ArticlePDF Available

Psychological aspects associated with ACL rehabilitation and recurrence in football players: a systematic review

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Although most football players recover good physical function after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery, some do not return to their sport or to the same pre-injury level, and there is a risk of recurrence. Therefore, this study aimed to examine research on psychological aspects of ACL rehabilitation and Return to Play (RTP), as well as their influence on possible recurrence in football and futsal players. The search was conducted using the Scopus, PubMed, WoS, CENTRAL databases, and grey literature sources DART-Europe and OpenGrey. A total of nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The results indicated as the most evaluated psychological factor the psychological readiness to RTP through the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI). Likewise, psychological interventions in ACL-injured football players have positive effects on mood states, reduces pain perception, and fear reinjury, among others. Risk profiles for recurrence included vulnerability to stress and high psychological readiness to RTP. Therefore, psychological interventions should be incorporated into the rehabilitation process and screening to identify players at risk for poor outcomes or recurrences. Additional research would help to understand the influence of other variables or optimal levels of psychological readiness to RTP. Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament; RTP; sports injury; psychology; rehabilitation.
Content may be subject to copyright.
2024, Retos, 55, 397-410
© Copyright: Federación Española de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educación Física ( FEADEF) ISSN: Edición impresa: 1579-1726. Edición Web: 1988-2041 (https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/retos/index)
-397- Retos, número 55, 2024 (junio)
Psychological aspects associated with ACL rehabilitation and recurrence in football players: a
systematic review
Aspectos psicológicos asociados a la rehabilitación del LCA y las recidivas en futbolistas: una revisión
sistemática
Luis Miguel Ramos Pastrana, José María Giménez Egido, Aurelio Olmedilla Zafra
Universidad de Murcia (España)
Abstract. Although most football players recover good physical function after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery, some do not
return to their sport or to the same pre-injury level, and there is a risk of recurrence. Therefore, this study aimed to examine research
on psychological aspects of ACL rehabilitation and Return to Play (RTP), as well as their influence on possible recurrence in football
and futsal players. The search was conducted using the Scopus, PubMed, WoS, CENTRAL databases, and grey literature sources
DART-Europe and OpenGrey. A total of nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The results indicated as the most evaluated psycho-
logical factor the psychological readiness to RTP through the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI).
Likewise, psychological interventions in ACL-injured football players have positive effects on mood states, reduces pain perception,
and fear reinjury, among others. Risk profiles for recurrence included vulnerability to stress and high psychological readiness to RTP.
Therefore, psychological interventions should be incorporated into the rehabilitation process and screening to identify players at risk
for poor outcomes or recurrences. Additional research would help to understand the influence of other variables or optimal levels of
psychological readiness to RTP.
Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament; RTP; sports injury; psychology; rehabilitation.
Resumen. Aunque la mayoría de los jugadores de fútbol recuperan una buena función física después de la cirugía del ligamento cruzado
anterior (LCA), algunos no regresan a su deporte o al mismo nivel previo a la lesión, y existe el riesgo de recidivas. Por tanto, este
estudio tuvo como objetivo examinar la investigación sobre los aspectos psicológicos de la rehabilitación del LCA y el retorno al juego
(RTP), así como su influencia en las posibles recidivas en jugadores de fútbol y fútbol sala. La búsqueda se realizó utilizando las bases
de datos Scopus, PubMed, WoS, CENTRAL y las fuentes de literatura gris DART-Europe y OpenGrey. Un total de nueve estudios
cumplieron los criterios de inclusión. Los resultados indicaron como factor psicológico más evaluado la disposición psicológica al RTP
a través del Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI). Asimismo, las intervenciones psicológicas en futbo-
listas lesionados de LCA tienen efectos positivos sobre los estados de ánimo, reducen la percepción del dolor y el miedo a volver a
lesionarse, entre otros. Los perfiles de riesgo para las recidivas incluyeron la vulnerabilidad al estrés y una alta disposición psicológica
para el RTP. Por lo tanto, las intervenciones psicológicas deben incorporarse al proceso de rehabilitación y al cribado para identificar a
los jugadores con riesgo de peores resultados o recidivas. Investigaciones adicionales ayudarían a comprender la influencia de otras
variables o los niveles óptimos de disposición psicológica para el RTP.
Palabras clave: ligamento cruzado anterior; RTP; lesión deportiva; psicología; rehabilitación.
Fecha recepción: 05-03-24. Fecha de aceptación: 13-03-24
Aurelio Olmedilla Zafra
olmedilla@um.es
Introduction
Injury is a significant concern in sports practice and re-
search in the field of physical activity and sports (Johnson &
Ivarsson, 2017; Schneider et al., 2006). Sports injuries have
a significant impact not only on athletic performance, but
also on the personal and social lives of injured athletes (Ru-
bio et al., 2020; Truong et al., 2020). Numerous theoreti-
cal models have been proposed in the scientific literature to
analyse the relationship between psychological variables and
sports injuries (Andersen & Williams, 1988; Brewer, 1994;
Heil, 1993). Wiese-Bjornstal et al. (1998) presented a com-
prehensive model that addressed the psychological response
to injury and the rehabilitation process, highlighting the
crucial role of stress in this context. For these authors, per-
sonal and situational factors are present throughout the pro-
cess, which is dynamic and circular. Cognitive appraisals
can influence emotions, which in turn can impact behav-
iour. Similarly, emotions affect behaviours and behaviours
affect cognitive appraisals, and so on. Finally, psychological
consequences are connected to the whole injury experi-
ence, around the three components of the model: cognitive
appraisal, emotional response, and behavioural response.
Based on this model, it is understood that stress is not only
an element of risk in sports injuries but also an obstacle to
recovery from these injuries.
One of the five fundamental lines of research on the re-
lationship between psychological factors and sports injuries
is the study of athletes’ emotional and psychological reac-
tions to injuries (Olmedilla & García-Mas, 2009). A consid-
erable diversity of cognitive reactions, such as intrusive
thoughts or reduced self-esteem, as well as emotional re-
sponses of sadness, anger or fear, have been observed. In
addition, behavioural changes such as eating disorders or al-
cohol consumption have been identified as a consequence of
sports injuries (Brewer, 2017). Following the model pro-
posed by Wiese-Bjornstal et al. (1998), the way in which
athletes perceive their injury, rather than the fact that it oc-
curred, plays a fundamental role in understanding the emo-
tional responses of injured athletes (Tracey, 2003). Like-
wise, this model can explain how athletes' willingness to
commit to rehabilitation, as well as the value they place on
this process, influences their cognitive, emotional, and be-
havioural reactions to the rehabilitation of their injury.
2024, Retos, 55, 397-410
© Copyright: Federación Española de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educación Física ( FEADEF) ISSN: Edición impresa: 1579-1726. Edición Web: 1988-2041 (https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/retos/index)
-398- Retos, número 55, 2024 (junio)
According to Olmedilla & García-Mas (2023), some of the
psychological variables present in the recovery process are
pain, mood, catastrophic thinking, anxiety, depression,
perfectionism, and coping resources. Johnston & Carroll
(1998) provide an example of how psychological variables
affect rehabilitation processes. The authors observed that
athletes with fear of re-injury were hesitant, did not try as
hard as they could, and were suspicious of injury-provoking
situations (e.g., during rehabilitation and in sporting con-
texts). Likewise, the method of assessing rehabilitation also
affected the psychological and behavioural levels. Athletes
who perceived their rehabilitation positively reported feel-
ing happiness and relief, which promoted greater adher-
ence. Conversely, those who perceived it negatively re-
ported feeling frustrated, which led to hesitation and cau-
tion towards performing the exercises in their rehabilitation
program.
Scientific research also highlights the importance of cer-
tain psychosocial influences, such as fear of re-injury, life-
style changes, work demands, available social support, loss
of motivation, perceived self-efficacy, and psychological
readiness to return to play (RTP), appear to play in an ath-
lete's recovery and subsequent decision to return to sports
(Baez et al., 2020; Burland et al., 2019; Forsdyke et al.,
2022; Podlog & Eklund, 2010). Webster et al. (2018)
found that fewer pain symptoms and better self-reported
knee function were associated with psychological readiness
to RTP. Phelan et al. (2019) compared psychological read-
iness to RTP between uninjured athletes and those who had
undergone ACL surgery. The authors found that nine
months after surgery, psychological readiness did not re-
turn to the levels observed in the uninjured group. A meta-
analysis found that low psychological readiness to RTP was
associated with higher odds of graft rupture after ACLR
(Cronstrom et al., 2023). Similarly, younger individuals
with lower psychological readiness have a higher risk of sus-
taining a second ACL injury after returning to sports
(McPherson et al., 2019a). These findings are important
given that athletes who return to sports before feeling psy-
chologically prepared may experience anxiety, fear, and
stress, sustaining a second injury and decreasing perfor-
mance (Gómez-Espejo et al., 2022; Paterno et al., 2018).
ACL tears are among the most common sports-related
knee injuries (Majewski et al., 2006). In the case of football,
Requejo-Herrero et al. (2023) reported an average of 11
ACL tears per season and 17 recurrent injuries over 10 sea-
sons in La Liga Española. In other countries, such as Ger-
many, a total of 72 injuries have been reported, with an av-
erage of 9.6 ACL tears per season (Schiffner et al., 2018),
or in the Italian first division with 84 ACL injuries, 25% of
which were recurrent (Grassi et al., 2020). In addition,
some studies suggest that female players have a two to three
times higher risk of ACL injury than their male counterparts
(Waldén et al., 2011) and a higher incidence of a second
ACL injury (Hong et al., 2023). Serrat et al. (2023) re-
ported 94 ACL injuries over 10 seasons in female first and
second division players. In addition, 31.9% of the
footballers had already suffered an ACL injury in the previ-
ous seasons. On the other hand, although not many epide-
miologic studies on ACL injuries in futsal have been found,
some studies seem to indicate that it is one of the sports with
the highest incidence of injuries, with the main injured body
part being the lower limb, specifically the knees and ankles
(Gene-Morales et al., 2021; Ruiz-Pérez et al., 2021), and
ACL tears being one of the most frequent and severe (Ruiz-
Pérez et al., 2019). Regarding the RTP rate in football play-
ers, Zaffagnini et al. (2014) found that 95% of professional
football players returned to the same level of activity one
year after surgery, and 71% could still play competitive
football after four years. More recently, Farinelli et al.
(2023) reported an RTP rate of 92.6% in elite UEFA foot-
ball players. Despite this, many athletes with good knee
function do not return to their previous level of sports par-
ticipation after ACLR, suggesting the existence of other fac-
tors that influence RTP (Ardern et al., 2016).
