Article

Pain Neuroscience Education Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair for Patients With Rotator Cuff Tears: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Authors:
  • Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Objective This trial examines the efficacy of the Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) on clinical outcomes in patients with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). Design A total of 36 participants undergoing ARCR were assigned to either the experimental group (n = 18) or control group (n = 18) in this randomized study. A 6-week-long conventional physiotherapy program was administered for both groups. In addition, a PNE protocol was administered for the experimental group for a whole period of 6 weeks (one session/week, 15-60 min per session). The primary outcomes were to compare pre- and post-treatment scores of the experimental versus control groups on the pain and disability. Our secondary outcomes included the comparisons of scores on the catastrophizing, anxiety, depression, kinesiophobia, and quality of life. The participants were assessed both at baseline and post-treatment. Results The improvement in pain catastrophizing, anxiety, depression and kinesiophobia was greater in the experimental group (p < 0.05). The improvement was similar in both groups in terms of the rest of outcome measures. Conclusion This study showed that the PNE improved only psychological aspects of the chronic pain in ARCR. Therefore, adding PNE to the conventional program might be useful to improve pain catastrophizing, anxiety, depression and kinesiophobia in patients with ARCR.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.

... The sample estimation was calculated through a previous feasibility study [57] with SPADI score as primary outcome measure and using G*Power Software (Version 3.1.9.7, Düsseldorf University, Düsseldorf, Germany). The minimum required sample size was calculated as 50 participants for the anticipated effect size of 0.82 with a probability level of 0.05 and statistical power level of 80%. ...
... In decreasing pain and disability in shoulder pain, different studies have reported unsatisfactory results on the efficacy of PNE. [42,57,63]. The trial by Kararti et al. examined the efficacy of PNE as an adjunct to clinical outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and compared the results to those from a control group treated with conventional physiotherapy [57]. ...
... [42,57,63]. The trial by Kararti et al. examined the efficacy of PNE as an adjunct to clinical outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and compared the results to those from a control group treated with conventional physiotherapy [57]. The study by Myers et al. evaluated the impact of a cognitive-behavioral intervention to improve expectations towards physiotherapy and reduce the likelihood of opting for surgery [63]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of a pain neuroscience education program completed by patients with shoulder pain. Methods: A randomized, controlled trial was performed. Fifty-five patients satisfied the eligibility criteria, agreed to participate, and were randomized into an experimental group (n = 27) or control group (n = 28). A manual therapy and exercises program was administered for both groups. The experimental group also received a 4-week pain neuroscience education protocol (1 session/week, 75 min per session). The measurements taken included the active range of motion, pain, disability, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and therapeutic alliance. The outcomes were assessed at baseline and 5 weeks after completion of treatment. The primary outcome analyzed was the group × time interaction. Results: The 2 × 2 analysis of variance revealed a significant group × time interaction for the active range of motion (F = 15.27; p = 0.011), disability (F = 6.14; p = 0.01), catastrophizing (F = 8.79; p = 0.01), kinesiophobia (F = 7.62; p = 0.008), and therapeutic alliance (p = 0.03) in favor of the experimental group. Conclusions: This study showed that the patients with shoulder pain who completed the pain neuroscience program achieved significantly better results in terms of their active range of motion, disability, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and therapeutic alliance compared to those achieved by the control group. Therefore, pain neuroscience education may be beneficial in the treatment of patients with shoulder pain.
... The results of this study are in line with the existing literature on the positive effects of PNE on various psychosocial variables. In relation to anxiety and depression, Kararti et al. [45] and Lepri et al. [46] observed significant improvements in patients with fibromyalgia and other chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions. Regarding catastrophizing, the studies by Kararti et al. [45], Galan-Martin et al. [42], Lepri et al. [46], and Meeus et al. [47] reported a remarkable reduction in this variable, even in patients with different chronic pain conditions. ...
... In relation to anxiety and depression, Kararti et al. [45] and Lepri et al. [46] observed significant improvements in patients with fibromyalgia and other chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions. Regarding catastrophizing, the studies by Kararti et al. [45], Galan-Martin et al. [42], Lepri et al. [46], and Meeus et al. [47] reported a remarkable reduction in this variable, even in patients with different chronic pain conditions. Finally, regarding kinesiophobia, both Kararti et al., 2024 [45] and Galan-Martin et al. [42] and the intervention with PNE in telerehabilitation programs for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome [43] showed positive results. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: PNE, focusing on cognitive aspects, aims to change patients’ beliefs about pain. However, it is unclear if these cognitive changes are sufficient to influence other components such as neuroplastic changes. Objective: To assess whether 3-h pain neuroscience education (PNE) can induce changes in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels and pain intensity in chronic pain patients. Methods: A double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted with 66 participants aged 18–65 years old (50.86 ± 8.61) with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain divided into two groups: an intervention group receiving 3-h PNE lecture and a control group that received an educational booklet. Primary outcomes included plasma BDNF levels and perceived pain intensity (VAS). Secondary outcomes included anxiety (HADS-A), depression (HADS-D), catastrophizing (PCS), kinesiophobia (TSK), stress (PSS), and knowledge about pain. Measurements were taken in both groups before and after a three-hour intervention. Data were analyzed using paired t-tests and Cohen’s d for effect sizes. Results: The results showed no significant changes in BDNF levels for the PNE lecture group (p = 0.708) or the educational booklet group (p = 0.298). Both groups showed significant reductions in pain intensity (PNE: p < 0.001, d = 0.70; booklet: p = 0.036, d = 0.39). Secondary variables, such as knowledge (PNE: p < 0.001, d = −0.972; booklet: p < 0.001, d = −0.975) and anxiety (PNE: p < 0.001, d = 0.70; booklet: p = 0.035, d = 0.39), also showed significant improvements. Conclusions: PNE did not significantly change BDNF levels but effectively improved pain intensity, pain-related knowledge, and other clinical variables. These findings suggest that while PNE has cognitive benefits, it may not be sufficient to induce immediate neurobiological changes. Further research is needed to explore long-term effects and incorporate additional therapeutic domains.
