; USDA-NASS 2022). Man-
agement of Huanglongbing with antimicrobial agents and
nutritional treatments has not prevented major production
losses in Florida (Blaustein et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2017).
Classical biological control of D. citri using a parasitic wasp,
Tamarixia radiata (Waterston) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae)
(Hoy et al. 1999) has not been eective in controlling the
psyllid presumably due to its sensitivity to insecticides and
low temperatures during winter (Chong et al. 2010; Qureshi
et al. 2009). The limited eect of biological control agents gets
exacerbated by ants in citrus groves, as ants help D. citri by
protecting them against natural enemies (predators and
parasitoids) in return for the psyllids sugary excretions
(i.e., honeydew) as their food. Ants do this by physically
attacking predators and parasitoids and driving them away
2M.S. Ascunce et al.: Ant community composition in a citrus grove in Florida
from D. citri (Michaud 2004; Navarrete et al. 2013; Oliver et al.
2008; Shrestha et al. 2022; Vanek and Potter 2010; Yoo et al.
2013). In Florida citrus groves, invasive and introduced ants,
including the red imported re ant, the African big-headed
ant, the rover ant, Brachymyrmex obscurior (Forel), as well as
the native pyramid ant, Dorymyrmex bureni (Trager) have
been observed tending and protecting D. citri (Michaud 2004;
Navarrete et al. 2013; Shrestha et al. 2022). This study focused
on ant species diversity ina Florida citrus grove as a rst step
to gain insights into the dierent ant species that can poten-
tially provide protection for D. citri against its predators.
On 5 July 2018, we surveyed a citrus grove at the Uni-
versity of Florida Indian River Research and Education
Center (IRREC) in Fort Pierce (27.43 °N, 80.41 °W). Ants were
collected using pitfall traps with ethanol (70 %), as described
in Laub et al. (2009). A mini-roofwas designed to protect
the traps from rain and reduce evaporation (Supplementary
Material 1). Traps were placed along three transects sepa-
rated by 25 m. Along each transect, 710 pitfall traps were
placed at about 5 m intervals for a total of 25 traps. Traps
were collected after 48 h. Ants were sorted, transferred
into vials with 95 % ethanol, and identied under a stereo-
microscope using taxonomic keys from Deyrup (2003, 2016)
and MacGown (2022).
After taxonomic identication, the presence of each ant
species per pitfall was summarized in Table 1. All 25 traps
(100 %) contained specimens of red imported re ant, and 19
(76 %) contained D. bureni.Cardiocondyla emeryi (Forel) and
B. obscurior were found in 15 (60 %) and 11 (44 %) traps,
respectively. The South American big-headed ant, Pheidole
obscurithorax (Naves), was found in 14 traps (56 %). Finally,
Cardiocondyla venustula (Wheeler) was found in one pitfall
(4 %).
A map was created to show the co-distribution of red
imported re ant and D. bureni, as well as P.obscurithorax
and C. venustula (Figure 1). We used the Global Biodiversity
Information Facility (GBIF) to create this map. Detailed in-
formation on the process used to create this map is in Sup-
plementary Material 2. Presence-only data for each species
was downloaded individually, combined and evaluated for
occurrences and duplications. The species records outside of
Florida were removed. A nal presence or absence matrix
Table :Presence of ant species per pitfall: Solenopsis invicta,Dorymyrmex bureni,Cardiocondyla emeryi,Pheidole obscurithorax,Brachymyrmex obscurior,
and Cardiocondyla venustula.
Pitfall S. invicta D. bureni C. emeryi P. obscurithorax B. obscurior C. venustula
xxxx
xxx x
xx
xx
xx x x
xx x
xxx x
xxx x x
xx
 xxx
 xx
 x
 xxx x
 x x
 xx x
 xxx x x
 x
 xxx x
 xxx x x
 xxxx
 xxx
 xxx x x
 xxx x
 xxx x x
 xxxx
# Positive pitfalls     
Prevalence  % % % % %%
Status Inv N Int Int Int Int
Status: Inv: invasive; Int: introduced; N: native.