Several reviews have found the influence of psychosocial
factors after ACLR. Athletes who suffered an ACL injury
may suffer from symptoms of depression, especially during
the first 6 weeks after ACL reconstruction, being more fre-
quent among professional athletes than among non-profes-
sionals (Piussi, Berghdal et al., 2022). Longo et al. (2023)
found that the main reasons for not RTP were concerns
about reinjury and pain, whereas self-efficacy, psychologi-
cal will, and age were associated with better functional out-
comes. Other factors that may help predict which athletes
are more likely to RTP include motivation to return, lower
levels of kinesiophobia, higher levels of self-efficacy, confi-
dence and subjective knee function, risk acceptance and so-
cial support (Momaya et al., 2024). In a recent meta-analy-
sis of 3744 patients, Xiao et al. (2023) found no significant
differences in the self-reported knee function of athletes
who had RTP compared to those who had not after ACL
surgery. However, the group that had RTP exhibited a
higher psychological readiness, higher self-efficacy, and
lower kinesiophobia than the other group. Similarly, Nwa-
chukwu et al. (2019) found that of the 795 patients who did
not achieve RTP, 64.7% cited psychological reasons for not
returning. Fear of reinjury was the most common reason
(76.7%); other psychological factors included lack of confi-
dence in the treated knee (14.8%), depression (5.6%), and
lack of interest/motivation (2.5%).
According to Olmedilla & García-Mas (2023), the psy-
chological elements that influence rehabilitation and RTP
can be subject to modification through appropriate inter-
ventions (Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy, EMDR or Mind-
fulness), improving the athlete's adherence and increasing
self-confidence at the time of RTP. However, these pro-
grams do not receive the systematic attention required for
traditional postoperative rehabilitation processes. Based on
the above, it is crucial to understand the relationship be-
tween psychological aspects in ACL injury rehabilitation
and subsequent RTP, especially considering that although
most patients recover good physical function after surgery,
some do not return to their sports or to the same pre-injury
2024, Retos, 55, 397-410
© Copyright: Federación Española de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educación Física ( FEADEF) ISSN: Edición impresa: 1579-1726. Edición Web: 1988-2041 (https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/retos/index)
-399- Retos, número 55, 2024 (junio)
level, in addition to the current risk of recurrence.
Although there are reviews in the literature on this topic
(Longo et al., 2023; Momaya et al., 2024; Nwachukwu et
al., 2019), they generally include studies with different types
of sports, making it difficult to identify football-specific fac-
tors. Football is an intense sport where there are quick and
sudden changes of direction, jumps and landings with impact
and physical contact with other players. The ACL injury data
presented above also supports the idea of conducting a sys-
tematic review focusing on this sport. In fact, football has a
higher incidence of ACL injuries than other team sports like
volleyball and basketball (Joseph et al., 2013). Furthermore,
to our knowledge, there are no reviews that consider futsal,
so the inclusion of studies involving futsal players could po-
tentially lead to the development of new research avenues.
Therefore, this study aimed to examine research on psycho-
logical aspects of ACL rehabilitation and Return to Play
(RTP), as well as their influence on possible recurrence in
football and futsal players.
Method
Once the study context was defined and the objectives
were stated, a systematic review of the scientific literature
was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol (PRISMA;
Page et al., 2021) through the following stages:
Selection of eligibility criteria.
Description of the sources of information and search
strategies
Process of selection, evaluation, extraction of infor-
mation and elaboration of a flow chart
Collection and listing of data
Eligibility Criteria
To be included in the systematic review, an article must
meet the following inclusion criteria. These criteria are based
on the PICO (Participants/Intervention/Comparison/Out-
comes) strategy. The study population consisted of football
and/or futsal players (both male and female) who sustained
ACL injuries. Experimental and observational studies were
selected as intervention criteria. Comparison criteria in-
cluded single-group studies and those that included two
groups: injured and uninjured football players. For the out-
come criterion, only studies that used validated instruments
to measure psychological variables were included. On the
other hand, articles were excluded if: (1) access to the full
text was not available; (2) they were written in a language
other than Spanish or English; (3) they were qualitative re-
search, review articles, letters to the editor, editorial com-
mentaries, etc.; (4) their objective was to validate an instru-
ment; (5) they presented data from football players and other
athletes together; (6) they included injuries other than ACL
injuries.
Sources of information
The Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science (WoS; Science
Citation Index Expanded and Social Sciences Citation Index)
databases were used for searching, critical reading, and eval-
uating the articles. The Cochrane Central Register of Con-
trolled Trials (CENTRAL) was also searched for potential
randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials of inter-
est. In addition, DART-Europe and OpenGrey were con-
sulted as sources of grey literature.
Search strategy
A search was performed in the "title, abstract, and key-
words" fields of the four databases. The following strategy
was used: "return to competition" OR rtc OR "return to
sport" OR rts OR "return to play" OR rtp OR rehabilitation
OR recovery AND acl OR "anterior cruciate ligament" AND
psych* AND football OR soccer OR futsal. No filtering was
applied to the search, and publications through October 1,
2023, were included.
For the search in DART-Europe and OpenGrey, the fol-
lowing strategy was used "anterior cruciate ligament" AND
psych* and English or Spanish language as a filter.
Study selection process
Zotero v. 6.0.26 was used to pool the results of the
searches and eliminate duplicate studies. The extraction pro-
cess was based on the protocol of Ateef et al. (2022), which
was consulted in the International Prospective Register of
Ongoing Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database. Thus,
two reviewers performed the inclusion of trials in a two-stage
process. In the first phase, the records were screened by
reading the title, abstract, and keywords to identify poten-
tially relevant studies. In the second phase, the selected arti-
cles were read in full to ensure that they met the eligibility
criteria. Quality control was carried out by two trained re-
viewers as in similar studies (Caicedo-Parada et al., 2020).
Specifically, the reliability of both was calculated using Co-
hen's kappa statistic with qualitative intervals of poor (< .20),
weak (.21.40), moderate (.41.60), good (.61.80), and
very good (> .81) for the screening of records and selection
of studies, giving very good intraobserver and interobserver
agreement values according to Altman (1991). The lowest
value corresponded to the interobserver agreement in the
screening process, with a value of k = .885. Finally, it was
adopted a conservative strategy in the screening phase and in-
cluded all records to be evaluated in the eligibility phase. Fig-
ure 1 illustrates the screening process.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram
2024, Retos, 55, 397-410
© Copyright: Federación Española de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educación Física ( FEADEF) ISSN: Edición impresa: 1579-1726. Edición Web: 1988-2041 (https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/retos/index)
-400- Retos, número 55, 2024 (junio)
Quality appraisal
Methodological rigor was verified using a structured
rating system called the PEDro scale (Gómez-Conesa et al.,
2015). This system has been used in numerous studies
(Guede-Rojas et al., 2023; Kakavas et al., 2023; Liddle et
al., 2023; Pastora-Bernal et al., 2021). It is used to quantify
the external validity, quality of the methods used, and sta-
tistical description in randomized experimental studies. It
consists of 11 items with a score ranging from 0 to 10 (item
1 assesses external validity but is not included in the total
score). A higher score indicated better methodological
quality, although the following classification has been rec-
ommended (Cashin & McAuley, 2020): (9-10) excellent;
(6-8) good; (4-5) acceptable; and poor (< 4).
Data extraction and synthesis
Outcome data were extracted independently by one re-
viewer and subsequently verified by the other reviewers.
Study variables were coded and grouped into three catego-
ries: 1) general study descriptors (citation, objective and
study design); 2) study population (group, sample size, sex,
mean age and standard deviation); 3) outcomes (psycholog-
ical assessment instruments and psychologically relevant
findings). Data synthesis was performed using an emergent
synthesis approach, which according to Schick-Makaroff et
al. (2016), provides a systematic approach to synthesising
varied literature in a thematic area that includes various
types of data.
The results were summarised in narrative and summary
expression and in tables, according to the proposed
method. Results were structured with subheadings, includ-
ing demographic characteristics of study participants,
methodology of included studies, psychological assessment
instruments and psychologically relevant findings.
Results
Demographic characteristics of study participants
The results of the extraction process are summarized in
Table 1. Nine studies that indicated the influence of psycho-
logical variables in football players who sustained an ACL
injury were included. The years of publication of the arti-
cles ranged from 2016 to 2023, with Faltstrom et al. (2016,
2021, 2023) being the author with the most articles. The
total number of participants was 1404, of which 55% were
male and 45% were female. The mean age of the partici-
pants was between 20 and 33 years. All participants were
football players, and none were futsal players.
Methodology of included studies
The total PEDro scale scores assigned to the articles in-
cluded in this review are presented in Table 1. The most
common design was cross-sectional, with three articles
(Bortone et al., 2021; Correa et al., 2023; Faltstrom et al.,
2016) of good methodological quality. There were two ran-
domized clinical trials by Almuhaya et al. (2023) and
D'Isanto et al. (2022) with excellent and good methodolog-
ical quality, respectively. Two prospective cohort studies
(Faltstrom et al., 2021, 2023) have also achieved excellent
quality. Manara et al. (2022) conducted a case series study
of good methodological quality. Finally, the single case
study by Palmi et al. (2018) was not analysed using the
PEDro scale because of the risk of bias inherent in this type
of design.
Table 1.
Analysis of the studies included in the systematic review.
Article
Participants
Objective
Design
Psychological
Assessment
instruments
Psychologically relevant findings
Almuhaya
et al.
(2023)
PEDro
Scale: 10
EG = 18 male
players (26.5 ±
6.65 years)
CG = 17 male
players (26.1 ±
5.33 years)
To examine the feasibility and
acceptability of adding a struc-
tured educational session to the
rehabilitation program for football
players following ACL injury.
RCT
- TSK
- ACL-RSI
At follow-up, the intervention group showed improvement in
kinesiophobia and fear of another injury, as well as psycholog-
ical readiness for the RTP, compared to the control group
who did not receive the educational session.
Correa et
al. (2023)
PEDro
Scale: 8
15 male players
ready for RTP
(23 ± 5.89
years)
20 male players
not ready for
RTP (21 ± 3.78
years).
To investigate whether there are
differences in kinesiophobia and
performance on field tests and
exercises related to the injured
knee after medical discharge
between players who perceive
themselves to be psychologically
ready for RTP and those who do
not.
Cross-sec-
tional
- TSK-11
- ACL-RSI
Football players who did not consider themselves psychologi-
cally ready for RTP had worse field test performance and
greater dynamic knee valgus during the squat test compared
to those who did perceive themselves to be ready. Addition-
ally, they reported greater fear of movement-related pain and
lower knee function.
Fältström
et al.
(2023)
PEDro
Scale: 9
112 female play-
ers (20± 2
years).
To explore whether the associa-
tion between various risk factors
and ACL injury in female football
players would be affected by dif-
ferent follow-up times and statisti-
cal approaches.
Cohort
study
- ACL-QoL
- ACL-RSI
- SSP
- SMPS
At 12-month follow-up, female players with higher psycho-
logical readiness scores for RTP, lower impulsivity scores,
higher stress vulnerability scores, and better knee functional-
ity had an eightfold increased risk of sustaining a second ACL
injury.
Manara et
al. (2022)
PEDro
Scale: 8
666 male players
and 196 female
players with an
average of 30
years.
To determine the rate of
subsequent ACL injuries and RTP
rate in football players, as well as
to evaluate predictors of RTP and
ACL injury recurrence.
Case series
- ACL-RSI
Younger age and better psychological readiness were found to
be predictors of return to play (RTP). Those who had re-
turned to football and had not experienced an additional ACL
injury had higher overall ACL-RSI scores and were less fearful
of another injury.
D’Isanto
EG = 15 female
To examine the effect of Mirror
RCT
- VAS
The Mirror Therapy group reported a greater perception of
2024, Retos, 55, 397-410
© Copyright: Federación Española de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educación Física ( FEADEF) ISSN: Edición impresa: 1579-1726. Edición Web: 1988-2041 (https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/retos/index)
-401- Retos, número 55, 2024 (junio)
et al.