... It has been reported in the literature that kinesiophobia in patients with chronic pain can be reduced by pain neuroscience education in addition to exercise [60,61]. The Pilates method has also been reported to reduce kinesiophobia in patients with NSCLBP [15]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Aims This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of stabilization-based exercises in reducing kinesiophobia in individuals with non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP). Methods The literature was searched from inception to August 2024 in PubMed, Web of Science and, Cochrane Library electronic databases. Only randomized controlled trials were included. Quality assessment, risk of bias assessment and meta-analysis were performed. Outcomes were also analysed according to follow up periods as short-term (< 3 months), mid-term (≥ 3 to 12 months) and long-term (> 12 months). Result This systematic review and meta-analysis included 13 randomized controlled trials including 346 patients with NSCLBP. High evidence showed that stabilization based exercise reduce kinesiophobia in the short term with small effect size. Moderate evidence suggested that stabilization based exercises effects on kinesiophobia in the mid term with with medium effect size. Stabilization based exercise is also effective on kinesiophobia in long term, but level of evidence is very low. Conclusion In conclusion, stabilization-based exercises are effective on kinesiophobia in the short and mid term in individuals with NSCLBP. However, long-term data is uncertain.
Article
Full-text available
Background Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a multifactorial form of rheumatic condition contributing to physical and psychological factors. Treatments have been provided solely and often compared with each other. An alternative view is that combined treatments addressing physical and psychological factors may result in more benefits. This study aimed to investigate the effect of pain neuroscience education (PNE) followed by Pilates exercises (PEs) in participants with knee OA, compared to PE alone. Methods In this two-arm assessor-blind pilot randomized controlled trial, fifty-four community-dwelling adults with knee OA were randomly assigned to the PNE followed by PEs and PEs groups (27 in each group). The study was conducted between early July 2021 and early March 2022 at the university’s health center. Primary outcomes were Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) subscales of pain and physical limitation and secondary outcomes were Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, and Timed "Up & Go" test covering function. The primary and secondary outcomes were measured at baseline and eight weeks post-treatment. A general linear mixed model was used for between-group comparison with a statistical significance level of 0.05. Results Significant within-group differences were observed in all outcomes in both groups at post-treatment. There were no statistically between-group differences in pain (adjusted mean difference: -0.8; 95% CI -2.2 to 0.7; p = 0.288), physical limitation (adjusted mean difference: -0.4; 95% CI -4 to 3.1; p = 0.812) and function (adjusted mean difference: -0.8; 95% CI -1.8 to 0.1; p = 0.069) at eight weeks. For pain catastrophizing (adjusted mean difference: -3.9; 95% CI -7.2 to -0.6; p = 0.021), kinesiophobia (adjusted mean difference: -4.2; 95% CI -8.1 to -0.4; p = 0.032), and self-efficacy (adjusted mean difference: 6.1; 95% CI 0.7 to 11.5; p = 0.028) statistically between-group improvements were observed favoring PNE followed by PEs group after the treatment. Conclusions Combining PNE with PEs could have superior effects on psychological characteristics but not on pain, physical limitation, and function, compared to PEs alone. This pilot study emphasizes the need to investigate the combined effects of different interventions. Trial registration IRCT20210701051754N1.
Article
Full-text available
Pain neuroscience education (PNE), a modern educational therapy, has been reported to be effective in pain control by reducing fear of movement. This study investigated the effects of additional PNE on a physical therapy rehabilitation protocol (PTRP) following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). In this single-blind, randomized controlled trial, 34 patients who had undergone ARCR were randomly allocated (1:1) into two groups: PNE (PTRP plus PNE) and PTRP. PTRP was performed five times a week, for four weeks, 115 min per session (physical agents, manual therapy, and exercises), and PNE was performed twice at the beginning (face-to-face PNE) and end (non-face-to-face) of the PTRP. The outcome measures were measured four times for pain intensity, pain cognition, and shoulder function; two times for a range of motion; and once for satisfaction. No significant difference in pain intensity was observed between the groups. However, in pain cognition, the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia avoidance showed a significant interaction between time and group, and PNE showed a higher effect size than PTRP in the post-test and follow-up in several variables. In conclusion, the significant improvement in avoidance in postoperative rehabilitation suggests that there is a partially positive benefit in terms of pain, range of motion, and shoulder function in ARCR patients.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of pain neuroscience education (PNE) versus biomedical education (BME) in a rehabilitation program following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) in patients with chronic shoulder pain. Methods: Twenty-nine patients who participated in a rehabilitation program were randomly assigned to either an experimental PNE group (N = 16) or a control BME group (N = 13). Measurements included pain intensity at rest and in movement, pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, disability and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Outcomes were evaluated at baseline and at 4 and 8 weeks after the intervention. Results: A main effect for time was observed for: intensity of pain at rest (p < .01); pain with movement (p < .01); pain catastrophizing (p < .01); kinesiophobia (p < .01); disability (p < .01); and HRQoL (p < .01). No group interactions were significant for any variable, except for pain with movement, which favored the PNE group (p = .03). Large effect sizes (ranging from d = 0.79 to d = 2.65) were found for both interventions in all outcomes. Conclusion: A rehabilitation program including either PNE or BME are equally effective in improving rest pain, pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, disability, and HRQoL in patients after ARCR, except for pain at movement in favor of the PNE group. The inclusion of PNE in the rehabilitation program appears to lead to clinically meaningful improvements in pain at rest in short term when treating patients with ARCR.