M.S. Ascunce et al.: Ant community composition in a citrus grove in Florida 3
based on latitude, longitude, and species was imported into
ArcGIS Pro v2.2 (Esri, Redlands, California), where separate
layers were created for each species.
Most agricultural lands are highly disturbed, facilitating
the establishment of invasive species that outcompete and
exclude native species (Mooney and Cleland 2001). This could
be the case in this citrus grove, in which ve out of the six
species collected were non-native (Table 1). However, long-
term studies need to be done to conrm this hypothesis. It
was not surprising to nd red imported re ant in 100 % of
the traps (Table 1). This invasive ant from South America was
rst detected in Mobile, Alabama, in the late 1930s. Since
then, it has rapidly spread throughout the southeast US as
well as other countries, becoming a global invasive species in
the 2000s (Ascunce et al. 2011). Several features make the red
imported re ant a successful invader, including high
reproducibility, ability to outcompete native ants for re-
sources, and social structure (Arnan et al. 2018; Bertelsmeier
et al. 2017; Holway et al. 2002; Passera 1994). Despite the red
imported re ants ability to outcompete native ants in
general, the native Dorymyrmex are able to coexist with
S. invicta (Helms and Vinson 2001; LeBrun et al. 2012; Stuble
et al. 2010), and in this study, D. bureni was in fact found in
70 % of the traps. Both species have been found to tend to
D. citri; however, S. invicta provides greater protection to the
psyllid against its natural enemies, resulting in a larger
economic cost to citrus growers in Florida (Shrestha et al.
2022).
Cardiocondyla are native to Africa and Asia, but some
Cardiocondyla species have become common cosmopolitan
introduced ants, including C. emeryi. In the case of C. venus-
tula, this ant has been recently introduced to the Caribbean,
Florida and Hawaii and its distribution seems to be
expanding (Seifert 2002; Starr et al. 2007), with this study
being its rst report in this county (Table 1, Figure 1). For B.
obscurior, a native ant from the Neotropics, the nature of its
presence in Florida as introduced or native species is not
clear (Deyrup et al. 2000). Finally, P. obscurithorax, an ant
native to South America, was rst found in Mobile, Alabama
in 1949, and then spread to other parts of the southeast US
(Naves 1985). Its current distribution in the US extends from
Texas to Florida, where it co-exists with the red imported re
ant. It reached the panhandle of Florida in the late 1990s
(Storz and Tschinkel 2004; Wetterer et al. 2015; Wilson 2003).
This study is the rst report of this species in the eastern part
of peninsular Florida and in a citrus grove. Although the
negative impact of its introduction is unclear, it continues to
spread through Florida and is expected to eventually occupy
a range similar to the red imported re ant (King and
Tschinkel 2007). Our study highlights the continued spread
Figure 1: Distribution of S. invicta,D. bureni,
P. obscurithorax, and C. venustula in Florida.
S. invicta (shaded light red, data from
USDA-APHIS-PPQ https://www.aphis.usda.
gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/reants/
downloads/federal-imported-re-ant-
quarantine.pdf), D. bureni (gray stripes, data
from Deyrup (2016)), P. obscurithorax (lled
circles, data from GBIF https://doi.org/10.
15468/dl.bc4w7h) and C. venustula (open cir-
cles, data from GBIF https://doi.org/10.15468/
dl.npp4zj). The black star shows the location of
the collection site for this study. The distribu-
tion of the introduced ants, C. emeryi and B.
obscurior is in Supplementary Material 2.