(2022)
PEDro
Scale: 7
players (33 ±
1.8 years) y
CG = 15 female
players (32 ±
1.6 years)
Therapy added to conventional re-
habilitation on psychological read-
iness and pain perception in ACL
injured female football players.
- ACL-RSI
psychological readiness compared to the conventional physical
therapy group. On the other hand, both groups experienced a
reduction in pain perception after rehabilitation.
Bortone et
al. (2021)
PEDro
Scale: 8
30 male players
(26.9±5.7
years).
To assess the clinical, psychologi-
cal and biomechanical condition of
football players who had the RTP
at 2 years after ACLR.
Cross-sec-
tional
- TSK
- ACL-RSI
Older football players exhibited a greater fear of re-injury and
lower motivation to RTP. Recreational football players re-
ported significantly higher levels of fear of re-injury compared
to those returning to the competitive level. Higher levels of
kinesiophobia were significantly associated with more com-
plaints of ACL injury and lower psychological readiness for
RTP. Football players with lower fear of re-injury demon-
strated better performance in terms of balance and strength
with fewer asymmetries. Although most participants reported
being psychologically ready to RTP at the time of assessment,
those with lower scores experienced greater limitations in
daily activities and took longer to perform the agility test,
particularly on the injured leg. Additionally, injury to the
dominant leg was associated with lower fear of re-injury and
lower psychological readiness for RTP.
Fältström
et al.
(2021)
PEDro
Scale: 9
117 female play-
ers (20 ± 2
years)
To investigate the combinations of
various clinical risk factors by
CART analysis that are associated
with secondary ACL injury in fe-
male football players after primary
unilateral ACLR.
Cohort
study
- ACL-QoL
- ACL-RSI
- SSP
- SMPS
Players who are at a higher risk of suffering a second ACL in-
jury are those who had low performance in the jumping test,
greater vulnerability to stress, were unadventurous, estimated
high psychological readiness for RTP, and performed well in
jumping with camber. This risk profile was three times more
likely to result in a second ACL injury.
Palmi et
al. (2018)
PEDro
Scale:
N/A
1 male player
aged 28 years
To evaluate the effectiveness of
Mindfulness in the rehabilitation
of an injured professional football
player.
Single case
design (n=1)
- POMS
- PANAS
- SE
- Sport injury
questionnaire
The analysis of the psychological moment on the day of the in-
jury indicates a high degree of motivation and self-demand, as
well as perceived demand from the coach. Differences were
observed between negative and positive emotions, with the
former scoring higher. Regarding mood states, the dimen-
sions of tension, depression, anger, fatigue, and confusion de-
creased progressively throughout the weeks of psychological
work, while the vigour dimension increased. The average
evaluation of the sessions was positive, with particular empha-
sis on learning relaxation and thought management tech-
niques.
Fältström
et al.
(2016)
PEDro
Scale: 8
94 current fe-
male players
(20.1 ± 2.3
years)
88 female play-
ers had not re-
turned (20.8 ±
3 years)
To determine whether demo-
graphic factors, psychological fac-
tors, and ACL injury characteris-
tics were associated with RTP.
Second, to make comparisons of
current knee function, readiness
for RTP, and knee-related quality
of life between players who re-
turned to football and those who
did not.
Cross-sec-
tional
- Questionnaire
on factors re-
lated to the re-
turn to football
- ACL-QoL
- ACL-RSI
- SSP
- SMPS
The most common reasons for non-RTP were lack of confi-
dence in the knee and fear of re-injury. Current players had
higher motivation for RTP, higher scores on the personality
trait "adventure seeking" and "personal standards" of perfec-
tionism compared to players who did not return to football. A
one-point increase in motivation was associated with 1.5
times greater likelihood of returning to football. Likewise,
current players had higher scores on psychological readiness
for RTP and better quality of life related to ACL injury.
Note. N/A: Not applicable; EG: Experimental group; CG: Control group; ACL: Anterior cruciate ligament; RCT: Randomized Contro lled Trial; TSK/TSK-11:
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia; ACL-RSI: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury; RTP: Return To Play; ACL-QoL: Anterior Cruciate Ligament -
Quality of Life; SSP: Swedish Universities Scales of Personality; SMPS: Sport Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale; VAS: Visual Analogue Scale; ACLR: Anterior
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction; POMS: Profile of Mood States; PANAS: Positive and Negative Affect Schedule; SE: Session Evaluation.
Psychological assessment instruments
The most used psychological assessment instrument (n
= 8; 88.9%) was the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to
Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI), which was present in all in-
cluded studies, except Palmi et al. (2018). This was fol-
lowed by the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Quality of Life
(ACL-Qol) (n = 3; 33.3%), the Swedish Universities Scales
of Personality (SSP) (n = 3; 33.3%), and the Sport Multi-
dimensional Perfectionism Scale (SMPS) (n = 3; 33.3%).
The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) was present in
two studies (22.2%) and its short version (TSK-11) in one
study (11.1%). The remaining instruments were used in
only one study. Table 2 lists the instruments used and the
variables assessed for each instrument.
Table 2.
Psychological evaluation instruments and assessed variables.
Author
Variable assessed
Webster et al. (2008)
Psychological readiness for the athlete's return to sport after an ACL injury. It has
3 domains: emotions, risk appraisal and confidence in knee function and
performance.
Mohtadi (1998)
Impact of ACL injury on patients' lives. It has 5 domains: symptoms, physical
complaints, work-related concerns, physical activity and sport participation and
lifestyle and social concerns.
Miller et al. (1991)/
Woby et al. (2005)
Fear of movement and re-injury.
Gustavsson et al. (2000)
13 stable personality traits: somatic anxiety, psychic anxiety, stress susceptibility,
lack of assertiveness, impulsiveness, adventure seeking, detachment, social
desirability, embitterment, trait irritability, mistrust, verbal trait aggression,
2024, Retos, 55, 397-410
© Copyright: Federación Española de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educación Física ( FEADEF) ISSN: Edición impresa: 1579-1726. Edición Web: 1988-2041 (https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/retos/index)
-402- Retos, número 55, 2024 (junio)
physical traits and aggression.
Dunn et al. (2002)
Perfectionism in sport. It has 4 dimensions: personal standards, concern about
mistakes, perceived parental pressure and perceived coach pressure.
Balaguer et al. (1993)
Mood states. It has 6 dimensions: tension, depression, anger, vigour, fatigue and
confusion.
Sandín et al. (1999)
Affections considered positive and negative.
Hayes & Patterson (1921)
Subjective perception of pain.
Note. * This is a shortened version of the original TSK with 11 items.
In addition to these standardized instruments, some ar-
ticles use interviews and ad hoc questionnaires, such as the
Sports Injury Questionnaire by Palmi et al. (2018), which
assesses personal data, sport, and injury history. Similarly,
information on daily stressors, anxiety levels, coach de-
mands, motivation, attention, and psychological resources
on the day of injury was collected. Another instrument pre-
sented in this study is the Session Evaluation (SE), in which
the football player evaluated the criteria of learning, inter-
est, and intra-session comfort and answered two open-
ended questions about what he liked the most and what was
the most difficult.
Another example of an ad hoc instrument is the study
by Faltstrom et al. (2016), in which players answered a
questionnaire about factors related to returning to football
and the reasons they did not return to competition. Possible
reasons included "poor knee function," "don't trust my
knee," "fear of reinjury," "had a new injury," "team or
training changed," "family situation," "work situation,"
"don't enjoy playing anymore," or "other reasons." The au-
thors also assessed behavioural factors, including motivation
to RTP, reasons for playing football before the injury, and
risk-taking behaviours while playing football before the in-
jury.
Psychologically relevant findings
Three studies investigated the effect of different inter-
ventions on psychological variables during ACL rehabilita-
tion (Almuhaya et al., 2023; D'Isanto et al., 2022; Palmi et
al., 2018). Results showed improvements in kinesiophobia,
fear of re-injury, psychological readiness for RTP (Almu-
haya et al., 2023) and reduced pain perception (D'Isanto et
al., 2022). In addition, improvements in mood states were
observed throughout the psychological treatment (Palmi et
al., 2018).
Four studies investigated the influence of psychological
aspects associated with RTP (Bortone et al., 2021; Correa
et al., 2023; Fältström et al., 2016; Manara et al., 2022).
Fältström et al. (2016) reported that the most common rea-
sons for not RTP were lack of confidence in the knee and
fear of re-injury. Active players had higher motivation for
RTP, higher scores on the personality trait 'adventure seek-
ing' and 'personal standards' of perfectionism, compared to
players who did not return to football. Similarly, active
players had higher scores on psychological readiness for
RTP and better quality of life related to ACL injury. Poorer
performance on physical tests and greater kinesiophobia
have also been observed in football players who did not feel
psychologically prepared for the RTP (Bortone et al., 2021;
Correa et al., 2023), experienced more complaints of ACL
injury and greater limitations in daily activities (Bortone et
al., 2021), with psychological readiness being a predictor
for the RTP (Manara et al., 2022).
Two studies identified risk profiles for a second ACL in-
jury (Fältström et al., 2021, 2023). According to Fältström
et al. (2021), players at highest risk were those with low
performance in the jumping test, higher vulnerability to
stress, were unadventurous, estimated high psychological
readiness for the RTP and good performance in the jump
rope test. This risk profile was three times more likely to
suffer a second ACL injury. Recently, Fältström et al.
(2023) reported an eightfold increased risk for those players
with higher RTP psychological readiness scores, lower im-
pulsivity scores, higher stress vulnerability scores and better
knee functionality. In contrast, Manara et al. (2022) re-
ported higher overall ACL-RSI scores and lower fear of re-
injury in those players who had returned to football and had
not suffered an additional ACL injury.
Discussion
Considering football as an intense contact sport, its par-
ticular characteristics and the previously presented data on
ACL injuries, it is necessary to conduct a review that spe-
cifically focuses on this sport. This study aimed to identify
the psychological aspects of ACL rehabilitation, as well as
RTP, and its influence on possible recurrences in football
and futsal players. After the review, nine studies were
found that met the inclusion criteria. The first aspect to
highlight is that no research was found in the field of futsal.
Although it is true that it is a sport with less impact than
football, the need to study futsal as a separate specialty
seems justified, since differences have been found in psy-
chological characteristics related to performance between
football and futsal (Mirzaei et al., 2016), and the data on
lower extremity injuries, such as ACL rupture, suggest an
interesting field in which to develop research (Gene-Mo-
rales et al., 2021; Ruiz-Pérez et al., 2019, 2021).
Based on the objectives and results of the studies in-
cluded in this review, they can be divided into two groups.
The first group included articles that aimed to investigate
the effects of some treatments on the rehabilitation of foot-
ball players with ACL injuries (Almuhaya et al., 2023;
D'Isanto et al., 2022; Palmi et al., 2018). The treatments
included Mindfulness, Mirror Therapy, and incorporation
of a structured educational session into the conventional re-
habilitation program. The results showed benefits in mood
states, a positive evaluation of the sessions in learning psy-
chological techniques, improvement in the perception of
psychological readiness for RTP, reduced pain perception,
2024, Retos, 55, 397-410
© Copyright: Federación Española de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educación Física ( FEADEF) ISSN: Edición impresa: 1579-1726. Edición Web: 1988-2041 (https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/retos/index)
-403- Retos, número 55, 2024 (junio)
and reduced kinesiophobia and fear of reinjury.