Article
Full-text available
Background Retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) consistently challenges medical staff and patients, and the incidence of retear after surgery is 10-94%. The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors that cause retear after ARCR and provide theoretical guidance for clinical intervention to reduce the occurrence of postoperative rotator cuff retear. Study Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021225088). PubMed, Web of Science and Embase were searched for observational studies on risk factors for rotator cuff retear after arthroscopic repair. Meta-analytical methods were used to determine the odds ratio (OR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) of potential risk factors related to postoperative rotator cuff retear. Stata 15.1 was used to quantitatively evaluate the publication bias of the statistical results. Results Fourteen studies from 6 countries with a total of 5693 patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed that the risk factors for retear after rotator cuff repair were age, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, subscapularis and infraspinatus fatty infiltration, symptom duration, bone mineral density, tear length, tear width, tear size area, amount of retraction, critical shoulder angle (CSA), acromiohumeral interval (AI), distance from the musculotendinous junction to the glenoid, operative duration, biceps procedure, and postoperative University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) score. Conclusion These findings can help clinical medical staff identify patients who are prone to retear early after arthroscopic repair and develop targeted prevention and treatment strategies for modifiable risk factors, which are of great significance for reducing the occurrence of rotator cuff retear after ARCR.
Article
Full-text available
Exercise and pain neuroscience education (PNE) have both been used as standalone treatments for chronic musculoskeletal pain. The evidence supporting PNE as an adjunct to exercise therapy is growing but remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of combining PNE and exercise for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, when compared to exercise alone. A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted from inception to November 6, 2020. A quality effects model was used to meta-analyze outcomes where possible. Five high quality randomized controlled studies (n=460) were included in this review. The PEDro scale was used to assess the quality of individual studies and GRADE analysis was conducted to determine the quality of evidence for each outcome. Meta-analyses were performed for pain intensity, disability, kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing using data reported between 0 and 12 weeks post-intervention. Long-term outcomes (>12 weeks) were only available for two studies and therefore were not suitable for meta-analysis. Meta-analysis revealed a significant difference in pain (WMD, -2.09/10; 95% CI, -3.38 to -0.80; low certainty), disability (SMD, -0.68; 95% CI, -1.17 to -0.20; low certainty), kinesiophobia (SMD, -1.20; CI, -1.84 to -0.57; moderate certainty) and pain catastrophizing (WMD, -7.72; 95% CI, -12.26 to -3.18; very low certainty) that favoured the combination of PNE and exercise. These findings suggest that combining PNE and exercise in the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain results in greater short-term improvements in pain, disability, kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing relative to exercise alone.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose To evaluate the effects of Myofascial Release Technique (MRT) with a roller massager combined with core stabilization exercises (CSE) in elderly with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). Patients and methods A total of forty-five participants were randomly divided into two groups (CSE and CSE+MRT). A core stabilization exercise program was applied for the participants in the CSE group for 3 days per week for a total of 6 weeks. In addition to the core stabilization exercises, myofascial relaxation technique with a roller massager was performed for 3 days per week for 6 weeks for the participants in the CSE+MRT group. Participants were assessed in terms of pain, low back disability, lower body flexibility, kinesiophobia, core stability endurance, spinal mobility, gait characteristics and quality of life both pre- and post-treatment. Results It was found that the improvement in core stability endurance (p=0.031) and spinal mobility (in the sagittal plane) (p=0.022) was greater in the CSE+MRT group compared to the CSE group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of pain, low back disability, lower body flexibility, kinesiophobia, gait characteristics and quality of life (p>0.05). Conclusion The current study suggests that myofascial release technique with a roller massager combined with core stabilization exercises can be a better choice in the treatment of NSLBP in elderly. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT3898089.
Article
Full-text available
Pain neuroscience education (PNE) is increasingly used as part of a physical therapy treatment in patients with chronic pain. A thorough clinical biopsychosocial assessment is recommended prior to PNE to allow proper explanation of the neurophysiology of pain and the biopsychosocial interactions in an interactive and patient-centered manner. However, without clear guidelines, clinicians are left wondering how a biopsychosocial assessment should be administered. Therefore, we provided a practical guide, based on scientific research and clinical experience, for the biopsychosocial assessment of patients with chronic pain in physiotherapy practice. The purpose of this article is to describe the use of the Pain – Somatic factors – Cognitive factors – Emotional factors – Behavioral factors – Social factors – Motivation – model (PSCEBSM-model) during the intake, as well as a pain analysis sheet. This model attempts to clearly establish what the dominant pain mechanism is (predominant nociceptive, neuropathic, or non-neuropathic central sensitization pain), as well as to assess the provoking and perpetuating biopsychosocial factors in patients with chronic pain. Using this approach allows the clinician to specifically classify patients and tailor the plan of care, including PNE, to individual patients.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: Systematic review of randomized control trials (RCTs) for the effectiveness of pain neuroscience education (PNE) on pain, function, disability, psychosocial factors, movement, and healthcare utilization in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain. Data sources: Systematic searches were conducted on 11 databases. Secondary searching (PEARLing) was undertaken, whereby reference lists of the selected articles were reviewed for additional references not identified in the primary search. Study selection: All experimental RCTs evaluating the effect of PNE on chronic MSK pain were considered for inclusion. Additional Limitations: Studies published in English, published within the last 20 years, and patients older than 18 years. No limitations were set on specific outcome measures. Data extraction: Data were extracted using the participants, interventions, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) approach. Data synthesis: Study quality of the 13 RCTs used in this review was assessed by 2 reviewers using the PEDro scale. Narrative summary of results is provided for each study in relation to outcomes measurements and effectiveness. Conclusions: Current evidence supports the use of PNE for chronic MSK disorders in reducing pain and improving patient knowledge of pain, improving function and lowering disability, reducing psychosocial factors, enhancing movement, and minimizing healthcare utilization.