4M.S. Ascunce et al.: Ant community composition in a citrus grove in Florida
of introduced and invasive ants in Florida. The erosion of
native ant diversity in this citrus grove may likely be the
result of invasional meltdown, which was dened as: the
process by which a group of [introduced] species facilitate
one anothers invasion in various ways, increasing the
likelihood of survival and/or of ecological impact, and
possibly the magnitude of impact(Simberloand Von Holle
1999, p 22). However, to test this hypothesis, long-term
studies are needed. In addition, management practices
directed to control the Asian citrus psyllid and other citrus
insect pests could also aect native ant diversity.
Acknowledgments: We thank the University of Florida, IFAS
Seed Grant on Interdisciplinary Research on Invasive Spe-
cies (IRIS) for initial funding of this project, Erica Goss
(University of Florida, Plant Pathology Department) for her
encouragement about the project and comments on early
versions of this manuscript, Rachel Atchison (USDA-ARS-
CMAVE) for help with taxonomic identication and Sara
Alvarez (Education and Volunteer Specialist for Manatee
County, Florida) who assisted with the ant collection. We
would like to thank two anonymous reviewers and the editor
for their valuable comments on this manuscript.
Research ethics: Not applicable.
Author contributions: The authors have accepted
responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and
approved its submission.
Competing interests: The authors state no conict of
interest.
Research funding: This research work was supported by
IFAS Seed Grant on Interdisciplinary Research on Invasive
Species (IRIS) and partial funding was obtained from USDA-
ARS-CMAVE-Fire Ant Unit based funds.
Data availability: The raw data is provided in the manuscript.
References
Arnan, X., Andersen, A.N., Gibb, H., Parr, C.L., Sanders, N.J., Dunn, R.R.,
Angulo, E., Baccaro, F.B., Bishop, T.R., Boulay, R., et al. (2018).
Dominancediversity relationships in ant communities dier with
invasion. Glob. Change Biol. 24: 46144625.
Ascunce, M.S., Yang, C.-C., Oakey, J., Calcaterra, L., Wu, W.-J., Shih, C.-J.,
Goudet, J., Ross, K.G., and Shoemaker, D. (2011). Global invasion
history of the re ant Solenopsis invicta.Science 331: 10661068.
Bertelsmeier, C., Ollier, S., Liebhold, A., and Keller, L. (2017). Recent human
history governs global ant invasion dynamics. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1: 0184.
Bertelsmeier, C., Ollier, S., Liebhold, A.M., Brockerho, E.G., Ward, D., and
Keller, L. (2018). Recurrent bridgehead eects accelerate global alien
ant spread. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 115: 54865491.
Blaustein, R.A., Lorca, G.L., and Teplitski, M. (2018). Challenges for
managing Candidatus Liberibacter spp. (Huanglongbing disease
pathogen): current control measures and future directions.
Phytopathology 108: 424435.
Bové, J.M. (2006). Huanglongbing: a destructive, newly-emerging, century-
old disease of citrus. J. Plant Pathol. 88: 737.
Chong, J.-H., Roda, A.L., and Mannion, C.M. (2010). Density and natural
enemies of the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera:
Psyllidae), in the residential landscape of southern Florida. J. Agric.
Urban Entomol. 27: 3349.
Deyrup, M. (2003). An updated list of Florida ants (Hymenoptera:
Formicidae). Fla. Entomol 86: 4348.
Deyrup, M. (2016). Ants of Florida: identication and natural history. CRC
Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
Deyrup, M., Davis, L., and Cover, S. (2000). Exotic ants in Florida. Trans. Am.
Entomol. Soc. 126: 293326.
Elith, J. and Leathwick, J.R. (2009). Species distribution models: ecological
explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol.
Syst. 40: 677697.
Graham, J., Gottwald, T., and Setamou, M. (2020). Status of Huanglongbing
(HLB) outbreaks in Florida, California and Texas. Trop. Plant Pathol. 45:
265278.
Halbert, S.E. (1998) Entomology section. In: Anderson, P.J., and Hodges, G.S.