As can be seen, many psychological factors are present
in ACL rehabilitation. Some authors also highlight social
support, motivation and goal setting, self-efficacy, athlete
expectations regarding the time and effort required for this
process, kinesiophobia, and fear of re-injury (Johnson et al.,
2016; Walker et al., 2022). Piussi, Berghdal et al. (2022)
conducted a systematic review and found that athletes who
suffer an ACL injury may experience symptoms of depres-
sion, particularly during the first 6 weeks after ACLR. As
Burland et al. (2019) point out, all psychological responses
play a role in the outcome or success of recovery after in-
jury. For example, football players who exhibit lower levels
of self-confidence and less optimism (cognition) show
greater fear of re-injury (emotion), which may lead to
lower adherence to rehabilitation (behaviour) and influence
whether the football player achieves successful RTP (out-
come). In this sense, research such as that of Candel et al.
(2023) shows the role of catastrophic thinking on mood
states in football players with severe and very severe inju-
ries, where the greater the catastrophism (rumination,
helplessness, and magnification), the greater the negative
mood state (tension, depression, anger, and fatigue), and
the lower the positive mood state (vigour). Similarly, fear
of new exercises during rehabilitation can manifest as anger
or frustration (Kvist et al., 2023).
There is consensus on the importance of good psycho-
logical readiness for RTP times and outcomes, as it is a good
predictor of return to pre-injury level and recurrences in
football players (Figueroa et al., 2022). Kunnen et al.
(2020) found that football players manifested psychological
readiness for RTP based on confidence in four areas: in the
rehabilitation process, in their physical abilities, in medical
professionals, and in not fear of reinjury. These results are
of particular importance since work such as that of Gómez-
Espejo, Olmedilla, et al. (2022) shows that correct psycho-
logical readiness is related to good mental health during
RTP. Moreover, as readiness increased over time, levels of
stress, anxiety, and depression tended to improve.
Other studies have demonstrated the benefits of psycho-
logical interventions for knee rehabilitation (Cupal &
Brewer, 2001; Maddison et al., 2006, 2012). Brewer et al.
(2022) implemented an interactive multimedia program us-
ing a cognitive behavioural approach in athletes and non-
athletes with ACL injuries. Those who completed the pro-
gram demonstrated greater preoperative confidence in
their ability to cope than those who received standard care.
They also experienced lower levels of postoperative pain
and kinesiophobia as well as greater use and perceived use-
fulness of patient education materials. Therefore, even the
addition of a few psychoeducational sessions to conven-
tional rehabilitation programs may be an economical and ef-
fective means of addressing the psychological problems or
needs of football players at the time of injury and during
their ACL recovery process (Gómez-Espejo, García-Mas,
et al., 2022).
The second group of studies aimed to investigate factors
related to RTP and new ACL injuries (Bortone et al., 2021;
Correa et al., 2023; Faltstrom et al., 2016, 2021, 2023;
Manara et al., 2022). Thus, the factors associated with RTP
are higher motivation for RTP, better injury-related quality
of life, "adventure seeking" and "personal standards" as
personality traits and perfectionism. Conversely, the most
common reasons for not returning were lack of confidence
in the knee and fear of reinjury. These factors are compara-
ble to those identified in other reviews (Longo et al., 2023;
Momaya et al., 2024; Nwachukwu et al., 2019). For exam-
ple, Nwachukwu et al. (2019) reported the most common
reasons were fear of reinjury, lack of confidence in the
knee, depression, and lack of interest or motivation.
Momaya et al. (2024) identified motivation to return,
lower levels of kinesiophobia, higher levels of self-efficacy,
confidence and subjective knee function, risk acceptance
and social support as factors that might predict athletes
more likely to RTP. In contrast to previous reviews, per-
sonality factors as "adventure seeking" and "personal stand-
ards" related to RTP were found in this study. Accordingly,
it would be interesting to investigate other variables that
may play protective or facilitating roles in RTP.
These findings are also consistent with other studies.
Webster et al. (2018) found that fewer pain symptoms and
better self-reported knee function were associated with
psychological readiness to RTP. Even in athletes with ACL
injuries without surgical treatment, a relationship between
good knee function and good psychological readiness for
RTP prior to injury has been observed (Slater et al., 2023).
In this respect, social support also plays an important role
at RTP. For example, Forsdyke et al. (2022) found that
reinjury anxiety mediates the relationship between social
support and psychological readiness for RTP in football
players. This suggests that increasing positive perceptions of
social support will decrease reinjury anxiety during rehabil-
itation, which may help football players to be more psycho-
logically prepared for RTP.
Other studies discussed in this review demonstrated the
effect of psychological readiness for RTP and kinesiophobia
or fear of injury on physical test performance (Bortone et
al., 2021; Correa et al., 2023). Bortone et al. (2021) as-
sessed players two years after ACLR and found that higher
levels of kinesiophobia were significantly associated with
higher ACL injury complaints and poorer psychological
readiness for RTP. In addition, those with less fear of rein-
jury showed better performance in terms of balance and
strength with less asymmetry, while those with lower psy-
chological readiness scores reported greater limitations in
daily activities and longer times to perform the agility test,
especially in the injured leg. Correa et al. (2023) investi-
gated whether there were differences in kinesiophobia and
performance on field tests and exercises related to the in-
jured knee after medical discharge between players who
perceived themselves as psychologically prepared for RTP
and those who did not. The authors found that players who
did not perceive themselves to be psychologically prepared
for RTP had worse field test performance and greater
2024, Retos, 55, 397-410
© Copyright: Federación Española de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educación Física ( FEADEF) ISSN: Edición impresa: 1579-1726. Edición Web: 1988-2041 (https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/retos/index)
-404- Retos, número 55, 2024 (junio)
dynamic knee valgus during the squat test compared to
those who perceived themselves to be prepared. Addition-
ally, these players had greater kinesiophobia and lower self-
reported knee function. In this regard, there is no doubt
that fear of re-injury and motivation play critical roles dur-
ing rehabilitation and subsequent RTP. Kvist et al. (2023)
explored the influence of fear after ACLR on rehabilitation
and RTP. However, research by Kunnen et al. (2020) with
football players showed that the motives for returning to
competition were the happiness that football gave them, the
sense of belonging, and the love of their sport, which were
stronger than the fear of re-injury. Sonesson et al. (2017),
on the other hand, reported that greater motivation during
rehabilitation was associated with a return to pre-injury
sports activity and greater satisfaction with the level of knee
activity and function. Johnston & Carroll (1998) observed
that athletes with fear of re-injury were hesitant, did not
work as hard as they could, and were wary of injury-pro-
voking situations. Athletes who perceived their rehabilita-
tion as positive reported feelings of happiness and relief,
which promoted greater adherence. In contrast, those who
perceived it negatively reported feeling frustrated, which
led to hesitation and caution in performing exercises in their
rehabilitation program.
Finally, two articles included in the review presented
risk profiles for a second ACL injury. Faltstrom et al.
(2021) found that one of the highest risk profiles was those
players who had low performance in the jump test, greater
susceptibility to stress, were unadventurous, estimated high
psychological readiness for RTP, and obtained good results
in the jumping jack. These players were three times more
likely to suffer a second ACL injury. The second study was
published by Faltstrom et al. (2023). They found a risk pro-
file in which players with higher psychological readiness
scores for RTP, lower impulsivity scores, higher stress vul-
nerability scores, and higher knee functionality had an
eight-fold increased risk of sustaining a second ACL injury
at the 12-month follow-up. In contrast, Manara et al.
(2022) found that players who had returned to competition
and had not suffered a second ACL injury had a better psy-
chological disposition and a greater lack of fear of re-injury.
First, these results support the proposed models of Ander-
sen & Williams (1988) or Wiese-Bjornstal et al. (1998), and
the role of stress. Based on the revised model of Williams
& Andersen (1998), it is possible that football players at
higher risk of injury are more concerned with protecting
themselves from re-injury, which could increase their stress
levels, reduce their attentional focus, and lead to errors in
decision-making and sport performance. If increased mus-
cle tension is included as a response to stress, it would in-
crease the likelihood of injury, which would not occur in
those with less susceptibility to stress and less fear of rein-
jury.
Nevertheless, these results reflect the complexity of risk
factor analysis, as a certain contradiction was found regard-
ing high psychological readiness for RTP and the possibility
of recurrence. On the one hand, studies such as McPherson
et al. (2019a) show that young athletes with lower psycho-
logical readiness for RTP have a higher risk of a second ACL
injury. McPherson et al. (2019b) found that those who sus-
tained a second ACL injury did not significantly improve in
psychological readiness for RTP from the pre-intervention
assessment to one year after ACLR, and improved less com-
pared to those who were not injured. Additionally, the in-
jured group reported being more nervous about participat-
ing in sports, more frustrated and less confident about par-
ticipating in sports without worrying about the knee, and
more fearful of reinjuring while participating in sports. In a
meta-analysis by Cronstrom et al. (2023), low psychologi-
cal readiness for RTP was associated with a higher likeli-
hood of graft rupture after ACLR. In contrast, Piussi,
Beischer et al. (2022) compared the psychological charac-
teristics of athletes who had suffered a second ACL injury
with those who did not. The authors found that those who
suffered a new ACL tear had better psychological readiness,
that is, greater confidence in performance, fewer negative
emotions, and a lower risk assessment of returning to
sports, as well as greater knee-related self-efficacy.
According to Piussi, Beischer et al. (2022), athletes who
progress rapidly in rehabilitation and reach the RTP criteria
develop a stronger psychological profile, that is, higher RTP
disposition and higher knee-related self-efficacy. This
would mean that both athletes and health professionals
could suggest that RTP is possible, but at the cost of ignor-
ing biological healing and important phases of rehabilita-
tion. Thus, higher self-reported psychological readiness for
RTP and higher knee-related self-efficacy may lead to ear-
lier and riskier exposure to sports participation, and thus, a
greater risk of ACL reinjury. In fact, Loose et al. (2018)
found that most football players wanted to make their own
decisions about returning to sport and often decided to re-
turn to sport after injury against the recommendation of
their physician. Coaches often return injured players to play
sooner against the physician's decision, although in most
cases, they believe that the physician plays the main role in
the decision to RTP. In addition, approximately 30% of
players and 70% of coaches reported a new injury after not
following the doctor's advice not to RTP after a serious in-
jury. This discrepancy also reflects the current reality of
RTP processes in elite football.
A complementary explanation would be that proposed
by Webster (2022) based on the Yerkes-Dodson law
(Yerkes & Dodson, 1908). According to this law, perfor-
mance increases with physiological or mental arousal but
only up to a certain point, after which performance de-
creases when arousal levels become too high. For Webster
(2022), the same inverted "U" pattern may also explain the
relationship between psychological responses and the risk
of further ACL injury, i.e., too much or too little would
not be optimal. Finally, the results may vary depending on
the relationships between variables. It is likely that suscep-
tibility to stress plays a moderating role between psycho-
logical readiness and a second ACL injury. Other psycho-
logical variables, such as certain personality traits, may also
2024, Retos, 55, 397-410
© Copyright: Federación Española de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educación Física ( FEADEF) ISSN: Edición impresa: 1579-1726. Edición Web: 1988-2041 (https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/retos/index)
-405- Retos, número 55, 2024 (junio)
influence possible relationships. For example, Olmedilla et
al. (2022) found that adaptive perfectionism, including "per-
sonal standards," played a protective role against symptoms
of anxiety, stress, and depression. In addition, because these
mental health indicators are related to injury, the likelihood
of injury was lower. Conversely, maladaptive perfectionism
was associated with worse mental health symptoms and a
higher risk of injury.