Article
Full-text available
The aim of this study was to validate the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) in the Turkish population and to investigate its correlation with the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients. Volunteer patients, who were scheduled for elective surgery and who applied to the Outpatient Clinic of Anesthesiology for preoperative evaluation, were asked to complete a PCS form. The patient's age, sex, educational level, marital status, presence of chronic pain, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score were recorded, and PCS scores and demographic variables were compared statistically. Of the 257 patients enrolled in the study, 136 were male, 121 female, and the median age was 40. The 3 subscales in the Turkish version of the PCS consisted of rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Internal consistency of PCS was found to be congruent with Cronbach's alpha = 0.90. Significantly higher PCS scores were found in women with chronic pain. In addition, patients who graduated from primary school had statistically higher scores compared to those who graduated from high school. In accordance with the original scale, demographic specifications of the Turkish version of the PCS were found congruent. PCS scores in our population were found compatible with the literature review.
Article
Full-text available
To evaluate the evidence for the effectiveness of neuroscience education (NE) for pain, disability, anxiety, and stress in chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain. Systematic searches were conducted on Biomed Central, BMJ.com, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, NLM Central Gateway, OVID, ProQuest (Digital Dissertations), PsycInfo, PubMed/Medline, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science. Secondary searching (PEARLing) was undertaken, whereby reference lists of the selected articles were reviewed for additional references not identified in the primary search. All experimental studies including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), nonrandomized clinical trials, and case series evaluating the effect of NE on pain, disability, anxiety, and stress for chronic MSK pain were considered for inclusion. Additional limitations: studies published in English, published within the last 10 years, and patients older than 18 years. No limitations were set on specific outcome measures of pain, disability, anxiety, and stress. Data were extracted using the participants, interventions, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) approach. Methodological quality was assessed by 2 reviewers using the Critical Review Form-Quantitative Studies. This review includes 8 studies comprising 6 high-quality RCTs, 1 pseudo-RCT, and 1 comparative study involving 401 subjects. Most articles were of good quality, with no studies rated as poor or fair. Heterogeneity across the studies with respect to participants, interventions evaluated, and outcome measures used prevented meta-analyses. Narrative synthesis of results, based on effect size, established compelling evidence that NE may be effective in reducing pain ratings, increasing function, addressing catastrophization, and improving movement in chronic MSK pain. For chronic MSK pain disorders, there is compelling evidence that an educational strategy addressing neurophysiology and neurobiology of pain can have a positive effect on pain, disability, catastrophization, and physical performance.
Article
IntroductionAlthough the negative effects of kinesiophobia on functional status in subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS) patients are clearly demonstrated, no study examines the risk factors of kinesiophobia in individuals with SAPS from a biopsychosocial perspective. The present study aims to determine the risk factors of kinesiophobia in individuals with SAPS using a biopsychosocial approach. This study also aims to explore the compounding effects of multiple associative risk factors by developing a clinical prediction tool to identify SAPS patients at higher risk for kinesiophobia.Materials and methodsThis cross-sectional study included 549 patients who were diagnosed with SAPS. The Tampa-Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) was used to assess kinesiophobia. Visual analog scale (VAS), The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, the presence of metabolic syndrome, using any non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Illness Perception Questionnaire-revised (IPQ-R), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), behavioral pattern of the patient, sociodemographic characteristics, and treatment expectancy were outcome measures.ResultsThirteen significant risk factors of having kinesiophobia were: VASat rest (≥ 5.2), VASduring activity (≥ 7.1), DASH (≥ 72.1), presence of metabolic syndrome, PCShelplessness (≥ 16.1), IPQ-Rpersonal control (≤ 17.1), IPQ-Rtreatment control (≤ 16.3), HADSdepression (≥ 7.9), avoidance behavior type, being female, educational level (≤ high school), average hours of sleep (≤ 6.8), and treatment expectancy (≤ 6.6). The presence of seven or more risk factors increased the probability of having high level of kinesiophobia from 34.3 to 51%.Conclusions It seems necessary to address these factors, increase awareness of health practitioners and individuals.Level of evidenceLevel IV.