(Eds.). Tri-ology, Vol. 37. Division of Plant Industry, Gainesville, Florida,
pp. 59.
Helms, K.R. and Vinson, S.B. (2001). Coexistence of native ants with the red
imported re ant, Solenopsis invicta.Southwest. Nat 46: 396400.
Holway, D.A., Lach, L., Suarez, A.V., Tsutsui, N.D., and Case, T.J. (2002). The
causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Systemat.
33: 181233.
Hoy, M.A., Nguyen, R., and Jeyaprakash, A. (1999). Classical biological
control of Asian citrus psylla. Citrus Ind. 1: 2022.
ISSG (Invasive Species Specialist Group) (2015). The global invasive species
database, Version 2015.1. Available at: http://iucngisd.org/gisd/
search.php. [Accessed 2 July 2023].
King, J.R. and Porter, S.D. (2007). Body size, colony size, abundance, and
ecological impact of exotic ants in Floridas upland ecosystems. Evol.
Ecol. Res. 9: 757774.
King, J.R. and Tschinkel, W.R. (2007). Range expansion and local
population increase of the exotic ant, Pheidole obscurithorax,in
the southeastern United States (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Fla.
Entomol.90:435439.
Lach, L., Parr, C.L., and Abbott, K.L. (Eds.) (2010). Ant ecology. Oxford
University Press, New York, USA.
Laub, C., Youngman, R.R., Love, K., and Mize, T. (2009). Using pitfall traps to
monitor insect activity. Virginia Cooperative Extension Publication.
Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia,
pp. 444416.
LeBrun, E.G., Plowes, R.M., and Gilbert, L.E. (2012). Imported re ants near
the edge of their range: disturbance and moisture determine
prevalence and impact of an invasive social insect: habitat determines
imported re ant impacts. J. Anim. Ecol. 81: 884895.
MacGown, J.A. (2022). Identication keys. ants (Formicidae) of the
southeastern United States. Uploaded on 6 March 2003, last updated on 7
February 2022. Available at: https://
mississippientomologicalmuseum.org.msstate.edu/
Researchtaxapages/Formicidaepages/Identication.Keys.htm.
[Accessed 1 February 2019].
Michaud, J.P. (2004). Natural mortality of Asian citrus psyllid (Homoptera:
Psyllidae) in central Florida. Biol. Control 29: 260269.
Mooney, H.A. and Cleland, E.E. (2001). The evolutionary impact of invasive
species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98: 54465451.
Navarrete, B., McAuslane, H., Deyrup, M., and Peña, J.E. (2013). Ants
(Hymenoptera: Formicidae) associated with Diaphorina citri
M.S. Ascunce et al.: Ant community composition in a citrus grove in Florida 5
(Hemiptera: Liviidae) and their role in its biological control. Fla.
Entomol. 96: 590597.
Naves, M.A. (1985). A monograph of the genus Pheidole in Florida
(Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insecta Mundi 1: 5390.
Ohyama, L., King, J.R., and Gochnour, B.M. (2020). Changes in an invaded
Florida ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) community over 25 years. Fla.
Entomol. 103: 180190.
Oliver, T.H., Jones, I.A.N., Cook, J.M., and Leather, S.R. (2008). Avoidance
responses of an aphidophagous ladybird, Adalia bipunctata, to aphid
tending ants. Ecol. Entomol. 33: 523528.
Passera, L. (1994) Characteristics of tramp species. In: Williams, D.F. (Ed.).
Exotic ants: biology, impact, and control of introduced species. Westview
Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA, pp. 2343.
Qureshi, J.A., Rogers, M.E., Hall, D.G., and Stansly, P.A. (2009). Incidence of
invasive Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) and its introduced
parasitoid Tamarixia radiata (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in Florida
citrus. J. Econ. Entomol. 102: 247256.