Limitations, future lines of research and practi-
cal implications
Although the present review was conducted according to
PRISMA recommendations (Page et al., 2021), it has some
limitations. The quality of the review is limited to the data
available in the included studies. In this sense, according to
the scores obtained on the PEDro scale, the studies would
have good or excellent methodological quality, except for the
study by Palmi et al. (2018), owing to its single-case design.
Based on the expected paucity of studies, we did not include
limitations regarding year of publication and design, there-
fore the included articles are heterogeneous. As a result, the
conclusions and findings should be interpreted with caution.
Another limitation is that the level of the football players was
not considered, so the total sample of the review included
from amateur to elite level. It would be interesting to con-
duct research that makes comparisons at the competitive
level, as well as to analyse the possible age and gender differ-
ences that some studies have found regarding ACL injury and
subsequent RTP. Similarly, based on the suggestion of
Olmedilla & García-Mas (2023), further research could be
carried out with the aim of studying the characteristics that
differentiate football players who have not suffered ACL in-
juries or recurrences from those who have. The results ob-
tained could be used to implement prevention protocols as a
"vaccine" in football and futsal teams.
In view of the results obtained, it is necessary to consider
the psychological aspects of rehabilitation and their influence
on RTP. A simple screening regarding motivation and fear of
re-injury can help to identify those players who may have a
lower adherence to rehabilitation and thus, a higher risk of
worse evolution and subsequent RTP. Additionally, the im-
plementation of psychological interventions such as Cogni-
tive Behavioural Therapy, EMDR or Mindfulness, as well as
specific strategies such as motor imagery, relaxation or goal
setting (Lope & Solís, 2020; Olmedilla & García-Mas, 2023;
Pastora-Bernal et al, 2021), would complement conventional
rehabilitation protocols, which generally focus on physical
and functional recovery of the knee. Such interventions could
help football players to reduce pain perception and kinesio-
phobia, while improving their mood, perception of social
support and optimal psychological readiness for RTP.
Conclusion
Although some football players meet the clinical criteria
for RTP, some do not return to their pre-injury levels or
do not return to RTP. This systematic review provides ev-
idence on the psychological factors present in the rehabili-
tation of ACL injuries and their influence on RTP and pos-
sible recurrences. On the other hand, the main factors as-
sociated with RTP are higher motivation for RTP, better
injury-related quality of life, and adventure seeking and per-
sonal standards as personality traits and perfectionism. Con-
versely, the most common reasons for not returning were
lack of confidence in the knee and fear of re-injury. Fear of
reinjury and poorer psychological readiness were also asso-
ciated with poorer performance on physical tests. In terms
of risk profiles, the results suggest that susceptibility to
stress and high psychological readiness, in combination with
other variables, may increase the risk of sustaining a second
ACL injury. Therefore, further studies are needed to ex-
plore the optimal level of psychological readiness and pos-
sible intervention of other factors such as age or gender, in-
cluding psychological variables such as perfectionism. Fi-
nally, the included studies also suggest positive effects of
psychological interventions on mood states, improved per-
ceptions of psychological readiness for RTP, reduced pain
perception, and reduced kinesiophobia and fear of reinjury.
Based on these findings, screening is recommended to iden-
tify players at risk of both poor rehabilitation and recur-
rence. Likewise, future research could focus on the charac-
teristics of football players without ACL injuries and de-
velop prevention protocols as a "vaccine" to be imple-
mented in football and futsal teams.
Acknowledgements
This study has been carried out, in part, thanks to the
collaboration agreement between the Football Federation
of the Region of Murcia (FFRM) and the University of
Murcia (UM), Project FFRM+UMU-36731GIN-
VEST12574.
References
Almuhaya, A., Albarrati, A., Alhowimel, A., & Alodaibi,
F. (2023). Adding A Structured Educational Session to
the Rehabilitation Program of Football Players Follow-
ing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Fea-
sibility Study. International Journal of Sports Physical
Therapy, 18(1), 81-91.
https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.68141
Altman D. G. (1991). Mathematics for Kappa. In D. G.
Altman (Ed.), Practical statistics for medical re-
search (pp. 406-407). Chapman & Hall.
Andersen, M. B., & Williams, J. M. (1988). A Model of
Stress and Athletic Injury: Prediction and Prevention.
Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10(3), 294-
306. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.10.3.294
Ardern, C. L., Kvist, J., & Webster, K. E. (2016). Psycho-
logical Aspects of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries.
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Reconstruction:
From Perioperative Management to Rehabilitation and
2024, Retos, 55, 397-410
© Copyright: Federación Española de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educación Física ( FEADEF) ISSN: Edición impresa: 1579-1726. Edición Web: 1988-2041 (https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/retos/index)
-406- Retos, número 55, 2024 (junio)
Return-to-Play, 24(1), 77-83.
https://doi.org/10.1053/j.otsm.2015.09.006
Ateef, M., Alqahtani, M., Alzhrani, M., Alkathiry, A. A.,
Alanazi, A., & Alshewaier, S. A. (2022). A Systematic
Review of Psychometric Properties of Knee-Related
Outcome Measures Translated, Cross-Culturally
Adapted, and Validated in Arabic Language. Healthcare,
10(9), 1631.
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10091631
Baez, S. E., Hoch, M. C., & Hoch, J. M. (2020). Psycho-
logical factors are associated with return to pre-injury
levels of sport and physical activity after ACL recon-
struction. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Ar-
throscopy, 28(2), 495-501.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05696-9
Balaguer, I., Fuentes, I., Meliá, J., García-Merita, M. L., &
Pérez, G. (1993). El perfil de los estados de ánimo
(POMS): Baremo para estudiantes valencianos y su apli-
cación en el contexto deportivo. Revista de psicología
del Deporte, 2(2), 39-52.
Bortone, I., Moretti, L., Bizzoca, D., Caringella, N., Del-
medico, M., Piazzolla, A., & Moretti, B. (2021). The
importance of biomechanical assessment after Return to
Play in athletes with ACL-Reconstruction. Gait & pos-
ture, 88, 240-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gait-
post.2021.06.005
Brewer, B. W. (1994). Review and critique of models of
psychological adjustment to athletic injury. Journal of
Applied Sport Psychology, 6(1), 87-100.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10413209408406467
Brewer, B. W. (2017). Psychological Responses to Sport
Injury. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acre-
fore/9780190236557.013.172
Brewer, B. W., Van Raalte, J. L., & Cornelius, A. E.
(2022). An interactive cognitive-behavioural multime-
dia program favourably affects pain and kinesiophobia
during rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament
surgery: An effectiveness trial. International Journal of
Sport and Exercise Psychology, 20(4), 1133-1155.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2021.1934712
Burland, J. P., Toonstra, J. L., & Howard, J. S. (2019).
Psychosocial Barriers After Anterior Cruciate Ligament
Reconstruction: A Clinical Review of Factors Influenc-
ing Postoperative Success. Sports Health, 11(6), 528-
534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738119869333
Caicedo-Parada, S., Lago-Peñas, C., & Ortega, E. (2020).
Passing Networks and Tactical Action in Football: A
Systematic Review. International Journal of Environ-
mental Research and Public Health, 17(18).
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186649
Candel, M. J., Mompeán-Rey, R., Olmedilla, A., & Gimé-
nez-Egido, J. M. (2023). Catastrophic thinking and
temporary evolution of mood state in injured football
players. Retos, 47, 710-719.
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v47.95553
Cashin, A. G., & McAuley, J. H. (2020). Clinimetrics:
Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Scale. Jour-
nal of Physiotherapy, 66(1), 59.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2019.08.005
Correa, R., Verhagen, E., Resende, R., & Ocarino, J.
(2023). Performance in field-tests and dynamic knee
valgus in football players psychologically ready and not
ready to return to sports after ACL reconstruction.
Knee, 42, 297-303.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2023.04.011
Cronstrom, A., Tengman, E., & Hager, C. (2023). Return
to Sports: A Risky Business? A Systematic Review with
Meta-Analysis of Risk Factors for Graft Rupture Fol-
lowing ACL Reconstruction. Sports Medicine, 53(1),
91-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-
01747-3
Cupal, D. D., & Brewer, B. W. (2001). Effects of relaxa-
tion and guided imagery on knee strength, reinjury anx-
iety, and pain following anterior cruciate ligament re-
construction. Rehabilitation Psychology, 46(1), 28-43.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0090-5550.46.1.28
D’Isanto, T., D’Elia, F., Esposito, G., Altavilla, G., &
Raiola, G. (2022). Examining the Effects of Mirror
Therapy on Psychological Readiness and Perception of
Pain in ACL-Injured Female Football Players. Journal of
Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 7(4), 113.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk7040113
Dunn, J. G. H., Dunn, J. C., & Syrotuik, D. G. (2002).
Relationship between multidimensional perfectionism
and goal orientations in sport. Journal of Sport & Exer-
cise Psychology, 24(4), 376-395.
Faltstrom, A., Hagglund, M., & Kvist, J. (2016). Factors
associated with playing football after anterior cruciate
ligament reconstruction in female football players.
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports,
26(11), 1343-1352.
https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12588
Faltstrom, A., Hagglund, M., Kvist, J., & Mendonca, L.
(2023). Risk Factors for Sustaining a Second ACL Injury
after Primary ACL Reconstruction in Female Football
Players: A Study Investigating the Effects of Follow-Up
Time and the Statistical Approach. Sports Medicine-
Open, 9(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-
023-00571-x
Faltstrom, A., Kvist, J., Bittencourt, N., Mendonca, L., &
Hagglund, M. (2021). Clinical Risk Profile for a Second
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in Female Football
Players After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruc-
tion. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 49(6),
1421-1430.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546521999109
Farinelli, L., Abermann, E., Meena, A., Ueblacker, P.,
Hahne, J., & Fink, C. (2023). Return to Play and Pat-
tern of Injury After ACL Rupture in a Consecutive Se-
ries of Elite UEFA Football Players. Orthopaedic Jour-
nal of Sports Medicine, 11(3).
https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671231153629
Figueroa, D., Arce, G., Espregueira-Mendes, J., Maestu,
2024, Retos, 55, 397-410
© Copyright: Federación Española de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educación Física ( FEADEF) ISSN: Edición impresa: 1579-1726. Edición Web: 1988-2041 (https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/retos/index)
-407- Retos, número 55, 2024 (junio)
R., Mosquera, M., Williams, A., Parker, D., Cohen,
M., Karahan, M., Ochoa, G. A., Zaffagnini, S., Neyret,
P., Karlsson, J., Musahl, V., Radice, F., Van Der
Merwe, W. M., Landreau, P., Imhoff, A., Menetrey,
J., … Patnaik, S. (2022). Return to sport football after
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: ISAKOS con-
sensus. Journal of ISAKOS, 7(6), 150-161.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2022.08.004
Forsdyke, D., Madigan, D., Gledhill, A., & Smith, A.