Article
Background Current evidence supports the use of pain neuroscience education (PNE) in several chronic pain populations. However, the effects of PNE at group level are rather small and little is known about the influence of personal factors (e.g. level of education [LoE]). Objective To examine whether the effectiveness of PNE differs in chronic spinal pain (CSP) patients with high LOE (at least a Bachelor's degree) versus lower educated patients. Method A total of 120 Belgian CSP patients were randomly assigned to the experimental (PNE) or control group (biomedical-focused neck/back school). Participants within each group were further subcategorized based on highest achieved LoE. ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc analyses were used to evaluate differences in effectiveness of the interventions between higher and lower educated participants. Results No differences between higher and lower educated participants were identified for pain-related disability. Significant interactions (P < 0.05) were found for kinesiophobia and several illness perceptions components. Bonferroni post-hoc analysis revealed a significant improvement in kinesiophobia (P < .001 and P < .002, medium effect sizes) and perceived negative consequences (P < .001 and P < .008, small effect sizes) in the PNE groups. Only the higher education PNE group showed a significant improvement in perceived illness cyclicity (P = .003, small effect size). Post-treatment kinesiophobia was significant lower in the higher educated PNE group compared to the higher educated control group (p < 0.001). Conclusion Overall, the exploratory findings suggest no clinical meaningful differences in effectiveness of PNE between higher and lower educated people. PNE is effective in improving kinesiophobia and several aspects of illness perceptions regardless of LoE.
Article
Purpose: A few studies have focused on factors predisposing to retear after arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair (ARRCR). This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate (1) the structural and clinical outcomes of ARRCR and (2) pre- and intraoperative factors affecting the integrity of the rotator cuff (RC) tendon by focusing on preoperative RC tendon integrity, tear size, muscle hypotrophy and fatty infiltration. Methods: Patients who underwent ARRCR between 2006 and 2016 were reviewed. Preoperative variables included demographic data, RC tendon integrity, tear size, and muscle hypotrophy and fatty infiltration on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Intraoperative variables included repair technique and completeness of repair. The visual analog scale for pain (PVAS), functional VAS (FVAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, and shoulder range of motion (ROM) were assessed. Postoperative tendon integrity was evaluated using over 6-month follow-up MRI. Patients were classified into groups A (healed) and B (retear), and their variables were compared. Results: Overall 65 patients with a mean follow-up of 49.5 ± 30.2 (range, 24.0-148.9) months were analyzed. Fifty-six of 65 (86.2%) patients underwent MRI at 9.1 ± 9.7 (range, 4.4-40.2) months after ARRCR, and 20 of 56 (35.7%) patients (group B) exhibited retear. Group A (36/56, 64.3%) showed higher functional scores and ROMs than group B at the final follow-up, with significant differences in the FVAS scores (Group A versus B: FVAS, 7.6 ± 1.8 versus 6.4 ± 1.9, p = 0.036). Intraoperative variables, including preoperative tendon integrity (p = 0.021), tear size (p = 0.007), supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscle hypotrophy and fatty infiltration (p < 0.001 and p = 0.046), and completeness of repair (p = 0.030), differed significantly between the groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative supraspinatus muscle hypotrophy and fatty infiltration were independent predisposing factors for retear after ARRCR [odds ratio = 7.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-55.8, p = 0.048]. Conclusion: The retear was found in 20/56 patients (35.7%) after ARRCR for less than massive rotator cuff tears in this limited study population. Preoperative tendon integrity, tear size, supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscle hypotrophy and fatty infiltration, and completeness of repair was revealed to be associated with tendon integrity following ARRCR. Among them, preoperative supraspinatus muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration were the independent factors for retear after ARRCR, although generalization is limited. Level of evidence: IV.
Article
Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the short- and mid-term effects of pain neuroscience education (PNE) combined with manual therapy (MT) and a home exercise program (HEP) on pain intensity, back performance, disability, and kinesiophobia in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Methods: This study was designed as a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study in which 69 participants were randomly assigned to three groups. Participants in Group 1 received PNE, MT, and the HEP, while Group 2 received MT and the HEP. Participants in the control group did the HEP only. All interventions lasted 4 weeks. The participants’ pain intensity, disability, low back performance, and kinesiophobia were assessed. All assessments were executed before intervention, at 4 weeks, and at 12 weeks post-intervention by the same blinded physiotherapist. A mixed model for repeated measures was used for each outcome measure. Results: Analysis of pain level (p < .05), back performance (p < .05), disability (p < .05) and kinesiophobia (p < .05) revealed significant time, group, and time-by-group interaction effects. The participants in Group 1 exhibited greater improvement in terms of pain intensity and kinesiophobia compared to the participants in Group 2 and the control group. Level of disability was significantly decreased in both Group 1 and Group 2 compared to the control group. Conclusion: This study suggests that a multimodal treatment program combining PNE, MT, and HEP is an effective method for improving back performance and reducing pain, disability, and kinesiophobia in the short (4 weeks) and midterm (12 weeks).