Seifert, B. (2002). The ant genus Cardiocondyla (Insecta: Hymenoptera:
Formicidae) a taxonomic revision of the C. elegans,C. bulgarica,C.
batesii,C. nuda,C. shuckardi,C. stambuloi,C. wroughtonii,C. emeryi,
and C. minutior species groups. Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, B Bot. Zool.
104: 203338.
Shrestha, B., Hoyte, A., and Stelinski, L.L. (2022). Ant-psyllid mutualism
aects predation of Diaphorina citri by lady beetle larvae and
abundance of psyllid natural enemies. BioControl 67: 407417.
Simberlo, D. and Von Holle, B. (1999). Positive interactions of
nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol. Invasions 1: 2132.
Singerman, A. and Rogers, M.E. (2020). The economic challenges of dealing
with citrus greening: the case of Florida. J. Integr. Pest Manag. 11: 3.
Starr, F., Starr, K., and Loope, L.L. (2007). Survey for little re ant (Wasmannia
auropunctata) on the island of Maui, Hawaii. United States Fish and
Wildlife Service. Puunene, Hawaii, USA, pp. 35.
Storz, S.R. and Tschinkel, W.R. (2004). Distribution, spread, and ecological
associations of the introduced ant Pheidole obscurithorax in the
southeastern United States. J. Insect Sci. 4: 12.
Stuble, K.L., Kirkman, L.K., and Carroll, C.R. (2010). Are red imported re
ants facilitators of native seed dispersal? Biol. Invasions 12:
16611669.
USDA-NASS (United Stated Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural
Statistics Service) (2022). United States Department of Agriculture.
20212022 citrus summary production, price and value production by
county and per tree. USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service,
Washington D.C., pp. 125.
Vanek, S.J. and Potter, D.A. (2010). Ant-exclusion to promote biological
control of soft scales (Hemiptera: Coccidae) on woody landscape
plants. Environ. Entomol. 39: 18291837.
Wang, N., Pierson, E.A., Setubal, J.C., Xu, J., Levy, J.G., Zhang, Y., Li, J., Rangel,
L.T., and Martins, J. (2017). The Candidatus Liberibacter host interface:
insights into pathogenesis mechanisms and disease control. Annu.
Rev. Phytopathol. 55: 451482.
Wetterer, J.K., MacGown, J.A., and Calcaterra, L.A. (2015). Geographic spread
of Pheidole obscurithorax (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Trans. Am.
Entomol. Soc. 141: 222231.
Wilson, E.O. (2003). Pheidole in the New World: a dominant, hyperdiverse
ant genus, Vol. 1. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Wong, M.K., Economo, E.P., and Guénard, B. (2023). The global spread and
invasion capacities of alien ants. Curr. Biol. 33: 16.
Yoo, H.J.S., Kizner, M.C., and Holway, D.A. (2013). Ecological eects of multi-
species, ant-hemipteran mutualisms in citrus: ecological eects of a
multi-species mutualism. Ecol. Entomol. 38: 505514.
Supplementary Material: This article contains supplementary material
(https://doi.org/10.1515/aent-2024-0011).
6M.S. Ascunce et al.: Ant community composition in a citrus grove in Florida
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Many alien species are neither cultivated nor traded but spread unintentionally, and their global movements, capacities to invade ecosystems, and susceptibility to detection by biosecurity measures are poorly known. We addressed these key knowledge gaps for ants, a ubiquitous group of stowaway and contaminant organisms that include some of the world’s most damaging invasive species. We assembled a dataset of over 146,000 occurrence records to comprehensively map the human-mediated spread of 520 alien ant species across 525 regions globally. From descriptions of the environments in which species were collected within individual regions—such as in imported cargoes, buildings, and outdoor settings—we determined whether different barriers to invasion had been overcome and classified alien ant species under three levels of invasion capacity corresponding to increasing biosecurity threat. We found that alien species of different invasion capacities had different sources and sinks globally. For instance, although the diversity of indoor confined species peaked in the Palearctic realm, that of species able to establish outdoors peaked in the Nearctic and Oceanian realms, and these mainly originated from the Neotropical and Oriental realms. We also found that border interceptions worldwide missed two-thirds of alien species with naturalization capacity, many associated with litter and soil. Our study documents the vast spread of alien ants globally while highlighting avenues for more targeted biosecurity responses, such as prioritizing the screening of imports from regions that are diversity hotspots for species of high invasion capacity and improving the detection of cryptic alien invertebrates dwelling in substrates.