(2022). Perceived Social Support, Reinjury Anxiety,
and Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport in Foot-
ball Players. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 31(6),
749-755. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2021-0181
Gene-Morales, J., Saez-Berlanga, A., Bermudez, M., Flán-
dez, J., Fritz, N., & Colado, J. C. (2021). Incidence and
prevalence of injuries in futsal: A systematic review of
the literature. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise,
16(3proc), S1467-S1480.
https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2021.16.Proc3.63
Gómez-Conesa, A., Serrano, C. S., Matamoros, D. C., &
López-López, J. (2015). The Spanish translation and ad-
aptation of the Pedro scale. Physiotherapy, 101, e463-
e464.
Gómez-Espejo, V., García-Mas, A., Ortega, E., & Olme-
dilla, A. (2022). Psychological programs in sport injury
rehabilitation. Archivos de Medicina del Deporte,
39(1), 26-33.
Gómez-Espejo, V., Olmedilla, A., Abenza-Cano, L., Gar-
cía-Mas, A., & Ortega, E. (2022). Psychological readi-
ness to return to sports practice and risk of recurrence:
Case studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.905816
Grassi, A., Macchiarola, L., Filippini, M., Lucidi, G. A.,
Villa, F., & Zaffagnini, S. (2020). Epidemiology of An-
terior Cruciate Ligament Injury in Italian First Division
Football Players. Sports Health, 12(3), 279-288.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738119885642
Guede-Rojas, F., Benavides-Villanueva, A., Salgado-Gon-
zález, S., Mendoza, C., Arias-Álvarez, G., Soto-Martí-
nez, A., & Carvajal-Parodi, C. (2023). Effect of
strength training on knee proprioception in patients
with knee osteoarthritis. A systematic review and meta-
analysis. Sports Medicine and Health Science.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smhs.2023.10.005
Gustavsson, J. P., Bergman, H., Edman, G., Ekselius, L.,
Von Knorring, L., & Linder, J. (2000). Swedish univer-
sities Scales of Personality (SSP): Construction, internal
consistency and normative data. Acta Psychiatrica Scan-
dinavica, 102(3), 217-225.
https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-
0447.2000.102003217.x
Hayes, M. H., & Patterson, D. G. (1921). Experimental
development of the graphic rating method. Psychologi-
cal Bulletin, 18, 98-99.
Heil, J. (1993). Psychology of sport injury. Human Kinetics
Publishers.
Hong, I. S., Pierpoint, L. A., Hellwinkel, J. E., Berk, A.
N., Salandra, J. M., Meade, J. D., Piasecki, D. P.,
Fleischli, J. E., Ahmad, C. S., Trofa, D. P., & Saltzman,
B. M. (2023). Clinical Outcomes After ACL Recon-
struction in Football (Football, Futbol) Players: A Sys-
tematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Health,
15(6), 788-804.
https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381231160167
Johnson, U., & Ivarsson, A. (2017). Psychosocial factors
and sport injuries: Prediction, prevention and future re-
search directions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 16,
89-92.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.023
Johnson, U., Ivarsson, A., Karlsson, J., Hägglund, M.,
Waldén, M., & Börjesson, M. (2016). Rehabilitation af-
ter first-time anterior cruciate ligament injury and re-
construction in female football players: A study of resil-
ience factors. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Reha-
bilitation, 8(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-
016-0046-9
Johnston, L. H., & Carroll, D. (1998). The Context of
Emotional Responses to Athletic Injury: A Qualitative
Analysis. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 7(3), 206-
220. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.7.3.206
Joseph, A., Collins, C., Henke, N., Yard, E., Fields, S. &
Comstock, R. (2013). A multisport epidemiologic
comparison of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in high
school athletics. Journal of Athletic Training, 48(6),
810-817. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-
48.6.03
Kakavas, G., Giannakopoulos, I., Tsiokanos, A., Potoup-
nis, M., & Tsaklis, P. V. (2023). The Effect of Ball
Heading and Subclinical Concussion On the Neuromus-
cular Control Of The Lower Limb: A Systematic Re-
view. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy,
18(5), 1054-1064.
https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.87922
Kunnen, M., Dionigi, R. A., Litchfield, C., & Moreland,
A. (2020). ‘My desire to play was stronger than my fear
of re-injury’: Athlete perspectives of psychological
readiness to return to football following anterior cruci-
ate ligament reconstruction surgery. Annals of Leisure
Research, 23(3), 447-461.
https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2019.1647789
Kvist, J., Bengtsson, J., & Lundqvist, C. (2023). The expe-
rience and influence of fear after anterior cruciate liga-
ment reconstruction: An interview study with young
athletes. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilita-
tion, 15(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-
023-00659-7
Liddle, N., Taylor, J. M., Chesterton, P., & Atkinson, G.
(2023). The Effects of Exercise-Based Injury Prevention
Programmes on Injury Risk in Adult Recreational Ath-
letes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports
Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-023-
01950-w
Longo, U. G., De Salvatore, S., D’Orrico, F., Bella, M.,
Corradini, A., Rizzello, G., De Marinis, M. G., &
2024, Retos, 55, 397-410
© Copyright: Federación Española de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educación Física ( FEADEF) ISSN: Edición impresa: 1579-1726. Edición Web: 1988-2041 (https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/retos/index)
-408- Retos, número 55, 2024 (junio)
Denaro, V. (2023). The Impact of Psychological Factors
on Return to Sports after Anterior Cruciate Ligament
Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Osteology, 3(3),
78-93. https://doi.org/10.3390/osteology3030009
Loose, O., Achenbach, L., Fellner, B., Lehmann, J., Jan-
sen, P., Nerlich, M., Angele, P., & Krutsch, W.
(2018). Injury prevention and return to play strategies
in elite football: No consent between players and team
coaches. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery,
138(7), 985-992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-
018-2937-6
Lope, D. E., & Solís, O. B. (2020). Estrategias de afronta-
miento como intervención al estrés en futbolistas.
Retos, 38, 613–619.
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v38i38.75724
Maddison, R., Prapavessis, H., & Clatworthy, M. (2006).
Modeling and rehabilitation following anterior cruciate
ligament reconstruction. Annals of Behavioral Medi-
cine, 31(1), 89-98.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm3101_13
Maddison, R., Prapavessis, H., Clatworthy, M., Hall, C.,
Foley, L., Harper, T., Cupal, D., & Brewer, B. (2012).
Guided imagery to improve functional outcomes post-
anterior cruciate ligament repair: Randomized-con-
trolled pilot trial. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine &
Science in Sports, 22(6), 816-821.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01325.x
Majewski, M., Susanne, H., & Klaus, S. (2006). Epidemi-
ology of athletic knee injuries: A 10-year study. The
Knee, 13(3), 184-188.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2006.01.005
Manara, J., Salmon, L., Kilani, F., de Camino, G., Monk,
C., Sundaraj, K., Pinczewski, L., & Roe, J. (2022). Re-
peat Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Return to
Sport in Australian Football Players After Anterior Cru-
ciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon
Autograft. American Journal of Sports Medicine,
50(13), 3533-3543.
https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465221125467
McPherson, A. L., Feller, J. A., Hewett, T. E., & Webster,
K. E. (2019a). Psychological Readiness to Return to
Sport Is Associated With Second Anterior Cruciate Lig-
ament Injuries. The American Journal of Sports Medi-
cine, 47(4), 857-862.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518825258
McPherson, A. L., Feller, J. A., Hewett, T. E., & Webster,
K. E. (2019b). Smaller Change in Psychological Readi-
ness to Return to Sport Is Associated With Second An-
terior Cruciate Ligament Injury Among Younger Pa-
tients. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 47(5),
1209-1215.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546519825499
Miller, R. P., Kori, S. H., & Todd, D. D. (1991). The
Tampa Scale: A Measure of Kinisophobia. The Clinical
Journal of Pain, 7(1), 51-52.
Mirzaei, A., Nikbakhsh, R., & Sharififar, F. (2013). The re-
lationship between personality traits and sport
performance. European Journal of Experimental Biol-
ogy, 3(3), 439-442.
Mohtadi, N. (1998). Development and Validation of the
Quality Of Life Outcome Measure (Questionnaire) for
Chronic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency. The
American Journal of Sports Medicine, 26(3), 350-359.
https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465980260030201
Momaya, A. M., Wood, A. S., Benson, E. M., & Kwapisz,
A. L. (2024). The Influence of Psychosocial Factors on
Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Re-
construction. Sports Health, 19417381231223560.
https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381231223560
Nwachukwu, B., Adjei, J., Rauck, R., Chahla, J., Oko-
roha, K., Verma, N., Allen, A., & Williams, R. (2019).
How Much Do Psychological Factors Affect Lack of Re-
turn to Play After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Recon-
struction? A Systematic Review. Orthopaedic Journal of
Sports Medicine, 7(5).
https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967119845313
Olmedilla, A., & García-Mas, A. (2009). El modelo global
psicológico de las lesiones deportivas. Acción Psicoló-
gica, 6(2), 77-91.
https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.6.2.223
Olmedilla, A., & García-Mas, A. (2023). Psycholight: Pro-
tocolo de evaluación e intervención psicológica para la
prevención y la rehabilitación de lesiones deportivas.
Revista de Psicología Aplicada al Deporte & al Ejercicio
Físico, 8(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5093/rpa-
def2023a4
Olmedilla, A., Aguilar, J., Ramos-Pastrana, L. M., Trigue-
ros, R., & Cantón, E. (2022). Perfectionism, mental
health, and injuries in women footballers. Journal of
Sport Psychology, 31(1), 49-56.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I.,
Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetz-
laff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glan-
ville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M.
M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDon-
ald, S., Alonso-Fernández, S. (2021). Declaración
PRISMA 2020: Una guía actualizada para la publicación
de revisiones sistemáticas. Revista Española de Cardio-
logía, 74(9), 790-799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.re-
cesp.2021.06.016
Palmi, J., Planas, A., & Sole, S. (2018). Mindfulness inter-
vention of rehabilitation of an injured athlete: Case in
professional football. Revista de Psicología del Deporte,
27(1), 115-124.
Pastora-Bernal, J. M., Estebanez-Pérez, M. J., Lucena-An-
ton, D., García-López, F. J., Bort-Carballo, A., & Mar-
tín-Valero, R. (2021). The Effectiveness and Recom-
mendation of Motor Imagery Techniques for Rehabili-
tation after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruc-
tion: A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Medi-
cine, 10(3), 428.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10030428
Paterno, M. V., Flynn, K., Thomas, S., & Schmitt, L. C.
(2018). Self-Reported Fear Predicts Functional
2024, Retos, 55, 397-410
© Copyright: Federación Española de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educación Física ( FEADEF) ISSN: Edición impresa: 1579-1726. Edición Web: 1988-2041 (https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/retos/index)
-409- Retos, número 55, 2024 (junio)
Performance and Second ACL Injury After ACL Recon-
struction and Return to Sport: A Pilot Study. Sports
Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach, 10(3), 228-233.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738117745806
Phelan, B., King, E., Richter, C., Webster, K., & Falvey,
E. (2019). A comparison of anterior cruciate liga-
ment—Return to sports after injury (ACL-RSI) scores
of male athletes nine-months Post-ACL reconstruction
with matched uninjured controls. Physical Therapy in
Sport, 38, 179-183.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.05.006
Piussi, R., Beischer, S., Thomeé, R., Thomeé, C., San-
sone, M., Samuelsson, K., & Senorski, E. (2022).