Article
Purpose: To determine whether psychosocial factors affect patient-reported outcomes in individuals with rotator cuff tears or after rotator cuff repair. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using a computerized search of the PubMed and Web of Science electronic databases in adherence with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Articles were then evaluated based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality and risk of bias. Because of study heterogeneity and varied levels of evidence, meta-analysis was not possible. Results: Of 980 identified articles, 15 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In those reported, the visual analog scale correlation with distress scales ranged from -0.476 to 0.334, depending on outcome, with a trend toward increased pain in patients with distress. The depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was negatively correlated with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score in 2 of 3 studies (-0.309 to 0.235). Six studies evaluated the presence of psychosocial factors and their correlation with patient-reported outcomes prior to surgery. These showed a significant correlation between rotator cuff pathology and psychological distress (i.e., depression or anxiety) as identified on standardized patient-reported outcome measures. Nine studies evaluated psychosocial factors either before and after surgery or only postoperatively. Of these 9 studies, 3 found no statistically significant differences in outcomes as related to psychosocial factors. In contrast, 6 of 9 reported an association between outcomes and psychosocial factors. Moreover, 2 of these 6 studies reported a direct relationship between patient expectations and outcomes, with 1 of these 2 studies finding that higher expectations improved baseline scores on the mental component summary of the Short Form 36 (r = 0.307). One study found significant differences in mental status in patients with rotator cuff tears based on age and sex. Conclusions: This review found that most studies support that psychosocial factors do significantly influence the level of disability and pain experienced by patients preoperatively; however, 3 of 9 studies showed significant improvements in postoperative pain and function even with significant psychosocial confounders. These studies, however, do support that there is a direct relation between patient expectations and outcomes in rotator cuff surgery. Level of evidence: Level IV, systematic review of Level I through IV studies.
Article
Background: Tendon repair and physiotherapy are frequently used treatment methods for small and medium-sized rotator cuff tears. In 2 previous publications of the 1 and 5-year results of this study, we reported significant but small between-group differences in favor of tendon repair. Long-term results are needed to assess whether the results in both groups remain stable over time. Methods: In this study, 103 patients with a rotator cuff tear not exceeding 3 cm were randomly assigned to primary tendon repair or physiotherapy with optional secondary repair. Blinded follow-up was performed after 6 months and 1, 2, 5, and 10 years. Outcome measures included the Constant score; the self-report section of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score; the measurement of shoulder pain, motion, and strength; and patient satisfaction. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on surgically treated shoulders after 1 year, and ultrasound was performed on all shoulders after 5 and 10 years. The main analysis was by 1-way analysis of covariance and by intention to treat. Results: Ninety-one of 103 patients attended the last follow-up. After 10 years, the results were better for primary tendon repair, by 9.6 points on the Constant score (p = 0.002), 15.7 points on the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (p < 0.001), 1.8 cm on a 10-cm visual analog scale for pain (p < 0.001), 19.6° for pain-free abduction (p = 0.007), and 14.3° for pain-free flexion (p = 0.01). Fourteen patients had crossed over from physiotherapy to secondary surgery and had an outcome on the Constant score that was 10.0 points inferior compared with that of the primary tendon repair group (p = 0.03). Conclusions: At 10 years, the differences in outcome between primary tendon repair and physiotherapy for small and medium-sized rotator cuff tears had increased, with better results for primary tendon repair. Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Article
Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is an urgent global public health concern. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) is an intervention used in the management of CMP aiming to reconceptualize an individual's understanding of their pain as less threatening. This mixed-methods review undertook a segregated synthesis of quantitative and qualitative studies to investigate the clinical effectiveness, and patients’ experience of, PNE for people with CMP. Electronic databases were searched for studies published between January 1, 2002, and June 14, 2018. Twelve randomized, controlled trials (n = 755 participants) that reported pain, disability, and psychosocial outcomes and 4 qualitative studies (n = 50 participants) that explored patients experience of PNE were included. The meta-analyzed pooled treatment effects for PNE versus control had low clinical relevance in the short term for pain (−5.91/100; 95% confidence interval [CI], −13.75 to 1.93) and disability (−4.09/100; 95% CI, −7.72 to −.45) and in the medium term for pain (−6.27/100; 95% CI, −18.97 to 6.44) and disability (−8.14/100; 95% CI, −15.60 to −.68). The treatment effect of PNE for kinesiophobia was clinically relevant in the short term (–13.55/100; 95% CI, –25.89 to –1.21) and for pain catastrophizing in the medium term (–5.26/52; 95% CI, –10.59 to.08). A metasynthesis of 23 qualitative findings resulted in the identification of 2 synthesized findings that identified several key components important for enhancing the patient experience of PNE, such as allowing the patient to tell their own story. These components can enhance pain reconceptualization, which seems to be an important process to facilitate patients’ ability to cope with their condition. The protocol was published on PROSPERO (CRD42017068436). Perspective: We outline the effectiveness of PNE for the management of pain, disability, and psychosocial outcomes in adults with CMP. Key components that can enhance the patient experience of PNE, such as allowing the patient to tell their own story, are also presented. These components may enhance pain reconceptualization.
Article
Purpose: The purpose of this single-subject experimental study was to describe the patient’s outcome following pain neuroscience education in combination with therapeutic exercise for Brazilian women with central sensitisation and a low level of education. Methods: Eight Brazilian women with central sensitisation and a low level of education were screened from a total of 57 patients with musculoskeletal disorders in an outpatient physiotherapy department. Twelve sessions were performed, once a week, including group pain education and supervised exercises. The outcome measures of pain intensity, functionality, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, quality of life, knowledge of pain physiology and global improvement rating were collected pre- and post-intervention. Results: There was an improvement in pain (before median = 8.5, after median = 5.0; Z = −2.032, p = .042) and functionality (before median = 2.5, after median = 5.6; Z = −2.366, p = .018) at post-intervention evaluation measured by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A meaningful improvement was observed in global perceived effect. There were no statistically significant differences for other outcomes. Conclusion: Following a combination of pain neuroscience education with therapeutic exercise, Brazilian women with central sensitisation and a low level of education showed pain relief and improved function. Nonetheless, psychosocial factors, knowledge of pain and quality of life did not improve with the intervention.