Article
Full-text available
Exotic invasive species are one of the most widespread and common agents of change in ecosystems worldwide. Here, we are focused on community-level changes associated with the appearance and persistence of exotic species in an ecosystem over more than 2 decades. We combined datasets of Florida's ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) community from Wekiwa Springs State Park, Florida, USA, spanning 25 yr, which included 3 sampling events in several distinct upland ecosystems. Species accumulation curves, non-parametric species estimators, community similarity indices, and ratios of exotic to native ants were used to assess sampling effort, including patterns of diversity, and changes in community composition. Our data showed that the ant community of Wekiwa Springs has at least 4 exotic species present in all of the ecosystems sampled within the park. These upland ecosystems are accumulating exotics slowly and, with one exception, there is no clear signal that the exotic species are displacing native species. The likely exception is the invasive fire ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), causing local extinction of the native fire ant Solenopsis geminata (Fabricius) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Continued long-term monitoring efforts are necessary to understand how these exotics may impact native communities in the future.
Article
Full-text available
While pest management decisions are made at the farm level, a distinctive characteristic of the pest management of invasive species is its public-good nature. Here, we examine the challenges that a vector-disease pathosystem such as Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Liviidae)—citrus greening, creates for the adoption of prevention and collective management practices from an economic perspective. Those economic challenges originate from the choices and behavior of individual growers, which can impact not only their own payoff but also the choices, behavior and payoffs of other growers; influencing, for example, the spread of the disease, the vector population dynamics, and the adoption of proposed scientific solutions. While for most people the economics of invasive species is limited to calculating damage or control costs, economics is more than that. Economics can provide insights on the interactions between human behavior and natural processes, enabling a better understanding of the rationale of individual growers’ choices, which are key for the design and implementation of effective public policies to deal with invasive pests and diseases.
Article
Full-text available
The relationship between levels of dominance and species richness is highly contentious, especially in ant communities. The dominance‐impoverishment rule states that high levels of dominance only occur in species‐poor communities, but there appear to be many cases of high levels of dominance in highly diverse communities. The extent to which dominant species limit local richness through competitive exclusion remains unclear, but such exclusion appears more apparent for non‐native rather than native dominant species. Here we perform the first global analysis of the relationship between behavioral dominance and species richness. We used data from 1293 local assemblages of ground‐dwelling ants distributed across five continents to document the generality of the dominance‐impoverishment rule, and to identify the biotic and abiotic conditions under which it does and does not apply. We found that the behavioral dominance – diversity relationship varies greatly, and depends on whether dominant species are native or non‐native, whether dominance is considered as occurrence or relative abundance, and on variation in mean annual temperature. There were declines in diversity with increasing dominance in invaded communities, but diversity increased with increasing dominance in native communities. These patterns occur along the global temperature gradient. However, positive and negative relationships are strongest in the hottest sites. We also found that climate regulates the degree of behavioral dominance, but differently from how it shapes species richness. Our findings imply that, despite strong competitive interactions among ants, competitive exclusion is not a major driver of local richness in native ant communities. Although the dominance‐impoverishment rule applies to invaded communities, we propose an alternative dominance‐diversification rule for native communities. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Article
Full-text available
Significance Because of the globalization of trade and travel, worldwide invasion rates are high. A potential driver of the global acceleration of new invasions is the so-called bridgehead effect, in which initial invasive populations serve as the source of additional invasions via secondary introductions. However, the frequency and overall importance of secondary introductions remain largely unknown. Using a remarkable dataset, spanning nearly 100 years (1914–2013), of ant interceptions at air and maritime ports in the United States and New Zealand, we found that most ant introductions arise via secondary transport via intermediate regions. Our analyses also reveal positive feedback between the introduction and establishment stages of the invasion process via secondary introductions acting as a critical driver of increasing global invasion rates.