Greater Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport, as
Well as Greater Present and Future Knee-Related Self-
Efficacy, Can Increase the Risk for an Anterior Cruciate
Ligament Re-Rupture: A Matched Cohort Study. Ar-
throscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Sur-
gery, 38(4), 1267-1276.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.08.040
Piussi, R., Berghdal, T., Sundemo, D., Grassi, A., Zaf-
fagnini, S., Sansone, M., Samuelsson, K., & Senorski,
E. H. (2022). Self-Reported Symptoms of Depression
and Anxiety After ACL Injury: A Systematic Review.
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 10(1),
23259671211066493.
https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671211066493
Podlog, L., & Eklund, R. C. (2010). Returning to compe-
tition after a serious injury: The role of self-determina-
tion. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28(8), 819-831.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640411003792729
Requejo-Herrero, P., Pineda-Galan, C., & Medina-
Porqueres, I. (2023). Anterior cruciate ligament rup-
tures in Spanish football first division: An epidemiolog-
ical retrospective study. The Knee, 41, 48-57.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2022.11.014
Rubio, V. J., Quartiroli, A., Podlog, L. W., & Olmedilla,
A. (2020). Understanding the dimensions of sport-in-
jury related growth: A DELPHI method ap-
proach. PLoS one, 15(6), e0235149.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235149
Ruiz-Pérez, I., López-Valenciano, A., Elvira, J. L. L., Gar-
cía-Gómez, A., Croix, M. D. S., & Ayala, F. (2021).
Epidemiology of injuries in elite male and female futsal:
A systematic review and meta-analysis. Science and
Medicine in Football, 5(1), 59-71.
https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2020.1789203
Ruiz-Pérez, I., López-Valenciano, A., Jiménez-Loaisa, A.,
Elvira, J. L. L., Croix, M. D. S., & Ayala, F. (2019).
Injury incidence, characteristics and burden among fe-
male sub-elite futsal players: A prospective study with
three-year follow-up. PeerJ, 7, e7989.
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7989
Sandín, B., Chorot, P., Lostao, L., Joiner, T. E., Santed,
M. A., & Valiente, R. M. (1999). Escalas PANAS de
afecto positivo y negativo: Validación factorial y conver-
gencia transcultural. Psicothema, 11(1), 37-51.
Schick-Makaroff, K., MacDonald, M., Plummer, M., Bur-
gess, J., & Neander, W. (2016). What Synthesis Meth-
odology Should I Use? A Review and Analysis of Ap-
proaches to Research Synthesis. AIMS public
health, 3(1), 172–215. https://doi.org/10.3934/pub-
lichealth.2016.1.172
Schiffner, E., Latz, D., Grassmann, J. P., Schek, A., The-
len, S., Windolf, J., Schneppendahl, J., & Jungbluth, P.
(2018). Anterior cruciate ligament ruptures in German
elite football players: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and
return to play. The Knee, 25(2), 219-225.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2018.01.010
Schneider, S., Seither, B., Tönges, S., & Schmitt, H.
(2006). Sports injuries: population based representative
data on incidence, diagnosis, sequelae, and high risk
groups. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 40(4), 334.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2005.022889
Serrat, S., Sánchez-Gómez, J., González-Ponce, I., &
Romero-Moraleda, B. (2023). Estudio descriptivo de
las lesiones de ligamento cruzado en el fútbol femenino.
Retos, 50, 172-179. https://doi.org/10.47197/re-
tos.v50.96622
Slater, D., Kvist, J., & Ardern, C. L. (2023). Biopsychoso-
cial Factors Associated With Return to Preinjury Sport
After ACL Injury Treated Without Reconstruction:
NACOX Cohort Study 12-Month Follow-up. Sports
Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach, 15(2), 176-184.
https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381221094780
Sonesson, S., Kvist, J., Ardern, C., Österberg, A., & Sil-
bernagel, K. G. (2017). Psychological factors are im-
portant to return to pre-injury sport activity after ante-
rior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Expect and moti-
vate to satisfy. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Ar-
throscopy, 25(5), 1375-1384.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4294-8
Tracey, J. (2003). The Emotional Response to the Injury
and Rehabilitation Process. Journal of Applied Sport
Psychology, 15(4), 279-293.
https://doi.org/10.1080/714044197
Truong, L. K., Mosewich, A. D., Holt, C. J., Le, C. Y.,
Miciak, M., & Whittaker, J. L. (2020). Psychological,
social and contextual factors across recovery stages fol-
lowing a sport-related knee injury: a scoping re-
view. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 54(19), 1149-
1156. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2019-
101206
Waldén, M., Hägglund, M., Werner, J., & Ekstrand, J.
(2011). The epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament
injury in football (football): A review of the literature
from a gender-related perspective. Knee Surgery,
Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy: Official Journal of
the ESSKA, 19(1), 3-10.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1172-7
Walker, A., Hing, W., Gough, S., & Lorimer, A. (2022).
‘Such a massive part of rehab is between the ears’; bar-
riers to and facilitators of anterior cruciate ligament re-
construction rehabilitation: A qualitative focus group
2024, Retos, 55, 397-410
© Copyright: Federación Española de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educación Física ( FEADEF) ISSN: Edición impresa: 1579-1726. Edición Web: 1988-2041 (https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/retos/index)
-410- Retos, número 55, 2024 (junio)
analysis. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilita-
tion, 14(1), 106. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-
022-00499-x
Webster, K. E. (2022). Editorial Commentary: Why the
Mind Matters in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Re-
covery: Psychological Readiness and Return to Sport.
Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related
Surgery, 38(4), 1277-1278.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.10.033
Webster, K. E., Feller, J. A., & Lambros, C. (2008). De-
velopment and preliminary validation of a scale to meas-
ure the psychological impact of returning to sport fol-
lowing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction sur-
gery. Physical Therapy in Sport, 9(1), 9-15.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2007.09.003
Webster, K. E., Nagelli, C. V., Hewett, T. E., & Feller, J.
A. (2018). Factors Associated With Psychological Read-
iness to Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Liga-
ment Reconstruction Surgery. The American Journal of
Sports Medicine, 46(7), 1545-1550.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518773757
Wiese-Bjornstal, D. M., Smith, A. M., Shaffer, S. M., &
Morrey, M. A. (1998). An integrated model of response
to sport injury: Psychological and sociological dynam-
ics. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 10(1), 46-69.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10413209808406377
Williams, J. M., & Andersen, M. B. (1998). Psychosocial
antecedents of sport injury: Review and critique of the
stress and injury model’. Journal of Applied Sport Psy-
chology, 10(1), 5-25.
Woby, S. R., Roach, N. K., Urmston, M., & Watson, P.
J. (2005). Psychometric properties of the TSK-11: A
shortened version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesio-
phobia. Pain, 117(1), 137-144.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2005.05.029
Xiao, M., van Niekerk, M., Trivedi, N. N., Hwang, C. E.,
Sherman, S. L., Safran, M. R., & Abrams, G. D.
(2023). Patients Who Return to Sport After Primary
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Have Sig-
nificantly Higher Psychological Readiness: A Systematic
Review and Meta-analysis of 3744 Patients. The Amer-
ican Journal of Sports Medicine, 51(10), 2774-2783.
https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465221102420
Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of
strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation.
Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology,
18(5), 459-482.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.920180503
Zaffagnini, S., Grassi, A., Muccioli, G. M., Tsapralis, K.,
Ricci, M., Bragonzoni, L., Villa, S., & Marcacci, M.
(2014). Return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament
reconstruction in professional football players. The
Knee, 21(3), 731-735.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2014.02.005
Datos de los autores y traductor:
Luis Miguel Ramos Pastrana
luismiguel.ramos@um.es
Autor/a Traductor/a
José María Giménez Egido
josemaria.gimenez@um.es
Autor/a
Aurelio Olmedilla Zafra
olmedilla@um.es
Autor/a
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
The rehabilitation of those who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is a complex process that involves many factors. Physical ability recovery is not the only factor in the return to sport; psychosocial factors such as anxiety, pain response, self-esteem, locus of control, and fear of re-injury also play an important role. A systematic search was conducted on the PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, CINAHL and Embase databases using the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). No randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINOR) was used to assess the quality of the identified non-RCT studies. A total of 308 studies were identified, of which 32 met the eligibility criteria. The results of these studies were obtained using the KOOS (ADL, Sport, QoL), ACL, TSK-11, K-SES, questionnaires/interviews, and other scales as instrumental approaches. This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that psychological factors have a significant influence on the post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcomes of athletes. Fear of re-injury and pain were the primary factors that limited return to sport, whereas self-efficacy, psychological will, and age were associated with better functional outcomes and were essential for male and young patients. Clinicians should focus on both physical and psychological components to optimize rehabilitation.
Article
Full-text available
Proprioception is significantly impaired in knee osteoarthritis (KOA), contributing to reduced functionality. Strength training (ST) is essential in KOA by improving muscle strength, although it may also be effective in improving proprioception. The purpose was to determine the effect of ST on knee proprioception in KOA patients. Pubmed, CINAHL, Scopus, WOS, and PEDro were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (inception to March 2023). Comparisons for ST were physical exercise different from ST, non-exercise-based interventions, and no intervention. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale, and risk of bias (RoB) using the Cochrane tool. Meta-analyses were performed by comparison groups using the standardized mean difference (SMD) (Hedge's g) with random effects models, also considering subgroups by proprioception tests. Finally, six RCTs were included. The mean PEDro score was 6.3, and the highest proportion of biases corresponds to performance, selection, and detection. The meta-analysis indicated that only when compared with non-intervention, ST significantly improved knee proprioception for the joint position sense (JPS) (active + passive), JPS (passive), and threshold to detect passive motion (TTDPM) subgroups (g = −1.33 [-2.33, −0.32], g = −2.29 [-2.82, −1.75] and g = −2.40 [-4.23, −0.58], respectively). However, in the knee JPS (active) subgroup, ST was not significant (g = −0.72 [-1.84, 0.40]). In conclusion, ST improves knee proprioception compared to non-intervention. However, due to the paucity of studies and diversity of interventions, more evidence is needed to support the effectiveness of ST. Future RCTs may address the limitations of this review to advance knowledge about proprioceptive responses to ST and contribute to clinical practice.