Article
Background: Standard preoperative education for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been shown to have no effect on postoperative outcomes. This may be because such education programs fail to educate patients about pain. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) focuses on teaching people more about pain from a neurobiological and neurophysiological perspective. Design and setting: Case Series. Aim: To determine the immediate effects, if any, of providing PNE before TKA surgery on patient self-report measures. Participants: Twelve patients (female = 10) prior to TKA for knee osteoarthritis (OA). Intervention: Preoperative educational session by a physical therapist on the neuroscience of pain, accompanied by an evidence-based booklet. Main outcome measures: Comparison of pre- and post-PNE self-report measures on knee pain (NPRS), Pain Catastrophization Scale (PCS), fear of movement (TSK), and beliefs about TKA; as well as three physical performance measures - knee flexion active range of motion, 40 m self-paced walk, and pressure pain threshold (PPT). Results: Immediately following the PNE, patients had statistically significant lower TSK scores, increased PPT, and improved beliefs about their upcoming surgery. There were no significant changes in knee pain, function, or flexion active range of motion. Conclusions: Results appear to suggest that immediately after PNE, patients scheduled for TKA had statistically significant changes in fear of movement, decreased sensitivity to pain and positive shifts in their beliefs about their future knee surgery. Larger trials with control/comparison groups are warranted to determine the true effects of preoperative PNE for patients about to undergo TKA.
Article
Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of pain neuroscience education (PNE) and neck/shoulder exercises with no intervention in adolescents with chronic idiopathic neck pain (CINP). Methods: Forty-three adolescents with CINP were randomly allocated to receive PNE and shoulder/neck exercises (n = 21) or no intervention (n = 22). Data on pain intensity, neck flexor and extensor muscles endurance, scapular stabilizers endurance, pain catastrophizing, anxiety, and knowledge of pain neurophysiology were collected. Measurements were taken before and after the intervention. Results: All participants completed the study. Analysis using ANCOVA revealed a significant increase in the neck extensors endurance capacity (adjusted mean ± SE change = + 47.5 ± 13.5 s versus +14.2 ± 13.1 s) and knowledge of pain neurophysiology (adjusted mean ± SE change = + 9.8 ± 3.2 versus -0.6 ± 0.6) in the group receiving the intervention. A higher mean decrease in pain intensity, pain catastrophizing and anxiety and a higher mean increase in the scapular stabilizers endurance capacity were also found in the intervention group, but differences did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: Results suggest a potential benefit of PNE and exercise for adolescents with CINP. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed.
Article
Purpose: Comparative evidence on treating rotator cuff tear is inconclusive. The objective of this review was to evaluate the evidence on effectiveness of tendon repair in reducing pain and improving function of the shoulder when compared with conservative treatment of symptomatic rotator cuff tear. Method: Search on CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science and Pedro databases. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing surgery and conservative treatment of rotator cuff tear. Study selection and extraction based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic reviews of Interventions. Random effects meta-analysis. Results: Three identified RCTs involved 252 participants (123 cases and 129 controls). The risk of bias was considered low for all three RCTs. For Constant score, statistically insignificant effect size was 5.6 (95% CI -0.41 to 11.62) points in 1-year follow up favouring surgery and below the level of minimal clinically important difference. The respective difference in pain reduction was -0.93 (95% CI -1.65 to -0.21) cm on a 0-10 pain visual analogue scale favouring surgery. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.012) in 1-year follow up but below the level of minimal clinically important difference. Conclusion: There is limited evidence that surgery is not more effective in treating rotator cuff tear than conservative treatment alone. Thus, a conservative approach is advocated as the initial treatment modality. Implications for Rehabilitation There is limited evidence that surgery is not more effective in treating rotator cuff tear than conservative treatment alone. There was no clinically significant difference between surgery and active physiotherapy in 1-year follow-up in improving Constant score or reducing pain caused by rotator cuff tear. As physiotherapy is less proneness to complications and less expensive than surgery, a conservative approach is advocated as the initial treatment modality to rotator cuff tears.
Article
This is a consensus statement on rehabilitation developed by the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists. The purpose of this statement is to aid clinical decision making during the rehabilitation of patients after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The overarching philosophy of rehabilitation is centered on the principle of the gradual application of controlled stresses to the healing rotator cuff repair with consideration of rotator cuff tear size, tissue quality, and patient variables. This statement describes a rehabilitation framework that includes a 2-week period of strict immobilization and a staged introduction of protected, passive range of motion during weeks 2-6 postoperatively, followed by restoration of active range of motion, and then progressive strengthening beginning at postoperative week 12. When appropriate, rehabilitation continues with a functional progression for return to athletic or demanding work activities. This document represents the first consensus rehabilitation statement developed by a multidisciplinary society of international rehabilitation professionals specifically for the postoperative care of patients after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Level of evidence: Level V; Expert Opinion. © 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees.
Article
A fully functioning, painless shoulder joint is essential to maintain a healthy, normal quality of life. Disease of the rotator cuff tendons (RCTs) is a common issue that affects the population, increasing with age, and can lead to significant disability and social and health costs. RCT injuries can affect younger, healthy patients and the elderly alike, and may be the result of trauma or occur as a result of chronic degeneration. They can be acutely painful, limited to certain activities or completely asymptomatic and incidental findings. A wide variety of treatment options exists ranging from conservative local and systemic pain modalities, to surgical fixation. Regardless of management ultimately chosen, physiotherapy of the RCT, rotator cuff muscles and surrounding shoulder girdle plays an essential role in proper treatment. Length of treatment, types of therapy and timing may vary if therapy is definitive care or part of a postoperative protocol. Allowing time for adequate RCT healing must always be considered when implementing ROM and strengthening after surgery. With current rehabilitation methods, patients with all spectrums of RCT pathology can improve their function, pain and quality of life. This manuscript reviews current theories and practice involving rehabilitation for RCT injuries.