Article
Full-text available
Huanglongbing (HLB; "citrus greening" disease) has caused significant damages to the global citrus industry as it has become well established in leading citrus-producing regions and continues to spread worldwide. Insecticidal control has been a critical component of HLB disease management, as there is a direct relationship between vector control and Candidatus Liberibacter spp. (i.e., the HLB pathogen) titer in HLB-infected citrus trees. In recent years, there have been substantial efforts to develop practical strategies for specifically managing Ca. Liberibacter spp.; however, a literature review on the outcomes of such attempts is still lacking. This work summarizes the greenhouse and field studies that have documented the effects and implications of chemical-based treatments (i.e., applications of broad-spectrum antibiotics, small molecule compounds) and non-chemical measures (i.e., applications of plant-beneficial compounds, applications of inorganic fertilizers, biological control, thermotherapy) for phytopathogen control. The ongoing challenges associated with mitigating Ca. Liberibacter spp. populations at the field-scale, such as the seasonality of the phytopathogen and associated HLB disease symptoms, limitations for therapeutics to contact the phytopathogen in planta, adverse impacts of broad-spectrum treatments on plant-beneficial microbiota, and potential implications on public and ecosystem health, are also discussed.
Article
Ants can be involved in mutualistic relationships with honeydew producing hemipterans in which ants provide protection against their natural enemies, and, in return, hemipterans reward ants with honeydew. Such mutualism may affect population regulation of hemipterans by third trophic level predators. However, current knowledge regarding the effects of this food-for-protection mutualism of ants with Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri, in Florida, USA is limited. Two treatments were established in replicated small plots under field conditions in a citrus (var. Valencia) grove: (1) ants present, and (2) ants absent by exclusion with a tangle-trap sticky barrier deployed on the base of trees. Lower abundance of Coccinellidae, Araneae, and Eulophidae and corresponding higher abundance of D. citri were recorded in trees with ants compared to that recorded in trees without ants as measured by direct visual observations and stem tap sampling. In addition, ant-beetle behavioral interactions were directly investigated with three species of ants [Solenopsis invicta Buren, Dorymyrmex bureni (Trager), and Brachymyrmex obscurior Forei]. Predation of D. citri nymphs by ladybeetle larvae was reduced on leaf flushes infested with S. invicta as compared with leaves without ants and this species caused significant direct mortality to larval beetles. Our results support the hypothesis that predation of D. citri by natural enemies may be reduced in citrus groves colonized by S. invicta than in those where ant populations are suppressed. Furthermore, our results indicate that S. invicta aggressively protect D. citri nymphs on leaves from otherwise effective potential predators, such as Harmonia axyridis.
Article
Nowhere in the U.S. is Huanglongbing (HLB) under adequate control due to the lack of effective tools to reduce spread of the vector, Diaphorina citri (Asian citrus psyllid), and transmission of the associated pathogen, Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus, in the absence of disease resistance in commercial citrus varieties. In Florida, Asian citrus psyllid was well established by the time of HLB discovery and growers did not remove trees to eliminate inoculum, so there was no chance of controlling the epidemic. Based on the Florida experience, Texas proactively controlled the vector by implementing area-wide management and disease spread was slower than in Florida, however, they also did not remove infected trees. California controlled both ACP and tree inoculum and have delayed the development of an epidemic in the Central Valley. This situation is aided by topographic isolation from the Los Angeles basin where ACP and HLB are endemic and a climate distinctly different from other citrus growing regions in the U.S.