Article
Full-text available
Background Injuries are common in adult recreational athletes. Exercise-based injury prevention programmes offer the potential to reduce the risk of injury and have been a popular research topic. Yet, syntheses and meta-analyses on the effects of exercise-based injury prevention programmes for adult recreational athletes are lacking. Objectives We aimed to synthesise and quantify the pooled intervention effects of exercise-based injury prevention programmes delivered to adults who participate in recreation sports. Methods Studies were eligible for inclusion if they included adult recreational athletes (aged > 16 years), an exercise-based intervention and used a randomised controlled trial design. Exclusion criteria were studies without a control group, studies using a non-randomised design and studies including participants who were undertaking activity mandatory for their occupation. Eleven literature databases were searched from earliest record, up to 9 June, 2022. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was used to assess the risk of bias in all included studies. Reported risk statistics were synthesised in a random-effects meta-analysis to quantify pooled treatment effects and associated 95% confidence intervals and prediction intervals. Results Sixteen studies met the criteria. Risk statistics were reported as risk ratios [RRs] (n = 12) or hazard ratios [HRs] (n = 4). Pooled estimates of RRs and HRs were 0.94 (95% confidence interval 0.80–1.09) and 0.65 (95% confidence interval 0.39–1.08), respectively. Prediction intervals were 0.80–1.09 and 0.16–2.70 for RR and HR, respectively. Heterogeneity was very low for RR studies, but high for HR studies (tau = 0.29, I2 = 81%). There was evidence of small study effects for RR studies, evidenced by funnel plot asymmetry and Egger’s test for small study bias: − 0.99 (CI − 2.08 to 0.10, p = 0.07). Conclusions Pooled point estimates were suggestive of a reduced risk of injury in intervention groups. Nevertheless, these risk estimates were insufficiently precise, too heterogeneous and potentially compromised by small study effects to arrive at any robust conclusion. More large-scale studies are required to clarify whether exercise-based injury prevention programmes are effective in adult recreational athletes.
Article
Full-text available
Background Soccer is unique among sports because it is the only sport that involves purposeful use of the head to control, pass, or shoot the ball. Over the previous five years, a relationship between lower extremity (LE) injury and sports related concussion (SRC) has been established in various sporting populations. Athletes at the high school, collegiate, and professional levels have demonstrated a greater risk for sustaining a LE injury post SRC. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the relationship of the SRC with the incidence of LE injuries. Methods Ten databases were searched with the following keywords: Lower limb, ball heading, neuromuscular control, concussion, MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE(R) Daily, and Ovid MEDLINE(R), EMBASE, and Scopus. The search was limited to English-language and peer-reviewed publications, until 15/12/2022. The PEDro scale was used for the assessment of the risk of bias among the included studies. All included papers were qualitatively analyzed. Results A total of 834 studies were identified and 10 articles (four concussion-MSK biomechanics, six concussion-MSK injury) were included in the qualitative analyses. Included papers ranged from low to high quality. Due to the heterogeneous nature of the included study designs, quantitative meta-analysis was unable to be performed. All four of the included concussion-MSK biomechanics studies demonstrated, to some degree, that worse cognitive performance was associated with lower extremity MSK biomechanical patterns suggestive of greater risk for MSK injury. Among the six injury related studies, two investigations failed to determine group differences in cognitive performance between subsequently injured and non-injured athletes. Conclusion More research is needed to better understand the relationship of SRC and lower extremity injuries and the extent to which they are related to concussions and/or repetitive neurotrauma after ball heading sustained in soccer. Level of Evidence 2
Article
Full-text available
Background Studies evaluating risk factors for sustaining an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury have different, sometimes contrasting, results. Different follow-up times and statistical approaches may be a reason for these differences. The aim of this study was to explore if different follow-up times and statistical approaches, classification and regression tree (CART) analysis and Cox regression, would impact on the association between various candidate risk factors and ACL injury in female football players. In total, 112 active female football players, 18 ± 8 months after ACL reconstruction (mean age ± SD, 20 ± 2 years), were included and followed for at least 36 months. At baseline, all players underwent assessment of range of motion of knee and ankle joints, functional tests, and answered questionnaires regarding knee function, psychological and personality traits. Nineteen independent variables were included for the CART analysis and for univariable Cox regression and compared using four different follow-up times: 0–12, 0–24, 0–36, and 0–>36 months. Results Forty-three (38%) players sustained a second ACL injury. The identified risk factors varied depending on follow-up time both with CART analysis and with Cox regression. CART identified 12 of the 19 independent variables and selected between 5 and 6 of the variables in the four different follow-up times associated with second ACL injury. The accuracy of the different follow-up times for the CART varied between 86 and 93% with 77–96% sensitivity and 70–81% specificity. Cox regression identified two risk factors: knee extension at 0–36 months and 0–>36 months, and time between primary injury and surgery at 0–>36 months. The accuracy varied between 54 and 64% with 44–88% sensitivity and 32–71% specificity. Conclusions The identified risk factors associated with a second ACL injury varied depending on the follow-up time and statistical approach used. Thus, in future research on risk factors, the time athletes are followed up and the type of statistical methods used are important to discuss.
Article
Full-text available
This article was aimed to investigate the relationship between personality traits with sport performance. The method of the study is descriptive correlational. The data was collected using questionnaires and through field study procedure. The population of the study consisted of 229 non elite football and futsal players in the 2010-2011 season in Ardebil city. The sample size was equated with the population. Personality was assessed using the NEO-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI; Costa & McCrae, 1992) and athlete's performance was assessed by coach's rating (Piedmont et al., 1999). The stepwise regression analysis indicated that from among personality components only Conscientiousness have positive significant correlation with sport performance. The result, also, indicated that conscientiousness was the sole predictor of sport performance.
Article
Full-text available
Background Despite good physical function, many athletes do not return to sports after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). One important reason for this is fear of new injury. The aim of this study was to investigate young athletes’ experiences of knee-related fear after an ACLR and how they perceive this fear to affect them in their sporting and everyday life. Methods A qualitative interview study was conducted, using semi-structured interviews. Athletes who were active in contact or pivoting sport before an ACL injury, with the goal of returning to the same sport and who scored highly on fear of new injury at six months post-ACLR, were asked to participate. Ten athletes (six women and four men, aged 17–25 years), were interviewed by an independent researcher, 7–9 months after ACLR. Content analysis employing an abductive approach was used. Results The analysis resulted in three categories with associated subcategories: 1. The expressions of fear; (i) reason for fear, (ii) changes in fear over time, and (iii) injury situation. 2. Reactions, consequences, and adaptations; (i) reactions, (ii) behavioural adaptation and influence on rehabilitation and daily life, (iii) present consequences, and (iv) consequences for the future. 3. Fear and adaptations related to returning to sports; (i) fear related to returning to sports and, (ii) adaptations in sports and life due to fear. Fear was described in broad and complex ways, with fear of a new injury being expressed as one of several aspects. Various reasons (e.g., seeing others getting injured in the past, previous experience of injury, failed rehabilitation, perceived knee instability) were given to explain the fear, and athletes reacted both physically and mentally to fear. Both positive and negative adaptations to fear were described, in both daily life and sports. Conclusion The results contribute to an increased understanding of fear as an essential psychological factor to consider during rehabilitation and leaves the way open for research to investigate how physiotherapists can work to manage fear better among ACLR patients.
Article
Full-text available
Background Anterior cruciate ligament rupture represents a career-threatening injury for professional soccer players. Purpose To analyze the pattern of injury, return to play (RTP), and performance of a consecutive series of elite professional soccer players after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Study Design Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods We evaluated the medical records of 40 consecutive elite soccer players who underwent ACLR by a single surgeon between September 2018 and May 2022. Patient age, height, weight, body mass index, position, injury history, affected side, RTP time, minutes played per season (MPS), and MPS as a percentage of playable minutes before and after ACLR were retrieved from medical records and from publicly available media-based platforms. Results Included were 27 male patients (mean ± SD age at surgery, 23.2 ± 4.3 years; range, 18-34 years). The injury occurred during matches in 24 players (88.9%), with a noncontact mechanism in 22 (91.7%). Meniscal pathology was found in 21 patients (77.8%). Lateral meniscectomy and meniscal repair were performed in 2 (7.4%) and 14 (51.9%) patients, respectively, and medial meniscectomy and meniscal repair were performed in 3 (11.1%) and 13 (48.1%) patients, respectively. A total of 17 players (63.0%) underwent ACLR with bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft and 10 (37.0%) with soft tissue quadriceps tendon. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis was added in 5 patients (18.5%). The overall RTP rate was 92.6% (25 of 27). Two athletes moved to a lower league after surgery. The mean MPS% during the last preinjury season was 56.69% ± 21.71%; this decreased significantly to 29.18% ± 20.6% ( P < .001) in the first postoperative season and then increased to 57.76% ± 22.89% and 55.89% ± 25.8% in the second and third postoperative seasons. Two (7.4%) reruptures and 2 (7.4%) failed meniscal repairs were reported. Conclusion ACLR in elite UEFA soccer players was associated with a 92.6% rate of RTP and 7.4% rate of reinjury within 6 months after primary surgery. Moreover, 7.4% of soccer players moved to a lower league during the first season after surgery. Age, graft selection, concomitant treatments, and lateral extra-articular tenodesis were not significantly associated with prolonged RTP.
Article
Context Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries greatly impact patients in terms of future performance, reduced physical activity and athletic participation, and overall economic burden. Decades of research have investigated how to improve ACL reconstruction (ACLR) outcomes. Recently, there has been growing interest to understand the effects of psychosocial factors on patient outcomes. Study Design Clinical review. Evidence Acquisition A search of the PubMed database was performed in March 2023. Articles were reviewed by at least 2 authors to determine relevance. We highlighted publications of the past 5 years while incorporating previous pertinent studies. Level of Evidence Level 5. Results There is no standardization of psychosocial factors regarding ACLR. As such, there is a lack of consensus regarding which psychosocial measures to use and when. There is a need for clarification of the complex relationship between psychosocial factors and physical function. Despite this, psychosocial factors have the potential to help predict patients who are more likely to return to sport: (1) desire/motivation to return; (2) lower levels of kinesiophobia; (3) higher levels of self-efficacy, confidence, and subjective knee function; (4) risk acceptance; and (5) social support. However, there are no standardized interventions to improve psychosocial factors after ACLR. Conclusion Psychosocial factors affect outcomes after ACLR. However, the interplay between psychosocial factors and physical function is complex. There is emerging evidence that testing and interventions may improve ACLR outcomes. There is a lack of standardized interventions to determine or improve psychosocial factors after ACLR. Further research is needed to identify psychosocial factors and to develop standardized interventions for clinicians to implement to improve clinical outcomes.
Article
Background: The objective was to compare the performance in field tests, dynamic knee valgus, knee function, and kinesiophobia of soccer players who were psychologically ready and not ready to return to unrestricted training or competitions after ACL reconstruction. Methods: Thirty-five male soccer players who had undergone primary ACL reconstruction at least 6 months were divided based on the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) questionnaire score into ready (≥60) and not-ready (<60) groups. The modified Illinois change of direction test (MICODT) and reactive agility test (RAT) were used to impose the demand for directional change and reactive decision-making. We assessed the frontal plane knee projection angle (FPKPA) during a single-leg squat and distance in crossover hop test (CHD). In addition, we assessed kinesiophobia through the shortened version of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11) and knee function using the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC). Independent t-tests were used to compare the groups. Results: The not-ready group had lower performance on the MICODT (effect size (ES) = -1.2; p < 0.001) and RAT (ES = -1.1; p = 0.004) tests and higher FPKPA (ES = 1.5; p < 0.001). In addition, they presented lower IKDC (ES = 3.1; p < 0.001) and higher TSK-11 (ES = -3.3; p < 0.001) scores. Conclusions: Physical and psychological deficits may persist in some individuals after rehabilitation. On-field tests and dynamic knee alignment evaluation should be included in the athlete evaluation before the decision-making about clearance to sports participation, especially in athletes who perceive themselves as psychologically not ready.