Article
Objectives: The Shoulder Pain And Disability Index (SPADI) is a self-report questionnaire developed to evaluate patients with shoulder problems. No validated Turkish version exists. This study sought to translate and culturally adapt a Turkish version of the SPADI and validate its use for assessing shoulder pain and disability in Turkish patients with shoulder pathology. Methods: One hundred forty patients (mean age, 60.31 ± 13.02 years) with shoulder problems participated. Patients completed the Turkish SPADI, the Short Form 36 (SF-36), and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaires. Results: Internal consistency of the SPADI was good (Cronbach alpha: 0.83 for pain and 0.83 for disability subscales). There was a significant relation between SPADI pain and SF-36 bodily pain (r: - 0.594; P < 0.01), SPADI disability and SF-36 physical function (r: - 0.339, P < 0.01), and SPADI disability and SF-36 physical role limitation (r: - 0.317, P < 0.05). There was a significant relation between SPADI pain and DASH 1 (r: 0.354, P < 0.01) and SPADI disability and DASH 1 (r: 0.591, P < 0.01). Conclusions: The Turkish version of the SPADI is areliable and valid instrument to assess pain and disability in patients with shoulder pathology.
Article
Very little comparative information is available regarding the demographic and morphological characteristics of asymptomatic and symptomatic rotator cuff tears. This information is important to provide insight into the natural history of rotator cuff disease and to identify which factors may be important in the development of pain. The purpose of the present study was to compare the morphological characteristics and prevalences of asymptomatic and symptomatic rotator cuff disease in patients who presented with unilateral shoulder pain. Five hundred and eighty-eight consecutive patients in whom a standardized ultrasonographic study had been performed by an experienced radiologist for the assessment of unilateral shoulder pain were evaluated with regard to the presence and size of rotator cuff tears in each shoulder. The demographic factors that were analyzed included age, gender, side, and cuff thickness. All of these factors were evaluated with regard to their correlation with the presence of pain. Of the 588 consecutive patients who met the inclusion criteria, 212 had an intact rotator cuff bilaterally, 199 had a unilateral rotator cuff tear (either partial or full thickness), and 177 had a bilateral tear (either partial or full thickness). The presence of rotator cuff disease was highly correlated with age. The average age was 48.7 years for patients with no rotator cuff tear, 58.7 years for those with a unilateral tear, and 67.8 years for those with a bilateral tear. Logistic regression analysis indicated a 50% likelihood of a bilateral tear after the age of sixty-six years (p < 0.01). In patients with a bilateral rotator cuff tear in whom one tear was symptomatic and the other tear was asymptomatic, the symptomatic tear was significantly larger (p < 0.01). The average size of a symptomatic tear was 30% greater than that of an asymptomatic tear. Overall, patients who presented with a full-thickness symptomatic tear had a 35.5% prevalence of a full-thickness tear on the contralateral side. There is a high correlation between the onset of rotator cuff tears (either partial or full thickness) and increasing age. Bilateral rotator cuff disease, either symptomatic or asymptomatic, is common in patients who present with unilateral symptomatic disease. As the size of a tear appears to be an important factor in the development of symptoms, we recommend surveillance at yearly intervals for patients with known rotator cuff tears that are treated nonoperatively.
Risk factors affecting rotator cuff retear after arthroscopic
  • J Zhao
  • M Luo
  • J Pan
Zhao J, Luo M, Pan J, et al. Risk factors affecting rotator cuff retear after arthroscopic
omuz ve el sorunları (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand-DASH) anketi Türkçe uyarlamasının güvenirliği ve geçerliği
  • T Düger
  • E Yakut
  • Ç Öksüz
Düger T, Yakut E, Öksüz Ç, et al. Kol, omuz ve el sorunları (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand-DASH) anketi Türkçe uyarlamasının güvenirliği ve geçerliği. Fiz Rehabil. 2006;17(3):99-107.
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Turkish form: validation and reliability study
  • Ö Aydemir
  • T Güvenir
  • L Küey
  • S Kultur
Aydemir Ö, Güvenir T, Küey L, Kultur S. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Turkish form: validation and reliability study. Türk Psikiyatr Der. 1997;8(4):280e287.
Tampa Kinezyofobi Ölçeği'nin Türkçe versiyonu ve test-tekrar test güvenirliği
  • Ö T Yilmaz
  • Y Yakut
  • F Uygur
  • N Uluğ
Yilmaz ÖT, Yakut Y, Uygur F, Uluğ N. Tampa Kinezyofobi Ölçeği'nin Türkçe versiyonu ve test-tekrar test güvenirliği. Fiz Rehabil. 2011;22(1):44-49.
SF-12 Yaşam Kalitesi Ölçeği'nin Türkçe formunun güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. Türk Psikiyatr Derg
  • C Soylu
  • B Kütük
Soylu C, Kütük B. SF-12 Yaşam Kalitesi Ölçeği'nin Türkçe formunun güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. Türk Psikiyatr Derg. Published online 2021.